Hubbry Logo
Irish neutralityIrish neutralityMain
Open search
Irish neutrality
Community hub
Irish neutrality
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Irish neutrality
Irish neutrality
Irish neutrality
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ireland has a longstanding policy of military neutrality, which has meant not joining military alliances or defence pacts, or taking part in international conflicts. The nature of Irish neutrality has varied over time.

The Irish Free State declared itself a neutral country in 1922, and Ireland remained neutral during the Second World War; although it allowed Allied military aircraft to fly through part of its airspace, and shared intelligence with the Allies (see Irish neutrality during World War II). During the Cold War, it did not join NATO nor the Non-Aligned Movement.[1] Since the 1970s, some have defined Irish neutrality more broadly to include a commitment to "United Nations peacekeeping, human rights and disarmament".[1] Recent Irish governments have defined it narrowly as non-membership of military alliances.[1][2] Although the Republic is not in any military alliance, it relies on a NATO member, the United Kingdom, to protect Irish airspace.[3] In recent years, the UK has intercepted armed Russian bombers flying into Irish airspace. The Republic also allows stopovers by some foreign military aircraft, provided they are not armed.

Ireland is one of four European Union countries that are not members of NATO; the others are Austria, Cyprus and Malta. The compatibility of neutrality with Ireland's EU membership has been a point of debate in EU treaty referendum campaigns since the 1990s. The Seville Declarations on the Treaty of Nice acknowledge Ireland's "traditional policy of military neutrality".[4][5] The Irish Defence Forces have been involved in many UN peacekeeping missions.

Concept

[edit]

There are notable differences between Irish neutrality and “traditional” types of neutral states:

  • Traditionally, neutral states maintain strong defence forces; Ireland has a relatively small defence force of approximately 10,500 personnel.[6]
  • Traditionally, neutral states do not allow any foreign military within their territory; Ireland has a long history of allowing military aircraft of various nations to refuel at Shannon Airport. Under the Air Navigation (Foreign Military Aircraft) Order, 1952,[7] the Minister for Foreign Affairs, exceptionally, could grant permission to foreign military aircraft to overfly or land in the state. Confirmation was required that the aircraft in question be unarmed, carry no arms, ammunition or explosives and that the flights in question would not form part of military exercises or operations.

After the September 11 attacks, these conditions were "waived in respect of aircraft operating in pursuit of the implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1368".[8] Irish governments have always said that allowing aircraft to use Irish soil does not constitute participation in any particular conflict and is compatible with a neutral stance, adducing the transit of German troops between Finland and Norway through neutral Swedish territory during World War II.

A neutral state may also allow its citizens to serve in the armed forces of other, possibly belligerent, nations. Ireland does not restrict its citizens from serving in foreign armies, and significant numbers of Irish citizens serve or have served in the British, and to a lesser extent United States armies and the French Foreign Legion.[9][10][11]

[edit]

Ireland's neutrality is in general a matter of government policy rather than a requirement of statute law. One exception is Article 29.4.9° of the Irish constitution:[12]

The State shall not adopt a decision taken by the European Council to establish a common defence pursuant to Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union where that common defence would include the State.

This was originally inserted by the 2002 amendment ratifying the Treaty of Nice,[13] and updated by the 2009 amendment ratifying the Treaty of Lisbon.[14] An earlier bill intended to ratify the Treaty of Nice did not include a common defence opt-out, and was rejected in the first Nice referendum, in 2001.[15]

The Defence Act 1954, the principal statute governing the Irish Defence Forces, did not oblige members of the Irish Army to serve outside the state (members of the Air Corps and Naval Service were not so limited).[16] A 1960 amendment[17] was intended to allow deployment in United Nations peacekeeping missions,[18][19] and requires three forms of authorisation, which since the 1990s have come to be called the "triple lock":[20]

  1. A UN Security Council resolution or UN General Assembly resolution;
  2. A formal decision by the Irish government;
  3. Approval by a resolution of Dáil Éireann (the lower house of the Oireachtas or parliament, to which the government is responsible).

These provisions were modified in 1993[21] to allow for Chapter VII missions and again in 2006[22] to allow for regionally organised UN missions.[20] In 2025, the government proposed to eliminate the requirement of UN Security Council approval, so that the Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council did not have a veto.[23]

History

[edit]

Before independence

[edit]
Irish Citizen Army outside Liberty Hall in 1914, in front of a banner reading "We serve neither King nor Kaiser but Ireland".

Irish leaders in the Nine Years' War (1594–1603) allied with Habsburg Spain, who sent military aid to the Irish.[24] Following their defeat, all of Ireland was a dependency of England and then of Great Britain. During this period, Catholic soldiers from Ireland fought in the armies of several European Catholic countries, in what is known as the Flight of the Wild Geese. In 1644–1645, during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, the Irish Confederacy sent a military expedition to Scotland to help the Scottish Royalists. During the Irish Rebellion of 1798, the United Irishmen sought and received military assistance from the French First Republic.[24]

Ireland was part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland from 1801 to 1922. While Irish unionists supported political integration with Britain, Irish nationalists were divided between those who envisaged some continuing link with Britain and the "advanced nationalists", mainly republicans, who wanted full independence. Separatists generally envisaged an independent Ireland being neutral, but were prepared to ally with Britain's enemies in order to secure that independence, reflected in the maxim "England's difficulty is Ireland's opportunity".[24] At the outbreak of the First World War, James Connolly was president of the Irish Neutrality League[25] and was prosecuted for a banner reading "We serve neither King nor Kaiser but Ireland". During the 1916 Easter Rising, Connolly and the other leaders of the uprising sought military aid from Germany.[26]

In the 1921 negotiations leading to the Anglo-Irish Treaty, Erskine Childers envisaged the Irish Republic having a neutral status guaranteed in international law on the model of Belgium and Switzerland.[27]

Irish Free State

[edit]

The Irish Free State established in 1922 by the Anglo-Irish Treaty was a Dominion of the British Commonwealth, with the UK retaining responsibility for Ireland's marine defence as well as three naval bases, the "Treaty Ports". Article 49 of the 1922 Constitution of the Irish Free State stated, "Save in the case of actual invasion, the Irish Free State ... shall not be committed to active participation in any war without the assent of the Oireachtas [parliament]". In the Third Dáil debate on the draft constitution, the Provisional Government rejected a Labour Party amendment requiring assent of the electorate via referendum. Thomas Johnson argued "The war that is to be guarded against is a war overseas, is a war that this country may be drawn into by Parliament, by the will of Parliament perhaps, at the instigation of perhaps Canada, or perhaps Australia, or perhaps South Africa, or perhaps Great Britain, and the last is very much the more likely".[28]

In the Statute of Westminster 1931, the UK renounced the right to legislate for the Free State. The 1938 Anglo-Irish Trade Agreement saw the Treaty Ports handed over to the Free State.

The Free State joined the International Committee for Non-Intervention in the Spanish Civil War. The Spanish Civil War (Non-Intervention) Act, 1937 made it an offence to travel from Ireland to Spain to fight for either side.[29] This applied both to Irish citizens and nationals of other countries on the committee.[30][31] Nevertheless, there was Irish involvement in the Spanish Civil War on both sides by private individuals and groups. Another statute related to the committee was the Merchant Shipping (Spanish Civil War) Act 1937, which restricted Irish shipping's access to Spain until 27 April 1939.[32][33]

World War II

[edit]
Main article: Irish neutrality during World War II

Ireland remained neutral during World War II. The Fianna Fáil government's position was flagged years in advance by Taoiseach Éamon de Valera and had broad support. James Dillon was the only member of Dáil Éireann to oppose it during the war, resigning from Fine Gael in 1942 and demanding that Ireland assist the Allies (while not necessarily declaring war on the Axis).[34][35] However, tens of thousands of Irish citizens, who were by law British subjects, fought in the Allied armies against the Nazis, mostly in the British army. Senators John Keane and Frank MacDermot also favoured Allied support.[36]

De Valera said in his wartime speeches that small states should stay out of the conflicts of big powers; hence Ireland's policy was officially "neutral", and the country did not publicly declare its support for either side. In practice, while Luftwaffe pilots who crash-landed in Ireland and German sailors were interned, Royal Air Force (RAF), Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF), and United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) pilots who crashed were released on personal assurances and usually allowed to cross the border into British territory (although some Allied personnel were also interned[37]). The internees were referred to as "guests of the nation". The German embassy had to pay for their keep. If they were on a non-combative mission they were repatriated. While it was easy for Allied pilots to make that claim, it was not realistic for Luftwaffe pilots to make a similar claim. Towards the end of the war, the German embassy was unable to pay, so the internees had to work on local farms. Strict wartime press censorship had the effect of controlling a moral reaction to the war's unfolding events and reiterated the public position that Irish neutrality was morally superior to the stance of any of the combatants.[38]

Allied military aircraft were allowed to overfly County Donegal to bases in County Fermanagh. This was known as the Donegal Corridor. The bodies of any crashed Allied airmen were repatriated by the Irish Army at the border, where they would be met by an Allied officer. On at least one occasion, an Allied Air Force officer thanked his Irish counterpart for the honour they bestowed upon the repatriated airmen. The Irish captain was said to reply, "Ours may be the honour, but yours is the glory."[39]

USAAF aircraft flying to North Africa refuelled at Shannon Airport and flying boats at nearby Foynes.[citation needed]

During the war, an estimated 70,000 citizens of neutral Ireland served as volunteers in the British Armed Forces (and another estimated 50,000 from Northern Ireland).[38] Those who deserted the Irish Army to serve in the British Army, on returning to Ireland were stripped of all pay and pension rights, and banned for seven years from any employment paid for by state or government funds.[40]

Irish military intelligence (G2) shared information with the British military and even held secret meetings to decide what to do if Germany invaded Ireland to attack Britain, which resulted in Plan W, a plan for joint Irish and British military action should the Germans invade. However General Hugo McNeill, the commander of the Irish Second Division based on the Northern Ireland border, had private discussions with the German ambassador, Edouard Hempel, about German military assistance in the event of a British invasion from the north.[41] De Valera declined Germany's offer of captured British weapons.[42] The Germans did have a plan for an invasion of Ireland called Operation Green, similar to the Allies' Operation Bodyguard, but it was only to be put into operation with Operation Sea Lion, the plan to conquer Britain.

