Hubbry Logo
Early modern periodEarly modern periodMain
Open search
Early modern period
Community hub
Early modern period
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Early modern period
Early modern period
from Wikipedia

1700 map of the world by Paolo Petrini

The early modern period is a historical period that is defined either as part of or as immediately preceding the modern period, with divisions based primarily on the history of Europe and the broader concept of modernity. There is no exact date that marks the beginning or end of the period and its extent may vary depending on the area of history being studied. In general, the early modern period is considered to have started at the beginning of the 16th century, and is variably considered to have ended at the beginning of the 18th or 19th century[ambiguous] (around 1500 to 1700-1800). In a European context, it is defined as the period following the Middle Ages and preceding the advent of modernity; but the dates of these boundaries are far from universally agreed. In the context of global history, the early modern period is often used even in contexts where there is no equivalent "medieval" period.

Various events and historical transitions have been proposed as the start of the early modern period, including the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the start of the Renaissance, the end of the Crusades, the Reformation in Germany giving rise to Protestantism, and the beginning of the Age of Discovery and with it the onset of the first wave of European colonization. Its end is often marked by the French Revolution, and sometimes also the American Revolution or Napoleon's rise to power,[1][2] with the advent of the second wave modern colonization of New Imperialism.

Historians in recent decades have argued that, from a worldwide standpoint, the most important feature of the early modern period was its spreading globalizing character.[3] New economies and institutions emerged, becoming more sophisticated and globally articulated over the course of the period. The early modern period also included the rise of the dominance of mercantilism as an economic theory. Other notable trends of the period include the development of experimental science, increasingly rapid technological progress, secularized civic politics, accelerated travel due to improvements in mapping and ship design, and the emergence of nation states.

Definition

[edit]

The early modern period is a subdivision of the most recent of the three major periods of European history: antiquity, the Middle Ages and the modern period. The term "early modern" was first proposed by medieval historian Lynn Thorndike in his 1926 work A Short History of Civilization as a broader alternative to the Renaissance. It was first picked up within the field of economic history during the 1940s and 1950s and gradually spread to other historians in the following decades and became widely known among scholars during the 1990s.[4]

Overview

[edit]

At the onset of the early modern period, trends in various regions of the world represented a shift away from medieval modes of organization, politically and economically. Feudalism declined in Europe, and Christendom saw the end of the Crusades and of religious unity in Western Europe under the Roman Catholic Church. The old order was destabilized by the Protestant Reformation, which caused a backlash that expanded the Inquisition and sparked the disastrous European wars of religion, which included the especially bloody Thirty Years' War and ended with the establishment of the modern international system in the Peace of Westphalia. Along with the European colonization of the Americas, this period also contained the Commercial Revolution and the Golden Age of Piracy. The globalization of the period can be seen in the medieval North Italian city-states and maritime republics, particularly Genoa, Venice, and Milan. Russia reached the Pacific coast in 1647 and consolidated its control over the Russian Far East in the 19th century. The Great Divergence took place as Western Europe greatly surpassed China in technology and per capita wealth.[5]

As the Age of Revolution dawned, beginning with revolts in America and France, political changes were then pushed forward in other countries. This was partly as a result of the upheavals of the Napoleonic Wars and their impact on the world of ideas and thought of the time: concepts from nationalism to organizing armies were attracting attention and debate.[6][7][8] The early modern period ended in a time of economic and political change, as a result of mechanization in society, the American Revolution, and the first French Revolution; other factors included the redrawing of the map of Europe by the Final Act of the Congress of Vienna[9] and the peace established by the Second Treaty of Paris, which ended the Napoleonic Wars.[10]

A Japanese depiction of a Portuguese trading carrack. Advances in shipbuilding technology during the Late Middle Ages would pave the way for the global European presence characteristic of the early modern period.

In the Americas, pre-Columbian peoples had built a large and varied civilization, including the Aztec Empire, the Inca civilization, the Maya civilization and its cities, and the Muisca. The European colonization of the Americas began during the early modern period, as did the establishment of European trading hubs in Asia and Africa, which contributed to the spread of Christianity around the world. The rise of sustained contacts between previously isolated parts of the globe, in particular the Columbian Exchange that linked the Old World and the New World, greatly altered the human environment. Notably, the Atlantic slave trade and colonization of Indigenous peoples of the Americas began during this period.[11] The Ottoman Empire conquered Southeastern Europe, and parts of West Asia and North Africa.[12]

In the Islamic world, after the fall of the Timurid Renaissance, powers such as the Ottoman, Suri, Safavid, and Mughal empires grew in strength (three of which are known as gunpowder empires for the military technology that enabled them). Particularly in the Indian subcontinent, Mughal architecture, culture, and art reached their zenith, while the empire itself is believed to have had the world's largest economy, bigger than the entirety of Western Europe and worth 25% of global GDP.[13] By the mid-18th century, India was a major proto-industrializing region.[14]

Various Chinese dynasties controlled the East Asian sphere. In Japan, the Edo period from 1600 to 1868 is also referred to as the early modern period. In Korea, the early modern period is considered to have lasted from the rise of the Joseon dynasty to the enthronement of King Gojong. By the 16th century, Asian economies under the Ming dynasty and Mughal Bengal were stimulated by trade with the Portuguese, the Spanish, and the Dutch, while Japan engaged in the Nanban trade after the arrival of the first European Portuguese during the Azuchi–Momoyama period.

Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia, the Toungoo Empire along with Ayutthaya experienced a golden age and ruled a large extent of Mainland Southeast Asia,[15][16] with the Nguyen and Trinh lords[17] de facto ruling the south and north of present-day Vietnam respectively, whereas the Mataram Sultanate was the dominant power in Maritime Southeast Asia. The early modern period experienced an influx of European traders and missionaries into the region.

Asia and Africa

[edit]

East Asia

[edit]

In early modern times, the major nations of East Asia attempted to pursue a course of isolationism from the outside world but this policy was not always enforced uniformly or successfully. However, by the end of the early modern period, China, Korea and Japan were mostly closed and uninterested in Europeans, even while trading relationships grew in port cities such as Guangzhou and Dejima.

Chinese dynasties

[edit]

Around the beginning of the ethnically Han Ming dynasty (1368–1644), China was leading the world in mathematics as well as science. However, Europe soon caught up to China's scientific and mathematical achievements and surpassed them.[18] Many scholars have speculated about the reason behind China's lag in advancement. A historian named Colin Ronan claims that though there is no one specific answer, there must be a connection between China's urgency for new discoveries being weaker than Europe's and China's inability to capitalize on its early advantages. Ronan believes that China's Confucian bureaucracy and traditions led to China not having a scientific revolution, which led China to have fewer scientists to break the existing orthodoxies, like Galileo Galilei.[19] Despite inventing gunpowder in the 9th century, it was in Europe that the classic handheld firearms, matchlocks, were invented, with evidence of use around the 1480s. China was using the matchlocks by 1540, after the Portuguese brought their matchlocks to Japan in the early 1500s.[20] China during the Ming dynasty established a bureau to maintain its calendar. The bureau was necessary because the calendars were linked to celestial phenomena and that needs regular maintenance because twelve lunar months have 344 or 355 days, so occasional leap months have to be added in order to maintain 365 days per year.[21]

Cishou Temple Pagoda, built in 1576: the Chinese believed that building pagodas on certain sites according to geomantic principles brought about auspicious events; merchant-funding for such projects was needed by the late Ming period.

In the early Ming dynasty, urbanization increased as the population grew and as the division of labor grew more complex. Large urban centers, such as Nanjing and Beijing, also contributed to the growth of private industry. In particular, small-scale industries grew up, often specializing in paper, silk, cotton, and porcelain goods. For the most part, however, relatively small urban centers with markets proliferated around the country. Town markets mainly traded food, with some necessary manufactures such as pins or oil. In the 16th century the Ming dynasty flourished over maritime trade with the Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch Empires. The trade brought in a massive amount of silver, which China at the time needed desperately. Prior to China's global trade, its economy ran on paper money. However, in the 14th century, China's paper money system suffered a crisis, and by the mid-15th century, crashed.[22] The silver imports helped fill the void left by the broken paper money system, which helps explain why the value of silver in China was twice as high as the value of silver in Spain during the end of the 16th century.[23]

China under the later Ming dynasty became isolated, prohibiting the construction of ocean going sea vessels.[24] Despite isolationist policies the Ming economy still suffered from an inflation due to an overabundance of Spanish New World silver entering its economy through new European colonies such as Macau.[25] Ming China was further strained by victorious but costly wars to protect Korea from Japanese invasion.[26] The European trade depression of the 1620s also hurt the Chinese economy, which sunk to the point where all of China's trading partners cut ties with them: Philip IV restricted shipments of exports from Acapulco, the Japanese cut off all trade with Macau, and the Dutch severed connections between Goa and Macau.[27]

Painting depicting the Qing Chinese celebrating a victory over the Kingdom of Tungning in Taiwan. This work was a collaboration between Chinese and European painters.

The damage to the economy was compounded by the effects on agriculture of the incipient Little Ice Age, natural calamities, crop failure and sudden epidemics. The ensuing breakdown of authority and people's livelihoods allowed rebel leaders, such as Li Zicheng, to challenge Ming authority.

The Ming dynasty fell around 1644 to the ethnically Manchu Qing dynasty, which would be the last dynasty of China. The Qing ruled from 1644 to 1912, with a brief, abortive restoration in 1917. During its reign, the Qing dynasty adopted many of the outward features of Chinese culture in establishing its rule, but did not necessarily "assimilate", instead adopting a more universalist style of governance.[28] The Manchus were formerly known as the Jurchens. When Beijing was captured by Li Zicheng's peasant rebels in 1644, the Chongzhen Emperor, the last Ming emperor, committed suicide. The Manchus then allied with former Ming general Wu Sangui and seized control of Beijing, which became the new capital of the Qing dynasty. The Manchus adopted the Confucian norms of traditional Chinese government in their rule of China proper. Schoppa, the editor of The Columbia Guide to Modern Chinese History argues,

"A date around 1780 as the beginning of modern China is thus closer to what we know today as historical 'reality'. It also allows us to have a better baseline to understand the precipitous decline of the Chinese polity in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries."[29]

Japanese shogunates

[edit]

The Sengoku period that began around 1467 and lasted around a century consisted of several continually "warring states".

Following contact with the Portuguese on Tanegashima Isle in 1543, the Japanese adopted several of the technologies and cultural practices of their visitors, whether in the military area (the arquebus, European-style cuirasses, European ships), religion (Christianity), decorative art, language (integration to Japanese of a Western vocabulary) and culinary: the Portuguese introduced tempura and valuable refined sugar.[30]

The Great Wave off Kanagawa, c. 1830 by Hokusai, an example of art flourishing in the Edo period

Central government was largely reestablished by Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi Hideyoshi during the Azuchi–Momoyama period. Although a start date of 1573 is often given, in more broad terms, the period begins with Oda Nobunaga's entry into Kyoto in 1568, when he led his army to the imperial capital in order to install Ashikaga Yoshiaki as the 15th, and ultimately final, shōgun of the Ashikaga shogunate, and it lasts until the coming to power of Tokugawa Ieyasu after his victory over supporters of the Toyotomi clan at the Battle of Sekigahara in 1600.[31] Tokugawa received the title of shōgun in 1603, establishing the Tokugawa shogunate.

The Edo period from 1600 to 1868 characterized early modern Japan. The Tokugawa shogunate was a feudalist regime of Japan established by Tokugawa Ieyasu and ruled by the shōguns of the Tokugawa clan. The period gets its name from the capital city, Edo, now called Tokyo. The Tokugawa shogunate ruled from Edo Castle from 1603 until 1868, when it was abolished during the Meiji Restoration in the late Edo period (often called the Late Tokugawa shogunate).[32]

Society in the Japanese "Tokugawa period" (Edo society), unlike the shogunates before it, was based on the strict class hierarchy originally established by Toyotomi Hideyoshi. The daimyōs (feudal lords) were at the top, followed by the warrior-caste of samurai, with the farmers, artisans, and traders ranking below. The country was strictly closed to foreigners with few exceptions with the Sakoku policy.[33] Literacy among the Japanese people rose in the two centuries of isolation.[33]

In some parts of the country, particularly smaller regions, daimyōs and samurai were more or less identical, since daimyōs might be trained as samurai, and samurai might act as local lords. Otherwise, the largely inflexible nature of this social stratification system unleashed disruptive forces over time. Taxes on the peasantry were set at fixed amounts which did not account for inflation or other changes in monetary value. As a result, the tax revenues collected by the samurai landowners were worth less and less over time. This often led to numerous confrontations between noble but impoverished samurai and well-to-do peasants. None, however, proved compelling enough to seriously challenge the established order until the arrival of foreign powers.[34]

Korean dynasty

[edit]

In 1392, General Yi Seong-gye established the Joseon dynasty (1392–1910) with a largely bloodless coup. Yi Seong-gye moved the capital of Korea to the location of modern-day Seoul.[35] The dynasty was heavily influenced by Confucianism, which also played a large role to shaping Korea's strong cultural identity.[36][37] King Sejong the Great (1418–1450), one of the only two kings in Korea's history to earn the title of great in their posthumous titles, reclaimed Korean territory to the north and created the Korean alphabet.[38]

During the end of the 16th century, Korea was invaded twice by Japan, first in 1592 and again in 1597. Japan failed both times due to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, Korea's revered naval genius, who led the Korean Navy using advanced metal clad ships called turtle ships. Because the ships were armed with cannons, Admiral Yi's navy was able to demolish the Japanese invading fleets, destroying hundreds of ships in Japan's second invasion.[37] During the 17th century, Korea was invaded again, this time by Manchurians, who would later take over China as the Qing dynasty. In 1637, King Injo was forced to surrender to the Qing forces, and was ordered to send princesses as concubines to the Qing Prince Dorgon.[39]

South Asia

[edit]

Indian empires

[edit]
Map of the Gunpowder Empires, with the Mughal Empire in orange
The Mughal ambassador Khan'Alam in 1618 negotiating with Shah Abbas the Great of Iran

The rise of the Mughal Empire is usually dated from 1526, around the end of the Middle Ages. It was an Islamic Persianate[40] imperial power that ruled most of the area as Hindustan by the late 17th and the early 18th centuries.[41] The empire dominated South Asia,[41] becoming the largest global economy and manufacturing power,[42] with a nominal GDP valued at a quarter of the global economy, superior than the combined GDP of Europe.[13][43] The empire, prior to the death of the last prominent emperor Aurangzeb,[44] was marked by a highly centralized administration connecting its different provinces. All the significant monuments of the Mughals, their most visible legacy, date to this period which was characterized by the expansion of Persian cultural influence in the Indian subcontinent, with brilliant literary, artistic, and architectural results. The Maratha Confederacy, founded in the southwest of present-day India, surpassed the Mughals as the dominant power in India from 1740 and rapidly expanded until the Third Battle of Panipat halted their expansion in 1761.[45]

British and Dutch colonization

[edit]

The development of New Imperialism saw the conquest of nearly all eastern hemisphere territories by colonial powers. The commercial colonization of India commenced in 1757, after the Battle of Plassey, when the Nawab of Bengal surrendered his dominions to the British East India Company,[46][citation not found] in 1765, when the company was granted the diwani, or the right to collect revenue, in Bengal and Bihar,[47][48] or in 1772, when the company established a capital in Calcutta, appointed its first Governor-General, Warren Hastings, and became directly involved in governance.[49]

Robert Clive and Mir Jafar after the Battle of Plassey, 1757, by Francis Hayman

The Maratha Confederacy, following the Anglo-Maratha wars, eventually lost to the British East India Company in 1818 with the Third Anglo-Maratha War. Rule by the Company lasted until 1858, when, after the Indian rebellion of 1857 and following the Government of India Act 1858, the British government assumed the task of directly administering India in the new British Raj.[50] In 1819, Stamford Raffles established Singapore as a key trading post for Britain in its rivalry with the Dutch. However, the rivalry cooled in 1824 when an Anglo-Dutch treaty demarcated their respective interests in Southeast Asia. From the 1850s onwards, the pace of colonization shifted to a significantly higher gear.

