Hubbry Logo
Seanad ÉireannSeanad ÉireannMain
Open search
Seanad Éireann
Community hub
Seanad Éireann
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Seanad Éireann
Seanad Éireann
Seanad Éireann
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

53°20′26″N 6°15′14″W / 53.34055°N 6.254021°W / 53.34055; -6.254021 Seanad Éireann (/ˈʃænəd ˈɛərən, ˈʃænəð/ ⓘ SHAN-əd(h) AIR-ən;[3] Irish: [ˈʃan̪ˠəd̪ˠ ˈeːɾʲən̪ˠ]; "Senate of Ireland") is the upper house of the Oireachtas (the Irish legislature), which also comprises the President of Ireland and Dáil Éireann (the lower house).

Key Information

It is commonly called the Seanad or Senate and its members are known as senators (Irish: seanadóirí, singular: seanadóir). Unlike Dáil Éireann, it is not directly elected but consists of a mixture of members chosen by various methods. Its powers are much weaker than those of the Dáil and it can only delay laws with which it disagrees, rather than veto them outright. It can introduce new legislation. Since its establishment, it has been located in Leinster House.

Composition

[edit]
Politics of the Republic of Ireland
Coat of arms of Ireland
Constitution
Presidency
President
Catherine Connolly
Government
Cabinet
Oireachtas
Courts
Elections
General
Presidential
Local
European
Administrative geography
Foreign relations

Under Article 18 of the Constitution of Ireland, Seanad Éireann consists of 60 senators, composed as follows:

Election

[edit]

The general election for the Seanad occurs after a Dáil general election and not later than 90 days after the dissolution of the preceding Dáil. The election occurs under the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote. Membership is open to all Irish citizens over 21, but a senator cannot also be a member of Dáil Éireann. As stated above, nomination to vocational panel is restricted; nomination in the university constituencies requires signatures of 10 graduates. The Taoiseach's nominations are made after the elected seats have been filled.

In the case of casual vacancies in the vocational panels, the electorate in the by-election consists of Oireachtas members only.[4] Vacancies to the university seats are filled by the full electorate in that constituency until March 2025, after which vacancies will be filled through a list system.

Members of the 27th Seanad (2025–)

[edit]
Main article: 27th Seanad
Party Senators
Fianna Fáil 19
Fine Gael 17
Sinn Féin 6
Labour 2
Aontú 1
Green 1
Social Democrats 1
Independent 13
Total 60

Powers

[edit]

The powers of Seanad Éireann are modelled loosely on those of the British House of Lords. It is intended to play an advisory and revising role rather than to be an equal of the popularly elected Dáil. While notionally every Act of the Oireachtas must receive assent of both chambers, in practice the Seanad can only delay rather than veto decisions of the Dáil. The fact that 11 senators are appointed by the Taoiseach usually ensures that the Government, which must have the support of the Dáil, enjoys at least a plurality in the Seanad. The constitution imposes the following specific limitations on the powers of the Seanad:

  • If a bill approved by Dáil Éireann has not received the assent of the Seanad within 90 days, then the Dáil may, within a further 180 days, resolve that the measure is "deemed" to have been approved by the Seanad. This has only occurred twice since 1937, once in 1959 when the Seanad rejected the Third Amendment to the Constitution Bill 1958 (the amendment proposed by this bill was, in the event, rejected in the subsequent referendum) and again in 1964 when they rejected the Pawnbrokers Bill 1964. In both instances the Dáil passed the requisite motion deeming the legislation to have been passed.[5]
  • A money bill, such as the budget, may be deemed to have been approved by the Seanad after 21 days.
  • In the case of an urgent bill, the time that must have expired before it can be deemed to have been approved by the Seanad may be abridged by the Government (cabinet) with the concurrence of the President (this does not apply to bills to amend the constitution).

The Constitution does, however, grant to the Seanad certain means by which it may defend its prerogatives against an overly zealous Dáil:

  • The Seanad may, by a resolution, ask the president to appoint a Committee of Privileges to adjudicate as to whether or not a particular bill is a money bill. The president may, however, refuse this request. This procedure has not been initiated since the re-establishment of the Seanad under the current Constitution in 1937.[6]
  • If a majority of senators and at least one-third of the members of the Dáil present a petition to the President stating that a bill is of great "national importance" the president can decline to sign the bill until it has been 'referred to the people'. This means that the president can refuse to sign it until it has been approved either in an ordinary referendum or by the Dáil after it has reassembled after a general election.

Activities

[edit]

Seanad Éireann adopts its own standing orders and appoints its president, known as the Cathaoirleach ("Chair"). The Taoiseach appoints a senator to be Leader of the House and direct government business there. The Seanad establishes its own standing committees and select committee; senators also participate, along with TDs (members of the Dáil) in joint committees of the Oireachtas. A maximum of two senators may be ministers in the Government.

Standing committees

[edit]
  • Committee on Administration
  • Committee on Consolidation Bills
  • Committee of Selection
  • Committee on Procedure and Privileges
    • Sub-committee on Compellability
  • Committee on Members' Interests of Seanad Éireann

Select committees

[edit]
  • Select committee on Communications, Natural Resources and Agriculture
  • Select committee on Environment, Transport, Culture and the Gaeltacht
  • Select committee on European Union Affairs
  • Select committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade
  • Select committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform
  • Select committee on Health and Children
  • Select committee on the Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement
  • Select committee on Investigations, Oversight and Petitions
  • Select committee on Jobs, Social Protection and Education
  • Select committee on Justice, Defence and Equality

Historical origins

[edit]

Precursors

[edit]

The first parliamentary upper house in Ireland was the House of Lords of the Parliament of Ireland, beginning in 1297. Like its British counterpart, this house consisted of hereditary nobles and bishops. After the abolition of the Irish Parliament under the Act of Union of 1800 no parliament existed in Ireland until the twentieth century.

In 1919 Irish nationalists established a legislature called Dáil Éireann but this body was unicameral and so had no upper house. In 1920 the Parliament of Southern Ireland was established by British law with an upper house called the Senate. The Senate of Southern Ireland consisted of a mixture of Irish peers and government appointees. The Senate convened in 1921 but was boycotted by Irish nationalists and so never became fully operational. It was formally abolished with the establishment of the Irish Free State in 1922 but a number of its members were soon appointed to the new Free State senate.

Free State Seanad Éireann (1922–1936)

[edit]
Main article: Seanad Éireann (Irish Free State)

The name Seanad Éireann was first used as the title of the upper house of the Oireachtas of the Irish Free State. The first Seanad consisted of a mixture of members appointed by the President of the Executive Council and members indirectly elected by the Dáil, and W. T. Cosgrave agreed to use his appointments to grant extra representation to the state's Protestant minority. The procedures for election of senators were amended before the first Seanad election by the Constitution (Amendment No. 1) Act 1925. It was intended that eventually the entire membership of the Seanad would be directly elected by the public. However, after only one election, in 1925, where 19 Seanad members were elected in one district using STV, this system was abandoned in favour of a form of indirect election.

