Hubbry Logo
Molly houseMolly houseMain
Open search
Molly house
Community hub
Molly house
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Molly house
Molly house
Molly house
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In 18th- and 19th-century Britain, a molly house or molly-house was a meeting place for homosexual men. The meeting places were generally taverns, public houses, coffeehouses[1] or even private rooms[2] where patrons could either socialise or meet possible sexual partners.

Despite the reputation of molly-houses as places having primarily sexual connotations, rather than as social meeting places, some historians are reluctant to classify them specifically as brothels. Rictor Norton, for example, argues that the regular customers could have been in fact mutual friends, at least at the beginning, since consistent evidence concerning male prostitution seems to be insufficient in Britain until the 1780s.[2][3]

From 1533 onwards, homosexual relations and sexual activities remained illegal and were frequently prosecuted, with homosexual sexual activities being included in the offence categories of buggery and sodomy (the terms which were often used interchangeably), they remained capital offences until 1861.[4] From the 16th century onwards until 1861, particularly during the 1720s, molly-houses came to be the scenes of raids and arrests,[1] and their customers frequently became targets for blackmail.[5]

Molly-houses can be considered a precursor to some types of contemporary meeting places for the gay community,[1][6] such as cottaging.

Etymology

[edit]

The word molly (also spelt as molley, mollie, mally) is a pet-form of the female forename Mary, and had two main connotations in 18th century English.[7] The first one is close to the word moll, designating a lower-class girl or woman, occasionally a prostitute. The second one is classified as slang, defining an effeminate, usually homosexual, male.[7][8][9] Along with the possible perception of intrinsic female features deriving from the association with the name Mary, another possible origin of this denomination for a homosexual man could be found in the Latin form mollis, indicating the supposed passive-effeminate partner in male homosexual relationships.[10] In a 1762 Swedish/English dictionary by Jacob Serenius and in a 1767 French/English dictionary by Thomas Nugent the word was present, but simply defined a sodomite, without effeminate connotations.[11]

Other uses of the word can be seen in the verb to molly (to have homosexual intercourse),[12] in the expressions mollycot (a British regional expression indicating man interested in activities traditionally associated with women)[13] and Miss Molly[14] (referring to an effeminate or homosexual male). The Kent tradition of Hoodening includes the participation of a Molly; a male who takes on womanhood for the night. She is referenced (often humorously) in hoodening songs.[15]

History

[edit]
A parodic cartoon depicting male and female crossdressing, c. 1780, after a work by John Collet.
A parodic cartoon depicting male and female crossdressing, c. 1780, after a work by John Collet.

Gender issues in 18th century London

[edit]

According to one historian, English society of Georgian era accorded high importance to the concepts of family and household as fundamental units for reproduction, subsistence and interaction between generations:[16] in this context, male and female roles evolved into more static forms. Men were associated with an active, assertive role both in sexual behaviour and in managing the household,[17] while women were "defined in terms of their maternal functions",[18] contrarily to a tradition common at the start of the century, attributing them features related to lustfulness and aggressiveness in sexual matters.[16] It is possible to see that the notion of molly-house was rooted in the emergence of a distinctive identity according to gender and sexual orientation, a peculiar social phenomenon considered crucial by some critics in gender studies.[17][19][20][21]
As stated by Robert Shoemaker, "... any activity (such as homosexual intercourse), in which [men] could be seen as acting passively was further marginalised".

Some of the activities popular among the homosexual community, that were seemingly taking place in molly-houses (by nature, marginalised meeting places), were often associated both to female roles and to a family environment (e.g. cross-dressing, "marriage" and "mock birth" rituals, as described in a satire work of the time, Edward Ward's Satyrical Reflections on Clubs, Chapter XXV "Of the Mollies Club").[22]

Molly-houses and the homosexual subculture in London

[edit]
Covent Garden in 1747, on a satirical print The Covt. Garden morning frolick. Gaillardise du Commun Jardin by Louis Peter Boitard.
Covent Garden in 1747, in Louis Peter Boitard's satirical print The Covt. Garden morning frolick. Gaillardise du Commun Jardin.

As sodomy was a capital offence, the organisation of homosexual men and their activities had to be a crucial point, in order to keep the community as safe as possible from prosecution. As a consequence, molly districts seemed to appear, and eventually grow, in areas in which their business could be acknowledged and tolerated at the same time: such connivance could be often found in areas with a high rate of criminal acts such as theft and prostitution.[23]

An editorial in The London Journal singled out a number of areas:[23]

The presence of pillories punishing sodomitical offences, ironically, identified the sites where such acts frequently took place. Pillories were often organised near the crime locations attributed to the accused.[23]

Molly-houses could be considered the most organised phenomenon of London 18th-century homosexual subculture.[24] They were enclosed, private spaces gathering individuals with a common purpose, i.e. socializing and seeking pleasure with partners of the same sex.

Law enforcement and sources of information

[edit]

Before 1533, the "unnatural sin" (also defined "detestable crime" in trial records[25]) of sodomy or buggery, (a specific common law offence, meaning anal intercourse between a man and another man or woman, or anal or vaginal intercourse with a beast – in this way encompassing both sodomy and bestiality) was dealt with by the ecclesiastical courts. From that year however, the country's first civil sodomy law was introduced as An Acte for the punishment of the vice of Buggerie (Buggery Act 1533), and also criminal courts could prosecute individuals accused of such crimes.[26] According to the Old Bailey Online Proceedings site:[27]

In order to obtain a conviction, it was necessary to prove that both penetration and ejaculation had occurred, and two witnesses were required to prove the crime. Both the "active" and "passive" partner could be found guilty of this offence. But due to the difficulty of proving this actual penetration and ejaculation many men were prosecuted with the reduced charge of assault with sodomitical intent.

From the late 1690s to the early 1710s, the Societies for the Reformation of Manners (organizations born after the Revolution in 1688, seeking to eliminate immorality and disrespect for religion from public life)[28] actively pursued prostitutes, Sabbath breakers and also homosexual men, through the means of spies and provocateurs to dismantle molly houses and prosecute individuals. In the 1720s and 30s thief-takers like Charles Hitchen and Jonathan Wild stimulated the Societies' activities. The peak of this wave of prosecution is to be recognized in the late 1720s with a raid on the most famous molly house, Mother Clap's.[25] According to Rictor Norton:[24]

The organized molly subculture was effectively suppressed by the mid-1730s. However, molly houses began to reappear again after 1750.

