Hubbry Logo
Natomas, Sacramento, CaliforniaNatomas, Sacramento, CaliforniaMain
Open search
Natomas, Sacramento, California
Community hub
Natomas, Sacramento, California
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Natomas, Sacramento, California
Natomas, Sacramento, California
Natomas, Sacramento, California
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Natomas is a community in the northwestern section of the city of Sacramento, in the U.S. state of California.

Key Information

Natomas is generally divided into two areas by Interstate 80: North Natomas and South Natomas. North Natomas was historically an agricultural area on the floodplains of the Sacramento River, but grew quickly starting in the mid-1990s with extensive residential development, office park, and retail construction.[2] South Natomas developed predominantly as residential subdivisions from the 1950s to the 1980s, but in 1982, amended its community plan to permit 2.4 million square feet of new office parks along Interstate 5.[3]

As a major center of employment, retail and entertainment facilities, Natomas is recognized as one of Greater Sacramento's most important edge cities (suburban economic centers) by Joel Garreau, who popularized the term.[4] Natomas is generally defined as south of the Sacramento County line, north of the Garden Highway and the American River, west of the Steelhead Creek, and east of the Sacramento River.[5] The neighborhood school district is Natomas Unified School District.

Parks and recreation

[edit]

Natomas is also home to a variety of outdoor spaces, including bike trails and parks. One of the newest additions is North Natomas Regional Park.[6] Although it is being completed in phases, it is home to a water spray area for kids, grassy fields, playgrounds, ball fields, picnic areas, two dog parks (one for little and another for big dogs), asphalt and concrete paths for walking and riding, and a permanent farmers' market structure. Jackrabbits, birds of prey, and other wildlife romp in the undeveloped fields adjacent to the developed portions.

Government

[edit]

Natomas is represented by Lisa Kaplan, the District 1 representative on the Sacramento City Council,[7] and Karina Talamantes,[8] the District 3 representative on the Sacramento City Council as well as by Phil Serna, the District 1 representative on the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors.[9]

In the California State Legislature, Natomas is in the 8th senatorial district, represented by Democrat Angelique Ashby[10] and in the 6th Assembly district, represented by Democrat Maggy Krell.[11]

In the United States House of Representatives, Natomas is in California's 6th congressional district, represented by Democrat Ami Bera.[12]

The Natomas Basin Conservancy serves as plan operator for the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. It acquires and manages habitat land for the benefit of the 22 special status species covered under the plan.[13]

Economy

[edit]

Natomas is a retail and entertainment hub for the metropolitan area, including The Promenade at Sacramento Gateway, Natomas Marketplace, and the Park Place Shopping Center, with many smaller shopping centers scattered throughout the region. Northgate Boulevard is home to further retail businesses and hotels.[14] Natomas is considered, by Joel Garreau who popularized the idea, to be one of the major edge cities, i.e. suburban economic centers, in Greater Sacramento.[4]

ARCO Arena (later Sleep Train Arena) was a major feature of the Natomas area of Sacramento and was the previous home of the NBA's Sacramento Kings, who have since moved to the Golden 1 Center in downtown Sacramento. The arena was torn down in 2022. The Sacramento International Airport is within the bounds of Natomas as defined by Sacramento County, but it is several miles away from the largely populated area of Natomas. Since Natomas is the closest portion of the city to the airport, there are many hotels located throughout the Natomas area. Natomas is a historical flood plain and is therefore subject to flooding. Another feature of this area is the ease of access to Interstate 5, Interstate 80, and the northern portion of Highway 99's route through Sacramento, making it a desirable living area for workers who commute.

Education

[edit]

Most of the Natomas region is served by the Natomas Unified School District. Small portions are served by Twin Rivers Unified School District.

In South Natomas, elementary schools include American Lakes K-8, Jefferson K-8, Bannon Creek K-8, and Two Rivers Elementary. The main high school is Natomas High School.

In North Natomas, elementary schools on include Natomas Park Elementary (established 2000), Witter Ranch Elementary (established 2004), Heron K-8 (established 2006), H. Allen Hight Elementary (established 2008), and Paso Verde K-8 (established 2017). Natomas Middle School is the traditional middle school and Inderkum High School is the main high school.

Charter schools are a very popular option. Firstly, the district runs a dependent charter school in Southwest Natomas named Leroy Greene Academy, a 6–12 college preparatory secondary school. Independent charter school options include the Star Academy (K-5), Leading Edge Middle School (6-8) and Performing Fine Arts Academy (6–12) which are all part of the Natomas Charter School. Star Academy is located on its own campus in Natomas Crossing while the other schools are located at the main Natomas Charter Campus in Natomas Park. There is also Westlake Charter School (K-8) which moved to a new campus in Natomas Park in 2017 and Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Academy (K-12, college prep). NP3 K–5 is located in a temporary location on East Commerce Way near the old ARCO Arena site while the middle school and high school portion are located on Del Paso Road.

The Northgate region of South Natomas is served by Twin Rivers Unified School District. Students in these areas are assigned to Grant Union High School in Del Paso Heights. There is also a small portion of North Natomas served by Twin Rivers Unified School District. The elementary school is Regency Park Elementary School. The assigned middle school is Norwood (in the Robla area) and Rio Linda High School but many students do not attend those assigned schools and opt for either NUSD schools or for charter schools.

Private preschools also available throughout Natomas, including Merryhill School (Infants-Pre-K).[15][16]

Notable residents

[edit]

With the development of Natomas in the 1990s and 2000s, it became a very popular spot for legislators to buy second residences during the real estate boom of the early twenty-first century. Two reasons for its popularity were its relative affordability and proximity to the capitol.

Current

[edit]

Former

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Natomas, Sacramento, California

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Natomas is a district in northwestern Sacramento, California, divided into North and South Natomas, encompassing a population of approximately 121,000 residents in a suburban area developed primarily since the 1970s on former agricultural land within the flood-prone Natomas Basin.
The region features flat, low-lying terrain protected by levees along the Sacramento and American Rivers, with development guided by community plans emphasizing residential expansion, parks, and infrastructure improvements such as light rail extensions amid ongoing habitat conservation requirements.
Demographically diverse, with significant Asian and Hispanic populations alongside White residents, Natomas exemplifies Sacramento's suburban growth patterns, including recent approvals for thousands of new housing units, though balanced against flood risk mitigation and agricultural preservation debates in adjacent unincorporated areas.
Historically tied to irrigation systems like the Natomas Ditch and early 19th-century land grants, the area shifted from rice farming and wetlands to master-planned communities, hosting landmarks such as the now-demolished Sleep Train Arena, which served as a major entertainment venue until the Sacramento Kings' relocation in 2016.

Geography

Location and Boundaries

Natomas is a district situated in the northern portion of , approximately 9 miles northwest of . This positioning places it adjacent to key transportation infrastructure, including , which forms part of its western edge. The district is roughly bounded by Elverta Road to the north, the to the east, Northgate Boulevard and to the west, and the southern city limits adjacent to the American River Parkway to the south. (SMF), serving as a major regional hub, is located within the North Natomas subarea. The entirety of core Natomas falls within Sacramento's municipal boundaries, distinguishing it from adjacent unincorporated county lands.

Topography, Hydrology, and Flood Risks

Natomas occupies the Natomas Basin, a low-lying topographic depression northwest of , characterized by nearly flat terrain averaging 25 to 30 feet above mean . This shallow bowl-shaped landscape, encompassing roughly 53,000 acres, resulted from historical sediment deposition and fluvial processes at the confluence of the Sacramento and American Rivers, rendering it a natural extension of the Central Valley . in the basin's peat-rich soils, exacerbated by long-term agricultural drainage and extraction, has further lowered elevations relative to surrounding waterways, increasing vulnerability to inundation. Hydrologically, the basin is hemmed in by the to the east, the to the southeast via diversion channels, the Natomas Cross Canal to the south, and the Natomas East Main Drain Canal to the west, with internal drainage reliant on a network of pumps and channels to manage . These features stem from 19th-century reclamation efforts that converted seasonal wetlands into , but the enclosed system's dependence on perimeter levees for containment limits natural outflow during high river stages. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has identified the basin's as prone to rapid filling from upstream runoff, with limited storage capacity amplifying risks from peak flows in the contributing rivers. Flood risks in Natomas are elevated due to the basin's position below river flood stages and engineering constraints of its 42-mile ring, which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers classifies as a high-hazard zone susceptible to failure modes including through-seepage, underseepage, boil formation, and overtopping. Seismic vulnerabilities arise from proximity to active faults, such as the Foothills Fault System, potentially triggering in saturated deltaic soils during earthquakes of magnitude 6.5 or greater. Historical events underscore these perils: the February 1986 floods produced record-high stages on the , causing levee near-breaches and widespread seepage in Natomas, while the January 1997 storms revealed additional underseepage weaknesses without overtopping but necessitating emergency interventions. These incidents, driven by intense atmospheric rivers rather than isolated climate factors, highlight inherent limitations in design amid rates of up to 1-2 inches annually in untreated areas. Ongoing Corps-led upgrades aim for 200-year protection levels, yet residual annual exceedance probabilities remain above 0.5% due to risks.

Climate

Natomas features a hot-summer , with long, dry summers and short, wet winters dominated by from Pacific storms. Average high temperatures reach 93°F in , the hottest month, while lows average 40°F, reflecting mild winter conditions without extreme cold snaps below freezing on most days. Annual totals approximately 18 inches, with over 70% falling between and , often as rather than due to temperatures rarely dipping below 32°F. Summers exhibit low humidity levels, typically under 40%, contributing to comfortable evenings despite daytime heat, though periodically push temperatures above 100°F for up to 23 days annually, primarily from May to . Winter mornings frequently bring dense , reducing visibility and persisting into midday, a phenomenon tied to the region's flat Central Valley topography and calm winds. Climate data from nearby and downtown stations show negligible microclimatic differences for Natomas, as its low elevation and proximity to the urban core limit variations, though ongoing residential and commercial development since the has introduced slight warming, elevating local nighttime lows by 1-2°F compared to rural outskirts.

