Hubbry Logo
Democratic Progressive PartyDemocratic Progressive PartyMain
Open search
Democratic Progressive Party
Community hub
Democratic Progressive Party
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Democratic Progressive Party
Democratic Progressive Party
Democratic Progressive Party
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Democratic Progressive Party
Traditional Chinese民主進步黨
Simplified Chinese民主进步党
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinMínzhǔ Jìnbù Dǎng
Bopomofoㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄓㄨˇ ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄅㄨˋ ㄉㄤˇ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhMinjuu Jinnbuh Daang
Wade–GilesMin2-chu3 Chin4-pu4 Tang3
Tongyong PinyinMín-jhǔ Jìn-bù Dǎng
MPS2Mínjǔ Jìnbù Dǎng
IPA[mǐn.ʈʂù tɕîn.pû tàŋ]
Hakka
RomanizationMìn-chú Chin-phu Tóng
Southern Min
Hokkien POJBîn-chú Chìn-pō͘ Tóng
Tâi-lôBîn-tsú Tsìn-pōo Tóng
DPP
Traditional Chinese民進黨
Simplified Chinese民进党
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinMínjìn Dǎng
Bopomofoㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄐㄧㄣˋ ㄉㄤˇ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhMinjinn Daang
Wade–GilesMin2-chin4 Tang3
Tongyong PinyinMín-jìn Dǎng
MPS2Mínjìn Dǎng
IPA[mǐn.tɕîn tàŋ]
Hakka
RomanizationMìn-chin Tóng
Southern Min
Hokkien POJBîn-chìn Tóng
Tâi-lôBîn-tsìn Tóng

The Democratic Progressive Party[I] (DPP)[II] is a centre-left Taiwanese nationalist political party in Taiwan.[5][6][7] As the dominant party in the Pan-Green Coalition, one of the two main political camps in Taiwan, the DPP is currently the ruling party in Taiwan, leading a minority government that controls the presidency and the central government.

Founded in 1986 by Hsu Hsin-liang, Roger Hsieh and Lin Shui-chuan,[8][9] a year prior to the end of martial law, the DPP is one of two major parties in Taiwan, the other being the Kuomintang (KMT), a Chinese nationalist party previously ruling the country as a one-party state, and its smaller allies in the Pan-Blue Coalition. It has traditionally been associated with a strong advocacy of human rights, emerging against the authoritarian White Terror that was initiated by the KMT, as well as the promotion of Taiwanese nationalism and identity. Lai Ching-te is the current chairperson of the DPP from 2023, who also serves as the incumbent President and is the third member of the DPP to hold the presidency; he succeeded fellow DPP member Tsai Ing-wen in May 2024.

The DPP is a longtime member of Liberal International and a founding member of the Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats. It represented Taiwan in the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO). The DPP is widely classified as socially liberal, having been founded as a party for human rights, including factions within the party supporting same-sex marriage and other LGBT rights. On foreign policy, the DPP is more willing to increase military expenditures to prevent military intimidation from the People's Republic of China (PRC) owing to the ambiguous political status of Taiwan. It favors closer ties with democratic nations such as Japan and the United States, as well as the nations of ASEAN as part of its New Southbound Policy.

In its policy on cross-strait relations, the DPP as a ruling party chooses to keep the status quo of Taiwan, instead of approaching de jure independence, despite being a pro-independence group in its party platform. The party considers that Taiwan is already a sovereign country under the name "Republic of China" and not subordinate to the PRC.[10] The DPP is frequently accused by the PRC government of being a primary force in Taiwan to "prevent the Chinese nation from achieving complete reunification" and "halt the process of national rejuvenation"[11] due to the party's outspoken advocacy of the Taiwanese nationalism, Taiwanese self-determination,[12][13] and its firm opposition to "One China", including the alleged "1992 Consensus" narratives by both the PRC and the KMT.

History

[edit]

The DPP's roots were in the Tangwai movement, which formed in opposition to the Kuomintang's one-party authoritarian rule under the "party-state" system during martial law. This movement culminated in the formation of the DPP as an alternative, but still illegal, party on 28 September 1986 by eighteen organizing members at Grand Hotel Taipei, with a total of 132 people joining the party in attendance. The new party members contested the 1986 election as "nonpartisan" candidates since competing parties would remain illegal until the following year. These early members of the party, like the tangwai, drew heavily from the ranks of family members and defense lawyers of political prisoners, as well as intellectuals and artists who had spent time abroad. These individuals were strongly committed to political change toward democracy and freedom of speech, press, assembly, and association.[14][15]

The tangwai were not a unified political unit and consisted of factions which carried over into the early DPP. At its founding the DPP consisted of three factions: the Kang group, a moderate faction led by Kang Ning-hsiang, New Tide faction, consisting of intellectuals and social activists led by Wu Nai-ren and Chiou I-jen, and the Progress Faction led by Lin Cheng-chieh, a waishengren opposed to independence. Moderates would later coalesce around the Formosa faction, founded by those arrested during the Formosa Incident after their release from prison. In the early days of the party, the Formosa faction focused on winning elections by wielding the star power of its leaders, while New Tide would focus on ideological mobilization and developing grassroots support for social movements. As a result, the Formosa faction would become more moderate, often bending to public opinion, while New Tide would become more ideologically cohesive. By 1988 the Formosa Faction would dominate high-level positions within the party.[16]

The party did not at the outset give explicit support to an independent Taiwanese national identity, partially because moderates such as Hsu Hsin-liang were concerned that such a move that could have invited a violent crackdown by the Kuomintang and alienate voters, but also because some members such as Lin Cheng-chieh supported unification. Partially due to their waning influence within the party and partially due to their ideological commitment, between 1988 and 1991 the New Tide Faction would push the independence issue, bolstered by the return of pro-independence activists from overseas who were previously barred from Taiwan. In 1991, in order to head off the New Tide, party chairman Hsu Hsin-liang of the moderate Formosa faction agreed to include language in the party charter which advocated for the drafting of a new constitution as well as declaration of a new Republic of Taiwan via referendum (which resulted in many pro-unification members leaving the party).[17][18] However, the party would quickly begin to walk back on this language, and eventually in 1999 the party congress passed a resolution that Taiwan was already an independent country, under the official name "Republic of China", and that any constitutional changes should be approved by the people via referendum, while emphasizing the use of the name "Taiwan" in international settings.[19]

Despite its lack of electoral success, the pressure that the DPP created on the ruling KMT via its demands are widely credited in the political reforms of the 1990s, most notably the direct popular election of Republic of China's president and all representatives in the National Assembly and Legislative Yuan, as well as the ability to openly discuss events from the past such as the February 28 Incident and its long aftermath of martial law, and space for a greater variety of political views and advocacy. Once the DPP had representation in the Legislative Yuan, the party used the legislature as a forum to challenge the ruling KMT.

In 1996, DPP Chairman Shih Ming-teh united with the New Party to run for the President of the Legislative Yuan, but lost by one vote. The vote that was missing was legislator Chang Chin-cheng's failure to vote for Shih. As a result, Chang was expelled from the DPP.

Post-democratization, the DPP shifted their focus to anti-corruption issues, in particular regarding KMT connections to organized crime as well as "party assets" illegally acquired from the government during martial law.[20] Meanwhile, factions continued to form within the DPP as a mechanism for coalition-building within the party; notably, future President Chen Shui-bian would form the Justice Alliance faction.

2000–2008: in minority government

[edit]
Former President Chen Shui-bian, the first DPP President (2000–2008)

The DPP won the presidency with the election of Chen Shui-bian in March 2000 with a plurality, due to Pan-Blue voters splitting their vote between the Kuomintang and independent candidate James Soong, ending 91 years of KMT rule in the Republic of China. Chen softened the party's stance on independence to appeal to moderate voters, appease the United States, and placate China. He also promised not to change the ROC state symbols or declare formal independence as long as the People's Republic of China did not attack Taiwan. Further, he advocated for economic exchange with China as well as the establishment of transportation links.[20]

In 2001, the DPP ran an advertisement promoting the party that featured Adolf Hitler and others in an attempt to encourage young people to engage with politics.[21] The DPP initially responded to criticism from the Israeli and German representative offices in Taiwan by saying the advertisement was meant to highlight "people who dared to express their opinions," and claimed some had deliberately misrepresented the content. The DPP's then chair Frank Hsieh later said the advertisement would be retired to avoid causing misunderstanding among victims of Nazism.

In 2002, the DPP became the first party other than the KMT to reach a plurality in the Legislative Yuan following the 2001 legislative election. However, a majority coalition between the KMT, People First Party, and New Party prevented it from taking control of the chamber. This coalition was at odds with the presidency from the beginning, and led to President Chen's abandonment of the centrist positions that he ran his campaign on.[20]

In 2003, Chen announced a campaign to draft a referendum law as well as a new constitution, a move which appealed to the fundamentalist wing of the DPP. By now, the New Tide faction had begun to favor pragmatic approaches to their pro-independence goals and dominated decision-making positions within the party. By contrast, grassroots support was divided largely between moderate and fundamentalist wings. Though Chen's plans for a referendum on a new constitution were scuttled by the legislature, he did manage to include a largely symbolic referendum on the PRC military threat to coincide with the 2004 presidential election.[20] President Chen Shui-bian would be narrowly re-elected in 2004 after an assassination attempt the day before the election, and in the later legislative election, the pan-blue coalition opposition retained control of the chamber.

