Hubbry Logo
Key of SolomonKey of SolomonMain
Open search
Key of Solomon
Community hub
Key of Solomon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Key of Solomon
Key of Solomon
Key of Solomon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

One of the pentacles found in the Key of Solomon manuscripts. This one is identified as "The Great Pentacle" and appears in Bodleian Library Michael MS. 276, a 17th-century Italian manuscript. An equivalent figure also appears in a Latin version, Bodleian Library, Aubrey MS. 24, dated to 1674. The figure is a variant of the Sigillum Aemeth published by Athanasius Kircher in Oedipus Aegyptiacus (Rome, 1652–4, pp. 479–81).

The Key of Solomon (Latin: Clavicula Salomonis; Hebrew: מַפְתֵּחַ-שְׁלֹמֹה, romanized: Map̄teḥa Šəlomo), also known as the Greater Key of Solomon, is a pseudepigraphical grimoire attributed to King Solomon. It probably dates back to the 14th or 15th century Italian Renaissance. It presents a typical example of Renaissance magic.[citation needed]

It is possible that the Key of Solomon inspired later works, particularly the 17th-century grimoire known as The Lesser Key of Solomon or Lemegeton, although there are many differences between the books.[citation needed]

Manuscripts and textual history

[edit]

Many such grimoires attributed to King Solomon were written during the Renaissance, ultimately being influenced by earlier works of Jewish theosophical kabbala and Muslim magicians.[1] These, in turn, incorporated aspects of the Greco-Roman magic of late antiquity.[2]

Several versions of the Key of Solomon exist, in various translations, with minor to significant differences. The original type of text was probably a Latin or Italian text dating to the 14th or 15th century.[3] Most surviving manuscripts date from the late 16th, 17th or 18th century. There is also an early Greek manuscript dating to the 15th century (British Library, Harley MS 5596) that is closely associated with the text.[citation needed] The Greek manuscript is referred to as The Magical Treatise of Solomon, and was published by Armand Delatte in Anecdota Atheniensia (Liège, 1927, pp. 397–445.) Its contents are very similar to the Clavicula.

An important Italian manuscript is (Bodleian Library, Michael MS 276) an early Latin text that survived in printed form, dated to ca. 1600 (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Memorial Library, Special Collections). There are a number of later (17th century) Latin manuscripts. One of the oldest existing manuscripts (besides Harley MS 5596) is a text in English translation, entitled The Clavicle of Solomon, revealed by Ptolomy the Grecian and dated to 1572 (British Library, Sloane MS 3847). There are a number of French manuscripts, all dated to the 18th century, with the exception of one dated to 1641 (P1641, ed. Dumas, 1980).

A group of pentacles from the Hebrew manuscript (BL Oriental 14759, fol. 35a)

A Hebrew text survives in two versions, one kept at the British Library, on a parchment manuscript, separated in BL Oriental MSS 6360 and 14759. The BL manuscript was dated to the 16th century by its first editor Greenup (1912), but is now thought to be somewhat younger, dating to the 17th or 18th century.[4] The discovery of a second Hebrew text in the library of Samuel H. Gollancz was published by his son Hermann Gollancz in 1903, who also published a facsimile edition in 1914.[5] Gollancz's manuscript had been copied in Amsterdam, in the Sephardic cursive Solitreo script, and is less legible than the BL text. The Hebrew text is not considered the original. It is rather a late Jewish adaptation of a Latin or Italian Clavicula text. The BL manuscript is probably the archetype of the Hebrew translation, and Gollancz's manuscript a copy of the BL one.[4]

Abramo Colorni translated the Hebrew Sefer Mafteah Shelomoh into Italian and Latin around 1580[6][7] at the request of the Duke of Mantua.[8][9][10] According to Jütte, this could possibly be an original work synthesized by Colorni and not a translation at all, with the Hebrew version being in fact a translation from Colorni's Latin or Italian versions. However, he believes it is not possible to conclusively determine the philological origin and nature of the work, since there are differences in the 17th and 18th French century manuscripts which claim to be based on Colorni.[10] Robert Mathiesen believed the Greek version to be the original.[9]

A French edition titled La véritable Magie Noire ou Le secret des secrets (The True Black Magic or The secret of secrets) is kept at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France. It is a translation from Hebrew by Iroé-Grego, dated 1750.[11]

An English edition based on the manuscripts of the British Library was published by S. L. MacGregor Mathers in 1889.[12] L. W. de Laurence in 1914 published The Greater Key of Solomon, directly based on Mathers' edition, to which he made alterations in an attempt to advertise his mail-order business (for example by inserting instructions like "after burning one-half teaspoonful of Temple Incense" along with ordering information for the incense).

Contents

[edit]

Summary

[edit]

The Key of Solomon is divided into two books. It describes the necessary drawings to prepare each "experiment" or, in more modern language, magical operations.

Unlike later grimoires such as the Pseudomonarchia Daemonum (16th century) or the Lemegeton (17th century), the Key of Solomon does not mention the signature of the 72 spirits constrained by King Solomon in a bronze vessel. As in most medieval grimoires, all magical operations are ostensibly performed through the power of God, to whom all the invocations are addressed. Before any of these "experiments," the operator must confess his sins and purge himself of evil, invoking the protection of God.