History

Pre-20th Century Origins

The Natomas Basin, encompassing the low-lying floodplains north of Sacramento, served as seasonal territory for the (Southern ) and Plains peoples prior to European contact, who exploited its wetlands for hunting waterfowl, gathering acorns, tule roots, and seeds, and fishing in the meandering channels of the and American Rivers. The referred to the area as Natomas, translating to "north place" in their language, reflecting its position relative to higher ground and villages along the rivers. Archaeological evidence indicates human presence in the dating back millennia, with the basin's periodic flooding maintaining a dynamic of marshes and riparian zones that supported these subsistence activities without permanent year-round settlements due to inundation risks. During the Spanish and Mexican eras (late 18th to mid-19th centuries), exploratory expeditions traversed the region, but its swampy character—dominated by tules and seasonal overflows—precluded significant ranchos or missions, unlike upland grants such as nearby Rancho del Paso (confirmed 1833). Mexican land grant records from the 1840s document allocations in Sacramento County totaling over 35,000 acres for ranching, yet the Natomas Basin's alluvial tracts remained largely ungranted public domain or marginal extensions of riverine holdings, utilized sporadically for grazing. The 1848 Gold Rush catalyzed American overland migration, prompting squatters to claim Natomas's fertile silt-loam soils for initial and cultivation, leveraging the nutrient-rich sediments from river deposition to supply camps despite insecure tenure under unresolved Mexican claims. By the early 1850s, rudimentary farms emerged amid the basin's isolation from Sacramento proper, but seasonal flooding—exemplified by the January 1850 deluge that submerged adjacent city streets to six feet—severely constrained viability, with ad hoc levees of piled earth constructed by settlers proving inadequate against recurrent overflows from unchecked river courses. These early hydraulic interventions, lacking coordinated , repeatedly breached, perpetuating the basin's status as underutilized swampland into the late .

Agricultural Era and Mid-20th Century Changes

During the early , Natomas consisted primarily of vast tracts of reclaimed wetlands transformed into productive farmland through extensive drainage and construction efforts led by the , which began operations after its formation in 1909 from mergers of earlier development entities. Reclamation commenced in 1913 with the building of a perimeter system, completed by 1915 at a cost of approximately $2 million, enabling the sale of irrigated lands east of Sacramento suitable for intensive cultivation. These adaptations, including early pumping stations to manage seasonal flooding from the Sacramento and American Rivers, supported large-scale focused on crops such as grains, beans, beets, and , with the fertile soils yielding high productivity once waterlogged areas were drained. To sustain irrigation amid the basin's low elevation and flood-prone hydrology, four mutual water companies, including Natomas Central Mutual Water Company incorporated in 1921, were established around 1920 by the Natomas Company of California to appropriate and distribute water from the Sacramento River. These entities, operating under Reclamation District No. 1000 for drainage infrastructure, significantly boosted agricultural output by providing reliable water supplies, though intensive pumping exacerbated land subsidence risks as organic soils oxidized and compacted, leading to gradual elevation losses in the Natomas Basin similar to those observed in adjacent peat-dependent areas. By the mid-20th century, through the 1950s and into the 1960s, Natomas remained dominated by such farming operations, with technological improvements in drainage and water management enhancing yields of row crops and grains on thousands of acres, while federal surveys later documented subsidence rates in the broader Sacramento Valley tied to these practices. Following , Natomas experienced initial suburban development pressures as Sacramento's urban expansion encroached, yet its population stayed sparse, numbering fewer than 5,000 residents until the , preserving its rural agricultural character amid growing demands like improved roadways and flood controls. This era marked a transitional phase, with economic reliance on farming output—bolstered by the mutual water systems—contrasting emerging land-use debates over conversion to non-agricultural purposes, though large-scale was deferred until later decades.

Late 20th-Century Urbanization and Annexation

The Natomas area underwent significant urbanization in the late , transitioning from predominantly to residential and commercial development amid rising housing demand in the Sacramento . Annexations by the City of Sacramento, including Natomas parcels #1 through #3 between 1961 and 1965 and #4 in 1969, incorporated unincorporated lands into , facilitating infrastructure extension and growth near . South Natomas saw primary residential subdivision development from the 1950s to the 1980s, with 8,412 residents and 2,826 housing units recorded in 1975, reflecting market-driven expansion for affordable suburban living compared to denser central areas. North Natomas remained largely undeveloped until the mid-1980s, when the North Natomas Community Plan was adopted in 1986, promoting master-planned communities designed to accommodate new housing and employment opportunities on relatively inexpensive farmland. These plans attracted middle-class families seeking spacious lots and proximity to urban amenities, with projections under the plan indicating substantial residential build-out by the . Economic anchors, such as the (later renamed Sleep Train Arena), opened on November 8, 1988, boosting retail and entertainment sectors in the basin. A major flood event in February 1986 tested the region's s, bringing Natomas near catastrophe and underscoring the need for enhanced flood control infrastructure amid accelerating . This prompted immediate emergency responses and long-term investments by local agencies, including levee reinforcements, to mitigate risks from the Sacramento and American Rivers while supporting continued development. By the end of the decade, these efforts, combined with and planning, had driven Natomas's beyond initial sparse figures, establishing it as a key growth corridor for Sacramento.

21st-Century Expansion and Infrastructure Projects

The Natomas Levee Improvement Program (NLIP), launched in the early 2000s by the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) and state partners, targeted upgrades to the basin's 42-mile perimeter levee system to achieve 200-year flood protection standards. Phase 3 landside improvements, implemented from 2008 to 2010, included seepage cutoff walls, bank protection, and levee stabilization along key reaches of the East Levee. These federal-assisted efforts addressed vulnerabilities exposed after FEMA's 2006 decertification of the levees, which had triggered a moratorium on new building permits in 2008 amid heightened flood risks. By 2015, completed reinforcements enabled federal authorities to lift the moratorium, resuming issuance of permits for residential and commercial construction after a six-year pause. Post-moratorium expansion has emphasized commercial and industrial investments proximate to Interstate 5, leveraging the area's logistics advantages. The Natomas Logistics Center, with properties offering direct I-5 frontage and high-visibility signage, has supported distribution and warehousing operations. Developments like Natomas Crossing have incorporated retail pads and up to 426,000 square feet of shopping space, enhancing commercial viability in North Natomas. Office investments include a five-building corporate park marketed by Pappas Investments in 2020, targeting business relocations with access to I-80 and I-5 corridors. Building permit activity has sustained this trajectory, with approvals for projects like Natomas Commerce Center flex spaces underscoring demand for industrial and mixed-use facilities. Ongoing infrastructure initiatives address connectivity and risk mitigation. The Truxel Bridge Project, proposed to span the and link South Natomas to via Truxel Road and Sequoia Pacific Boulevard, advanced through planning stages in 2024. Levee work resumed in phases through the 2020s, including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers efforts closing segments like Garden Highway for stabilization. These upgrades have facilitated denser allowances, though elevated flood insurance premiums persist due to residual basin-wide vulnerabilities.

Demographics

Population Growth and Density

The Natomas area, proxied by the Sacramento County (Northwest)--Sacramento City (Northwest/Natomas) Public Use Microdata Area (PUMA), had an estimated population of 120,884 in 2023 per the 1-year estimates. This marked a slight increase of 0.159% from 121,996 residents in 2022. Over the prior decades, the region has seen substantial expansion from a sparse base in the mid-20th century, when combined North and South Natomas populations totaled fewer than 9,000 in 1975 amid predominantly agricultural land use. Population density in the PUMA reached 1,967 persons per across 61.5 s in 2023, consistent with low-to-moderate suburban densities rather than urban cores. This configuration reflects post-annexation residential development emphasizing single-family homes and planned communities, contributing to sprawl patterns in Sacramento's northwest quadrant. In-migration has underpinned recent gains, with California internal flows showing net positive movement to Sacramento County from higher-cost Bay Area locales, including a 70% surge in San Francisco-to-Sacramento County migration in 2020 amid post-2010s housing pressures. County-level projections anticipate sustained 1% annual growth through 2027, potentially amplified in Natomas by initiatives like the Upper Westside Specific Plan, which allocates capacity for 9,356 additional housing units on former farmland.

Racial and Ethnic Composition

The racial and ethnic composition of Natomas reflects a pluralistic population shaped by post-1990s development and regional migration patterns. In the Sacramento County (Northwest)--Sacramento City (Northwest/Natomas) Public Use Microdata Area (PUMA), which covers significant portions of the neighborhood, the 2020 Census reported a distribution of 26.1% (non-Hispanic), 27% or Latino (of any race), 26% Asian (non-Hispanic), 14% or African American (non-Hispanic), and approximately 6.9% comprising two or more races, Native American, Pacific Islander, or other categories. School enrollment data from the Natomas Unified School District, serving the area's families, indicates a similar but slightly more Hispanic-plurality makeup among youth, with 33.2% Hispanic/Latino, 23.6% Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander, 18.5% Black or African American, 12.9% White, 1.0% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 0.5% American Indian/Alaska Native, and 10.3% two or more races as of the 2023-2024 academic year. This mirrors trends while highlighting concentrations in school-age demographics.
Racial/Ethnic GroupPUMA Percentage (2020)School District Percentage (2023-2024)
/Latino27%33.2%
(non-)26.1%12.9%
Asian26%23.6%
/African American14%18.5%
Other/Two or More~6.9%11.8%
Over recent decades, Natomas has experienced relative growth in , Asian, and populations compared to residents, with data showing a 570-person increase in residents in Natomas Creek alone from 2010 to 2020, the largest such gain in Sacramento County. These shifts align with Sacramento's broader patterns of immigration-driven diversification, where foreign-born residents constitute about 19% of the county population, contributing to the area's transition from earlier -majority agricultural demographics to current pluralism.