President Chen's moves sparked a debate within the party between fundamentalists and moderates who were concerned that voters would abandon their party. The fundamentalists won out, and as a result the DPP would largely follow Chen's lead. The DPP suffered a significant election defeat in nationwide local and county elections in December 2005, while the pan-blue coalition captured 16 of 23 county and city government offices under the leadership of popular Taipei mayor and KMT Party Chairman Ma Ying-jeou. Moderates within the party would blame this loss on the party's fundamentalist turn.[20]

The results led to a shake up of the party leadership. Su Tseng-chang resigned as DPP chairman soon after election results were announced. Su had pledged to step down if the DPP lost either Taipei County or failed to win 10 of the 23 mayor/magistrate positions. Vice President Annette Lu was appointed acting DPP leader. Presidential Office Secretary-General Yu Shyi-kun was elected in a three-way race against legislator Chai Trong-rong and Wong Chin-chu with 54.4% of the vote.

Premier Frank Hsieh, DPP election organizer and former mayor of Kaohsiung twice tendered a verbal resignation immediately following the election, but his resignation was not accepted by President Chen until 17 January 2006 after the DPP chairmanship election had concluded. The former DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang was appointed to replace Hsieh as premier. Hsieh and his cabinet resigned en masse on 24 January to make way for Su and his new cabinet. President Chen had offered the position of Presidential Office Secretary-General (vacated by Su) to the departing premier, but Hsieh declined and left office criticizing President Chen for his tough line on dealing with China.

In 2005, following the passage of the Anti-Secession Law, the Chen administration issued a statement asserting the position that Taiwan's future should be decided by the people on Taiwan only.[22]

Separate identity from China

[edit]

On 30 September 2007, the DPP approved a resolution asserting a separate identity from China and called for the enactment of a new constitution for a "normal nation". It struck an accommodating tone by advocating general use of "Taiwan" as the country's name without calling for abandonment of the name Republic of China.[23]

Tsai Ing-wen, the second DPP President (2016–2024) and the leader of the DPP (2008–2022). Tsai is the first female leader of the DPP.

2008–2016: return to opposition

[edit]

In the national elections held in early months of 2008, the DPP won less than 25% of the seats (38.2% vote share) in the new Legislative Yuan while its presidential candidate, former Kaohsiung mayor Frank Hsieh, lost to KMT candidate Ma Ying-jeou by a wide margin (41.55% vs. 58.45%). In May, the DPP elected moderate Tsai Ing-wen as their new leader over fundamentalist Koo Kwang-ming.[20] Tsai became the first female leader of the DPP and the first female leader to lead a major party in Taiwan.

The first months since backed to the opposition were dominated by press coverage of the travails of Chen Shui-bian and his wife Wu Shu-jen. On 15 August 2008, Chen resigned from the DPP and apologized: "Today I have to say sorry to all of the DPP members and supporters. I let everyone down, caused you humiliation and failed to meet your expectations. My acts have caused irreparable damage to the party. I love the DPP deeply and am proud of being a DPP member. To express my deepest regrets to all DPP members and supporters, I announce my withdrawal from the DPP immediately. My wife Wu Shu-jen is also withdrawing from the party." DPP Chairperson followed with a public statement on behalf of the party: "In regard to Chen and his wife's decision to withdraw from the party and his desire to shoulder responsibility for his actions as well as to undergo an investigation by the party's anti-corruption committee, we respect his decision and accept it."[24]

The DPP vowed to reflect on public misgivings towards the party. Chairperson Tsai insisted on the need for the party to remember its history, defend the Republic of China's sovereignty and national security, and maintain its confidence.[25][26]

The party re-emerged as a voice in Taiwan's political debate when Ma's administration reached the end of its first year in office. The DPP marked the anniversary with massive rallies in Taipei and Kaohsiung. Tsai's address to the crowd in Taipei on 17 May proclaimed a "citizens' movement to protect Republic of China" seeking to "protect our democracy and protect Republic of China."[27]

2016–2024: in majority government

[edit]

On 16 January 2016, Taiwan held a general election for its presidency and for the Legislative Yuan. The DPP gained the presidential seat, with the election of Tsai Ing-wen, who received 56.12% of the votes, while her opponent Eric Chu gained 31.2%.[28] In addition, the DPP gained a majority of the Legislative Yuan, winning 68 seats in the 113-seat legislature, up from 40 in 2012 election, thus giving them the majority for the first time in its history.[29]

President Tsai won reelection in the 2020 Taiwanese presidential election on 11 January 2020, and the Democratic Progressive Party retained its legislative majority, winning 61 seats.

2024–present: return to minority government

[edit]

The 13 January 2024 presidential election and legislative elections led to the election of Lai Ching-te who won with 40.1% of the votes, while his opponents, Hou Yu-ih of the KMT had 33.5% of the votes, and Ko Wen-je of the Taiwan People's Party with 26.5% of the vote. In addition, this election made the DPP the first party to win three consecutive presidential terms since direct elections were introduced in 1996. The DPP was unable to retain its majority in the Legislative Yuan, losing ten seats.[30][31]

Ideology and policies

[edit]
Part of a series on
Taiwan independence
movement
Basis
Branch
Theory
Document
History
Incident
Policy
Extant parties

Pan-Green

Other

Historical parties

Republic of China rule

Japanese rule

Alliances
Organization
People (big-tent)
Movements
Related topics
Taiwan portal
Part of a series on
Progressivism
Movements
Ideas
Variants
Ideologies
Activists
Commentators
Intellectuals
Politicians
Literature
Organizations
Media
By region
Related

The DPP's political position is center-left,[32][33][5][34] but it is also specified as centrist[35] or left-wing.[36][37][38] The DPP is generally described as progressive.[39][40][41][42][43] It has also been described as liberal,[43][44] as well as social democratic.[44][45][46] The party takes a Taiwanese nationalist position, advocating for strengthening Taiwanese identity;[32] the party opposes the KMT and mainland China's pan-Chinese nationalism, and criticizes China's claims of sovereignty over Taiwan as 'colonialism' or 'imperialism'.[47] The party also defines its own identity as an "anti-communist" in the context of opposition to the PRC and united front.[48]

Programs supported by the party include moderate social welfare policies involving the rights of women, senior citizens, children, young people, labor, minorities, indigenous peoples, farmers, and other disadvantaged sectors of the society. Furthermore, its platform includes a legal and political order based on human rights and democracy; balanced economic and financial administration; fair and open social welfare; educational and cultural reform; and, independent defense and peaceful foreign policy with closer ties to the United States and Japan. The party is socially liberal[44][49] and has a progressive stance that includes support for gender equality and same-sex marriage under Tsai's leadership, and also has a conservative base that includes support from the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan.

Stance on Taiwanese independence

[edit]

The primary political axis in Taiwan involves the issue of Taiwan independence versus Chinese unification. Although the differences tend to be portrayed in polarized terms, both major coalitions have developed modified, nuanced and often complex positions. Though opposed in the philosophical origins, the practical differences between such positions can sometimes be subtle.

The current official position of the party is that Taiwan is an independent and sovereign country whose territory consists of Taiwan and its surrounding smaller islands and whose sovereignty derives only from the ROC citizens living in Taiwan (similar philosophy of self-determination), based on the 1999 "Resolution on Taiwan's Future". It considers Taiwan an independent nation under the name of Republic of China, making a formal declaration of independence unnecessary.[19] Though calls for drafting a new constitution and a declaration of a Republic of Taiwan was written into the party charter in 1991,[18] the 1999 resolution has practically superseded the earlier charter. The DPP rejects the so-called "One China principle" defined in 1992 as the basis for official diplomatic relations with the PRC and advocates a Taiwanese national identity which is separate from mainland China.[50]

By contrast, the KMT or pan-blue coalition agrees that the Republic of China is an independent and sovereign country that is not part of the PRC, but argues that a one China principle (with different definitions across the strait) can be used as the basis for talks with China. The KMT also opposes Taiwan independence and argues that efforts to establish a Taiwanese national identity separated from the Chinese national identity are unnecessary and needlessly provocative. Some KMT conservative officials have called efforts from DPP "anti-China" (opposing migrants from mainland China, who DPP officials did not recognize as Taiwanese, but Chinese). At the other end of the political spectrum, the acceptance by the DPP of the symbols of the Republic of China is opposed by the Taiwan Solidarity Union.

The first years of the DPP as the ruling party drew accusations from the opposition as a self-styled Taiwanese nationalist party, the DPP was itself inadequately sensitive to the ethnographic diversity of Taiwan's population. Where the KMT had been guilty of "Chinese chauvinism", the critics charged, the DPP might offer nothing more as a remedy than "Hoklo chauvinism".[51] The DPP argues that its efforts to promote a Taiwanese national identity are merely an effort to normalize a Taiwanese identity repressed during years of authoritarian Kuomintang rule.

Support

[edit]

Since the democratization of Taiwan in the 1990s, the DPP has had its strongest performance in the Hokkien-speaking counties and cities of Taiwan, compared with the predominantly Hakka and Mandarin-speaking counties, that tend to support the Kuomintang.

