Hubbry Logo
Pirc DefencePirc DefenceMain
Open search
Pirc Defence
Community hub
Pirc Defence
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pirc Defence
Pirc Defence
Pirc Defence
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pirc Defence
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
f8 black bishop
g8 black knight
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
d6 black pawn
e4 white pawn
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
d2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
b1 white knight
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
g1 white knight
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Moves1.e4 d6
ECOB07–B09
Named afterVasja Pirc
ParentKing's Pawn Game
Synonyms
  • Pirc–Ufimtsev Defence[1]
  • Ufimtsev Defence
  • Yugoslav Defence

The Pirc Defence (/ˈpɪərts/ PEERTS) is a chess opening characterised by the moves:

1. e4 d6

It is named after Slovenian grandmaster Vasja Pirc or alternatively after Soviet master Anatoly Ufimtsev as the Ufimtsev Defence. Black allows White to establish a centre with pawns on d4 and e4, but plans to undermine it later. It can lead to both sharp and solid games.[2] Black should remain cautious about playing too passively.[3] Play most often continues with 2...Nf6 3.Nc3, and Black often then plays 3...g6 and 4...Bg7. Sometimes, only the line 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 is classified as part of the opening, or even only lines with 3...g6. Third move alternatives for Black include 3...c6 (the Czech Defence), 3...e5, and 3...Nbd7 (supporting 4...e5).

Transpositional opportunities to and from other openings are common. The main line of the Pirc Defence is closely related to the Modern Defence, the primary difference being that Black delays developing the knight to f6 in the Modern. The main line is also similar to the King's Indian Defence, with the difference being that that White has not played c4 before playing Nc3. All 3 setups involve allowing White to occupy the center with pawns on e4 and d4, in hypermodern fashion.

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

History

[edit]
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
f8 black bishop
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
d6 black pawn
f6 black knight
g6 black pawn
d4 white pawn
e4 white pawn
c3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
g1 white knight
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Hooper and Whyld's definition

The Pirc Defence, named after Slovenian grandmaster Vasja Pirc, is a relatively new opening; while it was seen on occasion in the late nineteenth century, it was considered irregular, thus remaining a sideline. The opening began gaining some popularity only after World War II, and by the 1960s it was regarded as playable, owing in large part to the efforts of Canadian grandmaster Duncan Suttles. Black, in hypermodern fashion, does not immediately stake a claim in the centre with pawns; rather, Black works to undermine White's centre from the flanks. Its first appearance in a World Championship match was in 1972, when it was played by Bobby Fischer against Boris Spassky at Reykjavík (game 17); the game ended in a draw.

The Pirc has been criticized for passivity. According to Garry Kasparov, the Pirc Defence is "hardly worth using in the tournaments of the highest category", as it gives White "too many opportunities for anybody's liking".[4]

Definition

[edit]

Hooper and Whyld gave a distinct formal definition, 1.d4 d6 2.e4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6, permuting White's first two moves, although they qualified the definition by remarking that 1.e4 d6 could also transpose to the Pirc.[5] The presence or absence of Black's third move in the Pirc is reported differently, according to the source;[6] with the pawn move 3...g6, Black prepares to fianchetto the king's bishop to g7. Paul van der Sterren therefore described 3...g6 as "the defining move of the Pirc Defence" because the development of the bishop to g7 "creates the same sort of positional tension as the King's Indian Defence".[7] Unlike in the King's Indian, in the Pirc, White plays Nc3 without having first played c4.

A distinction is usually drawn between the Pirc and lines where Black delays the development of his knight to f6, or omits it altogether; this is known as the Modern Defence (or Robatsch Defence). The tenth edition of Modern Chess Openings (1965) grouped the Pirc and Robatsch together as the "Pirc–Robatsch Defense".

Main line: 3...g6

[edit]

Austrian Attack: 4.f4

[edit]
Main article: Pirc Defence, Austrian Attack
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black bishop
h7 black pawn
d6 black pawn
f6 black knight
g6 black pawn
d4 white pawn
e4 white pawn
f4 white pawn
c3 white knight
f3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Austrian Attack after 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3

The Austrian Attack begins 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3, and was a favourite of Fischer. It is also well respected by Nick de Firmian, the author of Modern Chess Openings (MCO). In placing pawns on d4, e4 and f4, White establishes a powerful centre, intending to push in the centre and/or attack on the kingside; in the main line, Black will usually counter with ...e5, aiming for play against the dark squares and weaknesses created by White's central advance. This direct, aggressive line is one of the most ambitious systems against the Pirc. Jan Timman has played the Austrian successfully with both colours. Yuri Balashov does well with the white pieces, and Valery Beim has an impressive score on the black side.

5...0-0

[edit]

The most frequently played move after 5...0-0 is 6.Bd3 (the Weiss Variation), with 6...Nc6 the most common response, though 6....Na6, with the idea of ....Nc7, ....Rb8 and ....b5 became popular in the 1980s after 6....Nc6 was found to offer Black few winning chances. 6.e5 is a sharp try, with unclear consequences, which was much played in the 1960s, though it has never attained popularity at the highest levels. 6.Be2 is another move which was often seen in the 1950s and early 1960s, although the defeat sustained by Fischer in the game given in the example games spurred White players, including Fischer, to turn to 6.Bd3. In the 1980s, 6.Be2 c5 7.dxc5 Qa5 8.0-0 Qxc5+ 9.Kh1 was revived with more favourable results. 6.Be3 is another possibility, first extensively explored in the 1970s and played by Bojan Kurajica, Yuri Balashov and Alexander Beliavsky, which leads to sharp play.

