Hubbry Logo
Transit Center at ManasTransit Center at ManasMain
Open search
Transit Center at Manas
Community hub
Transit Center at Manas
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Transit Center at Manas
Transit Center at Manas
Transit Center at Manas
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Transit Center at Manas (formerly Manas Air Base and unofficially Ganci Air Base) is a former U.S. military installation at Manas International Airport, near Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan. It was primarily operated by the U.S. Air Force. The primary unit at the base was the 376th Air Expeditionary Wing. On 3 June 2014 American troops vacated the base and it was handed over back to the Kyrgyzstan military.[2]

Key Information

The base was opened in December 2001 to support U.S. military operations in the War in Afghanistan. The base was a transit point for U.S. military personnel coming from and going to Afghanistan. Recreation facilities included internet cafes, wireless internet, pool tables, free video games, and telephone lines via the DSN that allowed coalition forces to call their homes at little or no cost. The base had a large dining facility, a gymnasium, and a chapel. There was also a library where books and magazines were available for active duty airmen. It also hosted forces from several other International Security Assistance Force member states.

Several events, such as the shooting of a local civilian and rumors of fuel dumping, had led to strained relations with some of the local population.[3] Powers such as Russia and China had been pushing for the closure of the base since 2005.[4]

In February 2009, the Kyrgyz Parliament voted to close the base after the two governments failed to agree on a higher rent for the property.[5][6][7] American and Kyrgyz officials continued negotiations after the announcement, and on 23 June a tentative agreement was reached. Under the new arrangement, the United States will pay[8] $200 million, three times the previous rent, for continued use of the facilities. Before the handover to the Kyrgyz military, Kyrgyz forces handled security in the areas surrounding the facility, while American forces provided security for the facility, and the site was then called a "transit center" instead of an "air base".[9]

All U.S. forces vacated the base in early June 2014, at which time control of the base was handed over to Kyrgyz authorities.[10][11] The U.S. lease officially expired in July 2014.[12]

Name

[edit]
Cap inscribed "U.S. Air Force – Manas Air Base, Kyrgyzstan"

The installation was initially named after New York Fire Department Chief Peter J. Ganci, Jr., who was killed in the September 11 attacks.[13] The all-ranks club/recreation center on base was known as "Pete's Place" in his honor.[14]

Shortly after the U.S. Air Force had used the name "Ganci", it was found that an Air Force Instruction (AFI) dictated that non-U.S. air bases could not bear the name of any U.S. citizens (the former Clark Air Base in the Philippines pre-dated this instruction). Since that time the air base has been officially called Manas Air Base, after the name of Manas International Airport where it is located.[citation needed]

The name "Manas" refers to the Epic of Manas, a world-renowned Kyrgyz epic poem.[15]

The facility was renamed "Transit Center at Manas" following a new agreement between the U.S. and Kyrgyz governments, signed in June 2009. Most English-language sources, however, continue to refer to it as "Manas Air Base".

History

[edit]

The center opened on 16 December 2001.[16]

Operation Enduring Freedom

[edit]

In December 2001, the 86th Contingency Response Group out of Ramstein Air Base in Germany arrived at Manas to open the airfield for military use as part of Operation Enduring Freedom.[17]

U.S. close air support aircraft deployed there included U.S. Air Force F-15Es and U.S. Marine Corps F-18s. In February 2002, a detachment of French Air Force Dassault Mirage 2000D ground attack aircraft and KC-135 air-refueling tankers deployed to Manas in support of ground forces in Afghanistan as part of Operation Enduring Freedom. In March of the same year, the Royal Australian Air Force stationed two B707 air-to-air refueling aircraft at the base. A Norwegian C-130 deployed there in early 2002; it was withdrawn in October 2002 when a tri-national detachment, known as European Participating Airforces (EPAF) of a total of 18 F-16s, 6 from the Danish, 6 from the Dutch and 6 from the Norwegian F-16 multirole aircraft took the place of the Mirages. Support for the new aircraft came in the form of one Netherlands KDC-10 tanker, and several American KC-135s, which remained assigned until June 2014. At the same time, Spain deployed two Superpuma rescue helicopters from its Army Aviation and at least two C-130s. Several of the servicemen from this unit were killed in an air crash on their way home from the base.[18]

ISAF support

[edit]
A KC-135 Stratotanker sits on the flightline at Manas Air Base.

In September 2004, the Royal Netherlands Air Force again returned with 5x F-16 fighter/bomber to provide Close Air Support (CAS) for the ISAF mission, which now encompassed both Kabul and Northern Afghanistan. To supplement the small availability of tanker aircraft, a RNLAF KDC-10 was also deployed which flew regularly to supply Dutch F-16s with fuel. At that time, the Spanish Airforce was also giving support with a single C-130. The Dutch, commanded by LtCol Bob "Body" Verkroost, remained until the presidential elections of 9 October 2004 elected Hamid Karzai as president of Afghanistan. The last F-16 mission was flown on 19 November 2004 at which time the F-16s were withdrawn to their homebase of Volkel Airbase in the Netherlands, while the KDC-10 flew the personnel back to Eindhoven Airport. The Dutch returned with F-16s to the Afghan theatre in 2005 but at that time began operating out of Kabul Airport.

Tulip Revolution

[edit]

The Tulip Revolution of March 2005 led to the toppling of Kyrgyz president Askar Akayev. However, American and allied personnel did not find themselves disrupted or affected, according to international news reports. One military member even indicated, "It's been business as usual...We did not miss a single flight."[19]

In April 2006, Kyrgyzstan's new president, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, threatened to expel U.S. troops if the United States would not agree by 1 June to pay more for stationing forces in the Central Asian nation. He later withdrew this threat.

On 6 September 2006, U.S. Air Force officer Maj. Jill Metzger went missing after being separated from her group while visiting a shopping center in Bishkek. She was found three days later in the nearby city of Kant. After an Air Force investigation, it was confirmed in February 2012 that Metzger had indeed been kidnapped as she had claimed.[20]

December 2006 shooting

[edit]
A C-5 Galaxy cargo plane being refuelled by a KrAZ tanker truck at Manas after arriving from Ramstein Air Base.

On 6 December 2006, U.S. serviceman Zachary Hatfield fatally shot Alexander Ivanov, a Kyrgyz civilian, at a truck checkpoint at the base. A statement from the base stated the airman "used deadly force in response to a threat at an entry control checkpoint".[21] Ivanov, a truck driver for Aerocraft Petrol Management, was waiting to finish the security check before proceeding into the U.S.-controlled area. According to a base spokesman, "As the airman approached the tent, the driver physically threatened him with a knife which was discovered at the scene. The airman drew his 9mm weapon and fired in self-defense."[22] Hatfield fired two shots into Ivanov's chest, killing him.

The killing drew widespread condemnation from Kyrgyz authorities and they quickly demanded that Hatfield's immunity from local prosecution be revoked. In the meantime, U.S. authorities agreed to have Hatfield remain in Kyrgyzstan until the matter was resolved.[23] Another issue to come out of the shooting was that of the compensation offered to Ivanov's family. His employer offered the family $50,000 while the U.S. government offered only around $2,000. Galina Skripkina, a lawyer representing Ivanov's widow, described the U.S. offer as "humiliating" and said that if it was not increased the family would take legal action. However, the U.S. embassy stated that this amount was an interim payment and that final compensation would be determined once the investigation into the shooting was concluded.[24]

More detailed data about the hearings on the Hatfield case were published in late December 2010 via the web site Russian Reporter, which issued a series of dispatches from the State Department and U.S. embassies, supposedly originating from the WikiLeaks archive.[citation needed] "Junior Sergeant Hatfield was subject to severe administrative measures against him, which will have long-term effects and negatively affect his career," the dispatch stated though criminal charges against Hatfield never went to a military court.[citation needed] According to the dispatch, the officer authorized to initiate court-martial was General Arthur Lichte, a commander at the airbase, who, "after reviewing the report of the Article 32 investigation and considering the advice of his staff judge advocate...dismissed the charge against SrA Hatfield," the dispatch states. It said that Lichte had ruled for a non-prosecution based "on his own professional and impartial judgment of the facts of the case and the evidence that was available." The paper reported that Lichte was given the power of referral because he was not previously involved in the investigation of the case, nor in the chain of command relating to Hatfield.[25] In the summer of 2009, after dismissing criminal charges against Hatfield, the U.S. military gave Ivanova's widow $250,000.[26]

2009 threat of closure and restructuring

[edit]
Russian news coverage of the vote to close Manas Air Base in the Kyrgish Parliament.