Socioeconomic and Household Data

The median household income in the Sacramento County (Northwest)--Sacramento City (Northwest/Natomas) Public Use Microdata Area (PUMA), encompassing much of the Natomas district, stood at $97,177 according to the latest available estimates. This exceeds the broader Sacramento city median, which hovers around $70,000–$80,000, signaling relatively stronger economic conditions in this suburban zone driven by professional and service-sector households. However, a rate of 12% affects the area, lower than the national average of 12.5% but comparable to California's 12%, with higher concentrations among renter-occupied units in denser South Natomas developments where stock predominates. Household structures in Natomas reflect family-oriented suburban patterns, with approximately 72% of units classified as family households and an average size of 2.6–2.8 persons, aligning closely with Sacramento's overall average of 2.66. Homeownership rates approximate 55–60%, tempered by escalating property values—median home prices surpassing $500,000 in subareas like Natomas Park—and a mix of single-family homes in North Natomas alongside higher-density rentals in the south, contributing to cost pressures on lower-income families. The area's younger median age of around 36–38 years further underscores growth in units, with about 20% of residents under 15, fostering demand for stable housing amid rising maintenance and mortgage expenses. Labor force participation in the Natomas PUMA approximates 65%, with commuting dominated by private vehicles due to the district's peripheral location relative to major job hubs like and , resulting in mean travel times of 25–30 minutes for most workers and limited public transit uptake below 5%. This vehicle reliance exacerbates household transportation costs, estimated at 15–20% of income for median earners, particularly in sprawling North Natomas where residential expansion outpaces transit infrastructure.

Government and Politics

Administrative Structure

Natomas is predominantly incorporated within the City of Sacramento, with North Natomas falling under City Council District 1 and South Natomas under District 3, as established by the council district boundaries adopted on December 16, 2021. These districts handle municipal services, zoning, and planning for incorporated portions, encompassing approximately 15 square miles in North Natomas bounded by Elkhorn Boulevard, Steelhead Creek, Interstate 80, and the West Drainage Canal. Unincorporated pockets, including areas like the Upper Westside proposed development site, remain under Sacramento County jurisdiction, governed by the County and subject to county planning policies outside the city's Urban Services Boundary. This creates jurisdictional overlaps, particularly in the Natomas Basin, where a 2002 city-county coordinates development and conservation but requires separate approvals for unincorporated land uses. In unincorporated areas, the Natomas Community Planning Advisory Council (CPAC) serves an advisory role, reviewing proposed projects ranging from changes to broad policy applications and providing community input to county planners without veto authority. City-provided services, such as fire and (EMS), are managed through the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District, which operates across both city and county boundaries in Natomas. Budget allocations for these services rely heavily on property taxes collected by Sacramento County, with secured taxes forming the ad-valorem base for funding local operations. Per-capita spending for and EMS response in Sacramento remains below comparable peer cities, at levels benchmarked lower than regional averages as of 2012 analyses, reflecting efficient but constrained resource distribution tied to tax revenues.

Political Dynamics and Representation

Natomas, primarily encompassed within Sacramento City Council District 1, has been represented by Lisa Kaplan since December 13, 2022, following her victory over Alyssa Lozano in the November 8, 2022, general election. Kaplan, a former Natomas Unified School District board member, succeeded , who held the seat from 2010 to 2022 and was known for advancing suburban development in the area. Sacramento City Council elections are officially nonpartisan, though District 1 candidates typically align with moderate positions emphasizing local growth and infrastructure over stringent regulatory constraints. Local election turnout in Sacramento County, which includes Natomas precincts, reached approximately 56% in the general election, with primaries drawing around 39%, reflecting moderate participation favoring candidates supportive of continued expansion. Voters in Natomas have historically prioritized pro-growth platforms, as evidenced by the sustained electoral success of representatives like Ashby, who oversaw significant residential and commercial builds amid the area's late-20th-century urbanization. This pattern underscores a preference for pragmatic development amid California's housing pressures, distinguishing Natomas from more progressive central city districts. Demographic evolution from rural agricultural roots to affluent suburbs has shifted Natomas from pockets of conservative independence—evident in early resistance to urban integration—to a predominantly Democratic-leaning electorate, though retaining suburban toward expansive state-level mandates on and taxation. Key efforts, such as phased incorporations of North Natomas parcels starting in the and accelerating through the 1980s-1990s via city-county joint agreements, expanded the voter base and bolstered representation for growth-accommodating policies, altering district balances to include more family-oriented, development-friendly constituents.

Policy Debates on Development and Regulation

In Natomas, policy debates on development have centered on balancing housing supply needs against stringent and land-use restrictions, particularly amid California's statewide housing shortage. Sacramento County's Upper Westside Specific Plan, proposed for 9,400 homes on farmland, faced significant opposition from the Sacramento City Council, which voted 8-1 in August 2025 to reject it for violating a 2002 urban services boundary agreement that limits sprawl into agricultural areas. Proponents argued the project advances property rights by rezoning underutilized land and includes like four new schools, while critics emphasized preservation of existing urban plans and potential strain on services, highlighting tensions where regulatory boundaries prioritize containment over expansion despite empirical evidence of regional shortages exceeding 100,000 units. Zoning ordinances in Natomas have enforced predominantly single-family residential standards in much of North and South Natomas, contributing to debates over their role in exacerbating supply constraints. Although Sacramento adopted the Missing Middle Housing Ordinance in April 2025 to permit duplexes and smaller multifamily units on single-family lots—effectively reducing exclusive single-family zoning citywide—implementation in Natomas has lagged due to community pushback and site-specific entitlements, with rezoning efforts like a March 2025 proposal to convert 5 acres in South Natomas from office to housing facing protracted reviews. These restrictions, rooted in general plan policies favoring low-density growth, are critiqued as barriers to supply elasticity, as state-mandated reforms like SB 9 have yielded limited uptake locally without streamlined local processes, per analyses showing zoning rigidity correlates with 20-30% lower housing starts in restricted suburbs. The entitlements process for Natomas developments underscores delays from layered approvals, often extending timelines beyond six months for larger projects and deterring builders via uncertainty. Sacramento County's planning commission approved the Upper Westside plan in June 2025, but supervisors postponed a final vote in August due to backlash, exemplifying how public hearings and inter-agency disputes—such as city-county jurisdictional conflicts—impede progress, with average single-family permit times at 6-8 weeks masking complexities for phased communities. Such bottlenecks, requiring variances and environmental reviews under CEQA, are linked to reduced production, as 2024 saw Sacramento permits drop to about 4,200 units amid financing hurdles amplified by regulatory friction. Tax policies, including development impact fees, fund Natomas infrastructure but spark contention over their deterrent effects on affordability. North Natomas imposes fees like the SAFCA Development Impact Fee of 2,100−2,100-5,250 per residential unit for flood control and a transit fee for mobility improvements, with a 2024 city resolution allocating proceeds for public land acquisition tied to growth. While enabling backbone projects like roads and sewers—essential for planned communities—these fees, averaging thousands per unit, are argued to raise entry costs for builders, potentially pricing out starter homes and correlating with empirical outcomes where delayed Natomas projects contribute to metro rents rising 7.7% year-over-year in mid-2025, as supply lags demand in a market with inventory up but still below equilibrium. Market data indicate that jurisdictions with faster entitlements and fee waivers see 15-25% more units built, suggesting Natomas' model, while funding necessary upgrades, inadvertently sustains higher rents by throttling supply responsiveness.

Economy

Key Industries and Employment

The economy of Natomas centers on private-sector activities in , transportation, warehousing, retail trade, and , driven by its strategic location near major highways and . In the Sacramento County Northwest--Sacramento City Northwest/Natomas Public Use Microdata Area (PUMA), which encompasses the district, total employment reached 60,914 in 2023, marking a 1.24% increase from 2022, with key occupations including truck drivers (1,600 positions) and retail cashiers (1,478 positions). These sectors reflect a focus on distribution and consumer-facing roles, supported by the area's industrial parks and proximity to regional supply chains. The expansion since the 2010s has accelerated warehousing and growth, converting former agricultural lands into distribution facilities and bolstering job creation in , transportation, and utilities. North Natomas specifically hosts around 11,000 jobs, with major concentrations in these areas alongside and services. The Sacramento metropolitan area's rate averaged 4.3% in 2023, lower than California's statewide figure of approximately 4.8%, signaling robust private-sector demand. This evolution underscores Natomas's emergence as an , where employment has shifted from pre-1990s to service- and -oriented industries, yielding a of $99,235 in 2023—elevated relative to broader Sacramento County trends. The district's integration with operations further amplifies roles, though precise on-site employment figures remain tied to broader impacts exceeding direct county staffing.