5...c5

[edit]

Black's chief alternative to 5...0-0 lies in an immediate strike against the white centre with 5...c5, to which the usual response is either 6.dxc5 or 6.Bb5+. The former allows 6...Qa5. The latter promises a tactical melee, with a common line being 6.Bb5+ Bd7 7.e5 Ng4 8.e6 (8.h3 or 8.Bxd7+ are other possibilities) 8...fxe6, which was thought bad, until Yasser Seirawan played the move against Gyula Sax in 1988[8] (8...Bxb5 is the alternative, if Black does not want the forced draw in the main line), continuing 9.Ng5 Bxb5! Now if White tries 10.Nxe6, Black has 10...Bxd4!, ignoring the threat to his queen, in view of 11.Nxd8 Bf2+ 12.Kd2 Be3+ with a draw by perpetual check. White can instead try 11.Nxb5, with complicated play.

White can also essay the sharp 6.e5 against 5...c5, after which 6...Nfd7 7.exd6 0-0 is considered to offer good play for Black.

Classical (Two Knights) System: 4.Nf3

[edit]
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
f8 black rook
g8 black king
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black bishop
h7 black pawn
d6 black pawn
f6 black knight
g6 black pawn
d4 white pawn
e4 white pawn
c3 white knight
f3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
e2 white bishop
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
f1 white rook
g1 white king
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Classical (Two Knights) System after: 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 0-0 6. 0-0

The Classical (Two Knights) System begins 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 0-0 6.0-0. White contents themselves with the 'classical' pawn centre with pawns at e4 and d4, forgoing the committal move f2–f4 as Black castles and builds a compact structure. Efim Geller, Anatoly Karpov and Evgeni Vasiukov have all successfully used this system for White; Zurab Azmaiparashvili has scored well as Black. This transposes into the Sicilian Dragon after 6...c5 7.Be3 cxd4 8.Nxd4.

The 150 and Argentine Attacks

[edit]

The setup f2–f3, Be3 and Qd2 is commonly used against the King's Indian Defence and Dragon Sicilian, and can also be used against the Pirc; indeed, this system is as old as the Pirc itself.

The system 4.f3 was introduced by Argentine players c. 1930 and again in 1950. It was never considered dangerous for Black because of 4.f3 Bg7 5.Be3 c6 6.Qd2 b5. It received a severe blow in about 1985, when Gennady Zaichik showed that Black could castle anyway and play a dangerous gambit with 5...0-0 6.Qd2 e5.

The Argentines feared the sally ...Ng4, though some British players (especially Mark Hebden, Paul Motwani, Gary Lane, later also Michael Adams) came to realise that this was mainly dangerous for Black, therefore playing Be3 and Qd2 in all sorts of move orders, while omitting f2–f3. They called this the 150 Attack, because players of this strength (150 ECF) can easily play this position and get strong play without any theory.[9]

The original Argentine idea probably is only viable after 4.Be3 Bg7 5.Qd2 0-0 6.0-0-0 c6 (or Nc6) 7.f3 b5 8.h4. Black usually does not castle, though, and prefers 5...c6 or even 4...c6. The question of whether and when to insert Nf3 remains unclear.

Other systems

[edit]
  • 4.Bg5 was introduced by Robert Byrne in the 1960s, after which Black has often played the natural 4...Bg7, though 4...c6 is considered more flexible, as Black may wish to save a tempo in anticipation of White's plan of Qd2, followed by Bh6, by deferring ...Bg7 as long as possible, playing for queenside activity with ...b7–b5 and ...Qa5. White's idea of Qd2 and Bh6 may give a transposition to the lines with Be3 and Qd2. Less commons methods of playing this system include 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Bg5 and 4.Bg5 Bg7 5.f4 (followed by 6. Nf3, 7. Bd3, 8. O-O as played by Robert Byrne, with the intention of playing an Austrian attack whithout blocking the dark-squared bishop.)
  • 4.Bf4. This formerly rare move has become more popular lately, in large part because the position can come about via a fashionable line of the London System: 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 g6 3.Nc3 d6 4.e4.
  • 4.Bc4 Bg7 5.Qe2 is a sharp try for advantage; 5...Nc6 can lead to hair-raising complications after 6.e5, when Black's best line may be 6...Ng4 7.e6 Nxd4 8.Qxg4 Nxc2+, avoiding the more frequently played 6...Nxd4 7.exf6 Nxe2 8.fxg7 Rg8 9.Ngxe2 Rxg7, which has been generally considered to lead to an equal or unclear position, though White has scored heavily in practice. 6...Nd7 is now considered fine for Black, in view of 7.e6?! fxe6 8.Qxe6 Nde5! 9.Qd5 e6 with advantage to Black. If White instead plays the better 7.Nf3, Black has multiple solid choices, including 7...0-0 and 7...Nb6 (followed by ...Na5), which is considered to equalise. Another possibility for Black is 5...c6, though 6.e5 dxe5 7.dxe5 Nd5 8.Bd2, followed by long castling, gives White the advantage, as Black's position is cramped and he lacks active counterplay.
  • 4.g3 and 5.Bg2, followed by Nge2, is a solid line, which was sometimes adopted by Karpov.
  • 4.Be3 is another alternative. Considered relatively passive in earlier times, today's practice uses this move as a flexible entry into lines which may feature h3/Nf3 or even h3/g4/Bg2 – while still maintaining the option of returning to 150-like plans or the Austrian if Black commits to moves that do not help in this type of position.
  • 4.Be2 may transpose into the Classical System after 4...Bg7 5.Nf3, or White may try one of two highly aggressive lines, the Bayonet Attack (5.h4) or the Chinese Variation (5.g4).

Early deviations

[edit]

After 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3, Black has an alternative to 3...g6 (Main line) known as the Pribyl System or Czech Defence, beginning 3...c6. The lines often transpose to the Pirc if Black later plays ...g6; alternatively, Black can play ...Qa5 and ...e5 to challenge White's centre, or expand on the queenside with ...b5.

A common deviation by Black in recent practice is 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e5. This has been tried by many GMs over the years, including Zurab Azmaiparashvili and Christian Bauer. The common line 4.dxe5 dxe5 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Bc4 Be6 7.Bxe6 fxe6 results in a drawish endgame despite Black's loss of castling rights (a similar idea to a famous variation of the Berlin Defence). As such, White most often transposes to the Philidor Defence instead with 4.Nf3.