Southeast Asia

[edit]

At the start of the modern era, the Spice Route between India and China crossed Majapahit, an archipelagic empire based on the island of Java. It was the last of the major Hindu empires of Maritime Southeast Asia and is considered one of the greatest states in Indonesian history.[51] Its influence extended to Sumatra, the Malay Peninsula, Borneo, and eastern Indonesia, though the effectiveness of this influence remains debated.[52][53] Majapahit struggled to control the rising Sultanate of Malacca, which dominated Muslim Malay settlements in Phuket, Satun, Pattani, and Sumatra. The Portuguese invaded Malacca's capital in 1511, and by 1528, the Sultanate of Johor was established by a Malaccan prince to succeed Malacca.[54] While in Borneo, Brunei began their golden age during the reign of Sultan Bolkiah when he defeated the Kingdom of Tondo in the Tondo War however but was paused when it fought the Spanish in the Castilian War in 1578. It was later restarted again with the reign of Sultan Muhammad Hassan, later in 1660, Brunei's first civil war started and in the aftermath of said war it paused Brunei's golden age once again until the reign of Omar Ali Saifuddien I defeating the Sulu in the Twenty Years' War.

West Asia and North Africa

[edit]

Ottoman Empire

[edit]
Ottoman Empire 1481–1683

During the early modern era, the Ottoman Empire enjoyed an expansion and consolidation of power, leading to a Pax Ottomana.[55][56] This was perhaps the golden age of the empire. The Ottomans expanded southwest into North Africa while battling with the re-emergent Persian Shi'a Safavid Empire to the east.

North Africa

[edit]

In the Ottoman sphere, the Turks seized Egypt in 1517 and established the regencies of Algeria, Tunisia, and Tripolitania (between 1519 and 1551), Morocco remaining an independent Arabized Berber state under the Sharifan dynasty.[57][58]

Safavid Iran

[edit]

The Safavid Empire was a great Shia Persianate empire after the Islamic conquest of Persia and the establishment of Islam, marking an important point in the history of Islam in the east.[59][60] The Safavid dynasty was founded about 1501. From their base in Ardabil, the Safavids established control over all of Persia and reasserted the Iranian identity of the region, thus becoming the first native dynasty since the Sassanids to establish a unified Iranian state. Problematic for the Safavids was the powerful Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans, a Sunni dynasty, fought several campaigns against the Safavids.[61]

What fueled the growth of Safavid economy was its position between the burgeoning civilizations of Europe to its west and Islamic Central Asia to its east and north. The Silk Road, which led from Europe to East Asia, revived in the 16th century. Leaders also supported direct sea trade with Europe, particularly England and The Netherlands, which sought Persian carpet, silk, and textiles. Other exports were horses, goat hair, pearls, and an inedible bitter almond hadam-talka used as a spice in India. The main imports were spice, textiles (woolens from Europe, cotton from Gujarat), metals, coffee, and sugar. Despite their demise in 1722, the Safavids left their mark by establishing and spreading Shi'a Islam in major parts of the Caucasus and West Asia.[62]

Uzbeks and Afghan Pashtuns

[edit]

In the 16th to early 18th centuries, Central Asia was under the rule of Uzbeks, and the far eastern portions were ruled by the local Pashtuns. Between the 15th and 16th centuries, various nomadic tribes arrived from the steppes, including the Kipchaks, Naimans, Kangly, Khongirad, and Manghuds. These groups were led by Muhammad Shaybani, who was the Khan of the Uzbeks.

The lineage of the Afghan Pashtuns stretches back to the Hotaki dynasty.[63] Following Muslim Arab and Turkic conquests, Pashtun ghazis (warriors for the faith) invaded and conquered much of northern India during the Lodhi dynasty and Suri dynasty. Pashtun forces also invaded Persia, and the opposing forces were defeated in the Battle of Gulnabad. The Pashtuns later formed the Durrani Empire.

Sub-Saharan Africa

[edit]

The Songhai Empire took control of the trans-Saharan trade at the beginning of the modern era. It seized Timbuktu in 1468 and Jenne in 1473, building the regime on trade revenues and the cooperation of Muslim merchants. The empire eventually made Islam the official religion, built mosques, and brought Muslim scholars to Gao.[64]

Europe

[edit]

Many major events caused Europe to change around the start of the 16th century, starting with the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, the fall of Muslim Spain and the discovery of the Americas in 1492, and Martin Luther's Protestant Reformation in 1517. In England the modern period is often dated to the start of the Tudor period with the victory of Henry VII over Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485.[65][66] Early modern European history is usually seen to span from the start of the 15th century, through the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries, until the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century.

The early modern period is taken to end with the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, and the Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire at the Congress of Vienna. At the end of the early modern period, the British and Russian empires had emerged as world powers from the multipolar contest of colonial empires, while the three great Asian empires of the early modern period, Ottoman Turkey, Mughal India and Qing China, all entered a period of stagnation or decline.

Gunpowder and firearms

[edit]

When gunpowder was introduced to Europe, it was immediately used almost exclusively in weapons and explosives for warfare. Though it was invented in China, gunpowder arrived in Europe already formulated for military use; European countries took advantage of this and were the first to create the classic firearms.[20] The advances made in gunpowder and firearms was directly tied to the decline in the use of plate armor because of the inability of the armor to protect one from bullets. The musket was able to penetrate all forms of armor available at the time, making armor obsolete, and as a consequence the heavy musket as well. Although there is relatively little to no difference in design between arquebus and musket except in size and strength, it was the term musket which remained in use up into the 1800s.[67]

European kingdoms and movements

[edit]

In the early modern period, the Holy Roman Empire was a union of territories in Central Europe under a Holy Roman Emperor the first of which was Otto I. The last was Francis II, who abdicated and dissolved the Empire in 1806 during the Napoleonic Wars. Despite its name, for much of its history the Empire did not include Rome within its borders.

The Renaissance was a cultural movement that began in the 14th century,[68] beginning in Italy in the Late Middle Ages and later spreading to the rest of Europe. The term is also used more loosely to refer to the historic era, but since the changes of the Renaissance were not uniform across Europe, this is a general use of the term. As a cultural movement, it encompassed a rebellion of learning based on classical sources, the development of linear perspective in painting, and gradual but widespread educational reform.

Notable individuals

[edit]
Gutenberg reviewing a press proof (a colored engraving created probably in the 19th century)

Johannes Gutenberg is credited as the first European to use movable type printing, around 1439, and as the global inventor of the mechanical printing press. Nicolaus Copernicus formulated a comprehensive heliocentric cosmology (1543), which displaced the Earth from the center of the universe.[69] His book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres) began modern astronomy and sparked the Scientific Revolution. Another notable individual was Machiavelli, an Italian political philosopher, considered a founder of modern political science. Machiavelli is most famous for a short political treatise, The Prince, a work of realist political theory. The Swiss Paracelsus (1493–1541) is associated with a medical revolution[70] while the Anglo-Irish Robert Boyle was one of the founders of modern chemistry.[71] In visual arts, notable representatives included the "three giants of the High Renaissance", namely Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael,[72] Albrecht Dürer (often considered the greatest artist of Northern Renaissance),[73] Titian from the Venetian school,[74] Peter Paul Rubens of the Flemish Baroque traditions.[75] Famous composers included Guillaume Du Fay, Heinrich Isaac, Josquin des Prez, Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina, Claudio Monteverdi, Jean-Baptiste Lully.[76][77]

Among the notable royalty of the time was Charles the Bold (1433–1477), the last Valois Duke of Burgundy, known as Charles the Bold (or Rash) to his enemies,[78] His early death was a pivotal moment in European history.[79] Charles has often been regarded as the last representative of the feudal spirit,[80] although in administrative affairs, he introduced remarkable modernizing innovations.[81][82] Upon his death, Charles left an unmarried nineteen-year-old daughter, Mary of Burgundy, as his heir. Her marriage would have enormous implications for the political balance of Europe. Frederick III, Holy Roman Emperor secured the match for his son, the future Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, with the aid of Mary's stepmother, Margaret. In 1477, the territory of the Duchy of Burgundy was annexed by France. In the same year, Mary married Maximilian, Archduke of Austria. A conflict between the Burgundian side (Maximilian brought with himself almost no resources from the Empire[83]) and France ensued, culminating in the Treaty of Senlis (1493) which gave the majority of Burgundian inheritance to the Habsburg (Mary already died in 1482).[84] The rise of the Habsburg dynasty was a prime factor in the spreading of the Renaissance.[85]

In Central Europe, King Matthias Corvinus (1443–1490), a notable nation builder, conqueror (Hungary in his time was the most powerful in Central Europe[86]) and patron, was the first who introduced the Renaissance outside of Italy.[87][88] In military area, he introduced the Black Army, one of the first standing armies in Europe and a remarkably modern force.[89][90]

Some noblemen from the generation that lived during this period have been attributed the moniker "the last knight", with the most notable being the above-mentioned Maximilian I (1459–1519),[91] Chevalier de Bayard (1476–1524),[92] Franz von Sickingen (1481–1523)[93] and Götz von Berlichingen (1480–1562).[94] Maximilian (although Claude Michaud opines that he could claim "last knight" status by virtue of being the last medieval epic poet[95]) was actually a chief modernizing force of the time (whose reform initiatives led to Europe-wide revolutions in the areas of warfare[96][97][98] and communications,[99] among others), who broke the back of the knight class (causing many to become robber barons)[97] and had personal conflicts with the three other men on the matter of the knight's status.[100][101][97]

Christians and Christendom

[edit]
Johann Sebastian Bach – Mass in B minor – Agnus Dei, From 1724

Christianity was challenged at the beginning of the modern period with the fall of Constantinople in 1453 and later by various movements to reform the church (including Lutheran, Zwinglian, and Calvinist), followed by the Counter Reformation.

End of the Crusades and Unity

[edit]

The Hussite Crusades (1419–1434) involved military actions against the followers of Jan Hus in Bohemia, concluding with the Battle of Grotniki. These wars were notable for being among the first European conflicts where hand-held gunpowder weapons, like muskets, played a decisive role. The Taborite faction of Hussite warriors, primarily infantry, decisively defeated larger armies with heavily armored knights, contributing to the infantry revolution. However, the Hussite Crusades were ultimately inconclusive.[102]

Battle of Vienna, 12 September 1683

The final crusade, the Crusade of 1456, was organized to counter the advancing Ottoman Empire and lift the Siege of Belgrade (1456), led by John Hunyadi and Giovanni da Capistrano. The siege culminated in a counterattack that forced Sultan Mehmet II to retreat, with the victory being credited with deciding the fate of Christendom.[103] The noon bell, ordered by Pope Callixtus III, commemorates this victory across the Christian world to this day.

Nearly a century later, the Peace of Augsburg (1555) ended the concept of a united Christian church. The principle of cuius regio, eius religio allowed rulers to determine their state's religion. This framework was solidified by the Treaty of Westphalia (1648), which ended the European Wars of Religion and the notion of a singular Christian hegemony. The treaty also marked the birth of the modern concept of national sovereignty.[104]

Inquisitions and Reformations

[edit]

The Inquisition in the modern era refers to several institutions within the Catholic Church tasked with prosecuting heretics and others who violated canon law. The first significant manifestation was the Spanish Inquisition (1478–1834).[105] The Inquisition prosecuted crimes such as sorcery, blasphemy, Judaizing, witchcraft, and censorship of printed literature. Its jurisdiction was limited to baptized Catholics, while non-Christians were typically tried by secular courts.[105]

Martin Luther hammers his 95 theses to the door, by Ferdinand Pauwels

The Reformation and rise of modernity in the early 16th century brought changes to Christendom. The Augustinian friar Martin Luther in Germany challenged the Church with his Ninety-five Theses, marking the start of the Reformation. Luther's movement, supported by the Electorate of Saxony, developed at the University of Wittenberg, where he became a professor.[106]

Luther's 95 Theses criticized practices like the sale of indulgences and sparked debates, leading to the rise of rival Protestant denominations, such as Lutheranism and the Reformed tradition. In England, the movement became known as the English Reformation, resulting in the formation of Anglicanism.[105]

The Diet of Worms (1521) declared Luther a heretic, but Emperor Charles V was preoccupied with external threats and allowed German princes to decide whether to enforce the Edict of Worms. The religious conflict escalated, leading to the formation of the Schmalkaldic League to defend Protestant interests. This culminated in the Peace of Augsburg (1555), which established the principle of cuius regio, eius religio—allowing rulers to determine the religion of their territories.[107]

Two main Inquisitions remained active in the modern era:

The Counter-Reformation began in 1545 with the Council of Trent in response to the Protestant Reformation. Its goal was to reform internal Church practices while reaffirming the Church's authority as the true Church of Christ.[110]

Tsardom of Russia

[edit]

In development of the Third Rome ideas, the Grand Duke Ivan IV (the "Awesome"[111] or "the Terrible") was officially crowned the first Tsar ("Caesar") of Russia in 1547. The Tsar promulgated a new code of laws (Sudebnik of 1550), established the first Russian feudal representative body (Zemsky Sobor) and introduced local self-management into the rural regions.[112][113] During his long reign, Ivan IV nearly doubled the already large Russian territory by annexing the three Tatar khanates (parts of disintegrated Golden Horde): Kazan and Astrakhan along the Volga River, and Sibirean Khanate in South Western Siberia. Thus by the end of the 16th century Russia was transformed into a multiethnic, multiconfessional and transcontinental state.

