Hubbry Logo
Liberty TimesLiberty TimesMain
Open search
Liberty Times
Community hub
Liberty Times
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Liberty Times
Liberty Times
Liberty Times
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Liberty Times is a national newspaper published in Taiwan. Founded by Lin Rong-San, it is published by the Liberty Times Group. The newspaper was first published on 17 April 1980, as Liberty Daily, before adopting its current name in 1987. In 1999, they launched their English language version, the Taipei Times.

Key Information

It is one of the four most influential newspapers in Taiwan, the other three being the Apple Daily, the China Times, and the United Daily News.[1] While the United Daily News is regarded as taking an editorial line that supports a Pan-Blue political stance, the Liberty Times is thought to take a Pan-Green pro-independence political stance.[2]

History

[edit]

Early history

[edit]

In 1946, the Three Principles of the People Youth League established a newspaper in Taitung, called Taitung Daobao. Initially on the verge of closure in 1948, it was taken over by Chen Zhen-zong and renamed Taitung Xinbao, becoming the first newspaper in eastern Taiwan. However, due to insufficient funding, the publication ceased in October 1950. It resumed operations in July 1952 and was later privatised by Wu A-ming in early 1961, eventually relocating to Changhua and rebranding as the Ziqiang Ribao.[3]

Foundation and early development

[edit]

The Liberty Daily was founded in April 1980 by Lin Rong-San, following his acquisition of Ziqiang Ribao for 40 million NT dollars. Despite significant investment, the paper initially suffered monthly losses of around 20 million NT.[4]

To establish itself in the market, Liberty Daily dramatically reduced the price of small ads from 35 NT to 5 NT, attracting advertisements and filling a gap left by larger newspapers due to limited space. The paper also capitalised on the rise of lotteries, publishing columns that predicted winning numbers, which not only boosted readership but also significantly increased revenue from small ads related to lotteries. This strategy helped the paper balance its finances, with circulation rising from 30,000 to 40,000 copies and monthly ad revenue exceeding a million NT.[4]

Government measures later restricted the paper's lottery-related content, leading to a decline in circulation and advertising revenue. In 1986, Liberty Daily relocated to Taipei and underwent a major reform, shifting its focus towards promoting "Taiwan" over the "Republic of China" and prioritising local perspectives, with the slogan "Taiwan above all, priority to freedom."[4]

Post-media control era

[edit]

In 1988, Taiwan lifted media controls, and Liberty Daily was rebranded as Liberty Times. Immediately following the liberalisation, the United Daily News and the China Times faced a steep decline in sales after raising their prices. In contrast, Liberty Daily, which kept its price at NT$10, saw its readership surge from 14.2% to 21.7%. The paper adopted an aggressive distribution policy, including recruiting employees from the United Daily News and the China Times distribution networks by offering better pay.[4]

The paper experienced rapid growth, with circulation increasing from 185,000 in 1988 to over a million by 1996, becoming Taiwan's most popular newspaper. On June 15, 1999, Lin launched the Taipei Times, an English-language daily, establishing the Liberty Times group. After 1996, Liberty Times remained the leading Taiwanese daily, but from 1999 onwards, its readership began to erode. Additionally, its advertising revenue remained smaller than that of its competitors: in 2001, it accounted for 18% of the market, compared to 25% for United Daily News and 24% for China Times.[4]

In 2003, the launch of Apple Daily in Taiwan shook the existing newspaper landscape, quickly attracting a significant readership. However, Liberty Times retained its position as the leading newspaper, with a readership of 19.1%.[4] By 2009, it had become the second most popular newspaper after Apple Daily, with a readership of 25%.[5]

Political positions

[edit]

The Liberty Times has been notably partisan, at times opportunistically aligning with the prevailing political forces. In 2000, it supported the Kuomintang (KMT) presidential candidate Lien Chan, but by 2004, it shifted its support to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)'s candidate, Chen Shui-bian.[4] The Liberty Times developed strong connections with the newly elected DPP government after 2000, effectively transitioning from backing the liberal faction of the KMT to supporting the DPP. Meanwhile, its chief competitors, United Daily News and China Times, faced growing commercial pressure to increase their coverage of issues important to the increasingly assertive pro-independence movement.[5]

Since 2008, the newspaper has consistently supported the DPP and its agenda to promote the Taiwan identity.[6] In a survey published in 2022, the newspaper was believed to support the Pan-Green Coalition and had a China-critical leaning.[7] It has become almost a mouthpiece for the Taiwanese independence faction within the DPP, criticizing even the moderate policies of President Tsai Ing-wen.[3]