An unusual deviation for Black is 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e6, which can transpose to the Scheveningen Variation of the Sicilian Defence after 4.Nf3 Be7 5.Bb5+ c6 6.Be2 0-0 7.Be3 c5 8.0-0 cxd4 9.Nxd4.

An unusual but quite reasonable deviation for White is 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.f3. At the 1989 Barcelona World Cup event, former world champion Garry Kasparov surprised American grandmaster Yasser Seirawan with this move. After 3...g6 4.c4, an unhappy Seirawan found himself defending the King's Indian Defence for the first time in his life,[10] though he managed to draw the game. Black can avoid a King's Indian with 3...e5, which may lead to an Old Indian type of position after 4.d5, with 3...c5, which may lead to a Benoni type of position after 4.d5 or transpose to Prins Variation of the Sicilian Defence after 4.Ne2 cxd4 5.Nxd4, or with 3...d5. This can transpose to the Classical Variation of the French Defence after 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 e6 6.Nf3, to the Tarrasch Variation of the French Defence after 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 e6 6.c3 c5 7.Nd2 Nc6 8.Ndf3, or even to the Blackmar–Diemer Gambit with an extra tempo for White after 4.Nc3 dxe4 5.Bg5 exf3 6.Nxf3.

Example games

[edit]
  • In the following game, Azmaiparashvili uses the Pirc to defeat reigning world chess champion Karpov.
    Karpov vs. Azmaiparashvili, USSR Championship, Moscow 1983
    1.e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bg7 5.Be2 0-0 6.0-0 Bg4 7.Be3 Nc6 8.Qd2 e5 9.d5 Ne7 10.Rad1 b5 11.a3 a5 12.b4 axb4 13.axb4 Ra3 14.Bg5 Rxc3 15.Bxf6 Bxf3 16.Bxf3 Ra3 17.Bxg7 Kxg7 18.Ra1 Qa8 19.Rxa3 Qxa3 20.Be2 Qb2 21.Rd1 f5 22.exf5 Nxf5 23.c3 Qxd2 24.Rxd2 Ra8 25.Bxb5 Ra3 26.Rc2 Ne7 27.f4 exf4 28.Bc6 Nf5 29.Kf2 Ne3 30.Rc1 Kf6 31.g3 Ke5 32.Kf3 g5 33.gxf4+ gxf4 34.h4 Nxd5 35.Bxd5 Kxd5 36.Kxf4 Kc4 37.Re1 Rxc3 38.Re7 Kxb4 39.Rxh7 d5 40.Ke5 c6 41.Kd4 Rc4+ 0–1
  • Kasparov vs. Veselin Topalov, Wijk aan Zee 1999. Called Kasparov's Immortal, this game has been called "the most famous Pirc game of all time".[11]
    1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.f3 b5 7.Nge2 Nbd7 8.Bh6 Bxh6 9.Qxh6 Bb7 10.a3 e5 11.0-0-0 Qe7 12.Kb1 a6 13.Nc1 0-0-0 14.Nb3 exd4 15.Rxd4 c5 16.Rd1 Nb6 17.g3 Kb8 18.Na5 Ba8 19.Bh3 d5 20.Qf4+ Ka7 21.Rhe1 d4 22.Nd5 Nbxd5 23.exd5 Qd6 24.Rxd4 cxd4 25.Re7+ Kb6 26.Qxd4+ Kxa5 27.b4+ Ka4 28.Qc3 Qxd5 29.Ra7 Bb7 30.Rxb7 Qc4 31.Qxf6 Kxa3 32.Qxa6+ Kxb4 33.c3+ Kxc3 34.Qa1+ Kd2 35.Qb2+ Kd1 36.Bf1 Rd2 37.Rd7 Rxd7 38.Bxc4 bxc4 39.Qxh8 Rd3 40.Qa8 c3 41.Qa4+ Ke1 42.f4 f5 43.Kc1 Rd2 44.Qa7 1–0
  • Mikhail Tal vs. Tigran Petrosian, Moscow 1974
    1.Nf3 g6 2.e4 Bg7 3.d4 d6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.Be2 0-0 6.0-0 Nc6 7.d5 Nb8 8.Re1 e5 9.dxe6 Bxe6 10.Bf4 h6 11.Nd4 Bd7 12.Qd2 Kh7 13.e5 dxe5 14.Bxe5 Ne4 15.Nxe4 Bxe5 16.Nf3 Bg7 17.Rad1 Qc8 18.Bc4 Be8 19.Neg5+ hxg5 20.Nxg5+ Kg8 21.Qf4 Nd7 22.Rxd7 Bxd7 23.Bxf7+ 1–0
  • Fischer vs. Viktor Korchnoi, Curaçao 1962
    1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 c5 7.dxc5 Qa5 8.0-0 Qxc5+ 9.Kh1 Nc6 10.Nd2 a5 11.Nb3 Qb6 12.a4 Nb4 13.g4? Bxg4! 14.Bxg4 Nxg4 15.Qxg4 Nxc2 16.Nb5 Nxa1 17.Nxa1 Qc6 18.f5 Qc4 19.Qf3 Qxa4 20.Nc7 Qxa1 21.Nd5 Rae8 22.Bg5 Qxb2 23.Bxe7 Be5 24.Rf2 Qc1+ 25.Rf1 Qh6 26.h3 gxf5 27.Bxf8 Rxf8 28.Ne7+ Kh8 29.Nxf5 Qe6 30.Rg1 a4 31.Rg4 Qb3 32.Qf1 a3 33.Rg3 Qxg3 0–1[12]
  • Hikaru Nakamura vs. Ilya Smirin, Foxwoods Open 2005
    1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.f4 Nf6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.e5 Nfd7 7.h4 c5 8.h5 cxd4 9.hxg6 dxc3 10.gxf7+ Rxf7 11.Bc4 Nf8 12.Ng5 e6 13.Nxf7 cxb2 14.Bxb2 Qa5+ 15.Kf1 Kxf7 16.Qh5+ Kg8 17.Bd3 Qb4 18.Rb1 Bd7 19.c4 Qd2 20.Bxh7+ Nxh7 21.Qxh7+ Kf8 22.Rh4 1–0
  • Gukesh Dommaraju vs. Arjun Erigaisi, Norway Chess 2025
    1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Bc4 0-0 6.h3 Nxe4 7.Bxf7+ Rxf7 8.Nxe4 d5 9.Nc3 c5 10.0-0 cxd4 11.Nxd4 Nc6 12.Nf3 d4 13.Ne4 Qd5 14.Re1 h6 15.c3 d3 16.Re3 Bf5 17.Ng3 Rd8 18.Bd2 e5 19.Ne1 e4 20.f3 exf3 21.Nxf3 Be6 22.Ne4 Ne5 23.Nxe5 Bxe5 24.Qe1 Rdf8 25.Ng3 Bf4 26.Rxe6 Bxd2 27.Rxg6+ Kh7 28.Qe6 Qxe6 29.Rxe6 Bf4 30.Nf1 Bc7 31.Rd1 Rd7 32.Nd2 Bb6+ 33.Kh1 Kg7 34.Nf3 Rf6 35.Re4 Rfd6 36.Ne5 Rd8 37.Rg4+ Kf6 38.Nc4 Rc6 39.Rf1+ Ke7 40.Rg7+ Ke8 41.Rg8+ Ke7 42.Rg7+ Ke8 43.Ne5 Re6 44.Rg8+ Ke7 45.Rg7+ Ke8 46.Rg8+ Ke7 47.Rxd8 Kxd8 48.Nxd3 Re2 49.a4 Rd2 50.Rf3 a5 51.h4 Ke7 52.Kh2 Ke6 53.b4 Kd5 54.bxa5 Bc7+ 55.Kh3 Kc4 56.Nf2 Bxa5 57.Ng4 Rd6 58.Ne3+ Kb3 59.Nf5 Ra6 60.Kg4 Kxa4 61.Kh5 Rc6 62.Rf4+ Ka3 63.c4 Bd2 64.Rd4 Bc3 65.Rd5 Ka4 66.Rb5 b6 67.Nxh6 Ba5 68.Nf5 Rxc4 69.Rb1 b5 70.Ra1+ Kb4 71.g4 Rc5 72.Kg6 Rc6+ 73.Kf7 Rc7+ 74.Kg6 Rc6+ 75.Kf7 Rc7+ 76.Ke6 Rc6+ 77.Kd7 Rc7+ 78.Kd6 Rc4 79.Rb1+ Ka4 80.Ra1+ Kb4 81.g5 Bc7+ 82.Ke6 Re4+ 83.Kf7 Be5 84.Rf1 Ka3 85.Rf3+ Ka2 86.Re3 Rxe3 87.Nxe3 b4 88.g6 Kb1 89.Nc4 Bc3 90.g7 Bxg7 91.Kxg7 Kc2 92.Na5 1–0