On 3 February 2009, Kyrgyzstan's President Kurmanbek Bakiyev announced that Manas Air Base would soon be closed.[27] A bill calling for the closure of the base and the eviction of U.S. forces was passed by the Kyrgyz parliament by a vote of 78 to one on 19 February 2009.[7] The following day, 20 February, an official eviction notice was delivered to the U.S. Embassy in Bishkek, according to the Kyrgyzstan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.[28]

The news of the base's closure followed the announcement of a new agreement between Russia and Kyrgyzstan in which Kyrgyzstan will receive $2 billion in loans and $150 million in financial aid from Russia.[29] Most observers see the two events as connected, and believe that Russian financial assistance was offered on the condition that U.S. forces were expelled from Kyrgyzstan.[30][31][32][33] As of 2009, the U.S. government provided $150 million in aid annually to Kyrgyzstan.[30] According to General David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command, around $63 million of that sum is directly connected to the base.[34] The larger Russian package is viewed by some analysts as an effort to "out-bid" the Americans.[30]

Referring to the closure of Manas Air Base, Pentagon spokesman Geoff S. Morrell directly accused Russia of "attempting to undermine [American] use of that facility".[29] U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates also said that, "The Russians are trying to have it both ways with respect to Afghanistan in terms of Manas. On one hand you're making positive noises about working with us in Afghanistan, and on the other hand you're working against us in terms of that airfield which is clearly important to us."[33] However Russian President Dmitry Medvedev distanced his country from the announcement, saying that it was "within the competence of the Kyrgyz Republic" to decide how the Manas base functioned.[29]

On 23 June 2009 a new deal was reached between the U.S. and Kyrgyz governments. It was ratified by the Kyrgyz parliament two days later, and signed into law by President Bakiyev on 7 July.[35][36] Under the terms of the new agreement, U.S. payment for use of the facilities will increase from $17.1 million to $60 million. An additional $117 million will be given to the Kyrgyz government, including $36 million for upgrading the airport with additional storage facilities and aircraft parking, $21 million for fighting drug trafficking in the country, and $20 million for economic development.[37][38]

The facility's official title also was altered under the new agreement. Instead of being referred to as "Manas Air Base", it became the "Transit Center at Manas International Airport".[38] According to a Kyrgyz government spokesman, the facility will officially cease to be an air base in August 2009, after which point its legal status would be altered to a logistic center.[35] Additionally, security around the base will now be handled by Kyrgyz personnel, as opposed to American servicemen.[9]

Several local political observers believe that despite the changes in the new agreement, activities at the base will continue unaltered, and in fact, as of March 2010, operations had continued.[9][38] In March 2010 the United States transported 50,000 NATO soldiers to Afghanistan via Kyrgyzstan as it represents the quickest and most efficient route.[39] The new agreement does not appear to restrict the kind of materials U.S. forces can move into and out of the base.[9]

According to Bill Gertz, US State Department officials reportedly overheard that China had asked the government of Kyrgyzstan to close the base to U.S. use in return for $3 billion in cash (a sum equal to a tenth of all Chinese foreign aid given from 1950 to 2009).[40] According to Gertz, the Chinese ambassador to Kyrgyzstan subsequently denied to the U.S. ambassador that the covert cash offer had been made.[41]

2010 Kyrgyzstan revolution

[edit]

On 6 April 2010 a second revolution took place. The transit center itself saw few mishaps during the revolution. The 376th Expeditionary Security Forces and augmentees were initially called to combat duty when a Kyrgyz military armored personnel carrier (APC) was taken from a National Guard facility in Bishkek by revolutionaries and was driven to the transit center with the intent to enter the base and stop any fleeing members of the former government. Small arms fire erupted in several locations around the base to include the flight line. The base commander Colonel Holt had all armed combat units and those that were transiting to or from Afghanistan in combat posture to defend the transit center.

Closure

[edit]

On 8 November 2011, newly elected President Almazbek Atambayev announced that he would attempt to close the base when its lease ran out in 2014.[42]

In September 2012, Atambayev repeated his view that "Manas should be a civil airport" which "should not be a military base for any country". He reaffirmed his stance that starting from 2014, Manas airport will only be used to transport passengers.[43]

In 2014, American military flights began to fly out of Mihail Kogălniceanu International Airport, Romania instead of Manas.[44]

Incidents and accidents

[edit]
  • On 26 September 2006, a USAF KC-135R, 63-8886, was damaged beyond economical repair when it was struck by a Tupolev Tu-154 of Altyn Air, EX-85718, while stopped on a taxiway after landing at Manas Airbase. The Tu-154 was taking off and its right wing struck the fairing of the KC-135R No. 1 engine. The force of the impact nearly severed the No. 1 engine, but destroyed a portion of the left wing and the resulting fire caused extensive damage to the KC-135. The Tu-154 lost about 6 feet (1.8 m) of its right wingtip, but was able to get airborne and return to the airport for an emergency landing. The tanker crew had been directed to use Taxiway Golf, a taxiway which was not usable for night operations, and the controller failed to note that they reported "holding short" of that taxiway, rather than "clear of" the runway at that point. Both a contractor safety liaison employed by the U.S. Air Force and the air traffic control tower personnel failed to note that the KC-135 was not clear of the runway prior to clearing the Tu-154 for takeoff.[45] The crew of the KC-135 evacuated the aircraft without serious injuries.[46]
  • On 3 May 2013, a Fairchild AFB, WA air crew flying a McConnell AFB, KS (USAF) KC-135R, 63-8877, crashed about 8 minutes after taking off from Manas Airbase in Kyrgyzstan, killing three crew members. The aircraft was at cruise altitude about 200 km west of Bishkek when it lost altitude and crashed in a mountainous area near the village of Chorgolu, close to the border between Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. Videotape evidence seems to indicate that the fuselage was in flames as it descended from the clouds overhead, although the tail and some wreckage (left wing, vertical stabilizer, one engine, boom and boom drogue adapter) were not blackened by fire and landed some distance away. This may indicate an inflight explosion or structural failure, possibly related to thunderstorms in the area.[47] Ultimately, the mishap board determined that a rudder system malfunction contributed to development of oscillatory instability, known as "Dutch roll." The aircrew did not adequately diagnose the problem and, by using rudder to maintain course, contributed to structural failure of the aircraft.[48] Although one of the last -135 aircraft built, this airframe was 48 years and 10 months old at the time of its loss.[49][50]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Transit Center at Manas

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Transit Center at Manas was a military transit facility situated at near , , operational from December 2001 to June 2014. It primarily served as an air refueling and mobility hub for coalition forces supporting in , processing over 5.3 million troops and allied personnel while conducting more than 33,000 missions. The center handled passenger embarkation and debarkation, cargo throughput, and aeromedical evacuations, enabling rapid deployment and sustainment in the theater. Originally established as Manas Air Base shortly after the to facilitate the U.S.-led intervention in , the installation underwent multiple bilateral agreements with Kyrgyz authorities amid disputes over rent and usage terms. Renamed the Transit Center in 2010 to emphasize its logistical rather than combat-oriented role, it navigated geopolitical pressures, including Russian influence on Kyrgyz policy and parliamentary votes to terminate operations. The facility contributed significantly to U.S. and logistics but faced challenges from local protests and economic dependencies on base-related contracts. A major involved fuel supply contracts, where congressional investigations uncovered evidence of , including overpricing, falsified documents, and ties between U.S. contractors and Kyrgyz political elites, leading to of tens of millions of dollars. These issues, detailed in reports like "Mystery at Manas," strained U.S.-Kyrgyz relations and highlighted risks in wartime contracting. The center's closure aligned with the U.S. drawdown from , resulting in the of facilities and an end to transit operations without major disruptions to ongoing missions.

