Hubbry Logo
Papa IsioPapa IsioMain
Open search
Papa Isio
Community hub
Papa Isio
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Papa Isio
Papa Isio
Papa Isio
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Dionisio Magbuelas (20 March 1846 - 1911),[1] Dionisio Seguela or Dionisio Papa y Barlucia, more widely known as Papa Isio (Hiligaynon, “Pope Isio”), was the leader of a group of babaylanes who were, as conjectured by Modesto P. Sa-onoy, recruited from the remnants of Dios Buhawi’s movement, which dissolved under the poor leadership of Camartin de la Cruz in the years before the outbreak of the Philippine Revolution.[2]

Key Information

Early life

[edit]

Magbuelas was the son of migrants from Panay to the west, either Antique or San Joaquín, Iloilo, who cleared a small piece of land in the forests of Himamaylan. In his younger years, Magbuelas witnessed the loss of their small landholding to the marauding “sugar barons” of Negros. His family then moved to Payao in Binalbagan. When his parents died, Magbuelas gathered coconut sap and made native coconut wine in order to make ends meet. He later reportedly worked for the family of a Carlos Gemora in Ilog. By 1880, he was 34 years old and was working as a cattle herder in the farm of the Montilla family in Tinungan. It was here that Magbuelas had a scuffle with a Spaniard whom he wounded. Fearing reprisal from the Spanish authorities and the Guardia Civil, Magbuelas fled to the mountains as Dios Buhawi was leading his revolt, and he may have joined this group.[3]

Revolution

[edit]
See also: Negros Revolution
Papa Isio with two babaylanes followers in a prison in Bacolod after his surrender to American authorities in 1907

According to Sa-onoy, Magbuelas's nom de guerre “Papa Isio” was partly dictated by the religious thrust of his revolt against Spain and the Christianity it championed. His appropriation of the title "Papa" was to repudiate the authority of the Pope (Santo Papa). This particular group of babaylanes were organized by Magbuelas in 1896 in Himamaylan, Negros Occidental.[4]

Fusing religion with agrarian reform and nationalism, Papa Isio called for the expulsion of foreigners from Negros and the division of the land among the natives. It is contended that Papa Isio responded to the Philippine Revolution which was begun in August 1896 by Andrés Bonifacio. The group of babaylanes was said to have adopted the battle cries "¡Viva Rizal!" (Spanish, "Long live Rizal!"), "¡Viva Filipinas libre!" (Spanish, "Long live a free Philippines!") and "Kamatayon sa Katsila" (Hiligaynon, "Death to Spaniards!").[3]

While Filipino revolutionary General Miguel Malvar, widely acknowledged as the last leader of the Philippine Revolution to surrender to the Americans, had capitulated on April 16, 1902, Papa Isio gave up his own struggle very much later on August 6, 1907. Finally cornered by colonial forces, Papa Isio surrendered to American Lieutenant J. S. Mohler.[5] At first, he was sentenced to death, which was commuted to life imprisonment. Papa Isio soon died in the Old Bilibid Prison in Manila in 1911.[6]

Commemoration

[edit]

On November 6, 2009, the National Historical Institute unveiled a historical marker in honor of Magbuelas at the public plaza of Isabela, Negros Occidental. The marker states:

Papa Isio was known to be a leader in Negros and organized a group in Isabela fighting for freedom from the Spanish colonizers in 1896. He became the military chief of the municipality of La Castellana under the Cantonal Government of Negros in November 1898. He also fought the American colonizers in 1899-1907, surrendered on August 6, 1907, and died at the Manila Bilibid Prison in 1911.[1]

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Papa Isio

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Dionisio Magbuelas (c. 1846–1911), commonly known as Papa Isio, was a Filipino revolutionary and spiritual leader who directed babaylan militias in against Spanish colonial authorities during the of 1896 and later spearheaded prolonged guerrilla resistance to American occupation. Rejecting the authority of the Roman Pope, he adopted the title "Papa Isio" and mobilized followers through indigenous rituals and amulets, framing their struggle as a divine mandate for independence. As the politico-military governor and superior military chief of under the , Papa Isio commanded forces that plundered exploitative hacenderos and local elites while sustaining anti-colonial operations, emerging as the last organized holdout in the region until his surrender on August 6, 1907—outlasting even General . His movement blended agrarian discontent with millenarian beliefs, targeting not only foreign rulers but also abusive principalia and Chinese merchants, which American authorities later branded as banditry to justify suppression. Deceived by assurances of a post and , he was arrested, convicted of , and initially sentenced to death—a penalty commuted to —before dying in Bilibid Prison in in 1911.

