Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Sorbs
View on WikipediaSorbs (Upper Sorbian: Serbja; Lower Sorbian: Serby; German: Sorben pronounced [ˈzɔʁbn̩] ⓘ; Czech: Lužičtí Srbové; Polish: Serbołużyczanie; also known as Lusatians, Lusatian Serbs[5] and Wends) are an indigenous West Slavic ethnic group predominantly inhabiting the parts of Lusatia located in the German states of Saxony and Brandenburg. Sorbs traditionally speak the Sorbian languages (also known as "Wendish" and "Lusatian"), which are closely related to Czech and Lechitic languages. Upper Sorbian and Lower Sorbian are officially recognized minority languages in Germany.
Key Information
In the Early Middle Ages, the Sorbs formed their own principality, which later shortly became part of the early West Slavic Samo's Empire and Great Moravia, as were ultimately conquered by the East Francia (Sorbian March) and Holy Roman Empire (Saxon Eastern March, Margravate of Meissen, March of Lusatia). From the High Middle Ages, they were ruled at various times by the closely related Poles and Czechs, as well as the more distant Germans and Hungarians. Due to a gradual and increasing assimilation between the 17th and 20th centuries, virtually all Sorbs also spoke German by the early 20th century. In the newly created German nation state of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, policies were implemented in an effort to Germanize the Sorbs. These policies reached their climax under the Nazi regime, who denied the existence of the Sorbs as a distinct Slavic people by referring to them as "Sorbian-speaking Germans". The community is divided religiously between Roman Catholicism (the majority) and Lutheranism. The former Minister President of Saxony Stanislaw Tillich is of Sorbian origin.
Etymology
[edit]The ethnonym "Sorbs" (Serbja, Serby) derives from the medieval ethnic groups called "Sorbs" (Surbi, Sorabi). The original ethnonym, Srbi, was retained by the Sorbs and Serbs in the Balkans.[6] By the 6th century, Slavs occupied the area west of the Oder formerly inhabited by Germanic peoples.[6] The Sorbs are first mentioned in the 6th or 7th century. In their languages, the other Slavs call them the "Lusatian Serbs", and the Sorbs call the Serbs "the south Sorbs".[7] The name "Lusatia" was originally applied only to Lower Lusatia.[6] It is generally considered that their ethnonym *Sŕbъ (plur. *Sŕby) originates from Proto-Slavic with an appellative meaning of a "family kinship" and "alliance", however others argue a derivation from Iranian-Sarmatian.[8][9][10][11]
History
[edit]Early Middle Ages
[edit]
The name of the Sorbs can be traced to the 6th century or earlier when Vibius Sequester recorded Cervetiis living on the other part of the river Elbe which divided them from the Suevi (Albis Germaniae Suevos a Cerveciis dividiit).[12][13][14][15][16] According to Lubor Niederle, the Serbian district was located somewhere between Magdeburg and Lusatia, and was later mentioned by the Ottonians as Ciervisti, Zerbisti and Kirvisti.[17] The information is in accordance with the Frankish 7th-century Chronicle of Fredegar according to which the Surbi lived in the Saale-Elbe valley, having settled in the Thuringian part of Francia since the second half of the 6th century or beginning of the 7th century and were vassals of the Merovingian dynasty.[12][18][19]
The Saale-Elbe line marked the approximate limit of Slavic westward migration.[20] Under the leadership of dux (duke) Dervan ("Dervanus dux gente Surbiorum que ex genere Sclavinorum"), they joined the Slavic tribal union of Samo, after Samo's decisive victory against Frankish King Dagobert I in 631.[18][19] Afterwards, these Slavic tribes continuously raided Thuringia.[18] The fate of the tribes after Samo's death and dissolution of the union in 658 is undetermined, but it is considered that they subsequently returned to Frankish vassalage.[21]
According to a 10th-century source De Administrando Imperio, they lived "since the beginning" in the region called by them as Boiki which was a neighbor to Francia, and when two brothers succeeded their father, one of them migrated with half of the people to the Balkans during the rule of Heraclius in the first half of the 7th century.[22][23] According to some scholars, the unnamed 7th-century Serbian ruler who led the White Serbs to the Balkans was most likely a son, brother or other relative of Dervan.[24][25][26][27]


Sorbian tribes, Sorbi/Surbi, are noted in the mid-9th-century work of the Bavarian Geographer.[8][28][29] Having settled by the Elbe, Saale, Spree, and Neisse in the 6th and early 7th century, Sorbian tribes divided into two main groups, which have taken their names from the characteristics of the area where they had settled. The two groups were separated from each other by a wide and uninhabited forest range, one around Upper Spree and the rest between the Elbe and Saale.[30] Some scholars consider that the contemporary Sorbs are descendants of the two largest Sorbian tribes, the Milceni (Upper) and Lusici [de] (Lower), and these tribes' respective dialects have developed into separate languages.[6][31] However, others emphasize differences between these two dialects and that their respective territories correspond to two different Slavic archeological cultures of Leipzig group (Upper Sorbian language) and Tornow group ceramics (Lower Sorbian language),[30] both a derivation of Prague(-Korchak) culture.[32][33]

The Annales Regni Francorum state that in 806, Sorbian Duke Miliduch fought against the Franks and was killed. In 840, Sorbian Duke Czimislav was killed. From the 9th century was organized Sorbian March by the East Francia and from the 10th century the Saxon Eastern March (Margravate of Meissen) and March of Lusatia by the Holy Roman Empire. In 932, the German king Henry I conquered Lusatia and Milsko. Gero, Margrave of the Saxon Eastern March, reconquered Lusatia the following year and, in 939, murdered 30 Sorbian princes during a feast.[34] As a result, there were many Sorbian uprisings against German rule. A reconstructed castle, at Raddusch in Lower Lusatia, is the sole physical remnant from this early period.
High and Late Middle Ages
[edit]In 1002, the Sorbs came under the rule of their Slavic relatives, the Poles, when Bolesław I of Poland took over Lusatia. Following the subsequent German–Polish War of 1003–1018, the Peace of Bautzen confirmed Lusatia as part of Poland; but, it returned to German rule in 1031. In the 1070s, southern Lusatia, passed into the hands of the Sorbs' other Slavic relatives, the Czechs, within their Duchy of Bohemia. There was a dense network of dynastic and diplomatic relations between German and Slavic feudal lords, e.g. Wiprecht of Groitzsch (a German) rose to power through close links with the Bohemian (Czech) king and marriage to the king's daughter.[citation needed]
The Kingdom of Bohemia eventually became a politically influential member of the Holy Roman Empire, but was in a constant power-struggle with neighbouring Poland. In the following centuries, at various times, parts of Lusatia passed to Piast-ruled fragmented Poland. In the German-ruled parts, Sorbs were ousted from guilds, the Sorbian language was banned and German colonisation and Germanisation policies were enacted.[35]
From the 11th to the 15th century, agriculture in Lusatia developed and colonization by Frankish, Flemish and Saxon settlers intensified. This can still be seen today from the names of local villages which geographically form a patchwork of typical German (ending on -dorf, -thal etc.) and typical Slavic origin (ending on -witz, -ow etc.), indicating the language originally spoken by its inhabitants, although some of the present German names may be of later origin from the time of planned name changes to erase Slavic origin, especially in the 1920s and 1930s. In 1327 the first prohibitions on using Sorbian before courts and in administrative affairs in the cities of Altenburg, Zwickau and Leipzig appeared. Speaking Sorbian in family and business contexts was, however, not banned, as it did not involve the functioning of the administration. Also the village communities and the village administration usually kept operating in Sorbian.
Early modern period
[edit]
From 1376 to 1469 and from 1490 to 1635 Lusatia was part of the Lands of the Bohemian Crown under the rule of the houses of Luxembourg, Jagiellon and Habsburg and other kings, whereas from 1469 to 1490 it was ruled by King Matthias Corvinus of Hungary. Under Bohemian (Czech) rule, Sorbs were allowed to return to cities, offices and crafts, Germanisation significantly reduced and the Sorbian language could be used in public.[36] From the beginning of the 16th century the whole Sorbian-inhabited area, with the exception of Bohemian-ruled Lusatia, underwent Germanization.
During the Thirty Years' War, in 1635, Lusatia became a fiefdom of Saxon electors, but it retained a considerable autonomy and largely its own legal system (see Lusatian League). The Thirty Years' War and the plague of the 17th century caused terrible devastation in Lusatia. This led to further German colonization and Germanization.
In 1667 the Prince of Brandenburg, Frederick Wilhelm, ordered the immediate destruction of all Sorbian printed materials and banned saying masses in this language. At the same time, the Evangelical Church supported printing Sorbian religious literature, as a means of fighting the Counterreformation. With the formation of the Polish-Saxon union in 1697, Polish-Sorbian contacts resumed, and Poles influenced the Sorbs' national and cultural activities (see Relationship with Poland below). With the Age of Enlightenment, the Sorbian national revival began and resistance to Germanization emerged.[37] In 1706 the Sorbian Seminary, the main centre for the education of Sorbian Catholic priests, was founded in Prague.[37] Sorbian preaching societies were founded by Evangelical students in Leipzig and Wittenberg in 1716 and 1749, respectively.[37]
Late modern period
[edit]
The Congress of Vienna, in 1815, divided Lusatia between Prussia and Saxony. More and more bans on the use of Sorbian languages appeared from then until 1835 in Prussia and Saxony; emigration of the Sorbs, mainly to the town of Serbin in Texas and to Australia, increased. In 1848, 5,000 Sorbs signed a petition to the Saxon Government, in which they demanded equality for the Sorbian language with the German one in churches, courts, schools and Government departments. From 1871, the whole of Lusatia became a part of united Germany and was divided between two parts; Prussia (Silesia and Brandenburg), and Saxony.[citation needed]
In 1871, the industrialization of the region and German immigration began; official Germanization intensified. Persecution of the Sorbs under German rule became increasingly harsh throughout the 19th century. Slavs were labeled inferior to Germanic peoples, and in 1875, the use of Sorbian was banned in German schools. As a result, almost the entire Sorbian population was bilingual by the end of the 19th century.[a]
During World War I, one of the most venerated Serbian generals was Pavle Jurišić Šturm (Paul Sturm), a Sorb from Görlitz, Province of Silesia.[citation needed]
Interbellum and World War II
[edit]
Although the Weimar Republic guaranteed constitutional minority rights, it did not practice them.[39]
Under Nazi Germany, Sorbians were described as a German tribe who spoke a Slavic language. Sorbian costume, culture, customs, and the language was said to be no indication of a non-German origin. The Reich declared that there were truly no "Sorbs" or "Lusatians", only Wendish-speaking Germans. As such, while the Sorbs were largely safe from the Reich's policies of ethnic cleansing, the cultivation of "Wendish" customs and traditions was to be encouraged in a controlled manner and it was expected that the Slavic language would decline due to natural causes. Young Sorbs enlisted in the Wehrmacht and were sent to the front. The entangled lives of the Sorbs during World War II are exemplified by the life stories of Mina Witkojc, Měrćin Nowak-Njechorński and Jan Skala.
Persecution of the Sorbs reached its climax under the Nazis, who attempted to completely assimilate and Germanize them. Their distinct identity and culture and Slavic origins were denied by referring to them as "Wendish-speaking Germans". Under Nazi rule, the Sorbian language and practice of Sorbian culture was banned, Sorbian and Slavic place-names were changed to German ones,[40] Sorbian books and printing presses were destroyed, Sorbian organizations and newspapers were banned, Sorbian libraries and archives were closed, and Sorbian teachers and clerics were deported to German-speaking areas and replaced with German-speaking teachers and clerics. Leading figures in the Sorbian community were forcibly isolated from their community or simply arrested.[b][c][d][e][f] The Sorbian national anthem and flag were banned.[46] The specific Wendenabteilung was established to monitor the assimilation of the Sorbs.[a]
Towards the end of World War II, the Nazis considered the deportation of the entire Sorbian population to the mining districts of Alsace-Lorraine.[b][d]
East Germany
[edit]

The first Lusatian cities were captured in April 1945, when the Red Army and the Polish Second Army crossed the river Queis (Kwisa). The defeat of Nazi Germany changed the Sorbs’ situation considerably. The regions in East Germany (the German Democratic Republic) faced heavy industrialisation and a large influx of expelled Germans.[citation needed] The East German authorities tried to counteract this development by creating a broad range of Sorbian institutions. The Sorbs were officially recognized as an ethnic minority, more than 100 Sorbian schools and several academic institutions were founded, the Domowina and its associated societies were re-established and a Sorbian theatre was created. Owing to the suppression of the church and forced collectivization, however, these efforts were severely affected and consequently over time the number of people speaking Sorbian languages decreased by half.

The relationship between the Sorbs and the government of East Germany was not without occasional difficulties, mainly because of the high levels of religious observance and resistance to the nationalisation of agriculture. During the compulsory collectivization campaign, a great many unprecedented incidents were reported. Thus, throughout the Uprising of 1953 in East Germany, violent clashes with the police were reported in Lusatia. A small uprising took place in three upper communes of Błot. There were also tensions between German and Sorbian parents in the 1950s and early 1960s, as many German families protested the state policy of mandatory instruction of the Sorbian language in schools located in bilingual areas. As a consequence of the tensions, which split the local SED, Sorbian language classes were no longer mandatory after 1964, and a temporary but sharp decline in the number of learners occurred immediately thereafter. The number of learners increased again after 1968, when new regulations were adopted giving Domowina a greater role in consulting parents of schoolchildren. The number of learners did not decrease again until after German reunification.[47]
Sorbs experienced greater representation in the German Democratic Republic than under any other German government. Domowina had status as a constituent member organization of the National Front, and a number of Sorbs were members of the Volkskammer and State Council of East Germany. Notable Sorbian figures of the period include Domowina Chairmen Jurij Grós and Kurt Krjeńc, State Council member Maria Schneider, and writer and three-time recipient of the National Prize of the German Democratic Republic Jurij Brězan.[48]
In 1973, Domowina reported that 2,130 municipal councillors, 119 burgomasters, and more than 3,500 members of commissions and local bodies in East Germany were ethnic Sorbs registered with the organization.[49] Additionally, there was a seat reserved for a Sorbian representative in the Central Council of the Free German Youth, the mass organization for young people in East Germany, and magazines for both the FDJ and the Ernst Thälmann Pioneer Organisation were published in the Sorbian language on a regular basis under the titles Chorhoj Měra and Plomjo, respectively.[50] As of 1989, there were nine schools with exclusively Sorbian language instruction, eighty-five schools that offered Sorbian-language instruction, ten Sorbian-language periodicals, and one daily newspaper.[51]
After reunification
[edit]After the reunification of Germany on 3 October 1990, Lusatians made efforts to create an autonomous administrative unit; however, Helmut Kohl’s government did not agree to it.[citation needed] After 1989, the Sorbian movement revived, however, it still encounters many obstacles. Although Germany supports national minorities, Sorbs claim that their aspirations are not sufficiently fulfilled.[citation needed] The desire to unite Lusatia in one of the federal states has not been taken into consideration. Upper Lusatia still belongs to Saxony and Lower Lusatia to Brandenburg. Liquidations of Sorbian schools, even in areas mostly populated by Sorbs, still happen, under the pretext of financial difficulties or demolition of whole villages to create lignite quarries.[citation needed]
Faced with growing threat of cultural extinction, the Domowina issued a memorandum in March 2008[52] and called for "help and protection against the growing threat of their cultural extinction, since an ongoing conflict between the German government, Saxony and Brandenburg about the financial distribution of help blocks the financing of almost all Sorbian institutions". The memorandum also demands a reorganisation of competence by ceding responsibility from the Länder to the federal government and an expanded legal status. The call has been issued to all governments and heads of state of the European Union.[53]
Dawid Statnik, president of Domowina, the umbrella association of Sorbs in Germany, said in an interview with Tagesspiegel that he considers it dangerous that the AFD defines the issue of German citizens through an ethnic aspect. He believes that there is a concrete danger for the Sorbs if the AfD enters the governments of the federal states of Brandenburg and Saxony in the autumn elections.[54] From 2008 to 2017, Stanislaw Tillich, a Catholic Sorb, served as the Minister-President of Saxony – the first time a Sorb held this office. Since 2014, various sources have pointed to a rising number of right-wing extremist attacks against Sorbs.[55]
Population genetics
[edit]According to 2013 and 2015 studies, the most common Y-DNA haplogroup among the Sorbs who speak Upper Sorbian in Lusatia (n=123) is R1a with 65%, mainly its R-M458 subclade (57%). It is followed in frequency by I1 (9.8%), R1b (9.8%), E1b1b (4.9%), I2 (4.1%), J (3.3%) and G (2.4%). Other haplogroups are less than 1%.[56][57] A study from 2003 reported a similar frequency of 63.4% of haplogroup R1a among Sorbian males (n=112).[58] Other studies that covered aspects of Sorbian Y-DNA include Immel et al. 2006,[59] Rodig et al. 2007,[60] and Krawczak et al. 2008.[61] Significant percentage of R1a (25.7-38.3%), but strongly diminished in value because of high R1b (33.5-21.7%), and low I2 (5.8-5.1%) are in whole Saxony and Germania Slavica area as well.[62]
A 2011 paper on the Sorbs' autosomal DNA reported that the Upper Sorbian speakers (n=289) showed the greatest autosomal genetic similarity to Poles, followed by Czechs and Slovaks, consistent with the linguistic proximity of Sorbian to other West Slavic languages.[63] In another genome-wide paper from the same year on Upper Sorbs (n=977), which indicated their genetic isolation "which cannot be explained by over-sampling of relatives" and a closer proximity to Poles and Czechs than Germans. The researchers however question this proximity, as the German reference population was almost exclusively West-German, and the Polish and Czech reference population had many that were part of a German minority.[64] In a 2016 paper, Sorbs cluster autosomally again with Poles (from Poznań).[65]
Language and culture
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (July 2025) |
The oldest known relic of Sorbian literature originated in about 1530 – the Bautzen townsmen's oath. In 1548, Mikołaj Jakubica – Lower Sorbian vicar, from the village called Lubanice, wrote the first unprinted translation of the New Testament into Lower Sorbian. In 1574 the first Sorbian book was printed: Albin Mollers’ songbook. In 1688 Jurij Hawštyn Swětlik translated the Bible for Catholic Sorbs. From 1706 to 1709, the New Testament was printed in the Upper Sorbian translation was done by Michał Frencel and in Lower Sorbian by Jan Bogumił Fabricius (1681–1741). Jan Bjedrich Fryco (a.k.a. Johann Friedrich Fritze) [1747–1819], translated the Old Testament for the first time into Lower Sorbian, published in 1790.
