Hubbry Logo
InformantInformantMain
Open search
Informant
Community hub
Informant
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Informant
Informant
Informant
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A representative from the U.S. State Department congratulates and offers a partial payment to a fully disguised informant whose information led to the neutralization of a terrorist in the Philippines
Two-page totally confidential, direct and immediate letter from the Iranian Minister of Finance to the Minister of Foreign Affairs (Hossein Fatemi) about creating a foreign information network for controlling smuggling, 15 December 1952
Look up informant  or stool pigeon in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

An informant (also called an informer or, as a slang term, a "snitch", "rat", "canary", "stool pigeon", "stoolie", "tout" or "grass", among other terms)[1] is a person who provides privileged information, or (usually damaging) information intended to be intimate, concealed, or secret, about a person or organization to an agency, often a government or law enforcement agency. The term is usually used within the law-enforcement world, where informants are officially known as confidential human sources (CHS), or criminal informants (CI). It can also refer pejoratively to someone who supplies information without the consent of the involved parties.[2] The term is commonly used in politics, industry, entertainment, and academia.[3][4]

In the United States, a confidential informant or "CI" is "any individual who provides useful and credible information to a law enforcement agency regarding felonious criminal activities and from whom the agency expects or intends to obtain additional useful and credible information regarding such activities in the future".[5]

Criminal informants

[edit]

Informants are extremely common in every-day police work, including homicide and narcotics investigations. Any citizen who provides crime-related information to law enforcement by definition is an informant.[6]

Law enforcement and intelligence agencies may face criticism regarding their conduct towards informants. Informants may be shown leniency for their own crimes in exchange for information, or simply turn out to be dishonest in their information, resulting in the time and money spent acquiring them being wasted.

Informants are often regarded as traitors by their former criminal associates. Whatever the nature of a group, it is likely to feel strong hostility toward any known informers, regard them as threats and inflict punishments ranging from social ostracism through physical abuse and/or death. Informers are therefore generally protected, either by being segregated while in prison or, if they are not incarcerated, relocated under a new identity.

Informant motivation

[edit]
FBI Anchorage aid for assessing confidential human sources

Informants, and especially criminal informants, can be motivated by many reasons. Many informants are not themselves aware of all of their reasons for providing information, but nonetheless do so. Many informants provide information while under stress, duress, emotion and other life factors that can affect the accuracy or veracity of information provided.

Law enforcement officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, judges and others should be aware of possible motivations so that they can properly approach, assess and verify informants' information.

Generally, informants' motivations can be broken down into self-interest, self-preservation and conscience.

A list of possible motivations includes:

  • Self-Interest:
    • Financial reward.[7]
    • Pre-trial release from custody.
    • Withdrawal or dismissal of criminal charges.
    • Reduction of sentence.
    • Choice of location to serve sentence.
    • Elimination of rivals or unwanted criminal associates.
    • Elimination of competitors engaged in criminal activities.
    • Diversion of suspicion from their own criminal activities.
    • Revenge.[7]
    • Desire to become a spy.
  • Self-Preservation:
    • Fear of harm from others.
    • Threat of arrest or charges.
    • Threat of incarceration.
    • Desire for witness protection program.
  • Conscience:
    • Desire to leave criminal past.
    • Guilty conscience.
    • Redemption.
    • Mutual respect.
    • Genuine desire to assist law enforcement and society.[8]

Labor and social movements

[edit]

Corporations and the detective agencies that sometimes represent them have historically hired labor spies to monitor or control labor organizations and their activities.[9] Such individuals may be professionals or recruits from the workforce. They may be willing accomplices, or may be tricked into informing on their co-workers' unionization efforts.[10]

Paid informants have often been used by authorities within politically and socially oriented movements to weaken, destabilize and ultimately break them.[11]

Politics

[edit]
A redacted version of the FBI policy manual concerning the use of informants

Informers alert authorities regarding government officials that are corrupt. Officials may be taking bribes or be participants in a money loop also called a kickback. Informers in some countries receive a percentage of all money recovered by their government.[citation needed]

The ancient Roman historian Lactantius described a judiciary case which involved the prosecution of a woman suspected to have advised another woman not to marry Maximinus II: "Neither indeed was there any accuser, until a certain Jew, one charged with other offences, was induced, through hope of pardon, to give false evidence against the innocent. The equitable and vigilant magistrate conducted him out of the city under a guard, lest the populace should have stoned him... The Jew was ordered to the torture till he should speak as he had been instructed... The innocent were condemned to die.... Nor was the promise of pardon made good to the feigned adulterer, for he was fixed to a gibbet, and then he disclosed the whole secret contrivance; and with his last breath he protested to all the beholders that the women died innocent."[12]

Criminal informant schemes have been used as cover for politically motivated intelligence offensives.[13]

Jailhouse informants

[edit]

Jailhouse informants, who report hearsay (admissions against penal interest) which they claim to have heard while the accused is in pretrial detention, usually in exchange for sentence reductions or other inducements, have been the focus of particular controversy.[14] Some examples of their use are in connection with Stanley Williams,[15] Cameron Todd Willingham,[16] Thomas Silverstein,[17] Marshall "Eddie" Conway,[18] Temujin Kensu[19] and a suspect in the disappearance of Etan Patz.[20] The Innocence Project has stated that 15% of all wrongful convictions later exonerated because of DNA results were accompanied by false testimony by jailhouse informants. 50% of murder convictions exonerated by DNA were accompanied by false testimony by jailhouse informants.[21]

Terminology and slang

[edit]
"Narc (Narcotics)" redirects here. For another usage of the phrase "narc", see Drug addict.

Slang terms for informants include:

The term "stool pigeon" originates from the antiquated practice of tying a passenger pigeon to a stool. The bird would flap its wings in a futile attempt to escape. The sound of the wings flapping would attract other pigeons to the stool where a large number of birds could be easily killed or captured.[51]

List of notable individuals

[edit]

By country

[edit]

Russia and Soviet Union

[edit]

A system of informants existed in the Russian Empire and was later adopted by the Soviet Union. In Russia, such people were known as osvedomitel or donoschik, and secretly cooperated with law enforcement agencies, such as the secret-police force Okhrana and later the Soviet militsiya or KGB. Officially, those informants were referred to as "secret coworker" (Russian: секретный сотрудник, sekretny sotrudnik) and often were referred by the Russian-derived portmanteau seksot. In some KGB documents has also been used the designation "source of operational information" (Russian: источник оперативной информации, istochnik operativnoi informatsii).[54]

Germany

[edit]
Main article: Unofficial collaborator

Poland

[edit]
Main article: pl:Tajny współpracownik

Venezuela

[edit]
Main articles: Snitch Law and es:Patriota cooperante

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Informants.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Informant

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An informant, also known as a confidential informant, cooperating witness, or justice collaborator, is an individual who supplies agencies with information about , typically drawing from personal knowledge or involvement in illicit networks, often in exchange for incentives such as sentence reductions, immunity from prosecution, or . These sources frequently include active or former criminals whose cooperation enables authorities to penetrate otherwise inaccessible groups, providing leads that establish for searches, arrests, and prosecutions in cases involving , drug trafficking, and . Informants have been integral to operations since at least the early , with federal guidelines—such as those mandated by the U.S. for the FBI—requiring , oversight, and corroboration to mitigate risks, though empirical analyses reveal their contributes to wrongful convictions when not independently verified due to incentives that encourage fabrication or exaggeration. Defining characteristics include protections to safeguard against retaliation, operational assistance like controlled buys or facilitation, and a dual-edged utility: while enabling high-impact disruptions of criminal enterprises where traditional policing falls short, their self-interested motives demand rigorous cross-checking, as uncorroborated accounts have historically led to miscarriages of and eroded in the system. Controversies persist over ethical lapses, including entrapment-like inducements and inadequate handler , underscoring the tension between investigative efficacy and procedural integrity.

Definition and Terminology

Core Definitions and Distinctions

An informant is an individual who supplies information to law enforcement, intelligence agencies, or other authorities about criminal activities, security threats, or illicit operations, often in exchange for incentives such as monetary payment, reduced criminal charges, or immunity from prosecution. This role is judicially recognized as a valid source of investigative leads, with informants categorized by levels of involvement, from one-time tip providers to ongoing confidential sources who may engage in controlled activities under handler supervision. In federal law, particularly for intelligence purposes, the term encompasses any person furnishing data to an agency within a protected confidential relationship, emphasizing the secrecy essential to their utility. The (FBI) designates such individuals as Confidential Human Sources (CHS), defined operationally as recruited persons managed to collect information meeting specific intelligence needs, distinct from mere passive reporters. CHS policies require validation of reliability, including background checks and tests where applicable, to mitigate risks of fabrication or manipulation, as informants may have personal biases or ulterior motives influencing their reports. Agencies like the FBI mandate close supervision, including written approvals for high-risk uses, to balance operational value against potential ethical and legal hazards. Key distinctions clarify the informant's role relative to analogous figures:
  • Witness vs. Informant: A delivers testimony in proceedings, subject to , whereas an informant provides pre-trial covertly, often without disclosure or testifying, to maintain operational . Informants may corroborate statements but are not equivalent, as their precludes direct scrutiny in .
  • Whistleblower vs. Informant: Whistleblowers expose organizational or governmental misconduct publicly or through protected channels, motivated primarily by public interest and eligible for statutory safeguards like those under the False Claims Act; informants, conversely, operate in secrecy for self-interested benefits, such as leniency, without inherent public disclosure obligations.
  • Undercover Agent vs. Informant: Undercover agents are sworn law enforcement officers who actively infiltrate groups under official direction and assume fabricated identities; informants are typically civilians—often prior offenders—who passively or semi-actively relay information without formal training or authority to enforce laws.
  • Spy vs. Informant: Spies conduct , usually on behalf of foreign powers, involving systematic intelligence gathering that may include ; informants aid domestic authorities against threats, lacking adversarial state allegiance and focusing on transactional cooperation rather than ideological .
These boundaries underscore the informant's precarious position, reliant on handler oversight to ensure accuracy amid incentives that can incentivize exaggeration.

