Hubbry Logo
Lava fieldLava fieldMain
Open search
Lava field
Community hub
Lava field
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lava field
Lava field
Lava field
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Hell's Half Acre Lava Field, Idaho, United States of America.
Barren waste of lava fields at Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland.
Degassing Holuhraun lava field with fountaining at crater Baugur, Iceland, Sept. 2014
Ögmundarhraun lava fields in Iceland caused by eruption in 1151 AD

A lava field, sometimes called a lava bed, is a large, mostly flat area of lava flows. Such features are generally composed of highly fluid basalt lava, and can extend for tens or hundreds of kilometers across the underlying terrain.[1]

Morphology and structure

[edit]

The final morphology of a lava field can reveal properties such as internal structure, composition, and mechanics of the lava flow when it was fluid. The ridges and patterns on top of the lava field show the direction of the lava channels and the often active lava tubes that may be underneath the solidified "crust."[2] It can also reveal whether the lava flow can be classified as pāhoehoe or 'a'ā. The two main types of lava field structures are defined as sheet flow lava and pillow lava. Sheet flow lava appears like a wrinkled or folded sheet, while pillow lava is bulbous, and often looks like a pile of pillows atop one another.[3]

An important aspect of lava flow morphology is a phenomenon known as lava flow inflation. This occurs in pāhoehoe flows that have a high effusion rate, and initially forms a thin crust atop the lava flow. The fluid lava underneath the crust continues to increase due to the sustained high effusion rate, and thus the entire "structure" increases in size, up to four meters in height.[2] This anomaly can expose important physics and mechanisms behind lava flow that was not previously known.

The structure of lava fields also vary based on geographic location. For example, in subaqueous lava fields, sheet flow lava is found near volcanoes characterized by fast-flowing centers, like the Galapagos Rift, while on the other hand pillow lava fields are found near more slow-flowing centers, like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.[3]

Mapping and prediction

[edit]

The extent of large lava fields is most readily studied from the air or in satellite photos, where their commonly dark, near-black color contrasts sharply with the rest of the landscape. Current computer models are mostly unable to predict the placement of lava fields due to the inability to anticipate random environmental influences.[2] Computer modeling is consistently increasing in quality, but the many micro factors directing lava flow and shape, such as source geometry and lava extrusion rate, limit the accuracy that is currently available.[3]

Notable examples

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lava field

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A lava field, also referred to as a lava flow field, is an extensive area of solidified basaltic lava flows produced by one or more effusive volcanic eruptions, where molten rock spreads across the landscape to form broad, relatively flat terrains. These fields typically result from low-viscosity basaltic , which allows flows to travel distances of tens of kilometers, creating dramatic, dark rock surfaces that dominate volcanic landscapes. Unlike explosive volcanic deposits, lava fields represent the accumulation of fluid lava that cools and solidifies on the Earth's surface without fragmenting into or pyroclasts. Lava fields form primarily during non-explosive eruptions from volcanoes, fissure vents, or monogenetic cones, where high eruption rates and gentle slopes enable the lava to advance as broad sheets, channeled streams, or through subsurface . The ic composition, with low silica content (around 45-52%), imparts high fluidity to the lava, facilitating flow speeds up to 30 km per hour in and covering areas from a few square kilometers to over 1,000 km² in larger fields. , eruption duration, and cooling rates influence the field's morphology, with some fields developing complex networks of and caves that preserve heat and extend flow lengths. The surface textures of lava fields vary distinctly based on flow dynamics: pahoehoe flows produce smooth, ropy, or billowy surfaces from slower, cooler movement, while ʻaʻā flows create rough, jagged, clinkery terrains from faster, more turbulent advance. These features not only record the eruption's conditions but also affect erosion, vegetation, and human use of the land. Many lava fields are polygenetic, built from multiple eruptions over thousands to millions of years, as seen in the Craters of the Moon lava field in , which spans about 1,600 km² with over 60 flows from various vents dating from about 15,000 to 2,000 years ago. Prominent examples illustrate the global distribution and diversity of lava fields, often associated with hotspots or rift zones. The in covers 400 km² and exemplifies young basaltic activity in the , with flows as recent as 5,200 years old. In , the Zuni-Bandera includes extensive ʻaʻā and pahoehoe flows from over 100 cinder cones, forming rugged terrains preserved in . Such fields contribute to geological understanding of mantle plumes and , while hosting specialized ecosystems adapted to nutrient-poor, rocky substrates.

