Hubbry Logo
MesostigmataMesostigmataMain
Open search
Mesostigmata
Community hub
Mesostigmata
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mesostigmata
Mesostigmata
Mesostigmata
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Mesostigmata
Temporal range: Cenomanian–present
Varroa destructor
Dermanyssus gallinae
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Superorder: Parasitiformes
Order: Mesostigmata
Suborders[1]
  • Monogynaspida
    Camin & Gorirossi, 1955
  • Sejida
    Kramer, 1885
  • Trigynaspida
    Camin & Gorirossi, 1955
Diversity
about 130 families, 900 genera, > 8,000 species

Mesostigmata is an order of mites belonging to the Parasitiformes. They are by far the largest group of Parasitiformes, with over 8,000 species in 130 families. Mesostigmata includes parasitic as well as free-living and predatory forms. They can be recognized by the single pair of spiracles positioned laterally on the body.

The family with the most described species is Phytoseiidae. Other families of note are Diplogyniidae, Macrochelidae, Pachylaelapidae, Uropodidae and Veigaiidae.

Amongst the best known species are Varroa destructor, an economically important parasite of honey bees, as well as the red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae), a parasite of poultry, most commonly chickens.

Description

[edit]

Mesostigmata are mites ranging from 0.12–4 mm long (0.2–4 mm according to another source[2]). They have a pair of stigmatal openings above legs III–IV usually associated with a peritrematal groove. The gnathosoma has a sclerotised ring around the bases of the chelicerae (basis capitulum). The palps have five (rarely four) free segments and usually a subdistal palp apotele. The chelicerae are three segmented. The subcapitulum usually has a median groove with transverse rows of one to many denticles. There are usually bifurcate or membranous corniculi present. Except in some parasitic species, a flagellate tritosternum is present. The coxae of the legs are freely articulating with the body. The intercoxal region has sternal and genital shield elements. Adults have a genital opening and either chelicerae modified for sperm transfer (if male) or a sperm-receiving structure (if female).[3]

The above description applies to adults. Larvae have six legs, instead of the eight possessed by later stages, and may or may not feed. There are two nymphal stages (protonymph, deutonymph) that usually have lightly sclerotized dorsal, intercoxal and ventral plates.[3]

Ecology

[edit]

Many Mesostigmata are free-living predators of invertebrates that live in soil and litter, on the soil surface or on plants.[4] There are also some that live in freshwater.[5] Other Mesostigmata are parasites of vertebrates or arthropods, pollen and nectar feeders in flowers, fungus feeders, or saprophages that subsist on dead or decaying organic matter.[2][3]

The soil-dwelling Mesostigmata are not as abundant as oribatids or prostigmatids that also occur in this habitat, but they are still ubiquitous in soil and may be important predators. Larger species tend to be predators of small arthropods or arthropod eggs, whereas smaller species prey on nematodes. Size of these mesostigmatans decreases with soil depth: plant litter and humus have large species such as Veigaia (Veigaiidae), the humus-soil interface has smaller species like Dendrolaelaps (Digamasellidae) and the mineral soil has the tiny Rhodacarellus (Rhodacaridae).[6]

A few species are known from freshwater habitats, such as wet soil, phytotelmata, waterside vegetation and sewage filter-beds. These appear to move by crawling as no species are known to swim. Some species are known to prey on mosquito eggs and one species was reared on a diet of nematodes.[5]

The parasitic Mesostigmata are mostly in superfamily Dermanyssoidea. These include parasites of invertebrates (e.g. Varroidae) and of vertebrates (other families), as well as both ectoparasites (external) and endoparasites (internal).[7]

Phoresy, the temporary attachment of a smaller animal to a larger one for travel, is common in the Mesostigmata. For example, the freshwater species are phoretic on flies of families Tipulidae, Ceratopogonidae, and Culicidae.[5]

Economic importance

[edit]

Varroa destructor (Varroidae) is a major pest of honey bees. It harms bees both directly by feeding on fat body tissue, and indirectly by transmitting viruses.[8]

Similarly, the red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) feeds on the blood of birds, including poultry (chickens, turkeys, ducks) and wild birds. It reduces animal health, welfare and production.[9]

In agriculture, soil-dwelling mesostigmatans are important predators of nematodes, springtails and insect larvae, while plant-dwelling mesostigmatans control pests such as spider mites.[4]

Evolution

[edit]

The oldest known record of the group is an indeterminate Sejidae deutonymph from the mid-Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) aged Burmese amber of Myanmar.[10]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Taxonomy to families (Beaulieu 2011). Genus and species counts fluctuate over time.[1][11]