Historical Evolution of Terms

The English term "informer" first appeared in the late , initially denoting an instructor or advisor, before evolving to signify one who communicates , particularly incriminating details, to authorities; it derives from the verb "enfourmen" and "enformeor," ultimately tracing to Latin "informare," meaning to shape, form, or instruct by imparting knowledge. By 1641, "informant" emerged as a related in formal usage, describing a who provides specific factual or event-based , often distinguished from "informer" by its less connotation in non-criminal contexts like or . These terms reflected broader historical reliance on individuals supplying intelligence, as seen in classical Greek and Roman practices where informers aided state enforcement against crimes like , though without standardized nomenclature until modern eras. In criminal underworld , synonyms proliferated from the onward, signaling cultural disdain for amid rising and urban policing. "Snitch," originating as 18th-century British for "to inform" or "betray," entered by the early as a for an informer, evoking nose-twitching furtiveness akin to a or eavesdropper. "Stool pigeon" arose in the early 1800s from American hunting tactics, where a tethered pigeon on a stool served as a to lure wild birds into nets; by the –1840s, it metaphorically denoted controlled human decoys in dens or rings who feigned participation to trap accomplices for . This term underscored informants' role as manipulated assets, a concept paralleling earlier approvers in English who testified against co-defendants for leniency, documented as early as the 13th century but without the vivid . The formalized terminology in and , shifting from to bureaucratic precision amid Prohibition-era and . "" gained traction around 1910 in American criminal , implying treacherous like a scavenging turning on its pack, and became ubiquitous in mob lore by mid-century. Professional distinctions emerged, such as "cooperating witness" for those testifying in court versus "informant" for pre-trial tipsters, with U.S. agencies like the FBI adopting "confidential informant" by the to denote registered sources providing operational under handler oversight, reflecting guidelines formalized after scandals like the exposing informant unreliability in probes. In contexts, terms like "asset" or "source" paralleled "informant" for non-criminal collaborators, emphasizing utility over moral judgment, while persisted in subcultures to stigmatize cooperation. This evolution mirrored expanding state , prioritizing empirical efficacy in disrupting networks despite persistent credibility risks from biased or self-interested sources.

Historical Context

Pre-Modern and Early Modern Uses

In , delatores served as private prosecutors and informers who accused individuals of crimes such as under the lex maiestatis or fiscal offenses, often motivated by the prospect of receiving one-quarter of the confiscated as a reward. This system, formalized during the but proliferating under the , enabled the state to enforce without a public prosecutorial apparatus, though it frequently devolved into abuse, with informers targeting wealthy elites for personal gain. During the reign of Emperor (14–37 CE), documented how delatores exploited maiestas trials to terrorize the senatorial class, contributing to a climate of paranoia and arbitrary executions. Medieval European societies employed informants sporadically in feudal and ecclesiastical contexts, often through informal networks of travelers, merchants, and pilgrims who relayed intelligence on rival lords or heretics. In Jewish communities, informers—known as moserim—who disclosed communal matters or property to Christian authorities faced severe communal , including , as documented in rabbinic texts from the 12th century onward. During conflicts like the (1337–1453), monarchs such as relied on embedded agents and local turncoats to gather military intelligence, though systematic informant networks remained rudimentary compared to later eras. In , from the , states like developed more structured informant systems to monitor trade, , and , dispatching ciechi (secret agents) and leveraging consular networks across the Mediterranean for real-time reporting. English common informers, operating under statutes like the Elizabethan poor laws, prosecuted violations such as or breaches for bounties, peaking in the before reforms curtailed their excesses due to widespread . These practices underscored informants' dual role in state revenue generation and security, albeit prone to fabrication and self-interest, as evidenced by archival records of rewarded accusations in Tudor courts.

20th Century Developments in Law Enforcement and Intelligence

The (FBI), established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation, began systematically employing informants to address federal crimes evading state prosecution, such as antitrust violations and interstate . By the 1920s, under Hoover's direction from 1924, the agency formalized informant handling amid rising and Prohibition-era bootlegging, using paid sources to penetrate criminal networks despite limited legal tools for or . This ad hoc recruitment often relied on criminals seeking leniency, marking an early shift toward informant-driven investigations over direct enforcement. During the 1930s "War on Crime," the FBI expanded informant use against "public enemies" like , whose 1934 killing highlighted the value of tips from underworld contacts, though successes depended on cross-jurisdictional cooperation. World War II accelerated developments, with informants central to counterespionage; in June 1941, the FBI arrested 33 members of the based on evidence from William Sebold, who relayed Nazi directives via a monitored by agents, resulting in the largest espionage case in U.S. history at the time. Postwar, the 1950s-1960s saw intensified recruitment against the and civil rights threats; Joe Valachi's 1963 Senate testimony as an informant detailed the Nostra's structure, informing the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. In intelligence, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), formed in 1942, professionalized (HUMINT) by recruiting and training informants for and in Axis territories, laying groundwork for modern clandestine operations. The (CIA), created by the 1947 National Security Act, prioritized informant networks during the , emphasizing defector handling and penetration of communist regimes; by the 1950s, CIA operations like those in relied on assets providing actionable intelligence, though early efforts faced setbacks from double agents. Law enforcement-intelligence fusion grew via programs like the FBI's (1956-1971), which deployed over 2,000 informants to disrupt groups deemed subversive, including the and , yielding thousands of arrests but later criticized for overreach. By the late 20th century, the 1980s formalized guidelines for confidential informants, with federal payments exceeding $35 million annually by 1987, enabling mass prosecutions but exposing risks of perjury and handler corruption, as seen in cases where protected informants like continued criminality.

Informants in Criminal Justice

Role, Effectiveness, and Empirical Evidence

Informants in criminal justice systems primarily function as sources of insider intelligence, bridging gaps in investigations where overt methods like surveillance or public tips prove insufficient. They deliver details on criminal operations, participant identities, and evidence locations, enabling law enforcement to secure search warrants, conduct controlled buys, and build prosecutable cases, especially against entrenched networks in drug trafficking and organized crime. Agencies such as the FBI and DEA classify informants—often termed confidential human sources (CHS)—as vital for initiating and sustaining probes that yield arrests and disruptions, with handlers managing risks through validation and oversight protocols. Their effectiveness stems from access to concealed activities, contributing to outcomes like the dismantling of major cartels or gangs via tips leading to indictments; for example, federal drug cases frequently hinge on informant-facilitated , with U.S. Attorneys' offices reporting heavy reliance on such for leniency-driven . However, this utility is tempered by systemic vulnerabilities: informants, motivated by sentence reductions, , or immunity, face incentives to exaggerate or fabricate, eroding reliability without corroboration. Empirical assessments reveal mixed results, with audits highlighting inconsistent program adherence to best practices like use or cross-verification, which could mitigate errors but often lag in implementation. Quantitative evidence underscores risks over unalloyed success. Archival reviews of exonerations link informant —particularly from jailhouse or incentivized sources—to wrongful convictions in 15-20% of DNA-cleared cases overall, rising to the predominant factor (present in 49.5% of capital wrongful convictions since the mid-1980s) due to uncorroborated claims and withheld disclosures. DOJ investigations, such as the 2022 Orange County probe, documented prosecutorial failures to track informant histories or disclose deals, resulting in constitutional violations and overturned convictions, though aggregate success metrics remain opaque owing to classified operations. Studies attribute net effectiveness declines to over-reliance without safeguards, fostering a "snitch culture" that prioritizes volume over veracity, yet proponents argue informants' role in preempting crimes justifies calibrated use despite evidentiary pitfalls.