Definition and Formation

Definition and Characteristics

A lava field is defined as a large, mostly flat expanse of solidified basaltic lava flows, typically resulting from one or more effusive eruptions, covering areas ranging from a few square kilometers to hundreds of square kilometers. Lava fields can form from a single large eruption, such as the 1783-1784 event that produced the Eldhraun field in , which spans approximately 565 square kilometers, illustrating the scale possible from major effusive events. These features form broad, low-relief landscapes where the lava has spread extensively due to its fluid nature during emplacement. Key characteristics of lava fields include their predominant composition, which contains low silica content (typically 45-52%), enabling low viscosity and allowing the molten material to flow rapidly over great distances before solidifying. This results in flat or gently undulating with minimal changes, in stark contrast to the steep profiles of volcanic cones or domes. Lava fields commonly develop in extensional tectonic settings, such as zones along divergent plate boundaries or intraplate hotspots, where ascends easily to the surface. Surfaces may exhibit textures like smooth pahoehoe or rough aa, reflecting variations in flow dynamics. Lava fields differ from volcanic fields, which encompass clusters of multiple vents, cinder cones, and other edifices across a broader prone to localized eruptions, whereas lava fields emphasize the expansive, overlapping sheets of flows without prominent central structures. They also contrast with individual lava flows, which represent singular eruptive episodes rather than the buildup from one or more events that defines a field, where successive flow lobes or layers can bury earlier deposits, creating a cohesive, low-gradient . The earliest documented observations of lava fields date to 18th-century explorations in , where the 1783–1784 eruption produced vast flows that were meticulously recorded by local priest Jón Steingrímsson, influencing modern geological terminology for such features.

Formation Processes

Lava fields primarily form through effusive eruptions of basaltic magma from fissure vents or low-relief shield volcanoes, where non-explosive activity allows molten lava to spread laterally across extensive areas rather than building up steeply. These eruptions occur when low-viscosity basaltic lava, characterized by its fluid nature due to low silica content, emerges at the surface and flows outward, covering landscapes over distances of tens to hundreds of kilometers. The formation process begins with magma ascent from the mantle, driven by partial melting at hotspots or along rift zones, where upwelling heat reduces the melting point of peridotite. As magma rises through the crust, it undergoes degassing near the surface, releasing volatiles like water and carbon dioxide. Upon eruption, the lava advances at typical rates of 1 to 10 meters per second, influenced by slope and channel development, before cooling begins. Initial crust formation occurs within hours to days via radiative and convective cooling at the surface, while full solidification of thicker flows (4-5 meters) can take over 130 days to reach temperatures around 200°C, with complete cooling to ambient levels extending into years due to insulation by the outer crust and conductive heat loss at the base. Tectonic settings play a crucial role, with most lava fields associated with divergent plate boundaries such as mid-ocean ridges, where plate separation facilitates magma upwelling, or intraplate hotspots like those beneath or , generating persistent volcanic activity. Underlying influences flow paths by channeling lava into valleys or depressions, enhancing lateral spread and thickness buildup in low-relief areas. Over time, lava fields develop through repeated eruptions spanning thousands to millions of years, with successive flows stacking to form layers 10 to 50 meters thick, as seen in continental provinces.