ECO codes

[edit]

Some of the systems employed by White against the Pirc Defence include the following:

  • 4.Bc4 (ECO B07) Kholmov System (4.Bc4 Bg7 5.Qe2)
  • 4.Be2 (ECO B07) sub-variants after 4.Be2 Bg7 include the Chinese Variation, 5.g4, and the Bayonet (Mariotti) Attack, 5.h4
  • 4.Be3 (ECO B07) 150 or "Caveman" Attack (4.Be3 c6 5.Qd2)
  • 4.Bg5 (ECO B07) Byrne Variation
  • 4.g3 (ECO B07) Sveshnikov System
  • 4.Nf3 (ECO B08) Classical (Two Knights) System (sub-variants after 4...Bg7 include 5.h3 and 5.Be2)
  • 4.f4 (ECO B09) Austrian Attack (sub-variants after 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 include 6.e5, 6.Be2, 6.Bd3 and 6.Be3; also, after 4...Bg7 is 5.Bc4, the Ljubojevic Variation; Black also has the option to move into the Dragon Formation after 5.Nf3 with 5...c5)

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pirc Defence

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Pirc Defence (ECO codes B07–B09) is a hypermodern in which Black responds to White's 1.e4 with 1...d6, followed typically by 2.d4 Nf6 and 3.Nc3 g6, allowing White to establish a strong pawn center before counterattacking it with piece pressure and pawn breaks. Named after the Slovenian grandmaster (1907–1980), a five-time Yugoslav champion who popularized the system in the mid-20th century through his advocacy and successful play, the opening emerged as a distinct line in the 1930s but saw limited adoption until the hypermodern school gained traction post-World War II. It received further theoretical development in the 1970s and 1980s from English grandmasters and , who analyzed its dynamic potential extensively in their writings and games. Strategically, the Pirc emphasizes flexibility and counterplay: Black fianchettos the king's to for long-diagonal control, castles kingside early, and targets center with advances like ...e5 or ...c5, often combining them with pins via ...Bg4 or queenside expansion. This approach contrasts classical principles by conceding space initially, inviting White to overextend before launching an attack, though it risks White gaining a lasting initiative if Black's counterplay is delayed. Main variations include the aggressive Austrian Attack (4.f4), building a broad pawn trio on e4-d4-f4 for kingside assault; the solid Classical System (4.Nf3), prioritizing development and central harmony; the tactical 150 Attack (4.Be3 followed by Qd2 and often 0-0-0), aiming for rapid piece coordination against Black's castled king; and the positional Variation (4.g3), mirroring Black's structure for a strategic battle. The Pirc remains a favored weapon among top players for its imbalance and winning chances, employed regularly by grandmasters such as and , with occasional use by , , , , and Vassily Ivanchuk in high-level events. Notable historical examples include Bobby Fischer's draw against in their 1972 match and Viktor Korchnoi's mixed results versus in 1978.