Elaborate preparations are necessary, and each of the numerous items used in the operator's "experiments" must be constructed of the appropriate materials obtained in the prescribed manner, at the appropriate astrological time, marked with a specific set of magical symbols, and blessed with its own specific words. All substances needed for the magic drawings and amulets are detailed, as well as the means to purify and prepare them. Many of the symbols incorporate the Transitus Fluvii occult alphabet.

Introduction

[edit]

According to the mythical history of the document, as recorded in its introduction, Solomon wrote the book for his son Rehoboam, and commanded him to hide the book in his sepulchre upon his death. After many years the book was discovered by a group of Babylonian philosophers repairing Solomon's tomb. None could interpret the text, until one of them, Iohé Grevis, suggested that they should ask the Lord for understanding. The Angel of the Lord appeared to him and extracted a promise that he would keep the text hidden from the unworthy and the wicked, after which he was able to read it plainly. Iohé Grevis then placed a spell on the book that the unworthy, the unwise or those who did not fear God would not attain the desired effect from any of the workings contained in the book.

Book I

[edit]

Book I contains conjurations, invocations, and curses to summon and constrain spirits of the dead and demons in order to compel them to do the operator's will. It also describes how to find stolen items, become invisible, gain favour and love, and so on.

Book II

[edit]

Book II describes various purifications which the operator (termed "exorcist") should undergo, how they should clothe themselves, how the magical implements used in their operations should be constructed, and what animal sacrifices should be made to the spirits.

Cultural references

[edit]

English translations

[edit]
  • The Key of Solomon the King (Clavicula Salomonis). Trans. and ed. S. Liddell MacGregor Mathers [1889]. Foreword by R. A. Gilbert. Boston/York Beach, ME: Weiser Books, 2000.
  • The Veritable Key of Solomon. Translated by Stephen Skinner and David Rankine, Llewellyn Publications, 2008.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Key of Solomon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Key of Solomon, also known as the Clavicula Salomonis or Greater Key of Solomon, is a pseudepigraphical grimoire attributed to the biblical King Solomon, purporting to reveal his secret knowledge of ceremonial magic, including rituals for conjuring and commanding spirits, crafting protective pentacles, and performing astrological operations. Despite the legendary attribution to Solomon—who, according to the text, received the wisdom from the angel Michael—the work is a product of late medieval or early Renaissance occult traditions, likely originating in the 14th or 15th century with roots in Greek manuscripts dating as early as the 15th century. Surviving copies, numbering over a dozen in Greek and many more in Latin, Italian, French, and other languages, emerged primarily between the 16th and 18th centuries, reflecting adaptations across Europe during periods of renewed interest in Hermetic and Kabbalistic studies. No Hebrew original has been confirmed, though the text claims descent from ancient Jewish sources, and scholarly analysis classifies it as a composite work drawing from earlier magical treatises like the Hygromanteia. The is typically divided into two books of roughly twenty chapters each: the first outlines conjurations, invocations, and the use of pentacles aligned with planetary influences, while the second details preparatory rites, such as the purification of the operator, consecration of tools like the and , and selection of auspicious days and hours. Emphasizing moral purity and ritual precision to avoid spiritual dangers, it integrates elements of , classical , and . The Key has profoundly shaped , influencing magicians, 19th-century orders like the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn through S.L. MacGregor Mathers' 1889 English edition, and contemporary ceremonial practices.

Historical Context and Manuscripts

Attribution and Authenticity

The Key of Solomon, also known as the Clavicula Salomonis, is a pseudepigraphical falsely attributed to the biblical King to imbue it with divine authority and ancient prestige, a common practice in medieval and literature. Scholars universally reject the Solomonic authorship, identifying the text's composition in the 14th or within a Jewish-Christian milieu in or , where Jewish exiles and Christian scholars interacted amid rising interest in and classical esotericism. The grimoire's historical origins trace to earlier Jewish magical traditions, particularly texts like the Sepher ha-Razim (Book of Secrets), a late antique work from the 3rd–7th century CE that details angelic invocations and attributes esoteric knowledge to Solomon's era, serving as a conceptual precursor to Solomonic . It incorporates influences from Hellenistic , such as planetary correspondences and spirit hierarchies derived from Greco-Roman sources; Kabbalistic elements, including Hebrew divine names and sephirotic symbolism; and medieval European astrological and alchemical practices adapted into a syncretic framework. Scholarly debates on the text's dating and authenticity center on analyses by historians like Lynn Thorndike, who in his multi-volume A History of Magic and Experimental Science (1923–1958) argues for a post-1300 composition based on astrological references to and planetary tables unknown before the , while dismissing Solomonic origins due to pervasive Christian anachronisms such as invocations of the and references to post-biblical saints. Idries Shah, in The Secret Lore of Magic (1957), similarly positions the Key within a 15th-century European synthesis of Oriental and Occidental occultism, emphasizing its compilation from disparate medieval fragments rather than a unified ancient source. Evidence against the grimoire's authenticity includes linguistic inconsistencies, with a Latin base interspersed with Hebrew, Greek, and occasionally terms that reflect medieval multilingual rather than ancient uniformity, and the complete absence of any such Solomonic magical manual in biblical narratives or early Jewish lore, where 's wisdom is portrayed as philosophical and judicial, not operative sorcery. These factors, combined with the text's reliance on Christian liturgical elements incompatible with a 10th-century BCE Jewish context, confirm its status as a fabrication.

