Hubbry Logo
Metallic microlatticeMetallic microlatticeMain
Open search
Metallic microlattice
Community hub
Metallic microlattice
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Metallic microlattice
Metallic microlattice
Metallic microlattice
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A block of metallic microlattice being supported by a dandelion seed head.

A metallic microlattice is a synthetic porous metallic material consisting of an ultra-light metal foam. With a density as low as 0.99 mg/cm3 (0.00561 lb/ft3), it is one of the lightest structural materials known to science.[1] It was developed by a team of scientists from California-based HRL Laboratories, in collaboration with researchers at University of California, Irvine and Caltech, and was first announced in November 2011. The prototype samples were made from a nickel-phosphorus alloy.[2] In 2012, the microlattice prototype was declared one of 10 World-Changing Innovations by Popular Mechanics.[3] Metallic microlattice technology has numerous potential applications in automotive and aeronautical engineering.[4] A detailed comparative review study among other types of metallic lattice structures showed them to be beneficial for light-weighting purposes but expensive to manufacture.[5]

Synthesis

[edit]

To produce their metallic microlattice, the HRL/UCI/Caltech team first prepared a polymer template using a technique based on self-propagating waveguide formation,[6][7] though it was noted that other methods can be used to fabricate the template.[8] The process passed UV light through a perforated mask into a reservoir of UV-curable resin. Fiber-optic-like "self-trapping" of the light occurred as the resin cured under each hole in the mask, forming a thin polymer fiber along the path of the light. By using multiple light beams, multiple fibers could then interconnect to form a lattice.

The process was similar to photolithography in that it used a two-dimensional mask to define the starting template structure, but differed in the rate of formation: where stereolithography might take hours to make a full structure, the self-forming waveguide process allowed templates to be formed in 10–100 seconds. In this way, the process enables large free-standing 3D lattice materials to be formed quickly and scalably. The template was then coated with a thin layer of metal by electroless nickel plating, and the template is etched away, leaving a free-standing, periodic porous metallic structure. Nickel was used as the microlattice metal in the original report. Owing to the electrodeposition process, 7% of the material consisted of dissolved phosphorus atoms, and it contained no precipitates.[8]

Properties

[edit]

A metallic microlattice is composed of a network of interconnecting hollow struts. In the least-dense microlattice sample reported, each strut is about 100 micrometres in diameter, with a wall 100 nanometres thick. The completed structure is about 99.99% air by volume,[2] and by convention, the mass of air is excluded when the microlattice density is calculated.[8] Allowing for the mass of the interstitial air, the true density of the structure is approximately 2.1 mg/cm3 (2.1 kg/m3), which is only about 1.76 times the density of air itself at 25 °C. The material is described as being 100 times lighter than Styrofoam.[9] Microlattices can also be 100 times stronger than regular polymers.[10]

Metallic microlattices are characterized by very low densities, with the 2011 record of 0.9 mg/cm3 being among the lowest values of any known solid. The previous record of 1.0 mg/cm3 was held by silica aerogels, and aerographite is claimed to have a density of 0.2 mg/cm3.[11] Mechanically, these microlattices are behaviorally similar to elastomers and almost completely recover their shape after significant compression.[12] This gives them a significant advantage over earlier aerogels, which are brittle, glass-like substances. This elastomeric property in metallic microlattices furthermore results in efficient shock absorption. Their Young's modulus E exhibits different scaling, with the density ρ, E ~ ρ2, compared to E ~ ρ3 in aerogels and carbon nanotube foams.[8]

Applications

[edit]

Metallic microlattice may find potential applications in thermal and vibration insulators such as shock absorbers, and may also prove useful as battery electrodes and catalyst supports.[8] Additionally, the microlattices' ability to return to their original state after being compressed may make them suitable for use in spring-like energy storage devices.[2] Automotive and aeronautical manufacturers[which?] are using microlattice technology to develop extremely lightweight and efficient structures that combine multiple functions, such as structural reinforcement and heat transfer, into single components for high-performance vehicles.[4]

Similar materials

[edit]

A similar but denser material, consisting of an electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel layer over a polymeric rapid-prototyped truss, was created by researchers at the University of Toronto in 2008.[13] In 2012, German researchers created a carbon foam known as aerographite, with an even lower density than a metallic microlattice.[14] In 2013, Chinese scientists developed a carbon-based aerogel which was claimed to be lighter still.[1]

