Hubbry Logo
Local area networkLocal area networkMain
Open search
Local area network
Community hub
Local area network
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Local area network
Local area network
Local area network
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A conceptual diagram of a LAN at a residential house; the router in this case is assumed to also function as a wireless access point. Also shown in this example (shaded in yellow) is the network's connection to the Internet via fixed-line means.

A local area network (LAN) is a computer network that interconnects computers within a limited area such as a residence, campus, or building,[1][2][3] and has its network equipment and interconnects locally managed. LANs facilitate the distribution of data and sharing network devices, such as printers.

The LAN contrasts the wide area network (WAN), which not only covers a larger geographic distance, but also generally involves leased telecommunication circuits or Internet links. An even greater contrast is the Internet, which is a system of globally connected business and personal computers.

Ethernet and Wi-Fi are the two most common technologies used for local area networks; historical network technologies include ARCNET, Token Ring, and LocalTalk.

Computer network types
by scale

Cabling

[edit]
Twisted pair LAN cable
Further information: Ethernet over twisted pair, Twisted Pair, and Ethernet

Most wired network infrastructures utilize Category 5 or Category 6 twisted pair cabling with RJ45 compatible terminations. This medium provides physical connectivity between the Ethernet interfaces present on a large number of IP-aware devices. Depending on the grade of cable and quality of installation, speeds of up to 10 Mbit/s, 100 Mbit/s, 1 Gbit/s, or 10 Gbit/s are supported.

Wireless LAN

[edit]
Further information: IEEE 802.11

In a wireless LAN, users have unrestricted movement within the coverage area. Wireless networks have become popular in residences and small businesses because of their ease of installation, convenience, and flexibility.[4] Most wireless LANs consist of devices containing wireless radio technology that conforms to 802.11 standards as certified by the IEEE. Most wireless-capable residential devices operate at both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies and fall within the 802.11n or 802.11ac standards.[5] Some older home networking devices operate exclusively at a frequency of 2.4 GHz under 802.11b and 802.11g, or 5 GHz under 802.11a. Some newer devices operate at the aforementioned frequencies in addition to 6 GHz under Wi-Fi 6E. Wi-Fi is a marketing and compliance certification for IEEE 802.11 technologies.[6] The Wi-Fi Alliance has tested compliant products, and certifies them for interoperability. The technology may be integrated into smartphones, tablet computers and laptops. Guests are often offered Internet access via a hotspot service.

Infrastructure and technicals

[edit]
A conceptual diagram of a LAN at a small business office; this example includes two rooms, each with a switch, as well as a file server, and a mix of wired and wireless connections. This is the star topology.

Simple LANs in office or school buildings generally consist of cabling and one or more network switches; a switch is used to allow devices on a LAN to talk to one another via Ethernet. A switch can be connected to a router, cable modem, or ADSL modem for Internet access. LANs at residential homes usually tend to have a single router and often may include a wireless repeater. A LAN can include a wide variety of other network devices such as firewalls, load balancers, and network intrusion detection.[7] A wireless access point is required for connecting wireless devices to a network; when a router includes this device, it is referred to as a wireless router.

Advanced LANs are characterized by their use of redundant links with switches using the Spanning Tree Protocol to prevent loops, their ability to manage differing traffic types via quality of service (QoS), and their ability to segregate traffic with VLANs. A network bridge binds two different LANs or LAN segments to each other, often in order to grant a wired-only device access to a wireless network medium.

Network topology describes the layout of interconnections between devices and network segments. At the data link layer and physical layer, a wide variety of LAN topologies have been used, including ring, bus, mesh and star. The star topology is the most common in contemporary times. Wireless LAN (WLAN) also has its topologies: independent basic service set (IBSS, an ad-hoc network) where each node connects directly to each other (this is also standardized as Wi-Fi Direct), or basic service set (BSS, an infrastructure network that uses an wireless access point).[8]

Various topologies that may be used in a centralised wired LAN: star, ring, bus, and tree

Network layer configuration

[edit]

DHCP is used to assign internal IP addresses to members of a local area network. A DHCP server typically runs on the router[9] with end devices as its clients. All DHCP clients request configuration settings using the DHCP protocol in order to acquire their IP address, a default route and one or more DNS server addresses. Once the client implements these settings, it will be able to communicate on that internet.[10]

Protocols

[edit]

At the higher network layers, protocols such as NetBIOS, IPX/SPX, AppleTalk and others were once common, but the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP) has prevailed as the standard of choice for almost all local area networks today.

Connection to other LANs

[edit]

LANs can maintain connections with other LANs via leased lines, leased services, or across the Internet using virtual private network technologies. Depending on how the connections are established and secured, and the distance involved, such linked LANs may also be classified as a metropolitan area network (MAN) or a wide area network (WAN).

Connection to the Internet

[edit]

Local area networks may be connected to the Internet (a type of WAN) via fixed-line means (such as a DSL/ADSL modem[11]) or alternatively using a cellular or satellite modem. These would additionally make use of telephone wires such as VDSL and VDSL2, coaxial cables, or fiber to the home for running fiber-optic cables directly into a house or office building, or alternatively a cellular modem or satellite dish in the latter non-fixed cases. With Internet access, the Internet service provider (ISP) would grant a single WAN-facing IP address to the network. A router is configured with the provider's IP address on the WAN interface, which is shared among all devices in the LAN by network address translation.

A gateway establishes physical and data link layer connectivity to a WAN over a service provider's native telecommunications infrastructure. Such devices typically contain a cable, DSL, or optical modem bound to a network interface controller for Ethernet. Home and small business class routers are often incorporated into these devices for additional convenience, and they often also have integrated wireless access point and 4-port Ethernet switch.

The ITU-T G.hn and IEEE Powerline standard, which provide high-speed (up to 1 Gbit/s) local area networking over existing home wiring, are examples of home networking technology designed specifically for IPTV delivery.[12][relevant?]