The deep-rooted hostility between Taiwanese aborigines and (Taiwanese) Hoklo, and the effective KMT networks within aboriginal communities contribute to aboriginal skepticism against the DPP and the aboriginals' tendency to vote for the KMT.[52] Aboriginals have criticized politicians for abusing the "indigenization" movement for political gains, such as aboriginal opposition to the DPP's "rectification" by recognizing the Truku for political reasons, where the Atayal and Seediq slammed the Truku for their name rectification.[53] In 2008, the majority of mountain townships voted for Ma Ying-jeou.[54] However, the DPP share of the aboriginal vote has been rising.[55][56]

Corruption

[edit]

The DPP has been plagued by several corruption scandals which has increased feelings amongst voters that fraud is an acceptable practice within the party.[57][58][59]

Former DPP president of Taiwan Chen Shui-bian has also been involved in a raft of corruption scandals that continue to affect the party's reputation. Chen was sentenced to life imprisonment on corruption charges in 2009 that his supporters said were politically motivated. Chen was acquitted of embezzling millions of New Taiwan Dollars from a special presidential fund while he was in power, but was found guilty of money laundering and forging documents, and was given an additional two-year sentence.[60] As Taiwan president Tsai Ing-wen prepared to leave office in 2024, she declined to comment on whether or not she would pardon Chen of his corruption convictions.[61] In the end, there was no presidential pardon delivered to Chen.

In 2024, the former DPP vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan was detained on corruption charges relating to his time as Mayor of Taoyuan,[62] former DPP Tainan City Council speaker Lai Mei-hui received a 2-year suspended sentence for corruption,[63] and prosecutors began an investigation into DPP Legislator Lin I-chin for allegedly fraudulently claiming public funds.[64]

In June 2025, Kaohsiung DPP representative Lin Dai-hua was indicted alongside nine others for embezzling nearly fifteen million New Taiwan Dollars by misappropriating city funds designated as wages for her assistants.[65]

Structure

[edit]
DPP headquarters at Huashan Business Building Level 10 in Taipei.[66]

The DPP National Party Congress selects, for two-year terms, the 30 members of the Central Executive Committee and the 11 members of the Central Review Committee. The Central Executive Committee, in turn, chooses the 10 members of the Central Standing Committee. Since 2012, the DPP has had a "China Affairs Committee" to deal with Cross-Strait relations; the name caused some controversy within the party and in the Taiwan media, with critics suggesting that "Mainland Affairs Committee" or "Cross-Strait Affairs Committee" would show less of a hostile "One Country on Each Side" attitude.[67]

Factions

[edit]

For many years the DPP officially recognized several factions within its membership, such as the New Tide faction (新潮流系), the Formosa faction (美麗島系), the Justice Alliance faction (正義連線系) and Welfare State Alliance faction (福利國系). Different factions endorse slightly different policies and are often generationally identifiable, representing individuals who had entered the party at different times. In 2006, the party ended recognition of factions.[68] The factions have since stated that they will comply with the resolution. However, the factions are still referred to by name in national media.[69][70]

As of 2022, Taiwan News identified at least 7 factions within the party:[71]

Chair

[edit]
Main article: Chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party

Secretary-General

[edit]
Main article: List of Secretaries-General of the Democratic Progressive Party
  • Current Secretary-General: Lin Hsi-yao (since May 2020)

Legislative Yuan leader (caucus leader)

[edit]

Election results

[edit]

Presidential elections

[edit]
Election Candidate Running mate Total votes Share of votes Outcome
1996 Peng Ming-min Frank Hsieh Chang-ting 2,274,586 21.13% Defeated
2000 Chen Shui-bian Annette Lu Hsiu-lien 4,977,737 39.30% Elected
2004 6,446,900 50.11% Elected
2008 Frank Hsieh Chang-ting Su Tseng-chang 5,445,239 41.55% Defeated
2012 Tsai Ing-wen Su Jia-chyuan 6,093,578 45.63% Defeated
2016 Chen Chien-jen ( Ind.) 6,894,744 56.12% Elected
2020 Lai Ching‑te 8,170,231 57.13% Elected
2024 Lai Ching-te Hsiao Bi-khim 5,586,019 40.05% Elected

Legislative elections

[edit]
Election Total seats won Total votes Share of votes Changes Party leader Status President
1989
21 / 130
 Huang Hsin-chieh Minority Lee Teng-hui
1992
51 / 161
 2,944,195 31.0% Increase 30 seats Hsu Hsin-liang Minority
1995
54 / 164
 3,132,156 33.2% Increase 3 seats Shih Ming-teh Minority
1998
70 / 225
 2,966,834 29.6% Increase 16 seats Lin Yi-hsiung Minority
2001
87 / 225
 3,447,740 36.6% Increase 21 seats Chen Shui-bian Minority Chen Shui-bian
2004
89 / 225
 3,471,429 37.9% Increase 2 seats Minority
2008
27 / 113
 3,775,352 38.2% Decrease 62 seats Minority Ma Ying-jeou
2012
40 / 113
 4,556,526 34.6% Increase 13 seats Tsai Ing-wen Minority
2016
68 / 113
 5,370,953 44.1% Increase 28 seats Majority Tsai Ing-wen
2020
61 / 113
 4,811,241 33.98% Decrease 7 seats Cho Jung-tai Majority
2024
51 / 113
 4,981,060 36.16% Decrease 10 seats Lai Ching-te Minority Lai Ching-te

Local elections

[edit]
Election Magistrates and mayors Councilors Township/city mayors Township/city council representatives Village chiefs Party leader
1994
provincial
1 / 3
52 / 175
 — — — Shih Ming-teh
1997–1998
12 / 23
114 / 886
28 / 319
 — — Hsu Hsin-liang
1998
municipal
1 / 2
28 / 96
 — — — Lin Yi-hsiung
2001–2002
9 / 23
147 / 897
28 / 319
 — — Chen Shui-bian
2002
municipal
1 / 2
31 / 96
 — — —
2005
6 / 23
192 / 901
35 / 319
 — —
2006
municipal
1 / 2
33 / 96
 — — —
2009
4 / 17
128 / 587
34 / 211
 — — Tsai Ing-wen
2010
municipal
2 / 5
130 / 314
 — —
220 / 3,757
2014
unified
13 / 22
291 / 906
54 / 204
194 / 2,137
390 / 7,836
2018
unified
6 / 22
238 / 912
40 / 204
151 / 2,148
285 / 7,744
2022
unified
5 / 22
277 / 910
35 / 204
123 / 2,139
226 / 7,748

National Assembly elections

[edit]
Election Total seats won Total votes Share of votes Changes Party leader Status President
1991
66 / 325
 2,036,271 23.3% Increase66 seats Huang Shin-chieh Minority Lee Teng-hui
1996
99 / 334
 3,121,423 29.9% Increase33 seats Shih Ming-teh Minority
2005
127 / 300
 1,647,791 42.52% Increase28 seats Annette Lu Hsiu-lien Plurality Chen Shui-bian

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Democratic Progressive Party

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP; Chinese: 民主進步黨; pinyin: Mínzhǔ Jìnbùdǎng) is a centre-left in , founded on 28 1986 as the island's first opposition party after the Second , emerging from activists challenging the Kuomintang's (KMT) authoritarian one-party rule. Rooted in the tangwai ("outside the party") movement, the DPP prioritizes , , economic innovation, and Taiwanese sovereignty, with historical advocacy for formal via , though recent platforms emphasize maintaining the status quo of de facto amid cross-strait tensions. The party marked Taiwan's democratization by electing as president in 2000—the first non-KMT victory and peaceful power transfer—and secured consecutive terms in 2004, followed by Tsai Ing-wen's wins in 2016 and 2020, and Lai Ching-te's in 2024, reflecting voter support for its resistance to Beijing's unification claims despite lacking a legislative post-2024. While credited with advancing Taiwan's transition to multiparty democracy and strengthening international alliances, the DPP has encountered defining controversies, including high-profile cases such as 2009 conviction for graft and , which tarnished its early governance, alongside ongoing indictments of party figures.

History

Formation and opposition era (1986–2000)

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was founded on September 28, 1986, by members of the tangwai (outside-the-party) movement, who defied the (KMT) regime's ban on new political organizations during the ongoing imposed since 1949. The formation occurred at the Grand Hotel in , with 135 signatories including political activists, advocates, and defense lawyers who had long opposed KMT one-party rule and sought democratic reforms, abolition of , and enhanced for . This act represented Taiwan's first locally formed political party since the KMT's retreat to the island in 1949, emerging amid President Chiang Ching-kuo's tentative liberalization measures that tolerated rather than crushed the nascent group. Despite its illegal status, the DPP participated in the December 1986 Legislative Yuan election shortly after formation, establishing itself as the primary opposition force by advocating for and challenging KMT dominance. Martial law's lifting on July 15, 1987, legalized the party, enabling open campaigning and organizational growth, though it faced ongoing harassment, arrests, and internal factionalism between moderates and hardline independence proponents. In the 1989 legislative election—the first under relaxed restrictions—the DPP expanded its presence, capitalizing on public discontent with KMT corruption and authoritarianism to build grassroots support, particularly among native Taiwanese voters wary of elite influence. Throughout the 1990s, the DPP solidified its role as opposition standard-bearer, winning increasing seats in the (from 1992 onward) and key local executive posts, such as Chen Shui-bian's election as Taipei mayor in December 1994, which highlighted the party's appeal in urban centers. The party moderated its early pro-independence rhetoric to broaden electability while criticizing KMT economic policies and cross-strait overtures, culminating in the March 18, 2000, presidential election where candidate secured 39.3% of the vote against a divided KMT, achieving Taiwan's first democratic from the . This victory ended over five decades of uninterrupted KMT governance, validating the DPP's persistence despite suppression risks and ideological tensions.