Establishment and Early Operations

Initial US-Kyrgyz Agreement (2001)

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States rapidly sought logistical support from Central Asian states to facilitate military operations against the Taliban in Afghanistan under Operation Enduring Freedom. Kyrgyzstan, under President Askar Akayev, approved U.S. access to Manas International Airport near Bishkek, enabling the establishment of a transit facility rather than a permanent base. On December 12, 2001, the Kyrgyz Parliament ratified the agreement permitting the U.S. to utilize the civilian airport for military purposes, with U.S. forces commencing operations on December 16, 2001. The agreement, framed as a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), stipulated temporary use of the airport as the Transit Center at Manas for air refueling, troop rotations, and cargo handling to support coalition efforts in Afghanistan, without authorizing combat operations from the site. Initial annual rent payments from the U.S. to Kyrgyzstan totaled approximately $2 million, supplemented by fuel and service contracts routed through Kyrgyz entities, though these arrangements later drew scrutiny for potential corruption under Akayev's regime. The facility was named in honor of New York Fire Department Chief Peter J. Ganci Jr., killed in the 9/11 attacks, reflecting its origins in the U.S. response to those events. This pact marked Kyrgyzstan's alignment with Western security interests amid post-Soviet regional dynamics, providing the U.S. a critical northern node while granting economic benefits and aid assurances, though it also sowed seeds for future geopolitical tensions with . The deal's emphasis on transit operations underscored its non-aggressive intent, with U.S. personnel peaking at around 1,000 initially to manage for bombers and en route to theater.

Role in Operation Enduring Freedom

![U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker at Manas Air Base][float-right] The Transit Center at Manas, originally designated Manas Air Base, was established in December 2001 as a critical logistical node supporting in . Following a bilateral agreement with , the U.S. initiated operations to provide and transit capabilities, enabling aircraft to stage closer to the theater of operations. This reduced transit times to to about 90 minutes, compared to six to eight hours from distant bases like . The facility hosted KC-135 Stratotankers and KC-10 Extenders, which conducted refueling missions for bombers such as B-52s and B-1s, as well as fighters including F-15s and F-16s en route to combat operations. Between one-third and one-half of all missions supporting originated from Manas, significantly enhancing the sustainment of air campaigns against and targets. Cargo and personnel movements were central to its function, with C-17 Globemaster III and C-5 Galaxy aircraft facilitating the rapid deployment of troops, equipment, and supplies. Thousands of U.S. and coalition service members—, Soldiers, Airmen, and others—transited through the base each month, processing arrivals and departures to maintain operational tempo in . Close air support assets, including fighters, were also deployed from Manas to provide direct tactical support, underscoring the base's multifaceted contributions to the initial phases of the U.S.-led and stabilization efforts. Over its operational lifespan tied to Enduring Freedom, the center processed substantial volumes of cargo and passengers, though precise early-year statistics reflect its foundational role in enabling coalition force projection.

Infrastructure Development and Initial Logistics

Following the U.S.-Kyrgyzstan agreement in December 2001, American military engineers rapidly upgraded the existing runways at and constructed an adjacent encampment to establish operational capabilities for . The site, unofficially designated Peter J. Ganci Air Base after a New York Fire Department chief killed in the , became functional by late December 2001, transforming a dilapidated Soviet-era facility into a viable . Initial infrastructure consisted primarily of a accommodating up to 2,000 personnel, including air-conditioned tents, a small power plant for electricity, a , dining facilities, a , , fitness center, and recreation areas, with security enhanced by watchtowers. Early logistics operations centered on and troop movements, positioning Manas as a critical northern hub for coalition forces deploying to . KC-135 Stratotanker aircraft provided in-flight refueling support for bombers and fighters transiting from U.S. bases, enabling extended-range strikes without intermediate stops closer to the theater. Passenger and cargo airlift handled initial surges of personnel—facilitating onward movement to forward operating bases—while supply chains managed , , and prepositioning, with daily throughput building from hundreds to thousands of troops by early 2002. These functions relied on coordinated Expeditionary Wing protocols, including 24-hour air terminal operations for processing arrivals and departures, underscoring Manas's role in sustaining rapid deployment amid limited regional alternatives. ![KC-135 Stratotanker on flightline at Manas][float-right] The setup emphasized expeditionary efficiency, with modular facilities allowing scalability as mission demands grew, though early challenges included harsh winter conditions and integration with Kyrgyz . By mid-2002, refueling operations had supported thousands of sorties, and throughput exceeded initial projections, validating the investments despite geopolitical sensitivities.

Political and Geopolitical Context

Influence of the Tulip Revolution (2005)

The of March 2005, which forced President to flee on March 24 amid widespread protests against and , resulted in assuming acting presidential powers. The upheaval did not immediately disrupt U.S. operations at the Transit Center at Manas, established under Akayev's 2001 agreement; the base's role in supporting coalition logistics for persisted uninterrupted, with Kyrgyz officials under the interim government affirming its contributions to national stability and budget revenues exceeding $40 million annually at the time. Bakiyev's administration, however, quickly moved to reassess the basing terms, framing the original deal as tainted by U.S. tolerance of Akayev's to delegitimize it and justify revisions. By autumn , Bakiyev initiated discussions for increased lease payments, influenced by Moscow's urging amid Russia's broader campaign against U.S. military footholds in ; this marked an early pivot toward leveraging the facility for financial and geopolitical gains rather than ideological alignment. The U.S. responded by engaging in preliminary talks, but no formal changes materialized until later years, preserving operational continuity while signaling rising Kyrgyz assertiveness post-revolution.

Renaming and Restructuring Amid Kyrgyz Demands (2009)

In February 2009, Kyrgyz President announced the termination of the U.S.-Kyrgyz agreement allowing operations at Manas Air Base, citing the need for higher compensation and alignment with national interests amid pressure from , which had offered substantial economic aid including a $2.15 billion loan and $450 million in assistance. The Kyrgyz voted to close the facility by early summer, demanding rent increases from $17.4 million annually to over $200 million, alongside restrictions on base activities to reduce perceived military permanence. Negotiations intensified in spring 2009, leading to a reversal on June 23 when the governments signed a new one-year agreement, renewable annually, that preserved U.S. access while addressing Kyrgyz demands through enhanced financial terms and operational changes. The annual rent rose to $60 million, supplemented by U.S. payments of $117 million for base-related services like and utilities, plus broader economic aid packages exceeding $300 million in grants and loans for and counternarcotics efforts. The Kyrgyz parliament ratified the deal on June 25, 2009, enabling continued logistics support for operations. As part of the , the facility was renamed the Transit Center at Manas effective June , shifting emphasis from a combat-oriented to a and refueling hub to assuage domestic and regional concerns over foreign presence. U.S. forces reduced personnel from approximately 1,100 to around 500-600, limited activities to non-combat transit functions such as cargo handling and , and ceded external control to Kyrgyz forces while retaining internal base authority. This reconfiguration aimed to minimize geopolitical friction, particularly with , which viewed the base as encroaching on its sphere of influence, though critics argued the changes were largely cosmetic given the center's ongoing role in supporting missions.

Impact of the 2010 Kyrgyzstan Revolution

The 2010 Kyrgyzstan Revolution, which culminated in the overthrow of President on April 7, 2010, introduced immediate security risks to the Transit Center at Manas, including attempts by protesters to approach and disrupt the facility amid widespread unrest in . Operations at the base were temporarily suspended for U.S. military and contractor air traffic starting April 8, 2010, as Kyrgyz authorities imposed restrictions to manage the chaos following the . Despite these disruptions, U.S. personnel maintained security protocols, and there were no confirmed breaches of the perimeter, though the volatile environment heightened concerns over potential plots. Bakiyev's ouster was partly attributed by him to Russian displeasure over his 2009 decision to reverse a planned closure of the base—initially announced after provided $2 billion in aid—and instead accept increased U.S. lease payments of $60 million annually plus fuel surcharges. The interim government, formed under and initially leaning toward closer ties with , faced internal debates and external pressures to terminate the U.S. presence, yet prioritized economic benefits from the facility's operations supporting logistics in . On April 14, 2010, Otunbayeva publicly affirmed that the base would remain operational, extending the lease beyond its July 2010 expiration to ensure continued revenue and stability. By mid-2010, as ethnic violence erupted in southern in , the base resumed full throughput, handling thousands of troops and tons of cargo monthly without significant long-term interruptions, underscoring its strategic resilience amid political upheaval. The revolution's aftermath thus reinforced the center's role as a pragmatic economic asset for the fragile interim regime, delaying closure pressures until later geopolitical shifts in 2014.

