Hubbry Logo
SphingidaeSphingidaeMain
Open search
Sphingidae
Community hub
Sphingidae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sphingidae
Sphingidae
Sphingidae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Hawk moths
Temporal range: Miocene–Recent
Convolvulus hawk-moth, Agrius convolvuli
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Superfamily: Bombycoidea
Family: Sphingidae
Latreille, 1802
Type species
Sphinx ligustri
Subfamilies
Diversity
About 200 genera, roughly 1,450 species

The Sphingidae are a family of moths commonly called sphinx moths, also colloquially known as hawk moths, with many of their caterpillars known as hornworms. It includes about 1,450 species.[1] It is best represented in the tropics, but species are found in every region.[2] They are moderate to large in size and are distinguished among moths for their agile and sustained flying ability, similar enough to that of hummingbirds as to be reliably mistaken for them.[2] Their narrow wings and streamlined abdomens are adaptations for rapid flight. The family was named by French zoologist Pierre André Latreille in 1802.

Some hawk moths, such as the hummingbird hawk-moth or the white-lined sphinx, hover in midair while they feed on nectar from flowers, so are sometimes mistaken for hummingbirds. This hovering capability is only known to have evolved four times in nectar feeders: in hummingbirds, certain bats, hoverflies, and these sphingids[3] (an example of convergent evolution). Sphingids have been studied for their flying ability, especially their ability to move rapidly from side to side while hovering, called "swing-hovering" or "side-slipping". This is thought to have evolved to deal with ambush predators that lie in wait in flowers.[3]

Sphingids are some of the faster flying insects; some are capable of flying at over 5.3 m/s (19 km/h).[4] They have wingspans from 4 cm (1+1⁄2 in) to over 10 cm (4 in).

Description

[edit]

Sphingid's antennae are not very feathery, even in males.[2] They lack tympanal organs, but members of the group Choerocampini have hearing organs on their heads.[2] They have a frenulum and retinaculum to join hindwings and forewings.[2] The thorax, abdomen, and wings are densely covered in scales. Some sphingids have a rudimentary proboscis, but most have a very long one,[2] which is used to feed on nectar from flowers. Most are crepuscular or nocturnal, but some species fly during the day.[5] Both males and females are relatively long-lived (10 to 30 days).[5] Prior to flight, most species shiver their flight muscles to warm them up, and, during flight, body temperatures may surpass 40 °C (104 °F).[5]

In some species, differences in form between the sexes is quite marked. For example, in the African species Agrius convolvuli (the convolvulus or morning glory hawk-moth), males have thicker antennae and more mottled wing markings than females. Only males have both an undivided frenular hook and a retinaculum. Only males have a partial comb of hairs along with their antennae.[6] Females attract males with pheromones. The male may douse the female with a pheromone[5] before mating.

Behavior

[edit]

Some species fly only for short periods either around dusk or dawn, while other species only appear later in the evening and others around midnight, but such species may occasionally be seen feeding on flowers during the day. A few common species in Africa, such as the Oriental beehawk (Cephonodes hylas virescens), Macroglossum hirundo, and Macroglossum trochilus, are diurnal.[6]

A number of species are known to be migratory, all in the Sphingini and Macroglossinae, and specially in the genera Agrius, Cephonodes, Macroglossum, Hippotion and Theretra.[7]

Flight

[edit]

In studies with Manduca sexta, moths have dynamic flight sensory capabilities due to their antennae. The antennae are vibrated in a plane so that when the body of the moth rotates during controlled aerial maneuvers, the antennae are subject to the inertial Coriolis forces that are linearly proportional to the angular velocity of the body.[8] The Coriolis forces cause deflections of the antennae, which are detected by the Johnston's organ at the base of each antenna, with strong frequency responses at the beat frequency of the antennae (around 25 Hz) and at twice the beat frequency. The relative magnitude of the two frequency responses enables the moth to distinguish rotation around the different principal axes, allowing for rapid course control during aerial maneuvers.[9]

Vine hawk-moth larva (Hippotion celerio)
An example of the posterior "horn" seen on the tomato hornworm

Life cycle

[edit]

Most species are multivoltine, capable of producing several generations a year if weather conditions permit.[5] Females lay translucent, greenish, flattened, smooth eggs, usually singly on the host plants. Egg development time varies highly, from three to 21 days.

A Hyles gallii caterpillar seeking a place to pupate: the color of the caterpillar darkens before pupation.
Hyles euphorbiae pupa

Sphingid caterpillars are medium to large in size, with stout bodies. They have five pairs of prolegs.[5] Usually, their bodies lack any hairs or tubercules, but most species have a "horn" at the posterior end,[2] which may be reduced to a button, or absent, in the final instar.[5] Many are cryptic greens and browns, and have countershading patterns to conceal them. Others are more conspicuously colored, typically with white spots on a black or yellow background along the length of the body. A pattern of diagonal slashes along the side is a common feature. When resting, the caterpillar usually holds its legs off the surface and tucks its head underneath (praying position), which, resembling the Great Sphinx of Giza, gives rise to the name "sphinx moth".[5] Some tropical larvae are thought to mimic snakes.[2][10] Larvae are quick to regurgitate their sticky, often toxic, foregut contents on attackers such as ants and parasitoids.[5] Development rate depends on temperature, and to speed development, some northern and high-altitude species sunbathe.[5] Larvae burrow into the soil to pupate, where they remain for two to three weeks before they emerge as adults.

In some sphingids, the pupa has a free proboscis, rather than being fused to the pupal case as is most common in the macrolepidoptera.[2] They have a cremaster at the tip of the abdomen.[5] Usually, they pupate off the host plant, in an underground chamber, among rocks, or in a loose cocoon.[5] In most species, the pupa is the overwintering stage.