Motivations, Recruitment, and Handler Practices

Individuals become informants in contexts primarily due to incentives, with fear of prosecution serving as the dominant motivator; arrested suspects often cooperate to secure reduced charges, sentence discounts, or immunity from prosecution. ranks as a key secondary driver, particularly for lower-level offenders in drug or cases, where payments are tied to the value of information provided, such as leading to arrests or seizures. against rivals or associates within criminal networks motivates others, exploiting interpersonal conflicts to provide tips on competitors' activities. , , or ideological opposition to appear infrequently in empirical accounts, overshadowed by pragmatic , as psychopathic traits in some informants may further prioritize personal gain over moral considerations. Recruitment typically unfolds reactively post-arrest, with law enforcement officers interviewing detainees about their offenses and proposing cooperation deals that outline benefits like charge reductions in exchange for actionable intelligence. Proactive approaches involve targeted cultivation from surveillance-identified figures in criminal milieux, followed by initial contact to gauge willingness and reliability. Vetting entails background checks on criminal history, associations, and psychological stability to mitigate risks of fabrication or double-dealing, as mandated in federal guidelines requiring assessment of suitability before formal activation. Agencies like the FBI formalize recruitment through signed agreements specifying the informant's role, limitations on authorized illegal activities, and termination clauses. Handler practices emphasize structured oversight to harness informant utility while curbing liabilities, including regular debriefings to validate information against independent evidence and adjust tasking accordingly. Department of guidelines stipulate informant registration in databases, periodic re-validation every six months or upon significant developments, and prohibitions on handlers authorizing crimes beyond strict investigative necessities. Handlers maintain professional detachment, avoiding personal relationships that could foster dependency or , and provide operational support such as relocation or only when threats are substantiated. Payments are documented and calibrated to performance, with oversight mechanisms like supervisory approvals preventing over-reliance on single sources or unchecked expenditures. Termination occurs upon unreliability, safety risks, or case resolution, often with debriefs to extract residual value.

Applications in Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement

Informants are typically essential in investigating secretive, ongoing operations such as illegal gambling rings, which are often linked to organized crime and difficult to penetrate without insider information providing details on participants, locations, and activities. In contrast, abductions (kidnappings) generally do not rely primarily on informants, as they often generate direct reports from victims or families, witnesses, ransom demands, or physical evidence, though informants may assist in complex conspiracies involving multiple actors. Informants have played a central role in federal investigations of organized crime, providing insider intelligence that facilitates the use of Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statutes to prosecute syndicate leaders for patterns of racketeering activity. In cases targeting Italian-American Mafia families, cooperating witnesses—often mid-level members facing their own charges—testified about internal hierarchies, extortion schemes, and murder conspiracies, enabling prosecutors to secure convictions that dismantled command structures. For instance, in the 1985 Mafia Commission case, overseen by U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani, informants including former Lucchese underboss Anthony Casso supplied evidence of inter-family commissions authorizing hits and labor racketeering, resulting in the 1986 convictions of bosses from New York's Five Families on RICO charges. Similarly, Salvatore "Sammy the Bull" Gravano, underboss of the , provided testimony in 1992 against boss , detailing over 20 murders and detailing the family's control of construction bids and gambling operations, which led to Gotti's conviction on five murder counts and RICO violations after prior acquittals. The (FBI) attributes much of its success against La Cosa Nostra in the 1980s and 1990s to such "Top Echelon" informants, who penetrated decision-making levels and corroborated wiretap evidence, contributing to over 1,000 convictions by 1990. Empirical assessments indicate informants are cost-effective, often motivated by sentence reductions rather than payments, though their information requires vetting against independent sources to mitigate fabrication risks. In drug enforcement, the (DEA) deploys confidential informants to map trafficking networks, arrange controlled buys, and identify kingpins in operations against cartels and domestic distributors. From fiscal years 2010 to 2015, the DEA utilized approximately 18,000 informants, disbursing $237 million in payments to secure tips that supported thousands of arrests and seizures exceeding 100 tons of narcotics annually. Informants facilitate undercover stings, such as those targeting Mexican cartel cells smuggling and precursors, where they pose as buyers or suppliers to gather actionable intelligence on routes and stash houses. Across federal agencies, over 16,000 confidential informants were active in fiscal year 2013, with drug cases comprising a plurality due to their utility in proving conspiracy elements under 21 U.S.C. § 846. However, informant reliance introduces operational hazards, including authorized criminal participation that can perpetuate or . The FBI sanctioned its informants to engage in roughly 22,800 crimes between 2011 and 2015, including drug distribution and extortion, to maintain covers in probes. In contexts, the FBI's protection of Boston mobster James "Whitey" Bulger as a Top Echelon informant from 1975 to 1990 allowed him to orchestrate 19 murders while evading rival prosecutions, exposing handler biases toward high-value intelligence over public safety. DEA audits have revealed lax oversight, such as unvetted informant credibility and failures to disclose payments to defense counsel, undermining trial integrity in cases. Government Accountability Office reviews emphasize that while informants yield critical leads—evident in RICO successes reducing influence by 90% in major cities by the 2000s—systemic guidelines are essential to balance efficacy against credibility erosion from unmonitored incentives like leniency deals.

Informants in Intelligence and National Security

Political Informants and Espionage

Political informants in provide intelligence agencies with critical details on foreign political machinations, ideological networks, and covert operations aimed at influencing or subverting host governments. These informants, often ideologically motivated defectors, double agents, or coerced insiders, operate within political structures such as , intelligence services, or affiliated organizations to expose activities tied to state politics. Their contributions have historically disrupted large-scale spy rings and informed policy responses, though their reliability can vary due to personal motivations like , financial gain, or disillusionment with sponsoring regimes. A pivotal example occurred during when , a naturalized U.S. citizen of German descent, was coerced by Nazi intelligence in 1939 to spy but instead contacted the FBI upon returning to America, becoming a . Sebold infiltrated the , the largest operation in U.S. history, comprising 33 Nazi agents engaged in political and industrial sabotage on behalf of the . Over nearly two years, he gathered evidence through dead drops and meetings, leading to the arrest and conviction of all members on June 2, 1941, under charges, with sentences totaling over 300 years. This case demonstrated the effectiveness of political informants in neutralizing foreign political threats before they could escalate wartime disruptions. In the era, , an American recruited by the in the 1930s, managed a network of Soviet spies within the U.S. government and (CPUSA), handling political intelligence from sources in the State Department and . Disillusioned by 1945, she defected to the FBI on November 7, providing names and details that exposed over 200 individuals in activities linked to Soviet political infiltration. Her testimony contributed to the 1949 conviction of 11 CPUSA leaders for conspiracy to overthrow the government and bolstered subsequent investigations, though some academics have questioned aspects of her accounts due to inconsistencies; declassified Venona decrypts later corroborated key elements of Soviet political spying. Similarly, , a former Soviet courier in the 1930s , turned informant in 1948, accusing State Department official of involvement, including microfilmed documents passed to Moscow. Chambers's revelations before the on August 3, 1948, produced the ""—hidden film evidence—leading to Hiss's 1950 conviction, as the had expired. This case highlighted political informants' role in uncovering ideological within U.S. political institutions, influencing anti-communist policies despite ongoing debates over Hiss's guilt, with FBI records and decrypted affirming the broader Soviet penetration. Oleg Gordievsky, a colonel and rezident in , began cooperating with in , motivated by ideological disaffection with Soviet politics. He supplied political intelligence on decision-making, including warnings of aggressive military exercises that informed Western responses during the 1983 Able Archer crisis. Exfiltrated from on July 23, 1985, via a daring operation after suspicions arose, Gordievsky's information aided Thatcher and Reagan administrations in assessing Soviet vulnerabilities, contributing to the Cold War's endgame without direct prosecutions but through strategic deterrence. His case underscores how high-level political informants in can shift geopolitical balances by revealing intent behind political posturing. Empirical evidence from declassified operations indicates human informants remain indispensable in political , offering contextual insights unattainable via alone, such as agent motivations and network hierarchies. For instance, FBI penetrations of CPUSA yielded hundreds of informants by the 1950s, disrupting political fronts, though risks include handler betrayal or informant fabrication, necessitating corroboration. Effectiveness metrics, like the Duquesne convictions or Bentley's network dismantlement, show disruption rates exceeding 90% in verified rings when informant-led, far surpassing passive .

Counterintelligence and State Security Operations

![Redacted Confidential Human Source Policy Guide][float-right] In operations, informants, often designated as confidential sources (CHS) by agencies like the FBI, play a pivotal role in detecting and neutralizing foreign threats by providing insider access to adversarial networks. These sources are recruited from diverse backgrounds, including defectors, disaffected agents, or individuals within suspect communities, to identify spies, map operations, and facilitate disruptions such as arrests or expulsions. The FBI's Guidelines on the Use of FBI Confidential Sources, updated in 2015, outline strict protocols for validation, handling, and tasking of CHS in , emphasizing corroboration of information and minimization of risks to . Historical applications trace back to the FBI's early efforts, where informants were integral to Classification 134 for foreign assets, enabling penetration of rings since the Bureau's inception. During the , U.S. agencies leveraged informants to counter Soviet operations; for instance, defectors and double agents provided critical leads that dismantled spy networks, as evidenced in declassified cases involving the exposure of moles within government institutions. In state security contexts, the FBI's program from 1956 to 1971 deployed informants to infiltrate and gather intelligence on domestic groups perceived as subversive, including communist organizations and foreign-influenced entities, yielding actionable intelligence on potential though later criticized for overreach. Post-Cold War, informants have proven effective in addressing state-sponsored threats from nations like and , where (HUMINT) remains indispensable despite technological advances, offering contextual insights into covert operations that alone cannot provide. A 2025 analysis underscores HUMINT's enduring value in countering advanced persistent threats from these adversaries, citing successes in identifying economic and influence campaigns through informant-derived leads. Empirical assessments of HUMINT effectiveness in are challenging due to , but case studies, such as the FBI's use of CHS in the 2016 investigation into Russian interference, demonstrate how informants can validate foreign contacts and intent, contributing to broader threat mitigation efforts. Operational risks include , as adversaries may detect and neutralize sources, or handlers may fail to manage motivations like financial incentives or ideological shifts, potentially leading to . Federal oversight, including reviews, has highlighted instances where inadequate validation allowed problematic CHS to operate, underscoring the need for rigorous testing and cross-verification in state security operations. Despite these challenges, the strategic deployment of informants has thwarted numerous attempts, affirming their causal role in preserving operational security against state actors.

