Hubbry Logo
Nikolai MyaskovskyNikolai MyaskovskyMain
Open search
Nikolai Myaskovsky
Community hub
Nikolai Myaskovsky
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nikolai Myaskovsky
Nikolai Myaskovsky
Nikolai Myaskovsky
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Nikolai Yakovlevich Myaskovsky[1] (Russian: Никола́й Я́ковлевич Мяско́вский; Polish: Mikołaj Miąskowski; 20 April 1881 – 8 August 1950), was a Russian and Soviet composer. He is sometimes referred to[by whom?] as the "Father of the Soviet Symphony". Myaskovsky was awarded the Stalin Prize five times.

Key Information

Early years

[edit]

Myaskovsky was born in Nowogieorgiewsk, near Warsaw, Congress Poland, Russian Empire, the son of an engineer officer in the Russian army. After the death of his mother the family was brought up by his father's sister, Yelikonida Konstantinovna Myaskovskaya, who had been a singer at the Saint Petersburg Opera. The family moved to Saint Petersburg in his teens.

Though he learned piano and violin, he was discouraged from pursuing a musical career, and entered the military. However, a performance of Tchaikovsky's Pathétique Symphony conducted by Arthur Nikisch in 1896 inspired him to become a composer. In 1902 he completed his training as an engineer, like his father. As a young subaltern with a Sappers Battalion in Moscow, he took some private lessons with Reinhold Glière and when he was posted to Saint Petersburg he studied with Ivan Krizhanovsky as preparation for entry into the Saint Petersburg Conservatory, where he enrolled in 1906 and became a student of Anatoly Lyadov and Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov.

A late starter, Myaskovsky was the oldest student in his class but soon became firm friends with the youngest, Sergei Prokofiev, and they remained friends throughout the older man's life.[2] At the Conservatory, they shared a dislike of their professor Anatoly Lyadov, which, since Lyadov disliked the music of Edvard Grieg, led to Myaskovsky's choice of a theme by Grieg for the variations with which he closed his String Quartet No. 3.[3]

Early works

[edit]

Prokofiev and Myaskovsky worked together at the conservatory on at least one work, a lost symphony, parts of which were later scavenged to provide material for the slow movement of Prokofiev's Piano Sonata No. 4. They both later produced works using materials from this period—in Prokofiev's case the Third and Fourth piano sonatas; in Myaskovsky's other works, such as his Tenth String Quartet and what are now the Fifth and Sixth Piano Sonatas, all revisions of works he wrote at this time.

Early influences on Myaskovsky's emerging personal style were Tchaikovsky, strongly echoed in the first of his surviving symphonies (in C minor, Op. 3, 1908/1921), which was his Conservatory graduation piece, and Alexander Scriabin, whose influence comes more to the fore in Myaskovsky's First Piano Sonata in D minor, Op. 6 (1907–10), described by Glenn Gould as "perhaps one of the most remarkable pieces of its time",[4] and his Symphony No. 3 in A minor, Op. 15 of 1914, a turbulent and lugubrious work in two large movements.

Myaskovsky graduated in 1911 and afterwards taught in Saint Petersburg, where he also developed a supplementary career as a penetrating musical critic, writing for the Moscow publication, "Muzyka."[5] He was one of the most intelligent and supportive advocates in Russia for the music of Igor Stravinsky,[6] though the story that Stravinsky dedicated The Rite of Spring to Myaskovsky is untrue.[7]

Called up during World War I, he was wounded and suffered shell-shock on the Austrian front, then worked on the naval fortifications at Tallinn. During this period he produced two diametrically opposed works, his Symphony No. 4 (Op. 17, in E minor) and his Symphony No. 5 (Op. 18, in D major). The next few years saw the violent death of his father, an ex-Tsarist general who was murdered by Red Army soldiers while waiting for a train in the winter of 1918–19,[8] and the death of his aunt, to whom he was closely attached, in the winter of 1919–20. His brother-in-law, the husband of his sister Valentina Yakovlevna, had committed suicide before the War because of financial troubles.[9] Myaskovsky himself served in the Red Army from 1917 to 1921; in the latter year he was appointed to the teaching staff of the Moscow Conservatory and membership of the Composers' Union. Thereafter he lived in Moscow, sharing an apartment with his widowed sister Valentina and her daughter. (He also had a married sister, Vera.)[9]

Middle years

[edit]

In the 1920s and 1930s Myaskovsky was the leading composer in the USSR dedicated to developing basically traditional, sonata-based forms. He wrote no operas—though in 1918 he planned one based on Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novel The Idiot, with a libretto by Pierre Souvtchinsky;[10] but he would eventually write a total of 27 symphonies (plus three sinfoniettas, two concertos, and works in other orchestral genres), 13 string quartets, 9 piano sonatas as well as many miniatures and vocal works. Through his devotion to these forms, and the fact that he always maintained a high standard of craftsmanship, he was sometimes referred to as 'the musical conscience of Moscow'. His continuing commitment to musical modernism was shown by the fact that along with Alexander Mosolov, Gavriil Popov and Nikolai Roslavets, Myaskovsky was one of the leaders of the Association for Contemporary Music. While he remained in close contact with Prokofiev during the latter's years of exile from the USSR, he never followed him there.

Myaskovsky's reaction to the events of 1917–21 inspired his Symphony No. 6 (1921–1923, rev. 1947—this is the version that is almost always played or recorded) his only choral symphony and the longest of his 27 symphonies, sets a brief poem (in Russian though the score allows Latin alternatively—see the American Symphony Orchestra page below on the origins of the poem—the soul looking at the body it has abandoned.) The finale contains quite a few quotes—the Dies Irae theme, as well as French revolutionary tunes.[citation needed]

The years 1921–1933, the first years of his teaching at the Moscow Conservatory, were the years in which he experimented most, producing works such as the Tenth and Thirteenth symphonies, the fourth piano sonata and his first string quartet. Perhaps the best example of this experimental phase is the Thirteenth symphony, which was the only one of his works to be premiered in the United States.