Classification and Types

By Lava Composition and Viscosity

Lava fields are primarily classified by the of their constituent lavas, which directly influences and thus the scale, shape, and extent of the resulting fields. Basaltic lava fields dominate globally due to their low silica content, typically 45-52 wt% SiO₂, which imparts high fluidity and enables the formation of vast, expansive fields covering hundreds of square kilometers. In contrast, andesitic and rhyolitic lava fields are rarer, as their higher silica contents—57-63 wt% SiO₂ for and over 69 wt% SiO₂ for rhyolite—result in greater polymerization of the melt, leading to more viscous flows that produce shorter, thicker, and more confined fields. Viscosity, a key rheological property, governs how far and how thinly lava spreads to form fields, with low-viscosity basaltic lavas (typically 10-1000 Pa·s at eruption temperatures around 1000-1200°C) allowing rapid, far-reaching flows that create broad, flat expanses. Higher-viscosity andesitic lavas (around 10³-10⁴ Pa·s) and especially rhyolitic lavas (10⁴-10⁶ Pa·s) resist flow, resulting in stubby, dome-like or blocky fields with limited lateral extent, often less than a few kilometers across. This viscosity-driven variation affects field morphology, as basaltic flows cool slowly over distance to form coherent sheets, while siliceous ones fracture and pile up due to internal stresses. Within basaltic fields, subtypes like tholeiitic and alkalic basalts further modulate flow behavior; tholeiitic basalts, common in hotspot settings such as , are iron-rich and subalkaline, forming larger fields, while alkali-enriched alkalic basalts are found in ocean island margins. Intermediate compositions, such as basaltic andesites, occur rarely in transitional tectonic settings like continental rifts, where they produce moderately extensive fields blending basaltic fluidity with andesitic resistance. Examples include the predominantly basaltic Columbia River Basalts in the U.S., expansive tholeiitic fields covering over 160,000 km², versus rarer rhyolitic fields in , where viscous flows form confined plateaus like the Upper Basin. Andesitic examples are seen in the Mount Edgecumbe Volcanic Field in , where intermediate lavas create rugged, limited fields amid more dominant basalts. Geochemical analysis is essential for classifying lava field compositions, with techniques like (XRF) widely used to quantify major elements such as SiO₂ from rock samples, providing precise proxies without destructive sampling. XRF's non-invasive nature allows rapid assessment of field-wide variations, confirming, for instance, the low-silica dominance in basaltic provinces.

By Morphological Features

Lava fields are classified morphologically based on the surface textures, landforms, and structural complexities resulting from the flow dynamics during eruption, which reflect variations in , , and environmental interactions. These features provide insights into the eruptive behavior and can be observed directly on the surface without requiring subsurface analysis. Predominantly basaltic lava fields exhibit these morphologies due to their low , enabling diverse flow patterns. Texture-based subtypes form the primary morphological distinction in lava fields. Pahoehoe-dominated fields feature smooth, ropy, or billowy surfaces formed by slow-moving, laminar flows that develop through folding and shearing of the crust, often covering extensive areas with undulating lobes up to several meters wide. In contrast, aa-dominated fields display rough, jagged, clinkery surfaces with spinose fragments and rubble, arising from faster, more turbulent flows where the crust breaks repeatedly, typically advancing at rates exceeding 10-30 meters per hour. Transitional or block lava fields combine elements of both, with slabby or blocky textures emerging from flows that accelerate mid-eruption, producing entrained blocks up to 1-2 meters in size embedded in a fragmented matrix. Landform variations further differentiate lava fields by their topographic expression. Shield-like fields develop gentle slopes (typically 1-5 degrees) from prolonged, low-effusion-rate eruptions that build broad, convex-up profiles resembling volcanic shields, with flows radiating outward over distances of kilometers. Plateau fields, conversely, form on relatively flat terrain through high-volume effusions that spread laterally without significant elevation gain, creating expansive, nearly level expanses bounded by steep flow fronts. Tube-fed fields are characterized by channeled flows within insulated , resulting in surface features like linear ridges, (skylights up to 10-20 meters wide), and drained channels that indicate subsurface transport over long distances. The scale and complexity of lava fields vary with eruption duration and flow interactions, influencing morphological development. Simple fields consist of single or few overlapping flows with minimal structural features, often from short-lived eruptions lasting days to weeks, covering areas of 1-10 square kilometers. Complex fields arise from prolonged eruptions (months to years), where repeated flows create levees—raised embankments 2-10 meters high formed by solidified flow margins—and pressure ridges, which are compressional folds up to 5-15 meters high resulting from flow inflation and stagnation. Longer eruption durations promote greater complexity by allowing and repeated inundation, enhancing feature diversity. Morphological identification in the field relies on observable criteria such as surface texture, flow front characteristics, and structural elements. For instance, aa flows are distinguished by their steep, rubble-strewn fronts 1-5 meters high, contrasting with the more gradual, intact lobes of pahoehoe (often less than 1 meter high). Field criteria also include the presence of vesicles, cooling cracks, and flow direction indicators like aligned ropes or blocks, enabling rapid during surveys.