During the Belfast Blitz in April 1941, when the Luftwaffe bombed Belfast in Northern Ireland, De Valera responded immediately to a request for help from Basil Brooke, Prime Minister of Northern Ireland. Fire engines were sent from the south to help their Belfast colleagues. De Valera formally protested to the German government and made a speech declaring "they are our people".

Irish neutrality during the war was threatened from within by the Irish Republican Army (IRA), which sought to provoke a confrontation between Britain and Ireland. This plan collapsed, however, when IRA chief of staff Seán Russell died in a U-boat off the Irish coast as part of Operation Dove; the Germans also later came to realise they had overestimated the capabilities of the IRA. The American ambassador, David Gray, stated that he once asked de Valera, early in the war, what he would do if German paratroopers "liberated" Derry. According to Gray, de Valera was silent for a time and then replied "I don't know."[citation needed]

Many German spies were sent to Ireland, but all were captured quickly as a result of good intelligence and sometimes their ineptitude. The chief Abwehr spy was Hermann Görtz.

As the state was neutral, Irish cargo ships continued to sail with full navigation lights. They had large tricolours and the word "EIRE" painted large on their sides and decks. Irish ships rescued more than 500 seamen, and some airmen, from many countries during the war. However, many Irish ships were attacked by belligerents on both sides. Over 20% of Irish seamen died, on clearly marked neutral vessels, in the Irish Mercantile Marine during World War II.

Winston Churchill, the British wartime Prime Minister, made an attack on the Irish Government and in particular Éamon de Valera in his radio broadcast on VE Day. Churchill maintained that the British government displayed restraint on the Irish state while the de Valera government were allowed to "frolic with the Germans". Churchill maintained that the British could have invaded the Irish state, but displayed "considerable restraint" in not doing so. De Valera replied to Churchill in a radio broadcast:[43]

Mr. Churchill makes it clear that in certain circumstances he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain's necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean that Britain's necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people's rights were not to count....this same code is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars... shall it be world war number three?

The Cold War

[edit]

During the Cold War, Ireland maintained its policy of neutrality. It did not align itself officially with NATO, the Warsaw Pact, or the Non-Aligned Movement. It refused to join NATO due to a sovereignty dispute over Northern Ireland with the United Kingdom, a NATO member.[44][45][46][47] Ireland offered to set up a separate alliance with the United States but this was refused. This offer was linked in part to the $133 million received from the Marshall Aid Plan.[citation needed]

However, secret transmission of information from the government to the CIA started in 1955. The link was established by Liam Cosgrave via a Mr. Cram and the Irish embassy in London, and was not revealed until December 2007.[48] In 1962–63, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, Seán Lemass authorised searches of aircraft that stopped over at Shannon while flying between Warsaw Pact countries and Cuba, for "warlike material".[49]

In 1952 the government agreed a secret memorandum of understanding with the UK government regarding air defence, under which the Royal Air Force can apply to intercept hostile aircraft in Irish airspace, conscious of the lack of capability of the Irish Air Corps to do so. The agreement has been renewed by subsequent governments despite misgivings. In 2023, Senator Gerard Craughwell applied to the High Court for a judicial review of its constitutionality.[50]

Ireland applied to join the then European Communities in 1963 and finally acceded in 1973. Garret FitzGerald, who was Minister for Foreign Affairs 1973–77, claims that both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael in the 1960s and 1970s accepted that European integration would eventually reach a point where Ireland would have to join in defence co-operation.[51] FitzGerald points to Charles Haughey's opposition to the explicit mention of neutrality in a 1981 Dáil motion,[52] stating that Haughey adopted a more pro-neutrality stance upon entering opposition later in 1981.[51]

1990s–2010s

[edit]
See also: Ireland–NATO relations

The 1994 coalition government undertook not to change the policy of military neutrality without a referendum.[53] That government's 1996 white paper on foreign policy stated:[53]

The majority of the Irish people have always cherished Ireland's military neutrality, and recognise the positive values that inspire it, in peace-time as well as time of war. Neutrality has been the policy of the State in the event of armed conflict and has provided the basis for Ireland's wider efforts to promote international peace and security.

It recommended joining NATO's Partnership for Peace and participating in humanitarian missions of the Western European Union (WEU), but opposed joining NATO or the WEU as incompatible with military neutrality.[53]

Ireland provided 120 Defence Forces personnel as trainers to the International Security Assistance Force mission in the 2001–2021 Afghanistan War.[54][55] The personnel were provided under United Nations mandate.[54]

The Fianna Fáil-led government did not take a position on the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Ireland, then a member of the UN Security Council, voted "yes" to Resolution 1441, which warned of "serious consequences" if Iraq did not comply with weapons inspectors. Some United States Air Force planes were allowed to refuel at Shannon Airport before and during the conflict, as were civilian aircraft transporting US military personnel; others had permission to overfly Irish air space. A resolution of the Dáil on 20 March 2003 approved these arrangements.[56]

Anti-war activist Edward Horgan took a case in the High Court seeking declarations that the government, in allowing use of Shannon, had breached the state's obligations as a neutral state. While the court held that the custom in international law was that "a neutral state may not permit the movement of large numbers of troops or munitions of one belligerent State through its territory en route to a theatre of war with another", it found this was not part of Irish domestic law, as Irish neutrality was "a matter of government policy only". The Dáil resolution implied that letting military aircraft refuel at Shannon did not amount to "participation" in the war, and the courts had no power to overrule the Dáil on this issue.[57]

In 2006, the Minister for Defence, Willie O'Dea, announced that the Irish government would open talks on joining the European Union battle groups. O'Dea said that joining the battlegroups would not affect Ireland's military neutrality, and that a UN mandate would be required for all battlegroup operations with Irish participation. Green Party foreign affairs spokesperson John Gormley condemned the decision, saying that the government was "discarding the remnants of Irish neutrality".[58]

Taoiseach Enda Kenny said in 2007: "the truth is, Ireland is not neutral. We are merely unaligned".[59]

In 2012, the Oireachtas established a joint committee to review petitions submitted by the public. An early petition sought clarification of government policy in relation to the use of Irish airspace by foreign military aircraft. In 2013–16 the committee held discussions with the petitioners, government members, the Secretary General of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and academics,[60] and issued a report, which stated:[61]

The Joint Committee note the lacuna between what is understood by the citizens by neutrality and what is the de facto position. Accordingly, the Joint Committee recommend that the Dáil and Seanad debate the matter of neutrality with a view to the holding of a Referendum so that the will of the people can be determined.

In 2015, the Fine Gael–Labour government published a foreign policy review which stated, "Our policy of military neutrality remains a core element of Irish foreign policy."[62] It defined neutrality as "non-membership of military alliances and non-participation in common or mutual defence arrangements",[63] while working with international organisations for peacekeeping missions.[64]

An RAF Typhoon intercepting a Russian Tupolev Tu-95 bomber in 2014

Since the Russian annexation of Crimea, Russian bomber aircraft have deliberately flown into Irish-controlled airspace several times, without warning, and with their transponders switched off. As the Irish Air Corps lacks air defence, the British Royal Air Force (RAF) have had to intercept these bombers.[65] In February 2015, two Russian Tupolev Tu-95 "Bear" bombers flew into Irish-controlled airspace twice, with their transponders switched off.[66] The Norwegian and British militaries confirmed that the bombers were carrying nuclear warheads.[67] The bombers flew within 25 nautical miles of the Irish coast, and were intercepted by RAF Eurofighter Typhoon jets.[68]

Ireland joined the EU's Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) when it was founded in December 2017. The Fine Gael-led government said it would participate on a case-by-case basis and membership did not compromise neutrality. Fianna Fáil supported membership; Sinn Féin, the Greens, Solidarity, and People Before Profit opposed it; the Labour Party had reservations.[69]

Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

In January 2022, during the buildup to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russia controversially announced plans to hold naval drills about 150 nautical miles off the coast, within Ireland's exclusive economic zone. It was to involve naval artillery and missiles. Local fishermen protested to the Russian embassy and announced they would continue to fish in the area regardless. Russia's Ambassador to Ireland, Yury Filatov, warned the fishermen to "refrain from any provocative actions which might endanger all involved".[70] Eventually, in response to requests from the Irish government, Russia's Minister of Defence Sergey Shoigu agreed to move the naval drills further away from Ireland.[71]

In a Dáil discussion that month on the Russo-Ukrainian crisis, Richard Boyd Barrett of People Before Profit asked:[72]

Why does the Government correctly condemn Russian military exercises in Irish waters but allow the US military to use Shannon Airport [?] ... Neutrality means not taking sides in dangerous conflicts and game-playing between major imperial powers.