Manuscripts and Textual History

The Key of Solomon, known in Latin as Clavicula Salomonis, survives in numerous manuscripts dating primarily from the 15th to the 18th centuries, with the earliest known reference appearing in the early 14th century. The text likely originated in during the late medieval or early period, around the 1300s, as evidenced by citations in d'Abano's Lucidator dubitabilium astronomiae (1303–1310), which mentions a work attributed to on magical operations. Scholars trace its provenance to Italian circles influenced by earlier Arabic grimoires transmitted through and during the medieval period, incorporating elements of astrological and talismanic magic from Islamic sources. Among the most significant surviving manuscripts is Sloane MS 3847, an English translation dated April 8, 1572, representing one of the earliest complete vernacular versions of the . This 16th-century includes detailed instructions on conjurations and pentacles, transcribed in a clear hand with accompanying diagrams. Another key example is Lansdowne MS 1202, a 17th-century Italian purporting to be a translation from Hebrew by Abraham Colorno under the direction of , though the attribution is pseudepigraphic given d'Abano's death in 1316; it features elaborate illustrations of magical circles and sigils. Earlier manuscripts, such as the 15th-century Greek Harley MS 5596, provide glimpses into the text's formative stages, with archaic phrasing and fewer pentacles than later copies. Textual variants across these manuscripts reveal an evolving tradition, with differences in structure, content, and emphasis reflecting scribal adaptations and regional influences. For instance, some versions, like Sloane MS 3847, divide the work into two books with extensive conjurations, while others, such as certain Italian copies, append additional pentacles or omit sections on ; French exemplars from the often show more concise rituals compared to the expanded English and Latin translations of the . These variations stem from the text's transmission from original Italian and French forms into Latin, English, and even Hebrew adaptations, where Western European manuscripts influenced later Jewish magical compilations without evidence of a pre-existing Hebrew . The evolution highlights a fluid corpus, with no single authoritative version, as scribes incorporated local esoteric traditions. The transmission history of the Key of Solomon began in Renaissance Italy, where humanist scholars and astrologers like disseminated magical texts amid growing interest in ancient wisdom, leading to widespread copying in monastic and private libraries across . By the 16th and 17th centuries, the circulated in vernacular languages, reaching and through practitioners who adapted it for practical use. Its role surged in the 19th-century revival, particularly through S. L. MacGregor Mathers' 1889 edition, which drew from manuscripts like Harley MS 5596 and Lansdowne MS 1203 to make the text accessible to English-speaking audiences, influencing modern . Recent scholarly efforts, including Joseph H. Peterson's revisions of Mathers' work, continue to catalog over 100 known manuscripts, emphasizing the text's enduring adaptability.

Structure and Contents

Overall Summary

The Key of Solomon, known in Latin as the Clavicula Salomonis, is a pseudepigraphical of attributed to the biblical King Solomon, though scholarly consensus places its composition in the 14th or 15th century during the . Its core purpose is to serve as a comprehensive manual for , or divine , instructing practitioners on how to summon, command, and bind , and planetary spirits to achieve practical outcomes, such as locating hidden treasures, attaining invisibility, acquiring love, or gaining knowledge of sciences and arts. Central themes in the revolve around the absolute necessity of purity—both moral and physical—for the operator, alongside meticulous adherence to astrological timings and the of divine names to assert authority over spirits. The text integrates Jewish mystical traditions, Christian liturgical prayers, and elements of pagan conjurations, framing magic as an extension of divine will that requires and to avoid peril. It stresses that only those aligned with godly intentions can safely wield its powers, positioning as a sacred rather than profane . Structurally, the Key of Solomon is organized into two main books: Book I addresses foundational preparations, including the consecration of magical tools and circles, along with conjurations for invoking spirits; Book II focuses on the creation and use of pentacles as talismans for specific experiments and protections. In its earliest forms, each book comprises approximately twenty chapters—for example, 18 chapters in Book I and 22 in Book II in editions like S.L. MacGregor Mathers' translation—with overall lengths varying across versions but generally encompassing 100 to 150 pages of detailed instructions and diagrams. The targets an audience of medieval and practitioners—often scholars or initiates in traditions—who possess the requisite spiritual ; it includes explicit warnings that impure or novice individuals risk spiritual harm or failure, underscoring the elite and hazardous nature of its intended use.