Russia experienced territorial growth through the 17th century, which was the age of Cossacks. Cossacks were warriors organized into military communities, resembling pirates and pioneers of the New World. The native land of the Cossacks is defined by a line of Russian/Ruthenian town-fortresses located on the border with the steppe and stretching from the middle Volga to Ryazan and Tula, then breaking abruptly to the south and extending to the Dnieper via Pereyaslavl. This area was settled by a population of free people practicing various trades and crafts.

Mercantile capitalism

[edit]
Trade and the new economy
[edit]

In the Old World, the most desired trading goods were gold, silver, and spices. Western Europeans used the compass, new sailing ship technologies, new maps, and advances in astronomy to seek a viable trade route to Asia for valuable spices that Mediterranean powers could not contest.

Piracy's Golden Age
[edit]

The Golden Age of Piracy is a designation given to one or more outbursts of piracy in the early modern period, spanning from the mid-17th century to the mid-18th century. The buccaneering period covers approximately the late 17th century. This period was characterized by Anglo-French seamen based in Jamaica and Tortuga attacking Spanish colonies and shipping in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.[114] The Pirate Round was a route followed by certain Anglo-American pirates in the early 18th century, involving voyages from Bermuda and the Americas to attack Muslim and East India Company ships in the Indian Ocean and Red Sea.[115] The post-War of the Spanish Succession period saw many unemployed sailors and privateers turning to piracy in the Caribbean, the American eastern seaboard, West Africa, and the Indian Ocean.[116]

European states and politics

[edit]
Europe after the Peace of Westphalia in 1648

The 15th to 18th century period is marked by the first European colonies, the rise of strong centralized governments, and the beginnings of recognizable European nation states that are the direct antecedents of today's states. Although the Renaissance included revolutions in many intellectual pursuits, as well as social and political upheaval, it is perhaps best known for European artistic developments and the contributions of such polymaths as Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo, who inspired the term "Renaissance man".[117][118]

The Peace of Westphalia resulted from the first modern diplomatic congress. Until 1806, the regulations became part of the constitutional laws of the Holy Roman Empire. The Treaty of the Pyrenees, signed in 1659, ended the war between France and Spain and is often considered part of the overall accord.

French power
[edit]

Men who featured prominently in the political and military life of France during this period include Mazarin, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Turenne, Vauban. French culture likewise flourished during this era, producing a number of figures of great renown, including Molière, Racine, Boileau, La Fontaine, Lully, Le Brun, Rigaud, Louis Le Vau, Jules Hardouin Mansart, Claude Perrault and Le Nôtre.

Early English revolutions
[edit]

Before the Age of Revolution, the English Civil War was a series of armed conflicts and political machinations between Parliamentarians and Royalists. The first and second civil wars pitted the supporters of King Charles I against the supporters of the Long Parliament, while the third war saw fighting between supporters of King Charles II and supporters of the Rump Parliament. The Civil War ended with the Parliamentary victory at the Battle of Worcester. The monopoly of the Church of England on Christian worship in England ended with the victors consolidating the established Protestant Ascendancy in Ireland. Constitutionally, the wars established the precedent that an English monarch cannot govern without Parliament's consent. The English Restoration, or simply put as the Restoration, began in 1660 when the English, Scottish and Irish monarchies were all restored under Charles II after the Commonwealth of England that followed the English Civil War. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 establishes modern parliamentary democracy in England.

International balance of power
[edit]

The Peace of Utrecht established after a series of individual peace treaties signed in the Dutch city of Utrecht concluded between various European states helped end the War of the Spanish Succession. The representatives who met were Louis XIV of France and Philip V of Spain on the one hand, and representatives of Queen Anne of Great Britain, the Duke of Savoy, and the United Provinces on the other. The treaty enregistered the defeat of French ambitions expressed in the wars of Louis XIV and preserved the European system based on the balance of power.[119] The Treaty of Utrecht marked the change from Dutch to British naval supremacy.

Americas

[edit]
World Colonization of 1492 (Early Modern World), 1550, 1660, 1754 (Age of Enlightenment), 1822 (Industrial revolution), 1885 (European Hegemony), 1914 (World War I era), 1938 (World War II era), 1959 (Cold War era) and 1974, 2008 (Recent history)

The term colonialism is normally used with reference to discontiguous overseas empires rather than contiguous land-based empires, European or otherwise. European colonisation during the 15th to 19th centuries resulted in the spread of Christianity to Sub-Saharan Africa, the Americas, Australia and the Philippines.

Exploration and conquest of the Americas

[edit]

Colonial Latin America

[edit]

Initially, Portuguese settlements (Brazil) in the coastal northeast were of lesser importance in the larger Portuguese overseas empire, where lucrative commerce and small settlements devoted to trade were established in coastal Africa, India and China. With sparse indigenous populations that could not be coerced to work and no known deposits of precious metals, Portugal sought a high-value, low-bulk export product and found it in sugarcane. Black African slave labour from Portugal's West African possessions was imported to do the grueling agricultural work. As the wealth of the Ibero-America increased, some Western European powers (Dutch, French, British, Danish) sought to duplicate the model in areas that the Iberians had not settled in numbers. They seized some Caribbean islands from the Spanish and transferred the model of sugar production on plantations with slave labour and settled in northern areas of North America in what are now the Eastern Seaboard of the United States and Canada.[120]

Colonial North America

[edit]
John Trumbull's Declaration of Independence, showing the Committee of Five in charge of drafting the Declaration in 1776 as it presents its work to the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia

North America outside the zone of Spanish settlement was a contested area in the 17th century. Spain had founded small settlements in Florida and Georgia, but nowhere near the size of those in New Spain or the Caribbean islands. France, The Netherlands, and Great Britain held colonies in North America and the West Indies from the 17th century, 100 years after the Spanish and Portuguese established permanent colonies. The British colonies in North America were founded between 1607 (Virginia) and 1733 (Georgia). The Dutch explored the east coast of North America and began founding settlements in what they called New Netherland (now New York State.). France colonized what is now Eastern Canada, founding Quebec City in 1608. France's loss in the Seven Years' War resulted in the transfer of New France to Great Britain.

The Thirteen Colonies, in lower British North America, rebelled against British rule through 1765–1783, due to various factors such as belief in natural rights, the enforcement of new taxes levied by a Parliament which they could not vote for representatives in, and opposition to monarchy. The British colonies in Canada remained loyal to the crown, and a provisional government formed by the Thirteen Colonies proclaimed their independence on 4 July 1776, and subsequently became the original 13 United States of America. With the 1783 Treaty of Paris ending the American Revolutionary War, Britain recognised the former Thirteen Colonies' independence.[121]

Atlantic World

[edit]
Waldseemüller map with joint sheets, 1507

A key development in early modern history is the creation of the Atlantic World as a category. The term generally encompasses Western Europe, West Africa, and the Americas. It seeks to illustrate both local and regional developments, as well as the connections between these geographical regions through trade, migration, and cultural exchange.[122]

Religion, science, philosophy, and education

[edit]

Protestant Reformation

[edit]

The early modern period was initiated by the Reformation and the collapse of the unity of the medieval Western Church. The theology of Calvinism in particular has been argued as instrumental to the rise of capitalism. Max Weber has written a highly influential book on this called The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Counter-Reformation and Jesuits

[edit]

The Counter-Reformation was a period of Catholic revival in response to the Reformation during the mid-16th to mid-17th centuries. The Counter-Reformation was a comprehensive effort, involving ecclesiastical reforms as well as political and spiritual movements.

Such reforms included the foundation of seminaries for the proper training of priests, the reform of religious life by returning orders to their spiritual foundations, and new spiritual movements focusing on the devotional life and a personal relationship with Christ, including the Spanish mystics and the French school of spirituality. It also involved political activities that included the Roman Inquisition.[123]

New religious orders were a fundamental part of this trend. Orders such as the Capuchins, Ursulines, Theatines, Discalced Carmelites, the Barnabites, and especially the Jesuits strengthened rural parishes, improved popular piety, helped to curb corruption within the church, and set examples that would be a strong impetus for Catholic renewal.[124]

Scientific Revolution

[edit]
Model for the Three Superior Planets and Venus from Georg von Peuerbach, Theoricae novae planetarum

The Great Divergence in scientific discovery, technological innovation, and economic development began in the early modern period as the pace of change in Western countries increased significantly compared to the rest of the world.

During the Scientific Revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries, empiricism and modern science replaced older methods of studying nature, which had relied on ancient texts by writers like Aristotle. By the time of the Revolution, these methods resulted in an accumulation of knowledge that overturned ideas inherited from ancient Greece and Islamic scholars. Major changes during the Scientific Revolution and the 18th century included:

In the social sciences:

Technology

[edit]

Inventions of the early modern period included the floating dock, lifting tower, newspaper, grenade musket, lightning rod, bifocals, and Franklin stove. Early attempts at building a practical electrical telegraph were hindered because static electricity was the only source available.

Enlightenment and reason

[edit]
"If there is something you know, communicate it. If there is something you don't know, search for it." An engraving from the 1772 edition of the Encyclopédie; Truth (center) is surrounded by light and unveiled by the figures to the right, Philosophy and Reason.

The Age of Enlightenment is also called the Age of Reason because it marked a departure from the medieval tradition of scholasticism, which was rooted in Christian dogma, and from Renaissance philosophy's occultist approaches. Instead, reason became the central source of knowledge, initiating the era of modern philosophy, especially in Western philosophy.[141] This period in Europe was characterized by system-builders—philosophers who established unified theories of epistemology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, and sometimes even politics and the physical sciences.[142]

Early 17th-century philosophy is often referred to as the Age of Rationalism, succeeding Renaissance philosophy and preceding the Enlightenment. Some consider it the earliest part of the Enlightenment, stretching over two centuries. This era includes the works of Isaac Newton (1643–1727), such as Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), and the development of Descartes' famous proposition Cogito, ergo sum (1637).[143] The first major advancements in modern science included Newton's theory of gravity, which, along with the contributions of John Locke, Pierre Bayle, Baruch Spinoza, and others, fueled the Enlightenment.[144]

The 18th century saw the rise of secularization in Europe, notably following the French Revolution. Immanuel Kant classified his predecessors into two philosophical schools: Rationalism and Empiricism.[145] The former was represented by figures such as René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, and Gottfried Leibniz.[146] Roger Williams established the colony of Providence Plantations in New England on the principle of separation of church and state after being exiled by the Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.[147]

French salon culture played a key role in spreading Enlightenment ideas, culminating in the influential Encyclopédie (1751–72), edited by Denis Diderot with contributions from thinkers such as Voltaire and Montesquieu.[148] The Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns stirred debate within the French Academy, elevating contemporary knowledge over classical Greek and Roman wisdom. Enlightenment thought also significantly influenced German philosophy, fostered by Frederick the Great, with Immanuel Kant emerging as a leading figure. These developments also had profound impacts on the Scottish Enlightenment, Russian Enlightenment, Enlightenment in Spain, and Enlightenment in Poland.[149] The Enlightenment flourished until around 1790–1800, after which the emphasis on reason gave way to Romanticism and the growing influence of Counter-Enlightenment movements.[150]

Humanism

[edit]

With the adoption of large-scale printing after 1500, Italian Renaissance Humanism spread northward to France, Germany, Holland and England, where it became associated with the Reformation.

Developing during the Enlightenment era, Renaissance humanism as an intellectual movement spread across Europe. The basic training of the humanist was to speak well and write (typically, in the form of a letter). The term umanista comes from the latter part of the 15th century. The people were associated with the studia humanitatis, a novel curriculum that was competing with the quadrivium and scholastic logic.[151]

In France, pre-eminent Humanist Guillaume Budé (1467–1540) applied the philological methods of Italian Humanism to the study of antique coinage and to legal history, composing a detailed commentary on Justinian's Code. Although a royal absolutist (and not a republican like the early Italian umanisti), Budé was active in civic life, serving as a diplomat for Francis I and helping to found the Collège des Lecteurs Royaux (later the Collège de France). Meanwhile, Marguerite de Navarre, the sister of Francis I, herself a poet, novelist and religious mystic,[152] gathered around her and protected a circle of vernacular poets and writers, including Clément Marot, Pierre de Ronsard and François Rabelais.

Death in the early modern period

[edit]

Mortality rates

[edit]

During the early modern period, thorough and accurate global data on mortality rates is limited for a number of reasons including disparities in medical practices and views on the dead. However, there still remains data from European countries that still holds valuable information on the mortality rates of infants during this era. In his book Life Under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900, Tommy Bengtsson provides adequate information pertaining to the data of infant mortality rates in European countries as well as provide necessary contextual influences on these mortality rates.[153]

European infant mortality rates

[edit]

Infant mortality was a global concern during the early modern period as many newborns would not survive into childhood. Bengsston provides comparative data on infant mortality averages in a variety of European towns, cities, regions and countries starting from the mid-1600s to the 1800s.[153] These statistics are measured for infant deaths within the first month of every 1,000 births in a given area.[153]

For instance, the average infant mortality rate in what is now Germany was 108 infant deaths for every 1,000 births; in Bavaria, there were 140–190 infant deaths reported for every 1,000 births.[153] In France, Beauvaisis reported 140–160 infants dying per every 1,000 babies born.[153] In what is now Italy, Venice averaged 134 infant deaths per 1,000 births.[153] In Geneva, 80–110 infants died per every 1,000 babies born. In Sweden, 70–95 infants died per 1,000 births in Linköping, 48 infants died per 1,000 births in Sundsvall, and 41 infants died per 1,000 births in Vastanfors.[153]

Causes of infant mortality

[edit]

Bengsston writes that climate conditions were the most important factor in determining infant mortality rates: "For the period from birth to the fifth birthday, [climate] is clearly the most important determinant of death".[153] Winters proved to be harsh on families and their newborns, especially if the other seasons of the year were warmer. This seasonal drop in temperature was a lot for an infant's body to adapt to.