Introduction

Definition and Basic Moves

The Pirc Defence is a hypermodern for against 's 1.e4, in which initially concedes control of to White's pawns while preparing a with minor pieces, typically beginning with 1...d6 to support a later ...e5 push and control e5 indirectly. This approach contrasts with classical openings by prioritizing flank development over immediate central occupation, allowing White to advance pawns to d4 and e4 before Black fianchettoes the king's . The principal move order is 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6, with Black following up by developing the bishop to g7 (...Bg7), which pins the knight on c3 and exerts long-range pressure on the d4 pawn from afar. The knight on f6 challenges e4 early, while ...g6 prepares the to enhance Black's kingside control and potential counterplay along the long diagonal. The opening is named after Slovenian grandmaster (1907–1980), who popularized it during the 1930s through his advocacy and successful use in tournaments. A standard position in the Classical System arises after 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 O-O:

FEN: rnbq1rk1/ppp1ppbp/3p1np1/8/3PP3/2N2N2/PPP1BPPP/R1BQK2R w KQ - 0 6

FEN: rnbq1rk1/ppp1ppbp/3p1np1/8/3PP3/2N2N2/PPP1BPPP/R1BQK2R w KQ - 0 6

In this setup, White has developed harmoniously with knights on c3 and f3, bishop on e2, and castling rights intact, while Black has completed the , castled kingside, and positioned the to contest the center.

Historical Background

The Pirc Defence traces its earliest precursors to the mid-19th century, when Indian player Moheschunder Bannerjee frequently employed similar pawn structures and piece placements against John Cochrane in over 50 games during the 1850s, securing a 40% win rate as Black—significantly higher than his overall in those matchups. These setups echoed elements of the later Pirc, such as an early ...d6 and development, though they lacked the systematic that defines the modern form. Formal recognition of the opening emerged in the 1920s, aligned with the , where theorists like and Richard Réti promoted indirect center control through flank development rather than immediate pawn occupation. The defence derives its name from Slovenian grandmaster Vasja (1907–1980), a five-time Yugoslav champion who championed it through his games and analyses in . Pirc's advocacy highlighted the opening's potential for flexible development and counterplay, despite contemporary views dismissing it as inferior; his tournament successes, including wins in domestic events, laid the groundwork for its theoretical foundation. Post-World War II, the Pirc saw increased popularization among elite players, notably and , who integrated it into high-level competition during the 1950s. himself adopted the Pirc in the late 1950s, achieving strong results without losses in several games. Notably, employed the defence against in their 1954 encounter, demonstrating its robustness against strong opposition. , a fellow Yugoslav grandmaster and 12-time national champion, became a prominent exponent, using it extensively in international tournaments to achieve solid results and further embed it in mainstream theory. The opening gained additional traction around this period through appearances in major events, such as the 1954 . In recent decades, chess engines have affirmed the defence's soundness, consistently evaluating it as viable for Black with equalizing chances after precise play, thereby reinforcing its status as a reliable hypermodern option.

Opening Principles

Black's Strategic Ideas

In the Pirc Defence, Black adopts a hypermodern approach, permitting White to establish a pawn center on e4 and d4 while preparing a counterattack from the flanks. This strategy relies on the early development of the knight to f6, which challenges White's e4 pawn and controls central squares, combined with the fianchetto of the king's bishop to g7, which exerts pressure along the long diagonal toward d4. By avoiding direct occupation of the center, Black maintains flexibility and aims to undermine White's structure later rather than engaging prematurely. Black's typical development emphasizes solid piece placement and king safety, beginning with ...Nf6 and ...g6 followed by ...Bg7, then kingside (...O-O) to secure the . Support for the center comes via ...c6 or ...Nbd7, which bolster the knight on f6 and prepare breaks like ...e5 to contest White's pawns without risking closed, French-like positions from an early ...e5. This setup allows Black to transition fluidly into counterplay, timing central advances to exploit any overextension by White. Key motifs in Black's play include the fianchettoed bishop on g7 providing sustained pressure on the dark squares and kingside, enabling potential attacks if White's structure weakens. Queenside expansion with ...b5 can generate counterchances, often after ...a6, while a solid pawn structure—typically involving ...c6 or ...d6—helps absorb aggressive responses from White. These elements foster a resilient position that rewards patient maneuvering over immediate confrontation. Common pitfalls for Black arise from kingside overextension, particularly if the structure is compromised during White's aggressive kingside assaults, leading to vulnerabilities around the castled king. Additionally, delaying or mistiming the ...c5 break can allow to consolidate unchallenged, underscoring the need for precise coordination between piece activity and pawn advances. Careful handling of these risks ensures Black's hypermodern setup translates into enduring counterattacking potential.

White's Common Responses

White's primary objectives in responding to the Pirc Defence revolve around achieving rapid development of the minor pieces, expanding in the center with an eventual e4-e5 push to challenge 's setup, and initiating kingside attacks that target the vulnerabilities created by 's fianchettoed on g7. This approach exploits the delayed occupation of the center by , allowing to build an imposing pawn duo on d4 and e4 while coordinating pieces for aggressive play. By prioritizing these goals, seeks to seize the initiative early, preventing from fully activating the fianchettoed 's influence over the long diagonal. White's options generally fall into broad categories that balance aggression and solidity. Aggressive lines often involve pawn storms on the kingside, such as advancing the f-pawn to support a rapid e5 expansion and open lines for attack. In contrast, solid setups emphasize harmonious development with knights and bishops before committing to pawn advances, frequently incorporating moves like Be3 followed by Qd2 to reinforce the attack and target the dark squares around Black's king. Sharp gambits may also arise, offering White dynamic chances at the cost of material, though these require precise calculation to maintain pressure. Positionally, White can aim to dominate the light squares by developing the to c4, exerting pressure on d5 and supporting central control without immediate confrontation. Alternatively, fianchettoing the king's on g2 provides to Black's setup, bolstering the center and preparing for a more measured queenside expansion or flank maneuvers. However, White must navigate inherent risks, as overcommitting pawns in the center or on the kingside can lead to structural weaknesses, enabling Black to launch effective counterplay via queenside advances like ...b5 or central breaks with ...c5 and ...d5. Such imbalances underscore the need for careful timing to avoid isolation of advanced units.

