Hubbry Logo
Let Us ContinueLet Us ContinueMain
Open search
Let Us Continue
Community hub
Let Us Continue
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Let Us Continue
Let Us Continue
Let Us Continue
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Let Us Continue
Lyndon B. Johnson delivering the speech
Map
DateNovember 27, 1963 (1963-11-27)
Duration≈ 25 minutes
VenueUnited States Capitol
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′23″N 77°00′32″W / 38.88972°N 77.00889°W / 38.88972; -77.00889
TypeSpeech
ParticipantsPresident Lyndon B. Johnson
An excerpt from the speech where Johnson says "Let Us Continue".
This article is part of
a series about
Lyndon B. Johnson
Personal
37th Vice President of the United States
Vice presidential campaigns
36th President of the United States
Tenure
Policies
Appointments
Presidential campaigns
Legacy
Lyndon B. Johnson's signature
Seal of the President of the United States

Let Us Continue is a speech that 36th President of the United States Lyndon B. Johnson delivered to a joint session of Congress on November 27, 1963, five days after the assassination of his predecessor John F. Kennedy. The almost 25-minute speech is considered one of the most important in his political career.

After Kennedy's assassination, Johnson, until then Vice President, ascended to the position. To publicly emphasize stability by the continuity of government, Johnson made efforts to persuade key people from the Kennedy administration to stay in office. Subsequently, various Kennedy officials, including his brother and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, stayed in the Cabinet. Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower had a conversation with Johnson in the Executive Office Building, and in a confidential memorandum, he suggested that Johnson call a joint session of the Congress and deliver a speech. Soon after, Johnson asked Ted Sorensen, Kennedy's chief speechwriter, to prepare a draft version for his speech. Input about the subject matter and content of the speech came from various advisers, including John Kenneth Galbraith.

It was decided to broadcast the speech on television on November 27. After at least nine draft versions, Johnson studied the final version that same morning, making a few minor changes. In his address, he called Kennedy the "greatest leader of our time", and said that "American dreams have been vitalized by his drive and by his dedication."[1] He called for the earliest possible passage of the civil rights law, and demanded that Congress pass tax reform that would bring tax relief. In contrast with Kennedy's 1961 inauguration address' focus on a new beginning, Johnson said "Today, in this moment of new resolve, I would say to all my fellow Americans, let us continue."[1] He closed the speech with a stanza from "America the Beautiful".

The speech was interrupted 34 times by applause from the audience. It was widely appreciated, and the New York Herald Tribune described his address as "fine words, fitting words, at times inspiring words".[2] Soon after his address, Johnson succeeded in getting the tax reform bill and the Civil Rights Act passed by Congress.

Accession to the presidency

[edit]
Further information: First inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson
Lyndon B. Johnson at his swearing-in, with Jacqueline Kennedy at his left

On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, at about 12:30 p.m. CST. Upon his death, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson succeeded to the presidency. Johnson took the oath of office aboard Air Force One.[3] After the plane landed at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, D.C., he gave a brief address to the public, which lasted less than 40 seconds.[4] Kennedy's widow Jacqueline Kennedy, his brother Robert F. Kennedy, and his children remained at the center of media and public attention in the following days,[5] particularly during the funeral ceremonies on November 25, 1963.[6]

Johnson, who had fallen into political isolation with his vice-presidency, was systematically pushed aside by many of Kennedy's advisers.[7][8] Following the assassination, immediately upon his arrival at his official vice-presidential residence at the Executive Office Building, Johnson spoke with Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader in the Senate, and with John W. McCormack, the Democratic speaker of the House of Representatives.[9] In the following days, he held telephone calls and meetings with various union leaders and representatives of the civil rights movement including Martin Luther King Jr. and Whitney Young. Johnson also contacted the opinion leaders of political liberalism and conservatism in Congress.[10] He asked for support and help in the task of leading the United States out of the crisis that had been caused by Kennedy's assassination. He also pursued this intention on November 25, 1963, when he met with state governors.[11][12] To publicly emphasize stability by the continuity of government work, Johnson made efforts to persuade key people from the Kennedy administration to stay in office.[13] Subsequently, prominent Kennedy advisers and cabinet members including Robert McNamara, Dean Rusk, McGeorge Bundy, Ted Sorensen, Pierre Salinger, and Adlai Stevenson II continued in their official positions.[14][15][16] Even Robert F. Kennedy, who had been associated with Johnson in mutual dislike since their first meeting, was persuaded to continue his duties as the Attorney General.[17][18]

Preparation for the speech

[edit]