Physical Morphology and Structure

Surface Morphology

The surface morphology of lava fields is dominated by primary features that emerge during the emplacement and cooling of basaltic flows, including flow lobes, tumuli, and squeeze-ups. Flow lobes represent the bulbous, advancing fronts of pahoehoe lava, formed as molten material extends incrementally with a thin, cooling crust that insulates the interior. Tumuli, or blisters, appear as low, dome-like mounds typically less than 10 m high, resulting from buildup that buckles the solidified crust over confined lava pathways. Squeeze-ups occur as viscous lava extrudes through cracks in the crust, forming bulbous or wedge-shaped protrusions up to 0.7 m in size, often enriched in phenocrysts. During cooling, a glassy rind develops on the surface within hours, trapping gas bubbles that create vesicles—small, rounded voids—while the underlying crust thickens to protect the still-molten core. Texture variations on lava field surfaces reflect the rheological behavior of the flows, with pahoehoe exhibiting smooth, ropy, or billowy forms and 'a'ā displaying rough, jagged profiles. In pahoehoe, shelves form as flat, overhanging extensions of the crust along flow margins, while toes develop as small, bulbous extensions at the advancing edge, created by low-velocity of fluid lava that skins over rapidly. 'A'ā textures consist of clinkers—sharp, spinose blocks—and , generated when faster-moving, viscous lava fractures its cooling surface into loose, angular fragments that accumulate as the flow advances. Over centuries, through oxidation alters these textures, producing red-black patinas as iron minerals in the convert to , dulling the initial shiny black or iridescent rind and creating a mottled appearance. Topographically, lava fields exhibit gentle undulations with overall slopes typically less than 5°, fostering broad, low-relief expanses that extend for kilometers. These subtle elevations and depressions arise from the irregular advance of flow lobes and features, creating a hummocky . Drainage patterns are often impeded by the impermeable flows, which dam pre-existing valleys and force water to divert around margins, resulting in irregular networks that serve as indicators of underlying volcanic . On older surfaces, vegetation colonization follows primary succession patterns, beginning with like lichens and ferns in moisture pockets, progressing to shrubs and trees over decades to centuries, with denser cover on windward, wetter slopes compared to arid exposures. Evolutionary changes in surface morphology transition from initial post-eruption instability, where fragile, thin crusts collapse under thermal stress or minor loading, to long-term stability as the flows solidify fully. This instability phase, lasting days to weeks, involves spalling and minor slumps of the glassy rind, exposing incandescent interiors. Over time, in arid climates, erosion proceeds at low rates of 0.001–0.005 mm/year, primarily through chemical weathering and occasional physical breakdown, preserving the overall form while gradually rounding edges and deepening fissures.