Russian and Regional Pressures on Base Operations

Russia consistently opposed the presence of the U.S.-operated Transit Center at Manas, viewing it as an extension of American military influence in that encroached on its sphere of strategic interests. From the base's establishment in , expressed concerns over a prolonged U.S. footprint near its borders, exerting diplomatic and economic pressure on to limit or terminate operations. This opposition intensified after , when began leveraging its economic and energy supplies to influence Kyrgyz policy, including offers of loans and conditional on reducing U.S. access. In February 2009, under pressure from the , the Kyrgyz Parliament voted to terminate the U.S. agreement, citing the need to align with regional security dynamics dominated by Russian-led organizations like the (CSTO). President Kurmanbek Bakiyev's administration, facing Russian threats of higher energy prices and withheld aid, announced the closure, though it reversed course in June 2009 following U.S. offers of increased lease payments and fuel contracts, prompting Russian dismissal of the site's rebranding as a "transit center" rather than a . This episode highlighted Moscow's use of economic , as Russia had previously extended $2 billion in loans and credits to in exchange for anti-U.S. stances. Following the 2010 revolution, Russian influence persisted through media campaigns amplifying anti-American sentiment and portraying the base as a source of corruption and environmental harm, which Kyrgyz governments used to extract concessions. Elected President in 2011 explicitly assured of the base's closure to secure Russian support, culminating in Kyrgyzstan's June 2013 parliamentary vote to end the by July 2014, after wrote off $500 million in Kyrgyz debt and ratified a 15-year for its own base at Kant. Regional pressures compounded this, with echoing Russian calls for base closures via the since , prioritizing non-interference in Central Asian security affairs. These dynamics reflected broader geopolitical competition, where Russian economic dominance—evident in Kyrgyzstan's reliance on Russian remittances and trade—enabled to prioritize its military basing rights over U.S. operations.

Operational Achievements and Logistics

Support for ISAF and NATO Missions

The Transit Center at Manas functioned as a vital logistics node for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), NATO's multinational mission in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2014, enabling rapid deployment and sustainment of coalition forces through passenger transit, cargo airlift, and aerial refueling. Over its lifespan, the facility processed more than 5.3 million U.S. and allied personnel transiting to and from the theater, supporting the rotation and reinforcement of ISAF troops. This throughput included the majority of NATO forces entering and exiting Afghanistan, with the center's Air Terminal Operations Center coordinating airlift schedules for multinational contingents. Aerial refueling operations, primarily conducted by KC-135 Stratotankers of the 376th Air Expeditionary Wing, extended the operational reach of ISAF combat and transport aircraft, with over 33,000 such missions completed from Manas. By May 2012, a single refueling squadron had logged 25,000 missions in the area, offloading millions of pounds of fuel to sustain strikes, reconnaissance, and logistics flights over Afghanistan. In 2008 alone, the wing executed 3,294 refueling sorties, dispensing approximately 194 million pounds of fuel. Additional support encompassed aeromedical evacuations, airdrops of supplies, and processing for coalition partners, ensuring continuous operational tempo for missions despite regional geopolitical pressures. For instance, in early 2010, personnel at Manas facilitated the movement of about 50,000 U.S., , and partner nation troops into the conflict zone. These capabilities underscored Manas's role as the primary staging base for ISAF logistics until its closure in June 2014.

Throughput Statistics and Refueling Operations

The Transit Center at Manas facilitated the transit of over 5.3 million U.S. and allied troops to and from between 2001 and its closure in 2014. Peak throughput occurred during surge periods, with a record 19,827 coalition personnel processed in the week of March 19–25, 2012. By 2014, monthly volumes had stabilized at approximately 15,000 personnel and 500 tons of . Earlier operations in 2009 saw similar monthly figures of around 15,000 U.S. troops and substantial handling, underscoring the center's role as a primary node for . Refueling operations at Manas supported over 33,000 missions, enabling for transient bound for . The facility hosted KC-135 Stratotankers and other platforms from , which staged to extend the range of fighters, bombers, and transports. Daily fuel issuance records, such as over 44,000 gallons pumped by a single in 2008, highlighted the intensity of ground refueling for both departing and arriving . These efforts contributed to broader logistics, where U.S. tankers offloaded billions of pounds of fuel across theaters, with Manas as a pivotal forward hub.

Personnel Management and Security Protocols

The 376th Air Expeditionary Wing oversaw personnel management at the Transit Center at Manas, with permanent-party staff drawn from rotating Air Force expeditionary units supporting logistics, airlift, and base operations, alongside high transient throughput of troops en route to or from Afghanistan. Rotations contributed to elevated personnel turnover, facilitating shared facilities that heightened risks for disease transmission but were managed through standard deployment health protocols. Security personnel, including those from the 376th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron, underwent training for threat response, with manning challenges addressed via inter-service augmentation, such as integrating four Army military police from the 304th Military Police Battalion in 2013 to bolster gate security amid rising local incidents. Security protocols emphasized layered , with the 376th Expeditionary Squadron maintaining perimeter patrols, entry control points, and barriers like to counter potential threats ranging from to insurgent activity. working dogs supported detection efforts, while routine inspections at checkpoints enforced access controls. operations with Kyrgyz Ministry of Interior personnel enhanced coordination, including group for main defense. A notable 2006 checkpoint incident underscored protocol enforcement: on , a local fuel truck driver, after failing a routine , threatened a squadron with a inside a tent, prompting two defensive shots to the chest that resulted in the driver's death despite medical intervention; the was placed off-duty pending investigation by U.S. and Kyrgyz authorities to review procedures and . perimeter control extended to the exterior fence and main gate, with protocols adapted to local threats without compromising operational tempo.

Economic Contributions and Local Impacts

Lease Payments and Financial Agreements

The initial lease agreement for U.S. access to facilities at Manas International Airport was signed on December 11, 2001, as a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) enabling coalition operations in Afghanistan, with annual rent payments starting at $2 million. In July 2006, amid Kyrgyz requests for higher compensation, the United States and Kyrgyzstan renegotiated the lease, raising annual payments to $17.4 million through 2011 and pledging an additional $150 million in assistance for fiscal year 2007 to support Kyrgyz development priorities. These terms reflected Kyrgyzstan's leverage from regional geopolitical shifts, including Russian influence, though the rent remained below levels demanded by Kyrgyz officials, who cited ecological impacts and lost commercial revenue. Tensions escalated in early 2009 when Kyrgyzstan's parliament voted on February 19 to revoke the lease, citing insufficient payments and alignment with Russian-backed initiatives like the Collective Security Treaty Organization base at Kant. After negotiations, a revised agreement was finalized on June 23, 2009, renaming the site the Transit Center at Manas while maintaining its logistics role; it stipulated annual rent of $60 million—more than triple the prior amount—paid quarterly to the Kyrgyz government for access, use of facilities, and logistic support, effective in one-year increments renewable up to five years without alteration. The deal also mandated reasonable landing and parking fees for U.S. aircraft based on International Civil Aviation Organization standards, treating the airport as commercial under U.S. policy. Beyond direct rent, the 2009 accord incorporated U.S. investments totaling approximately $36 million for a new aircraft parking ramp and cargo pad at , subject to Kyrgyz approval, alongside separate commitments of $30 million for upgrades, $20 million for , $21 million for counter-narcotics programs, and $10 million for counter-terrorism efforts. These provisions aimed to channel funds locally, requiring U.S. of and services from Kyrgyz firms, which generated substantial indirect through taxes—often exceeding $180 million annually on aviation alone—pushing total annual financial flows to above $200 million in peak years, including lease fees, landing charges, and procurement-related taxes. All payments were contingent on U.S. congressional appropriations and legal compliance. The structure prioritized verifiable economic benefits to while securing U.S. operational continuity until the 2014 handover.