Food plants

[edit]

Larvae

[edit]
C. kingii, Crows Nest

Sphingid larvae tend to be specific feeders, rather than generalists.[5] Compared to similarly sized saturniids, sphingids eat soft young leaves of host plants with small toxic molecules, and chew and mash the food into very small bits.[11] Some species can tolerate quite high concentrations of specific toxins. Tobacco hornworms (Manduca sexta) detoxify and rapidly excrete nicotine, as do several other related sphinx moths in the subfamilies Sphinginae and Macroglossinae, but members of the Smerinthinae that were tested are susceptible.[12] The species that are able to tolerate the toxin do not sequester it in their tissues; 98% was excreted. However, other species, such as Hyles euphorbiae and Daphnis nerii, do sequester toxins from their hosts, but do not pass them on to the adult stage.[5]

Adults

[edit]

Most adults feed on nectar, although a few tropical species feed on eye secretions, and the death's-head hawkmoth steals honey from bees.[5] Night-flying sphingids tend to prefer pale flowers with long corolla tubes and a sweet odor, a pollination syndrome known as "sphingophily".[3] Some species are quite general in visitations, while others are very specific, with the plant only being successfully pollinated by a particular species of moth.[3] Orchids frequently have such specific relations with hawk moths and very long corolla tubes. The comet orchid (Angraecum sesquipedale), a rare Malagasy flower with its nectar stored at the bottom of a 30-centimetre-long (12 in) tube, was described in 1822 by Louis-Marie Aubert du Petit-Thouars, and later, Charles Darwin famously predicted there must be some specialized moth to feed from it:

[A. sesquipetale has] nectaries 11 and a half inches long [29 cm], with only the lower inch and a half [4 cm] filled with very sweet nectar [...] it is, however, surprising, that any insect should be able to reach the nectar: our English sphinxes have probosces as long as their bodies, but in Madagascar, there must be moths with probosces capable of extension to a length of between 10 and 12 inches! [25 and 30 cm][13]

Alfred Russel Wallace published a sort of "wanted poster" (properly, a drawing in a book)[14] of what this lepidopteran might look like, and, concurring with his colleague, added:

[The proboscis of a hawk moth] from tropical Africa ([Xanthopan] morganii) is seven inches and a half [19 cm]. A species having a proboscis two or three inches longer [8 cm] could reach the nectar in the largest flowers of Angraecum sesquipedale, whose nectaries vary in length from ten to fourteen inches [36 cm]. That such a moth exists in Madagascar may be safely predicted, and naturalists who visit that island should search for it with as much confidence as astronomers searched for the planet Neptune, – and they will be equally successful.[15]

The predicted sphingid was discovered 21 years later and described as a subspecies of the one African species studied by Wallace: Xanthopan morganii praedicta,[16] for which, the subspecific name praedicta ("the predicted one") was given. The Madagascan individuals had a pink, rather than white, breast and abdomen and a black apical line on the forewing, broader than in mainland specimens. Molecular clock models using either rate- or fossil-based calibrations imply that the Madagascan subspecies X. m. praedicta and the African subspecies X. m. morgani diverged 7.4 ± 2.8 Mya (million years ago), which overlaps the divergence of A. sesquipedale from its sister, A. sororium, namely 7.5 ± 5.2 Mya.[17] Since both these orchids have extremely long spurs, longspurs likely existed before that and were exploited by long-tongued moths similar to Xanthopan morganii praedicta. The long geological separation of subspecies morgani and praedicta matches their morphological differences in the color of the breast and abdomen.

Relationships and species

[edit]
A sphinx moth, subfamily Macroglossinae, in Cibodas Botanical Garden, Java

The Sphingidae is sometimes assigned its own exclusive superfamily, Sphingoidea, but is alternatively included with the more encompassing Bombycoidea. Following Hodges (1971) two subfamilies are accepted, namely the Sphinginae and Macroglossinae.[18] Around 1,450 species of hawk moths are classified into around 200 genera. Some of the best-known hawk moth species are:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sphingidae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Sphingidae, commonly known as hawk moths or sphinx moths, constitute a diverse family within the order , encompassing approximately 1,450 to 1,600 of medium- to large-sized moths distinguished by their robust, streamlined bodies, narrow forewings, and exceptional flight capabilities that enable hovering akin to hummingbirds while feeding on via an elongated . These moths exhibit a , occurring on all continents except , with the highest in tropical and subtropical regions, though temperate zones host notable diversity as well. Adults are primarily nocturnal but some , such as the , are diurnal, showcasing rapid wingbeats that produce a characteristic humming sound during flight. Their larvae, referred to as hornworms due to the prominent caudal horn, are voracious herbivores that develop through five instars, often displaying cryptic color patterns or eyespots for defense, and pupate in soil or leaf litter. Taxonomically, Sphingidae is divided into three main subfamilies—Macroglossinae, Smerinthinae, and Sphinginae—along with minor groups, comprising around 205 genera worldwide. Ecologically, Sphingidae play a crucial role as pollinators, particularly for deep-tubed flowers that rely on their long proboscides, and some undertake long-distance migrations, contributing to across habitats. Certain larvae are agricultural pests, targeting crops like tomatoes and , while others serve as indicators of due to their sensitivity to environmental changes.