In the 1920s and 1930s Myaskovsky's symphonies were quite frequently played in Western Europe and the USA. His works were issued by Universal Edition, one of Europe's most prestigious publishers.[11] In 1935, a survey made by CBS of its radio audience asking the question "Who, in your opinion, of contemporary composers will remain among the world's great in 100 years?" placed Myaskovsky in the top ten along with Prokofiev, Rachmaninoff, Shostakovich, Richard Strauss, Stravinsky, Sibelius, Ravel, de Falla and Fritz Kreisler.[12]

The next few years after 1933 are characterized mostly by his apparent discontinuation of his experimental trend, though with no general decrease in craftsmanship. The Violin Concerto dates from these years, the first of two or three concerti, depending on what one counts, the second being for cello, and a third if one counts the Lyric Concertino, Op. 32 as a concerto work.

Another work from the period up to 1940 is the one-movement Symphony No. 21 in F-sharp minor, Op. 51, a compact and mostly lyrical work, very different in harmonic language from the Thirteenth.

Despite his personal feelings about the Stalinist regime, Myaskovsky did his best not to engage in overt confrontation with the Soviet state. While some of his works refer to contemporary themes, they do not do so in a programmatic or propagandistic way. The Symphony No. 12 was inspired by a poem about the collectivization of farming, while No. 16 was prompted by the crash of the huge airliner Maxim Gorky and was known under the Soviets as the Aviation Symphony. This symphony, sketched immediately after the disaster and premiered in Moscow on 24 October 1936, includes a big funeral march as its slow movement, and the finale is built on Myaskovsky's own song for the Red Air Force, 'The Aeroplanes are Flying'. The Salutation Overture was dedicated to Stalin on his sixtieth birthday.

Final decade

[edit]

The year 1941 saw Myaskovsky evacuated, along with Prokofiev and Aram Khachaturian among others, to what were then the Kabardino-Balkar regions. There he completed the Symphony-Ballade (Symphony No. 22) in B minor, inspired in part by the first few months of the war. Prokofiev's Second String Quartet and Myaskovsky's Symphony No. 23 and Seventh String Quartet contain themes in common—they are Kabardinian folk-tunes the composers took down during their sojourn in the region. The sonata-works (symphonies, quartets, etc.) written after this period and into the post-war years (especially starting with the Symphony No. 24, the piano sonatina, the Ninth Quartet) while Romantic in tone and style, are direct in harmony and development. He does not deny himself a teasingly neurotic scherzo, as in his last two string quartets (that in the Thirteenth Quartet, his last published work, is frantic, and almost chiaroscuro but certainly contrasted) and the general paring down of means usually allows for direct and reasonably intense expression, as with the Cello Concerto (dedicated to and premiered by Sviatoslav Knushevitsky) and Cello Sonata No. 2 (dedicated to Mstislav Rostropovich).

While not particularly experimental, there is no suggestion—as with some earlier works—that Alexander Scriabin or Arnold Schoenberg might still have been influences. In 1947 Myaskovsky was singled out, with Shostakovich, Khachaturian and Prokofiev, as one of the principal offenders in writing music of anti-Soviet, 'anti-proletarian' and formalist tendencies. Myaskovsky refused to take part in the proceedings, despite a visit from Tikhon Khrennikov inviting him to deliver a speech of repentance at the next meeting of the Composers' Union.[12] He was rehabilitated only after his death from cancer in 1950, leaving an output of eighty-seven published opus numbers spanning some forty years, and students with recollections.

Legacy

[edit]

Character and influence

[edit]

Myaskovsky was long recognized as an individualist, even by the Soviet establishment. In the 1920s the critic Boris Asafyev commented that he was "not the kind of composer the Revolution would like; he reflects life not through the feelings and spirit of the masses, but through the prism of his personal feelings. He is a sincere and sensible artist, far from 'life's enemy', as he has been portrayed occasionally. He speaks not only for himself, but for many others".[12]

Myaskovsky never married and was shy, sensitive and retiring; Pierre Souvtchinsky believed that a "brutal youth (in military school and service in the war)" left him "a fragile, secretive, introverted man, hiding some mystery within. It was as if his numerous symphonies provide a convenient if not necessary refuge in which he could hide and transpose his soul into sonorities".[12]

Stung by the many accusations in the Soviet press of "individualism, decadence, pessimism, formalism and complexity", Myaskovsky wrote to Asafyev in 1940, "Can it be that the psychological world is so foreign to these people?"[12] When somebody described Zhdanov's decree against "formalism" to him as "historic", he is reported to have retorted "Not historic – hysterical".[13] Shostakovich, who visited Myaskovsky on his deathbed, described him afterwards to the musicologist Marina Sabinina as "the most noble, the most modest of men".[14] Mstislav Rostropovich, for whom Myaskovsky wrote his Second Cello Sonata late in life, described him as "a humorous man, a sort of real Russian intellectual, who in some ways resembled Turgenev".[14]

Myaskovsky exercised an important influence on his many pupils, as a professor of composition at the Moscow Conservatory from 1921 until his death. The young Shostakovich considered leaving Leningrad to study with him. His students included Aram Khachaturian, Dmitri Kabalevsky, Varvara Gaigerova, Vissarion Shebalin, Rodion Shchedrin, German Galynin, Andrei Eshpai, Alexei Fedorovich Kozlovsky, Alexander Lokshin, Boris Tchaikovsky, and Evgeny Golubev.

The degree and nature of his influence on his students is difficult to measure. What is lacking is an account of his teaching methods, what and how he taught, or more than brief accounts of his teaching; Shchedrin makes a mention in an interview he did for the American music magazine Fanfare. It has been said that the earlier music of Khachaturian, Kabalevsky and other of his students has a Myaskovsky flavor, with this quality decreasing as the composer's own voice emerges (since Myaskovsky's own output is internally diverse such a statement needs further clarification)[15]—while some composers, for instance the little-heard Evgeny Golubev, kept something of his teacher's characteristics well into their later music. The latter's sixth piano sonata is dedicated to Myaskovsky's memory and the early "Symphony No. 0" of Golubev's pupil Alfred Schnittke, released on CD in 2007, has striking reminiscences of Myaskovsky's symphonic style and procedures.[citation needed]

Recordings

[edit]

Myaskovsky has not been as popular on recordings as have Shostakovich and Prokofiev. Nonetheless, most of his works have been recorded, many of them more than once, including the Cello Concerto, the Violin Concerto, many of the Symphonies, and much of his chamber and solo music.