Book I: Preparations and Conjurations

Book I of the Key of Solomon delineates the foundational rituals and protocols essential for the safe and effective of spirits, attributing these practices to King 's divine wisdom. The text posits that mastery of these arts requires foremost a profound devotion to , as Solomon states that "the beginning of the study of the Mystery of is the knowledge of the " to ensure operations align with holy purposes rather than profane desires. This initial emphasis on spiritual disposition sets the tone for all subsequent instructions, integrating Kabbalistic principles where divine names serve as protective barriers against malevolent forces. The preparatory chapters outline rigorous requirements for the magician's purification to attune the body and soul to celestial influences. The operator must observe a nine-day period of , forgoing meat, wine, baths on certain days, and all carnal acts, while reciting specific orisons each to invoke . Materials such as virgin —derived from unborn animals—and pure are mandated for any inscriptions or figures, ensuring no prior defilement compromises the ritual's potency. Timing is governed by planetary correspondences; for instance, operations involving solar spirits are confined to Sundays during the hours ruled by the Sun, calculated via tables of to align with astrological virtues. These steps, consistent across major manuscript families like the Oldest Text group, underscore the text's reliance on cosmology for efficacy. Essential tools and materials receive meticulous consecration to imbue them with sacred power. The magical circle, central to all operations, is formed using a consecrated , , or to trace its boundaries on the ground or , accompanied by prayers such as "O Lord , Who hast formed man in Thine Image," to enclose the operator in divine protection. Key implements include an iron sword or poniard for warding off adversarial entities, a long white linen robe symbolizing purity, and planetary perfumes like lignum aloes for Venusian rites or mastic for Mercurial ones, all sanctified through aspersion with , suffumigation, and invocations of names like Gibor. The text details rituals for the sword's consecration, involving its immersion in consecrated water while reciting and Kabbalistic names derived from the Sepher , ensuring it becomes an extension of the operator's will. Conjuration methods build upon these foundations, providing structured invocations to summon and command spirits. The procedure demands the magician stand within the circle, directing the spirit to manifest visibly in a designated without, while holding the consecrated as a of . Initial prayers invoke the divine , as in the opening conjuration: "O ADONAI, most Holy, deign to bless this circle... so that all Spirits within may be obedient," incorporating names like Adonai, , and the Shemhamphorasch to bind the entity. Stronger forms escalate with repeated calls, threatening the spirit with expulsion to if it resists, always framed within praises of God's to maintain ritual integrity. Throughout, the text issues stark warnings on the perils of inadequate preparation or impious intent, cautioning that "if thou performest not these things, thou shalt not be able to command the Spirits," risking madness, physical , or eternal damnation from demonic deception. Ethical imperatives stress using the solely for divine glory and just causes, with as the bulwark against backlash; lapses invite spirits to mock or assault the operator, as illustrated in admonitions drawing from Kabbalistic traditions where misuse of sacred names profanes the divine order. Manuscript variations, such as those in the French and Italian clades, occasionally amplify these ethical notes but preserve the core emphasis on and faith.

Book II: Pentacles and Experiments

Book II of the Key of Solomon details the fabrication and employment of pentacles as potent talismans for directing planetary influences toward specific magical ends, alongside practical experiments that utilize these devices to invoke spirits and achieve tangible results. These pentacles, numbering up to seven per classical planet in many manuscripts, serve as focal points for operations, harnessing the virtues of Saturn through the Moon to compel obedience from associated intelligences and accomplish feats ranging from destruction to illusion. The text underscores their construction during astrologically auspicious hours, using metals attuned to each planet—lead for Saturn, tin for Jupiter, iron for Mars, gold for the Sun, copper for Venus, quicksilver or silver for Mercury, and silver for the Moon—and engraving them with a consecrated burin bearing Hebrew letters that form divine names, angelic invocations, and excerpts from Psalms. The of Saturn, dedicated to operations of hindrance and subjugation, include designs for evoking planetary spirits to bind enemies or cause discord; for instance, the First Pentacle of Saturn depicts a figure with surrounding Hebrew characters to summon Sabathiel and other Saturnine intelligences, compelling their manifestation for destructive purposes. Jupiter's , conversely, promote and , with the Third Pentacle featuring the name IHVH and sigils to acquire honors and when worn or carried during invocations. Mars empower martial endeavors, such as over adversaries or in conflict, often engraved on iron plates; French variants, like those in the library collection, append extra Mars for intensified aggressive workings not present in Italian or English copies. Solar , wrought in , facilitate glory, healing, and princely favor; for example, the First Pentacle of the Sun contains the head of the great Angel Methraton or Metatron, the vice-regent and representative of Shaddai, who is called the Prince of Countenances, and the right-hand masculine Cherub of the Ark, as Sandalphon is the left and feminine. On either side is the Name "El Shaddai." Around is written in Latin: "Behold His face and form by Whom all things were made, and Whom all creatures obey." This pentacle serves to invoke respect and obedience from superiors and spirits. The Second Pentacle of the Sun bears the names of divine attributes to elevate the bearer's status and health. Venusian pentacles center on amatory and social harmonies, crafted from and inscribed with characters to draw ; a representative experiment involves the Fourth Pentacle of , used in charms by fumigating it with and mastic during 's first hour, followed by reciting versicles to bind a desired person's will, ensuring compliance in romantic pursuits. Mercury's pentacles support intellectual and deceptive arts, including eloquence and concealment; the Fifth Pentacle of Mercury, with its Hebrew square and of Michael, enables an experiment wherein the operator, after consecration, holds the pentacle aloft during Mercury's hour and intones commands, rendering themselves unseen to observers for up to an hour. Lunar pentacles, typically six, govern voyages, deceptions, and revelations, such as the Second Pentacle of the for safe travel or the Third for illusions that confound enemies, often involving spirit binding to unearth treasures or secrets through nocturnal rituals under the 's influence. To activate these pentacles, the operator must first engrave the designs precisely, then consecrate them through a sequence of exorcisms, sprinklings of holy water, and suffumigations with planet-specific incenses like myrrh for Saturn or cinnamon for the Sun, all performed in a purified circle while invoking the relevant archangels and reciting appointed orations. This process assumes the foundational purity and preparations from the first book, ensuring the talisman's efficacy in commanding spirits. Successful outcomes encompass the prompt obedience of planetary intelligences—such as spirits materializing to execute the operator's will in love bindings or invisibility veils—and reliable magical effects, like the revelation of hidden knowledge via bound lunar entities. However, the issues stern limitations and cautions: pentacles forged outside the proper planetary days and hours, or by impure hands, prove inert or counterproductive, potentially inciting spirit rebellion that endangers the practitioner with madness or physical harm; misuse for malevolent ends without due reverence invites failure, as the divine names embedded in the engravings demand moral alignment to function. Manuscript discrepancies further complicate application, with some versions, such as Additional MS 36674, lacking pentacles altogether and using Roman script instead of Hebrew, altering potency across textual traditions.