Job Creation and Infrastructure Benefits

The Transit Center at Manas generated approximately 700 jobs for Kyrgyz nationals, primarily in support roles such as logistics, maintenance, and administrative services at the facility and adjacent Manas International Airport. These positions provided direct wage employment in a region with limited industrial opportunities, helping to alleviate local unemployment pressures exacerbated by Kyrgyzstan's post-Soviet economic transitions and reliance on remittances. The employment footprint stemmed from U.S.-Kyrgyz agreements mandating local hiring quotas for base operations, which sustained household incomes and stimulated secondary economic activity through worker spending in nearby communities. Beyond direct jobs, the center's operations drove enhancements via targeted U.S. investments tied to renewals. In 2009, following Kyrgyz demands for renegotiated terms, the U.S. committed approximately $36 million specifically for upgrades to facilities, including runways, lighting, and support systems shared with civilian operations. These improvements extended the airport's capacity for both transits and commercial flights, yielding long-term benefits for Kyrgyzstan's sector despite the center's 2014 closure. Additionally, the U.S. funded 37 projects totaling over $4.7 million, focusing on constructing and renovating schools, orphanages, and hospitals in the Manas district, which addressed chronic underinvestment in public facilities. Cumulative direct U.S. investments reached at least $318 million over the center's lifespan from 2001 to 2014, encompassing not only employment and works but also ancillary like fuel storage and utilities that indirectly bolstered regional power and water systems. Such outlays, while contractually obligated to mitigate sovereignty concerns, empirically correlated with localized economic multipliers, including increased vendor contracts for Kyrgyz firms supplying goods and services to the base. Post-closure assessments noted these benefits persisted in upgraded throughput but highlighted vulnerabilities, as the loss of jobs and project funding contributed to a measurable dip in local GDP contributions.

Broader Economic Stimulus in Kyrgyzstan

The Transit Center at Manas provided substantial financial inflows to the through escalating lease payments, which rose from $2 million annually in 2001 to $60 million by 2009 following renegotiated agreements. These payments, combined with service contracts and fuel procurement, injected hundreds of millions of dollars into the national over the facility's 13-year operation, with total direct U.S. investments exceeding $318 million. In alone, base-related activities contributed $142 million, including rent and local expenditures, accounting for approximately 3% of Kyrgyzstan's national budget at the time. Such revenues represented the second-largest source of income after , helping to offset fiscal deficits in a resource-dependent with GDP around $6.5 billion that year. Beyond direct fiscal transfers, the center stimulated ancillary sectors through procurement chains and enhancements. U.S.-funded upgrades to , totaling $36 million in , improved civilian aviation capabilities, facilitating increased cargo and passenger traffic that supported trade and remittances—key drivers of national GDP growth from $1.5 billion in 2001 to $7.5 billion by 2014. Additional U.S. assistance packages, such as $150 million allocated in for and , amplified these effects by bolstering connectivity in a landlocked reliant on transit routes. However, the broader multiplier impact remained constrained, as significant portions of funds were reportedly diverted through among political elites, limiting diffusion to wider economic diversification or . The center's operations coincided with Kyrgyzstan's overall , partly attributable to base-induced inflows alongside remittances and booms, though post-2014 closure data indicate the national adapted without , buoyed by alternative foreign investments from and . This suggests the stimulus, while notable for revenue stabilization, did not fundamentally alter structural dependencies on commodities and migration, with annual base contributions peaking at levels equivalent to 2-3% of GDP but yielding uneven long-term national benefits.

Controversies, Incidents, and Criticisms

Fuel Procurement Scandal and Corruption Allegations

The fuel procurement process at the Transit Center at Manas involved contracts awarded by the U.S. Energy (DLA-Energy) primarily to Mina Corporation, a Texas-based firm, for supplying to support operations from 2002 onward. These no-bid contracts, totaling approximately $1.4 billion by 2010, routed fuel through a complex that included intermediary Kyrgyz entities, raising concerns about opacity and potential . Specifically, fuel was often sourced internationally—frequently from —and transshipped via local firms such as Red Star LLC, owned by Maxim Bakiyev, son of Kyrgyz President , and Manas Aerofuels, leading to allegations of inflated markups exceeding $80 million in undue profits funneled to Kyrgyz insiders between 2008 and 2010. Corruption allegations intensified following the April , which ousted President Bakiyev amid widespread discontent over and graft, with Manas fuel deals cited as emblematic of regime enrichment. The interim Kyrgyz government launched probes into fuel suppliers, focusing on Maxim Bakiyev's role; was accused of receiving kickbacks estimated at over $100 million through exclusive local handling rights, despite lacking significant infrastructure, as fuel was trucked short distances for resale at premiums. Kyrgyz authorities issued arrest warrants for Bakiyev family members and seized assets, claiming the deals violated transparency laws and contributed to fueling the uprising. In the United States, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's National Security Subcommittee, chaired by Rep. John Tierney, conducted an eight-month investigation culminating in the December 2010 report Mystery at Manas: Strategic Blind Spots in the Department of Defense's Fuel Contracts in Kyrgyzstan. The report documented DLA-Energy's awareness of the convoluted chain— involving at least five entities per transaction, including Russian suppliers and Kyrgyz pass-throughs—but prioritized operational continuity over anti-corruption measures, as alternative suppliers risked disrupting fuel for Afghanistan-bound missions. It criticized the Pentagon for not enforcing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance rigorously, noting that while no direct U.S. contractor indictments ensued from the fuel probe, the arrangements exposed vulnerabilities to host-nation leverage and perceptions of complicity in local graft. Despite findings, DLA-Energy renewed Mina's contract in November 2010, citing reliability amid limited regional alternatives. The scandal underscored tensions between logistical imperatives and ethical procurement, with Kyrgyz opposition figures arguing that U.S. tolerance enabled Bakiyev's kleptocracy, while U.S. officials maintained that contract prices aligned with global benchmarks and that halting supplies would endanger troops. No conclusive evidence of U.S. official bribery emerged, but the episode eroded public support for the base in Kyrgyzstan, influencing subsequent lease renegotiations and highlighting how opaque subcontracting in high-stakes environments can amplify host-country corruption risks without yielding proportional oversight benefits. Later U.S. probes into related bid-rigging schemes targeted broader DoD fuel networks but did not retroactively alter Manas-specific findings.

Security Incidents Including the 2006 Shooting

On December 6, 2006, a member of the U.S. Air Force's 376th Expeditionary Squadron fatally shot a Kyrgyz at a checkpoint near the entrance to the Transit Center at Manas. The incident took place around 3 p.m. local time during a routine of a truck operated by a local contractor, when the driver accelerated toward the checkpoint in a manner perceived by the as an imminent . Staff Sgt. Zachary Hatfield, the security forces member on duty, fired multiple rounds, killing 42-year-old Alexander , who was employed by a Kyrgyz supply firm. U.S. military officials described the shooting as a defensive response to a potential vehicle-borne , consistent with checkpoint protocols amid heightened vigilance for attacks in the region. Kyrgyz authorities launched an immediate investigation and demanded that the U.S. waive Hatfield's to allow local prosecution, citing concerns and public outrage over the death of a national. The U.S. conducted its own inquiry, which ruled the justified based on the airman's reasonable belief in an active threat, supported by witness statements and vehicle trajectory evidence; Hatfield faced no criminal charges but underwent administrative review. The episode strained bilateral relations temporarily, fueling nationalist protests and media scrutiny in , though operations at the transit center resumed without disruption. Prior to the 2006 shooting, the base faced terrorism-related threats, including a September 2003 plot by three Kyrgyz nationals convicted of planning an attack on Manas facilities, motivated by Islamist extremism and anti-U.S. sentiment. On July 8, 2004, militants launched a direct assault on the base perimeter, which Kyrgyz security forces repelled with no U.S. casualties reported, highlighting vulnerabilities despite robust defenses. No large-scale successful terrorist penetrations occurred during the center's operation, attributable to layered security measures such as armed checkpoints, surveillance, and joint patrols with Kyrgyz forces, though minor breaches like unauthorized local access attempts were periodically addressed through enhanced protocols. In April 2010, amid nationwide ethnic unrest, the base briefly restricted movements and fortified perimeters to prevent spillover violence, but sustained no direct attacks. These incidents underscored the challenges of operating in a geopolitically sensitive area proximate to regional insurgencies, prompting iterative improvements in force protection without compromising logistical throughput.