Other Sorbian Bible translators include Jakub Buk (1825–1895), Michał Hórnik (Michael Hornig) [1833–1894], Jurij Łušćanski (a.k.a. Georg Wuschanski) [1839–1905]. In 1809 for the short period of time, there was the first printed Sorbian newspaper. In 1767 Jurij Mjeń publishes the first secular Sorbian book. Between 1841 and 1843, Jan Arnošt Smoler and Leopold Haupt (a.k.a. J.L. Haupt and J.E. Schmaler) published two-volume collection of Wendish folk-songs in Upper and Lower Lusatia. From 1842, the first Sorbian publishing companies started to appear: the poet Handrij Zejler set up a weekly magazine, the precursor of today’s Sorbian News. In 1845 in Bautzen, the first festival of Sorbian songs took place. In 1875, Jakub Bart-Ćišinski, the poet and classicist of Upper Sorbian literature, and Karol Arnošt Muka created a movement of young Sorbians influencing Lusatian art, science and literature for the following 50 years. A similar movement in Lower Lusatia was organized around the most prominent Lower Lusatian poets Mato Kósyk (Mato Kosyk) and Bogumił Šwjela.
In 1904, mainly thanks to the Sorbs’ contribution, the most important Sorbian cultural centre (the Sorbian House) was built in Bautzen. In 1912, the social and cultural organization of Lusatian Sorbs was created, the Domowina Institution – the union of Sorbian organizations. In 1919, it had 180,000 members. In 1920, Jan Skala set up a Sorbian party and in 1925 in Berlin, Skala started Kulturwille – the newspaper for the protection of national minorities in Germany. In 1920, the Sokol Movement was founded (youth movement and gymnastic organization). From 1933, the Nazi party started to repress the Sorbs. At that time the Nazis also dissolved the Sokol Movement and began to combat every sign of Sorbian culture. In 1937, the activities of the Domowina Institution and other organizations were banned as anti-national. Sorbian clergymen and teachers were forcedly deported from Lusatia; Nazi German authorities confiscated the Sorbian House, other buildings and crops.
On May 10, 1945, in Crostwitz, after the Red Army's invasion, the Domowina Institution renewed its activity. In 1948, the Landtag of Saxony passed an Act guaranteeing protection to Sorbian Lusatians; in 1949, Brandenburg resolved a similar law. Article 40 of the constitution of German Democratic Republic adopted on 7 October 1949 expressly provided for the protection of the language and culture of the Sorbs. In the times of the German Democratic Republic, Sorbian organizations were financially supported by the country, but at the same time the authorities encouraged Germanization of Sorbian youth as a means of incorporating them into the system of "building Socialism". Sorbian language and culture could only be publicly presented as long as they promoted socialist ideology. For over 1,000 years, the Sorbs were able to maintain and even develop their national culture, despite escalating Germanization and Polonization, mainly due to the high level of religious observance, cultivation of their tradition and strong families (Sorbian families still often have five children). In the middle of the 20th century, the revival of the Central European nations included some Sorbs, who became strong enough to attempt twice to regain their independence. After World War II, the Lusatian National Committee in Prague claimed the right to self-government and separation from Germany and the creation of a Lusatian Free State or attachment to Czechoslovakia. The majority of the Sorbs were organized in the Domowina, though, and did not wish to split from Germany.[citation needed] Claims asserted by the Lusatian National movement were postulates of joining Lusatia to Poland or Czechoslovakia. Between 1945 and 1947 they postulated about ten petitions[66] to the United Nations, the United States, Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, Poland and Czechoslovakia, however, it did not bring any results. On April 30, 1946, the Lusatian National Committee also postulated a petition to the Polish Government, signed by Pawoł Cyž – the minister and an official Sorbian delegate in Poland. There was also a project of proclaiming a Lusatian Free State, whose Prime Minister was supposed to be a Polish archaeologist of Lusatian origin- Wojciech Kóčka. The most radical postulates in this area ("Na swobodu so ńečeka, swobodu so beŕe !")[67] were expressed by the Lusatian youth organization- Narodny Partyzan Łužica. Similarly, in Czechoslovakia, where before the Potsdam Conference in Prague, 300,000 people demonstrated for the independence of Lusatia. The endeavours to separate Lusatia from Germany did not succeed because of various individual and geopolitical interests.

The following statistics indicate the progression of cultural change among Sorbs: by the end of the 19th century, about 150,000 people spoke Sorbian languages. By 1920, almost all Sorbs had mastered Sorbian and German to the same degree. Nowadays, the number of people using Sorbian languages has been estimated to be no more than 40,000. A 2024 study estimates the number of Lower Sorbian speakers at a competent level to be between 50 and 100.[68]
The Israeli Slavic linguist Paul Wexler has argued that the Yiddish language structure provides "compelling evidence of an intimate Jewish contact with the Slavs in the German and Bohemian lands as early as the 9th century", and has theorized that Sorbs may have been contributors to the Ashkenazic Jewish population in Europe from the same period.[69][70]
Fine arts
[edit]Traditions
[edit]Many traditions have been preserved, especially Easter horseback riding, the Bird Wedding, and the traditional painting of Easter eggs. Numerous Slavic mythological beliefs are still alive today, such as the Midday Woman (Připołdnica / Přezpołdnica), the Water Man (Wódny muž), the Divine Lament (Bože sadleško), or the money- and luck-bringing dragon (Upper Sorbian: zmij, Lower Sorbian: plón).
In the Upper Sorbian core area, roughly defined by a triangle between the towns of Bautzen, Kamenz, and Wittichenau, wayside crucifixes and those in front gardens, along with well-kept churches and chapels, are expressions of a (mostly Catholic) popular piety still practiced today, which has contributed significantly to preserving Sorbian identity.[citation needed]
Sorbian folk costumes vary greatly by region. Some older women still wear them daily, while younger women usually only wear them on major feast days, such as the Corpus Christi (Fronleichnam) celebration, when the bridesmaid's costume (družka) is worn.[citation needed]
A Shrove Tuesday festival Zapust is the most popular tradition of the Sorbs, deeply linked to the working life of the community. Traditionally, festivities would last one week ahead of the spring sowing of the fields and would feature traditional dress, parade and dancing.[71]
Egg decorating (pisanici) is a Slavic Easter tradition maintained by Sorbs since the 17th century.[72][better source needed]
Religion
[edit]

Most current speakers of Upper-Sorbian are part of the Catholic denomination. Originally, the majority of Sorbs were Lutheran Protestants, and this was still the case going into the 20th Century (with a Protestant population of 86.9% recorded in 1900).[73] Only the Sorbs of the Kamenz area – predominantly settled on the expansive former site of the Saint Marienstern Monastery in Panschwitz-Kuckau – veered from the norm, with a Catholic population of 88.4%. Otherwise, the proportion of Catholics remained under 1% throughout the region of Lower Lusatia. Due to the rapid decline in language and cultural identity amongst the Protestant Sorbs – particularly during the years of the GDR – the denominational make-up of the Sorbian-speaking population of the region has now been reversed.[citation needed]

The differing development of language use among Catholic and Protestant Sorbs is partly due to the differing structures of the churches. While the Protestant Church is a state church (and the rulers of Sorbian territories were always German-speaking), the Catholic Church, with its ultramontane orientation toward the Vatican, has always been transnational.The Protestant Church’s closer ties to the state had a particularly negative effect on the Sorbian language area, especially in Lower Lusatia, where a policy of Germanization had been pursued since the 17th century.
On the other hand, the Catholic Church generally held the view that one’s native language is a gift from God, and that abandoning it would be sinful. This explains the increasingly emphasized close connection between Catholicism and Sorbian identity since the late 19th century—an association that still exists today.
Today, Catholic communities form the core of the remaining Sorbian majority areas, whereas in the Protestant regions in the east and north, the language has mostly disappeared. In western Upper Lusatia, it was especially the centuries-long bond between the Sorbs and the Catholic Church that played a decisive role in preserving the Sorbian mother tongue. In contrast, in Lower Lusatia, the Protestant Church, both before and after 1945—and despite the general promotion of the Sorbs in the GDR—showed no interest in maintaining the Sorbian language in religious life. Only since 1987, at the initiative of a few Lower Sorbs, have regular Wendish-language church services resumed.
Since the second half of the 20th century, there has also been a significant proportion of non-religious Sorbs.
National symbols
[edit]

The flag of the Lusatian Sorbs is a cloth of blue, red and white horizontal stripes. First used as a national symbol in 1842, the flag was fully recognized among Sorbs following the proclamation of pan-Slavic colors at the Prague Slavic Congress of 1848. Section 25 of the Constitution of Brandenburg contains a provision on the Lusatian flag. Section 2 of the Constitution of Saxony contains a provision on the use of the coat of arms and traditional national colors of the Lusatian Sorbs. The laws on the rights of the Lusatian Sorbs of Brandenburg and Saxony contain provisions on the use of Lusatian national symbols (coat of arms and national colors).[74]
The national anthem of Lusatian Sorbs since the 20th century is the song Rjana Łužica (Beautiful Lusatia).[75] Previously, the songs “Still Sorbs Have Not Perished” (written by Handrij Zejler in 1840)[76] and “Our Sorbs Rise from the Dust” (written by M. Domashka, performed until 1945)[77] served as a hymn.
Regions of Lusatia
[edit]There are three main regions of Lusatia that differ in language, religion, and customs.
Region of Upper Lusatia
[edit]Catholic Lusatia encompasses 85 towns in the districts of Bautzen, Kamenz, and Hoyerswerda, where Upper Sorbian language, customs, and tradition are still thriving. In some of these places (e.g., Radibor or Radwor in Sorbian, Crostwitz or Chrósćicy, and Rosenthal or Róžant), Sorbs constitute the majority of the population, and children grow up speaking Sorbian.
On Sundays, during holidays, and at weddings, people wear regional costumes, rich in decoration and embroidery, encrusted with pearls.
Some of the customs and traditions observed include Bird Wedding (25 January), Easter Cavalcade of Riders, Witch Burning (30 April), Maik, singing on St. Martin's Day (Nicolay), and the celebrations of Saint Barbara’s Day and Saint Nicholas’s Day.
Region of Hoyerswerda (Wojerecy) and Schleife (Slepo)
[edit]In the area from Hoyerswerda to Schleife, a dialect of Sorbian which combines characteristic features of both Upper and Lower Sorbian is spoken. The region is predominantly Protestant, highly devastated by the brown coal mining industry, sparsely populated, and to a great extent germanicized. Most speakers of Sorbian are over 60 years old.
The region distinguishes itself through many examples of Slavic wooden architecture monuments including churches and regular houses, a diversity of regional costumes (mainly worn by elderly women) that feature white-knitting with black, cross-like embroidery, and a tradition of playing bagpipes. In several villages, residents uphold traditional festivities such as expelling of winter, Maik, Easter and Great Friday singing, and the celebration of dźěćetko (disguised child or young girl giving Christmas presents).
Region of Lower Lusatia
[edit]There are 60 towns from the area of Cottbus belonging to this region, where most of the older people over 60, but few young people and children can speak the Lower Sorbian language[citation needed]; the local variant often incorporates many words taken from the German language, and in conversations with the younger generation, German is generally preferred. Some primary schools in the region teach bilingually, and in Cottbus there is an important Gymnasium whose main medium of instruction is Lower Sorbian. The region is predominantly Protestant, again highly devastated by the brown coal mining industry. The biggest tourist attraction of the region and in the whole Lusatia are the marshlands, with many Spreewald/Błóta canals, picturesque broads of the Spree.
Worn mainly by older but on holidays by young women, regional costumes are colourful, including a large headscarf called "lapa", rich in golden embroidering and differing from village to village.
In some villages, following traditions are observed: Shrovetide, Maik, Easter bonfires, Roosters catching/hunting. In Jänschwalde (Sorbian: Janšojce) so-called Janšojski bog (disguised young girl) gives Christmas presents.
Relations with other Slavic nations
[edit]Relations with Poland
[edit]Medieval period
[edit]
Bolesław I the Brave had taken control of the marches of Lusatia (Łużyce), Sorbian Meissen (Miśnia), and the cities of Budziszyn (Bautzen) and Miśnia in 1002, and refused to pay the tribute to the Empire from the conquered territories. The Sorbs sided with the Poles, and opened the town gates and allowed Bolesław I into Miśnia in 1002.[78] Bolesław, after the Polish-German War (1002–1018), signed the Peace of Bautzen on 30 January 1018, which made him a clear winner. The Polish ruler was able to keep the contested marches of Lusatia and Milsko not as fiefs, but as part of Polish territory.[79][80] The Polish prince Mieszko destroyed about 100 Sorbian villages in 1030 and expelled Sorbians from urban areas, with the exception of fishermen and carpenters who were allowed to live in the outskirts.[81] In 1075–1076, Polish King Bolesław II the Bold sought the restoration of Lusatia from Bohemia to Poland.[82] In the following centuries, at various times, parts of Lusatia formed part of Piast-ruled fragmented Poland.
18th century
[edit]The 18th century saw increased Polish-Sorbian contacts during the reign of Kings Augustus II the Strong and Augustus III of Poland in Poland and Lusatia. Sorbian pastor Michał Frencel [dsb] and his son polymath Abraham Frencel [hsb] took their cues from Polish texts in their Sorbian Bible translations and philological works, respectively.[83] Also Polish-born Jan Bogumił Fabricius established a Sorbian printing house and translated the catechism and New Testament into Sorbian.[84] Polish and Sorbian students established contacts at the University of Leipzig.[83] Polish dignitaries traveled through Lusatia on several occasions on their way between Dresden and Warsaw, encountering Sorbs.[85] Some Polish nobles owned estates in Lusatia.[85]

The first translation from Sorbian into another language was a translation of the poem Wottendzenje wot Liepska teho derje dostoineho wulze wuczeneho Knesa Jana Friedricha Mitschka by Handrij Ruška [hsb] into Polish, made by Stanisław Nałęcz Moszczyński, a Polish lecturer at the University of Leipzig, and published by the famous Polish traveler Jan Potocki.[87]
A distinct remnant of the region's ties to Poland are the 18th-century mileposts decorated with the coat of arms of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth located in various towns in the region.