History and development of LAN

[edit]

Early installations

[edit]
Home networking standards
IEEE standardized
ITU-T recommendation

The increasing demand and usage of computers in universities and research labs in the late 1960s generated the need to provide high-speed interconnections between computer systems. A 1970 report from the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory detailing the growth of their "Octopus" network gave a good indication of the situation.[13][14]

A number of experimental and early commercial LAN technologies were developed in the 1970s. Ethernet was developed at Xerox PARC between 1973 and 1974.[15][16] The Cambridge Ring was developed at Cambridge University starting in 1974.[17] ARCNET was developed by Datapoint Corporation in 1976 and announced in 1977.[18] It had the first commercial installation in December 1977 at Chase Manhattan Bank in New York.[19] In 1979,[20] the electronic voting system for the European Parliament was the first installation of a LAN connecting hundreds (420) of microprocessor-controlled voting terminals to a polling/selecting central unit with a multidrop bus with Master/slave (technology) arbitration.[dubious – discuss] It used 10 kilometers of simple unshielded twisted pair category 3 cable—the same cable used for telephone systems—installed inside the benches of the European Parliament Hemicycles in Strasbourg and Luxembourg.[21]

The development and proliferation of personal computers using the CP/M operating system in the late 1970s, and later DOS-based systems starting in 1981, meant that many sites grew to dozens or even hundreds of computers. The initial driving force for networking was to share storage and printers, both of which were expensive at the time. There was much enthusiasm for the concept, and for several years, from about 1983 onward, computer industry pundits habitually declared the coming year to be, "The year of the LAN".[22][23][24]

Competing standards

[edit]

In practice, the concept was marred by the proliferation of incompatible physical layer and network protocol implementations, and a plethora of methods of sharing resources. Typically, each vendor would have its own type of network card, cabling, protocol, and network operating system. A solution appeared with the advent of Novell NetWare which provided even-handed support for dozens of competing card and cable types, and a much more sophisticated operating system than most of its competitors.

Of the competitors to NetWare, only Banyan Vines had comparable technical strengths, but Banyan never gained a secure base. 3Com produced 3+Share and Microsoft produced MS-Net. These then formed the basis for collaboration between Microsoft and 3Com to create a simple network operating system LAN Manager and its cousin, IBM's LAN Server. None of these enjoyed any lasting success; Netware dominated the personal computer LAN business from early after its introduction in 1983 until the mid-1990s when Microsoft introduced Windows NT.[25]

In 1983, TCP/IP was first shown capable of supporting actual defense department applications on a Defense Communication Agency LAN testbed located at Reston, Virginia.[26][27] The TCP/IP-based LAN successfully supported Telnet, FTP, and a Defense Department teleconferencing application.[28] This demonstrated the feasibility of employing TCP/IP LANs to interconnect Worldwide Military Command and Control System (WWMCCS) computers at command centers throughout the United States.[29] However, WWMCCS was superseded by the Global Command and Control System (GCCS) before that could happen.

During the same period, Unix workstations were using TCP/IP networking. Although the workstation market segment is now much reduced, the technologies developed in the area continue to be influential on the Internet and in all forms of networking—and the TCP/IP protocol has replaced IPX, AppleTalk, NBF, and other protocols used by the early PC LANs.

Econet was Acorn Computers's low-cost local area network system, intended for use by schools and small businesses. It was first developed for the Acorn Atom and Acorn System 2/3/4 computers in 1981.[30][31]

Further development

[edit]

In the 1980s, several token ring network implementations for LANs were developed.[32][33] IBM released its own implementation of token ring in 1985,[34][35] It ran at 4 Mbit/s.[36] IBM claimed that their token ring systems were superior to Ethernet, especially under load, but these claims were debated;[37][38] while the slow but inexpensive AppleTalk was popular for Macs, in 1987 InfoWorld said, "No LAN has stood out as the clear leader, even in the IBM world".[39] IBM's implementation of token ring was the basis of the IEEE 802.5 standard.[40] A 16 Mbit/s version of Token Ring was standardized by the 802.5 working group in 1989.[41] IBM had market dominance over Token Ring, for example, in 1990, IBM equipment was the most widely used for Token Ring networks.[42]

Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), a LAN standard, was considered an attractive campus backbone network technology in the early to mid 1990s since existing Ethernet networks only offered 10 Mbit/s data rates and Token Ring networks only offered 4 Mbit/s or 16 Mbit/s rates. Thus it was a relatively high-speed choice of that era, with speeds such as 100 Mbit/s. By 1994, vendors included Cisco Systems, National Semiconductor, Network Peripherals, SysKonnect (acquired by Marvell Technology Group), and 3Com.[43] FDDI installations have largely been replaced by Ethernet deployments.[44]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Local area network

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A local area network (LAN) is a that interconnects devices, such as computers, printers, and servers, within a limited geographic area, typically a single building, office, home, or , enabling resource sharing and communication among connected devices. LANs are distinguished from wider networks like wide area networks (WANs) by their confined scope, which allows for higher data transfer speeds and lower latency, often reaching up to 400 Gb/s in modern implementations. They support both wired and wireless connections, facilitating everything from simple home to complex enterprise environments with thousands of users. The concept of LANs emerged in the early 1970s, with Ethernet invented in 1973 by and David Boggs at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) to connect computers and peripherals using coaxial cables at initial speeds of about 2.94 Mb/s. This innovation was inspired by earlier systems like and gained standardization in 1983 when the Local Area Network Standards Committee adopted Ethernet as , establishing a unified framework for 10 Mb/s operation over shared media. Over the decades, Ethernet evolved through amendments like IEEE 802.3u (1995) for 100 Mb/s and IEEE 802.3ab (1999) for 1 Gb/s , transitioning to twisted-pair cabling such as Category 5 for broader adoption. Wireless LANs (WLANs), a subset of LANs, were enabled by the standard ratified in 1997, which introduced 2.4 GHz at up to 2 Mb/s, later advancing to higher speeds like up to 600 Mb/s in 802.11n (2009), and further to standards like 802.11ax (2019, up to 9.6 Gb/s) and 802.11be (2024, up to 46 Gb/s). Key components of a LAN include network interface cards (NICs) in devices, switches and routers for , cabling (e.g., Ethernet twisted-pair or fiber optic), and wireless access points for WLANs, often segmented into virtual LANs (VLANs) for and efficiency. LANs operate primarily in client/server or topologies, where client/server models use centralized servers for larger networks, while suits smaller setups without dedicated servers. Benefits include cost-effective resource sharing, such as printers and , enhanced , and , though they require protocols like TCP/IP for reliable data transmission and measures to mitigate risks like unauthorized access. Today, LANs form the backbone of most internal networks, integrating with cloud services while adhering to evolving standards for interoperability.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