Taxonomy and classification

Etymology and history

The family name Sphingidae derives from the Greek word Sphinx, alluding to the characteristic resting posture of the larvae, in which the anterior body segments are raised, evoking the pose of the mythical sphinx figure. This resemblance was first noted by in 1736, who applied the term "Sphinx" to the larva of what is now known as . formalized the genus Sphinx in 1758 within his , encompassing several early-described species and establishing the foundational nomenclature for the group. Early contributions to the study of Sphingidae came from entomologists such as , who between 1775 and 1807 described numerous species and expanded the genus Sphinx significantly through works like Systema Entomologiae. William Haworth advanced British with his 1802–1803 publication Lepidoptera Britannica, providing detailed descriptions and classifications of native Sphingidae species, including illustrations and life history notes. established the family Sphingidae in 1802, distinguishing it as a distinct based on morphological traits like wing venation and body structure, separating it from broader groupings such as the silk moth family Bombycidae, where some species had previously been lumped due to superficial similarities in robust build. Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, classifications underwent shifts, with Sphingidae often placed within the superfamily Bombycoidea alongside families like and Bombycidae, reflecting evolving understandings of lepidopteran phylogeny based on morphology. A landmark revision occurred in 1903 by Walter Rothschild and Karl Jordan, who produced a comprehensive reorganizing genera and worldwide using . Mid-20th-century works, such as Hodges' 1971 treatment of North American Sphingidae, further refined regional taxonomy. The integration of molecular data revolutionized Sphingidae taxonomy starting in the late . Kawahara et al. (2009) presented a robust phylogeny using sequences from five nuclear genes across 124 , clarifying relationships and supporting the of major clades like Macroglossinae. Subsequent analyses, including Barber and Kawahara (2013) on Sphinginae and ongoing genomic studies, have refined genus-level boundaries and incorporated for identification. By 2025, the Sphingidae Taxonomic Inventory project, led by the Natural History Museum, , continues to update the global classification, integrating phylogenomic data from mitochondrial and nuclear loci to resolve remaining ambiguities in diversification patterns.

Subfamilies and diversity

The family Sphingidae is currently classified into three main subfamilies: Sphinginae (true hawk moths), Macroglossinae (hummingbird hawk moths), and Smerinthinae. These subfamilies encompass a range of tribes that further delineate the group's diversity; for instance, Sphinginae includes tribes such as Acherontiini and Sphingini, while Macroglossinae features tribes like Dilophonotini, Macroglossini, and Philampelini, and Smerinthinae contains Smerinthini, Sphingulini, and Ambulycini. This hierarchical structure reflects ongoing refinements in lepidopteran taxonomy based on morphological and molecular data. As of 2025, Sphingidae comprises approximately 1,600 described species distributed across about 205 genera worldwide, with the majority concentrated in tropical and subtropical regions. The Sphingidae Taxonomic Inventory, maintained by the Natural History Museum, , as of 2025, recognizes approximately 1,600 species and continues to incorporate phylogenomic data for further refinements, including new descriptions from . Estimates suggest additional undiscovered species, particularly in biodiverse tropical areas, potentially increasing the total by hundreds due to the family's high and cryptic diversity in understudied habitats. Prominent genera include Manduca (notable for species like the tobacco hornworm, M. sexta), Sphinx (the type genus of the family), and Agrius (including the widespread A. convolvuli). Recent taxonomic updates in the 2020s, driven by and phylogenetic analyses, have significantly enhanced understanding of Sphingidae diversity, leading to the recognition of numerous cryptic and new descriptions, especially in where regional checklists have incorporated dozens of additions through molecular confirmation. These efforts underscore the role of integrative in resolving boundaries in this cosmopolitan family.

Morphology

Adult features

Adult Sphingidae moths exhibit a robust, streamlined body adapted for high-speed flight, with wingspans generally ranging from 5 to 20 cm across the family. The body is notably thick and often covered in fine hairs or scales, which enhance aerodynamic efficiency and provide insulation during nocturnal activity. This compact, shape contrasts with the more delicate builds of many other lepidopterans, emphasizing their specialization as swift hoverers and long-distance fliers. The wings display characteristic proportions suited to agile locomotion: forewings are long, narrow, and pointed, forming the primary surface for sustained flight, while hindwings are shorter and more rounded, aiding in maneuverability. A defining feature is the elongated , a coiled tubular mouthpart used for feeding, which can extend up to 22 cm in species such as Xanthopan morganii, enabling access to hidden deep within tubular flowers like those of certain orchids. Antennae in adults are typically clavate, gradually thickening toward the distal end to form a club-like structure, though bipectinate forms with feather-like branches occur in some taxa, particularly males. The compound eyes are large and prominent, optimized for low-light vision during crepuscular or nocturnal periods when most species are active. Sexual dimorphism is pronounced in several traits, including antennal size and coloration. Males generally have larger, more elaborate antennae equipped with enhanced sensilla for detecting female sex pheromones over long distances, as observed in species like Manduca sexta. Wing shape also shows subtle differences, with allometric scaling linked to body size variations between sexes. Coloration patterns often serve cryptic functions for camouflage against bark or foliage, though females tend to be darker and more uniformly marked than males in many species, potentially aiding in predator avoidance.

Larval features

The larvae of Sphingidae, commonly referred to as hornworms, possess a cylindrical body form that supports their robust, fast-growing structure, typically reaching lengths of up to 10 cm in mature instars. This shape is accentuated by the presence of five pairs of prolegs and three pairs of thoracic legs, enabling efficient locomotion and feeding on foliage. A defining external feature is the prominent dorsal horn or spine located on the eighth abdominal segment, which functions primarily as a defensive structure to intimidate or startle predators, though it is often reduced or absent in the final instar. In terms of coloration and patterning, Sphingidae larvae are predominantly green or brown, hues that blend with their host plant foliage, often accented by oblique lateral stripes in white, yellow, or black that run along the sides of the body for enhanced . These markings can vary in prominence, with some displaying bold, contrasting patterns to disrupt outlines, while others feature more subdued tones. Defensive adaptations extend to eyespot markings on the or in certain taxa, which mimic the appearance of a larger animal's eyes or head; for instance, like Hemeroplanes triptolemus can inflate anterior segments to exaggerate a false head, deterring avian and predators by simulating a threat. Internally, these larvae exhibit specialized adaptations for their herbivorous lifestyle, including an enlarged digestive tract that constitutes a significant portion of the body volume (approximately 20-35%), facilitating the rapid processing of material to support high growth rates and voracious feeding. This expanded gut, coupled with efficient peristaltic movements, allows individuals to strip leaves quickly, sometimes consuming their body weight in foliage daily during peak instars. While chemical defenses are primarily derived from sequestered plant toxins, some larvae regurgitate oral secretions containing such compounds or other deterrents as a secondary defense, though eversible structures like osmeteria are not characteristic of the family. Variations in larval features occur across Sphingidae subfamilies, reflecting ecological adaptations to specific host plants and habitats. For example, larvae in the Smerinthinae tend to display more cryptic, mottled patterns with reduced striping and horn prominence, aiding concealment on woody or hosts, in contrast to the bolder, more conspicuous forms in Sphinginae or Macroglossinae that rely on aposematic signaling or rapid escape. These differences underscore the family's diversity, with over 1,200 exhibiting tailored morphologies for survival.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic range