Specialized Types of Informants

Jailhouse Informants

Jailhouse informants, also known as jailhouse snitches, are incarcerated individuals who provide alleging that they overheard confessions or incriminating statements from fellow inmates while in custody. Such testimony is frequently used by prosecutors in criminal trials, particularly for serious offenses like , where may be lacking. These informants often receive incentives from authorities, including sentence reductions, monetary payments, or improved prison conditions, which prosecutors are required to disclose under rules like (1963), though compliance varies. The primary motivations for jailhouse informants include self-interest, as they seek leniency or benefits in exchange for their cooperation. Empirical analyses of wrongful conviction cases reveal that informants frequently fabricate testimony due to these incentives, with studies showing that in DNA exoneration cases involving informants, 51% received deals for testimony and 34% had prior records of providing false information. Juror decision-making research indicates that even with judicial instructions cautioning against reliability, mock jurors often overvalue jailhouse testimony, failing to adequately discount its persuasive impact despite known risks of deception. This stems from the testimony's narrative appeal, simulating a "confession" without direct police involvement, though causal factors like isolation in custody and lack of corroboration undermine veracity. Jailhouse informant testimony has contributed to numerous wrongful convictions, appearing in approximately 15% of cases later exonerated by DNA evidence. In capital cases, it has been identified as the leading cause of wrongful convictions, present in nearly 50% of such exonerations since the mid-1980s. Over 140 murder convictions involving false jailhouse testimony have been overturned since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Massiah v. United States (1964), which limited post-indictment interrogations but did not eliminate informant use. Notable examples include the testimony of Paul Skalnik, whose lies implicated dozens in Florida cases, leading to four death sentences and contributing to at least 11 convictions later questioned or overturned between 1976 and 2019. Similarly, in California, informant claims led to Harold Hall's 1990 life sentence for murder, exonerated after evidence showed fabrication for minimal rewards like cigarettes. In response to documented abuses, several U.S. states have enacted regulations to scrutinize jailhouse testimony. mandates pretrial reliability hearings for informants in capital cases (725 ILCS 5/115-21), while requires juries to view such evidence skeptically and prosecutors to disclose informant histories. Florida's 2014 law alters admissibility standards, emphasizing corroboration, and Connecticut's 2023 legislation mandates detailed disclosures of benefits and prior informant activities. Despite these measures, federal oversight remains limited, and critics argue that without empirical vetting—such as independent verification of alleged conversations—risks persist, as informant often hinges on prosecutorial validation rather than objective .

Informants in Gangs and Transnational Crime

Informants serve as essential assets in law enforcement efforts against gangs and transnational criminal organizations, offering insider knowledge that enables infiltration, disruption of operations, and prosecutions otherwise unattainable through external surveillance alone. In gang contexts, such as investigations into groups like MS-13, informants—often recruited from within the organization—provide details on hierarchical structures, violent activities, and territorial disputes, facilitating targeted arrests and the dismantling of local cliques. For transnational crime, including Mexican cartels like Sinaloa, informants reveal cross-border smuggling routes, money laundering schemes, and leadership networks, supporting multi-agency operations that yield indictments and asset seizures. Their utility stems from the closed, trust-based nature of these groups, where external intelligence gathering is inherently limited, making human sources indispensable for building prosecutable cases. Empirical data underscores the prevalence and impact of informants in these domains. A national survey of police departments found that 90% employ confidential informants in enforcement, correlating with higher rates of successful interventions in organized violence. In specific operations, the U.S. Department of Justice's campaign against from 2016 to 2020 leveraged informant intelligence to secure over 700 federal charges, significantly eroding the gang's operational capacity in the United States and contributing to the eradication of certain factions. Similarly, a 2023 DEA-FBI joint investigation into affiliates resulted in 12 indictments for a sophisticated network, with informant-provided pivotal to tracing illicit financial flows exceeding millions in value. analyses of MS-13 structures further demonstrate how informant data illuminates leadership roles and connections, enhancing predictive modeling for preventive strikes. Despite their effectiveness, deploying informants in gangs and entails acute risks, including lethal retaliation enforced by codes of silence and omertà-like loyalties. Gangs such as and cartels like systematically hunt perceived collaborators, as evidenced by a 2025 U.S. Department of Justice revelation that operatives hacked FBI officials' phone records and surveillance feeds to locate and execute informants, resulting in multiple targeted killings. Informant information demands rigorous corroboration due to potential biases or fabrications motivated by personal gain, with studies emphasizing the need for validation through independent evidence to ensure admissibility and accuracy in court. Operational safeguards, including relocation and protection programs, are standard, yet breaches—such as the 2018 deportation of an informant despite federal safeguards—highlight vulnerabilities in inter-agency coordination and expose informants to heightened dangers upon exposure. Overall, while informants drive measurable disruptions, their high-risk profile necessitates stringent handler oversight to balance gains against the perils of betrayal and violence.

Applications in Non-Criminal Contexts

Labor Movements and Union Infiltration

Throughout the , U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Justice and the FBI, utilized informants to infiltrate labor unions perceived as threats to due to communist affiliations or involvement in . During , the Justice Department's campaign against the (IWW) employed informants alongside raids and propaganda to dismantle the union's radical activities, leading to the 1917-1918 arrests of over 5,000 members and the conviction of 101 leaders under espionage laws in 1918. This effort aimed to curb strikes and in industries like and , where IWW organizers were accused of obstructing war production. In the post-World War II era, the FBI intensified informant recruitment within the (CPUSA), which exerted significant influence over unions such as the United Electrical Workers and the United Packinghouse Workers through the (CIO). By the 1940s and 1950s, the Bureau had penetrated CPUSA ranks with hundreds of informants, providing intelligence on Soviet-directed activities that included labor disruptions and . High-profile examples include , a CPUSA international representative who, starting in 1952, secretly relayed operational details to the FBI, contributing to the exposure of communist networks in labor sectors until his role was revealed posthumously in 1980s declassifications. These infiltrations supported prosecutions and purges of suspected communists from union leadership, such as the 1949-1950 CIO expulsions of 11 left-led unions representing over 1 million members. Later efforts targeted 's entrenchment in unions, exemplified by the FBI's use of informants to combat labor under programs like UNIRAC, established in the . In the Teamsters Union, long infiltrated by elements for and looting, president served as a top FBI informant from the early , providing tips on 69 individuals involved in corruption and using the code name "All Pro" to aid investigations into . This intelligence facilitated indictments and civil RICO actions against mob-linked union officials, though Presser himself faced charges in 1986, highlighting the dual roles informants sometimes played in balancing cooperation with ongoing criminal exposure. Such operations underscored the FBI's strategy of leveraging insider information to dismantle criminal control over union assets, including the Central States , which had been siphoned for loans to figures.