Internal Structure and Layering

Lava fields exhibit distinct layering patterns resulting from sequential emplacement and cooling of multiple flow units. Individual flows often display superimposed layers with chilled margins at their bases and tops, formed by rapid cooling against the underlying substrate or atmosphere. These margins are typically glassy or finely crystalline, transitioning inward to coarser interiors. Rubbly bases, characterized by fragmented and brecciated material, arise from shear zones where the flow base interacts with the ground, leading to autobrecciation during movement. Thickness variations are common, with flows generally thinner at their lateral edges due to faster cooling and spreading, and thicker centrally where insulation preserves heat longer, allowing greater accumulation. Internal features within these layers include systematic vesicle distributions, where dense, vesicle-poor bases grade upward into more vesicular zones and spongy, highly porous tops. This pattern reflects dynamics, with bubbles initially trapped at the flow base and migrating upward as the lava cools and crystallizes. Autobrecciation can occur in flow interiors, particularly in more viscous lavas, producing internal breccias from tensile stresses during flow. Additionally, crystal segregation during emplacement leads to zones enriched in phenocrysts, such as or , separated from the melt by gravitational or flow-induced sorting. Geophysical methods reveal these internal structures through contrasts in physical properties. Seismic velocity profiles show cyclic patterns corresponding to individual flows, with lower velocities in vesicular upper crusts and higher velocities in dense cores, highlighting density contrasts from porosity variations. Magnetic anomalies arise from cooling-induced alignments of magnetic minerals like , producing dipolar patterns that delineate flow boundaries and thicknesses, especially in basaltic fields. Specific structures form through cooling and processes. Pipe vesicles develop in basal zones as dissolved volatiles exsolve into bubbles that rise vertically through the semi-molten lava, creating elongated pipes up to several meters long. In rare cases, thermal contraction during slow cooling produces , where perpendicular fractures form hexagonal prisms in the flow interior, accommodating shrinkage stresses. These features, while internal, may subtly influence overlying surface textures through differential .

Scientific Study and Applications

Mapping and Remote Sensing Techniques

Ground-based mapping of lava fields involves detailed field surveys to delineate flow boundaries and document stratigraphic features. Scientists employ GPS-enabled devices to precisely record the edges of lava flows, often supplemented by drone-based for high-resolution aerial imagery that captures flow extents in challenging terrains. For instance, during eruptions in , the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) uses handheld GPS units and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to map active flow fronts and channels in real-time, enabling accurate boundary delineation with positional errors typically under 1 meter. Stratigraphic logging of outcrops further reveals layering and compositional variations, achieved through on-site sampling and direct observation to construct cross-sectional profiles of the lava field. Remote sensing techniques have revolutionized lava field documentation by providing broad-scale, non-invasive data. from platforms like Landsat utilizes thermal bands to detect heat signatures and estimate flow ages through changes in cover, as older flows show increased near- reflectance due to revegetation. (Light Detection and Ranging) systems generate 3D topographic models with resolutions better than 1 meter, facilitating precise mapping of flow morphology even under ; for example, airborne surveys of volcano have quantified volume changes in active flows with centimeter-level vertical accuracy. enhances composition mapping by capturing narrow spectral bands that distinguish mineralogies, such as distinguishing basaltic from andesitic lavas in fields like , , through unique reflectance signatures in the visible to shortwave range. Mapping approaches have evolved significantly from historical methods to modern computational techniques. In the , lava fields were documented via manual sketches and rudimentary surveys, as seen in early geological maps of Mount Etna by Waltershausen (1845–1859), which relied on field observations without geospatial precision. Post-2010s advancements incorporate AI-assisted analysis, including classifiers applied to multispectral data for automated flow detection; supervised algorithms, for instance, achieve over 90% accuracy in delineating recent lava extents on Mount Etna using imagery. Recent studies as of 2023 continue to refine these techniques for near-real-time monitoring. These modern methods outperform historical techniques by integrating temporal data series for dynamic monitoring. Data integration in geographic information systems (GIS) unifies these datasets into comprehensive lava field databases. Layers from ground surveys, DEMs, and are overlaid with eruption chronologies in tools like , enabling of flow evolution; the open-source Q-LAVHA plugin, for example, facilitates probabilistic inundation modeling within environments for hazard-prone regions. This approach supports global databases, such as those maintained by the USGS for Hawaiian volcanoes, where integrated maps correlate flow ages with morphological features like pahoehoe and aa surfaces.