Because sodomy was a capital offence, most of the information concerning molly-houses and the community around them is available through an indirect form, that is, mostly through newspaper reports and the accounts given during the Old Bailey trials relating to sexual offences, such as sodomy, assault with sodomitical intent and keeping a brothel, or sometimes the ones related to theft cases (for example, in cases with men caught stealing during a sexual encounter).[25][29][30]

Other important sources include satires and pamphlets, such as An Answer To A Late Insolent Libel by Jonathan Wild, Edward Ward's Satyrical Reflections on Clubs, Chapter XXV Of the Mollies Club,[31] John Dunton's The He-Strumpets. A Satyr on the Sodomite-Club,[32] James Dalton's A Genuine Narrative of all the Street Robberies Committed since October last.

Later in the eighteenth century, waves of prosecutions can be identified in the 1750s and 1770s.[25] However most of the details concerning sexual offences trials came to be more and more rare owing to a trend for a strait-laced morality, but fraud and extortion cases seemed to continue in giving retail at length detailed accounts of alleged sexual encounters between men.[25]

Activities

[edit]

The adoption of specific codes and rituals in relating to each other seemed to be another feature allowing cohesion in the group. These peculiarities were often described in trials and libels, often to be put on public display and disapproval. Some of the uses seemed to be:

the Marshal was complimented by the Company with the Titles of Madam and Ladyship.

From James Dalton's A Genuine Narrative of all the Street Robberies Committed since October last:[35]

Their chief Names are as follows. Ellinor Roden, China Mary, Flying Horse Moll, Smal Coal Mary, Johannah the Ox-cheek Woman, Tub Nan,' Sukey Pisquill, Garter Mary, Hardward Nan, Prety Criss, a Soldier of the 2d Regiment, Aunt England, a noted Soap Boyler, Pomegranate Molly, Orange Mary, an Orange Merchant near London-Bridge,'Old Fish Hannah,'Kate Hutton an old Man that never wears a Shirt, Thumbs and Waste Jenny, Queen Irons, alias Pippin Mary, Hanover Kate, spouse to Pippin Mary, Miss Kitten (Oviat), Rose Gudger, 'Black Moll, &c.

They could take on a female persona, have a female name, and affect feminine mannerisms and speech. Again from Jonathan Wild:

The men calling one another my Dear, and hugging, kissing, and tickling each other, as if they were a Mixture of wanton Males and Females, and assuming effeminate Voices and Airs[34]

  • Cross-dressing, from Jonathan Wild:

    At the expected Time several of the sporting Youngsters were seized in Women's Apparel, and convey'd to the Compter. Next Morning they were carried before the Lord-Mayor in the same Dress they were taken in. Some were compleatly rigg'd in Gowns, Petticoats, Head-cloths, fine lac'd Shoes, furbelow'd Scarves and Marks; some had Riding-hoods; some were dressed like Milk-Maids, others like Shepheardesses with green Hats, Waistcoats and Petticoats; and others had their Faces patch'd and painted, and wore very extensive Hoop-petticoats, which had been very lately introduced.[34]

  • Marriage ceremonies: often a euphemism for sexual intercourse but sometimes actual ceremonies between a Mollie and his male lover, enacted to symbolise their partnership and commitment to each other.[36]
  • "Mock-birth" rituals: during which a man dressed in a nightgown pretended to be a woman giving birth to a baby assisted by fellow Mollies as "midwives" — a fact confirmed by other sources including trials. This ritual almost certainly originated as a couvade, designated to collectively relieve the extreme stress this particular social group was forced to live under. The ceremonies described by Ned Ward took place in specific periods called "Festival Nights", which other sources indicate took place towards the end of December.[22]

Mother Clap's molly-house

[edit]
Field Lane, Holborn, the location of Mother Clap's molly-house on the left side of the picture, Rocque Map of London, 1746.

The most well known molly-house in 18th century London was that owned by Mother Clap, which had been open from 1724 to 1726, when a raid sustained by the Societies for the Reformation of Manners had it dismantled. It was located in Field Lane, near to another tavern The Bunch of Grapes in Holborn, a suburban parish of Middlesex a short distance from the City of London.[37][38] This area came to be renowned as a rookery[39] in the next decades, and described as a sort of distinct town, or district calculated for the reception of the darkest and most dangerous enemies to society; in which when pursued for the commission of crimes they easily conceal themselves and readily escape.[40] A literary example can be interpreted as a sort of confirmation of the reputation of this lane, since Charles Dickens placed here Fagin's den, an old Jewish man earning a living as a fence, in his 1837 novel Oliver Twist.
This homosexual meeting place, however, became well known to the public during the 1720s through the trial of its keeper, Margaret Clap, indicted for keeping a disorderly house and for encouraging her customers to commit sodomy;[41] and, particularly, through the account given by an agent provocateur, Samuel Stevens.[28]

On Sunday Night the 14th of November. I went to the Prisoners House in Field-Lane, Holbourn. I found near Men Fifty there, making Love to one another as they call'd it. Sometimes they'd sit in one anothers Laps, use their Hands indecently Dance and make Curtsies and mimick the Language of Women – O Sir! - Pray Sir! - Dear Sir! Lord how can ye serve me so! - Ah ye little dear Toad! Then they'd go by Couples, into a Room on the same Floor to be marry'd as they call'd it. The Door at that Room was kept by – Ecclestone to prevent any body from balking their Diversions.[41]

She and half a dozen of her customers were also put into the pillory, fined, and imprisoned for periods of up to two years. Three of her customers were hanged for sodomy: Gabriel Lawrence, a 43-year-old milkman; William Griffin, a 43-year-old furniture upholsterer; and Thomas Wright, who was a molly house keeper.[37]

[edit]

In the eighteenth century, according to the Old Bailey Proceedings, only two individuals were formally arrested for keeping a molly-house: Margaret Clap and Julius Cesar Taylor,[42] but several accused of sodomitical practices seems to be reported as brothel keepers as well (i.e. Thomas Wright).

On 9 May 1726, three men (Gabriel Lawrence, William Griffin, and Thomas Wright) were hanged at Tyburn for buggery following a raid of Margaret Clap's molly-house. Their trials are fundamental since they provide important details for the descriptions of the gay community surroundings. On 12 April 1727 Charles Hitchin was convicted of assault with sodomitical intent.[43][44]

[edit]

References and representations of molly-houses and gay subculture during the 18th and the 19th century London can be found in several contemporary productions.

Film

  • 2022: The short film Tommies by filmmakers Brian Fairbairn and Karl Eccleston explores the fallout of the Vere Street Coterie scandal from the perspective of the wives of the men involved.

