Hubbry Logo
Inguinal herniaInguinal herniaMain
Open search
Inguinal hernia
Community hub
Inguinal hernia
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Inguinal hernia
Inguinal hernia
Inguinal hernia
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Inguinal hernia
Diagram of an indirect, scrotal inguinal hernia (median view from the left).
Pronunciation
SpecialtyGeneral surgery
SymptomsPain, bulging in the groin[1]
ComplicationsStrangulation[1]
Usual onset< 1 year old, > 50 years old[2]
Risk factorsFamily history, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, pregnancy, peritoneal dialysis, collagen vascular disease, connective tissue disease, previous open appendectomy[1][2][3]
Diagnostic methodBased on symptoms, medical imaging[1]
TreatmentConservative, surgery[1]
Frequency27% (males), 3% (females)[1]
Deaths59,800 (2015)[4]

An inguinal hernia or groin hernia is a hernia (protrusion) of abdominal cavity contents through the inguinal canal. Symptoms, which may include pain or discomfort, especially with or following coughing, exercise, or bowel movements, are absent in about a third of patients. Symptoms often get worse throughout the day and improve when lying down. A bulging area may occur that becomes larger when bearing down. Inguinal hernias occur more often on the right than the left side. The main concern is strangulation, where the blood supply to part of the intestine is blocked. This usually produces severe pain and tenderness in the area.[1]

Risk factors for the development of a hernia include: smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, pregnancy, peritoneal dialysis, collagen vascular disease, and previous open appendectomy, among others.[1][2] Predisposition to hernias is genetic[5] and they occur more often in certain families.[6][7][8][1] Deleterious mutations causing predisposition to hernias seem to have dominant inheritance (especially for men). It is unclear if inguinal hernias are associated with heavy lifting. Hernias can often be diagnosed based on signs and symptoms. Occasionally, medical imaging is used to confirm the diagnosis or rule out other possible causes.[1]

Groin hernias that do not cause symptoms in males do not need repair. Repair, however, is generally recommended in females due to the higher rate of femoral hernias (also a type of groin hernia), which have more complications. If strangulation occurs, immediate surgery is required. Repair may be done by open surgery or by laparoscopic surgery. Open surgery has the benefit of possibly being done under local anesthesia rather than general anesthesia. Laparoscopic surgery generally has less pain following the procedure.[1][9]

In 2015, inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernias affected about 18.5 million people.[10] About 27% of males and 3% of females develop a groin hernia at some time in their life.[1] Groin hernias occur most often before the age of one and after the age of fifty.[2] Globally, inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernias resulted in 60,000 deaths in 2015 and 55,000 in 1990.[4][11]

Signs and symptoms

[edit]
Frontal view of an inguinal hernia (right).

Hernias usually present as bulges in the groin area that can become more prominent when coughing, straining, or standing up. The bulge commonly disappears on lying down. Mild discomfort can develop over time. The inability to "reduce", or place the bulge back into the abdomen, usually means the hernia is 'incarcerated' which requires emergency surgery.

Another frontal view of such a hernia, this time without pubic hair.

As the hernia progresses, contents of the abdominal cavity, such as the intestines, can descend into the hernia and run the risk of being pinched within the hernia, causing an intestinal obstruction. Significant pain at the hernia site is suggestive of a more severe course, such as incarceration (the hernia cannot be reduced back into the abdomen) and subsequent ischemia and strangulation (when the hernia becomes deprived of blood supply).[12] If the blood supply of the portion of the intestine caught in the hernia is compromised, the hernia is deemed "strangulated" and gut ischemia and gangrene can result, with potentially fatal consequences. The timing of complications is not predictable.

Pathophysiology

[edit]

In males, indirect hernias follow the same route as the descending testes, which migrate from the abdomen into the scrotum during the development of the urinary and reproductive organs. The larger size of their inguinal canal, which transmits the testicle and accommodates the structures of the spermatic cord, might be one reason why men are 25 times more likely to have an inguinal hernia than women. Although several mechanisms, such as the strength of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and shutter mechanisms compensating for raised intra-abdominal pressure, prevent hernia formation in normal individuals, the exact importance of each factor remains under debate. The physiological school of thought thinks that the risk of hernia is due to a physiological difference between patients who develop a hernia and those who do not, namely the presence of aponeurotic extensions from the transversus abdominis aponeurotic arch.[13]

Inguinal hernias mostly contain the omentum or a part of the small intestines, however, some unusual contents may be an appendicitis, diverticulitis, colon cancer, urinary bladder, ovaries, and rarely malignant lesions.[14]

  • Illustration of an inguinal hernia.
    Illustration of an inguinal hernia.
  • Different types of inguinal hernias.
    Different types of inguinal hernias.
  • Inguinal fossae
    Inguinal fossae

Diagnosis

[edit]
An incarcerated inguinal hernia as seen on cross sectional CT scan
A frontal view of an incarcerated inguinal hernia (on the patient's left side) with dilated loops of bowel above.
An inguinal hernia which contains part of the bladder. Bladder cancer is also present.

There are two types of inguinal hernia, direct and indirect, which are defined by their relationship to the inferior epigastric vessels. Direct inguinal hernias occur medial to the inferior epigastric vessels when abdominal contents herniate through a weak spot in the fascia of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal, which is formed by the transversalis fascia. Indirect inguinal hernias occur when abdominal contents protrude through the deep inguinal ring, lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels; this may be caused by failure of embryonic closure of the processus vaginalis.

In the case of the female, the opening of the superficial inguinal ring is smaller than that of the male. As a result, the possibility for hernias through the inguinal canal in males is much greater because they have a larger opening and therefore a much weaker wall through which the intestines may protrude.

Type Description Relationship to inferior epigastric vessels Covered by internal spermatic fascia? Usual onset
Direct inguinal hernia Enters through a weak point in the fascia of the abdominal wall (Hesselbach triangle) Medial No Adult
Indirect inguinal hernia Protrudes through the inguinal ring and is ultimately the result of the processus vaginalis failing to close after the testicle's passage during the embryonic stage Lateral Yes Congenital / Adult

Inguinal hernias, in turn, belong to groin hernias, which also includes femoral hernias. A femoral hernia is not via the inguinal canal, but via the femoral canal, which normally allows passage of the common femoral artery and vein from the pelvis to the leg.

