Hubbry Logo
Branching (polymer chemistry)Branching (polymer chemistry)Main
Open search
Branching (polymer chemistry)
Community hub
Branching (polymer chemistry)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Branching (polymer chemistry)
Branching (polymer chemistry)
Branching (polymer chemistry)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
IUPAC definitions

branched chain: A chain with at least one branch point intermediate between the boundary units. [1]
branch (side chain, pendant chain): An oligomer molecule or polymeric offshoot from a macromolecular chain. (See Gold Book entry for note.) [2]

Branch point in a polymer
Glycogen, a branched polysaccharide

In polymer chemistry, branching is the regular or irregular attachment of side chains to a polymer's backbone chain. It occurs by the replacement of a substituent (e.g. a hydrogen atom) on a monomer subunit by another covalently-bonded chain of that polymer; or, in the case of a graft copolymer, by a chain of another type. Branched polymers have more compact and symmetrical molecular conformations, and exhibit intra-heterogeneous dynamical behavior with respect to the unbranched polymers.[3][4] In crosslinking rubber by vulcanization, short sulfur branches link polyisoprene chains (or a synthetic variant) into a multiple-branched thermosetting elastomer. Rubber can also be so completely vulcanized that it becomes a rigid solid, so hard it can be used as the bit in a smoking pipe. Polycarbonate chains can be crosslinked to form the hardest, most impact-resistant thermosetting plastic, used in safety glasses.[5]

Branching may result from the formation of carbon-carbon or various other types of covalent bonds. Branching by ester and amide bonds is typically by a condensation reaction, producing one molecule of water (or HCl) for each bond formed.

Polymers which are branched but not crosslinked are generally thermoplastic. Branching sometimes occurs spontaneously during synthesis of polymers; e.g., by free-radical polymerization of ethylene to form polyethylene. In fact, preventing branching to produce linear polyethylene requires special methods. Because of the way polyamides are formed, nylon would seem to be limited to unbranched, straight chains. But "star" branched nylon can be produced by the condensation of dicarboxylic acids with polyamines having three or more amino groups. Branching also occurs naturally during enzymatically-catalyzed polymerization of glucose to form polysaccharides such as glycogen (animals), and amylopectin, a form of starch (plants). The unbranched form of starch is called amylose.

The ultimate in branching is a completely crosslinked network such as found in Bakelite, a phenol-formaldehyde thermoset resin.

Special types of branched polymer

[edit]
Dendrimer synthesis first generation Newkome 1985
  • A graft polymer molecule is a branched polymer molecule in which one or more of the side chains are different, structurally or configurationally, from the main chain.
  • A star-shaped polymer molecule is a branched polymer molecule in which a single branch point gives rise to multiple linear chains or arms. If the arms are identical the star polymer molecule is said to be regular. If adjacent arms are composed of different repeating subunits, the star polymer molecule is said to be variegated.
  • A comb polymer molecule consists of a main chain with two or more three-way branch points and linear side chains. If the arms are identical the comb polymer molecule is said to be regular.
  • A brush polymer molecule consists of a main chain with linear, unbranched side chains and where one or more of the branch points has four-way functionality or larger.
  • A polymer network is a network in which all polymer chains are interconnected to form a single macroscopic entity by many crosslinks.[6] See for example thermosets or interpenetrating polymer networks.
  • A dendrimer is a repetitively branched compound.

In radical polymerization

[edit]
Polymerization of 1,3-butadiene

In free radical polymerization, branching occurs when a chain curls back and bonds to an earlier part of the chain. When this curl breaks, it leaves small chains sprouting from the main carbon backbone. Branched carbon chains cannot line up as close to each other as unbranched chains can. This causes less contact between atoms of different chains, and fewer opportunities for induced or permanent dipoles to occur. A low density results from the chains being further apart. Lower melting points and tensile strengths are evident, because the intermolecular bonds are weaker and require less energy to break.

The problem of branching occurs during propagation, when a chain curls back on itself and breaks - leaving irregular chains sprouting from the main carbon backbone. Branching makes the polymers less dense and results in low tensile strength and melting points. Developed by Karl Ziegler and Giulio Natta in the 1950s, Ziegler–Natta catalysts (triethylaluminium in the presence of a metal(IV) chloride) largely solved this problem. Instead of a free radical reaction, the initial ethene monomer inserts between the aluminium atom and one of the ethyl groups in the catalyst. The polymer is then able to grow out from the aluminium atom and results in almost totally unbranched chains. With the new catalysts, the tacticity of the polypropene chain, the alignment of alkyl groups, was also able to be controlled. Different metal chlorides allowed the selective production of each form i.e., syndiotactic, isotactic and atactic polymer chains could be selectively created.

However, there were further complications to be solved. If the Ziegler–Natta catalyst was poisoned or damaged then the chain stopped growing. Also, Ziegler–Natta monomers have to be small, and it was still impossible to control the molecular mass of the polymer chains. Again new catalysts, the metallocenes, were developed to tackle these problems. Due to their structure they have less premature chain termination and branching.