Nanolattices like tube-based nanostructures are similar structures on a smaller scale.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Metallic microlattice

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A metallic microlattice is an ultra-lightweight synthetic porous metallic material composed of a periodic three-dimensional lattice of interconnected hollow nickel–phosphorus tubes, with wall thicknesses around 100 nanometers and densities as low as 0.9 mg/cm³, rendering it approximately 100 times lighter than Styrofoam while comprising 99.99% air by volume. Developed in 2011 by researchers at HRL Laboratories in collaboration with the California Institute of Technology and the University of California, Irvine, this material was recognized by Guinness World Records as the lightest metallic structure, with a record set in 2011. The fabrication process begins with a self-propagating waveguide template formed through exposure, which is then coated with a thin layer of nickel-phosphorus via electroless plating, followed by chemical etching to remove the and yield the hollow metallic framework. This technique allows for scalable production of architectures with feature sizes on the micrometer scale, enabling customizable densities and geometries that mimic natural structures like or tissue. Key mechanical properties include exceptional stiffness-to-weight ratios, with scaling linearly with the square of (E ~ ρ²), surpassing traditional foams and aerogels that follow a cubic scaling (E ~ ρ³). These microlattices demonstrate complete elastic recovery after compression exceeding 50% strain and high energy absorption capabilities comparable to elastomers, while also exhibiting superior and vibration damping due to their hierarchical nano-to-macro structure. Applications span and automotive industries for lightweight structural components, such as aircraft wings and blast protection; sectors for battery electrodes and catalyst supports; and biomedical fields for heat exchangers or scaffolds, leveraging their high surface area and impact resistance. Ongoing research explores additive manufacturing advancements to enhance scalability and integrate microlattices into multifunctional composites for improved durability in high-stress environments.

Background

Definition and Characteristics

A metallic microlattice is an ultra-lightweight synthetic porous material composed of a three-dimensional periodic lattice formed by interconnected hollow metallic struts, functioning as an advanced with exceptional low density and structural integrity. This architecture operates at the micrometer scale, where individual unit cells typically span tens to hundreds of micrometers, differentiating it from larger macro-lattices (millimeter-scale) or smaller nano-lattices, and enabling unique combinations of lightness and mechanical resilience not achievable in traditional foams. Key characteristics include densities as low as 0.9 mg/cm³, equivalent to about 99.99% air by volume, making it lighter than many aerogels while retaining metallic properties such as conductivity and strength. The struts in these structures measure approximately 100 micrometers in diameter with wall thicknesses around 100 nanometers, contributing to the material's hierarchical design that spans nano-, micro-, and macro-scales for optimized performance. The primary composition involves a nickel-phosphorus , which provides resistance and ease of deposition, though variants have been explored using other base metals like aluminum or to tailor properties for specific environments. This material class represents a breakthrough in engineered metamaterials, prioritizing void volume to minimize weight without sacrificing the inherent advantages of metals.

History and Development

Metallic microlattices were first developed in 2011 by researchers at , LLC—a research and development facility jointly owned by The Boeing Company and —in collaboration with the , and the . This breakthrough emerged from efforts to create ultralight structural materials with metal-like properties, leveraging advanced techniques to address limitations in traditional foams and lattices. The foundational work was published in the journal Science on November 18, 2011, in the seminal paper "Ultralight Metallic Microlattices" by Tobias A. Schaedler, Lorenzo Valdevit, and colleagues, which detailed the synthesis and performance of nickel-phosphorus-based prototypes achieving densities as low as 0.9 mg/cm³. Lead contributors Schaedler and Valdevit, along with teams from the collaborating institutions, pioneered the use of polymeric templates coated via electroless plating, marking a significant advancement in architected materials. Key milestones followed rapidly, including recognition in as one of ' Breakthrough Awards for innovative technologies poised to transform industries. By 2016, comprehensive reviews underscored progress in and process refinements, expanding the material's potential beyond initial lab-scale demonstrations. A 2022 study further advanced the field by revealing size-dependent strengthening effects in scaled microlattice variants, where reduced feature sizes from 20 to 60 μm yielded up to threefold increases in strength and . Recent developments from 2023 to 2025 have focused on advanced additive techniques, including multiscale dynamic toughening in medium-entropy alloys and graded lattice structures via thick film , enhancing impact resistance and multifunctionality. The evolution of metallic microlattices has progressed from early nickel-based prototypes to more sophisticated multi-material configurations in the , driven by innovations in technologies such as projection microstereolithography, which enable precise control over architecture and composition for enhanced functionality.