In Amyand's hernia, the content of the hernial sac is the appendix.

Ultrasound image of inguinal hernia. Moving intestines in the inguinal canal with respiration.

In Littre's hernia, the content of the hernial sac contains a Meckel's diverticulum.

Clinical classification of hernia is also important, according to which the hernia is classified into

  1. Reducible hernia: can be pushed back into the abdomen by putting manual pressure on it.
  2. Irreducible/Incarcerated hernia: cannot be pushed back into the abdomen by applying manual pressure.

Irreducible hernias are further classified into

  1. Obstructed hernia: is one in which the lumen of the herniated part of the intestine is obstructed.
  2. Strangulated hernia: is one in which the blood supply of the hernia contents is cut off, thus leading to ischemia. The lumen of the intestine may be patent or not.

Direct inguinal hernia

[edit]

The direct inguinal hernia enters through a weak point in the fascia of the abdominal wall, and its sac is noted to be medial to the inferior epigastric vessels. Direct inguinal hernias may occur in males or females, but males are ten times more likely to get a direct inguinal hernia.[15]

A direct inguinal hernia protrudes through a weakened area in the transversalis fascia near the medial inguinal fossa within an anatomic region known as the inguinal or Hesselbach's triangle, an area defined by the edge of the rectus abdominis muscle, the inguinal ligament and the inferior epigastric artery. These hernias are capable of exiting via the superficial inguinal ring and are unable to extend into the scrotum.

When a patient develops a simultaneous direct and indirect hernia on the same side, it is called a pantaloon hernia or saddlebag hernia because it resembles a pair of pants with the epigastric vessels in the crotch, and the defects can be repaired separately or together. Another term for pantaloon hernia is Romberg's hernia.

Since the abdominal walls weaken with age, direct hernias tend to occur in the middle-aged and elderly. This is in contrast to indirect hernias, which can occur at any age, including the young, since their etiology includes a congenital component where the inguinal canal is left more patent (compared to individuals less susceptible to indirect hernias).[16][17] Additional risk factors include chronic constipation, being overweight or obese, chronic cough, family history and prior episodes of direct inguinal hernias.[15]

Indirect inguinal hernia

[edit]
Ultrasound of an indirect hernia containing fat, with testicle seen at right.
T2 weighted MRI of the same case (done for another purpose), also demonstrating fat content.
Ultrasound showing an indirect inguinal hernia[18]
Incarcerated inguinal hernia[19]

An indirect inguinal hernia results from the failure of embryonic closure of the deep inguinal ring. In the male, it can occur after the testicle has passed through the deep inguinal ring. It is the most common cause of groin hernia. A double indirect inguinal hernia has two sacs.

In the male fetus, the peritoneum gives a coat to the testicle as it passes through this ring, forming a temporary connection called the processus vaginalis. In normal development, the processus is obliterated once the testicle is completely descended. The permanent coat of peritoneum that remains around the testicle is called the tunica vaginalis. The testicle remains connected to its blood vessels and the vas deferens, which make up the spermatic cord and descend through the inguinal canal to the scrotum.

The deep inguinal ring, which is the beginning of the inguinal canal, remains as an opening in the fascia transversalis, which forms the fascial inner wall of the spermatic cord. When the opening is larger than necessary for passage of the spermatic cord, the stage is set for an indirect inguinal hernia. The protrusion of the peritoneum through the internal inguinal ring can be considered an incomplete obliteration of the processus.

In an indirect inguinal hernia, the protrusion passes through the deep inguinal ring and is located lateral to the inferior epigastric artery. Hence, the conjoint tendon is not weakened.

There are three main types

  • Bubonocele: In this case, the hernia is limited to the inguinal canal.
  • Funicular: here, the processus vaginalis is closed at its lower end just above the epididymis. The content of the hernial sac can be felt separately from the testis, which lies below the hernia.
  • Complete (or scrotal): here, the processus vaginalis is patent throughout. The hernial sac is continuous with the tunica vaginalis of the testis. The hernia descends to the bottom of the scrotum, and it is difficult to differentiate the testis from the hernia.

In females, groin hernias are only 4% as common as in males. Indirect inguinal hernia is still the most common groin hernia for females. If a woman has an indirect inguinal hernia, her internal inguinal ring is patent, which is abnormal for females. The protrusion of the peritoneum is not called "processus vaginalis" in women, as this structure is related to the migration of the testicle to the scrotum. It is simply a hernia sac. The eventual destination of the hernia contents for a woman is the labium majus on the same side, and hernias can enlarge one labium dramatically if they are allowed to progress. [citation needed]

Medical imaging

[edit]

A physician may diagnose an inguinal hernia, as well as the type, from medical history and physical examination.[20] For confirmation or in uncertain cases, medical ultrasonography is the first choice of imaging, because it can both detect the hernia and evaluate its changes with for example pressure, standing and Valsalva maneuver.[21]

When assessed by ultrasound or cross sectional imaging with CT or MRI, the major differential in diagnosing indirect inguinal hernias is differentiation from spermatic cord lipomas, as both can contain only fat and extend along the inguinal canal into the scrotum.[22]

On axial CT, lipomas originate inferior or lateral to the cord, and are located inside the cremaster muscle, while inguinal hernias lie anteromedial to the cord and are not intramuscular. Large lipomas may appear nearly indistinguishable as the fat engulfs anatomic boundaries, but they do not change position with coughing or straining.[22]

Differential diagnosis

[edit]

Differential diagnosis of the symptoms of inguinal hernia mainly includes the following potential conditions:[23]

Management

[edit]

Conservative

[edit]

There is currently no medical recommendation about how to manage an inguinal hernia condition in adults, due to the fact that, until the early 2010s,[24][25] elective surgery used to be recommended. The hernia truss (or hernia belt) is intended to contain a reducible inguinal hernia within the abdomen. It is not considered to provide a cure, and if the pads are hard and intrude into the hernia aperture, they may cause scarring and enlargement of the aperture. In addition, most trusses with older designs are unable to effectively contain the hernia at all times, because their pads do not remain permanently in contact with the hernia. The more modern variety of truss is made with non-intrusive flat pads and comes with a guarantee to hold the hernia securely during all activities. They have been described by users as providing greater confidence and comfort when carrying out physically demanding tasks.[citation needed] However, their use is controversial, as data to determine whether they help prevent hernia complications is lacking.[1] A truss also increases the probability of complications, which include strangulation of the hernia, atrophy of the spermatic cord, and atrophy of the fascial margins. This allows the defect to enlarge and makes subsequent repair more difficult.[26] Their popularity is nonetheless likely to increase, as many individuals with small, painless hernias are now delaying hernia surgery due to the risk of post-herniorrhaphy pain syndrome.[27] Elasticated pants[specify] used by athletes may also provide useful support for the smaller hernia.[citation needed]