For instance, Italy is home to a very warm climate in the summer, and the temperature drops immensely in the winter.[153] This lends context to Bengsston writing that "the [Italian] winter peak was the cruelest: during the first 10 days of life, a newborn was four times more likely to die than in the summer".[153] According to Bengsston, this trend existed amongst cities in different parts of Italy and in various parts of Europe even though cities operated under different economic and agricultural conditions.[153] This leads Bengsston to his conclusion on what may have caused mortality rates in infants to spike during winter: "The strong protective effect of summer for neonatal deaths leads us to suppose that in many cases, these might be due to the insufficient heating systems of the houses or to the exposure of the newborn to cold during the baptism ceremony. This last hypothesis could explain why the effect was so strong in Italy".[153]

Capital punishment

[edit]

During the early modern period, many societies' views on death changed greatly. With the implementation of new torture techniques, and increased public executions, people began to give more value to their life, and their body after death. Along with the views on death, methods of execution also changed. New devices to torture and execute criminals were invented.[154] The number of criminals executed by gibbeting increased,[155] as did the total rate of executions during the early modern period.[155]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The early modern period encompasses the stretch of history from roughly the mid-fifteenth century to the late eighteenth century, a time of accelerated global interconnectedness driven by European maritime , the proliferation of weaponry, and intellectual shifts including the revival of classical learning, the Protestant Reformation's challenge to ecclesiastical authority, the Scientific Revolution's empirical methodologies, and the Enlightenment's emphasis on reason and individual rights. This era witnessed the rise of powerful centralized states in , the expansion of transoceanic empires, and the establishment of in and the Islamic world, fundamentally altering political, economic, and cultural landscapes worldwide. Key achievements included technological innovations like the , which facilitated the rapid spread of ideas and literacy, and navigational advances enabling voyages such as those of in 1492 and from 1519 to 1522, initiating sustained European contact with the and of the globe. Scientific milestones, from Nicolaus Copernicus's heliocentric model in 1543 to Isaac Newton's in 1687, overturned medieval cosmologies and established mechanistic views of nature. Economically, the influx of silver and the growth of joint-stock companies fostered proto-capitalist systems and global trade networks, though these were predicated on exploitative colonial enterprises and the Atlantic slave trade. Defining characteristics also encompassed profound controversies, such as the religious wars sparked by the , including the (1618–1648) that devastated , and inquisitorial persecutions including witch trials that claimed tens of thousands of lives. The period's Eurocentric has been critiqued in modern for underemphasizing contemporaneous developments in non-Western regions, like the Mughal and Ottoman empires' administrative sophistication and cultural patronage, yet it undeniably marks the onset of modernity's causal drivers: intensified competition among states, the of economies, and the of knowledge production.

Definition and Historiography

Temporal Boundaries and Periodization

The early modern period lacks universally agreed-upon temporal boundaries, as periodization reflects historiographical conventions rather than precise caesurae, with dates varying by region, discipline, and interpretive framework. In European historiography, the era is frequently delimited from approximately 1450 to 1789, commencing with the consolidation of and the onset of transoceanic exploration, and concluding with the , which precipitated modern political transformations. This framework emphasizes causal shifts such as the printing press's diffusion after Johannes Gutenberg's innovations circa 1440 and the Ottoman conquest of in , which disrupted Byzantine continuity and spurred Western intellectual migrations. Alternative start dates include 1492, tied to Christopher Columbus's voyage and the completion of the in Spain, marking the initiation of sustained European colonial expansion, or 1500 as a round chronological marker for the Protestant Reformation's prelude under figures like . Endpoints diverge similarly: some scholars extend to 1800 or 1850 to encompass the and early industrialization, arguing these represent culminations of absolutist state-building and mercantilist economics rather than abrupt ruptures. For instance, global histories may anchor the close around 1750, aligning with the Seven Years' War's geopolitical realignments, which presaged imperial competitions leading into the . Periodization debates underscore the Eurocentric origins of the term "early modern," coined in the mid-20th century to bridge medieval and modern eras, but contested for imposing linear progress narratives on non-Western contexts where analogous transformations—such as Ming-Qing transitions in (circa 1644) or Safavid consolidation in Persia (1501)—do not synchronize. Historians like those in the Cambridge World History favor a broader onset to capture pre-Columbian Eurasian connectivities, critiquing narrower bounds for overlooking continuity in Islamic or East Asian state formations. Such variations arise from empirical divergences: European timelines prioritize print culture's proliferation (over 20 million volumes by 1500) and scientific empiricism, whereas global schemas integrate ecological and demographic data, like the 16th-century Little Ice Age's impacts from 1550 onward, which affected period-defining events unevenly across hemispheres. Empirical rigor demands recognizing these as tools, not ontological divides, with source biases—often rooted in 19th-century —favoring dramatic events over gradual causal processes like demographic recoveries post-Black (peaking around 1450).

Key Definitional Debates

The early modern period lacks universally agreed temporal boundaries, with historians debating starting points tied to pivotal European events such as the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the widespread adoption of the printing press around 1450, or Christopher Columbus's voyage in 1492, while some favor a round date of 1500 to align with the onset of sustained transatlantic exploration and the Reformation's initiation in 1517. End dates similarly vary, often pegged to the French Revolution of 1789 as a rupture in absolutist structures, the onset of industrialization around 1800, or the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815, reflecting disputes over whether the period culminates in political upheaval or the preconditions for industrial modernity. These chronologies emphasize European inflection points, yet empirical evidence from archival records and contemporary accounts shows uneven adoption of technologies like gunpowder and print across regions, complicating rigid demarcations. A core definitional contention concerns the period's characterizing traits, with some scholars positing it as a precursor to marked by state centralization, capitalist proto-institutions, and empirical , evidenced by the rise of fiscal-military states extracting revenues via taxation increases—such as England's from £0.8 million in 1600 to £7.7 million by 1688—and navigational advancements enabling by 1522. Critics argue this framework imposes teleological assumptions, overlooking causal contingencies like the Black Death's demographic recovery by the 1500s enabling labor mobility and urban growth, which did not uniformly propel "" elsewhere; for instance, Ottoman fiscal systems stagnated post-1600 despite early adoption, per treasury ledgers. Such debates highlight how risks retrofitting history to Enlightenment narratives of progress, though data on European doubling from 60 million in 1500 to 120 million by 1700 underscores distinct demographic and institutional shifts. The application of "early modern" beyond Europe sparks sharp critiques of Eurocentrism, as the label derives from continent-specific phenomena like the Protestant Reformation's doctrinal fractures after 1517 and the Scientific Revolution's paradigm shifts by Galileo's 1632 Dialogue, which lacked direct parallels in contemporaneous Ming China, where bureaucratic stasis prevailed amid population growth to 150 million by 1600. Proponents of global early modernity invoke shared dynamics, such as the "gunpowder empires" (Ottoman, Safavid, Mughal) fielding armies of 100,000+ by the 1500s via artillery, or Manila galleon trade volumes peaking at 50 tons of silver annually from 1571, linking Eurasian economies. However, causal analysis reveals Europe's edge stemmed from combinatorial innovations—e.g., print amplifying scientific dissemination, with 20 million volumes by 1500—absent in Confucian exam systems prioritizing classical texts, rendering the term's universalization empirically strained and potentially diluting Europe's outlier trajectory in global GDP share rising from 20% in 1500 to 25% by 1800. Academic pushes for de-Eurocentrizing often reflect institutional incentives toward inclusivity, yet primary sources like Jesuit reports on Qing stagnation affirm divergent paths over convergent "modernity."

Historiographical Perspectives and Global Critiques

Traditional historiography of the early modern period, spanning roughly 1450 to 1800, emphasized 's internal transformations, including the , , and , as pivotal shifts toward modernity, often framed through national lenses in 19th-century works by historians like , who prioritized primary sources and political narratives. This approach, rooted in Enlightenment-era periodization, delimited the era by events such as the fall of in 1453 and the in 1789, viewing them as causal markers of cultural revival and state centralization driven by printing technology's dissemination of knowledge—evidenced by over 200 million books printed in by 1600—and overseas exploration's influx of wealth. German scholars, influencing the term "Frühneuzeit," extended boundaries to 1494 (French invasion of Italy) for its role in initiating interstate competition that spurred military and administrative innovations. Twentieth-century historiography shifted toward socioeconomic analyses, with Marxist-influenced scholars like attributing the period's dynamics to transitions from to , evidenced by England's movements displacing 250,000 peasants between 1450 and 1600 and fostering proto-industrial textile production. Post-World War II cultural turns, informed by Fernand Braudel's , incorporated global trade networks but retained Eurocentric foci on institutions like joint-stock companies, which by 1600 enabled the Dutch East India Company's capitalization at 6.4 million guilders for sustained naval projection. Debates persist on periodization's arbitrariness, as markers like the Columbian voyages align with European agency but overlook contemporaneous non-European stabilities, such as the Ming dynasty's 1405-1433 treasure fleets traversing 7,000 miles without establishing lasting colonies due to inward-focused policies prioritizing agrarian stability over expansion. Global critiques, amplified since the 1970s, assail this framework as Eurocentric for privileging Europe's "rise" while marginalizing contemporaneous achievements elsewhere, such as the Ottoman Empire's 16th-century artillery advancements at in 1526, which employed 300 cannons to shatter Hungarian forces, or the Mughal Empire's revenue system under (r. 1556-1605) yielding 100 million rupees annually through precise land surveys. Post-colonial scholars argue such narratives retroactively justify imperialism by attributing divergence to inherent European superiority in institutions or culture, rather than contingent factors like silver inflows—estimated at 180 tons annually from mines post-1545—fueling inflation and investment in while destabilizing Asian economies via the trade. However, empirical reassessments, including quantitative comparisons of per capita GDP, reveal Europe's edge by 1700 (e.g., England's £6.50 vs. China's £6, adjusted for ) stemmed from verifiable causal chains: property rights securing , as in the 1689 limiting monarchical expropriation, contrasted with absolutist reversals in under , who revoked Huguenot privileges in 1685, prompting 200,000 emigrations and tech outflows. These critiques, often emanating from academia's left-leaning orientations, advocate "global history" paradigms like Immanuel Wallerstein's , positing a 16th-century core-periphery structure with exploiting and , yet overlook counter-evidence of bidirectional exchanges, such as Chinese porcelain techniques influencing wares by 1650 or Indian cotton textiles comprising 50% of England's imports in 1700, spurring . Defenses of moderated maintain that while interconnectedness existed—e.g., Ottoman-Venetian trade sustaining Mediterranean commerce—the period's defining innovations in (e.g., 1590s Dutch fluyt ships reducing crew by 60% for efficiency) and empirical enabled 's disproportionate global impact, verifiable in colonial acquisitions totaling 35 million square kilometers by 1800, absent equivalent projections from Ming or Safavid realms. Recent scholarship thus integrates comparative metrics, acknowledging non-European agencies without dissolving periodization, as in analyses of "early modernities" where Tokugawa Japan's 1603 policy preserved stability amid 20% urban literacy rates, rivaling 's, yet forewent oceanic ventures yielding no comparable divergence.

Core European Developments

Renaissance Humanism and Cultural Revival

emerged in 14th-century as a scholarly movement dedicated to recovering and studying and Roman texts, marking a shift from medieval toward direct engagement with classical sources through the principle of ("to the sources"). This approach prioritized the studia humanitatis, a curriculum encompassing , , , moral philosophy, and , aimed at cultivating , ethical reasoning, and civic responsibility among educated elites. Humanists viewed humanity as capable of virtue and achievement independent of divine predestination, fostering an emphasis on individual potential and secular learning while often integrating . By the early , this revival had influenced like , where patronage from families such as the Medici supported manuscript copying and translation efforts, producing over 1,000 new Latin editions of classical works by 1500. Francesco Petrarca (1304–1374), commonly known as Petrarch, is regarded as the foundational figure of humanism for his discovery and promotion of Cicero's letters in 1345, which exemplified introspective personal correspondence over abstract theology, and for his own vernacular poetry in the Canzoniere (completed circa 1374), blending classical form with emotional depth. Later Italian humanists, including Leonardo Bruni (1370–1444) and Lorenzo Valla (1407–1457), advanced philological criticism; Valla's 1440 exposé debunking the Donation of Constantine as a forgery demonstrated humanism's application to historical authenticity, undermining medieval papal claims with linguistic evidence. These efforts extended to education, with humanists reforming curricula in universities like Padua and Florence to prioritize oratory and ethics, training approximately 200 scholars annually by the mid-15th century in rhetorical skills drawn from Quintilian and Demosthenes. The movement spread northward after 1450, facilitated by the printing press invented by around 1440, which produced over 20 million volumes by 1500 and disseminated humanist texts beyond elite circles. In , Desiderius Erasmus (1466–1536) epitomized by editing the Greek in 1516, advocating a return to original to correct errors, and authoring The Praise of Folly (1511), a satirical critique of ecclesiastical abuses that sold thousands of copies across Europe. Figures like in England integrated humanist ideals into governance, as seen in (1516), proposing rational social reforms inspired by Plato's . This diffusion encountered resistance from entrenched scholastic traditions but adapted by emphasizing piety alongside classics, influencing over 100 Northern universities by 1520 to incorporate humanist studies. Humanism's cultural revival catalyzed broader transformations, including artistic naturalism in works by and , who applied anatomical precision from classical models, and literary innovations like Machiavelli's (1532), which analyzed power dynamics through historical pragmatism rather than . Educationally, it promoted lay literacy, with humanist schools training 10–15% of urban males in by 1500, laying groundwork for empirical inquiry and statecraft in the early . While not uniformly secular—many humanists reconciled antiquity with —the movement's focus on verifiable texts over authority challenged dogmatic structures, contributing to intellectual pluralism amid 16th-century religious upheavals.

Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and Religious Conflicts

The initiated a profound within , commencing on October 31, 1517, when , an Augustinian friar and theology professor at the University of Wittenberg, affixed his to the door of All Saints' Church, critiquing the Catholic Church's sale of indulgences as a means to fund in and questioning papal authority over . Luther's theses emphasized justification by faith alone (), rejecting the notion that financial payments could remit temporal punishment for sins, a practice rooted in scholastic theology but widely abused for revenue. This act, intended as an academic disputation, escalated due to the printing press's proliferation of vernacular pamphlets, with Luther's German Bible translation (1522–1534) enabling direct scriptural access for and correlating with higher Protestant conversion rates in printing-dense regions, as evidenced by econometric analyses of pre-Reformation press locations. Parallel reforms emerged in Switzerland, where Huldrych Zwingli advocated and scriptural primacy in from , while systematized Reformed in via his (first edition 1536), stressing predestination and ecclesiastical discipline. In England, Henry VIII's rejection of papal annulment authority led to the 1534 Act of Supremacy, subordinating the Church to the crown and dissolving monasteries for fiscal gain, though doctrinal shifts toward accelerated under (1547–1553). These movements fragmented , with Protestant polities adopting vernacular liturgies and rejecting , fueling theological debates over sacraments and clerical celibacy. The Catholic responded with internal renewal and doctrinal clarification, exemplified by the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), founded by in 1540 to combat heresy through education and missions. The , convened in three sessions from 1545 to 1563, reaffirmed core dogmas including the seven sacraments, justification by faith cooperating with works, and the Bible's authority, while mandating seminaries for priestly training and curbing and to address pre-Reformation abuses. Trent's decrees, implemented via papal bulls like In eminenti (1563), strengthened and inquisitorial mechanisms, though enforcement varied by region. Religious conflicts ensued, exacerbated by princely ambitions and confessional alliances. The 1555 Peace of Augsburg established the principle that territorial rulers could select Catholicism or Lutheranism for their domains (cuius regio, eius religio), excluding Calvinists and Anabaptists, and permitting limited subject emigration (ius emigrandi). Yet tensions persisted, igniting the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547), French Wars of Religion (1562–1598) with events like the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre (1572, ~5,000–30,000 Huguenot deaths), and the Dutch Revolt (1568–1648) against Spanish Habsburg rule. The Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), triggered by Bohemian Protestant defiance of Catholic Emperor Ferdinand II, devolved into a continental struggle involving Sweden, France, and the Empire, resulting in 4.5–8 million deaths from combat, famine, and plague—demographically halving some German principalities. The Peace of Westphalia (1648), negotiated at and , concluded the war by extending Augsburg's formula to , affirming territorial sovereignty over religious uniformity, and weakening imperial authority, thereby laying foundations for modern state systems while entrenching Europe's confessional map. These upheavals, driven by irreconcilable doctrines and power rivalries rather than mere , reshaped alliances, economies, and identities, with Protestant states fostering literacy and commerce amid Catholic reconquests in regions like and .

State Formation, Absolutism, and Political Innovations

The formation of early modern states in Europe entailed the centralization of political authority, as monarchs curtailed feudal lords' autonomy through expanded bureaucracies and fiscal extraction, largely driven by the fiscal-military demands of prolonged conflicts. Warfare compelled rulers to innovate in revenue collection, with tax reforms emerging across the continent by the 16th century to sustain growing administrative apparatuses. This process varied by region: in Spain, the Habsburg monarchy unified disparate kingdoms under Ferdinand and Isabella by 1492, leveraging New World silver inflows to fund imperial ambitions until fiscal overextension in the 17th century. In contrast, England's trajectory diverged toward constitutional limits following the 1688 Glorious Revolution, where parliamentary oversight constrained royal prerogatives. Absolutism represented the apogee of monarchical centralization, positing the king's undivided sovereignty as derived from divine right, unmediated by estates or assemblies. France under Louis XIV (r. 1643–1715) epitomized this model; after the Fronde rebellions (1648–1653), he dismantled noble independence by mandating court attendance at Versailles from 1682, fostering a culture of royal dependence while expanding intendants—royal agents—to enforce edicts in provinces. Louis revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, imposing Catholic uniformity to consolidate internal cohesion, though this prompted Huguenot emigration and economic costs estimated at 10–20% of skilled workforce loss. Similar absolutist experiments occurred in Prussia under Frederick William I (r. 1713–1740), who militarized the Junkers into state service, creating a disciplined bureaucracy that underpinned Hohenzollern expansion. Key political innovations included the establishment of permanent standing armies, replacing feudal levies with professional forces loyal to the crown, financed by direct taxation and debt instruments. By 1700, maintained approximately 400,000 troops in peacetime, a scale necessitating venality of offices and impositions that yielded 100 million livres annually by the 1680s. The (1648) introduced the modern concept of territorial , affirming rulers' exclusive jurisdiction within borders and curtailing imperial or papal interference, thus laying groundwork for balance-of-power diplomacy. These shifts, while enhancing state efficacy, often provoked resistance, as seen in tax revolts like the French va-nu-pieds uprising of 1639, underscoring the causal link between militarization and domestic coercion.

Scientific Revolution and Technological Progress

The , occurring primarily between the mid-16th and late 17th centuries, represented a toward empirical observation, mathematical modeling, and experimentation in , departing from medieval reliance on Aristotelian deduction and ancient texts. This transformation was driven by precise data collection and the rejection of unverified authority, enabling verifiable predictions about natural phenomena. Key catalysts included the recovery and critique of classical knowledge during the , alongside institutional support for observation, though progress was incremental rather than abrupt, building on medieval foundations in and . Astronomical advancements initiated the era with Nicolaus Copernicus's (1543), positing a sun-centered universe that simplified by eliminating epicycles in Ptolemaic models. Tycho Brahe's meticulous naked-eye observations from 1576 to 1601 provided the empirical dataset for Johannes Kepler's derivation of elliptical planetary orbits and equal-area law (1609) and harmonic law (1619). Galileo Galilei's application of the —independently developed in the Netherlands in 1608—revealed Jupiter's satellites, Saturn's rings, and sunspots, offering direct visual corroboration of and challenging geocentric orthodoxy. His Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632) synthesized these findings mathematically, though it provoked ecclesiastical condemnation, resulting in his 1633 trial by the for advocating Copernicanism. In mechanics and mathematics, René Descartes's (1637) advocated doubt and mechanistic explanations, introducing that unified algebra and geometry. William Gilbert's (1600) empirically demonstrated through experiments with lodestones. These converged in Isaac Newton's (1687), which formulated three laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, grounded in inverse-square force derivations from Keplerian data and pendulum experiments. Newton's , independently developed alongside around 1675, provided tools for continuous change analysis, underpinning predictive dynamics. Medical and biological progress paralleled these, with Andreas Vesalius's De humani corporis fabrica (1543) correcting Galenic via dissections, emphasizing direct inspection over textual tradition. William Harvey's De Motu Cordis (1628) established blood circulation through quantitative vivisections and valve observations, overturning ancient humeral theory. Technological innovations facilitated this empirical turn, notably the printing press, perfected by Johannes Gutenberg circa 1450, which by 1500 had produced millions of volumes, accelerating idea dissemination and scholarly debate across Europe. Optical instruments advanced with the compound microscope (circa 1590s) and telescope (1608 patent by Hans Lippershey), enabling subvisible and celestial scrutiny. Precision timekeeping improved via pendulum clocks (Christiaan Huygens, 1656), aiding astronomical timing, while mercantile demands spurred navigational tools like refined astrolabes and backstaffs. The establishment of academies, such as the Accademia del Cimento (1657) in Italy and Royal Society (1660) in England, institutionalized collaborative experimentation, fostering verifiable replication over individual speculation. These developments yielded causal insights into phenomena previously attributed to , promoting a mechanistic that influenced subsequent feats, including early steam pumps by (1698) for mining drainage, though widespread industrialization emerged post-1800. Empirical rigor reduced dogmatic barriers, correlating with long-term via knowledge accumulation, as regions embracing outpaced those restricting it.

Enlightenment Thought and Rationalism

, a philosophical stance dominant in during the , posited that reason, rather than sensory experience, serves as the chief source and test of knowledge. Proponents argued for innate ideas and deductive methods akin to mathematics, contrasting with emerging empiricist views that emphasized observation and induction. (1596–1650), often deemed the father of modern philosophy, initiated this tradition through his method of doubt outlined in (1637), where he established "" as an indubitable foundation and advocated clear, distinct perceptions as criteria for truth. (1632–1677) extended rationalist metaphysics in (1677), employing Euclidean-style demonstrations to argue for a pantheistic wherein God and nature constitute a single substance, with human understanding derived from rational intuition of necessities. (1646–1716) refined these ideas by invoking pre-established harmony among monads and the principle of sufficient reason, asserting that truths of reason are analytically necessary and independent of empirical contingency. This rationalist framework influenced subsequent intellectual currents, yet faced challenges from British empiricists like (1632–1704), who in (1690) contended that the mind begins as a , acquiring all ideas through sensation and reflection. The debate underscored tensions between a priori reasoning and experiential evidence, shaping amid the Scientific Revolution's empirical advances. Enlightenment thought, flourishing primarily in the across , synthesized rationalist confidence in reason with empiricist methodologies, promoting the application of critical inquiry to challenge traditional authorities, including , , and custom. Core tenets included faith in human perfectibility via knowledge dissemination, advocacy for natural rights, , and , often disseminated through salons, academies, and print media enabled by expanded literacy and publishing. (1694–1778), a French exemplar, satirized optimism and intolerance in (1759) while defending against ecclesiastical power, embodying the era's deist leanings that viewed providence through rational lens rather than revelation. In contrast, (1712–1778) critiqued civilization's corrupting influence on natural human goodness, proposing in (1762) a sovereign to reconcile individual freedom with collective authority. Denis Diderot (1713–1784) and Jean le Rond d'Alembert co-edited the Encyclopédie (1751–1772), a 28-volume compendium aggregating scientific, technical, and philosophical knowledge to democratize enlightenment and undermine dogmatic structures, despite censorship efforts by authorities wary of its subversive undertones. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), bridging rationalism and empiricism, articulated in Critique of Pure Reason (1781) that synthetic a priori judgments underpin mathematical and physical sciences, while his essay "What is Enlightenment?" (1784) urged public use of reason amid private constraints. Scottish figures like David Hume (1711–1776) deepened empiricist skepticism toward causation and induction, influencing utilitarian and economic thought, as seen in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations (1776), which rationalized market self-regulation. These ideas, rooted in causal analysis of human faculties and societal mechanisms, fostered secular governance models but also sowed seeds for revolutionary upheavals, as unchecked rational critique eroded deference to inherited hierarchies.

Military and Expansionist Dynamics

Gunpowder Empires and the Military Revolution

The encompassed the in and the , the Safavid Empire in Persia, and the in the , which leveraged technologies for territorial expansion from the late 14th to the 17th centuries. These states integrated firearms, , and centralized military structures to overcome nomadic traditions and rival powers, enabling control over diverse populations and vast lands. The Ottomans, for instance, employed massive bombards in the 1453 siege of , firing stones weighing up to 1,200 pounds to breach Byzantine walls after a 53-day . Similarly, the Safavids under Shah Ismail I (r. 1501–1524) adopted muskets and cannons to defeat Uzbek at battles like in 1510, establishing Shia dominance in . The Mughals, founded by (r. 1526–1530), used and muskets at the in 1526, where 100 cannons and 500 matchlocks routed an army ten times larger, securing northern . In parallel, Europe's Military Revolution from circa 1450 to 1800 transformed warfare through gunpowder's integration, shifting from medieval knightly dominance to disciplined infantry formations and siege-centric campaigns. Key innovations included the trace italienne or bastion fort, a low, angled earthen design originating in 15th-century Italy to deflect cannon fire, as seen in forts like those built by Francesco di Giorgio Martini around 1460, which multiplied construction costs by factors of 10–20 compared to medieval castles. This necessitated larger field armies for sieges, with European forces growing from ad hoc levies of 5,000–10,000 in the early 1500s to standing armies exceeding 100,000 by the late 1600s, exemplified by France's 150,000-man army under Louis XIV in 1690. Tactical shifts emphasized pike-and-shot infantry, drill training for volley fire, and professional standing forces funded by taxation, reducing reliance on feudal obligations and enabling state monopolies on violence. These developments intersected through conflicts, as Ottoman Janissary corps—elite infantry with muskets numbering up to 40,000 by 1600—clashed with Habsburg forces at in , where European trace italienne defenses and coordinated artillery ultimately repelled the siege after two months. Gunpowder's diffusion from via Eurasian trade routes underscored causal links between technological adoption, administrative centralization, and imperial longevity, though inefficiencies in supply and training later hampered these empires against European naval and industrial advances. Empirical evidence from battle outcomes highlights how effective gunpowder use correlated with victory margins, yet sustained innovation required bureaucratic reforms absent in declining phases.

Age of Exploration and Naval Innovations

The Age of Exploration, spanning roughly from the mid-15th to the early 17th century, was propelled by European powers, particularly and , seeking alternative maritime routes to amid disruptions from Ottoman control over land paths. Economic incentives dominated, including access to spices, silks, and precious metals, alongside religious imperatives to propagate and personal ambitions for fame and fortune among explorers and monarchs. initiated systematic efforts under , capturing in 1415 to secure North African trade and establishing navigational schools that advanced cartography and astronomy. Key Portuguese voyages included rounding the in 1488, establishing a sea route to the , followed by Vasco da Gama's arrival in Calicut, , in 1498, which linked directly to Asian markets by sea. , rivaling , sponsored Christopher Columbus's 1492 voyage westward, inadvertently reaching the and initiating transatlantic exchanges, though Columbus believed he had found Asian outposts. Ferdinand 's 1519 expedition, under Spanish auspices, achieved the first circumnavigation, completed in 1522 after his death, confirming Earth's sphericity and the vast Pacific expanse. Naval innovations were pivotal, enabling sustained ocean voyages beyond coastal hugging. The , developed by Portuguese shipwrights in the early , featured a hybrid hull combining square and lateen sails for superior maneuverability and windward capability, displacing about 50 to 300 tons and ideal for reconnaissance. The magnetic compass, refined from Asian origins, and the , adapted for maritime use to measure via celestial bodies, improved and positioning. Larger vessels like the (late ) and () incorporated sternpost rudders, multiple masts, and broadside cannon ports, enhancing cargo capacity up to 1,000 tons and firepower for defense against and rivals. These advancements facilitated Europe's projection of power, with traverse boards tracking daily courses and backstaffs improving solar observations by the 16th century. By enabling reliable transoceanic navigation, they shifted trade dynamics, bypassing intermediaries and fueling colonial ambitions, though high risks persisted, as evidenced by Magellan's fleet losing four of five ships. Northern Europeans, including the Dutch and English, later adopted and refined these technologies, exemplified by the fluyt's efficiency in the 17th century for bulk trade.