A local area network (LAN) is a that interconnects devices, such as computers, printers, and servers, within a limited geographic area to facilitate the sharing of resources and data. Typically comprising up to 1,000 connected stations using compatible technologies, a LAN enables efficient communication among endpoints in environments like homes, offices, or small campuses. The scope of a LAN is confined to a small physical extent, generally spanning less than 4 kilometers in diameter, though practical limits often range from 100 meters for wireless implementations to about 1 kilometer for wired setups. This contrasts with wide area networks (WANs), which interconnect multiple LANs across cities, countries, or globally using public infrastructure, and personal area networks (PANs), which cover even smaller ranges—typically under 10 meters—for personal devices like smartphones and wearables via technologies such as . Common LAN examples include Ethernet-based office networks where employees access shared files and peripherals within a single building. The concept of the LAN emerged in the late 1960s and 1970s, driven by the rise of affordable minicomputers that necessitated high-speed, localized communication within buildings. Influenced by packet-switching innovations from the —a precursor wide-area network—and the radio system, the term and technology were pioneered in 1973 at PARC by and David Boggs through the development of Ethernet. The term was formalized in the early 1980s via industry specifications from , DEC, and in 1980, culminating in the standard approved in 1983 and published in 1985, which established Ethernet as the foundational LAN protocol.

Key Characteristics

Local area networks (LANs) exhibit high performance metrics that enable efficient data transfer within confined geographic areas. Data rates in LANs have evolved significantly, starting from 10 Mbps in early Ethernet implementations and extending to 100 Gbps or higher in contemporary standards defined by IEEE 802.3. Latency is typically very low, often under 1 ms for wired connections, owing to the minimal physical distances and direct cabling or links between devices. Additionally, error rates remain minimal, with bit error rates (BER) commonly achieving 10^{-12} or better, facilitated by the controlled indoor environment that reduces external interference and signal degradation. Reliability in LANs is enhanced through mechanisms, such as redundant pathways that allow traffic rerouting around failures, ensuring continuous operation even if individual links or components fail. Broadcast domains form a core aspect of LAN efficiency, where devices share a common communication space that simplifies message dissemination to all connected nodes without requiring point-to-point addressing for every interaction, thereby optimizing resource use in shared environments. LANs are generally privately owned by organizations, businesses, or individuals, granting full administrative control over configuration, , and policies tailored to specific needs, such as implementing custom firewalls or access restrictions. This ownership model contrasts with public networks and supports enhanced and rapid response to internal requirements. in LANs accommodates up to several hundred devices, limited primarily by bandwidth sharing among users, where increased device count can lead to contention and reduced per-device throughput unless mitigated by switching or segmentation.

Physical Layer Components

Cabling and Wiring

Twisted pair cabling is the most common wired medium for modern local area networks (LANs), consisting of pairs of insulated copper wires twisted together to reduce . Unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cabling, which lacks additional shielding, is widely used due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of installation, while shielded twisted pair (STP) provides foil or braided shielding around the pairs for environments with high electromagnetic noise, though it is more complex to install and less common in new deployments. Under the ANSI/TIA-568-E standard, Category 5e (Cat5e) UTP cabling supports frequencies up to 100 MHz and enables Gigabit Ethernet (1000BASE-T) speeds of 1 Gbps over distances up to 100 meters, making it suitable for most small to medium LANs. Category 6 (Cat6) UTP cabling extends performance to 250 MHz, supporting 1 Gbps over 100 meters and 10 Gbps (10GBASE-T) over up to 55 meters, with improved crosstalk reduction for higher-speed applications. Coaxial cable was an early medium for LANs, particularly in the 10BASE2 specification, which uses thin like RG-58 for 10 Mbps Ethernet in a bus . RG-58 features a 50-ohm , a 20 AWG solid or stranded center conductor, foam insulation, and a PVC jacket, with a maximum segment length of 185 meters to maintain . Although effective for legacy thin Ethernet networks, coaxial cabling has largely been supplanted by and fiber due to its inflexibility and susceptibility to single-point failures. Fiber optic cabling provides high-speed, low-loss transmission for LANs using light signals through glass or plastic s, ideal for longer distances or environments requiring immunity to electrical interference. In LAN contexts, multimode (MMF) is predominant, supporting multiple light paths with core diameters of 50 or 62.5 micrometers for short-range applications, while single-mode (SMF) with a narrower 8-10 micrometer core enables longer reaches but is less common in intra-building LANs due to higher costs. For example, the 1000BASE-SX standard uses 850 nm wavelength multimode to achieve 1 Gbps speeds over up to 550 meters, depending on grade (e.g., OM2 or OM3). Installation of LAN cabling follows structured cabling standards like ANSI/TIA-568-E to ensure reliability and scalability, organizing infrastructure into horizontal, backbone, and work area subsystems. Horizontal cabling from telecommunications rooms to outlets is limited to 90 meters of fixed cable, allowing an additional 10 meters total for patch cords and equipment cords to reach a 100-meter channel length, applicable across twisted pair, coaxial, and fiber media. Patch panels serve as central termination points in wiring closets, facilitating cross-connections and maintenance without disrupting end-user cabling, and must comply with category-specific performance requirements to avoid signal degradation.

