Hubbry Logo
IndexationIndexationMain
Open search
Indexation
Community hub
Indexation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Indexation
Indexation
Indexation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Indexation is a technique to adjust income payments by means of a price index, in order to maintain the purchasing power of the public after inflation, while deindexation is the unwinding of indexation. It is often used to make sure regular payments, such as pension payments keep pace with inflation, so that they have the same value in real terms over time.

Overview

[edit]

From a macroeconomics standpoint there are four main categories of indexation:

  1. wage indexation,[1]
  2. financial instruments rate indexation,[2]
  3. tax rate indexation,[3] and
  4. exchange rate indexation.[4]

The first three are indexed to inflation. The last one is typically indexed to a foreign currency, mainly the US dollar. Any of these different types of indexation can be reversed (deindexation).

Applying a cost-of-living escalation COLA clause to a stream of periodic payments protects the real value of those payments and effectively transfers the risk of inflation from the payee to the payor, who must pay more each year to reflect the increases in prices. Thus, inflation indexation is often applied to pension payments, rents and other situations which are not subject to regular re-pricing in the market.

COLA is not CPI, which is an aggregate indicator. Using CPI as a COLA salary adjustment for taxable income fails to recognize that increases are generally taxed at the highest marginal tax rate whereas an individual's rising costs are paid with after-tax dollars - dollars commensurate with an individual's average after-tax level. Indexing tax brackets does not address this fundamental issue but it does effectively eliminate "bracket-creep".

Indexation has been very important in high-inflation environments, and was known as monetary correction "correção monetária" in Brazil from 1964 to 1994. Some countries have cut back significantly in the use of indexation and cost-of-living escalation clauses, first by applying only partial protection for price increases and eventually eliminating such protection altogether when inflation is brought down to single digits.

Protecting one of the parties from the risk of inflation means that the price risk must be shifted to another party. For example, if state pensions are adjusted for inflation, the price risk is passed from the pensioners to the taxpayers.

Wages

[edit]

When a government decides to index wages of government employees to inflation it is to transfer the risk of inflation away from government workers onto the government. Such a policy is to attempt to reduce inflationary expectation and in turn inflation when it is rising rapidly. Research by economists is ambivalent on the success of such policies. Some have deemed it a success including Friedman (1974), Gray (1976), and Fischer (1977). Others have considered it less successful as they observed that indexation breeds inflation inertia (a reduction in the government and the central bank's effort in fighting inflation leading to inflation rate remaining higher than targeted). This perspective is supported by Bonomo and Garcia (1994).

The economists diverging opinions on the merit of indexation often depend on what data they looked at. A given country over a specific time series may have been successful conducting indexation. While another country at another time may have been less successful. Some economists believe there are appropriate times for indexation (when inflation is really high) and times for deindexation (when inflation has moderated after indexation, but remains still too high vs the central bank's inflation target).

In recent years Brazil, Chile, Israel, and Mexico have implemented successful inflation fighting campaigns by implementing the deindexation of wages (Lefort and Schmidt-Hebbel, 2002).

Debt

[edit]

The indexation of government debt to inflation is related to transferring the inflation risk from depositors to the government in an attempt to reduce inflation. Some governments have ultimately subjected their short-term debt instruments to deindexation so their central bank could regain control of short-term interest rates from a monetary policy standpoint and be in a better position to fight inflation. Another objective of indexation, for certain governments with already low inflation rate, is to reduce their borrowing cost by paying lower interest rates to depositors in exchange for assuming inflation risk. Both the UK and the US have issued inflation indexed government bonds to reduce their borrowing costs. When governments such as the UK and the US issue both inflation indexed bonds and regular nominal bonds, it gives them precise information on inflation expectation by observing the difference in yields between the two types of bonds. Robert Shiller has done extensive research on all mentioned aspects of government bond indexation.

Tax rate

[edit]

The indexation of tax rate is to avoid an increase in effective and marginal tax rates due to inflation pushing taxpayers taxable income into higher tax brackets even though their pre tax purchasing power has not changed. Tax codes of various countries can be very complicated. As a result, certain types of taxes may be partially or entirely subject to deindexation even though the main tax rate structure is not. This is the case in the US where the standard tax rate is indexed to inflation. But, its parallel Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) code is not. As a result, a rising share of the taxpayers’ population is anticipated to become liable under the AMT which was originally implemented to tax only the very rich.(On January 2, 2013, President Barack Obama signed the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which indexes to inflation the income thresholds for being subject to the tax.[1]) In Canada, a recent reduction in tax rate was in part countered by a partial deindexation of certain credits (the credits were adjusted upward by the inflation rate – 3%).

Currency

[edit]

The indexation of currency or exchange rate often refers to a country pegging its currency to the US dollar. In other words, such a country's central bank would buy or sell dollars so as to maintain a stable exchange rate with the dollar. Such a policy has been adopted by several Asian countries including China. If not for the mentioned pegging, the currencies of these countries would rise against the dollar as a result of the US chronic current account deficit with such countries. But, the Asian countries have a vested economic interest in keeping US demand for their exports high. That's where the pegging of their currency to the US dollar comes in. Often the pegging conducted by central banks is pretty discrete and not disclosed in any formal policy statement. The pegging also can be pretty elastic. A central bank will maintain an exchange rate within a deemed acceptable range instead of at a specific level. Over time, the acceptable range may broaden or narrow depending on such a country's economy overall reliance on exports to fuel growth. Thus, it is challenging to clearly observe the deindexation of a currency.

See also

[edit]
Look up indexation in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Indexation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Indexation is an economic mechanism that automatically adjusts nominal values—such as wages, brackets, pensions, or social benefits—in proportion to changes in a , typically the (CPI), to preserve real amid . This adjustment links economic variables to empirical measures of shifts, countering the erosion of value without requiring discretionary intervention. In policy applications, indexation has been employed to mitigate "bracket creep" in taxation, where inflation pushes taxpayers into higher brackets without real income gains; the United States implemented federal indexing via the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, effective from 1985, tying brackets and exemptions to CPI changes. Similar mechanisms protect entitlement programs, as seen in U.S. Social Security adjustments since the 1970s, ensuring benefits track to maintain retiree living standards. Wage indexation, prevalent in countries like and historically in during episodes, synchronizes labor compensation with cost-of-living rises, though empirical evidence indicates it can amplify business cycles by delaying relative price adjustments. Proponents argue indexation promotes stability and fairness by embedding causal responses to monetary expansion, reducing the tax's regressive bite on fixed incomes. Critics, however, highlight its potential to entrench expectations: partial or full indexing may foster wage-price spirals, where automatic hikes perpetuate cost-push pressures absent growth, leading to higher volatility—as evidenced by studies on suspending indexation mechanisms yielding employment preservation. In contexts, such as Arizona's indexed policy, it provides fiscal predictability but risks employment displacement if adjustments outpace local economic conditions. Overall, indexation's efficacy hinges on the degree of coverage and the underlying regime, with over-reliance potentially undermining flexibility.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Principles