Fabrication

Template Formation

The formation of the template serves as the foundational step in metallic microlattice fabrication, utilizing a self-propagating process to create intricate, three-dimensional scaffolds. This method involves exposing a of photopolymerizable to (UV) through a lithographic mask patterned with the desired lattice , such as an octet-truss configuration. The initial UV exposure initiates localized at the mask's features, forming solid polymer waveguides that act as light guides, enabling the polymerization front to propagate rapidly through the monomer without additional external illumination. The propagation occurs via a self-trapping phenomenon, where the polymerized regions channel the UV light along the paths, completing the in 10–100 seconds depending on the design complexity and . This rapid process allows for the creation of periodic, open-cellular lattices with interconnected hollow tube on the micrometer scale, typically featuring strut diameters of 50–200 μm and cell sizes around 0.5–2 mm. Thiol-ene based photoresists are commonly employed as the sacrificial due to their high reactivity and ability to form robust, yet etchable, structures. These templates are engineered for high architectural efficiency, maximizing the surface area for subsequent while minimizing material use in to support ultralight final structures. The hollow tubular design of ensures uniform accessibility during later processing steps, contributing to the overall of the fabrication approach.

Metal Deposition and Etching

The fabrication of metallic microlattices involves metallizing a template through electroless , a chemical deposition process that coats the scaffold with a thin -phosphorus layer. In this autocatalytic reaction, the surface is sensitized and activated (typically with palladium chloride) to initiate deposition, followed by immersion in a bath containing , , and stabilizers, which reduces ions onto the template without an external current. This method ensures conformal coverage on complex geometries, producing hollow struts with wall thicknesses as thin as 100 nm, controlled by duration to achieve relative densities below 1 mg/cm³. Alternative metallization techniques have been explored to incorporate metals beyond nickel-phosphorus, such as aluminum or , using (ALD). ALD employs sequential, self-limiting surface reactions of volatile precursors in a , enabling precise, uniform coatings at the atomic scale (typically 1-10 nm per cycle) on high-aspect-ratio structures like microlattice templates. This approach addresses limitations of electroless plating for , though it requires longer deposition times and higher costs compared to methods. Following deposition, the polymer core is removed via chemical etching to yield freestanding hollow metallic struts. For thiol-ene-based templates, immersion in a solution selectively dissolves the sacrificial material while preserving the metal shell, typically at elevated temperatures (e.g., 60°C) for several hours to ensure complete removal without damaging the thin walls. This step results in open-celled structures with high , but requires careful control to prevent of the delicate . Key challenges in these processes include achieving uniform coating thickness across intricate geometries to minimize defects like pinholes or uneven struts, which can compromise structural integrity. Optimizations, such as multi-step activation and agitation in the bath, have improved conformity. Post-2016 advancements in metallic microlattice manufacturing, including direct additive manufacturing techniques like (SLM), have enabled production of larger structures suitable for industrial applications. Recent developments as of 2025 have shifted toward direct metal additive manufacturing methods, such as laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), for fabricating solid metallic microlattices (e.g., in or 316L ) without relying on polymer templates, achieving scales up to centimeters and improved scalability for applications in and biomedical fields.

