Hubbry Logo
Muqan QaghanMuqan QaghanMain
Open search
Muqan Qaghan
Community hub
Muqan Qaghan
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Muqan Qaghan
Muqan Qaghan
Muqan Qaghan
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Muqan Qaghan[2] (Old Turkic: 𐰢𐰆𐰴𐰣:𐰴𐰍𐰣, romanized: Muqan qaɣan,[3] Chinese: 木杆可汗/木汗可汗; pinyin: Mùgān Kèhán/Mùhàn Kèhán, Sogdian: 𐼍𐼇𐼉𐼒𐼎 𐼉𐼒𐼄𐼒𐼎, romanized: mwx’n x’ɣ’n, Rouran: 𑀫𑀼𑀖𑀅𑀦 𑀕𑀅𑀖𑀅𑀦, romanized: Muɣan Qaɣan[4]), born Ashina Yandou[a] (阿史那燕都) was the second son of Bumin Qaghan and the third khagan of the Göktürks and the First Turkic Khaganate. He expanded their khaganate and secured the borders against the Hephthalites.

Key Information

This article contains Sogdian text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Sogdian characters.

Name

[edit]

According to Sergey Kljaštornyj and Vladimir Livšic, this ruler is mentioned in the 3rd and 5th lines of the Left Side and the 3rd lines of the Front Side of the Sogdian Bugut Inscription as "mwγ’n γ’γ’n",[5] and according to Yutaka Yoshida and Takao Moriyasu, in the 2nd, 3rd and 5th lines of the B-1 Side and the 3rd lines of the B-2 Side as "mwx’n x’γ’n."[6] Turkish researchers Talat Tekin, Ahmet Taşağıl, Ahmet Bican Ercilâsun as well as Christopher Beckwith reconstructed his Turkic regnal name as Buqan and equated him to Bokhanos (Βώχανος) of Menander Protector.[7]

Biography

[edit]

He was born Ashina Yandou (阿史那燕都) to Bumin Qaghan and was made irkin during his lifetime. He succeeded his elder brother Issik Khagan in a lateral succession in 553. Upon succession, he appointed his younger brother Ashina Kutou (阿史那庫頭) as lesser khagan in the east.

class=notpageimage|
Map of the Göktürk Qaghanate ("First Turkic Khaganate") and contemporary polities, circa 576, at the end of Muqan Qaghan's reign.

His accession to power was followed by finishing off remnants of the Rouran. Around the new year 554, after the defeat of Yujiulü Kangti at the hands of Göktürks, the remnants of the Rouran, which by that point was near its end, surrendered to the Northern Qi to seek protection from Gökturk attacks. Emperor Wenxuan personally attacked Muqan Qaghan, fighting off his army and then made Yujiulü Anluochen the new khagan of Rouran, settling the Rouran people within Northern Qi territory, at Mayi (馬邑, in modern Shuozhou, Shanxi). The last khagan of the Rouran Yujiulü Dengshuzi was executed by Emperor Gong in 555 because of Gökturks' pressure.

Muqan led an attack on Tuyuhun territory in 556 together with the Western Wei. According to the plan, Muqan was to attack Hezhen (near present-day Chaka Salt Lake, Qinghai) from the north and general Shi Ning (史寧) was to attack Shudun (near Gonghe County). The siege was a success as the Tuyuhun king Murong Kualu's wife, children and treasure was captured, but he returned to his homeland after the Turks withdrew. As the army prepared to withdraw, Muqan Qaghan gifted Ning 100 slaves, 500 horses, and 10,000 sheep.

He then defeated the Hephthalites to the west near Bukhara in 557 together with Khosrow I, however this battle was largely overseen by Muqan's uncle Istami.[8] He routed the Khitan to the east, and annexed the Kyrgyz to the north. This expansion also pushed against the Avars who were driven towards the Byzantine Empire and the Sassanid Empire and eventually towards the Danube. Other tribes of Central Asia, such as the eastern Bulgars were also displaced.[9]

Marriage proposals

[edit]

Muqan proposed to marry his daughter to Yuwen Tai in 556, but his death prevented this. After the establishment of the Northern Zhou by Emperor Ming, Muqan sent gifts and an emissary to establish contact in 558. At first he wanted to marry his daughter to Emperor Wu of Northern Zhou, however, she was also being courted by Emperor Wucheng of Northern Qi, which caused Muqan some indecision. Ultimately, Emperor Wu of Northern Zhou took the extra step of dispatching Yang Jian, the Governor of Liangzhou, along with Wang Qing (王庆) and others to formally propose the marriage. In fall 563, Northern Zhou entered into an alliance treaty with the Göktürks against the Northern Qi, part of which involved a promise that Emperor Wu would marry the daughter of Muqan Qaghan.

In the winter of 563, the joint forces of the Northern Zhou and Gökturks launched a two-prong attack on the Northern Qi, with the northern prong attacking the Northern Qi's secondary capital Jinyang (晉陽, in modern Taiyuan, Shanxi) and the southern prong attacking Pingyang (平陽, in modern Linfen, Shanxi).

In the spring of 565, Emperor Wu sent his brother Yuwen Chun (宇文純), Yuwen Gui (宇文貴), Dou Yi (竇毅) and Yang Jian (楊薦) to lead a ceremonial guard corps to Tujue to welcome back Muqan's daughter for marriage to him. However, when they arrived at Muqan's headquarters, he turned against the treaty and detained Yuwen Chun and his attendants.

In the spring of 568, a major storm at the Göktürks' headquarters inflicted substantial damage, and Muqan Qaghan took it as a sign of divine displeasure at his rescission of the marriage agreement with the Northern Zhou. He therefore returned Yuwen Chun, along with the daughter he promised Emperor Wu, back to Northern Zhou. Emperor Wu personally welcomed her and made her empress.

After Muqan's death in 572 the title of Qaghan passed to his younger brother Taspar.

Legacy

[edit]

Muqan's reign marked the pinnacle of Sogdian cultural influence in the Göktürk Empire. Sogdian culture was transmitted by merchants from Turpan who worked as ambassadors and advisers. The Sogdian language and script were used to govern the empire.[10]

Muqan Qaghan was friendly to Buddhist people, and is credited with being the first to introduce Buddhism to the Türks.[11][12] He promoted the construction of a Türkic Buddhist temple in the Chinese capital city of Chang'an. Despite his promotion of Buddhism in China, it is not known if he himself converted to Buddhism, and it is also uncertain whether or not a substantial number of Türks were Buddhists during his reign.[13]

Physical appearance

[edit]
Contemporary depiction of the reception of a noble Turk (center, with his retinue to the left) in the residence of the Sogdian trader An Jia (right half). 579 CE, Tomb of An Jia, Xi’an, China.[14]

Muqan Qaghan was described by Chinese authors as having an unusual appearance. He had a red complexion, his face was wide, and his eyes were described as like "colored glazes" (using the term "琉璃" (liúli), "glaze"):[15]

"狀貌奇異，面廣尺餘，其色赤甚，眼若琉璃。"
"His appearance was strange, his face was broad, his complexion was red, his eyes were like glazes".[15][16][17]

Some authors have translated the term "琉璃" ("glaze") as "lapis lazuli"-like (suggesting a blue color).[18][19][20][21]

He was characterized as being "tough and fierce", and he was regarded as brave and knowledgeable by historians.