Commercial and Retail Hubs

Natomas Marketplace serves as the principal retail hub in the Natomas area of Sacramento, comprising a power center of approximately 491,000 square feet at the northwest quadrant of Interstate 80 and Truxel Road. Anchored by Supercenter, Home Depot, and , the center also hosts Ross Dress for Less, PetSmart, Staples, and various dining options, drawing regional shoppers with its big-box retail focus. This development supports local economic activity through diverse tenant mix and highway accessibility. Office developments near Interstate 80 in Natomas accommodate and sectors, with business parks benefiting from proximity to major transport corridors. Sacramento's broader market exhibited vacancy rates of 8.9% in the first quarter of , reflecting pre-pandemic tightness that favored suburban areas like Natomas for expansion. These spaces have hosted firms, leveraging the district's growth in employment hubs. The former Sleep Train Arena site, demolished in 2022, underwent redevelopment into Innovation Park, an 183-acre master-planned community incorporating commercial, office, and healthcare components alongside residential elements. Initial infrastructure work commenced in 2025 by Argent Development, aiming to integrate retail and professional spaces to enhance surrounding commerce. This transformation sustains entertainment-derived economic momentum through new mixed-use vitality. The median sale price for homes in Natomas Park, a key subarea of Natomas, reached $640,000 in September 2025, reflecting a 6.6% year-over-year increase driven by sustained buyer and constrained supply. Similarly, median listing prices in the area stood at $582,500, up 3.6% from the prior year, with per-square-foot values at $312. These trends align with broader Sacramento dynamics, where home values have appreciated amid low inventory levels, though Natomas-specific growth outpaces the city average due to its proximity to employment hubs and urban amenities. Rental markets in Natomas exhibit tight conditions, with average rents in South Natomas at $1,816 per month as of 2025, a slight 0.16% rise year-over-year. Citywide vacancy rates for residential properties remain low, contributing to upward pressure on rents despite a from peak pandemic-era levels; multifamily has slowed after a 2024 surge of over 3,000 units, hampered by regulatory hurdles and high land costs. activity has stayed minimal since the post-2008 recovery, with Sacramento-area rates stabilizing as rebuilt and lending standards tightened, avoiding the sharp declines seen in the crisis era when local filings peaked in 2008. Investor participation remains active, particularly in property flips capitalizing on appreciation from prior urban expansions and annexation-driven land value uplifts in Natomas, though recent proposals for large-scale developments on adjacent farmland—such as the 9,300-unit Upper Westside project—signal potential future supply amid ongoing debates over environmental and infrastructural impacts. These patterns underscore market resilience, with speculative gains tempered by regulatory scrutiny on new builds.

Education

K-12 Public Education

The Natomas Unified School District (NUSD) serves as the primary public K-12 education provider for the Natomas area, operating 19 schools with an enrollment of 14,762 students during the 2023-24 school year. These schools encompass elementary, middle, and high levels, including two comprehensive high schools: Inderkum High School and Natomas High School. NUSD emphasizes (STEM) programs across its campuses, with dedicated (adding arts) integration at schools such as Paso Verde School through its framework and hands-on activities in after-school LEAP Academy offerings. District funding relies on California's Local Control Funding Formula, which incorporates property tax revenues limited by Proposition 13 (passed in 1978 to cap annual increases at 1% for reassessment purposes), supplemented by voter-approved general obligation bonds including Measure L, authorizing $172 million in November 2018 for facility improvements benefiting both district and charter schools. Public charter alternatives, such as (including its Natomas Charter Prep academy), enroll approximately 1,863 students and account for roughly 12% of the area's total K-12 public enrollment, offering specialized pathways in areas like college preparation and career technical education.

School Performance and Challenges

In the Natomas Unified School District (NUSD), academic performance metrics from the 2023-24 school year indicate proficiency rates below state averages in core subjects. Approximately 29% of students met or exceeded standards in mathematics, compared to the California statewide average of around 35%, with math proficiency at 26%. English language arts proficiency stood at 44%, reflecting persistent gaps in foundational skills amid high student mobility rates driven by rapid population growth in the area. Despite these shortcomings, the district maintains strong completion metrics, with a 94% average graduation rate and a dropout rate of 1.5%—lower than the state average of approximately 5.5%. Bilingual education programs have shown targeted successes, particularly in supporting English learners through structured immersion and dual-language models, contributing to redesignation rates for fluent English proficiency that align with or exceed expectations in recent cohorts. However, overall cohort data reveals elevated risks for chronic and incomplete credits among subgroups, correlating with math deficiencies and necessitating interventions like extended learning opportunities. These outcomes are influenced by demographic transience, where enrollment fluctuations from development exceed 10% annually, disrupting instructional continuity. Key challenges include acute teacher shortages, exacerbated by over 60 resignations in summer 2025, leading to recruitment difficulties and reliance on underqualified substitutes amid demands for competitive salaries and benefits. Per-pupil expenditures reached $13,001 in recent fiscal years, above national medians but strained by facility needs from enrollment growth outpacing infrastructure; this has prompted bond measures like the $172 million Measure L for modernization, yet criticisms highlight inefficiencies in resource allocation potentially inflated by collective bargaining agreements prioritizing compensation over outcomes. Overcrowding in portable classrooms and multi-grade setups persists at several sites, correlating with lower engagement metrics despite state-mandated class size reductions.

Post-Secondary Options and Attainment Levels

The Natomas Center provides local access to community college-level courses, including those for university transfer, foundational skills development, and high-demand career technical education in fields such as business, health sciences, and . , situated approximately 10 miles southeast of central Natomas, offers bachelor's and graduate programs across disciplines like , and , serving as a primary four-year option for residents. Natomas Unified School District's Adult Education program delivers vocational and skill-enhancement courses aimed at career advancement, including high school completion equivalents and preparation for trades or further postsecondary study, addressing gaps in areas like office skills and support integrated with readiness. While direct vocational partnerships with focus more on construction agreements for expansion projects rather than ongoing resident training programs, nearby aviation-related instruction is available through facilities at . Educational attainment data from the indicate variability within Natomas subareas: in Natomas Park, 30.2% of residents aged 25 and older hold a or higher, with 7.6% possessing an ; in South Natomas, these rates are 22% and 8.1%, respectively. These figures reflect proximity to accessible community colleges contributing to associate-level gains, though bachelor's and advanced degree attainment has shown limited growth amid commuting patterns to regional universities like UC Davis, approximately 20 miles west.

Infrastructure and Transportation

Road Networks and Major Highways

Interstate 5 (I-5) forms the backbone of Natomas' north-south road connectivity, running parallel to the western boundary of the neighborhood and facilitating commutes to and beyond. Interstate 80 (I-80) crosses east-west through northern Natomas, with its interchange at I-5 serving as a critical junction for traffic between West Sacramento, the vicinity, and points east toward Roseville. These highways accommodate heavy regional freight and commuter flows, with ongoing improvements such as interchange enhancements at Northgate Boulevard and Del Paso Road addressing capacity constraints from suburban expansion. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data from Caltrans highlights the intensity of use on these routes, with I-5 sections in the Sacramento area, including Natomas approaches, supporting tens of thousands of vehicles daily amid bottlenecks at key splits and merges. The I-80 corridor experiences similar demands, exacerbated by the split into business and mainline routes near Natomas, leading to frequent delays during peak periods. Arterial roads like El Camino Avenue complement the highways by distributing local , with recent upgrades including new signals, pedestrian crossings, and roadway rehabilitation to handle suburban volumes from residential and commercial growth. Congestion on I-5 and I-80 in the Natomas area peaks during weekday commutes, with Caltrans mobility reports documenting delays tied to high vehicle throughput and weaving maneuvers at interchanges. High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on these highways, operational through Friday from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m., provide by reserving capacity for carpools and reducing overall lane density during rush hours. U.S. Census data underscores private vehicle reliance, with approximately 81% of Sacramento County workers driving alone and an additional 7% carpooling, reflecting Natomas' car-dependent suburban character where over 88% of commutes occur via personal vehicles.

Public Transit and Airports

Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) provides bus service to Natomas, including low-frequency routes such as 11 (Natomas to Land Park) and 13 (Natomas to Arden), operating primarily during peak hours with headways of 30-60 minutes. Route 142 offers direct airport access from , running every 60 minutes from early morning to late evening. does not currently extend into Natomas, though the proposed Green Line project aims to add approximately 13 miles of track connecting northward through the River District, North Natomas, and , with planning dating back to at least 2021 but construction pending funding and approvals. SacRT's microtransit service, SmaRT Ride, previously operated in Natomas zones but was discontinued on January 1, 2025, due to high operational costs exceeding ridership benefits. Sacramento International Airport (SMF), situated within Natomas, functions as a key economic hub, facilitating cargo, employment in aviation-related sectors, and regional connectivity. In 2024, SMF recorded a record 13,634,838 passengers, surpassing pre-COVID levels and reflecting post-pandemic recovery with over 200 daily peak flights to more than 50 destinations. The airport's two runways and Terminal B expansion support capacity for up to 16 million annual passengers by the late 2020s, though current bus linkages remain infrequent and car-dependent access dominates. Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in Natomas includes the Natomas Westside Path, a multi-use linking North Natomas communities to South Natomas and the Bike , promoting recreational and commuter access amid suburban layout. County-wide efforts, such as the Sacramento County Active Transportation Plan, propose additional shared-use paths and buffered bike lanes in Natomas corridors, with projects like signalized crossings at key intersections enhancing safety. However, sprawling development patterns limit practical usage, as distances between residential, commercial, and employment nodes favor personal vehicles over non-motorized trips.

Utilities and Flood Management Systems

Electricity service in Natomas is provided by the (SMUD), a community-owned utility serving approximately 900 square miles, including most of Sacramento County where Natomas is located. SMUD's residential rates are among the lowest in and significantly lower—on average more than 50% below—those of neighboring investor-owned utilities like PG&E. Water, wastewater, and stormwater services are managed by the City of Sacramento's Department of Utilities for incorporated areas of Natomas, with Sacramento County Water Agency handling aspects in unincorporated portions. New residential developments in Natomas commonly incorporate solar photovoltaic systems, driven by California's 2020 building code mandate requiring solar on most new single-family homes. Examples include communities like in Sacramento, where solar is standard on every home, with options for purchase or lease. Flood management relies on a 42-mile system encircling the Natomas Basin, operated and maintained by Reclamation District 1000 (RD 1000) to protect against and Natomas East Main Canal overflows. The Natomas Levee Improvement Program (NLIP), initiated in the early 2000s following federal and state assessments of vulnerabilities, includes landside setback levees, seepage barriers, and reinforcement to achieve at least 200-year flood protection levels across the perimeter. By 2012, approximately 18 miles had been upgraded, with ongoing phases addressing the remaining segments through widening, cutoff walls, and vegetation management. Much of Natomas lies within FEMA-designated Special Flood Hazard Areas (Zones A and AE), necessitating flood insurance through the (NFIP) for mortgaged properties. The City of Sacramento, encompassing key Natomas areas, reports over $11 billion in NFIP coverage with thousands of historical claims, highlighting ongoing exposure despite levee enhancements. Annual premiums in Natomas averaged around $470 as of 2016, with rates subject to increases under NFIP reforms.