Magical Elements and Practices

Rituals and Tools

The rituals outlined in the Key of Solomon adhere to a structured, multi-stage framework designed to ensure the operator's safety and efficacy in invoking spiritual entities. The process begins with extensive preparations, including personal purifications through fasting, prayer, and ritual baths, followed by the consecration of the working space and implements. Central to the ritual is the formation of a protective circle, inscribed on the ground or a suitable surface with chalk or coal, incorporating the names of God (such as Adonai, Elohim, and Tetragrammaton) and angelic symbols to ward off malevolent influences. Once within the circle, the operator performs invocations using prescribed orations to summon the desired spirit, culminating in a formal license to depart that commands the entity to leave peacefully upon completion of the task. This sequence emphasizes discipline and piety, with the circle serving as a sacred boundary that maintains the operator's authority. Essential tools form the practical backbone of these rituals, each consecrated through specific ceremonies to imbue them with spiritual potency. The , a primary implement for command and defense, is forged from virgin with a blade inscribed with divine names and characters; its hilt, often of black horn or , is used to trace the circle and direct spirits, symbolizing the operator's unyielding authority derived from divine . The , crafted from a straight branch of wild or wood gathered at dawn on a Wednesday or , functions as an extension for pointing and channeling intent during invocations, representing the life force and creative will. The altar, typically a small table of wood or stone placed at the circle's center, holds the , burning , lamps, and vessels; it is draped in white linen and consecrated to serve as the focal point for offerings and the manifestation of results. recipes are tailored to planetary correspondences, such as a for Saturn composed of pepperwort, , and , burned to attune the ritual to themes of limitation and endurance. Symbolically, these tools and rituals embody the operator's alignment with divine order, transforming mundane objects into conduits for celestial power and underscoring the grimoire's theurgic intent to elevate the soul toward God. The sword evokes biblical imagery of , the wand mirrors the rod of as a tool of miracle-working, and incenses invoke aromatic sacrifices akin to temple rites, all reinforcing the practitioner's role as a mediator between earthly and heavenly realms. Astrological timing is integral, with operations for increase or growth recommended during the waxing moon and favorable —such as those ruled by for prosperity—to harness cosmic energies and avoid discord. Manuscript variations reveal cultural adaptations in tool usage, reflecting the grimoire's syncretic origins in Jewish Kabbalistic traditions—evident in the prominence of Hebrew divine names and protective seals—and later Christian emphases, where Latin invocations and Trinitarian references supplant or blend with earlier elements to align with symbolism. These differences, seen across Italian, French, and English codices, highlight how the text evolved from medieval and Arabic alchemical influences into a framework adaptable to Christian practices.