Novel

TV series

  • 2008: Episode 2 of the Channel 4 series City of Vice grants molly-house and mollies a predominant role
  • 2010: Episode 2 of the second series of Garrow's Law, a BBC production set in and around London's Old Bailey courthouse, depicts legal issues surrounding gay life in the 18th century, including a molly-house in its settings
  • 2013: Episode 2 of the NBC horror drama Dracula features a molly-house
  • 2013: A molly-house appears in episode 3 of the first series of the BBC's Ripper Street, set in London's Whitechapel area in 1889
  • 2017: A molly-house and related characters feature heavily in Taboo
  • 2018: Several molly-houses (referred to as boy brothels within the series) and multiple characters are one focal point of The Alienist set in 1896 New York City
  • 2019: A molly-house and mollies appear throughout season 3 of the Hulu series Harlots

Theatre

Gaming

  • 2024: Molly House from Wehrlegig Games, a board game with player characters attending a molly-house[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Molly house

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A molly house was a type of secret venue in early , typically a , alehouse, or private room, where men known as "mollies"—effeminate homosexuals—met to socialize, consume alcohol, engage in sexual acts, and perform rituals including , adopting female names, and conducting mock weddings. These establishments formed the core of an emerging male homosexual subculture that flourished amid severe legal prohibitions, with punishable by death under . Molly houses often featured specialized spaces for dancing to fiddle music, kissing, and intimate encounters, drawing 30 to 50 men nightly, particularly on Sundays, while participants used coded effeminate language such as addressing each other as "" or "." The subculture's visibility prompted aggressive policing by the Societies for the of Manners, culminating in high-profile raids like the operation at Mother Clap's house in Field Lane, , where approximately 40 men were arrested after constables infiltrated and documented lewd behaviors. Trials following such raids led to convictions for , with perpetrators like Gabriel Lawrence hanged at , and keepers like sentenced to pillory, fines, and imprisonment for maintaining disorderly houses. Despite periodic crackdowns, molly houses persisted into the mid-18th century, with examples including Julius Caesar Taylor's establishment in during the 1720s, where initiation rites involved female pseudonyms and gin rituals, though Taylor faced charges in 1728. The subculture's decline after the is attributed to intensified prosecutions and shifts in social organization, rendering it less overt, yet it represented a pioneering form of communal identity for homosexual men in an era of existential legal peril.

Terminology and Origins

Etymology of "Molly"

The term "molly" originated as a colloquial of the female Mary, prevalent in English from the late onward, initially denoting women of lower social classes or prostitutes, often abbreviated as "moll." By the early 1700s, this usage extended to describe effeminate men who adopted feminine mannerisms, attire, and roles, particularly those engaging in within clandestine subcultures in . The application reflected the perceived inversion of norms, as these men frequently assumed female pseudonyms like "Molly" during gatherings, mimicking domestic and behaviors typically associated with women. Earliest documented references to "molly" in this gendered sense appear around , coinciding with reports of organized meeting places for such men, though the term predates the specific phrase "molly house," which emerges in print by in accounts of raids on these venues. Historians note that the slang's from female connotations to male underscores a cultural derision of softness or weakness, potentially reinforced by Latin mollis ("soft" or "effeminate"), though primary evidence favors the English root over direct classical derivation. This aligns with contemporary records and satires, where "mollies" were mocked for their and theatrical femininity, distinguishing them from broader terms for sodomites. While some 20th-century scholarship posits a singular origin tied to , the term's adoption in subcultural contexts involved reclamation or ironic self-application among participants, as evidenced in testimonies from 1726 prosecutions, where men referred to each other by female aliases. No definitive pre-1700 attestation links "molly" explicitly to male , suggesting the semantic shift crystallized amid growing urban anonymity and vice raids in Georgian .

Definition and Characteristics

A molly house refers to a clandestine establishment in 18th-century Britain, primarily in , that functioned as a gathering place for homosexual men known as "mollies," who exhibited effeminate behaviors and often engaged in . These venues, typically public alehouses, coffee houses, or private rooms, provided spaces for social interaction, entertainment, and sexual activities among participants who adopted feminine personas, including female nicknames and mannerisms derived from mock "baptisms." The term "molly" itself stemmed from implying softness or , reflecting the participants' deliberate emulation of women in dress, speech, and gestures. Key characteristics included organized social rituals such as singing bawdy songs, dancing country jigs, and holding mock weddings in designated "chapels" or back rooms, where pairs formalized relationships through ceremonies mimicking heterosexual . Venues often accommodated 10 to 50 men, particularly on Sundays or during holiday masquerades like those on and , fostering a subcultural identity through the use of specialized and communal bonding. Sexual encounters occurred consensually in areas, sometimes without monetary exchange, distinguishing these houses from mere brothels. Participants were predominantly working-class tradesmen, such as butchers or tailors, operating under the of fellow mollies or sympathetic figures, with doormen ensuring discretion. Legal records from the indicate approximately 30 such houses were investigated during the century, with notable examples like Margaret Clap's establishment in , which hosted up to 40 men nightly before its 1726 raid by the Society for the Reformation of Manners. These sites represented a structured response to the criminalization of under the Buggery Act, enabling a degree of communal resilience amid severe penalties, including execution for convicted offenders.

Sodomy Laws and Enforcement

Sodomy, defined under as anal intercourse between humans or with animals, was criminalized as a by the Buggery Act of 1533, enacted during the reign of , making it the first secular statute on the matter and punishable by death upon conviction. This capital penalty persisted throughout the (1714–1830), requiring proof via two eyewitnesses to the act of emission or a for a guilty verdict, which contributed to historically low conviction rates despite the severity. Enforcement remained inconsistent, with prosecutions often reliant on informers motivated by bounties or personal grudges, and full executions rare; between 1660 and 1800, approximately 50 men were hanged for sodomy in , though attempted sodomy carried lesser penalties like pillorying, fines, or imprisonment. In the early 18th century, the Societies for the Reformation of Manners, formed in the 1690s, intensified scrutiny by deploying informers to infiltrate and report on illicit venues, leading to targeted raids on molly houses in as part of broader campaigns against . A prominent example occurred in 1725–1726, when authorities raided several molly houses, including that operated by in Field Lane, resulting in over 40 arrests; Clap was convicted on July 23, 1726, of keeping a disorderly house and executed by on July 24, while three men—Gabriel Laurence, William Griffin, and Thomas Newton—were convicted of and hanged at on May 9 and July 27, 1726. Other participants faced convictions for attempted sodomy, receiving sentences of pillory exposure, where they endured public stoning and abuse, highlighting the dual role of law in punishing both completed acts and associated gatherings. Post-1726, molly house activity temporarily declined due to these crackdowns, but prosecutions waned by mid-century as the Reformation Societies dissolved amid internal scandals and shifting priorities, with fewer than 10 sodomy executions recorded in after 1750 until the law's amendment. The death penalty for sodomy endured until its repeal in 1861, replaced by under the Offences Against the Act, though enforcement against homosexual subcultures continued variably through and charges.