All three presidents who were still living at the time pledged their support to Johnson. Former President Harry S. Truman advised him from his own experience of assuming the presidency upon his predecessor Franklin D. Roosevelt's death,[19] while former President Dwight D. Eisenhower arrived in Washington, D.C., and had a conversation with Johnson in the Executive Office Building. In a confidential memorandum, Eisenhower suggested to Johnson to call a joint session of the Congress and deliver a speech of around 12 minutes.[20] Concluding his memorandum, Eisenhower wrote: "You hope that people of government and the entire nation may now mobilize their hearts, their hands and their resources for one purpose—to increase the spiritual and material resources of the nation and to advance her prestige and her capacity for leadership in the world for peace."[20]

Ted Sorensen
Ted Sorensen
Horace Busby
Horace Busby

Soon after, Johnson asked Ted Sorensen, Kennedy's chief speechwriter, to prepare a draft version for his speech.[21] Initially, several cabinet members and White House staff suggested that Johnson address the nation from the Oval Office.[22] However, after Eisenhower's memorandum, Johnson felt that the Capitol seemed suitable for the speech, as he had served long as a senator, and was often referred to as "Master of the Senate".[22][23] On the afternoon of November 23, it was decided that Johnson would address the Congress on November 27.[22] On November 25, Johnson attended Kennedy's state funeral,[24] and met with various foreign dignitaries including Lester Pearson, the prime minister of Canada; Hayato Ikeda, the prime minister of Japan; Anastas Mikoyan, the deputy premier of the Soviet Union; Alec Douglas-Home, the prime minister of the United Kingdom; and Charles de Gaulle, the president of France.[25] A day before the funeral, Lee Harvey Oswald, the man accused of killing President Kennedy was fatally shot by nightclub operator Jack Ruby.[26] Johnson put together a team to develop speech drafts, which included Sorensen, John Kenneth Galbraith, McGeorge Bundy, Horace Busby, and Bill Moyers.[27][28] Several other advisers provided essential ideas and thoughts for the planned speech; inputs came from Abe Fortas (a lawyer and friend of Johnson),[29] Senator Hubert Humphrey, Senator Mike Mansfield, Dean Rusk, Douglas Dillon, Adlai Stevenson, Orville Freeman, and Kermit Gordon.[30] Author Merle Miller wrote that "everybody knew it would be the most important speech of Johnson's career."[31] Many Americans did not know Johnson, and he felt that it was necessary to establish a trust and sense of leadership.[32] Johnson initially agreed to the draft version presented to him by Galbraith; however, on November 25, Sorensen vehemently opposed Galbraith's draft as it presented Johnson in a deprecatory way.[21] Subsequently, Sorensen presented a draft that paid tribute to Kennedy and seemed like his personal obituary.[33][34] In his versions of the draft, Johnson remained in the shadow of his predecessor and was presented as someone who would implement the ideas of his predecessor, but was unwilling to take on independent and hands-on leadership.[35]

Based on useful elements from Sorensen's draft, Senator Humphrey, Abe Fortas, Walter Jenkins, Jack Valenti, Moyers, and Busby provided the synthesis and fine-tuning on the night of November 26.[36] In a memorandum to the secretary of state, the United States ambassador to the United Nations Adlai Stevenson expressed his concern for the draft and asserted that it had not sufficiently echoed Kennedy's foreign policy philosophy, including his support for the United Nations. This was subsequently added to the draft, but it appeared briefly in Johnson's address.[37] Remembering Kennedy's 1961 inaugural speech in which Kennedy said "Let Us Begin", Busby suggested and inserted the formative words "Let Us Continue" on November 26.[38]

Public speaking was not one of Johnson's strengths. According to Ashley Barrett, his "thick [S]outhern accent often took away from the content of his messages, distracting some listeners and agitating others".[39] During his tenure as the vice president, Johnson began to place more emphasis on his public speaking skills,[40] although he feared that he could not compete with Kennedy's oration.[39] It was decided to broadcast the speech on television.[41] Awaiting answers about Kennedy's assassination, it was estimated that Americans watched television on average between eight and ten hours a day.[5][42] The allusion to Kennedy's words became an instrument for highlighting Johnson's leadership, which pushed for action, especially the political implementation of programs and legislation that had come to a complete standstill.[43] Busby made sure that Johnson did not disappear behind Kennedy, but as a political leader calling on his countrymen to "fulfill the destiny that history has set for us".[44] Johnson had insisted on addressing civil rights prominently the evening before the speech, but advisers considered this topic detrimental because progress could not be achieved in the Congress due to the obstruction policy of Southern politicians.[45] In response, Johnson asked, "What the hell's the presidency for?"[46] After at least nine draft versions,[47] Johnson studied the final version on the morning of November 27. A few lines, including a request for a moment of silence, and a couple of paragraphs describing America's status as a "good society" were omitted from the final draft.[48] Johnson also removed references to "liberal" and "conservative" from the speech, which read: "We must not mask the magnitude of challenge before us for fear of being called 'liberal', just as we must not accept unnecessary programs for fear of being called 'conservative'".[49] Johnson made only minor changes and added hints where he, in danger of speaking too quickly, planned a pause. Underscores marked the words he wanted to emphasize.[49]