Indexation fundamentally entails the automatic adjustment of nominal economic variables—such as wages, contract payments, tax thresholds, or asset values—to track changes in a designated , with the objective of preserving their real value against -induced erosion of . This principle rests on the recognition that unchecked diminishes the real worth of fixed nominal amounts, as evidenced by historical episodes where unadjusted s lagged price rises; for example, during the U.S. inflationary surge of the , real median family stagnated despite nominal gains until partial indexing was introduced in social security benefits via the 1972 Social Security Amendments. The mechanism operates through predefined formulas linking adjustments to index variations, typically the (CPI), which measures average price changes for a fixed basket of representing typical household expenditures. Central to indexation is the principle of empirical anchoring to verifiable price data, ensuring adjustments reflect actual economic conditions rather than discretionary negotiations, which can introduce delays or biases. Degrees of indexation vary: full indexation applies a 100% pass-through of index changes, stabilizing real values completely, while partial indexation (e.g., 50-80% coverage in many union contracts) balances protection with flexibility to accommodate gains or fiscal constraints. Frequency and lag structures further refine this, with quarterly or annual reviews common to align with index publication cycles, though retroactive or threshold-based triggers (e.g., adjustments only after exceeds 2%) mitigate over-sensitivity to transient shocks. The causal rationale emphasizes real-value invariance: without indexation, acts as a hidden tax on nominal holdings, disproportionately affecting fixed-income groups, as nominal rigidities amplify output volatility in monetary models. However, the principle acknowledges trade-offs, as pervasive indexation can embed inflationary persistence by insulating agents from price signals, potentially complicating efforts to anchor expectations, a dynamic observed in Brazil's where high indexation degrees sustained wage-price spirals until reforms reduced coverage to under 20%. Selection of the index itself demands fidelity to the adjusted variable's context—CPI for labor contracts versus GDP deflators for broader fiscal links—to avoid substitution biases or sector-specific distortions inherent in Laspeyres-type formulae used in most official indices.

Common Indices Used

The is the most prevalent index employed in indexation mechanisms, particularly for adjusting wages, pensions, and cost-of-living allowances (COLAs) to reflect changes in the cost of goods and services purchased by households. Published by the U.S. , the CPI measures average price changes in a fixed basket of consumer items, with variants such as CPI-U (for urban consumers) and CPI-W (for urban wage earners and clerical workers) tailored to specific applications; for instance, U.S. Social Security benefits are indexed annually to CPI-W increases exceeding a 0% threshold. In private contracts, CPI escalation clauses enable periodic price adjustments using formulas like the ratio of current to base-period index values, ensuring nominal values track without eroding real . Internationally, analogous consumer price indices serve similar roles, though methodologies vary; for example, in the , the underpins indexation in labor agreements and public pensions. The , also from the BLS, tracks wholesale price changes for goods and services at earlier production stages, making it suitable for indexation in commercial contracts involving raw materials, commodities, or supply chains where consumer-level may lag producer costs. Unlike CPI, which focuses on final retail prices, PPI encompasses over 10,000 commodity indices, allowing precise adjustments; for example, contracts for might reference the PPI for primary metals to escalate costs based on input , calculated as (current PPI / base PPI) × contract price. This index is favored in agreements to mitigate risks from volatile upstream prices, as evidenced in U.S. guidelines recommending PPI for non-labor cost pass-throughs. Other indices, such as the , are occasionally used for broader economic indexation in fiscal policies or long-term debt instruments, as it reflects price changes across the entire economy rather than specific baskets, providing a comprehensive measure of domestic ; however, its quarterly revisions and less granular data limit routine application in contracts compared to CPI or PPI. Sector-specific indices, like cost indices or municipal cost indices, apply in targeted indexation for bonds or wages, adjusting for localized cost pressures such as labor or materials in building projects. In inflation-linked bonds, such as U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), principal and interest payments are indexed directly to non-seasonally adjusted CPI-U, with adjustments compounded semi-annually to preserve real yields amid surprises.
IndexPrimary Use in IndexationKey CharacteristicsExample Application
CPIWages, pensions, COLAs, consumer contractsHousehold basket; monthly updates; variants for urban populationsSocial Security adjustments; rental escalations
PPISupply chain contracts, commodity pricingProducer/wholesale levels; industry-specific sub-indicesMaterial cost pass-through in manufacturing agreements
Macro fiscal/debt indexationEconomy-wide; quarterly; includes imports/exportsNational debt servicing in some emerging markets

Historical Development

Origins in Economic Theory

The concept of indexation, involving the adjustment of nominal values such as wages or contracts to an index of to preserve real , first emerged in classical economic thought during the early amid concerns over monetary instability and fluctuating levels. British economists Joseph Lowe and George Poulett proposed linking wages to price indices as a mechanism to counteract the distorting effects of or on labor . Lowe, in his 1823 analysis of British prices and wages, advocated for a "sliding scale" where worker compensation would automatically vary with commodity to maintain equity between employers and employees without relying on discretionary negotiations. extended this in 1833, arguing in parliamentary testimony that wage indexation to a would stabilize class relations by preventing real wage erosion during price rises, drawing on the quantity theory of money's insight that changes drive variations. These proposals reflected a first-principles recognition that nominal rigidities exacerbate economic distortions, though they were largely theoretical and faced practical challenges like index construction accuracy and potential inflationary feedback loops. By the late 19th century, indexation ideas influenced limited practical experiments, such as coal miners' contracts in Britain incorporating price-linked wage adjustments, but theoretical development accelerated in the early 20th century with advancements in index number theory. Irving Fisher, building on earlier work by Simon Newcomb, formalized monetary indexation in his 1920 book Stabilizing the Dollar, proposing to adjust the gold content of the U.S. dollar inversely to a wholesale price index (e.g., reducing gold weight by 1% if prices rose 1%) to achieve price-level stability. Fisher's plan aimed to eliminate the real effects of monetary fluctuations by rendering the currency's value "compensated" against inflation, grounded in his equation distinguishing nominal interest rates from real rates plus expected inflation (i = r + π^e), which highlighted how unindexed systems transfer wealth unpredictably. This extended indexation beyond wages to the monetary base itself, emphasizing causal links between unstable money and economic inefficiency, though Fisher acknowledged risks like lagged index responses amplifying volatility if not managed carefully. These early theoretical origins underscored indexation's role in promoting neutrality in contracts and , countering the biases of fixed nominal values in variable price environments. However, adoption was hindered by debates over index reliability—early indices like those of Jevons or Marshall were aggregates prone to substitution bias—and fears of entrenching expectations, as partial indexation could reduce incentives for monetary restraint. Fisher's advocacy, including proposals for indexed bonds in the , laid groundwork for later applications, but pre-Keynesian theory viewed indexation as a palliative rather than a cure for root monetary causes of price instability.