The Sphingidae family exhibits a , occurring on all continents except , with species adapted to a wide array of environments from tropical rainforests to arid zones. This broad range is facilitated by their strong migratory capabilities and diverse ecological tolerances, though overall is markedly higher in tropical latitudes than in temperate or polar-adjacent areas. Tropical regions host the greatest diversity, with the supporting an estimated 400 species, many concentrated in biodiverse areas like the where local surveys have documented up to 134 species across multiple genera in southeastern alone. The Indo-Australian realm similarly features high richness, with over 300 species recorded in subregions like and , reflecting the area's extensive tropical forests and island archipelagos. For example, in the Sydney area of eastern Australia, common large green caterpillars observed in suburban gardens belong to the Sphingidae family, such as those of the Privet Hawk Moth (Psilogramma menephron), which are frequently seen feeding on privet hedges. In contrast, the has more than 200 species, predominantly in warmer southern portions, with fewer than 70 in the Western Palaearctic due to challenges in overwintering and cold tolerance in higher latitudes. Temperate zones generally support lower densities, as many species rely on seasonal migrations rather than permanent residency. Key biodiversity hotspots include the and , where environmental stability and host plant abundance sustain large assemblages; for instance, Andean-Amazonian foothills in yield 94 in targeted elevations. Recent observations indicate range expansions northward in , linked to warming, with like the (Macroglossum stellatarum) establishing resident populations in the UK where they were previously only migrants. Similarly, the (Acherontia atropos) has shown increased sightings as far north as in the 2020s, potentially tied to milder winters facilitating longer migrations. Endemism is notable on isolated islands; exemplifies this, hosting around 60 highly endemic that have co-evolved with local flora like baobabs. This pattern underscores the role of geographic isolation in driving within the family.

Environmental preferences

Sphingidae predominantly favor warm and humid environments, with the highest diversity occurring in tropical forests, savannas, and urban gardens where sources and host plants are abundant. These moths thrive in regions with consistent moisture and temperatures above 20°C, enabling year-round activity in equatorial zones, though temperate exhibit seasonal patterns aligned with warmer months. Some have adapted to arid zones through prolonged pupal , allowing them to endure extended dry periods by remaining dormant underground until favorable rains return, a strategy particularly evident in desert-edge populations. Larval stages of Sphingidae are closely tied to host plants located in vegetation, such as shrubs and low canopy layers in forested or semi-wooded areas, where they feed on foliage while remaining concealed from predators. In contrast, adult moths prefer open areas for their high-speed flight and hovering behaviors, often foraging in clearings, edges of woodlands, or expansive fields that facilitate efficient navigation and activities. This dichotomy in habitat use supports their ecological roles, with larvae exploiting sheltered microsites and adults exploiting exposed spaces for mobility. The family occupies a broad altitudinal range from to approximately 3,000 meters, with peaking at mid-elevations in montane due to diverse microclimates. Sphingidae exhibit sensitivity to , which fragments habitats and reduces floral resources; recent assessments indicate that over 20% of North American species, including many Sphingidae, face elevated risk primarily from habitat loss. Microhabitat variations further define preferences: Macroglossinae, often diurnal, favor floral-rich meadows and open grasslands for , while Sphinginae are more associated with woodlands and interiors where their larger size aids in navigating denser vegetation.

Life cycle

Egg and larval stages

Sphingidae eggs are typically spherical or oval, measuring 1 to 2 mm in diameter, and are pale green to yellow when freshly laid, often turning white or translucent as they mature. Females lay eggs singly or in small clusters, usually on the undersides or edges of host plant leaves to avoid and predation. The lasts 3 to 10 days, varying with and ; warmer conditions accelerate hatching to as little as 3–5 days in tropical species, while cooler environments extend it. Upon hatching, Sphingidae larvae emerge as small caterpillars, approximately 1–2 mm long, and undergo five instars characterized by rapid growth through continuous feeding on host plant foliage. Each instar lasts 3 to 7 days, with ecdysis triggered by hormonal changes and increasing body size; total larval development spans 2 to 4 weeks, during which larvae can grow to over 10 cm in length. Growth is exponential, driven by high feeding rates that support biomass accumulation. Over 90% of total larval growth occurs in the final two instars, where consumption rates peak and account for the majority of food intake, often exceeding 80% of the cumulative foliage consumed during the entire larval period. These later stages feature intense defoliation of host plants, with larvae skeletonizing leaves or consuming entire foliage. Defensive behaviors in Sphingidae larvae include rapid dropping from the host on a thread when disturbed by predators or mechanical stimuli, allowing temporary escape and relocation. This response, observed across instars but most pronounced in later ones, is often accompanied by body thrashing and regurgitation of gut contents to deter attackers. In temperate , environmental factors like shortening day lengths and cooling temperatures influence larval development, potentially leading to as mature larvae or prepupae to overwinter, resuming growth in spring.