A complete genetic analysis of Muqan Qaghan's daughter Empress Ashina (551–582) in 2023 by Xiaoming Yang et al. found nearly exclusively Ancient Northeast Asian ancestry (97,7%) next to minor West-Eurasian components (2,7%), and no Chinese ("Yellow River") admixture. This supports the Northeast Asian origin of the Ashina tribe and the Göktürk Khanate.[22] According to the authors, these findings "once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages" and refutes "the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses" in favor of an East Asian origin for the Türks.[23]

Family

[edit]

Muqan Qaghan's Türkic wife was childless. This caused difficulties for his son Talopien, as he was born to a non-Turkic woman who Muqan had married for diplomatic reasons.[24]

His daughter Empress Ashina became the wife of Emperor Wu of Northern Zhou. His son Talopien, as Apa Qaghan unsuccessfully claimed the throne after the death of his uncle Taspar while his other son Yangsu Tegin was ancestor of the later Western Turkic Qaghans.

Ancestry

[edit]
See also: Göktürk family tree
Ashina Tuwu (Grand Yabgu)
Bumin Qaghan (r.552)
First khagan of the Göktürks and founder of the First Turkic Khaganate
Grandmother: unrecorded
Muqan Qaghan (r.553-572)
Third khagan of the Göktürks
Mother: unrecorded

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Muqan Qaghan

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Muqan Qaghan (died 572) was the third khagan of the Göktürk Khaganate, succeeding his elder brother Issik Qaghan in 553 and ruling until his death nearly two decades later. As the second son of the khaganate's founder , he presided over a period of aggressive expansion that elevated the to dominance across the Eurasian steppes. Under Muqan Qaghan's leadership, the khaganate achieved its territorial , extending from the eastern reaches near the to the western Xi-hai, and from the southern Sha-mo deserts to the northern Bei-hai. His military campaigns decisively dismantled rival powers, including the complete subjugation of the by 555 and the conquest of the Hephthalites (Yanda) in alliance with the Sassanid Empire around 557, alongside defeats of the Khitan (Qi-dan) tribes to the east and integration of northern groups like the Qigu. These victories secured vast tribute networks and trade routes, fostering Sogdian cultural influences within the empire while Muqan skillfully balanced diplomacy with fragmented Northern Chinese dynasties, such as and , to extract concessions without full commitment to either. Muqan Qaghan's death in 572 at Ötükän yish in prompted the succession of his younger brother Taspar Qaghan, marking the transition from expansion to internal consolidation amid emerging factional tensions. His reign, documented in Chinese annals like the Sui Shu and Zhou Shu as well as inscriptions such as Bugut, exemplified the Ashina clan's strategic blend of nomadic warfare and imperial ambition that reshaped Central Asian geopolitics.

Etymology and Titles

Name Variations and Meanings

Muqan Qaghan's name appears in runiform script as 𐰢𐰆𐰴𐰣𐰴𐰍𐰣, conventionally romanized as Muqan qaɣan, reflecting the phonetic structure of early . This rendering derives from inscriptions and contemporary attestations associated with the Göktürk era, where qaɣan denotes the supreme ruler title. Variant romanizations include Mugan or Muhan, accounting for dialectical shifts in and consonant assimilation common in phonology. Chinese historical records, such as those in the Zhou shu and Sui shu annals, transliterate the name as 木桿可汗 (Mùgǎn kěhán), approximating the Turkic pronunciation through Sino-Xenic conventions of the Northern Dynasties period. Recent philological analysis argues for a restoration to 木汗 (Mùhàn), positing that the graph 桿 may reflect a scribal error or variant transcription influenced by regional dialects, aligning more closely with attested Sogdian forms. In Sogdian script, as preserved in the Bugut inscription from (ca. 584 CE), the name is rendered as Mwx'n, evidencing Iranian linguistic mediation in Turkic-Sogdian interactions along trade routes. Etymological proposals connect Muqan to Proto-Turkic roots denoting power or capability, with later Turkic reflexes (e.g., Kazakh mūkan "strong, mighty") suggesting connotations of rulership strength rather than abstract wisdom. Such interpretations draw from but lack direct attestation in primary Göktürk texts, highlighting potential Sogdian substrate influences in . Unsubstantiated folk derivations, such as links to non-Turkic terms without inscriptional support, are dismissed in favor of evidence-based reconstructions.

Official Titles and Epithets

Muqan succeeded to the paramount title of qaghan (Chinese: 可汗, kèhàn), denoting the supreme sovereign of the Göktürk Khaganate, upon the death of his elder brother Issik Qaghan in 553 CE, ruling the eastern territories as the primary authority while his uncle Istami managed the west. This title, inherited from founder —who had proclaimed himself Illig Qaghan (supreme qaghan) in 552 CE—signified absolute hierarchical dominance over Turkic tribes and subject peoples, emphasizing centralized command in nomadic confederations where the qaghan held divine mandate as a sky-ordained . Prior to his ascension, Muqan held the subordinate title of irkin (Chinese: 俟斤, sìjīn), a prestigious rank equivalent to a regional prince or commander overseeing tribal contingents, as recorded in annals. His full pre-regnal designation was Yandu Irkin (燕都俟斤), where Yandu (燕都) likely functioned as an epithet or locative honorific, possibly a variant of Yan-jun (燕郡) or linked to iniy.gün, connoting "younger generation" or "" in familial succession contexts, underscoring his prepared role in Ashina clan hierarchy. In Chinese historiographical records such as the Zhou shu, Muqan's regnal epithet appears as Muqan Qaghan (木杆可汗 or 木桿可汗), with philological corrections suggesting muhan (木汗 or 木扞) as the accurate transcription, reflecting phonetic adaptations that elevated his status through conquest-validated authority over expanded domains from to the . These titles, continuous with Bumin's but amplified by Muqan's subjugation of Rouran remnants and Hephthalites, symbolized not mere inheritance but reinforced imperial legitimacy through martial prowess and border stabilization, as per dynastic chronicles prioritizing verifiable tributary submissions and military yields.