Sovereignty and Environmental Disputes

The presence of the Transit Center at Manas fueled ongoing debates over Kyrgyz , with nationalist groups and politicians arguing that the facility compromised national independence by allowing extensive U.S. operations on Kyrgyz soil. Protests erupted periodically, such as in June 2007 when demonstrators gathered near demanding the base's closure to restore full and reduce foreign influence. These sentiments intensified amid Russian diplomatic pressure, culminating in February 2009 when then-President announced the termination of the U.S.-Kyrgyz agreement, citing concerns and the need to prioritize relations with regional powers. Although a revised transit agreement was signed in June 2010 following U.S. concessions on rent and fuel procurement, Kyrgyz parliamentarians voted 91-5 on June 20, 2013, to end the pact effective June 11, 2014, under President , who framed the decision as an assertion of against prolonged foreign basing. Environmental disputes centered on allegations of from base operations, including air from emissions and burning, which local activists claimed harmed nearby communities and . In 2012, Kyrgyz protesters, organized by the NGO Asyr Kul, rallied against the center, citing as a key grievance alongside sovereignty issues, though the U.S. Embassy rejected these claims, stating there was no supporting the NGO's assertions of widespread harm. U.S. environmental reports from 2002-2014 documented potential exposures to airborne dust, vehicle emissions, and occasional smoke plumes from refuse burning at the site, but emphasized limited preventive measures and no conclusive links to significant off-base ; local residents in some accounts dismissed fears of or other . These environmental critiques often intertwined with broader anti-base , yet lacked independent verification beyond activist reports, contrasting with the facility's compliance with bilateral environmental protocols in lease agreements.

Diverse Viewpoints: Strategic Necessity vs. Nationalistic Backlash

U.S. military officials and analysts maintained that the Transit Center at Manas was strategically indispensable for Operations Enduring Freedom and Inherent Resolve, serving as a primary northern transit hub for troops, cargo, and aerial refueling en route to Afghanistan, with capacities handling up to 15,000 personnel, multiple aircraft sorties, and 500 tons of cargo monthly during peak operations. Its proximity—just a 90-minute flight to Kabul—enabled rapid force projection and flexibility amid southern supply line vulnerabilities through Pakistan, processing nearly all inbound U.S. and NATO personnel and reducing dependence on adversarial overflight permissions from Russia or Iran. Proponents, including U.S. Air Force commanders, argued this logistical backbone sustained counter-terrorism objectives without establishing a permanent combat footprint, emphasizing its rebranding from air base to transit center in 2009 as evidence of minimal intrusion. In contrast, Kyrgyz nationalists and political leaders framed the facility as a erosion, symbolizing foreign dominance that prioritized U.S. interests over national and exposed the country to geopolitical risks from entanglement in American conflicts. President , fulfilling a 2011 campaign pledge, cited security imperatives and the need for independent , signing legislation in June 2013—ratified by 91-5—to terminate the agreement effective July 2014, amid declining Afghanistan needs but persistent domestic opposition viewing the base as a lingering colonial outpost. Earlier, in February 2009, voted 78-1 to close it under President , influenced by concerns and rumors of opaque operations fueling among nationalists like those in the Ata-Jurt party. Critics argued economic benefits masked unequal power dynamics, advocating repurposing for civilian aviation to assert and align with regional powers like , whose pressure amplified these nationalistic calls by portraying the base as a barrier to Kyrgyz neutrality.

Closure and Transition

Final Negotiations and 2014 Handover

![A U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III departs Manas on March 3, 2014][float-right] In June 2013, the Kyrgyz parliament voted 91-5 to terminate the U.S.-Kyrgyz agreement on the Transit Center at Manas, setting the closure date for July 11, 2014, one year after the vote. President Almazbek Atambayev signed the termination law on June 26, 2013, citing the need to reclaim sovereignty over the facility amid declining utility as U.S. and NATO forces drew down from Afghanistan. The decision reflected Kyrgyzstan's pivot toward stronger alignment with Russia, which had opposed the base's presence since its establishment in 2001. The opted against pursuing a extension, announcing in October 2013 that it would vacate the center by July 2014 to align with the Northern Distribution Network's reduced role in Afghan . Transfer preparations began immediately, involving the repatriation of equipment and infrastructure turnover to Kyrgyz authorities, with transit volumes having already dropped significantly by late 2013 due to the Afghan surge's reversal. No protracted bilateral talks ensued, as both sides acknowledged the base's obsolescence amid the Assistance Force's withdrawal timeline. The formal handover occurred on June 3, 2014, when U.S. Ambassador Pamela Spratlen and Kyrgyz officials exchanged control of the Manas facilities, marking the end of 13 years of American operations. The remaining U.S. personnel, reduced to a skeleton crew, departed within days, with the last formation noted on June 6, 2014. Post-handover, the site reverted to Kyrgyz military and civilian use, with the U.S. having invested over $1 billion in upgrades that were transferred without compensation disputes. This closure underscored the transient nature of post-9/11 basing agreements in , driven by host-nation politics and mission evolution rather than acrimonious fallout.

Immediate Post-Closure Effects on US Logistics

The Transit Center at Manas formally closed on June 3, 2014, with full U.S. operations ceasing by July 10, 2014, after relocation efforts began on October 18, 2013. This hub had facilitated the transit of 5.3 million personnel, 42,000 cargo missions, and 33,500 refueling operations supporting 98% of International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) movements to and from Afghanistan, including offloading over 1 billion liters of fuel. Its shutdown immediately compelled U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) to redirect airlift and passenger processing, increasing reliance on longer routes via the Northern Distribution Network (NDN) and alternative air bases. Passenger and cargo transit shifted primarily to Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base in , established as the key replacement for Manas functions by August 2014, while refueling operations moved to unspecified bases in Southwest Asia. NDN routes, already in use, became more critical for ground and rail shipments but incurred 2-3 times longer transit times compared to prior ground options due to customs delays and trans-loading requirements. These adaptations raised logistics costs through extended flight distances and reduced efficiency, though U.S. officials noted the advanced stage of the Afghanistan drawdown— with troop levels declining from peaks of over 100,000—limited the severity of disruptions. U.S. Central Command assessed that all remaining troops and equipment could still exit by December 2014 using NDN and air routes without Manas, as testified by General William Fraser on February 27, 2014. However, the closure marked a strategic pivot away from Central Asian basing, heightening dependence on European and Middle Eastern facilities like Al Udeid in for sustained air mobility support. Immediate post-closure reports indicated no major operational halts, but the loss of Manas' proximity—90 minutes from —escalated fuel and time expenditures for residual missions.

Legacy and Strategic Analysis

Contributions to US Counter-Terrorism Objectives

The Transit Center at Manas functioned as a pivotal logistics node for -led counter-terrorism operations under , enabling the rapid deployment and sustainment of forces targeting and networks in after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Established in 2001 through a bilateral agreement with , the facility supported , troop rotations, and cargo throughput essential for maintaining operational tempo against terrorist threats. Over its operational lifespan from December 2001 to June 2014, the center processed more than 5.3 million U.S. and coalition personnel transiting to and from Afghanistan, facilitating surges in troop levels that intensified counter-terrorism efforts, including the 2009-2012 buildup exceeding 100,000 U.S. forces. Daily averages reached approximately 1,200 coalition troops, with the base handling up to 90% of U.S. personnel inflows at peak periods, directly underpinning ground operations that degraded terrorist safe havens. In , Manas hosted tankers that completed over 33,000 missions, offloading fuel critical for extending the range and endurance of strike aircraft conducting counter-terrorism sorties over ; this accounted for about one-third of all in-theater tanker fuel deliveries. The center also managed substantial cargo flows, processing roughly 500 tons monthly, including munitions and supplies that sustained combat units engaged in against terrorist elements. By reducing reliance on vulnerable ground routes like the Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement, Manas enhanced logistical resilience, minimizing disruptions from insurgent attacks on supply lines and thereby supporting uninterrupted counter-terrorism momentum. These contributions extended to , , and enablers transiting through the base, bolstering targeting of high-value terrorist leaders and networks. Overall, the facility's role in force projection and sustainment was deemed indispensable by U.S. Central Command for achieving objectives like dismantling al-Qaeda's operational capabilities in .