Adoption During Hyperinflation Episodes

In , during the chronic high of the that escalated to ary levels—reaching monthly rates of approximately 82% by early 1990—widespread formal and informal indexation of wages, rents, obligations, and financial contracts to consumer price indices was adopted to mitigate erosion of real incomes and values. This practice, which intensified after earlier stabilization attempts failed, created strong inflationary inertia by embedding automatic adjustments that perpetuated price acceleration even as underlying monetary expansion slowed. Indexation delayed the onset of full but ultimately contributed to its entrenchment, with nearly all federal bond debt rolled over via indexed overnight loans by decade's end. Israel experienced similar adoption of indexation mechanisms in response to triple-digit annual in the early , peaking at 445% in , where wages, savings deposits, and government bonds were systematically linked to the to protect amid fiscal deficits and currency overhang. Daily monitoring of the CPI became routine, with indexed adjustments fueling a wage-price spiral that economists later identified as a key barrier to stabilization until the 1985 plan enforced de-indexation alongside fiscal and anchoring. In Argentina's recurrent episodes, including the late surge exceeding 3,000% annually, businesses and contracts increasingly incorporated indexation to U.S. dollars or local metrics to reduce transaction volatility and preserve real terms in trade and debt obligations. This adoption, often bypassing formal , reflected private sector efforts to circumvent monetary instability but amplified overall rigidity, as indexed clauses propagated shocks across sectors without addressing root fiscal imbalances. Across these cases, indexation's uptake during provided short-term hedging against but frequently intensified , requiring eventual heterodox reforms to break the cycle.

Expansion in Stable Economies

In the 1970s, amid the Great Inflation period triggered by oil shocks and loose monetary policies, several countries with historically stable price levels—such as the , , and —expanded indexation provisions to mitigate erosion of and benefits during episodes of moderate but persistent averaging 5-10% annually. This shift marked a departure from adjustments, introducing automatic mechanisms in wages, pensions, and taxes to preserve without frequent legislative intervention, though economists later noted risks of embedding inflationary expectations. The implemented automatic cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) for Social Security benefits under the Social Security Amendments of , with the first such increase occurring in 1975 at 8.0%, calculated using the for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). Private-sector wage indexation also grew, as cost-of-living allowance clauses in union contracts covered a rising share of workers, peaking in the mid-1980s before declining with . Tax bracket indexation followed, with partial implementation via the Revenue Act of 1978 and full adoption in 1981 under the Economic Recovery Tax Act, reducing bracket creep from inflation. In Europe, Belgium's longstanding wage indexation framework, rooted in post-World War II collective agreements, expanded in the 1970s to automatically link private-sector wages to the "health index"—a CPI variant excluding volatile items like tobacco and fuel—covering over 90% of employees by decade's end and stabilizing real incomes during inflation spikes to 12.6% in 1975. Italy similarly broadened its scala mobile system in 1975, raising adjustment thresholds and extending CPI-linked escalators to more wage categories, affecting millions of workers amid inflation reaching 20.5% that year, though this amplified wage-price spirals in the absence of strict monetary anchors. Other stable economies, including and the Netherlands, adopted partial indexation in during this era, often limited to 50-80% of price changes to balance worker protection with competitiveness concerns. By the early 1980s, as central banks like the U.S. under prioritized , many systems were scaled back or reformed to prevent perpetuating persistence, highlighting indexation's role as a temporary response rather than a permanent fixture in low-inflation regimes.

Theoretical Mechanisms

Adjustment Formulas and Degrees of Indexation

Adjustment formulas in indexation mechanisms scale nominal values—such as wages, prices, or debt payments—by the proportional change in a reference index, typically a (CPI) or (PPI), to preserve real value against or other economic shifts. The standard mathematical expression is Vadjusted=Voriginal×IcurrentIbaseV_{\text{adjusted}} = V_{\text{original}} \times \frac{I_{\text{current}}}{I_{\text{base}}}, where VoriginalV_{\text{original}} is the initial value, IcurrentI_{\text{current}} is the index level at the adjustment period, and IbaseI_{\text{base}} is the index level at the contract's inception or reference date. This ratio-based approach ensures adjustments reflect cumulative index changes rather than periodic increments, as seen in U.S. federal contract escalations using PPI data from the (BLS). Variations in formulas account for contract-specific lags, caps, or floors to mitigate volatility; for example, some clauses apply geometric means for item-level price ratios in CPI-linked adjustments, computed as It=∏(Pi,t/Pi,0)ωi×100I_t = \prod (P_{i,t}/P_{i,0})^{\omega_i} \times 100, where Pi,tP_{i,t} and Pi,0P_{i,0} are current and base prices for item ii, and ωi\omega_i are expenditure weights. In wage contracts, adjustments may incorporate a lag, such as using the prior year's CPI, to align with fiscal reporting cycles, as implemented in certain cost-of-living allowances (COLAs) under U.S. Social Security provisions since 1975. For debt indexation, like inflation-linked bonds (e.g., U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities issued since 1997), principal adjustments follow daily index ratios rounded to avoid fractional cents, with interest paid on the inflated principal. Degrees of indexation quantify the responsiveness of adjustments to index changes, ranging from none (zero adjustment, preserving ) to full (complete pass-through, coefficient ξ=1\xi = 1), with partial indexation (0<ξ<10 < \xi < 1) applying a to balance stabilization against wage-price spirals. In New Keynesian models with staggered price setting, partial indexation to past —parameterized as γ∈[0,1]\gamma \in [0,1]—influences ; empirical estimates from U.S. data suggest γ≈0.5−0.7\gamma \approx 0.5-0.7 for optimal long-run dynamics under low trend , reducing steady-state distortions compared to full indexation which amplifies during . Partial schemes, as in Israel's 1980s wage protocols adjusting 70-80% of CPI changes, empirically moderated without full escalatory feedback, though they risked embedding expectations if over-reliant on backward-looking indices. Full indexation suits high- environments for real protection but can perpetuate dynamics in stable regimes, per simulations showing heightened volatility under ξ=1\xi = 1 with positive trend above 2%.

Interaction with Monetary Policy

Indexation modifies the transmission mechanism of by increasing the inertia in and price adjustments, which can diminish the impact of changes on real economic activity. In settings with high indexation, monetary tightening faces amplified resistance from automatic escalations tied to past , leading to persistent inflationary pressures that require sustained high real s to overcome. This dynamic raises the short-term costs of , as indexed contracts propagate shocks across sectors, potentially exacerbating output gaps before stabilization occurs. Empirical studies show that economies with prevalent wage indexation experience stronger pass-through from current to medium- and long-term expectations, undermining central banks' credibility in anchoring forecasts near targets like 2%. For example, in the euro area, where only about 10% of wages were indexed as of , this limited prevalence has supported the European Central Bank's ability to manage expectations without deep recessions. In contrast, Israel's experience in the early 1980s illustrates the challenges: extensive indexation of wages, rents, and dollar-linked debts fueled exceeding 400% annually by 1984, rendering conventional monetary tools ineffective until the 1985 stabilization plan combined fiscal cuts, unification, and phased de-indexation to break the cycle and reduce to 20% within a year. Inflation-targeting frameworks correlate with reduced indexation prevalence across countries from 1975 to 2016, facilitating clearer policy signals, though goods market competition emerges as a factor explaining much of this pattern. Theoretical analyses indicate that partial backward-looking indexation steepens the , potentially lowering the output sacrifice ratio for but elevating inflation variance under stochastic shocks; full forward-looking indexation, however, could theoretically insulate real variables from nominal disturbances, though real-world implementations often foster absent credible low-inflation commitments. Central banks thus prioritize environments with minimal indexation to enhance transmission efficacy, as evidenced by post-1980s reforms in high-inflation economies shifting toward flexible nominal contracts.