Main Variations

Austrian Attack

The Austrian Attack represents White's most aggressive response in the Pirc Defence, characterized by the immediate pawn advance 4.f4 after 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6, aiming to seize central space and launch a rapid kingside pawn storm. This line, popularized by players like , commits White to an attacking posture, building a powerful pawn center with potential advances like e5, g4, and h4 to target Black's kingside. Black usually counters by fianchettoing the bishop with 4...Bg7, preparing to challenge White's center while maintaining flexibility. Following 5.Nf3, Black's main reply is 5...O-O, kingside to safeguard the monarch and enable quick development. White typically continues with 6.Bd3 to support the e-pawn and eye the kingside, met by Black's 6...Nc6 developing the knight and pressuring d4. After 7.0-0, Black strikes at the center with 7...e5, undermining White's pawn duo on d4 and f4 while opening lines for counterplay. This leads to sharp tactics around the f4-pawn, where White seeks to advance e5 for an attack but risks overextension, as Black can exploit the weakened d4 square or launch queenside initiatives. The resulting positions emphasize White's initiative through rapid piece coordination and pawn thrusts against Black's solid structure. An alternative for Black at move 5 is 5...c5, challenging the center early and transposing toward Sicilian Dragon-like structures with dynamic pawn play. White often captures with 6.dxc5, but Black recaptures via 6...Qa5+, pinning the knight on c3 and gaining time while regaining the pawn. This line shifts the focus to queenside expansion for Black, with the pinned knight potentially leading to imbalances if White overcommits on the kingside. Overall, the Austrian Attack offers White strong attacking prospects through its pawn storm and central dominance, but Black achieves solidity via timely central counterplay, with main lines assessed as roughly equal by engines after accurate defense.

Classical System

The Classical System in the Pirc Defence arises after the moves 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Nf3, where White develops the knight to f3 in a measured fashion, prioritizing piece coordination over immediate aggression. Black usually responds with 4...Bg7, fianchettoing the king's bishop to exert pressure on the diagonal, followed by 5.Be2 O-O 6.0-0, completing White's harmonious setup with the king's bishop on e2 and kingside castling. This structure allows White rapid development without pawn weaknesses, maintaining central control with pawns on d4 and e4 while preparing for flexible middlegame options. Black's typical replies after 6.0-0 include 6...Nc6, developing the queenside and contesting the d4 pawn, often leading to the key tabiya after 7.Re1, where reinforces the e4 pawn and targets potential ...e5 advances. Alternatively, Black may opt for 6...c6 followed by ...Nbd7, bolstering queenside play and preparing ...b5 expansion, or directly challenge the center with 6...e5, though this requires precise timing to avoid overextension. These responses aim to undermine 's space advantage through piece activity and pawn breaks. In the middlegame, White leverages the spatial edge to initiate kingside maneuvers, such as rook lifts along the h-file or exploiting Black's ...e5 with central breaks like dxe5, while Black seeks counterplay via queenside advances with ...b5 or a kingside pawn storm featuring ...f5 to assault the e4 pawn. This dynamic balance often results in strategic battles where White's solid center restricts Black's mobility unless active piece play is achieved. The system was a favorite of former World Champion , who employed it successfully in numerous games. Theoretically, the Classical System is viewed as balanced, offering White a safe but less forcing path that Black can equalize with accurate defense. Database analysis reveals White scoring 37% wins, Black 29%, and draws in 34% of encounters, underscoring its solidity, though recent elite-level play has highlighted Black's potential for dynamic activity in counterattacking roles.

150 Attack and Argentine Variation

The 150 Attack arises after 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 Bg7 5.Qd2 c6 6.f3, where White reinforces the center with f3 to support an aggressive kingside pawn storm involving g4 and h4, while the bishop on e3 and queen on d2 prepare for rapid development and potential castling queenside. This setup creates tactical complexity, as White aims to exploit Black's fianchettoed kingside before Black can fully coordinate, often leading to sharp play reminiscent of the Yugoslav Attack in the Sicilian Dragon. Black typically counters with 6...b5, initiating queenside expansion to challenge White's center and gain counterplay, followed by ...Nbd7 and ...Q-c7 to bolster the defense and prepare ...e5. In unforced lines of the 150 Attack, modern engine evaluations indicate a slight advantage for , with database statistics showing White winning approximately 45% of games, draws in 24%, and Black in 31%, underscoring the need for precise play from Black to equalize. The variation's tactical depth demands accurate calculation from both sides, as deviations like Black's early ...a6 or ...Nc6 can into other Pirc systems but often favor White's attacking chances if mishandled. The Argentine Variation, characterized by 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f3 O-O 5.Be3 c6, builds a solid pawn triangle (d4, e4, f3) that solidifies White's and facilitates a kingside assault, with Be3 supporting further advances like Qd2 and O-O-O. Black responds dynamically with ...c6 to enable ...b5, aiming to undermine White's structure on the queenside while developing the to d7 and queen to c7 for central counterpressure. This line emphasizes White's reinforced pawn formation to launch attacks, but Black's precise defense often neutralizes the initiative, making it less forcing than the 150 Attack. Both variations highlight White's strategy of a robust enabling aggressive kingside play against the Pirc's hypermodern setup, requiring Black to prioritize accurate development with ...Nbd7 and ...Qc7 to avoid overextension. Their modern relevance has grown since the , fueled by online databases and like Aaron Summerscale's "The 150 Attack," which popularized these sharp lines among club and professional players seeking dynamic alternatives to more classical responses.