Surgical

[edit]
Main article: Inguinal hernia surgery
Surgical incision in groin after inguinal hernia operation

Surgical correction of inguinal hernias is called a hernia repair. It is not recommended in minimally symptomatic hernias, for which watchful waiting is advised, due to the risk of post-herniorraphy pain syndrome. Surgery is commonly performed as outpatient surgery. Various surgical strategies may be considered in the planning of inguinal hernia repair. These include the consideration of mesh use (e.g., synthetic or biologic), open repair, use of laparoscopy, type of anesthesia (general or local), appropriateness of bilateral repair, etc. Mesh or non-mesh repairs have both benefits in different areas, but mesh repairs may reduce the rate of hernia reappearance, visceral or neurovascular injuries, length of hospital stay, and time to return to activities of daily living.[28] In emergency surgery, it is currently uncertain if mesh or non-mesh repair works best.[29] Laparoscopy is most commonly used for non-emergency cases; however, a minimally invasive open repair may have a lower incidence of post-operative nausea and mesh associated pain. During surgery conducted under local anaesthesia, the patient will be asked to cough and strain during the procedure to help in demonstrating that the repair is without tension and sound.[30]

Frank Lamb, a black slave born near Halifax, North Carolina in 1789, affected by a major inguinal hernia since the age of 9. He was hospitalized in 1867 and underwent a successful surgery.
(photo: United States Military Medical Archives)
The photograph is blurry as the patient was shaking too much.

Constipation after hernia repair results in strain to evacuate the bowel, causing pain, and fear that the sutures may rupture. Opioid analgesia makes constipation worse. Promoting an easy bowel motion is important post-operatively.

Surgical correction is always recommended for inguinal hernias in children.[31]

Emergency surgery for incarceration and strangulation carries much higher risk than planned, "elective" procedures.[32] However, the risk of incarceration is low, estimated at 0.2% per year.[33] On the other hand, surgery has a risk of inguinodynia (10-12%), and this is why males with minimal symptoms are advised to watchful waiting.[33][34] However, if they experience discomfort while doing physical activities or they routinely avoid them for fear of pain, they should seek surgical evaluation.[35] For female patients, surgery is recommended even for asymptomatic patients.[36]

Epidemiology

[edit]

A direct inguinal hernia is less common (~25–30% of inguinal hernias) and usually occurs in men over 40 years of age.

Men have an 8 times higher incidence of inguinal hernia than women.[37]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Inguinal hernia

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An inguinal hernia is a condition in which abdominal contents, such as a loop of intestine or fatty tissue, protrude through a weakened area in the lower , typically entering the in the region. It represents the most common type of , comprising about 75% of all abdominal hernias, and affects about 27% of men and 3% of women over their lifetime. These hernias can occur at any age but are particularly prevalent in infants, premature babies, and middle-aged to older men, with an estimated 1 million inguinal hernia repairs performed annually . Inguinal hernias are classified into two primary types: indirect and direct. Indirect inguinal hernias, the more common variant, arise from a congenital defect where the fails to close properly after fetal development, allowing abdominal contents to follow the path of the descending in males or enter the in females. Direct inguinal hernias, which occur almost exclusively in men, develop later in life due to progressive weakening of the muscles, often exacerbated by chronic strain. Both types can present on one or both sides of the and may be initially, but they carry risks of complications if untreated. Common causes include congenital weaknesses or acquired factors that increase intra-abdominal pressure, such as heavy lifting, chronic coughing, constipation, obesity, or pregnancy. Risk factors encompass male sex (with a 9:1 to 10:1 predominance), advancing age (peaking between 40 and 59 years or over 75), family history, prematurity in infants, and certain conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or previous abdominal surgery. Symptoms typically involve a visible or palpable bulge in the groin or scrotum that may worsen with standing, straining, or coughing, accompanied by discomfort, a burning or aching sensation, or a feeling of heaviness in the area. In severe cases, complications such as incarceration (where the hernia cannot be pushed back) or strangulation (compromised blood supply to the protruded tissue) can lead to intense pain, nausea, bowel obstruction, or life-threatening tissue death, necessitating emergency intervention. Diagnosis is primarily based on a , often involving maneuvers like standing or coughing to elicit the bulge, with imaging such as or CT scans used if the presentation is unclear or complications are suspected. Treatment for symptomatic inguinal hernias generally involves surgical repair, either through open herniorrhaphy or laparoscopic hernioplasty with reinforcement to strengthen the , as is suitable only for small, asymptomatic cases in low-risk patients. Postoperative recurrence rates range from 0% to 10%, and early surgical intervention is recommended for infants and women to prevent progression. Prevention strategies focus on maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding heavy lifting with proper technique, and managing conditions that cause chronic straining, though congenital cases cannot be prevented.

Background

Definition and Types

An inguinal hernia is the protrusion of abdominal contents, such as intra-abdominal fat or a loop of intestine, through a weakened area in the lower abdominal wall into the inguinal canal. This condition represents the most common form of hernia, accounting for approximately 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. Inguinal hernias are primarily classified into indirect and direct types based on their anatomical path relative to the inferior epigastric vessels. Indirect inguinal hernias develop lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels, entering the inguinal canal through the deep (internal) inguinal ring, and are generally congenital, resulting from a patent processus vaginalis. Direct inguinal hernias emerge medial to the inferior epigastric vessels, protruding through a weakened posterior wall of the inguinal canal (Hesselbach's triangle), and are typically acquired due to progressive tissue attenuation. A rare variant, known as pantaloon hernia, involves simultaneous direct and indirect defects, producing a characteristic dual-sac or saddlebag configuration. These classifications hold , as indirect hernias predominate in younger individuals (especially males) and often manifest as a reducible bulge that may extend into the , whereas direct hernias are more frequent in middle-aged and older men, presenting as a broader, more localized swelling with potentially lower rates of incarceration.