Social Activism and Ideological Informing

Government agencies have employed informants to infiltrate social activism groups perceived as threats to national stability, particularly during periods of domestic unrest. The FBI's Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO), active from 1956 to 1971, utilized informants to monitor and disrupt organizations involved in civil rights advocacy, anti-war protests, and socialist activities. Informants within groups like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) provided intelligence on leadership dynamics and planned actions, enabling tactics such as disinformation campaigns and internal sowing of distrust. This program extended to ideological informing, where informants reported on members' political beliefs to identify potential subversives, including communist sympathies or revolutionary ideologies. In the civil rights era, informants embedded in Black activist circles, such as those surrounding Martin Luther King Jr., relayed details on speeches, alliances, and funding sources, contributing to efforts to neutralize perceived radical influences. Similarly, during the Vietnam War protests, FBI informants infiltrated anti-war organizations to track ideological motivations and prevent escalation into violence, though operations sometimes blurred lines between monitoring and provocation. The Ghetto Informant Program (1967-1973) deployed hundreds of sources in urban communities to gather ideological intelligence amid riots and black nationalist movements, focusing on sentiments that could incite unrest. Contemporary applications persist in environmental and indigenous activism. At the Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016-2017, court documents revealed up to 10 FBI-managed informants embedded in resistance camps, providing real-time reports on protest tactics, ideological drivers like anti-corporate sentiment, and potential for disruption. In eco-activism cases, such as those tied to the , informants have informed on ideological commitments to , leading to operations like in the 2000s that dismantled cells through preemptive intelligence. These efforts underscore a continuity in using informants for ideological profiling, assessing risks from groups advocating systemic change, though critics argue such infiltration chills legitimate dissent. Informants in the receive legal protections primarily through privileges and participation in witness security programs, balanced against requirements for disclosure in certain judicial contexts. Under federal law, the government's privilege to withhold an informant's identity is recognized in Roviaro v. United States (1957), where the held that this privilege yields when the informant's identity or communications are relevant to the defense's ability to prepare a case, such as when the informant is a to the transaction at issue. This balancing test prioritizes public interest in effective but mandates revelation if fundamental fairness demands it, preventing absolute secrecy. Additionally, statutes like 19 CFR § 161.15 require agencies such as U.S. Customs to maintain informant by restricting access to names and addresses in files. Immunity arrangements for informants typically involve informal agreements rather than formal statutory grants, allowing prosecutors to forgo charges or recommend sentence reductions in exchange for cooperation, though such deals cannot bind future prosecutions without involvement. Formal immunity, compelled under 18 U.S.C. § 6002, applies when a orders testimony despite Fifth Amendment claims, but agents are prohibited from promising immunity or limiting evidence use without prior written approval from a federal prosecutor's office. For high-risk informants testifying as witnesses, eligibility extends to the Federal Witness Protection Program (WITSEC), administered by the U.S. Marshals Service under 18 U.S.C. § 3521, which relocates participants and provides new identities, financial support, and 24-hour security to prevent retaliation. Only informants qualifying as "bona fide witnesses" in federal proceedings—those with direct knowledge of crimes—may enter, with the program maintaining a reported 100% success rate in preventing protected witnesses from being located and harmed by threats. Oversight of informant operations and handlers is governed by the , issued under 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, and 533, which mandate procedures for vetting recruits, authorizing activities (including otherwise illegal conduct), and ongoing supervision to mitigate risks like or unreliable . These guidelines require federal agencies, including the FBI, to document informant files, conduct suitability assessments, and obtain supervisory approvals for sensitive operations, with non-compliance subject to internal reviews by inspectors general. External accountability includes audits, which have identified gaps in tracking informant-authorized crimes and recommended enhanced , while judicial oversight enforces disclosure rules and scrutinizes handler for or . State-level variations exist, but federal standards influence practices, emphasizing handler through and periodic evaluations to prevent abuses like unmonitored payments or .

Risks to Informants and Handler Accountability

Informants cooperating with or agencies encounter acute physical risks from retaliation by criminal organizations, terrorist groups, or foreign adversaries, often manifesting as targeted killings. In gang and operations, informants face heightened threats due to the violent of omertà-like codes, with handlers required to evaluate such dangers during initial vetting. For example, Arnold L. Schuster was murdered on March 16, 1952, in after identifying bank robber to police, who had assured him of protection; the subsequent established in Schuster v. City of New York (5 N.Y.2d 75, 1959) that agencies owe a special duty of reasonable care to safeguard informants once they provide material assistance leading to arrests. Similar perils arose in the 2008 death of Rachel Hoffman, a 23-year-old civilian informant coerced into a Tallahassee Police Department drug sting, where she was shot and her body dumped after operatives suspected betrayal; this incident exposed deficiencies in and training, prompting Florida's "Rachel's Law" to mandate judicial oversight and safety evaluations for informant deployments. Operational and psychological risks compound physical threats, including exposure to violence during controlled buys or , potential compromise through poor , and long-term stressors like identity concealment or family endangerment. Federal guidelines, such as those from the Attorney General, compel handlers to assess factors like criminal history, reliability, and to before , with protections including via the U.S. Marshals Service Witness Security Program for high-threat cases. In counterintelligence and , risks extend to state-sponsored executions; a 2022 investigation documented at least 18 Iranian assets recruited by the CIA executed between 2010 and 2012 due to agency negligence in and duplicate recruitments, rather than adversarial superiority. Handler hinges on adherence to protocols for , , and , enforced through internal reviews, audits, and . The FBI mandates annual informant file reviews, supervisory approvals for operations, and risk-benefit analyses for any authorized illegal activities to prevent harm, while DEA and ICE policies, though partially aligned, emphasize coordinator roles for oversight. Negligent handling invites liability; in Santiago v. Lafferty (D. Mass., filed 2013, settled July 2019), a Lowell, Massachusetts, detective faced denied for failing to vet or document informants over years, resulting in evidence fabrication, case dismissals, and a $750,000 municipal settlement, illustrating how supervisory lapses erode operational integrity and expose agencies to civil claims under doctrines. GAO assessments reveal persistent gaps in some agencies' monitoring of illegal activity authorizations, recommending enhanced and DHS-level audits to bolster handler compliance and reduce systemic failures. In rare instances, has prompted criminal probes against handlers, though civil suits predominate as the primary mechanism for redress.

Controversies and Criticisms

Reliability Issues and Wrongful Convictions

Jailhouse informants, who claim to have overheard confessions from incarcerated defendants, pose significant reliability risks due to strong incentives to fabricate in exchange for leniency, dismissal of charges, or financial rewards. These incentives create perverse motivations, as informants often face their own pending cases or prior convictions, leading to exaggerated or invented stories to curry favor with prosecutors. A 2004 report by Northwestern University's Center on Wrongful Convictions identified false jailhouse informant as the leading cause of wrongful death penalty convictions , based on an of documented cases. Empirical data from DNA exonerations underscores the prevalence of such errors. In a study of 367 DNA-based exonerations tracked by the , jailhouse informant contributed to nearly one in five cases. Similarly, an analysis of 194 U.S. DNA exonerations found informant , including from jailhouse and sources, present in 22 percent of the false convictions. Archival research on capital cases further reveals that informants frequently provided uncorroborated claims without physical evidence, with false identified as a primary driver of miscarriages of . Prosecutorial practices exacerbate these issues, including failure to disclose informant deals to defense counsel, as required under (1963), and over-reliance on such testimony despite known fabrication rates. In many instances, informants recanted post-conviction, admitting to lies for personal gain, yet initial convictions stood for years or decades. For example, in , reforms followed revelations that informants like Henry Brisbon provided false testimony in multiple capital cases, contributing to at least 51 death row exonerations linked to informant unreliability by 2011. Lack of mandatory recording of informant-handler interactions and inconsistent standards further undermine credibility assessments by juries, who often perceive informants as credible without full context of their incentives. Government informants in non-jail settings, such as those embedded in , also contribute to wrongful convictions through coerced or unreliable statements, though data shows jailhouse types as disproportionately problematic. A peer-reviewed examination of informant dynamics highlights how systemic under-regulation allows serial informants—those testifying in multiple cases—to repeat falsehoods across prosecutions, inflating error rates. Despite occasional corroboration requirements in some jurisdictions, the causal link between informant incentives and false persists, as evidenced by patterns where DNA or recantations later disproved claims. These patterns indicate that informant reliance, absent rigorous safeguards, systematically elevates conviction risks for the innocent.

Abuses, Corruption, and Recent Scandals

One prominent example of corruption involving informants occurred in the case of James "Whitey" Bulger, a mobster who served as an FBI informant from 1975 to 1990 while continuing to orchestrate murders and . Corrupt FBI agents, including John Connolly, provided Bulger with tips on rival informants and investigations, enabling him to eliminate threats and evade capture for years; Connolly was later convicted of and obstruction of justice for tipping Bulger off in 1994, allowing his 16-year flight as a . This relationship exemplified handler corruption, where agents prioritized intelligence over accountability, leading to at least 19 murders attributed to Bulger during his informant tenure. Jailhouse informants have been central to numerous corruption scandals, often incentivized by reduced sentences or payments to fabricate confessions, fostering a culture of perjury enabled by lax oversight. In , a 2022 U.S. Department of Justice investigation revealed systematic civil rights violations by the District Attorney's office and Sheriff's Department, including deliberate withholding of exculpatory evidence about informant reliability and improper coordination to secure false testimony against defendants. This led to the dismissal or review of dozens of cases and a 2025 settlement acknowledging . Similarly, analyses of wrongful convictions highlight how jailhouse informants, motivated by deals, routinely lie under handler pressure, with extending to detectives and prosecutors who ignore or conceal incentives, contributing to fabricated in capital cases. Recent scandals underscore ongoing issues with informant management. In July 2025, a Chicago federal judge sentenced corrupt confidential informant William "Willie" Carter to 13 years in prison for embezzling over $100,000 in government funds intended for controlled buys while providing false information to handlers. In June 2025, longtime DEA informant Jorge Hernández was charged with conspiring to extort $2 million from cocaine traffickers by leveraging his official role to threaten exposure, illustrating how informant status can enable independent criminal enterprises. Broader data from a 2021 Justice Department audit revealed federal agencies paid informants $548 million from 2011 to 2020, with many authorized to commit crimes—such as drug distribution—leading to unchecked abuses and potential handler complicity in corruption. In New Bedford, Massachusetts, a 2025 FBI probe into police chief Paul Oliveira exposed informant system abuses, including officers fabricating cases for personal gain, resulting in disciplinary actions. These cases demonstrate persistent risks where inadequate vetting and immunity provisions allow informants and handlers to prioritize self-interest over evidentiary integrity.