Early Life

Birth and Family Background

Dionisio Magbuelas, later known as Papa Isio, was born on March 20, 1846, in Negros Occidental, Philippines. He was the son of migrants from Panay, originating from either Antique province or San Joaquin in Iloilo, who had settled in the area by clearing a small plot of forested land near Himamaylan in southern Negros Occidental. His family exemplified the lowland peasant class typical of the region, engaging in subsistence farming amid Spanish colonial oversight and the expanding influence of hacienda-based sugar production. This rural, agrarian background positioned Magbuelas within communities navigating imposed Catholic practices alongside residual indigenous Hiligaynon traditions, including animist elements prevalent among Negrense peasants resisting full . The socioeconomic pressures of land clearance and labor under Spanish friar estates underscored the vulnerabilities of such families to exploitation in Negros's plantation-dominated economy.

Formative Experiences and Pre-Revolutionary Activities

Dionisio Magbuelas, later known as Papa Isio, was born around 1846 to migrant settlers from who had cleared small forest plots near in southern for , reflecting the influx of laborers drawn to the island's expanding frontiers in the mid-19th century. This rural, indigenous background exposed him early to the vulnerabilities of smallholder life amid ' transition toward cash-crop . The rapid growth of the from the onward concentrated land in haciendas owned by Spanish s and elite planters, displacing families like Magbuelas' through debt peonage, forced sales, and enclosure of communal areas, while abuses—such as excessive rents and punishments—exacerbated agrarian grievances among tenant farmers and laborers. Natural calamities, including epidemics and poor harvests, compounded these hardships, heightening resentment toward colonial authorities and clerical intermediaries who controlled much of the . In his early adulthood, Magbuelas labored in rural occupations, facing repeated displacements and clashes with enforcers like the Guardia Civil, experiences that aligned him with babaylan networks offering spiritual solace and communal resistance to exploitation, though without organized political action until 1896. These formative pressures, rooted in empirical economic dispossession rather than abstract ideology, cultivated anti-clerical and pro-peasant orientations evident in his subsequent role as a healer and agitator among the marginalized mountain folk.

Ideology and Leadership Style

Fusion of Religion, Nationalism, and Agrarianism

Papa Isio's ideology exhibited a syncretic religious framework rooted in babaylan traditions, which merged indigenous animist reverence for anito (ancestral spirits) with selective Christian motifs to challenge Spanish friar dominance and perceived religious idolatry. This blend positioned spiritual forces as unified against clerical exploitation, empowering peasant followers through shamanic rituals that claimed divine sanction for rebellion, distinct from orthodox Catholicism yet invoking defense of "holy faith." Nationalism in his worldview demanded sovereign Negros governance, rejecting foreign rule and local elite pacts that perpetuated dependency, including ilustrado accommodations with Spanish authorities or post-1898 American occupiers. He framed such elite alignments as betrayal, issuing threats of "blood retribution" to planters for treason in accepting U.S. sovereignty, thereby prioritizing peasant autonomy over negotiated transitions. Agrarianism addressed core peasant hardships from Negros's hacienda system, where sugar monoculture displaced communal lands, enforced debt peonage, and induced famine risks by prioritizing exports over food crops. Papa Isio advocated violent overhaul for hacienda division and communal ownership revival, targeting oligarchic planters—killing 12, expelling 70 Spanish owners, and torching over 50 estates—as enablers of colonial extraction rather than incidental foes.