Order Mesostigmata G. Canestrini, 1891
Suborder Monogynaspida Camin & Gorirossi, 1955
Infraorder Gamasina Kramer, 1881
Hyporder Arctacariae Johnston, 1982
Superfamily Arctacaroidea Evans, 1955
Family Arctacaridae Evans, 1955 (2 genera, 6 species)
Hyporder Dermanyssiae Evans & Till, 1979
Superfamily Ascoidea Voigts & Oudemans, 1905
Family Ameroseiidae Evans, 1961 (10 genera, 148 species)
Family Ascidae Voigts & Oudemans, 1905 (17 genera, 338 species)
Family Melicharidae Hirschmann, 1962 (12 genera, 201 species)
Superfamily Dermanyssoidea Kolenati, 1859
Family Dasyponyssidae Fonseca, 1940 (2 genera, 2 species)
Family Dermanyssidae Kolenati, 1859 (2 genera, 26 species)
Family Entonyssidae Ewing, 1923 (9 genera, 27 species)
Family Haemogamasidae Oudemans, 1926 (5 genera, 78 species)
Family Halarachnidae Oudemans, 1906 (7 genera, 43 species)
Family Hystrichonyssidae Keegan, Yunker & Baker, 1960 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Iphiopsididae Kramer, 1886 (14 genera, 68 species)
Family Ixodorhynchidae Ewing, 1923 (6 genera, 43 species)
Family Laelapidae Berlese, 1892 (90 genera, 1316 species)
Family Larvamimidae Elzinga, 1993 (6 genera, 43 species)
Family Macronyssidae Oudemans, 1936 (34 genera, 233 species)
Family Manitherionyssidae Radovsky & Yunker, 1971 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Omentolaelapidae Fain, 1961 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Rhinonyssidae Trouessart, 1895 (8 genera, 510 species)
Family Spelaeorhynchidae Oudemans, 1902 (1 genus, 7 species)
Family Spinturnicidae Oudemans, 1901 (12 genera, 101 species)
Family Varroidae Delfinado & Baker, 1974 (2 genera, 6 species)
Superfamily Eviphidoidea Berlese, 1913
Family Eviphididae Berlese, 1913 (19 genera, 108 species)
Family Leptolaelapidae Karg, 1978 (12 genera, 48 species)
Family Macrochelidae Vitzthum, 1930 (20 genera, 470 species)
Family Pachylaelapidae Berlese, 1913 (26 genera, 199 species)
Family Parholaspididae Evans, 1956 (12 genera, 96 species)
Superfamily Phytoseioidea Berlese, 1916
Family Blattisociidae Garman, 1948 (11 genera, 369 species)
Family Otopheidomenidae Treat, 1955 (10 genera, 28 species)
Family Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916 (90 genera, 2300 species)
Family Podocinidae Berlese, 1913 (2 genera, 25 species)
Superfamily Rhodacaroidea Oudemans, 1902
Family Digamasellidae Evans, 1957 (13 genera, 261 species)
Family Halolaelapidae Karg, 1965 (4 genera, 80 species)
Family Laelaptonyssidae Womersley, 1956 (1 genus, 6 species)
Family Ologamasidae Ryke, 1962 (45 genera, 452 species)
Family Rhodacaridae Oudemans, 1902 (15 genera, 148 species)
Family Teranyssidae Halliday, 2006 (1 genus, 1 species)
Superfamily Veigaioidea Oudemans, 1939
Family Veigaiidae Oudemans, 1939 (4 genera, 95 species)
Hyporder Epicriiae Kramer, 1885
Superfamily Epicrioidea Berlese, 1885
Family Epicriidae Berlese, 1885 (4 genera, 48 species)
Superfamily Heatherelloidea Walter, 1997
Family Heatherellidae Walter, 1997 (1 genus, 2 species)
Superfamily Zerconoidea G. Canestrini, 1891
Family Coprozerconidae Moraza & Lindquist, 1999 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Zerconidae G. Canestrini, 1891 (36 genera, 390, species)
Hyporder Parasitiae Evans & Till, 1979
Superfamily Parasitoidea Oudemans, 1901
Family Parasitidae Oudemans, 1901 (35 genera, 426 species)
Infraorder Uropodina Kramer, 1881
Family Dithinozerconidae Ainscough, 1979
Superfamily Diarthrophalloidea Trägårdh, 1946
Family Diarthrophallidae Trägårdh, 1946 (22 genera, 63 species)
Superfamily Microgynioidea Trägårdh, 1942
Family Microgyniidae Trägårdh, 1942 (2 genera, 4 species)
Family Nothogynidae Walter & Krantz, 1999 (1 genus, 2 species)
Superfamily Thinozerconoidea Halbert, 1915
Family Protodinychidae Evans, 1957 (1 genus, 3 species)
Family Thinozerconidae Halbert, 1915 (1 genus, 1 species)
Superfamily Uropodoidea Kramer, 1881
Family Baloghjkaszabiidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 3 species)
Family Brasiluropodidae Hirschmann, 1979 (2 genera, 18 species)
Family Cillibidae Trägårdh, 1944 (2 genera, 19 species)
Family Clausiadinychidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 4 species)
Family Cyllibulidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 32 species)
Family Deraiophoridae Trägårdh, 1952 (1 genus, 36 species)
Family Dinychidae Berlese, 1916 (1 genus, 34 species)
Family Discourellidae Baker & Wharton, 1952 (1 genus, 76 species)
Family Eutrachytidae Trägårdh, 1944 (1 genus, 36 species)
Family Hutufeideriidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 9 species)
Family Kaszabjbaloghiidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 6 species)
Family Macrodinychidae Hirschmann, 1979 (4 genera, 22 species)
Family Metagynuridae Balogh, 1943 (2 genera, 17 species)
Family Nenteriidae Hirschmann, 1979 (2 genera, 128 species)
Family Oplitidae Johnston, 1968 (8 genera, 163 species)
Family Phymatodiscidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 10 species)
Family Polyaspididae Berlese, 1913 (1 genus, 16 species)
Family Prodinychidae Berlese, 1917 (3 genera, 16 species)
Family Rotundabaloghiidae Hirschmann, 1979 (4 genera, 165 species)
Family Tetrasejaspidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 15 species)
Family Trachytidae Trägårdh, 1938 (7 genera, 108 species)
Family Trachyuropodidae Berlese, 1917 (17 genera, 99 species)
Family Trematuridae Berlese, 1917 (13 genera, 401 species)
Family Trichocyllibidae Hirschmann, 1979 (5 genera, 57 species)
Family Trichouropodellidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 11 species)
Family Trigonuropodidae Hirschmann, 1979 (1 genus, 87 species)
Family Uroactiniidae Hirschmann & Zirngiebl-Nicol, 1964 (3 genera, 67 species)
Family Urodiaspididae Trägårdh, 1944 (3 genera, 26 species)
Family Urodinychidae Berlese, 1917 (13 genera, 267 species)
Family Uropodidae Kramer, 1881 (9 genera, 261 species)
Suborder Sejida Kramer, 1885
Superfamily Heterozerconoidea Berlese, 1892
Family Discozerconidae Berlese, 1910 (2 genera, 3 species)
Family Heterozerconidae Berlese, 1892 (7 genera, 13 species)
Superfamily Sejoidea Berlese, 1885
Family Ichthyostomatogasteridae Sellnick, 1953 (3 genera, 10 species)
Family Sejidae Berlese, 1885 (5 genera, 46 species) (5 genera, 46 species)
Family Uropodellidae Camin, 1955 (1 genus, 6 species)
Suborder Trigynaspida Camin & Gorirossi, 1955
Infraorder Antennophorina Camin & Gorirossi, 1955
Superfamily Aenictequoidea Kethley, 1977
Family Aenictequidae Kethley, 1977 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Euphysalozerconidae Kim, 2008 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Messoracaridae Kethley, 1977 (2 genera, 3 species)
Family Ptochacaridae Kethley, 1977 (1 genus, 3 species)
Superfamily Antennophoroidea Berlese, 1892
Family Antennophoridae Berlese, 1892 (6 genera, 19 species)
Superfamily Celaenopsoidea Berlese, 1892
Family Celaenopsidae Berlese, 1892 (7 genera, 14 species)
Family Costacaridae Hunter, 1993 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Diplogyniidae Trägårdh, 1941 (42 genera, 85 species)
Family Euzerconidae Trägårdh, 1938 (12 genera, 24 species)
Family Megacelaenopsidae Funk, 1975 (2 genera, 2 species)
Family Neotenogyniidae Kethley, 1974 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Schizogyniidae Trägårdh, 1950 (6 genera, 10 species)
Family Triplogyniidae Funk, 1977 (2 genera, 11 species)
Superfamily Fedrizzioidea Trägårdh, 1937
Family Fedrizziidae Trägårdh, 1937 (3 genera, 34 species)
Family Klinckowstroemiidae Camin & Gorirossi, 1955 (4 genera, 36 species)
Superfamily Megisthanoidea Berlese, 1914
Family Hoplomegistidae Camin & Gorirossi, 1955 (1 genus, 7 species)
Family Megisthanidae Berlese, 1914 (1 genus, 30 species)
Superfamily Paramegistoidea Trägårdh, 1946
Family Paramegistidae Trägårdh, 1946 (5 genera, 30 species)
Superfamily Parantennuloidea Willmann, 1941
Family Parantennulidae Willmann, 1941 (3 genera, 5 species)
Family Philodanidae Kethley, 1977 (2 genera, 2 species)
Family Promegistidae Kethley, 1977 (1 genus, 1 species)
Infraorder Cercomegistina Camin & Gorirossi, 1955
Superfamily Cercomegistoidea Trägårdh, 1937
Family Asternoseiidae Vale, 1954 (2 genera, 3 species)
Family Cercomegistidae Trägårdh, 1937 (5 genera, 13 species)
Family Davacaridae Kethley, 1977 (2 genera, 4 species)
Family Pyrosejidae Lindquist & Moraza, 1993 (2 genera, 3 species)
Family Saltiseiidae Walter, 2000 (1 genus, 1 species)
Family Seiodidae Kethley, 1977 (1 genus, 1 species)
Other
Meliponopus palpifer Fain & Flechtmann, 1985 has not yet been placed into a family.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mesostigmata