Applications

Wage and Labor Contracts

Wage indexation provisions in labor contracts link nominal adjustments to fluctuations in a specified , such as the (CPI), to mitigate erosion of during inflationary periods. These mechanisms, often embedded in agreements, typically involve partial or full escalation clauses where wages increase by a fraction of observed , frequently with a lag to incorporate verified price data rather than forecasts. In unionized settings, indexation emerged prominently in North American labor markets during the amid rising , as modeled in empirical analyses of long-term contracts showing that such clauses influence wage paths across inflation regimes. Historically, automatic wage indexation has been adopted in response to sustained price instability, as seen in post-World War II Europe. In , a 1947 trade union agreement established a foundational framework for linking wages to cost-of-living indices, while implemented a comprehensive system post-war that automatically triggers adjustments exceeding predefined thresholds, though recent high episodes, such as in 2022 when rates neared 10%, prompted temporary suspensions of tranches to curb secondary effects. In the United States, indexation clauses proliferated in major union contracts by the late 1970s, covering up to 40% of union workers by 1980, but declined sharply after the early 1980s Volcker disinflation as stabilized below 5% annually. These systems tend to recede during prolonged , reflecting their reactive nature to inflationary pressures rather than inherent labor market efficiency. Theoretically, indexation operates through adjustment formulas like wt=wt−1(1+βπt−k)w_t = w_{t-1} (1 + \beta \pi_{t-k}), where wtw_t is the wage at time tt, β\beta (0 < β ≤ 1) denotes the degree of indexation, π\pi is inflation, and kk captures the lag, often quarterly or semi-annually to align with data releases. Full indexation (β=1) fully offsets price changes, preserving real wages, while partial forms allow some flexibility for productivity gains or firm-specific factors. However, lagged adjustments embed past inflation into current wages, contributing to persistence as workers demand compensation for prior losses, which firms pass through as higher prices, potentially amplifying wage-price spirals. Empirical models confirm this dynamic, demonstrating that indexation clauses heighten the dependence of current inflation on lagged rates, with simulations showing reduced disinflation speed under high β values. Economically, indexation offers stabilizing benefits by shielding workers from unanticipated , maintaining consumption and , particularly in high-inflation contexts where nominal rigidities otherwise erode living standards. Yet, it introduces rigidities that impair labor market adjustment to shocks; for instance, during demand contractions, indexed resist downward real flexibility, elevating as firms cut hours or hiring instead. A 2023 study on Belgium's system found that suspending automatic indexation during inflationary shocks preserved levels, as rigid upward adjustments otherwise exacerbate pressures and hiring hesitancy. Cross-country evidence indicates that economies with pervasive wage indexation, such as those in , exhibit steeper wage Phillips curves, where responds more sharply to gaps, complicating efforts to anchor expectations. In practice, indexation's prevalence varies by institutional context: widespread in centralized bargaining systems like Belgium's, where it covers most private-sector wages, but rarer in decentralized U.S. markets post-1980s, limited to about 10% of contracts by 2000. Policymakers often intervene, as in the ' 2020-2023 agreements tying minimum increases to CPI plus productivity, or U.S. proposals for indexing to average , which aim to reduce volatility but risk embedding trend . Overall, while indexation causally links wage dynamics to price signals, its net effects hinge on the inflation environment—beneficial for one-off shocks but prone to perpetuating disequilibria in persistent high- settings, as evidenced by slower real wage recovery in indexed versus non-indexed contracts during the 1970s U.S. .

Debt Obligations and Bonds

Debt obligations and bonds can incorporate indexation to preserve their real value amid inflation fluctuations, typically by linking principal repayments or interest payments to a (CPI) or similar measure. These instruments, often termed inflation-linked bonds (ILBs) or Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) in the United States, adjust the bond's upward with rising prices, ensuring investors receive compensation beyond nominal returns. Issuers, primarily governments, employ such bonds to borrow at real rates while signaling commitment to , as indexation diminishes the fiscal incentive to generate for erosion. In the U.S., TIPS were first issued on January 15, 1997, with the principal adjusted semiannually based on changes in the non-seasonally adjusted CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). The adjustment formula multiplies the original principal by the ratio of the current CPI to the base CPI at issuance; interest payments, fixed as a percentage of the adjusted principal, are disbursed semiannually. At maturity, investors receive the greater of the inflation-adjusted principal or the original principal, providing a floor. This mechanism has enabled the U.S. Treasury to issue over $500 billion in outstanding TIPS by 2023, facilitating hedging for investors like pension funds while allowing the government to tap real-yield demand. The pioneered modern index-linked gilts, issuing the first tranche—£1 billion nominal of 2% —via on March 27, 1981, amid post-1970s concerns. These bonds link both coupons and principal to the Retail Prices Index (RPI), with adjustments lagged by eight months to reflect realized ; real yields are determined at . By 2021, index-linked gilts comprised about 25% of the gilt market, aiding liability matching for insurers and reducing nominal debt sensitivity to price shocks. Economically, indexed debt obligations mitigate issuer risks from unexpected by stabilizing real repayment burdens, potentially lowering long-term borrowing costs through enhanced confidence. For holders, they offer principal protection but introduce and deflation risks, with empirical data showing TIPS underperforming nominal bonds during low- periods due to lower yields. In emerging markets, such as , shifting toward indexed issuance has diversified funding sources and reduced default probabilities by aligning service with economic conditions. However, widespread adoption may amplify fiscal pressures if indices overestimate , as observed in some historical episodes where real grew faster than anticipated.

Taxation Systems

Indexation in taxation systems adjusts key parameters such as brackets, standard deductions, personal exemptions, and credits for , typically using a like the CPI for Urban Consumers (CPI-U). This mechanism counters "bracket creep," where rising nominal incomes due to push taxpayers into higher brackets without corresponding real economic gain, effectively increasing the real burden. By linking adjustments to metrics, indexation preserves the intended progressivity and neutrality of structures, ensuring that does not erode or act as an implicit hike. In the United States, federal indexation was enacted through the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, with adjustments applying to tax years beginning after December 31, 1984. The computes annual changes based on the percentage increase in the CPI-U from the prior year, rounding to the nearest $5, $50, or $100 as appropriate for brackets and deductions. For tax year 2026, announced on October 9, 2025, the lowest 10% bracket for single filers applies to up to $11,925, while the highest 37% bracket begins at $626,350; these figures reflect a roughly 2.8% adjustment from 2025 levels tied to recent CPI data. Prior to 1985, unindexed brackets led to significant revenue gains for the government during inflationary periods, such as the , when effective tax rates rose mechanically. Many other jurisdictions apply similar indexation to income taxes, though implementation varies. adjusts federal and provincial brackets annually using the previous year's CPI change, as mandated under the Income Tax Act since the 1970s, to maintain real threshold values. historically indexed bases for until 1999, when it shifted to a discount system, but retains limited bracket adjustments. In contrast, some developing economies lack comprehensive indexation, exposing taxpayers to fiscal drag during high , which can amplify inequality by disproportionately affecting middle-income earners. Empirical analyses indicate that indexation reduces relative to non-indexed systems—potentially by 1-2% of GDP over decades in moderate environments—by limiting automatic buoyancy, though it enhances perceived fairness and compliance by aligning taxes with real economic conditions. Critics argue that imperfect inflation measures, such as CPI understating substitution effects or overemphasizing costs, can lead to over-adjustments, further compressing bases. Nonetheless, non-indexed systems risk perpetuating an " tax" that undermines incentives for work and , as nominal growth outpaces real gains but incurs higher marginal rates. Longitudinal from indexed regimes show stabilized effective rates across quintiles, mitigating distortions from monetary policy-induced .