Structure and Properties

Microstructural Design

Metallic microlattices are engineered with periodic architectures that optimize load-bearing efficiency at the microscale, primarily featuring octet- unit cells composed of interconnected hollow tubular struts. These struts, typically with diameters on the order of 10 to 100 micrometers and wall thicknesses from tens of nanometers to a few micrometers, enable uniform stress distribution by minimizing stress concentrations at nodes and promoting axial loading along the members. The design achieves ultralow relative densities in the range of ρ∗/ρs≈10−3\rho^*/\rho_s \approx 10^{-3} to 10−210^{-2}, where ρ∗\rho^* denotes the effective density of the lattice and ρs\rho_s the density of the solid base metal such as or nickel-phosphorus alloys; this scaling is governed by the geometric relation ρ∗/ρs≈26.64(d/L)2\rho^*/\rho_s \approx 26.64 (d/L)^2, with dd as strut diameter and LL as edge length on the millimeter scale. Such micrometer-scale features allow for hierarchical structuring, integrating nanoscale wall thicknesses with microscale struts to balance lightness and structural integrity. Central to the microstructural rationale is the distinction between stretch-dominated and bending-dominated configurations, where octet-truss geometries exemplify the former by channeling loads primarily through tension and compression in struts, yielding superior relative to compared to bending-prone open-cell foams. Strut slenderness, characterized by high aspect ratios (e.g., length-to-thickness exceeding 1000:1), enhances resistance by shifting failure modes from brittle to recoverable deformation, particularly at densities below 1% of the solid material. Earlier designs, such as those with octahedral cells lacking basal struts, leaned toward bending dominance due to thin walls, but octet-truss iterations prioritize stretch behavior for enhanced rigidity. Recent advancements include hybrid designs that incorporate density gradients or multi-scale hierarchies, such as combining octet-truss with other unit cells like rhombic dodecahedra in 316L lattices, to tailor regional stiffness and improve overall energy absorption without uniform scaling. These variations leverage additive manufacturing to create spatially varying architectures, addressing limitations in isotropic uniformity for targeted applications.

Mechanical Properties

Metallic microlattices, owing to their stretch-dominated architecture, display outstanding mechanical performance characterized by high , strength, and energy absorption at densities far below those of conventional metals. These properties arise from the efficient load distribution through axial stretching of struts rather than , enabling superior specific mechanical metrics compared to bending-dominated cellular materials. The mechanical behavior follows established density-scaling relations for stretch-dominated lattices, where the relative modulus E∗/Es≈(ρ∗/ρs)2E^*/E_s \approx (\rho^*/\rho_s)^2 and the relative yield strength σ∗/σys≈(ρ∗/ρs)3/2\sigma^*/\sigma_{ys} \approx (\rho^*/\rho_s)^{3/2}. Here, EsE_s and σys\sigma_{ys} denote the and yield strength of the parent solid material, while ρ∗\rho^* and ρs\rho_s represent the densities of the microlattice and solid, respectively. These relations, validated experimentally, highlight how reducing relative density ρ∗/ρs\rho^*/\rho_s (often below 0.01) maintains structural integrity under load. Key metrics underscore their advantages over traditional lightweight materials: at equivalent low densities, metallic microlattices exhibit considerably higher strength-to-weight ratios than open-cell foams, with specific strengths approaching those of natural composites like . Energy absorption is particularly notable, achieved through progressive of hollow struts, which dissipates energy in a controlled, non-catastrophic manner and enhances crash resistance in composite structures. Under compressive loading, these materials demonstrate exceptional elastic recovery, with nearly complete shape restoration after strains exceeding 50%, attributed to the resilience of thin-walled struts and minimal plastic deformation at low densities. This behavior supports near-ideal shock absorption, as the structure rebounds without permanent damage during dynamic impacts. Quasi-static compression tests from 2011 confirmed these traits, showing linear elastic response up to ~1% strain followed by buckling-dominated yielding, consistent with theoretical models for octet-truss geometries. More recent 2022 investigations into hybrid metallic microlattices (combining stretch- and bend-dominated unit cells) revealed enhanced compressive performance, with improved energy absorption efficiency due to optimized progressive failure modes.