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Mesostigmata is an order of mites belonging to the superorder in the class Arachnida, distinguished by their respiratory positioned between the bases of the third and fourth pairs of legs. This order encompasses approximately 12,000 described (as of 2020) across about 900 genera and 109 families, representing roughly 25% of all known species. Key morphological characteristics include the absence of eyes, the presence of a (a structure on the ventral side), and typically with both fixed and movable digits, though males in some groups possess a spermatodactyl for transfer. The order is divided into three suborders: Sejida, Trigynaspida, and Monogynaspida, with the latter being the most diverse and including superfamilies such as the predatory Phytoseioidea and the soil-dwelling Uropodoidea. Biologically, mesostigmatans undergo development beginning with a hexapod larval stage that molts into octapod nymphs and adults, often requiring moist environments for survival and reproduction. Their feeding habits are highly varied, with many species acting as predators on other arthropods, including nematodes and , while others are parasitic on vertebrates or , fungivores, or detritivores. Sensory setae cover their bodies, aiding in environmental detection, chemoreception, and communication during mating. Notable groups include the family Phytoseiidae, with over 2,700 species (as of 2020) widely used in biological control of agricultural pests like spider mites. Ecologically, mesostigmatans inhabit diverse microhabitats, from litter and forest floors to plant surfaces, freshwater sediments, and as ectoparasites on animals, playing crucial roles in nutrient cycling, pest regulation, and as indicators of . In ecosystems, they can constitute up to 25% of the community, contributing to the of and control of mesofauna populations. Some , such as those in the Varroidae (e.g., the varroa ), are significant pests in apiculture, while others like and mites pose veterinary and medical concerns. Despite their importance, many remain undescribed, with estimates suggesting over 100,000 total worldwide.

Introduction and Description

General Overview

Mesostigmata is an order of mites within the superorder , representing the largest and most species-rich group in this lineage, with over 11,600 described species (as of 2018) distributed across approximately 110 families and nearly 900 genera. These mites are arachnids characterized by their small size, with adults typically ranging from 0.12 to 4 mm in length, enabling them to inhabit diverse microenvironments. Ecologically, mesostigmatid mites are predominantly free-living predators that feed on small , nematodes, and other , playing crucial roles in regulating populations within and litter food webs as well as broader communities. While most species are predatory and contribute to nutrient cycling and in terrestrial ecosystems, a minority exhibit parasitic lifestyles, infesting vertebrates or such as birds and mammals. Their predatory habits make them important biological control agents in agricultural and natural settings. The name Mesostigmata, coined by Canestrini in 1891, derives from the Greek "mesos" (middle) and "stigmata" (breathing pores), referring to the characteristic placement of their respiratory openings (spiracles) in a mid-body position, typically between the third and fourth pairs of legs. This taxonomic designation highlights a defining feature that distinguishes them from other mite orders.