Relevant Anatomy

The is an oblique passage through the lower anterior , measuring approximately 4 cm in length in males and slightly shorter in females, extending superomedially from the deep (internal) inguinal ring to the superficial (external) inguinal ring. This canal serves as a conduit for structures passing between the and the external genitalia or , with its formation resulting from eversion and fusion of layers of the abdominal musculature during embryonic development. The canal's obliquity provides a structural safeguard against intra-abdominal transmission. The boundaries of the inguinal canal are well-defined and contribute to its stability. The anterior wall is formed by the of the external oblique muscle, reinforced laterally by fibers of the internal oblique muscle in its lateral third. The posterior wall consists of the throughout its length, strengthened medially by the . The roof is composed of the arched aponeurotic fibers of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, which converge medially to form the . The floor is created by the , the rolled inferior edge of the external oblique , with medial reinforcement from the . These layered boundaries maintain the canal's integrity under normal physiological conditions. Key components within and around the inguinal canal include the internal and external inguinal rings, which mark its entrances. The internal inguinal ring is an oval defect in the , located midway between the and the , approximately 1.25 cm above the and lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels. The external inguinal ring is a triangular slit in the external oblique , positioned superior and slightly lateral to the , with its margins formed by medial and lateral crura. The inferior epigastric vessels serve as a critical anatomical landmark, ascending along the posterior and lying lateral to the internal ring, thereby distinguishing potential pathways through the region. Hesselbach's triangle, an area of clinical relevance, is bounded inferiorly by the , medially by the lateral border of the , and superolaterally by the inferior epigastric vessels. Gender differences in inguinal canal anatomy arise primarily from reproductive development. In males, the canal is wider and longer to accommodate the descent of the testes, transmitting the , which includes the , gonadal vessels, and nerves. In females, the canal is narrower and shorter, transmitting the round ligament of the along with associated vessels and lymphatics, reflecting the absence of testicular migration. These variations influence the overall dimensions and contents of the canal. Supporting structures include the and the . The , also known as the falx inguinalis, is a fibrous structure formed by the fused aponeuroses of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, inserting onto the pubic crest and pectineal line to reinforce the medial posterior wall of the . The , a branch of the L1 , enters the canal through the internal ring, courses along its length within the or round ligament, and exits via the external ring to provide sensory innervation to the skin of the upper medial , , and either the in males or the in females.

Causes and Risk Factors

Etiology

Inguinal hernias arise from distinct etiological pathways, primarily categorized as congenital or acquired, with underlying tissue weaknesses contributing in both cases. Congenital inguinal hernias, predominantly indirect in type, result from the failure of the embryonic processus vaginalis to close completely after testicular descent, leaving a persistent peritoneal sac that allows abdominal contents to protrude through the internal inguinal ring. This developmental anomaly occurs in approximately 1-5% of full-term infants, with higher rates observed in preterm neonates due to incomplete maturation. Acquired inguinal hernias, often direct, develop later in life due to chronic elevations in intra-abdominal pressure that exceed the tensile strength of the , leading to fascial disruptions at the . Common precipitating activities include heavy lifting, persistent coughing from respiratory conditions, and straining associated with chronic , which repeatedly stress the myopectineal orifice and Hesselbach's triangle. These mechanical forces cause gradual enlargement of pre-existing weaknesses, facilitating herniation without a patent processus vaginalis. Connective tissue abnormalities further predispose individuals to both congenital and acquired forms by compromising the structural integrity of the inguinal region. Deficiencies in collagen synthesis, particularly an imbalance in type I and type III collagen ratios, weaken the and aponeurotic layers, while elevated activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)—enzymes that degrade —accelerates tissue remodeling and breakdown. These molecular disruptions are more pronounced in direct hernias and correlate with aging-related . The distinction between congenital and acquired etiologies was first elucidated in the through anatomical dissections, notably by Dutch physician Petrus Camper, who identified the role of the processus vaginalis in indirect hernias via studies of pediatric and adult cadavers. This foundational work laid the groundwork for later 19th-century contributions, such as those by , who detailed the transversalis fascia's vulnerability in acquired cases.

Predisposing Factors

Predisposing factors for inguinal hernia can be categorized as non-modifiable or modifiable, with the former including inherent biological traits and the latter encompassing lifestyle and environmental influences that heighten susceptibility through increased intra-abdominal pressure or tissue weakening. Non-modifiable factors prominently feature male sex, which confers an 8- to 10-fold higher risk compared to females due to anatomical differences in the and hormonal influences on . Advanced age also plays a key role, as progressive degradation in the reduces tissue strength and elasticity, with studies showing altered metabolism and increased immature types in older patients. Family history indicates a , with first-degree relatives of affected individuals facing elevated risk; this is exemplified by disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, where defective synthesis leads to tissue fragility and higher hernia incidence. Modifiable factors include , which impairs synthesis and promotes , thereby elevating intra-abdominal pressure and tissue breakdown, with evidence linking use to higher hernia development rates. Chronic constipation and associated straining similarly increase risk by generating repeated pressure on the inguinal region, as observed in epidemiological studies associating bowel habit alterations with hernia occurrence. Occupational exposure to heavy manual labor further predisposes individuals, as strenuous activities like lifting impose chronic mechanical stress on the , with systematic reviews confirming elevated risk in professions involving high-effort work, such as . Iatrogenic factors, including prior lower abdominal surgeries, can contribute by disrupting local tissue integrity, though this primarily heightens recurrence risk in subsequent hernia formations.