Long-Term Effects on US-Kyrgyzstan Relations

The closure of the Transit Center at Manas in June 2014 marked the end of the peak period of U.S. military and economic engagement in , contributing to a sustained cooling in bilateral relations as reoriented toward . Annual U.S. lease payments of approximately $60 million ceased, depriving of a significant that had supported local and GDP growth, which expanded from $1.5 billion in 2001 to $7.5 billion by 2014 partly due to base-related activities. This shift aligned with President Almazbek Atambayev's 2011 campaign promise to expel U.S. forces, influenced by Russian incentives including a $500 million debt write-off in 2012, leading to 's accession to the in 2015 and deepened security ties, such as expanded Russian use of the Kant airbase. Public sentiment reflected this divergence, with surveys indicating that by 2015, 53 percent of Kyrgyz respondents viewed the as a , up from 33 percent in 2011, amid perceptions of diminished U.S. reliability following the base's eviction. U.S. military logistics in relocated primarily to facilities in and other regions, eliminating a key pillar of strategic partnership and reducing Washington's leverage against Kyrgyz alignment with and . Kyrgyzstan's multi-vector persisted nominally, but post-closure actions, including alignment with Russian positions on regional security and economic dependence on for remittances from Kyrgyz migrant workers, underscored a pro-Russian tilt. Despite the downturn, the U.S. maintained non-military engagement through annual of around $50 million, directed toward governance, , and education, though with acknowledged limited efficacy in countering authoritarian trends under subsequent leaders like . Initiatives such as a 76 percent increase in U.S. student visas for Kyrgyz citizens in 2022–2023 (totaling 1,245) highlighted residual efforts. However, policies like Kyrgyzstan's April 2024 foreign agents law, which restricts NGOs and echoes Russian legislation, have strained ties further by targeting U.S.-funded programs, signaling entrenched prioritization of ties with and , the latter providing 80 percent of Kyrgyzstan's oil imports and major infrastructure investments. Overall, the Manas closure facilitated Russia's consolidation of influence in , with no comparable U.S. military footprint reestablished, while U.S. post-2021 Afghanistan withdrawal redirected focus to neighbors like and , leaving bilateral relations in a state of subdued, aid-dependent equilibrium rather than robust partnership.

Geopolitical Lessons Regarding Russian Influence

Russia's opposition to the U.S.-operated Transit Center at Manas demonstrated its commitment to preventing permanent Western military footprints in the post-Soviet "near abroad," employing a combination of economic incentives, diplomatic pressure, and regional alliances to sway Kyrgyz decision-making. Throughout the center's tenure from to 2014, viewed the facility—despite its rebranding as a non-combat transit hub—as a potential vector for long-term American influence in [Central Asia](/page/Central Asia), prompting active efforts to secure its closure. In , following Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiev's initial threat to terminate the agreement, extended $2.15 billion in loans, credits, and packages, including $300 million in direct support and $1.7 billion for the , which effectively subsidized the government's pivot away from U.S. basing. This financial leverage was complemented by direct high-level interventions, such as Russian Prime Minister Putin's 2010 query to Kyrgyz counterpart Daniyar Usenov on why the base remained open, underscoring 's expectation of compliance from allies within frameworks like the (CSTO). A key lesson from the Manas episode is the efficacy of Russia's "carrot-and-stick" approach in exploiting the economic vulnerabilities of transit states like Kyrgyzstan, which relied heavily on Russian remittances, energy supplies, and security guarantees amid limited U.S. counteroffers. Kyrgyz governments repeatedly leveraged Russian pressure to extract higher transit fees from the U.S.—rising from $17.6 million annually in 2009 to $60 million by 2012—but ultimately prioritized Moscow's inducements over American logistics needs, culminating in President Almazbek Atambaev's 2013 announcement refusing post-2014 renewal. Russia's simultaneous expansion of its own Kant airbase, with troop increases and operational enhancements by 2013, illustrated a strategy of supplanting U.S. presence with exclusive Russian facilities, reinforcing dominance in the Collective Security Treaty Organization space. This dynamic highlighted how post-Soviet republics, facing domestic nationalism and fiscal constraints, often deferred to the regional hegemon's geopolitical red lines despite short-term U.S. aid, as evidenced by the base's handover on June 3, 2014, coinciding with Putin's consolidation of influence in Bishkek. The case also underscores the limitations of U.S. strategic basing in contested regions when host nations perceive greater long-term risks from antagonizing , including potential energy cutoffs or CSTO withdrawal threats, over benefits from partnerships. While Kyrgyz agency played a —driven by assertions and scandals—the preponderance of evidence points to Russian orchestration as pivotal, with post-closure effects including deepened via the in 2015 and sustained military cooperation at Kant. For Western policymakers, Manas illustrates the need for diversified logistics routes and stronger economic incentives to mitigate great-power rivalry, as Moscow's success here emboldened similar pressures in other spheres, such as opposing expansion or U.S. initiatives in the .