Other White Systems

In the Pirc Defence, after 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6, White's 4.Be2 represents a quiet, development-oriented approach that emphasizes early and control of the center with pawns on e4 and d4. This move allows White to prepare 0-0 and potentially support an advance like e4-e5, while keeping the position flexible for central play. Following 4...Bg7, White often inserts 5.Nf3, transposing into the Classical System's Quiet Variation, where Black completes development with ...0-0 and ...c6 or ...Nbd7. Alternatives like inserting Bd3 instead of Be2 can arise, but these typically lead to similar middlegame structures favoring gradual piece exchanges and Black's counterplay against the center. Another minor response is 4.g3, mirroring Black's and aiming for a symmetrical kingside setup with Bg2, Nge2, and 0-0. This leads to closed-center positions where White reinforces the e4-pawn and seeks to maneuver with Be3 or Qd2, but the lack of immediate aggression allows Black comfortable equalization. Black typically responds with ...Bg7, ...0-0, and ...c5, challenging White's d4-pawn and opening lines for the queenside or b-pawn advance, often resulting in balanced, strategic play without sharp tactics. Aggressive sidelines include 4.h4, a rare gambit-like push targeting the g6-pawn with ideas of h5 and potential kingside disruption, or 4.Bc4, which develops the light-squared to exert pressure on f7 and support e4-e5. In 4.h4 lines, Black refutes the early pawn thrust by striking back in with ...c5 or ...e5 after ...Bg7, undermining White's overextended structure. Similarly, 4.Bc4 aims for rapid development and central tension but proves impotent against Black's standard ...Bg7 and ...0-0, as the lacks lasting pressure once Black counters with ...c5 or ...e5, often leaving White's vulnerable. Overall, these systems pose fewer challenges to compared to sharper main lines, frequently transposing into favorable endgames where 's active on g7 and pawn breaks provide dynamic equality or slight advantages.

Advanced Topics

Early Deviations by Black

In the Pirc Defence, 's early deviations occur primarily after 1.e4 d6 2.d4, where instead of the standard 2...Nf6, alternatives like 2...g6 or 2...e5 can arise, potentially transposing to other openings or creating independent lines. The move 2...g6 commits to an early of the kingside , aiming to control the center from afar in a hypermodern style similar to the Modern Defence. This risks overexposure on the kingside, as White can seize more central space with moves like 3.c4 or 3.Nc3 before develops the knight to f6, potentially leading to unbalanced positions where 's pawn structure remains flexible but vulnerable to rapid White expansion. Database statistics indicate scores around 35% wins in this line across thousands of games. Another option, 2...e5, directly challenges White's center pawn on d4, often transposing into the if White responds with 3.Nf3, as the position mirrors 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4. This deviation provides Black with a solid foothold in the center but limits flexibility by fixing the e5 pawn early, potentially weakening the d5 square and inviting White's aggressive responses like 3.dxe5 or knight developments targeting the isolated . It is relatively rare, with Black achieving scores around 35% in database games. Following the more common 2...Nf6 3.Nc3, Black can deviate from the mainline 3...g6 with moves such as 3...Nbd7 or 3...c6, preserving options without immediate commitment to the . The flexible 3...Nbd7 develops the queenside knight while supporting a potential ...e5 advance, often leading to setups that avoid the standard Pirc dynamics and instead aim for central symmetry or transpositions to Philidor-like structures after 4.Nf3 e5. This allows Black to sidestep White's prepared anti-Pirc lines, such as the Austrian Attack, but delays kingside development and castling, with database results showing varied Black scores around 20-35%. Similarly, 3...c6 forms the Czech Variation (or Pirc-Sicilian hybrid), bolstering the queenside and preparing ...e5 or ...b5 expansions, which strengthens Black's control over d5 and prevents Nb5 incursions. However, it slows the kingside attack compared to 3...g6, resulting in solid equalization but with Black scores around 20-35% in databases. Overall, these deviations prioritize flexibility and avoidance of theoretical mainlines, often achieving equality at the cost of the Pirc's aggressive pawn breaks and bishop pressure.

Illustrative Games

One of the earliest recorded successes with the setup in the Pirc Defence occurred in Josef Noa vs Amos Burn, Frankfurt 1887, where Black's hypermodern approach led to a convincing win. The game is classified as the (B06) but features Pirc-like elements with an early ...g6 and ...Bg7. Burn's challenged White's center from afar. The game ended in Black's victory after 29 moves, illustrating Black's potential for dynamic counterattack when White commits to an early center. In a classic demonstration of the Austrian Attack's dangers for Black, defeated in the 1963 US Championship. The game followed 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Bd3 Nc6 7.0-0 e5. Fischer's aggressive pawn storm with 8.fxe5 dxe5 9.dxe5 Ng4 seized the initiative, targeting Black's kingside. Benko's error on move 12...f5 allowed 13.e6, creating a and disrupting Black's development. Key tactics emerged on move 17, where Fischer sacrificed the exchange with Rxf6 to open lines, followed by Qh5+ forcing resignation on move 21 after Black's king was exposed. This win highlights common Black mistakes like premature ...e5 and inadequate defense against White's kingside assault in the Austrian line. A modern example of the Classical System's solidity can be seen in games where achieves equality, such as in high-level play demonstrating balanced chances when avoiding early weaknesses. The Classical line underscores viability for equal opportunities with precise play.

Classification

ECO Codes

The Pirc Defence is classified within the of Chess Openings (ECO) under the codes B07 to B09, encompassing its core lines arising from 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3. B07 covers foundational variations after 3.Nc3, including 3...g6 with various White responses such as the 150 Attack (4.Be3 Bg7 5.Qd2) and the Ufimtsev-Pytel Variation (3...c6), which emphasize 's flexible development before committing to pawn breaks. B08 covers the Classical System, typically featuring 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 O-O or 5.Bd3, where White aims for central control with minor piece development. B09 addresses the Austrian Attack (4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 c5), a sharp line where White seeks rapid kingside aggression against 's fianchettoed bishop. Certain Pirc positions can transpose into the via White's inclusion of c4, shifting classification to E60-E99; specifically, lines like 4.c4 Bg7 5.Nf3 O-O often fall under E90-E99, aligning with standard King's Indian main lines such as the Classical (E98) or Saemisch (E80) variations. This overlap highlights the Pirc's hypermodern nature, where Black's setup mirrors King's Indian structures but accommodates White's early e4 advance without immediate symmetry. The ECO system also notes conceptual proximity to the Modern Defence, coded as B06 (for 1.e4 g6) or A41-A42 (for 1.d4 g6 without early Nf6), as both employ similar and delayed challenges, with Pirc move orders sometimes delaying ...Nf6 to avoid specific White responses. Since its establishment in the and final major edition in the , the ECO classification for the Pirc has seen no substantive revisions, though contemporary digital databases like those from or refine sub-variations through extensive game analysis.