Wireless Technologies

Wireless technologies enable radio-based communication in local area networks (LANs), providing mobility and flexibility compared to wired connections by transmitting data via electromagnetic waves in unlicensed spectrum bands. The primary standards for wireless LANs are defined by the family, commonly known as , which operate primarily in the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz frequency bands to balance range, data rates, and interference resistance. These technologies form the for high-speed, short-to-medium range networking in homes, offices, and public spaces, supporting applications from basic connectivity to high-bandwidth streaming. The evolution of Wi-Fi standards has progressively increased throughput and efficiency through advancements in modulation, channel bonding, and multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) techniques. IEEE 802.11b (1999) introduced higher speeds up to 11 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz band using direct-sequence spread spectrum (DSSS). IEEE 802.11a (1999) shifted to the 5 GHz band with (OFDM) for up to 54 Mbps, reducing interference from common 2.4 GHz devices like microwaves. IEEE 802.11g (2003) combined these by delivering 54 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz band while maintaining with 802.11b. IEEE 802.11n (Wi-Fi 4, 2009) expanded to dual-band operation (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) with and 40 MHz channels, achieving theoretical speeds up to 600 Mbps. IEEE 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5, 2013) focused on the 5 GHz band, introducing wider 80 MHz and 160 MHz channels plus (MU-MIMO) for up to 3.5 Gbps theoretical throughput. IEEE 802.11ax (, 2021) supports 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands with enhanced OFDMA and MU-MIMO, enabling theoretical peak speeds of 9.6 Gbps and better performance in dense environments. The latest major standard, IEEE 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7, 2025), builds on these with 320 MHz channels, 4096-QAM modulation, and multi-link operation (MLO) across 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands, achieving theoretical peak speeds up to 46 Gbps for extremely high throughput applications. For short-range extensions within LANs, technology under IEEE 802.15.1 provides low-power, ad-hoc connectivity over distances up to 10 meters, complementing by linking peripherals like keyboards, mice, and sensors without dedicated infrastructure. Defined in IEEE 802.15.1-2002 and updated in 2005, it uses in the 2.4 GHz band for robust, short-range personal area networking that can integrate with broader LAN setups for device offloading. Low-energy variants, such as (BLE) introduced in Bluetooth 4.0 (aligned with IEEE 802.15 extensions), reduce power consumption to under 1 mW while maintaining data rates up to 1 Mbps, making it suitable for battery-powered LAN extensions in IoT scenarios. Wireless LAN hardware relies on access points (APs) as central hubs that connect wireless clients to the wired backbone, often using antennas to shape signal propagation. Omni-directional antennas radiate signals uniformly in a 360-degree horizontal pattern, ideal for open indoor spaces to provide broad coverage but prone to interference from all directions. In contrast, directional antennas focus energy in a narrow beam (e.g., 30-60 degrees), extending range up to several kilometers for point-to-point links while minimizing exposure to external noise, though they require precise alignment. Interference mitigation involves dynamic channel selection, where APs scan the spectrum to avoid overlapping frequencies from neighboring networks, particularly in the crowded 2.4 GHz band; tools like automatic rate adaptation further optimize by adjusting modulation based on signal quality. At the physical layer, security focuses on protecting radio transmissions from eavesdropping and unauthorized access, with as the current standard enhancing over WPA2. mandates for robust resistant to offline dictionary attacks, using 192-bit cryptographic suites for enterprise and personal modes to secure data in transit. It introduces individualized per session, preventing attackers from decrypting traffic even if they capture packets. Basic measures like SSID hiding—disabling beacon broadcasts of the network name—add obscurity by not advertising the network, forcing manual configuration on clients, though it offers limited protection as probe requests from devices can reveal hidden SSIDs. These physical layer safeguards integrate with higher protocols but prioritize initial link establishment integrity.

Network Architecture

Topologies

Network topologies refer to the arrangement of various elements (links, nodes, etc.) in a local area network (LAN), which can be physical (the actual layout of cabling) or logical (the way data flows). Common LAN topologies include bus, , ring, , and hybrid configurations, each offering distinct advantages in terms of , reliability, and cost, though they also present specific challenges in implementation and maintenance. In a bus topology, all devices connect to a single linear backbone cable, typically using wiring with terminators at each end to prevent signal reflection; this was the foundational layout for early Ethernet LANs under standards. Data is broadcast across the shared medium, allowing with (CSMA/CD) for access control. Advantages include low cost and simplicity, requiring minimal cabling, but the entire network fails if the backbone breaks, creating a , and troubleshooting is difficult due to signal degradation over distance. Bus topologies are largely legacy today, superseded by more robust designs in modern Ethernet implementations. The star topology connects each device to a central hub or switch via dedicated links, forming a point-to-point structure that is the most prevalent in contemporary LANs. This layout supports scalable Ethernet networks under , where the central device manages traffic and isolates faults to individual links. Key advantages are fault isolation—a single cable failure affects only one device—ease of expansion by adding ports to the center, and straightforward troubleshooting through centralized management. However, it requires more cabling than bus designs and depends on the central hub or switch, which represents a single point of failure if it malfunctions. Star configurations excel in scalability for office and enterprise environments. Ring topology arranges devices in a closed loop, with data flowing unidirectionally; a notable implementation is , standardized by IEEE 802.5, where a token circulates to grant transmission rights and prevent collisions. Physically, it often uses a star-wired setup with multistation access units (MAUs) to connect nodes logically in a ring. Advantages include predictable performance under load, as ensures equal access and constant bandwidth, and easier fault location along the loop. Drawbacks encompass network-wide disruption from a single node or link failure and challenges in expansion, which requires reconfiguring the ring. Dual-ring variants, as in IEEE 802.5c supplements, enhance by providing paths for fault recovery. Mesh topology provides multiple interconnections between devices, either fully (every node links to all others) or partially (select redundant paths); it is employed in high-reliability LANs for critical applications. Full mesh offers maximum redundancy with n(n-1)/2 links for n nodes, ensuring alternative routes if a path fails, while partial mesh balances cost and reliability. Advantages include robust fault tolerance and optimized traffic routing, reducing congestion in demanding setups. Disadvantages are high cabling and port requirements, making it expensive and complex to implement and maintain, limiting its use to small-scale or specialized LAN segments. Hybrid topologies integrate elements of multiple designs, such as combining star and mesh for enterprise LANs to leverage centralized management with added redundancy in key areas. For instance, a star backbone with mesh interconnections between critical nodes enhances scalability and fault tolerance without full-mesh overhead. This approach allows customization to specific needs, offering flexibility over pure topologies, though it increases design complexity and potential troubleshooting challenges. Hybrid configurations are common in large-scale LANs to optimize performance across diverse environments.