Currency Pegs and Adjustments

In currency peg regimes, indexation mechanisms facilitate systematic adjustments to the nominal to counteract differentials between the domestic and the anchor currency, preserving the real exchange rate's competitiveness. Unlike rigid fixed pegs, which rely on interventions to defend a static rate, indexed adjustments—often implemented via crawling pegs—involve pre-announced, gradual depreciations or appreciations tied to a domestic such as the (CPI). The rate of crawl is typically calibrated to match or lag domestic relative to the foreign anchor, with formulas like et=et−1+πd−πfe_t = e_{t-1} + \pi_d - \pi_f, where ee denotes the , πd\pi_d domestic , and πf\pi_f foreign . This approach extends internal indexation practices (e.g., to wages or contracts) to the external sector, reducing the need for discrete, market-disrupting devaluations. Brazil provides a prominent historical example of indexed currency peg adjustments during its inflationary periods. From February 1968 to 1986, the operated under a system featuring daily "mini-devaluations" calculated as a fraction of lagged CPI , averaging around 15-20% annually in the to offset high domestic rates exceeding 40% in some years. This mechanism was integrated with broader economy-wide indexation of financial assets and contracts, allowing the to maintain export competitiveness without abrupt shocks, though it contributed to persistent expectations. The system was abandoned amid accelerating in the late 1980s, transitioning to the Real Plan in 1994. Other Latin American countries adopted similar indexed crawling pegs during hyperinflation episodes. In , from 1975 to 1979, the crawled at a fixed monthly rate of 1-2%, intended to approximate expected but often underestimating it (actual averaged 50-100% annually), leading to real appreciation and eventual in 1982. implemented a in 1978-1981 under the "tablita" system, with pre-announced deceleration in rates tied to projected , but persistent wage indexation and fiscal deficits caused overvaluation and a . These cases illustrate how indexed adjustments can stabilize short-term trade balances but risk amplifying inflationary inertia if not paired with fiscal discipline. In modern contexts, indexed peg adjustments appear in emerging markets managing capital flows and commodity dependence. For instance, some oil-exporting nations like those in the maintain dollar pegs but incorporate informal inflation-indexed tweaks via interventions, though explicit crawling mechanisms are rare post-2000s due to pressures favoring floating rates. Empirical analysis shows that crawling pegs with full indexation to differentials reduce real misalignment volatility by 20-30% compared to fixed pegs in high- settings, but they demand credible to avoid speculative attacks.

Economic Effects

Stabilizing Benefits

Indexation mechanisms, by automatically adjusting nominal values such as wages, pensions, and payments to indices, preserve real and mitigate the distortive effects of unexpected price changes on economic agents' . This adjustment reduces the variability of real incomes during inflationary episodes, allowing households and firms to maintain stable consumption and patterns without needing frequent renegotiations of contracts. For instance, in wage contracts, indexation enables to respond to actual rather than anticipated , thereby lowering fluctuations in real labor costs and supporting smoother output adjustments to shocks. In theoretical models, full inflation indexation stabilizes intertemporal economic relationships by hedging against shocks, which otherwise erode the real value of savings and fixed obligations, potentially leading to suboptimal intertemporal allocation of resources. This stabilization fosters greater confidence in long-term planning, as agents face less about the erosion of nominal claims over time. Empirical analyses of union contracts, such as those in , show that indexed provisions correlate with industry-specific price responses, helping to align wage adjustments with actual economic conditions and thereby dampening real volatility relative to non-indexed fixed-nominal contracts. Optimal degrees of indexation can further enhance macroeconomic stability depending on the nature of shocks; high indexation levels are beneficial when nominal or demand-side disturbances predominate, as they facilitate quicker real wage equilibration and reduce output volatility compared to rigid nominal wages. Forward-looking indexation schemes, which incorporate expected , have been found to support price stabilization efforts by aligning adjustments prospectively and avoiding persistence from backward-looking mechanisms. In applications, such as indexed pensions, indexation stabilizes replacement rates across cohorts, preventing cohort-specific inequities that could otherwise disrupt aggregate savings and consumption.

Destabilizing Risks

Indexation can exacerbate economic by embedding inflationary expectations into contracts and prices, thereby reducing the flexibility needed to absorb shocks. When wages, rents, or payments are automatically adjusted upward based on past rates, this backward-looking mechanism perpetuates price increases even after the initial inflationary impulse dissipates, leading to greater persistence. In environments with nominal rigidities, such adjustments hinder the downward flexibility of , amplifying the transmission of supply or demand shocks to output volatility rather than allowing . A primary destabilizing channel is the reinforcement of wage-price spirals, where indexed hikes prompt firms to raise prices to maintain margins, which in turn trigger further wage adjustments, creating a self-sustaining feedback loop. Empirical models indicate that full wage indexation to lagged destabilizes output responses to both nominal and real shocks, as agents anticipate ongoing adjustments rather than adapting to new equilibria. Historical evidence from high- episodes supports this: in during the early 1980s, widespread indexation of wages, taxes, and financial assets contributed to accelerating to over 400% annually by 1984, as sectoral price shocks propagated rapidly through the economy, entrenching inertial inflation that resisted conventional monetary tightening. Similarly, Brazil's extensive indexation practices in the 1980s, covering wages, rents, and obligations, fueled cycles, with monthly rates exceeding 80% in early 1990, by automating escalations that outpaced productivity growth and eroded fiscal discipline. Even in moderate-inflation settings, indexation risks amplifying transient shocks into prolonged disequilibria, particularly when combined with unionized labor markets or automatic mechanisms. For instance, Belgium's statutory indexation , which ties adjustments to consumer price indices, has been linked to heightened sensitivity to energy price spikes, potentially intensifying wage-price dynamics during post-pandemic recovery periods. Stabilization efforts in indexed economies often require abrupt policy shocks, such as Israel's 1985 heterodox plan, which froze indexed contracts and imposed -price controls to break the , underscoring how indexation can until forcibly disrupted. These cases illustrate that while partial indexation may mitigate erosion in low-inflation regimes, comprehensive application heightens vulnerability to spirals and policy impotence, demanding vigilant monetary frameworks to counteract embedded escalatory tendencies.