Diagnostic Features

Mesostigmata mites are distinguished by a single pair of spiracles, known as stigmata, positioned dorsally between the bases of the third and fourth pairs of legs (coxae III and IV), which connect to a tracheal system often accompanied by a peritreme; this feature represents a primary synapomorphy defining the order. These stigmata are typically peritrematal, facilitating gas exchange, and their location helps differentiate Mesostigmata from other Parasitiformes like ticks (Ixodida), which have stigmata only in nymphal and adult stages. The gnathosoma in Mesostigmata is sclerotized, providing structural support, and features three-segmented chelicerae that form a pincer-like chela adapted for either piercing host tissues in parasitic species or chewing prey in free-living forms. The fixed digit of the chelicera often includes a pilus dentilis, a seta-like structure aiding in feeding mechanics, while the movable digit opposes it for grasping; this configuration contrasts with the simpler chelicerae in Prostigmata. The palps, with five segments, assist in prey manipulation or host location. A tritosternum, a bifid or Y-shaped structure with laciniae posterior to the gnathosoma, is present in most Mesostigmata species and functions in sensory perception or fluid flow during feeding, though it is absent in certain parasitic taxa. This tritosternum arises from the presternal region and is a diagnostic ventral feature, often with feathered or pilose laciniae. Ontogenetically, Mesostigmata exhibit a larval stage with only six legs, lacking the fourth pair, which develops during the transition to the protonymph; subsequent nymphal and adult stages possess eight legs, enabling identification of immature forms. This leg reduction in larvae is a shared trait among many acarine orders but, combined with the stigmatic position, confirms Mesostigmata affiliation.

Taxonomy

Classification

Mesostigmata is classified as an order within the superorder , subclass Acari, class Arachnida, and phylum Arthropoda. This placement reflects its position among the two major lineages of mites, with distinguished by features such as the arrangement of the gnathosoma and tritosternum. The order is divided into three main suborders: Monogynaspida, Sejida, and Trigynaspida. Monogynaspida is the largest suborder, encompassing the majority of free-living predatory species commonly found in environments. Sejida includes a range of forms, from free-living predators in litter and to parasitic species on or vertebrates, with some inhabiting marine habitats. Trigynaspida comprises smaller mites, often endoparasitic or commensal on arthropods and reptiles, characterized by a tripartite genital shield in females. These suborders are defined primarily by differences in genital shield morphology and associated setal patterns in adult females. Historically, the taxon was established by Canestrini in 1891 as Mesostigmata, based on the diagnostic position of the stigmata (spiracles) between the second and third or third and fourth pairs of legs, distinguishing it from other groups with anterior or posterior spiracles. Earlier classifications treated Mesostigmata as a cohort or subgroup within Acari, but it was elevated to ordinal status in modern due to accumulated morphological and developmental evidence supporting its distinctiveness within Parasitiformes. Recent molecular studies, including mitochondrial metagenomic analyses, have confirmed the of , including Mesostigmata, by resolving deep phylogenetic relationships among acarine lineages with high support from nucleotide sequences. For instance, investigations of mitochondrial genome organization in mesostigmatid mites have reinforced the coherence of the order while highlighting lineage-specific rearrangements that align with subordinal boundaries.

Diversity and Major Groups

Mesostigmata represents one of the most species-rich lineages within the , encompassing approximately 109 families, ~900 genera, and ~12,000 described , though estimates indicate the true total may surpass 100,000 when including undescribed taxa. This substantial diversity underscores the order's ecological versatility, spanning free-living predators, parasites, and commensals across various microhabitats. The taxonomic richness is documented in comprehensive catalogs, highlighting the ongoing challenges in due to the group's morphological complexity and cryptic . Among the major families, Phytoseiidae stands out as the largest, comprising 2,880 described (as of 2023) primarily recognized as predatory mites inhabiting plant surfaces and . Laelapidae follows as the second most speciose family, with over 1,500 exhibiting broad ecological roles from predation to on vertebrates. Parasitidae ranks third, with approximately 500 , many of which are free-living predators in and environments. These families collectively account for a significant portion of mesostigmatan , with Phytoseiidae alone contributing nearly a quarter of all known . The order displays a , with peak diversity concentrated in tropical soils, where warm, humid conditions foster high rates and niche partitioning among soil-dwelling forms. In contrast, certain suborders such as Sejida remain underrepresented, particularly in marine and freshwater ecosystems, where only a handful of have been documented despite their primitive morphology suggesting potential for broader occupancy. Recent taxonomic efforts continue to expand known diversity.