Chen Shui-bian administration (2000–2008)

Chen Shui-bian of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) assumed the presidency on May 20, 2000, following his election victory on March 18, 2000, which ended the Kuomintang's (KMT) 55-year rule over Taiwan's executive branch. His administration operated without a legislative majority, leading to frequent gridlock in the controlled by the KMT and allied parties. Early efforts focused on measures, resulting in the prosecution and imprisonment of several officials for and graft, which reduced overt compared to prior administrations. Domestically, the administration prioritized infrastructure development and social reforms. Key projects included the dredging of the River, the construction of the on the Taipei-Yilan Freeway, and expansions in Taichung's urban infrastructure. Social policies addressed issues such as closing government-run brothels, imposing a midnight curfew for individuals under 18, cracking down on illegal gambling, and shuttering approximately 4,000 unlicensed establishments. Economically, faced a slump upon Chen's inauguration, with the administration navigating challenges from global downturns and restrictions on cross-strait investment, though policies gradually eased prohibitions that had driven underground economic activities with . In cross-strait relations, Chen initially pledged moderation through the "Four Noes and One Without" commitments in his inaugural address: no , no change to the national title, no inclusion of sovereignty-defining issues in the , no promotion of via referendums, and no abolition of the National Unification Guidelines without mainland consent. These assurances aimed to stabilize ties with , but relations deteriorated as Chen advocated for referendums and a new by 2008, prompting China's passage of the in March 2005 authorizing force against formal moves. Efforts to join the under the name "" and defensive referendums tied to arms purchases further escalated tensions, contrasting with the relatively peaceful period under subsequent KMT rule. Defense policies emphasized self-reliance, with increases in indigenous weapons production and debates over length amid budgetary constraints from legislative opposition. The administration sought U.S. arms deals to bolster deterrence, though domestic polarization over and rhetoric hindered unified policy implementation. Chen's 2004 re-election, following a controversial assassination attempt on March 19, 2004, relied on a narrow 51.1% vote share amid KMT divisions. The latter years were marred by corruption allegations against Chen's family and aides, culminating in post-term convictions for graft that damaged the DPP's reputation and contributed to its 2008 electoral defeat. These scandals, involving from special funds, overshadowed earlier reforms and fueled disillusionment, as evidenced by declining approval ratings and legislative obstructionism. Overall, the administration advanced DPP goals of Taiwanese identity assertion but at the cost of heightened cross-strait risks and internal divisions, polarizing along ethnic and ideological lines.

Return to opposition (2008–2016)

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) returned to opposition following defeats in the 2008 presidential and legislative elections, where candidate secured 58.45% of the presidential vote against DPP nominee Frank Hsieh's 41.55%, while the KMT gained a legislative majority with 81 seats to the DPP's 27. The losses stemmed primarily from corruption scandals engulfing outgoing DPP President and his family, including allegations of and graft totaling over NT$1 billion, which eroded public trust in the party after eight years in power. Chen was convicted in 2009 on multiple charges, receiving a life sentence later commuted, an outcome that analysts attribute to systemic graft perceptions damaging the DPP's reformist image. DPP leadership transitioned to Tsai Ing-wen as party chair in May 2008, amid efforts to distance from Chen's legacy through internal reforms and a focus on transparency, though the party faced factional disputes and poor midterm showings. In the 2012 presidential election, Tsai ran as the DPP candidate, receiving 6,093,578 votes (45.63%) to Ma's 6,589,699 (51.60%), with the DPP criticizing Ma's administration for economic stagnation and over-reliance on cross-strait trade deals that prioritized engagement with China at the expense of domestic industries. The party held 40 legislative seats post-2012, maintaining vocal opposition to KMT policies perceived as conceding sovereignty, including the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) signed in 2010, which boosted trade but fueled DPP arguments of asymmetric benefits favoring Beijing. From 2012 to 2014, the DPP capitalized on public discontent with Ma's cross-strait initiatives, supporting the in March 2014, where protesters occupied the legislature for 24 days against the unscrutinized (CSSTA), viewing it as a threat to Taiwan's autonomy and labor standards. Although student-led and independent, the movement aligned with DPP critiques of opaque KMT-China negotiations, amplifying anti-incumbent sentiment without direct party orchestration. This momentum propelled DPP gains in the November 2014 local elections, securing 13 of 22 mayoral positions and majorities in county assemblies, interpreted as a on Ma's and a rebuke to closer ties. These victories, with DPP vote shares exceeding 49% in key races, signaled electoral recovery and positioned the party for national contention by highlighting KMT vulnerabilities on economic inequality and identity issues.

Tsai Ing-wen administration (2016–2024)

Tsai Ing-wen of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was elected president on January 16, 2016, securing 56.1% of the vote and ending eight years of Kuomintang (KMT) rule, with the DPP also gaining a legislative majority of 68 seats in the 113-seat Yuan. This victory marked the DPP's first control of both executive and legislative branches since 2008, enabling passage of key reforms despite subsequent opposition. Tsai was reelected on January 11, 2020, with 57.1% amid heightened tensions with China, further consolidating DPP governance until the handover to successor Lai Ching-te on May 20, 2024. Domestically, the administration prioritized progressive reforms, including pension adjustments in 2017 that reduced benefits for and civil servants to address fiscal shortfalls, sparking widespread protests and temporarily eroding public support to as low as 15% approval ratings. Labor standards were updated to mandate one day off per week, raise minimum wages, and extend protections, though businesses criticized the measures for increasing costs. was legalized on May 17, 2019, via judicial interpretation and legislative action, making Taiwan the first Asian jurisdiction to do so, aligning with DPP's social liberal orientation. The Tsai administration managed the effectively without national lockdowns, relying on mask mandates, , and border controls, resulting in low case numbers and deaths relative to global peers, which bolstered Tsai's approval and contributed to her reelection. Economic varied, with GDP growth reaching 6.5% in 2021 amid semiconductor demand but slowing to 2.45% in 2022 and entering a technical in early 2023 due to global slowdowns and reduced dependence. Efforts to diversify trade away from enhanced but faced challenges from shifts toward renewables, leading to occasional power shortages. Cross-strait relations deteriorated after Tsai declined to endorse the , prompting to suspend official dialogues, intensify military incursions, and impose on Taiwanese goods, though Tsai maintained a of no provocation while strengthening defense and international ties. The DPP's stance preserved independence without formal declaration, fostering domestic unity against perceived threats but straining economic links and escalating regional tensions. For the party, Tsai's tenure solidified its electoral base through competent and identity-based appeals, yet exposed vulnerabilities in local elections and internal factionalism, culminating in a legislative minority after 2024 despite presidential success.

Lai Ching-te administration (2024–present)

Lai Ching-te of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was elected president on January 13, 2024, securing 40.05% of the vote alongside vice presidential candidate Hsiao Bi-khim, marking the DPP's third consecutive term in office despite losing its legislative majority. He was inaugurated on May 20, 2024, delivering an address emphasizing the construction of a "democratic, peaceful, and prosperous new Taiwan" and highlighting the global implications of cross-strait relations. The administration appointed Cho Jung-tai, former DPP chairman, as on May 20, 2024, prioritizing continuity with prior policies on defense, economy, and . Cho's cabinet focused on five key goals: promoting , enhancing social welfare, advancing green energy, strengthening , and improving governance efficiency. Domestic challenges emerged due to the DPP's minority in the , leading to political and recall movements against lawmakers, complicating policy implementation. In cross-strait relations, the administration maintained a stance of principled stability, with Lai's inaugural address signaling continuity rather than escalation, though responded with military drills and labeled Lai's rhetoric as separatist. Tensions intensified through 2025, prompting Lai to outline "Four Pillars of Peace" encompassing strengthened defense, economic security, stable cross-strait ties, and international partnerships. In his October 10, 2025, address, Lai stressed defensive resilience against potential Chinese aggression, announcing an advanced all-domain air defense system. Defense policies advanced with proposals to elevate the 2026 budget to 3.3% of GDP and initiatives for non-red supply chains to bolster . Lai introduced 17 measures in April 2025 to fortify and societal resilience. Economically, the administration prioritized livelihoods and industrial cooperation in semiconductors, AI, and green energy amid U.S. trade pressures. sustained diplomatic allies without losses since and deepened ties with democratic partners. Approval ratings fluctuated, reaching 45.7% by mid-2025, influenced by economic performance and legislative opposition.