Pathophysiology

Hernia Formation Mechanisms

The formation of an inguinal hernia arises from biomechanical forces that disrupt the structural integrity of the abdominal wall in the inguinal region. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure, often generated by activities such as the Valsalva maneuver (e.g., coughing, straining, or heavy lifting), applies outward force on the peritoneal lining and underlying fascia, promoting protrusion when local tissue strength is compromised. This process is governed by principles of wall tension, as described by Laplace's law, where the tension (T) in the abdominal wall is given by T=P×rhT = \frac{P \times r}{h}, with P representing intra-abdominal pressure, r the radius of the abdominal cavity, and h the wall thickness; increased pressure or thinned walls thus amplify tension, facilitating bulge formation at sites of weakness. Tissue failure is central to hernia development, primarily involving attenuation or weakening of the , which forms the posterior wall of the and serves as the primary structural support against protrusion. This fascial thinning, often due to chronic mechanical stress or disordered metabolism (e.g., elevated type III and activity), allows the to herniate, forming a sac that may contain omentum, bowel, or preperitoneal fat. In cases of indirect herniation, progressive dilation of the internal inguinal ring further enables abdominal contents to enter the canal, exacerbating the defect. Inguinal hernia development typically progresses through stages beginning with a pre-hernia phase of latent weakness in the , which may be congenital (e.g., incomplete closure of the processus vaginalis) or acquired through aging, repetitive strain, or alterations. This subclinical stage can evolve into overt formation under sustained pressure, often gradually as a sliding hernia where the hernia sac incorporates part of an adjacent organ wall, allowing slow protrusion of contents. Alternatively, acute pressure spikes may precipitate sudden formation, potentially leading directly to an incarcerated hernia where contents become trapped and irreducible due to or adhesions. Gender influences hernia formation mechanisms, with inguinal hernias occurring approximately eight times more frequently in males than females due to anatomical differences in canal contents and dimensions. In females, the —traversing the in place of the —may contribute to weakness at the internal ring, though such cases are less common and typically manifest as indirect hernias from congenital patency rather than fascial attenuation.

Differences Between Types

Indirect inguinal hernias originate lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels and pass through the deep inguinal ring, following the path of the persistent processus vaginalis, a congenital peritoneal extension that accompanies testicular descent during fetal development. In contrast, direct inguinal hernias arise medial to the inferior epigastric vessels and protrude directly through Hesselbach's triangle due to acquired weakness in the posterior , primarily involving attenuation of the . These distinct anatomical pathways contribute to key pathophysiological differences: indirect hernias can extend along the into the in males, often presenting as inguinoscrotal hernias with a piriform shape broad at the base, whereas direct hernias rarely extend beyond the external inguinal ring and maintain a more globular configuration confined to the . In pediatric cases, nearly all indirect inguinal hernias are associated with a processus vaginalis, which fails to obliterate postnatally and allows peritoneal contents to herniate. inguinal hernias, however, are exceedingly rare in children and predominate in older adults, where chronic strain and tissue degeneration play a larger role; data indicate that direct hernias constitute a significant portion of cases in men over 40 years, with inguinal hernia incidence overall rising markedly after age 50 due to age-related weakening. Comparatively, indirect hernias carry a higher of incarceration in children, occurring in up to 12% of cases and approaching 30% in infants under 6 months, owing to the narrow deep ring and active peritoneal dynamics. hernias, linked to vascular factors such as that elevate intra-abdominal pressure through and impaired compliance, exhibit lower incarceration rates but may complicate management due to comorbid conditions in elderly patients. A pantaloon hernia, a variant combining both direct and indirect components on the same side, exhibits a characteristic appearance with separate sacs straddling the inferior epigastric vessels, complicating surgical repair by requiring dual sac and increasing recurrence risk. These type-specific features influence diagnostic , with an impulse felt at the fingertip for indirect hernias and bulging against the side of the examining finger for direct hernias.

Clinical Presentation

Signs and Symptoms

Inguinal hernias often present with a noticeable bulge in the area, which becomes more prominent when the individual is standing, coughing, or straining, and may reduce or disappear when lying down. Patients commonly report a dull ache, burning sensation, or feeling of heaviness or pressure in the , particularly exacerbated by activities such as , lifting, or prolonged standing. This pain may occur suddenly after exercise or straining and can include a "popping" sensation; it is often triggered or worsened by increased abdominal pressure, such as laughing, coughing, or lifting, and typically relieves with rest but recurs with activity. Symptoms may also be prominent during high-pressure exercises like pull-ups. In males, the hernia may extend into the , causing additional discomfort or swelling around the testicles if the protruding tissue descends there. Self-checking for possible signs of an inguinal hernia is not a reliable substitute for professional medical diagnosis, as it can miss small or internal hernias, lead to misinterpretation, and does not detect complications. Authoritative sources strongly recommend consulting a physician if a hernia is suspected, due to the risk of serious complications such as strangulation. A general method described in medical resources for observing potential signs includes these steps:
  1. Stand upright in front of a mirror with good lighting, preferably naked or with underwear removed for clear view of the groin area.
  2. Look for any visible bulge or swelling in the groin (the area between the lower abdomen and upper thigh) or scrotum (in men).
  3. Cough repeatedly or bear down (as if having a bowel movement) to increase abdominal pressure and check if a bulge appears, enlarges, or becomes more noticeable.
  4. Gently place your hand over the groin area to feel for any protrusion or impulse during coughing.
For men, a more specific technique sometimes described involves inserting a finger into the scrotum toward the inguinal canal to feel for a bulge when coughing, though this maneuver is typically performed by physicians during clinical examination and is not recommended for self-performance. If a bulge is detected, or if accompanied by pain, discomfort, nausea, vomiting, or if the bulge becomes painful and irreducible, seek immediate medical attention. Hernias require professional confirmation via physical examination, ultrasound, or other imaging. On , the typically appears as a visible or palpable swelling in the inguinal region, often with a positive cough impulse where the bulge expands during or straining. This swelling is usually reducible, meaning it can be gently pushed back into the . Many inguinal hernias are , with estimates indicating that up to one-third of cases in adults present with minimal or no symptoms and are discovered incidentally, particularly small hernias. In pediatric patients, inguinal hernias frequently manifest as a bulge in the or that becomes evident during crying, coughing, or straining, and may resolve when the child is at rest or sleeping; infants may also exhibit .