Reputation

[edit]

In 2024, a survey conducted by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism found that 41% of respondents trusted the Liberty Times, while 25% expressed distrust. In comparison, the most trusted media outlets garnered 59% trust, whereas the least trusted had a trust level of 38%.[8]

Awards and recognitions

[edit]
Year Awarded by Category Award type Title Journalists References
2010 The Society of Publishers in Asia (SOPA) Archived 2020-02-17 at the Wayback Machine Excellence in Reporting on the Environment Award for Excellence 煙囪裡的秘密—台灣六輕麥寮高罹癌率大追蹤 劉力仁、林國賢、謝文華、王昶閔 [9][10]
2010 Taipei Journalists Association's Social Bright Side Reporting Awards (SBSRA) Printed Newspapers (平面新聞報紙類獎項) Award 菜販捐圖書館、續攢千萬助貧 黃明堂 [11][12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Liberty Times

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Liberty Times (自由時報; Zìyóu Shíbào) is a Chinese-language daily newspaper based in , founded on April 17, 1980, by businessman Lin Rong-san and published by the Liberty Times Group headquartered in . It emerged during Taiwan's period as a challenger to the long-standing dominance of Kuomintang-affiliated media outlets, rapidly gaining prominence for its coverage of politics, society, and international affairs with a focus on and security issues. The newspaper maintains a consistent editorial position advocating Taiwan independence and sovereignty, often critiquing policies perceived as conciliatory toward while supporting the aligned with the . This stance has positioned it as a key influencer in public discourse on cross-strait relations, though it has drawn accusations of ideological bias and selective reporting from pro-unification perspectives. In response to competitive pressures, including the entry of tabloid competitors in the early 2000s, Liberty Times adjusted its content strategy to sustain readership, incorporating more sensational elements while preserving its core political orientation. Through its Liberty Times Group, the publication extends its reach via affiliated outlets, including the English-language launched in 1999, enhancing its role in both domestic and international commentary on 's geopolitical challenges. Despite declining print circulation amid digital shifts, it remains one of 's major dailies, rated as mostly factual in reporting despite its partisan leanings.

History

Founding and Early Development

The Liberty Times was founded as the Liberty Daily (自由日報) by Taiwanese businessman Lin Rong-San (林榮三) on April 17, 1980, during the waning years of under the (KMT) regime. Lin, born in 1939 and a self-made entrepreneur who had established the Union Bank of Taiwan, invested in the newspaper to amplify ordinary Taiwanese perspectives and counter the dominant pro-unification media landscape controlled by KMT-affiliated outlets. The publication emerged in a restrictive environment where press freedom was curtailed, yet it quickly positioned itself as a voice for localization (benshengren interests) and democratic reforms, focusing primarily on domestic political and social issues. In its initial years, Liberty Daily faced public skepticism amid a market dominated by established papers like the United Daily News and China Times, both seen as aligned with the ruling party's narrative. Despite this, the paper's editorial stance emphasized "Taiwan Foremost, Liberty First" (台灣優先，自由第一), prioritizing freedom of expression, economic policies favoring small and medium enterprises over large-scale mainland trade, and resistance to authoritarian controls. It gained traction by reporting critically on government corruption and abuses, aligning with the rising dangwai (outside-the-party) opposition movement, though it operated under until the late . Circulation grew steadily as Taiwan's accelerated, reflecting broader public demand for uncensored local discourse. The newspaper underwent a to Liberty Times (自由時報) in 1987, coinciding with the lifting of on July 15 that year, which allowed for expanded press freedoms and new entrants into the market. This period marked its transition to a full-fledged daily , solidifying its role as one of Taiwan's "big four" newspapers and a counterweight to KMT-influenced media, with initial print runs emphasizing on , labor issues, and electoral reforms. By the early 1990s, under Lin's continued oversight, it had established a reputation for bold advocacy, contributing to the normalization of pro-independence sentiments in public debate.