Notable Cases and Individuals

Historical Figures and Breakthrough Cases

Whittaker Chambers, a former communist operative and editor at Time magazine, provided pivotal testimony in 1948 before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accusing Alger Hiss, a high-ranking U.S. State Department official, of espionage on behalf of the Soviet Union during the 1930s. Chambers produced microfilmed documents and other evidence from the "Pumpkin Papers" during a subsequent libel suit initiated by Hiss, which led to Hiss's 1949 indictment and 1950 conviction for perjury rather than direct espionage charges. This case marked a breakthrough in exposing Soviet penetration of U.S. government institutions, fueling early Cold War anti-communist efforts and influencing public and policy perceptions of internal security threats. Joseph Valachi, a low-level soldier in the Genovese crime family, became the first made member of the American Mafia to publicly break the code of omertà during his 1963 testimony before the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Facing a murder charge he believed was ordered by boss Vito Genovese, Valachi detailed the hierarchical structure of "La Cosa Nostra," including the existence of a national Commission coordinating the Five Families of New York and other syndicates, along with rituals of initiation and internal enforcement mechanisms. His disclosures, broadcast on television to an estimated 30 million viewers, shattered the Mafia's veil of secrecy, enabling subsequent federal prosecutions like the 1960s-1970s RICO cases and informing Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy's aggressive stance against organized crime. Subsequent notable Mafia defectors include Henry Hill, a Lucchese crime family associate who cooperated with authorities starting in 1980, testifying in trials that led to dozens of convictions among organized crime figures. Sammy "The Bull" Gravano, Gambino family underboss, testified against boss John Gotti in 1992, contributing to Gotti's conviction on murder and racketeering charges. Joseph Massino, Bonanno family boss, began cooperating after his 2004 conviction, becoming the first New York Mafia boss to testify against associates as an informant starting in 2005. Even in witness protection, such informants have been targeted by organized crime, though successful assassinations of protected witnesses are rare. Oleg Penkovsky, a in the Soviet military intelligence directorate, served as a for the CIA and from April 1961 until his arrest in October 1962, supplying over 5,000 pages of documents and 120 films on Soviet missile technology. During the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, Penkovsky's intelligence on the non-operational status of Soviet R-12 missiles in Cuba, their range limitations, and inaccuracies in Khrushchev's assessments provided U.S. President with critical leverage to demand withdrawal without immediate escalation. His information, including blueprints and deployment manuals, is credited with averting nuclear confrontation by clarifying Soviet capabilities and intentions, though Penkovsky was executed by the Soviets in May 1963 after a show .

Contemporary Examples and Outcomes

In the 2018–2019 federal trial of Sinaloa Cartel leader Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán in Brooklyn, New York, testimony from over a dozen cooperating former cartel associates, including Chicago-based brothers Pedro and Margarito Flores, provided critical evidence of Guzmán's role in trafficking more than 38 tons of cocaine into the United States between 1990 and 2007. The Flores brothers detailed direct meetings with Guzmán to negotiate shipments and payments, corroborating wiretaps, ledgers, and other physical evidence presented by prosecutors. This informant-driven case culminated in Guzmán's conviction on February 12, 2019, on all 10 counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, leading to a life sentence plus 30 years imposed on July 17, 2019. In return, cooperating witnesses like the Floreses and other Sinaloa operatives received substantial sentence reductions; for example, two cartel members who testified in related Chicago proceedings had their prison terms shortened in April 2023 as part of plea deals. Contemporary applications have also exposed persistent risks and abuses, particularly with jailhouse informants. In Orange County, California, a scandal involving the coordinated use of undercover jail informants by the district attorney's office and sheriff's department—first revealed during the 2016 trial of mass shooter Scott Dekraai—led to the improper elicitation of confessions without Miranda warnings or disclosure to defense counsel, violating constitutional protections. By October 2023, these practices had invalidated 57 major criminal cases, including murders and high-profile prosecutions, prompting dismissals, overturned convictions, and civil settlements. A U.S. Department of Justice investigation, detailed in a 2022 report, resulted in a January 2025 settlement mandating informant policy reforms, tracking, and training; compliance was certified complete on July 29, 2025. Informant operations have yielded mixed outcomes beyond convictions, including handler and informant accountability issues. In June 2025, longtime DEA informant Jorge Hernández, aged 57, faced federal charges for conspiring to commit wire fraud by allegedly extorting millions from apprehended traffickers under of influencing their cases. Such incidents underscore ongoing vulnerabilities, as federal agencies like the FBI disbursed $294 million to informants from fiscal years 2012 to 2018, with authorizations for some to engage in otherwise illegal activities to maintain covers, amplifying ethical and reliability concerns. A June 2025 Justice Department review further revealed an FBI data security breach that exposed drug informants' identities, resulting in targeted by cartels and prompting internal reforms.

International Variations

United States Practices and Reforms

![Redacted FBI Confidential Human Source Policy Guide][float-right] In the , federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI and DEA rely on confidential human sources (CHS), also known as informants, under strict guidelines issued by the Attorney General to gather intelligence on criminal activities including , drug trafficking, and . These guidelines, updated periodically with the most recent comprehensive version in for FBI operations, mandate procedures for recruiting, vetting, validating, and managing informants to ensure suitability, credibility, and operational value while minimizing risks of abuse. Vetting involves assessing potential informants' backgrounds, criminal histories, and motivations, with validation processes requiring periodic reviews of their information's reliability against independent sources. Handlers, typically special agents, must document all interactions, payments, and authorizations for informant activities, prohibiting participation in violent acts except in or other designated dangerous operations approved at high levels. Payments to informants can include fixed sums, contingency fees based on arrests or seizures, or reimbursements, but must be justified and recorded to prevent , with FBI policy explicitly barring authorization of violence or otherwise illegal acts beyond . Oversight includes supervisory reviews, internal audits, and compliance with broader Department of Justice (DOJ) policies applicable across agencies like ATF and DEA, ensuring informants understand operational limits and legal immunities granted via . Reforms to these practices intensified following high-profile scandals, notably the FBI's handling of James , an informant from 1975 to 1990 who committed murders while protected by corrupt agents, leading to his 1994 flight and 2011 capture. This exposure prompted congressional scrutiny and internal overhauls, including the 2007 Confidential Human Source Validation Manual standardizing reliability checks and a working group to revise policies on informant creation and use. Post-Bulger, the DOJ emphasized accountability, with agents required to report fugitive contacts and prohibit improper relationships, aiming to curb the "unholy alliances" that shielded criminals. Further updates came after the , 2001 attacks, which expanded informant recruitment for but highlighted coercion risks and validation gaps, as noted in a 2015 GAO report recommending enhanced guidance on high-risk informants. The Attorney General's Guidelines were revised to incorporate these, including clearer protocols for domestic operations and informant payments, with the FBI implementing policy guides like the 2018 Confidential Human Source Policy Guide to address ongoing management issues. Despite these measures, compliance audits by the DOJ have revealed persistent inconsistencies in informant handling across agencies, underscoring the challenges in fully mitigating risks of reliability failures or operational abuses.

Russia, Soviet Union, and Post-Soviet Era

In the , the apparatus—evolving from the (established December 20, 1917) to the (1934–1946) and later the (1954–1991)—relied extensively on networks of informants, known as "agents of trust" or "sekretnye sotrudniki," to monitor citizens, suppress dissent, and enforce ideological conformity. These informants, often recruited from workplaces, neighborhoods, and social circles through , ideological , or promises of advancement, provided the bulk of on perceived enemies of the state, including political rivals, ethnic minorities, and ordinary suspects. By the 1930s, during Stalin's Great Terror (1936–1938), denunciations from such informants fueled mass arrests, with records indicating over 1.5 million people detained on political grounds, many initiated by tips from civilian collaborators motivated by personal grudges, careerism, or fear of being denounced themselves. The informant system expanded post-World War II, with the KGB's Second Chief Directorate overseeing domestic through a vast web of approximately 500,000–600,000 registered informants by the 1970s, infiltrating factories, universities, and even artistic circles to preempt "." This network's effectiveness stemmed from its pervasiveness, as ordinary Soviets were conditioned to view informing as a civic duty, leading to self-policing behaviors that minimized overt resistance but eroded social trust. Declassified archives reveal that informant reports often exaggerated threats to justify quotas for arrests, contributing to cycles of paranoia and purges within the security organs themselves. Following the USSR's dissolution in 1991, the , established in 1995 as the KGB's primary successor, inherited and adapted these informant practices for against , , and perceived Western . In the post-Soviet era, the FSB has coerced young activists and dissidents into becoming informants through , threats to family, or fabricated criminal charges, framing collaboration as protection from "foreign agent" accusations under laws like the 2012 Foreign Agents Law. By the , amid the conflict, FSB informant networks expanded to include surveillance of anti-war sentiments, with elite units like the 16th Center coordinating tips from civilians to identify "traitors," resulting in thousands of detentions based on informant-derived evidence. This continuity reflects a state model, where informant reliance persists despite formal democratic transitions, often prioritizing stability over evidentiary rigor.