Taoiseach Micheál Martin replied:[72]

Ireland accepts Ukrainian territorial integrity [...] We're not politically neutral but we're militarily neutral. It's an important distinction. We're members of the European Union. We work with our European Union colleagues in terms of rules-based multilateral approaches to international disputes.

In response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, the Tánaiste Leo Varadkar stated that while Ireland is not militarily aligned, the country is "not neutral at all" in relation to this conflict and that "support for Ukraine is unwavering and unconditional".[73] Days later the Department of Foreign Affairs said it would "constructively abstain" from an EU fund for military aid to Ukraine, but contribute instead to a fund that did not include weaponry.[74]

Since the invasion, the Irish Navy and Air Corps have increasingly observed Russian "spy ships" believed to be mapping critical undersea communications cables and energy pipelines off the Irish coast. Some of them are escorted by Russian warships and are fitted with equipment for sabotaging undersea cables.[75][76][77]

In March 2023 a bill to hold a referendum on Irish membership in a hypothetical European army was opposed by the government, who called it "unnecessary".[78] Micheál Martin said that if the referendum had taken place he was confident it would have passed and that Ireland needs to 'reflect' on the issue of neutrality.[79]

A Consultative Forum on International Security Policy was held in Dublin, Cork and Galway during 2023. It was a public forum to discuss Ireland's foreign, security and defence policy. Micheál Martin, then Minister for Defence and Foreign Affairs, said every country in Europe had reviewed their defence and security in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.[80][81][82] President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins, rebuffed the forum, saying that Ireland was drifting away from neutrality and "playing with fire". His comments were criticised by government ministers.[83][84][85] The forum was disrupted by anti-NATO protesters from the Connolly Youth Movement; with Martin describing them as "undemocratic" and "trying to shut down debate".[86] Boyd Barrett accused those involved in the forum of "trying to soften up public opinion to abandoning Ireland's neutrality."[87]

In the 2025 Irish presidential election, eventual winner Catherine Connolly criticised government proposals to remove the triple lock.[88] Her vision statement on the President of Ireland's official website states she "wants to be a voice for equality and justice and for the defence of neutrality as an active, living tradition of peacemaking, bridge-building and compassionate diplomacy".[89]

United Nations peacekeeping

[edit]

Irish Defence Forces have seen active service as part of United Nations peacekeeping activities – initially in the early 1960s Congo Crisis, and subsequently in Cyprus (UNFICYP) and Lebanon (UNIFIL).

Weapons control

[edit]

A 2004 report by Forfás noted that the policy of neutrality is a factor in Ireland's lack of an arms industry and strict export controls on weapons.[90] The latter were previously enforced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009,[91] a statutory instrument made under the Control of Exports Act 1983.[92] The 2009 order was replaced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012, which reflects the 2008 EU Common Position on Arms Exports.[93][94] The 2004 Forfás report noted concerns about dual-use technology and the use as weapons components of products from major Irish export industries such as chemicals, telecommunications equipment, computer chips and software.[95] The state is also bound by EU regulations and international arms control treaties.[96][93] In 2017, four export licence applications were refused for dual-use items.[93] In the 1980s and early 1990s, successive governments rebuffed proposals by companies including Eurometaal and Thyssen Henschel to establish arms manufacturing and repair plants in the state, on the grounds that it might compromise neutrality and that there was then no specific legislation limiting the area to which the arms could be exported.[97]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Irish neutrality

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Irish neutrality denotes the Republic of Ireland's policy of military non-alignment, entailing abstention from membership in permanent military alliances or mutual defense pacts, a doctrine practiced consistently by successive governments since the state's declaration of independence in 1922 and formalized amid the approach of the Second World War in 1939. This framework permits selective engagement in multilateral operations, particularly United Nations-mandated peacekeeping missions decided on a case-by-case basis, which have constituted a cornerstone of Ireland's international security contributions without compromising the core principle of non-belligerence in conflicts between major powers. Codified in the Protocol on Irish neutrality annexed to the Lisbon Treaty, the policy accommodates Ireland's participation in European Union Common Security and Defence Policy initiatives, such as non-executive projects under Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), provided they align with UN imperatives and do not presuppose collective defense obligations. Historically, neutrality preserved Ireland's sovereignty during the Second World War, averting direct involvement despite geographic proximity to active theaters and internal pressures, though it drew empirical critiques for asymmetric treatment of Axis and Allied actions, including official condolences following Adolf Hitler's death and restrictions on Allied . Post-war, Ireland declined accession in 1949, citing partition of the island as a barrier to alignment with Britain, while leveraging neutrality to cultivate a reputation for impartial mediation in global disputes. Defining characteristics include the "triple lock" mechanism—requiring authorization, cabinet approval, and (parliamentary) consent for deployments exceeding twelve personnel—which safeguards against unilateral military commitments, though recent government proposals to reform it for efficiency have sparked debate without altering public preference for the extant model of neutrality. Controversies persist over practical dilutions, such as the facilitation of military transits through since the 1990s, which critics argue erodes impartiality despite lacking formal combat involvement, and selective PESCO engagements that, while voluntary and capability-focused, fuel perceptions of creeping alignment amid heightened European security concerns post-2022 . Empirical public opinion data affirm robust backing, with 63% endorsing the current framework in 2025 polling, underscoring neutrality's endurance as a causal bulwark against conscription risks and fiscal burdens of alliance warfare, even as bolsters domestic defense spending in response to proximate threats. This policy's pragmatic realism—prioritizing preservation over ideological purity—has yielded a low-conflict foreign posture, enabling with and the transatlantic sphere without the liabilities of expeditionary entanglements.

Core Principles of Irish Neutrality

Ireland's policy of military neutrality is defined by non-membership in military alliances and non-participation in mutual or common defence arrangements, principles consistently upheld by successive governments since the establishment of the state. This stance ensures that Ireland avoids entanglement in conflicts originating from alliance obligations, preserving sovereign decision-making over the . The policy aligns with Article 29.5 of the Irish Constitution, which pledges devotion to peace and international cooperation, though neutrality itself lacks explicit constitutional codification and remains a matter of executive practice. Central to these principles is the commitment to non-belligerency, whereby Ireland refrains from offensive military engagements or providing combat support to parties in armed conflicts, except in self-defence as permitted under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Impartiality towards belligerents forms another foundational element, rooted in customary international law as outlined in the 1907 Hague Conventions, requiring neutral states to abstain from aiding or favoring combatants while maintaining the capacity to defend their neutrality. Ireland's adherence to these tenets was formalized in its 1939 declaration of neutrality at the onset of World War II, emphasizing territorial integrity and non-alignment amid great-power rivalries. Complementing non-alignment is Ireland's active support for multilateral efforts, particularly through UN-mandated operations, which are deemed compatible with neutrality as they promote without partisan involvement. This "UN-centric" approach underscores a principle of positive neutrality, focusing on conflict prevention and humanitarian imperatives rather than . Protocols attached to EU treaties, such as the Irish Protocol to the Lisbon Treaty (2009), further safeguard these principles by affirming that EU security cooperation does not compel Ireland to assume mutual defence obligations.

Constitutional and Statutory Framework

The does not explicitly enshrine military neutrality as a binding principle, treating it instead as a matter of government policy rather than constitutional imperative. Article 28.3.1° states: "War shall not be declared and the State shall not participate in any war save with the assent of ," thereby requiring parliamentary approval for entry into hostilities, which successive governments have interpreted as aligning with non-participation in belligerent alliances absent such consent. This provision, adopted in 1937, establishes a legislative check on executive warmaking powers but permits flexibility in defensive or scenarios, such as those authorized under international mandates. Article 29, addressing , promotes adherence to treaties and peaceful without mandating abstention from alliances, further underscoring neutrality's status as discretionary policy. Statutory law reinforces this framework through the Defence Acts, which delineate the Irish ' roles, including overseas deployments strictly for peacekeeping under auspices. The Defence Act 1954, as amended, empowers the deployment of contingents abroad only for duties like or humanitarian assistance, prohibiting involvement in wars between states. Subsequent amendments, such as the Defence (Amendment) Act 1993, explicitly tie overseas missions to UN Chapter VII mandates, ensuring alignment with Ireland's policy of military non-alignment by barring participation in offensive operations or mutual defense pacts. A key operational safeguard is the "triple lock" mechanism for troop deployments exceeding 12 personnel, requiring three approvals: a or resolution (or equivalent authorization for non-UN missions), a decision, and a resolution. This practice, formalized through parliamentary convention and tied to the Defence Acts, prevents unilateral executive action and has consistently upheld neutrality by conditioning Irish involvement on multilateral, impartial mandates since its evolution in the 1990s. As of 2025, the has initiated reforms to amend the triple lock, proposing to eliminate the UN requirement for missions up to 50 personnel to address veto-induced delays in the , while retaining Dáil oversight to preserve democratic control. These changes, outlined in draft , aim to enhance operational agility without altering the core policy of non-membership in military alliances.