Moral and Religious Views in Georgian England

In Georgian England, Christian theology, particularly within the established Church of England, regarded sodomy—the term encompassing male homosexual acts—as a grave sin against divine and natural order, drawing on biblical prohibitions such as Leviticus 18:22 ("Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination") and Romans 1:26-27, which depicted such acts as contrary to nature and deserving of God's wrath. Sermons reinforced this, with Thomas Bray's 1709 address condemning sodomy as a "moral evil" that invited national ruin, urging reformation to avert divine judgment akin to that on Sodom and Gomorrah. Cross-dressing and effeminacy in molly houses were similarly viewed as abominations, violating Deuteronomy 22:5's mandate against men adopting women's apparel, seen as blurring God-ordained gender distinctions and fostering further depravity. Religious societies, such as the Societies for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge and the Societies for the Reformation of Manners (founded 1691), mobilized against these practices, interpreting them as symptoms of broader moral decay threatening England's covenant with God. These groups, driven by evangelical zeal, conducted raids on molly houses—such as the 1707-1710 campaign that entrapped dozens and the 1726 suppression of Mother Clap's establishment—framing not merely as legal crime but as spiritual pollution warranting under the 1533 Buggery Act to preserve societal purity. A 1726 grand jury address echoed this, portraying sodomites as "enemies to mankind" whose unchecked vice eroded familial and structures. While elite discourse occasionally rationalized through classical references or private tolerance, public religious sentiment remained punitive, associating molly house culture with , , and existential peril to the nation, as evidenced by ecclesiastical prosecutions and calls for vigilant suppression. This stance reflected causal realism in : unrepented , as an affront to procreative ends of sexuality, was believed to provoke providential calamities, justifying harsh measures over leniency.

Gender Norms and Deviance Perceptions

In eighteenth-century , gender norms rigidly delineated as synonymous with dominance, , and public authority, while connoted passivity, emotionality, and domestic confinement, a framework upheld by patriarchal laws and religious doctrine to preserve social hierarchy and reproduction. These expectations derived from biblical interpretations, such as 1 Corinthians 6:9 condemning (malakoi), and Enlightenment emphases on biological dimorphism, which pathologized deviations as disruptions to natural order. Molly house attendees systematically violated these norms by embracing as identity, adopting female pseudonyms (e.g., "maiden" names like "Betsy" or "Sally"), mimicking women's speech patterns, and in petticoats during "festival nights" at gatherings. Trial testimonies from the 1726 raid on Mother Clap's molly house detailed men dancing as women, parodying childbirth with cushions under gowns, and conducting mock weddings where participants exchanged vows as "husband" and "wife," inverting marital roles to affirm same-sex pairings. Such rituals, recorded in proceedings, highlighted a subcultural inversion where passive, receptive roles in aligned with feminine stereotypes, distinguishing mollies from presumed active, opportunistic sodomites. Societal and legal perceptions framed this gender deviance as emblematic of profound moral corruption, intertwining with as evidence of innate vice rather than transient acts; the Society for the Reformation of Manners, founded in 1690, targeted molly houses as hubs of "he-strumpets" whose behaviors signaled a contagious threat to manhood and empire. Satirical pamphlets, such as John Dunton's 1707 The He-Strumpets, lampooned mollies for blurring sexes through and demeanor, portraying them as monstrous hybrids undermining divine hierarchy, a view echoed in prosecutions where alone bolstered convictions despite sparse direct evidence. This linkage intensified post-1700, as urban growth and anonymity allegedly fostered "third sex" identities, per historical analyses tying molly emergence to stricter gender binarism amid scientific biologization of sexes. While evaded specific statutes, it functioned evidentially in trials, equating gender nonconformity with criminal predisposition and justifying executions, as in the 1726 hangings of three mollies for .

Development of the Subculture

Early Emergence in

The concept of the molly, referring to effeminate homosexual men who adopted female personas, emerged in toward the end of the seventeenth century, coinciding with increased visibility of organized sodomitical activities. Early evidence of such subcultural gatherings appears in trial records and contemporary accounts from the late 1690s, when the Societies for the Reformation of Manners began systematically targeting and prosecuting men for using entrapped agents. These efforts indicate pre-existing meeting places, as the societies aimed to suppress venues facilitating male homosexual encounters, though direct descriptions of dedicated "molly houses" remain sparse before the 1700s. One of the earliest documented cases involved Captain , tried in 1698 for after being lured to the George Tavern on , a site used for solicitation. By 1707, eight men identifying as mollies faced conviction at the , with the Royal Exchange cited as a cruising ground for such individuals; contemporary pamphlets like John Dunton's The He-Strumpets described these men mimicking women in behavior and attire during gatherings. Literary observations, such as Edward Ward's The London Spy (1700), further alluded to nocturnal assemblies of sodomites in taverns and backrooms, suggesting informal precursors to formalized molly houses in areas like the and Westminster. Historians like Randolph Trumbach identify explicit references to molly houses by 1709 and 1714, marking the transition from cruising spots—possibly originating in mid-seventeenth-century theaters and gardens—to structured venues in pubs or private rooms where men socialized, cross-dressed, and engaged in sexual acts. These early establishments operated covertly amid sodomy laws, drawing participants from apprentices, sailors, and tradesmen, with the subculture's growth fueled by London's expanding urban anonymity rather than sudden invention. Prosecutions remained intermittent until the , implying that the network had developed sufficiently to evade routine detection prior to intensified raids.

Locations and Operational Structure

Molly houses were predominantly located in London during the early 18th century, with concentrations in central and eastern districts such as , , , and . , particularly the path known as the "Sodomites' Walk" in Upper (now part of ), served as a major cruising ground and vicinity for several establishments, including Thomas Wright's house in Christopher Alley (later Beech Lane) and the Three Shoes alehouse adjacent to the Harrow Tavern in Long Alley (now Appold Street). Other documented sites included Margaret Clap's residence in Field Lane near , Julius Taylor's operation on , Samuel Roper's ("Plump Nelly") in Giltspur Street, and Jonathan Muff's ("Miss Muff") in Black Lion Yard, . Historical records indicate approximately 20 such houses were under investigation by the for the of Manners in the mid- to late 1720s, though operations extended to taverns near and the Talbot Inn on the Strand. Operationally, molly houses functioned as clandestine extensions of public houses, taverns, coffee houses, or private dwellings, typically utilizing back rooms, first floors, or cellars to provide privacy for gatherings of 10 to 40 men, often nightly and peaking on Sundays. They were managed by keepers—frequently women such as or effeminate men adopting female aliases like "Plump Nelly" or "Miss Muff"—who facilitated access, supplied liquor, and maintained s or dedicated "chapels" for private encounters. These venues masqueraded as ordinary alehouses or brothels to evade detection, with keepers like Clap actively participating by fetching drinks and overseeing events in her house, which featured multiple bedrooms and a large double for rituals. Enforcement risks were high, as seen in raids informed by informants, leading to arrests of keepers for maintaining disorderly houses; Clap, for instance, was convicted in 1726 and sentenced to , fine, and two years' imprisonment. Participants, mainly working-class tradesmen such as drapers and butchers, entered discreetly to minimize exposure under prevailing statutes.