Pupal and adult stages

Upon completing larval feeding, Sphingidae enter the pupal stage, forming obtect pupae where the appendages are appressed to the body. These pupae are typically naked, lacking a silken cocoon, and are constructed in or , measuring 2–5 in length depending on size. In temperate zones, pupae often enter and overwinter for 6–9 months, remaining dormant through cold periods before development resumes in spring. Adult emergence, or eclosion, occurs when environmental cues signal suitable conditions, often synchronized with the flowering of host plants to align with availability. Post-eclosion, the soft-bodied adult expands its wings by pumping through the veins, a process that hardens the structures within hours; simultaneously, the long uncoils from its initial position and coils into a compact spiral for flight. Adults typically live 10–30 days, dedicating this brief period primarily to feeding and . Voltinism varies geographically, with tropical species producing 1–3 generations per year under favorable conditions, while northern temperate populations are often univoltine, completing one generation annually due to seasonal constraints. This pattern reflects adaptations to , ensuring larval stages coincide with host plant availability.

Behavior

Flight and locomotion

Sphingidae exhibit remarkable flight capabilities, including the ability to hover stationary in mid-air while extracting nectar from flowers, a reminiscent of hummingbirds. This hovering is enabled by exceptionally high wingbeat frequencies, reaching up to 85 Hz in smaller species such as the (Macroglossum stellatarum), which allows for sustained lift generation through rapid flapping of elongated wings. Larger species like the tobacco hornworm moth (Manduca sexta) operate at lower frequencies around 25 Hz, but the family's overall high-frequency wingbeats facilitate agile maneuvers and precise positioning during foraging. Flight speeds in Sphingidae vary by species and context, with typical cruising velocities ranging from 5 to 30 km/h (1.4 to 8.3 m/s) during forward flight, as observed in controlled studies of species like M. sexta. Bursts of speed can exceed 50 km/h in migratory or evasive contexts, particularly in robust species adapted for long-distance travel. Sustained migration flights have been tracked up to approximately 90 km in a single bout for the (), enabling seasonal movements spanning thousands of kilometers between continents. The anatomical basis for these flight traits includes powerful asynchronous thoracic muscles that drive rapid wing oscillations with minimal neural input per cycle, coupled with elongated, high-aspect-ratio wings that optimize lift-to-drag ratios. In genera like Agrius, such as the convolvulus hawk-moth (A. convolvuli), wing morphology is further adapted with enhanced surface area and structural reinforcements to generate superior lift for endurance during transcontinental migrations. Recent biomechanical analyses, including 2023 studies on haemolymph flow and resonant tuning, indicate optimized viscoelastic properties in their flight systems that contribute to energy efficiency during prolonged hovering and forward flight. These adaptations stem from the adult body's streamlined shape and robust musculature, which minimize drag and maximize power output.

Mating behaviors

In Sphingidae, mating is typically initiated by females releasing species-specific sex s, such as bombykal ((10E,12Z)-hexadecadienal) and its analogues, which serve as long-range attractants for males. These volatile compounds, emitted from pheromone glands in the female's , elicit upwind flight in males, guiding them to the source through olfactory detection via specialized antennal receptors. Upon arrival, the major pheromone component primarily triggers attraction and initial behaviors, while minor components modulate the intensity and specificity of the male response, ensuring species isolation. Close-range courtship often involves aerial maneuvers, where males hover near the female and attempt to land, clasping her with their genitalia to initiate copulation. In species like Manduca sexta, males exhibit wing fanning and abdominal curling responses during approach, potentially releasing anti-aphrodisiac pheromones to deter rivals after successful mating. Copulation duration varies but commonly lasts 30–60 minutes, during which the male transfers a spermatophore—a nutrient-rich gelatinous packet containing sperm—into the female's bursa copulatrix via his aedeagus. Sperm from the spermatophore migrates to the female's spermatheca within 30–45 minutes post-copulation, facilitating fertilization. Females often engage in multiple matings, receiving successive that enhance fertility and egg production; for instance, in M. sexta, females mated to fed males, which produce larger , lay significantly more eggs than those mated to unfed males. This allows females to select superior male contributions, with spermatophore size correlating to male nutritional status and flight muscle development. Following , females select for oviposition based on olfactory cues from plant volatiles, integrating innate preferences with learned experiences to identify suitable foliage. favors larger males in competitive contexts, as seen in M. sexta, where bigger individuals achieve higher success through improved flight capabilities for mate location and larger production, conferring indirect benefits to offspring viability.

Ecology

Larval host plants

Larvae of Sphingidae, commonly known as hornworms, feed primarily on foliage from a diverse array of plants, utilizing over 1,100 genera across 132 families worldwide. Prominent host families include , with genera such as and serving as key resources; , including and Ligustrum; and , such as species. For instance, species in the genus Manduca, like the tobacco hornworm (), specialize on plants including () and ( lycopersicum). Diet breadth varies significantly among Sphingidae species, with approximately 47% classified as oligophagous, restricting feeding to 2–5 plant families, while 23% are monophagous (one family) and 30% polyphagous (more than five families). This oligophagous tendency often confines larvae to a single plant family, enhancing adaptation to specific chemical defenses. The tomato hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata), for example, is monophagous, primarily targeting nightshade family members like potato (Solanum tuberosum), tomato, pepper (Capsicum spp.), and eggplant (Solanum melongena). Such specialization influences larval survival and distribution, with polyphagous species like Hyles lineata exploiting at least 10 families for broader ecological flexibility. To counter plant defenses, Sphingidae larvae employ nutritional adaptations, particularly for detoxifying alkaloids prevalent in host plants like those in . Gut enzymes, including inducible monooxygenases in the , facilitate the and sequestration of these compounds, preventing toxicity while allowing nutrient extraction. In , for example, these enzymes rapidly process , with over 98% of ingested alkaloids excreted via within hours of consumption. Agriculturally, Sphingidae larvae pose significant challenges as pests on solanaceous crops, defoliating and plants and causing substantial yield losses. Species like can consume entire leaves, impacting commercial production. Transgenic Bt crops expressing toxins, such as Cry1Ac, effectively target these larvae, with serving as a model for susceptibility studies; however, ongoing monitoring through 2024 indicates emerging low-level resistance in some lepidopteran populations, though Sphingidae remain largely controlled. While less common on (), certain polyphagous species occasionally damage it, underscoring the need for .