Growth Amid Political Transition

Following the lifting of on July 15, 1987, and the repeal of press restrictions (baojin) effective January 1, 1988, which ended decades of state control over new publications, Liberty Times underwent rapid expansion amid Taiwan's broader process. This allowed the , originally founded in 1980 but constrained under prior regulations, to intensify its operations and marketing efforts, including the use of lotteries and promotions to attract readers seeking nativist perspectives. The political transition from one-party rule under the (KMT) to multi-party competition, marked by events such as the Wild Lily Student Movement in 1990 and the first direct presidential election in 1996, created space for media outlets aligned with emerging Taiwanese identity to flourish. Circulation figures illustrate this surge: from 185,000 copies in 1988, Liberty Times reached over 1 million by the second quarter of 1996, securing a readership share of 21.7 percent and establishing it as Taiwan's most widely circulated daily at the time. The newspaper's pro-local stance, supporting President during KMT internal factional struggles from 1988 to 1993 and later aligning with the (DPP), resonated with audiences favoring Taiwan-centric narratives over pro-unification views dominant in established outlets like United Daily News. This positioning capitalized on public disillusionment with legacy media, as evidenced by campaigns such as "Say No to United Daily," amid rising demands for open debate on cross-strait relations and during the 1990s. By the late 1990s, Liberty Times had relocated its headquarters to in June 1989 and diversified its reach, contributing to a fragmented yet competitive market that reflected Taiwan's evolving political pluralism. Its growth underscored how enabled niche media to challenge monopolistic structures, though readership began eroding after 1999 due to intensifying competition and digital shifts, dropping to 19.1 percent by the end of 2003. Academic analyses attribute this trajectory not to neutral journalistic innovation alone but to the paper's adept alignment with pan-green sentiments during a period of causal realignment in Taiwanese , where intertwined with identity-based electoral mobilization.

Digital Expansion and Recent Adaptations

The Liberty Times established its digital presence with the launch of Liberty Times Net (news.ltn.com.tw) in 2000, enabling real-time online news dissemination alongside its print edition and catering to Taiwan's expanding user base, which grew from under 10 million in 2000 to over 15 million by 2005. This platform initially focused on mirroring print content but evolved to include interactive features and alerts, positioning the outlet as an among Taiwanese dailies amid rising penetration. To address the shift toward mobile-first consumption, the Liberty Times developed a dedicated application, which by April 2022 had become Taiwan's most downloaded app, with 42 percent of surveyed users citing it as their primary source for , surpassing competitors like Central News Agency at 26 percent. The app integrates push notifications, customizable feeds, and archived articles, reflecting adaptations to user preferences for on-the-go access in a market where mobile internet usage exceeded 90 percent by 2020. Social media integration forms a core element of the Liberty Times' digital strategy, with active accounts on platforms including —boasting millions of followers—and , used for sharing infographics, short videos, and opinion pieces to amplify reach among demographics under 40, who constitute a growing segment of news consumers. By 2025, the outlet's online platform garnered 17 percent usage among for , per the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, underscoring sustained audience growth despite competition from global and domestic digital natives. Recent adaptations emphasize multimedia and data-driven content, including embedded videos and interactive visualizations on Liberty Times Net, as part of broader post-2020 efforts to counter declining —down approximately 20 percent industry-wide since 2019—and capitalize on video consumption, which rose to 46 percent via in by 2025. These enhancements, informed by analytics on user engagement, prioritize rapid cross-strait and domestic reporting, though the platform's pro-independence framing has drawn scrutiny for potential echo-chamber effects in algorithmic distribution, as noted in analyses of Taiwan's polarized media ecosystem.

Ownership and Organizational Structure

Founders and Leadership

The Liberty Times was established on April 17, 1980, when businessman Lin Rong-san acquired the financially distressed Ziqiang Ribao newspaper for NT$40 million and relaunched it under the new name to promote democratic ideals amid Taiwan's martial law era. Lin Rong-san (1939–2015), a self-made entrepreneur who rose from a rice trading family to build a conglomerate spanning real estate, banking, and media—including founding Union Bank of Taiwan—served as the publisher and guiding force behind the Liberty Times Group, which oversees the newspaper and its English-language sister publication, the Taipei Times. In 2005, Lin Rong-san delegated day-to-day management of the Liberty Times to his second son, Lin Hong-bang, while retaining oversight of content such as社論 until his death. Lin Rong-san passed away on November 28, 2015, at age 76 from complicated by a tumor, leaving a fortune estimated at over NT$100 billion and a media empire aligned with his pro-Taiwan independence views. Following Lin's death, the Liberty Times Group has remained under family control, with Lin Hong-bang as a key principal. As of 2023, Andy Lin serves as chairman of the group, continuing the founder's legacy in a competitive media landscape.