19th century
[edit]Polish-Sorbian contacts continued in the 19th century. Noted advocate for the preservation of Polish culture and language in Masuria, Gustaw Gizewiusz, during his visits in Budissin and Leipzig, came into close contact with Sorbian publicist Jan Pětr Jordan [hsb], and then Jordan published a study on the situation of the Poles in Masuria, including a collection of documents and journal articles from 1834–1842.[88] In the 1840s, Polish Romantic poet Roman Zmorski [pl] befriended the Sorbian writer Jan Arnošt Smoler in Wrocław, and then he settled in Lusatia, where he got to know other leading Sorbian national revival figures Křesćan Bohuwěr Pful [hsb], Jaroměr Hendrich Imiš and Michał Hórnik [hsb].[89] Zmorski then issued the Polish newspaper Stadło in Budissin, translated four Smoler's poems into Polish, and published articles about the Sorbs in other Polish press.[90] Michał Hórnik declared his sympathy and admiration for the Poles, popularised knowledge of Nicolaus Copernicus and Tadeusz Kościuszko through Sorbian press, reported on the events of the Polish January Uprising of 1863–1864 and made contacts with Poles during visits to Warsaw, Kraków and Poznań.[91] Polish historian Wilhelm Bogusławski [pl] wrote the first book on Sorbian history Rys dziejów serbołużyckich, published in Saint Petersburg in 1861. The book was expanded and published again in cooperation with Michał Hórnik in 1884 in Bautzen, under a new title Historije serbskeho naroda. Polish historian and activist Alfons Parczewski [pl] was another friend of Sorbs, who from 1875 was involved in Sorbs' rights protection, participating in Sorbian meetings in Bautzen. Parczewski joined the Maćica Serbska organization in 1875, supported Sorbian publishing, wrote articles about Sorbs in Polish press and collected Sorbian magazines and books, which now form part of the Adam Asnyk Regional Public Library in Kalisz.[92] It was thanks to him, among others, that Józef Ignacy Kraszewski founded a scholarship for Sorbian students. His sister Melania Parczewska [pl] joined the Maćica Serbska in 1878, wrote articles about Sorbs in Polish press and translated Sorbian poems into Polish.[92]
Early 20th century
[edit]
In the early 20th century, Polish slavist and professor Henryk Ułaszyn [pl] met several prominent Sorbs, including Jan Skala, Jakub Bart-Ćišinski and Arnošt Muka.[94]
After World War I and the restoration of independent Poland, Polish linguist Jan Baudouin de Courtenay supported the Sorbs' right to self-determination and demanded that the League of Nations assume protection over them.[95] In the interbellum, the Poles and Sorbs in Germany closely cooperated as part of the Association of National Minorities in Germany, established at the initiative of the Union of Poles in Germany in 1924. Sorbian journalist, poet and activist Jan Skala was a member of the press headquarters of the Union of Poles in Germany, and was one of the authors of the Leksykon Polactwa w Niemczech ("Lexicon of Poles in Germany").[96] In 1935–1936, Sorb Jurij Cyž was employed as a legal advisor of the First District of the Union of Poles in Germany, before he left for Poland under pressure of the Nazi authorities of Germany.[97] There were also notable Polish communities in Lusatia, such as Klettwitz (Upper Sorbian: Klěśišća, Polish: Kletwice).[93]
In Poland, Antoni Ludwiczak, founder of the folk high school in Dalki, Gniezno, offered Sorbs five tuition-free spots for each course at the school, however, after the Nazi Party came to power in Germany in 1933, enrollment of Sorbs in the school was almost completely halted.[98] Several Sorbs studied in Poland in the interbellum.[99] In 1930, the Association of Friends of the Sorbs was established in Poznań with Henryk Ułaszyn as its president.[100] Similar associations, the Polish Association of Friends of the Sorbian Nation (Polskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Narodu Łużyckiego) at the University of Warsaw and the Association of Friends of Lusatia (Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Łużyc) in Katowice were established in 1936.[97] The Warsaw-based organization gathered people not only from the university. Its president was Professor Stanisław Słoński, and the deputy president was Julia Wieleżyńska. The association was a legal entity. The association in Warsaw issued the Polish-language Biuletyn Serbo-Łużycki ("Sorbian Newsletter"), which reported on Serbian affairs. The association in Katowice was led by Karol Grzesik, who was murdered by the Russians in the Katyn massacre during World War II.[101][102]
During World War II, the Poles postulated that after the defeat of Germany, the Sorbs should be allowed free national development either within the borders of Poland or Czechoslovakia, or as an independent Sorbian state in alliance with Poland.[103] On 22 January 1945, Jan Skala was murdered by a Soviet soldier in Dziedzice, and his grave at the local cemetery is now a Polish protected cultural heritage monument.[104] There is also a memorial to Skala in nearby Namysłów. In 1945, Polish troops fought against German forces in several battles in Lusatia, including the largest Battle of Bautzen. There are memorials to Polish soldiers in Bautzen (Budyšin), Crostwitz (Chrósćicy) and Königswartha (Rakecy) with inscriptions in Sorbian, Polish and German.
After 1945, the Sorbs that historically lived in the eastern part of Lusatia (now part of Poland) were expelled, as they were German citizens. Eastern Lusatia was resettled by Poles expelled from former eastern Poland annexed by the Soviet Union and has by now lost its Sorbian identity.[105]
After World War II
[edit]Prołuż founded in Krotoszyn, expanded to all Poland (3,000 members). It was the biggest non-communist organization that dealt with foreign affairs. This youth organization was created during the Soviet occupation and its motto was "Polish guard over Lusatia" (Polish: Nad Łużycami polska straż). Its highest activity was in the region of Greater Poland. After the creation of East Germany, Prołuż was dissolved, and its president historian from Poznań Alojzy Stanisław Matyniak was arrested.[106]
In 1946, the establishment of a gymnasium for Sorbs in Zgorzelec, Poland, was initiated, and the registration of Sorbian students at Polish universities resumed.[107] Despite the readiness to accept Sorbian youth in 1946, the gymnasium was not opened as the Sorbs had not yet obtained border passes to Poland.[108] The launch of the gymnasium was postponed by a year and free boarding and scholarships were prepared for the Sorbs, but in view of the continued lack of border passes to Poland and the establishment of a Sorbian gymnasium in Bautzen, the idea was abandoned.[109]
One of the main centers of pro-Sorbian initiatives in post-war Poland was Wrocław, with a branch of the Prołuż organization, and several articles about the Sorbs were published in local press.[110] In 1946, Associations of Friends of Lusatia were founded in Opole and Prudnik.[111] In 1947, eight Sorbian students established the "Lusatia" Association of Sorbian Students of Higher Education of Wrocław, with eight more joining the following year.[112] Also local press in Katowice, Opole and Prudnik published articles about the Sorbs and Lusatia.[113]
In Opole, the "Lusatian Days" (Dni Łużyckie) are organized annually, and the Pro Lusatia. Opolskie Studia Łużycoznawcze yearbook is published since 1999.[111] The Polish-Sorbian Association Pro Lusatia was established in Poland in 2004.[111]
After a proposal to rebuild a pre-war statue of Otto von Bismarck in Bautzen (Budyšin) appeared in 2021, the Sorbs objected and the Serbski Institut, in an open letter, reasoned the objection with the Bismarck government's repressions of the Sorbs, Poles, as well as Danes and French, and Bismarck's calls for the extermination of Poles.[114]
Relations with Czechia
[edit]Lusatia was partly or wholly part of the Czech Duchy or Kingdom (also known as Bohemia, in the west) at various times between 1075 and 1635, and several remnants of Czech rule can be found in the region. When Lusatia returned from German to Bohemian (Czech) rule, Sorbs were allowed to return to cities, offices and crafts, and the Sorbian language could be used in public.[36] As result, it was in the lands under Czech rule that the Sorbian culture and language persisted, while the more western original Sorbian territory succumbed to Germanization policies. One of the remnants of Czech rule in the region are the many town coats of arms that include the Czech Lion, as in Drebkau (Drjowk), Görlitz (Zhorjelc), Guben (Gubin), Kamenz (Kamjenc), Löbau (Lubij) and Spremberg (Grodk).
In 1706 the Catholic Sorbian Seminary was founded in Prague.[37] In 1846, the Serbowka [hsb] organization was founded by Sorbian students in Prague, and it issued the Kwětki [hsb] magazine until 1892.
Calls for the incorporation of Lusatia into Czechoslovakia were made after Germany's defeats in both world wars. In 1945, the Czechs established a gymnasium for the Sorbs in Česká Lípa, then relocated to Varnsdorf in 1946 and to Liberec in 1949, however, the Sorbs took their high school diploma in Bautzen after a Sorbian high school was established there.[115]
Relations with Yugoslavia
[edit]First permanent cultural and political contacts between Sorbs and South Slavs were established in the mid-19th century, and the contacts reached in their peak in the early 20th century.[116] In 1934, the first and only issue of the Srbska Lužica newspaper was published by consortium Srbska Lužica in Yugoslavia.[116]
In November 1945, Yugoslavia declared support for the freedom aspirations of the Sorbs.[117] On 1 January 1946, the Sorbian National Council appointed Jurij Rjenč as its plenipotentiary representative in Belgrade, soon confirmed by the Yugoslav authorities after his arrival and meetings with several Yugoslav officials.[117] The Military Mission of Yugoslavia (VMJ) to the Allied Control Council established contacts with Sorbian national activists and declared it imperative to legally guarantee the cultural and national rights of the Sorbs, merge Upper and Lower Lusatia into one administrative district, and to halt the settlement of German displaced persons in Sorbian villages.[118] The Military Mission of Yugoslavia assisted Sorbian activists in Berlin with accommodation and catering, and contributed to the rebuilding of the Serbski dom in Bautzen, the chief cultural institution of Sorbs.[119]
Relations with Slovakia
[edit]
The Lusatian Serbs were supported by Ľudovít Štúr (he also visited this region), as well as Ján Kollár (he helped establish the Matica Serbská) and Martin Hattala (communicated with students of the Serbian Seminary in Prague).[120][121]
The Slovak Matica cooperates with the Maćica Serbska. In 2025, a delegation of the Slovak Matica of the Sorbians (Domowina institution, Sorbian Institute; Bautzen, Hodźij and Storcha) visited the Sorbs at the invitation of the Maćica Serbska.[122]
Demography
[edit]Estimates of demographic history of the Sorb population since 1450:[1][123][124][125]
| Year | 1450 | 1700 | 1750 | 1790 | 1858 | 1861 | 1880 | 1900 | 1905 | 1945 | 2006 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,000 | 250,000 | 200,000 | 250,000 | 164,000 | 165,000 | 166,000 | 146,000 | 157,000 | 145,700 | 40,000-50,000 | 40,000 |
Sorbian population in the middle of the 19th century:
| Region | County | Census year | Total population | Sorbian population | % of Sorbs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regierungsbezirk Frankfurt | Cottbus | 1846 | 49248 | 33522 | 68.1% |
| Regierungsbezirk Frankfurt | Spremberg | 1843 | 14092 | 9183 | 65.2% |
| Regierungsbezirk Frankfurt | Lübben | 1858 | 31566 | 12427 | 39.4% |
| Regierungsbezirk Frankfurt | Calau | 1849 | 43363 | 12143 | 28.0% |
| Regierungsbezirk Frankfurt | Sorau | 1858 | 71826 | 10116 | 14.1% |
| Regierungsbezirk Liegnitz | Hoyerswerda | 1855 | 30068 | 17223 | 57.3% |
| Regierungsbezirk Liegnitz | Rothenburg | 1843 | 42891 | 14267 | 33.3% |
| Saxony | Königswartha | 1861 | 7407 | 6385 | 86.2% |
| Saxony | Weißenberg | 1861 | 6579 | 4777 | 72.6% |
| Saxony | Bautzen | 1861 | 37096 | 23148 | 62.4% |
| Saxony | Kamenz | 1861 | 23564 | 7847 | 33.3% |
| Saxony | Löbau | 1861 | 27260 | 4089 | 15.0% |
| Saxony | Schirgiswalde | 1861 | 16636 | 2196 | 13.2% |
| Saxony | Bischofswerda | 1861 | 21051 | 1642 | 7.8% |

Sorbs are divided into two ethnographical groups:
- Upper Sorbs (about 40,000 people).[127]
- Lower Sorbs, who speak Lower Sorbian (about 15–20,000 people).[128][1]
The dialects spoken vary in intelligibility in different areas.
-
Map of approximate Sorb-inhabited area in Germany
-
Map of area and towns inhabited by Sorbs
-
Detailed map of Sorb-inhabited area in Germany (in Lower Sorbian)
Diaspora
[edit]During the 1840s, many Sorbian émigrés travelled to Australia, along with many ethnic Germans. The first was Jan Rychtar, a Wendish Moravian Brethren missionary who settled in Sydney during 1844.[129] There were two major migrations of Upper Sorbs and Lower Sorbs to Australia, in 1848 and 1850 respectively. The diaspora settled mainly in South Australia – especially the Barossa Valley – as well as Victoria and New South Wales.

A group of over 500 Sorbs, led by the Evangelical Lutheran pastor Jan Kilian, sailed to Galveston in 1854 aboard the ship Ben Nevis. They later founded the settlement of Serbin in Lee County, Texas, near Austin. Two-thirds of the emigrants came from the Prussian part, and one-third from the Saxon part of Upper Lusatia, including about 200 Sorbs from the Klitten area. The Sorbian language, a variant of Upper Sorbian, survived in Serbin until the 1920s, though it was increasingly influenced first by German, then by English. In the past, newspapers in Sorbian were also published in Serbin. Today, the former Sorbian school in Serbin houses the Texas Wendish Heritage Museum, which tells the story of the Sorbs in the USA. Descendants of these emigrants went on to found Concordia University Texas in Austin in 1926.[130]
Institutions
[edit]Domowina
[edit]
The Domowina, founded in 1912 (a poetic Sorbian term for “homeland”), is the umbrella organization of local chapters, five regional associations, and twelve Sorbian associations active at a supraregional level,[132] with a total of around 7,300 members.[133] Members who are part of more than one affiliated association may be counted multiple times.
Foundation for the Sorbian People
[edit]The Foundation for the Sorbian People (Załožba za serbski lud) serves as a joint instrument of the federal government and the states of Brandenburg and Saxony to support the preservation, development, promotion, and dissemination of the Sorbian language, culture, and traditions as an expression of the Sorbian people's identity.
It was initially established in 1991 by decree as a non-legally-capable public foundation within the Protestant Church of Lohsa.[134] Recognizing that the Sorbian people have no kin-state outside the Federal Republic of Germany, and based on the obligations declared in Protocol Note No. 14 to Article 35 of the Unification Treaty, the necessary material framework was thus created. With the signing of the State Treaty between Brandenburg and Saxony on the establishment of the Foundation for the Sorbian People on August 28, 1998, the foundation was granted legal capacity. At the same time, the first funding agreement between the federal government and the states of Brandenburg and Saxony was signed, valid until the end of 2007. Based on the Second Funding Agreement of July 10, 2009, the foundation has since received annual contributions from Saxony, Brandenburg, and the federal government to fulfill its mission. This agreement was valid until December 31, 2013. Until the third agreement was concluded in 2016, the funding amount was determined annually.[134]
The annual funding amount set until 2013 was €16.8 million, divided as follows: Federal Government: €8.2 million, Saxony: €5.85 million and Brandenburg: €2.77 million.[134]
The largest shares of the foundation’s budget went to:
- Sorbian National Ensemble: 29%
- Domowina Publishing House: 17.2%
- Sorbian Institute: 11.3%
- Foundation administration: 11.4%[133]
There have been public controversies over the absolute funding volume and distribution among institutions and projects, some of which led to demonstrations.[135][136]
On July 20, 2021, Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, Brandenburg’s Minister-President Dietmar Woidke, and Saxony’s Minister-President Michael Kretschmer signed the joint funding agreement for the next funding period.[137] The agreement provides for annual funding of €23.916 million from 2021 to 2025.
Institute for Sorbian Studies
[edit]On December 10, 1716, six Sorbian theology students founded the “Wendish Preachers' Collegium” (later renamed “Lusatian Preachers’ Society”) with the permission of Leipzig University’s senate—the first Sorbian association ever.[138] Their motto, which was also their greeting, was: “Soraborum saluti!” (For the good of the Sorbs!)
Today, the Institute for Sorbian Studies at Leipzig University is the only institute in Germany where Sorbian teachers and scholars (Sorabists) are trained. Classes are held in both Upper and Lower Sorbian. In recent years, Sorbian studies and its degree programs have attracted increasing interest, particularly from the Slavic-speaking world. Since March 1, 2003, the director of the institute has been Eduard Werner (Sorbian: Edward Wornar).
Sorbian Institute
[edit]
Since 1951, there has been a non-university research institute for Sorbian studies in Bautzen, which was part of the German Academy of Sciences in East Berlin until 1991. Re-established in 1992 as the Sorbian Institute e. V. (Serbski Institut z. t.), it currently has about 25 permanent employees working at two locations: Bautzen (Saxony) and Cottbus (Brandenburg).[citation needed]
The institute's broad mission includes research into the Sorbian language (both Upper and Lower Sorbian), as well as the history, culture, and identity of the Sorbian people in Upper and Lower Lusatia. Through its various projects, the institute contributes to the practical preservation and development of Sorbian national substance. It is affiliated with the Sorbian Central Library and the Sorbian Cultural Archive, which collect, preserve, and share Sorbian cultural heritage spanning nearly 500 years.[citation needed]
Domowina Publishing House
[edit]
Also located in Bautzen, the Domowina Publishing House (Ludowe nakładnistwo Domowina) publishes most of the Sorbian books, newspapers, and magazines. It evolved from the VEB Domowina Publishing House, founded in 1958 and reorganized as a GmbH in 1990.
The publishing house is funded by the Foundation for the Sorbian People with €2.9 million (as of 2012). Since 1991, it has operated the Smoler’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Smolerjec kniharnja), named after the Sorbian bookstore founded in 1851 by the first Sorbian publisher Jan Arnošt Smoler (1816–1884).[139]
Sorbian Museum
[edit]
The Sorbian Museum (Serbski muzej Budyšin) is located in the Salzhaus of the Ortenburg castle complex in Bautzen. Its exhibition offers an overview of Sorbian history from the 6th century to the present, along with insights into Sorbian culture and daily life.
The museum also features rotating special exhibitions of Sorbian visual artists or exhibitions focused on specific historical themes. The museum is operated by the Bautzen district and is supported by the Foundation for the Sorbian People and the Cultural Area of Upper Lusatia–Lower Silesia.
Sorbian National Ensemble
[edit]
The Sorbian National Ensemble (Serbski ludowy ansambl) is the only professional Sorbian music and dance theater, with departments for orchestra, ballet, and choir. Its repertoire includes dance theater, musical theater, concerts, and children's music theater—ranging from traditional Sorbian to modern styles.