Pentacles, Sigils, and Spirits

The pentacles of the Key of Solomon are intricate geometric talismans central to its magical system, consisting of interlocking circles, pentagrams, hexagrams, and other polygons adorned with sacred inscriptions in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. These designs encode divine names, angelic invocations, and planetary symbols to channel cosmic energies for protection, revelation, or compulsion. Each planetary series—seven sets corresponding to Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Venus, Mercury, and Moon—serves distinct purposes; for instance, the pentacles of the Sun, featuring radiant motifs and names like Adonai and Elohim, are employed to invoke illumination, gain favor from authorities, and reveal hidden truths. Crafted on virgin parchment or metal alloys suited to the planet (e.g., gold for the Sun), they must be consecrated under auspicious astrological conditions to activate their potency. Sigils and seals function as personalized emblems or "signatures" for spirits, distinguishing them from generic planetary symbols and enabling precise command during rituals. These are typically linear or calligraphic figures derived from mystical alphabets, often integrated into pentacles or drawn separately on talismans. Creation involves meticulous timing: sigils for solar spirits, for example, are inscribed during the Sun's —calculated from sunrise using tables of diurnal and nocturnal divisions—employing inks compounded from planetary metals, herbs, and blood or virgin wax for binding efficacy. The process emphasizes purity and intent, as errors in formation could render the seal ineffective or provoke rebellion from the invoked entity. The delineates a hierarchical cosmology of spirits, encompassing angels, planetary intelligences, and subordinate entities, each with defined attributes, powers, and manifestations to guide the operator's expectations. Angels such as Michael, ruler of the Sun, appear as majestic warriors in golden armor, granting protection against adversaries and insight into divine will; , linked to Mercury, manifests as a youthful healer with a , bestowing eloquence and medical knowledge. Planetary intelligences like Nakhiel (Sun) or Hagiel () oversee broader cosmic forces, appearing in ethereal forms to mediate between the divine and material realms, with powers over , , or intellect. While the Key of Solomon prioritizes these beneficent beings, it intersects with Goetic traditions in the broader Solomonic corpus, referencing hierarchies including the 72 demons of the Ars Goetia—such as , a wrathful king with three heads (bull, man, ram) who commands legions and reveals treasures but incites destruction if unbound. These demons, ranked from kings to earls, possess attributes like , shape-shifting, or elemental control, their appearances varying from leonine beasts to hybrid humanoids. Invocation theory in the Key of Solomon asserts that pentacles and sigils compel spirit obedience through their embodiment of primordial divine authority, evoking terror via inscribed (e.g., YHVH, ) that mirror creation's foundational seals and override infernal resistances. When displayed, these symbols force spirits to manifest visibly and submit, as the states: "If thou invokest the spirits by virtue of these pentacles, they will obey thee without repugnance, and having considered them they will be struck with dread." Modern scholarly analyses, drawing from manuscript studies and historical contextualization, interpret this efficacy dualistically: supernaturally as literal pacts with intermediary beings in a Neoplatonic chain of being, or psychologically as archetypal symbols inducing trance states, self-empowerment, and subconscious alignment akin to Jungian , where the "spirits" represent internalized projections rather than external entities. Such views highlight the 's role in esotericism as a bridge between theology and proto-psychology, emphasizing ritual's cathartic impact over ontological claims.

Influence and Legacy

Historical Impact on Occultism

The Key of Solomon played a pivotal role in the dissemination of knowledge during the , serving as a foundational text for integrating ancient magical traditions into emerging Hermetic frameworks. Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa's De Occulta Philosophia () incorporated elements of Solomonic rituals and pentacles, adapting them to synthesize , celestial, and with Kabbalistic and Neoplatonic elements, thereby transmitting pseudepigraphic Solomonic lore to broader European circles. This influence extended to Hermetic orders, where the grimoire's emphasis on ritual purity and spirit invocation informed the structured hierarchies of magical practice that characterized occultism. In the , the Key of Solomon experienced a significant revival through English translations and editions that revitalized amid growing interest in esotericism. S.L. MacGregor Mathers' 1889 edition, based on manuscripts, became integral to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, where its conjurations and tools shaped the order's initiatory rituals and syncretic system blending , , and . This publication influenced later occultists, while incorporated adapted pentacles and invocations from the grimoire into his Thelemic system, notably in Liber 777 (1909). Earlier, Francis Barrett's The Magus (1801) excerpted key sections of the Clavicula Salomonis, presenting them alongside Agrippan philosophy to popularize Solomonic practices among aspiring English occultists and bridge medieval grimoires with modern revivalism. The grimoire's broader legacy established enduring standards for , emphasizing elaborate preparations, protective circles, and hierarchical spirit commands that became archetypes in . Its Solomonic attribution resonated with Rosicrucian manifestos, which echoed themes of divine wisdom and alchemical transmutation, while indirect connections to arose through shared symbolism of King as a for moral and mystical architecture, influencing speculative Masonic rituals focused on builder archetypes. These elements solidified the Key of Solomon as a for high magic traditions, prioritizing ethical over folk sorcery. 20th-century scholarly reception built on these foundations, with post-2000 analyses providing deeper textual and cultural scrutiny. Don Karr's The Study of Solomonic Magic in English (2009) catalogs manuscript variants and translations, highlighting the grimoire's evolution from Byzantine precursors to Latin disseminations and its role in shaping occult historiography. Stephen Skinner's Techniques of Solomonic Magic (2015) traces practical transmissions across centuries, examining how European colonialism facilitated the grimoire's spread to non-Western contexts through missionary encounters and esoteric societies in and the , thus addressing gaps in earlier editions like Barrett's by emphasizing authenticated rituals over pseudepigraphic claims. More recent editions, such as the 2021 reformatted version by Troy Books, continue to make the text accessible for contemporary study.