Initially casual vacancies in the Seanad were filled by vote of the remaining members. However this system was replaced under the Constitution (Amendment No. 11) Act 1929 by filling of vacancies by vote of both Dáil and Seanad, the system that continues today for panel members. The Free State Seanad was abolished entirely in 1936 after it delayed some Government proposals for constitutional changes.

Constitution of Ireland (since 1937)

[edit]

The modern Seanad Éireann was established by the Constitution of Ireland in 1937, and first sat on 25 January 1939. When the 1937 constitution was adopted, it was decided to preserve the titles of Oireachtas for the two houses of the legislature, in conjunction with the President, Dáil Éireann for the lower house, and Seanad Éireann for the upper house, the latter having been used during the Irish Free State. The new Seanad was considered to be the direct successor of the Free State Seanad and so the first Seanad convened under the new constitution was referred to as the "Second Seanad".

The new system of vocational panels used to nominate candidates for the Seanad was inspired by the corporatist Roman Catholic social teaching of the 1930s and, in particular, the 1931 papal encyclical Quadragesimo anno. In that document, Pope Pius XI argued that the Marxist concept of class conflict should be replaced with a vision of social order based on the co-operation and interdependence of society's various vocational groups.[7][8]

Calls for reform

[edit]

Since 1928, twelve separate official reports have been published on reform of the Seanad.[9] In the 1980s, the Progressive Democrats called for its abolition; however, in government, members of the party were nominated to the Seanad by the Taoiseach. The post-1937 body has been criticised on a number of grounds, including claims that it is weak and dominated by the Government of the day. There are also allegations of patronage in the selection of its members, with senators often being close allies of the Taoiseach or candidates who have failed to be elected to the Dáil. Many senators have subsequently been elected as TDs.

Irish universities have a long tradition of electing independent candidates. Some, like the pressure group Graduate Equality, argue that the franchise for electing university senators should be extended to the graduates of all third level institutions. Others believe that this does not go far enough and that at least some portion of the Seanad should be directly elected by all adult citizens. Calls have also been made for the Seanad to be used to represent Irish emigrants or the people of Northern Ireland. In 1999 the Reform Movement called for some of the Taoiseach's nominations to be reserved for members of the Irish-British minority, and other minorities such as members of the Travelling Community and recently arrived immigrants.

Graduate franchise

[edit]
Main article: Higher Education (Seanad constituency) § Background

The Seventh Amendment in 1979 altered the provisions of Article 18.4 to allow for a redistribution of the university seats to any other institutes of higher education in the state.

In 2019, Tomás Heneghan, a graduate of University of Limerick, challenged the limitation of voting rights to graduates of National University of Ireland, Trinity College Dublin, and to Oireachtas and local authority members.[10] The case was heard by a three-judge division of the High Court in 2021.[11] The challenge was rejected by the court later that year.[12] On 31 March 2023, following a direct appeal on the point of university graduates voting, the seven-judge Supreme Court ruled in Heneghan's favour and struck down provisions of the Seanad Electoral (University Members) Act 1937 limiting the right to vote to NUI and Trinity College graduates.[13] However, the court suspended its ruling to 31 July 2023 to allow the state to determine how it would institute the necessary changes to the law. On 26 July 2023, the Supreme Court gave a second ruling, allowing the Oireachtas up to 31 May 2025 to legislate for the expansion of the electorate.[14]

The Seanad Electoral (University Members) (Amendment) Act 2024, enacted on 29 October 2024, abolishes the two three-seat National University of Ireland and Dublin University constituencies, and creates a new six-seat Higher Education constituency in which all degree-holders from third-level state institutions of higher education will be entitled to vote at the next Seanad general election after 21 March 2025. The legislation also replaces Seanad by-elections for the six seats with a list system mirroring the process used in European Parliament elections and increases the number of nominations a prospective candidate needs from 10 to 60 registered electors or the payment of a deposit of €1,800. As of 21 March 2025, the entire 2024 Act was in force, with the exception of sections 27 and 31-46 that will take effect upon the next dissolution of Dáil Éireann.[15] On 1 April 2025, the first register of Higher Educations Electors was published, with 62,775 registered electors.[16]

Referendum on abolition

[edit]
Main article: Thirty-second Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2013

In October 2009, Fine Gael leader Enda Kenny stated his intention that a Fine Gael government would abolish the Seanad, and along with reducing the number of TDs by 20, it would "save an estimated €150m over the term of a Dáil."[17] During the 2011 election campaign, Labour, Sinn Féin and the Socialist Party also supported abolition of the Seanad,[18][19][20] while Fianna Fáil supported a referendum on the issue.[21] The programme of the Fine Gael–Labour coalition, which came to power at the election, sought to abolish the Seanad as part of a broader programme of constitutional reform,[22] but lost a referendum on the matter in October 2013 by 51.7% to 48.3%.

Members from Northern Ireland

[edit]

Taoisigh have often included people from Northern Ireland among their eleven nominees, such as John Robb (served 1982–1989), Seamus Mallon (1982–1983) of the SDLP, Bríd Rodgers (1983–1987) also of the SDLP, peace campaigner Gordon Wilson (1993–1997), businessman Edward Haughey (1994–2002), Maurice Hayes (1997–2002), and Emer Currie (2020–2024).

Sam McAughtry was elected to the Industrial and Commercial Panel in a by-election in February 1996. Niall Ó Donnghaile was elected in April 2016 as a Sinn Féin senator for the Administrative Panel while serving on Belfast City Council. Ian Marshall, a farmer and activist from a Unionist background, was elected to the Agricultural Panel in a by-election in April 2018.[23] Mal O'Hara of Belfast, leader of Green Party Northern Ireland, was deemed elected on the Administrative Panel in 2024.[24][25][26] In the 2025 election, Sinn Féin MLA for Newry and Armagh and Minister for the Economy, Conor Murphy was elected to the Seanad alongside the Social Democrats' Patricia Stephenson, who is originally from Belfast.[27]

Notable former senators

[edit]
For notable senators of the Seanad of the Irish Free State, see Seanad Éireann (Irish Free State) § Notable members.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Seanad Éireann

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Seanad Éireann is the of the , the bicameral legislature of the . It comprises 60 members known as senators, who serve terms concurrent with those of the Dáil Éireann, the lower house. The Seanad's composition emphasizes vocational and expert representation: 11 senators are nominated by the , six are elected by graduates of and constituencies, and 43 are elected from five panels representing cultural, educational, agricultural, labor, industrial/commercial, and administrative sectors, with an consisting of members of the and local councillors. Established in its modern form by the , it succeeded the Senate of the formed in 1922, incorporating elements of to prioritize sectoral interests over mass . The Seanad's primary functions include reviewing, amending, and debating bills initiated in the Dáil, though it holds limited powers: it may delay ordinary legislation but cannot veto it permanently, as the Dáil can override rejections, and it lacks authority over money bills beyond recommendations. Notable for its role in refining legislation—having proposed over 500 amendments in recent sessions—it has faced persistent criticism for undemocratic selection processes, high costs relative to influence, and perceived ineffectiveness as a check on the Dáil, prompting repeated reform debates and a failed constitutional to abolish it.