Between 1991 and 1993 the conductor Yevgeny Svetlanov realized a massive project to record Myaskovsky's entire symphonic output and most of his other orchestral works on 16 CDs,[16] with the Symphony Orchestra of the USSR and the State Symphony Orchestra of the Russian Federation. In the chaotic conditions prevailing at the breakup of the USSR, Svetlanov is rumoured to have had to pay the orchestral musicians himself in order to undertake the sessions. The recordings began to be issued in the West by Olympia Records in 2001, but ceased after volume 10; the remaining volumes were issued by Alto Records starting in the first half of 2008. To complicate matters, in July 2008, Warner Music France issued the entire 16-CD set, boxed, as volume 35 of their 'Édition officielle Evgeny Svetlanov'.

In a testimony printed in French and English in the accompanying booklet, Svetlanov describes Myaskovsky as "the founder of Soviet symphonism, the creator of the Soviet school of composition, the composer whose work has become the bridge between Russian classics and Soviet music ... Myaskovsky entered the history of music as a great toiler like Haydn, Mozart and Schubert. ... He invented his own style, his own intonations and manner while enriching and developing the glorious tradition of Russian music". Svetlanov also likens the current neglect of Myaskovsky's symphonies to the neglect formerly suffered by the symphonies of Gustav Mahler and Anton Bruckner.[17]

Advocates

[edit]

One of Myaskovsky's strongest early advocates was the conductor Konstantin Saradzhev. He conducted the premieres of Myaskovsky's 8th,[18] 9th[19] and 11th[20] symphonies and the symphonic poem Silence, Op. 9 (which was dedicated to Saradzhev).[20] The 10th Symphony was also dedicated to Saradzhev.[20] In 1934 Myaskovsky wrote a Preludium and Fughetta on the name Saradzhev (for orchestra, Op. 31H; he also arranged it for piano 4-hands, Op. 31J).[20]

In the 1930s, Myaskovsky was also one of two Russian composers championed by Frederick Stock, the conductor of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. The other was Reinhold Glière, whom he met in 1940 and commissioned to write his "Feast in Fergana", Op. 75, a large-scale orchestral fantasia.

Stock met Myaskovsky in March 1938 at the invitation of the Composers Union. He commissioned Myaskovsky's 21st Symphony (Symphony-Fantasy in F-sharp minor) for the Chicago Symphony's Fiftieth Anniversary. The first performance was in Moscow on 6 November 1940 (conducted by Aleksandr Gauk); Stock conducted the Chicago premiere on 26 December 1940.

Honours and awards

[edit]
Myaskovsky in later years
1916 – Glinka prize (shared, 350 rubles) for Piano Sonata No. 2
1941 – first class for Symphony No. 21
1946 – first class for String Quartet No. 9
1946 – first class for Concerto for Cello and Orchestra
1950 – second class for Sonata No. 2 for cello and piano
1951 (posthumous) – first class for Symphony No. 27 and String Quartet No. 13.

List of works

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nikolai Myaskovsky

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nikolai Yakovlevich Myaskovsky (20 April 1881 – 8 August 1950) was a Russian and Soviet , , and music critic, best known for composing 27 symphonies that established him as a foundational figure in Soviet symphonic music. Born in Novo-Georgievsk in the to a military family, he initially pursued engineering and military training before studying composition at the St. Petersburg Conservatory under and , beginning formal musical education relatively late in his twenties. Myaskovsky's oeuvre, which includes 13 string quartets, nine piano sonatas, and various orchestral works, emphasized traditional sonata forms amid the ideological constraints of Soviet musical life, positioning him as the leading symphonist in the USSR during the . He taught composition at the from 1921, influencing generations of Soviet composers such as and , while also contributing as a critic and public figure. His music often conveyed introspective and tragic undertones, reflecting personal losses and the era's upheavals, yet he navigated official expectations by avoiding overt . Among his distinctions, Myaskovsky received the Stalin Prize five times—more than any other composer—and was named in 1946, underscoring his alignment with state cultural policies despite underlying tensions in Soviet arts enforcement. Though his reputation waned post-mortem due to the dominance of more figures, recent has reevaluated his technical mastery and emotional depth, as detailed in Patrick Zuk's 2021 drawing from archival sources.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood

Nikolai Yakovlevich Myaskovsky was born on , , in Novogeorgievsk, a Russian military fortress near in (now Modlin, Poland), to parents rooted in military and cultural traditions. His father, Yakov Konstantinovich Myaskovsky, served as an engineer officer in the Imperial Russian Army's department of military fortifications, eventually attaining the rank of general, which dictated frequent relocations for the family during Nikolai's early years. His mother, Vera Nikolayevna Myaskovsky, provided a cultured home environment amid these moves. As the second child, Nikolai had an older brother, Sergei (born 1877), who died in his teens from , and three sisters, though specific details on the sisters' lives remain limited in primary accounts. The family's nomadic lifestyle, driven by Yakov's postings, included residences in from 1888 to 1889 and thereafter, exposing young Nikolai to varied regional influences within the . In 1891, when Nikolai was ten, Vera Nikolayevna died, leaving a profound void that shifted family dynamics. Thereafter, his father's sister, Yelikonida Konstantinovna Myaskovskaya—a trained singer who had performed at the Imperial —assumed primary responsibility for raising Nikolai and his siblings, instilling discipline and cultural exposure in a household still oriented toward . This upbringing, marked by loss and mobility, aligned with the Myaskovsky family's noble military heritage, steering Nikolai toward initial training rather than artistic pursuits. By 1895, the family had relocated to , where these early experiences laid the groundwork for his later divergence into music.

Military Service and Initial Exposure to Music

Myaskovsky, adhering to his family's military tradition—his father having risen to the rank of general in the —pursued formal military education beginning in the late . He initially studied in before transferring to the Second Cadet Corps in St. Petersburg, eventually graduating from the St. Petersburg Institute of Military Engineering around 1902. Assigned to an engineers' battalion, he completed his mandatory service in sapper units, focusing on fortifications and technical duties rather than combat roles. During his early military years, Myaskovsky's initial serious exposure to music occurred through private self-study and informal encounters, despite familial discouragement from a professional path. Having learned basic and in childhood, he deepened his engagement around age 20, inspired by a of Tchaikovsky's Pathétique Symphony, which ignited his compositional ambitions. In St. Petersburg, proximity to the city's vibrant musical scene— including access to concerts and libraries—expanded his horizons, leading him to analyze scores and attempt early sketches while balancing officer duties. Recommendations from figures like , whom he approached informally, validated his potential and facilitated auditing opportunities at the Conservatory before official enrollment. By 1906, at age 25 and nearing the end of his obligatory term, Myaskovsky faced a profound internal conflict between military obligation and musical vocation, ultimately securing release from in 1907 to enroll full-time at the St. Petersburg Conservatory. interrupted this transition; recalled in August 1914, he served as a lieutenant engineer on the Austrian front until 1917, enduring frontline hardships that included shelling and evacuation due to injury, during which he composed sporadically in trenches using limited resources. From 1917 to 1921, he continued in the amid revolutionary turmoil, transitioning from Imperial to Bolshevik service without notable ideological friction, before demobilization allowed full commitment to music.