The ensemble’s headquarters are located near the Röhrscheidt Bastion by the Friedensbrücke in Bautzen. Since 1952, the group has toured to over 40 countries on 4 continents, with about 14,000 guest performances.
The ensemble is managed as a non-profit limited company (GGmbH). Its sole shareholder is the Foundation for the Sorbian People, from which it receives over €5 million annually, about one-fifth of the foundation’s total budget.
Schools and kindergartens
[edit]In Saxony and Brandenburg, the Sorbian bilingual settlement areas have several bilingual Sorbian-German schools, as well as other schools where Sorbian is taught as a foreign language. In Saxony during the 2013/14 school year, there were eight bilingual elementary schools and six bilingual secondary schools and in Brandenburg, there were four bilingual elementary schools and one combined secondary school with an elementary level.[140][141] High school graduation in Sorbian is possible at the Sorbian Gymnasium in Bautzen and the Lower Sorbian Gymnasium in Cottbus.
There are also several Sorbian kindergartens in both states. The Sorbisches Schulverein (Sorbian School Association), which operates across state borders, launched the “Witaj” (Sorbian for 'welcome') project, promoting bilingual education in kindergartens and schools through language immersion—where children learn Sorbian naturally through everyday interaction.[142]
Media
[edit]
A daily Upper Sorbian newspaper, Serbske Nowiny (Sorbian Newspaper), and a weekly Lower Sorbian newspaper, Nowy Casnik (New Newspaper), are published. Additionally, there is the monthly Sorbian cultural magazine Rozhlad (Review), the children’s magazine Płomjo (Flame), the Catholic magazine Katolski Posoł, and the Protestant church newspaper Pomhaj Bóh (God Help). The Sorbian Institute publishes the academic journal Lětopis (Yearbook) every six months. There is also the professional journal for educators, Serbska šula (Sorbian School).[citation needed]
Furthermore, there is Sorbian radio broadcasting, with programming produced by Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk (MDR) and Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg (RBB). Every day, a few hours of Sorbian-language radio programs are broadcast from stations in Calau (RBB) and Hoyerswerda (MDR 1). All Lower Sorbian broadcasts from RBB are also available for replay online. For younger audiences, RBB broadcasts the half-hour monthly magazine Bubak on the first Thursday of each month, and MDR airs the two-hour weekly magazine Radio Satkula every Monday.[citation needed]
Since April 1992, RBB has produced the half-hour Lower Sorbian television magazine Łužyca (Lusatia), aired monthly. Since September 8, 2001, MDR has produced the monthly half-hour Upper Sorbian program Wuhladko (View). In addition, MDR broadcasts Unser Sandmännchen (Our Little Sandman) every Sunday with dual audio (including Sorbian).[citation needed]
Sorbian in literature, film, and television
[edit]Literature
[edit]In his Walks through the March of Brandenburg (1862–1889), Theodor Fontane describes not only the history but also the lifestyle, customs, and traditional dress of the Sorbs (Wends) in Lower Lusatia. In Wilhelm Bölsche’s contemporary novel Die Mittagsgöttin (The Midday Goddess) from 1891, some of the scenes are set in the Spreewald, including the then predominantly Lower Sorbian-speaking village of Lehde. Furthermore, the novel Die Mittagsfrau by Julia Franck, published in 2007, is named after the well-known Sorbian mythical figure. The first part of the novel portrays the childhood of Martha and Helene in Bautzen, whose Sorbian maid suspects the curse of the "Mittagsfrau" (Midday Woman) to be the cause of their mother’s mental breakdown.[citation needed]
Film and television
[edit]In the GDR, documentaries were produced such as Wie die Sorben den Maibaum aufstellen (How the Sorbs Erect the Maypole) (1956) and Leben am Fließ – W Błotach (1990). The DEFA animated film Als es noch Wassermänner gab is based on a Sorbian fairy tale and also deals with Sorbian wedding customs. In 2010, the ZDF broadcast the crime film Der Tote im Spreewald (The Dead Man in the Spreewald). One of the main characters is the son of a traditionally-minded Sorbian family, who does not feel connected to his cultural roots. The film introduced Sorbian culture to a wider audience, while also reflecting on issues of homeland and minority identity.[143]
In 2007, the Minet – Minderheitenmagazin aired a program on RAI 3 (Bozen station) titled Die Sorben – ein slawisches Volk in Deutschland (The Sorbs – a Slavic People in Germany).[144] Also in 2007, Radiotelevisiun Svizra Rumantscha produced the film Ils Sorbs en la Germania da l’ost (The Sorbs in Eastern Germany) as part of its series Minoritads en l’Europa (Minorities in Europe).[145] The 2020 documentary Sorben ins Kino! by Knut Elstermann focuses on Sorbian filmmakers, including those in the Sorbian Film production group.[146]
In the series Straight Outta Crostwitz, released exclusively on ARD Mediathek in 2022, Jasna Fritzi Bauer plays the Sorbian character Hanka.[147] She sings Sorbian folk songs with her father but actually wants to make rap music. This dramedy-style story of emancipation spans four episodes, each between nine and twelve minutes long, and was also filmed in Lusatia.[148]
On April 18, 2024, the documentary Bei uns heißt sie Hanka premiered in cinemas. Directed by Grit Lemke, the film explores the search for Sorbian identity.[149]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ a b "[A]nti-Sorbian policies throughout the Sorbian area of settlement got increasingly aggressive and, unsurprisingly, saw their climax under Nazi rule. Sorbs were declared to be "Wendish-speaking Germans" and a "Wendenabteilung was established to monitor the process of assimilation..."[38]
- ^ a b "Sorbs inhabiting Upper and Lower Lusatia, whose distinct identity and culture were simply denied by the Nazis, who described them as “Wendish-speaking” Germans and who, toward the end of the war, considered moving the Sorbs en masse to the mining districts of Alsace-Lorraine.".[41]
- ^ "The Nazis intended to assimilate and permanently germanize these 'Wendish-speaking Germans' through integration into the 'National Socialist national community' and through the forbidding of the Sorbian language and manifestations of Sorbian culture, Sorbian and Slav place-names and local names of topographical features (fields, hills and so forth) were germanized, Sorbian books and printing presses confiscated and destroyed, Sorbian schoolteachers and clerics removed and put in German-speaking schools and parishes, and representatives of Sorbian cultural life were either forcibly isolated from their fellows or arrested."[42]
- ^ a b "[A]fter 1933, under the Nazi regime, the Sorbian community suffered severe repression, and their organizations were banned. Indeed, the very existence of the ethnic group was denied and replaced by the theory of the Sorbs as 'Slavic speaking Germans'. Plans were made to re-settle the Sorbian population in Alsace in order to resolve the 'Lusatian question'. The 12 years of Nazi dictatorship was a heavy blow for a separate Sorbian identity."[43]
- ^ "They pressed Sorbian associations to join Nazi organizations, often with Success, and the Domowina received an ultimatum to adopt a statute which defined it as a 'League of Wendish-speaking Germans'.” But the Domowina insisted upon the Slavonic character of the Sorbs. In March 1937 the Nazis forbade the Domowina and the Sorbian papers, all teaching in Sorbian was discontinued, and Sorbian books were removed from the school libraries."[44]
- ^ "[T]he programmatic re-invention of the Sorbian minority as wen- dischsprechende Deutsche under the Nazi regime..."[45]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Gebel, K. (2002). Language and ethnic national identity in Europe: the importance of Gaelic and Sorbian to the maintenance of associated cultures and ethno cultural identities (PDF). London: Middlesex University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-05-01. Retrieved 2018-02-08.
- ^ a b Chambers, Madeline (26 November 2007). "Germany's Sorb minority struggles for survival". Reuters. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
- ^ "Table 1. First, Second, and Total Responses to the Ancestry Question by Detailed Ancestry Code: 2000" (PDF). census.gov. United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
- ^ Sparrow, Thomas (16 June 2021). "Sorbs: The ethnic minority inside Germany". BBC. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
- ^ Oldřich Tůma, Jaroslav Pánek (2018). History of the Czech Lands. p. 237.
- ^ a b c d Stone 2015, p. 9.
- ^ Deutsche Welle. "Lužički Srbi - njemački Slaveni protestantske vjere" (in Croatian). Retrieved 6 December 2014.
- ^ a b Łuczyński, Michal (2017). ""Geograf Bawarski" — nowe odczytania" ["Bavarian Geographer" — New readings]. Polonica (in Polish). XXXVII (37): 73. doi:10.17651/POLON.37.9. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
- ^ Rudnicki, Mikołaj (1959). Prasłowiańszczyzna, Lechia-Polska (in Polish). Państwowe wydawn. naukowe, Oddzia ︢w Poznaniu. p. 182.
- ^ Pohl, Heinz-Dieter (1970). "Die slawischen Sprachen in Jugoslawien" [The Slavic languages in Yugoslavia]. Der Donauraum (in German). 15 (1–2): 72. doi:10.7767/dnrm.1970.15.12.63. S2CID 183316961.
Srbin, Plural Srbi: „Serbe", wird zum urslawischen *sirbŭ „Genosse" gestellt und ist somit slawischen Ursprungs41. Hrvat „Kroate", ist iranischer Herkunft, über urslawisches *chŭrvatŭ aus altiranischem *(fšu-)haurvatā, „Viehhüter"42.
- ^ Popowska-Taborska, Hanna (1993). "Ślady etnonimów słowiańskich z elementem obcym w nazewnictwie polskim". Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica (in Polish). 27: 225–230. doi:10.18778/0208-6077.27.29. hdl:11089/16320. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
- ^ a b Simek, Emanuel (1955). Chebsko V Staré Dobe: Dnesní Nejzápadnejsi Slovanské Území (in Czech). Vydává Masarykova Universita v Brne. pp. 47, 269.
O Srbech máme zachován první historický záznam ze VI. století u Vibia Sequestra, který praví, že Labe dělí v GermaniinSrby od Suevů65. Tím ovšem nemusí být řečeno, že v končinách severně od českých hor nemohli býti Srbové již i za Labem (západně od Labe), neboť nevíme, koho Vibius Sequester svými Suevy mínil. Ať již tomu bylo jakkoli, víme bezpečně ze zpráv kroniky Fredegarovy, že Srbové měli celou oblast mezi Labem a Sálou osídlenu již delší dobu před založením říše Samovy66, tedy nejméně již v druhé polovici VI. století67. Jejich kníže Drevan se osvobodil od nadvlády francké a připojil se někdy kolem roku 630 se svou državou k říši Samově68. V následujících letech podnikali Srbové opětovně vpády přes Sálu do Durinska 69... 67 Schwarz, ON 48, dospěl k závěru, že se země mezi Labem a Sálou stala srbskou asi r. 595 a kolem roku 600 že bylo slovanské stěhování do končin západně od Labe určitě již skončeno; R. Fischer, GSl V. 58, Heimatbildung XVIII. 298, ON Falk. 59, NK 69 datuje příchod Slovanů na Chebsko do druhé polovice VI. století, G. Fischer(ová), Flurnamen 218, do VI. století. Chebský historik Sieg1 dospěl v posledním svém souhrnném díle o dějinách Chebska Eger u. Egerland 4 k závěru, že Slované (myslil na Srby) přišli do Chebska již kolem roku 490, tedy před koncem V. století.
- ^ Sułowski, Zygmunt (1961). "Migracja Słowian na zachód w pierwszym tysiącleciu n. e." Roczniki Historyczne (in Polish). 27: 50–52. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
- ^ Tyszkiewicz, Lech A. (1990). Słowianie w historiografii antycznej do połowy VI wieku (in Polish). Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. p. 124. ISBN 978-83-229-0421-3.
...Germaniae Suevos a Cervetiis dividit mergitur in oceanum". Według Szafarzyka, który odrzucił emendację Oberlina Cervetiis na Cheruscis, zagadkowy lud Cervetti to nikt inny, jak tylko Serbowie połabscy.
- ^ Dulinicz, Marek (2001). Kształtowanie się Słowiańszczyzny Północno-Zachodniej: studium archeologiczne (in Polish). Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk. p. 17. ISBN 978-83-85463-89-4.
- ^ Moczulski, Leszek (2007). Narodziny Międzymorza: ukształtowanie ojczyzn, powstanie państw oraz układy geopolityczne wschodniej części Europy w późnej starożytności i we wczesnym średniowieczu (in Polish). Bellona. pp. 335–336.
Tak jest ze wzmianką Vibiusa Sequestra, pisarza z przełomu IV—V w., którą niektórzy badacze uznali za najwcześniejszą informację o Słowianach na Polabiu: Albis Germaniae Suevon a Cervetiis dividit (Vibii Sequestris, De fluminibus, fontibus, lacubus, memoribus, paludibus, montibus, gentibus, per litteras, wyd. Al. Riese, Geographi latini minores, Heilbronn 1878). Jeśli początek nazwy Cerve-tiis odpowiadał Serbe — chodziło o Serbów, jeśli Cherue — byli to Cheruskowie, choć nie można wykluczyć, że pod tą nazwą kryje się jeszcze inny lud (por. G. Labuda, Fragmenty dziejów Słowiańszczyzny Zachodniej, t. 1, Poznań 1960, s. 91; H. Lowmiański, Początki Polski..., t. II, Warszawa 1964, s. 296; J. Strzelczyk, Vibius Sequester [w:] Slownik Starożytności Słowiańskich, t. VI, Wroclaw 1977, s. 414). Pierwsza ewentualność sygeruje, że zachodnia eks-pansja Słowian rozpoczęta się kilka pokoleń wcześniej niż się obecnie przypuszcza, druga —że rozgraniczenie pomiędzy Cheruskami a Swebami (Gotonami przez Labę względnie Semnonami przez Soławę) uksztaltowało się — być może po klęsce Marboda — dalej na południowy wschód, niżby wynikało z Germanii Tacyta (patrz wyżej). Tyle tylko, że nie będzie to sytuacja z IV w. Istnienie styku serbsko-turyńskiego w początkach VII w. potwierdza Kronika Fredegara (Chronicarum quae dicuntw; Fredegari scholastici, wyd. B., Krusch, Monu-menta Gennaniae Bisiorka, Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum, t. II, Hannover 1888, s. 130); bylby on jednak późniejszy niż styk Franków ze Slowianami (Sldawami, Winklami) w Alpach i na osi Dunaju. Tyle tylko, te o takim styku możemy mówić dopiero w końcu VI w.
- ^ Fomina, Z.Ye. (2016). "Славянская топонимия в современной Германии в лингвокультуроло-гическоми лингво-историческом аспек" [Slavonic Toponymy in Linguoculturological and Linguo-historical Aspects in Germany]. Современные лингвистические и методико-дидактические исследования (in Russian). 1 (12): 30. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
Как следует из многотомного издания „Славянские древности" (1953) известного чешского ученого Любора Нидерле, первым историческим известием о славянах на Эльбе является запись Вибия Секвестра «De fluminibus» (VI век), в которой об Эльбе говорится: «Albis Suevos a Cervetiis dividit». Cervetii означает здесь наименованиесербскогоокруга (pagus) на правом берегу Эльбы, между Магдебургом и Лужицами, который в позднейших грамотах Оттона I, Оттона II и Генриха II упоминается под терминомCiervisti, Zerbisti, Kirvisti,нынешний Цербст[8]. В тот период, как пишет Любор Нидерле, а именно в 782 году, началось большое, имевшее мировое значение, наступление германцев против сла-вян. ПерейдяЭльбу, славяне представляли большую опасность для империи Карла Вели-кого. Для того, чтобы создать какой-то порядок на востоке, Карл Великий в 805 году соз-дал так называемый limes Sorabicus, который должен был стать границей экономических (торговых) связеймежду германцами и славянами[8].
- ^ a b c Sigfried J. de Laet; Joachim Herrmann (1 January 1996). History of Humanity: From the seventh century B.C. to the seventh century A.D. UNESCO. pp. 282–284. ISBN 978-92-3-102812-0.
- ^ a b Gerald Stone (2015). Slav Outposts in Central European History: The Wends, Sorbs and Kashubs. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-4725-9211-8.
- ^ Vlasto 1970, p. 142.
- ^ Saskia Pronk-Tiethoff (2013). The Germanic loanwords in Proto-Slavic. Rodopi. pp. 68–69. ISBN 978-94-012-0984-7.
- ^ Živković, Tibor (2002). Јужни Словени под византијском влашћу (600-1025). Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. p. 198. ISBN 9788677430276.
- ^ Živković, Tibor (2012). De conversione Croatorum et Serborum: A Lost Source. Belgrade: The Institute of History. pp. 152–185.
- ^ Sava S. Vujić, Bogdan M. Basarić (1998). Severni Srbi (ne)zaboravljeni narod. Beograd. p. 40.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Miloš S. Milojević (1872). Odlomci Istorije Srba i srpskih jugoslavenskih zemalja u Turskoj i Austriji. U državnoj štampariji. p. 1.
- ^ Relja Novaković (1977). Odakle su Sebl dos̆il na Balkansko poluostrvo. Istorijski institut. p. 337.
- ^ Kardaras, Georgios (2018). Florin Curta; Dušan Zupka (eds.). Byzantium and the Avars, 6th-9th Century AD: political, diplomatic and cultural relations. BRILL. p. 95. ISBN 978-90-04-38226-8.