Morphology

Body Structure

The body of mesostigmatic mites is divided into two primary tagmata: the gnathosoma anteriorly and the idiosoma posteriorly. The gnathosoma, which houses the , palps, and hypostome, is separated from the idiosoma by a circumcapitular furrow. The idiosoma comprises the podosoma, the region bearing the legs, and the opisthosoma, the posterior portion containing the digestive, reproductive, and excretory apertures. In most species, the prosoma (gnathosoma plus podosoma) and opisthosoma are fused, forming a compact, ovoid to elongate body without distinct segmentation, though flexible interscutal allows expansion during feeding. A small bifurcating protuberance called the tritosternum is present ventrally on the idiosoma, immediately posterior to the gnathosoma. Dorsally, the idiosoma is typically covered by a sclerotized dorsal shield that provides protection against and predation. This shield often appears as a single plate but may be subdivided into an anterior podonotal shield and a posterior opisthonotal shield, with the latter sometimes reduced or absent in certain taxa. The shields bear a characteristic array of setae—simple or barbed hair-like structures—that function in mechanoreception for detecting environmental stimuli and in defense through irritation of potential predators. Ventral sclerites, such as the sternal and ventrianal shields, similarly support setae and frame the genital and anal regions. The podosoma supports four pairs of ambulatory legs in adults and nymphs (legs I–IV), arranged laterally and freely articulating at the coxae, which are not fused to the body wall. Each consists of six podomeric segments—coxa, , , genu, , and tarsus—ending in a pretarsus equipped with ambulacra for substrate . The ambulacra usually feature paired lateral claws and a central empodium or adhesorial pulvillus, adaptations that enable clinging to hosts or surfaces in diverse microhabitats. Larvae exhibit a reduced leg complement, possessing only three pairs (I–III), reflecting their hexapod condition early in . Sexual dimorphism in body structure is pronounced in several mesostigmatic lineages, particularly concerning the . In males of species such as those in the Dermanyssidae and Macronyssidae, the are enlarged and modified, with the fixed digit often bearing a spermatodactyl—a thumb-like projection—for direct via transfer to the female's , contrasting with the simpler, piercing-style of females used for feeding. This dimorphism underscores reproductive specializations while the overall body sclerotization may be more robust in males for agonistic interactions.

Respiratory and Sensory Systems

The of Mesostigmata features a pair of lateral positioned between the third and fourth pairs of legs, typically associated with peritremes that extend anteriorly from the openings. These peritremes are microtuberculate, slit-like tubes that connect the stigma to an atrial chamber, enabling efficient in terrestrial environments by providing an alternative pathway for air entry if the stigma is blocked by debris and by minimizing water loss through reduced . The stigma-peritreme complex links to a network of tracheae and tracheoles, ventilated by indirect muscles that facilitate oxygen delivery to internal tissues. This structure supports the active lifestyles of many Mesostigmata, such as predatory soil-dwelling species. In parasitic Mesostigmata, respiratory adaptations enhance survival in host-associated microhabitats; for instance, in the ectoparasitic bee mite (formerly V. jacobsoni), the peritreme is movable and can be raised in low-humidity conditions outside the host to limit water vapor loss or lowered in high-carbon-dioxide environments within brood cells for better . Compared to Endeostigmata, where are located at the posterior body margin, the more anterior positioning in Mesostigmata integrates better with locomotion, aiding mobility in diverse habitats without compromising respiratory efficiency. Sensory systems in Mesostigmata rely on chemoreceptive and mechanoreceptive structures adapted for environmental and host detection. Chemoreception occurs via sensilla on the palps and foretarsi, including a tarsal depression with sensory setae that detects olfactory and gustatory cues, analogous to Haller's organ in ticks for identifying hosts or prey chemicals. Mechanoreception is provided by various body setae that sense vibrations and air currents, with probable trichobothria-like structures in some parasitic species enhancing detection of host movements within confined spaces like nasal cavities or . These adaptations, absent in less mobile groups like oribatid mites, underscore the role of sensory organs in the predatory and parasitic behaviors of Mesostigmata.

Life History

Reproduction

Mesostigmata exhibit predominantly sexual reproduction characterized by haplodiploid sex determination, known as arrhenotoky, where females develop from fertilized diploid eggs and males from unfertilized haploid eggs. This system is widespread across families such as Macronyssidae and Phytoseiidae, enabling unmated females to produce male offspring while mating allows for female production. In the northern fowl mite Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Macronyssidae), for instance, virgin females produce exclusively male progeny, with oedipal mating—where females mate with their sons—facilitating the production of daughters. Mating behaviors in Mesostigmata vary by family but often involve indirect sperm transfer via spermatophores. In Uropodina species like Trichouropoda ovalis (Trematuridae), males form and transfer spermatophores using unspecialized in a venter-to-venter position, followed by female uptake through ventral pressing. Similarly, in Laelapidae such as Tropilaelaps clareae, males deposit spermatophores externally near the female's coxae after mounting dorsally, with no specialized observed. Pheromones play a key role in mate attraction within Phytoseiidae; for example, in Metaseiulus occidentalis, deutonymphal and adult females produce a that elicits hovering and arrestment behaviors in males. Oviposition typically occurs after a short preoviposition period, with females laying eggs singly or in small clutches on substrates like soil litter or directly on hosts in parasitic species. Embryonic development within eggs generally lasts 2–5 days under optimal conditions (e.g., 25°C), varying by species and temperature; for instance, in Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Laelapidae), it takes approximately 2.5 days, while in Holaspulus tenuipes (Parholaspididae), it averages approximately 3.9 days (3 days and 21 hours). As an alternative to , occurs in select Uropodina , where populations consist almost entirely of females capable of . This strategy is documented in over 25% of examined Polish Uropodina , such as those in stable litter habitats, though rare males may appear without clear functional roles.