Formal Training at Moscow Conservatory

Myaskovsky did not enroll as a student at the for formal musical training. His primary structured education in composition occurred earlier at the St. Petersburg Conservatory, where he entered in 1906 at age 25 after completing military engineering studies and initial private harmony lessons with . There, he pursued coursework in composition and harmony under and orchestration under , culminating in graduation in 1911 with a in composition. Upon relocating to in , following service in the and independent compositional work during and the , Myaskovsky was directly appointed professor of composition at the without prior student affiliation. This position reflected recognition of his self-directed development and mentorship under established figures rather than institutional progression through its curriculum. He commenced free composition classes immediately, influencing a generation of Soviet composers including , Dmitri Kabalevsky, and Vissarion Shebalin, while continuing to refine his own symphonic style amid the emerging demands of .

Early Compositions and Influences

Debut Works and Stylistic Formations

Myaskovsky's debut compositions emerged during his final years of formal training at the , with his Symphony No. 1 in C minor, Op. 3, marking his initial foray into large-scale symphonic writing; composed in 1908, this three-movement work earned him a scholarship that enabled completion of his studies. The piece adheres to the late Romantic symphonic model, characterized by expansive orchestration and lyrical themes, and was first performed in its original version on July 2, 1914, in Pavlovsk under conductor Aleksandr Aslanov. A revised edition followed in 1921, reflecting refinements in structure and scoring informed by subsequent experience. Stylistically, the First Symphony draws heavily from , evident in its pathos-laden melodies and dramatic contrasts, positioning it within the Russian symphonic lineage while avoiding overt nationalism. Traces of Alexander Scriabin's The Divine Poem appear in harmonic ambiguities and mystical undertones, alongside echoes of Alexander Glazunov's Symphony No. 8 in motivic development, signaling Myaskovsky's absorption of contemporary Russian idioms during his formative period. This foundational work laid the groundwork for stylistic evolution seen in his immediate follow-up, Symphony No. 2 in , Op. 11 (1911), where Tchaikovskian emotionalism persists but integrates Scriabin's more assertively, fostering a personal synthesis of introspection and orchestral vigor that would define his early output. These debut efforts, unburdened by later ideological constraints, prioritize structural coherence and expressive depth over innovation, establishing Myaskovsky as a diligent inheritor of the post-Tchaikovsky tradition.

Impact of World War I and Revolutionary Upheaval

Myaskovsky was mobilized as a reserve officer at the outbreak of in July 1914, shortly after completing his Symphony No. 3, and served on the Austrian front in Galicia as part of an engineers' battalion. During intense combat, he sustained wounds and endured shell-shock, a traumatic condition that exacerbated his inherent sensitivity and disrupted his psychological equilibrium. Reassigned from frontline duties, he contributed to naval fortifications in (then Reval) for approximately one year before transfer to , where he remained until 1921; this period effectively halted his compositional output and postponed his professional musical advancement amid the exigencies of wartime engineering tasks. The of 1917 and ensuing Civil War compounded these interruptions, as Myaskovsky, identifying as a political liberal, endorsed the and enlisted in the , continuing military service through 1921 while assigned to the Naval General Staff. This extended obligation amid revolutionary upheaval and Bolshevik consolidation provided institutional continuity but deferred his return to civilian musical pursuits, reflecting the broader of professionals into the new regime's apparatus. Demobilized in 1921, Myaskovsky resigned his commission to accept a professorship in composition at the , marking a pivotal shift from to pedagogical and creative roles within the emerging Soviet cultural framework. The cumulative strains of war trauma and revolutionary instability influenced his introspective style, evident in contemporaneous works like Symphony No. 4 (completed 1918), which conveys elegiac despair possibly informed by personal ordeal, though he later navigated Soviet demands with restrained lyricism.

Professional Career in the Soviet Union

Professorship and Mentorship Role

Myaskovsky joined the faculty of the Moscow Conservatory in 1921 as a professor of composition, shortly after completing his own studies there and serving in the Red Army from 1917 to 1921, and retained this role until his death in 1950. In this capacity, he focused on training composers in symphonic and instrumental forms, emphasizing technical rigor and structural coherence amid the evolving demands of Soviet musical policy. His pedagogical approach prioritized the cultivation of individual voice within collective artistic norms, drawing from his own experiences under mentors like Rimsky-Korsakov and Lyapunov. Myaskovsky established a prominent compositional school at the Conservatory, mentoring approximately 70 students over nearly three decades and exerting substantial influence on the trajectory of Soviet symphonism. Notable pupils included , whose early works reflected Myaskovsky's guidance in orchestral color and thematic development, and Dmitri Kabalevsky, who credited his teacher with fostering disciplined craftsmanship. His mentorship extended beyond formal instruction, involving detailed critiques and encouragement of experimentation within ideological boundaries, which helped sustain creative output during periods of state scrutiny. Colleagues and contemporaries regarded Myaskovsky's teaching as generous and supportive, contributing to his reputation as a stabilizing force in Soviet musical education despite his personal reticence. This role complemented his compositional career, as he balanced administrative duties—such as curriculum oversight—with private consultations, often prioritizing symphonic training to align with official preferences for monumental forms. By the , his influence permeated the Composers' Union, where former students advanced his emphasis on lyrical accessibility over tendencies.