Hardware Devices

Network interface cards (NICs) serve as the essential hardware components that enable end-user devices, such as computers and servers, to connect to a by converting into signals suitable for transmission over physical media. These adapters implement the physical and data link layers of the Ethernet standard defined in , supporting wired connections via interfaces like RJ-45 ports for twisted-pair cabling. For wireless connectivity, NICs incorporate adapters compliant with standards, allowing devices to join wireless LANs through signals in the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, or 6 GHz bands. Modern Ethernet NICs commonly support speeds from 1 Gbps (, 1000BASE-T) to 10 Gbps or higher (e.g., 2.5GBASE-T, 10GBASE-T) over Category 5e or higher cabling, with multi-gigabit variants per IEEE 802.3bz (2016) now widespread in consumer and enterprise devices as of 2025. NICs adhere to evolving amendments, with versions such as 802.11ax ( 6) and 802.11be ( 7, published 2024) providing multi-gigabit throughput—up to 46 Gbps theoretical for 7—through technologies such as (OFDMA) and multi-link operation (MLO). Hubs represent legacy hardware for connecting multiple devices in early Ethernet LANs, operating at the by broadcasting incoming signals to all ports, which results in a single shared where data packets from different devices can interfere with each other. This design, rooted in the original 10BASE-T Ethernet specifications of , led to reduced efficiency in busier networks due to frequent collisions managed via with (CSMA/CD). In contrast, modern switches have largely replaced hubs, functioning as intelligent Layer 2 devices that forward traffic only to the intended recipient based on MAC addresses, thereby creating separate s for each port to eliminate interference. Switches support virtual LANs (s) through tagging, which encapsulates Ethernet frames with VLAN identifiers to segment broadcast traffic and enhance security within a single physical infrastructure. Routers play a role at the boundaries of LANs by connecting internal networks to external ones, performing basic (NAT) to map private IP addresses used within the LAN to a public IP for outbound communication. In LAN contexts, routers facilitate address conservation by allowing multiple devices to share a single public address via port address translation (PAT), a common implementation in devices like home or small office gateways. While primarily designed for inter-network routing at Layer 3, their NAT functionality ensures seamless connectivity without exposing internal LAN addresses. Repeaters are simple devices used to extend the reach of Ethernet signals in LANs by regenerating and amplifying attenuated signals, adhering to specifications for maintaining over longer distances up to the standard's maximum segment length of 100 meters for twisted-pair media. They operate transparently without altering frame content but do not segment collision domains, propagating collisions across the extended link. Bridges, operating at the per standards, connect multiple LAN segments while filtering traffic to reduce unnecessary broadcasts, effectively segmenting collision domains by learning MAC addresses and forwarding frames only between segments as needed. This legacy function of bridges laid the groundwork for modern switching, improving overall LAN performance by isolating traffic and preventing widespread collision propagation.

Protocols and Configuration

Layered Protocols

Local area networks (LANs) primarily utilize the (Layer 1) and (Layer 2) of the to facilitate reliable communication within a bounded geographic area. The handles the transmission and reception of raw bit streams over such as twisted-pair cabling or wireless channels, ensuring and signal integrity. The , subdivided into the media access control (MAC) and (LLC) sublayers, manages frame formatting, addressing, access to the shared medium, and error detection to enable node-to-node data transfer without higher-layer involvement. standards, which govern most LAN implementations, emphasize these two layers to support diverse media types while maintaining interoperability. A core example of Layer 2 operation in LANs is the format specified by , which structures data for transmission across shared or switched media. The frame begins with a 7-octet of alternating 1s and 0s for receiver synchronization, followed by a 1-octet start frame delimiter (SFD) signaling the frame's start. This is succeeded by 6-octet destination and source MAC addresses for identifying endpoints, a 2-octet length/type field indicating size or upper-layer protocol, a variable data field (46 to 1500 octets, padded if necessary), and a 4-octet (FCS) using (CRC) for integrity verification. This structure ensures efficient in with (CSMA/CD) environments and supports full-duplex operation in modern switched LANs. The (ARP), defined in RFC 826, operates at the to resolve IP addresses to corresponding MAC addresses within a LAN, enabling Layer 3 packets to be encapsulated in Layer 2 frames. When a device needs to communicate with an on the local network, it broadcasts an ARP request packet containing its own MAC and IP addresses along with the target IP, prompting the matching device to a reply with its . Devices maintain an ARP cache table of resolved mappings, with entries timed out after inactivity to adapt to network changes, ensuring dynamic address resolution without manual configuration. This process confines broadcasts to the local segment, optimizing performance in Ethernet-based LANs. In switched LANs, the , standardized in , prevents broadcast storms and loops by dynamically configuring a tree that blocks redundant paths while allowing . Switches exchange Bridge Protocol Data Units (BPDUs) every 2 seconds to propagate bridge identifiers (a 16-bit priority and 48-bit ) and path costs, electing the root bridge as the device with the lowest identifier—default priority of 32768, with ties broken by the lowest . Non-root bridges then select root ports based on lowest-cost paths to the root and designate ports for downstream forwarding, placing alternate ports in a blocking state to eliminate cycles; changes trigger rapid reconvergence in enhanced variants like RSTP. IEEE 802.1Q provides virtual LAN () segmentation at Layer 2 by inserting a 4-octet tag into Ethernet , allowing a single physical LAN to be logically divided into multiple isolated broadcast domains for improved and traffic management. The tag follows the source and includes a 2-octet Tag Protocol Identifier (TPID, typically 0x8100 for Ethernet) to denote the 802.1Q format, and a 2-octet Tag Control Information (TCI) field comprising a 3-bit Priority Code Point (PCP) for , a 1-bit Drop Eligible Indicator (DEI, formerly CFI), and a 12-bit Identifier (VID) ranging from 1 to 4094 to assign to specific s. Untagged are assigned a default by the receiving bridge, while tagged maintain their segmentation across trunk links; the FCS is recalculated post-insertion to preserve error detection. This tagging enables scalable LAN designs without additional hardware.