Popularity and Usage

The Pirc Defence reached its peak popularity in professional chess during the 1970s and 1980s, when it was frequently employed by grandmasters such as , , and , who appreciated its dynamic counterattacking potential against 1.e4. During this era, the opening appeared in approximately 5-10% of elite-level games, reflecting its status as a viable hypermodern alternative to more classical responses like the Sicilian or French Defences. Its usage declined in the 1990s as deeper theoretical analysis exposed vulnerabilities in certain lines, leading top players to favor more solid options; however, it experienced a revival after 2010, bolstered by chess engines that validated its soundness and highlighted tactical resources for Black. In modern professional play, the Pirc remains a niche choice among top grandmasters, often reserved for surprise value or faster time controls. Players like have adopted it successfully in blitz and rapid games, showcasing its flexibility, while others such as , , , , , and Vassily Ivanchuk have employed it in classical encounters to seek imbalances. In elite play from 2020-2025, the Pirc appeared in approximately 2% of games against 1.e4, with players like continuing to employ it successfully in classical formats (as of 2025 Mega Database statistics). Database statistics indicate Black achieves a win rate of around 35-40% in the Pirc, with overall performance scores near 45% when including draws, underscoring its respectability despite White's slight edge. The opening's modern appeal stems from its solidity against 1.e4, allowing Black to challenge center without immediate confrontation, though it is less common against 1.d4 due to frequent transpositions into the . Its popularity has surged in online and amateur play, where the tactical complexity rewards prepared players at intermediate levels (around 2000 Elo), but in super-grandmaster games from 2020 to 2025, it accounts for roughly 2% of responses to 1.e4 according to the Mega Database. Within the Pirc, the Austrian Attack (4.f4) emerges as most frequent choice, appearing in over half of recorded main-line games and often leading to sharp, kingside assaults.

References

  1. https://www.365chess.com/eco/B07-B09_Pirc_defence
  2. https://www.chess.com/openings/Pirc-Defense
  3. https://www.chessable.com/blog/chess-opening-basics-the-pirc-defense/
  4. https://www.chess.com/blog/vitualis/pirc-defense-play-pre-emptive-tactics
  5. https://www.chessworld.net/pirc-defense.asp
  6. https://www.365chess.com/chess-openings/Pirc-Defense
  7. https://thechessworld.com/articles/openings/pirc-defense-complete-guide-for-black/
  8. https://www.thechesswebsite.com/pirc-defense/
  9. https://www.chessgammon.co.uk/blog/pirc-defense/
  10. https://en.chessbase.com/post/popularity-of-chess-openings-over-time
  11. https://en.chessbase.com/tagged?tag=Vasja%20Pirc
  12. https://en.chessbase.com/post/botvinnik-and-the-pirc-modern
  13. https://www.chessbookshop.com/katalog.asp?id=78&ll=en&all=1&page=6
  14. https://www.chessable.com/blog/pirc-defense/
  15. https://terrycucf.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/2/9/19295043/pircmoderndefence.pdf
  16. https://www.chess.com/openings/Pirc-Defense-Main-Line-Austrian-Attack
  17. https://lichess.org/opening/Pirc_Defense_Austrian_Attack
  18. https://www.chess.com/openings/Pirc-Defense-Classical-Variation
  19. https://www.chess.com/openings/Pirc-Defense-Main-Line-150-Attack
  20. https://www.chess-chivalry.com/en/blogs/chess-openings/chess-opening-the-pirc-defence
  21. https://chesstempo.com/game-database/opening/pirc-defense-150-attack/1515
  22. https://learn.chessbase.com/en/page/the-pirc-ufimtsev-defence
  23. https://www.chessable.com/discussion/thread/779307/comment/779371/
  24. https://thechessworld.com/store/product/beating-the-pirc-modern-defences-the-150-attack-gm-aaron-summerscale/
  25. https://www.chess.com/openings/Pirc-Defense-Classical-Quiet-System
  26. https://www.chess.com/video/player/the-pirc-defense---part-5-the-4-bc4-variation
  27. https://www.chess.com/openings/Modern-Defense-with-1-e4
  28. https://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=5&n=116&ms=e4.d6.d4&ns=3.116.116.158
  29. https://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=5&n=116&ms=e4.d6.d4&ns=3.116.116.159
  30. https://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=11&n=320&ms=e4.d6.d4.Nf6.Nc3&ns=3.116.159.320.320.549
  31. https://www.chess.com/openings/Pirc-Defense-Czech-Defense
  32. https://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=11&n=320&ms=e4.d6.d4.Nf6.Nc3&ns=3.116.159.320.320.550
  33. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1013065
  34. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008421
  35. https://chessopenings.com/eco/B07/
  36. https://www.365chess.com/eco/B07_Pirc_150_attack
  37. https://www.365chess.com/eco/B07_Pirc_Ufimtsev-Pytel_variation
  38. https://www.indianchess.org/assets/books/eco-codes.pdf
  39. https://chessopenings.com/eco/B09/
  40. https://www.chess.com/blog/jishnuplayschess/a-simple-guide-to-the-modern-defense
  41. https://scidvspc.sourceforge.net/doc/ECO.htm
  42. https://royalchessmall.com/blogs/blog/pirc-defense
  43. https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/revival-of-hypermodern-chess
  44. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801575
  45. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n23TFFiZdnc
  46. https://chesstempo.com/game-database/opening/pirc-defense-general/1536
  47. https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/pirc-defense-after-1-d4
  48. https://chessmood.com/course/pirc-defense-czech-variation
  49. https://en.chessbase.com/post/master-the-pirc-defence
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.