Developmental Stages

The life cycle of Mesostigmata mites encompasses the stage followed by a series of postembryonic instars, typically including the , protonymph, deutonymph, and adult, with the tritonymph being rare or absent in many . The is laid singly or in clusters, depending on the , and hatches into the hexapod , which is often non-feeding and short-lived in numerous taxa, such as those in the Varroa genus. The first molt transforms the into the protonymph, which possesses eight legs and actively feeds, marking the onset of significant trophic activity. Subsequent molts lead to the deutonymph, a stage specialized for phoresy in many to facilitate dispersal on host organisms, and finally the adult, with the tritonymph occurring only sporadically across the order. Developmental progression involves distinct metamorphic changes, particularly the addition of the fourth pair of legs during the transition from to protonymph, enabling greater mobility and predatory capabilities. With each successive , the body undergoes increasing sclerotization, enhancing structural rigidity and protection as the matures from the soft-bodied to the more armored form. Under optimal conditions of 20–25°C and high humidity (typically 70–80% relative humidity), the complete cycle from egg to spans 10–30 days, though this duration varies widely by and environmental factors; for instance, predatory species in the Phytoseiidae often complete development in 5–12 days at similar temperatures due to their rapid reproductive strategies. In response to adverse conditions such as low temperatures or food scarcity, many Mesostigmata enter , particularly as deutonymphal , which halts development and promotes survival until favorable conditions return, a observed in various gamasid lineages. This can extend the overall cycle duration significantly, allowing flexibility in unpredictable habitats.

Ecology

Habitats and Distribution

Mesostigmata mites are predominantly found in terrestrial environments, with the majority of species inhabiting and layers where they function as predators or decomposers. The majority of described species occupy these upper horizons and organic , particularly in floors and agricultural settings, where organic matter accumulation supports high abundances. Plant surfaces, including foliage and bark, host phytophagous and predatory forms such as those in the family Phytoseiidae, which exploit herb layers for prey like spider mites. A smaller proportion inhabits freshwater systems, including filter beds and phytotelmata—water-filled cavities like bromeliad tanks—where humidity and provide suitable conditions. Additionally, the family Sejidae are terrestrial, commonly found in and moist habitats, often associated with rotting . The global distribution of Mesostigmata is cosmopolitan, spanning all continents and major biomes, though and abundance peak in ecosystems with thick organic layers and in tropical agroecosystems such as piles and fields. In temperate regions, densities can reach up to individuals per square meter in undisturbed meadows and forests, driven by favorable and prey . Tropical areas show elevated numbers in modified landscapes like dung pats and compost heaps, facilitated by agricultural practices. Conversely, polar regions exhibit low diversity, with only around 36 recorded in the Svalbard archipelago, primarily Holarctic or Palaearctic forms restricted to and seabird-influenced sites. Abiotic factors like , organic carbon content, and strongly influence occupancy, with no significant ties to calcium or precipitation in some studies. Microhabitat preferences within soils vary by trophic role: predatory species dominate upper horizons and litter layers (epedaphic zone), preying on nematodes and small arthropods, while saprophagous forms are more common in deeper layers (euedaphic zone, 5–20 cm), where they feed on decaying . Phoresy, the attachment to larger arthropods like flies or beetles, plays a crucial role in dispersal across fragmented habitats, enabling rapid colonization of new sites. Recent environmental changes have altered distributions; fosters distinct mite communities in managed green spaces, often with higher abundances linked to vegetation cover. and land modification, including post-mining reclamation, have led to increased densities in recovering landscapes, as seen in 2024 studies of stands on post-industrial sites where wet conditions boosted mesostigmatid richness during succession.

Trophic Interactions

Mesostigmata mites exhibit diverse trophic interactions, with the predatory being the most prominent, comprising the majority of species in the order. These predators primarily feed on small soil such as nematodes, collembolans, and other mites, playing a crucial role in regulating prey populations within ecosystems. For instance, members of the family Phytoseiidae are specialized predators of phytophagous spider mites (Tetranychidae), consuming eggs, larvae, and adults to suppress outbreaks on crops and wild plants. Parasitic forms represent a significant minority, including ectoparasites on vertebrates and parasites associated with . Species in the family Laelapidae, such as those in the genus Gigantolaelaps, are common ectoparasites of , feeding on blood and skin secretions while potentially transmitting pathogens. Some mesostigmatids also act as endoparasites or kleptoparasites within arthropod hosts, while phoresy—dispersal via attachment to insects or beetles—is facilitated by specialized deutonymph stages in families like Uropodidae, allowing access to new habitats without direct . Other trophic roles include mycophagy and detritivory, particularly in the subcohort Uropodina, where species consume fungi, decaying , and microbial films in litter. In bird nests, certain mesostigmatids engage in commensal relationships, inhabiting nest materials and feeding on or fungi without harming the hosts, thus contributing to nest . In food webs, Mesostigmata exert top-down control by preying on herbivores and detritivores, influencing cycling and community structure. Their abundance and diversity serve as indicators of ; for example, studies in urban green areas of , , in revealed higher of predatory Mesostigmata in unmanaged sites, correlating with better conditions like higher and lower compaction, highlighting their sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance.

Applied Aspects

Biological Control

Mesostigmata, particularly species in the family Phytoseiidae, serve as important natural enemies in agricultural pest management, targeting phytophagous mites and small arthropods. Among these, Phytoseiulus persimilis is a prominent predatory mite used for controlling the twospotted spider mite, , in greenhouse crops such as vegetables and ornamentals. This species has been commercially introduced and deployed globally since the , establishing itself as a cornerstone of augmentative biological control programs. Mass-rearing of Phytoseiidae relies on cost-effective techniques using factitious hosts, such as pollen from like cattail or , to support large-scale production without depending on live prey. These alternative diets maintain viable populations across multiple generations, enabling commercial suppliers to produce millions of mites for release. In applications, release rates for P. persimilis typically range from 2 to 50 individuals per square meter, or 10 to 20 per infested plant, applied weekly to suppress pest outbreaks. Such strategies have proven effective in (IPM), where P. persimilis introductions control T. urticae populations in crops like tomatoes and peppers, often reducing the need for chemical pesticides by integrating with selective sprays. Success in biological control with Mesostigmata has been documented in greenhouse systems, where Phytoseiidae predators can eliminate hotspots within days, leading to sustained suppression and lower reliance in IPM frameworks. For instance, augmentative releases in vegetable production have decreased T. urticae densities by over 70% in some trials, supporting environmentally sustainable farming practices. However, challenges persist in establishing these predators under field conditions, where environmental factors like fluctuations and residues can hinder persistence and dispersal. Recent phylogenomic studies, including a 2025 analysis of Phytoseiidae classification using genomic data, are enhancing strain selection for biological control by clarifying evolutionary relationships and identifying traits for improved adaptability. This work aids in choosing resilient strains for mass-rearing and release, addressing establishment issues in diverse agricultural settings.