Role as Spiritual and Military Leader

Papa Isio, born Dionisio Magbuelas, assumed a as spiritual and over a network of babaylanes—indigenous priests blending animist traditions with folk Catholic elements—in . He styled himself as "Papa," establishing a pseudo-hierarchical structure akin to a native "church," where subordinates swore oaths of loyalty reinforced by talismans known as anting-anting, believed to confer invulnerability to bullets and blades through incantations or oracion prayers. This system drew followers primarily from dispossessed peasants, ex-revolutionaries, and mountain folk, fostering intense devotion by promising supernatural protection in exchange for unwavering allegiance. His claims of personal invulnerability, tested repeatedly in skirmishes, cultivated a cult-like following estimated at several thousand, with dynamics characterized by blind in his spiritual prowess despite mounting evidence of failures in sustained . Followers internalized these beliefs, often charging into battle with red garments symbolizing ("red") sects, prioritizing mystical assurances over tactical realism, which colonial military reports attributed to manipulated rather than genuine . This devotion enabled rapid mobilization but also led to high attrition, as empirical outcomes contradicted the promised immunity. Contemporary critiques from Spanish elites, American officials, and local ilustrados framed Papa Isio's leadership as cloaked in religious , dismissing babaylan rituals as exploited to coerce among marginalized groups prone to unrest. Such views, while reflecting colonial biases against non-Western structures, highlight causal factors like economic grievances and cultural resistance driving , rather than inherent criminality; yet, the inclusion of known outlaws in his ranks lent credence to charges of predatory tactics over organized resistance. American ethnographers noted the movement's reliance on of spiritual reprisal for oath-breakers, underscoring a coercive element beneath the veneer of communal .

Anti-Spanish Resistance

Initial Uprising in 1896

In 1896, Papa Isio organized a babaylan in , to resist Spanish colonial rule, responding to the sparked by Andrés Bonifacio's in August of that year. His movement drew from indigenous spiritual traditions, positioning him as a self-proclaimed who blended religious authority with calls for . The initial forces consisted of local peasants disillusioned by exploitative systems and mounting debts, who rallied under promises of and expulsion of foreign oppressors, enabling rapid recruitment in the rural hinterlands. Early actions involved guerrilla ambushes on Spanish outposts, leveraging familiarity with ' rugged terrain to evade patrols and inflict casualties, thereby establishing momentum aligned with national revolutionary fervor before escalating into open rebellion by 1897.

Organization of Babaylan Forces

In 1896, Papa Isio, also known as Dionisio Magbuelas, unified disparate babaylan groups in , recruiting primarily from hacienda peasants aggrieved by Spanish colonial abuses and landowner exploitation, establishing an initial base in areas such as and later shifting toward Mount Kanlaon for operations. These forces coalesced around spiritual oaths administered through babaylan rituals, which invoked indigenous beliefs in protection to foster loyalty and morale among fighters lacking formal military training. The organizational structure blended religious hierarchy with rudimentary military ranks, incorporating governance elements like taxation on raided haciendas to sustain operations, while emphasizing decentralized armed bands suited to guerrilla raids rather than conventional formations. Fighters, drawn from native and classes, wore distinctive grayish- uniforms accented with and stripes culminating in a white triangle—symbolizing insurgent aspirations—and topped with straw hats featuring bands for enlisted men or chasseur-style caps for officers. Armament relied heavily on traditional bolos (machetes) and spears, supplemented by anting-anting amulets believed to confer invulnerability, reflecting severe constraints on acquiring Spanish firearms amid rural isolation. Initial bands comprised several hundred adherents, expanding to approximately 1,500 by 1897 through successful repulses of Guardia Civil patrols, which bolstered recruitment via demonstrated efficacy. Temporary alliances formed with proximate revolutionary factions, including sympathizers, enabled coordinated harassment of Spanish outposts prior to regional negotiations that sidelined elements. This composition prioritized ideological cohesion over logistical sophistication, enabling sustained low-intensity resistance rooted in agrarian discontent and spiritual fervor.

Anti-American Campaigns

Shift to Opposition Against U.S. Occupation

Following the defeat of Spanish forces in the and the subsequent Treaty of Paris on December 10, 1898, which ceded the archipelago to the , the elite-driven —initiated on November 5, 1898, under figures like —culminated in the brief . Local sugar planters, seeking to preserve their economic dominance, facilitated an unopposed U.S. landing on February 2, 1899, and accepted American oversight, effectively dissolving the republic's autonomy by April 1899 without engaging in hostilities against the new occupiers. This rapid alignment of hacenderos with U.S. authorities, prioritizing stability for their system over sustained , served as the primary catalyst for Papa Isio's strategic pivot, as his interior-based babaylan forces—composed largely of dispossessed peasants—found themselves excluded from the elite pact and confronted by renewed foreign dominion. Papa Isio, who had previously focused on anti-Spanish operations, redirected his opposition toward as "new colonizers" while condemning the ' complicity as a treacherous abandonment of the . In explicit terms, Papa Isio threatened the elites with "blood retribution for their ," mobilizing his followers to raid haciendas, raze associated towns, and target planter assets, actions that underscored a resistance blending nationalist expulsion of foreigners with reprisals against internal class betrayers who had enabled the occupation. This causal framing positioned his campaign as a corrective to both imperial overreach and oligarchic collaboration, driving bands to burn over 50 haciendas and displace dozens of in punitive strikes that disrupted production central to the U.S.-backed order. The resulting guerrilla tactics emphasized evasion and attrition against U.S. troops, with Papa Isio's forces withdrawing to mountainous redoubts like Mount Kanlaon to prolong operations, outlasting organized resistance elsewhere—such as General Miguel Malvar's surrender on April 16, 1902—and maintaining active opposition until his own capitulation on August 6, 1907.

