Hubbry Logo
Marca GeronisMarca GeronisMain
Open search
Marca Geronis
Community hub
Marca Geronis
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Marca Geronis
Marca Geronis
Marca Geronis
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The scope of territorial jurisdiction of Gero I (green regions, up to the red line), as held in traditional historiography

The Marca Geronis or March of Gero is a historiographical term, derived from titles and offices of early medieval military commanders and governors of various German frontier jurisdictions in lands of Polabian Slavs. In primary sources, such as the Thietmar's Chronicle, the term was used in relation to count Gero II (d. 1015), whose frontier province (march) was mentioned as the count Gero’s march (Latin: Geronis marcham comitis; German: Mark des Grafen Gero).[1][2] In later historiography, the same term was borrowed and reapplied as a descriptive designation for an earlier frontier jurisdiction of count Gero I (d. 965), a prominent noble from the Duchy of Saxony, who was appointed margrave (Latin: marchio) by king and emperor Otto I (936-973). The nature and scope of his jurisdiction as a margrave is indicated in several sources, such as the 11th century Thietmar's Chronicle, that mentions Gero I as Margrave of the East (Latin: Gero Orientalium marchio; German: Markgraf Gero von der Ostmark).[3][4]

Various sources contain data on frequent and continuous involvement of margrave Gero I in German expansion towards the east, into the lands of Polabian Slavs, and thus in traditional (early modern) historiography he was regarded not only as frontier commander, but also as an effective provincial governor in the subdued Slavic regions, thus applying the term March of Gero for his province too. Newer scholarly analyses have shown that copies of some charters that contain data on early German marches in Slavic regions should be considered as interpolated or even forged, thus leading modern researches to question or reject various traditional views regarding the scope and effective existence of some frontier jurisdictions, as described in older historiography.[5]

Among complexities involved in ascertaining the territoriality of the march over which Gero I ruled is the nature of the margravial title and office in tenth-century Saxony, and Germany in general, since it may have signified territorial governance, or a military command over a frontier region, with additional duties regarding the collecting of tributes from dependent peoples and tribes, as attested by activities of Gero I, but on the other hand may have been just an honorific title for especially powerful counts.

Traditional views

[edit]

According to traditional historiographical views, composed during the early modern period, the march of Gero I was a vast frontier region in the middle of the tenth century.[6] Some historians have assumed that it was created even earlier, for count Thietmar in the 920s and passed consecutively to his two sons, Siegfried and Gero I. In those views, on Gero's death in 965, his vast march was divided into several different marches: the Nordmark, Ostmark, Meissen, Zeitz, and Merseburg.

Because Siegfried's and Gero's comital seat was Merseburg, it has sometimes been called the March of Merseburg. However, there was also a Merseburger march which grew out of it after 965. Because the central diocese in his march was Magdeburg, it was sometimes called the March of Magdeburg. Other historians prefer to call it the Saxon Eastern March or Saxon Ostmark, but these terms are also applied to another march which grew out of it in 965. Because the Marca Geronis was created simultaneously with the March of Billung to the north, it is sometimes said to be the southern half of the Ostmark. Some historians even call it the "March of Meissen."[7] Within the span of one page, James Westfall Thompson refers to it as both the "Sorben Mark" and the "Thuringian March".[8]

Rwferences

[edit]
  1. ^ Trillmich 1957, p. 202, 203.
  2. ^ Warner 2001, p. 211.
  3. ^ Trillmich 1957, p. 48, 49.
  4. ^ Warner 2001, p. 102.
  5. ^ Stieldorf 2026, p. 112-114, 121, 132, 177, 181, 230-245, 252-260, 344, 432-444, 487, 496-498, 505-511, 517, 592.
  6. ^ Thompson, 639.
  7. ^ Jakubowska, 64 n16.
  8. ^ Thompson, 487.