References

  1. https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/manas_transit_center.pdf
  2. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/109467/transit-center-introduces-kyrgyz-military-to-aeromedical-evacuations/
  3. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA501039.pdf
  4. https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/hybrid-threats-us-transit-center-at-manas/84
  5. https://www.amc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/144245/air-terminal-operations-center-gets-troops-to-from-fight
  6. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA535786.pdf
  7. https://www.afcent.af.mil/News/Article/500202/last-liberandos-leave-the-transit-center-at-manas/
  8. https://harriman.columbia.edu/central-asia-military-base-timeline/
  9. https://eurasianet.org/kyrgyzstan-the-five-lessons-of-the-great-american-air-base-debate
  10. https://jamestown.org/program/kyrgyzstans-manas-airbase-a-key-asset-in-the-war-on-terrorism/
  11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02634937.2015.1008796
  12. https://eurasianet.org/manas-airbase-key-to-us-and-nato-operations-in-afghanistan/
  13. https://www.afcent.af.mil/News/Video/?videoid=322654&dvpTag=376th
  14. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/117082/manas-airmen-move-troops-into-afghanistan/
  15. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/509252/manas-transit-center-facilitates-success-afghanistan
  16. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/mission-accomplished-for-us-air-base-in-pro-moscow-kyrgyzstan-idUSBREA251SB/
  17. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/97-690.html
  18. https://factsanddetails.com/central-asia/Kyrgyzstan/sub8_5d/entry-4793.html
  19. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/centralasia/manas.htm
  20. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASPJ/journals/Chronicles/marion.pdf
  21. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/121231/manas-members-continue-to-support-coalition-operations/
  22. https://jamestown.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Jamestown-TulipRevolution.pdf
  23. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/an-american-opportunity-in-kyrgyzstan/
  24. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/pm_0423.pdf
  25. https://jamestown.org/program/moment-of-truth-in-kyrgyzstan-for-u-s-policy/
  26. https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/downloads/db78tc808?disposition=inline&locale=es
  27. https://www.justice.gov/file/267136/dl?inline=
  28. https://fpa.org/kyrgyzstan-uncertain-future-manas-transit-center/
  29. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/world/asia/24base.html
  30. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/11868-analytical-articles-caci-analyst-2009-7-1-art-11868.html?tmpl=component&print=1
  31. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/NEWS-ARTICLES/News-Article-View/Article/883882/kyrgyz-parliament-approves-manas-air-base-agreement/
  32. https://centralasiaprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Policy-Brief-19-December-2014-1.pdf
  33. https://nautilus.org/publications/books/australian-forces-abroad/australian-bases-abroad/manas-air-base/
  34. https://iwpr.net/global-voices/us-base-kyrgyzstan-renamed-remains
  35. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2013-07-10/kyrgyzstan-has-terminated-agreement-us-manas-air-base
  36. https://eurasianet.org/kyrgyzstan-us-air-base-contracts-to-face-scrutiny
  37. https://www.rferl.org/a/kyrgyzstan-manas-base-us-afghanistan/25318711.html
  38. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/4/23/bakiyev-blames-russia-for-overthrow
  39. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna36214883
  40. https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2010/apr/14/us-air-base-stay-says-interim-kyrgyz-lead-20100414/
  41. https://sldinfo.com/2010/05/the-manas-challenge/
  42. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8624723.stm
  43. https://www.rferl.org/a/Moscow_Chills_Relations_With_Kyrgyzstan/1966393.html
  44. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/197603/Russia-angry-at-Kyrgyzstan-dirty-trick
  45. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us-vacates-base-in-central-asia-as-russias-clout-rises-idUSKBN0EE1LG/
  46. https://www.amc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/144968/first-refueling-unit-to-reach-25000-missions-in-single-aor
  47. https://www.wired.com/2009/02/losing-manas-a/
  48. https://eurasianet.org/manas-airbase-key-to-us-and-nato-operations-in-afghanistan
  49. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/111437/transit-center-moves-nearly-20k-people-in-one-week/
  50. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/519910/potential-closure-manas-air-base-wont-disrupt-afghanistan-ops
  51. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/72827/kc-135s-keep-operation-enduring-freedom-mission-moving-kyrgyzstan
  52. https://www.afcent.af.mil/News/Article/221732/manas-air-base-fuels-flight-continues-to-break-records/
  53. https://www.nationalguard.mil/News/Article/586924/oef-anniversary-deployed-tanker-pilots-discuss-supporting-afghanistan-ops/
  54. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/108954/af-army-unite-to-protect-transit-center/
  55. https://www.afcent.af.mil/Units/379th-Air-Expeditionary-Wing/News/Display/Article/221436/security-forces-defenders-keep-manas-airmen-safe/
  56. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Airmen_with_the_376th_Expeditionary_Security_Forces_Squadron_maintain_concertina_wire_at_the_Transit_Center_at_Manas%2C_Kyrgyzstan%2C_Dec._12%2C_2013_131212-F-VU439-269.jpg
  57. https://www.vandenberg.spaceforce.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2000568032/
  58. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/262176/joining-forces-securing-transit-center
  59. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/128786/manas-checkpoint-incident-under-investigation/
  60. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R40564.html
  61. https://thediplomat.com/2024/11/kyrgyzstan-us-relations-10-years-after-the-closure-of-manas-air-base/
  62. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/130490.pdf
  63. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jun/23/kyrgyzstan-us-manas-airbase-open-afghanistan
  64. https://www.rferl.org/a/us-kyrgyzstan-manas-blake/24840757.html
  65. https://eurasianet.org/kyrgyzstan-proposals-for-post-manas-transit-hub-lack-air-under-wings
  66. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/12668-what-options-for-us-influence-in-central-asia-after-manas?.html
  67. https://fpa.org/kyrgyzstans-manas-air-base-the-americans-got-to-keep-their-base-but-who-really-won/
  68. https://www.afcent.af.mil/News/Article/500211/transit-center-at-manas-hosts-transfer-ceremony/
  69. https://www.forbes.com/sites/morganhartley/2013/09/25/the-us-spent-billions-in-kyrgyzstan-but-is-leaving-without-a-trace/
  70. https://www.typeinvestigations.org/investigation/2010/04/21/fueling-afghan-war/
  71. https://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-confirms-it-gave-14-billion-no-bid-fuel-contracts-mysterious-companies-217042
  72. https://eurasianet.org/bishkek-fuel-supply-corruption-probe-focusing-on-maxim-bakiyev
  73. https://www.justsecurity.org/2726/the-juice-worth-squeeze-kyrgyzstan-fuel-contracts/
  74. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/world/asia/05kyrgyz.html
  75. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/national/2010/05/05/kyrgyzstan-probing-firms-that-sold-fuel-supplied-to-us-air-base/b64c0945-09d8-4dd7-bc5d-e62508795759/
  76. https://eurasianet.org/does-the-pentagon-operate-beyond-us-anti-corruption-laws-at-manas
  77. https://jamestown.org/program/dod-renews-contract-on-manas/
  78. https://www.congress.gov/event/111th-congress/house-event/LC5481/text
  79. https://www.dodig.mil/Criminal-Investigations/Article/1794625/more-charges-announced-in-ongoing-investigation-into-bid-rigging-and-fraud-targ/
  80. https://www.flyingsquadron.com/forums/topic/1731-death-at-manas/
  81. https://jamestown.org/program/u-s-air-base-at-manas-at-risk-over-shooting-suspect/
  82. https://www.rferl.org/a/1073254.html
  83. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2006/12/08/2003339582
  84. https://www.rferl.org/a/1073268.html
  85. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/kyrgyzstan-usefulness-manas-shooting-incident
  86. https://fpa.org/kyrgyzstan-tension-at-manas-afb/
  87. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/us-and-russian-bases-in-kyrgyzstan-affected-by-unrest/
  88. https://www.rferl.org/a/1076877.html
  89. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/feb/04/kyrgyzstan-us-base-afghanistan
  90. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/kyrgyz-parliament-votes-to-close-u-s-transit-center-at-manas/
  91. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/3/kyrgyz-protest-us-air-base-environmental-concerns/
  92. https://ph.health.mil/PHC%2520Resource%2520Library/U_KYZ_Manas_POEMS_2002-2014%2520Final.pdf
  93. https://www.stripes.com/news/2013-12-23/looming-closure-of-manas-transit-center-met-with-economic-concern-ambivalence-1843944.html1
  94. https://www.policyarchive.org/download/18965
  95. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2012-03-21/a-new-chapter-relations-between-nato-usa-and-central-asia
  96. https://www.army.mil/article/140098/setting_a_theater_establishing_transit_center_mk
  97. https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/the-manas-base-and-challenges-the-us-presence-kyrgyzstan
  98. https://www.rfi.fr/en/americas/20111101-new-kyrgyzstan-president-tells-us-close-base-2014
  99. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-22988967
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/feb/19/kyrgyzstan-obama-russia-us-airbase
  101. https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/sca/rls/rmks/2010/149426.htm
  102. https://jamestown.org/program/manas-at-the-center-of-kyrgyzstans-complex-foreign-policy/
  103. https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/the-united-states-just-closed-its-last-base-in-central-asia/
  104. https://eurasianet.org/kyrgyz-parliament-sets-date-for-manas-transit-center-closure
  105. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/us-shuts-afghan-transit-base-in-kyrgyzstan-67341
  106. https://www.dover.af.mil/News/Article/762216/dod-begins-the-transfer-of-airbase-in-kyrgyzstan/
  107. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/oct/22/air-forces-manas-operations-ending/
  108. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/04/world/asia/staging-base-for-afghan-war-is-handed-to-kyrgyzstan.html
  109. https://www.rferl.org/a/us-handing-over-key-to-kyrgyz-base/25408141.html
  110. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL33458.html
  111. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2014/0605/Why-closure-of-Kyrgyzstan-air-base-is-point-of-no-return-for-Afghan-war
  112. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/494562/romania-air-base-replaces-transit-center-manas/
  113. https://www.afhistory.af.mil/FAQs/Fact-Sheets/Article/458975/2001-operation-enduring-freedom/
  114. https://www.edwards.af.mil/News/Article/485254/the-end-of-an-era-376th-air-expeditionary-wing-inactivation-ceremony/
  115. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2010/oct/24/mission-to-maintain/
  116. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/wanted-new-afghan-supply-routes/
  117. https://www.centcom.mil/Portals/6/Documents/Transcripts/Votel_03-13-18.pdf
  118. https://eurasianet.org/us-military-giving-up-on-kyrgyzstan
  119. https://www.cfr.org/interview/moscow-indicates-it-wont-be-ignored-near-abroad
  120. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/12764-kyrgyzstans-decision-to-renounce-manas-transit-center-favors-russia.html
  121. https://eurasianet.org/russia-to-double-presence-at-kyrgyzstan-air-base
  122. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/18/russia-tightens-control-over-kyrgyzstan
  123. https://rcsp.am/en/entry/8498/kyrgyzstan-and-russia-political-economic-and-security-ties-since-1991/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.