IP Addressing and Subnetting

In local area networks (LANs), IP addressing primarily utilizes the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) for device identification and communication routing within the confined network scope. IPv4 addresses in LANs are typically drawn from private address spaces to avoid conflicts with public addresses and conserve global IPv4 resources. These private ranges, as defined in RFC 1918, include 10.0.0.0/8 (providing over 16 million addresses), 172.16.0.0/12 (over 1 million addresses), and 192.168.0.0/16 (65,536 addresses), which are non-routable on the public Internet and reserved exclusively for internal network use. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) serves as the standard mechanism for automatically assigning IPv4 addresses and related configuration parameters, such as masks and default gateways, to devices joining the LAN. DHCP operates on a client-server model where a designated server—often integrated into a LAN router—responds to broadcast requests from clients, leasing addresses for a configurable period to simplify management and reduce manual errors in larger networks. In contrast, static IP addressing involves manual configuration by network administrators, suitable for servers or devices requiring fixed addresses but increasing administrative overhead in dynamic environments. Subnetting divides a larger IP network into smaller subnetworks to enhance organization, security, and efficiency within a LAN, using (CIDR) notation as outlined in RFC 4632. In CIDR, the prefix length (e.g., /24) indicates the number of bits used for the network portion of the address, with the remainder for host identification; for instance, a /24 subnet mask equates to 255.255.255.0 in dotted decimal, supporting up to 254 usable hosts (256 total minus network and broadcast addresses). To calculate subnets, administrators borrow bits from the host portion—for example, subnetting 192.168.0.0/16 into /24 segments yields 256 subnets, each with 254 hosts, by extending the mask from 16 to 24 bits. IPv6 addressing is increasingly adopted in modern LANs to address IPv4 exhaustion, featuring a 128-bit format for vastly expanded address space. Within LANs, link-local IPv6 addresses (fe80::/10 prefix) are automatically generated for each interface without configuration, enabling initial communication on the local segment before global addressing is assigned. Transition mechanisms like facilitate IPv6 deployment over existing IPv4 LAN infrastructure by embedding IPv4 addresses into IPv6 prefixes (2002::/16), allowing automatic tunneling without immediate full IPv6 router upgrades. Configuration of IP addressing in LANs often relies on router-based DHCP servers for both IPv4 and IPv6 (via ), which centralize address pool management and integrate with subnetting schemes to enforce policies like lease times and reservations. Tools such as command-line interfaces on routers (e.g., or iproute2) or graphical network management software enable static assignments and subnet mask verification, ensuring compatibility across the LAN.
Private IPv4 RangeCIDR NotationAddress CountTypical LAN Use
10.0.0.0–10.255.255.255/816,777,216Large enterprise LANs
172.16.0.0–172.31.255.255/121,048,576Medium-sized organizational networks
192.168.0.0–192.168.255.255/16Small home or office LANs

Connectivity and Expansion

Linking Multiple LANs

Linking multiple local area networks (LANs) enables the creation of extended network infrastructures that surpass the physical limitations of a single LAN segment, facilitating communication across larger areas while maintaining Layer 2 connectivity. Bridges and switches serve as key devices for this , operating at the to forward frames based on es. A bridge connects separate LAN segments by learning and maintaining a MAC address table, which records the port associated with each device's MAC address through observation of incoming frames; this allows the bridge to forward traffic only to the relevant segment, reducing collisions and extending the network without creating a single . Switches, as multi-port bridges, perform similar functions at higher speeds and with greater density, supporting full-duplex communication to further enhance performance in interconnected LANs. Virtual LAN (VLAN) trunking provides a method to link switches while segmenting traffic logically, allowing multiple s to traverse a single physical link between devices. The standard defines VLAN tagging, where a 4-byte tag is inserted into Ethernet frames to identify the VLAN membership, enabling switches to multiplex traffic from different s over trunk ports without mixing broadcast domains. This approach supports inter-switch connectivity in campus environments, preserving and security across linked LANs. For broader interconnections forming metropolitan area networks (MANs), optic or links connect LANs across buildings or campuses, providing high-bandwidth, low-latency extensions beyond copper cabling limits. optic cables, such as those compliant with standards for Ethernet over , offer distances up to several kilometers with minimal signal loss, serving as backbones to link distributed LANs in urban settings. links, utilizing line-of-sight radio frequencies in the 10-80 GHz bands, deliver gigabit speeds over distances of 1-10 km for building-to-building connections where trenching for is impractical, ensuring reliable Layer 2 bridging with proper alignment and licensing. Legacy methods like were used to extend early Ethernet LANs by regenerating signals across multiple segments, but they had strict limitations to prevent excessive latency and collisions. In 10 Mbps Ethernet networks per , the "" permitted a maximum of five segments connected by four repeaters, with only three segments populated by devices, to keep the round-trip delay within acceptable bounds for with (CSMA/CD). These approaches created a single , making them unsuitable for modern switched environments.

Internet Gateway Integration

Internet gateways serve as the critical interface between a local area network (LAN) and the broader , enabling secure and efficient connectivity for internal devices to external resources. These gateways typically combine , address , and security functions to manage traffic flow, ensuring that private LAN environments can access public internet services while maintaining isolation from unauthorized access. Common implementations include residential and enterprise routers that handle , , and protection mechanisms, often integrated into a single device for simplicity. Network Address Translation (NAT) and Port Address Translation (PAT) are fundamental to gateway operations, allowing multiple devices on a private LAN to share a single public provided by the (ISP). maps private , such as those in the RFC 1918 range, to a public for outbound traffic, enabling transparent routing without requiring unique public addresses for each device. PAT extends this by further translating port numbers, permitting thousands of internal connections to multiplex through one public , which is essential for conserving scarce IPv4 address space in typical home or small office LANs. For instance, a router might use PAT to allow simultaneous web browsing, streaming, and gaming from several devices using just one ISP-assigned . Firewall integration at the LAN edge enhances by inspecting and controlling traffic passing through the gateway, often incorporating stateful inspection to track connection states and prevent unauthorized sessions. Stateful inspection firewalls monitor the full context of network packets, including sequence numbers and flags, to distinguish legitimate responses from potential attacks, going beyond simple port-based filtering. Many gateways also support (DMZ) configurations, where public-facing servers like web hosts are placed in an isolated between the LAN and the , allowing controlled exposure while protecting the internal network from direct threats. This setup is common in enterprise environments to host services without compromising the core LAN perimeter. Modems and DSL/cable gateways form the physical and protocol layer for , converting wide-area signals into Ethernet for LAN connectivity, with PPPoE often used for in DSL and deployments. DSL modems use twisted-pair lines for asymmetric speeds up to several hundred Mbps, while cable gateways leverage infrastructure for shared bandwidth, typically offering download speeds exceeding 1 Gbps in modern tiers. PPPoE encapsulates PPP frames over Ethernet to establish authenticated sessions, requiring username and credentials from the ISP before granting access, which adds a layer of for point-to-point-like connections over broadcast media. optic gateways, such as those in EPON systems for symmetric 1 Gbps or XGS-PON for symmetric 10 Gbps as of 2023, provide low-latency performance ideal for bandwidth-intensive LAN applications without the contention issues of shared cable or DSL mediums. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) enable secure remote access to the LAN via the gateway, using tunnels to encrypt traffic and extend the network perimeter. operates at the network layer to provide , , and authentication through protocols like ESP and AH, forming secure associations between endpoints. Site-to-site VPNs connect entire remote LANs to the primary network, creating a seamless for inter-office communication without individual user intervention. In contrast, client-to-site VPNs allow individual remote users, such as teleworkers, to authenticate and access LAN resources via software clients or gateway portals, often using IKE for to establish dynamic tunnels. This distinction supports scalable while maintaining gateway-enforced policies for traffic routing back to private IP schemes within the LAN.