Origins and Ascension

Ancestry and Clan Background

Muqan Qaghan, also known as Ashina Yandou, was the second son of , the founder of the who unified Turkic tribes in 552 CE following a revolt against the . His elder brother, Yami Qaghan (variously recorded as Issik or Khoqan Qaghan), succeeded Bumin briefly upon the latter's death in 552 before dying shortly thereafter, paving the way for Muqan's accession. As a direct descendant in the patrilineal Ashina clan, Muqan's position exemplified the hereditary principle central to Göktürk leadership, where khagans were selected from Bumin's male lineage to maintain clan authority over the eastern and western wings of the khaganate. The Ashina clan, to which Muqan belonged, emerged from nomadic tribes in the region, where they engaged in ironworking and herding as vassals within pre-khaganate tribal structures. Prior to 552, the clan, under leaders like Bumin's father Ashina Tuwu, operated as a subordinate group amid confederations dominated by the Rouran, forging tools and weapons that later aided the Göktürk unification. This background rooted the Ashina in the steppe's competitive tribal dynamics, emphasizing mobility, metallurgy, and alliances that transitioned from subjugation to imperial expansion under Bumin's progeny. Turkic traditions, corroborated in historical records, invoke a mythical she-wolf origin for the Ashina, symbolizing survival and divine mandate, though such lore likely served to legitimize rule rather than reflect empirical genealogy.

Early Life and Rise to Power

Muqan Qaghan, born Ashina Yandou (阿史那燕都), was the second son of Bumin Qaghan (Ashina Tumen), the founder of the Göktürk Khaganate, with records of his early years limited to inferences from Chinese dynastic annals documenting the Ashina clan's rise. Born likely in the early sixth century amid the Ashina's vassalage to the Rouran Khaganate, Muqan grew up in a context of tribal subjugation and ironworking smiths under Rouran overlordship, where the Ashina forged weapons and managed herds in the Altai Mountains region. Primary sources such as the Zhou Shu provide chronological anchors for the pivotal events of 552 CE, when Bumin, leveraging alliances with the Western Wei dynasty, orchestrated the rebellion that shattered Rouran hegemony, but they offer no direct accounts of Muqan's personal involvement prior to this. As Bumin's son, Muqan contributed to the nascent state's formation through participation in the anti-Rouran campaigns culminating in the defeat of Anagui's forces north of Huaihuang, an event that propelled the Ashina to supremacy over tribes including remnants of the Tiele confederation. His role likely encompassed military support and efforts to secure loyalty among Ashina retainers and allied nomadic groups, fostering the tribal coalitions essential for the khaganate's initial cohesion amid the power vacuum left by Rouran collapse. These preparatory actions under paternal leadership built the foundations of Göktürk authority, positioning Muqan as a key figure in the clan's transition from vassals to rulers, though Sui Shu and Zhou Shu emphasize collective Ashina endeavors over individual exploits in this pre-553 period.

Ascension Following Bumin Qaghan's Death

Bumin Qaghan died in 553 CE, shortly after establishing the Göktürk Khaganate through the decisive defeat of the in 552. His son Qara Qaghan (also recorded as Issik or Kara Issik Qaghan) succeeded him as ruler of the eastern territories, but his reign lasted only months, ending with his death the same year. Muqan Qaghan, Bumin's younger son, then ascended as of the eastern khaganate in 553 CE, marking a lateral succession among Bumin's heirs rather than strict . This transition, corroborated in Chinese dynastic annals such as the Zhou Shu, occurred amid fraternal competition for authority among the Ashina clan's sons, though no major civil war ensued. The stability of Muqan's ascension stemmed primarily from pragmatic alliances and military leverage, particularly the endorsement and forces provided by his paternal uncle Istami, who controlled the western khaganate and ensured coordinated governance across the divided empire. This uncle-nephew partnership, rooted in shared Ashina lineage and mutual interests against external threats, preempted fragmentation by aligning key tribal loyalties and resources under Muqan's leadership.

Reign and Conquests

Consolidation of Göktürk Authority

Upon ascending the throne as eastern in 553 CE following the brief of his brother Issik Qaghan, Muqan prioritized the suppression of Rouran holdouts who had contested Göktürk dominance since Bumin Qaghan's uprising in 552 CE. By early 554 CE, Göktürk forces under Muqan's command defeated the Rouran leader Yujiulü Kangti, dismantling organized resistance and scattering surviving factions. This culminated in the total subjugation of Rouran remnants by 555 CE, when the last claimants, including Dengshuzi Khan, submitted or fled westward, eliminating a primary internal threat and securing the eastern steppes for Göktürk control. With Rouran power eradicated, Muqan turned to integrating tribes, notably the Tiele , which had previously oscillated between Rouran overlordship and independence. The Tiele, comprising diverse nomadic groups in the northern steppes, pledged allegiance to the post-555 CE, providing manpower and that bolstered central authority without immediate revolt. This incorporation stabilized core territories by channeling tribal resources into a hierarchical system, as recorded in annals, where subject peoples delivered horses, furs, and livestock to Ötüken, the Göktürk heartland, fostering economic cohesion amid nomadic dispersal. Muqan further consolidated authority by formalizing the dual khaganate division initiated by Bumin, appointing his uncle Istami (also known as Istämi ) to govern the western territories from 553 CE onward. This structure delineated eastern domains under Muqan's direct rule—encompassing and the Altai—while Istami managed expansive western reaches toward the , enabling coordinated administration over vast distances without fracturing unity. Military efficacy was enhanced through decentralized yet loyal tribal levies organized under Ashina loyalists, sustaining the Göktürk cavalry's mobility for rapid response to dissent, as evidenced by the absence of major internal upheavals until later reigns. These measures, rooted in pragmatic control of nomadic alliances, laid the groundwork for subsequent expansions by ensuring stable resource flows and undivided command.

Defeat of the Hephthalites

In 558 CE, Muqan Qaghan oversaw a decisive joint campaign with the under Anushirvan against the Hephthalite Empire, marking a pivotal expansion of Göktürk influence westward. The alliance targeted the Hephthalites as a mutual rival controlling key Central Asian territories, with Göktürk forces advancing from the north and Sasanian armies from the south and west. This strategic coordination culminated in an epic battle near between 558 and 561 CE, where the combined forces routed the Hephthalite army, effectively dismantling their imperial structure. Field operations were primarily led by Muqan's uncle, Istami Yabgu, who commanded the western Göktürk contingent as the designated yabgu of the western territories. Historical accounts attribute the alliance's formation to Istami's diplomatic initiatives, though Muqan, as supreme khagan, held ultimate authority over the khaganate's military endeavors. The Hephthalite defeat ended their independence, with the Oxus River (Amu Darya) serving as the demarcation line: territories north of the river annexed by the Göktürks, and those to the south incorporated into the Sasanian domain. This victory secured western territories for the , including access to lucrative tribute and control over segments of the trade routes previously dominated by the Hephthalites. The acquisition bolstered economic and military prestige, facilitating further expansions and establishing the khaganate as a dominant Eurasian power. Remnants of Hephthalite principalities persisted in peripheral regions like , but their centralized empire was irrecoverably shattered.