- ^ V. von Keltsch, Der bairische Geograph, Alpreussische Monatsschr., 23 (1886),
- ^ Gerhard Billig, Zur Rekonstruktion der ältesten slawischen Burgbezirke im obersächsisch-meißnischen Raum auf der Grundlage des Bayerischen Geographen, Neues Archiv für sächsische Geschichte 66 (1995), s. 27-67
- ^ a b Sedov, Valentin Vasilyevich (2013) [1995]. Славяне в раннем Средневековье [Sloveni u ranom srednjem veku (Slavs in Early Middle Ages)]. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga. pp. 191–205. ISBN 978-86-6263-026-1.
- ^ John Sandford (3 April 2013). Encyclopedia of Contemporary German Culture. Routledge. p. 412. ISBN 978-1-136-81603-1.
- ^ Paul M. Barford (2001). The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press. pp. 64–65, 77–78, 104–105. ISBN 9780801439773
- ^ Brather, Sebastian (2004). "The beginnings of Slavic settlement east of the river Elbe". Antiquity. 78 (300): 314–329. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00112980. S2CID 163828473.
- ^ *Pech, Edmund (2015). "Milzener, Lusizer und Glomaci-Daleminzer Kontroversen zur frühen Geschichte der Sorben" [Milceni, Luzici and Glomaci-Daleminci. Controversies concerning the early History of the Sorbs]. LĚTOPIS. Zeitschrift für sorbische Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur. Časopis za rěč, stawizny a kulturu Łužiskich Serbow (2): 129.
- ^ Golecka 2003, p. 57.
- ^ a b Golecka 2003, p. 58.
- ^ a b c d Matyniak 1968, p. 241.
- ^ Remus 2014, p. 4.
- ^ Schönwälder, Karen (1996). "The Constitutional Protection of Minorities in Germany: Weimar Revisited". The Slavonic and East European Review. 74 (1): 38–65. ISSN 0037-6795. JSTOR 4211979.
- ^ Golecka 2003, p. 61.
- ^ Ramet 2016, p. 227.
- ^ Pynsent 2000, p. 115.
- ^ The Group 1993, p. 32.
- ^ Zank 1998, p. 173.
- ^ Glaser 2007, p. 275.
- ^ Golecka 2003, p. 60.
- ^ Dolowy-Rybinska, Nicole (2023). Upper Sorbian Language Policy in Education: Bringing the Language Back, or Bringing It Forward?. Brill. p. 43. ISBN 978-9004510746.
- ^ Absees: Soviet and East European Abstracts Series, Volume 4. Oxford Microform Publications Limited. 1973. p. 182.
- ^ Absees: Soviet and East European Abstracts Series, Volume 4. Oxford Microform Publications Limited. 1973. p. 182.
- ^ Plum, Catherine (2015). Antifascism After Hitler: East German Youth and Socialist Memory, 1949-1989. Routledge. p. 51. ISBN 978-1317599289.
- ^ Ramet, Sabrina (1995). Social Currents in Eastern Europe: The Sources and Consequences of the Great Transformation. Duke University Press. p. 69. ISBN 0822315483.
- ^ "DOMOWINA - Medijowe wozjewjenje - Pressemitteilung- Press release". sorben.com. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "Kulturhoheit: Sorben bitten Europa um Hilfe - International - Politik - Tagesspiegel". tagesspiegel.de. 7 March 2008. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "Lužički Srbi strahuju od uspjeha AfD-a". www.index.hr (in Croatian). Retrieved 2024-07-27.
- ^ Herwig, Sophie (3 February 2019). ""Scheiß Sorben", brüllen sie". zeit.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ Rębała, Martínez-Cruz; et al. (2013). "Contemporary paternal genetic landscape of Polish and German populations: from early medieval Slavic expansion to post-World War II resettlements". European Journal of Human Genetics. 21 (4): 415–422. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.190. PMC 3598329. PMID 22968131.
- ^ Kushniarevich, Utevska; et al. (2015). "Genetic Heritage of the Balto-Slavic Speaking Populations: A Synthesis of Autosomal, Mitochondrial and Y-Chromosomal Data". PLOS One. 10 (9): Table K in S1 File. Frequencies of the NRY haplogroups in Balto–Slavic populations. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1035820K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135820. PMC 4558026. PMID 26332464.
- ^ Behar DM, Thomas MG, Skorecki K, et al. (October 2003). "Multiple origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y chromosome evidence for both Near Eastern and European ancestries". American Journal of Human Genetics. 73 (4): 768–779. doi:10.1086/378506. PMC 1180600. PMID 13680527.
- ^ Immel, UD; et al. (January 2006). "Y-chromosomal STR haplotype analysis reveals surname-associated strata in the East-German population". European Journal of Human Genetics. 14, pages 577–582 (2006) (5): 577–82. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201572. PMID 16435000.
- ^ Rodig, Heike; et al. (January 2007). "Population study and evaluation of 20 Y-chromosome STR loci in Germans". Int J Legal Med. 121 (1): 24–27. doi:10.1007/s00414-005-0075-5. PMID 16710736. S2CID 40129551.
- ^ Krawczak, M.; et al. (April 2008). "Genetic Diversity in the German Population". eLS. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0020801. ISBN 978-0470016176 – via Wiley Online Library.
- ^ Kowalski, Kowalski (December 2020). "The Early Mediaeval Slav-German border (Limes Sorabicus) in the light of research into Y-chromosome polymorphism in contemporary and historical German populations". Geographia Polonica. 93 (4): 569–596. doi:10.7163/GPol.0190.
- ^ Veeramah, Krishna R. (May 2011). "Genetic variation in the Sorbs of eastern Germany in the context of broader European genetic diversity". European Journal of Human Genetics. v.19(9): 935–1018 2011 Sep (9): 995–1001. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.65. PMC 3179365. PMID 21559053.
- ^ Gross, Arnd (July 2011). "Population-genetic comparison of the Sorbian isolate population in Germany with the German KORA population using genome-wide SNP arrays". BMC Genetics. 12 (67) 67. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-67. PMC 3199861. PMID 21798003.
- ^ Lazaridis, Iosif (August 2016). "Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East". Nature. 536 (7617): 414–429. Bibcode:2016Natur.536..419L. doi:10.1038/nature19310. PMC 5003663. PMID 27459054.
- ^ Administrator. "Działalność Wojciecha (Wojcecha) Kócki w serbołużyckim ruchu narodowym w latach 1945 - 1950". prolusatia.pl. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ Administrator. "Akcja "Narodny Partyzan Łužica" (1946 - 1947) i jej reperkusje w serbołużyckim ruchu narodowym". prolusatia.pl. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "Warum nicht mehr als 100 Menschen noch kompetent Niedersorbisch sprechen". rbb24.de. 7 April 2025. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ Paul Wexler, The Ashkenazic Jews, Slavica Publishers, 1993
- ^ Paul Wexler (1992), "From Serb Lands to Sorb Lands," in The Balkan Substratum of Yiddish: A Reassessment of the Unique Romance and Greek Components, Harrassowitz Verlag, 1992, p. 111
- ^ Germany's Sorbs celebrate Zapust festival Archived 2021-03-09 at the Wayback Machine. The local Germany's News in English. March 12, 2010.
- ^ German Slavic minority cultivates a colorful Easter tradition Archived 2011-10-01 at the Wayback Machine. Ethiopian Review. March 31, 2010.
- ^ According to the 1900 Census. See Ernst Tschernik: Die Entwicklung der Sorbischen Bevölkerung. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1954, P. 34.
- ^ Андреева, Г. Н. (2005). "Сорбы в ФРГ: ценный опыт правового регулирования статуса национального меньшинства в немецкой и российской литературе". Социальные и гуманитарные науки (1): 40–42.
- ^ Гугнин, А. А. (1997). Введение в историю серболужицкой словесности и литературы от истоков до наших дней (PDF). М. p. 90.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ "Unknown". Slovanský přehled. 26 (1): 152. 1934.
- ^ Šołta, Jan (1984). Nowy biografiski slownik k stawiznam a kulture Serbow. p. 115.
- ^ Wojciechowski, Zygmunt (1948). "Bolesław Chrobry i rok 1000". Przegląd Zachodni (in Polish) (3): 248.
- ^ Jasienica, Pawel (2007) (in Polish). Polska Piastow. Proszynski Media. ISBN 978-83-7648-284-2
- ^ Bernhardt, John W (1993). Itinerant Kingship and Royal Monasteries in Early Medieval Germany, c. 936–1075. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-52183-1
- ^ "Лужички Срби, њихова историја и култура". // rastko.rs. Retrieved 2016-10-24.
- ^ Pałys 2008, p. 131.
- ^ a b Matyniak 1968, p. 240.
- ^ Matyniak 1968, p. 242.
- ^ a b Matyniak 1968, p. 243.
- ^ Słownik geograficzny Królestwa Polskiego i innych krajów słowiańskich, Tom VII (in Polish). Warszawa. 1886. p. 117.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Matyniak 1968, p. 244.
- ^ Sukertowa-Biedrawina, Emilia (1958). "Z zagadnień walki o szkołę polską w diecezji ełckiej w pierwszej połowie XIX wieku". Komunikaty Mazursko-Warmińskie (in Polish). No. 1. p. 65.
- ^ Lewaszkiewicz 2015, p. 88.
- ^ Lewaszkiewicz 2015, pp. 88–89.
- ^ Wojtal, Józef (1973). "Michał Hornik – budziszyński przyjaciel Polski i popularyzator dzieł Kopernika". Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka (in Polish). XXVIII (2). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich: 184–186.
- ^ a b Lewaszkiewicz 2015, p. 91.
- ^ a b Leksykon Polactwa w Niemczech (in Polish). Opole: Związek Polaków w Niemczech. 1939. p. 364.
- ^ Lewaszkiewicz 2015, pp. 91–92.
- ^ Orzechowski, Marian (1976). "Kwestia serbołużycka w polskiej myśli politycznej w latach 1939–1947". Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka (in Polish). XXXI (2). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk: 379.
- ^ Smołka, Leonard (1978). "Centrala prasowa Związku Polaków w Niemczech (1923–1939)". Kwartalnik Historii Prasy Polskiej (in Polish). XVII (2): 52, 59.
- ^ a b Pałys 2008, p. 133.
- ^ Lewaszkiewicz 2015, p. 93.
- ^ Lewaszkiewicz 2015, p. 94.
- ^ Lewaszkiewicz 2015, p. 92.
- ^ Pałys 2008, pp. 133–134.
- ^ Listy katyńskiej ciąg dalszy. Straceni na Ukrainie (in Polish). Warszawa: Niezależny Komitet Historyczny Badania Zbrodni Katyńskiej, Polska Fundacja Katyńska, Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa. 1994. p. 30.
- ^ Orzechowski, pp. 380–381
- ^ Joanna Banik. "Grób Jana Skali". Zabytek.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 5 November 2023.
- ^ "Verwaistes Erbe". 31 January 2020.
- ^ "Prołuż Akademicki Związek Przyjaciół Łużyc" Jakub Brodacki. Polska Grupa Marketingowa 2006 ISBN 83-60151-00-8
- ^ Pałys, Piotr (2002). "Próby utworzenia w Zgorzelcu w latach 1946–1948 gimnazjum łużyckiego". Rocznik Lubuski (in Polish). Vol. XXVIII, no. 1. Zielona Góra. p. 90. ISSN 0485-3083.
- ^ Pałys, p. 92
- ^ Pałys, pp. 94–95
- ^ Pałys 2008, p. 134.
- ^ a b c Pałys 2008, p. 136.
- ^ Pałys 2008, pp. 134–135.
- ^ Pałys 2008, p. 135.
- ^ Joanna Banik (11 October 2021). "Offener Brief zum Beschluss des Hauptausschusses des Bautzener Stadtrats vom 6. Oktober 2021 zur Wiedererrichtung eines Bismarck-Denkmals". Serbski institut (in German). Retrieved 15 October 2023.
- ^ Pałys, pp. 89–90
- ^ a b Sokolović, Dalibor (2012). ""Srbska Lužica" - efemeryda czasopiśmiennictwa sorabistycznego na Bałkanach". Pro Lusatia (in Polish and English). Vol. 11. Opole. pp. 15, 20.
- ^ a b Pałys 2012, p. 149.
- ^ Pałys 2012, p. 150.
- ^ Pałys 2012, p. 151.
- ^ "Matica slovenská prijala pozvania Matice lužickosrbskej – Matica slovenská". matica.sk. 23 May 2025. Retrieved 2025-08-11.
- ^ "V Lužici můžete zahlédnout odraz české duše". www.ukforum.cz. Retrieved 2025-08-11.
- ^ "Delegácia Matice slovenskej navštívila Lužických Srbov". www.teraz.sk. 22 May 2025. Retrieved 2025-08-11.
- ^ Víšek, Zdeněk. "Lužičtí Srbové a česko-lužickosrbské vztahy". Listy (in Czech). Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ a b Henning Hahn, Hans; Kunze, Peter (1999). Nationale Minderheiten und staatliche Minderheitenpolitik in Deutschland im 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH. ISBN 978-3-05-003343-3.
- ^ Kaleta, Petr (2006). Češi o Lužických Srbech. Prague: Masarykův ústav AV ČR. p. 15. ISBN 9788086495415.
- ^ Belzyt, Leszek (1998). Sprachliche Minderheiten im preussischen Staat: 1815 - 1914 ; die preußische Sprachenstatistik in Bearbeitung und Kommentar. Marburg: Herder-Inst. ISBN 978-3-87969-267-5.
- ^ Petr Kaleta: Češi o Lužických Srbech. Prague,2006. Page 15.
- ^ "Sorben". sachsen.de. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ Nielsen. Georg, R. In Search of a Home,(1977); Birmingham Slavonic Monographs. ISBN 0 70440236 X.
- ^ "Texas Wendish Heritage". Archived from the original on 23 February 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "Satzung der Domowina - Bund Lausitzer Sorben e. V." domowina.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ "Regionalverbände und Mitgliedsvereine der Domowina". domowina.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ a b "Geförderte Einrichtungen". zalozba.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ a b c "Geschichte, Satzung und Finanzierung der Stiftung". zalozba.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ "Minderheit: Die Sorgen der Sorben". Der Tagesspiegel. 29 May 2009. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ Essler, Christian. "Bautzen - Protestdemo gegen Kulturabbau für das Sorbische National-Ensemble". www.lausitznews.de (in German). Archived from the original on 2013-10-15. Retrieved 2025-08-08.
- ^ "Abkommen über die Finanzierung der Stiftung des sorbischen Volkes unterzeichnet". bmi.bund.de. Federal Ministry of the Interior (Germany). 20 July 2021. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
Seehofer: "Wertvolle Arbeit der Stiftung ist auch in Zukunft auskömmlich finanziert"
- ^ "17.-18. Jahrhundert". archive.ph. Wendisches Museum. Archived from the original on 2022-06-25. Retrieved 2025-08-09.
- ^ "Smolerjec kniharnja / Smolerʼsche Verlagsbuchhandlung in Bautzen". domowina-verlag.de. Domowina-Verlag Bautzen. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ "Allgemein bildende Schulen im Land Brandenburg". archive.ph. 2013-01-06. Archived from the original on 2024-12-05. Retrieved 2025-08-09.
- ^ "Bilinguale Angebote und Fremdsprachenzertifikate". mbjs-brandenburg.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ "Willkommen auf den Seiten des Sorbischen Schulvereins e. V." sorbischer-schulverein.de. Retrieved 9 August 2025.
- ^ "Extrem Düster: "Der Tote im Spreewald"". wp.de. 25 October 2009. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ "Die Sorben – ein slawisches Volk in Deutschland". minet-tv.com. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ "Minoritads en l'Europa (Minderheiten in Europa): Ils Sorbs en la Germania (Die Sorben in Deutschland)". rtr.ch. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ "Sorben ins Kino! Auf der Suche nach dem sorbischen Film". filmfestivalcottbus.de. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ "Straight Outta Crostwitz". ardmediathek.de. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ "Straight Outta Crostwitz". mdr.de. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ Meyer, Lars (18 April 2024). ""Bei uns heißt sie Hanka" | Film über sorbische Identität startet im Kino". mdr.de. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
Sources
[edit]- Glaser, Konstanze (2007). Minority Languages and Cultural Diversity in Europe: Gaelic and Sorbian Perspectives. Multilingual Matters. ISBN 9781853599323.
- Golecka, Aneta (2003). "Serbołużyczanie w Niemczech". Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio K, Politologia (in Polish). X. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie.
- Lewaszkiewicz, Tadeusz (2015). "Zarys dziejów sorabistyki i zainteresowań Łużycami w Wielkopolsce". In Kurowska, Hanna (ed.). Kapitał społeczno-polityczny Serbołużyczan (in Polish). Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski.
- Matyniak, Alojzy S. (1968). "Kontakty kulturalne polsko-serbołużyckie w XVIII w.". Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka (in Polish). XXIII (2). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
- Pałys, Piotr (2008). "Związki Serbołużyczan ze Śląskiem. Wstępny zarys problematyki". Pro Lusatia (in Polish). Vol. 7. Opole.
- Pałys, Piotr (2012). "Serbołużyczanie z perspektywy Belgradu. Opracowanie Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych Federacyjnej Ludowej Republiki Jugosławii (Materijal o Lužičkim Srbima) z 1949 r.". Pro Lusatia (in Polish). Vol. 11. Opole.