Historical Development

Pre-Independence Influences

Irish opposition to involvement in British-led wars emerged prominently in the , shaped by nationalist leaders who viewed such conflicts as extensions of imperial dominance rather than national interests. , a key advocate for and of the Union, condemned the dispatch of Irish recruits to foreign wars, praising in 1811 those statesmen who refused participation in morally unjust campaigns, thereby establishing early precedents for non-entanglement in imperial ventures. This anti-militaristic stance persisted into the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with Irish nationalists criticizing recruitment for wars like the Second Boer War (1899–1902) as exploitative of Irish manpower for British colonial aims. The Irish nationalist press during this period increasingly portrayed British military engagements as detrimental to Ireland's domestic struggles, fostering a of separation from imperial conflicts. The advent of World War I in 1914 crystallized these attitudes through the establishment of the Irish Neutrality League in September of that year, an organization dedicated to opposing Irish participation in the Anglo-German conflict and prioritizing Ireland's . , socialist leader and president of the league, chaired its inaugural public meeting on October 12, 1914, in , where it declared its mission to protect Irish interests from being "sacrificed to English exigencies." The league mobilized nationalists, labor groups, and republicans against enlistment, framing the war as irrelevant to Irish . Intensifying resistance came with Britain's 1918 attempt to extend to via the Military Service Bill, which encountered unified opposition from , the , labor unions, and the Catholic hierarchy, who issued pastoral letters denouncing it as an assault on Irish rights. This campaign, involving mass protests, pledges of resistance, and political agitation, successfully deterred implementation, as the government postponed it amid the escalating push for independence. These efforts underscored a burgeoning consensus among Irish nationalists for insulating the island from external military obligations, laying ideological foundations for the neutrality policy enacted post-independence in 1922.

Formation During the Irish Free State

The , proclaimed on 6 December 1922 under the , adopted an initial foreign policy emphasizing diplomatic recognition of its sovereignty while navigating obligations within the British Commonwealth. The government of , led by the pro-Treaty party, prioritized stability post-Civil War and pursued multilateral engagement without binding military commitments. On 10 September 1923, the Free State became the first member admitted to of Nations after the Irish delegation's election to the Council, a move designed to affirm international status and support principles through rather than armament or alliances. This approach reflected pragmatic avoidance of entanglement in European , informed by the Treaty's Article 7, which deferred defense arrangements with Britain but imposed no immediate alliance duties on the Free State. The election of Éamon de Valera's party on 9 March 1932 marked a decisive turn toward assertive non-alignment, viewing ties as impediments to full and potential vectors for involuntary war participation. De Valera, drawing from anti-Treaty republicanism, pursued legislative decoupling—abolishing the oath of allegiance to the British Crown via the Constitution (Amendment No. 2) Act on 12 October 1933 and centralizing treaty execution under the External Relations (Execution of Treaties and Formal Documents) Act of 12 December 1936—reducing monarchical oversight in foreign affairs. These steps laid groundwork for neutrality by prioritizing national over imperial defense pacts, amid de Valera's public advocacy for Ireland's abstention from conflicts not directly threatening its territory, as evidenced in addresses critiquing enforcement failures like the 1935–1936 Abyssinian crisis. Neutrality's conceptual formation crystallized in response to escalating European instability, including the remilitarization of the Rhineland in March 1936 and the from July 1936, where Ireland officially observed non-intervention despite domestic divisions. De Valera positioned neutrality as a realist bulwark against historical patterns of Irish involvement in British-led wars, rejecting League sanctions implying military escalation and focusing instead on diplomatic to resolve partition internally. The Bunreacht na hÉireann (), enacted on 29 December 1937, reinforced this by declaring the state sovereign without external suzerainty references, enabling policy autonomy. The of 25 April 1938, ceding British naval access to at Cobh, Berehaven, and , eliminated strategic vulnerabilities that could compel alignment, directly facilitating neutrality's operational viability.

Implementation in World War II

Upon the outbreak of war in on 1 , the Irish government declared a on 2 September and affirmed its policy of neutrality the following day, as instigated by Éamon de Valera and adopted by the . This stance was rooted in Ireland's recent assertion of sovereignty and public aversion to entanglement in a conflict perceived as British-led, though tempered by geographic proximity and economic dependence on Britain. The Emergency Powers Act 1939, enacted on 3 September, provided the legal framework for implementation by empowering the government to issue orders controlling essential supplies, services, and public order; authorizing , of press and correspondence; and regulating the economy to avert wartime disruptions. These measures enabled strict enforcement of neutrality, including prohibitions on military activities within Irish territory, while facilitating defensive preparations such as and resource allocation. Militarily, neutrality necessitated rapid expansion of the from fewer than 20,000 personnel in 1939 to over 40,000 by 1941, including the creation of the Local Defence Force (LDF) on 28 as a volunteer auxiliary for internal security, coastal defense, and support to the . The LDF, reaching 200,000 members at its peak, focused on anti-invasion drills, lookout posts, and auxiliary policing, while the army fortified ports, deployed anti-aircraft batteries, and conducted coastwatching to detect incursions. These efforts deterred potential Axis landings, though equipment shortages limited offensive capabilities. Diplomatically, the government under Foreign Minister Joseph P. Walshe pursued impartiality by maintaining legations with both Axis and Allied powers, prohibiting propaganda or espionage that could favor one side, and prioritizing protection of trade routes vital to Britain's supply lines as a neutrality imperative given Ireland's position. airmen were subject to under , but implementation varied: all approximately 50 German aircrew landings resulted in full wartime , whereas from 1942 onward, most of the 254 Allied personnel from 52 crashes were escorted to the border without formal , allowing to avoid diplomatic friction. Weather observations from stations like Blacksod Point were covertly shared with the Allies, aiding operations such as the D-Day landings on 6 June 1944 by providing Atlantic forecasts unavailable elsewhere. Neutrality faced violations, notably the Luftwaffe bombing of Dublin's North Strand on 31 May 1941, which killed 28 civilians, injured over 300, and damaged hundreds of homes, prompting a formal to demanding compensation, reparations, and guarantees against future overflights. The rejected British requests for base access but permitted repairs to Allied ships and aircraft, while censoring pro-Axis activities and expelling German spies when detected. Economic controls under emergency orders sustained trade with Britain, which accounted for 90% of imports, despite U-boat threats. In the war's closing days, on 2 , de Valera visited the German legation to offer condolences on Adolf Hitler's death, framing it as a protocol of neutrality toward a state's , irrespective of the regime's collapse or atrocities—a decision that drew international criticism but aligned with consistent diplomatic equidistance. Overall, implementation balanced strict legal adherence with pragmatic concessions to the Allies, reflecting causal priorities of preservation amid risks and partition grievances, rather than ideological affinity for either bloc.

Evolution During the Cold War

Following the declaration of the Republic of Ireland in 1949, the government declined an invitation to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), primarily due to the ongoing partition of the island and the resulting sovereignty dispute with the United Kingdom, a founding NATO member. While Irish leaders, including Minister for External Affairs Seán MacBride, expressed support for defending "Christian civilization" against communism, membership was conditioned on British withdrawal from Northern Ireland, reflecting a prioritization of national unification over military alignment. This refusal entrenched Ireland's policy of military non-alignment, distinguishing it from other European neutrals by maintaining an unarmed stance without formal impartiality toward the superpowers, as the policy implicitly favored Western democratic values over Soviet influence. Ireland's admission to the on December 14, 1955, marked a shift toward "active neutrality," enabling participation in multilateral without compromising detachment. Initial contributions included observers to the (UNTSO) in the starting in 1958, followed by a significant deployment of up to 6,000 personnel to the United Nations Operation in the Congo (ONUC) from 1960 to 1964, where Irish forces faced , including the Siege of Jadotville in September 1961. Subsequent missions, such as the United Nations Force in (UNFICYP) from 1964 onward, reinforced this approach, with Ireland deploying contingents averaging several hundred troops, positioning as a means to assert and global relevance amid tensions. Throughout the era, Ireland permitted unarmed U.S. military aircraft overflights and stopovers at Shannon Airport under the 1952 Air Navigation (Foreign Military Aircraft) Order, which required case-by-case approval but often granted it tacitly to non-armed flights, reflecting pragmatic economic and transatlantic ties despite official neutrality. Defense expenditures remained modest, averaging under 1% of GDP, with the Irish Defence Forces—totaling around 13,000 personnel—focused on territorial defense rather than expeditionary capabilities beyond UN mandates. No formal military pacts emerged, even as economic policies under Taoiseach Seán Lemass from 1959 improved relations with Britain and the West, underscoring a consistent delineation between political alignment with democratic states and abstention from collective defense obligations. This framework persisted into the détente and late Cold War periods, with neutrality framed domestically as opposition to communism while avoiding entanglement in superpower conflicts.