Composition and Election

Vocational Panels and Election Process

The Seanad Éireann allocates 43 of its 60 seats through elections from five vocational panels, intended to represent distinct societal and occupational interests as outlined in Article 18 of the . These panels are the Administrative Panel (7 seats), Agricultural Panel (11 seats), Cultural and Educational Panel (5 seats), Industrial and Commercial Panel (9 seats), and Labour Panel (11 seats). Candidates must demonstrate qualifications or experience aligning with the panel's vocational focus, such as for the Administrative Panel or for the Agricultural Panel. Nominations for panel candidates occur via two routes: registered nominating bodies—non-profit organizations specific to each panel's interests, such as trade unions for the Labour Panel or farming groups for the Agricultural Panel—or by at least four members of the incoming or outgoing Seanad Éireann. Nominating bodies are pre-approved by the Clerk of the Seanad and must reflect the panel's vocational character, with a limit on the number of candidates they can endorse per election. Elections to the vocational panels employ by means of the (PR-STV), conducted indirectly by an comprising all 160 members of the incoming Dáil, the 60 members of the outgoing Seanad, and approximately 950 elected members of county and city councils, totaling around 1,170 voters. Voting occurs within 90 days of a Dáil dissolution, often in , with ballots ranked by preference; candidates reaching the (calculated as votes divided by seats plus one, with remainder ignored) are elected, and surpluses or eliminated candidates' votes transfer accordingly. This system, governed by the Seanad Electoral (Panel Members) Act 1947, aims to balance representation across panels while incorporating vocational input, though the electorate's composition—dominated by political —has drawn for prioritizing affiliations over pure occupational representation.

University and Graduate Constituencies

Six senators are elected to Seanad Éireann from two university constituencies: the University of Dublin and the National University of Ireland, each returning three members. These seats are filled by proportional representation using the single transferable vote system among eligible graduates who are Irish citizens aged 18 or over. Elections occur by post following a general election to Dáil Éireann, with polls typically open for a short period in late January, as seen in the 2025 election for the 27th Seanad where voting closed on 29 January for the National University of Ireland constituency. The constituency comprises graduates of , with an electorate of approximately 110,000 as of recent elections. Candidates must be registered electors in the constituency and are nominated either by the provost and senior fellows or by petitions signed by at least ten registered graduates. In the 2025 election, incumbents and Tom Clonan were re-elected alongside Aubrey McCarthy. The National University of Ireland constituency includes graduates from its constituent institutions: , , , , and the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Its electorate exceeds 200,000, reflecting the larger scale of NUI-affiliated universities. Nominations require either endorsement by the federal governing body or signatures from ten or more registered graduates, with candidates required to hold a degree from a qualifying institution. The 2025 election featured 12 candidates contesting the three seats. These constituencies originated under the Seanad Electoral (University Members) Acts of 1937 and have remained distinct from the vocational panels, providing representation for the educated elite as envisioned in the 1937 Constitution. However, the Seanad Electoral (University Members) (Amendment) Act 2024 establishes a new six-seat Higher Education constituency to replace the existing ones starting with the subsequent Seanad, expanding the electorate to include graduates from additional designated higher education institutions such as and the . This reform aims to broaden participation beyond the traditional NUI and monopolies, with a new unified register managed via seanadvoter.ie and initial registrations closing on 23 January 2025.

Taoiseach's Nominations

The nominates 11 members to Seanad Éireann as stipulated in Article 18.1° of the , which composes the chamber of 60 senators in total. These direct appointments, without electoral process, enable the to select individuals deemed suitable for legislative roles. Nominations are made after the assembly of a newly elected , within 90 days of the Dáil's dissolution, allowing the to finalize selections post-election outcomes. The exercises personal discretion in choosing nominees, subject to consultation with coalition partners in multi-party governments, though the retains the ultimate decision. No specific vocational or expertise criteria apply to these positions beyond general senator qualifications, including Irish citizenship and being at least 21 years old. Upon nomination, the President appoints these individuals to Seanad Éireann on the 's advice, granting them full membership rights and a term aligning with the Seanad's five-year cycle or until dissolution. Up to two of the 's nominees may serve as members of the , nominated separately by the for ministerial or junior roles. This mechanism has remained unchanged since the 1937 , providing the executive with influence over the upper house's composition independent of panel or university elections.

Current Membership: 27th Seanad (2025–2030)

The 27th Seanad Éireann consists of 60 members: 43 elected from the five vocational panels (Administrative, Agricultural, Cultural and Educational, Industrial and Commercial, and Labour), 6 from the university constituencies (3 from the and 3 from the ), and 11 nominated by the . Elections for the 49 seats occurred by postal vote in January 2025, with counts concluding on 3 February 2025. The Seanad first met on 12 2025, when Senator Mark Daly, a Kerry representative and former Leas-Chathaoirleach, was elected unopposed. Among the elected senators, 20 were women, marking a 43% increase from the 14 elected in 2020. Key results included the election of independents Michael McDowell, Ronán Mullen, and ; and Tom Clonan in the constituency alongside Aubrey McCarthy; and Aontú's Sarah O'Reilly securing the party's first-ever Seanad seat on the Agricultural Panel. All 11 seats on the Labour Panel were filled, including 's Pat Casey and Sinn Féin's Maria Doyle. Taoiseach nominated 11 senators on 7 February 2025, including seven women: Dee Ryan (former Limerick Chamber CEO), Alison Comyn, (former TD), Lorraine Clifford-Lee, Imelda Goldsboro, Nikki Bradley, and others such as and Manus Boyle. These appointments raised the total female representation to 27 senators, or 45%—a record for the chamber.