European Colonial Ventures and Global Reach

European colonial ventures in the early modern period expanded from initial Iberian explorations to encompass vast trading networks and territorial empires across the Americas, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific. Portugal pioneered direct maritime routes to Asia, with Vasco da Gama's expedition reaching Calicut, India, on May 20, 1498, establishing the first European sea link to the Indian Ocean spice trade and bypassing Ottoman-controlled land routes. This enabled Portugal to secure trading posts, or feitorias, along African coasts such as Elmina Castle founded in 1482, and in Asia including Goa captured in 1510, Hormuz in 1515, and Malacca in 1511, forming the basis of an empire reliant on naval superiority and fortified enclaves rather than large-scale territorial conquest in Asia. By the mid-16th century, Portugal controlled key chokepoints like the Cape of Good Hope route, facilitating the transport of spices, gold, and slaves, though its Asian holdings generated revenues equivalent to about 1-2 million cruzados annually by 1550, underscoring the economic incentives driving expansion. Spain's ventures focused on the Americas following Christopher Columbus's 1492 voyage, which initiated systematic colonization under the (1494) dividing non-European lands between Iberia. Hernán Cortés's conquest of the from 1519 to 1521 reduced a population of approximately 25 million to under 2 million by 1600 due to disease, warfare, and exploitation, yielding vast silver outputs from Potosí mines discovered in 1545, which supplied up to 80% of the world's silver by the late 16th century and fueled global trade via the starting in 1565. Francisco Pizarro's campaign against the (1532-1533) similarly dismantled a realm spanning 2 million square kilometers, integrating it into the by 1542. These conquests established systems extracting labor and tribute, with New Spain's GDP per capita rising through silver exports but at the cost of indigenous demographic collapse estimated at 90% mortality from pathogens. Northern European powers challenged Iberian dominance in the 17th century through chartered companies leveraging joint-stock financing and state-backed monopolies. The Dutch United East India Company (VOC), established March 20, 1602, with initial capital of 6.4 million guilders, captured Portuguese assets like (1641) and Ceylon (1658), dominating trade from the and achieving dividends averaging 18% annually until 1700, while maintaining a fleet of over 150 merchant ships and 40 warships by mid-century. The English East India Company, chartered December 31, 1600, secured a at in 1613 via Mughal Emperor Jahangir's , expanding to by the 1630s and initiating and trades that by 1700 accounted for 10% of Britain's overseas commerce. France's Compagnie des Indes Orientales, founded 1664, and similar ventures extended European reach, interconnecting Atlantic and Pacific economies through involving African slaves—over 12 million transported by 1800—silver flows to , and commodity exchanges that integrated global markets, with Europe's share of world GDP rising from 20% in 1500 to 25% by 1800. These ventures not only disseminated European technologies like and but also provoked local resistances, such as the Dutch-Portuguese wars in (1600-1663), highlighting the militarized nature of commercial expansion.

The Americas and Atlantic Interactions

Discovery, Conquest, and Initial Encounters

, sailing under the Spanish flag, departed from on August 3, 1492, with three ships—the , Pinta, and Santa María—and landed on an island in , which he named [San Salvador](/page/San Salvador), on October 12, 1492. He subsequently explored parts of and , establishing the first European settlement, , on the latter island before returning to in 1493. undertook three additional voyages between 1493 and 1504, mapping more Caribbean islands and coastal areas of Central and , though he never recognized the lands as a separate from . Meanwhile, Portuguese explorer Pedro Álvares Cabral, en route to , deviated westward and sighted the Brazilian coast on April 22, 1500, claiming the territory for after brief interactions with indigenous people, who offered trade goods like feathers and dyes. Initial encounters in the involved the people, whom Columbus described as peaceful and generous, facilitating early barters for and food; however, Spanish demands for soon led to enslavement and violent reprisals, including the abduction of natives and punitive expeditions against resistance. By 1494, Columbus had shipped hundreds of to as slaves, initiating a pattern of exploitation that decimated local populations through overwork and brutality, with estimates indicating the numbers on fell from around 250,000 in 1492 to fewer than 60,000 by 1508 due to combined violence and introduced diseases. These interactions set precedents for European claims justified by papal bulls like (1493), dividing spheres between and , while indigenous groups initially viewed arrivals as potential trading partners or deities but increasingly as threats. The conquest of the Aztec Empire began in 1519 when Hernán Cortés landed near Veracruz with about 500 men, horses, and cannons, then marched inland, forming alliances with Tlaxcalan city-states resentful of Aztec tribute demands, which provided thousands of indigenous warriors against the empire's core. Cortés entered Tenochtitlán in November 1519, seizing Emperor Moctezuma II as a hostage; following Moctezuma's death amid unrest, the Spanish retreated during La Noche Triste on June 30, 1520, losing over half their force before regrouping and besieging the city, which fell on August 13, 1521, after smallpox had already ravaged defenders, killing Moctezuma's successor Cuitláhuac. This victory, leveraging superior steel weapons, gunpowder, and horses alongside indigenous auxiliaries numbering up to 200,000, dismantled the Aztec polity centered on a population of several million, enabling Spanish control over central Mexico. In , Francisco Pizarro's expedition of roughly 180 men and 37 horses reached in 1531, exploiting the between brothers and ; at on November 16, 1532, Pizarro ambushed and captured despite Inca numerical superiority exceeding 80,000, using cavalry charges and firearms to kill thousands with minimal Spanish losses. offered a room filled with gold and two with silver as ransom, fulfilled by 1533, but was executed on July 26, 1533, after which Pizarro advanced on , installing rulers amid ongoing resistance, securing the Inca heartland by 1536 despite a population base of 10-12 million pre-contact. Across the Americas, initial encounters facilitated the rapid spread of Old World diseases like smallpox, measles, and influenza, to which indigenous populations lacked immunity, causing demographic collapses estimated at 90-95% in many regions within the first century post-contact, far exceeding direct violence from conquests. Smallpox epidemics, such as the 1520 outbreak in Mexico that killed 25% of Tenochtitlán's residents including key leaders, and similar waves in Inca territories, disrupted societies before full military subjugation, enabling small European forces to prevail through alliances with disease-weakened rivals and the psychological impact of unfamiliar afflictions interpreted as omens or divine punishment. These biological exchanges, unintended yet causal drivers of conquest outcomes, reshaped power dynamics, with surviving indigenous groups often compelled into labor systems like the encomienda.

Colonial Establishments in Latin America

The conquest of the culminated in 1521 with the fall of , upon which founded as the administrative and symbolic center of Spanish holdings in . This urban refounding preserved elements of the indigenous layout while imposing a grid-based Spanish colonial design, serving as the seat for governance over vast territories extending from central Mexico to the . The Viceroyalty of New Spain was formalized in 1535 under Viceroy , who centralized authority to curb the autonomy of conquistadors and integrate indigenous tribute systems into crown-controlled structures. Regional audiencias, or high courts, were established in by 1528 to enforce royal ordinances, blending judicial oversight with revenue collection from coerced indigenous labor. In , Francisco Pizarro's defeat of the between 1532 and 1533 enabled the foundation of in 1535 as a coastal stronghold, strategically positioned for trans-Pacific trade and administrative control. The followed in 1542, with as its capital, encompassing most Spanish South American territories and relying on audiencias in Lima and Charcas for local administration. The system, instituted from the early 1500s, granted Spanish settlers rights to indigenous communities for tribute in goods and labor, nominally in exchange for protection and evangelization, but frequently resulting in demographic collapse through overwork and disease. Reforms via the of 1542 aimed to abolish perpetual encomiendas and mitigate abuses, though enforcement was uneven, shifting reliance toward haciendas and crown monopolies. Catholic orders, including and , established reducciones—concentrated indigenous settlements—to facilitate conversion and labor extraction, contributing to a rigid social hierarchy stratified by , creoles, mestizos, , and Africans. Economic foundations hinged on extractive industries, particularly after the 1545 discovery of vast deposits at in the , where the yielded an estimated 22,695 metric tons of silver between 1545 and 1823 through the system of rotational forced indigenous labor. This output, comprising over one-third of global silver production during its peak in the late , financed Spanish imperial wars and trade via the Manila Galleons and Atlantic fleets, while local economies incorporated agriculture and coerced labor. Urban foundations proliferated, including in 1538 and in 1534, to anchor mining districts and agricultural estates. Portuguese establishments in Brazil contrasted with Spanish models, emphasizing decentralized settlement after Pedro Álvares Cabral's 1500 landfall. In the 1530s, King João III divided the territory into 15 hereditary captaincies to incentivize private colonization, granting donatários vast coastal lands for sugar cultivation using initially indigenous, then African slave labor. Only São Vicente and captaincies thrived initially, with Salvador da Bahia founded in 1549 as the first capital and hub for the sugar export economy, which by the late supplied amid rising transatlantic slave imports exceeding 4 million Africans by 1800. Royal intervention in 1572 centralized governance under governors-general, fostering bandeirante expeditions for slave raids and gold prospecting, though remained peripheral to Portuguese Asia-focused empire until the 1690s .

North American Settlements and Indigenous Dynamics

The earliest permanent European settlements in North America north of Mexico included the Spanish founding of St. Augustine in Florida in 1565, aimed at protecting treasure fleets and countering French incursions, followed by English efforts at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607, where 104 colonists arrived to establish a foothold for the Virginia Company amid high mortality from starvation, disease, and conflicts with the Powhatan Confederacy. French settlement began with the founding of Quebec by Samuel de Champlain in 1608, focusing on the fur trade and alliances with Indigenous groups like the Huron to access beaver pelts, while Dutch traders established posts in the Hudson Valley around 1614, leading to New Netherland's formal colonization in 1624 with emphasis on commerce rather than large-scale agrarian settlement. These outposts grew slowly; by 1700, European-descended populations numbered around 250,000, concentrated in coastal enclaves, contrasting with vast Indigenous territories. Indigenous dynamics varied by colonial power and region, with French and Dutch colonies fostering interdependent trade networks—French voyageurs exchanging goods for furs with Algonquian and Huron allies, often intermarrying and forming military pacts against rivals in the (roughly 1638–1701), which disrupted Indigenous demography through captive-taking and displacement. English settlements, driven by tobacco cultivation and family migration, prioritized land clearance, leading to rapid expansion and friction; initial Powhatan-English alliances in Virginia collapsed into the (1610–1646), culminating in the near-destruction of Native polities through warfare and enslavement. In New England, Puritan expansion sparked the (1636–1638), where colonial militias and allies massacred hundreds of Pequots, effectively dismantling their power, followed by (1675–1676), a multi-tribal uprising that killed 5–10% of New England's English population but devastated Indigenous groups, reducing their regional numbers by over 40%. Catastrophic population declines among Indigenous North Americans—estimated at 90% or more in affected areas by 1700—stemmed primarily from epidemics like and , to which natives lacked acquired immunity, spreading ahead of settlements via trade routes and decimating communities before direct European contact; secondary factors included warfare, malnutrition from disrupted food systems, and enslavement, with archaeological and genetic evidence confirming bottlenecks post-1500 unrelated to pre-contact climatic declines. French and Dutch policies, reliant on Native labor and markets, mitigated some violence through , enabling groups like the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy) to leverage European rivalries for territorial gains, whereas English demographic pressure—exemplified by Virginia's export of 300–500 Indigenous slaves by 1620—accelerated displacement and cultural erosion via coerced land cessions and missionization. By the late , these dynamics entrenched European footholds while fragmenting Indigenous autonomy, setting precedents for 18th-century imperial contests.

Columbian Exchange: Biological and Economic Exchanges

The facilitated the transatlantic transfer of numerous plant and animal species, reshaping and ecosystems in both hemispheres. From the to the , key introductions included , potatoes, sweet potatoes, , tomatoes, chili peppers, , cacao, and squash, which diversified diets and enhanced caloric yields in , , and . Potatoes, in particular, proved highly productive on marginal soils, contributing to a significant rise in European food production and supporting from approximately 80 million in 1500 to over 180 million by 1800. similarly boosted agricultural output in southern and , while sweet potatoes sustained expansion in . Conversely, exports to the encompassed , , , oats, , , and bananas, which were domesticated or intensified in the , often at the expense of indigenous polycultures. Livestock transfers were equally transformative, with Old World species such as , cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and chickens introduced to the , where no large domesticated herbivores existed pre-contact. revolutionized mobility for indigenous groups like the Plains tribes, enabling and warfare, while cattle and pigs proliferated rapidly, providing protein and draft power that underpinned colonial ranching economies. These animals also accelerated and alteration through overgrazing in regions like the Argentine pampas. In the reverse direction, New World contributions were limited to turkeys and guinea pigs, which had minimal global impact compared to the influx of Eurasian . Pathogen exchanges proved demographically catastrophic, primarily from Old to , as indigenous populations lacked immunity to Eurasian crowd diseases. , , , , and —transmitted via direct contact and fomites—triggered epidemics that scholars estimate reduced the ' population from 50-60 million in 1492 to about 6 million by 1650, a decline of over 90 percent in many regions. For instance, the 1520 outbreak in central killed up to 25 percent of the population within months, with subsequent waves compounding mortality through and social disruption. Evidence from missionary records, abandonments, and genetic studies supports disease as the primary causal factor, though warfare and enslavement exacerbated losses. The reverse flow included , which emerged in Europe post-1493, though its origin remains debated among epidemiologists. Economically, these biological shifts spurred global trade networks and monetary expansion. New World silver mines, notably Potosí in Bolivia (operational from 1545) and Zacatecas in Mexico, produced roughly 85 percent of global silver output between 1500 and 1800, totaling over 150,000 tons, which flooded European markets and contributed to the —inflation rates averaging 1-2 percent annually from 1500-1600. This bullion financed Spain's wars and mercantilist policies but largely exited Europe via trade deficits, with much redirected to Asia—particularly , where silver monetized the economy and supported to 300 million by 1800. Agricultural innovations from exchanged crops lowered risks and labor costs, fostering , while the trade (1565-1815) linked American silver to Chinese silks and , integrating the Pacific into a nascent . These dynamics, however, entrenched inequalities, as indigenous labor in mines and plantations—under systems like the —suffered high mortality, sustaining European accumulation at local expense.