Participant Demographics and Social Dynamics

Participants in molly houses were predominantly men from working-class and artisanal backgrounds, reflecting the urban laboring population of early 18th-century London. Occupations commonly included butchers, barbers, blacksmiths, tailors, porters, servants, and street sellers, as evidenced by trial testimonies from raids such as those in 1726 and 1732. For instance, John Cooper, known within the subculture as Princess Seraphina, worked as a butcher, while Gabriel Lawrence, convicted in the Mother Clap case, was a clergyman of lower standing who had fallen into poverty. Limited class diversity existed, with some participants from military ranks (e.g., foot soldiers or captains like Edward Rigby) or trade merchants, but elite involvement remained rare due to the subculture's clandestine, lower-end venues and the severe legal risks. Ages are sparsely documented in records, though roles like "aunties" (e.g., Aunt May or Aunt England) indicate older, experienced members mentoring younger apprentices or laborers. Social dynamics emphasized and communal bonding, with participants adopting feminine pseudonyms or "maiden names" such as Orange Mary, Dip-Candle Mary, or Miss Kitten to enact inversion during gatherings. These aliases facilitated interactions mimicking domestic and marital structures, including mock "husbands" and "wives" in temporary unions, as described in contemporary accounts like Ned Ward's 1709 pamphlet. Hierarchies formed organically through elected or informal positions, such as stewards (e.g., Miss Fanny Knight) for managing events, clerks (e.g., Mrs. Anne Page) for record-keeping, and masters of ceremonies to oversee rituals, providing organizational stability amid persecution. Interactions featured coded language, a " dialect," curtsies, dancing, and parodic ceremonies like "" simulations of with jointed dolls as infants, complete with mock midwives and christenings, which reinforced group cohesion while subverting normative expectations. These dynamics created a semi-structured within molly houses, functioning as clubs with chapels for "marriages" and rooms for private encounters, drawing primarily from London's transient male workforce where and shared marginality fostered . Trial evidence, derived from proceedings and informant testimonies, reveals that such organization enabled resilience but also vulnerability, as internal betrayals occasionally aided raids by reformation societies. While sensationalized in pamphlets like Hell upon Earth (), the core patterns align across multiple prosecutions, indicating a genuine subcultural framework rather than mere fabrication.

Practices and Activities

Social Gatherings and Rituals

Molly houses functioned as clandestine social hubs where homosexual men, known as mollies, convened for camaraderie, conversation, and leisure activities such as drinking, smoking, singing bawdy songs, and dancing. These gatherings typically occurred in back rooms of taverns, private residences, or dedicated spaces like a "" partitioned for , attracting 30 to 50 participants on typical nights and larger crowds on Sundays or holidays from around 1716 to 1726 at establishments such as Mother Clap's in Field Lane, . Attendance emphasized community among men who adopted effeminate mannerisms, including curtsies and feminine speech, fostering a temporary escape from public norms. Rituals within these gatherings often parodied heterosexual domesticity to affirm group identity. New regulars underwent "christenings," receiving female nicknames such as "Orange Deb" or "Princess Seraphina," sometimes with gin splashed on their faces as a ceremonial gesture, as testified in 1728 trials. Mock marriages were conducted with formality, featuring assigned roles of groom, bride, and bridesmaids; for instance, trial records from 1726 detail the union of Thomas Coleman and John Hyons (alias Queen Irons), solemnized before witnesses in a molly house setting. Further rituals included simulated births on festival nights, where a participant acted as a "" to "deliver" a , followed by its , mocking conventional family rites as described in contemporary legal testimonies. amplified these events, with men donning women's attire and performing dances or gossip sessions under maiden names like "Sukey," a practice evident in early 1700s accounts and later reinforced by 1720s raid evidence. Such customs, drawn from sodomy trial depositions, highlight a subculture's deliberate inversion of expectations for bonding and defiance.

Sexual and Cross-Dressing Behaviors

In molly houses, participants engaged primarily in , defined under as anal intercourse between men, often alongside other indecent acts such as kissing and manual stimulation. Trial testimonies from the 1726 raid on Margaret Clap's establishment in Field Lane, , describe men entering a designated "Marrying " for , frequently leaving the door ajar to allow onlookers to observe. Witnesses reported groups of up to 40-50 men gathering nightly, with some pairs proceeding directly to carnal acts while others socialized beforehand. Convictions for in these cases, such as those of Gabriel Lawrence for acts committed on 20 July 1725 and 10 November 1725, resulted in executions by hanging at on 9 May 1726. Cross-dressing was a prominent feature, with men adopting feminine attire and mannerisms to embody "mollies," a term denoting effeminate male homosexuals. Accounts from 1709 by satirist Ned Ward detail "Festival Nights" in late December where participants donned women's nightgowns, sarsnet hoods, and nightrails, mimicking female gait, speech, and curtseying. These events included ritualistic mock childbirths, or "lying-in," wherein a man disguised as a pregnant woman simulated labor using a jointed wooden baby prop, attended by pretend midwives and gossips who performed christenings and feasts afterward. Such behaviors extended to everyday gatherings, as evidenced by Martin Mackintosh, alias "Orange Deb," who exhibited effeminacy at a Drury Lane molly house on 12 November 1725, leading to his conviction for attempted sodomy. Mock marriage ceremonies further intertwined sexual and elements, serving as preludes to intercourse in rooms dubbed "The ." Couples exchanged vows in front of witnesses, with participants like those at Clap's house wedded pairs before consummating acts. These rituals underscored a subcultural inversion of norms, where receptive partners in assumed wifely roles, though itself was not criminally prosecuted unless tied to attempts. Primary trial records from the , including proceedings against Clap and her patrons, confirm these practices occurred routinely in London's clandestine venues from at least the early 1700s.