Potential Complications

One of the primary complications of an inguinal hernia is incarceration, where the herniated contents become trapped and irreducible, occurring in approximately 10% of cases. This leads to persistent pain, potential , and symptoms such as and due to impaired intestinal function. A more severe progression from incarceration is strangulation, involving vascular compromise and ischemia of the trapped tissue, affecting 5-15% of incarcerated hernias. Symptoms include sudden severe pain, fever, , , and discoloration of the hernia bulge to red, purple, or dark hues, signaling tissue death if untreated. This condition demands emergency surgery, with mortality rates reaching up to 10% in cases of delayed intervention due to risks like bowel . Untreated or mismanaged inguinal hernias can result in chronic effects, including recurrent from ongoing pressure on intestinal segments and in males, particularly with indirect hernias extending into the , with an estimated incidence of 2-3% following incarceration. Rarely, a may develop, involving only partial of the bowel wall in the hernia sac, which can lead to or without full obstruction, complicating diagnosis and increasing the risk of severe outcomes like .

Diagnosis

History and Physical Examination

The diagnosis of an inguinal hernia primarily relies on a thorough patient history and , which are sufficient in most cases to confirm the presence of a . During history taking, clinicians inquire about the duration of any noticed bulge in the area, its reducibility (whether it disappears when lying down), and associated symptoms such as or discomfort that worsens with activities increasing intra-abdominal , like coughing, lifting, or straining. Risk factors are also explored, including prior surgeries, chronic , heavy lifting at work, history, and family predisposition, as these can contribute to hernia development. Red flags for complications, such as sudden severe , , , or obstipation indicating possible incarceration or strangulation, prompt urgent evaluation. The begins with the patient standing to facilitate inspection of the for any visible bulge, particularly during Valsalva maneuvers such as coughing or straining, which may elicit an expansile impulse. In males, bimanual involves gently invaginating the scrotal skin with the examining finger to enter the via the external ring, allowing detection of an impulse at the fingertip for indirect hernias or along the side of the finger for direct hernias. Direct hernias typically present as a globular, expansile mass medial to the , while indirect hernias appear more finger-like or piriform, potentially extending into the lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels. Both inguinal regions should be assessed to identify bilateral involvement, and the exam is repeated in the to evaluate reducibility by gentle manual pressure. Limitations of the physical examination include challenges in obese patients, where excess can obscure bulges or impulses, potentially leading to false-negative results. Even without a palpable defect, an occult may be suspected based on , necessitating further investigation in equivocal cases. In pediatric patients, the examination requires gentle handling to minimize distress, with reliance on parental reports of intermittent swelling and careful during or straining to provoke any hernia sac.

Imaging Techniques

Imaging techniques play a supportive role in diagnosing inguinal , particularly when findings are inconclusive, such as in cases without a palpable bulge or in obese patients. According to guidelines from the American College of Radiology (ACR), imaging is not routinely required for clinically evident hernias but is appropriate for suspected groin hernias, with , computed tomography (CT), and (MRI) rated as usually appropriate modalities. These methods help confirm the presence of a hernia sac, assess contents, and identify complications like incarceration, though they are utilized in only about 10-20% of cases overall. Ultrasound serves as the first-line imaging modality due to its high diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, portability, and lack of . It achieves a sensitivity greater than 90% and specificity of 82-86% for detecting inguinal , making it particularly useful for dynamic evaluation. During the procedure, a high-frequency linear is used to scan the inguinal region in longitudinal and transverse planes, with maneuvers like the Valsalva or coughing to provoke hernia protrusion and visualize sac contents in real-time. This dynamic approach enhances detection of indirect or direct , especially in symptomatic patients without obvious clinical signs, and is recommended when is equivocal. However, performance is operator-dependent, with lower sensitivity (33-86%) for , and it may be less reliable in women due to subtler anatomical landmarks. For more complex scenarios, such as suspected complications, obscuring exam findings, or persistent suspicion after negative , CT or MRI provides detailed anatomical visualization of fascial defects and hernia contents. CT is preferred when bowel involvement or acute complications like strangulation are suspected, offering sensitivity around 80% for hernias, though it involves exposure (typically 5-10 mSv for abdomen-pelvis scans). MRI, performed dynamically with Valsalva, excels in diagnosing hernias with 91% sensitivity and 92% specificity, and positive predictive value of 95%, without risks. It is especially valuable in or recurrent cases, differentiating inguinal from femoral hernias with over 95% accuracy. Both modalities are reserved for atypical presentations due to higher costs and limited availability compared to . A of imaging modalities confirms as the preferred initial choice when clinical assessment is inconclusive, outperforming CT and MRI in for standard inguinal hernia diagnosis, provided adequate operator expertise is available. Limitations across techniques include the need for specialized protocols in dynamic MRI to avoid false negatives in cases, and overall, should complement rather than replace skilled .

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of an inguinal hernia includes various conditions that present with swelling, , or a palpable mass, necessitating careful clinical evaluation to distinguish true hernias from mimics and prevent misdiagnosis. Common mimics encompass hernias of other types, vascular anomalies, musculoskeletal disorders, and infectious or neoplastic processes. Accurate differentiation relies on history, findings such as the presence or absence of a cough impulse and reducibility, and, when needed, imaging modalities like to confirm or rule out alternatives. Femoral hernia is a frequent mimic, particularly in females, where abdominal contents protrude through the femoral canal below the , often presenting as a small, irreducible mass inferolateral to the that may incarcerate more readily than inguinal hernias. In contrast to inguinal hernias, femoral hernias lack a cough impulse above the and are more prevalent in women due to wider pelvic anatomy. Hydrocele, a fluid collection around the testis, appears as a scrotal or inguinal swelling that transilluminates on examination and does not change size with or coughing, unlike the dynamic bulge of a . It is especially common in neonates and infants, where can demonstrate an anechoic fluid-filled sac without peritoneal communication. Inguinal , often due to or , manifests as firm, non-reducible, possibly tender nodes in the that do not exhibit a impulse or reducibility, and may be multiple or associated with systemic symptoms. Ultrasound reveals hypoechoic, rounded structures with potential vascularity, helping differentiate from hernias. Vascular conditions such as present as a "bag of worms" sensation in the due to dilated veins, typically on the left side, without a true bulge or impulse, and may worsen with standing. , a dilated saphenous , appears as a compressible swelling near the saphenofemoral junction, often linked to lower limb , and empties upon lying down. Musculoskeletal issues like sports hernia (athletic pubalgia) cause pain without a visible or palpable bulge, often in athletes with a history of repetitive strain, featuring pain on resisted hip adduction but no Valsalva-related impulse. Other mimics include , a soft, unchanging fatty mass that is non-tender and lacks dynamic features like reducibility or cough impulse. abscess presents as a painful, fluctuant, erythematous swelling with signs of , such as fever, and does not reduce. In males, mimics acute hernia presentations with sudden severe pain and a high-riding, tender testis, but lacks a bulge and requires urgent Doppler to assess blood flow. In females, ovarian pathologies like or cysts can cause cyclic pain or masses, appearing as firm, non-mobile lesions on imaging that vary with the . Neoplastic processes, such as metastatic carcinomas (e.g., from or ), may present as atypical, non-reducible masses initially mistaken for hernias, often with irregular borders and systemic involvement. Diagnostic clues pointing away from inguinal hernia include the absence of a cough impulse, lack of reducibility, , or static nature of the mass on examination. When clinical features are equivocal, provides high sensitivity (>90%) for identifying hernias versus static mimics like lipomas or .