Post-Cold War Shifts (1990s–2010s)

Following the end of the , Ireland's policy of military neutrality underwent gradual adaptation amid deepening integration and expanded international roles, while maintaining non-membership in military alliances. The 1996 White Paper on Foreign Policy emphasized Ireland's commitment to UN-mandated operations as compatible with neutrality, reflecting increased deployments to conflict zones like in 1993 and Bosnia in the mid-1990s, where Irish forces contributed to UNPROFOR stabilization efforts under multinational commands. This period saw neutrality evolve from isolationist non-alignment to active participation in mechanisms, justified by successive governments as preserving while addressing global instability. EU treaty developments tested public and political support for neutrality. The 2001 referendum on the Treaty of Nice initially failed, with 54% voting against, partly due to concerns over the treaty's provisions for a Common European Security and Defence Policy (CESDP), perceived by opponents as risking conscription or alliance entanglement; a second referendum passed in October 2002 (63% approval) after EU leaders issued declarations affirming that the treaty upheld Ireland's non-participation in mutual defense commitments. Similarly, the 2008 Lisbon Treaty referendum rejection (53% no) highlighted fears of eroding neutrality through enhanced EU defense structures, leading to a 2009 revote (67% yes) following Irish-specific guarantees that the treaty neither prejudiced military neutrality nor provided for conscription into EU forces. These assurances, while politically reassuring, were critiqued by neutrality advocates as non-binding and insufficient to prevent de facto alignment via EU mechanisms. In the 2000s, Ireland committed to EU rapid response capabilities without altering core non-alignment. The 2000 White Paper on Defence outlined reforms to enhance interoperability for UN and EU missions, including a 20% increase in defense personnel to 11,500 by 2004, while reaffirming neutrality as non-participation in wars outside UN auspices. Ireland joined the Nordic EU Battlegroup in 2006, contributing up to 150 personnel for standby rotations beginning January 2008, framed as supporting crisis management rather than collective defense; this marked initial engagement with EU military structures, though deployments remained limited and non-combat focused. Critics, including peace groups, argued such integrations blurred neutrality lines, enabling indirect support for NATO-led operations through EU channels. Post-9/11 security dynamics further strained traditional interpretations. From 2001 onward, successive Irish governments permitted U.S. military transit through for operations in and , with over 2.5 million U.S. troops passing through by 2010; officials maintained this complied with neutrality by restricting activities to refueling and personnel changes without arming or preparation on Irish soil. However, reports of CIA rendition flights and armed troops documented by monitoring groups fueled domestic protests and legal challenges, with opponents contending it facilitated belligerent actions, eroding . By the late 2000s, defense expenditure hovered at 0.4-0.5% of GDP, prioritizing capabilities over offensive assets, yet documents increasingly emphasized "triple-lock" mechanisms—requiring UN mandate, Dáil approval, and government decision—for overseas deployments to safeguard neutrality. Overall, these shifts reflected pragmatic alignment with , sustaining broad public backing for neutrality (around 60-70% in polls) while accommodating Ireland's and transatlantic ties.

Developments Since the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Following Russia's full-scale invasion of on 24 February 2022, the Irish government condemned the action as a violation of and provided non-lethal assistance to , including €50 million in by March 2022 and subsequent packages totaling approximately €380 million in military, non-lethal support such as and field hospitals by September 2024. also imposed sanctions on and hosted over 100,000 Ukrainian refugees under the , reflecting solidarity without direct military involvement consistent with its neutrality policy. The prompted a review of Ireland's posture, leading to commitments for increased defense expenditure amid heightened threats, including Russian naval incursions into Ireland's in June 2022, where a Russian vessel damaged undersea cables. In July 2022, the government outlined a plan to raise annual defense spending by 50% to €1.5 billion by 2028, focusing on capabilities like naval patrols and cyber defense, with the 2026 budget allocating a record €1.49 billion, an 11% increase from prior years. This escalation was justified by as necessary for sovereignty in a deteriorated European environment, though it stopped short of alignment. Ireland participated in the EU Military Assistance Mission to Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) from February 2023, deploying up to 30 defense personnel for training roles, framed as capacity-building rather than combat support to preserve neutrality. Debates intensified over the "triple lock" mechanism requiring UN mandate, government, and Dáil approval for deployments exceeding 12 troops, with proposals in 2023-2024 to reform it for faster EU responses, drawing criticism from neutrality advocates for potentially enabling non-UN missions. The Department of Foreign Affairs' International Security Policy white paper, published in 2023, reaffirmed military neutrality while emphasizing enhanced EU defense cooperation and resilience against hybrid threats. Public opinion remained supportive of neutrality, with a April 2025 Irish Times poll showing 63% favoring the current model and only 19% backing membership per a September 2025 analysis, though concerns over Russian airspace violations—intercepted by RAF aircraft—fueled calls for air policing investments. No major party advocated abandoning neutrality, and rejected accession despite European pressures post-Finland and Sweden's 2023 entries. These developments reflected pragmatic adaptations to geopolitical realities without formal policy reversal, as evidenced by continued UN-focused and abstention from collective defense pacts.

Operational Policies

United Nations Peacekeeping Contributions

Ireland's participation in United Nations peacekeeping operations exemplifies its neutral stance by confining military engagements to UN-mandated missions aimed at restoring international peace and security, thereby avoiding alignment with permanent alliances like NATO. The Irish Defence Forces first deployed to the UN Operation in the Congo (ONUC) in July 1960, marking the inception of Ireland's involvement, with subsequent continuous service establishing it as the only nation maintaining an unbroken presence in UN and UN-mandated operations since 1958. This record underscores a policy of selective engagement, where deployments require UN Security Council authorization and, domestically, adherence to the "triple lock" mechanism involving parliamentary, governmental, and UN approvals—though legislative reforms in 2025 streamlined this for missions under 50 personnel to enhance operational flexibility without altering neutrality's core tenets. Key historical contributions include the Congo mission (1960–1964), where Ireland provided over 6,000 personnel at its peak, including the 35th Infantry Battalion that defended Elisabethville against Katangese secessionist forces in a notable early engagement. Subsequent missions encompassed UNFICYP in from 1964 onward, with Irish troops numbering up to 900 in the 1970s; and UNIFIL in since 1978, Ireland's largest and longest commitment, involving over 30,000 personnel to date and resulting in 47 fatalities amid border skirmishes with non-state actors. Other significant deployments include UNDOF in the (Syria/ buffer zone) since 2013, currently with 130 Irish troops focused on observation and disengagement enforcement; and contributions to MINUSMA in until its 2023 drawdown, emphasizing logistical and advisory roles. Quantitatively, Ireland has dispatched personnel to over 60 UN-led or mandated operations across , the , , and Asia, with annual overseas deployments peaking at around 1,000–1,500 troops in the 1990s–2000s before stabilizing at 400–500 in recent years. As of March 2025, 428 Defence Forces members were serving abroad, predominantly in UN missions such as UNIFIL (approximately 340 personnel) and UNDOF, though funding constraints prompted considerations of reducing up to 40 troops from by late 2025. Ireland's financial assessed contribution to the UN budget stood at 0.44% in 2024, reflecting its proportional commitment relative to GDP. Under the UN Standby Arrangements System (UNSAS), Ireland pledges up to 850 troops, enhancing rapid response capabilities while preserving operational independence. These efforts align with Ireland's neutrality by prioritizing impartiality and consent-based mandates, though empirical instances of armed confrontations—such as the 1980 Battle of At Tiri in , where Irish forces repelled an Israeli incursion—demonstrate that has occasionally entailed defensive combat, testing the boundaries of non-belligerency without formal declarations of war. Overall, UN reinforces Ireland's diplomatic leverage in multilateral forums, with over 90 personnel fatalities across missions attributed to hostile actions, accidents, and illnesses, underscoring the tangible costs of this policy. Recent UN Security Council extensions, such as UNIFIL's mandate to 2027, affirm ongoing viability amid regional volatility.