Establishment of the Negros Republic

Papa Isio, leading a of babaylan followers and disaffected peasants, established a self-proclaimed independent entity known as the Negros Republic in the interior highlands of southern circa 1899-1900, following the lowland elites' accommodation with U.S. forces in February 1899. This peasant-led polity operated as a governance experiment amid the Philippine-American War, controlling remote areas inaccessible to American patrols and collaborators. Isio positioned himself as the supreme authority, extending his pre-existing role as military chief in regions like La Castellana to assert over these territories. Governance blended hierarchical military command—structured around Isio's spiritual and tactical leadership—with informal communal practices for and among agrarian followers, fostering cohesion through religious rituals and opposition to systems. These structures emphasized in forested interiors, where followers sustained operations via local and rudimentary , but lacked formalized or external . The republic's short lifespan, collapsing by 1902-1907, stemmed from inherent unsustainability: geographic isolation in mountainous enclaves restricted supply chains and , while U.S.-backed alliances with —who dominated coastal economies and provided —enabled systematic isolation and attrition without direct . Absent broader economic bases or elite defections, the could not withstand prolonged resource denial, highlighting the causal primacy of logistical vulnerabilities over ideological appeal in guerrilla governance viability.

Key Battles and Guerrilla Tactics

Papa Isio's resistance against U.S. occupation relied on guerrilla tactics suited to Negros Occidental's rugged volcanic terrain, particularly the slopes of Mt. Kanlaon, where his forces used mobility and intimate knowledge of the landscape to launch ambushes and evade pursuit. These methods disrupted American supply lines and patrols, with babaylane bands striking isolated outposts before withdrawing into the mountains. Between 1901 and 1903, Papa Isio's followers conducted raids on U.S. patrols and haciendas, targeting the economic backbone of the occupation by attacking whom they denounced as collaborating with . These actions prompted laborers to desert haciendas and join the insurgents, further straining the colonial economy amid reports of widespread flight to the hills. U.S. responses included scorched-earth measures such as burning villages and crops, which Papa Isio countered by emphasizing rapid dispersal and avoidance of prolonged engagements, sustaining operations despite superior American firepower. The babaylanes faced a major setback in 1902, suffering a coordinated defeat that fragmented their organized capabilities, after which Papa Isio's remaining adherents shifted to smaller-scale hit-and-run actions. Over the campaign's duration, attrition mounted from and other mountain diseases, desertions induced by U.S. amnesties offered through local elites, and incremental captures by units, gradually eroding force cohesion without decisive field victories for the insurgents.

Capture, Trial, and Imprisonment

Surrender and Arrest in 1907

By 1907, Papa Isio's forces had suffered severe attrition from sustained U.S. military operations and desertions, leaving him as one of the last organized holdouts against American occupation in . On August 6, 1907, he surrendered to American authorities, accepting an offer that facilitated his capitulation amid the broader context of U.S. pacification efforts, which included amnesties for earlier insurgents though his prolonged resistance precluded such general provisions. Accompanied by two aides, Papa Isio was immediately arrested upon surrender and photographed in prison, providing visual evidence of his capture and the diminished scale of his remaining entourage.