Sources

[edit]
  • Bachrach, David S. (2020). "The Eastern Campaigns of King Henry II of Germany, 1003–17". Journal of Medieval Military History. 18: 1–36.
  • Dvornik, F. "The First Wave of the Drang Nach Osten." Cambridge Historical Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3. (1943), pp 129–145.
  • Howorth, H. H. "The Spread of the Slaves. Part III. The Northern Serbs or Sorabians and the Obodriti." The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 9. (1880), pp 181–232.
  • Jakubowska, Bogna. "Salve Me Ex Ore Leonis." Artibus et Historiae, Vol. 12, No. 23. (1991), pp. 53–65.
  • Lang, Henry Joseph. "The Fall of the Monarchy of Mieszko II, Lambert." Speculum, Vol. 49, No. 4. (Oct., 1974), pp 623–639.
  • Leyser, Karl. "Ottonian Government." The English Historical Review, Vol. 96, No. 381. (Oct., 1981), pp 721–753.
  • Leyser, Karl. "Henry I and the Beginnings of the Saxon Empire." The English Historical Review, Vol. 83, No. 326. (Jan., 1968), pp 1–32.
  • Pech, Edmund (2015). "Milzener, Lusizer und Glomaci-Daleminzer: Kontroversen zur frühen Geschichte der Sorben". Lětopis: Zeitschrift für sorbische Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur: Časopis za rěč, stawizny a kulturu Łužiskich Serbow. 62 (2): 119–132.
  • Reuter, Timothy (2013) [1991]. Germany in the Early Middle Ages c. 800–1056. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Stieldorf, Andrea (2026) [2012]. Marken und Markgrafen: Studien zur Grenzsicherung durch die fränkisch-deutschen Herrscher (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  • Thompson, James Westfall. Feudal Germany, Volume II. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., 1928.
  • Trillmich, Werner, ed. (1957). Thietmar von Merseburg: Chronik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaf.
  • Warner, David A., ed. (2001). Ottonian Germany: The Chronicon of Thietmar of Merseburg. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Marca Geronis

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Marca Geronis, also known as Gero's , was a expansive frontier (super-march) in the eastern borderlands of , established by King I around 937 and governed by until his death in 965. It covered a broad territory in what is now eastern , stretching from the River eastward across areas populated by Slavic groups like the , serving primarily as a military and administrative base for subduing tribal resistance, extracting tribute, and initiating German eastward colonization (). Under 's direction, the march saw relentless campaigns that expanded effective Saxon control, incorporated Slavic lands through conquest and diplomacy, and laid groundwork for ecclesiastical foundations such as the to support Christian missionary efforts amid ongoing border conflicts. Following 's demise without direct heirs to consolidate its scale, Emperor I reorganized the overextended domain in 965–966, partitioning it into more manageable units including the Marches of , Merseburg, , the (Nordmark), and to enhance administrative stability and prevent over-reliance on a single margrave.

Origins and Establishment

Formation in the 920s

The Marca Geronis emerged in the late 920s as part of King Henry I's reorganization of the Saxon eastern frontier following successful campaigns against Polabian Slavic tribes. In 929, Henry subdued the Daleminzi (Glomacze), extracting an annual tribute of 300 talents of silver and 500 cows, while imposing a nine-year truce that enabled the construction of fortified burghs such as Meißen and Strehla to anchor defenses along the and rivers. These measures shifted from sporadic raids to systematic border control, integrating tributary Slavic gaus into Frankish administration without immediate conquest. Circa 930, Henry appointed Thietmar, a Saxon noble with experience, as margrave over the nascent march, encompassing territories from the mountains eastward to the , including pagan Serimunt, Daleminzi, and Nisane gaus. Thietmar's role involved collecting , maintaining fortifications, and leading punitive expeditions, forming a buffer against recurrent Slavic uprisings while facilitating gradual German settlement and Christian influence. This structure consolidated disparate frontier commands under centralized authority, reflecting Henry's emphasis on cavalry-based warfare and burgh networks over levies. The march's formation prioritized pragmatic containment over ideological expansion, as evidenced by Henry's avoidance of full-scale invasion in favor of tribute extraction, which funded further military reforms. Thietmar governed until circa 932, when the territory passed to his son , establishing familial continuity amid ongoing threats from tribes like the Hevelli and Redarii. This early phase set precedents for later margraviate subdivisions, though primary accounts like of Corvey's Saxonicae emphasize tactical victories over formal institutional dates, underscoring the march's evolution through ad hoc responses to Slavic resistance.

Leadership under Thietmar (c. 920–932)

Thietmar (died 1 June 932), count of Merseburg, acted as the military tutor to , imparting advanced knowledge of warfare to the future king, earning description as a man peritissimus in . During his tenure from approximately 920, he governed the nascent Marca Geronis, a Saxon frontier territory formed to counter Slavic threats east of the River. Thietmar's leadership emphasized defensive consolidation and offensive strikes against West Slavic tribes, particularly the . In response to their raids, including the capture of Saxon leader Walsleben, he co-commanded a Saxon with Count Bernard, besieging the fortified Slavic stronghold of Lenzen from late to 4 929. His contingent of armored delivered the decisive blow, shattering the enemy lines and enabling a Saxon victory that extended German control along the and curtailed Obotrite expansion. Following Thietmar's death in 932, the Marca Geronis inherited by his sons and , who continued its administration amid ongoing frontier pressures. His efforts laid foundational military structures for the region's defense, influencing subsequent expansions under his lineage.