Empirical Studies and Data

Empirical analyses of indexation, particularly and adjustments to lagged , demonstrate that it enhances output stability against nominal shocks but heightens vulnerability to supply-side disturbances. In Gray's (1976) and Fischer's (1977) foundational models, partial indexation optimally balances these effects based on shock variance, with full indexation stabilizing monetary fluctuations while amplifying real shock impacts; empirical calibrations to aggregate output data from economies confirm this , showing reduced variance under nominal shocks but increased volatility under shocks. Cross-country regressions reveal a positive association between indexation prevalence and . Pooled annual data from eleven developed nations (1954–1976) indicate that higher indexation coverage raises inflation's standard deviation by transmitting wage adjustments into price expectations, independent of tightness. Similarly, panel estimates across inflation-targeting adopters show indexation degrees averaging 20-30% lower in such regimes versus non-targeting peers, correlating with halved persistence coefficients in vector autoregressions of CPI deviations. High-indexation episodes in and the underscore causal risks of inertia. In (1974–1985), econometric decompositions attribute 40-60% of acceleration to inertial components from wage indexation clauses, where backward-looking formulas decoupled price growth from fiscal or monetary drivers, sustaining annual rates above 200% despite multiple stabilization attempts. Israel's system, with near-universal wage-price linkages by the early , propagated oil and fiscal shocks into peaking at 445% in 1984, as tests on series reject stationarity under indexed contracts but regain it post-1985 wage controls. Low-indexation environments contrast sharply, with U.S. structural models estimating indexation parameters below 0.1 since the 1990s, yielding half-lives of 4-6 quarters versus 8-12 in indexed simulations; euro area disaggregation further shows persistence metrics 15-25% higher in high-indexation nations like (coverage ~100%) than in (near 0%). These patterns hold in frameworks, where indexation parameters calibrated to micro-price data amplify shock propagation by 20-50% absent forward-looking anchors.

Controversies and Debates

Inflation Persistence and Wage-Price Spirals

Wage indexation, by automatically adjusting nominal wages to past measures such as the (CPI), can embed inflationary momentum into labor costs, contributing to persistence where fails to subside despite stabilizing monetary conditions. In theoretical models, this mechanism operates through a feedback loop: rising prices trigger indexed wage hikes, which elevate production costs and prompt further price increases, potentially forming a wage-price spiral if expectations become unanchored. Stanley Fischer's analysis demonstrates that partial wage indexation amplifies the inflationary impact of monetary shocks, as the degree of indexation (denoted by parameter β) raises both the variance of and the cumulative response, making more costly in terms of output loss. Empirical evidence links high degrees of indexation to prolonged episodes, particularly in economies with backward-looking adjustment clauses. In during the and early , widespread indexation of wages, rents, and financial assets sustained annual rates exceeding 100% by propagating shocks across sectors, requiring a comprehensive de-indexation under the stabilization plan to break the inertia. Similarly, in Latin American economies like and , "inertial" persisted due to corrective mechanisms tying wages and contracts to past price changes, where even moderate money growth triggered spirals until heterodox shocks or reforms severed the links. Critics, however, contend that wage-price spirals are not an independent cause of inflation but a symptom of excessive monetary expansion, with indexation merely exacerbating symptoms rather than originating them; historical data from the U.S. in the 1970s shows correlations between wage growth and prices but causality flowing primarily from money supply to both. Recent studies on advanced economies affirm that automatic indexation heightens spiral risks by reducing nominal wage flexibility, as seen in European countries like Belgium and Italy, where indexation clauses prolonged post-2008 inflation pressures compared to non-indexed peers. Nonetheless, full indexation does not inevitably lead to hyperinflation if monetary policy remains credible, though partial schemes often result in higher sacrifice ratios for reducing inflation by 1 percentage point, estimated at 1-2% of GDP in indexed systems versus lower in flexible ones.

Market Distortions and Efficiency Losses

Indexation introduces market distortions by decoupling nominal adjustments from signals and variations, thereby undermining the of prices in directing resources to their highest-value uses. In economies with widespread or indexation, agents respond less to sector-specific shocks, as aggregate indices mask underlying changes in supply or , leading to persistent misallocation of labor and capital. Theoretical models grounded in New Keynesian frameworks illustrate how such rigidity amplifies the propagation of shocks, increasing the variance of output and beyond what flexible markets would produce. In labor markets, wage indexation particularly fosters efficiency losses through reduced real wage flexibility, which hampers firms' ability to adjust labor costs during downturns or productivity shifts, resulting in higher or suboptimal hiring decisions. Empirical analyses of indexation in cost-of-living crises, such as price surges, show that universal application erodes competitiveness in open economies, elevating output losses while protecting nominal ; targeted indexation to vulnerable groups trades off these gains against induced distortions in wage dispersion and allocation. Model-based evidence further reveals that indexation steepens the , curtailing monetary policy's real effects on labor markets and necessitating greater volatility to achieve reallocation, with suboptimal productivity-linked adjustments exacerbating fluctuations. Historical cases underscore these inefficiencies: Brazil's extensive indexation regime from the to mid-1990s, covering wages, rents, and financial assets, entrenched inflationary persistence by automating price pass-throughs, complicating disinflation efforts and prolonging high episodes despite policy interventions. Similarly, Israel's pre-1985 indexation system fueled inertia in high- periods, as backward-looking adjustments to consumer prices propagated shocks across sectors, elevating the sacrifice ratio for stabilization—defined as output loss per unit of reduction—compared to non-indexed economies. These dynamics highlight how indexation, while mitigating short-term nominal losses, imposes long-run deadweight costs through delayed and heightened macroeconomic instability.

Political Economy Considerations

Indexation influences political incentives by constraining governments' ability to exploit for fiscal gains. In non-indexed systems, erodes the real value of and enables bracket creep in progressive income taxes, where nominal income rises push taxpayers into higher brackets without real income growth, thereby increasing revenues implicitly. Full indexation of tax brackets and obligations eliminates these mechanisms, compelling policymakers to address fiscal shortfalls through explicit measures rather than hidden inflationary transfers, which enhances transparency but reduces short-term political flexibility. This shift diminishes the appeal of inflationary policies as a tool for revenue enhancement or debt monetization, as indexed adjustments preserve real burdens on borrowers and taxpayers. Consequently, governments in indexed economies face stronger incentives for fiscal restraint, as automatic escalators in expenditures—such as for wages or transfers—amplify deficits during inflationary surges, heightening the political costs of loose monetary policy. Empirical observations from partial indexation regimes, like pre-1981 U.S. tax code, indicate that non-indexed elements allowed sustained real revenue gains equivalent to several percentage points of GDP over decades, often without legislative debate. Interest group dynamics further shape indexation outcomes, with labor unions and pension recipients for and benefit adjustments to shield against erosion, potentially entrenching rigidities that complicate efforts. Such provisions can foster expectations of perpetual accommodation, pressuring central banks and raising the unemployment threshold for , as seen in historical cases where high indexation delayed stabilization in during the . Politicians may resist comprehensive indexation to retain leverage over distributional outcomes, favoring selective application that benefits core constituencies while preserving avenues for discretionary fiscal expansion. In turn, incomplete indexation perpetuates debates over equity, as unadjusted elements disproportionately burden fixed-income groups, influencing electoral pressures toward reforms rather than systemic overhauls.