Hazard Assessment and Prediction

Hazard assessment for lava fields primarily evaluates risks associated with active or potential flows, focusing on direct threats to human life, , and ecosystems. Key hazards include flow inundation, where advancing lava engulfs and destroys structures, roads, and landscapes in its path. Hot lava flows can also ignite and buildings, leading to widespread wildfires that exacerbate damage beyond the flow itself. Additionally, fresh lava surfaces create barren, infertile substrates that hinder regrowth and agricultural use for decades, though long-term enrichment may occur through . Probability models for these hazards often rely on recurrence intervals derived from geological records of past eruptions in basaltic fields. For monogenetic basaltic volcanic fields, repose intervals typically range from hundreds to several thousand years (e.g., 100-3000 years), informing long-term . These models integrate historical data to estimate eruption likelihood, such as one event every few centuries in fields like Craters of the Moon, where intervals approximate 2000 years but vary locally. Prediction methods combine geophysical monitoring and numerical simulations to forecast eruption onset and flow progression. Eruption forecasting employs seismic swarms—clusters of earthquakes signaling movement—and ground deformation detected via (InSAR), which measures surface uplift or with millimeter precision to anticipate vent locations. Flow simulation software, such as the DOWNFLOW probabilistic model, predicts advance rates and paths by incorporating , , and rates, enabling real-time hazard mapping during outbreaks. Mitigation strategies emphasize proactive planning to minimize impacts. Zoning laws restrict development in high-risk zones around established lava fields, designating areas prone to inundation as protected or limited-use. Evacuation planning accounts for initial flow velocities, which can reach up to 10 km/h on steep slopes for basaltic lavas, though channelized flows may accelerate to 50 km/h briefly, necessitating rapid alerts and predefined routes to ensure safe egress. Global databases like the Smithsonian Institution's provide trend analysis of eruption histories and hazards, supporting updated probabilistic models for fields worldwide.

Geological Significance and Examples

Role in Volcanic Landscapes

Lava fields play a pivotal role in the geological evolution of volcanic landscapes by contributing to crustal thickening, particularly in zones where repeated effusions of basaltic lava fill topographic lows and accumulate in layers averaging 250 meters thick, thereby reducing basin rugosity and adding substantial volume to the . These accumulations modify , creating structural highs that influence and enhance overall crustal stability during post-rift stages. Furthermore, lava fields serve as critical archives for paleovolcanology, preserving detailed records of ancient eruptive processes through their landforms, such as cones and varied lava morphologies ranging from 'a'ā to pāhoehoe, which document styles from effusive to explosive activity driven by magmatic volatiles. The internal structures of these flows, including vesicular and massive layers, remain largely intact in ancient terrains, allowing reconstruction of ascent paths and eruption dynamics over timescales. In addition, established lava fields can influence subsequent magmatism by altering local stress regimes and thermal profiles, facilitating shear-driven melt segregation in intraplate settings and promoting recurrent basaltic activity along tectonic lineaments. Ecologically, lava fields initiate primary succession on barren substrates, where such as lichens and first colonize the surface, breaking down rock through and to enable development. Over centuries, this progresses to mosses, ferns, and vascular plants, eventually supporting shrublands and forests as organic matter accumulates, with full canopy closure occurring in less than 150 years in wet regions on basaltic substrates, though longer in drier areas. The of lava produces fertile andisols, characterized by high organic content and retention, which foster nutrient-rich soils capable of sustaining productive ecosystems after prolonged exposure. Fragmented lava fields, with their mosaic of flows and cracks, create heterogeneous habitats that enhance , serving as refugia for endemic and promoting ecological connectivity in volcanic regions. Lava fields interact with global climate systems through contrasting processes of gas release and long-term sequestration. During formation, large effusive events emit substantial CO₂, with individual episodes releasing millions of tons into the atmosphere, contributing to transient warming as seen in historical large igneous provinces. Conversely, post-emplacement basaltic sequesters CO₂ via mineral , accounting for 30–35% of natural global drawdown, as rainwater reacts with silicates to form stable carbonates over millennia. From a perspective, lava fields provide essential resources, including crushed aggregates for , valued for their durability and derived from ancient volcanic quarries that yield high-quality material for . Culturally, these landscapes hold profound significance for indigenous communities, embodying spiritual entities like the Hawaiian goddess Pele, where eruptions are honored through ceremonies, prayers, and offerings that reinforce ancestral ties to the land. Recent research highlights their potential in for carbon capture, where finely crushed basaltic rocks from lava fields are applied to agricultural soils to accelerate CO₂ mineralization, improving fertility while removing up to several tons of carbon per hectare annually in tropical settings.