Ideology and policies

Core ideological foundations

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) emerged from the dangwai (outside-the-party) movement in , which opposed the Kuomintang's (KMT) authoritarian one-party rule under from 1949 to 1987, advocating for multi-party democracy, , assembly, and press as foundational responses to suppressed political pluralism and . These roots emphasized a free and democratic legal-political system, rejecting the KMT's emphasis on unification with and promoting Taiwan-centric governance based on rather than imposed . At its core, the DPP's ideology centers on establishing —distinct from the —as a , independent, and autonomous nation, formalized in its platform's fundamental proposition for a of with self-determination rights for its people, including indigenous groups through autonomous regions. This stance derives from empirical recognition of 's separate post-1949 historical trajectory, since the 1990s, and public referenda outcomes, such as the 1996 presidential election under direct suffrage, prioritizing independence and status quo maintenance over formal declarations that could provoke conflict, while critiquing KMT's pan-Chinese identity as misaligned with majority Taiwanese self-identification surveys showing over 60% favoring or indefinitely by 2023. The party further grounds its foundations in progressive social equity, including welfare expansion, , via policies like legalization in 2019, and environmental sustainability, drawing from first-principles advocacy for fairness amid rapid industrialization's inequalities, as evidenced by platform commitments to indigenous self-rule and measures to deepen democratic values post-1986 formation. These elements reflect causal realism in addressing Taiwan's demographic shifts—urbanization, aging population, and aspirations for work-life balance—over ideological conformity to traditional , though internal debates persist on balancing with redistributive policies.

Cross-strait relations and independence stance

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) originated from pro-independence activists and dissidents opposing the Kuomintang's (KMT) claim to represent all of , including , and has historically rejected unification with the (PRC) under the Chinese Communist Party's rule. The party's 1999 Resolution on Future affirmed that sovereignty belongs to its 23 million people, who should determine the island's status through democratic processes, explicitly opposing "" or any framework subordinating to . This stance stems from empirical observations of the PRC's authoritarian governance and military threats, prioritizing de facto independence and democratic over ideological unification narratives promoted by the KMT and . Under President (2000–2008), the DPP pursued policies emphasizing Taiwan's distinct identity, such as proposing a new and in 2004, which heightened cross-strait tensions and prompted PRC anti-secession in March 2005 authorizing force against formal independence moves. Subsequent DPP leaders adopted a more pragmatic approach to avoid immediate conflict while bolstering defenses. President (2016–2024) rejected the ""—a KMT-endorsed understanding of "" with differing interpretations—as nonexistent, instead basing cross-strait engagement on the Republic of China (ROC) framework, respect for the 1992 meetings' outcomes without consensus, and the principle that Taiwan's future rests with its people. Her administration maintained unofficial channels via Taiwan's and expanded international alliances, particularly with the , amid PRC military drills escalating post-2016 election. President , assuming office in May 2024, upholds Tsai's "four commitments" for cross-strait stability: adherence to the ROC framework, affirmation of the talks without a one-China consensus, rejection of divergent one-China interpretations, and insistence on Taiwan's democratic consensus for any future path. Lai has advocated on terms of parity and , while prioritizing asymmetric defense capabilities, including a "T-Dome" layered air defense system announced in October 2025, in response to over 1,700 PRC incursions into Taiwan's in his first year. labels the DPP as "Taiwan separatists," citing the party's refusal to accept the PRC's claims and its promotion of Taiwanese identity as causal factors in stalled official talks since 2016, though DPP officials argue PRC aggression, including economic coercion like 2021 pineapple import bans, drives tensions rather than DPP policies. The DPP avoids formal declarations to preserve the status quo, recognizing that unilateral moves could invite PRC without guaranteed external intervention, as evidenced by stalled U.S. arms deliveries and 's 2022 reiterating unification by force if necessary.

Economic and social policies

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has prioritized economic policies centered on , diversification, and to bolster Taiwan's competitiveness amid geopolitical tensions. During the administration (2016–2024), the government expanded investments in high-tech sectors like semiconductors and , contributing to GDP growth from NT$17.5 trillion in 2016 to over NT$23 trillion by 2023. Policies included optimizing the investment environment through NT$720 billion in new loans to attract domestic and foreign capital, alongside easing barriers such as restrictions on U.S. and imports to foster reciprocal agreements. The party's platform emphasizes fiscal and tax reforms to reduce income disparities and eliminate waste, while promoting green energy transitions with a target of nuclear-free operations by 2025 and increased operating reserves exceeding 14 percent. Under (2000–2008), efforts focused on economic-policy integration with principles of equality and democracy, though growth stagnated amid global and domestic challenges. DPP social policies advocate moderate welfare expansion, including higher minimum wages and benefits for vulnerable groups to address stagnant wages and inequality. The party platform supports judicial impartiality, farmers' and laborers' rights, and protections for seniors, children, youth, and women. Labor reforms under DPP governance have included strengthened employment rights, while gender equality measures enforce the Gender Equity Education Act, Act of Gender Equality in Employment, and Sexual Harassment Prevention Act to promote women's political participation, workplace equity, and safety. For , the DPP endorses self-rule regions to protect political, economic, and cultural autonomy, aligning with broader commitments to and ethnic equity. These policies reflect the party's progressive orientation, though implementation has varied across administrations, with Tsai's term emphasizing and rights expansions post-2016.

Foreign policy orientation

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) maintains a foreign policy orientation centered on safeguarding Taiwan's de facto independence, prioritizing alliances with democratic partners, and reducing economic and diplomatic dependence on the (PRC). This approach stems from the party's foundational commitment to and rejection of the "" principle, viewing cross-strait relations through the lens of asymmetric threats posed by Beijing's military buildup and territorial claims. Under DPP administrations, such as those of Presidents (2016–2024) and (2024–present), policy has emphasized asymmetric defense enhancements, including increased defense spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2025, and diversification via initiatives like the , which expanded trade ties with Southeast Asian nations and from $56 billion in 2016 to over $200 billion by 2023. A cornerstone of DPP foreign policy is deepening unofficial ties with the , framed as essential for deterrence amid PRC aggression, including over 1,700 PLA aircraft incursions into Taiwan's since 2016. The party has advocated for U.S. arms sales, such as the $2 billion package approved in 2020, and participation in multilateral frameworks like the U.S.-led , while avoiding formal independence declarations to prevent escalation. This U.S. pivot has yielded tangible gains, including joint military exercises and Taiwan's inclusion in global efforts, though critics, including PRC , attribute heightened tensions—such as the 2022 Pelosi visit aftermath—to DPP "provocations." Relations with and the reflect DPP efforts to cultivate a "democracy vs. " alignment, promoting shared values in security and technology. With , cooperation has intensified under Lai, focusing on AI, semiconductors, and joint maritime patrols, building on Tsai-era visits that elevated bilateral investment to $100 billion by 2024. Toward the EU, the DPP has pursued investment pacts and advocacy for Taiwan's WHO observer status, with EU-Taiwan trade reaching €80 billion in 2023, despite Beijing's diplomatic pressure on European states. This multilateral hedging strategy aims to counter PRC isolation tactics, evidenced by Taiwan's 14 new representative offices abroad since 2016, though it has strained cross-strait dialogue, with no high-level talks since 2016.

Organizational structure

Leadership roles and selection

The Democratic Progressive Party's central leadership is headed by a chairperson, who serves as the primary executive authority, overseeing party headquarters operations, nominating the secretary-general and deputies, and representing the party in major decisions. The chairperson is an of both the Central Executive Committee (CEC) and the Central Standing Committee (CSC), and holds a two-year term, renewable once. Under Article 15-1 of the party constitution, the incumbent president of , if a DPP member, automatically assumes the chairperson role during their presidential tenure, as exemplified by President Lai Ching-te's concurrent service since May 2024. The CEC, comprising 30 full members and 5 alternates, functions as the party's main executive body, responsible for implementing National Congress resolutions, formulating political strategies, managing budgets, and supervising local branches. From the CEC, a 10-member CSC is internally elected to handle day-to-day deliberations. Complementing this is the Central Supervision Committee, with 11 members and 3 alternates, tasked with auditing finances, enforcing discipline, and overseeing CEC activities to ensure compliance with party principles. Selection for these roles occurs primarily through democratic mechanisms outlined in the party . The chairperson is directly elected by the full membership via , with vacancies filled either by CEC vote (if under one year remaining) or another membership-wide (if over one year). CEC and Central Supervision Committee members are chosen by at the biennial National Party Congress, the party's supreme decision-making body, which convenes annually but holds elections every two years; representatives to the congress include elected delegates from local chapters and ex officio members such as legislators. This process was applied in the July 2022 National Congress for the 20th CEC, demonstrating its role in aligning leadership with internal electoral dynamics. By-elections for chairperson, such as the January 2023 contest won by then-Vice President Lai Ching-te, occur as needed to address interim vacancies.