Recent Developments

Post-Pandemic Policy Shifts

Following the surge in global peaking in mid-2022, several countries with established automatic wage indexation mechanisms experienced accelerated labor cost growth, prompting policy interventions to curb potential wage-price spirals. In , where wages are automatically adjusted based on the health index exceeding a 2% threshold, indexation triggered a 3.58% increase in early 2022 and a substantial 11.08% rise in 2023, resulting in cumulative nominal wage growth of about 15% from 2021 to 2023. This mechanism, enshrined in law since and covering most private-sector employees, amplified inflationary pressures by linking pay to lagged price changes, raising concerns over reduced export competitiveness and sustained high averaging 4% in 2022. Policymakers responded by debating reforms, including caps on adjustments or shifts to forward-looking indices, as automatic backward-looking indexation risks embedding higher inflation expectations. In October 2025, the Belgian government imposed a 0% national wage norm for 2025-2026, effectively freezing negotiated increases beyond indexation thresholds to align with competitiveness rules and limit deviation from euro area wage growth. Similar dynamics emerged in other euro area nations with partial or full indexation, such as , , , and , where public wages rose more rapidly in response to compared to non-indexed peers, contributing to divergent unit labor cost pressures. In contrast, countries without broad automatic systems, like and , relied on negotiations or statutory hikes, avoiding the feedback loops observed elsewhere, though this exposed workers to greater real wage erosion during the 2021-2023 episode. On the tax side, high post-pandemic inflation exacerbated bracket creep in jurisdictions lacking full indexation, prompting targeted adjustments to mitigate effective tax hikes. , federal income tax brackets continued annual chained CPI-based indexing, with 2026 thresholds rising by an average 2.7% to reflect recent , preserving the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's structure amid debates over its expiration. States like New York, where brackets remain unindexed, saw proposals in 2025 to introduce inflation linking, estimating that absent adjustments, thresholds would have needed a 15.29% uplift since 2020 to neutralize fiscal drag. Across , non-automatic systems in most countries boosted revenues via inflation-driven shifts into higher brackets, but responses included Germany's temporary hikes to the tax-free allowance—raised by 5.5% in 2023 and further in 2024—to offset erosion, highlighting measures over systemic reform in the absence of automatic mechanisms. These shifts underscore a broader tension: while indexation shields against inflation's erosive effects, rigid forms can hinder , influencing central banks' assessments of persistence risks.

Capital Gains and Tax Reforms

In recent years, proposals to index capital gains taxes for inflation have gained renewed attention amid persistent inflationary pressures, aiming to adjust the cost basis of assets upward by the cumulative inflation rate since acquisition, thereby taxing only real economic gains rather than nominal increases driven by rising prices. This approach would mitigate the effective tax rate distortion caused by inflation, where even non-appreciating assets can generate taxable "gains" solely from price level changes; for instance, analyses indicate that high inflation can elevate the effective capital gains tax rate above the statutory 23.8% maximum when unadjusted. Proponents argue that such indexation would enhance investment incentives by preserving after-tax returns on savings, potentially boosting capital formation and long-term growth without favoring debt over equity financing. A key legislative development occurred on February 28, 2025, when Senator introduced S. 798, the Capital Gains Inflation Relief Act of 2025, which seeks to implement inflation indexing for capital gains calculations, allowing taxpayers to adjust asset bases using metrics like the . This bill reflects broader Republican efforts, including prior urgings from senators to the Treasury Department to leverage existing authority for indexing, emphasizing its potential to unlock investment capital and counteract 's erosion of real wealth. Similarly, former President Donald Trump's 2024 tax platform, influencing 2025 policy discussions, proposed indexing capital gains alongside reducing the top long-term rate to 15%, positioning it as a pro-growth to shield investors from inflationary taxation. These initiatives build on economic analyses showing that without indexation, effectively raises the tax burden on held assets, discouraging sales and locking in capital. Critics, including analyses from left-leaning policy centers, contend that indexing would exacerbate federal revenue shortfalls, estimating costs of $100–200 billion over a decade, thereby intensifying fiscal deficits and necessitating spending cuts or alternative revenue sources. Conservative-leaning think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute have also questioned its net benefits, arguing that while it might marginally increase saving incentives, the macroeconomic impacts—such as higher after-tax returns—would be modest and potentially outweighed by administrative complexities in implementation. Empirical evidence remains limited due to the rarity of sustained indexing regimes; historical U.S. experiments and international precedents, such as Australia's pre-1999 system, suggest reduced lock-in effects but highlight challenges in measuring real gains accurately amid varying inflation volatility. As of October 2025, no major jurisdictions have enacted comprehensive capital gains indexation in response to post-pandemic inflation, though these proposals underscore ongoing debates over tax neutrality in inflationary environments.