Geographical Extent

Core Territories and Borders

The Marca Geronis encompassed the central territories of the Saxon eastern frontier, primarily the regions east of the River and the middle River, including the Hassegau around Merseburg, the Gau Daleminzier near , and the areas of and the later Lusatian lands. These core areas formed the administrative and military base established under Thietmar around 920 and expanded under from 937, focusing on fortified settlements and bishoprics to secure German control against Slavic incursions. Western borders were defined by the River in the southern sectors, separating it from Thuringian territories, and the River northward from roughly to Dannenberg, distinguishing it from the northern Billung March. Eastern limits fluctuated with conquests but centered on the Mulde River valleys and extended toward the Bóbr and rivers in by the 950s, incorporating subdued Slavic gaus like those of the Daleminzi and Lusici. Southern boundaries adjoined the Bohemian March near the , while the northern edge met the Elbe's tributaries, avoiding overlap with Baltic-oriented marches. The march's cohesion relied on Merseburg as the primary seat, with subsidiary strongholds at for southern defense and for southeastern oversight, enabling centralized governance over an estimated – square kilometers of mixed Germanic-Slavic lands by 965. These borders, while militarily enforced rather than formally demarcated, reflected Otto I's strategy of buffer zones, later formalized in the 965 partition into the Marches of Merseburg, , , Nordmark, and .

Slavic Frontier Regions

The Slavic frontier regions of Marca Geronis lay primarily east of the and rivers, forming a contested between Saxon-controlled territories and the settlements of Polabian Slavic tribes, including the in and the Daleminzi near . These areas, initially marked by tribute extraction rather than full incorporation, encompassed gaus such as the Chutizi and Niudizi, where sparse German oversight relied on local Slavic elites and intermittent enforcement to maintain imperial influence. Margrave 's campaigns from the 930s onward pushed the effective frontier eastward toward the Bober River, a of the , subjugating groups like the Glomacze and establishing forward positions that temporarily secured tribute from tribes extending to the Neisse River. This expansion, achieved through raids and alliances, integrated contested Slavic lands into the march's administrative framework, though control remained precarious due to the tribes' decentralized polities and resistance to . Northern extensions of the frontier bordered the Hevelli and other Wendish groups around the Havel River, while southern limits adjoined Bohemian influences, but the core Slavic interactions focused on central Polabian peoples whose pagan strongholds posed ongoing threats to Saxon expansion. Fortifications like those at and Merseburg anchored these regions, facilitating annual campaigns that yielded captives and resources, yet fostering deep resentment among the , as evidenced by later revolts.

Rule of Gero

Appointment and Administrative Reforms (c. 937–939)

In 937, King Otto I appointed , a noble from an influential Saxon family, as tasked with defending the eastern frontier districts against Wendish incursions, particularly along the lower River. This followed the death of the prior Thietmar on 1 June 932, which had left the region fragmented under multiple local counts amid ongoing Slavic pressures. succeeded his brother in overseeing these counties, receiving enfeoffment with the Eastern March to consolidate royal authority in the area. The appointment elevated to the role of royal legate (missus), granting him hierarchical command over subordinate counts and enabling centralized coordination of military levies, collection, and fortifications. This addressed prior inefficiencies in decentralized county-based administration, which had struggled to enforce consistent border security and fiscal demands on Slavic tributaries. By streamlining oversight, aimed to bolster the empire's eastern defenses without diverting core Saxon ducal resources. Gero's early tenure, solidified by 939, formalized these territories into the expansive Marca Geronis, a unified super-march spanning from the to the , incorporating prior Ostmark elements under single margravial rule. His loyalty during the 938 of Thankmar—Otto's half-brother, who resented the favoritism toward Saxon appointees like —further entrenched this structure, as Gero mobilized forces to suppress the uprising and maintain frontier stability.