Internal factions and dynamics

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been characterized by informal factional groupings since its founding in 1986, which historically facilitated candidate nominations, resource allocation, and policy debates within the party. These factions emerged from diverse ideological and regional bases, including reformist intellectuals, social welfare advocates, and hardliners, often competing for influence in central executive committee elections and positions. In 2006, the DPP formally voted to dissolve all factions amid concerns over internal divisions undermining party unity, particularly following electoral setbacks. Despite this, factional networks persisted informally, shaping endorsements and alliances without official structures, as evidenced by their role in the 2022 central executive committee elections where factional slates influenced outcomes. Prominent groups include the New Tide faction (新潮流系), known for its organizational discipline and emphasis on pragmatic reforms, which has produced key figures like President ; the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (正國會), a pro-independence bloc ranking as the second-most influential; and remnants of the Alliance (福利國系), focused on social policies. Under (2016–2024), factional dynamics emphasized balance to maintain cohesion, with power-sharing formulas distributing roles across groups. This approach shifted after Lai's ascension to party chair and in 2024, as he pursued greater New Tide dominance, appointing members to 30–40% of key positions and leveraging business ties for leverage, which has heightened risks of infighting. By September 2025, internal tensions escalated, with growing pressure on longtime legislative caucus leader Ker Chien-ming to resign amid factional disputes over strategy and accountability following the DPP's 2024 legislative election losses. These dynamics reflect ongoing challenges in reconciling ideological differences—such as varying degrees of independence advocacy—with electoral imperatives, potentially complicating governance amid minority status in the .

Electoral history

Presidential elections

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) first achieved a breakthrough in Taiwan's direct presidential elections with Chen Shui-bian's victory in 2000, where he received 39.3% of the popular vote amid a divided opposition vote between (KMT) candidates and . This marked the end of KMT dominance following the party's split, with voter turnout reaching 83%. Chen's win shifted power to the DPP, emphasizing Taiwanese identity and democratic reforms. In the 2004 election, Chen secured re-election in a razor-thin contest against , obtaining 6,471,970 votes with an 80.28% turnout, amid controversy over an assassination attempt on Chen the previous day that mobilized supporters. The DPP's hold weakened thereafter, losing to KMT's in 2008 after eight years of governance marred by corruption scandals and economic dissatisfaction. Ma's re-election in 2012 further extended KMT rule, with the DPP's capturing a plurality but falling short, reflecting voter fatigue with Chen-era issues. The DPP regained the presidency in 2016 under Tsai Ing-wen, who won over 56% of the vote against KMT's Eric Chu, capitalizing on public discontent with Ma's cross-strait policies and economic stagnation. Tsai's 2020 re-election delivered a landslide 57.1% against KMT's Han Kuo-yu, driven by rejection of Beijing's influence and the COVID-19 response. In 2024, DPP vice presidential nominee Lai Ching-te prevailed with 40.05% (5.59 million votes) over KMT's Hou Yu-ih and Taiwan People's Party's Ko Wen-je in a fragmented field, securing a third consecutive term despite losing the legislative plurality. This outcome highlighted persistent support for DPP's sovereignty stance amid heightened China tensions, though the lower share signaled internal divisions and voter shifts.
Election YearDPP CandidateVote ShareOutcome
200039.3%Victory
2004~50.1%Victory
2016>56%Victory
202057.1%Victory
202440.05%Victory

Legislative elections

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) first participated in in 1992 as the principal opposition to the long-dominant (KMT), gradually building its legislative presence through consistent campaigning on issues of , , and Taiwanese identity. Early gains positioned the DPP as a viable alternative, but it did not achieve control until decades later. A major reversal occurred in the January 12, 2008, legislative , where the DPP suffered heavy losses due to voter backlash against corruption scandals during President Chen Shui-bian's tenure, resulting in the KMT regaining a majority in the reformed 113-seat chamber. The party's subsequent recovery culminated in the , , , when it secured an absolute majority for the first time in , alongside Tsai Ing-wen's presidential , enabling unified control of the executive and . The DPP retained its legislative majority in the January 11, 2020, election, capitalizing on public support for Tsai's handling of the outbreak and cross-strait tensions, which bolstered the party's domestic security-focused agenda. However, in the January 13, 2024, election—held concurrently with the presidential contest won by DPP candidate —the party lost its majority amid voter dissatisfaction with , energy policy shortcomings, and perceived overreach in , winning 51 seats against the KMT's 52 and the Taiwan People's Party's 8 in the 113-seat body. This outcome created a fragmented , complicating passage of the new administration's priorities without cross-party negotiation.
Election YearDPP SeatsTotal SeatsNotes
2016 (68)113Historic first absolute ; unified with .
2020113Retained control amid response approval.
202451113Lost ; with KMT (52) and TPP (8).

Local and other elections

In the 2014 nine-in-one local elections conducted on November 29, the Democratic Progressive Party secured 13 of the 22 county magistrate and municipal mayor positions, marking a substantial advance from its previous standing and signaling widespread discontent with the incumbent Kuomintang's administration on issues such as and scandals. This outcome included victories in key municipalities like Taoyuan and , enhancing the DPP's organizational reach and voter mobilization capabilities ahead of national contests. The 2018 nine-in-one elections on represented a reversal for the DPP as the ruling party, with the party retaining only six mayoral seats, largely in its traditional southern bases including , , and Pingtung counties. reached 74.9%, and losses were linked to domestic grievances over pension reforms, labor policies, and perceived policy overreach, rather than foreign relations, culminating in President Tsai Ing-wen's resignation as party chairperson. The 2022 nine-in-one elections on November 26 further eroded DPP local control, yielding five mayoral wins confined to City and County, , , and Pingtung, while the claimed 13 positions. The DPP garnered approximately 4.74 million votes in magistrate races, a decline from prior highs, amid criticisms of energy shortages and inflation; again stepped down as chairperson, highlighting the punitive nature of Taiwanese local voting against incumbents on bread-and-butter concerns. In councilor elections across these cycles, the DPP mirrored mayoral trends, gaining over 1,800 seats in but dropping to around 400 in , underscoring fluctuating support. For other elections, the DPP benefited from the failure of opposition-initiated in December 2021, where all four propositions—on issues like civic groups' electoral involvement and terminology—fell short of approval thresholds, aligning with government positions. More recently, in the August 2025 on reactivating the Third , voter support exceeded 50% but failed due to insufficient turnout, reflecting mixed public sentiment on amid DPP-led phase-out efforts.
YearDPP Mayors/Magistrates Won (out of 22)Key Factors
201413Anti-KMT backlash on and
20186Incumbency penalty from reforms and growth slowdown
20225 and cost-of-living pressures

Controversies and criticisms

Corruption allegations and scandals

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has faced significant corruption allegations, most notably during the presidency of , who served from 2000 to 2008. In September 2009, a Taipei District Court convicted Chen and his wife, Wu Shu-chen, on six counts of bribery and corruption, sentencing them to ; the charges involved accepting bribes exceeding NT$100 million (approximately US$3 million at the time) and special presidential funds for personal use, including transfers to overseas accounts linked to family members. The convictions were upheld on appeal in multiple cases, such as the Longtan land purchase scandal and the Diana Chen educational fund , leading to Chen serving nearly eight years in prison before medical parole in 2015; while some charges were later dismissed due to changes in accounting laws in 2022, core bribery convictions remained intact, confirming systemic graft within his administration. These scandals severely damaged the DPP's reputation, contributing to electoral losses in and prompting internal reforms, though critics argue the party has not fully eradicated entrenched patronage networks. Under subsequent DPP administrations, isolated incidents persisted, including the 2019 cigarette smuggling scandal involving National Security Bureau personnel and presidential bodyguards, who undeclared over 10,000 cartons of duty-free cigarettes for resale, leading to the resignation of spy chief Peng Sheng-chu and convictions for and in 2021. President publicly apologized for the episode, attributing it to individual misconduct rather than systemic issues. In the 2020s, several DPP legislators faced indictments for and . For instance, in August 2025, former DPP lawmaker Chen Ou-po was indicted alongside his wife and 14 others on 16 counts, including accepting NT$20 million in bribes for influencing permits and legislative subsidies. Similarly, in 2025, incumbent DPP legislator Lin I-chin was charged with related to improper fund allocations. In July 2024, prosecutors investigated former DPP official for under the Corruption Prevention Ordinance, stemming from official acts during his tenure. These cases highlight ongoing vulnerabilities to graft in local and legislative roles, despite DPP claims of judicial across parties.

Policy impacts on cross-strait tensions

The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) policies have historically emphasized Taiwan's distinct identity and sovereignty, rejecting frameworks like the that imply mutual acceptance of "" with differing interpretations, which views as essential for cross-strait dialogue. During Chen Shui-bian's presidency (2000–2008), DPP initiatives such as proposed al reforms, a 2003 push for a new , and advocacy for UN membership under the name "" provoked 's passage of the on March 14, 2005, authorizing military force against formal independence moves. These actions suspended official cross-strait talks, led to China's suspension of ministerial-level exchanges in 2006, and prompted missile tests near in 2004, escalating military tensions while economic ties frayed with reduced direct flights and investment scrutiny. Under (2016–2024), the DPP maintained rejection of the , framing cross-strait relations in terms of Taiwan's democratic values versus 's authoritarianism, which halted institutional dialogues and prompted to intensify "gray zone" coercion. (PLA) aircraft crossed Taiwan's median line 1,711 times in 2021 alone, a sharp rise from pre-2016 levels, alongside naval encirclement drills following high-profile events like Tsai's 2023 U.S. transit. imposed economic measures, including bans on Taiwanese pineapples and wax apples in 2021 and restrictions on group tourism since 2019, reducing visitor numbers from 2.7 million in 2018 to near zero by 2020, though Taiwan mitigated impacts via trade diversification. Tsai's administration boosted defense spending to 2.4% of GDP by 2022 and accelerated U.S. arms purchases, such as $2 billion in 2020, heightening 's perceptions of external interference. Lai Ching-te's continuation of these policies since May 2024 has correlated with further escalation, including over 100 PLA warplane incursions monthly and large-scale exercises simulating blockades in May and October 2024. has peeled away Nauru's diplomatic recognition from Taiwan on January 15, 2024, leaving 12 allies, and intensified economic coercion, such as suspending tariff concessions under the (ECFA) in early 2025. DPP policies have thus preserved Taiwan's autonomy but at the cost of heightened , with PLA activity surging 400% from 2016 to 2023 levels, underscoring a causal link between sovereignty assertions and 's rejection of peaceful unification pathways absent Consensus adherence.