Notable Lava Fields Worldwide

One of the most prominent examples of a historical lava field is the lava field in , formed during the 1783–1784 eruption along a 27-km-long fissure in the Eastern Volcanic Zone. This event produced approximately 14–15 km³ of basaltic lava, covering 565 km² primarily with pāhoehoe flows, including slabby and rubbly variants that exemplify insulated transport in low-viscosity basaltic eruptions. The in the represents a classic flood basalt province, erupted during the epoch from about 17.5 to 6 million years ago, covering over 210,000 km² across , Washington, and . Composed mainly of tholeiitic basalt flows, it exemplifies large-scale, repetitive effusive volcanism with individual flows reaching thicknesses of 10–50 m and volumes exceeding 1,000 km³ in major formations like the Grande Ronde Basalt. In diverse environmental contexts, the Toomba lava field in northeastern highlights adapted to semi-arid conditions. Erupted around 13,000 years ago from a monogenetic vent in the Nulla Volcanic Province, it produced a remarkably long, tube-fed pāhoehoe flow extending 120 km eastward, with rise ridges indicating sustained distal flow in a low-gradient, dry landscape. Remnants of the in west-central provide insight into ancient, extinction-linked lava fields from the period, approximately 66 million years ago. This continental flood basalt province originally covered an estimated 1,000,000–1,500,000 km² with stacked flows up to 3 km thick, now eroded but exposing about 500,000 km²; its massive volatile emissions, including sulfur and CO₂, are temporally correlated with the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass . The in , , illustrates monogenetic vent-dominated lava fields spanning the Pleistocene to . Encompassing over 600 basaltic vents within a 5,000 km² area, it features short-lived cinder cones and associated 'a'ā and pāhoehoe flows, such as those from Sunset Crater's 1085 CE eruption, demonstrating clustered, low-volume effusions in a continental rift setting. Australia's Newer Volcanics Province in southeastern Victoria and exemplifies an active, intraplate basaltic field spanning the last 4.5 million years. Covering about 15,000 km² with over 400 monogenetic vents and extensive flows, it poses ongoing eruption threats due to its youth and proximity to urban areas like , with activity including the ~5,000-year-old Mount Schank scoria cone and older features like Mt. Eccles (~37,000 years ago). A modern analog is the series of eruptions at and nearby Sundhnúkur on Iceland's Peninsula, beginning in 2021. The initial subglacial-to-surface event from March to September 2021 produced about 0.15 km³ of basaltic lava, covering 4.85 km² with diverse pāhoehoe and 'a'ā flows. This was the first on the peninsula in over 800 years, offering insights into rift-zone dynamics and serving as a smaller-scale comparison to historical fields like , with effusion rates peaking at 20 m³/s. Subsequent eruptions occurred in 2022–2025, with cumulative lava volume exceeding 0.3 km³ and area over 6 km² as of November 2025, highlighting ongoing reactivation of the rift.