Adult feeding and pollination

Adult Sphingidae, commonly known as hawkmoths, primarily feed on nectar from flowers with deep corollas or spurs, where their elongated proboscis allows access to rewards inaccessible to shorter-tongued pollinators. Species such as Manduca sexta exhibit innate preferences for volatiles from Nicotiana flowers (related to petunias), whose tube lengths match the moth's proboscis, optimizing energy gain during foraging. A classic example is the co-evolution between the Madagascar orchid Angraecum sesquipedale, with its 30–35 cm spur, and the hawkmoth Xanthopan morgani praedicta, whose proboscis reaches the nectar at the base; Charles Darwin predicted this mutualism in 1862, noting the orchid's structure implied a long-tongued pollinator. Feeding occurs via hovering flight, during which the moth uncoils its to probe the flower and draws through suction generated by muscular action in the cibarial . This mechanism enables rapid intake, with species like Macroglossum stellatarum achieving rates of up to 50 µl/s for optimal solutions, allowing adults to consume substantial volumes to fuel their high metabolic demands during sustained flight. In , Sphingidae contribute significantly by transferring between flowers while foraging, particularly for plants exhibiting the hawkmoth : pale white or yellow blooms that open nocturnally, emit strong sweet scents at to attract moths, and feature long tubes rich in . These traits ensure precise deposition on the moth's or body, promoting effective cross-pollination in specialized systems. Ecologically, hawkmoths serve as key pollinators in tropical regions, where diverse Sphingidae species support reproduction in numerous plant taxa, including orchids and tubular-flowered families; low abundances can lead to limitation in specialized hawkmoth-dependent species. Recent analyses indicate declining populations in temperate areas like the , potentially disrupting nocturnal networks and exacerbating amid broader insect declines.

Evolutionary aspects

Fossil record

The fossil record of Sphingidae is sparse compared to other lepidopteran families, with no confirmed body fossils predating the era and limited evidence overall. The earliest known traces are pupation chambers from the early Eocene, such as Teisseirei barattinia described from palaeosols in and , with a wall structure tentatively attributed to sphinx moth larval activity, though attribution to Sphingidae remains uncertain. These trace fossils, dating to approximately 50 million years ago, represent potential early evidence of Sphingidae-like behavior and suggest the family may have been present in South American ecosystems during the . A 2023 re-examination of purported Bombycoidea fossils, including those assigned to Sphingidae, concluded that none display unequivocal diagnostic characters for the family, emphasizing the tentative nature of many assignments. Body fossils appear in the Tertiary, primarily from deposits. A notable example is Mioclanis shanwangiana from the Shanwang Basin in Province, , preserved in lacustrine shales and tentatively assigned to Sphingidae based on wing venation patterns resembling modern genera like Sphinx. This specimen, dating to about 15–20 million years ago, highlights early diversification within the family. Additional tentative identifications include three moth specimens from Dominican amber, where wing shapes and scale arrangements suggest affinities with Sphingidae, though diagnostic features like structure are not preserved. Eocene Baltic amber contains over 50 described lepidopteran species, with historical claims of affinities to Sphingidae based on wing traits, though these identifications cannot be confirmed due to lost or inadequately described specimens. Wing venation in Sphingidae fossils shows remarkable evolutionary stasis, with specimens displaying configurations nearly identical to those in living , including the arrangement of radial and medial veins that support high-speed flight. This conservatism suggests minimal morphological change in flight apparatus since at least the mid-Cenozoic, likely due to strong selective pressures for aerodynamic efficiency. The pre-Cenozoic record remains notably sparse, with no verified Sphingidae fossils from the despite abundant preservation in ambers like those from (approximately 100 million years old), which document primitive structures in early glossatan potentially ancestral to sphingids. This gap aligns with molecular phylogenies estimating the family's crown radiation around 40–45 million years ago in the Eocene. Recent paleontological work has filled some voids for , underscoring ongoing challenges in tracing the family's deep origins.

Phylogenetic relationships

Sphingidae belongs to the superfamily Bombycoidea within the order , where it forms a to the family , the wild silk moths. This relationship is supported by phylogenomic analyses using transcriptomic data from multiple genes, which place the divergence between Sphingidae and Saturniidae approximately 60 million years ago during the epoch. The Bombycoidea superfamily as a whole exhibits a crown-group age estimated around 84 million years ago, highlighting the ancient origins of these large-bodied moths. Internally, the phylogeny of Sphingidae is characterized by Macroglossinae as the basal subfamily, with Smerinthinae and Sphinginae forming a derived . A 2022 study utilizing nearly complete mitochondrial genomes from 19 Bombycoidea , including representatives from all major Sphingidae subfamilies, confirmed the of Sphinginae, Smerinthinae, and Macroglossinae, while resolving higher-level relationships within the family at the subfamily level. Earlier molecular analyses based on five nuclear genes further delineated tribe-level structure, supporting the basal position of Macroglossinae and revealing in some traditionally recognized tribes, such as Dilophonotini within Macroglossinae. Recent mitogenomic data have helped stabilize these tribe-level trees by incorporating broader taxon sampling across the family's approximately 1,450 . Key morphological traits have played a significant role in reconstructing Sphingidae phylogeny, particularly the evolution of the and modifications in larval morphology. The in Sphingidae is a highly conserved, elongated siphoning organ adapted for feeding, with its smooth, slender structure and intrinsic musculature enabling efficient liquid uptake; this trait likely evolved early in the family's history as an adaptation for hovering flight and . In larval stages, the characteristic caudal horn—present in most species and giving rise to the common name "hornworms"—serves as an anti-predator defense, but its reduction or loss has occurred independently in certain lineages, such as the genus Pachysphinx in Smerinthinae, providing synapomorphies for delimitation in morphological phylogenies. Controversies in Sphingidae phylogeny have centered on the placement of Dilophonotini, initially recognized as a but shown to be polyphyletic in early molecular studies due to with respect to other Macroglossinae groups. Subsequent analyses, including those incorporating mitogenomic data up to 2022, have resolved Dilophonotini as a valid subtribe within Macroglossinae, supported by shared genitalic features like the double and gnathos, thus clarifying its monophyletic status and integrating it into a more robust family-wide tree.