Judicial Proceedings and Sentencing

Following his surrender to American forces on August 6, 1907, Dionisio Magbuelas, known as Papa Isio, faced under U.S. colonial for against the occupation. The proceedings exemplified the American legal framework's treatment of holdout insurgents as criminal elements rather than participants in recognized revolutionary struggles, with charges emphasizing disruption of order over political motivations. Initial conviction carried a death sentence, promptly commuted to , underscoring the U.S. administration's intent to neutralize perceived without immediate execution. American authorities classified Papa Isio's forces as comprising "criminals and ex-insurgents," framing his babaylan-led resistance as and religious rather than ideological opposition, which biased the judicial process toward suppression of native . This perspective aligned with broader colonial policies criminalizing guerrilla persistence post-1899, denying legitimacy to movements not aligned with U.S.-brokered peace accords. No formal defense invoking rights to is documented in available records, though the commutation may reflect pragmatic avoidance of martyrdom for a figure whose influence waned amid military encirclement. Papa Isio was confined to Old Bilibid Prison in , where he succumbed in 1911 at approximately age 65, his death hastened by advanced age, prior wounds from campaigns, and the facility's inadequate conditions for elderly indigenous prisoners. The sentencing and incarceration highlighted systemic disparities in colonial , prioritizing pacification over equitable for anti-imperial holdouts.

Legacy and Assessments

Achievements in Prolonged Resistance

Papa Isio's leadership sustained guerrilla operations against U.S. forces in from the onset of the Philippine-American War in 1899 until his surrender on August 6, 1907, marking one of the longest individual resistances in the . This endurance exceeded that of coordinated revolutionary efforts elsewhere, as major commanders like capitulated by April 16, 1902, leaving Isio's babaylan forces as the primary organized holdouts in Negros by late 1901. By maintaining mountain-based strongholds, particularly around Mount Kanlaon, Isio's campaigns necessitated ongoing U.S. military deployments and operations in the region, diverting personnel and supplies that might otherwise have supported broader pacification elsewhere. These efforts disrupted local collaboration between American authorities and elites, as Isio's fighters targeted hacenderos and profiteers perceived as aiding colonial exploitation, thereby prolonging instability and hindering the swift establishment of civil governance on the island. Isio's integration of spiritual authority with tactical mobility exemplified self-reliant native defense, rallying sharecroppers and laborers in a proto-agrarian push against land concentration under foreign-influenced systems, which echoed in later mobilizations without reliance on urban or coordination. Historical records from 1902 to 1907 underscore how his persistence forced adaptive U.S. strategies, including inducements for , underscoring the empirical toll on colonial resource allocation in sustaining .

Criticisms, Controversies, and Failures

U.S. military and press reports frequently portrayed Papa Isio as a "fanatical bandit leader" whose guerrilla forces terrorized , associating him with criminal elements like thieves and ex-insurgents rather than legitimate revolutionaries. These depictions emphasized his leadership of mountain folk, including escapees, in raids that disrupted local order and targeted sugar plantations central to the island's economy. Papa Isio's attacks on haciendas were criticized by Filipino elites and American administrators for sabotaging , as his forces denounced as traitors and directly assaulted estates, exacerbating labor shortages and hindering the sugar industry's recovery post-Spanish rule. , prioritizing export markets under U.S. protection, viewed such actions as economically destructive, repugnant to their interests in maintaining a commercial crop system that employed thousands but entrenched inequality. This perspective framed his resistance not as anti-colonial heroism but as outlawry that prolonged instability without constructive alternatives. His religious claims, including self-proclaimed divinity as a babaylan "," were dismissed by contemporaries as delusional , fostering a cult-like following among marginalized groups but alienating broader and preventing viable . The theocratic vision, which echoed pre-colonial spiritual authority blended with anti-foreign , led to internal fractures as it failed to evolve into sustainable governance, relying instead on sporadic raids rather than alliances or reforms. The movement's ultimate defeat stemmed from strategic isolation: after the short-lived Negros Republic alliance collapsed in 1899, local elites collaborated with U.S. forces to safeguard their haciendas, leaving Papa Isio without elite backing or external support. Lacking adaptation beyond guerrilla tactics, his forces could not counter superior American resources or Filipino constabulary recruitment, resulting in no enduring political or agrarian reforms despite initial momentum in 1901-1902. Controversies persist over allegations versus legitimacy, with U.S.-aligned sources emphasizing criminality to justify suppression, while critics of argue ' "" of for economic gain enabled his isolation. This debate highlights tensions between popular resistance and oligarchic priorities, where Papa Isio's uncompromising stance achieved prolonged defiance but no systemic change.