- Pynsent, Robert [in Czech] (2000). The Phoney Peace: Power and Culture in Central Europe, 1945-49. School of Slavonic and East European Studies. ISBN 9780903425018.
- Ramet, Sabrina P. (2016). Alternatives to Democracy in Twentieth-Century: Collectivist Visions of Alternative Modernity. Central European University Press. ISBN 9789633863107.
- Remus, Thérèse (2014). Endangered minority languages. A comparison of the Upper Sorbian and North Frisian cases. GRIN Verlag. ISBN 9783656685258.
- The Group (1993). Minority Rights Group International Report. Minority Rights. ISBN 9781897693001.
- Zank, W. (1998). The German Melting Pot: Multiculturality in Historical Perspective. Springer. ISBN 9780230375208.
- Stone, Gerald (2015). The Smallest Slavonic Nation: The Sorbs of Lusatia. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4742-4154-0.
- Veeramah; et al. (2011). "Genetic variation in the Sorbs of eastern Germany in the context of broader European genetic diversity". European Journal of Human Genetics. 19 (9): 995–1001. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.65. PMC 3179365. PMID 21559053.
- Vlasto, A. P. (1970). The Entry of the Slavs Into Christendom: An Introduction to the Medieval History of the Slavs. CUP Archive. pp. 142–147. ISBN 978-0-521-07459-9.
- Žura, Slavica Vrkić (2011). "Lužički Srbi – Najmanji slavenski narod". Ethnologica Dalmatica (in Croatian). 18 (1): 93–130.
Further reading
[edit]- Filip Gańczak Mniejszość w czasach popkultury, Newsweek, nr 22/2007, 03.06.2007.
- W kręgu Krabata. Szkice o Juriju Brězanie, literaturze, kulturze i językach łużyckich, pod red. J.Zarka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice, 2002.
- Mirosław Cygański, Rafał Leszczyński Zarys dziejów narodowościowych Łużyczan PIN, Instytut Śląski, Opole 1997.
- Die Sorben in Deutschland, pod red. M.Schiemann, Stiftung für das sorbische Volk, Görlitz 1997.
- Mały informator o Serbołużyczanach w Niemczech, pod red. J.Pětrowej, Załožba za serbski lud, 1997.
- Dolnoserbske nałogi/Obyczaje Dolnych Łużyc, pod red. M.Stock, Załožba za serbski lud, 1997.
- "Rys dziejów serbołużyckich" Wilhelm Bogusławski Piotrogród 1861
- "Prołuż Akademicki Związek Przyjaciół Łużyc" Jakub Brodacki. Polska Grupa Marketingowa 2006 ISBN 83-60151-00-8.
- "Polska wobec Łużyc w drugiej połowie XX wieku. Wybrane problemy", Mieczkowska Małgorzata, Szczecin 2006 ISBN 83-7241-487-4.
- Wukasch, C. (2004) A Rock Against Alien Waves: A History of the Wends. Concordia University Press: Austin, TX ISBN 978-1-881848-07-3.
- "Sorbs," David Zersen, in Germans and the Americas: Culture, Politics and History, 3 vols., edited by Thomas Adam. ABC-CLIO, 2005.
External links
[edit]- . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 25 (11th ed.). 1911.
- The Domowina Institution
- SERBSKE NOWINY—Sorbian newspaper
- SERBSKI INSTITUT—Sorbian history and culture
- Independent Sorbian internet magazine Archived 2007-08-26 at the Wayback Machine
- Sorbian emigration into Australia
- Project Rastko - Lusatia, Electronic Library of Sorbian-Serbian Ties
- Texas Wendish Heritage Society
- Wendish Heritage Society of Australia
Sorbs
View on GrokipediaTerminology and Identity
Etymology
The ethnonym "Sorb" stems from the Slavic self-designations Serbja (for Upper Sorbs) and Serby (for Lower Sorbs), which trace to the Proto-Slavic sьrbъ, an appellative denoting kinship or alliance among tribal groups.[11] This root appears in early medieval Slavic tribal nomenclature, reflecting endogenous linguistic evolution rather than external impositions. Philological analysis links sьrbъ to Proto-Indo-European ser-, connoting protection or guardianship, underscoring communal bonds in early Slavic societies.[12] German exonyms evolved separately: "Wenden" (Wends) derives from Roman-era references to eastern tribes as Veneti, a term applied broadly to Slavs by medieval chroniclers and persisting in Germanic usage for Slavic populations west of the Oder.[13] By contrast, "Sorben" emerged later as a direct adaptation of the Slavic self-name, gaining currency in German texts from the 16th century onward to specify the Lusatian groups, distinguishing them from generalized "Wend" labels for other Slavs.[11] Chronicles like that of Thietmar of Merseburg (c. 1012–1018) document early attestations of Sorb-related tribal names, such as the Surbici, portraying them as pagan entities in the Saxon marches without implying migration from southeastern Slavic regions.[14] These records prioritize empirical geographic and political contexts over speculative etymological ties to non-local groups, aligning with philological evidence of localized Proto-Slavic derivations.[15]Ethnic designations and external perceptions
The Sorbs maintain a primary internal distinction between Upper Sorbs (Serbja or Łužičane), residing mainly in Upper Lusatia around Bautzen in Saxony, and Lower Sorbs (Serby), concentrated in Lower Lusatia around Cottbus in Brandenburg, a division rooted in geographic, linguistic, and cultural differences that has persisted since at least the medieval period.[16] This binary self-identification emphasizes local affiliations over a unified ethnic label, with Upper Sorbs numbering approximately 40,000 and Lower Sorbs around 20,000 based on organizational estimates derived from community surveys and declarations.[1] A pan-Sorbian consciousness, transcending these subgroups, crystallized during the 19th-century national revival, driven by intellectuals like Handrij Zejler who fostered shared literary and cultural endeavors amid broader European nationalism, though subgroup identities remained dominant.[17] Externally, German-speaking majorities have long perceived and labeled Sorbs as Wends (Wenden), a term originating from early medieval references to Slavic tribes in the region and implying a residual, pre-Germanic presence subject to cultural assimilation, as evidenced in historical administrative and ethnographic texts that framed them as an archaic minority rather than equals.[18] This designation persisted into the modern era, reflecting a view of Sorbs as ethnically distinct yet integrable into German society, particularly during periods of state-driven Germanization policies. In contrast, Slavic neighbors in Poland and Czechia have regarded Sorbs through lenses of ethnic kinship, occasionally invoking pan-Slavic solidarity in 19th-century discourse, though practical interactions remained limited by borders and differing national trajectories.[19] Contemporary self-reported Sorbian ethnicity in Germany hovers around 60,000 individuals, per estimates from minority advocacy groups and academic assessments aggregating local registrations and surveys, significantly outpacing the roughly 20,000 fluent speakers and underscoring a broader cultural affiliation detached from daily language use.[1][8] This discrepancy highlights evolving perceptions of Sorbian identity as symbolic and heritage-based rather than strictly linguistic or tribal, with official recognition as a national minority since 1990 reinforcing minority status over historical tribal connotations.[20]Origins
Prehistoric settlement and archaeology
Archaeological evidence points to the initial Slavic settlement of Lusatia occurring during the 6th and 7th centuries CE, coinciding with the decline of Germanic populations following the Migration Period. Excavations reveal a shift in material culture, including the appearance of hand-formed pottery typical of early Slavic groups, such as those linked to the Prague-Korchak horizon, which differs markedly from preceding Germanic wheel-turned wares and cremation urns. This transition is evident in sites across Lower and Upper Lusatia, where open villages replaced earlier farmsteads, indicating population influx from eastern regions rather than local evolution.[21][22] Settlement patterns evolved toward defensibility by the 8th century, with fortified structures emerging amid interactions with expanding Frankish and Saxon influences. The ringwall at Raddusch, constructed around the 9th to 10th centuries, exemplifies this development: a circular earth-and-timber rampart enclosing approximately 1.5 hectares, likely serving as a refuge for nearby communities during raids. Pottery and tools recovered from the site, including coarse handmade vessels and iron implements, align with West Slavic assemblages, underscoring continuity from initial migrations without evidence of pre-6th-century Slavic presence.[23][24] Claims of deeper autochthony, positing Slavic roots in Bronze Age or Iron Age cultures like the Lusatian (c. 1300–500 BCE), are unsupported by stratigraphic discontinuities and ceramic typologies, which show no direct lineage to Slavic forms. Regional excavations, including those in the Elbe-Saale region, confirm depopulation post-Germanic exodus before Slavic repopulation, refuting notions of unbroken continuity through appeals to earlier substrate populations. Such interpretations often stem from 19th-century nationalist historiography rather than empirical stratigraphy.[25]Population genetics and anthropology
Genetic studies of the Sorbian population, utilizing genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, demonstrate close autosomal affinities with other West Slavic groups. Analysis of 178 unrelated Upper Sorbian individuals revealed the lowest pairwise FST distances to Czechs (0.0008) and Poles (0.0011), exceeding those to neighboring Germans (0.0018–0.0026), with principal component analysis positioning Sorbs within the West Slavic cluster despite geographic adjacency to German-speaking populations.[26] This pattern aligns with linguistic and historical evidence of shared Slavic origins, reflecting limited gene flow from surrounding Germanic groups.[26] Paternal lineages further underscore Sorbian Slavic heritage, with Y-chromosome data showing elevated frequencies of haplogroup R1a subclades such as M458, characteristic of West Slavs, in samples from Lusatia (n=82 Upper Sorbs).[27] Genome-wide comparisons of 977 Sorbs against 1,644 Germans from the KORA cohort indicate genetic isolation, evidenced by an order-of-magnitude higher FST, increased runs of homozygosity (particularly 2.5–5 Mb lengths suggestive of ancient bottlenecks), and eastward-shifted principal components toward Polish-adjacent clusters.[28] These signatures point to historical endogamy and population contractions—causally linked to episodes of persecution and cultural resistance—preserving Slavic ancestry amid assimilation pressures, with subtle but detectable differentiation from regional Germans.[28] Early 20th-century anthropometric surveys of Lusatian inhabitants, including Sorbian communities, documented physical traits consistent with West Slavic norms, such as dolichocephalic indices and robust cranial features derived from prehistoric Slavic settlers, rather than predominant Germanic influences.[29] Such data refuted 19th-century hypotheses positing Teutonic origins for Sorbs, which lacked empirical support and ignored archaeological continuity of Slavic material culture; modern genetics corroborates the primacy of West Slavic morphological inheritance over admixture-driven shifts.[29][26]History
Early and High Middle Ages
The ancestors of the Sorbs, as West Slavic tribes, began settling the region between the Elbe and Saale rivers around 600 AD, following the Migration Period's depopulation by Germanic tribes moving southward.[30] These settlers established communities in Lusatia, forming the basis of Sorbian polities amid ongoing migrations from the east.[31] The Sorbs, recorded as "Surbi" in the Chronicle of Fredegar, first appear in historical sources in 631 AD, during alliances against Frankish expansion, such as under Duke Dervan who joined Samo's realm.[30] By the 8th century, Sorbian groups raided Thuringia and Saxony, prompting Frankish military responses under Charlemagne, including campaigns by Adalgis and others to reassert control and extract tribute.[32] In the 10th century, the Daleminzi (Dalenici) and Milceni emerged as distinct principalities; the Daleminzi occupied areas near the Elbe around modern Dresden, while the Milceni controlled Upper Lusatia near Bautzen, both paying periodic tribute to Saxon rulers to maintain autonomy.[33] King Henry I subdued the Daleminzi in 928 AD through conquest, imposing tribute obligations documented in contemporary annals as essential for border security.[18] Emperor Otto I intensified campaigns against Sorbian revolts in the 940s and 950s, defeating coalitions at battles like those near Recknitz in 955, leading to feudal incorporation via burgwards—fortified districts manned by Slavic and German settlers to enforce loyalty and taxation.[18] Christianization accompanied these efforts, with Otto I initiating missionary work among the southern Wends (Sorbs) and establishing bishoprics, such as in Meissen by 968 AD, to integrate the region into the Holy Roman Empire's ecclesiastical structure.[33] Tribute records from Milceni principalities, including annual payments in silver and cattle, evidenced their subjugation, though intermittent uprisings persisted until stabilized by the 11th century under margraves like Dietrich I of Meissen.[34]Late Middle Ages and early modern period
During the 13th and 14th centuries, the Margraviate of Brandenburg in Lower Lusatia and the Kingdom of Bohemia in Upper Lusatia actively promoted German settlement through the granting of charters and privileges to colonists, leading to the foundation of numerous towns and a gradual demographic shift favoring German speakers in urban areas.[22] Land records from this period document the allocation of estates to German settlers, often at the expense of Sorbian communal land rights, as local Slavic nobility ceded influence to incoming burghers who introduced German municipal laws and customs.[35] This colonization eroded residual Sorbian political autonomy, as charters emphasized feudal obligations that integrated settlers into German administrative structures under overlords like the Ascanians and Wettins, reducing native control over local governance.[22] The Hussite Wars of the 1420s further accelerated Germanization in Lusatia, particularly in Upper Lusatia under Bohemian rule, where Sorbian communities experienced military incursions and cultural exchanges amid the conflict between Hussite forces and imperial allies.[18] While some Sorbs in border regions may have aligned with Hussite sympathizers due to shared Slavic ties, the Lusatian estates predominantly supported Emperor Sigismund's anti-Hussite campaigns, fostering alliances with German princes and reinforcing German linguistic and administrative dominance in post-war reconstructions.[18] The wars disrupted Sorbian agrarian structures, prompting further influxes of German settlers to repopulate affected areas and fortify towns, thereby diluting native demographic majorities and political leverage.[18] The Lutheran Reformation in the 16th century introduced bilingual clergy in Sorbian parishes to disseminate Protestant teachings, yet it ultimately hastened linguistic assimilation by prioritizing German as the scholarly and ecclesiastical lingua franca.[36] Early Sorbian printing efforts, such as the 1574 Lower Sorbian edition of Luther's catechism and the 1595 Upper Sorbian version, were sponsored by Lutheran authorities to counter Catholic influences, marking the first standardized religious texts in the languages.[36] However, these initiatives relied on German-trained pastors who often conducted services in both languages, embedding Sorbian within a German-dominated church hierarchy that viewed the minority tongue as a tool for conversion rather than cultural preservation.[36]Enlightenment to industrialization
The establishment of the Sorbian Seminary in Prague in 1706 marked an early institutional effort to promote literacy and education among Catholic Sorbs in their native languages, countering prevailing German dominance in schooling.[37] Concurrently, translations of the New Testament into Upper Sorbian (1706) and Lower Sorbian (1709) by figures such as Michal Frencel and Bogumil Fabricius provided foundational texts for standardizing written forms.[31] These developments, amid Prussian acquisition of Lusatia in 1815, laid groundwork for Enlightenment-era resistance to assimilation, though empirical trends showed persistent linguistic shifts toward German in administrative and ecclesiastical contexts. In the mid-18th century, the first grammar of literary Lower Sorbian appeared in 1761, authored by Johann Gottfried Hauptmann, aiding the codification of the language's southern Cottbus dialect variant.[38] Secular literature emerged with Jurij Mjen's 1767 translation of Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock's Messias, signaling a cultural awakening influenced by broader Slavic nationalisms.[31] By the early 19th century, intellectuals like Handrij Zejler advanced this revival through periodicals such as Tydzenska Nowina (1841), while Jan Arnošt Smoler and Leopold Haupt's collection of Sorbian folk songs (1841–1842) preserved oral traditions amid growing print culture.[39] During the 1848–1849 revolutions, Sorbian peasants formed societies advocating social reforms and national recognition, culminating in the "Great Petition of the Sorbs" endorsed by approximately 5,000 households; representatives like Smoler engaged pan-Slavic circles but prioritized minority rights within a German framework at forums including the Frankfurt Assembly.[31] [40] These demands yielded limited concessions, as revolutionary failures reinforced Prussian centralization and Germanization policies, subordinating Sorbian aspirations to broader unification efforts. Industrialization from the mid-19th century, driven by lignite coal extraction in Lusatia, spurred economic growth but facilitated demographic shifts through influxes of German laborers, elevating their proportion in the region while diluting Sorbian speakers from roughly 30% to 10% of the total population over the century.[41] Rural Sorbs increasingly migrated to urban mining centers, where intermarriage and workplace German monolingualism accelerated assimilation; by the late 1800s, village disruptions from extraction compounded emigration waves, such as to Texas starting in 1854, further eroding compact settlements.[31] [30] Census trends reflected these pressures, with Sorbian vitality sustained primarily in cultural enclaves despite systemic incentives for linguistic conformity.[42]World War I, interwar, and Nazi era
In the aftermath of World War I, Lusatian Sorbs, who had been conscripted into the German military alongside other citizens, faced continued political marginalization in the Weimar Republic. The Domowina, a Sorbian cultural and political organization originally established in 1912, intensified efforts for recognition and autonomy, including petitions in 1919 demanding self-governance or separation for Lusatia amid the post-war redrawing of borders; these were ultimately rejected by German authorities, preserving Sorbian subordination within Saxony and Prussia.[43] With the Nazi seizure of power in 1933, Sorbs were officially classified as "Wendish-speaking Germans" rather than a distinct Slavic ethnicity, a designation aimed at denying their national identity and facilitating assimilation into the German Volksgemeinschaft. Sorbian organizations like the Domowina were dissolved by 1937, and public use of Sorbian languages was progressively banned, including in schools, newspapers, and cultural associations, as part of a broader policy of forced Germanization that renamed Slavic toponyms and suppressed ethnic symbols.[1][44][45] During World War II, male Sorbs were drafted into the Wehrmacht, suffering casualties proportional to those in the German population, while cultural repression intensified with the closure of remaining Sorbian-language schools and the destruction or confiscation of libraries, artifacts, and publications—losses later documented in post-war Sorbian inventories estimating the eradication of thousands of cultural items. Nazi policies explicitly rejected Slavic kinship claims, viewing Sorbian distinctiveness as a dialectal variation amenable to eradication through education and propaganda, though overt genocide was not pursued as with other groups deemed racially inferior.[46][45][47]Post-World War II in the German Democratic Republic