Key Collaborations and Institutional Involvement

In 1921, Myaskovsky was appointed professor of composition at the , a position he held until his death in 1950, during which he established a prominent school of composition and trained approximately 70 composers. Notable students included , , Vissarion Shebalin, Andrey Eshpai, , , German Galïnin, Evgeny Golubev, Vano Muradeli, and Boris Tchaikovsky. His pedagogical approach emphasized rigorous analysis and generosity, earning him the reputation as "the musical conscience of " among colleagues. Beyond teaching, Myaskovsky held administrative roles in Soviet musical institutions, including assistant director of the music department in the from 1921 to 1922, editor at the from 1922 to 1931, and consultant for music broadcasts at the All-Union Radio Committee in his later years. He co-founded the Association for in in 1923 to promote modernist works but withdrew in the early amid shifting ideological pressures. From 1932 to 1948, he served on the organizational committee of the Union of Soviet Composers, contributing to its early structure during the transition to . Myaskovsky's key collaborations centered on personal and professional ties with contemporaries. He maintained a lifelong friendship with , forged as fellow students at the , where they debuted in the same concert; Myaskovsky suggested titles for many of Prokofiev's early works and exchanged critical correspondence on compositions such as Prokofiev's Symphony No. 10. During their shared evacuation to in 1941, they jointly researched Kabardino-Balkarian folk songs, influencing Myaskovsky's Symphony No. 23 (1941). He also advised musicologist Boris Asafiev on career focus and dedicated his Symphony No. 3 (1914) to him, while collaborating with bandmaster Ivan Petrov on Symphony No. 19 (1939) for wind orchestra. These associations positioned Myaskovsky as a central figure in Soviet musical networks, often mediating between artistic innovation and official demands.

Interactions with Soviet Authorities

Alignment with Socialist Realism Demands

Myaskovsky demonstrated alignment with by composing symphonies that incorporated programmatic elements reflecting Soviet ideological themes, such as revolutionary struggle, collective labor, and optimistic portrayals of socialist progress, particularly from the early onward. His No. 12 in D minor, Op. 66 (1931), premiered just before the formal codification of in music, featured expansive structures with lyrical melodies and folk-inspired motifs evoking national resilience and communal harmony, positioning it as an early model for the doctrine's emphasis on accessible, uplifting content over modernist experimentation. Similarly, No. 11 in , Op. 34 (1931–1932), introduced greater thematic unity and tonal clarity, adhering to demands for music that served as "engineering of the human soul" by promoting ideological upliftment without dissonance or abstraction. In the postwar period, Myaskovsky further complied by producing works like , Op. 46 (1945), subtitled the " Symphony," which depicted the triumphs of collective farm life through vibrant and heroic motifs drawn from Russian folk traditions, earning praise from Soviet critics for embodying the doctrine's requirement for realistic depictions of socialist construction. This 's structure—featuring movements symbolizing agricultural labor, communal joy, and future prosperity—directly responded to 1948 Central Committee directives urging composers to prioritize content glorifying ist policies, resulting in its award of a Stalin Prize second class in 1946. Myaskovsky's adoption of diatonic harmonies, expansive chorales, and narrative arcs in these pieces contrasted with his earlier introspective style, reflecting a calculated shift to ensure institutional approval and public performance amid regimentation pressures post-1932. Despite occasional critiques of residual pessimism, Myaskovsky's output satisfied core Socialist Realist tenets by prioritizing emotional directness and patriotic fervor, as evidenced by the performance of over a dozen symphonies during his lifetime and multiple state honors, including five Stalin Prizes between 1941 and 1950 for works like Symphonies Nos. 21 and 22, which evoked Moscow's wartime defense and Slavic unity. This compliance enabled his continued role at the , where he influenced students to integrate similar ideological elements, though academic analyses note his adaptations preserved subtle personal lyricism within the imposed framework.

Accusations of Formalism and Official Repercussions

In February 1948, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union issued a resolution condemning "formalism" in music, following Andrei Zhdanov's speech "Against Formalistic Tendencies in Soviet Music," which targeted works perceived as elitist, dissonant, and disconnected from proletarian accessibility. Myaskovsky, despite his long-standing efforts to align with Soviet cultural directives, was among the prominent composers named in the ensuing criticism, including Dmitry Shostakovich and Sergei Prokofiev; his symphonies were faulted for excessive complexity, pessimism, and individualistic expression that allegedly prioritized formal experimentation over ideological clarity and mass appeal. At the 1948 USSR Composers' Congress, he was further denounced as a pedagogical influence fostering formalism among younger musicians, reflecting broader scrutiny of his role at the Moscow Conservatory. The accusations stemmed from interpretations of Myaskovsky's oeuvre—particularly his later symphonies—as embodying "decadent" Western influences and lacking the optimistic, folk-derived lyricism demanded by , though he had composed over two dozen symphonies with thematic elements drawn from Russian landscapes and historical motifs. Official repercussions included mandatory self-criticism sessions, where composers like Myaskovsky were compelled to repudiate their "errors" in party-organized forums, alongside the reorganization of musical institutions under stricter ideological oversight via the Union of Soviet Composers. His works faced curtailed performances and publications, contributing to a deliberate neglect that persisted until the Soviet Union's dissolution, despite his prior honors as a People's Artist of the RSFSR in 1935 and the USSR in 1946. Myaskovsky privately expressed disdain for the campaign, reportedly retorting to a colleague describing Zhdanov's decree as "historic" that it was instead "hysterical," underscoring the coercive nature of the purges amid postwar cultural tightening. These events exacerbated his health decline, already strained by heart issues, and marked a stark contrast to his earlier compliance with expectations, highlighting the arbitrary enforcement of aesthetic even against relatively conformist figures.

Musical Style and Output

Symphonic Innovations and Thematic Elements

Myaskovsky composed 27 symphonies, establishing him as a central figure in the Soviet symphonic tradition through expansive forms that often extended traditional structures while incorporating modernist techniques early on. His innovations included the frequent adoption of single-movement sonata forms, as seen in Symphonies Nos. 10 (1927), 13 (1933), and 21 (1940), which condensed multi-movement elements into unified, densely argued wholes lasting around 20-40 minutes, allowing for seamless thematic development and dramatic compression. He also employed variation forms ingeniously, such as in the finale of Symphony No. 25 (1941), deriving material from scherzo motifs to create cyclical cohesion. Orchestration balanced lush Romantic textures with precise, bass-heavy gloom, influenced by Mahler and Scriabin, while simplifying in the 1930s to align with demands for accessibility under socialist realism. Thematic content drew heavily from Russian folk modalities, evident in protyazhnaya-style melodies evoking vast landscapes and , as in the solo opening No. 21's introduction, which conveys melancholy and longing. Ethnic folk influences enriched specific works, including Caucasian tunes in No. 23 (1941), Kazakh elements in No. 14 (1933), and Slavonic themes in No. 26 (1945), integrating modal scales and rhythms into symphonic discourse without . Early symphonies featured chromatic, dissonant themes reflecting personal turmoil and post-revolutionary upheaval, while later ones incorporated energetic, masculine motifs symbolizing socialist optimism, though often undercut by tragic or funereal undertones, as in No. 21's consoling second subject yielding to a death-like coda. Programmatic elements appeared selectively, with Symphonies Nos. 10, 12, and 16 depicting or historical events, but Myaskovsky's core strength lay in abstract lyricism expressing inner duality—sensitivity amid ideological constraint—prioritizing emotional depth over overt narrative. This evolution from early , with linear-constructivist experiments challenging , to constrained preserved his symphonies' psychological resonance.