Corporate Governance and Media Group

The Liberty Times is published by the Liberty Times Group, a private media entity that also operates the English-language . The group generates revenue primarily through advertising and subscriptions, reflecting a standard model for Taiwanese print media operations. Founded in 1980 by Lin Rong-San via the acquisition of the struggling Ziqiang Ribao newspaper, the group has remained under family ownership, integrated into Lin's broader conglomerate interests spanning , banking, and . Corporate governance follows a familial structure typical of privately held Taiwanese enterprises, with decision-making centralized among Lin family members and limited transparency due to non-public status. Lin Rong-San, who built the group's foundation amid Taiwan's post-martial law media liberalization, led until his death from a tumor-related cardiopulmonary failure on November 28, 2015, at age 76. Leadership transitioned to his second son, Lin Hong-bang, who assumed the role of president in 2005 and concurrently chairs affiliated entities, ensuring continuity in editorial and operational direction. The widow, Lin Chang Su-O, and other heirs, including sons Lin Hong-lian and Lin Hong-yao, maintain stakes across the family's holdings, valued at billions in assets primarily from real estate. As a non-listed entity, the Liberty Times Group discloses minimal formal governance details, such as board composition or oversight, prioritizing internal family alignment over external shareholder mechanisms. This structure has sustained the group's pro-Taiwan advocacy but draws scrutiny for potential conflicts with Lin family business ties, including the Union Bank of Taiwan, though no verified instances of have been documented in peer-reviewed analyses.

Editorial Stance and Ideology

Advocacy for Taiwanese Independence

The Liberty Times maintains a staunch editorial position in favor of Taiwanese independence, framing it as essential for preserving the island's democratic sovereignty against Chinese unification pressures. This stance aligns closely with the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which it endorses through consistent support for DPP candidates and policies emphasizing Taiwan's distinct identity separate from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Its coverage and opinion pieces routinely portray cross-strait relations as existential threats, advocating for strengthened defenses and international alliances to deter PRC aggression rather than concessions that could imply eventual unification. Editorials in the Liberty Times explicitly critique actions perceived as undermining , such as PRC incursions or domestic policies softening Taiwan's stance. For instance, a July 18, 2024, editorial described Chinese harassment via warplanes, warships, and drones as punitive measures against Taiwan's de facto , rejecting Beijing's framing of the Republic of China (ROC) on as inherently "parasitic" . Similarly, following the January 2024 , an editorial celebrated the DPP's victory under as a reaffirmation of and implicit rejection of unification paths, urging vigilance against opposition forces sympathetic to . These pieces often invoke historical grievances, including the PRC's "," to argue that is not provocation but a necessary response to causal threats of . The newspaper's advocacy extends to cultural and identity narratives, promoting "Taiwan subjectivity" through analyses that extract themes of autonomy from public discourse, as evidenced in content portraying unification advocates as eroding local self-determination. During electoral cycles, it has framed voting against DPP candidates as risking pro-unification outcomes, as seen in 2024 coverage warning that support for Kuomintang (KMT) or Taiwan People's Party (TPP) alignments could align Taiwan with Beijing's preferences. This positioning has drawn criticism for bias, with analyses noting its editorials skew "strongly in favor of independence" compared to more balanced outlets, potentially amplifying pan-green perspectives while marginalizing pro-status quo views. Nonetheless, its influence stems from high circulation—over 500,000 daily copies—and role in shaping public resistance to PRC narratives.

Positions on Cross-Strait Relations

The Liberty Times maintains a staunch position against unification with the People's Republic of China (PRC), framing cross-strait relations as an existential threat to Taiwan's sovereignty and democratic system. It consistently portrays Beijing's policies—such as military incursions, economic coercion, and united front operations—as aggressive encroachments designed to erode Taiwan's autonomy rather than genuine dialogue. For instance, a December 22, 2024, editorial described purported "cross-strait exchanges" as inherently unequal, with China's tactics serving to subordinate Taiwan under the guise of mutual benefit. This view aligns with the newspaper's broader advocacy for Taiwan's distinct identity, rejecting frameworks like the "1992 Consensus," which it sees as a pretext for PRC dominance that legitimizes unification claims. In critiquing domestic actors, the Liberty Times accuses the (KMT) of endangering by accommodating Beijing's authoritarian model, arguing that such leanings undermine democratic resilience and invite further pressure. A , 2024, highlighted the KMT's inheritance of past authoritarian tendencies, positioning it as overly conciliatory toward at the expense of 's future security. Conversely, it endorses the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) resistance to PRC intimidation, emphasizing pragmatic defenses like military modernization and international alliances to deter invasion. The paper has repeatedly condemned 's refusal to renounce force, interpreting it as evidence of irredentist intent, as noted in coverage of Beijing's military buildups and gray-zone tactics. The Liberty Times also promotes a narrative of Taiwan's "subjectivity"—a discourse of rooted in local identity and democratic will—over any familial or historical ties to the PRC. of its editorials from 2008 to 2020 reveals a push for policies that prioritize Taiwan's against unification pressures, often framing cross-strait stability as contingent on Beijing's abandonment of coercive strategies. This stance has intensified amid events like PRC military drills, which the paper depicts as punitive responses to Taiwan's independence-leaning rhetoric, urging heightened vigilance and rejection of . Overall, its coverage prioritizes empirical indicators of threat, such as documented incursions by Chinese aircraft and vessels, to substantiate calls for robust deterrence over negotiation.