References

  1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/indexation.asp
  2. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indexation
  3. https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/economy/articles/business-review/1981/br81sobh.pdf
  4. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/tax-indexing-turns-30/
  5. https://www.britannica.com/money/indexation
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9932419/
  7. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/indexation-inflation-tax
  8. https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/macroeconomics/monetary-system-topic/macro-nominal-v-real-interest-rates/a/indexing-and-its-limitations-cnx
  9. https://csel.asu.edu/research/publications/October-2022-research-note
  10. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9815.pdf
  11. https://openstax.org/books/principles-economics-3e/pages/22-5-indexing-and-its-limitations
  12. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1996/121/article-A001-en.xml
  13. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1975/003/article-A003-en.xml
  14. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/173021468767380963/pdf/multi-page.pdf
  15. https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/escalation.htm
  16. https://www.bls.gov/cpi/overview.htm
  17. https://www.bls.gov/ppi/publications/price-adjustment-guide-for-contracting-parties.htm
  18. https://www.gfoa.org/materials/inflationary-indices-in-budgeting
  19. https://www.pimco.com/us/en/resources/education/understanding-inflation-linked-bonds
  20. https://www.richmondfed.org/~/media/richmondfedorg/publications/research/economic_review/1974/pdf/er600601.pdf
  21. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/books/stabilizing_fisher.pdf
  22. https://www.richmondfed.org/-/media/richmondfedorg/publications/research/economic_quarterly/1993/summer/pdf/patinkin.pdf
  23. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2701&context=cowles-discussion-paper-series
  24. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9818.pdf
  25. http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/papers/1993/93-Hyperinflation&Stabilization.pdf
  26. https://manifold.bfi.uchicago.edu/read/the-case-of-brazil/section/a3fd5ab8-87e5-49aa-b4a9-b4f4b682f359
  27. https://merip.org/1985/10/israels-economic-crisis/
  28. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-rise-and-fall-of-israeli-inflation
  29. https://hbr.org/2022/11/3-lessons-from-hyperinflationary-periods
  30. https://online.ucpress.edu/currenthistory/article/123/850/50/199814/Living-with-Inflation-in-Argentina
  31. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/wp00178.pdf
  32. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great-inflation
  33. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1976/001/article-A008-en.xml
  34. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/colasummary.html
  35. https://www.aarp.org/social-security/cola-history/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0164070418304786
  37. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/mb200805_focus05.en.pdf
  38. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/selected-issues-papers/Issues/2023/03/03/Wage-Indexation-and-International-Competitiveness-in-Belgium-An-Uneasy-Coexistence-Belgium-530512
  39. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/324447/1/1932945288.pdf
  40. https://www.sirion.ai/library/contract-clauses/price-adjustment-clause/
  41. https://www.acquisition.gov/vaar/852.216-71-economic-price-adjustment-contract-prices-based-price-index
  42. https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/cpi/calculation.htm
  43. https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/page-one-economics/2023/01/03/adjusting-for-inflation
  44. https://www.univ-evry.fr/fileadmin/mediatheque/ueve-institutionnel/03_Recherche/laboratoires/Epee/wp/04-06.pdf
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176505002521
  46. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/87113/1/577006916.pdf
  47. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w1108/w1108.pdf
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227349049_The_Long-run_Optimal_Degree_of_Indexation_in_the_New_Keynesian_Model_Models_with_Price_Staggering_a_la_Calvo
  49. https://www.banque-france.fr/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/wage-indexation-prices-and-inflation-expectation-anchoring
  50. https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo_wp867.pdf
  51. https://www.hnb.hr/documents/20182/121009/offenbacher-dollarization-and-indexation.pdf/3364eede-8c43-48c4-9fc0-f70054d963a8
  52. https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/6772/Frenkel_JH96.PDF
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164070418304786
  54. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w1388/w1388.pdf
  55. https://researchrepository.ilo.org/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=41ILO_INST&filePid=13115238370002676&download=true
  56. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-10/near-record-inflation-tests-belgium-s-automatic-wage-indexation
  57. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=386460
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239436468_Wage_Indexation_and_Inflation_Persistence
  59. https://www.uni-europa.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2023/04/22_02_2023_indexation-1.pdf
  60. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R44667/R44667.3.pdf
  61. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9712.pdf
  62. https://www.treasurydirect.gov/kids/basics/basics_tips.htm
  63. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tips.asp
  64. https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2014/201424/201424pap.pdf
  65. https://www.dmo.gov.uk/data/gilt-market/index-linked-gilts/
  66. https://ehs.org.uk/index-linked-gilts-and-the-end-of-rpi/
  67. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11029/c11029.pdf
  68. https://www.frbsf.org/wp-content/uploads/wp2023-04v2.pdf
  69. https://resources.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/04v10n1/0405sack.pdf
  70. https://taxfoundation.org/taxedu/glossary/inflation-indexing/
  71. https://itep.org/indexing-income-taxes-for-inflation-why-it-matters-1/
  72. https://bradfordtaxinstitute.com/Free_Resources/Federal-Income-Tax-Rates.aspx
  73. https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-releases-tax-inflation-adjustments-for-tax-year-2026-including-amendments-from-the-one-big-beautiful-bill
  74. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/IntlEvidenceNoCapitalGainsTaxSec3A.pdf
  75. https://www.bls.gov/pir/journal/gj07.pdf
  76. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/taxes-inflation/
  77. https://www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/er/2003/eng/1203.htm
  78. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/260954
  79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1837356
  80. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00875R001600030172-8.pdf
  81. https://akjournals.com/view/journals/032/52/1/article-p57.pdf
  82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022199605000978
  83. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1992/001/article-A003-en.xml
  84. http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/64340/wageindexationma00fisc.pdf
  85. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2126032
  86. https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/wage-index-union.pdf
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0167223177900057
  88. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9738.pdf
  89. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v68n3/v68n3p1.html
  90. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp672.pdf?8d34e73f1be8360f1c2e86e02440b332
  91. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c9237/c9237.pdf
  92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396712798_Comparative_Analysis_of_Hyperinflation_in_Brazil_and_Israel_Causes_Consequences_and_Stabilisation_Lessons
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176523003671
  94. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09692290.2019.1699146
  95. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/022/0023/004/article-A004-en.xml
  96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3270681
  97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0165176585902538
  98. https://swopec.hhs.se/gunwpe/papers/gunwpe0008.pdf
  99. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/downloadpdf/view/journals/024/1989/003/article-A001-en.pdf
  100. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/economists/sbordone/aerfinal.pdf
  101. https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Workingpapers/PDF/wp0914.pdf
  102. https://www.nber.org/papers/w0670
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304393283900375
  104. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262561631/indexing-inflation-and-economic-policy/
  105. https://www.cato.org/commentary/wage-price-spiral-explanation-inflation-dangerous-myth
  106. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2022/sep/wage-price-dynamics-in-a-high-inflation-environment-the-international-evidence.html
  107. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/WagePriceSpirals.pdf
  108. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5095520
  109. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1989/003/article-A001-en.xml
  110. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/804/
  111. https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/internal/media/dispatcher/214978/full
  112. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114218301100108
  113. https://businessbelgium.be/news/belgian-wage-indexation-reveal/
  114. https://www.brusselstimes.com/1414785/future-government-considers-adjusting-wage-indexation-what-does-this-mean
  115. https://www.nbb.be/doc/ts/publications/nbbreport/2022/en/t1/report2022_tii_h3.pdf
  116. https://econfix.wordpress.com/2024/11/26/wage-indexing-wage-price-spiral-and-the-belgian-economy/
  117. https://www.crowell.com/en/insights/client-alerts/wage-freeze-imposed-in-belgium-for-2025-2026
  118. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/focus/2023/html/ecb.ebbox202305_08~37403a54da.en.html
  119. https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/2026-tax-brackets/
  120. https://manhattan.institute/article/eliminate-the-hidden-inflation-tax-why-new-york-state-should-index-taxes-to-inflation
  121. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/eu/high-inflation-tax-revenue-europe/
  122. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/focus/2022/html/ecb.ebbox202201_08~ac43e1199c.en.html
  123. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45229
  124. https://www.cato.org/blog/inflation-can-increase-capital-gains-tax-rate-infinity
  125. https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/its-time-stop-taxing-inflation-and-start-indexing-capital-gains
  126. https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/legislative-documents/legislative-text/s-798-capital-gains-inflation-relief-act-2025-introduced/7rbnh
  127. https://www.rer.org/republican-senators-urge-treasury-to-index-capital-gains-to-inflation/
  128. https://smartasset.com/taxes/trump-capital-gains-tax
  129. https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-tax/indexing-capital-gains-for-inflation-would-worsen-fiscal-challenges-give
  130. https://www.aei.org/economics/indexing-capital-gains-for-inflation-still-not-worth-it/
  131. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/index-for-inflation-tax-adjustments/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.