Eastern and Northern Expansions

During his reign from 553 to 572 CE, Muqan Qaghan directed military campaigns eastward against the Khitan tribes, defeating them and extending Göktürk dominance over regions east of the . These operations, conducted around 560 CE, disrupted Khitan resistance and incorporated their territories into the khaganate's tributary system. To the north, Muqan Qaghan's forces annexed the Kyrgyz tribes, whose lands along the upper Yenisei River were brought under direct Göktürk authority. This conquest, also circa 560 CE, eliminated a potential northern threat and opened access to Siberian resources through imposed obligations. The subjugation secured vital flanks, averting encirclement by uncoordinated nomadic coalitions that could have challenged core Ashina holdings. Further offensives targeted the Tiele (Töles) confederation, including tribes like the , whose defeat by 555 CE finalized control over the and central Mongolian steppe. As detailed in Chinese records such as the Sui Shu, these victories from roughly 555 to 565 CE yielded annual tribute in , furs, and manpower, directly enhancing Göktürk and economic resilience against rival powers. By neutralizing these peripheral groups, the expansions fortified the empire's strategic depth, enabling sustained projection of power westward without rear-guard vulnerabilities.

Western Campaigns and Istami's Role

Istami, Muqan Qaghan's uncle and Bumin's brother, was appointed yabgu of the western territories upon Muqan's ascension in 553 CE, granting him operational autonomy for expansions westward while Muqan retained supreme oversight from the east. Istami's campaigns focused on Central Asian steppes and oases, targeting Hephthalite remnants and local polities to complement Muqan's eastern consolidations against Rouran and other nomads. A pivotal joint effort occurred through Istami's alliance with Sassanid , culminating in the Hephthalite Empire's destruction by 560 CE, with decisive battles near enabling Göktürk forces to overrun and . Muqan's strategic approval facilitated this coordination, as Chinese note the khaganate's unified command structure dividing eastern and western fronts without discord. The spoils included Hephthalite tribute networks and Sogdian trade hubs, yielding Göktürk dominance over western segments from the to the Pamirs, with Istami extracting annual levies estimated at hundreds of thousands of gold coins redirected to Muqan's court. This bilateral model was formalized through shared titles—Istami as "Yabgu of the West" under Muqan's paramountcy—and equitable division of conquests, sustaining campaigns into the 570s CE as Persian sources confirm ongoing Göktürk-Sassanid pacts absent reports of khaganate infighting. Such harmony, evidenced in annals detailing envoy exchanges, underscored Muqan's supervisory role in leveraging Istami's victories for khaganate-wide prestige and resources.

Diplomacy and Alliances

Marriage Proposals and Alliances

In 556, shortly after ascending as qaghan, Muqan proposed marrying one of his daughters to , the paramount regent of who laid the foundations for the dynasty, as a means to legitimize Göktürk dominance over steppe tribes and elicit from Chinese courts amid ongoing power struggles in northern . Yuwen Tai's death in the same year halted the arrangement, though it signaled Muqan's intent to leverage marital for strategic gains without military concessions. A more substantive alliance materialized in autumn 563, when Northern Zhou's Emperor Wu (Yuwen Yong) forged a pact with the against their mutual rival, ; central to the treaty was Emperor Wu's commitment to wed Muqan's daughter, the princess Ashina, born in 551 to Muqan and a consort from a prior dynastic tie. This union, formalized in 568 with Ashina's installation as empress, facilitated coordinated assaults on in 563–565, where Göktürk cavalry complemented Zhou forces, weakening Qi's defenses and enabling territorial encroachments. The marriage yielded pragmatic benefits for the Göktürks, including sustained silk tribute and border stability that freed resources for western expansions, while allowing Muqan to project equality rather than vassalage—evident in continued Göktürk raids on Chinese frontiers post-alliance, underscoring the tie's role as a temporary expedient in power balancing rather than ideological alignment. Ashina's position at until Wu's death in 578 further embedded Göktürk influence, though underlying tensions persisted due to the khaganate's nomadic autonomy and reluctance to fully submit to sedentary norms.

Relations with Chinese Dynasties

During Muqan Qaghan's reign (553–572 CE), the Göktürks exploited the political division between the (557–581 CE) and (550–577 CE) dynasties, whose mutual rivalry and post-Rouran vulnerabilities positioned the steppe power as the dominant partner in . Göktürk military successes against the Rouran remnants, Kitans, and other nomads granted Muqan leverage to demand in silks and brides following conquests, while firmly rejecting any posture of subservience to Chinese authority. This dynamic stemmed from the causal reality of Chinese fragmentation enabling Göktürk suzerainty over northern border interactions, rather than equitable exchanges. Both Chinese states vied aggressively for Göktürk favor, dispatching embassies laden with gifts to court against their counterpart, with Muqan deliberately postponing decisions to extract maximum concessions. In autumn 563 CE, this culminated in a formal with , initiating joint offensives against , including a coordinated winter assault that demonstrated Göktürk strategic initiative in directing the campaign. Diplomatic engagements persisted into later years, with recognitions of Göktürk overlordship by 568 CE reinforcing tribute obligations and alliance terms, as Muqan maintained control over trade routes to amplify economic pressure on the Chinese courts. These relations underscored Göktürk exploitation of Chinese disunity for unilateral gains, absent narratives of benevolent .

Interactions with Neighboring Powers

During Muqan Qaghan's reign (553–572 CE), the pursued an opportunistic alliance with the Sassanid Empire to dismantle the Hephthalite confederation, a mutual threat dominating . Coordinated by Muqan's uncle and western viceroy Istemi Yabgu, forces launched northern assaults on Hephthalite territories starting circa 558 CE, complementing Sassanid southern campaigns under Anushirvan. This joint effort culminated in the Hephthalites' decisive defeat by 565 CE, with their power shattered near ; territories north of the Oxus River were incorporated into the domain, while Sassanid control extended southward, delineating a durable frontier that persisted for decades and enabled trade flows without immediate escalation to rivalry. Persian chronicles, such as those preserved in al-Tabari's history, attribute the slaying of the Hephthalite king to the qaghan, underscoring Göktürk agency in the conquest's causality from a Sassanid perspective, though variant accounts credit Khosrow I; this divergence reflects narrative emphases in Iranian sources amid shared strategic gains. The pact's empirical success lay in partitioning spoils—Göktürks gained vassal tribes and tribute routes, Sassanids reclaimed Bactria—averting unilateral overextension and stabilizing the khaganate's southwestern flank for further eastern consolidations. Concurrently, Göktürk expansions under Muqan exerted relentless pressure on Avar confederations, remnants or allies of subdued Rouran elements, compelling their westward circa 558–562 CE. This displacement redirected nomadic agglomerations toward Byzantine and Sassanid peripheries, neutralizing latent threats to Göktürk western approaches and channeling rival energies externally rather than into direct frontier contests. By forestalling Avar consolidation in , Muqan's campaigns empirically buffered khaganate coherence, prioritizing conquest causality over prolonged entanglement with peripheral migrants.