Environment and Sustainability

Natural Habitats and Conservation Efforts

Natomas encompasses remnant wetlands and seasonal marshes, particularly within the Natomas Basin, which historically formed part of the floodplain. These habitats include managed wetlands that support perennial and seasonal vegetation beneficial for waterfowl and other wetland-dependent species. Riparian zones along the provide corridors for native riparian vegetation, hosting migratory birds along the , including species such as sandhill cranes and various shorebirds during seasonal migrations. Agricultural remnants, including ricelands, function as surrogate habitats for foraging and nesting birds, sustaining over 225 avian species in the broader context. The Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan (NBHCP), finalized in April 2003, establishes a framework for conserving habitats amid urban expansion and agricultural persistence across approximately 53,000 acres of the basin. Administered by the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the plan mandates mitigation through wetland creation and habitat enhancement to offset development impacts on 22 covered plant and animal species, such as the federally threatened giant gartersnake (Thamnophis gigas) and the state-threatened (Buteo swainsoni). Since inception, the Conservancy has acquired over 5,100 acres of mitigation properties for preservation and restoration, focusing on assembling contiguous habitat blocks. Habitat restoration efforts under the NBHCP include water management for marsh vegetation propagation and the establishment of new wetlands equivalent to disturbed areas, balancing urban edges with agricultural buffers. The Sacramento Audubon Society collaborates in advocacy for open space protection, emphasizing farmland's role in and opposing conversions that fragment habitats. Annual biological effectiveness monitoring surveys, conducted since the plan's implementation, track vegetation cover, , and species occupancy to evaluate conservation outcomes. Urban development within Natomas has converted wetlands and farmlands, leading to and documented declines in richness; studies on similar anthropogenic impacts report average reductions of 48% in affected areas post-development. Giant gartersnake surveys in adjacent basins, such as the , reveal persistent presence in remnant habitats but heightened vulnerability from habitat loss and drought, underscoring the need for ongoing restoration. These metrics inform under the NBHCP to counteract development-driven pressures.

Environmental Risks and Mitigation

Natomas faces air quality challenges primarily from vehicular traffic along major corridors like and local emissions, resulting in occasional (AQI) values exceeding 100, particularly for during summer months. Monitoring data from Sacramento County stations, including those near South Natomas, show episodic unhealthy levels for sensitive populations, with PM2.5 concentrations contributing to regional non-attainment status under federal standards. Groundwater contamination persists as a legacy of pre-urban agricultural activities in the , where pesticides from rice farming, such as bentazon, have been detected in shallow wells at concentrations posing potential health risks. Regional assessments indicate that herbicides and degradates from historical applications migrate into aquifers, affecting municipal supplies and necessitating treatment for volatile organic compounds in Natomas-area production wells. Land subsidence, driven by groundwater extraction and , occurs at rates of approximately 1-2 cm per year in Sacramento levee systems adjacent to Natomas, as measured via GPS and InSAR by the USGS, which exacerbates stresses on flood control infrastructure and reduces effectiveness over time. Mitigation efforts incorporate the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), enforced locally in Sacramento for new developments in Natomas, mandating reduced water use, energy-efficient designs, and stormwater management to minimize pollution runoff and subsidence-related vulnerabilities. These standards require, for instance, 20% less indoor water usage than baseline models in residential projects. Compliance has supported sustainable retrofits, though ongoing monitoring by agencies like the Sacramento Groundwater Authority addresses persistent contaminants through well replacement programs.

Urban Development Impacts

Urban development in Natomas has transformed large expanses of former agricultural fields and seasonal wetlands into residential, commercial, and industrial zones, substantially increasing coverage and altering local . This paving reduces , channeling more precipitation directly into stormwater systems and elevating peak runoff flows, as observed in broader Basin studies where urban landscapes produce rapid rises compared to pervious rural areas. In Natomas specifically, post-1990s growth under community plans has amplified these effects, with new subdivisions incorporating detention basins and low-impact design to capture runoff onsite, yet legacy impervious areas from earlier phases continue to overburden downstream channels during storms. The conversion has intensified the urban heat island effect, with Sacramento metropolitan areas, including Natomas, recording summer temperature differentials of up to 9°F higher than surrounding rural zones due to heat retention in and asphalt. Natomas' grid of subdivisions and strip commercial zones contributes to this localized warming, exacerbating energy demands for cooling and straining ecosystems adapted to cooler, vegetated conditions. Ecologically, these land use shifts have resulted in net and loss of riparian and functions, trading for economic expansion through housing and employment growth. However, per-capita carbon analyses indicate that Natomas' relatively compact suburban density—featuring mixed-use nodes—yields lower emissions from transport and residential energy than equivalent sprawl elsewhere, potentially mitigating some impacts despite upfront costs. This density advantage stems from reduced vehicle miles traveled per resident, though overall basin-wide development still diminishes natural capacity.

Parks, Recreation, and Community

Major Parks and Green Spaces

North Natomas Regional Park covers approximately 212 acres and serves as a central green space in the neighborhood, featuring multi-use sports fields, extensive walking and biking trails, a lake for aesthetic and recreational purposes, playgrounds, picnic areas, and dog parks. Approximately 47 acres of the park have been developed with amenities including baseball, softball, and little league fields, as well as youth sports facilities. The park's design supports passive and active recreation, with ongoing plans for additional features like botanical gardens on undeveloped portions. Sutter's Landing Regional Park, spanning 26 acres along the , provides key river access points and integrates with the for trail connectivity. Amenities include paved walking trails, bike paths, and open green areas suitable for informal gatherings, though much of the site originated from remediated landfill conversion. Its location facilitates wildlife viewing and historical interpretation tied to John Sutter's 1839 landing site. Development plans for Natomas allocate open space through community plans requiring contributions via impact fees from new construction, ensuring parks like these are funded by growth rather than general taxes. maintenance efforts for regional parks, including Natomas facilities, address deferred needs estimated at $128 million citywide as of , prioritizing high-use areas during peak seasons.

Sports and Leisure Facilities

The North Natomas Aquatics Complex, opened in 2013, serves as a primary venue for aquatic sports and recreation, featuring a 50-meter Olympic-sized pool for lap swimming and competitive events, a 25-yard recreational pool with water slides, and an activity pool for family use. Connected to an 8,000-square-foot community center, it hosts fitness classes, swim lessons, and youth aquatic programs managed by the City of Sacramento's Parks and Recreation Department. South Natomas features the South Natomas Sport & Event Arena, a multi-purpose indoor facility accommodating , , and other court-based sports, alongside event spaces for recreational leagues and tournaments. Complementing this, the South Natomas Community Center provides gymnasiums for indoor activities such as and fitness training, supporting programs for all age groups through city-sponsored enrichment classes. Youth athletic leagues thrive in Natomas, with organizations like the Natomas Youth Soccer League offering recreational and competitive programs for ages U6 to U19, utilizing fields at North Natomas Community Park and other local sites. Natomas Youth Baseball, established in 1959, operates seasonal leagues emphasizing skill development and on diamond fields maintained by the league and city parks. Similarly, North Natomas Little League fields teams for and , drawing participants from the area's schools and neighborhoods for spring and summer play. Golf enthusiasts access public courses near Natomas, including Teal Bend Golf Club in adjacent West Sacramento, an 18-hole layout on 250 acres with wetlands-integrated fairways opened in 1992. Haggin Oaks Golf Complex, approximately five miles southeast, offers two 18-hole championship courses and a driving range, hosting junior clinics and amateur tournaments since its expansion in the 1970s. The demolition of Sleep Train Arena in 2021, formerly home to the Sacramento Kings from 1988 to 2016, left a gap in large-scale sports venues, with the 183-acre site repurposed for an innovation park including commercial, residential, and medical developments rather than athletic facilities. Private options like The Club at Natomas Park provide members with tennis courts, fitness centers, and pools for leisure activities, reflecting amenities geared toward suburban middle-class residents.

Cultural and Social Activities

Natomas features community-driven events that emphasize local gatherings and , including the District 1 Autumn and Trunk-or-Treat at North Natomas Regional , scheduled annually in to engage families through seasonal activities. Similarly, Dia de los Muertos celebrations occur in the area, reflecting traditions with communal observances. The Global Family at Natomas , held on September 20, 2025, from 4:00 to 7:00 PM, highlights ethnic diversity through shared cultural performances and food, drawing on the neighborhood's multicultural resident base. Homeowners associations (HOAs) in North Natomas play a key role in social organization by supporting programs, with groups like the of North Natomas promoting resident vigilance to foster safer environments. For instance, the HOA in installed seven license plate readers at main entrances in February 2021 to monitor and reduce crime, contributing to community-led efforts. Other Natomas HOAs, including , have adopted similar technologies, with at least seven associations deploying readers by 2023 to address issues like theft. Faith-based groups contribute to social activities, such as Tarbiya Institute's Cultural Fall Festival on October 31, 2025, from 7:00 to 9:00 PM at its Natomas location, which brings together participants for heritage-themed events. Adventure Christian Church of North Natomas organizes regular gatherings aimed at building community ties through faith-based programs. Ethnic community organizations, like the Natomas Group, host festivals such as Bathukamma and Dussehra celebrations, as seen in their 17th anniversary event on September 28, 2025, open to all for cultural immersion. Civic bodies including the Rotary Club of Natomas hold weekly Friday morning meetings starting at 7:15 AM for local business representatives, facilitating networking and volunteer coordination. The North Natomas Community Center serves as a hub for enrichment classes and event rentals, supporting ongoing social interactions among residents. These activities underscore suburban patterns of self-organized cohesion, with HOAs and groups addressing local needs through proactive measures rather than relying on external mandates.