Human interactions

Economic importance

Sphingidae moths, particularly species in the genus Manduca, represent a significant economic concern as agricultural pests due to larval defoliation of solanaceous crops like tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) and (). The tomato hornworm () and tobacco hornworm () consume large amounts of foliage, potentially reducing yields by up to 1.8% in tobacco fields at economically justifiable treatment thresholds, with nonuniform infestations exacerbating losses. These pests can cause significant economic damage in commercial production, though outbreaks are often sporadic and more problematic in home gardens than large-scale farms. Control of Manduca species typically involves chemical pesticides applied to young larvae, but biological agents such as Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Bt) are preferred in (IPM) to target caterpillars selectively while minimizing harm to beneficial . IPM strategies also incorporate monitoring with pheromone traps, cultural practices like , and conservation of natural enemies such as parasitoid wasps (Cotesia congregata), which can cause over 90% mortality in field conditions. Emerging genetic approaches, including CRISPR/Cas9 editing to enhance host defenses against biotic stresses, show promise for developing disease-resistant varieties. Conversely, adult Sphingidae provide economic benefits as nocturnal pollinators, facilitating fruit set in crops such as squash (Cucurbita spp.) through efficient pollen transfer during hovering flight. Hawkmoths contribute to the broader value of insect pollination services, estimated at $34 billion annually for U.S. agriculture as of 2012, supporting diverse vegetable and fruit production. In urban and home gardening contexts, these dual roles create trade-offs, where enhances yields of flowering crops but larval feeding on host plants like tomatoes necessitates vigilant management to prevent localized damage.

Cultural and conservation significance

Sphingidae, commonly known as hawk moths or sphinx moths, have held symbolic significance in human culture, often representing transformation, mystery, and the supernatural due to their hovering flight and dramatic life cycles. The family's name derives from mythological sphinx, a creature embodying riddles and guardianship, which has influenced artistic depictions since ancient times; the resting posture of Sphingidae larvae, with the head raised, evokes this iconic form, linking the moths to themes of enigma and rebirth in Western art history. Particularly notable is the (Acherontia spp.), whose thoracic skull-like pattern has cemented its role in as an omen of death and misfortune across European traditions, appearing in and superstitions as a harbinger from the underworld, tied to Greek myths of fate and the river . This symbolism extends to modern media, where the features prominently in the film The Silence of the Lambs (1991) as a motif of psychological transformation and dread, drawing on its eerie appearance to underscore themes of metamorphosis and mortality. Conservation efforts for Sphingidae are challenged by habitat loss from , , and , which fragment breeding sites and host plant availability, affecting over 1,400 globally. While the assesses only a limited number of due to data deficiencies, several Sphingidae, such as Euproserpinus wiesti ( sphinx moth), are classified as vulnerable or endangered, highlighting broader risks to as pollinators. In the , certain like Proserpinus proserpina are protected under the (Council Directive 92/43/EEC), which mandates strict conservation measures for habitats supporting these to mitigate declines. Research on Sphingidae remains understudied, particularly in , where approximately 70% of the family's species occur but inventory completeness is low due to sparse sampling efforts, limiting understanding of biodiversity hotspots and threats. Citizen science initiatives, including apps like , have begun addressing migration tracking gaps by crowdsourcing sightings of migratory such as , aiding in mapping long-distance movements and population trends. Sphingidae serve as valuable bioindicators of , with population declines signaling and degradation; their sensitivity to contaminants like pesticides and makes them effective for monitoring integrity in studies across diverse biomes.