Historical Development

Early Innovations

The development of local area networks (LANs) in the late 1960s and early 1970s drew inspiration from earlier wide-area networking experiments, particularly in addressing the need for efficient data sharing among computers in close proximity. Precursors emerged during this period, with the project at the University of serving as a foundational prototype. Initiated in 1966 under Norman Abramson and operational by June 1971, connected seven computers across four using UHF radio broadcasts at 9.6 kbps, demonstrating transmission with slotted protocol to manage collisions on shared channels. This system provided inter-island access to computing resources and influenced subsequent wired and wireless LAN designs by proving the feasibility of in broadcast media. A pivotal wired LAN innovation occurred at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) in 1973, where and colleagues developed the Ethernet prototype. On May 22, 1973, Metcalfe circulated an internal memo proposing a network to connect Xerox's computers to shared peripherals, evolving from and concepts into a cable-based bus using with (CSMA/CD). The initial prototype, implemented later that year with David Boggs, operated at 2.94 Mbps over 1 km of RG-8 coax cable, connecting multiple Altos and laser printers in a demonstration that highlighted deterministic contention resolution for office environments. This setup marked the first practical local network for personal computing, emphasizing simplicity and over complex routing. In parallel, other early prototypes addressed deterministic access needs. Datapoint Corporation introduced in 1977 as a token-passing bus LAN for office automation, building on internal "communication bus" experiments from 1976. Developed under Victor Poor and implemented by John Murphy, ARCNET used a star topology with or twisted-pair cabling at 2.5 Mbps, passing a token sequentially among up to 255 nodes to avoid collisions, and was first installed commercially in for resource sharing among Datapoint minicomputers. Across the Atlantic, the Cambridge Ring emerged in 1974 at the University of Cambridge's Computer Laboratory as a slotted ring LAN operating at 10 Mbps, with nodes inserting fixed-size minipackets into circulating slots on a fiber optic or twisted-pair loop, enabling high-speed, low-latency communication for research clusters. Additionally, early installations in the 1970s featured local segments connecting host computers to Interface Message Processors (IMPs) via short or custom cables, forming rudimentary LAN-like extensions within sites like UCLA and SRI to aggregate multiple devices before wide-area transmission. These innovations collectively laid the groundwork for shared-medium networking in constrained environments.

Standards Evolution

In 1980, the IEEE Computer Society established the Local Area Network/ Standards Committee (LMSC) to develop unified standards for local area networking technologies, addressing the growing need for amid competing proprietary systems. The committee's first meeting occurred in February 1980, marking the beginning of a collaborative effort involving industry leaders to define physical and specifications for LANs. A key outcome of the IEEE 802 efforts was the standardization of Ethernet under in 1983, which formalized the with (CSMA/CD) access method for shared-medium networks operating at 10 Mbps. This standard, approved on June 24, 1983, built on earlier Ethernet specifications from , , and , enabling broader adoption through open specifications. In contrast, IBM championed , standardized as IEEE 802.5 in 1985, which used a token-passing mechanism to avoid collisions and provide deterministic performance, particularly suited for environments with high traffic loads. The rivalry between Ethernet and intensified during the mid-1980s, with IBM's market influence initially driving adoption in corporate settings, capturing significant share post-1986 due to its integration with IBM's . However, Ethernet's lower cost, simpler implementation, and support from multiple vendors led to its market dominance by the early 1990s, eventually overtaking as the prevailing LAN technology. Parallel to these developments, the (FDDI), developed by the ANSI X3T9.5 committee in the mid-, emerged as a 100 Mbps token-passing standard using fiber optic cabling for high-speed LAN backbones and campus-wide networks. Approved as ANSI X3.148 in 1988, FDDI provided dual-ring redundancy for and supported distances up to 200 km, making it ideal for connecting multiple lower-speed LANs in enterprise environments. Its adoption in the late and early filled a gap for bandwidth-intensive applications, though it remained more expensive than copper-based alternatives. By the mid-1990s, the push for higher speeds culminated in , defined by the IEEE 802.3u amendment ratified in 1995, which extended Ethernet to 100 Mbps while maintaining with existing 10 Mbps infrastructure through and shared cabling standards like 100BASE-TX. This upgrade preserved the CSMA/CD protocol and frame format, allowing seamless integration with legacy Ethernet devices and accelerating the transition to faster networks without requiring full overhauls.

Modern Advancements

Since the late 1990s, , standardized under IEEE 802.3ab as 1000BASE-T, has enabled 1 Gbps data rates over existing Category 5e twisted-pair cabling up to 100 meters, facilitating widespread adoption in enterprise and home LANs without requiring infrastructure overhauls. This advancement marked a significant leap from , supporting full-duplex operation and , and remains integral to modern LAN backbones for handling increased bandwidth demands in data centers and offices. Wireless LAN technologies have evolved rapidly, with IEEE 802.11n, ratified in 2009, introducing multiple-input multiple-output () technology to achieve up to 600 Mbps throughput across 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands through and wider 40 MHz channels. Building on this, (IEEE 802.11ax), released in 2021, enhanced efficiency with (OFDMA) and improved , supporting up to 9.6 Gbps in dense environments. The extension to in 2020 added the 6 GHz band, providing additional spectrum for reduced interference and higher speeds, particularly in smart homes and high-density settings. (IEEE 802.11be), published in July 2025, further advances with multi-link operation across 2.4, 5, and 6 GHz bands and 320 MHz channels, enabling theoretical speeds up to 46 Gbps for applications requiring extremely high throughput and low latency. Software-defined networking (SDN) principles have transformed LAN management by decoupling control and data planes, allowing centralized orchestration via protocols like , which enables programmable switches to dynamically route traffic based on application needs. This approach, promoted by the Open Networking Foundation since 2011, supports virtualized LANs in cloud environments, improving scalability and automation for enterprise networks without hardware replacements. LANs now integrate seamlessly with Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems, supporting protocols like for low-power in smart homes, where devices connect via gateways to IP-based LANs for centralized control of lighting and sensors. Similarly, Thread, an IPv6-based mesh protocol developed by the Thread Group, enables direct integration with Ethernet LANs through border routers, offering reliable, low-latency connectivity for battery-operated devices in . Emerging trends include the IEEE 802.3-2022 standard, which specifies Ethernet operation up to 400 Gbps for and data centers, using advanced modulation and optical interfaces to meet AI-driven bandwidth requirements. Ongoing work in IEEE P802.3dj targets 800 Gb/s and 1.6 Tb/s Ethernet to address future bandwidth needs in data-intensive applications. Complementing this, IEEE 802.3bt (PoE++), ratified in 2018, delivers up to 90 W over four-pair Ethernet cables, powering high-demand devices like pan-tilt-zoom cameras and access points directly through LAN infrastructure, reducing cabling complexity.