Powers and Functions

Legislative Scrutiny and Amendment Powers

The Seanad Éireann possesses the authority to scrutinize and propose amendments to bills passed by the , serving primarily as a chamber for review rather than origination for most legislation. Under Article 20 of the , every bill initiated in and passed by the Dáil must be sent to the Seanad for consideration within 90 days, excluding periods of recess specified . During this period, the Seanad conducts detailed examination through its standard legislative stages, beginning at Second Stage for bills received from the Dáil, where general principles are debated. This scrutiny allows senators to highlight potential flaws, suggest improvements, and ensure alignment with broader policy objectives, though the chamber lacks veto power over Dáil decisions. Amendments proposed by the Seanad occur primarily at Committee Stage, where individual sections of a bill are dissected, and at Report Stage for further refinements based on committee deliberations. These amendments must pertain to the bill's content and cannot introduce unrelated matters or increase charges on the people without Dáil consent. If the Seanad passes amendments, the bill returns to the Dáil for approval or rejection; accepted changes are incorporated, while ones, often termed the "cream list," proceed without them. Non-government amendments at Report Stage require a proposer and seconder, ensuring procedural discipline. In practice, this process has led to substantive modifications in areas such as environmental protections and social welfare provisions, though the Dáil retains ultimate authority to override. For money bills, defined under Article 22 as those imposing or varying taxation or appropriating revenue, the Seanad's role is curtailed: such bills originate exclusively in the Dáil and are forwarded to the Seanad for recommendations within . The Seanad may suggest alterations, but these are framed as recommendations rather than binding amendments, and the Dáil must consider them before final passage; failure by the Seanad to respond within the timeframe does not impede enactment. This limitation underscores the Seanad's advisory function on fiscal matters, preventing obstruction of measures. If the Seanad fails to pass an ordinary bill or explicitly rejects it within the 90-day window, the Dáil may, after an additional 180 days, pass a resolution deeming the measure enacted by both houses, bypassing further Seanad involvement. This mechanism enforces the Seanad's delaying capacity—up to approximately 270 days in total—without granting absolute blockage, aligning with the Constitution's design for a weaker to check hasty legislation while preserving Dáil primacy. Pre-legislative scrutiny by committees, often involving the Seanad, further enhances this review by examining general schemes before bill publication, recommending adjustments on policy impacts.

Committee System and Oversight

The committee system of Seanad Éireann facilitates detailed parliamentary scrutiny through a combination of select s, which comprise solely senators, and joint committees formed with members of . Select committees shadow government departments or address specific policy areas, while joint committees integrate members from both houses to avoid duplication and enhance collective oversight. Following each election, the Seanad establishes committees via orders of reference, with the 27th Seanad approving provisions for 23 such bodies on May 20, 2025, covering sectoral, thematic, and special mandates. Sectoral committees align with ministerial portfolios to examine departmental policies, , and administration, often evolving into joint formats for broader review. Thematic committees tackle cross-departmental issues, such as budgetary oversight or affairs, enabling evaluation of government fiscal plans and EU compliance. Special committees, appointed for finite durations, investigate targeted matters like or disability policy, producing time-bound reports to inform debate. Housekeeping and statutory committees, including the Seanad-specific Committee on Procedure and Privileges, manage internal procedures, standing orders, and members' interests, with the former overseeing parliamentary privileges under Seanad Standing Orders. Oversight functions emphasize , with committees empowered to question ministers on policy implementation, summon witnesses, and compel pursuant to the Houses of the (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act 2013, subject to approval. Joint committees, such as the Committee of Public Accounts, scrutinize public expenditure by reviewing audited accounts and departmental estimates, while the Joint Committee on Budgetary Oversight assesses medium-term fiscal strategies and annual budgets. Pre-legislative allows committees to draft bills before enactment, soliciting public submissions and stakeholder hearings to identify flaws or propose amendments. These mechanisms enable Seanad members to influence actions indirectly, though reports are advisory and require adoption for binding effect, distinguishing Seanad's contributory role from the Dáil's primacy in financial oversight.

Limitations Relative to Dáil Éireann

The Seanad Éireann possesses subordinate legislative authority compared to the Dáil Éireann, as all money bills must originate in the Dáil and the Seanad is prohibited from amending them in ways that increase charges on public funds. Money bills receive expedited consideration in the Seanad, limited to 21 sitting days, after which they are deemed passed if not approved, ensuring the Dáil's budgetary primacy cannot be obstructed indefinitely. This contrasts with the Dáil's unrestricted initiation and final determination of fiscal legislation under Article 21 of the Constitution. For non-money bills passed by the Dáil, the Seanad may propose amendments or reject them outright, but such actions serve only to delay enactment; the Dáil can resolve to proceed after 180 days, overriding Seanad objections without further recourse. Bills initiated in the Seanad, limited to non-financial matters and capped at a small number per session, must still pass the Dáil for enactment, subjecting them to potential Dáil rejection or modification with no equivalent override mechanism available to the . These provisions embed Dáil supremacy in the legislative process, rendering the Seanad a chamber of revision rather than co-equal authority. The Seanad lacks influence over executive formation and accountability, domains reserved to the Dáil. The Dáil alone nominates and elects the , who then forms the , with the Seanad playing no formal role in this process under Article 28. accountability attaches exclusively to the Dáil, where motions of confidence or can compel or dissolution, whereas Seanad votes on similar matters hold no constitutional force to unseat the executive. Dissolution of the occurs on the 's advice to the President, tied to Dáil proceedings, automatically extending to the Seanad without independent initiation rights for the . In oversight functions, the Seanad participates in committees for policy scrutiny and public inquiries, yet these yield non-binding recommendations, lacking the Dáil's capacity to enforce accountability through funding controls or legislative compulsion. This structural asymmetry underscores the Seanad's role as a deliberative but non-sovereign body, designed post-1937 to prevent the obstruction seen in the earlier Free State Senate while preserving bicameral review.

Historical Origins and Evolution

Pre-Independence Influences

The bicameral structure of pre-independence Irish legislative proposals drew from the longstanding tradition of the , which functioned from the late until its dissolution by the Act of Union 1800. This parliament mirrored the English model, featuring a House of Lords composed primarily of hereditary peers, archbishops and bishops, and appointed law lords, alongside a House of Commons elected by property-owning elites in counties and boroughs. The served as a revising and delaying chamber, often dominated by Anglo-Irish Protestant interests, which shaped nationalist skepticism toward aristocratic upper houses in later self-government debates. Revival of emerged in early 20th-century partition schemes amid the Anglo-Irish conflict. The , enacted by the British Parliament on December 23, 1920, established separate parliaments for Northern and Southern , each with a bicameral design to balance elected assemblies with appointed or indirectly elected upper houses. For Southern , Section 5 of the Act specified a Senate comprising 64 members, including ex-officio holders such as the and certain ecclesiastical representatives, with the remainder to be elected by the Southern from five panels representing administrative, commercial, educational, labor, and interests. This structure aimed to incorporate minority protections and expertise, reflecting British efforts to stabilize governance amid rising opposition. The Senate of Southern Ireland was formally constituted in early 1921 but rendered ineffective by the nationalist of the , as prioritized the unilateral established in January 1919. Only four members attended its single meeting on January 14, 1922: the and three bishops serving ex officio. This minimal operation underscored irreconcilable divides over sovereignty and representation, with unionists viewing the Senate as a safeguard against , while nationalists dismissed it as an extension of British partition. The Act's framework nonetheless provided a template for upper-house mechanisms in post-Treaty constitutional planning, emphasizing vocational and minority elements over .