Controversies and Criticisms

Flooding History and Preparedness Failures

Natomas Basin, a low-lying area northwest of , has long been susceptible to flooding from the Sacramento and American Rivers due to its enclosure by aging levees constructed primarily in the 19th and early 20th centuries, often on unstable peat soils prone to seepage and erosion. The , California's most severe recorded deluge, submerged vast portions of the , transforming the basin into an inland sea and prompting initial levee-raising efforts that proved insufficient for future events. The 1955 flood further inundated areas adjacent to and north of Natomas, overwhelming early flood control infrastructure and highlighting the basin's topographic vulnerability as a former . Subsequent crises in 1986 and 1997 exposed critical levee weaknesses, including seepage under high river stages that nearly caused breaches. In February 1986, a series of record storms pushed Sacramento River flows to extremes, bringing Natomas "to the brink of flooding" and necessitating emergency sandbagging and flood-fighting measures to avert disaster, though the event caused widespread regional inundation and underscored the inadequacy of existing protections. The 1997 New Year's floods, driven by atmospheric rivers and rapid snowmelt, generated unprecedented inflows, threatening Natomas levees and contributing to over 120,000 evacuations across the Central Valley, with Sacramento-area damages exceeding hundreds of millions amid near-failures that spared the basin from direct breaching only through intensive interventions. These events resulted in total California flood damages nearing $2 billion, amplifying calls for systemic upgrades. Pre-2000s preparedness failures stemmed from chronic underinvestment in modernization, local regulatory complacency that permitted extensive residential and commercial buildout in the high-risk zone despite known seepage vulnerabilities certified as adequate by federal standards in the , and delays in securing federal authorization and funding for comprehensive reinforcements following repeated near-misses. Engineering assessments post-1986 revealed foundational flaws, such as erodible soils, yet development proceeded, exacerbating potential exposure; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reports later deemed many urban s, including those ringed around Natomas, substandard and at risk of failure even in moderate events without overtopping. Contemporary measures include early warning via county alert systems and flood modeling by Reclamation 1000 to forecast breaches, alongside pumping stations for interior drainage, but hydraulic simulations indicate that a 1-in-200-year event could still inundate the basin with up to 20 feet of water and $10-20 billion in losses if underseepage or failures occur before full upgrades are certified. Ongoing Natomas Improvement Program phases aim for 200-year protection standards, yet historical patterns of delayed response persist as a cautionary baseline.

Urban Growth Conflicts and Upper Westside Project

The Upper Westside Specific Plan proposes developing 2,066 acres of farmland in Sacramento County's Natomas area, along Garden Highway between Interstates 5 and 80, into a master-planned community with approximately 9,356 housing units, 10 parks, three elementary schools, and supporting infrastructure such as trails and a greenbelt. The Sacramento County Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the plan on June 23, 2025, finding it compliant with performance-based development standards that include a mix of housing densities and affordable units. However, the Sacramento City Council voted 8-1 against the project on August 13, 2025, arguing it violates a 2002 city-county agreement limiting urban expansion to preserve and habitats, while also lacking a agreement from the city. The county postponed a final vote scheduled for August 20, 2025, amid community protests exceeding 100 participants opposing the rezoning. Proponents emphasize the project's role in alleviating Sacramento's housing shortage, where median home values reached $474,400 in 2025 amid persistent supply constraints that have driven affordability challenges, with monthly mortgage payments for mid-tier homes rising nearly $2,700 statewide since 2020 due to limited inventory. Advocates, including county planners and developers, argue that the 25,000-resident community—located 3.5 miles from downtown and major employment hubs—would foster through jobs, new schools, and proximity to job centers, while incorporating mitigations like preserved farmland buffers and protections to balance development rights of private landowners with environmental goals. This perspective aligns with successful conversions of farmland into suburbs, such as in Orange County, where post-World War II expansions created stable communities without widespread ecological collapse, provided levees and infrastructure are maintained. Opponents, including city officials and environmental groups, highlight risks of expanding into the Natomas Basin's flood-prone zone, where added could stress levees and elevate overflow dangers from the , despite prior levee upgrades reducing overall basin risk. Additional concerns encompass intensified , air pollution from commutes, intrusion into protected habitats, and strain on services without resolved water entitlements, potentially prioritizing sprawl over preservation of prime agricultural land. Critics contend these factors undermine long-term , though project documents outline engineering solutions like systems and modeling to address them, echoing debates where developer entitlements clash with preservationist aims but comparable efforts elsewhere have proceeded with adaptive measures.

Governance and Regulatory Disputes

In Natomas, inter-jurisdictional tensions between the City of Sacramento and Sacramento County have centered on policies and management, exemplified by conflicts over development in unincorporated areas. A 2002 agreement between the city and county aimed to delineate an urban services boundary to curb uncoordinated expansion, but disputes persist when county-led projects encroach on this framework. In May 2025, the city approved a 472-acre project amid environmental and community concerns, yet broader clashes escalated with the city's formal opposition to county initiatives perceived as violating jurisdictional boundaries. These frictions manifested in 2025 postponements of key approvals, such as Sacramento County's August deferral of a major housing plan vote following council opposition and resident backlash, which delayed proceedings and underscored governance coordination failures. Legal challenges have further complicated annexations, including a June 2025 lawsuit by the and Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS) against a sphere-of-influence enabling the Airport South industrial project, alleging inadequate environmental review and procedural overreach. Such delays highlight critiques of fragmented , where -county disagreements impede timely decision-making on . Regulatory disputes in Natomas reflect wider California patterns under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), where litigation often stalls builds by requiring extensive environmental impact assessments prone to challenges from advocacy groups. Empirical analyses link CEQA processes to development delays averaging 2-5 years and cost escalations, with one study estimating litigation contributes to housing shortages by inflating expenses through prolonged reviews and mitigation demands. In Natomas, these burdens compound jurisdictional hurdles, as protracted permitting correlates with higher project costs—potentially 20-25% in comparable California contexts—favoring empirical evidence for streamlined regulations to align supply with demand and mitigate affordability pressures, though defenders argue CEQA primarily enforces necessary safeguards rather than driving core economic constraints.

Notable People

Current Residents

Heather Fargo, who served as Mayor of Sacramento from 2001 to 2009, resides in South Natomas and has advocated for controlled urban growth in the area. As president of the Environmental Council of Sacramento since at least 2025, she has opposed expansive developments like the Upper Westside Project, citing risks to farmland, habitat, and flood protection established under prior Natomas Basin plans she helped implement during her tenure. Her long-term residency in the neighborhood, spanning decades, underscores her contributions to balancing residential expansion with environmental safeguards. Lisa Kaplan, a member of the Sacramento City Council representing District 1—which encompasses much of Natomas—has deep ties to the community through her prior service on the Natomas Unified School District Board of Trustees from 2008 to 2020. Elected to the council in 2020, she focuses on public safety, education, and infrastructure improvements benefiting Natomas residents, including enhancements to local parks and traffic management near the . Her work supports the area's evolution as a hub for families and professionals amid ongoing .

Former Residents

Marlon Moore, born September 3, 1987, in Sacramento, attended Natomas High School, where he played football before committing to Fresno State University. After college, Moore signed with the as an undrafted in 2010, appearing in 25 games for the team through 2012 with 17 receptions for 209 yards and one touchdown. He later played for the in 2013, recording three receptions for 18 yards in four games, and briefly appeared in one game for the in 2015, concluding his NFL career after 28 total games. Moore's tenure in Natomas during his high school years aligned with the neighborhood's growing emphasis on youth sports amid the Sacramento Kings' presence at nearby from 1988 to 2016, though specific influences on his development remain undocumented in primary records. Early agricultural developers associated with the Natomas area included figures like Amos Catlin, who as president of the Natoma Water Mining Company facilitated the 1857 acquisition of approximately 9,000 acres from the Joseph L. Folsom estate, laying groundwork for reclamation efforts that transformed flood-prone basin lands into productive farmland. Subsequent incorporation of the Natomas Development Company in 1906 by R. G. Hanford further advanced irrigation and land sales east of Sacramento, enabling expansion before widespread in the late . These pioneers resided primarily in Sacramento proper or but directed operations from Natomas holdings, contributing to the area's shift from marshy ranchos to a viable economic basin without establishing long-term personal residency there.