References

  1. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/volcanoes/basaltic-lava-flows.htm
  2. https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vsc/glossary/lava.html
  3. https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vsc/glossary/basalt.html
  4. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/lava-flow-surface-features.htm
  5. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2007/2969/downloads/pdf/2969_pamphlet_508.pdf
  6. https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/hells-half-acre-lava-field
  7. https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/tour/federal/monuments/el_malpais/zuni-bandera/background.html
  8. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/volcanoes/glossary-of-volcanic-terms.htm
  9. https://www.nmnaturalhistory.org/volcanoes/zuni-bandera-field-and-mccartys-lava-flow
  10. https://www.travelreykjavik.com/attractions/iceland/eldhraun-lava-field/
  11. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/plate-tectonics-hotspots.htm
  12. https://www2.tulane.edu/~sanelson/Natural_Disasters/volclandforms.htm
  13. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20211072
  14. https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vsc/glossary/lava_flow.html
  15. https://www.medievalist.com/articles/strongjn-versus-the-volcano-an-eighteenth-century-icelandic-priests-account-of-a-moment-of-crisisstrong
  16. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/volcanoes/plate-tectonics-and-volcanoes.htm
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X21003897
  18. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/how-do-lava-flows-cool-and-how-long-does-it-take
  19. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014JF003103
  20. https://volcano.oregonstate.edu/volcano
  21. https://www2.tulane.edu/~sanelson/Natural_Disasters/volcan&magma.htm
  22. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/igneous.htm
  23. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/volcanoes/lava-flows.htm
  24. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19980018980/downloads/19980018980.pdf
  25. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1801/downloads/pp1801_Chap3_Clague.pdf
  26. https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/faq/volcanoes/igneous_classification.html
  27. https://avo.alaska.edu/pdfs/cit639_5.0.pdf
  28. https://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/152_SR/VOLUME/CHAP_35.PDF
  29. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3422&context=etd
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1464343X15300844
  31. https://volcano.oregonstate.edu/faq/what-are-different-types-basaltic-lava-flows-and-how-do-they-form
  32. https://www.usgs.gov/news/volcano-watch-lava-rocks-come-many-colors
  33. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022JF006666
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/lava-flow
  35. https://www.usgs.gov/news/volcano-watch-lava-flow-forest-primary-succession
  36. https://www.uwyo.edu/geolgeophys/people/faculty/ksims/_files/docs/sims-et-al-geology-2007.pdf
  37. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1984/0224/report.pdf
  38. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70019553
  39. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/135_SR/VOLUME/CHAPTERS/sr135_37.pdf
  40. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/132770/445_2021_1485_ReferencePDF.pdf?sequence=1
  41. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/163_SR/VOLUME/CHAPTERS/CHAP_03.PDF
  42. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/sir20235061/full
  43. https://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/the-magnetic-thickness-of-a-recent-submarine-lava-flow/
  44. https://volcano.oregonstate.edu/columnar-jointing
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897544/
  46. https://www.usgs.gov/observatories/hvo/news/volcano-watch-cloud-ten-thousand-points-terrestrial-laser-scanning
  47. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL083501
  48. https://www.italianjournalofgeosciences.it/297/article-84/geological-map-of-etna-volcano-1-50-000-scale.html
  49. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/16/1916
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0098300416303715
  51. https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/craters-of-the-moon-volcanic-field/science/future-eruptions-around-craters-moon-lava
  52. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2004gl021718
  53. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12651
  54. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/17/6/2144/609360/Quaternary-basaltic-volcanic-fields-of-the
  55. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/84952
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831921000433
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1617138125000299
  58. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1002478107
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-58729-w
  60. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrbproceedings/29/29-013.pdf
  61. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/02/mauna-loa-volcano-erupts-native-hawaiians
  62. https://www.ucdavis.edu/climate/news/adding-crushed-rock-farmland-pulls-carbon-out-air
  63. https://volcano.oregonstate.edu/laki-iceland-1783
  64. https://www.isu.edu/digitalgeologyidaho/crb/
  65. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1457g/report.pdf
  66. https://people.wou.edu/~taylors/gs407rivers/tolan_etal_2009_CRB_Overview.pdf
  67. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/134886/9/134886.pdf
  68. https://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=259807
  69. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/98jb00029
  70. https://www.princeton.edu/news/2019/03/04/did-volcanoes-kill-dinosaurs-new-evidence-points-maybe
  71. https://timslab.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf2276/files/media/gchron-3-181-2021.pdf
  72. https://pages.uoregon.edu/leif/resources/papers/GSAB_2015_Richards.pdf
  73. https://azgs.arizona.edu/photo/volcanoes-san-francisco-volcanic-field
  74. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2021/1072/ofr20211072.pdf
  75. https://experts.nau.edu/en/publications/volcanology-and-associated-hazards-of-the-san-francisco-volcanic-/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10073071/
  77. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AGUFM.V51B0353S/abstract
  78. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2007JB005110
  79. https://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=371032
  80. https://volcano.si.edu/showreport.cfm?doi=10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN202209-371032
  81. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/148510/fagradalsfjall-continues-to-erupt
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.