Modern Interpretations and Cultural References

The has significantly influenced 20th-century revivals, serving as a foundational text in and traditions that adapt its preparatory rites and tools for contemporary use. In , elements like consecrated circles and talismans from the Key inform ritual frameworks, integrated into earth-centered practices by figures such as . practitioners, drawing from eclectic paradigms, repurpose Solomonic sigils and invocations as flexible tools for paradigm-shifting, emphasizing belief as a malleable rather than rigid . Online communities have digitized and adapted Key of Solomon rituals, fostering virtual grimoires and forums where practitioners share modified conjurations using apps for astrological timing or AI-generated sigils. These digital spaces, including esoteric Discord servers and Reddit occult subgroups, enable global collaboration on ethical adaptations, though they raise concerns about diluting traditional solemnity. The Key of Solomon appears in modern literature, such as Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum (1988), where it features among esoteric texts satirizing conspiracy theories and occult obsessions, underscoring the grimoire's role in fictional explorations of hidden knowledge. Video games like the Persona series incorporate demons from the related Lesser Key of Solomon's Ars Goetia, such as Eligor in Persona 5 (2016), using them as summonable entities in psychological RPG battles. Television references include the CW's Supernatural, where the Key appears in season 1, episode 22 ("Devil's Trap," 2006), as a protective grimoire consulted by hunters against demonic threats, with echoes in later episodes exploring Solomonic seals. Ethical debates surrounding the Key of Solomon center on cultural appropriation of its Jewish mystical elements, including Hebrew divine names and Kabbalistic influences, which were incorporated into Christian grimoires during the medieval period. Modern critics contend that non-Jewish practitioners' use of these components without contextual reverence perpetuates historical erasure of Jewish esoteric traditions, advocating for acknowledgment of origins to mitigate harm. This concern has intensified in diverse occult communities, prompting discussions on respectful engagement versus exploitative adoption.

Translations and Editions

English Translations

The most influential English translation of the Key of Solomon is S.L. MacGregor Mathers' 1889 edition, titled The Key of Solomon the King: Clavicula Salomonis, which was derived primarily from 18th-century French manuscripts held in the , including exemplars of the earlier Italian Colorno manuscript tradition. This version introduced the to English-speaking occultists and shaped much of modern , though it remains incomplete, omitting certain chapters such as operations involving dreams and that appear in fuller manuscript variants. Mathers supplemented the text with extensive footnotes incorporating interpretations from the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, his esoteric society, which blended the grimoire's content with Kabbalistic and ritualistic elements. A more comprehensive and accurate edition is Joseph H. Peterson's online version from 1999 (revised in 2004 and later), available at Esoteric Archives, drawing from a of over a dozen manuscripts in Latin, Italian, French, and English to provide textual variants and restore omitted sections. Peterson's work prioritizes fidelity to the sources, avoiding Mathers' interpolations and offering parallel readings to highlight discrepancies across traditions. Peterson has also contributed forewords to print reprints of Mathers' edition, such as the 2016 Weiser Books version, which are available in print and digital formats. Translating the Key of Solomon presents challenges due to its pseudepigraphic nature and manuscript variations, particularly in rendering Hebrew divine names, angelic invocations, and planetary attributions, which differ significantly between Italian, French, and Latin copies—e.g., inconsistent transliterations of terms like Adonai or Elohim. Mathers' reliance on French intermediaries introduced potential errors in these esoteric terms, compounded by his Golden Dawn lens that sometimes imposed 19th-century occult frameworks onto medieval content. Mathers' edition entered the due to its age, making it widely accessible online through digital archives like the and Esoteric Archives, where scanned originals and plain-text versions facilitate study by researchers and practitioners. Peterson's online edition is freely available digitally for comparative analysis, while his appear in copyrighted print reprints of Mathers' text. Critics note that Peterson's edition rectifies several of Mathers' inaccuracies, such as the misnumbering and misattribution of —e.g., correcting the sequence of the First Pentacle of Mercury, which Mathers conflated with later variants—and reinstates chapters like the "Experiment Concerning Things Stolen" for completeness. In the 2020s, annotated reprints of Mathers' text, such as the 2024 illustrated edition with a by Peterson, have added historical contextual notes on provenance and evolution, aiding modern readers without altering the core translation.

Non-English Translations and Editions

The Key of Solomon, known in Latin as Clavicula Salomonis, survives primarily through manuscripts composed in non-English languages, with the earliest likely originating in Italian or Latin during the 14th or 15th century , though most extant copies date from the 16th to 18th centuries. These include Italian exemplars such as Sloane MS 1307 (ca. 17th century), which features prayers and conjurations in Latin alongside Italian text, and French manuscripts like Kings MS 288 and Harley MS 5596 (both 18th century), which preserve detailed ritual instructions. Latin editions from the , such as those collated in early printed grimoires, often served as intermediaries for later translations, reflecting a blend of classical and medieval European occult traditions. A Hebrew version, Sepher Maphteah Shelomoh, appears in manuscripts like Oriental MS 14759 (17th century), emphasizing the text's pseudepigraphic ties to King and . Major non-English translations emerged in the 18th and 19th centuries, adapting the for regional audiences while preserving its core structure of preparations, conjurations, and pentacles. In German, expurgated versions like Clavicula Salomonis expurgata circulated in manuscripts from the early , such as University Library MS Cod. mag. 27, which tones down demonic invocations to align with Christian moral sensibilities, omitting explicit spirit-binding rituals found in fuller Latin and Italian copies. French translations, drawn from 18th-century manuscripts, include illuminated copies like the one auctioned by (ca. ), featuring cabalistic diagrams and amulets tailored for practical use in a Catholic context, with added prayers to saints not present in earlier Italian sources. Italian editions, such as the multilingual manuscript at the (17th century, in Italian, Latin, Dutch, and Hebrew), highlight regional variations in tool consecrations, incorporating local lore absent in northern European versions. Hebrew scholarly interest persisted, with Hermann Gollancz's 1914 facsimile edition of a 17th-century (Clavicula Salomonis: A Hebrew Manuscript) providing a critical reproduction that underscores the text's Jewish esoteric roots, including untranslated incantations. Modern non-English editions continue this tradition, often as scholarly facsimiles or annotated translations. The 1914 Gollancz Hebrew edition remains a benchmark for academic study, reproducing an original with illustrations and notes on its divergence from Latin variants, such as expanded protections against malevolent spirits. In Italian, contemporary publications like La Chiave di Salomone (Venexia Edizioni, 2010s) reconstruct rituals from original manuscripts, emphasizing designs with fidelity to sources while noting omissions in Protestant-influenced German copies that removed Catholic elements like blessings. Spanish editions, such as La Llave de Salomón (2023), translate from French and Latin bases but adapt colonial-era influences minimally, retaining core experiments without the Iberian exorcistic additions seen in some manuscripts, which integrated local invocations during the 17th-18th centuries. Comparative analyses reveal how translations alter rituals: Catholic French and Italian versions amplify ecclesiastical tools (e.g., asperging with ), whereas Protestant-era German expurgations prioritize ethical warnings over coercive conjurations, reflecting critiques of demonic pacts. Scholarly editions focus on critical to address textual gaps. Gollancz's Hebrew work (1914) identifies interpolations from Kabbalistic sources, distinguishing it from Latin editions that Christianized Solomon's lore. Recent Italian facsimiles, such as those from the by academic presses, reprint 17th-century manuscripts like the of Israel's copy, updating annotations to highlight Jewish reclamation efforts in Israeli scholarship, which trace variations to medieval Sephardic influences absent in northern European texts. These editions underscore persistent challenges, including lost Portuguese colonial adaptations potentially blending Solomonic magic with , though few verifiable copies survive.