![Demonstration against open-cast mining in Klitten][float-right] The German Democratic Republic (GDR), established in 1949, constitutionally recognized the Sorbs as a national minority with rights to preserve their language and culture, as stipulated in Article 40 of the constitution, which guaranteed the free development of national minorities.[48] This formal acknowledgment aligned with the regime's efforts to demonstrate solidarity with Slavic peoples, including through support for the Domowina, the Sorbian umbrella organization reestablished in 1946 as one of the first post-war cultural associations. However, the Domowina operated under close supervision by the Socialist Unity Party (SED), limiting its autonomy and aligning its activities with state ideology, as evidenced by its monitored structure and promotion of socialist cultural initiatives.[49] Bilingual education was introduced in Sorbian settlement areas, with Sorbian taught as a subject and used alongside German in primary schools, yet higher education and professional training remained predominantly German-language, fostering assimilation.[41] Official policies emphasized cultural preservation, such as state-sponsored folklore groups and media in Sorbian, but centralized planning prioritized economic development over minority linguistic vitality.[50] Intensive brown coal (lignite) mining in Lusatia, a key pillar of the GDR economy, led to the displacement of Sorbian villages through open-cast operations expanded in the 1950s and 1970s, resettling over 22,000 inhabitants, including many Sorbs, to urban or peripheral areas.[51] These relocations disrupted traditional rural communities where Sorbian was primarily spoken, accelerating language shift as families migrated to industrialized zones like Cottbus and Hoyerswerda, where German dominated workplaces and social life.[52] Empirical data from 1980s surveys indicated around 67,000 Sorbian speakers amid a stable ethnic population of about 60,000, but proportional decline in active use reflected urbanization's causal role over ideological suppression.[53] By 1989, despite institutional support, Sorbian linguistic proficiency had eroded in daily contexts, with mining-induced migrations and industrial labor demands contributing to a shift toward German as the lingua franca, underscoring a disconnect between proclaimed minority policies and socioeconomic realities.[2] This pattern of de facto assimilation through modernization, rather than overt prohibition, marked the GDR era for Sorbs.After German reunification
Following German reunification in 1990, the Sorbs benefited from the continuity of state-level protections established in the constitutions of Saxony and Brandenburg, which affirm their rights to cultural preservation, bilingual education, and media support, though implementation has faced debates over funding adequacy amid fiscal constraints in the eastern states.[1] These provisions align with Germany's ratification of the Council of Europe's Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities in 1998, which Sorbs invoke to advocate for enhanced institutional support, including for organizations like the Domowina cultural association.[8] However, systemic challenges persist, with critics noting insufficient federal enforcement to counter assimilation pressures, as evidenced by ongoing disputes over resource allocation for Sorbian-language schools and broadcasting.[54] Demographic erosion has accelerated post-reunification, driven by outmigration and low birth rates in Lusatia's rural areas, reducing the estimated Sorbian population to around 60,000, with fluent speakers numbering 15,000 to 30,000—predominantly elderly and concentrated in Upper Sorbian regions.[1] [55] No official census tracks Sorbian ethnicity due to Germany's policy against registering national minorities, but linguistic surveys indicate a sharp decline, with Lower Sorbian speakers falling to under 5,000 by the 2010s, reflecting intergenerational transmission rates below 20% in some communities.[53] The planned lignite coal phase-out by 2038 has compounded economic vulnerabilities in Sorbian settlement areas, where mining historically displaced villages and eroded cultural sites, as seen in the 2020 demolition of the Sorbian town of Mühlrose for open-cast operations.[56] While halting further extraction could preserve remaining habitats and reduce forced relocations—potentially stabilizing communities by curbing industrial encroachment—job losses exceeding 10,000 in lignite-dependent regions have spurred emigration, exacerbating language loss without targeted retraining programs attuned to minority needs.[57] Sorbian activists have protested such developments, framing them as existential threats while pushing for EU-level recognition to bolster cross-border cultural ties with Polish Lusatians.[58]Geography and Demography
Settlement regions in Lusatia
The Sorbian settlement regions are concentrated in Lusatia, historically divided into Upper Lusatia within the Free State of Saxony and Lower Lusatia within the State of Brandenburg, reflecting administrative boundaries established after German reunification in 1990. These regions encompass legally recognized areas where Sorbian languages hold co-official status alongside German, marked by bilingual place names and signage to denote core habitats.[1] The division contributes to relative isolation between Upper and Lower Sorbian communities, exacerbated by differing state policies and geographic separation along the Spree River valley.[1] Upper Lusatia's core extends from the city of Bautzen (Serbski: Budyšin), the political and cultural hub, northward through highland areas including the districts of Bautzen and Görlitz, with strongholds in rural Catholic parishes around Wittichenau (Serbski: Witaj) and Panschwitz-Kuckau.[1][59] These predominantly agricultural zones, historically tied to the Milceni tribe, feature compact village clusters where Sorbian identity persists amid surrounding German-majority territories.[60] Lower Lusatia centers on Cottbus (Serbski: Chóśebuz) and radiates into Protestant-majority municipalities across the Spree-Neiße and Dahme-Spreewald districts, such as Schleife and north of Cottbus including Drachhausen and Dissen-Striesow.[30][61] This flatter, mining-impacted landscape hosts dispersed settlements shaped by the Luzici tribe's legacy, with administrative recognition aiding preservation efforts despite economic pressures.[1] Post-1945 boundary shifts, stemming from the Potsdam Conference and the Oder-Neisse line, transferred eastern Lusatia to Poland, resulting in the expulsion of Sorbian inhabitants as German citizens and contracting the overall habitat to its current German confines; this reduced prior extensions into areas now Polish, without altering the internal Upper-Lower divide.[1] Subsequent lignite mining further fragmented some villages through relocation, though core regions endured.[1]Population estimates and decline trends
The Sorbian population, based on self-identification, is estimated at approximately 60,000 individuals, with around 40,000 residing in Upper Lusatia (Saxony) and 20,000 in Lower Lusatia (Brandenburg).[60][1] This figure derives from surveys and organizational data rather than mandatory ethnic censuses, as Germany prohibits routine ethnic statistics to protect privacy and avoid discrimination.[62] However, the number of individuals actively participating in Sorbian cultural life or demonstrating fluency in Sorbian languages is substantially lower, estimated at 20,000 to 30,000, reflecting a gap between ethnic affiliation and practical engagement.[1] Sorbian population trends show relative stability in self-identified numbers since the 1990s, but underlying decline in vitality stems from sub-replacement fertility rates mirroring those in eastern Germany (around 1.4-1.5 children per woman in the 2010s-2020s) and persistent net out-migration from rural Lusatia to urban centers like Dresden, Berlin, and Leipzig.[63][64] These factors have contributed to a broader depopulation of the region, with Lusatia experiencing over 20% overall population loss between 2000 and 2020 due to negative natural increase and emigration, disproportionately affecting minority cohesion as younger Sorbs seek economic opportunities elsewhere.[64][65] Assimilation accelerates in urban settings, where intermarriage with non-Sorbs and exposure to dominant German culture erode linguistic and cultural transmission, contrasting with higher retention rates (estimated at 70-80% active affiliation) in rural villages where community institutions remain stronger.[1] Empirical data indicate that rural Sorbian-majority areas sustain higher rates of language use and tradition adherence, while urban migrants often shift to passive identification, exacerbating the divide between nominal and active population segments over generations.[63]Linguistic proficiency and assimilation rates
Estimates of fluent speakers of Upper Sorbian range from 13,000 to 25,000 individuals with good command, while active speakers number around 20,000, with fewer than half using the language daily; these speakers are predominantly elderly.[1][66] For Lower Sorbian, fluent speakers are estimated at 6,400 to 8,000, mostly among older generations, with active usage even lower and critically endangered.[1][53] In the bilingual Sorbian-German environment, proficiency is maintained in private domains like the home but diminishes in public and professional spheres, where German predominates; this domain loss contributes to intergenerational transmission rates below 50% in many families.[67] Surveys indicate a proficiency drop from the 1990s to 2010s, particularly post-German reunification, with Lower Sorbian speakers declining from approximately 5,000 in 2000 to 2,000 by 2010 due to economic migration and reduced institutional support.[53] Upper Sorbian shows relative stability but similar aging trends, with younger generations exhibiting passive knowledge rather than fluency.[68] Both languages hold UNESCO endangered status, with Lower Sorbian classified as critically endangered due to rapid speaker decline.[46] Revival programs, including bilingual education and cultural initiatives since the 1990s, have increased school enrollment but failed to reverse overall assimilation, as evidenced by persistent low transmission rates and no net growth in fluent adult speakers.[69][70] Efficacy data from these efforts highlight challenges in creating new fluent speakers amid dominant German monolingualism in broader society.[71]Languages
Upper Sorbian language
Upper Sorbian (hornjoserbsce) is a West Slavic language spoken primarily in the Upper Lusatia region of Saxony, Germany, with an estimated 18,000 to 25,000 speakers concentrated around Bautzen (Budyšin).[66][72] As the larger of the two Sorbian languages by speaker base, it holds official minority language status in Saxony, where bilingual signage and education support its use, though daily proficiency has declined due to German dominance.[63] Its literary standard, developed since the 16th century, ranks it as the fourth-largest West Slavic literary language after Polish, Czech, and Slovak.[72] Phonologically, Upper Sorbian features palatalized (soft) consonants, such as ś [ɕ] and ź [ʑ], alongside nasal vowels like ą [ã] and ę [ɛ̃], which distinguish it within West Slavic.[66] Glottal stops serve as word-boundary markers before vowels, with higher usage among child speakers than adults, indicating ongoing phonetic variation.[73] Lingual fricatives, including alveolar ś and ź, share inventory traits with Czech but remain underexplored via advanced imaging like MRI.[74] Vocabulary exhibits notable overlaps with Czech, such as shared lexical roots for everyday terms (e.g., Upper Sorbian dźěło for "work" akin to Czech dílo), reflecting geographic and historical ties to Bohemian Slavic dialects rather than Polish influences dominant in Lower Sorbian.[75] Grammatically, it preserves the dual number productively across nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and verbs—a rare retention among living Indo-European languages—alongside six cases and three genders.[76] The single auxiliary verb być ("to be") supports constructions like perfect tenses, while morphosyntactic features include distinct imperative forms and prohibitions via specialized negation.[76][77] Standardization emerged through Protestant Bible translations, beginning with partial New Testament works in the 1670s and culminating in fuller texts by the early 18th century, which established early orthographic norms influenced by German models. In 1841, Jan Ernst Smoler reformed the orthography to a phonetic Latin-based system with diacritics (ą, ě, ź), promoting literary unification and distancing from confessional divides between Catholic and Protestant variants. Contemporary documentation includes digital corpora, such as the EuroSlav 2010 spoken text collection and resources enabling phonotactic research, aiding low-resource language modeling despite limited data compared to major Slavic tongues.[78] These efforts support acoustic modeling transfers from German and preserve the language's vitality amid assimilation pressures.[79]Lower Sorbian language
Lower Sorbian, a West Slavic language, is primarily spoken in the Lower Lusatia region of Brandenburg, Germany, where it retains synthetic grammatical features including six cases, dual number for nouns and verbs, and a distinction between perfective and imperfective aspects.[80] Compared to Upper Sorbian, it exhibits greater dialectal variability and less rigid standardization, reflecting ongoing instability in its codified form.[81] Its proximity to the Polish border has led to lexical borrowings and phonological similarities with Polish, distinguishing it from the Czech-influenced Upper Sorbian.[71] The language's written tradition began in the 16th century with Mikławš Jakubica's translation of the New Testament in 1548, based on the Cottbus dialect.[82] Further development occurred through religious texts, including Gottlieb Fabricius's 1709 New Testament translation, which standardized elements of the eastern Lower Sorbian variety. By the 20th century, however, Lower Sorbian faced sharp decline amid industrialization, particularly lignite mining in Lusatia, which displaced Sorbian-speaking communities and accelerated German assimilation.[53] Lower Sorbian is classified as severely endangered, with fewer than 4,000 speakers and minimal intergenerational transmission, worsened by Brandenburg's demographic shifts toward urban German monolingualism.[16] Revitalization measures include Brandenburg's legal requirements for bilingual signage in Sorbian settlement areas and the Witaj bilingual education program, yet youth acquisition remains low due to limited institutional support and cultural pressures.[83][84]Standardization, dialects, and revival initiatives
The standardization of Upper Sorbian emerged prominently in the mid-19th century through the efforts of figures like Handrij Zejler, who advanced a literary form based on the Bautzen dialect spoken by Protestant Sorbs, incorporating neologisms to reduce reliance on German loanwords amid broader Slavic revival movements.[85] [44] Lower Sorbian, by contrast, had its literary standard established earlier in the 18th century on the southern Cottbus dialect, though 19th-century activists continued refining it while debating puristic reforms against pervasive German borrowings in religious and secular texts.[53] [86] These efforts reflected tensions between purism—favoring constructed Slavic roots over dialects laden with Germanisms—and retention of local vernaculars to preserve oral traditions, with purists arguing for a unified, "purified" standard to foster national literature, while dialect advocates emphasized authenticity at the risk of fragmentation.[87] Upper Sorbian dialects divide into the Protestant Bautzen group (basis for the standard) and the more conservative Catholic variants around Wittichenau and Panschwitz-Kuckau, while Lower Sorbian features the Cottbus standard alongside northern dialects like those near Burg, contributing to mutual intelligibility challenges within each language. This dialectal fragmentation, exacerbated by historical religious divides—Protestants favoring innovative forms and Catholics retaining archaic traits—has hindered linguistic unity, as varying phonology and vocabulary impede standardization and shared media production, perpetuating separate subdialectal identities over a cohesive norm.[41] [88] Post-1990 reunification spurred revival initiatives in Saxony and Brandenburg, including state-subsidized bilingual education, radio broadcasts via Serbski rozhlós, and digital tools like language apps to engage youth, alongside policies promoting new speakers through immersion programs.[89] [63] However, outcomes remain limited, with active Upper Sorbian speakers estimated at around 25,000 and Lower at no more than 7,000 as of the early 2000s, predominantly older adults; youth usage metrics indicate negligible reversal of decline, as home transmission has largely ceased and competent young speakers constitute a small fraction, underscoring assimilation pressures over measurable gains in exposure or proficiency.[63] [90]Culture
Folklore, traditions, and daily life
The Vogelhochzeit, or Bird Wedding, represents a key Sorbian winter custom observed primarily on January 25, marking the symbolic onset of bird mating season and the waning of winter. Children don costumes depicting birds, with pairs acting as bride and groom, while others serve as attendants; rituals include placing empty plates outside homes to receive "gifts" from birds, reflecting pre-Christian agrarian hopes for renewal. This practice, rooted in ethnographic observations among Lusatian Sorbs, continues in rural communities, though some urban adaptations have emerged.[91][92] Easter egg decoration constitutes another enduring tradition, employing wax-resist techniques to create intricate patterns on dyed eggs, a custom first documented among Sorbs around 1700 and integral to family rituals. Eggs symbolize fertility and are exchanged during Easter festivities, with designs varying by region—Upper Sorbs favoring floral motifs and Lower Sorbs geometric ones—preserving ethnographic continuity in village settings despite broader cultural assimilation. These practices maintain empirical links to Slavic agrarian customs, observed in household production rather than solely commercial outlets.[3][93] Culinary traditions feature dishes like Sorbian wedding soup, prepared with beef broth, vegetables such as carrots, celeriac, and cauliflower, lard, and star-shaped pasta, typically served at matrimonial and family gatherings to reinforce communal bonds. Family structures emphasize monogamous marriages with a noted preference for endogamy within Sorbian communities, supporting daily life centered on rural households and seasonal labors. Village reenactments of these customs, as opposed to tourist-oriented spectacles in areas like Spreewald, underscore authentic preservation amid modernization pressures.[94][95]Literature, arts, and media
Sorbian literature emerged in the 16th century with early texts such as the Bautzen townsmen's oath from around 1530 and religious works by Mikołaj Jakubica in 1548. Poetry saw significant development in the late 19th century, led by Handrij Zejler (1804–1872), a priest and poet who established foundational grammar rules and founded a weekly magazine precursor to modern Sorbian publications.[96] [97] Zejler's works, including collected poetry, marked the onset of modern Upper Sorbian poetry.[98] In the 20th century, Jurij Brězan (1916–2006) emerged as a prominent novelist, producing prose, poetry, and stories that elevated literature's role in Sorbian identity, as he himself noted in 1993.[99] [96] Brězan's novels represented a shift toward extended narrative forms previously rare in Sorbian writing.[100] Despite these contributions, Sorbian literary output remains modest, with only 41 book titles produced in 2020, limiting broader international recognition.[96] Visual arts among Sorbs include efforts to preserve motifs through collections of paintings and drawings, as pursued by Jurij Łušćanski (1839–1905), who focused on Lusatian themes.[101] The Circle of Sorbian Artists, established in 1924, has supported fine arts development alongside literature and music.[102] Sorbian media features dedicated radio and television programming. MDR 1 RADIO SACHSEN – SERBSKI ROZHŁÓS broadcasts 21.5 hours weekly in Upper Sorbian from Bautzen, while MDR and RBB provide TV content accessible via satellite across Europe.[103] These outlets sustain cultural expression for an estimated 60,000 speakers, though print media circulation specifics are low relative to population scale.[104]Religion and worldview