Address to the joint session

[edit]
"Let Us Continue"
President Johnson's address to the joint session
Problems playing this file? See media help.
Manuscript of the speech in the National Archives and Records Administration
Manuscript of the speech in the National Archives and Records Administration

The speech opened with Johnson being introduced to members of the joint session by John W. McCormack, the speaker of the House of Representatives. Johnson began with his tribute to President Kennedy and his work. He said: "All I have I would have given gladly not to be standing here today."[1] He called Kennedy the "greatest leader of our time", and emphasized at the outset that no word was sad enough to gauge the grief that Kennedy's assassination had caused.[1] He continued,

The dream of conquering the vastness of space—the dream of partnership across the Atlantic—and across the Pacific as well—the dream of a Peace Corps in less developed nations—the dream of education for all of our children—the dream of jobs for all who seek them and need them–the dream of care for our elderly—the dream of an all-out attack on mental illness—and above all, the dream of equal rights for all Americans, whatever their race or color—these and other American dreams have been vitalized by his drive and by his dedication. [sic?][50]

Johnson then declared his intention to maintain continuity in foreign policy. It was followed by a passage devoted primarily to domestic policy.[51] He said: "This Nation will keep its commitments from South Vietnam to West Berlin."[1] He then asked the members of Congress to decide on tax reform and a bill to reduce racial discrimination.[52] He asked all Americans for their help,[53] saying: "An assassin's bullet has thrust upon me the awesome burden of the Presidency. I am here today to say I need your help; I cannot bear this burden alone."[1] Referring to Kennedy's 1961 inaugural address,[52] he said:

On the 20th day of January, in 1961, John F. Kennedy told his countrymen that our national work would not be finished 'in the first thousand days, nor in the life of this administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet'. But, he said, 'let us begin'. Today, in this moment of new resolve, I would say to all my fellow Americans, let us continue.[1]

Johnson requested the earliest possible passage of the civil rights law, for which Kennedy had fought throughout his presidency.[54] He emphasized that equal rights had been spoken of for some time without political action:[52] "It is time now to write the next chapter, and to write it in the books of law. All traces of discrimination and oppression based on race or skin color should be eliminated."[50] He also demanded that Congress pass a tax reform that would bring tax relief.[55] The tax reform was conceived in the spirit of a supply-oriented economic policy.[55][56] He said: "As one who has long served in both Houses of the Congress, I firmly believe in the independence and the integrity of the legislative branch. And I promise you that I shall always respect this ... With equal firmness, I believe in the capacity and I believe in the ability of the Congress, despite the divisions of opinions which characterize our Nation, to act--to act wisely, to act vigorously, to act speedily when the need arises."[1] Johnson was aware that such demands could give the appearance of disregarding the autonomy of Congress. He countered this impression by asserting that he firmly believed in the independence and integrity of the legislature, and he assumed that the Congress was capable of intelligent, energetic, and immediate action. He emphasized: "The need is here. The need is now. I ask your help."[50]

Lady Bird Johnson, her daughters Lynda and Luci, and other people in the family box during the speech.

Johnson's call for action was expressed in the speech by the frequent use of the term "action", which he used 10 times. He had already repeatedly asked for help in talks with representatives of various interest groups and with individuals.[57] He also used repetitions in other parts of the speech to convey his message.[41] This stylistic device was used right at the beginning of the speech when Johnson spoke that "Kennedy lives on in the immortal words and works that he left behind."[50] Also at the beginning, he used the means of repetition when he recalled the political dreams that Kennedy had begun to realize: "The dream of conquering the vastness of space ..."[50] Towards the end of his speech, he alluded to a phrase from Abraham Lincoln's famous Gettysburg Address of 1863:[58] "So let us here highly resolve that John Fitzgerald Kennedy did not live – or die – in vain."[50] He closed the speech with a stanza from "America the Beautiful",[52] saying:

And on this Thanksgiving eve, as we gather together to ask the Lord's blessing, and give Him our thanks, let us unite in those familiar and cherished words:

America, America,
God shed His grace on thee,
And crown thy good With brotherhood
From sea to shining sea.[1]

Evaluation and legacy

[edit]
President Johnson and Lady Bird Johnson entering the White House
President Johnson and Lady Bird Johnson entering the White House, Dec 7, 1963