Economic and energy policy failures

The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) economic policies during Tsai Ing-wen's presidency (2016–2024) have drawn criticism for persistent wage stagnation relative to living costs, despite GDP growth averaging around 3% annually, largely propelled by exports. Average real monthly salaries declined for three consecutive years through 2023, as nominal increases were eroded by and failed to keep pace with productivity gains in high-tech sectors. Minimum wage hikes, which outpaced predecessors at an average annual rate of about 3–4%, benefited low earners but did little to lift broader median incomes, which grew sluggishly at under 1% annually in real terms, exacerbating income inequality and youth discontent. Housing affordability deteriorated sharply under DPP governance, with nationwide prices rising over 50% from 2016 to 2024, driven by speculation, low interest rates, and insufficient supply-side interventions like social housing programs that covered only a of . In , median apartment prices reached NT$36.52 million by mid-2025, while the house price-to-income ratio hit 20.1, among the world's highest, requiring over 20 years of full household income to purchase without other expenses. Policies such as luxury taxes and credit restrictions curbed speculation marginally but failed to address root causes like land hoarding and urban concentration, leaving young voters facing delayed homeownership and family formation. The DPP's energy agenda, anchored in the 2016 "nuclear-free homeland" pledge, accelerated the phase-out of —which supplied 10–20% of electricity—culminating in the shutdown of the last reactor at Maanshan on May 17, 2025, without commensurate baseload replacements. This shift prioritized renewables but fell short of the 20% clean energy target by 2025, achieving only about 10%, due to grid integration delays, issues, and overreliance on intermittent solar and amid Taiwan's typhoon-prone geography. imports, primarily and LNG, filled the gap, rising to over 80% of supply and inflating costs by 20–30% for industries, while exposing the to supply disruptions. Energy instability manifested in recurrent outages, with four major blackouts from 2017 to 2025 affecting 1.5–6 million households each time, including the August 2017 island-wide failure triggered by a fault but worsened by reserve shortages, halting production and costing billions in losses. These incidents stemmed from inadequate and aging , undermining Taiwan's tech edge—where even brief interruptions can ruin chip fabrication—and heightening vulnerability in a geopolitically tense environment. A 2025 referendum to restart the Lungmen garnered 74% support but failed , signaling public backlash against the policy's execution, though the DPP maintained ideological opposition.

Governance and democratic backsliding claims

During the presidencies of (2016–2024) and (2024–present), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has governed amid heightened cross-strait tensions and domestic polarization, maintaining high democratic ratings from international indices such as Freedom House's 94/100 score in 2025, indicating no measurable erosion in political rights or . Critics from the (KMT) and (TPP) have nonetheless alleged democratic backsliding, pointing to the DPP's portrayal of opposition figures as sympathetic to Chinese influence, which they argue stifles legitimate debate and justifies executive overreach. A primary contention arose following the January 2024 elections, where the DPP secured the but lost its legislative to a KMT-TPP that passed reforms in May 2024 expanding parliamentary investigative powers, including citations and unannounced audits of agencies. DPP leaders decried these as unconstitutional power grabs potentially enabling Chinese infiltration, prompting mass protests by DPP-aligned groups and subsequent petitions against over 30 opposition legislators in the "Great Recall" campaign of July–August . While all recalls failed to unseat legislators—requiring approval from over 10 percent of district voters for initiation and a in a follow-up vote—opponents characterized the effort as an abuse of Taiwan's low-threshold mechanism to circumvent electoral outcomes and paralyze . Analysts noted this intensified partisan , with the DPP's mobilization risking norms of legislative-executive balance, though public polls post-recall showed support for retaining the system and opposition-led oversight. Additional claims center on alleged judicial weaponization, exemplified by corruption charges against TPP leader in September 2024 over real estate deals during his 2018–2022 Taipei mayoralty, leading to his detention and indictment in January 2025. TPP supporters protested the prosecution as politically motivated retaliation for Ko's criticism of DPP policies, citing prolonged detention without bail and claims of insufficient evidence, which sparked clashes and accusations of eroding under DPP influence. However, investigations predated the 2024 election and involved documented irregularities in Ko's administration, with courts upholding charges based on financial records rather than partisan directives. Broader allegations include DPP efforts to curb perceived Chinese influence via the 2019 Anti-Infiltration Act, which mandates disclosure of foreign-linked funding for political activities and has been used against pro-unification advocates, drawing criticism from KMT figures for vaguely restricting assembly and speech. Despite these claims, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) ranked Taiwan 31st globally in liberal democracy as of 2024, with stable scores under DPP rule reflecting robust electoral competition and media pluralism, though domestic polarization—fueled by mutual accusations of disloyalty—has strained institutional trust without triggering systemic decline.