Alignment with Political Factions

The Liberty Times maintains a pronounced alignment with Taiwan's , particularly the (DPP), which emphasizes Taiwanese independence and resistance to Chinese influence. Academic analyses of its coverage describe the newspaper as adopting a pro-Green, pro-independence editorial posture, with reporting that prioritizes narratives supportive of DPP governance and sovereignty-focused policies. This orientation is evident in its consistent advocacy for measures strengthening Taiwan's distinct identity, such as critiques of economic dependencies on that could undermine autonomy..pdf) In opposition to the , dominated by the (KMT), the Liberty Times routinely portrays KMT positions as risks to Taiwan's democratic framework and security, often linking them to accommodation of Beijing's authoritarian model. For example, a November 2024 accused the KMT of inheriting undemocratic legacies and tilting toward China's regime over Taiwan's interests. Such rhetoric aligns with Pan-Green critiques of Pan-Blue overtures, including legislative pushes for cross-strait engagement perceived as concessions. Electoral coverage further underscores this factional tilt, as the newspaper's emphasis on existential threats from unification advocates has historically amplified DPP messaging without explicit candidate endorsements. Studies of patterns confirm that Pan-Green identifiers disproportionately favor Liberty Times over Pan-Blue-leaning outlets, fostering partisan media silos in Taiwan's polarized landscape. This alignment, while bolstering influence among supporters, draws accusations from critics of selective framing that marginalizes alternative views on cross-strait stability.

Operations and Content

Publishing Formats and Distribution

The Liberty Times is published as a daily newspaper in traditional Chinese, with print editions distributed primarily through home subscriptions and retail outlets across . Approximately 70% of its circulation consists of subscribers, equating to around 420,000 households or institutions as of early 2023, implying a total of roughly 600,000 copies daily. Northern accounts for nearly 240,000 copies, reflecting strong regional demand in urban areas like . Distribution relies on a network of delivery services ensuring reach even in adverse weather, supplemented by sales at stores and newsstands. Digitally, the newspaper maintains a comprehensive online presence via its website, ltn.com.tw, which has provided real-time news updates since its launch as Liberty Times Net in 2000. Content is also accessible through dedicated mobile applications for smartphones and tablets, alongside a and channels, enabling broad dissemination beyond print subscribers. A 2022 survey identified the Liberty Times print edition and its as the most popular local news sources in , underscoring the integration of traditional and digital formats.

Key Features and Supplements

The Liberty Times includes a prominent literary supplement titled 自由副刊, which focuses on , , and cultural content, featuring essays, , short , and serialized novels alongside columns by established writers. This section emphasizes reflective and creative works, such as personal narratives on social issues and artistic commentary, with recurring series like "名家專欄" (columns by renowned authors) and themed collections on writing processes or cultural events. Originally a staple for broader societal reflection, it now publishes four days per week, prioritizing literary depth amid space constraints while occasionally incorporating news-oriented topics to engage readers. Complementing the core editions, the newspaper produces a 週末生活版 (Weekend Life Edition) on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays, designed as a lifestyle-oriented supplement that covers consumption trends, , and practical advice, adapting to competitive market dynamics by emulating popular formats from rival publications. This edition aims to boost readership through accessible, leisure-focused material, including features on daily living and leisure activities, reflecting shifts in newspaper strategies toward diversified content since the early 2000s. Special reports and themed inserts, such as investigative series or event-specific coverage, appear periodically within the main paper or supplements to highlight in-depth topics like or human interest stories, though these are integrated rather than standalone publications. The overall structure supports the newspaper's emphasis on comprehensive coverage, with supplements enhancing its appeal beyond standard news by fostering cultural engagement and reader retention.