Military Campaigns and Conquests (939–965)

Gero's military efforts commenced shortly after his elevation to around 939, targeting the Daleminii (Glomacze), a Slavic tribe inhabiting regions east of the River. Employing deception, he summoned approximately thirty tribal chieftains to a supposed and ordered their execution, which precipitated the collapse of Daleminii resistance and enabled the rapid subjugation of their territory through subsequent Saxon forces. This treachery, chronicled in contemporary accounts, marked the inception of systematic expansion, yielding direct control over former Daleminii strongholds and facilitating the erection of burghs for frontier defense. Over the ensuing decades, Gero orchestrated recurrent expeditions against Sorbian and other Polabian Slavic groups, including the Sorbs and Milceni, to enforce tribute and deter incursions. These operations, often coordinated with imperial levies under King Otto I, involved scorched-earth tactics and fortified outposts that incrementally secured the Elbe-Saale line, transforming raiding zones into administered counties by the mid-950s. Gero's forces repelled Slavic counter-raids while exploiting intertribal divisions, though exact battle tallies remain sparse in records; his persistence yielded tribute from subjugated polities, bolstering Saxon resources for further advances. The culminating phase unfolded in 963, when Gero, despite advanced age, mobilized a large host against the Lusatian (Lusici) tribes, overrunning their settlements between the Bober and rivers. This campaign incorporated allied Slavic auxiliaries and inflicted decisive defeats, annexing proper into the Marca Geronis and compelling of to acknowledge Saxon overlordship via tribute payments. Outcomes included the partitioning of conquered lands into gau (districts) under loyal counts, with strategic castles like those at and Calbe anchoring control up to Polish borders. Gero perished in 965 amid ongoing operations, leaving an enlarged march spanning from to the middle , though vulnerabilities later surfaced in the 983 Slavic revolt.

Internal Governance and Society

Relations with Slavic Populations

Gero's administration in the Marca Geronis was characterized by aggressive subjugation of Polabian Slavic tribes, including the Daleminii, Hevelli, and Glomacze, aimed at securing and territorial control along the Elbe-Oder frontier. Following initial Saxon incursions under Henry I in the 920s, Gero intensified campaigns from 939 onward, compelling tribes between the and rivers to submit and pay annual in kind, such as , , and slaves, which funded further fortifications and Saxon settlement. This system replaced sporadic raiding with structured extraction, though enforcement relied on burghs (fortified strongholds) like those at and Calbe to suppress resistance. A pivotal event underscoring the coercive nature of these relations occurred around 940, when avenged the killing of Saxon merchants by inviting approximately 30 Slavic chieftains from the Hevelli (Stodorani) to a feast under pretense of , then massacring them. This treachery, recorded in of Corvey's Saxonicae, provoked widespread revolt among the Hevelli, who briefly expelled Saxon garrisons and withheld tribute, but 's retaliatory forces reconquered their strongholds by 941, reinstalling tributary obligations under threat of annihilation. Similar tactics were employed against other groups, such as the Daleminii, where surviving leaders like Tugumir were installed as puppets after elite decimation, facilitating Saxon oversight. Over time, subjugated transitioned from autonomous tribute-payers to integrated peasants under Saxon counts, with many reduced to on demesnes tied to burghal economies; this assimilation involved land redistribution favoring German settlers while preserving Slavic labor for and . Revolts persisted, notably in 953 when multiple tribes in the march rose amid I's Italian distractions, but Gero's loyalist forces, augmented by baptized Slavic auxiliaries, crushed them, exemplifying a pattern of deterrence through exemplary violence. grew, with supplying manpower for campaigns against distant foes like the Bohemians, yet underlying tensions fueled recurring uprisings, as evidenced by the Hevelli's later in 983 that briefly shattered the march's cohesion post-Gero.