References

  1. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/about
  2. https://cald.org/member-parties/democratic-progressive-party-of-taiwan/
  3. https://www.npr.org/2024/01/13/1224576576/taiwan-ruling-party-wins-election
  4. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/13/taiwan-ruling-partys-lai-wins-presidential-election
  5. https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202508280020
  6. https://oftaiwan.org/politics/democratic-progressive-party/
  7. https://www.taiwan.gov.tw/content_3.php
  8. https://taiwaninsight.org/2018/01/04/taiwans-political-party-system-past-present-and-future/
  9. https://www.kharistempleman.com/uploads/1/5/8/5/15855636/templeman_chapter_4_post-submission_edits.20240614.pdf
  10. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35855.htm
  11. https://www.fpri.org/books/from-opposition-to-power-taiwans-democratic-progressive-party/
  12. https://www.asj.upd.edu.ph/mediabox/archive/ASJ-39-1-2-2003/dagdag.pdf
  13. https://www.hoover.org/research/taiwans-democracy-challenged-chen-shui-bian-years
  14. https://jamestown.org/program/chen-shui-bians-two-years-at-the-helm/
  15. https://english.president.gov.tw/Page/87
  16. https://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Taiwan/sub5_1a/entry-3805.html
  17. https://eastasiaforum.org/2019/08/20/changing-economic-trends-in-taiwan/
  18. https://sup.org/books/politics/taiwans-china-dilemma/excerpt/table-contents
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371112555_Chen_Shuibian_and_the_Idea_of_Taiwan%27s_Independence
  20. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL30341.html
  21. https://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/436
  22. https://fairbank.fas.harvard.edu/research/blog/cross-strait-relations-the-challenges-ahead/
  23. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/4164821/taiwans-defense-policies-in-evolution/
  24. https://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/610
  25. https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=8A319E37A32E01EA&sms=2413CFE1BCE87E0E&s=3E550941C8EDA065
  26. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/shih2004.pdf
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30172672
  28. https://bti-project.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2008_TWN.pdf
  29. https://www.chinafile.com/library/reports/taiwans-2008-presidential-election
  30. https://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/3423
  31. https://www.fpri.org/2017/03/taiwans-ex-presidents-carousel-legal-problems/
  32. https://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Taiwan/sub5_1a/entry-3806.html
  33. https://fsi.stanford.edu/events/taiwans-democratic-development-reflections-ma-ying-jeou-era
  34. https://web.cec.gov.tw/english/article/21794
  35. https://www.fpri.org/article/2012/01/taiwans-2012-presidential-and-legislative-elections-winners-losers-and-implications/
  36. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2018/08/the-activist-legacy-of-taiwans-sunflower-movement?lang=en
  37. https://thediplomat.com/2024/05/the-memory-war-over-taiwans-sunflower-movement/
  38. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/taiwans-sunflower-protests-a-qa-with-shelley-rigger/
  39. https://www.csis.org/analysis/analysis-taiwans-nine-one-local-elections
  40. https://thediplomat.com/2014/12/opposition-dpp-wins-big-in-taiwan-elections/
  41. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwan-election-voters-turn-their-backs-on-closer-ties-with-china/
  42. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51029280
  43. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwans-tsai-ing-wen-enters-second-term-with-a-strong-political-mandate-but-no-room-for-complacency/
  44. https://english.president.gov.tw/Page/646
  45. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/01/taiwans-president-alumna-leads-fight-against-covid-19
  46. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-covid-19-crisis-has-revealed-taiwans-resilience/
  47. https://bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/TWN
  48. https://economic-research.bnpparibas.com/html/en-US/Taiwan-Economic-strategic-strength-7/11/2023%2C48780
  49. https://inss.ndu.edu/Publications/View-Publications/Article/3726458/xis-cross-strait-policy-in-the-new-era/
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350190319_Cross-Strait_relations_under_the_Tsai_administration
  51. https://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/taiwans-democratic-progressive-party-faces-multiple-crises
  52. https://ws.mofa.gov.tw/001/Upload/402/relfile/20/422/8ba84b6a-62e8-413a-8cb7-d42947d0ef27.pdf
  53. https://english.president.gov.tw/News/6726
  54. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taiwans-new-premier-is-ruling-partys-former-chairman-2024-04-10/
  55. https://english.president.gov.tw/Page/644
  56. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwan-president-lais-three-big-challenges-in-2025/
  57. https://www.cfr.org/blog/analyzing-lai-ching-tes-inaugural-address-more-continuity-difference
  58. https://taiwaninsight.org/2025/09/01/divided-not-doomed-domestic-challenges-for-the-lai-administrations-foreign-policy/
  59. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/facing-chinese-pressure-taiwan-president-stress-need-strong-defence-keynote-2025-10-09/
  60. https://thediplomat.com/2025/08/taiwans-government-eyes-expanded-defense-budget-at-3-3-of-gdp/
  61. https://www.pf.org.tw/tw/pfch/13-11279.html
  62. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/10/lai-ching-tes-fragile-presidency/
  63. https://thediplomat.com/2025/10/can-lais-taiwan-hold-on-to-its-diplomatic-allies/
  64. https://euroview.ecct.com.tw/category-inside.php?id=2458
  65. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrdppub/2019668236/2019668236.pdf
  66. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/upload/download/Party_Platform.pdf
  67. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/upload/download/Resolutions.pdf
  68. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/about/history_2
  69. https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=2BA0753CBE348412&sms=E828F60C4AFBAF90&s=550F490CF514C177
  70. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/fyrbt/202405/t20240530_11349769.html
  71. https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=BEC36A4A0BB0663C&sms=BF821F021B282251&s=DC2AE73162A42D37
  72. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=alr
  73. https://www.mac.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=14271038DDC4104F&sms=E828F60C4AFBAF90&s=098CDDA01EF7989D
  74. http://www.dpp.org.tw/en/content_print/media/92
  75. https://focustaiwan.tw/cross-strait/202510100016
  76. https://www.prcleader.org/post/china-s-view-of-lai-ching-te-and-the-pending-crisis-in-the-taiwan-strait
  77. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/202208/10/content_WS62f34f46c6d02e533532f0ac.html
  78. https://interpret.csis.org/translations/lai-ching-tes-outlook-on-cross-strait-policy/
  79. https://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zgyw/202208/t20220810_10740168.htm
  80. https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/tsai-ing-wens-legacy-weighing-on-voters-mind-159337
  81. https://english.president.gov.tw/News/5738
  82. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/02/economic-freedom-an-unheralded-driver-of-taiwanese-prosperity/
  83. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2024/01/13/2003812019
  84. https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/en/Articles/Details?Guid=b43475ad-7867-4391-a3ba-c6a0e76dc65b
  85. https://www.uscc.gov/research/taiwans-economy-amid-political-transition
  86. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/press_releases/contents/107
  87. https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article/64/4/635/199798/Foreign-Policy-Orientation-without-Party-CuesA
  88. https://www.cfr.org/blog/taiwans-2024-presidential-election-analyzing-william-lais-foreign-policy-positions
  89. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/press_releases/contents/11
  90. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10275
  91. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-taiwan-relations-tension-us-policy-trump
  92. https://english.president.gov.tw/News/7012
  93. https://thediplomat.com/2025/09/taiwans-successful-japan-diplomacy/
  94. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/10/taiwans-europe-imperative/
  95. https://asia.nikkei.com/politics/international-relations/taiwan-s-tsai-wraps-up-trip-highlighting-growing-european-relations
  96. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/giga-focus/taiwan-s-new-president-priorities-and-challenges
  97. https://www.dpp.org.tw/en/upload/download/Party_Constitution.pdf
  98. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/taiwan/dpp.htm
  99. https://globaltaiwan.org/2022/07/the-dpps-20th-central-executive-committee-election-clears-a-pathway-for-william-lais-2024-run/
  100. https://ir101.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/fulda-2001-the-politics-of-factionalism-in-taiwans-democratic-progressive-party.pdf
  101. https://ketagalanmedia.com/2021/06/29/where-are-the-dpps-party-factions-now/
  102. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2024/04/27/2003817010
  103. https://jamestown.org/program/taiwans-lai-risks-dpp-factional-infighting-in-bid-for-control/
  104. https://thediplomat.com/2025/09/internal-party-politics-roil-taiwans-main-political-parties/
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379402000100
  106. https://www.roc-taiwan.org/us_en/post/485.html
  107. https://www.uscc.gov/research/taiwan-opposition-party-wins-presidency-and-legislative-majority-historic-elections
  108. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/11/tsai-ing-wen-wins-landslide-in-taiwan-presidential-election
  109. https://www.sejong.org/web/boad/22/egoread.php?bd=23&itm=&txt=&pg=1&seq=7549
  110. https://www.chinafile.com/library/reports/taiwans-legislative-elections-january-2008-implications-us-policy
  111. https://www.csis.org/analysis/tsai-ing-wen-and-dpp-win-big-taiwan
  112. https://www.prcleader.org/post/taiwan-s-2020-election-analysis
  113. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2024/01/14/2003812069
  114. https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/01/the-outcomes-of-taiwans-2024-legislative-elections/
  115. https://interpret.csis.org/translations/results-and-analysis-of-the-2024-taiwan-legislative-yuan-elections/
  116. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwans-local-elections-explained/
  117. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/26/taiwan-election-china-is-big-winner-as-tsai-ing-wens-dpp-party-loses.html
  118. https://taiwannews.com.tw/news/4732171
  119. https://taiwaninsight.org/2022/12/02/how-did-the-dpp-perform-in-the-local-elections/
  120. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2022/11/27/2003789672
  121. https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/dpp-sweeps-taiwans-latest-referendum-vote/
  122. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=4294
  123. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/taiwan-ex-president-wife-get-life-for-corruption-idUSTRE58A1L5/
  124. https://www1.kmt.org.tw/english/page.aspx?type=article&mnum=113&anum=15587
  125. https://newbloommag.net/2022/05/30/chen-shui-bian-charges/
  126. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-23/taiwan-spy-chief-quits-over-200-000-tax-free-cigarettes-scandal
  127. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/06/14/2003759140
  128. https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/11830
  129. https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202510090012
  130. https://www.jurist.org/news/2024/07/taiwan-prosecutor-investigates-former-democratic-progressive-party-official-for-corruption/
  131. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2025/08/28/2003842818
  132. https://chinapower.csis.org/analyzing-chinas-response-to-taiwan-president-tsai-ing-wen-transit/
  133. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/06/taiwans-new-president-faces-tensions-china-and-domestic-division
  134. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceklk794102o
  135. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/north-east-asia/taiwan-strait-china/president-lais-first-year-sees-increased-tensions-across-taiwan-strait
  136. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/confrontation-over-taiwan
  137. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-and-national-security-analysis/taiwan-strategy-likely-lead-to-increased-tension
  138. https://dominotheory.com/president-elect-lai-under-pressure-to-fix-taiwans-economy/
  139. https://ketagalanmedia.com/2025/07/31/why-taiwans-average-wage-growth-is-slower-than-minimum-wage-growth/
  140. https://labourreview.org/labor-politics-in-taiwan/
  141. https://ketagalanmedia.com/2025/09/03/taiwan-needs-to-raise-wages-faster-to-protect-its-democracy/
  142. https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/asia/taiwan/price-history
  143. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2025/09/30/2003844632
  144. https://www.tpp.org.tw/en/our_platform-detail.php?id=35
  145. https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/24610
  146. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/reactor-closure-marks-taiwans-nuclear-exit
  147. https://globaltaiwan.org/2025/09/learning-from-tsai/
  148. https://e360.yale.edu/features/taiwan-energy-dilemma
  149. https://taipology.substack.com/p/how-tsai-failed-taiwan-on-energy
  150. https://www.economist.com/asia/2017/08/17/a-massive-blackout-prompts-questions-about-taiwans-energy-policy
  151. https://thediplomat.com/2025/05/taiwans-self-created-achilles-heel-eliminating-nuclear-power/
  152. https://freedomhouse.org/country/taiwan/freedom-world/2025
  153. https://www.facebook.com/FreedomHouseDC/posts/-taiwan-is-rated-free-by-freedomintheworld-2025the-country-remains-among-the-hig/1067868388709649/
  154. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/taiwan/taiwans-democracy-trouble
  155. https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/great-recall-taiwans-democratic-experiment/
  156. https://chinaobservers.eu/the-great-recall-democratic-progress-or-political-paralysis/
  157. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=4296
  158. https://taiwaninsight.org/2025/09/12/who-won-who-lost-taking-stock-of-taiwans-big-recall-movement-narratives/
  159. https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202508280018
  160. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taiwans-recall-vote-implications-for-taiwan-china-and-the-united-states/
  161. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/01/06/bkbn-j06.html
  162. https://www.ucldiplomacy.com/post/the-arrest-of-ko-wen-je-taiwan-s-democracy-at-stake-or-not
  163. https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202508300012
  164. https://thediplomat.com/2024/09/the-ko-wen-je-case-points-to-deeper-problems-in-taiwan-politics/
  165. https://www.cfr.org/blog/taiwans-democracy-thriving-chinas-shadow
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.