Economic Aspects and Risks

Molly houses sustained their operations primarily through the sale of alcoholic beverages, masquerading as legitimate taverns, coffee houses, or brandy shops that offered ale, spirits, and related refreshments to patrons. Keepers derived additional revenue by renting out rooms for private "marriages" or intimate encounters and potentially claiming a portion of sales, as evidenced in the case of Margaret Clap's establishment in Field Lane, , where beds were provided in multiple rooms for gatherings of 30 to 40 men nightly. Explicit entry fees or standardized charges for sexual activities were not recorded, with any exchanges more commonly involving informal gifts of drink rather than cash transactions. Male prostitution within molly houses played a limited economic role during the early eighteenth century, serving recreational rather than profit-driven purposes; while some lower-status participants might accept favors or ale in lieu of payment, systematic monetary akin to female brothels was rare and insufficient to sustain the venues independently. Detection by authorities posed acute financial risks to both keepers and attendees. Keepers convicted of maintaining a "disorderly ," as Clap was in 1726, faced fines—such as her penalty of 20 marks (approximately £13 6s 8d, comparable to several months' wages for an unskilled laborer)—alongside public exposure and , which halted business operations and incurred ongoing costs without income. Participants risked capital conviction for under statutes carrying the death penalty, resulting in total forfeiture of assets and future earning potential, as seen in the 1726 executions of three men from Clap's raid; lesser outcomes included fines, short-term incarceration disrupting employment, or humiliation leading to and job loss. Earlier precedents amplified these perils, with figures like Rigby fined £1,000 in 1698 for attempted , a sum representing significant personal and potential ruin for most involved. Raids invariably shuttered establishments, erasing proprietors' investments in and stock while exposing vulnerable attendees—often tradesmen or apprentices—to or long-term economic exclusion from guilds and networks.

Major Incidents and Suppression

Mother Clap's Molly House Raid

In late 1725, constables employed by the Society for the Reformation of Manners began surveilling a gathering place for homosexual men at a house in Field Lane, , , operated by . On November 14, 1725, informants Samuel Stevens and Joseph Sellers visited the premises undercover and observed approximately 40 to 50 men engaging in sodomitical practices, including kissing, embracing, dancing in imitation of women, and pairing off for mock marriages before retiring to private rooms for intercourse. Clap, present throughout, supplied liquor to the participants and expressed approval of the proceedings, facilitating the disorderly assembly. The raid occurred on a Sunday night in 1726, when constables stormed the , arresting around 40 men caught in the act. The operation, coordinated by the moral reform society to suppress vice, blocked exits and seized evidence of the molly house's functions as a hub for , effeminate rituals, and sexual encounters among men who adopted female personas. Most detainees were released without formal charges after initial questioning, but several faced prosecution for , with witnesses testifying to the prevalence of unnatural acts witnessed during and the incursion. Margaret Clap was indicted for maintaining a disorderly house that encouraged and tried at the on July 11, 1726. Convicted on the testimony of Stevens and Sellers detailing the house's operations, she received a sentence of standing in the at Smithfield on July 30, 1726, a fine of 20 marks, and two years' imprisonment; during her pillory exposure, she endured severe mob violence from onlookers. Among the men prosecuted from the raid, three—Gabriel Lawrence, William Griffin, and Thomas Wright—were convicted of and hanged at on May 9, 1726, marking a significant action against London's molly subculture.

Key Trials and Punishments

Following the February 1726 raid on Margaret Clap's molly house in Field Lane, , approximately 40 men were arrested, leading to a series of trials at the for and related offenses. herself was indicted in July 1726 for keeping a disorderly house and encouraging ; witnesses testified that she had hosted gatherings where men engaged in , mock marriages, and sexual acts, procuring beds for such purposes. Convicted on the basis of testimony from informants like Thomas Newton, who had infiltrated the group, Clap was sentenced to stand in the twice, pay a fine of 20 marks, and suffer two years' imprisonment; she reportedly died in shortly thereafter from the effects of her ordeal. Among the men tried for sodomy—defined under English law as anal intercourse between men, punishable by death per the Buggery Act of 1533—three were convicted and executed by hanging at Tyburn. Gabriel Lawrence, a 43-year-old milkman, was found guilty in April 1726 after testimony described him engaging in sodomy with an informant; he was hanged on May 26, 1726. William Griffin, a 43-year-old carpenter, and Thomas Wright, a 32-year-old clergyman and molly house keeper, faced similar charges based on informant accounts of sexual acts; both were hanged on July 9, 1726, following their convictions. Informants like Newton avoided execution by turning king's evidence, providing detailed depositions that formed the bulk of the prosecution's case, though no defendants were caught in the act, relying instead on circumstantial evidence and prior surveillance. Subsequent trials in 1726 and 1727 extended to raids on other molly houses, yielding additional convictions for lesser offenses. Martin MacKintosh, an orange-seller, was tried in July 1726 for attempted and sentenced to the , fine, and . Overall, the crackdown resulted in three executions for , multiple sentences for attempts or keeping disorderly houses, and imprisonments, with public pillorying often accompanied by crowd violence against the accused. These outcomes reflected the Societies for the of Manners' emphasis on suppressing perceived moral vices, though enforcement waned after 1727 as informant credibility was questioned in court.

Role of Reformation Societies

The Societies for the Reformation of Manners, established in 1691 as a network of voluntary associations in London, aimed to eradicate public vices including bawdy houses, profane swearing, Sabbath-breaking, and sodomy through systematic prosecution. These groups employed paid informers and constables to infiltrate suspected venues, gather eyewitness testimony—often via entrapment or prolonged surveillance—and coordinate raids with magistrates to ensure arrests and trials under existing statutes like the 1533 Buggery Act, which criminalized sodomy as a capital offense. By the 1720s, amid growing concerns over moral decay, the societies intensified efforts against homosexual subcultures, viewing molly houses as emblematic of effeminacy and unnatural vice threatening social order; Reverend William Bray, a prominent leader, preached vehemently against sodomy as an "evil force invading our land." In targeting molly houses, the societies deployed undercover agents who posed as participants to document rituals, , and sexual acts, compiling affidavits for prosecutions; records indicate investigations into approximately 20 such establishments in the mid- to late . A pivotal operation culminated in the February 1726 raid on Clap's molly house in Field Lane, , where constables Samuel Stevens and associates, acting on intelligence from informers like Mark Partridge and Thomas Newton, arrested around 40 men amid blocked exits and seized evidence of mock marriages and sodomitical practices. Clap was convicted of keeping a disorderly house, fined 20 marks, pilloried, and imprisoned for two years, while three men—Gabriel Lawrence, William Griffin, and Thomas Wright—were hanged for on 9 May 1726 following trials that highlighted informant testimonies of penetration and emissions. These campaigns extended beyond isolated raids, yielding 1,363 prosecutions for various vices from December 1726 to December 1727 alone, with sodomy cases publicized to deter participation and expose cruising grounds like the Royal Exchange. The societies' tactics, including agent provocateurs, generated dozens of sodomy convictions in the late 1690s to 1720s, such as the 1707 Guildhall trials of eight men and earlier entrapments like that of Captain Edward Rigby in 1698, fostering a of that temporarily disrupted molly networks by publicizing locations and increasing risks of betrayal and execution. Overall, the SRM's cumulative efforts—totaling nearly 94,000 vice prosecutions—contributed to heightened vigilance against , though their zealous methods drew criticism for overreach, leading to declining public support and formal disbandment by 1738.