Asia

East Asian Polities and Internal Transformations

In China, the late (1368–1644) faced severe internal challenges from fiscal overextension and corruption, exacerbated by heavy taxation to fund military campaigns against northern threats, which fueled peasant rebellions such as those led by in the 1630s and 1640s. These uprisings, characterized initially as disorganized raiding bands, escalated due to administrative inefficiency and influence, culminating in the capture of in 1644 and the dynasty's collapse. The subsequent (1644–1912), established by Manchu conquerors, implemented internal consolidation measures, including the Eight Banner system for military and administrative control, while integrating elites through Confucian examination reforms to legitimize rule. Qing emperors pursued administrative streamlining, with Yongzheng (r. 1722–1735) introducing a unified system in 1723 that merged land and poll taxes to reduce and enhance revenue collection, alongside the Secret Memorial for direct imperial oversight of officials. Under Kangxi (r. 1661–1722) and Qianlong (r. 1735–1796), these efforts supported , with surging from approximately 150 million in the late to over 300 million by 1800, driven by adoption of like sweet potatoes and that enabled cultivation on marginal lands previously unsuitable for . This growth, however, strained resources, highlighting tensions between agricultural innovation and land pressure absent robust institutional adaptation. In , the (1603–1868) achieved internal stability following the in 1600, which centralized power under by redistributing domains to loyal and enforcing the system from the 1630s, requiring feudal lords to alternate residence in (), thereby draining their finances and preventing rebellion while fostering economic circulation through mandated processions. This policy, alongside isolation edicts limiting foreign contact after 1639, prioritized domestic order over expansion, resulting in relative peace after centuries of Sengoku warfare and a population that grew modestly from about 18 million in 1600 to around 30 million by the mid-18th century before stabilizing due to practices and resource limits. Social rigidity, with at the apex and frozen class mobility, supported cultural flourishing in arts and urban commerce but constrained broader innovation. Korea under the dynasty (1392–1897) entrenched as state ideology from its founding, suppressing and emphasizing moral governance, scholarly examinations, and self-cultivation, which fostered scientific advances like the invention of the alphabet in 1443 and precise instruments such as the by the 15th century. Internal factionalism, however, intensified from the , with divisions between Easterners and Westerners evolving into sub-factions that triggered literati purges and political instability, as Neo-Confucian emphasis on rectitude clashed with power struggles, undermining administrative cohesion without leading to dynastic overthrow. Population estimates for indicate steady growth to roughly 10–12 million by the , supported by agrarian reforms but checked by periodic famines and internal strife.

South Asian Empires and European Trade Posts

The dominated northern and central from its founding in 1526 by following his victory at the Battle of Panipat, encompassing much of the by the late under rulers like (r. 1556–1605) and (r. 1658–1707). This empire, characterized by centralized administration, under Akbar's policies, and vast territorial expansion, integrated Persianate culture with indigenous traditions, fostering economic prosperity through agriculture, textiles, and trade. In the south, the , established in the mid-14th century, resisted northern Muslim incursions until its decisive defeat in 1565 by a coalition of —including , , Ahmadnagar, and —at the , leading to the sack of its capital and fragmentation of Hindu polities. The , successors to the Bahmani Kingdom after its disintegration around 1520, maintained independent Muslim-ruled states focused on maritime trade and military alliances until gradual absorption by the Mughals in the late . European engagement began with Portuguese voyages, as reached Calicut in 1498, seeking direct sea routes to access spices and textiles, bypassing Ottoman-controlled land paths. The Portuguese established fortified trade posts, capturing from the Bijapur Sultanate on December 9–10, 1510, under , transforming it into a key and administrative hub for their Estado da Índia, enforcing monopolies through naval superiority and (pass) systems. By the early , competition intensified with the Dutch United East India Company (VOC), chartered in 1602, setting up factories at (1616), , and for , , and pepper trade, often clashing with Portuguese holdings. The English (EIC), formed in 1600, secured its first factory at in 1612 after imperial Mughal farman from , expanding to Madras (Fort St. George, 1639), Bombay (1668), and Calcutta (1690), prioritizing textiles and saltpeter exports while relying on local brokers and minimal territorial claims initially. These trade posts operated as extraterritorial enclaves under company charters, negotiating privileges from Mughal governors or local rulers for revenue-free commerce, but armed conflicts arose over trade disputes, as seen in Anglo-Dutch rivalries and Portuguese-Dutch wars reducing Iberian dominance by the 1660s. French efforts, via their established in 1664, yielded posts at Pondichéry (1674) and Chandernagore, though secondary to British and Dutch operations. The companies' shift from pure commerce to political influence accelerated amid Mughal decline post-Aurangzeb in 1707, exemplified by the EIC's victory at the on June 23, 1757, where Robert Clive's forces, aided by defection of , defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah's larger army, granting the EIC diwani rights over Bengal's revenues in 1765 and marking the onset of territorial control. This event underscored how European firms leveraged superior , , and alliances to exploit regional power vacuums, transitioning trade posts into bases for economic extraction and .

Southeast Asian Kingdoms and Maritime Trade

The early modern maritime trade in Southeast Asia revolved around strategic port kingdoms that facilitated exchanges of spices, textiles, rice, and forest products across the , , and regional networks, with polities leveraging geography to extract revenues through tolls and monopolies. Key hubs like controlled the , channeling goods from , , and the archipelago to global markets until its conquest by forces under on August 24, 1511, after a 40-day involving around 1,000 Europeans and local allies against a divided sultanate. This event disrupted established Muslim merchant networks but prompted adaptive responses, as indigenous rulers rerouted trade to rival ports while Europeans sought to enforce monopolies on high-value spices like cloves, , and pepper. The emerged as a prominent maritime power on Sumatra's northern coast, consolidating control over pepper production and trade routes in the to counter influence, implementing monopolies that extended to the west Sumatran coast and fostering alliances with Ottoman suppliers for artillery. By the mid-16th century, Aceh's fleets dominated segments of the , exporting pepper—yielding substantial revenues estimated in the tens of thousands of bahars annually—and engaging in direct with regional powers to secure shipping lanes. Similarly, the in Siam positioned itself as a central entrepôt on the , signing trade treaties with in 1516 and the Dutch in 1592, while exporting rice, deerskins, and hides to and , with its phra khlang office regulating foreign commerce and attracting diverse merchants by the . These kingdoms maintained autonomy by balancing European incursions with intra-Asian ties, as evidenced by Ayutthaya's ship-borne exports southward and Aceh's resistance campaigns against Portuguese blockades. European powers intensified competition through chartered companies, with the Dutch United East India Company (VOC), formed in 1602, securing a near-monopoly on eastern Indonesian spices by 1621 through conquests like the , where it massacred or enslaved much of the population to enforce nutmeg exclusivity, generating profits that funded further expansion. The VOC established Batavia (modern ) in 1619 as its Asian headquarters, displacing Portuguese and Spanish rivals while integrating local prahu vessels into hybrid fleets for intra-regional trade, though indigenous sultanates like Mataram in and periodically allied against Dutch dominance. Meanwhile, Spanish control of from 1571 linked Chinese silks to Mexican silver via the galleon trade, indirectly boosting Southeast Asian ports by flooding markets with American bullion that stimulated demand for spices and aromatics. Local adaptations persisted, as port cities proliferated—evidenced by 16th-century shipwrecks carrying and spices—sustaining networks despite colonial pressures, with trade volumes in pepper and cloves sustaining kingdoms until the when British and French entrants further fragmented monopolies.

West Asian and Central Asian Powers

The Ottoman Empire emerged as the preeminent power in West Asia during the early modern period, leveraging gunpowder technology for territorial expansion across Anatolia, the Levant, and North Africa. Under Sultan Selim I (r. 1512–1520), Ottoman forces decisively defeated the Mamluk Sultanate at the Battle of Marj Dabiq on August 24, 1516, near Aleppo, resulting in the rapid conquest of Syria. This victory facilitated the subsequent capture of Cairo in 1517, incorporating Egypt, the Hejaz, and control over key Islamic holy sites into the empire, thereby enhancing Ottoman prestige as caliphal successors. Suleiman I (r. 1520–1566), titled "the Magnificent" in Europe, continued aggressive campaigns, capturing in 1521 and securing naval dominance with the conquest of in the same year. His victory at the on August 29, 1526, shattered Hungarian resistance, leading to the partition of and Ottoman suzerainty over and . These expansions strained relations with the rising Safavid Empire in Persia, culminating in the in 1514, where Ottoman artillery superiority routed Safavid cavalry, securing eastern for the Ottomans but failing to topple the Safavid regime. Subsequent Ottoman-Safavid wars, including those from 1532–1555 and 1578–1590, alternated gains and stalemates, with the (1555) confirming Ottoman control over while recognizing Safavid sovereignty in Persia. The , founded by Shah Ismail I in 1501, unified Persia under as the state religion, distinguishing it from Sunni neighbors and fostering a distinct Iranian identity through forced conversions and clerical alliances. Shah Abbas I (r. 1588–1629) revitalized the empire by reforming the military with slave-soldiers, recapturing from the Ottomans in 1623, and expelling Uzbek incursions from . He relocated the capital to , transforming it into a commercial hub via alliances with European powers like and the Dutch, boosting silk exports and architectural patronage, including the complex completed by 1629. These policies sustained Safavid power until internal decay and Afghan invasions culminated in the dynasty's fall in 1722. In , the Shaybanid supplanted the crumbling Timurid remnants, with Khan conquering in 1500 and establishing a dynasty that dominated through the . The , under Shaybanid rule, controlled key oases and trade routes, patronizing Persianate culture amid nomadic tribal confederations. Conflicts with Safavids over eastern territories persisted, as raided until Abbas I's campaigns in the early 17th century curtailed their expansion. By the 18th century, Shaybanid successors fragmented into rival khanates of , , and , weakening centralized authority and exposing the region to Russian encroachments by 1800. These polities maintained Sunni orthodoxy, contrasting with Safavid Shiism, and relied on rather than for internal cohesion, limiting their projection beyond frontiers.

Africa

North African and Barbary Coastal States

The Barbary coastal states of North Africa, primarily the Ottoman regencies of Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli, along with the independent Sultanate of Morocco, played a pivotal role in Mediterranean maritime affairs from the 16th to the early 19th centuries. These entities operated under varying degrees of Ottoman influence, with Algiers established as a regency in 1516 following the conquest by the Barbarossa brothers—Aruj and Hayreddin—who secured Ottoman naval support against Spanish forces. Tripoli was incorporated in 1551, and Tunis in 1574 after its reconquest from Spanish occupation, forming semi-autonomous provinces governed by pashas, deys, or beys selected from janissary corps or local elites. Morocco, outside direct Ottoman control, maintained its sovereignty under the Saadi dynasty from 1549 and later the Alaouites from 1631, yet paralleled the regencies in corsair operations from ports such as Salé. Economically, these states depended heavily on licensed corsair piracy, which targeted European merchant vessels and coastal villages, yielding plunder, ransom payments, and enslaved labor. Corsairs, often operating xebecs and galleys manned by multiethnic crews including renegade Europeans, captured an estimated 1 to 1.25 million Europeans for enslavement between 1500 and 1800, with alone holding up to 25,000 Christian captives at peak periods in bagnios for labor or conversion incentives. Revenue streams included direct tribute from European powers—such as Britain's payments formalized in treaties from 1662—and sales of goods like , , and alongside slave auctions, sustaining urban centers like , which grew to over 100,000 inhabitants by the . This system enforced a balance of terror and diplomacy, compelling nations like and the to maintain consulates and pay protection money to avert raids. Military prowess derived from hybrid forces combining Ottoman artillery, local , and corsair fleets, enabling defenses against Habsburg incursions, such as the failed Spanish of in 1541. However, internal factionalism between Turkish janissaries, (mixed Ottoman-local descent), and indigenous tribes recurrently destabilized governance, as seen in the 1671 janissary revolt in establishing dey rule. Interactions with oscillated between conflict and commerce; for instance, English merchants traded woolens for Moroccan sugar despite intermittent raids, while French bombardments in 1683 and 1688 demonstrated growing naval disparities. By the late 18th century, the Barbary states' corsair dominance waned amid European naval advancements, including Britain's suppression of piracy post-1815 and the ' (1801–1805) against Tripoli, which ended tribute demands through and . This shift exposed vulnerabilities, culminating in French invasion of in 1830, though persisted independently until European partitions. The era underscored causal dependencies on maritime predation for state viability, with empirical records of captives and treaties revealing a pragmatic extortion economy rather than ideological , as regencies pragmatically allied with Christian powers against mutual foes.

Sub-Saharan Empires and Inland Trade Networks

The dominated the western from the mid-15th to late , with its capital at serving as a nexus for trans-Saharan commerce in gold, salt, kola nuts, leather, and slaves, facilitated by riverine and overland routes along the . Under Askia Muhammad (r. 1493–1528), the empire expanded to encompass and , key scholarly and market centers where Muslim merchants from exchanged Saharan salt and textiles for sub-Saharan gold and ivory, sustaining an economy estimated to involve thousands of camel caravans annually. Inland networks extended southward to forest zones, integrating Akan gold fields via intermediary Hausa traders, though the empire's collapse followed the Moroccan invasion at the in 1591, which disrupted these routes and fragmented control over interior trade. In the Lake Chad basin, the Kanem-Bornu Empire maintained continuity from the medieval period into the 17th and 18th centuries, peaking under Mai Idris Alooma (r. ca. 1571–1603), who introduced firearms and cavalry tactics to secure caravan paths linking the Sahel to the Fezzan and Egypt. Bornu's economy relied on taxing trans-Saharan convoys carrying natron, ostrich feathers, and slaves northward in exchange for horses, cloth, and metal goods, with inland extensions to Hausa markets like Kano fostering regional exchanges of grains, cattle, and kola nuts from southern tributaries. Diplomatic alliances and military campaigns preserved its influence against nomadic incursions, enabling Bornu to field armies of up to 30,000 by the early 17th century, though gradual shifts toward Atlantic coastal trade eroded some interior dominance by the 18th century. Further south, the emerged as a Yoruba powerhouse in the , controlling savanna-forest trade corridors in present-day through a force of 10,000 horsemen reliant on imported Saharan breeds. Oyo's inland networks channeled kola nuts, , and slaves from forested tributaries to northern markets like , exchanging them for salt, horses, and cowries, which served as across West African routes spanning hundreds of miles. By subjugating Dahomey in campaigns from 1724–1730 and 1738–1748, Oyo monopolized access to coastal ports for European goods while sustaining internal commerce, though overreliance on slave raids contributed to internal revolts and territorial overextension by the late 18th century. The Kingdom of Kongo, spanning the basin from the late , initially leveraged inland fluvial and overland paths to trade ivory, copper from mines like those in , and raffia cloth with interior groups, integrating these into networks reaching the Atlantic coast. contact from 1483 introduced firearms and , boosting Kongo's centralization under kings like Afonso I (r. 1509–1543), who regulated slave exports but faced disruptions from civil wars and raids that intensified captive procurement from inland provinces by the . These networks, involving tribute systems from provinces, exchanged forest products for imports like iron tools, sustaining populations estimated at over 2 million at peak, though escalating slave demands fragmented authority into competing provinces by 1700. Sub-Saharan inland trade networks, distinct from coastal Atlantic exchanges, comprised interconnected caravan and riverine systems linking empires to equatorial forests, with markets in Hausa city-states like Katsina serving as hubs for aggregating from Ashanti regions (up to 1 ton annually in some estimates) and distributing it northward alongside slaves captured in raids numbering tens of thousands per decade. Goods flowed bidirectionally—northern salt, millet, and textiles southward for tropical commodities like pepper and dyewoods—supported by kinship guilds and royal monopolies that enforced tolls, fostering urban growth in centers with populations exceeding 50,000. While resilient against environmental challenges like zones limiting horse use, these networks faced pressures from empire collapses and the 17th-century rise of states, redirecting some flows toward European forts without fully supplanting interior commerce until the .