References

  1. https://blogs.qub.ac.uk/specialcollections/clavicula-salomonis-the-key-of-solomon-ms-27-10-20/
  2. https://societasmagica.org/modules/newsletters/views/docs/SMN_Spring_2007_Issue_17.pdf
  3. https://www.gotquestions.org/Key-of-Solomon.html
  4. https://ia801300.us.archive.org/9/items/b24884431/b24884431.pdf
  5. https://www.academia.edu/36605438/The_Key_of_Solomon
  6. https://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/ksol.htm
  7. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/67330/67330-h/67330-h.htm
  8. https://idriesshahfoundation.org/books/the-secret-lore-of-magic/
  9. https://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/sl3847.htm
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/key-of-solomon-the-king-clavicula-salomonis/7D32CC69C2B47B21C6F2D0F7738567C5
  11. https://www.academia.edu/99951575/Forbidden_Rites_A_Necromancers_Manual_of_the_Fifteenth_Century_Richard_Kieckhefer
  12. https://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/ksol2.htm
  13. https://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/kos/kos27.htm
  14. https://sacred-texts.com/grim/kos/kos30.htm
  15. https://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/ad36674.htm
  16. https://www.semcoop.com/greater-and-lesser-keys-solomon-king
  17. http://www.labirintoermetico.com/06Numerologia_Cabala/Greater_Key_of_Solomon-2.pdf
  18. https://www.renaissanceastrology.com/hourskeysolomonarticle.html
  19. https://benebellwen.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/the-key-of-solomon-and-collected-studies-on-spirit-conjure.pdf
  20. https://www.academia.edu/1898504/_What_is_the_Right_Sigil_Mathers_Use_of_Sigils_in_the_Clavicula_Salomonis_
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42554403
  22. https://www.academia.edu/4881091/The_Study_of_Solomonic_Magic_in_English
  23. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230294707_6
  24. https://blog.philosophicalsociety.org/2017/10/18/the-key-of-solomon/
  25. https://arcaneofferings.com/products/the-key-of-solomon-the-king-translated-by-s-liddell-mac-gregor-mathers-troy-books-2021-paperback
  26. https://www.llewellyn.com/journal/article/1871
  27. https://benebellwen.com/2019/11/07/the-keys-of-solomonic-magic-and-spirit-conjures/
  28. https://digitaloccultlibrary.commons.gc.cuny.edu/foucaults-pendulum/
  29. https://www.thegamer.com/persona5-eligor-facts-trivia/
  30. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0460681/episodes?season=1
  31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43629847
  32. https://archive.org/details/b24884431
  33. https://www.amazon.com/Key-Solomon-King-Clavicula-Illustrated/dp/191707607X
  34. https://www.occult.live/index.php?title=Key_of_Solomon
  35. https://www.esotericarchives.com/gollancz/mafteahs.htm
  36. https://booksofmagick.com/clavicula-salomonis-expurgata/
  37. https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6352238
  38. https://www.nli.org.il/en/manuscripts/NNL_ALEPH990034372130205171/NLI
  39. https://archive.org/download/claviculasalomon00goll/claviculasalomon00goll.pdf
  40. https://www.amazon.com/Key-Solomon-Clavicula-Salomonis-Grimorio/dp/B0BW2VKM65
  41. https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Sepher-Maphteah-Shelomo-Book-Key-Solomon/31510731420/bd
  42. https://www.academia.edu/43654569/_Un_manuale_moderno_di_magia_in_ebraico_ed_italiano_dalla_Collezione_di_Lisa_e_William_Gross_
  43. https://www.facebook.com/groups/332204855888105/posts/818471187261467/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.