Arms Import, Export, and Weapons Control

Ireland's arms import policy aligns with its military neutrality by prioritizing defensive equipment for the Irish Defence Forces, focusing on capabilities for territorial defense, internal security, and operations rather than offensive weaponry. is managed by the Department of Defence's Contracts Branch, which adheres to public regulations emphasizing cost-effectiveness and with EU partners. Imports are limited in scale due to Ireland's low defense expenditure, typically around 0.3-0.4% of GDP, and exclude major combat systems like or heavy armor to avoid perceptions of . Key imports include small arms, , vehicles, and protective gear sourced primarily from member states, the , and occasionally other suppliers. For instance, in August 2025, awarded a €16.5 million contract for 6,000 Integrated Modular Systems through the 's of Supply of Arms, and (SAFE) framework, opening participation to other countries to reduce costs and enhance collective . Historically, suppliers have included Israeli firms for components, with €14.7 million in arms and military goods imported from over the decade prior to 2023, though such ties have faced scrutiny and partial suspensions amid geopolitical tensions. Arms exports from Ireland are minimal and tightly regulated under the Control of Exports Act 2023, which implements EU Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining eight criteria for approvals, including respect for , , and avoidance of fueling internal repression or aggression. The Act covers military items on the EU Common Military List and dual-use goods under Regulation (EU) 2021/821, requiring licenses for exports, with annual reporting to on issuances, values, and destinations. Ireland's proponent stance on the (2013) further embeds these controls, prohibiting transfers likely to violate prohibitions on or contribute to war crimes. Export volumes remain low, reflecting limited domestic production: weapons exports totaled $6.3 million in 2023, ranking 60th globally, while broader arms and exports reached $46 million in 2022. Recent developments include a 2024 on military goods exports to following an advisory opinion on occupation legality, suspending prior dual-use shipments valued at €70 million in 2023. These measures reinforce neutrality by ensuring Irish-origin arms do not support conflicts inconsistent with 's non-aligned , though critics note occasional approvals for dual-use items to stable partners raise questions about criterion application rigor. Domestic weapons control encompasses strict licensing for civilian possession, manufacture, and transfer, enforced by and the Department of Justice, with prohibitions on automatic weapons and emphasis on decommissioning post-Troubles. The Firearms Act 1925, as amended, limits imports to authorized entities, aligning with neutrality's aversion to proliferation while permitting access for operational needs. Annual reports detail zero denials in some categories but highlight ongoing vigilance against diversion risks.

Defense Expenditure and Military Capabilities

Ireland's defense expenditure has consistently ranked among the lowest in , at 0.24% of GDP in 2024, compared to the European average of 1.74%. This equates to €1.29 billion for that year, reflecting a historical emphasis on minimal consistent with the of neutrality, which prioritizes non-alignment over robust conventional deterrence. The 2025 allocation rose to €1.35 billion, a 22% increase from 2022, with further commitments to reach €1.5 billion by 2028 to address equipment modernization and personnel retention challenges. For 2026, the budget expands to €1.49 billion, including capital investments exceeding €2 billion over the medium term for maritime and air enhancements. The Irish Defence Forces maintain a small force structure, with approximately 7,500 permanent personnel as of early 2025, below the authorized strength of 9,500 amid ongoing recruitment and retention difficulties. The Army, the largest branch, fields light infantry brigades equipped with Steyr AUG rifles, FN MAG machine guns, and limited armored vehicles like the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle and Piranha APCs, but lacks heavy tanks or advanced anti-tank systems beyond Javelin missiles. Artillery capabilities include 120mm mortars and aging 105mm howitzers, with no long-range strike options. The Naval Service operates eight offshore patrol vessels for maritime surveillance, focusing on fishery protection and enforcement, but possesses no frigates, , or offensive naval weaponry, rendering it incapable of contested sea control. The Air Corps relies on a handful of like the CASA CN-235 and helicopters for transport and search-and-rescue, with of C-295W transports underway to bolster but no fighter jets or integrated air defense systems. Recent upgrades include lighter and early warning radars, yet overall capabilities emphasize defensive and expeditionary roles for UN missions over territorial denial against peer adversaries. This configuration, funded at levels far below NATO's 2% GDP benchmark, exposes vulnerabilities in air and maritime domains, as evidenced by Ireland's 97th ranking in global military power indices for 2025.

Strategic and Geopolitical Implications

Security Dependencies and Vulnerabilities

Ireland's military neutrality has fostered significant security dependencies, particularly on the for airspace protection, as the lacks fighter aircraft since disbanding its Light Strike Squadron in 1998. Under a longstanding, secretive bilateral agreement, (RAF) jets routinely intercept unauthorized aircraft, including Russian Bear bombers, in or near Irish-controlled airspace, with multiple incidents recorded since Russia's 2014 annexation of . For instance, in March 2020, two Russian Tu-95 bombers entered Irish-managed international airspace off the west coast, prompting RAF intercepts, while similar violations in 2015 forced commercial jets to divert. This reliance underscores Ireland's limited air defense capabilities, with the ' 7,550 permanent personnel in 2023 unable to independently monitor or respond to such threats. Maritime vulnerabilities are acute given Ireland's (EEZ), spanning approximately 10 times the land area and ranking among 's largest, yet patrolled by a Naval Service comprising just eight patrol vessels lacking advanced systems. The zone hosts critical undersea infrastructure, including transatlantic data cables vulnerable to sabotage, as highlighted by recent suspected incidents and the presence of foreign surveillance vessels, including Russia's "shadow fleet." Russian naval assets have frequently operated in the EEZ without effective challenge, exploiting the Naval Service's capacity constraints for fisheries protection and basic patrols over comprehensive domain awareness. These gaps expose Ireland to hybrid threats, such as disruption of subsea communications linking to , amplifying broader continental risks. Defense expenditure remains low at 0.22% of GDP in 2023, the lowest among European nations, funding rudimentary forces ill-equipped for peer conflicts or sustained operations. This underinvestment, coupled with recruitment and retention issues, limits capabilities in , munitions, and expertise, rendering dependent on informal NATO proximity for deterrence while facing accusations of freeloading on allies' defenses. Recent government plans for fighter jet acquisitions and enhancements aim to mitigate airspace reliance, but implementation lags amid persistent budgetary and structural shortfalls. Overall, neutrality's emphasis on non-alignment has prioritized UN over national deterrence, heightening exposure to state actors like testing Western resolve through incursions and infrastructure probing.

Relations with NATO and the European Union

Ireland has maintained military neutrality while engaging in limited, non-binding cooperation with since joining the (PfP) program on December 1, 1999. This framework enables bilateral cooperation on peacekeeping, crisis management, and capability development without entailing alliance membership or collective defense commitments under Article 5 of the treaty. In December 2023, Ireland formalized an Individually Tailored Partnership Programme (ITPP) with , effective from 2024 to 2028, which expands areas of collaboration including intelligence sharing, , and protection of critical undersea infrastructure such as data cables and energy links vulnerable to hybrid threats. These arrangements prioritize training and information exchange while explicitly aligning with Ireland's policy of non-participation in military alliances. Such engagements have drawn scrutiny for potentially eroding neutrality, though Irish governments assert they enhance national security without compromising sovereignty. For instance, cooperation includes joint exercises and access to NATO intelligence on regional threats, but excludes operational integration into NATO command structures. Proponents argue this pragmatic approach addresses Ireland's geographic vulnerabilities—flanked by NATO members and reliant on transatlantic links—without formal alignment, as evidenced by increased defense coordination post-2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Critics, including some domestic opposition, contend that interoperability upgrades align Irish forces with NATO standards, risking de facto entanglement in alliance contingencies. Within the European Union, Ireland's neutrality intersects with the (CSDP), where participation requires unanimity on military missions and adherence to the "triple lock" mechanism: approval by the government, , and a mandate. Ireland has contributed to over 60 CSDP missions since 2003, focusing on non-combat roles like civilian stabilization and training, totaling around 2,000 personnel deployments by 2023. EU treaties, including protocols annexed to the Lisbon Treaty (ratified by Ireland in 2009 after a second ), provide legal assurances that neutrality remains intact, exempting Ireland from mutual assistance obligations under Article 42.7 of the . Ireland's involvement in (PESCO), launched in 2017, reflects selective engagement: as of October 2025, it actively participates in six projects—such as and military medical support—and holds in seventeen others, allowing monitoring without resource commitments. This opt-in model avoids binding defense integration, though post-2022 developments, including the EU's Strategic Compass (adopted March 2022) and Readiness 2030 initiative, have prompted Ireland to boost defense spending by 50% to €1.5 billion annually by 2028, funding capabilities compatible with EU battlegroups. Debates persist over reforming the triple lock to streamline responses to crises, with government proposals in 2023-2025 aiming to replace UN mandate requirements with enhanced Dáil oversight, citing inefficiencies in rapid EU deployments while preserving neutrality's core. These evolutions underscore Ireland's balancing of EU solidarity—evident in sanctions alignment and hybrid threat responses—with aversion to , amid empirical pressures from Russia's actions and Europe's fragmented defense landscape.