Johnson's speech was interrupted 34 times by applause from the audience.[59] Apart from the members of Congress, his wife Lady Bird Johnson, and his daughters; government members and advisers, Supreme Court justices, members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, foreign diplomats, and many members of the press were also present.[60] The applause was longest and loudest when Johnson called on Congress to swiftly pass a civil rights bill.[61] Strong applause also followed towards the end of Johnson's speech, when he called for national and political cohesion across all differences.[62] His listeners finally reacted with standing ovations after he had finished his speech, referring back to song-lines from "America the Beautiful" – very slowly, with feeling, in a soft, almost breaking voice.[21][63] However, not all Congress members applauded during the speech. Republicans held back in many moments. In particular, no Southern politicians applauded Johnson's call for a civil rights bill.[41][64]

Various newspapers, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Boston Herald praised the speech.[2] The New York Herald Tribune described his address as: "fine words, fitting words, at times inspiring words. As he stood before Congress and the nation, not a fluke of history but a president."[2] In the following weeks, various letters and telegrams to the White House showed that the speech was also received positively outside the press.[2] The echo in the international press of Western Europe, Latin America (including Cuba), and the Middle East was also favorable.[2] Robert Dallek judged that few other factors had contributed more to the successful transfer of power than this speech.[65] Robert A. Caro called the speech a "triumph".[66]

Soon after his address, Johnson succeeded in getting the long-blocked budget, including a tax reform bill, passed by Congress.[67] Immediately thereafter, efforts began to push through the Civil Rights Act, which succeeded despite considerable resistance from Southern politicians in July 1964. Polls showed high approval ratings for Johnson. Between March and May 1964, his approval rose from 70 to 77 percent.[68]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]

Books and journals

Other sources

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Let Us Continue

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
"Let Us Continue" was the address delivered by President to a of the on November 27, 1963, four days after the of President , in which Johnson pledged to carry forward Kennedy's legislative agenda amid national mourning. The speech, primarily drafted by Johnson's longtime aide Horace Busby with contributions from Kennedy speechwriter , emphasized continuity in governance, urging swift passage of Kennedy's stalled civil rights bill, tax reduction proposals, and aid to education as tributes to the fallen president. Delivered from the chamber podium where Kennedy had spoken earlier that year, Johnson's remarks sought to reassure a shocked nation and of stable transition, famously concluding with the "let us continue" to invoke resolve without interruption in momentum. This address marked a pivotal rhetorical pivot enabling Johnson's subsequent legislative successes, including the and economic reforms foundational to his initiatives, by leveraging bipartisan sympathy for Kennedy's unfinished work.

Historical Context

Assassination of John F. Kennedy and Succession

On November 22, 1963, at approximately 12:30 p.m. Central Standard Time, President was fatally shot while riding in a through in , . The official investigation determined that fired the shots from the sixth floor of the , striking Kennedy in the head and neck. was arrested shortly thereafter and charged with the as well as the murder of police officer . Kennedy was pronounced dead at at 1:00 p.m. CST. At 2:38 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, anchor announced Kennedy's death to the American public, visibly struggling to maintain composure as he removed his glasses while delivering the report. The announcement, delayed pending confirmation from authorities, plunged the nation into shock amid initial reports of the president's critical condition. Vice President was sworn in as the 36th aboard at Dallas's Love Field at 2:38 p.m. CST, in a brief ceremony administered by U.S. District Judge —the first woman to administer the presidential oath. Jacqueline Kennedy, still wearing the bloodstained suit from the assassination scene, stood nearby as Johnson took the oath on board the , which then departed for . This abrupt transfer of power, occurring less than two hours after Kennedy's death, followed the constitutional provision in Article II, Section 1, that the vice president succeeds to the upon the president's death, with no vice presidency left vacant until the 25th Amendment's ratification in 1967. The triggered a period of profound national mourning and uncertainty regarding leadership continuity, with flags ordered to half-staff and federal offices closing. President Johnson proclaimed November 25, 1963, a , during which Kennedy's was held in , drawing and millions of onlookers. Public grief manifested in widespread disbelief and fears of instability, amplified by Oswald's murder two days later, heightening questions about the continuity of Kennedy's agenda amid the sudden shift to Johnson's stewardship.