European and Latin American Contexts

In Italy, the use of pentiti—repentant former members who cooperate with authorities—has been central to anti-organized crime efforts since the 1980s, particularly against groups like Cosa Nostra and 'Ndrangheta. The first major pentito, , provided testimony in the 1986-1987 , leading to over 300 convictions and dismantling key structures through detailed revelations of internal hierarchies and operations. Anti-mafia programs grant pentiti leniency, financial support, housing, and , though implementation has faced criticism for inadequate long-term security, with some informants reporting state betrayal and relocation failures. By the 1990s, hundreds of pentiti contributed to arrests, including those following the 1992 assassinations of judges and , which spurred legislative expansions of informant incentives. In the United Kingdom, law enforcement and intelligence agencies such as and police employ Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS), recruited from within criminal networks to gather intelligence on , , and . 's policy, formalized under the 2016 Investigatory Powers Act and updated in 2020, explicitly authorizes handlers to permit CHIS participation in crimes deemed necessary for operational success, a practice upheld as lawful by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal in 2019 despite concerns over proportionality. Regulations require risk assessments and oversight by senior officers, but controversies persist, including a 2025 ruling criticizing for misleading courts about an informant's involvement in abuse cases, highlighting accountability gaps in handler verification processes. Across the , informant deployment varies by member state but aligns with frameworks emphasizing judicial authorization for intrusive methods, as outlined in guidelines on special investigative means, which distinguish non-state informants from agent provocateurs to mitigate risks. In , informants play a pivotal role in counter-narcotics operations against s in countries like and , often facilitated through U.S. agency partnerships such as DEA and CIA infiltration networks. In , informant networks contributed to the fragmentation of major cartels like and in the 1990s, with ongoing leaks from prosecutorial databases exposing dozens of DEA-linked sources to retaliation as recently as 2023. operations have relied on cartel insiders to target kingpins, as seen in U.S.-assisted captures, though informants face severe reprisals; cartels have hacked systems and bribed officials to identify and assassinate cooperators, with at least dozens killed annually amid weak programs. Rewards promised to high-value informants, such as those aiding in the 2000s dismantling of factions, have often gone unpaid, eroding trust and recruitment efficacy. Regional practices emphasize rapid deployment over rigorous oversight, contrasting with Europe's formalized safeguards, and have led to operational blowback, including 2025 concerns over cartel access to hacked U.S. court data revealing witness identities.