References

  1. http://censusreporter.org/profiles/79500US0606705-sacramento-county-northwest-sacramento-city-northwestnatomas-puma-ca/
  2. https://datausa.io/profile/geo/sacramento-county-northwest-sacramento-city-northwestnatomas-puma-ca
  3. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/adopted-2040-general-plan/2040%2520GP_3-11f_North%2520Natomas_Adopted.pdf
  4. https://www.ecosacramento.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/2019/03/2019-ECOS-Natomas-Fact-Sheet.pdf
  5. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article311859731.html
  6. https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/sacramento/natomas-farmland-sacramento-county-development/103-55a34803-5984-4c3d-b4b0-db5b5d8da32f
  7. https://www.homes.com/local-guide/sacramento-ca/natomas-creek-neighborhood/
  8. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Community-Plans/South-Natomas.pdf
  9. https://www.sacramentomap.com/neighborhoods/natomas/
  10. https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/civil_works/CommonFeatures/appendix_e.pdf
  11. https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/bsp/docs/arbs/ARBS-Study.pdf
  12. https://www.safca.org/projects/natomas-basin/
  13. https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/natomas/
  14. https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Stories/Article/2154058/natomas-levee-improvements-hit-high-gear/
  15. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/14095
  16. https://weatherspark.com/y/1157/Average-Weather-in-Sacramento-California-United-States-Year-Round
  17. https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/sacramento/california/united-states/usca0967
  18. https://www.currentresults.com/Weather/California/Places/sacramento-temperatures-by-month-average.php
  19. https://www.snahc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Sacramento-Land-Acknowledgment.pdf
  20. https://www.sachistorymuseum.org/about/about-us/
  21. https://sactoday.6amcity.com/natomas-boston-sacramento-ca
  22. https://nwculaw.edu/school-information/nisenan-people-tribute
  23. https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/collections/ussg
  24. https://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/collections/ussg/grant-list
  25. https://www.abc10.com/article/news/history/when-sacramento-became-levee-city/103-48d5063b-ad48-4b32-9709-c7ca4fe8ea79
  26. https://cvfpb.ca.gov/news/when-sacramento-became-levee-city-marking-the-170-year-anniversary-of-the-flood-that-started-it-all/
  27. https://fishbio.com/levee-history/
  28. http://www.pacificng.com/template.php?page=/roads/ca/natomas/index.htm
  29. https://www.facebook.com/ctrsactohistory/posts/in-1913-natomas-consolidated-opened-for-sale-the-first-unit-of-its-irrigated-lan/680317517457212/
  30. https://waterresources.saccounty.gov/stormready/Documents/LHMP%25202021/Annex%2520L%2520Reclamation%2520District%25201000.pdf
  31. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SDU19131016.2.172
  32. https://natomasbasin.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/tnbcbroch-5megs.pdf
  33. https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart///weeg/docs/2016/NatomasMutualWaterCompany.pdf
  34. https://saclafco.saccounty.gov/MunicipalServiceReviews/Documents/Other%2520Districts/Reclamation%2520District%2520No.%25201000.pdf
  35. https://www.rd1000.org/local
  36. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/land-subsidence-in-california/science/subsidence-sacramento-san-joaquin-delta
  37. https://water.ca.gov/News/News-Releases/2019/January/Survey-Shows-Areas-of-Land-Subsidence
  38. https://www.southnatomas.info/history
  39. https://data.cityofsacramento.org/datasets/annexations
  40. https://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-353
  41. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/General-Plan/1988-General-Plan/1988-GP-Section_1.pdf
  42. https://prowrestling.fandom.com/wiki/Sleep_Train_Arena
  43. https://www.safca.org/about/history/
  44. https://www.rd1000.org/rd1000-history
  45. https://www.safca.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-EIS-EIR-Phase-4b_CEQA_Local_Funding_Mechanisms_NLIP_Phase4b_EIS.EIR_2010_10_FEIS.FEIR-compressed_1.pdf
  46. https://cvfpb.ca.gov/docs/meetings/2012/122112Item8a_18159_3_2_FEIR.pdf
  47. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article5529417.html
  48. https://www.crexi.com/properties/1279481/california-natomas-logistics-center
  49. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact-Reports/natomas-crossing-%28p04-264%29/Natomas-Crossing-DEIR-Appendices-Volume-I.pdf
  50. https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2020/02/19/pappas-plans-five-building-office-development-in.html
  51. https://www.colliers.com/en/properties/natomas-commerce-center/usa-1164-1174-national-drive/usa1066139
  52. https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/sacramento/new-bridge-over-american-river-next-steps/103-99a4fc1f-d744-47e8-a74a-1fe80204dc02
  53. https://www.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/News-Release-Article-View/Article/2161629/corps-to-resume-natomas-levee-work-close-garden-highway-on-april-23/
  54. https://www.rd1000.org/natomas-levee-project
  55. https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/increased-migration-bay-area-to-sacramento-18262928.php
  56. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportation-planning/documents/new-state-planning/transportation-economics/socioeconomic-forecasts/2022/sacramento-2022-a11y.pdf
  57. https://planning.saccounty.net/PlansandProjectsIn-Progress/Pages/UpperWestsideSpecificPlan.aspx
  58. https://ballotpedia.org/Natomas_Unified_School_District%2C_California
  59. https://www.sacbee.com/news/equity-lab/article258982813.html
  60. https://dornsife.usc.edu/eri/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2023/01/SACRAMENTO_web.pdf
  61. https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article276501901.html
  62. https://datausa.io/profile/geo/sacramento-county-west-sacramento-city-centraldowntown-midtown-puma-ca
  63. https://www.point2homes.com/US/Neighborhood/CA/Sacramento/Natomas-Park-Demographics.html
  64. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Long-Range/Housing-Element/H1_Sac-HE_Amended_Final_CommProfile_Dec142021.pdf
  65. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOWNRATEACS006067
  66. https://www.point2homes.com/US/Neighborhood/CA/Sacramento/South-Natomas-Demographics.html
  67. https://labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/file/commute-maps/sacramento2013.pdf
  68. https://www.behealthysacramento.org/indicators/index/view?indicatorId=529&localeId=154385&localeTypeId=39&periodId=6201
  69. https://data.cityofsacramento.org/datasets/28bd505c8e674a49ba5f782d0d806033_0/about
  70. https://www.capradio.org/articles/2022/10/10/sacramento-city-council-district-1-whos-running-in-the-november-2022-election/
  71. https://www.facebook.com/CouncilmemberKarinaTalamantes/
  72. https://planning.saccounty.net/PlansandProjectsIn-Progress/Pages/NatomasSPAMasterPlanBriefHistory.aspx
  73. https://planning.saccounty.gov/PlansandProjectsIn-Progress/Documents/City-CountyMOU.pdf
  74. https://planning.saccounty.net/CPAC/Pages/default.aspx
  75. https://agendanet.saccounty.gov/NatomasCPAC/Meetings/Search?dropid=7&mtids=149
  76. https://finance.saccounty.net/Tax/Pages/Secured.aspx
  77. https://sacramento.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=22&clip_id=2978&meta_id=383591
  78. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article269038317.html
  79. https://ballotpedia.org/Lisa_Kaplan
  80. https://results.saccounty.gov/resultsSW.aspx?type=CIT&map=MPRC&shape=Nov2022&eid=2040
  81. https://results.saccounty.gov/resultsSW.aspx?type=CIT&map=MPRC&shape=Jun2022&eid=2039
  82. https://www.capradio.org/articles/2022/05/19/sacramento-city-council-district-1-whos-running-in-the-june-7-primary-election/
  83. https://bestneighborhood.org/conservative-vs-liberal-map-natomas-park-sacramento-ca/
  84. https://www.capradio.org/articles/2025/08/20/sacramento-county-postpones-vote-on-natomas-housing-project-over-community-backlash/
  85. https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article311862726.html
  86. https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/upper-westside-development-natomas-planning-commission/
  87. https://www.planning.org/blog/9309314/new-ordinance-aims-to-boost-sacramentos-housing-supply/
  88. https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2025/03/30/south-natomas-land-rezone-office-housing.html
  89. https://www.planning.org/planning/2025/mar/how-sacramento-won-major-housing-gains-with-zoning-reform/
  90. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK1Bw9tLCfU
  91. https://www.domondonre.com/permits-housing-production-in-sacramento-what-you-need-to-know-in-2025
  92. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Building/Forms/CDD-0319_Residential-Fee-Estimation-for-Production-Homes-in-Natomas-Basin-New-Construction.pdf
  93. https://www.records.cityofsacramento.org/ViewDoc.aspx?ID=s6tFBnt4W%2BLPf14ZAl9qUr3WzpeaA9ug
  94. https://www.facebook.com/sacramentobee/posts/complex-housing-issues-in-the-sacramento-area-reveal-gaps-as-rent-hikes-reach-77/1246637670841050/
  95. https://blog.rentalbeast.com/post/sacramentos-q1-2025-market-report
  96. https://assets.cushmanwakefield.com/-/media/cw/marketbeat-pdfs/2023/q4/us-reports/office/sacramento_americas_marketbeat_office_q4-2023.pdf?rev=3d3911fa20c74ce881eabf364d1c987c
  97. https://sacramento.aero/scas/about/reports
  98. https://gallellire.com/property/natomas-marketplace/
  99. https://firstwash.propertycapsule.com/p/commercial-real-estate-listings/Sacramento-CA-95834/natomasmarketplace
  100. https://natomasmarketplace.com/
  101. https://www.tricommercial.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Sacramento-Office-1Q2020.pdf
  102. https://www.connectcre.com/stories/183-acre-innovation-park-to-rise-on-former-sacramento-kings-arena-site/
  103. https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2025/07/16/innovation-park-update-former-arco-arena-natomas.html
  104. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/community-development/planning/major-projects/innovation-park-cnu-hospital.html
  105. https://www.redfin.com/neighborhood/350822/CA/Sacramento/Natomas-Park/housing-market
  106. https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Natomas-Park_Sacramento_CA/overview
  107. https://www.noradarealestate.com/blog/sacramento-real-estate-market/
  108. https://www.rentcafe.com/average-rent-market-trends/us/ca/sacramento/south-natomas/
  109. https://www.mmproperties.com/sacramento-rental-market-update-may-2025/
  110. https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-elements/docs/sacramento_5th_adopted010914.pdf
  111. https://www.ecosacramento.net/2025/08/sacramento-fights-back-and-opposes-the-countys-terrible-natomas-project-august-12-2025/
  112. https://sacramentostandard.com/there-were-14-762-students-enrolled-in-natomas-unified-school-district-in-2023-24-school-year/
  113. https://www.natomasunified.org/
  114. https://pvs.natomasunified.org/programs/steam
  115. https://www.natomasunified.org/departments/educational-services-and-school-leadership/leap-academy/two-rivers-leap
  116. https://www.natomasunified.org/about-us/measure-l
  117. https://ballotpedia.org/Natomas_Unified_School_District%2C_California%2C_Measure_L%2C_Bond_Issue_%28November_2018%29