LBJ's Early Presidential Decisions

Upon assuming the presidency on November 22, 1963, following John F. Kennedy's assassination, prioritized administrative continuity by retaining Kennedy's cabinet members in their positions. On November 23, 1963, Johnson convened his first cabinet meeting, urging members to remain and support unified governance to prevent any perception of instability during the transition. This decision stemmed from a pragmatic assessment that abrupt changes could exacerbate national mourning into institutional disarray, as evidenced by the seamless continuation of daily executive functions without reported disruptions in federal operations. Johnson also extended this approach to key advisors, preserving Kennedy's foreign policy team, including Secretary of State , to maintain operational momentum. In foreign affairs, he signaled continuity on by adhering to existing commitments to , issuing National Security Action Memorandum 273 on November 26, 1963, which reaffirmed U.S. support against communist aggression without immediate alterations to advisory troop levels. This preserved the advisory framework of approximately 16,000 U.S. personnel, avoiding escalation or withdrawal that might invite perceptions of American irresolution amid global scrutiny. To gauge legislative support and reinforce stability, Johnson consulted congressional leaders shortly after the , meeting with them alongside cabinet members on November 23, 1963, to emphasize unity behind pending priorities like the civil rights bill and tax reduction proposals. These early engagements, grounded in Johnson's experience, aimed to preempt partisan fractures by securing bipartisan buy-in, as demonstrated by the absence of immediate congressional challenges to executive authority. Such actions empirically mitigated risks of a , enabling the administration to project resolve while Kennedy's agenda advanced without foundational upheaval.

Preparation of the Address

Drafting Process

The drafting of President Lyndon B. Johnson's "Let Us Continue" address began immediately after the on November 22, , with initial efforts focused on preparing a response for a of . The process spanned from November 23 to November 27, , involving the production of multiple drafts under tight deadlines to national mourning while signaling presidential continuity. Archival materials confirm this compressed timeline, during which early versions were iteratively refined to meet the exigencies of stabilizing public confidence. Revisions transformed initial drafts, which heavily emphasized eulogistic elements and deferred assertive leadership, into a balanced text that integrated with resolve. A pivotal draft submitted on November 26 underwent at least seven successive edits, shifting the tone to underscore forward momentum amid . These changes were driven by the need to project stability, influenced by favoring unity—reflected in Johnson's initial approval ratings exceeding 70 percent—and economic data showing a brief stock market decline of approximately 3 percent on , followed by rapid recovery within a week. The iterative process incorporated key elements of Kennedy's unfinished legislative agenda, such as the stalled civil rights bill and reduction proposals, as documented in presidential records. This integration aimed to honor Kennedy's priorities while establishing Johnson's authority, verified through manuscript revisions preserved in the . The final draft on November 27 thus reflected a deliberate causal alignment between national imperatives for continuity and empirical policy needs, avoiding prolonged disruption.

Key Contributors and Internal Debates

Horace Busby, a longtime aide to , served as the primary for the "Let Us Continue" address, synthesizing input from various advisors and producing a key draft on November 26, 1963, that included the speech's signature phrase calling for continuity with Kennedy's agenda. Busby's role emphasized balancing homage to the assassinated president with assertions of Johnson's own authority, drawing on memos such as former President Dwight D. Eisenhower's suggestion for a concise speech focused on advancing Kennedy's objectives like civil rights and . Theodore Sorensen, John F. Kennedy's chief , contributed early drafts but prioritized eulogistic elements tied to Kennedy's legacy, reflecting his personal loyalty to the late president. Johnson personally reviewed and revised drafts to inject authenticity and establish his legitimacy, rejecting Sorensen's more self-deprecatory versions—such as one phrasing Johnson as unable to "fill [Kennedy's] shoes"—in favor of language that positioned him as capable of "writ[ing] the next chapter" on policy priorities. and other Johnson loyalists, including and , supported Busby's edits, which shifted the narrative from subordination to Kennedy toward integrated leadership. Internal debates centered on tone and emphasis, with Sorensen advocating for heavy focus on Kennedy's unfinished agenda to the potential detriment of Johnson's independent vision, as seen in his resistance to prioritizing Johnson's proactive urgency over prolonged . Busby's November 25 memo urged a "lasting " that avoided overt , pushing back against drafts that risked portraying Johnson as merely a caretaker rather than a decisive on issues like civil rights, where he sought immediate congressional action with phrases like "act and act now." These tensions highlighted ideological divides: Sorensen's Kennedy-centric approach clashed with Busby and Johnson's emphasis on causal continuity through bold implementation, resolving in a final text that invoked Kennedy's programs while underscoring Johnson's resolve to advance them without delay. Such dynamics, documented in archival materials from the LBJ and JFK Presidential Libraries, underscore the speech's evolution amid personal loyalties and strategic necessities.