Chamber Music and Other Genres

Myaskovsky composed thirteen string quartets, the first four published under Opus 33 and dating from 1929–1930, with earlier unpublished quartets from 1907–1911 and the series continuing through Opus 86 for No. 13 in 1949. These works demonstrate his sustained interest in the genre, often featuring polyphonic textures and modal influences drawn from Russian folk elements, though several faced criticism for perceived during the 1930s and 1940s. In addition to quartets, Myaskovsky produced sonatas for solo strings with piano accompaniment, including , Op. 12 (1911, revised later), Cello Sonata No. 2 in A minor, Op. 81 (1948–1949), a Sonata finalized in 1947, and a Viola Sonata. These pieces emphasize expressive and structural rigor, with the later cello sonata reflecting postwar restraint in harmony and form to align with official aesthetic demands. Beyond chamber ensembles, Myaskovsky's piano output includes nine sonatas, commencing with Piano Sonata No. 1 in D minor, Op. 6 (1907–1910), and concluding with Nos. 7–9 (Opp. 82–84, 1949), alongside shorter sets such as Nine Piano Pieces, Op. 73 (1942). The sonatas evolve from romantic expansiveness in early works to more concise, introspective forms in maturity, with revisions to earlier sonatas (e.g., No. 4, Op. 27, revised 1945) incorporating tonal clarity. Myaskovsky also composed extensively for voice, producing over 115 songs for solo voice and , primarily in his early and middle periods, including cycles like Five Balmont Songs and , Op. 7 (1908). These vocal works, often setting Russian poets, prioritize melodic simplicity and emotional restraint, with later examples adapting to lyrical conventions favored under Soviet . He further contributed choral pieces, such as Feather-Grass, Op. 8d (1909), for chorus.

Evolution from Modernism to Constrained Lyricism

Myaskovsky's early compositional style in the 1920s incorporated elements, including dense and dissonant textures, as evident in his Tenth Symphony, composed in 1926–1927. These features reflected influences from contemporary associations like the Association for Contemporary Music (ACM), yet remained anchored in late Romantic traditions derived from composers such as Tchaikovsky and Glazunov, rather than fully embracing radical experimentation. His works from this period, such as the early symphonies revised post-World War I, demonstrated a personal voice marked by introspective tragedy and structural innovation, but without the or fragmentation seen in Western . By the early 1930s, Myaskovsky underwent a stylistic shift toward diatonic and modal harmonies, prioritizing clarity and accessibility, as manifested in the Twelfth Symphony (Op. 40, 1931–1932), subtitled Kolkhoz Symphony in reference to Soviet collectivization efforts. This transition, which predated intensified external pressures from the 1932 Central Committee resolution on arts but aligned with them, represented an internal creative renewal alongside adaptation to socialist realist demands for "democratization" of music—favoring tonal resolution, folk-infused melodies, and optimistic narratives over abstract dissonance. Critics like Boris Schwarz have interpreted this as a retreat to conventionality under regime influence, though evidence suggests Myaskovsky's choices also stemmed from broader symphonic aspirations and parallels with non-Soviet contemporaries. This evolution culminated in a constrained lyricism, where Myaskovsky's inherent melodic fluency—characterized by flowing, narrative lines—was channeled within ideological boundaries, eschewing overt propaganda while adhering to traditional sonata forms and heroic themes. The Thirteenth Symphony (Op. 36, 1933) exemplifies this phase, serving as a deliberate farewell to modernist "tonality destruction" through its lyrical introspection and abstract structure, which avoided programmatic Soviet content despite official expectations. In the 1940s, works like the Twenty-First Symphony (Op. 51, 1940), a one-movement commission blending tragic introduction with resolute Allegro, further simplified orchestration and form for emotional directness, earning a Stalin Prize while reflecting subdued personal conflict amid postwar ideological scrutiny. Overall, Myaskovsky's trajectory balanced artistic integrity with conformity, producing 27 symphonies that prioritized lyrical depth over modernist freedom, often at the expense of unperformed experimental impulses.

Later Years and Final Works

Postwar Compositions Amid Ideological Pressures

Following the Soviet victory in , Myaskovsky faced intensified ideological scrutiny as authorities demanded music that embodied —optimistic, accessible, and rooted in folk traditions to uplift the masses and reflect proletarian heroism, rather than introspective or modernist experimentation deemed "formalist." The 1948 Central Committee decree on music, which condemned "formalistic tendencies" in works by composers like Shostakovich and Prokofiev, explicitly criticized Myaskovsky as a leading educator who had fostered such deviations among students at the . Despite his established loyalty to Soviet themes, Myaskovsky privately described the decree as "hysterical," yet publicly complied by simplifying harmonic language and emphasizing tonal clarity in his remaining output, prioritizing survival in official circles over earlier modernist leanings. Myaskovsky's Symphony No. 25 in , Op. 69, composed in 1945–1946 and revised in 1949, exemplifies this adaptive lyricism; its expansive Adagio opening and Moderato evoke wartime remembrance without overt dissonance, though the composer expressed dissatisfaction with its initial form, leading to post-decree alterations for broader appeal. Dedicated to musicologist Levon Atovmyan after revision, the work premiered in on November 23, 1947, under Alexander Gauk, and its revised structure aligned with demands for emotional directness over complexity, reflecting Myaskovsky's concessions to official aesthetics amid growing censorship of "pessimistic" introspection. In direct response to the 1948 decree's emphasis on national folk heritage, Symphony No. 26 in C major, Op. 79 ("On Russian Themes"), completed in 1948, incorporated authentic Russian melodies and rhythms, such as variants of folk songs, to affirm cultural patriotism and avoid accusations of cosmopolitan detachment. Premiered on October 6, 1955, after the composer's death, this four-movement score shifts from contemplative themes to triumphant finales, embodying the mandated optimism of while retaining Myaskovsky's symphonic scale—though critics later noted its formulaic concessions diluted his earlier depth. His final Symphony No. 27 in C minor, Op. 85, sketched in 1949 and completed in early 1950 just before his death, further retreated into a conservative romantic idiom reminiscent of Glazunov, with memorable melodies and straightforward development eschewing the polyphonic intricacies once associated with formalism. Premiered posthumously on October 14, 1950, in under Mravinsky, the work's Adagio-Allegro structure and elegiac undertones subtly convey personal resignation amid unrelenting pressures, yet its tonal resolution and heroic gestures complied with the era's ideological mandates, marking Myaskovsky's ultimate alignment despite . These late symphonies, produced under duress, highlight how even a of Myaskovsky's stature navigated survival by tempering innovation with enforced accessibility.