Debates, Criticisms, and Reforms

Arguments Supporting Continued Neutrality

Irish neutrality has garnered sustained public support, with a 2025 Irish Times/ B&A poll indicating that 63% of voters favor maintaining the current model of military non-alignment, particularly among wealthier demographics and women. This aligns with broader surveys showing approximately 80% endorsement for active neutrality as the foundation of foreign and defense policy. Proponents argue that this policy, rooted in the state's 1922 independence and formalized during , preserves sovereignty by avoiding entanglement in great-power rivalries, as evidenced by Ireland's evasion of direct combat involvement in that conflict despite geographic proximity to belligerents. The Triple Lock mechanism—requiring UN authorization, Dáil approval, and government consent for overseas deployments—serves as a constitutional safeguard against unilateral executive decisions on action, thereby upholding democratic oversight and preventing drift toward commitments. Advocates contend this structure enables to prioritize over bilateral pacts, fostering an independent stance that has historically allowed criticism of interventions by major powers, such as U.S. actions in or European policies in the , without reciprocal obligations. From a causal perspective, neutrality's emphasis on non-alignment has minimized risks of retaliatory targeting, leveraging 's insular and lack of territorial disputes to maintain security at lower costs than aligned states. Neutrality facilitates robust participation in UN peacekeeping, where Ireland has maintained a continuous presence since its inaugural 1958 deployment to Lebanon, contributing personnel to over 60 missions worldwide and ranking as the fifth-largest EU troop contributor as of recent assessments. This "active neutrality" enhances Ireland's global moral authority and diplomatic leverage—such as securing non-permanent UN Security Council seats in 2001–2002 and 2013–2014—without compromising non-belligerency, as deployments remain limited to consent-based, impartial operations under UN mandates rather than combat alliances. Supporters highlight that this approach has yielded tangible benefits, including reputational gains that indirectly bolster economic interests, exemplified by Ireland's accession to the in 1973 on purely economic terms, unburdened by nascent military dimensions. Economically, neutrality correlates with restrained defense expenditures—averaging under 0.3% of GDP in recent decades—freeing resources for investment in and export-led growth, which propelled Ireland's GDP per capita from below the average in the 1980s to among the highest by 2020. Pro-neutrality voices assert that alignment pressures, intensified post-2022, risk escalating costs without proportional security gains for a small state, potentially diverting funds from domestic priorities amid fiscal constraints. Overall, these elements underpin claims that neutrality remains a pragmatic adaptation to Ireland's asymmetric capabilities, prioritizing deterrence through and geographic buffers over force projection.

Key Criticisms and Empirical Challenges

Ireland's policy of military neutrality has faced criticism for fostering inadequate defense capabilities, with military expenditure remaining at 0.22% of GDP in 2023, the lowest among European Union nations despite Ireland's high GDP per capita. This low spending level, equating to €1.29 billion in 2024 or 0.24% of GDP, contrasts sharply with the European average of 1.74% and leaves the Irish Defence Forces under-equipped for modern threats, including a lack of fighter jets, advanced air defense systems, and sufficient naval patrol vessels. Critics argue that neutrality enables fiscal free-riding on neighboring states, particularly the United Kingdom, which assumes responsibility for air policing Irish airspace under informal arrangements dating to 1952, rendering Ireland effectively defenseless against aerial incursions without foreign intervention. Empirical vulnerabilities have been highlighted by Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which exposed gaps in Ireland's , such as Russian "shadow fleet" vessels damaging undersea cables in Irish waters and operating unchallenged due to limited naval assets. Ireland's absence of air combat capabilities means reliance on the Royal Air Force for intercepts, as demonstrated in multiple instances of RAF scrambles responding to unidentified over Irish airspace, underscoring a strategic dependence that neutrality policies have failed to mitigate. This dependence creates an "open flank" for , where adversaries could exploit Irish airspace for or attack vectors without direct confrontation, as noted in analyses of post-Cold War evolutions. Further challenges arise from neutrality's incompatibility with collective defense mechanisms, limiting Ireland's participation in NATO's integrated air defense or full EU (PESCO) projects despite membership in the . A 2022 Commission on the Defence Forces report concluded that lacks credible deterrence across land, sea, and air domains, recommending capabilities beyond current neutrality constraints, yet implementation remains hampered by policy inertia. Detractors, including analysts, contend that this non-alignment fosters complacency, evidenced by stalled of —none acquired since the 1999 retirement of outdated models—and persistent underfunding that erodes operational readiness amid rising hybrid threats from state actors like .

Ongoing Reform Proposals and Public Opinion

In response to Russia's 2022 invasion of and heightened geopolitical tensions, the Irish government has advanced reforms to its defense deployment mechanisms while affirming commitment to military neutrality. The proposed Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 seeks to reform the "Triple Lock" approval process for overseas missions, eliminating the requirement for authorization and increasing the troop threshold for oversight from 12 to 50 personnel. Government officials maintain these changes enhance operational flexibility for UN-mandated without altering neutrality's core principle of non-participation in alliances or wars. Critics, including peace advocacy groups, argue the reforms erode safeguards against entanglement in non-UN conflicts, potentially aligning more closely with EU or NATO-led operations. The 2024 Defence Policy Review, published by the Department of Defence, recommends bolstering capabilities in cyber defense, maritime surveillance, and rapid response while upholding neutrality through enhanced bilateral partnerships rather than membership. It emphasizes to a deteriorating environment, including increased defense spending toward 0.5% of GDP by 2028, focused on non-offensive assets like patrol vessels and intelligence sharing. Deeper integration into EU frameworks, such as the (PESCO) and (CSDP), has been proposed to facilitate joint training and procurement without mandatory combat commitments, though participation in projects like military mobility initiatives has sparked debate over alignment. Public opinion remains broadly supportive of traditional neutrality, with a 2025 Irish Times/ B&A poll finding 63% favoring the current model of non-membership in alliances and UN-focused deployments, outpacing opposition by a 21-point margin. Support for maintaining the Triple Lock intact is lower, at around 40-50% in various surveys, reflecting concerns over reduced parliamentary checks amid EU defense pushes. A 2025 poll indicated widespread apprehension that reforms could draw into ongoing conflicts, reinforcing voter preference for status quo policies rooted in historical non-alignment during and consistent UN roles. Despite elite discourse on partnerships—driven by proximity to contested Atlantic routes—polls show minimal appetite for full membership, with under 20% endorsement in pre-2025 surveys, unchanged amid 2025 debates.