Free State Seanad (1922–1936)

The Seanad Éireann of the Irish Free State was established as the upper house of the Oireachtas under the Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Éireann) Act 1922, which defined it as a body composed of citizens selected for their public service, expertise, or representation of key societal interests. The inaugural session convened on 11 December 1922, shortly after the state's formation following the Anglo-Irish Treaty. Its creation reflected the provisional government's intent, led by President of the Executive Council W. T. Cosgrave, to incorporate minority viewpoints and specialized knowledge into legislation, countering potential majoritarian excesses in the Dáil Éireann amid post-civil war divisions. The first Seanad comprised 60 members, with 30 nominated by Cosgrave to ensure balanced representation and 30 elected by Dáil deputies via . Nominations prioritized individuals with records of or vocational standing, including figures from unionism, labor, and cultural sectors, as stipulated in Article 82 of the . Terms were staggered: the envisioned 12-year service for members, with one-quarter retiring every three years post-initial setup, elected from panels divided into sub-panels for and culture, administrative capacity and , labor, , and fisheries, industry and , and public utilities. This vocational framework aimed to embed by qualified electors over direct popular vote, fostering deliberation over partisanship. Subsequent partial elections filled vacancies from these panels, regulated by the Seanad Éireann Body Act 1924 and later adjustments. The 1925 election selected 19 members on 17 September, using with a national panel of candidates nominated two-thirds by the Dáil and one-third by the outgoing Seanad. Similar contests followed in 1928 and 1931, maintaining the body's pro-Treaty leanings despite Fianna Fáil's Dáil gains after 1932. The Seanad's legislative role involved scrutinizing Dáil bills, proposing amendments, and delaying non-money bills for up to nine months or two sessions, but lacking veto power, which limited its influence to advisory revision. Conflict escalated under Éamon de Valera's administration, which viewed the Seanad—still Cumann na nGaedheal-dominated—as an obstacle to constitutional changes, including oath removal and treaty opt-outs. The chamber's delays on bills like the Constitution (Removal of Oath) (Amendment) Bill prompted retaliation; de Valera exploited Article 50's amendment provisions to pass the Constitution (Amendment No. 24) Act on 29 May 1936, dissolving the Seanad immediately and eliminating the until the 1937 Constitution's adoption. This unilateral abolition, enacted without , underscored the Free State framework's executive-heavy amendment process and de Valera's strategy to consolidate authority ahead of replacing the 1922 document.

Establishment under 1937 Constitution

The , approved by plebiscite on 1 July 1937 and effective from 29 December 1937, re-established Seanad Éireann as the of the after its prior abolition in 1936 under the . Article 18 of the Constitution defined its composition as 60 members: 11 nominated by the and 49 elected indirectly from five vocational panels categorized by occupation and special interests, including the and Panel, Educational Panel, Agricultural Panel, Labour Panel, and Industrial and Commercial Panel, with six additional university seats allocated across the two universities. This structure aimed to incorporate expertise from diverse societal sectors while ensuring the chamber's subordinate role to Dáil Éireann, with the Seanad's legislative influence limited primarily to amendment and delay rather than outright veto. To implement these provisions, the passed enabling acts in 1937, including the Seanad Electoral (Panel Members) Act 1937, which outlined the and processes for panel candidates via electoral colleges comprising members of the Dáil, outgoing senators, and representatives from qualifying associations, and the Seanad Electoral ( Members) Act 1937, which regulated elections by graduates. These laws addressed transitional mechanics, such as sub-panels for within each vocational group and thresholds for candidacy based on associational support. The initial Seanad under the 1937 Constitution was elected in early 1938, with panel elections occurring between 17 March and 7 April 1938, followed by university elections on 19 April 1938; it convened for the first time on 27 April 1938 in . This body, retrospectively termed the Second Seanad in official records, marked a shift from the Free State era's more directly Dáil-influenced selection to a panel-based system intended to mitigate partisanship and enhance deliberative input, though Éamon de Valera's party secured a majority through nominations and panel outcomes. The term was set at five years, aligning with Dáil cycles but allowing for earlier dissolution tied to the .

Controversies and Reform Debates

Structural Criticisms and Cost-Benefit Analysis

The Seanad Éireann's indirect , whereby most seats are filled by votes from outgoing Dáil members, local councillors, and a restricted graduate constituency rather than , has drawn criticism for fostering and diminishing democratic accountability. This process results in low —often below 20% in university constituencies—and enables to dominate nominations, prioritizing loyalists over independent expertise. Critics argue that the five vocational panels, intended to represent sectors like labor, , and , in practice serve as vehicles for party placemen, undermining the chamber's original design for specialized input. An additional 11 seats nominated directly by the exacerbate perceptions of , allowing the executive to stack the house with allies and reward supporters outside electoral contests. Instances of such appointments, including to individuals with limited legislative experience, have fueled accusations of , particularly when nominees align closely with the government of the day. This mechanism contrasts with directly elected lower houses in other bicameral systems, contributing to the Seanad's lack of a distinct identity separate from the . Structurally, the Seanad's powers are inherently subordinate, limited to proposing amendments to Dáil-passed bills and delaying non-money bills for up to 180 days, powers that the Dáil can override at will. While this setup aims to provide a reviewing function, empirical outcomes show minimal substantive influence, as most amendments are technical or rejected outright, rendering the chamber a "talking shop" with redundant debate. The absence of authority over , entrenched since the 1937 Constitution, limits its role in checking executive overreach, unlike stronger upper houses in systems such as Canada's Senate. In cost-benefit terms, the Seanad contributes to the broader Oireachtas expenditure, with total services and programs estimated at €177 million in 2023, of which the upper house's share—encompassing salaries for 60 senators (comparable to Dáil deputies at around €100,000 annually each), staffing, and operations—represents a significant outlay for constrained output. Proponents highlight benefits like occasional amendments enhancing bill quality and sector-specific scrutiny, yet quantifiable impacts remain elusive, with no comprehensive data tracking long-term legislative improvements attributable to Seanad input. Critics, including during 2013 reform debates, contend the net benefit is negative, as the chamber's expenses yield marginal delays without preventing flawed policies, while diverting resources from more effective oversight mechanisms like Dáil committees. From a causal perspective, the structure incentivizes symbolic rather than rigorous review, with party alignment ensuring alignment with Dáil majorities, thus questioning the value of maintaining a bicameral system at current costs absent radical redesign.