References

  1. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/research/projects/sphingidae.html
  2. https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/70912/
  3. https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/ent-0094
  4. https://images.peabody.yale.edu/lepsoc/jls/2000s/2005/2005%284%29212-Duarte.pdf
  5. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide/sphinx-moths-hawk-moths
  6. https://bugguide.net/node/view/193
  7. https://www.thoughtco.com/sphinx-moths-family-sphingidae-1968209
  8. https://www.sphingidae.us/
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sphingidae
  10. https://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/hist.htm
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338748775_Hawkmoths_of_Australia_Identification_Biology_and_Distribution
  12. https://www.gbif.org/species/101951291
  13. https://bioone.org/journals/the-journal-of-the-lepidopterists-society/volume-64/issue-1/lepi.v64i1.a9/The-Hawk-Moths-of-North-America--A-Natural-History/10.18473/lepi.v64i1.a9.full
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2683934/
  15. https://www.sphingidae.myspecies.info/
  16. https://sphingidae-haxaire.com/index.php/general-information/the-family-sphingidae/
  17. https://www.sphingidae.us/macroglossinae.html
  18. https://www.sphingidae.us/smerinthinae.html
  19. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.00027/full
  20. https://recordsofzsi.com/index.php/zsoi/article/view/157648
  21. https://gardeningsolutions.ifas.ufl.edu/design/gardening-with-wildlife/sphingidae-moths/
  22. https://australian.museum/learn/animals/insects/hawk-moths/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6579779/
  24. https://genent.cals.ncsu.edu/insect-identification/order-lepidoptera/family-sphingidae/
  25. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/213/8/1272/10171/Male-moths-bearing-transplanted-female-antennae
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4672217/
  27. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/120617/bitstreams/395785/data.pdf
  28. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/GARDEN/FRUIT/PESTS/spinxmoths.html
  29. https://bygl.osu.edu/node/453
  30. https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/insect-and-related-pests-of-vegetables/pests-of-tomato
  31. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/why-do-butterflies-have-eyespots.html
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223008787
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14682517/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0044523116301048
  35. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005719
  36. https://www.scielo.br/j/zool/a/T8NcgCDyRgpCJxmdMpb5cys/?format=pdf&lang=en
  37. https://zoologia.pensoft.net/article/32938/
  38. http://www.bio-nica.info/biblioteca/Beck2006WallaceLine&Sphingids.pdf
  39. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-005-0306-6
  40. https://australianmuseum.net.au/privet-hawk-moth
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18405103/
  42. https://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/biog.htm
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232693144_Patterns_of_Richness_Composition_and_Distribution_of_Sphingid_Moths_Along_an_Elevational_Gradient_in_the_Andes-Amazon_Region_of_Southeastern_Peru
  44. https://www.eje.cz/pdfs/eje/2007/01/19.pdf
  45. https://observation.org/species/1647/
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2388628
  47. https://www.calacademy.org/learn-explore/specimens-in-focus/darwin%25E2%2580%2599s-hawkmoth
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8595201/
  49. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.1477
  50. https://images.peabody.yale.edu/lepsoc/jls/2000s/2006/2006-60%281%2941-Jump.pdf
  51. https://www.fs.usda.gov/wildflowers/pollinators/pollinator-of-the-month/hawk_moths.shtml
  52. https://nhm.openrepository.com/bitstream/10141/622599/3/Baertschi_etal_msGEBR5.pdf
  53. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2418742122
  54. https://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/species/macroglossum-stellatarum
  55. https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/trees-woods-and-wildlife/animals/moths/pine-hawk-moth/
  56. https://extension.uga.edu/content/dam/extension/programs-and-services/integrated-pest-management/documents/insect-pdfs/hornworm.pdf
  57. https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/projex/gallery/dl/Beneficial_Arthropods_Parasitoids/TEXT/LEP_Tobacco_hornworm_Manduca_sexta.html
  58. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1187
  59. https://hort.extension.wisc.edu/articles/white-lined-sphinx-moth-hyles-lineata/
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250034112_Leaf_consumption_and_duration_of_instars_of_the_cassava_defoliator_Erinnyis_ello_L_1758_Lepidoptera_Sphingidae
  61. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127988
  62. https://faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/entomol/lepidoptera.htm
  63. https://www.uky.edu/Ag/CritterFiles/casefile/insects/butterflies/sphinx/sphinx.htm
  64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2388706
  65. https://pnwmoths.biol.wwu.edu/about-moths/faqs/
  66. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004630758/B9789004630758_s008.pdf
  67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/oik.07119
  68. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/224/10/jeb230920/268389/Hovering-flight-in-hummingbird-hawkmoths
  69. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/200/21/2705/7599/The-mechanics-of-flight-in-the-hawkmoth-Manduca
  70. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/200/21/2723/7598/The-mechanics-of-flight-in-the-hawkmoth-Manduca
  71. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abn1663
  72. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2013.0099
  73. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/211/3/423/18114/Active-control-of-free-flight-manoeuvres-in-a
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10130727/
  75. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2024.0317
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340027493_Sex_Pheromone_Communication_System_in_Hawk_Moths
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC355905/
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347215004327
  79. https://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phen.12361
  80. https://elifesciences.org/articles/77429
  81. https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/60027/
  82. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1206
  83. https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/20/4/19/5893939
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0965174800000242
  85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225908364_Alkaloid_tolerance_in_Manduca_sexta_and_phylogenetically_related_sphingids_Lepidoptera_Sphingidae
  86. https://ejbpc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41938-024-00803-6
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5363726/
  88. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11644
  89. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01250.x
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11593772_Nectar_feeding_by_the_hovering_hawk_moth_Macroglossum_stellatarum_Intake_rate_as_a_function_of_viscosity_and_concentration_of_sucrose_solutions
  91. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12753
  92. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185683
  93. https://peerj.com/articles/16049/
  94. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/10/887
  95. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2021.0677
  96. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-019-1505-1
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10642363/
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9498458/
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9825987/
  100. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00021.x
  101. https://sphingidae.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term/5561
  102. https://academic.oup.com/jee/article/79/3/731/2214668
  103. https://extension.usu.edu/planthealth/research/tomato-tobacco-hornworms
  104. https://gardeningsolutions.ifas.ufl.edu/care/pests-and-diseases/pests/management/tomato-insect-pest-management/
  105. https://tobacco.ces.ncsu.edu/tobacco-pest-management-insects-tobacco-and-tomato-hornworm/
  106. https://lgpress.clemson.edu/publication/tobacco-hornworm-as-a-pest-of-tobacco/
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11360581/
  108. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13355-021-00766-2
  109. https://www.fws.gov/initiative/pollinators/pollinators-benefit-agriculture
  110. https://vegedge.umn.edu/insect-pest-profiles/tomato-hornworm
  111. https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/artistry/2021/04/26/the-sphinx/
  112. https://www.diy.org/article/sphingidae
  113. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26749460
  114. https://butterfly-conservation.org/news-and-blog/meet-the-deaths-head-hawk-moth
  115. https://jgeekstudies.org/2021/09/16/an-eldritch-anecdote-of-deaths-head-hawkmoth-from-the-silence-of-the-lambs/
  116. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/pdf/12908327
  117. https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/references/2326/species
  118. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/ActaEntSlov_27_0051-0057.pdf
  119. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.12039
  120. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367918744_Geographical_and_temporal_distribution_of_hawkmoth_Lepidoptera_Sphingidae_species_in_Africa
  121. https://www.munisentzool.org/yayin/Vol_16/Issue_2/20210520-BX9WJO4X.pdf
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X21004782
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.