Pests and Parasites

Mesostigmata includes several species that act as significant pests and parasites, inflicting economic damage on agriculture and posing health risks to animals and humans. One of the most notorious is Varroa destructor, an ectoparasite that primarily infests honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies by feeding on the fat bodies and hemolymph of bees and their brood. This feeding weakens bees and facilitates the transmission of debilitating viruses, such as deformed wing virus, contributing to colony collapse disorder (CCD) where entire hives die off rapidly. Originating in Asia, V. destructor has spread globally since the 1980s, devastating apiculture worldwide and leading to annual honey bee colony losses exceeding 30% in affected regions like North America and Europe. For example, in the United States, annual losses reached 55.6% between April 2024 and April 2025, while in Europe, rates have typically ranged from 12% to 30% in recent years. In poultry production, Dermanyssus gallinae, known as the poultry red mite, is a major blood-feeding parasite that hides in cracks and bedding during the day and attacks hens at night, causing , stress, reduced egg production, and increased mortality. Infestations lead to substantial economic losses, estimated at approximately €360 million annually in alone, affecting over 300 million laying hens through direct declines and control costs. This mite's rapid reproduction and ability to survive without hosts for months exacerbate its impact on commercial farms. Other mesostigmatan species also pose risks, particularly to birds and humans. The tropical fowl , Ornithonyssus bursa, parasitizes wild and domestic birds, including chickens and pigeons, by feeding on their and causing irritation, damage, and in heavy infestations. It occasionally bites humans in proximity to infested nests, leading to itchy . Similarly, Liponyssoides sanguineus, the tropical , primarily infests but readily bites humans when rodent hosts are nearby, resulting in painful skin lesions and serving as a vector for akari, the causative agent of —a mild but potentially widespread febrile illness. Management of these pests relies heavily on acaricides, such as amitraz for V. destructor and synthetic pyrethroids for D. gallinae, applied through or contact sprays to reduce mite populations below economic thresholds. However, widespread resistance has emerged due to repeated use, with V. destructor showing metabolic and target-site resistance to multiple compounds, complicating control efforts. (IPM) approaches, including regular monitoring, treatment rotation, and incorporation of predatory mites, are recommended to mitigate resistance and sustain long-term .

Evolution and Phylogeny

Fossil Record

The fossil record of Mesostigmata is notably sparse, with fewer than 50 described specimens and species, primarily reflecting under-sampling due to the mites' small size and the challenges of preserving soft-bodied arthropods in the geological record. No fossils predating the have been identified, underscoring a gap in understanding the suborder's early history. The oldest known Mesostigmata s are deutonymphs of the family Sejidae, preserved in mid-Cretaceous Burmese from , dating to approximately 100 million years ago. These inclusions represent the earliest valid record of the suborder and highlight the Sejidae's ancient lineage within the Sejida suborder. Subsequent records appear in ambers, including Gamasina, Microgyniina, and Uropodina mites from Eocene Baltic (approximately 44–49 million years ago), often found in phoretic association with longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Similarly, the Parasitidae family is documented in Eocene Baltic through the species Aclerogamasus stenocornis, marking the first representative of this diverse group. Miocene yields additional Mesostigmata inclusions, though specific family assignments remain limited compared to Baltic deposits. Preservation in Mesostigmata fossils overwhelmingly favors inclusions, which capture fine morphological details and ecological interactions such as phoresy, where deutonymphs attach to host insects for dispersal. Compression fossils in sedimentary rocks are exceedingly rare, with no well-documented examples providing substantial into pre- diversity. This bias toward amber preservation suggests that ancient Mesostigmata may be underestimated, as terrestrial sediments likely hosted many undiscovered populations.

Phylogenetic Relationships

The of Mesostigmata within the superorder is well-supported by morphological synapomorphies, including the distinctive position of a single pair of spiracles located laterally between the second and third pairs of walking legs, and the presence of a biflagellate tritosternum serving as a sensory and fluid-control structure anterior to the sternal shield. Within , Mesostigmata is the sister group to the clade comprising Ixodida (ticks) and Holothyrida, with shared derived features of the gnathosoma and , as inferred from recent phylogenomic analyses. Internal phylogenetic relationships within Mesostigmata reveal major lineages including a cohort Gamasina, comprising predominantly predatory and parasitic forms, and a uniting Uropodina and Cercomegistina; this topology is supported by mitochondrial using 13 protein-coding genes from diverse mite samples, though Sejida was unsampled. The suborder Sejida, represented by primitive families like Sejidae, occupies a basal position and is associated with early terrestrial habitats such as decaying wood, with transitions to diverse environments occurring early in mesostigmatan evolution. has evolved multiple times independently across Mesostigmata lineages, particularly in gamasine families such as Dermanyssidae and Laelapidae, transitioning from free-living predatory ancestors to and hosts. Recent phylogenomic advances, including whole-genome analyses of over 40 Phytoseiidae species using thousands of single-copy orthologs, have resolved subfamily relationships within this ecologically significant gamasine family, elevating Galendromus to subfamily status and sister to Amblyseiinae. These studies estimate ancient divergences within Phytoseiidae around 200 million years ago, aligning with broader inferences for mesostigmatan radiation during the , integrating fossil-calibrated timelines to highlight deep phylodiversity.