Thermal and Acoustic Properties

Metallic microlattices exhibit exceptionally low effective thermal conductivity, typically in the range of 0.05 to 1 W/m·K, owing to their ultra-high porosity exceeding 99%, which severely restricts solid-phase heat conduction through the thin-walled struts. For instance, hollow nickel microlattices with 99.9% porosity and 1 µm wall thickness achieve a value as low as 0.049 W/m·K at 320 K, increasing modestly to 0.075 W/m·K at 480 K due to rising radiative contributions from the high surface-to-volume ratio of approximately 1000 mm⁻¹. This low conductivity arises from the dominance of air-filled voids, with solid conduction scaling linearly with the relative density (ρ*/ρ_s), following k*/k_s ≈ ρ*/ρ_s, while radiation becomes significant at higher temperatures but remains secondary in insulating applications. Such properties position metallic microlattices as effective thermal insulators, particularly in aerospace thermal management where low density and mechanical resilience are critical. Recent advances as of 2025 have enabled microlattices with high-temperature stability, suitable for engine components and thermal management in extreme environments. Acoustic absorption in metallic microlattices stems from internal within the hollow struts and viscous-thermal losses in the interconnected pores, enabling high and sound energy dissipation without compromising structural integrity. Optimized designs with pore sizes around 0.2 mm and of 0.3–0.7 can achieve a sound absorption average (SAA) of up to 0.75 at a thickness of 50 mm, outperforming traditional porous absorbers in noise reduction. This mechanism leverages the microlattice's hierarchical architecture to convert into heat via strut and airflow resistance, making it suitable for in lightweight panels. Variations in electrical conductivity arise from the metallic composition of the struts, which retain inherent conductivity (e.g., nickel's ~14% IACS) but yield low effective values (on the order of 10^4 to 10^5 S/m) due to the sparse solid , enabling applications in electrodes. Measurements from post-2016 reviews highlight these ' role in multifunctional , such as in heat exchangers where low conductivity aids insulation while struts facilitate selective conduction.

Applications

Aerospace and Automotive

In aerospace applications, metallic microlattices enable significant weight reduction in components and panels while maintaining structural integrity. Developed by in collaboration with , prototypes of these materials have been explored since 2015 under NASA's Game Changing Development Program, targeting ultralight sandwich panels with lattice cores and carbon fiber facesheets for enhanced rigidity in and structures. These panels support deep space missions by potentially reducing overall mass by up to 40%, facilitating more efficient fuel use and capacity without compromising strength. The microlattices' hierarchical design, featuring hollow tubes, allows for complete recovery after compression exceeding 50% strain, making them suitable for lightweight components that withstand vibrational and shock loads during launch and operation. By 2017, metallic microlattices had been proposed for lightweight frames for fuselages and wings, leveraging their high strength-to-weight to optimize function-to-weight in sandwich constructions. Their vibration-damping properties, arising from energy absorption akin to elastomers, have been investigated for components, where they could mitigate acoustic and mechanical vibrations to improve and reduce noise in high-performance systems. In the automotive sector, metallic microlattices have been explored for shock absorbers and crash structures to enhance energy absorption during impacts. , partially owned by , has pursued these applications through ongoing collaborations since the material's post-2011 development, focusing on integrating microlattices into vehicle components for superior crash management. The structures' ability to absorb shock energy efficiently, combined with densities as low as 0.9 mg/cm³, supports potential weight savings in automotive panels and frames relative to conventional metals, preserving and enabling lighter, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Energy and Environmental

Metallic microlattices offer significant advantages in applications due to their hierarchical porous structures, which provide exceptionally high surface areas while maintaining structural integrity. In lithium-ion batteries, these ultralight frameworks serve as electrodes, enabling ultra-thick designs exceeding 1 mm that enhance ionic and electronic transport through convective flow within hollow conduits (10–1000 μm pores). This reduces diffusion overpotentials by up to 99% and boosts by minimizing inactive components, with densities as low as 0.9 mg/cm³ allowing for improved capacity via increased active material loading. Similarly, three-dimensional microlattices have been demonstrated as cathodes in lithium-oxygen batteries, increasing surface area over 30 times compared to flat films and facilitating the formation of toroidal Li₂O₂ discharge products that reversibly decompose during cycling. These properties stem from the microlattice's ability to combine nanoscale wall thicknesses (0.1–10 μm) with microscale periodicity, promoting efficient penetration and mechanical robustness. In catalysis, metallic microlattices have been proposed as supports in fuel cells and chemical reactors, leveraging their high surface-to-volume ratios and tunable permeability for superior gas diffusion and reaction efficiency. The open-cell architecture facilitates uniform distribution and enhanced mass transport, making them suitable for applications like catalytic converters where is intensified without reducing pellet size. For instance, nickel-based microlattices exhibit complete recovery after 50% compression, ensuring durability under operational stresses while maintaining catalytic activity. This design outperforms traditional supports by enabling hierarchical that accommodates reactive at multiple length scales, from nano- to millimeter. For environmental control, metallic microlattices have been explored in membranes for air and , where precise pore size control (via additive manufacturing) and high connectivity block particulates or enable selective chemical interactions. Additionally, their low conductivity positions them as thermal insulators in , such as supporting phase change materials for heat management in solar applications by promoting efficient conduction into storage media while minimizing losses. Recent advancements highlight the versatility of metallic microlattices in energy recovery, with 2018 studies demonstrating their high energy absorption—up to elastomer-like levels—through independent strut deformation, allowing full reversible recovery after 50% compression for applications in impact-resistant energy systems. Prototypes by 2025 further explore their potential in hydrogen storage, such as hierarchically porous iron-molybdenum microlattices for iron-air batteries, which sustain 92% oxidation and 98% reduction efficiency over 50 redox cycles at 800°C, inhibiting sintering to maintain porosity for reversible H₂ release and uptake. As of 2025, metallic microlattices remain primarily in research and prototyping stages across these applications, with the global market valued at approximately USD 0.1 billion in 2024 and projected to grow at a CAGR of 14.2% through 2035 due to demand for lightweight materials.