Journalistic Practices and Standards

The Liberty Times employs standard journalistic methods, including on-the-ground reporting by staff journalists, interviews with officials and experts, and aggregation from wire services, to cover domestic , cross-strait issues, and societal events with an emphasis on rapid publication to compete in Taiwan's saturated . Its practices prioritize investigative angles on and , often drawing from leaked documents and whistleblower accounts, but sourcing transparency is inconsistent, with articles rarely providing direct hyperlinks for verification. Independent evaluations assess the outlet's factual accuracy as mostly reliable, with proper use of sources and no systemic of failed fact checks, though minor errors occur in fast-paced reporting cycles typical of Taiwan's print and digital ecosystem. Corrections, when issued, appear in subsequent editions or online updates, aligning with broader industry expectations rather than a formalized internal protocol. The absence of a publicly disclosed code of ethics specific to the Liberty Times—unlike some international outlets—leaves its standards inferred from general Taiwanese journalistic norms, which stress and truth-seeking but face erosion from commercial pressures favoring volume over depth. In practice, editorial oversight integrates ideological alignment with factual constraints, resulting in story selection that amplifies narratives supportive of Taiwanese while scrutinizing pro-unification voices, a dynamic critiqued for potentially compromising neutrality in source vetting. Taiwan's polarized media landscape exacerbates these challenges, where outlets like the Liberty Times balance audience retention through engaging, opinion-inflected coverage against risks of , as evidenced by occasional regulatory scrutiny from bodies like the National Communications Commission for content accuracy.

Reputation and Public Perception

Circulation Metrics and Market Position

The Liberty Times has historically reported average daily figures exceeding 500,000 copies, with a 2016 estimate citing 529,178 copies and self-reported data from 2023 indicating approximately 600,000 total copies based on subscriber proportions (70% of circulation from about 420,000 household and institutional subscribers, concentrated heavily in northern at nearly 240,000 copies). These numbers reflect aggressive expansion tactics in the and early , including promotional giveaways, which propelled it past competitors like the and to claim the top spot by 2005 in both circulation and revenues. However, 's industry has experienced secular decline due to digital shifts, with overall print readership dropping amid unverified self-reported metrics, as major dailies classify circulation as proprietary and independent audits remain limited. In readership surveys, the Liberty Times consistently ranks as the most popular Chinese-language daily. A 2022 poll found 41.9% of print newspaper readers preferring it, ahead of the United Daily News (not quantified in the same metric but trailing overall), affirming its market leadership despite varying results in later reading rate polls where the United Daily News edged it slightly at 6.37% versus 5.79% for seven-day exposure in Q4 2023. Its dominance extends to digital metrics, with the online edition used by 17% of news consumers in 2025, though trailing television sources. This position stems from strong alignment with pro-independence sentiments and broad northern distribution, capturing a plurality of the shrinking print audience while competitors like the Apple Daily (ceased 2021) eroded the field.

Awards and Professional Accolades

The Liberty Times has garnered recognition primarily for its coverage and newspaper design. In November 2024, its reporting team received the 23rd Excellence in Award (卓越新聞獎) in the print and online text category for the series "Resilient Island – 0403 Hualien Earthquake Chronicle," which detailed the immediate , industrial recovery, and societal resilience following the magnitude 7.2 earthquake that struck on April 3, 2024. In the domain of visual and layout design, the newspaper earned accolades from the Society for News Design (formerly Society of Newspaper Design). In 2001, Liberty Times secured two awards of excellence for its features pages in the international competition, which evaluates global newspaper production standards. Similarly, in 2000, it won recognition for three features pages among non-English-language entries, highlighting innovative pagination and graphical elements. These design honors underscore the publication's emphasis on engaging presentation amid Taiwan's competitive print media landscape.

Influence on Public Discourse

The Liberty Times has shaped Taiwanese public discourse by amplifying pro-independence narratives and fostering a distinct "Taiwan subjectivity" that prioritizes separation from Chinese influence. Content analysis of its editorials and reporting from 2008 to 2020 demonstrates a consistent emphasis on Taiwan's unique cultural, historical, and political identity, often framing cross-strait relations in terms of existential threats from rather than opportunities for integration. This has reinforced pan-green perspectives, portraying unification advocates as undermining and encouraging readers to view Taiwan's democratic institutions as bulwarks against authoritarian encroachment. In electoral contexts, the newspaper's coverage has influenced voter framing, as seen in the presidential election where it depicted pro-unification candidates as equivalent to capitulation to , aligning with broader pro-democracy media strategies to mobilize support for (DPP) positions. With substantial readership—among the highest in Taiwan alongside the —it contributes to agenda-setting on issues like and , where it highlights Beijing's interference while downplaying internal divisions. Critics argue this influence stems from partisan alignment rather than neutral reporting, yet its Taiwan-centric editorial stance has popularized localization themes since the democratization, embedding concepts like "Taiwan foremost" into mainstream debate and countering pro-China media narratives. Empirical assessments confirm its role in sustaining public skepticism toward unification, with surveys linking exposure to such outlets to stronger sentiments among younger demographics.