Graduate Franchise and Elitism Charges

The graduate franchise in Seanad Éireann refers to the for the university panel, under which six senators—three from the (NUI) constituency and three from the Dublin University () constituency—are elected exclusively by eligible university graduates. This system originated in the 1922 Constitution of the and was retained in the 1937 Constitution, granting graduates a specialized voting right separate from the general electorate. Prior to 1973, the franchise was limited to those holding degrees from these institutions, but amendments extended eligibility to include certain other qualifications; as of 2024, the electorate comprised approximately 180,000 to 200,000 voters across both panels, representing a fraction of Ireland's total population of over 5 million. Critics have long charged this mechanism with fostering by conferring disproportionate political influence on a self-selecting group of higher-educated individuals, effectively granting them a second vote beyond their participation in elections. Figures such as political commentators have argued that it entrenches class-based privilege, as graduates—disproportionately from urban, backgrounds—hold sway over legislative representation unavailable to non-graduates, undermining the principle of equal enshrined in the Constitution's Article 16. Low , often below 20% in university panel elections, has been cited as evidence of detachment from broader democratic accountability, with parties exploiting the system to nominate insiders rather than fostering independent expertise. These charges gained prominence during debates, including the 2013 abolition , where opponents of retention highlighted the franchise's anachronistic nature in an era of expanded higher education access, arguing it perpetuates a pre-mass- akin to 19th-century property qualifications. Proponents of the system counter that it ensures specialized input on and , but detractors, including cross-party senators, contend this benefit is outweighed by democratic deficits, with empirical showing university senators often align closely with party machines rather than graduate interests. In response to persistent criticism, the Seanad Electoral (University Members) (Amendment) Act 2024, signed into law on October 29, 2024, abolished the separate NUI and Dublin University panels in favor of a unified six-seat Higher Education constituency open to graduates from all approved Irish higher-level institutions, potentially expanding the electorate by hundreds of thousands. This reform, enacted without , addresses some concerns by diluting the exclusivity of the original franchise but has drawn accusations of insufficiency, as it retains graduate-only voting and excludes non-graduates entirely, prompting calls for full integration into the general or outright abolition to align with norms. Despite the changes, analyses indicate that party nomination dominance persists, with over 80% of university panel candidates historically backed by major parties, reinforcing perceptions of insider entrenchment over meritocratic selection.

2013 Abolition Referendum

The Thirty-second Amendment of the Constitution (Abolition of Seanad Éireann) Bill 2013 proposed the complete abolition of Seanad Éireann, the of the , as part of a broader political reform agenda advanced by Taoiseach Enda 's Fine Gael-Labour . Kenny, who had pledged Seanad abolition during his time as opposition leader in 2009, argued post-2011 election that the chamber's structure—marked by indirect elections, limited powers, and perceived —hindered effective , particularly amid Ireland's post-financial measures. The government contended abolition would yield annual savings of approximately €20 million by eliminating salaries, staffing, and operational costs, while streamlining legislation without the need for bicameral delays. Critics, including and independent senators, countered that outright abolition ignored the Seanad's potential for scrutiny and expertise, advocating reform over elimination, and highlighted risks of unchecked Dáil Éireann dominance. The campaign, launched after the bill's passage through the in July 2013, emphasized fiscal efficiency on the pro-abolition (Yes) side, with framing it as essential for a "leaner" . Opponents (No side) mobilized civil society groups, academics, and figures like former , arguing the Seanad provided valuable checks on executive power and regional representation, and that abolition bypassed needed democratic enhancements like direct elections or expanded powers. Public discourse reflected divisions, with polls showing volatility; a late September survey indicated a narrow Yes lead tied to cost concerns, but No support grew amid perceptions of hasty implementation without comprehensive reform proposals. The vote occurred on 4 2013, concurrently with a successful establishing a Court of Appeal, which may have influenced turnout dynamics. Voters rejected abolition, with 51.7% (634,437 votes) opposing and 48.3% (591,937 votes) supporting it among 1,226,374 valid votes cast, on a turnout of 39.17%. The close margin—less than 43,000 votes—underscored polarized views, with stronger No support in rural constituencies and among older voters, while urban areas leaned Yes. Post-referendum attributed the defeat to voter over unproven savings claims, fears of power concentration in the , and effective No campaigning framing abolition as irreversible without alternatives. acknowledged the result but reiterated reform intentions, noting the low turnout reflected limited public engagement with parliamentary mechanics.

Post-Referendum Reform Efforts

Following the rejection of the abolition proposal in the October 4, 2013, , where 51.7% of voters opposed the measure, successive governments committed to reforming Seanad Éireann rather than dissolving it. The Fine Gael-Labour , which had campaigned for abolition, shifted focus to enhancement of the chamber's role, with Enda announcing plans for a to examine reforms including expanded powers and electoral changes. However, initial efforts yielded limited legislative progress, as broader constitutional amendments required , deterring major overhauls. In 2015, the Working Group on Seanad Reform, chaired by former , published a report recommending measures such as reducing the Taoiseach's nomination power from 11 to 7 seats, introducing list for vocational panels, and enhancing the Seanad's legislative veto capabilities. These proposals built on prior analyses like the 2004 Manning Report but faced implementation hurdles due to cross-party disagreements and fiscal constraints post-economic recovery. By 2018, the Seanad Reform Implementation Group (SRIG), established in May under independent Senator Michael McDowell and including representatives from major parties, produced a consensus report with draft legislation to enact select recommendations, such as electoral reforms for non-university panels and improved public engagement mechanisms. The SRIG emphasized non-constitutional changes to avoid referendums, focusing on procedural enhancements like mandatory pre-legislative scrutiny. Some targeted reforms have been enacted without constitutional alteration. The Civil Engagement Group, formalized in subsequent years, enables senators to propose motions for and debate, aiming to increase transparency and input from . Additionally, procedural rules now permit senators to invite nominating bodies from vocational panels to participate in chamber debates, fostering expertise-driven discussions. A significant electoral adjustment occurred with the Seanad Electoral (University Members) (Amendment) Act 2024, enacted on October 29, which consolidated the former and panels into a single six-seat higher education constituency, extending voting rights to graduates from approved institutions beyond the traditional universities. This fulfilled long-standing provisions of the Seventh Amendment (1979) and addressed critiques by broadening the electorate to approximately 2.5 million potential voters, though registration challenges persist. Despite these steps, comprehensive structural reforms remain unimplemented as of , with critics attributing stagnation to political inertia and reluctance to pursue referendums for changes like direct elections or reduced executive influence. Cross-party bills, such as one introduced by Senator in 2020 incorporating SRIG elements, have advanced through committee stages but stalled in the Dáil. The persistence of the Taoiseach's 11 nominations—often comprising a —and indirect vocational panel elections continues to fuel debates on democratic deficits, underscoring a pattern where post-referendum momentum has prioritized incremental tweaks over transformative redesign.

Political Impact and Representation

Achievements in Policy Influence

The Seanad Éireann has exerted policy influence chiefly through its constitutional power to amend bills originating in the , often identifying and correcting deficiencies in draft legislation. During the 32nd (2016–2020), senators proposed over 529 amendments to bills, many of which addressed incomplete or erroneous provisions before final passage, thereby enhancing legislative quality without veto power. This amending role has been particularly evident in technical and procedural refinements, such as those to the Statute Law Revision Bill 2024, where -amended versions returned to the Seanad for further scrutiny and approval. Notable instances include the advancement of private members' bills that spotlight emerging policy needs. Senator Lynn Ruane's Employment Equality (Amendment) (Non-Disclosure Agreement) Bill 2021, aimed at restricting NDAs in cases of workplace discrimination and harassment, successfully completed all stages in the Seanad in 2021, prompting Dáil consideration and broader public discourse on employee protections despite not ultimately enacting into law. Similarly, in public health, the Seanad endorsed the government's 1988 AIDS education and information program, urging expanded awareness campaigns and contributing to early national responses to the epidemic through targeted motions and debates. The chamber's vocational and graduate panels have facilitated niche expertise in policy scrutiny, as seen in university senators' advocacy for expansions in higher education access, culminating in the Seanad Electoral (University Members) () Act , which broadened the franchise for panel elections and reflected long-term senatorial pressure for electoral equity. Additionally, the inclusion of Northern Ireland-nominated senators has introduced cross-border perspectives, influencing debates on and shared policies, with the chamber's structure credited for amplifying minority voices in areas like disability rights and integration since the 1998 . These contributions underscore the Seanad's supplementary role in fostering deliberative refinement rather than origination of major reforms.