References

  1. https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/learn/topics/networking/what-is-a-lan-local-area-network.html
  2. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3/10422/
  3. https://www.networkworld.com/article/970970/what-is-ethernet.html
  4. https://standards.ieee.org/beyond-standards/ethernet-50th-anniversary/
  5. https://standards.ieee.org/beyond-standards/the-evolution-of-wi-fi-technology-and-standards/
  6. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.11/5536/
  7. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/local-area-network-LAN
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/local-area-network
  9. https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/networking/articles/what-is-local-area-network/
  10. https://aws.amazon.com/compare/the-difference-between-lan-and-wan/
  11. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/types-of-area-networks-lan-man-and-wan/
  12. https://ieeemilestones.ethw.org/Milestone-Proposal:Ethernet_Local_Area_Network_%28LAN%29%2C_1973-1985
  13. https://community.spiceworks.com/t/what-is-the-average-latency-in-ms-on-a-lan/363661
  14. https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/67473/what-is-an-acceptable-bit-error-ratio
  15. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Campus/cisco-campus-lan-wlan-design-guide.html
  16. https://community.cisco.com/t5/other-network-architecture-subjects/maximum-number-of-devices-per-vlan/td-p/17541
  17. https://www.tiafotc.org/tia-standards-update/tia-568-2-e/
  18. https://www.belden.com/products/cable/ethernet-cable/category-6-cable
  19. https://www.belden.com/products/cable/coax-triax-cable/50-ohm-coax-cable/9907
  20. https://www.tiafotc.org/ieee-802-3-ethernet-standards-update/multimode-standards-update/1000base-sx/
  21. https://www.tiafotc.org/tia-standards-update/tia-568-0-e/
  22. https://www.anixter.com/en_us/resources/literature/techbriefs/the-six-subsystems-of-a-structured-cabling-system.html
  23. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.11ax/7180/
  24. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.11be/7516/
  25. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.15.1/3513/
  26. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7862859/
  27. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/82068-omni-vs-direct.html
  28. https://spectrum.ieee.org/everything-you-need-to-know-about-wpa3
  29. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/legacy/sp/nistspecialpublication800-97.pdf
  30. https://www.csl.mtu.edu/cs4451/www/notes/Network%20Topologies.pdf
  31. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse567-08/ftp/topology/index.html
  32. https://www1.udel.edu/fth/itaw/ch10.pdf
  33. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.5c/1107/
  34. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3bz/6896/
  35. https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/1/files/public/docs2013/802-rev-D1-7CMP.pdf
  36. https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/misc-docs/GlobeCom2009/IEEE_802d3_Law.pdf
  37. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc826
  38. https://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2009/aq-seaman-merged-spanning-tree-protocols-0509.pdf
  39. https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/1/files/public/docs1997/tagging.pdf
  40. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1918
  41. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2131.html
  42. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4632
  43. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4291.html
  44. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3056
  45. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.1D/3387/
  46. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1309630
  47. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.1Q/6844/
  48. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel4/73/2639/00080382.pdf
  49. https://www.cablefree.net/wirelesstechnology/microwave/
  50. https://www.ethermanage.com/ethernet/ch13-ora/ch13.html
  51. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3022.html
  52. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2663
  53. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/long-reach-ethernet-lre-digital-subscriber-line-xdsl/asymmetric-digital-subscriber-line-adsl/12905-827spat.html
  54. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/legacy/sp/nistspecialpublication800-41r1.pdf
  55. https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/what-is-dmz
  56. https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-a-perimeter-firewall
  57. https://www.optcore.net/pppoe-vs-dhcp-difference/
  58. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2516
  59. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.9807.1/en
  60. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4301.txt
  61. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-77r1.pdf
  62. https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/network-security/ipsec-vpn/administration/ipsec-vpn-basics/ipsec-vpn
  63. https://www.eng.hawaii.edu/about/history/alohanet/
  64. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5350363
  65. https://historyofcomputercommunications.info/section/6.10/ALOHANET-and-Norm-Abramson-1966-1972/
  66. https://historyofcomputercommunications.info/section/8.7/Ethernet-and-Robert-Metcalfe-and-Xerox-PARC-1971-1975/
  67. https://www.digibarn.com/collections/diagrams/ethernet-original/index.html
  68. https://bitsavers.org/pdf/datapoint/arcnet/DatapointARC-MileStones.pdf
  69. https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/datapoint-corporation-history/
  70. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/pub/docs/ORL/tr.88.1.pdf
  71. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA115440.pdf
  72. https://standards.ieee.org/featured/ieee-802/
  73. https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/IEEE-802-LMSC-OverviewGuide-06-Oct-2016-v2.pdf
  74. https://ethw.org/Milestones:Ethernet_Local_Area_Network_%28LAN%29%2C_1973-1985
  75. https://spectrum.ieee.org/ethernet-ieee-milestone
  76. https://kenney.faculty.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/332/2018/03/Sponsors-Communities-and-Standards_-Ethernet-vs.-Token-Ring-in-the-Local-Area-Networking-Business.pdf
  77. https://www.ee.columbia.edu/~bbathula/courses/HPCN/chap02.pdf
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/fiber-distributed-data-interface
  79. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3ab/1086/
  80. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.11n/3952/
  81. https://opennetworking.org/sdn-definition/
  82. https://csa-iot.org/all-solutions/zigbee/
  83. https://www.threadgroup.org/
  84. https://www.ieee802.org/3/dj/
  85. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.3bt/6749/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.