Administration and Cultural Influence

Governance and Military Organization

The Göktürk Khaganate under Muqan Qaghan (r. 553–572) operated a decentralized model rooted in tribal , with the Ashina clan's supremacy ensuring cohesion among diverse nomadic groups through oaths of loyalty and hierarchical appointments of tribal begs (chieftains). This structure minimized fixed bureaucracy, relying instead on the khagan's personal authority to coordinate levies and tributes, which proved effective for rapid territorial consolidation across the steppes. Military organization emphasized tribal levies, summoning warriors from subject tribes for campaigns, augmented by a core elite guard drawn from loyal Ashina kin and allies to safeguard the and enforce edicts. Forces were arrayed in units—tens, hundreds, and thousands—adapted from prior empires, facilitating swift horse-archer maneuvers that sustained Muqan's conquests against Rouran remnants, Kitans, and others. A tribute-based , extracting goods like and livestock from vassals—including 100,000 bolts annually from and dynasties—financed armament and mobility without burdensome internal taxation, directly bolstering prolonged warfare capabilities. The khagan's yarghu, a judicial assembly for resolving disputes and affirming , centralized key decisions amid tribal , as echoed in later Orkhon traditions reflective of early practices. These mechanisms yielded nearly two decades of internal stability and unchecked expansion, contrasting with post-Muqan fragmentation, where weakened khagans failed to command equivalent tribal , exposing decentralization's vulnerabilities absent a dominant ruler.

Sogdian Cultural Integration

Following the Göktürks' conquest of the Hephthalites around 560 CE, Sogdian merchants, including communities in (near ), assumed roles as intermediaries, channeling scripts, diplomatic protocols, and trade commodities into the empire's operations. These urban traders, skilled in multilingual administration, enabled Göktürks to extract revenues from transcontinental routes without direct involvement in sedentary commerce, transmitting Iranian-influenced motifs and ledgers that supported imperial coordination across vast territories. Sogdian influence peaked in the 560s CE under Muqan Qaghan's expansions (r. 553–572 CE), marked by their advisory presence at court and adaptation of the Sogdian cursive script for Turkic governance needs, as later attested in artifacts like the Bugut stele's bilingual elements combining Sogdian and proto-runic forms dated to 584 CE. This era saw Sogdians handling ambassadorial missions, such as negotiations with the Eastern Romans, leveraging their networks to extend Göktürk leverage. Such integration yielded tangible economic gains through facilitated tolls and goods flow, yet historical accounts highlight inherent tensions: reliance on Sogdian expertise risked administrative vulnerabilities for nomadic rulers, though maintained core martial identity by subordinating merchants to tribal hierarchies rather than assimilating wholesale. This approach prioritized utility over cultural fusion, averting dilution while harnessing Sogdian acumen for empire-building.

Economic Policies and Trade

Following the defeat of the Hephthalites around 557–561 CE in alliance with the Sassanid Empire, Muqan Qaghan's Göktürk forces secured control over key segments of the traversing and the , enabling the imposition of transit fees and protection rackets on merchant caravans. This conquest-driven monopoly on overland trade routes from to Persia generated substantial revenue, as Sogdian merchants operated under Göktürk overlordship, paying dues for safe passage and military escort services against bandits and rival nomads. Muqan's northward campaigns against tribes such as the and Kyrgyz between 555 and 565 expanded access to Siberian resources, boosting exports of and furs to southern markets including , where steppe-bred were highly valued in exchange for and grains. Chinese annals record Göktürk delegations delivering thousands of annually during this period, underscoring the of peripheral conquests into the khaganate's pastoral economy. Verifiable prosperity is evident in tribute extracted from fragmented Chinese polities; and each paid 100,000 bolts of silk annually to Muqan from circa 555 onward to secure neutrality or alliance amid their rivalry, providing liquid wealth that financed further military expeditions. These inflows, documented in Zhou Shu chronicles, correlated with Göktürk military peak, yet historians note an overreliance on extortionate raids and ephemeral rather than institutionalizing sustainable production, rendering the vulnerable to diplomatic shifts post-Muqan.

Death, Succession, and Immediate Aftermath

Final Years and Health

In the early 570s, Muqan Qaghan directed efforts toward securing and administering the vast territories acquired through prior conquests, including the subjugation of Tiele confederations and incursions into lands during the 550s and 560s, as recorded in annals. No contemporary records describe major offensive campaigns in 570 or 571, suggesting a shift toward consolidation amid the khaganate's peak extent around 570. Muqan Qaghan died in 572 CE after a reign of approximately 19 years (553–572), with succession passing to his Taspar. Primary sources, chiefly Chinese dynastic histories like the Book of Zhou, provide no details on specific ailments, attempts, or acute illnesses preceding his death, consistent with natural causes attributable to the physical toll of prolonged nomadic warfare and over expansive domains. Inscriptions such as that from Little Khonakhai affirm the duration of his rule without indicating unnatural ends. Emerging fraternal tensions, particularly with Taspar over imperial priorities, may have compounded administrative strains in these years, though direct causal links to health remain unrecorded.

Succession Disputes

Muqan Qaghan died in 572 CE, after which the title of passed to his younger brother Taspar Qaghan, who assumed control of the eastern territories of the Göktürk Khaganate. This handover followed the established custom of lateral succession among the Ashina clan's senior brothers, prioritizing fraternal continuity over direct filial inheritance despite Muqan having a son, Talopien. Contemporary records do not document overt conflict at the moment of transition, indicating acceptance by key tribal leaders, yet the bypass of Talopien foreshadowed vulnerabilities in the dynastic line. The decision to elevate Taspar rather than Talopien stemmed from legitimacy concerns tied to Muqan's marital alliances, as his primary Türkic consort bore , and Talopien's mother was of foreign origin—a product of diplomatic marriages common among rulers. In the of nomadic confederations, where authority rested on tribal consensus and perceived fidelity to core ethnic interests, heirs from non-Türkic lineages risked diminished support from Ashina loyalists and allied clans, favoring instead a proven brother to preserve immediate stability. This pragmatic preference for figures embodying unadulterated tribal ties, while averting short-term discord, exposed a structural oversight in Muqan's lineage planning, as the absence of a unequivocally legitimate son sowed seeds for future instability; Taspar's later designation of Talopien as heir in 581 provoked rejection and khaganate division, illustrating how such succession dynamics eroded the empire's unified command.