Commemorations and Cultural Depictions

A honoring Papa Isio stands in Isio, Cauayan, , commemorating his role as a local revolutionary leader. The itself bears his name, reflecting enduring regional recognition of his resistance activities in the southern foothills. Papa Isio receives limited attention in mainstream Philippine national education and historical narratives, often overshadowed by more prominent figures in the revolutionary pantheon, positioning him primarily as an "unsung hero" in -specific contexts like the annual commemoration of the on November 5. In media, the 2021 documentary episode "Tales of Sugarlandia Season 2 Episode 3: The Life of Papa Isio," produced by , portrays him as a legendary spiritual and revolutionary figure who opposed both Spanish and American forces from mountain bases. Filipino author Eric Gamalinda's 2006 novel My Sad Republic draws loosely from Papa Isio's life, reimagining his religio-political struggles amid colonial occupation. Early American media depictions frequently labeled Papa Isio a "fanatic" due to his integration of indigenous babaylan practices with anti-colonial resistance, a framing that served to undermine native legitimacy during U.S. occupation and reflects inherent biases in colonial reporting rather than neutral assessment. Modern local interpretations in emphasize his prolonged defiance against foreign rule, though portrayals vary, with some highlighting agrarian motivations amid hacienda inequalities.

References

  1. https://opinion.inquirer.net/47253/early-filipino-popes-resisted-colonial-rule
  2. https://www.sunstar.com.ph/more-articles/pacete-col-papa-isio-last-revolutionary-leader-standing
  3. https://www.facebook.com/thesouthernproject/posts/dionisio-magbuelas-born-20-march-1846-death-1911-dionisio-seguela-or-dionisio-pa/1111630134313014/
  4. https://historica.fandom.com/wiki/Papa_Isio
  5. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Papa_Isio
  6. https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-ssi/1981/Volume%209%20Number%201/Babaylanism%20in%20Negros_%201896-1907.pdf
  7. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/3/article/857081
  8. https://www.academia.edu/29924934/_Baylan_Animist_Religion_and_Philippine_Peasant_Ideology_in_Philippine_Quarterly_of_Culture_and_Society_Vol_10_No_3_September_1982_pp_141_194
  9. https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=history-faculty-pubs
  10. https://www.prif.org/fileadmin/Daten/Publikationen/Prif_Reports/2011/prif112.pdf
  11. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft4580066d&chunk.id=d0e5917&toc.depth=100&brand=eschol
  12. https://thenonviolenceproject.wisc.edu/2023/05/22/deconstructing-folk-catholicism/
  13. https://ia801602.us.archive.org/2/items/afj2378.0001.001.umich.edu/afj2378.0001.001.umich.edu.pdf
  14. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/d84d179a-31e1-4a6c-9729-4f82841b31b6/download
  15. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/SERIALSET-04590_00_00-018-0170-0000/pdf/SERIALSET-04590_00_00-018-0170-0000.pdf
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310606975_Baylan_Animist_Religion_and_Philippine_Peasant_Ideology
  17. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/3/article/857081/pdf
  18. https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=leadership-and-strategy-faculty-pubs
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342048728_THE_NEGROS_PEOPLE_BETWEEN_TWO_REVOLUTIONS
  20. https://gallery.sfsu.edu/archive/events/1998/09/19/721-sino-ka-ano-ka.html
  21. https://www.bibliotikal.com/posts/myths-cinco-de-noviembre.html
  22. http://sallylyngestrella.blogspot.com/2013/11/cinco-de-noviembre-negros-revolution.html
  23. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft4580066d;chunk.id=d0e6403;doc.view=print
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42633166
  25. https://www.facebook.com/groups/oldnegros/posts/4568682816498893/
  26. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=5186
  27. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/4adbd578-5e36-4f58-a35b-4afc05faeb4e/download
  28. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft4580066d;chunk.id=0;doc.view=print
  29. https://www.nytimes.com/1902/01/27/archives/island-of-negros-terrorized.html
  30. https://www.nytimes.com/1902/06/07/archives/bandit-raid-in-luzon-seven-american-soldiers-and-prominent-civil.html
  31. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft4580066d%3Bchunk.id=d0e6403%3Bdoc.view=print
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/resrep14544.6
  33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25011532.pdf
  34. https://www.thefilipinomind.com/2013/03/our-unrecognized-heroes.html
  35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44256738
  36. https://negrosnowdaily.com/the-unsung-heoes-of-negros-revolution/
  37. https://www.facebook.com/groups/oldnegros/posts/the-first-picture-is-the-monument-of-dionisio-magbuelas-known-as-papa-isio-it-wa/3932279563472558/
  38. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBxxokm7oKQ
  39. https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/4219444
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.