Management

Conservative Approaches

Conservative management of inguinal hernia primarily involves and supportive measures for patients with or minimally symptomatic cases, particularly those at higher surgical risk such as the elderly. This approach aims to avoid unnecessary while monitoring for progression, as most hernias will eventually cause symptoms but carry a low immediate risk of complications like incarceration or strangulation in selected patients. However, watchful waiting is rare and not recommended for symptomatic adults, as surgical repair (herniorrhaphy or hernioplasty) is the standard treatment for symptomatic cases. Watchful waiting is recommended for men with small, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias, especially direct types which have a lower of incarceration compared to indirect hernias. undergo regular clinical monitoring, typically annual physical examinations to assess for symptom development or enlargement, with prompt surgical referral if pain, obstruction, or other changes occur. Evidence from a indicates that delaying repair is safe, with a low complication rate of approximately 0.3% for strangulation over two years in this population. Long-term follow-up from the same cohort shows that while about 70% of patients eventually require due to symptom progression over 7.5 years, the of acute emergencies remains minimal at 1.8 per 1000 patient-years. The progression to symptomatic status necessitating intervention is around 23% within two years, rising to over 50% by four years, underscoring the need for informed patient selection and education on . Supportive measures, such as use, are rarely recommended due to discomfort, irritation, and limited in preventing progression or complications. , which apply external pressure to keep the reduced, lack robust supporting long-term benefits and are considered obsolete by modern guidelines, with below 5% in maintaining control without adverse effects. Instead, lifestyle modifications form the cornerstone of non-operative support, including to reduce intra-abdominal pressure in individuals, adoption of a high-fiber diet to prevent and straining, and avoidance of heavy lifting or activities that increase abdominal strain. These changes can alleviate mild symptoms and lower the risk of , though they do not cure the . Indications for conservative approaches are limited to low-risk cases, such as minimally symptomatic direct hernias in patients with comorbidities precluding surgery, while contraindications include any evidence of incarceration risk, such as large indirect hernias or symptoms suggesting obstruction. The European Hernia Society guidelines endorse watchful waiting as a level 4 recommendation for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias, emphasizing shared decision-making based on patient preferences and overall health.

Surgical Interventions

Surgical interventions represent the definitive treatment for inguinal hernias, particularly in symptomatic or complicated cases, aiming to reduce the sac and reinforce the to prevent recurrence. Open and laparoscopic approaches are the primary methods, with reinforcement widely recommended to achieve low recurrence rates. Robotic-assisted repair is an emerging minimally invasive option, typically using a robotic system for enhanced precision in dissecting the preperitoneal and placing , similar to laparoscopic techniques; it shows comparable short-term outcomes but involves higher costs and a longer . The choice of technique depends on hernia characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon expertise, guided by international consensus such as the HerniaSurge guidelines. Open repair involves an incision in the to access the defect, allowing direct visualization and repair of the inguinal floor. The Lichtenstein tension-free technique, using synthetic to cover the defect, is considered the gold standard for primary inguinal hernias due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and low recurrence rate of less than 2% in experienced hands. In this procedure, the is secured to the and , distributing tension evenly without suturing the tissue under strain. For non-mesh options, the Bassini repair sutures the to the to reconstruct the posterior wall, while the Shouldice technique employs a four-layer imbrication of the and , offering the best outcomes among tissue-based repairs with recurrence rates of 1-3% at long-term follow-up when performed by specialists. These non-mesh methods are reserved for cases where is contraindicated, such as infections, though they carry higher recurrence risks of up to 10-15% compared to mesh repairs. Laparoscopic repair provides a minimally invasive alternative, particularly advantageous for bilateral or recurrent hernias, by enabling shorter recovery times and reduced postoperative pain. The totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach accesses the preperitoneal space without entering the , placing a synthetic to cover the defect, while the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique enters the first before dissecting the preperitoneal plane. Both methods use fixation, with heavyweight preferred for large defects to minimize recurrence rates of 1-2%, comparable to open techniques but with lower surgical site rates. Laparoscopic repairs are recommended for primary unilateral hernias by guidelines, offering benefits in younger, active patients despite a steeper requiring 50-100 procedures for proficiency. Anesthesia selection influences the procedure type and patient outcomes. with sedation is commonly used for open repairs, facilitating outpatient procedures and reducing risks like compared to general . In contrast, general is standard for laparoscopic techniques due to the need for and patient positioning. Regional anesthesia, such as spinal, may be employed for either approach but is avoided in elderly patients to minimize complications. In pediatric cases, surgical intervention typically involves high ligation of the hernia sac at the internal ring through an open inguinal approach, addressing the patent processus vaginalis without routine use, achieving recurrence rates under 1% in adolescents. For emergencies involving strangulated , urgent surgery is required; open or laparoscopic repair with is feasible if is absent, but bowel resection may be necessary if ischemia or is present, with recurrence rates of 2-5%.