Short-Term Consequences for the Khaganate

Taspar Qaghan, Muqan Qaghan's younger brother, succeeded to the eastern and central throne in 572 CE following Muqan's death, inheriting an empire at its territorial zenith but reliant on Muqan's personal prestige for cohesion among diverse vassal tribes. While initial succession occurred without open conflict, the absence of Muqan's military dynamism led to a subtle erosion of authority over peripheral regions, as local leaders tested central directives amid unresolved strains from rapid conquests, including burdensome tribute systems imposed to sustain the khaganate's armies. During Taspar's reign (572–581 CE), Chinese records in the Sui Shu describe growing internal frictions, with subject clans exhibiting mutual hostility and reluctance to submit fully, exacerbating the khaganate's decentralized structure where loyalty hinged on individual khagan's enforcement rather than enduring institutions. Taspar's diplomatic overtures, such as alliances with the and interest in foreign religions, diverted focus from consolidating Muqan's gains, allowing northern groups like the Tiele confederation—subdued but not fully integrated during Muqan's campaigns—to harbor discontent over fiscal exactions, setting the stage for future defiance. Taspar's designation of Muqan's son Talopien as preferred heir, bypassing his own offspring, intensified dynastic tensions by the late 570s, undermining Ashina clan unity and highlighting succession ambiguities left unaddressed under Muqan. This familial discord, compounded by overextension without corresponding administrative reforms, manifested in weakened enforcement of expansions by 580 CE, as vassals in distant territories asserted greater , preluding the civil wars that fractured the khaganate post-581.

Legacy and Historiography

Long-Term Impact on Göktürk Empire

Muqan Qaghan's campaigns from 553 to 572 transformed the Göktürk Khaganate from a nascent tribal confederation centered in into a expansive hegemon controlling territories extending to the in the west, through subjugation of the Tiele tribes and elimination of Rouran remnants by 555. This growth, achieved over approximately two decades, incorporated eastern groups like the Kitans and western steppe nomads, solidifying a controlled area that spanned core Mongolian steppes to Central Asian frontiers, thereby establishing the khaganate's zenith in scale and influence. These expansions fortified the empire's foundational territories against revivals of prior rivals, particularly the Rouran, whose decisive defeat precluded any organized resurgence and entrenched Göktürk supremacy in the eastern steppes for subsequent generations. The bilateral administrative model under Muqan, featuring coordinated eastern and western wings under Ashina kin, provided a template for division of authority that shaped the post-582 split into Eastern and Western Khaganates, sustaining operational continuity amid internal strains. Though this rapid territorial consolidation elevated the to hegemon status, it introduced risks of overextension, as the vast domain fostered factional rivalries among subordinate tribes and kin, presaging civil conflicts that fragmented the first khaganate by the 630s under Tang pressure. Nonetheless, the secured core and Ashina prestige indirectly facilitated the Second Khaganate's revival in 682, when reclaimed Ötüken and reasserted steppe dominance.

Evaluations in Primary Sources

The Zhou shu, compiled during the but drawing on contemporary records, depicts Muqan Qaghan as a aggressive conqueror whose forces exacted heavy and launched incursions threatening Chinese border regions, framing his reign as a period of heightened peril that necessitated vigilant defense and occasional counterstrikes. This portrayal aligns with the text's focus on immediate security concerns, verifiable through dated entries on envoy missions and levies, such as demands for silk and grain in the 550s. The Sui shu, reflecting a post-reign perspective under the , shifts emphasis to diplomatic protocols and kinship ties, recording Muqan's Ashina lineage, matrimonial alliances like his daughter's marriage to in 568, and structured tribute systems that positioned the as nominal subordinates in a sinocentric order. Such accounts highlight ritual exchanges over outright hostility, corroborating specifics like annual embassies but interpreting them as affirmations of Chinese . The Bugut inscription, a mid-6th-century in Sogdian script from , evaluates Muqan within the Ashina clan's foundational narrative, naming him explicitly as a predecessor qaghan who upheld tribal law and expanded dominion, thereby glorifying his contributions to khaganate stability amid conquests. Later Orkhon runic inscriptions, though from the 8th-century Second Khaganate, echo this by idealizing early rulers' unifications and victories over rivals like the Rouran, attributing enduring imperial glory to such figures without naming Muqan directly but reinforcing a heroic tradition. Persian chronicles, including Sassanid-era references preserved in later Islamic histories, provide indirect assessments through accounts of Göktürk-Sassanid in dismantling Hephthalite power circa 557–560, portraying Muqan's forces as pivotal allies whose mobility complemented Persian , though without personal encomia or criticisms. Contrasting these, Chinese annals offer chronological precision on interactions—e.g., the 555 destruction of Rouran holdouts—but systematically downplay Göktürk strategic autonomy by crediting Chinese envoys or internal fractures for containment, reflecting an imperial toward portraying nomads as reactive threats rather than proactive empires. Inscribed sources, by design, amplify agency through dynastic praise, yet align on empirical outcomes like tribal submissions (Kitan in the east, in the south). A synthesis privileges corroborated expansions, such as western thrusts verifiable in multiple records, over interpretive flourishes, revealing Muqan as an effective consolidator whose capabilities exceeded sinocentric diminutions but fell short of runic hyperbole.

Modern Interpretations and Debates

Scholars in the have increasingly scrutinized Muqan Qaghan's expansionist policies through genetic and archaeological lenses, prioritizing over traditional narrative reliance on Chinese . A 2023 genomic study of , Muqan's daughter, revealed that the Ashina Northeast Asian genetic profile—97.7% Northeast Asian ancestry with only 2.3% West Eurasian components—affirms continuity from pre-Göktürk elites like the Rouran, rather than substantial admixture from conquered populations during Muqan's reign. This finding fuels debates on as a mechanism for maintaining ruling legitimacy amid territorial conquests, countering earlier hypotheses of rapid hybridization in the khaganate's core. A analysis of Turkic-speaking populations' genetic legacy further informs interpretations of Muqan's strategies, demonstrating that Göktürk expansions entailed elite-driven linguistic dissemination with negligible genome-wide replacement in substrate populations—typically under 10% Turkic contribution in Central Asian groups. This pattern underscores dynamics: military dominance and extraction over demographic assimilation, challenging romanticized portrayals in some Western that emphasize nomad "tolerance" as a cultural rather than a pragmatic tool for alliance-building with groups like the Sogdians. Such views, often rooted in post-colonial frameworks, overlook causal evidence from conquest scales, where subjugated polities like the Hephthalites supplied resources without reciprocal integration into the khagan's inner circles. Debates on Sogdian integration under Muqan question whether this era constituted an overstated "golden age" of cultural autonomy or served primarily as an instrumental phase for Göktürk trade monopolies. Empirical reassessments, drawing on excavated Sogdian-Turkic bilingual artifacts, argue that Sogdian mercantile networks flourished not due to benevolent nomad policies but through coerced symbiosis, where khaganate oversight extracted tariffs and intelligence from urban outposts—evident in the rapid pivot to military auxiliaries during eastern campaigns. This perspective revises narratives privileging multicultural harmony, highlighting instead the khaganate's causal reliance on Sogdian intermediaries for silk road revenues, which funded Muqan's horse-archer legions without granting political sovereignty. Archaeological data from Hephthalite frontier sites, including layered fortifications in dated via to the 550s CE, prompt revisions to the chronology of Muqan's western campaigns, suggesting protracted sieges extending beyond the conventionally cited 558–562 defeat of Khushnavaz. These findings, corroborated by Sassanid coin hoards, indicate empirical adjustments: alliances were opportunistic realignments against mutual threats, not ideologically driven tolerance, with Göktürk forces extracting from fragmented Hephthalite remnants to sustain . Such debates underscore academia's occasional bias toward anachronistic projections of pluralism, favoring instead first-principles analysis of power asymmetries in nomadic .