  118. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/school_detail.asp?Search=1&DistrictID=0602003&ID=060200307250
  119. https://www.ed-data.org/district/sacramento/natomas-unified
  120. https://www.niche.com/k12/d/natomas-unified-school-district-ca/academics/
  121. https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/california/districts/natomas-unified-104693
  122. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/california/natomas-unified-school-district/600036-school-district
  123. https://sacramentostandard.com/natomas-unified-school-district-shows-lower-dropout-rate-than-california-average-in-2023-24-school-year/
  124. https://www.niche.com/k12/d/natomas-unified-school-district-ca/
  125. https://fox40.com/news/local-news/sacramento/natomas-teachers-demand-action-from-school-board-on-staffing-pay/
  126. https://arc.losrios.edu/natomascenter
  127. https://www.csus.edu/
  128. https://www.natomasunified.org/community/natomas-adult-education
  129. https://sacramento.aero/smf/about/news-and-events/sacramento-international-airport-executes-community-workforce-and-training
  130. https://www.aopa.org/destinations/business/40209
  131. https://www.ucdavis.edu/
  132. https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/1989052905
  133. https://www.sellnow916.com/blog/the-busiest-roads-and-highways-in-sacramento-ca/
  134. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/census/traffic-volumes
  135. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/district-3/documents/i80-cmcp/update_final_i80_cmcp_comprehensive_multimodal_corridor_plan_.pdf
  136. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/traffic-operations/documents/mpr/2024/q4/2024-d3-q4-a11y.pdf
  137. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/hov
  138. https://star-transit.org/2025/01/15/sacrt-low-frequency-bus-routes-11-13/
  139. https://star-transit.org/category/sacrt/green-line-to-the-airport/
  140. https://www.sacrt.com/green-line-to-the-airport/
  141. https://www.reddit.com/r/Sacramento/comments/1flfkv1/sacrt_smart_ride_service_to_be_discontinued_112025/
  142. https://ebs.publicnow.com/view/A66494362AAEBED772C5AC1047E72B78D9EC2CA6
  143. https://sacramento.aero/smf/about/news-and-events/sacramento-international-airport-sets-all-time-passenger-record-in-june
  144. https://www.traillink.com/trail/natomas-westside-path/
  145. https://jibe.org/placemaking/connectivity-projects
  146. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/SMUDs-Territory-Map
  147. https://www.smud.org/Rate-Information/Compare-rates
  148. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/utilities.html
  149. https://economic.saccounty.gov/Pages/UtilityProviders.aspx
  150. https://seia.org/news/solar-industry-california-makes-historic-decision-incorporate-solar-all-new-homes/
  151. https://bluemountaincommunities.com/communities/provence/
  152. https://www.rd1000.org/natomas-levees
  153. https://purvesinsurance.com/natomas-flood-insurance-updates/
  154. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/dou/utilities/stormwater/flood-preparedness/documents/CFMP%25202024%2520with%2520Appendix%2520%281%29_Final.pdf
  155. https://eugenecyates.com/flood-insurance/
  156. https://www.sacramentoriver.org/forum/publications/handbook/Ch8_SacRivHand03_webready.pdf
  157. https://www.sacramentoaudubon.org/news/protect-natomas-open-space
  158. https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/plan_documents/thcp/thcp_858.pdf
  159. https://natomasbasin.org/conservation-plans/about-the-natomas-basin-conservancy-plan-nbhcp/
  160. https://www.suttercounty.org/government/county-departments/development-services/planning-services/natomas-basin-habitat-conservation-plan
  161. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact-Reports/natomas-basin-habitat-conservation-plan/NBHCP_EIR-EIS_Vol_2.pdf
  162. https://www.sacramentoaudubon.org/news/protect-natomas-open-space-1
  163. https://natomasbasin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024_07_30_Natomas_Basin_Conservancy_BEM_Report_Public.pdf
  164. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/15/10/1037
  165. https://natomasbasin.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/2017_10_30_Natomas_Basin_Conservancy_Hansen_GGS_Monitoring_Report.pdf
  166. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Resources/Planning/City-of-Sacramento-2003_Natomas-Basin-HCP_Vol_1.pdf
  167. https://www.iqair.com/us/usa/california/sacramento-county
  168. https://sparetheair.com/
  169. https://www.sgah2o.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/pub-contambrochure.pdf
  170. https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/document/2020/Oct/07354626516.pdf
  171. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/high-resolution-measurement-levee-subsidence-related-energy-infrastructure-sacramento
  172. https://www.dgs.ca.gov/-/media/Divisions/BSC/05-Resources/CALGreen/2022-CALGreen-Supplement-Guide-07-01-24---Final.pdf
  173. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact-Reports/Groundwater-Master-Plan/Sac-GWMP-EIR-Draft.pdf
  174. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2007WR005954
  175. https://www.beriverfriendly.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SSQP-HMP-Report_FINAL_w-Figs_w-App_2018.pdf
  176. https://sacstormwater.org/ConstructionandNewDevelopment/NewDevelopment/HMP/ExecutiveSummary.pdf
  177. https://calepa.ca.gov/2015/09/16/urbanheat/
  178. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210013844/downloads/2020Fall_LaRC_SacramentoUrbanDevelopment_TechPaper_FD-final.docx.pdf
  179. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/urban/pdfs/The-True-Cost-of-Sprawl-report.pdf
  180. https://news.berkeley.edu/2014/01/06/suburban-sprawl-cancels-carbon-footprint-savings-of-dense-urban-cores/
  181. https://earthchronicles.org/suburban-sprawl-mapping-the-environmental-destruction-of-suburban-america/
  182. https://www.sherripatterson.net/north-natomas-regional-park
  183. https://dogtrekker.com/directories/north-natomas-regional-park/
  184. https://natomaschamber.org/natomas-area-parks/
  185. https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/sacramentos-north-natomas-eyes-tourism-boost-with-park-overhaul-new-attractions/
  186. https://www.langan.com/portfolio/sutters-landing-park
  187. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/Detail/591
  188. https://sacramento.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=21&event_id=4019&meta_id=630231
  189. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/ypce/parks/maintenance.html
  190. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/ypce/aquatics/pools/north-natomas-aquatics-complex.html
  191. https://www.aquaticdesigngroup.com/north-natomas
  192. https://www.mapquest.com/us/california/south-natomas-sport-event-arena-375985789
  193. https://www.facebook.com/SouthNatomasCC/
  194. https://www.natomasysl.org/
  195. https://www.natomasyouthbaseball.org/
  196. https://www.nnll.org/
  197. https://www.tealbendgolf.com/
  198. https://www.hagginoaks.com/
  199. https://fox40.com/news/local-news/sacramento/sacramento-officials-approve-funding-outline-for-planned-project-at-former-kings-arena-site/
  200. https://www.kcra.com/article/former-sleep-train-arena-natomas-hospital/36744575
  201. https://the-club-at-natomas-park.wheree.com/
  202. https://business.natomaschamber.org/events
  203. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPIcGwFDsVJ/
  204. https://www.facebook.com/groups/NeighborhoodWatchNatomas/
  205. https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/sacramento/natomas-hoa-using-license-plate-readers-cut-down-crime/103-b42b3c9d-4e53-4499-bee1-31caaa4c88e8
  206. https://www.kcra.com/article/sacramento-communities-buy-license-plate-readers-to-stop-crime/42806636
  207. https://sacramento.newsreview.com/2025/03/28/continued-mailbox-break-ins-in-natomas-highlight-a-crime-trend-felt-across-the-region/
  208. https://www.tarbiya.org/events/cultural-fall-festival-2025
  209. https://adventurenatomas.com/
  210. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1008494955938267/posts/24522562134104885/
  211. https://portal.clubrunner.ca/9116
  212. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/ypce/community-centers/north-natomas-center.html
  213. https://cepsym.org/history/LakeSacramento_book.pdf
  214. https://www.kcra.com/article/1986-flood-revisiting-one-of-the-costliest-storms-in-norcal-history-35-years-later/35553920
  215. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1999/0073/report.pdf
  216. https://www.dailynews.com/2006/07/26/corps-sacramento-levees-worse-than-thought/amp/
  217. https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/civil_works/CommonFeatures/final_natomas_pacr_oct_2010.pdf
  218. https://www.rd1000.org/flood-modeling-how-rd1000-prevents-flooding
  219. https://waterresources.saccounty.net/stormready/Pages/Region%27s-Flooding-History.aspx
  220. https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/regulatory/eis/200900480-FEIS-SAFCA_Phase_4a_FEIS_2-19-10_Document.pdf
  221. https://www.onsiteobserver.com/sacramento-city-council-opposes-countys-upper-westside-plan-ahead-of-key-vote/
  222. https://www.capradio.org/articles/2025/08/13/sacramento-city-council-formally-opposes-upper-westside-natomas-development/
  223. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article311719502.html
  224. https://www.zillow.com/home-values/20288/sacramento-ca/
  225. https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/793
  226. https://www.upper-westside.org/news
  227. https://www.malakaisparks.com/garden-groves-real-estate-roots-from-farms-to-suburbs/
  228. https://planning.saccounty.gov/PlansandProjectsIn-Progress/Documents/Upper%2520Westside%2520Specific%2520Plan/Comments/1.%2520Combined%2520DEIR%2520Comments.pdf
  229. https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article311584182.html
  230. https://www.upper-westside.org/
  231. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article306004226.html
  232. https://www.ecosacramento.net/2025/06/sierra-club-ecos-file-suit-opposing-step-toward-airport-south-project-annexation-june-9-2025-the-sacramento-business-journal/
  233. https://www.hklaw.com/en/case-studies/linking-ceqa-to-californias-housing-crisis
  234. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14660466.2019.1609848
  235. https://calmatters.org/explainers/california-housing-costs-explainer/
  236. https://www.dailyjournal.com/articles/379899-the-false-narrative-around-ceqa-and-the-california-housing-crisis
  237. https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/north-natomas-concerns-over-proposed-development/
  238. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DK-ZNDyhy2H/
  239. https://www.ecosacramento.net/2024/01/fighters-return-heather-fargo-continues-her-battle-for-open-space/
  240. https://www.comstocksmag.com/article/fighting-land
  241. https://www.facebook.com/CouncilwomanLisaKaplan/
  242. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/mayor-council/Find-Your-District.html
  243. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/MoorMa02.htm
  244. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/schools/high_schools.cgi?id=93bee41a
  245. https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=705
  246. https://www.pacificng.com/w/index.php?title=Natomas_Consolidated_Company
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.