Postoperative Considerations

Following inguinal hernia repair, patients typically experience immediate postoperative recovery focused on pain control and gradual resumption of activities. often involves nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen or acetaminophen for the first 1-2 weeks, alongside prescribed analgesics if needed, and application of cold compresses to reduce swelling and discomfort. Activity restrictions are essential to promote healing, including avoidance of heavy lifting exceeding 10 pounds (4.5 kg) for 4-6 weeks and limitation of strenuous exercise. For laparoscopic repairs, patients may return to work within 1-2 weeks, compared to 4 weeks or more for open procedures, allowing for faster overall . Potential postoperative complications require vigilant monitoring, though most are uncommon. Surgical site infections occur in approximately 0.4-2% of cases, often managed with antibiotics if superficial. , including affecting the or , develops in 10-15% of patients and may persist beyond 3 months, potentially impacting . Recurrence rates are low with , ranging from 1-5%, with most occurring within the first year. Follow-up care involves clinical review at 1-4 weeks postoperatively to assess and symptoms, with ongoing monitoring as needed for issues like mesh migration, a rare but possible long-term concern. Patients should report persistent pain, fever, or swelling promptly to mitigate risks. Long-term outcomes are generally favorable, with success rates exceeding 95% for both open and laparoscopic approaches, reflecting low recurrence and high patient satisfaction. Laparoscopic techniques reduce the incidence of by up to 50% compared to open repair, attributed to less tissue trauma.

Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Inguinal hernia represents a significant burden, with a lifetime of approximately 27% in males and 3% in females. The annual incidence among adults is estimated at 1 to 2 per 1,000 population. In pediatric populations, the incidence ranges from 1% to 5% in full-term infants under 1 year of age, rising substantially to 20% to 30% in preterm infants, with the vast majority classified as indirect inguinal hernias. Global trends indicate an increasing burden of inguinal hernia, driven by aging populations and rising incident cases, as documented in the , which reported 32.53 million prevalent cases worldwide in 2019 alone, up from prior decades. during the 2020s, approximately 800,000 inguinal hernia repairs are performed annually, reflecting a decline from historical peaks due to greater adoption of and conservative management for cases. Geographic variations highlight higher prevalence in developing countries compared to high-income regions, with studies in reporting rates up to twice those in Western populations, largely attributable to occupational factors such as manual labor.

Demographic Patterns

Inguinal hernias exhibit a bimodal age distribution, with one peak occurring in infancy and due to congenital factors and another in adulthood beyond 50 years associated with acquired weaknesses in the . Among children, the condition affects approximately 5% of full-term infants and up to 30% of preterm infants, predominantly boys. In adults, the incidence rises steadily with age, peaking between 70 and 79 years, reflecting cumulative effects of aging on tissue integrity. The majority of inguinal hernia repairs in men take place after the age of 40, as direct hernias—often linked to age-related weakening—become more prevalent in this group. This adult peak accounts for the bulk of surgical interventions, underscoring the role of degenerative changes in older males. Sex differences are pronounced in inguinal hernia occurrence, with males comprising about 90% of cases and undergoing the vast majority of repairs. Lifetime risk is estimated at 20-27% for men compared to 3-6% for women, largely due to anatomical features like the formed during testicular descent. In females, while inguinal hernias are less common, there is greater overlap with femoral hernias, which predominate in women and may complicate or . Ethnic variations influence inguinal hernia incidence, with higher rates reported among Caucasians relative to other groups. Non-Hispanic whites in the United States show elevated repair rates compared to , Hispanics, and Asians, potentially driven by ancestry-specific genetic factors identified in genome-wide association studies. African American men, in particular, exhibit lower lifetime incidence, highlighting population-level disparities. Similarly, Asians experience reduced rates, consistent with observed differences in repair incidence across ethnic strata. Socioeconomic status significantly affects both repair rates and untreated prevalence of inguinal hernias. Higher-income groups demonstrate greater access to elective surgical interventions, leading to elevated repair rates, whereas lower correlates with delayed care and increased risk of complications. In low-resource settings, untreated hernias are markedly more prevalent; for instance, studies in link lower socioeconomic position to higher rates of undiagnosed or unmanaged cases. Globally, low- and middle-income countries bear a heavy burden, with prevalence estimates reaching 8.6% among men in regions like and significant unmet surgical needs in areas such as and .

References

  1. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/16266-inguinal-hernia
  2. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2013/0615/p844.html
  3. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/inguinal-hernia
  4. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/hernias/inguinal-hernia
  5. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2023/march-2023-volume-108-issue-3/new-approaches-trends-are-emerging-in-hernia-repair/
  6. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/inguinal-hernia/symptoms-causes/syc-20351547
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2223000/
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459309/
  9. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/gastrointestinal-disorders/acute-abdomen-and-surgical-gastroenterology/inguinal-hernia
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470204/
  11. https://anatomy.elpaso.ttuhsc.edu/gastrointestinal_system/inguinal_lecture.html
  12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542321/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355124/
  14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549772/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11725168/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2819962/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5614933/
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19350324/
  19. https://www.uthsc.edu/surgery/education-training/documents/maish-inguinal-hernias.pdf
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10499061/
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19122458/
  22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17263984/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9225924/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014046/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12571447/
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10561684/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7520410/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10469297/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2276402/
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666138120300025
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK423/
  32. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1534281-overview
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12295799/
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4924119/
  35. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2020/1015/p487.html
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8411781/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2572665/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8389546/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11164662/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1602168/
  41. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/4337-inguinal-hernia-treatment-for-children
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9136348/
  43. https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12911-024-02440-3
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4907908/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522920/
  46. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537227/
  47. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/inguinal-hernia/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351553
  48. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3158169/Narrative/
  49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32328842/
  50. https://teachmesurgery.com/general/small-bowel/inguinal-hernia/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9262670/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936419/
  53. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/202212
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24022443/
  55. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10029-013-1191-7
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719730/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10588975/
  58. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/robotic-groin-hernia-repair
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11818799/
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5981671/
  61. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000274.htm
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9200870/
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4291946/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10035649/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5901827/
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12183091/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9160137/
  68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32991195/
  69. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/abdominal/Pages/Inguinal-Hernia.aspx
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389329/
  71. https://www.cureus.com/articles/102014-evaluation-of-regional-geospatial-clusters-in-inguinal-hernia-repair.pdf
  72. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1007/s00268-015-3335-7
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6291872/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10700424/
  75. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23342139/
  76. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31482863/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10132853/
  78. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09581596.2024.2351981
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025003435
  80. https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/31/13/2279/6501135
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11296966/
  82. https://divisionofresearch.kaiserpermanente.org/genetics-hernia/
  83. https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003861
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919114010188
  85. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/tropical-diseases/articles/10.3389/fitd.2024.1357802/full
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.