Christianization Efforts and Ecclesiastical Ties

Margrave fostered ecclesiastical ties in Marca Geronis through the foundation of the Abbey of Gernrode circa 936, an early Ottonian monastic establishment dedicated to Saint Cyriacus that emphasized prayer, , and land management to anchor Christian institutions amid frontier expansion. This foundation, later reorganized as a for noble canonesses by 961, received substantial endowments from , including villages and fiscal lands, thereby integrating religious authority into the march's administrative structure and providing spiritual support for Saxon settlers displacing or subduing Slavic populations. Christianization efforts under Gero prioritized military conquest over systematic evangelism, with his campaigns from 939 to 965 subduing Slavic tribes such as the Daleminzi and Glomacze, extracting tribute, and nominally incorporating pagan territories into the Christian orbit of existing sees like Halberstadt and Zeitz. While Widukind of Corvey's chronicle records instances of mass baptisms following victories, these were often coercive measures linked to surrender terms, serving political consolidation rather than deep theological conversion; the church's canon against enslaving baptized Christians further motivated pragmatic acceptances of baptism among captives to evade bondage. Gero's treachery, including the 939 massacre of thirty Wendish leaders at a feigned peace banquet, exemplified the blend of brutality and nominal faith imposition, undermining lasting pagan resistance but yielding superficial adherence that unraveled in later revolts. The march's ecclesiastical framework relied on coordination with regional bishops, who administered sacraments to German colonists and oversaw tithes from Slavic tributaries, laying groundwork for intensified missions post-965. Gero's donations to churches, including rebuilding efforts at Merseburg—his familial seat—reinforced this symbiosis, positioning the as a against "heathen" incursions while aligning secular power with episcopal legitimacy under King Otto I.

Division and Successor Entities

Gero's Death and Imperial Response (965)

Margrave Gero died on 20 May 965 without a direct male heir, having expanded the Marca Geronis into a vast frontier territory east of the and rivers. Emperor I, seeking to avoid the risks of entrusting such extensive marcher authority to a single successor amid ongoing Slavic threats and internal Saxon dynamics, promptly divided the march into smaller entities in 965 or early 966. This fragmentation redistributed control among multiple loyal nobles, including the establishment of the Marches of (under Rikdag), , Merseburg, the (Nordmark under Dietrich of Oldenburg-Haldensleben), and (Ostmark), with some accounts enumerating five or six distinct units to facilitate more granular oversight of the eastern borders. The partition reflected Otto's broader strategy of balancing expansion with centralized imperial control, as Gero's unchecked power had previously enabled aggressive conquests but also concentrated influence in one family; no immediate revolts ensued, though the smaller marches required ongoing military reinforcement against Slavic incursions.

Partition into Smaller Marches

Following the death of Margrave on 20 May 965 without male heirs, Emperor I reorganized the vast Marca Geronis by dividing it into smaller administrative units to distribute power among multiple nobles and avert potential challenges to imperial authority. This partition, implemented in early 966, fragmented the unified into five or sometimes six distinct marches, reflecting a strategic shift toward decentralized governance of the Saxon eastern . The resulting entities included the , the , the March of Meissen, the March of Zeitz, the March of Merseburg, and the Mark Lausitz. These marches were allocated to senior figures from Gero's extended kin and other influential Saxon families, ensuring loyalty through targeted rewards while maintaining military oversight against Slavic threats. This division preserved the conquered territories' integration into the Ottonian realm but curtailed the risk of any single replicating Gero's expansive influence, thereby bolstering long-term stability amid ongoing border conflicts.

Legacy and Impact

Contributions to Saxon Expansion

Gero's military campaigns as of the Marca Geronis significantly advanced Saxon territorial expansion eastward, subjugating Wendish tribes such as the and Hevelli during the 950s and 960s under Otto I's oversight. These efforts extended effective Saxon control from the River toward the , incorporating tribute systems that integrated Slavic economies into the Holy Roman Empire's framework and establishing fortified outposts to maintain dominance. By avenging missionary murders and defeating coalitions of around 959–962, Gero secured a vast frontier zone that temporarily unified disparate eastern territories under Saxon administration. The facilitated early efforts, aligning military conquest with ecclesiastical outreach, as supported the establishment of the archdiocese in 968 to missionize conquered Wendish populations. This dual approach of fort-building and created administrative precedents for holding Slavic lands, reducing reliance on annual raids in favor of semi-permanent garrisons and local alliances. 's governance model emphasized ruthless enforcement of alongside selective integration, which stabilized the frontier against immediate revolts and provided resources for further Saxon incursions. Following Gero's death in 965, the division of the Marca Geronis into smaller marches—such as the , , and —preserved and extended his gains, forming the nucleus for sustained German settlement in the from the 12th century onward. These entities withstood the major Slavic uprising of 983 more effectively in their southern segments, enabling gradual and the transformation of tribute-based control into feudal lordships. Gero's legacy thus lay in proving the viability of expansive march systems, which shifted Saxon strategy from episodic warfare to institutionalized expansion, ultimately contributing to the Germanization of regions east of the Elbe-Saale line.