Atlantic and Trans-Saharan Slave Trades

The Atlantic slave trade, spanning roughly from 1526 to 1867, involved European powers—primarily , Britain, , , the , and —purchasing and transporting enslaved sub-Saharan Africans across the ocean to labor in American plantations producing sugar, tobacco, cotton, and other commodities. Scholarly estimates based on shipping records indicate that approximately 12.5 million Africans were embarked on European vessels from ports in West and , with about 10.7 million surviving the to disembark in the due to mortality rates of 10-20% from , overcrowding, and violence. The trade's volume peaked between 1700 and 1850, when over 80% of departures occurred, driven by labor demands in European colonies; Britain alone accounted for about 3.1 million embarked slaves, followed by / at 5.8 million. African intermediaries, including kingdoms such as Dahomey, Ashanti, and Oyo, supplied captives through raids, judicial punishments, and intertribal warfare, exchanging them for European firearms, textiles, and in a system that incentivized further enslavement. In contrast, the , which predated the Atlantic trade but persisted through the early modern period (c. 1500-1800), was dominated by Muslim and Berber merchants who caravanned enslaved sub-Saharan Africans northward across desert routes to markets in , the , and the . Estimates for the trade's volume are less precise due to sparse records, but scholarly reconstructions place the total export of around 4-5 million slaves from sub-Saharan regions via Saharan routes between 1400 and 1900, with a significant portion occurring during the early modern era amid Ottoman demand for domestic servants, concubines, soldiers (e.g., Mamluks), and eunuchs. Routes like those from the (e.g., via or ) to Tripoli, , or involved annual caravans of 1,000-2,000 slaves, enduring high mortality from thirst and exposure; suppliers included Sahelian states like Songhai and Bornu, which captured victims through jihadist expansions or tribute systems. The two trades differed structurally: the Atlantic emphasized chattel slavery for hereditary, race-based plantation labor, exporting mostly adult males (about 66% of captives), whereas the trans-Saharan trade favored females and children (up to 60-70% in some estimates) for integration into households or harems, with higher castration rates among males for elite roles, leading to distinct demographic impacts on source regions. Both exacerbated depopulation and instability in Africa—estimated at 1-2% annual loss in high-export zones for the Atlantic—but the trans-Saharan's longevity (over a millennium) distributed its effects more gradually compared to the Atlantic's compressed intensity. European abolition efforts, culminating in Britain's 1807 ban and naval patrols, curtailed the Atlantic trade by the mid-19th century, while trans-Saharan routes declined later under colonial pressures and Ottoman reforms, though smuggling persisted into the 20th century.

Thematic Global Impacts

Economic Shifts: Mercantilism, Capitalism, and Trade Networks

emerged as the prevailing economic doctrine in from the 16th to the 18th centuries, emphasizing state-directed policies to achieve a favorable , accumulate , and enhance national power through colonial exploitation and trade monopolies. Governments imposed tariffs, subsidies for exports, and to restrict imports and promote domestic manufacturing, viewing wealth as finite and zero-sum among nations. This approach drove European powers like , , , , and the to establish colonies in the , , and for raw materials and markets, with 's extraction of silver from mines in —discovered in 1545 and yielding an estimated 60% of global silver production by the late —exemplifying the influx of precious metals that temporarily bolstered imperial treasuries but also sparked inflation and dependency on imports. Parallel to mercantilist state control, proto-capitalist institutions arose, particularly joint-stock companies that mobilized private capital for high-risk overseas ventures, marking a shift toward market-oriented enterprise with shared ownership and precursors. The (VOC), chartered in 1602 with a monopoly on Dutch trade east of the , exemplified this by deploying over 1,000 ships and establishing trading posts across , generating profits from spices, textiles, and intra-Asian that peaked at 18% annual returns in the early before declining due to and . Similar entities, such as the English founded in 1600, facilitated through stock trading on nascent exchanges like Amsterdam's, laying groundwork for modern amid mercantilist frameworks. Global trade networks expanded dramatically between 1500 and 1800, integrating the Atlantic, , and Pacific spheres into interconnected circuits driven by European demand for Asian luxuries and American commodities, with silver flows from the enabling purchases of Chinese silks and via Manila galleons. The Atlantic system, encompassing the of European manufactures to for enslaved labor, African captives to American plantations for sugar, tobacco, and cotton, and colonial goods back to , amplified commerce volumes; by the , British exports to its colonies grew tenfold from 1700 levels, while slave shipments exceeded 12 million across the period, underscoring coerced labor's role in . Asian networks, dominated by private merchants pre-European intrusion but increasingly influenced by chartered companies, saw European shares rise to 20-30% of intra-Asian by 1750, fostering specialization like Dutch control of Indonesian spices and dominance in Goa-Macau routes, though overall European-Asian remained a fraction of indigenous volumes until the . These shifts, blending state mercantilism with emergent capitalist mechanisms, propelled but entrenched inequalities through resource extraction and human bondage, with causal links evident in rising per capita incomes in trade-hub cities like , where GDP per head doubled between 1500 and 1800.

Demographic Patterns: Population Growth, Diseases, and Mortality

The global population expanded from approximately 500 million in 1500 to around 900 million by 1800, reflecting uneven regional dynamics driven by agricultural improvements, , and epidemiological shocks. This growth was concentrated in the , where new crops from the , such as and potatoes, bolstered caloric intake and resilience against famines in and , though causal links remain debated due to confounding factors like land clearance and reduced plague frequency after the 17th century. In contrast, the experienced a demographic , with indigenous populations declining by 80-95%—from estimates of 50-60 million pre-contact to under 6 million by 1650—primarily due to introduced pathogens like and , which exploited immunologically naive societies in what are termed "virgin soil" epidemics. Europe's population nearly doubled from about 65 million in 1500 to 127 million by 1750, with much of the increase occurring before 1620 amid post-medieval recovery, though punctuated by crises like the (1618-1648), which caused excess mortality of 15-30% in affected German regions through combat, famine, and disease. recurred sporadically, as in the (1665-1666), which killed roughly 100,000 people or 15-20% of the city's inhabitants, while endemic threats like and sustained high crude death rates of 30-40 per 1,000 annually. Infant and remained elevated, often exceeding 200-300 deaths per 1,000 live births, limiting at birth to 30-35 years, though adult survival improved slightly in by the late 18th century due to and precursors. In Asia, population growth was robust, with China's expanding roughly threefold from around 150 million in 1600 to over 400 million by 1800 under the , facilitated by , intensification, and relative stability despite occasional famines and rebellions. India's population rose from about 100-150 million to 200 million over the same span, supported by Mughal agricultural expansions, though disrupted by wars and the Deccan famines of the late . Diseases like and circulated endemically, but without the scale of introductions, mortality spikes were more tied to density and monsoon failures than novel pathogens. Africa's demographics were strained by the Atlantic slave trade, which forcibly removed an estimated 12.5 million people between 1500 and 1800, predominantly from West and Central regions, exacerbating local warfare, social disruption, and excess mortality equivalent to 2-5 million additional deaths from capture-related violence and disease. Continental population nonetheless grew slowly from ~100 million to ~130-150 million, as natural increase in unaffected areas offset losses, with rebound evident in West Africa by the mid-18th century through fertility responses and trade-induced economic adaptations. Endemic diseases such as malaria and sleeping sickness imposed chronic high mortality, particularly on infants, maintaining low growth rates compared to Eurasia. Overall, early modern mortality was dominated by infectious diseases, which accounted for 20-50% of deaths in pre-industrial societies, amplified by poor , crowding, and mobility from and ; however, declining plague virulence and crop exchanges laid groundwork for accelerated growth post-1750. These patterns underscore causal primacy of microbial transfers over endogenous factors in shaping hemispheric divergences, with empirical records from registers and colonial censuses providing the bulk of quantifiable evidence despite underreporting biases in non-literate regions.

Intellectual and Educational Advances

The invention of the movable-type by around 1440 revolutionized the dissemination of knowledge across Europe, enabling mass production of books and reducing costs dramatically, which facilitated wider access to texts and accelerated intellectual exchange. By the end of the , over 20 million books had been printed, including scientific treatises and philosophical works that challenged medieval . This technological advance underpinned the , as printed editions of ancient texts and new observations allowed scholars to build cumulatively on prior knowledge rather than relying on scarce manuscripts. The Scientific Revolution, spanning roughly 1543 to 1687, marked a shift toward empirical observation and mathematical reasoning in natural philosophy. Nicolaus Copernicus published De revolutionibus orbium coelestium in 1543, proposing a heliocentric model that displaced Earth from the universe's center, though it faced resistance from Aristotelian traditions. Galileo Galilei's telescopic observations in 1609–1610 provided evidence supporting heliocentrism, including the moons of Jupiter and phases of Venus, leading to conflicts with ecclesiastical authorities who prioritized scriptural interpretations over novel data. Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica in 1687 unified celestial and terrestrial mechanics under universal gravitation, establishing a mechanistic worldview grounded in quantifiable laws derivable from first principles. These developments arose in Europe amid competitive states and religious fragmentation, fostering patronage for inquiry absent in more centralized empires like the Ottoman or Ming China, where institutional inertia stifled similar empirical breakthroughs. Philosophical advancements during the Enlightenment (c. 1685–1815) emphasized reason, individual rights, and skepticism of tradition. John Locke's (1689) argued for government by consent and natural rights to life, liberty, and property, influencing constitutional thought. Voltaire's campaigns against religious intolerance and superstition, exemplified in his Lettres philosophiques (1734), promoted tolerance and empirical critique, drawing from Newtonian . Denis and Jean le Rond edited the (1751–1772), compiling knowledge from mechanics to arts, which critiqued absolutism and clerical authority while disseminating rationalist ideals to broader audiences via print. Immanuel Kant's 1784 essay "What is Enlightenment?" defined it as humanity's emergence from self-incurred immaturity, urging public use of reason despite state controls. These ideas, rooted in causal realism and rejection of teleological explanations, contrasted with stagnant in non-European centers, where Confucian prioritized harmony over . Educational institutions evolved to support these shifts, with universities expanding curricula beyond theology to include and . By the , European universities like and incorporated experimental science, influenced by Baconian induction, while new academies such as the Royal Society (founded ) prioritized empirical verification over disputation. Jesuit colleges, established post-1540 , emphasized mathematics and classics, aiding global knowledge transfer through missions, though subordinated to doctrinal ends. Enrollment in German universities rose from about 5,000 in 1500 to over 10,000 by 1700, reflecting state investments in literate bureaucracies amid confessional rivalries. In contrast, non-European systems, such as Ottoman medreses or Indian madrasas, retained medieval curricula focused on , with limited integration of European scientific methods until the , attributable to less exposure to print-driven pluralism. This European emphasis on verifiable evidence over authority laid foundations for modern science, though contemporary academic narratives sometimes understate institutional biases favoring orthodoxy.

Controversies in Interpretation: Achievements vs. Critiques of Expansion

The of early modern European expansion features ongoing debates between interpretations emphasizing transformative achievements in global integration and economic dynamism, and those highlighting profound human and societal costs associated with and exploitation. Proponents of achievement-oriented views argue that the period's maritime ventures, from the 1490s onward, catalyzed Europe's economic ascent through Atlantic , which increased by 6.1% to 22.7% and rates by 4.0% to 11.7% in major trading nations like , , the , and by 1800, relative to non-Atlantic European counterparts. This growth stemmed from inflows of American silver and commodities, fostering proto-capitalist institutions and institutional changes that propelled Western Europe's divergence from other regions after 1500. Such analyses, grounded in quantitative reconstructions of GDP and volumes, posit that these networks laid foundations for sustained gains, with Atlantic-oriented economies experiencing up to 20% higher growth rates than inland ones between 1500 and 1800. Critiques, often advanced in postcolonial scholarship, contend that these gains were predicated on demographic catastrophes and coercive labor systems, including the transatlantic slave trade that forcibly displaced approximately 12.5 million Africans between 1500 and 1866, with mortality rates exceeding 15% during voyages alone. In the , indigenous populations plummeted by 80-95% within a century of contact, primarily due to diseases like to which natives lacked immunity, though compounded by warfare and enslavement; estimates place pre-Columbian numbers at 50-100 million, reduced to 5-10 million by 1650. These perspectives highlight how expansion entrenched extractive institutions in colonized regions, retarding local development while channeling wealth to , and argue that short-term European prosperity masked long-term global inequalities, with colonial participation correlating to uneven income distributions persisting into modern eras. Controversies arise in evaluating net impacts, where achievement narratives invoke causal mechanisms like naval innovations and market incentives driving Europe's technological edge by 1500—encompassing superior shipbuilding, firearms, and printing—that enabled overseas dominance without presupposing inherent cultural superiority. Critics of Eurocentric interpretations, however, often frame expansion as an unmitigated imposition of Western hegemony, yet such accounts frequently underemphasize empirical asymmetries in military and productive capacities that predated conquest, as evidenced by non-European powers' stagnation amid similar gunpowder technologies. While postcolonial critiques, influenced by post-1945 anticolonial ideologies, stress cultural erasure and bias in Eurocentric historiography, data on trade-induced growth suggest expansion accelerated global knowledge diffusion and economic specialization, yielding long-term benefits like industrialization precursors despite immediate costs—though source selection in these debates reveals tendencies toward ideological framing over aggregate welfare metrics in academia-influenced narratives.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.