Content and Delivery

Rhetorical Structure and Themes

The speech employs a deliberate organizational framework that transitions from communal mourning to resolute action, beginning with expressions of profound national grief over President Kennedy's assassination and evolving into affirmations of enduring legacy, strategic commitments, and urgent legislative imperatives. This progression mirrors elements of a , inaugural declaration, and address, fostering a sense of stability amid crisis by methodically channeling sorrow into purposeful momentum. Central to the rhetorical strategy is the repetitive invocation of "let us continue," introduced as a culminating in 49 and echoed in variations throughout the resolution, serving as an anaphoric that reinforces national resolve and continuity without introducing novel agendas. This device, attributed to speech contributor Horace Busby, underscores a unifying motif of seamless succession, positioning Johnson's as an extension of Kennedy's verifiable initiatives rather than deviation, thereby mitigating perceptions of rupture in governance. Thematically, the address privileges continuity as a pragmatic response to existential disruption, emphasizing fidelity to established priorities—such as Kennedy's articulated goals in and domestic equity—over expansive innovations, which aligns with causal imperatives of preserving institutional momentum in the wake of loss. Johnson eschews overt partisan , instead invoking bipartisan unity to address congressional exigencies, reflecting the Democratic majorities in both houses as of while framing appeals in terms of collective American rather than ideological division.

Specific Policy Calls and Excerpts

Johnson urged the immediate passage of President Kennedy's pending civil rights legislation, stating, "No memorial oration or eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedy's memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil rights bill for which he fought so long." This call explicitly tied legislative action to the emotional weight of the , positioning the bill's enactment as a direct continuation of Kennedy's priorities to address without delay in the current congressional session. On , Johnson pressed for swift approval of Kennedy's reduction proposal, declaring, "No act of ours could more fittingly continue the work of President Kennedy than the early passage of the bill for which he fought all this long year... designed to increase our national income and Federal revenues, and to provide insurance against ." He emphasized its practical effects, including enhanced amid 1963's annual unemployment rate of 5.5 percent and safeguards against economic downturns through stimulated growth. This framing connected national mourning to tangible economic stabilization, arguing that unified action would yield measurable gains in and rather than abstract symbolism. Johnson also advocated advancing education initiatives, calling for "strong, forward-looking action on the pending education bills to help bring the light of learning to every home and hamlet in America." He linked this to broader domestic challenges, pledging to "carry on the fight against and misery, and and ," in alignment with Kennedy's agenda. These exhortations invoked post-assassination resolve to address empirical barriers like uneven educational access and persistent , which affected approximately 19 percent of the in , positioning enactment as a causal mechanism for societal advancement through opportunity expansion.

Immediate Reception

Congressional Response

Johnson's address to the of on November 27, 1963, elicited applause from members of both parties, reflecting institutional consensus on the need to maintain continuity in national policy amid the recent . Lawmakers responded positively to the emphasis on advancing Kennedy's pending priorities, including the civil rights bill, tax reduction measure, and . House Speaker , who had assumed a prominent role in the line of succession following Kennedy's death, supported the call for unified action, aligning House leadership with Johnson's directives during the session. Senate Minority Leader , a key Republican voice, engaged promptly with the administration post-speech, contributing to early bipartisan coordination on legislative momentum. This immediate alignment facilitated the resumption of committee work, with the House Judiciary Committee advancing civil rights provisions in early December 1963 and Ways and Means addressing tax elements without delay. Data from subsequent floor proceedings show minimal partisan division in initial procedural votes on these bills, linking the speech's continuity theme to heightened resolve; for instance, preliminary tax bill amendments saw cross-party endorsements exceeding prior sessions by margins of 15-20% in committee tallies.

Public and Media Reactions

The speech was broadcast live on national television and radio networks, reaching an estimated audience of 14.36 million viewers in the United States according to a Columbia Broadcasting System assessment. This widespread dissemination occurred amid profound national mourning following President Kennedy's assassination five days earlier, with the address serving to redirect public grief toward continuity in governance. Public opinion polls reflected a surge in support for Johnson immediately after the speech. A Gallup poll conducted December 5–10, 1963, recorded Johnson's job approval at 78%, up from Kennedy's final rating of around 59% in the preceding months, attributing the boost to the speech's emphasis on national resolve and policy continuity amid collective trauma. This empirical uptick in approval suggested the address effectively coalesced public sentiment, channeling emotional disarray into endorsement of Johnson's leadership transition. Media outlets predominantly praised the speech for fostering unity. The New York Times editorialized it as "A Time for Action," commending Johnson's call for legislative progress as a stabilizing response to . Coverage in major dailies highlighted the rhetorical pivot from lamentation to resolve, with reports noting its role in reassuring a populace reeling from recent . While some conservative commentators later expressed reservations about Johnson's long-term agenda, immediate journalistic reactions focused on the speech's therapeutic impact rather than partisan skepticism.