Health Struggles and Death

Myaskovsky's health declined markedly in the late 1940s, with initial signs of serious illness emerging around 1946 amid ongoing professional pressures. By this period, he was battling cancer, which sources attribute to a combination of physical deterioration and the psychological toll of postwar ideological scrutiny, including the 1948 resolution condemning formalism in music. Despite the advancing disease, Myaskovsky persisted in his compositional efforts, finishing his Twenty-Seventh in 1949 and a shortly before his condition rendered further work impossible. The composer's cancer proved terminal, leading to his death on August 8, 1950, in at the age of 69. He was interred at , near the graves of and .

Legacy and Reception

Soviet-Era Honors and Domestic Impact

Myaskovsky received numerous state honors during the Soviet era, reflecting his alignment with official cultural policies despite periodic ideological scrutiny. In , he was awarded the Stalin Prize of the first degree for his No. 19 in , Op. 46 (1939), marking the inaugural year of the prize's establishment. Subsequent awards included the second degree in 1943 for his No. 22 in , Op. 54 (); first degree in 1946 for No. 23 in , Op. 56 (1942, revised); and 1947 for his No. 10, Op. 74b (1945). A posthumous fifth prize in 1950 recognized his No. 2 in , Op. 81 (1948–49), underscoring his prolific output in symphonic and chamber forms. Additionally, he was conferred the title of on October 31, 1946, and received the , signifying high official esteem as a pillar of Soviet musical tradition. Domestically, Myaskovsky exerted profound influence through his pedagogical role at the , where he served as professor of composition from 1921 until his death in 1950. He mentored approximately 70 composers, establishing a significant compositional school that emphasized symphonic development and lyrical expressiveness within socialist realist frameworks. Notable students included , Dmitri Kabalevsky, Vissarion Shebalin, , and , many of whom became leading figures in Soviet music and perpetuated his emphasis on thematic depth drawn from Russian folk elements and patriotic motifs. His honors and teaching legacy positioned him as the "Father of the Soviet Symphony," with 27 symphonies that exemplified state-approved grandeur and accessibility, performed frequently by major orchestras like the Moscow Philharmonic. This domestic prominence facilitated the dissemination of his works in conservatory curricula and public concerts, fostering a generation of composers oriented toward collective ideological goals while preserving pre-revolutionary symphonic heritage. Even amid the 1948 resolution critiquing formalism, Myaskovsky's repeated accolades—more than any other composer—affirmed his utility to the regime's cultural apparatus, enabling him to shape Soviet musical orthodoxy through both creation and instruction.

International Recognition and Recent Scholarship

Myaskovsky's symphonies garnered notable performances in and the during the and , reflecting early international interest in his work as a leading Soviet symphonist. His music was published abroad by Universal Edition, facilitating broader exposure amid interwar cultural exchanges. However, postwar geopolitical tensions and shifting Western musical tastes toward avant-garde contributed to a sharp decline in performances and publications outside the Soviet bloc, relegating Myaskovsky to niche status among musicologists. Renewed international engagement emerged in the late through dedicated recordings, including Svetlanov's complete symphony cycle with the USSR State Academic Symphony Orchestra (1970s–1980s) and Neeme Järvi's versions with the (Chandos, 1980s–), which highlighted the emotional depth of works like Symphony No. 6 and No. 21. The Olympia label's multi-volume set (), reissued by in 2024, marked the first comprehensive traversal by a single conductor and orchestra outside , spanning all 27 symphonies and underscoring their structural rigor and lyrical introspection. Naxos's ongoing series with various Russian ensembles has further sustained accessibility, with awards such as the 2020 ICMA for specific volumes signaling growing critical acclaim. Recent scholarship has reevaluated Myaskovsky's oeuvre beyond Soviet ideological constraints, emphasizing his personal tragedies and stylistic evolution. Patrick Zuk's Nikolay Myaskovsky: A Composer and His Times (Boydell & Brewer, 2021) offers the first comprehensive English-language , drawing on archival sources to portray him as an individualist navigating regimentation, and received a 2022 Outstanding Academic Publication Award from the American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages. Complementing this, Gregor Tassie's Nikolay Myaskovsky: The Conscience of Russian (2014) examines his moral stance amid Stalinist pressures. A 2021 study marking the composer's 140th birth anniversary analyzes his rediscovery through concert programs, recordings, and reviews, arguing for sustained relevance in contemporary repertoires despite historical biases against Soviet-era figures. These works collectively challenge earlier dismissals of Myaskovsky as a conformist, prioritizing empirical analysis of his manuscripts and correspondences over politicized narratives.