Decline and Later Instances

Mid-18th Century Suppression

The intensive crackdowns on molly houses in the 1720s and early 1730s, orchestrated primarily by the Societies for the Promotion of Reformation of Manners, resulted in the effective dismantling of the organized subculture by the mid-1730s, with suppression persisting through the 1740s. These societies, founded in 1691 to combat public vices including sodomy, mobilized informants and constables for coordinated raids, leading to approximately 17 documented assaults on molly houses between 1726 and 1727 alone, alongside trials that yielded fines, pillory punishments, and executions for buggery under the 1533 Buggery Act. The raids exploited internal betrayals, as disgruntled participants or operators provided details to authorities, enabling infiltration and mass arrests that instilled widespread fear among participants. This suppression extended into the mid-18th century due to heightened legal vigilance and the deterrent effect of prior prosecutions, which reduced the viability of fixed molly house locations. Historians attribute the decline to the societies' sustained efforts until their disbandment amid in 1738, after which residual enforcement and societal stigma prevented reestablishment until the 1750s; molly houses were rarely targeted post-1730s, but the earlier shocks shifted activities toward less visible cruising grounds in parks or the rise of commercial brothels catering to discreet encounters. Court records from the indicate sporadic sodomy prosecutions continued—averaging 2-3 annually in during the 1740s—but lacked the organized molly house focus, reflecting a driven underground rather than eradicated. The mid-century lull underscores the causal impact of targeted on illicit networks, as the combination of capital penalties (with execution rates around 10-20% in trials) and public shaming via pillories disrupted recruitment and operations, fostering a temporary reliance on transient, less ritualized gatherings over structured molly houses. This period of dormancy, from roughly 1735 to 1750, marked a pivot in subcultural amid unchanging legal prohibitions, with no evidence of widespread revival until post-1750 shifts in urban anonymity and enforcement patterns.

Post-1750 Reappearances and Changes

Following the suppression of organized molly houses in the mid-1730s through raids and prosecutions, similar establishments reemerged in around 1750, though under greater caution to evade detection. These later venues maintained core functions as gathering spots for men seeking same-sex companionship and sexual encounters, often in taverns or private rooms, but records are sparser owing to heightened secrecy amid persistent legal perils, including for sodomy until 1861. By the late , molly houses persisted amid a broader , with activities documented in court records of trials for and attempted , numbering around 85 for the century overall. A notable late example occurred in at the tavern on Vere Street, which operated as a molly house from to 1811, attracting men for socializing, drinking, and sexual liaisons; a raid there arrested over 30 individuals, resulting in two executions for and public pillorying for others. This incident highlighted the subculture's endurance but also its vulnerability, as operators like advertised discreetly to regular patrons while facing informer betrayals. Changes in these post-1750 iterations included reduced emphasis on elaborate rituals like mock weddings or public balls, which had characterized earlier houses, in favor of more anonymous and fleeting interactions to minimize exposure. Parallel shifts saw increased reliance on outdoor cruising grounds, such as , for solicitation, supplementing rather than replacing indoor venues, as evidenced by trial testimonies describing pickups leading to private encounters. Economic risks remained acute, with proprietors charging entry fees or drinks but often relying on tips from sexual activities, though blackmail attempts by acquaintances grew, comprising about 50 documented cases in courts. Overall, the subculture adapted by dispersing activities across pubs, streets, and parks, reflecting a pragmatic response to sustained by reformation societies and magistrates.

Scholarly Interpretations and Cultural Legacy

Historical Scholarship and Sources

Historical scholarship on molly houses primarily draws from primary sources such as trial records at the , which document raids, participant testimonies, and associated behaviors like and mock marriages in venues such as taverns and private rooms. These legal proceedings, spanning the early , provide of organized gatherings, including the 1726 raid on Clap's establishment in , where over 40 men were apprehended, revealing details of effeminate rituals and sexual activities. Supplementary contemporary accounts include satirical writings by Ned Ward and reports from Reformation societies, which describe molly houses as sites of "abominable" subcultural practices, though these sources reflect moralistic biases aimed at suppression rather than neutral observation. Key secondary analyses emerged in the late , with Rictor Norton's Mother Clap's Molly House: The Gay Subculture in 1700–1830 (1992, updated edition) synthesizing trial transcripts and pamphlets to chronicle the subculture's structure, arguing for its continuity as a working-class network of taverns and clubs despite periodic crackdowns. Norton's work emphasizes verifiable details from prosecutions, such as the use of female aliases and initiation rites, positioning molly houses as precursors to modern communities based on direct evidentiary reconstruction rather than interpretive speculation. Randolph Trumbach's Sex and the Gender Revolution, Volume 1: Heterosexuality and the World of Desire (1998) frames molly houses within a broader "gender revolution," positing them as evidence of an emerging exclusive male homosexual identity distinct from occasional sodomy, supported by analysis of public perceptions in legal and print sources. Trumbach, credited as the first to assert a thriving 18th-century gay subculture, relies on quantitative patterns in Old Bailey cases to argue against viewing these as isolated acts, instead highlighting systemic social organization. Alan Bray's Homosexuality in (1982, reissued 1995) traces the molly house to the early 1700s as marking the "earliest emergence of a homosexual identity," using records and visual satires to illustrate how such spaces enabled men to "take off the mask" of normative behavior. Bray's approach privileges causal links between legal persecution and subcultural resilience, cautioning that prosecutorial focus may skew evidence toward urban, lower-class examples while underrepresenting elite or rural variants. Contemporary scholarship critiques earlier works for potential overreliance on biased legal archives, which prioritize sensationalized prosecutions over everyday practices, yet affirms their value for causal realism in tracing how anti-sodomy laws under the Buggery Act of 1533 inadvertently documented subcultural persistence. Academic treatments, often from LGBTQ-focused historians, exhibit interpretive tendencies toward anachronistic identity projections, but rigorous studies like those above ground claims in primary data to avoid unsubstantiated narratives of uninterrupted "" continuity.