Shortcomings and Perceptions of Irrelevance

The Seanad Éireann's legislative powers are inherently limited, allowing it only to amend bills passed by the , propose delays of up to 180 days on non-money bills, or initiate certain non-financial legislation, but lacking veto authority as the Dáil can override rejections or expedite processes. These constraints, formalized under the 1937 Constitution which curtailed delaying powers compared to the pre-independence Free State Senate, foster perceptions that the chamber functions more as a consultative forum than a robust check on executive dominance. In practice, the Seanad rarely alters government priorities significantly, with most amendments either cosmetic or accepted without contest, reinforcing views of it as a peripheral entity in law-making. Critics, including commentators in major outlets, have labeled the Seanad "useless and undemocratic" due to its via panels and vocational groups, which dilutes direct public accountability and enables party patronage over substantive debate. Empirical assessments of its scrutiny efficacy show no clear evidence that it detects legislative flaws at a higher rate than the Dáil, undermining claims of unique value in error-correction or policy refinement. The government's nomination of 11 of 60 members further entrenches majority control, often rendering the body a echo of Dáil proceedings rather than an independent voice, as evidenced by low rates of substantive opposition to executive bills. Financial scrutiny amplifies irrelevance perceptions, with annual costs exceeding €13.9 million—including €2.5 million in members' expenses, €2.1 million in staff support, and €9.3 million in indirect operations—yielding debatable returns in legislative influence amid Ireland's fiscal constraints. The 2013 abolition referendum, motivated partly by such cost-benefit imbalances, saw proponents argue that eliminating the Seanad would streamline governance without sacrificing democratic checks, though its narrow defeat (51.7% retention) reflected entrenched institutional inertia rather than proven utility. Persistent reform debates since, including awkward electoral mechanics involving county councillors and panel voting, highlight ongoing doubts about the chamber's adaptability to contemporary needs, with public discourse often framing it as an outdated layer adding expense without commensurate scrutiny or representation gains.

Northern Ireland Senators and Cross-Border Dynamics

The inaugural Seanad Éireann of 1922 included provisions aimed at incorporating unionist and perspectives to foster stability following partition, with nominations extending to figures from the six counties to represent Protestant and interests, though formal residency requirements limited direct NI-based membership. This approach sought to mitigate unionist alienation by providing a platform for cross-border input on southern legislation, reflecting the Free State's initial emphasis on minority accommodation amid the debates. Denis Ireland, a Belfast-born nationalist and former officer who served as a nominated senator from 1925 to 1936, exemplified early cross-border participation, advocating for economic ties and reconciliation efforts between North and South. In contemporary terms, direct representation from Northern Ireland remains exceptional due to the Seanad's electoral structure—49 seats via vocational panels and universities open to Irish citizens, plus 11 Taoiseach nominations—without reserved quotas for NI residents. A notable recent instance occurred in February 2025, when Sinn Féin MLA Conor Murphy, a Newry-based former Northern Ireland Economy Minister, secured election to the Industrial and Commercial Panel, resigning his Stormont role to assume the Seanad seat and subsequently becoming his party's Seanad leader. Murphy's appointment underscores Sinn Féin's strategy to leverage dual mandates for advancing Irish reunification advocacy within the Oireachtas, leveraging his NI political experience to influence debates on border economics and post-Brexit arrangements. Cross-border dynamics in the Seanad manifest through its scrutiny of North-South cooperation under the Good Friday Agreement, with the Committee on the Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement playing a central role in examining mutual interests like infrastructure, trade, and reconciliation initiatives. Senators have debated Brexit's implications for the Irish land border, including the Northern Ireland Protocol's effects on goods movement—over 1.8 million vehicles crossing monthly—and potential pathways for NI's EU re-access via constitutional change. This engagement extends to funding cross-border projects, such as the Irish government's €800 million allocation in 2024 for NI-benefiting initiatives in areas like health and education, reflecting the Seanad's advisory influence on policies mitigating partition's economic frictions. While lacking binding power, such deliberations provide a forum for integrating NI viewpoints, as evidenced by concerns during 2013 abolition proposals that eliminating the Seanad would erode "northern input" into southern politics.

Notable Former Senators

Mary Robinson served as a senator for the from 1969 to 1989, during which she advocated for legal reforms on contraception, , and , including successful pushes to amend restrictive laws in 1973 and 1979. She later became Ireland's first female president, serving from 1990 to 1997, and subsequently High Commissioner for Human Rights from 1997 to 2002. Garret FitzGerald was elected to the Seanad in 1965 on the Industrial and Commercial Panel, serving until 1969 while promoting Ireland's economic integration with Europe, including accession to the . He transitioned to the in 1969, later becoming and in two terms (1981–1982 and 1982–1987), where he advanced the of 1985 to address governance. James Dooge served as a senator from 1961 to 1977 and again from 1981 to 1987, including as Leas-Chathaoirleach (1965–1973) and (1983–1987), while contributing to policy and European affairs debates informed by his academic expertise in . He briefly acted as and Minister for in 1981–1982, influencing Ireland's EU treaty positions, such as the .