Critical Reassessments of Artistic Compromises

In the decades following the imposition of in the early 1930s, Western scholars such as Boris Schwarz characterized Myaskovsky's stylistic evolution—marked by reduced dissonance and greater emphasis on lyrical accessibility—as a retreat into conventionality driven by Stalinist regimentation, exemplified by his Twelfth Symphony (1931–1932), which aligned with themes of agricultural collectivization. This narrative portrayed the composer as prioritizing ideological conformity over modernist experimentation, with his pre-1932 works seen as more innovative in harmonic and structural terms. Post-Soviet scholarship has reassessed these compromises as more nuanced, with Patrick Zuk arguing that Myaskovsky maintained significant continuities between his early and later output, retaining modernist elements such as complex and introspective thematics despite external pressures. Zuk's analysis of archival sources challenges the notion of wholesale capitulation, suggesting that stylistic shifts reflected personal maturation and broader Soviet cultural dynamics rather than mere suppression, as evidenced by the composer's persistence with subjective, non-programmatic amid calls for optimism. For instance, the Twenty-Seventh Symphony (1949–1950), criticized in the 1948 resolution for "formalism" and pessimism, incorporated subtle dissonances and epic scope that defied full propagandistic simplification, indicating resilience in artistic voice. Zuk's 2021 biography further reframes Myaskovsky's navigation of ideological constraints, drawing on previously unexplored documents to highlight his role as a mentor who shielded pupils from while composing 13 string quartets and 27 symphonies that balanced accessibility with depth, avoiding the total aesthetic uniformity seen in some contemporaries. This reassessment posits that while compromises existed—such as thematic in wartime works—they did not eradicate his core , rooted in Russian Romantic traditions, and recent performances underscore the enduring viability of his postwar output beyond Soviet-era distortions. Critics now emphasize causal factors like Myaskovsky's health decline and institutional loyalty over simplistic coercion, crediting his five Stalin Prize awards (–) as pragmatic survival rather than endorsement of .

References

  1. https://www.wisemusicclassical.com/composer/5170/Nikolai-Myaskovsky/
  2. https://musopus.net/musicians/myaskovsky-nikolai/
  3. https://www.mosconsv.ru/museum/english/myaskovsky.html
  4. https://www.windrep.org/Nikolai_Miaskovsky
  5. https://www.classical-music.com/features/composers/myaskovsky-nikolai
  6. https://www.prestomusic.com/classical/composers/1373--miaskovsky
  7. https://academic.oup.com/ml/article/103/4/772/6674000
  8. http://www.classical.net/music/comp.lst/acc/myaskovsky.php
  9. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/miaskovsky-nikolai-yakovlevich
  10. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9798881871703_A63009655/preview-9798881871703_A63009655.pdf
  11. https://americansymphony.org/concert-notes/symphony-no-21-in-f-sharp-minor-op-51/
  12. https://boydellandbrewer.com/book/nikolay-myaskovsky-9781783275755/
  13. https://www.siue.edu/~aho/musov/discrev/myaskovsky.html
  14. https://www.naxos.com/Bio/Person/Nikolay_Yakovlevich_Myaskovsky/24632
  15. https://pages.uoregon.edu/music/public_html/events/programs/W2019/2-6-19_OWE.pdf
  16. https://imslp.org/wiki/Symphony_No.1%2C_Op.3_%28Myaskovsky%2C_Nikolay%29
  17. https://classic107.com/articles/this-week-on-intermezzo-5-works-by-nikolai-myaskovsky
  18. https://www.gramophone.co.uk/reviews/review?slug=myaskovsky-symphonies-nos-1-13-rudin
  19. https://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2021/Mar/Myaskovsky-sys-ALC3141.htm
  20. https://boydellandbrewer.com/blog/music/nikolay-myaskovsky/
  21. https://sofiaphilharmonic.com/en/authors/nikolai-myaskovsky-en/
  22. https://www.talkclassical.com/threads/nicolai-myaskovsky.5583/
  23. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/104670/2/02whole.pdf
  24. https://sin80.com/en/artist/nikolai-myaskovsky
  25. https://altocd.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ALC-3141-N40PP-inc-tracklist.pdf
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47368950_From_modernism_to_socialist_realism_in_four_years_Myaskovsky_and_Asafyev
  27. https://www.classicalsource.com/cd/nikolai-myaskovsky-complete-symphonic-works/
  28. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1448787
  29. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1448772/nikolay-myaskovsky-and-the-regimentation-of-soviet-composition-a-reassessment
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392055791_Nikolay_Myaskovsky_The_Conscience_of_Russian_Music
  31. https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/zhdanov/zhdanov-texts/against-formalistic-tendencies-in-soviet-music/
  32. https://www.naxos.com/person/Nikolay_Myaskovsky/24632.htm
  33. https://academic.oup.com/ml/article/105/3/366/7658705
  34. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/nikolay-myaskovsky-9781442231320/
  35. https://www.gresham.ac.uk/watch-now/1948-music
  36. https://musicwebinternational.com/2024/03/myaskovsky-complete-symphonic-works-vol-1-5-olympia/
  37. https://www.wtju.net/nikolay-myaskovsky-symphonies-demonstrate-composers-growth/
  38. https://fugueforthought.de/2017/02/28/a-month-of-myaskovsky/
  39. https://opusclassical.net/composer/myaskovsky
  40. https://www.earsense.org/chamber-music/composer/Nikolai-Myaskovsky/
  41. https://www.gramophone.co.uk/review/myaskovsky-shebalin-nechaev-violin-sonatas
  42. https://imslp.org/wiki/List_of_works_by_Nikolay_Myaskovsky
  43. https://myscena.org/norman-lebrecht/nikolai-myaskovsky-complete-piano-sonatas-moscow-conservatoire/
  44. https://arcana.fm/2022/03/02/myaskovsky-vocal-works/
  45. https://toccataclassics.com/product/nikolai-myaskovsky-vocal-works-volume-one/
  46. https://musicwebinternational.com/2023/08/myaskovsky-vocal-works-vol-2/
  47. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/music-behind-the-iron-curtain/socialist-realism-and-socrealizm/45B8DBF27442324E69C2B4CA59A5C1EC
  48. https://www.theguardian.com/music/tomserviceblog/2014/feb/18/symphony-guide-myaskovskys-tenth-tom-service
  49. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8T5ikYvGYM
  50. https://opusclassical.net/composer/myaskovsky/work/4011
  51. https://www.classicstoday.com/review/review-9606/
  52. http://www.musicweb-international.com/classrev/2021/Apr/Myaskovsky-sys-ALC3141.htm
  53. https://www.scribd.com/document/903759399/Nikolay-Myaskovsky-The-Conscience-of-Russian-Music-1st-Edition-Gregor-Tassie-full
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294576341_Nikolay_Myaskovsky_The_Conscience_of_Russian_Music_by_Gregor_Tassie
  55. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/9466254/nikolai-myaskovsky
  56. https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/modern-languages-cultures/about-us/news/patrick-zuks-monograph-nikolay-myaskovsky-a-composer-and-his-times-selected-for-outstanding-academic-publication-award-/
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360590442_Nikolai_Myaskovsky_-_140_th_birth_anniversary_Rediscovering_the_composer_in_the_present_times
  58. https://doi.org/10.1525/jm.2014.31.3.354
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.