Modern Debates on Morality and Legality

In most Western countries, the and practices central to molly houses are no longer criminalized for consenting adults in private settings. The decriminalized male homosexual acts between adults over 21 via the , influenced by the Wolfenden Committee's 1957 recommendation to distinguish between public offenses and private immorality, though full equality in and other rights extended later. In the United States, the Supreme Court's ruling on June 26, 2003, struck down remaining sodomy laws as violations of and privacy rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, overturning (1986). These changes reflect a liberal legal paradigm prioritizing individual autonomy over traditional moral prohibitions, yet some jurists and commentators, drawing on historical precedents like the Buggery Act of 1533—which targeted acts in molly houses with —argue that such erodes communal standards of decency, potentially inviting public disorder akin to 18th-century concerns over "disorderly houses." Moral debates persist, with natural law proponents maintaining that the anal intercourse and effeminate role-playing in molly houses exemplify intrinsically disordered conduct, divorced from the procreative and unitive ends of sexuality oriented toward marital complementarity. Philosopher , in his analysis of and law, asserts that homosexual acts are "radically non-marital" and thus unreasonable, frustrating human flourishing by prioritizing sterile pleasure over natural , a view rooted in Thomistic where sodomy ranks among grave vices second only to bestiality. This framework critiques molly house culture not merely as historical curiosity but as illustrative of behaviors that undermine familial and societal stability, echoing empirical observations of elevated health risks in male homosexual practices, such as disproportionate HIV transmission rates among men who have sex with men (accounting for 69% of new U.S. diagnoses in 2022 despite comprising 2-4% of the male population). Counterarguments from utilitarian and rights-based ethics, prevalent in post-1960s , frame molly houses as early assertions of identity against repressive norms, deeming moral condemnation itself harmful absent direct victims. Yet, this perspective often overlooks causal factors like the Societies for the Reformation of Manners' raids, which targeted perceived public nuisances rather than private vice alone, and assumes subcultural practices were benign rather than potentially contributory to social fragmentation. Academic sources advancing celebratory narratives of molly houses as "queer safe spaces" exhibit systemic biases toward , frequently downplaying contemporaneous views of as pathological or the evidentiary challenges in sodomy convictions, where penetration proof was required under . Ongoing religious and conservative critiques, informed by scriptural prohibitions and natural order, sustain opposition, viewing as a concession to over collective virtue.

Depictions in Literature and Media

In early 18th-century satirical literature, molly houses were depicted as sites of effeminate debauchery and moral decay. Ned Ward's The History of the London Clubs () provides one of the earliest such accounts in its chapter on "The Mollies Club," portraying gatherings where men adopted female names, attire, and mannerisms, including mock rituals simulating with wooden dolls as infants. Ward's description, drawn from observations and the trials of nine men for , emphasized ridicule and disgust, referring to participants as "Sodomitical Wretches" who minced, gossiped, and paired off in parodic unions, reflecting broader literature's condemnatory tone toward perceived threats to . Such portrayals extended to visual media, including satirical prints lampooning gender inversion linked to molly subculture. Louis Peter Boitard's The Covt. Garden Morning Frolick (1747) illustrates cross-dressed revelers in a adjacent to known molly haunts, exaggerating and disorder to critique urban vice. Similarly, John Collet's c. 1780 A Morning Frolic, or the Transmutation of the Sexes depicts mutual between men and women, evoking molly-like transvestism as a chaotic inversion of norms, often tied to critiques of London's underbelly. In 20th- and 21st-century media, molly houses feature in works re-examining historical persecution through contemporary lenses. Mark Ravenhill's play Mother Clap's Molly House (2001), with music by Matthew Scott, dramatizes the 1726 raid on Margaret Clap's establishment, interweaving 18th-century events with a modern storyline to explore sexual nonconformity and repression; it premiered at London's to mixed reviews praising its exuberance but noting its didactic edge. The production, revived in venues like Bedlam Theatre in 2024, highlights mock marriages and drag performances central to molly life, drawing from records while critiquing assimilationist pressures on identity. Fictional novels, such as A.R. Pip's Molly House (2021), incorporate molly elements into and aristocratic intrigue narratives, though these remain niche compared to scholarly or theatrical treatments.

References

  1. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/mother.htm
  2. https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/about/gay/
  3. https://historicengland.org.uk/research/inclusive-heritage/lgbtq-heritage-project/meeting-and-socialising/cross-dressing-and-queer-socialising/
  4. https://www.etymonline.com/word/molly
  5. https://rictornorton.co.uk/gu16.htm
  6. http://www.unofficialbritain.com/welcome-to-the-molly-house/
  7. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/molly-house_n
  8. https://www.worldwidewords.org/qa-mol1.html
  9. https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2021/09/06/the-meaning-of-the-term-molly/
  10. https://www.londonmuseum.org.uk/blog/molly-houses-queer-subculture-georgian-london/
  11. https://blog.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/2020/06/19/18th-century-molly-houses-londons-gay-subculture/
  12. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/regency-gay-bar-molly-houses
  13. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/
  14. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1709bray.htm
  15. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1733srm.htm
  16. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1726jury.htm
  17. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1735andr.htm
  18. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/molly2.htm
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/664465
  20. http://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/clap.htm
  21. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/dunton.htm
  22. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2007.00430.x
  23. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/lumen/2017-v36-lumen02702/1037858ar/
  24. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/moorfiel.htm
  25. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/maiden.htm
  26. https://www.academia.edu/2054752/Negative_Attitudes_Toward_Molly_Subculture_in_Eighteenth_Century_London_An_Analysis_of_Textual_Agencies_Regarding_the_Emerging_Gay_Community
  27. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/nedward.htm
  28. https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t17260711-54
  29. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/clap.htm
  30. https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t17260420-64
  31. https://ajwestauthor.com/mother-claps-molly-house/
  32. https://strangeasfolk.substack.com/p/mother-claps-molly-house
  33. https://www.layersoflondon.org/map/records/houses-of-debauchery-mother-clap-s-molly-house-in-field-lane-holborn
  34. https://www.londonlives.org/static/Reformation.jsp
  35. https://www.layersoflondon.org/map/records/societies-for-the-reformation-of-manners
  36. https://thecynicalhistorian.wordpress.com/early-modern-history/what-were-the-principal-features-of-the-molly-culture-in-eighteenth-century-england-how-have-historians-accounted-for-its-decline/
  37. https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/8/bailey_trumbach.php
  38. https://rictornorton.co.uk/eighteen/1810vere.htm
  39. https://amoroushistoriespodcast.wordpress.com/2022/01/29/18th-century-gay-clubs-london-molly-houses/
  40. https://rictornorton.co.uk/molly.htm
  41. https://rictornorton.co.uk/recover.pdf
  42. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/17854/summary
  43. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/homosexuality-in-renaissance-england/9780231102896/
  44. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/94b9a4757c2d479fb5a3675e9ad54df4
  45. https://ecti.english.illinois.edu/volume-50-2009-supplemen/queer-people-then-and-now/
  46. https://www.princeton.edu/~anscombe/articles/finnisorientation.pdf
  47. https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1870&context=scholar
  48. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2001/sep/05/theatre.artsfeatures
  49. https://bedlamtheatre.co.uk/shows/motherclapsmollyhouse
  50. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58048272-molly-house
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.