Comparisons

Similar Metallic Lattices

One notable similar metallic lattice structure was developed by researchers at the in 2008, consisting of an electrodeposited nanocrystalline layer over a polymeric rapid-prototyped template, with a bending-dominated that resulted in lower compared to subsequent stretch-dominated designs. later introduced multi-material variants of their microlattice in 2017, incorporating an elastomeric polymer core within hollow tubes to form hybrid structures that enhanced properties while maintaining low density, though these differed from pure metallic compositions like titanium-based lattices, which offer superior resistance for harsh environments. Recent advancements as of 2025 include multicomponent shell microlattices that enhance toughness and strength while maintaining low densities. Key differences between the original HRL metallic microlattices and these similar structures lie in scale and fabrication methods: HRL microlattices feature micrometer-scale struts (typically 100-500 μm) produced via templating followed by electroless and , whereas many comparable lattices operate at millimeter scales using direct additive manufacturing techniques like . In terms of performance, metallic microlattices from HRL achieve exceptionally low densities (as low as 0.9 mg/cm³) paired with higher stiffness efficiency, enabling superior (stiffness-to-weight ratio) relative to alternatives like the 2008 nickel lattice or millimeter-scale structures, where relative densities often exceed 1% and stiffness is compromised by larger feature sizes.

Alternative Lightweight Materials

While metallic microlattices represent an ordered, architected approach to ultra-lightweight metals, alternative lightweight materials often rely on non-metallic compositions or random cellular structures, offering distinct trade-offs in , strength, and functionality. Among these, carbon-based aerogels like provide exceptional low but compromise on mechanical robustness and electrical conductivity compared to metallic structures. , developed in 2012 by researchers at the University of and Hamburg University of Technology in , is a synthetic form of carbon consisting of interconnected microtubes with a hierarchical nanowall structure, achieving a of 0.18 mg/cm³. This material exhibits flexibility and can withstand compression up to 95% strain with partial recovery, yet its compressive strength is approximately 0.1–1 MPa, comparable to metallic microlattices at similar densities, which exhibit strengths on the order of 0.1-10 MPa depending on the exact . Furthermore, 's electrical conductivity is limited to about 0.2 S/m, orders of magnitude below the 10^6–10^7 S/m typical of metals, restricting its use in applications requiring high current handling. Silica aerogels, another class of non-metallic ultra-lightweight materials, excel in but lack structural integrity and electrical conductivity. These amorphous silica networks, formed via sol-gel processes followed by , can achieve densities as low as 1 mg/cm³, with exceeding 99%. For instance, advanced formulations demonstrate conductivities below 0.02 /m·K, making them superior insulators to metallic microlattices, which typically range from 0.02–0.1 /m·K despite their metallic struts, owing to the ultra-high . However, silica are inherently brittle, exhibiting catastrophic under modest compressive strains (often <5%) and Young's moduli of 1–10 kPa at ultra-low densities, rendering them non-structural and unsuitable for load-bearing roles where metallic —allowing plastic deformation without failure—is essential. Unlike metallic microlattices, silica aerogels also possess negligible electrical conductivity (<10^{-12} S/m), limiting them to passive or acoustic applications. Even within metallic alternatives, closed-cell metal foams such as those made from aluminum differ markedly from microlattices due to their random, pore structures formed by gas entrapment or precursor foaming. Aluminum foams typically exhibit densities of 100–500 mg/cm³, corresponding to relative densities of 5–20% of bulk aluminum (2.7 g/cm³), which is higher than the sub-10 mg/cm³ achievable in optimized microlattices. This random architecture leads to inconsistent mechanical properties, with compressive strengths varying widely (1–20 MPa) and reduced energy absorption efficiency compared to the uniform, designed struts in microlattices that optimize stress distribution. While aluminum foams offer good thermal conductivity (∼1–10 W/m·K, lower than bulk aluminum but higher than aerogels) and in the solid phase, their disordered cells can introduce stress concentrations, promoting brittle-like modes under impact, unlike the tunable, near-ideal behavior of ordered metallic lattices. Overall, these alternatives highlight key trade-offs: non-metallic aerogels like and silica variants achieve lower densities and superior insulation but sacrifice the , electrical conductivity, and structural predictability inherent to metallic microlattices, which combine metal-like functionality with lightweight design. In contrast, random metal foams provide a simpler fabrication route but at the cost of architectural precision and performance consistency.