Long-Term Administrative Influence

Following Gero's death on 20 May 965, Emperor I divided the expansive Marca Geronis into five smaller marches—Merseburg, , , Ostmark (), and Nordmark—to facilitate more effective governance over the conquered Slavic territories east of the and rivers. This partition distributed administrative responsibilities among appointed margraves, such as Rikdag in and Dietrich in the Nordmark, preserving the core functions of military defense, tribute collection, and judicial authority while mitigating the risks of a single overlord's potential overreach or rebellion. The restructuring emphasized decentralized yet coordinated frontier management, a model that aligned with the Holy Roman Empire's feudal principles of layered loyalties to local potentates under imperial suzerainty. The successor entities perpetuated Gero's administrative innovations, notably the integration of ecclesiastical structures for long-term stabilization. Bishoprics established under Gero's patronage, such as Merseburg (founded 968), extended imperial influence through land grants and tithes, fostering German settler influx (Ostsiedlung) and Slavic assimilation via feudal tenures and manorial economies. In Meissen, this evolved into a semi-autonomous margraviate under the Ekkehardinger dynasty until 1067, then the Wettins from 1081, whose control over mining revenues and tolls solidified economic administration, culminating in the margraviate's elevation as the nucleus of the Electorate of Saxony by 1356. Similarly, the Nordmark's margraves managed tribute from Polabian Slavs, laying groundwork for the Ascanian margraves of Brandenburg from the 12th century, where Gero's precedent of combined comital and ducal powers influenced persistent border fortifications and colonization charters. This fragmented yet resilient framework influenced broader eastern policy into the 12th century, prioritizing margravial autonomy for expansion while curbing ducal consolidation akin to earlier Carolingian marches. By embedding Saxon , castle networks, and bishopric synergies, the Marca Geronis model enabled sustained Germanization without full provincial autonomy, contrasting with more centralized duchies like ; territories once under formed enduring principalities, including Lusatia's integration into by 1370 and Zeitz's absorption into ecclesiastical domains. The approach's efficacy is evidenced by the region's relative stability post-983 Wend uprising, where revived marches reclaimed losses through iterative conquests rather than wholesale reconfiguration.

References

  1. https://www.academia.edu/40987141/Mihai_Dragnea_The_Saxon_expeditions_against_the_Wends_and_the_foundation_of_Magdeburg_during_Otto_Is_reign_The_Romanian_Journal_for_Baltic_and_Nordic_Studies_11_2_2019_pp_7_34
  2. http://judy-volker.com/Hometowns/Potsdam/People/Rulers1.html
  3. https://phersu-atlas.com/chronology/polity643.html
  4. https://historyofthegermans.com/otto-the-great-936-973/
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/561761
  6. https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/J.VIATOR.5.119572
  7. https://phersu-atlas.com/chronology/nation335.html
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229794007_Saxon_military_revolution_912-973_Myth_and_reality
  9. https://dokumen.pub/download/deeds-of-the-saxons-0813226937-9780813226934.html
  10. https://www.swedenmark.dk/getperson.php?personID=I6000000004128051749&tree=joanmarcussen_dk
  11. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Battle_of_Lenzen
  12. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004331488/BP000010.xml
  13. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/127314001/gero_i-of_merseburg
  14. https://historyofthegermans.com/95-2/
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324472841_Germanization_of_the_Land_Between_the_Elbe-Saale_and_Oder_Rivers_Colonisation_or_assimilation
  16. https://historyofthegermans.com/96-2/
  17. https://kids.kiddle.co/Gero
  18. http://macedonia.kroraina.com/en/fds/fds_5.htm
  19. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/GermanyBrandenburg.htm
  20. https://theodora.com/encyclopedia/g/gero.html
  21. http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SAXONY.htm
  22. https://medievalelbe.uoregon.edu/text/raids
  23. https://wendishresearch.org/2011/11/19/the-sorbs-wends/
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3020564
  25. https://pau.krakow.pl/Antemurale/tomy/Antemurale_XXV_1981.pdf
  26. https://historum.com/t/slavs-slaves.90609/page-3
  27. https://www.academia.edu/83546375/Polabian_Slavs_and_processes_of_political_consolidation
  28. https://www.strassederromanik.de/en/building/collegiate-church-of-st-cyriacus.html
  29. https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/monasticmatrix/monasticon/gernrode
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3155462.pdf
  31. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/bn999c87h
  32. https://historyofthegermans.com/8-2/
  33. https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/The-eastern-policy-of-the-Saxons
  34. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/MEISSEN.htm
  35. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SAXON%20NOBILITY.htm
  36. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SAXONY.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.