References

  1. https://www.dfa.ie/our-role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/international-security-policy/
  2. https://www.dfa.ie/our-role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/neutrality/
  3. https://www.dfa.ie/our-role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/peacekeeping/
  4. https://www.dfa.ie/our-role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/common-security-and-defence-policy/
  5. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2025-10-21/229/
  6. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501146/
  7. https://cartlann.org/authors/eamon-de-valera/speech-on-irish-neutrality/
  8. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1950v03/d653
  9. https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2025/04/19/irish-voters-support-neutrality-by-21-margin-but-are-less-convinced-on-triple-lock-poll-finds/
  10. https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/almost-half-of-irish-public-say-triple-lock-should-change-new-poll-finds/a1435861784.html
  11. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1361&context=isp_collection
  12. https://www.thejournal.ie/what-are-the-pesco-projects-ireland-has-signed-up-to-and-will-this-cause-conflict-or-end-neutrality-6433868-Jul2024/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396365351_IRELAND%27S_FOREIGN_POLICY_AT_A_CROSSROADS_BETWEEN_NEUTRALITY_AND_STRATEGIC_ENGAGEMENT_IN_EUROPEAN_SECURITY
  14. https://www.gov.ie/en/topics/international-security-policy
  15. https://gov.ie/en/department-of-foreign-affairs/publications/international-security-policy-background-information/
  16. https://verfassungsblog.de/neutrality-and-the-irish-constitution/
  17. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-foreign-affairs/publications/international-security-policy-background-information/
  18. https://www.ireland.ie/en/dfa/role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/neutrality/
  19. https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2025/07/30/reform-of-triple-lock-mechanism-for-deployment-of-troops-overseas-to-go-ahead-following-committee-report/
  20. https://www.e-ir.info/2024/07/09/the-resilience-of-irish-neutrality/
  21. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2010&context=etd
  22. https://cartlann.org/authors/irish-neutrality-league/
  23. https://www.pana.ie/posts/the-irish-neutrality-league-and-the-imperialist-war-1914-1918?8d70e572_page=3
  24. https://cartlann.org/authors/irish-neutrality-league/declaration-of-the-irish-neutrality-league/
  25. https://www.anphoblacht.com/contents/24531
  26. https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/irish-citizens-campaign-against-conscription-british-government-1918
  27. https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/irish-conscription-world-war-i
  28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30001795
  29. https://www.britannica.com/place/Ireland/Independent-Ireland-to-1959
  30. https://www.difp.ie/volume-5/1937/address-to-the-18th-assembly-league-of-nations/2239/
  31. https://doaj.org/article/a768b78ee4c14e59a48af432bdd384c3
  32. https://bmmhs.org/neither-war-nor-peace/
  33. https://historyireland.com/the-irish-army-and-the-emergency/
  34. https://www.difp.ie/volume-6/1939/irish-neutrality/2496/
  35. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1939/act/28/enacted/en/html
  36. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1939/act/28/enacted/en/html#sec2
  37. https://www.museum.ie/en-IE/collections-research/art-and-industry-collections/art-industry-collections-list/military-history/irish-soldiers-at-home%2C-abroad%2C-and-in-the-21st-ce/soldiering-in-the-20th-21st-centuries/the-emergency
  38. https://irelandsmilitarystory.ie/2019/04/16/reserve-celebrate-90-years/
  39. https://www.ww2irishaviation.com/background.htm
  40. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zvxs46f
  41. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/12/28/irish-woman-whose-weather-forecast-changed-course-of-d-day-dies-100.html
  42. https://www.difp.ie/volume-7/1941/protest-to-german-government-over-luftwaffe-bombing-of-dublin/3510/
  43. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/irelands-quixotic-neutrality/
  44. https://historyireland.com/de-valera-hitler-the-visit-of-condolence-may-1945/
  45. https://www.difp.ie/volume-9/1949/reply-to-united-states-government-regarding-nato-membership/4861/
  46. https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/irish-neutrality-3-5761862-May2022/
  47. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192512106058624
  48. https://www.military.ie/en/overseas-deployments/past-missions/
  49. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-32777-3
  50. https://www.springerprofessional.de/ireland-s-un-peacekeeping-policy-during-the-cold-war-era/25419704
  51. http://www.shannonwatch.org/files/docs/ShannonWatch_Book_2015.pdf
  52. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/evolving-irish-neutrality-military-opportunities-and-political-obstacles
  53. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:375c86b
  54. https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/a-brief-history-of-irelands-military-neutrality-and-how-things-stand-today/a1391082614.html
  55. https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/2000_Ireland.pdf
  56. https://www.iiea.com/images/uploads/resources/230535195500_Lisbon_Treaty_Explained.pdf
  57. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-european-unions-lisbon-treaty-some-thoughts-on-the-irish-legal-guarantees/
  58. https://ecfr.eu/archive/page/-/Eire_-_2000_-_White_Paper_on_Defence.pdf
  59. https://www.military.ie/en/public-information/publications/white_paper_review_2007.pdf
  60. https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/cp097.pdf
  61. https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2019/0115/1023314-a-question-of-neutrality-and-shannon-airport/
  62. https://www.trinitynews.ie/2025/04/irish-neutrality-in-the-face-of-european-bravado/
  63. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/9/1/war-in-ukraine-sees-ireland-reckon-with-its-policy-of-neutrality
  64. https://www.lawreview.nuigalway.ie/the-student-voice/irish-neutrality
  65. https://www.irishtimes.com/your-money/2025/10/07/record-defence-budget-unveiled-with-11-boost-to-military-spending/
  66. https://www.army-technology.com/news/ireland-raise-defence-spending-to-reach-e1-7bn-by-2030-2/
  67. https://www.irishecho.com/2025/2/ireland-increasing-defense-spending
  68. https://www.tni.org/files/2024-08/Policy_Brief_Ireland_web.pdf
  69. https://www.ireland.ie/en/dfa/role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/international-security-policy/
  70. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/as-europes-neutral-states-shift-closer-to-nato-ireland-approaches-a-turning-point-for-its-security/
  71. https://www.americamagazine.org/short-take/2025/08/18/can-ireland-keep-its-tradition-of-military-neutrality-in-the-era-of-trump-and-putin/
  72. https://rupture.ie/articles/the-fight-for-irish-neutrality
  73. https://www.ireland.ie/en/dfa/role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/peacekeeping/
  74. https://www.military.ie/en/overseas-deployments/about-overseas-deployments/
  75. https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2025/0522/1514313-ireland-triple-lock-explainer-legislation-defence-forces-peacekeeping/
  76. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/ireland
  77. https://www.ireland.ie/en/un/newyork/peace-and-security/peacekeeping/
  78. https://www.military.ie/en/overseas-deployments/current-missions/
  79. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2025-03-19/233/
  80. https://www.thejournal.ie/ireland-may-be-forced-to-cut-up-to-40-troops-from-lebanon-unifil-6851606-Oct2025/
  81. https://unric.org/en/ireland-and-the-un-a-70-year-commitment-to-multilateralism/
  82. https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2025/08/28/security-council-votes-to-keep-peacekeepers-in-lebanon-until-2027/
  83. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-defence/publications/procurement/
  84. https://www.ipsc.ie/noarmstrade
  85. https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/what-we-do/trade-investment/export-controls/
  86. https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/publications/publication-files/report-under-the-control-of-exports-act-2008-1-january-31-december-2023.pdf
  87. https://omegaresearchfoundation.org/reports/effective-laws-to-control-arms-in-ireland/
  88. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/weapons/reporter/irl
  89. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Ireland/arms_exports/
  90. https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/irelands-exports-of-restricted-dual-use-goods-to-israel-soar-to-70m-despite-sanctions-push/a671770615.html
  91. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/10/16/israel-weapons-ban-gaza-arms/
  92. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41574028.html
  93. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2025-05-08/212/
  94. https://www.military.ie/en/news-and-events/news/defence-forces-chief-of-staff-welcomes-historic-increase-in-defence-budget.html
  95. https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/defence-notes/ireland-to-increase-defence-capital-spending-by-half-to-2-billion/
  96. https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2025/0318/1502584-defence-forces/
  97. https://www.globalmilitary.net/countries/irl/
  98. https://bisi.org.uk/reports/navigating-neutrality-irelands-evolving-security-landscape
  99. https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/ireland-invests-e1-35bn-in-defence-2025-c295w-on-the-horizon/
  100. https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2025/04/14/battlegroup-troops-test-out-new-technology-for-wider-defence-forces/
  101. https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.php?country_id=ireland
  102. https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/ireland-plans-e2-5bn-fighter-jet-purchase-first-acquisition-in-50-years
  103. https://www.businessinsider.com/secret-deal-lets-british-jets-intercept-russian-bombers-near-ireland-2023-5
  104. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/russia-testing-nato-by-breaching-irish-airspace-ex-us-general-1.4205196
  105. https://theweek.com/62785/passenger-jet-diverted-off-irish-coast-to-avoid-russian-bombers
  106. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-defence/campaigns/consultation-on-the-proposed-national-maritime-security-strategy/
  107. https://www.csis.org/analysis/strategic-future-subsea-cables-ireland-case-study
  108. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41618941.html
  109. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/4042668/celtic-security-in-the-atlantic-how-does-ireland-secure-europes-western-flank/
  110. https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2023/11/why-ireland-matters-for-european-security?lang=en
  111. https://tradingeconomics.com/ireland/military-expenditure-percent-of-gdp-wb-data.html
  112. https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/1itgpm7/ireland_spends_least_on_defence_among_38_european/
  113. https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/ireland-branded-the-ultimate-defence-freeloader-in-report/
  114. https://militaeraktuell.at/en/ireland-invests-in-fighter-aircraft-and-national-radar-network/
  115. https://warontherocks.com/2023/03/no-time-to-hide-the-future-for-irish-defense-and-security-and-how-our-partners-can-help/
  116. https://www.ireland.ie/en/partnership-for-peace-delegation-brussels/ireland-in-the-partnership-for-peace-programme/
  117. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_51979.htm
  118. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2024-10-17/44/
  119. https://www.iisf.ie/Safeguarding-Undersea-Infrastructure-Ireland
  120. https://socialistdemocracy.org/RecentArticles/RecentAntWarBulletinMar25IrelandNeutralityAndMilitarism.html
  121. https://www.europeanmovement.ie/just-the-facts-ireland-eu-defence/
  122. https://socialistdemocracy.org/RecentArticles/RecentAntiWarBulletinJun25TheMilitarisationOfIrelandATimeline.html
  123. https://www.rundale.org/2025/07/31/the-struggle-for-active-neutrality-the-triple-lock-and-peace/
  124. https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/5086/1/Conor_Burke_20140623101215.pdf
  125. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/saving-the-triple-lock
  126. https://neutrality.ie/neutrality/
  127. https://www.jacobin.com/2023/07/ireland-nonalignment-neutrality-nato-us-european-union-war-foreign-policy
  128. https://www.ireland.ie/en/un/newyork/peace-and-security/overview/
  129. https://www.worldatlas.com/history/ireland-s-neutrality-and-european-integration.html
  130. https://debuglies.com/2025/07/18/irelands-strategic-balancing-act-navigating-military-neutrality-economic-dependencies-and-geopolitical-pressures-in-a-multipolar-world/
  131. https://www.statista.com/statistics/810428/ratio-of-military-expenditure-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp-ireland/
  132. https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2023/05/08/who-protects-irish-skies-the-secret-air-defence-deal-that-dates-back-to-the-cold-war/
  133. https://engelsbergideas.com/notebook/irish-neutrality-is-unsustainable/
  134. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/irish-airspace-and-waters-remain-europes-open-flank
  135. https://theweek.com/defence/secret-plan-for-uk-to-protect-irish-skies
  136. https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/2025-03-26/8/
  137. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyge72pv55o
  138. https://www.irishlegal.com/articles/oireachtas-committee-calls-for-extra-safeguards-in-triple-lock-reform-bill
  139. https://www.tni.org/en/article/alarm-at-irish-government-plans-to-dismantle-irelands-triple-lock
  140. https://warontherocks.com/2025/03/no-time-to-spare-irish-defense-and-security-in-2025/
  141. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41553730.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.