Criticisms and Controversies

Allegations of Political Bias

Liberty Times has faced allegations of political bias primarily from (KMT) supporters and pro-China commentators, who claim the newspaper functions as a mouthpiece for the (DPP) and the pan-green camp, systematically favoring independence narratives while portraying KMT policies and cross-strait engagement critically. Critics argue this manifests in editorial selections that amplify DPP achievements and downplay KMT perspectives, contributing to polarized public discourse in Taiwan's divided media landscape. Media bias evaluators, such as , rate Liberty Times as left-center biased, attributing this to its overt pro-Taiwan stance—emphasizing separation from —and consistent alignment with DPP positions, as seen in editorials endorsing DPP candidates like those in the 2023 publications. The outlet's ownership by the Liberty Times Group, founded by pro-independence activist Lin Rui-sheng, reinforces perceptions of ideological slant, with detractors pointing to story framing that skeptically covers developments and KMT-led initiatives. However, no major fact-check failures have been recorded in recent years, suggesting allegations center more on interpretive bias than outright fabrication. These claims are contextualized within Taiwan's partisan media ecosystem, where outlets like and are conversely accused of pan-blue (KMT) leanings, highlighting reciprocal accusations of imbalance across the spectrum. Pro-KMT voices, including in public forums, contend that Liberty Times' influence exacerbates divisions by prioritizing nativist sentiments over neutral reporting on unification debates. Despite this, the newspaper maintains high circulation, indicating resonance with audiences sympathetic to its viewpoint, though critics from opposing factions urge caution in treating its coverage as objective.

Factual Accuracy and Sensationalism Claims

, an independent media evaluation organization, rates Liberty Times as Mostly Factual in its reporting, based on an analysis of story selection, wording, and sourcing that found minimal instances of failed fact checks or significant factual inaccuracies, though occasional use of was noted. This assessment aligns with the outlet's track record, where no major retractions for fabricated stories have been documented in or regulatory actions by Taiwan's National Communications Commission as of 2024. Critics, primarily from Kuomintang (KMT)-aligned or pro-China perspectives, have accused Liberty Times of sensationalism, particularly in its coverage of cross-strait tensions and Chinese influence operations, claiming that headlines and framing exaggerate threats to align with pro-independence narratives rather than neutral reporting. Such allegations often cite the newspaper's confrontational style toward and the KMT, which opponents argue prioritizes over balanced , contributing to polarized public discourse in Taiwan's competitive media environment. For instance, during election cycles, Liberty Times reporting on alleged Chinese has been labeled by detractors as alarmist, potentially amplifying unverified claims to sway voter sentiment, though these criticisms lack systematic empirical backing beyond anecdotal partisan complaints. In the broader context of Taiwan's media landscape, sensationalistic tendencies are a systemic issue driven by market competition and political parallelism, with outlets like Liberty Times facing parallel accusations of tabloid-like elements in print and digital formats to capture readership amid declining circulation. Independent analyses, however, differentiate Liberty Times from lower-rated tabloids by noting its reliance on verifiable sources for core claims, even if editorial choices reflect a pro-Taiwan bias that can border on interpretive overreach. Regulatory bodies have not imposed fines on Liberty Times for factual distortions under Taiwan's anti-fake news guidelines, unlike some competitors, suggesting that while claims persist, they are more attributable to stylistic choices than outright inaccuracies. In 2000, independent presidential candidate filed a libel suit against the Liberty Times following its report alleging his ownership of undisclosed property, prompting the newspaper to defend the accuracy of its sourcing amid claims of political motivation. The Liberty Times has faced multiple aggravated libel charges from political figures critical of its editorial stance. In 2018, businessman Kuan Bi-ren initiated such a suit against two Liberty Times reporters over articles linking him to pro-China activities, but the High Court ruled against Kuan in October 2020, upholding the journalistic defense. That same year, former official filed aggravated libel complaints against the Liberty Times and another outlet for coverage he deemed defamatory regarding his public conduct. In a 2022 case, a Liberty Times journalist was charged with for insinuations in reporting about a legislator's alleged ties but was acquitted by the High Court in August, reflecting judicial scrutiny of intent under Taiwan's Articles 310 and 310-1. Weather anchor Fu-Cheng Lee pursued a against the Liberty Times, alongside other media, over allegedly false reporting on his professional conduct, with legal representation claiming victory in the proceedings. These cases illustrate Taiwan's stringent libel framework, where penalties include up to two years' imprisonment for libel, often invoked against aggressive reporting; outcomes frequently hinge on verification standards and , with the Liberty Times prevailing in several high-profile instances despite ongoing legal pressures from adversaries.