References

  1. https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/acarologia/article.php?id=4799
  2. https://idtools.org/id/invasive_mite/Invasive_Mite_Identification/key/Major_Mite_taxa/Media/Html/0001Intro.htm
  3. https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php/Mesostigmata
  4. https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/mites/Invasive_Mite_Identification/key/Mesostigmata/Media/Html/100Introduction.htm
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/mesostigmata
  6. https://idtools.org/id/invasive_mite/Invasive_Mite_Identification/key/Major_Mite_taxa/Media/Html/Mesostigmata.htm
  7. https://doi.org/10.24349/q3gy-1vyg
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/veterinary-science-and-veterinary-medicine/gnathosoma
  9. https://idtools.org/bee_mite/index.cfm?pageID=1783
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7108606/
  11. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=150319
  12. https://www.fws.gov/taxonomic-tree/1918786
  13. https://ab.pensoft.net/article/54206/
  14. https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/mites/Invasive_Mite_Identification/key/Mesostigmata/Media/Html/Sejida_Trigynaspida.htm
  15. https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/acarologia/article.php?id=47
  16. https://mbd.osu.edu/collections/acarology/about/classification-and-phylogeny
  17. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/37/3/683/5610533
  18. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zsc.12369
  19. http://kniznica.saras-arachno.sk/Zhang_2011biodiversity.pdf
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/8/1098
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S105579032500065X
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10997537/
  23. https://mapress.com/zs/article/view/47838/49270
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310966/
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0929139306001193
  26. https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/acarologia/article.php?id=4595
  27. https://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/acarologia/article.php?id=4797
  28. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20073012732
  29. https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/mites/qmites/html/Mesostigmata.htm
  30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1979.tb00084.x
  31. https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/mites/Invasive_Mite_Identification/key/Major_Mite_taxa/Media/Html/21_Peritremes.htm
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229866135_The_structure_and_probable_function_of_the_peritreme_in_intertidal_Gamasina_Acarina_Mesostigmata
  33. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb03808.x
  34. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01275523
  35. https://www.chaosofdelight.org/all-about-mites-mesostigmata
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4900186/
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292124516_Sensory_organs_of_mesostigmatic_mites_Acarina_Mesostigmata_dwelling_in_body_cavities_of_mammals_and_birds
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3519749/
  39. https://krex.k-state.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2ea7ff3a-45e7-405e-a3f3-22261f31bad0/content
  40. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01647954.2013.800133
  41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00051539
  42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1979.tb02930.x
  43. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/10/1/5
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16082925/
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323783520_Pre-ovipositional_and_ovipositional_behaviour_of_Holaspulus_tenuipes_Berlese_Parasitiformes_Mesostigmata_Parholaspididae_with_notes_on_egg_chorion_incubation_and_hatching
  46. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/z04-133
  47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359140/
  48. https://idtools.org/bee_mite/index.cfm?pageID=1720
  49. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342024000300301&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en
  50. https://biocontrol.entomology.cornell.edu/predators/Phytoseiulus.php
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281421536_Diapause_and_quiescence_as_two_main_kinds_of_dormancy_and_their_significance_in_life_cycles_of_mites_and_ticks_Chelicerata_Arachnida_Acari_Part_2_Parasitiformes
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880999000456
  53. https://idtools.org/id/invasive_mite/Invasive_Mite_Identification/key/Major_Mite_taxa/Media/Html/Sejides.htm
  54. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/13304/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9110456/
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/mesostigmata
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722054341
  58. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/12/9/323
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071712000806
  60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24750263.2023.2288847
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83417-4
  62. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10493-024-00968-7
  63. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/natural-enemies/phytoseiulus-predatory-mites/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880999000456
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2405939020302811
  66. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.en.33.010188.002141
  67. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/28307/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668786/
  69. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/32
  70. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2018.00192/full
  71. https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/phytoseiulus-persimilis-biological-control-agent-of-the-twospotted-spider-mite_MF3665.pdf
  72. https://ipm-cahnr.media.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3216/2022/12/2019biologicalcontrolofspidermitesfinal2-1.pdf
  73. https://ejbpc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41938-022-00518-6
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390740683_A_practical_mass-rearing_system_for_phytoseiid_mites_A_case_study_with_Amblyseius_swirskii_Neoseiulus_californicus_and_Neoseiulus_barkeri_Acari_Phytosiidae
  75. https://www.koppertus.com/crop-protection/biological-pest-control/predatory-mites/phytoseiulus-persimilis/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104996440300183X
  77. https://www.biobest.com/news/biological-control-of-spider-mites-in-peppers-with-phytoseiulus-system
  78. https://ejbpc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41938-024-00806-3
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9424159/
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391036258_Phylogenomics_offers_new_insights_into_the_classification_of_Phytoseiidae_Acari_Mesostigmata
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147149222030101X
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11221739/
  83. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bee-science/articles/10.3389/frbee.2023.1272937/full
  84. https://apiaryinspectors.org/US-beekeeping-survey-24-25
  85. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2020.565866/full
  86. https://www.redmiteexpert.com/impact/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5537931/
  88. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN575
  89. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/poultry/ectoparasites/mites-of-poultry
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/liponyssoides-sanguineus
  91. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/microbiolspec.iol5-0015-2015
  92. https://extension.psu.edu/methods-to-control-varroa-mites-an-integrated-pest-management-approach/
  93. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bee-science/articles/10.3389/frbee.2023.1297326/full
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8449538/
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401723000882
  96. https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/acarologia/article.php?id=4463
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354585124_Oldest_determined_record_of_a_mesostigmatic_mite_Acari_Mesostigmata_Sejidae_in_Cretaceous_Burmese_amber
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4190962/
  99. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12504
  100. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-2389-5_8
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.