The Sorbs exhibit a pronounced confessional divide that aligns with their linguistic subgroups and has reinforced ethnic identity boundaries. Upper Sorbs in Saxony maintain a Catholic majority, a legacy of the Counter-Reformation efforts in the 17th century that reconverted much of the population after initial Protestant inroads during the Reformation.[59] This Catholic adherence is evident in parish records from Upper Lusatia, where church registries document sustained participation in sacraments and pilgrimages, such as the annual Easter Riders processions involving mounted groups reciting prayers in Sorbian.[105] In contrast, Lower Sorbs in Brandenburg predominantly follow Lutheran Protestantism, established firmly by the 16th-century Reformation, with historical parish ledgers reflecting widespread evangelical baptisms and confirmations by the early 1600s.[106] This split, originating around 1523 with the onset of Reformation influences in Lusatia, has historically demarcated Sorbian communities, as Catholic Upper Lusatia emerged as a cultural stronghold amid Protestant surroundings.[1] Estimates from mid-20th-century diocesan surveys indicate approximately 15,000 practicing Catholic Sorbs, concentrated in Upper regions, underscoring the confessional role in preserving linguistic vitality against assimilation pressures.[61] Folk Christianity among Sorbs incorporates pre-Christian Slavic elements, such as herbal rituals blended with saint veneration and seasonal customs tied to agrarian cycles, observable in ethnographic accounts of blended healing practices persisting into the 19th century.[102] Secularization accelerated in the 20th century, paralleling broader German trends, with church attendance dropping sharply post-World War II due to urbanization and state policies in the German Democratic Republic era.[4] Parish records from the 1950s onward show declining baptism rates among Sorbs, from over 80% of births in the interwar period to below 50% by the 1980s in both confessional groups, reflecting ideological pressures and economic migration that eroded traditional adherence patterns.[51] Despite this, confessional milieus continue to anchor residual Sorbian worldview elements, with Catholic pilgrimage sites serving as focal points for cultural continuity.[107]Institutions and Symbols
Political and cultural organizations
The Domowina, founded on 13 October 1912 in Hoyerswerda as the umbrella organization for Sorbian societies, serves as the primary political and cultural representative body for the Sorbs in Germany.[60] It defends the democratic and national interests of the Sorbian people, advocating for the preservation of their language and culture while promoting bilingualism in Sorbian-German contexts, including through initiatives like the WITAJ language project established in 1998, which had engaged over 400 children by 2004.[60] With approximately 7,300 members organized across five regional associations and 13 specialized societies spanning Upper, Middle, and Lower Lusatia, the Domowina influences policy by representing Sorbian concerns to federal and state governments, contributing to the enactment of Sorbian language laws in Brandenburg in 1994 and Saxony in 1999.[60][108] Key cultural institutes supported by or affiliated with the Domowina include the Domowina Publishing House, operational since 1958 as the central publisher for Sorbian literature, journals, and newspapers such as Serbske Nowiny.[103][109] Other prominent bodies encompass the Sorbian Museum in Bautzen and the Wendish Museum in Cottbus, which document and exhibit Sorbian heritage.[110] These institutions receive funding primarily through the Foundation for the Sorbian People, established in 1991 and jointly financed by the German federal government and the states of Saxony and Brandenburg via co-funding agreements, distributing grants for cultural preservation activities including publishing and museum operations.[8] Despite its influence, the Domowina has faced challenges, including historical subordination to socialist objectives during the GDR era, which diminished its acceptance among some Sorbs, and ongoing internal divisions between Upper and Lower Sorbian communities, exacerbated by linguistic, religious (Catholic versus Protestant), and regional differences that hinder unified action.[60][55] The organization's reliance on state grants via the Foundation raises concerns about potential limitations on independence, as funding is tied to government priorities rather than solely community-driven initiatives.[8] Membership figures, representing roughly 12% of the estimated 60,000 Sorbs, indicate moderate engagement but also suggest limited broad-based participation in organizational efforts.[108]National symbols and representations
The national flag of the Lusatian Sorbs features three equal horizontal stripes of blue, red, and white, from top to bottom. It draws from pan-Slavic color schemes but arranges them to differentiate from flags of other Slavic groups, with the first documented use occurring in 1842 and formal adoption on 23 March 1848 at a gathering in Cottbus.[111] [112] The flag's design echoes the French tricolour in structure while incorporating Slavic hues, and it has been flown by Sorbian cultural groups since the mid-19th century.[113] The Sorbian national anthem, "Rjana Łužica" (Upper Sorbian) or "Rědna Łužyca" (Lower Sorbian), translates to "Beautiful Lusatia." Its lyrics were composed by Handrij Zejler and first published on 24 August 1827 in the magazine Serbska Nowina, with music added by Korla Awgust Kocor in 1845.[114] The anthem exists in versions for both Upper and Lower Sorbian dialects and serves as a unifying cultural emblem during events organized by groups like Domowina.[115] These symbols hold official status in the German states of Saxony and Brandenburg, where Sorbs form a recognized minority; the flag appears in bilingual signage in Lusatian districts, and both flag and anthem are protected under state constitutions enacted post-1990 reunification.[2] Usage remains primarily confined to Sorbian institutions and festivals, reflecting the ethnic group's estimated population of 40,000 to 60,000 speakers amid broader German assimilation pressures.[116] No standardized pan-Sorbian coat of arms exists, though the linden tree frequently symbolizes Slavic identity in regional emblems and Sorbian contexts.[117]Education and media infrastructure
The Witaj concept, introduced in the early 2000s, promotes bilingual education in Sorbian and German from preschool through secondary levels, primarily in Lusatia's settlement areas. In Saxony and Brandenburg, this includes kindergartens, primary schools offering Sorbian as a subject or immersion, and specialized grammar schools such as the Upper Sorbian Gymnasium in Bautzen and the Lower Sorbian Gymnasium in Cottbus. As of 2021, approximately 5,000 pupils were enrolled in Sorbian-language instruction across 41 primary schools and about a dozen secondary institutions, representing a small fraction of the estimated 60,000 Sorbs, with participation concentrated among families committed to language maintenance.[4] For Lower Sorbian specifically, around 1,500 school students engage with the language in Brandenburg, supplemented by about 200 in daycare settings, underscoring the program's role in addressing demographic decline but also its challenges in broader uptake.[118] Higher education in Sorbian studies is centered at the University of Leipzig's Institute of Sorbian Studies, offering bachelor's and master's programs in Sorabistics that cover linguistics, literature, and cultural history for both Upper and Lower variants. These degrees train philologists, educators, and researchers, with coursework emphasizing empirical language documentation and revival strategies amid assimilation pressures; enrollment remains modest, reflecting the field's niche status within Slavic studies.[119] [120] Sorbian media infrastructure supports language vitality through dedicated outlets, including the daily Upper Sorbian newspaper Serbske Nowiny and the weekly Lower Sorbian Nowy Casnik, which cover local news, culture, and advocacy with circulations in the low thousands. Broadcasting includes Serbski rozhłós, the Upper Sorbian radio program of MDR Saxony, airing daily content on news, music, and education, alongside the Sorbischer Rundfunk of RBB for Lower Sorbian audiences; both have adapted to digital platforms with podcasts and livestreams to reach diaspora and younger users, though listener numbers lag behind mainstream German media due to the minority's size.[103] [121]Intergroup Relations
Relations with Germans: Policies and integration
In the late 19th century, under Prussian policies associated with Otto von Bismarck's unification efforts, the Sorbian population faced intensified Germanization measures, including a 1875 ban on Sorbian-language classes in schools aimed at privileging High German and eroding minority linguistic practices.[122] These restrictions extended to church life and publishing, contributing to gradual cultural assimilation through enforced monolingualism in public institutions.[41] Following World War II, Sorbian language rights were formally revived in the German Democratic Republic, with provisions for bilingual education and cultural promotion reversing prior suppressions.[123] The 1990 Unification Treaty between West and East Germany explicitly upheld Sorbian protections, guaranteeing rights to use the language in courts, administration, and media, while Saxony's 1992 constitution and Brandenburg's laws mandated bilingual signage, schooling, and consultations in minority areas.[124][125] Despite these frameworks, enforcement exhibits persistent gaps, as Sorbian remains infrequently invoked in judicial proceedings and official documents are rarely translated, limiting practical access to rights.[41] Integration into the German economy offers Sorbs enhanced mobility—evident in urban resettlement and professional opportunities—but correlates with identity erosion, with estimates indicating only around 7,000 active speakers among 60,000 ethnic Sorbs as of 2020, driven by generational language shift favoring German for socioeconomic advancement.[87][51]Ties to other Slavic peoples
The Sorbs, classified as a West Slavic ethnic group, maintain linguistic affinities with neighboring Poles and Czechs, with Upper Sorbian sharing phonological and grammatical features akin to Czech and Lower Sorbian exhibiting parallels to Polish dialects.[126][127] These connections stem from shared West Slavic roots, though geographic isolation within German territories has historically constrained broader integration. Genetically, Sorbs cluster closely with Poles and Czechs, reflecting ancient migrations of Slavic tribes into the region around 1,500 years ago.[128] In the medieval era, Lusatia's incorporation into the Bohemian Crown in 1367 under King Charles IV established administrative and cultural links with Bohemian elites, positioning the region as a subsidiary land until the 17th century.[22] Polish-Sorbian interactions were more sporadic, resuming notably with the 1697 Polish-Saxon personal union, which facilitated elite-level exchanges amid resistance to Germanization.[4] These ties, however, yielded limited pan-Slavic solidarity, as Sorbs prioritized local survival against expanding German principalities over expansive alliances. The 19th-century Sorbian national revival intersected with pan-Slavism, as intellectuals like Jan Arnošt Smoler (1816–1884) collected Slavic folklore and advocated ethno-linguistic reciprocity, influencing the adoption of pan-Slavic tricolor symbolism post-1848 Prague Congress.[129][130] This era saw conceptual alignment with Czech and Polish awakenings, though practical participation remained modest due to Prussian-Saxon oversight. Under East German communism (1949–1990), ideological kinship linked Sorbs to Slavic states like Czechoslovakia, fostering linguistic-cultural exchanges via shared socialist frameworks, while ties to non-aligned Yugoslavia waned. Post-1989 reunification enabled renewed contacts, such as Sorbian cultural promotions in Prague since the early 2000s and professional networks among Slavic speakers, yet migration to Poland or Czechia has been negligible, underscoring persistent geographic and political barriers to deeper pan-Slavic fusion.[126][131][132]Modern Challenges and Debates
Economic pressures and environmental conflicts
Brown coal mining in the Lusatian region has historically imposed severe economic and environmental strains on Sorbian communities, particularly through large-scale village demolitions for open-cast operations. From the early 20th century, intensified during the German Democratic Republic era in the 1960s to 1990s, mining activities razed over 130 villages across Lusatia, displacing approximately 30,000 residents, many from Sorbian settlements in the northern areas.[133][134] These relocations disrupted traditional agrarian lifestyles and cultural heritage sites integral to Sorbian identity, with affected villages like those near Weißwasser forcing inhabitants into urban resettlements that accelerated assimilation pressures.[51] While mining generated significant regional GDP through energy production and employment—Lusatia's lignite sector historically supporting thousands of jobs amid limited industrial alternatives—the environmental toll included soil erosion, water contamination, and landscape alteration, exacerbating conflicts between short-term economic gains and long-term ecological damage.[52] Sorbian areas, overlapping with prime mining zones, bore disproportionate impacts, as open-cast pits expanded without adequate cultural impact assessments, leading to the loss of archaeological and traditional sites.[135][136] Germany's coal phase-out, legislated for completion by 2038 with potential acceleration to 2030, introduces new trade-offs: potential land restoration for recultivation into lakes or forests could mitigate past environmental harms, yet it threatens job losses in a region where direct lignite employment stood at around 8,000 by late 2023, down from peaks but still pivotal amid structural economic challenges.[137] Broader ripple effects could affect up to tens of thousands in supply chains and dependent communities, including Sorbs reliant on mining-related stability, pitting decarbonization imperatives against localized economic dependency.[138] Demonstrations, such as those in Klitten during the 1990s, highlighted community resistance to further expansions, underscoring ongoing tensions between energy policy and regional viability.[139]Identity preservation versus assimilation arguments
Arguments for preserving Sorbian identity emphasize the intrinsic value of linguistic and cultural diversity in fostering unique perspectives and resisting homogenization, even as empirical data show persistent declines in language use. Upper Sorbian speakers are estimated at around 25,000 with good proficiency, while Lower Sorbian has dwindled to approximately 2,000 active speakers by the 2010s, down from higher figures in prior decades due to intergenerational transmission failures and urban migration.[1][53] Proponents cite legal protections, such as those in German state constitutions guaranteeing the right to cultivate Sorbian language and identity, as essential for countering historical assimilation pressures from industrialization and wartime policies.[63] These efforts, however, rely on substantial public funding, with federal and state subsidies for Sorbian institutions totaling about €16 million annually as of the mid-2000s, underscoring the resource-intensive nature of retention amid broader societal bilingualism.[140] Counterarguments favoring assimilation portray the erosion of exclusive Sorbian monolingualism as an inevitable adaptation to globalization and economic integration, where bilingual competence enables Sorbs to thrive professionally without cultural extinction. Surveys indicate that while 62% of respondents in Sorbian areas claim strong understanding of the languages, daily use remains confined to niche domains, reflecting pragmatic shifts toward German dominance for mobility and education.[141] Advocates of this view highlight successes in mixed-language environments, arguing that forced preservation distorts natural linguistic evolution and imposes opportunity costs, as evidenced by unchanged decline trends despite policy interventions. They contend that full assimilation preserves core Slavic heritage through heritage awareness rather than halting demographic realities, avoiding the pitfalls of isolation that could exacerbate community fragmentation. In the 1990s, amid German reunification, commentaries critiqued Sorbian identity activism as potentially separatist, arguing it conflicted with efforts to forge a cohesive national identity post-division.[142] Such perspectives, voiced in analyses of the 1990 Unity Treaty, warned that emphasizing minority distinctions could undermine broader unity, prioritizing assimilation into shared German culture over subsidized ethnic silos.[142] These debates persist, weighing empirical speaker attrition against idealistic retention, with no consensus on whether subsidies effectively reverse trends or merely delay inexorable integration.[143]Criticisms of activism and dependency claims
Critics of Sorbian activism have accused the movement of fostering separatism, particularly in the post-reunification era when demands for cultural preservation were seen by some as resisting broader German integration. In 1990, Reverend Rudolf Kilank, pastor of Bautzen Cathedral, noted that Sorbian cohesiveness had often been criticized as separatist, reflecting tensions in public discourse where ethnic advocacy was perceived as prioritizing minority identity over national unity.[144] Such views echoed historical German rejections of Sorbian autonomy efforts, labeling them as nationalism or separatism that could undermine social cohesion.[145] Dependency claims center on the heavy reliance of Sorbian institutions on state subsidies, with detractors arguing this creates an unsustainable model lacking private initiative or philanthropy. Sorbian cultural and educational bodies, such as those under the Foundation for the Sorbian People, receive substantial annual funding from Saxony and Brandenburg governments—estimated in the millions of euros—to support bilingual education, media, and preservation efforts, but negotiations over these allocations have sparked fiscal critiques.[140] [63] In 2007, Saxon Premier Georg Milbradt expressed frustration with protracted funding talks, highlighting delays that some interpreted as evidence of entitlement-driven demands amid broader budget constraints.[140] Critics, including voices within Sorbian circles, contend this over-dependence risks backlash if speaker numbers decline, as funding ties to demographic justifications, potentially incentivizing inflated self-reporting rather than organic vitality.[146] [147] While Sorbian activism has achieved verifiable successes, such as standardized language documentation and legal recognitions post-1990, detractors warn that framing preservation as perpetual entitlement erodes self-sufficiency. Federal funding cuts in the early 2000s, for instance, exposed vulnerabilities in the model, prompting debates over transitioning to diversified support amid perceptions of fiscal burden on taxpayers.[148] This over-reliance, with minimal evidence of robust private endowments, is said to invite skepticism about long-term viability, potentially fueling anti-activist sentiment in resource-limited regions like Lusatia.[149]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/s%25D1%258Crb%25D1%258A