References

  1. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/role-of-the-oireachtas/seanad-eireann/
  2. https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government-in-ireland/houses-of-the-oireachtas/the-seanad/
  3. https://www.electoralcommission.ie/seanad-eireann/
  4. https://historyhub.ie/constitutional-no-mans-land
  5. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/en/constitution/index.html
  6. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html#article18
  7. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/elections/seanad-general-election/
  8. https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/electoralProcess/nominatingBodies/seanad/2024/2024-05-31_register-of-nominating-bodies-2024_en.pdf
  9. https://cdn.electoralcommission.ie/app/uploads/2025/06/19180713/PEER_Seanad2025_English-tagged.pdf
  10. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1947/act/42/enacted/en/print.html
  11. https://www.nui.ie/elections/seanad.asp
  12. https://www.nui.ie/elections/seanadelection2025/Results/SE2025_Result.asp
  13. https://www.tcd.ie/news_events/articles/2025/counting-underway-in-seanad-election/
  14. https://www.tcd.ie/news_events/articles/2025/final-seanad-election/
  15. https://www.nui.ie/elections/seanadelection2025/default.asp
  16. https://www.nui.ie/elections/seanadelection2025/candidatesprofiles_2025.asp
  17. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2024/act/40/enacted/en/html
  18. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-housing-local-government-and-heritage/press-releases/new-portal-seanadvoterie-launched-by-the-national-university-of-ireland-nui-the-central-registration-authority/
  19. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html
  20. https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/oireachtas/2025/02/03/marathon-five-day-seanad-count-completed-with-49-senators-elected/
  21. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2025-02-12/6/
  22. https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2025/02/12/new-senators-set-out-stalls-as-mark-daly-of-ff-elected-unopposed-as-cathaoirleach/
  23. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-41573191.html
  24. https://www.womenforelection.ie/seanad2025-outcomes/
  25. https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/first-candidates-elected-to-seanad-as-counting-continues-1724478.html
  26. https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/oireachtas/2025/02/01/seanad-election-second-fine-gael-senator-loses-seat-as-count-continues-over-weekend/
  27. https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2025/0202/1494316-seanad-count/
  28. https://www.fiannafail.ie/news/taoiseach-announces-nominees-to-seanad-%25C3%25A9ireann
  29. https://gov.ie/en/department-of-the-taoiseach/press-releases/taoiseach-announces-nominees-to-seanad-%25C3%25A9ireann/
  30. https://www.facebook.com/womenforelection/posts/today-the-largest-ever-number-of-women-senators-take-their-seats-in-seanad27-wom/1014967580654958/
  31. https://www.eolasmagazine.ie/the-27th-seanad/
  32. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html#article20
  33. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/seanad-procedure-guide/legislation/overview-of-legislative-process/
  34. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/how-laws-are-made/
  35. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/seanad-procedure-guide/legislation/amendments-to-bills/
  36. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html#article22
  37. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/committees/about-committees/
  38. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/seanad-procedure-guide/committees/committees-overview/
  39. https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/committee/seanad/27/committee_on_parliamentary_privileges_and_oversight_seanad_eireann/reports/2025/2025-05-20_report-on-orders-of-reference-and-establishment-of-committees_en.pdf
  40. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/committees/33/privileges-and-oversight-seanad/our-role/
  41. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/committees/
  42. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/
  43. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/history-and-buildings/history-of-parliament-in-ireland/
  44. https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/politics/docs/goi231220.htm
  45. https://www.ark.ac.uk/elections/h1921.htm
  46. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1922/act/1/enacted/en/html
  47. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/1923-12-12/6/
  48. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/centenaries/seanad100/members-of-the-first-seanad/
  49. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1922/act/1/enacted/en/print
  50. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1922/1/pdfs/ukpga_19220001_en.pdf
  51. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/centenaries/seanad100/members-of-the-first-seanad/members-of-the-first-seanad-biographies/
  52. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/centenaries/seanad100/seanad-debates-through-the-decades/
  53. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/1936-01-15/4/
  54. https://universitytimes.ie/2025/01/electing-the-seanad-irelands-biggest-threat-to-democracy/
  55. https://www.trinitynews.ie/2022/04/elitism-and-party-politics-in-the-seanad/
  56. https://www.mayonews.ie/news/home/1113009/controversy-surrounds-taoiseachs-seanad-appointments.html
  57. https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41551348.html
  58. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/the-seanad-is-useless-and-undemocratic-1.1060872
  59. https://www.thejournal.ie/oireachtas-budget-ireland-6108430-Jul2023/
  60. https://www.eolasmagazine.ie/the-seanad-a-case-for-abolition/
  61. https://www.nui.ie/elections/seanad-register.asp
  62. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-housing-local-government-and-heritage/press-releases/government-approve-legislation-to-extend-electorate-for-seanad-university-seats/
  63. https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/the-seanad-serves-a-strong-purpose-but-it-remains-let-down-by-an-elitist-and-undemocratic-voting-process/42251112.html
  64. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2024/07/17/seanad-is-an-elitist-institution-chosen-by-graduates-and-stuffed-with-political-wannabes/
  65. https://www.hotpress.com/opinion/the-scandal-of-the-seanad-elections-3876052
  66. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2024-10-10/11/
  67. https://www.eolasmagazine.ie/seanad-voting-rights-extended-to-graduates/
  68. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2024-10-16/8/
  69. https://www.kildarestreet.com/sendebates/?gid=2024-10-16a.101
  70. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22797036
  71. https://blogs.canterbury.ac.uk/politics/2013/10/09/irelands-referendum-to-abolish-its-upper-house-the-seanad/
  72. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24404157
  73. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2013-06-27/13/
  74. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/03/irish-voters-seanad-abolition-parliament
  75. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/seanad-to-be-retained-after-government-loses-referendum-1.1551657
  76. https://www.rte.ie/news/2013/1005/478505-referendum-count/
  77. https://electionsireland.org/results/referendum/refresult.cfm?ref=201332R&sort=no
  78. https://www.electoralcommission.ie/referendum/abolition-of-seanad-eireann-and-court-of-appeal-referendums/
  79. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2013-06-26/14/
  80. https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/bill/2020/11/seanad/3/amendment/numberedList/eng/b1120s-scnl.pdf
  81. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-the-taoiseach/organisation-information/protocol-and-civic-policy-division/
  82. https://www.alicemaryhiggins.ie/content/files/Seanad-Reform-Report-2018.pdf
  83. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/visit-and-learn/centenaries/seanad100/the-seanad-looking-forward/
  84. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2025-10-16/9/
  85. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/bills/bill/2024/74/
  86. https://www.alicemaryhiggins.ie/about/seanad-reform
  87. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2025-07-16/15/
  88. https://lynnruane.ie/bills/
  89. https://www.nui.ie/news/2024/SigningofSeanadElectoralBill2024.asp
  90. https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/communications/other/2022/2022-11-21_seanad100-minority-voices-major-changes_en.pdf
  91. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/admin-2022-0027
  92. https://historyhub.ie/seanad-abolition-no-threat-to-democracy
  93. https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2022/0223/966821-seanad-eireann-reform-electorate-7th-amendment/
  94. https://www.thejournal.ie/seanad-abolition-costs-1014705-Jul2013/
  95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272641812_Bicameralism_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland_The_Seanad_Abolition_Referendum
  96. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-24355393
  97. https://historyhub.ie/seanad-precedents
  98. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cre83pj2nx0o
  99. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/feb/03/conor-murphy-to-quit-as-northern-ireland-economy-minister-to-join-irish-parliament
  100. https://sinnfein.ie/news/senator-conor-murphy-appointed-sinn-fein-seanad-leader/
  101. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/committees/33/committee-on-the-implementation-of-the-good-friday-agreement/our-role/
  102. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2023-03-08/17/
  103. https://brexitlegal.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SEANAD-REPORT-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
  104. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8uYp8zM4gY
  105. https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/directory/mary-robinson/
  106. https://clubmadrid.org/who/members/robinson-mary/
  107. https://www.dib.ie/biography/fitzgerald-garret-10020
  108. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-13451939
  109. https://www.dib.ie/biography/dooge-james-clement-ignatius-jim-a9825
  110. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/former-minister-for-foreign-affairs-james-dooge-88-dies-1.640587
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.