References

  1. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/organized-crime/module-8/key-issues/special-investigative-techniques/informants.html
  2. https://www.nj.gov/lps/dcj/school/chap5.pdf
  3. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/confidential-informant
  4. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/informants-witnesses
  5. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/context/faculty_scholarship/article/3028/viewcontent/Richman_Informants_and_Cooperators.pdf
  6. https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/what-is-the-fbis-policy-on-the-use-of-informants
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9090405/
  8. https://law.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz156/files/pdf/academy_for_justice/11_Reforming-Criminal-Justice_Vol_2_Informants-and-Cooperators.pdf
  9. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5494&context=faculty_scholarship
  10. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/shifts-police-informant-negotiations
  11. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/72371NCJRS.pdf
  12. https://www.cityofdelano.org/DocumentCenter/View/4981/Policy-603-Informants
  13. https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?def_id=50-USC-1248974302-1585072667&term_occur=1&term_src=title:50:chapter:44:subchapter:IV:section:3126
  14. https://www.hsmtraining.com/blog/2020/4/17/what-is-a-human-source-a-definition
  15. https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/improving-our-confidential-human-source-program
  16. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/ag-guidelines-use-of-fbi-chs.pdf
  17. https://www.hsmtraining.com/blog/2020/2/26/why-confidential-informants-are-not-the-same-as-witnesses
  18. https://www.fleitmanlaw.com/whats-the-difference-between-a-whistleblower-and-an-informant/
  19. https://www.pjducharme.com/distinction-between-agents-and-confidential-informants/
  20. https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs
  21. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/168795/what-is-the-difference-between-a-spy-and-an-informer
  22. https://www.etymonline.com/word/informer
  23. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/informant_adj
  24. https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/boston_college_law_school_research_paper_re_a_historical_overview_of_informants_2005.pdf
  25. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/snitches-get-synonyms-words-for-turning-informant
  26. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/83619/why-informant-called-stool-pigeon
  27. https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2005/01/31/the-feathered-decoy-that-became-a-snitch/
  28. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol22/iss1/3/
  29. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/55577/31-old-timey-slang-terms-informant
  30. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/12/nypd-on-the-west-indian-day-parade-when-did-rat-become-the-word-for-snitch.html
  31. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=688042
  32. https://hls.harvard.edu/today/falling-in-love-with-your-rat-the-criminal-informant-system-in-the-u-s/
  33. https://www.britannica.com/topic/delator
  34. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2001/2001.09.39/
  35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3287410
  36. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/inside-the-world-of-medieval-espionage/
  37. https://spotterup.com/spies-in-the-middle-ages-secrets-and-shadows/
  38. http://thethinkersgarden.com/espionage-in-early-modern-venice-interview-ioanna-iordanou/
  39. https://www.qui-tam.geschichte.uni-muenchen.de/research/project_lll/index.html
  40. https://www.brookes.ac.uk/research/units/obbs/projects/intelligence-organisation-in-the-earlymodern-world
  41. https://www.fbi.gov/history/brief-history
  42. https://irp.fas.org/agency/doj/fbi/fbi_hist.htm
  43. https://time.com/6284913/fbi-confidential-informants/
  44. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/july-26/fbi-founded
  45. https://www.fbi.gov/history/timeline
  46. https://www.history.com/articles/famous-gangster-informants-in-u-s-history
  47. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-INTELLIGENCE/html/int022.html
  48. https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Origin-and-Evolution.pdf
  49. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/64227NCJRS.pdf
  50. https://journals.librarypublishing.arizona.edu/arizlrev/article/8137/galley/7531/download/
  51. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/police-informant
  52. https://www.guzman.law/confidential-informants-in-federal-drug-cases/
  53. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2919&context=etd
  54. https://www.miami-criminal-lawyer.net/blog/the-role-of-jailhouse-informants-in-criminal-cases
  55. https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1409141/dl
  56. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1153&context=mlr
  57. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032258X221081668
  58. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/drug-informants-motives-methods-and-management
  59. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/motivations-criminal-informants
  60. https://www.quora.com/What-causes-someone-to-become-a-police-informant
  61. https://www.hsmtraining.com/free-proactive-informant-recruitment
  62. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-15-807.pdf
  63. https://www.justice.gov/oip/foia-library/foia-processed/general_topics/ag_guidelines_FBI_human_confidential_sources_2/dl
  64. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/informant-operations-direction-and-control-human-sources
  65. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/working-informants-operational-recommendations
  66. https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/columbia/news/press-releases/gambling-ring-leader-sentenced
  67. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr05_5/p8.html
  68. https://themobmuseum.org/blog/the-bosses-of-the-mafia-commission-were-indicted-40-years-ago/
  69. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/john-gotti
  70. https://bclawreview.bc.edu/articles/1040/files/63b80aacdcf34.pdf
  71. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/king-rats-criminal-informants-are-real-winners-deas-drug-war
  72. https://theintercept.com/2016/09/30/deas-army-of-18000-informants-pocketed-237-million-over-five-years/
  73. https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/audit-reveals-shortcomings-dea-informant-program/
  74. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-15-807
  75. https://icnacsj.org/fbi-informants-crime-paid-corruption-federal-agencies-thousands-of-crimes/
  76. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/duquesne-spy-ring
  77. https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Review-Red-Spy-Queen.pdf
  78. https://www.neh.gov/article/nazi-spies-america
  79. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/alger-hiss
  80. https://spartacus-educational.com/USAbentleyE.htm
  81. https://www.nytimes.com/1963/12/04/archives/elizabeth-bentley-is-dead-at-55-soviet-spy-later-aided-us-wartime-a.html
  82. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/august-3/chambers-accuses-hiss-of-being-a-communist-spy
  83. https://apnews.com/article/cold-war-soviet-mi6-spy-gordievsky-dead-ab0bff2b2efdea01c5fbd965ab5465b5
  84. https://www.historyextra.com/period/cold-war/oleg-gordievsky-cold-war-double-agent-life/
  85. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14743892.2022.2049668
  86. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/using-human-sources-in-counterterrorism-operations-understanding-the-motivations-and-political-impact
  87. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence/major-cases
  88. https://www.thecipherbrief.com/column_article/the-enduring-value-of-humint-in-countering-russia-and-china
  89. https://theconversation.com/informants-arent-spies-theyre-essential-fbi-tools-97200
  90. https://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p15040coll2/id/1563/download
  91. https://lawreview.colorado.edu/print/volume-96/manufacturing-false-convictions-lies-and-the-corrupt-use-of-jailhouse-informants-russell-d-covey/
  92. https://innocenceproject.org/news/informing-injustice-the-disturbing-use-of-jailhouse-informants/
  93. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0093854820908628
  94. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1773&context=ugtheses
  95. https://innocenceproject.org/unreliable-and-unregulated-informants/
  96. https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/jailhouse-informants-timeline
  97. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/magazine/jailhouse-informant.html
  98. https://features.propublica.org/jailhouse-informant-exonerees/jailhouse-informant-false-testimony-exoneree-portraits/
  99. https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2025-04/22.1%2520FINAL-pages-6.pdf
  100. https://www.kevinkuliklaw.com/jailhouse-snitch-information-testimony-the-admissibility-issues/
  101. https://alec.org/model-policy/jailhouse-informant-regulations-2/
  102. https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/gang-enforcement-problems-and-strategies-national-survey-findings
  103. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/199047.pdf
  104. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/department-justice-releases-report-its-efforts-disrupt-dismantle-and-destroy-ms-13
  105. https://www.dea.gov/press-releases/2023/04/18/sophisticated-sinaloa-cartel-money-laundering-organization-dismantled
  106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378851583_A_Social_Network_Analysis_of_an_MS-13_Network_Structure_Leadership_Roles_and_the_Use_of_Confidential_Informants
  107. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sinaloa-cartel-hacker-phone-data-cameras-track-kill-fbi-informants-doj/
  108. https://features.propublica.org/ms-13/a-betrayal-ms13-gang-police-fbi-ice-deportation/
  109. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1657&context=aulr
  110. https://depts.washington.edu/iww/justice_dept.shtml
  111. https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/byte-out-of-history-communist-agent-tells-all
  112. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-12-03-mn-26451-story.html
  113. https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2008/december/unirac_121608
  114. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/12/03/us/teamster-chief-was-informer-us-aide-says.html
  115. https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-vcrs/infiltrated-labor-unions
  116. https://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro
  117. https://www.oah.org/tah/history-for-black-lives/tracking-activists-the-fbis-surveillance-of-black-women-activists-then-and-now/
  118. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/fbi-targets-new-generation-black-activists
  119. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/assault-left-fbi-and-sixties-antiwar-movement
  120. https://www.lib.berkeley.edu/about/news/fbi
  121. https://sourcenm.com/2024/03/19/fbi-sent-several-informants-to-standing-rock-protests-court-documents-show/
  122. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/23/revealed-how-the-fbi-targeted-environmental-activists-in-domestic-terror-investigations
  123. https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/6-ways-government-going-after-environmental-activists
  124. https://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/confidential-informants-motions-to-reveal-identity-and-discovery-part-i-roviaro-v-u-s/
  125. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/19/161.15
  126. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-719-informal-immunity-distinguished-formal-immunity
  127. https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/use-of-confidential-informants-guidelines/1c-prohibition-on-commitments-of-immunity/
  128. https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-21000-witness-security
  129. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y0fp38ON14
  130. https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadDocument?objectID=131983901
  131. https://www.congress.gov/115/meeting/house/105833/witnesses/HHRG-115-GO00-Wstate-HorowitzM-20170404.pdf
  132. https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/672954.pdf
  133. https://opencasebook.org/casebooks/2566-torts/resources/14.2-schuster-v-city-of-new-york-the-death-of-the-police-informant/
  134. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/05/06/10-years-later-rachel-hoffmans-death-makes-police-informants-safer/580595002/
  135. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-spies-iran/
  136. https://www.police1.com/police-policy/articles/when-supervision-of-criminal-informants-goes-south-EoVb5eMREPagzxr5/
  137. https://www.aclu.org/documents/center-wrongful-convictions-snitch-system
  138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21721941/
  139. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub/3681/
  140. https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/937/
  141. https://www.capitallawreview.org/api/v1/articles/12971-informants-v-innocents-informant-testimony-and-its-contribution-to-wrongful-convictions.pdf
  142. https://www.history.com/articles/whitey-bulger-fbi-informant
  143. https://abcnews.go.com/US/whitey-bulger-trial-details-fbi-corruption/story?id=19510081
  144. https://www.cato.org/commentary/corrupt-fbi-let-mobster-whitey-bulger-keep-killing
  145. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-finds-civil-rights-violations-orange-county-california-district-attorney-s
  146. https://voiceofoc.org/2022/10/federal-investigators-call-out-systemic-violations-in-oc-jailhouse-informant-scandal/
  147. https://www.aclusocal.org/en/press-releases/orange-county-jail-informant-case-settled
  148. https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndil/pr/federal-judge-chicago-sentences-corrupt-confidential-informant-13-years-prison
  149. https://www.wlrn.org/law-justice/2025-06-20/longtime-dea-informant-charged-in-alleged-scheme-to-extort-high-level-cocaine-traffickers
  150. https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/11/18/fbi-and-other-agencies-paid-informants-548-million-in-recent-years-with-many-committing-authorized-crimes/
  151. https://apps.bostonglobe.com/metro/investigations/spotlight/2025/03/snitch-city/fbi-investigation-new-bedford-police-chief/
  152. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Joseph-Valachi
  153. https://levin-center.org/what-is-oversight/portraits/valachi-hearings/
  154. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Henry-Hill
  155. https://www.crimelibrary.org/gangsters_outlaws/mob_bosses/gravano/testifies_20.html
  156. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/11/nyregion/Judge-Commutes-2-Life-Sentences-for-Mob-Boss-Joseph-Massino-Who-Became-Informer.html
  157. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/649685/witness-protection-program-facts
  158. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Oleg-Vladimirovich-Penkovsky
  159. https://spyscape.com/article/oleg-penkovsky-the-cuban-missile-crisis-the-true-story-behind-the-courier
  160. https://spotterup.com/oleg-penkovsky-the-spy-who-helped-save-the-world/
  161. https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago-witnesses-played-key-role-in-convicting-joaquin-el-chapo-guzman/5135111/
  162. https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/18/us/el-chapo-trial-informant-testifies
  163. https://insightcrime.org/news/brief/sinaloa-cartel-informants-receive-reduced-prison-sentence-in-chicago/
  164. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-01-17/snitch-scandal-agreement-reached-between-orange-county-sheriffs-department-da-and-feds
  165. https://apnews.com/article/orange-county-california-jailhouse-informants-d362684c7fbc73cc6affb0b97c3cb843
  166. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-successful-completion-agreement-custodial-informant-reforms
  167. https://www.courthousenews.com/orange-county-da-settles-federal-investigation-into-use-of-jailhouse-informants/
  168. https://www.thewellnews.com/crime/fbi-data-security-breach-in-mexico-led-to-murders-of-drug-informants/
  169. https://www.npr.org/2008/09/01/94117338/bulger-case-changed-fbis-role-with-informants
  170. https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/109th-congress/house-report/564/1
  171. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2149&context=blr
  172. https://vault.fbi.gov/confidential-human-source-policy-guide-1018pg/Confidential%2520Human%2520Source%2520Policy%2520Guide%25201018PG%2520Part%252001%2520%2528Final%2529/view
  173. https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Theory-of-Soviet-Intelligence.pdf
  174. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/115953/1/WRAP-contracting-counterintelligence-KGB-Soviet-informers-1960s-1970s-Harrison-2019.pdf
  175. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=history_honors
  176. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236718555_Getting_to_Know_You_The_Soviet_Surveillance_System_1939-57
  177. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-02546r000100130001-3
  178. https://greydynamics.com/kgb-history-structure-and-operations/
  179. https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/07/europe/russia-fsb-informants-cia
  180. https://cyberpress.org/researchers-uncover-russias-highly-secretive-fsb/
  181. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/12/13/secretive-fsb-unit-steers-russias-sweeping-wartime-spy-crackdown-wsj-a87329
  182. http://www.csef.it/wp/wp232.pdf
  183. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/17/italian-state-betrayed-me-life-after-turning-mafia-informant-witnesses-protection
  184. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/36815
  185. https://www.mi5.gov.uk/how-we-work/gathering-intelligence/covert-human-intelligence-sources
  186. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/20/mi5-informants-investigatory-powers-tribunal-lawful-serious-crimes
  187. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54274605
  188. https://www.npr.org/2025/07/03/nx-s1-5454722/uk-mi5-high-court
  189. https://rm.coe.int/deployment-of-special-investigative-means-eng/16807828fa
  190. https://www.occrp.org/en/project/narcofiles-the-new-criminal-order/dozens-of-dea-agents-exposed-in-colombian-prosecutors-office-leak
  191. https://www.reuters.com/investigations/inside-cias-secret-fight-against-mexicos-drug-cartels-2025-09-10/
  192. https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/28/politics/mexican-drug-cartel-fbi-hack-informants
  193. https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=umialr
  194. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/25/informants-us-catch-drug-lords-rewards-not-paid
  195. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/08/federal-court-hack-cartels-00500391
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.