Personal Characteristics

Physical Appearance

Chinese historical records describe Muqan Qaghan as having an unusual physical appearance, with a broad face exceeding one chi (roughly 23 cm) in width and a distinctly red complexion. His eyes were likened to liúli (琉璃), colored glazes typically evoking blue or green hues in ancient Chinese terminology for exotic materials like lapis lazuli or imported glass, a feature noted among some Ashina rulers possibly reflecting Western Eurasian admixture in the clan's origins. No contemporary portraits or detailed measurements of his build survive, but as a Göktürk leading expansive military campaigns from 553 to 572, he exemplified the hardy nomadic physique suited to warfare, characterized by endurance for long rides and prowess inferred from archaeological depictions of Turkic elites in armor and on horseback from the period. Genetic analysis of his daughter, (d. 582), confirms predominantly West ancestry without East Asian components, supporting interpretations of such atypical traits as authentic rather than stylized.

Reported Traits and Anecdotes

Muqan Qaghan exhibited strategic acumen by delegating oversight of western campaigns to his uncle Istami (Shi-dian-mi in Chinese records), who led expansions against the Hephthalites in alliance with the Sassanid Empire and subdued the On Oq tribes, enabling Muqan to prioritize eastern consolidations. This division of authority, as recorded in the Zhou Shu, facilitated simultaneous advances that doubled the khaganate's territory within years of his accession in 553, reaching from the Caspian regions westward to the Pacific seaboard eastward. His leadership emphasized decisive suppression of potential rivals, including the annihilation of remaining Rouran forces and subjugation of the Kitan and tribes, measures that causal to short-term stability by deterring rebellions amid rapid expansion. Chinese annals attribute the khaganate's peak under Muqan (r. 553–572) to such firm control, which integrated disparate groups under Ashina rule without noted internal fractures during his tenure. While primary sources like the Zhou Shu lack explicit envoy anecdotes on courtly interactions, the model underscores a pragmatic approach prioritizing outcomes over centralized .

Family

Consorts and Marital Relations

Muqan Qaghan's principal consort was a noblewoman of Turkic origin from the Ashina clan's allied tribes, who bore no children, necessitating reliance on secondary unions for . This childlessness shifted the locus of legitimate succession to from lesser-status consorts, creating tensions in the khaganate's patrilineal where heirs from the primary wife held precedence under customary Ashina law. A secondary consort, described in Chinese as of low birth and non-Turkic —likely from a Sogdian or recently subjugated group married to secure loyalty among vassals—produced key heirs, including the future Apa Qaghan (Da-luo-bian) and a dispatched in 563 to wed , sealing a pact against the . Such choices prioritized causal leverage over conquered peripheries, enhancing military cohesion but eroding elite consensus on succession purity, as non-principal faced and aristocratic challenges to . Proposals from for Muqan to wed a Chinese imperial princess, intended to bind the khaganate through , yielded no unions; Muqan instead dictated terms by offering his own daughter, inverting the dynamic to assert Göktürk dominance in alliance negotiations and avoiding dilution of Ashina lineage with Han elements. This pattern underscored marital relations as instruments of rather than symmetric reciprocity, with consort selection directly causal to the khaganate's internal stability by amplifying disputes over heir legitimacy post-Muqan's death in 572.

Children and Descendants

Muqan Qaghan's known offspring included at least one daughter and two sons, born primarily to secondary consorts of non-Turkic origin, as his primary Turkic wife reportedly bore no children, complicating succession legitimacy within the Ashina clan. His daughter, Ashina (born 551, died 30 May 582), was married in 568 to Emperor Wu (Yuwen Yong) of as a diplomatic alliance to secure Göktürk influence in Chinese courts; she became empress consort and posthumously , though her sons died in infancy without ascending the throne. This union facilitated tribute and military coordination against shared foes like the Sui precursors but ended with her death amid 's internal strife. Among his sons, Apa Qaghan (also known as Talopien or Da-luo-bian, reigned as claimant 581–587) sought the eastern khaganate throne after uncle Taspar Qaghan's death in 581, per Taspar's will, but was rejected by tribal elders favoring Taspar's son Anluo due to Apa's maternal lineage undermining his claim; Apa briefly held power before defeat by rivals, including western forces under Tardu, leading to his execution around 587. Another son, Yangsú Tegi(n), produced descendants who influenced later Western Turkic rulers, including Niri Qaghan (reigned 587–601), Yangsú's son, who briefly khaganated amid civil wars fragmenting the khaganate post-581. These sidelined heirs exemplified fraternal rivalries and maternal origin disputes that weakened central Ashina authority, paving for eastern khaganate collapse by 630.

Extended Kinship Ties

Muqan Qaghan's paternal , Istami, served as Yabgu of the West, administering the khaganate's expansive western territories from approximately 552 until his death around 576. This division of reflected the Ashina clan's strategy of delegating regional governance to close kin, with Istami overseeing alliances and campaigns, including the decisive with Sassanid Persia that contributed to the Hephthalite Empire's collapse by 561. Muqan's younger brother, Taspar Qaghan, succeeded him directly upon his death in 572, inheriting the eastern khaganate at its territorial zenith and continuing policies of tributary extraction from northern Chinese states. The fraternal transition underscored a preference for lateral succession within the immediate Ashina lineage when senior heirs were unavailable, though Taspar's later attempt to bequeath the throne to Muqan's son Apa in 581 deviated from this norm, precipitating a among elites. Among nephews, Tardu—son of Istami—emerged as a key figure in the western wing, assuming leadership after his father's death and periodically intervening in eastern affairs, such as during the post-Taspar turmoil around 581–603. These cross-branch ties, documented in Chinese dynastic annals like the Zhou Shu, reinforced Ashina dominance by intertwining eastern imperial authority with western military and diplomatic leverage, sustaining the khaganate's dual structure until internal rivalries eroded it in the late sixth century.