References

  1. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/liberty-times-taiwan-bias/
  2. http://mrtranslate.ru/press/taiwan/liberty-times/
  3. https://bacsuk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/JBACS-6Rawnsley.pdf
  4. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024/taiwan
  5. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/02/12/analysis-of-media-coverage-on-the-taiwan-question/
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-east-asian-studies/article/what-exactly-is-it-that-the-taiwan-greens-want-extracting-taiwan-subjectivity-from-the-liberty-times-newspaper/794E26F240F1C37486665F0FD9E989E3
  7. http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~chunfang/TWpapers.pdf
  8. https://www.w3newspapers.com/taiwan/
  9. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2015/12/27/2003635747
  10. https://rocketreach.co/zi-you-shi-bao-management_b733786ec427c3a4
  11. https://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/791
  12. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/07_taiwan_huang.pdf
  13. https://muckrack.com/media-outlet/ltncom
  14. https://www.airsupplycomms.com/works/liberty-times
  15. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2022/04/25/2003777184
  16. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025/taiwan
  17. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/3/3/39
  18. https://focustaiwan.tw/news/201511280016
  19. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2015/11/29/2003633579
  20. https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.liberty_times_ltd.4deea10315427658693592d52ae0aff7.html
  21. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2023/10/28/2003808352
  22. https://www.forbes.com/profile/lin-rong-san/
  23. https://www.forbes.com/profile/lin-chang-su-o-1/
  24. https://www.athensjournals.gr/media/2016-2-2-4-Liu.pdf
  25. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2024/07/18/2003820946
  26. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2024/01/17/2003812198
  27. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2024/12/06/2003828037
  28. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2024/12/22/2003828923
  29. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2024/11/05/2003826388
  30. https://taiwantt.org.tw/taipeitimes/2013/07/20130729-03.htm
  31. https://deniswu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Wu-Guo-2017-beyond-salience-transmission.pdf
  32. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=4258
  33. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2023/10/24/2003808124
  34. https://service.ltn.com.tw/assets/file/newspaper_ad.pdf
  35. https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/english/reports/pdf/report_17111301.pdf
  36. https://art.ltn.com.tw/literaturelist
  37. https://www.verse.com.tw/article/do-you-watch-supplement-newspaper-still
  38. https://ethesys.lis.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search-c/view_etd?URN=etd-0119109-161746
  39. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/453nm7
  40. https://art.ltn.com.tw/
  41. https://www.ltn.com.tw/
  42. https://deniswu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Impediments-to-Journalistic-Ethics-How-Taiwan-s-Media-Market-Obstructs-News-Professional-Practice.pdf
  43. https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/apsa/apsa24/online_program_direct_link/view_paper/2141499/
  44. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2005/11/04/2003278701
  45. https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=839&docid=1837
  46. https://www.masscomglobal.com/complete-advertising-media-guide-for-taiwan-airport-ooh-newspaper-radio-tv-options/
  47. https://topics.amcham.com.tw/2016/03/taiwans-changing-media-landscape/
  48. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/4868509
  49. https://feja.org.tw/77322/
  50. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2001/02/28/0000075491
  51. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2000/02/24/0000025358
  52. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512786.2024.2420733?af=R
  53. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512786.2022.2110928
  54. https://www.quora.com/Which-media-outlets-in-Taiwan-are-pro-China-and-or-pro-communism
  55. https://brill.com/view/journals/ijts/7/2/article-p229_002.xml
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381134812_Media_Political_Leanings_Polarised_Depictions_of_Hong_Kong_Migration_in_Taiwan
  57. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Volume-9_Chiao-Huang.pdf
  58. https://taiwanpolitics.quora.com/Taiwanese-News-Media-101
  59. https://international.thenewslens.com/article/39104
  60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512786.2024.2420733
  61. https://n3con.com/magazine/archives/2783
  62. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5172/4/4/70
  63. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/2000/01/22/0000020984
  64. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2020/10/08/2003744806
  65. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/breakingnews/2301851
  66. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/taiwan
  67. https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/en/Articles/Details?Guid=30541203-62cb-4b91-bcd4-037f8fa12aea
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.