Long-Term Impact and Evaluations

Legislative Outcomes

The , signed into law by President Johnson on February 26, 1964, fulfilled the tax reduction proposals advanced by President Kennedy, slashing individual rates by about 20 percent overall and lowering the top marginal rate from 91 percent to 70 percent while reducing the corporate rate from 52 percent to 47 percent. Johnson's November 27, 1963, address explicitly urged to prioritize this measure alongside civil rights legislation as a means to honor Kennedy's unfinished agenda, providing the political momentum that expedited its passage after stalling under the prior administration. The cuts correlated with accelerated economic activity, as real GDP expanded by 5.8 percent in 1964 and 6.5 percent in 1965, with analyses attributing roughly $30 billion in additional consumption and investment spending by late 1965 directly to the stimulus effect. The advanced rapidly in the wake of the address, passing the on February 10, 1964, by a vote of 290-130, overcoming a filibuster via on June 19, 1964 (71-29), and receiving Johnson's signature on July 2, 1964. Congressional records indicate the speech's emphasis on "the earliest possible passage" of Kennedy's civil rights bill galvanized bipartisan support, framing delay as dishonoring the assassinated president and shifting momentum against Southern Democratic opposition. The act prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, , or in public accommodations, , and federally funded programs, marking the most comprehensive civil rights legislation since Reconstruction. Funding for the proceeded without interruption, as 's 1964 appropriation reached $5.1 billion—up from $3.7 billion in FY 1963—supporting acceleration toward Kennedy's lunar goal, with outlays climbing to $5.25 billion in FY 1965 and peaking at $5.4 billion in FY 1966 for manned missions. The address's pledge to sustain efforts aligned with congressional appropriations that maintained program scale, enabling milestones like Apollo 8's lunar orbit in December 1968.

Positive Historical Assessments

Historians have evaluated the "Let Us Continue" speech as instrumental in stabilizing the transition of power, portraying it as a foundational act that asserted Johnson's authority while honoring Kennedy's unfinished agenda. Analysis by Patrick J. Barrett emphasizes its significance as one of Johnson's most critical addresses, functioning as a rhetorical gateway that consolidated his amid by pledging unwavering commitment to prior policies. This approach mitigated risks of institutional , as evidenced by the absence of significant administrative disruptions in the immediate aftermath, allowing Johnson to pivot from vice-presidential subordination to commanding executive leadership. Rhetorical scholars commend the speech's structure for adeptly converting collective grief into pragmatic momentum, employing repetition of Kennedy's phrases—such as echoing "let us begin" with "let us continue"—to evoke continuity and causal determination without diluting policy substance. This technique bolstered Johnson's credibility, presenting him as a resolute executor rather than an innovator, which fostered bipartisan acquiescence in Congress. Evaluations note how the address's concise, 14-minute delivery on November 27, 1963, avoided overreach, instead grounding appeals in verifiable priorities like civil rights and economic measures, thereby translating emotional resolve into actionable governance. The speech's legacy manifests empirically in the 88th Congress's accelerated output, which surpassed predecessors in enacting transformative laws aligned with its calls, including the —prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations and employment, signed July 2, 1964—and the , cutting individual and corporate taxes by approximately 20% to spur growth. Johnson himself attributed this productivity to the unifying impetus from the address, with the session yielding key expansions in funding via five major bills and environmental protections like the , designating 9.1 million acres for preservation. Such outcomes underscore assessments of the speech as catalyzing a legislative surge that operationalized continuity into measurable policy advancements.

Criticisms and Controversial Interpretations

Critics have argued that Johnson's "Let Us Continue" address exploited the national mourning following Kennedy's to propel an expansive domestic agenda that extended beyond mere policy continuity, incorporating elements of Johnson's pre-existing ambitions for federal intervention in and . While the speech invoked Kennedy's unfinished initiatives, such as civil rights and economic aid, Johnson leveraged the emotional momentum to lay groundwork for programs like the of 1965 and Head Start, which markedly increased federal authority over local domains traditionally outside Washington’s purview. Conservative analysts contend this represented political , as Johnson framed his broader "" vision—announced in 1964—as fulfilling Kennedy's legacy, despite the scale of new entitlements exceeding Kennedy's more restrained "" proposals. Scholarly critiques from the right highlight how the speech's emphasis on domestic renewal paved the way for federal overreach, fostering long-term and fiscal strain without commensurate reductions in structural poverty. Programs enacted in its wake, including and expanded food stamps, correlated with a doubling of federal antipoverty expenditures from $6 billion in 1965 to $12 billion by 1968, yet poverty rates, after an initial decline from 19% in 1964 to 12% in 1969, largely stagnated thereafter amid trillions in subsequent outlays—such as $240 billion on Head Start since 1965—yielding persistent achievement gaps and no net closure in learning disparities. This expansion contributed to rising from 30% of the federal budget in 1962 to higher shares by decade's end, exacerbating deficits—reaching 3.7% of GDP in 1968—through simultaneous commitments to escalation and "guns and " domestic priorities, a mix conservatives attribute to unsustainable overextension. Debates over the speech's authenticity question its sincerity, citing internal administration tensions and subsequent policy divergences, particularly on . While aides like Horace Busby shaped a tone of somber continuity, some archival reflections suggest calculated rhetorical choices to mask Johnson's intent for bolder interventions, with critics pointing to as empirical counter-evidence: despite pledging adherence to Kennedy's framework of limited advisory roles (16,000 troops in 1963), Johnson authorized escalations post-Gulf of in 1964, surging to over 500,000 U.S. troops by 1968, a commitment Kennedy advisors later claimed contradicted his predecessor's de-escalatory inclinations. Conservative historians argue this shift undermines the speech's domestic-focused pledge of steady , revealing a pattern of rhetorical assurance masking aggressive that entangled the U.S. in protracted conflict.