References

  1. http://www.transoxiana.org/Eran/Articles/osawa.html
  2. http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Altera/turks.html
  3. https://www.academia.edu/109023590/The_First_Qaghan_Policy_and_the_Rise_of_Ancient_Turks_in_Central_Asia_534_572_Ad_
  4. https://www.americanaejournal.hu/index.php/chronica/article/download/10787/10678/11147
  5. https://www.academia.edu/127899928/CHEN_Ken_2025_The_Identity_of_Silzibul_the_Early_Monarch_of_Western_Turks_Journal_of_Old_Turkic_Studies_9_1_7_30
  6. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DB30B1DD6567AA8327636EE37F8FD26B/9781942401766c9_p225-252_CBO.pdf/inner_asia.pdf
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44963163_The_Question_of_Turk_Origins
  8. https://www.theroloway.org/the-empires-of-the-nomadic-steppe/
  9. https://www.academia.edu/93216725/CHEN_Ken_On_the_Epithets_of_T%C3%BCrk_Mu_gan_Qaghan_%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BC%E7%AA%81%E5%8E%A5%E6%9C%A8%E6%9D%86%E5%8F%AF%E6%B1%97%E7%9A%84%E5%90%8D%E8%99%9F_Historical_and_Philological_Studies_of_Chinas_Western_Regions_%E8%A5%BF%E5%9F%9F%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E8%AA%9E%E8%A8%80%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E9%9B%86%E5%88%8A_2022_No_1_Vol_17_pp_43_55
  10. https://iie.kz/?p=25986
  11. https://kipchaks.com/altai-is-the-ancestral-home-of-the-turks/
  12. https://www.facebook.com/groups/thescythianway/posts/24465550939798845/
  13. https://japanesemythology.wordpress.com/notes-the-asena-ashina-wolf-clan/
  14. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/empires-and-exchanges-in-eurasian-late-antiquity/infrastructures-of-legitimacy-in-inner-asia/9C68062467FCD754BCFD0095E3D6CA35
  15. http://dragonsarmory.blogspot.com/2018/02/a-history-of-turkic-empire-and-turks-in.html
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-war/turks-and-the-other-peoples-of-the-eurasian-steppes-to-1175/2AE4DCC392C3307BC16EB1B3C3D99194
  17. https://brill.com/display/book/9789047406990/BP000012.pdf
  18. http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Altera/rouran.html
  19. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsFarEast/AsiaRouran.htm
  20. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Gokturks.pdf
  21. http://joycebaychinese.blogspot.com/2015/02/turkic-influence-on-western-world-and.html
  22. https://www.academia.edu/107720510/The_Government_system_of_the_Turkish_khaganate
  23. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hephthalites
  24. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/First_Perso-Turkic_War
  25. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/tafps/article/download/51551/51901/61847
  26. http://www.imperialchina.org/Turks_Uygurs.shtml
  27. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsFarEast/AsiaEasternKhagans.htm
  28. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JFJTgn4Pxkg
  29. https://medium.com/teatime-history/centuries-before-the-ottomans-turks-built-the-worlds-largest-empire-bb18ed64714e
  30. https://prateekdg.substack.com/p/the-children-of-the-wolf
  31. https://peachv.org/index.php/geography-menu-one/steppe/antiquity/turkic-khaganate
  32. https://www.advantour.com/silkroad/history-turkic-khaganate.htm
  33. https://prateekdg.substack.com/p/who-were-the-white-huns
  34. https://www.nouahsark.com/en/infocenter/culture/history/monarchs/emperor_wu_of_northern_zhou.php
  35. http://dragonsarmory.blogspot.com/2017/12/northern-and-southern-dynasties-1-north.html
  36. https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/721D143C9E254CA2B83EB4D203BCD9EF
  37. https://www.nouahsark.com/en/infocenter/culture/history/monarchs/empress_ashina.php
  38. https://www.academia.edu/136867427/The_G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks_A_Basic_Overview_of_the_First_Turkic_Khaganate
  39. https://pifk.magtu.ru/en/journal/23-2017-1/412-189.html
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334128756_Gokturk-_Sui_Iliskilerinde_Politik_Hedefler_ve_Yontemler/fulltext/5d195cf2458515c11c06b239/Goektuerk-Sui-Iliskilerinde-Politik-Hedefler-ve-Yoentemler.pdf
  41. https://iranologie.com/the-history-page/the-sasanian-empire-2/hephthalites-and-the-western-turks/
  42. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/empires-and-exchanges-in-eurasian-late-antiquity/sasanian-iran-and-its-northeastern-frontier/4CF2034B2D0847B90BD7C559A24B0247
  43. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-the-mongol-empire/thematic-histories/6A9342D848A952C0FD8B69B41B31B923/core-reader
  44. http://www.transoxiana.org/Eran/Articles/babayarov.html
  45. https://silkroadresearch.blog/2018/09/01/sogdians/
  46. http://www.transoxiana.org/Eran/Articles/alyilmaz.html
  47. https://www.academia.edu/39819322/A_Short_History_of_Bugut_Inscription
  48. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315280738-4/sogdian-ambassadors-g%25C3%25B6kt%25C3%25BCrks-eastern-roman-empire-raoul-mclaughlin-hyun-jin-kim
  49. https://www.academia.edu/1199116/Archaeological_Traces_of_Early_Turks_in_Transoxiana_An_Overview
  50. https://silkroadresearch.blog/2018/10/08/turkic-khaganate/
  51. https://www.academia.edu/9461845/Peaches_to_Samarkand_Long_distance_connectivity_small_worlds_and_socio_cultural_dynamics_across_Eurasia_300_800_CE
  52. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_the_First_Turkic_Khaganate.png
  53. https://www.academia.edu/45055157/A_Survey_of_the_Turkic_Cemetery_in_Little_Khonakhai
  54. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/sites/default/files/knowledge-bank-article/vol_III%2520silk%2520road_the%2520turk%2520empire.pdf
  55. https://elbilge.ucoz.ru/drompp001.pdf
  56. https://www.academia.edu/109023566/The_Policy_of_the_Muqan_and_Taspar_Tuobo_Qaghans_in_the_Turkish_Empire_553_581_Ad_
  57. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-war/foundations-c6001000-ce/50914493BC2A4AD26FD3E728BB516DDF
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366965287_Ancient_Genome_of_Empress_Ashina_reveals_the_Northeast_Asian_origin_of_Gokturk_Khanate
  59. https://www.academia.edu/108616437/Ancient_genome_of_Empress_Ashina_reveals_the_Northeast_Asian_origin_of_G%25C3%25B6kt%25C3%25BCrk_Khanate
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4405460/
  61. https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/8366/01_Text.pdf
  62. http://www.nouahsark.com/en/infocenter/culture/history/monarchs/empress_ashina.php
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.