References

  1. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1211649
  2. https://www.hrl.com/news/2011/11/17/hrl-researchers-develop-worlds-lightest-material
  3. https://www.hrl.com/news/2016/10/26/hrl-laboratories-achieves-guinness-world-record-for-lightest-metal
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127516301447
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264127516301447
  6. https://www.hrl.com/about
  7. https://phys.org/news/2011-11-world-lightest-material.html
  8. https://news.uci.edu/2012/10/10/valdevit-team-win-popular-mechanics-award-for-worlds-lightest-metal/
  9. https://www.hrl.com/news/2012/10/04/popular-mechanics-recognizes-hrls-breakthrough-development-of-ultralight-microlattice-materials
  10. https://phys.org/news/2022-10-stronger-ductile-microlattice-materials-sizes.html
  11. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adt0589
  12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40964-025-01300-4
  13. https://www.aimspress.com/aimspress-data/aimsmates/2025/3/PDF/matersci-12-03-028.pdf
  14. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2631-7990/ab8d9a
  15. https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/metamet-project-to-3d-print-metallic-microlattices-for-lightweight-parts
  16. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700797
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51808274_Ultralight_Metallic_Microlattices
  18. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9415562B1/en
  19. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6528/aa8a3b
  20. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Metallic-microlattice-materials%253A-a-current-state-of-Rashed-Ashraf/a99cce74b310e5f8418fc06ebc22a88b125a2b96
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2542529325002895
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020740322000303
  23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107093
  24. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apm/article/7/10/101108/149097/Thermal-transport-in-hollow-metallic-microlattices
  25. https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/matersci.2025028
  26. https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/137/4/EL334/940474/Optimization-on-microlattice-materials-for-sound
  27. https://www.hrl.com/news/2015/10/05/game-changing-space-travel-hrl-is-developing-ultralight-materials-for-future-aerospace-vehicles-and-structures
  28. https://insidemetaladditivemanufacturing.com/2017/08/05/metallic-microlattices-and-applications/
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785320354857
  30. https://gmauthority.com/blog/2015/10/micro-lattice-lightest-metal-structure-ever-developed-by-lab-partially-owned-by-gm/
  31. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/metal-999-percent-air-180957574/
  32. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9590228B1/en
  33. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.5b00443
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079642521001420
  35. http://ricecatalyst.com/discoveries/2018/11/metallic-microlattices-as-light-as-air-and-as-strong-as-an-airplane
  36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adfm.202307470
  37. https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/metallic-microlattice-market
  38. http://creationwiki.org/Microlattice
  39. https://www.espublisher.com/journals/articlehtml/engineered-science/10.30919-es1214
  40. https://mkt-intl.com/materials/aerogel/silica-aerogel/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6318623/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785322071395
  43. https://www.metalfoamweb.com/aluminum-foam/closed-cell-aluminum-foam/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.