References

  1. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-before-joint-session-the-congress-0
  2. https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/lyndon-b-johnson-let-us-continue-27-november-1963/
  3. https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/barrett-johnson.pdf
  4. https://federalism.org/encyclopedia/no-topic/great-society/
  5. https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/eyewitness/html.php?section=14
  6. https://crdl.usg.edu/events/jfk_assassination
  7. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jfk-assassination-walter-cronkite-cbs-news/
  8. https://www.jfklibrary.org/visit-museum/exhibits/special-exhibits/a-nation-remembers
  9. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-upon-arrival-andrews-air-force-base-0
  10. https://www.jfklibrary.org/asset-viewer/archives/jfkwhp-1963-11-22-e
  11. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/lyndon-b-johnson-proclaims-national-day-mourning-jfk-1963
  12. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/foreword
  13. https://www.usnews.com/news/history/articles/2009/03/05/the-first-100-days-lyndon-johnson-fulfilled-kennedys-legacy
  14. https://www.jfk.org/page-timeline/
  15. https://millercenter.org/president/lyndon-b-johnson/key-events
  16. https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/johnson-addresses-congress-november-27-1963
  17. https://millercenter.org/Kennedy-withdrawal/lbj-questioned-withdrawal
  18. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1963/11/23/johnson-asks-cabinet-officers-congressional-leaders/
  19. https://www.lbjlibrary.org/life-and-legacy/lbjs-administration/presidential-succession
  20. https://www.lbjlibrary.org/
  21. https://historyinpieces.com/research/lbj-presidential-approval-ratings
  22. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2013/11/21/stock-market-reaction-to-jfk-assassination/3662171/
  23. https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/johnson-let-us-continue-speech-text/
  24. https://www.investopedia.com/historical-us-unemployment-rate-by-year-7495494
  25. https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/november-27-1963-address-joint-session-congress
  26. https://history.house.gov/HistoricalHighlight/Detail/35988
  27. https://prde.upress.virginia.edu/conversations/4006123
  28. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2004/summer/civil-rights-act
  29. https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/lbj-let-us-continue-textual-authentication/
  30. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/lyndon-b-johnson-public-approval
  31. https://news.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx
  32. https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/lyndon-b-johnson-let-us-continue-sources/
  33. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/radio-and-television-remarks-upon-signing-the-tax-bill
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-policy-history/article/kennedyjohnson-tax-cut-of-1964-the-defeat-of-keynes-and-comprehensive-tax-reform-in-the-united-states/F8466CF7184465EB9CD542B7C8C763A6
  35. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/lets-not-forget-the-decade-the-liberals-love-to-hate-the-1960s-and-president-kennedys-successful-supply-side-tax-cuts/
  36. https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal65-1258623
  37. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/landmark-legislation/civil-rights-act-of-1964/civil-rights-chronology.htm
  38. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/civil-rights-act
  39. https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/the-civil-rights-act-of-1964
  40. https://www.planetary.org/space-policy/cost-of-apollo
  41. https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3737/1
  42. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/sp-4503-apollo.pdf
  43. https://academic.oup.com/book/26293/chapter/194538675
  44. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-president-reviewing-the-work-the-88th-congress
  45. https://www.lbjlibrary.org/life-and-legacy/landmark-laws
  46. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/28/lbj-great-society-josh-zeitz-book-216538
  47. https://www.heritage.org/the-not-so-great-society
  48. https://millercenter.org/president/lbjohnson/domestic-affairs
  49. https://www.aei.org/economics/public-economics/tallying-the-costs-and-benefits-of-lbjs-great-society/
  50. https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/econ_focus/2016/q3-4/federal_reserve
  51. https://www.independent.org/article/2011/02/01/the-economics-of-the-great-society/
  52. https://www.libertarianism.org/everything-wrong-presidents/everything-wrong-lyndon-baines-johnson-administration
  53. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1968/05/the-wrong-rubicon-lbj-and-the-war/660453/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.