Branching index

[edit]
IUPAC definition

Branching index: A parameter, g, characterizing the effect of long-chain branches on the size of a branched macromolecule in solution and defined as the ratio of the mean-square radius of gyration of a branched molecule, ⟨s2
b⟩, to that of an otherwise identical linear molecule, ⟨s2
l⟩, with the same relative molecular mass in the same solvent and at the same temperature:[7]

The branching index measures the effect of long-chain branches on the size of a macromolecule in solution. It is defined[8] as where sb is the mean square radius of gyration of the branched macromolecule in a given solvent, and sl is the mean square radius of gyration of an otherwise identical linear macromolecule in the same solvent at the same temperature. A value greater than 1 indicates an increased radius of gyration due to branching.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Branching (polymer chemistry)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , branching refers to the attachment of one or more side chains to the primary backbone of a , creating a non-linear that distinguishes it from linear polymers. These branches can occur at irregular intervals and vary in length and frequency, leading to structures where multiple chains emanate from branch points. Branched polymers are synthesized either intentionally through controlled techniques or as byproducts of processes involving multifunctional monomers, and they play a crucial role in tailoring material properties for diverse applications. Branched polymers encompass several architectural types, each with distinct structural features and synthesis approaches. Randomly branched polymers feature irregular side chains along the backbone, often arising from side reactions in chain-growth polymerizations like radical processes. Star polymers consist of multiple linear arms radiating from a central core, typically prepared via living anionic with divinyl cross-linkers. Comb polymers have regularly spaced branches grafted onto a linear backbone, synthesized using macromonomers in reactions. More complex forms include dendrimers, which are highly symmetric, tree-like molecules built through iterative divergent or convergent growth from core units, achieving monodisperse structures with precise generations up to molecular weights exceeding 1,000,000 Da. In contrast, hyperbranched polymers are irregularly branched dendritic-like macromolecules produced in one-pot reactions from ABx monomers (where x ≥ 2), resulting in polydisperse products with a high of functional end groups. The degree and type of branching profoundly influence polymer properties, enabling customization for industrial uses. Branching reduces chain packing efficiency, lowering crystallinity and —for instance, in where short branches on about 3% of backbone atoms yield a density of 0.92 g/cm³—while enhancing in solvents due to increased chain separation. It also decreases melt and solution viscosity, facilitating processing like , but can elevate the temperature by restricting segmental mobility and alter mechanical properties such as strength and elasticity. Thermodynamically, branched structures exhibit more compact conformations, impacting and enabling applications in coatings, systems, and rheology modifiers, where the multifunctional end groups of hyperbranched and dendritic types provide sites for further functionalization. Overall, branching bridges linear and cross-linked polymers, offering a versatile tool for advancing material science.

Fundamentals of Polymer Branching

Definition and Basic Concepts

In , branching refers to the attachment of side chains or branches to the main backbone, creating non-linear molecular architectures that deviate from the straight-chain structure of linear polymers. These branches, which can vary in length and frequency, arise from multifunctional monomers or reactions that form additional linkages beyond the primary chain, influencing properties such as melt viscosity, crystallinity, and mechanical strength. A linear consists of repeating units connected end-to-end in a single , represented schematically as −[M−M−M]−-[M-M-M]-, where MM denotes a unit. In contrast, a branched features side extending from branch points along the backbone, such as −[M−M(B)−M]−-[M-M(B)-M]-, where BB indicates a branch sprouting from a multifunctional site on the main ; this structure can be visualized as a tree-like or comb-shaped , with the main as the trunk and branches as offshoots. The recognition of branching originated from studies of natural polymers in the 1930s and 1940s, notably —the branched component of —where enzymatic and chemical analyses revealed α(1→6) glycosidic linkages forming branches every 24–30 glucose units along α(1→4)-linked chains. Key theoretical advancements followed in the 1940s through Paul Flory's work on the molecular size distribution and gelation in branched polyesters formed via of trifunctional monomers, establishing foundational statistical models for branching statistics. Basic distinguishes monodisperse branching, where branch lengths and positions are uniform (as in precisely synthesized structures), from polydisperse branching, characterized by statistical variation in branch distribution typical of random processes. In dendritic and hyperbranched polymers, the degree of branching (DB) quantifies this feature as the ratio of dendritic and terminal units to the total number of units, DB = \frac{D + T}{D + T + L}, where D, T, and L are the moles of dendritic, terminal, and linear units, respectively. A critical concept is the gelation threshold, beyond which the polymer forms an infinite network rather than finite molecules; the Flory-Stockmayer theory predicts this at the critical branching coefficient αc=1f−1\alpha_c = \frac{1}{f-1}, where ff is the average functionality of the branching (e.g., f=3f=3 for trifunctional units yields αc=0.5\alpha_c = 0.5). This mean-field model assumes random branching without cyclization, marking the point where the weight-average molecular weight diverges.

Distinction from Linear and Cross-Linked Polymers

Linear polymers consist of long, unbranched chains of repeating units connected end-to-end, resulting in a structure that promotes extensive chain entanglement and close packing in the solid state. In contrast, branched polymers feature side chains or branches emanating from the main backbone, creating a more compact, tree-like that reduces the degree of entanglement compared to linear counterparts, as the branches hinder efficient chain alignment and interpenetration. Cross-linked polymers, however, extend this connectivity further by forming covalent bonds between different chains or branches, leading to an infinite three-dimensional network structure with multiple junction points that eliminate individual chain mobility. These structural differences manifest in distinct functional properties, particularly regarding solubility and processability. Linear and branched polymers generally retain solubility in appropriate solvents because their finite molecular weights allow chains to separate and dissolve without forming a continuous network, enabling applications like melt processing. For instance, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), a linear polymer, exhibits high crystallinity and density (approximately 0.94 g/cm³) due to tight chain packing, while low-density polyethylene (LDPE), which contains short branches (about 3% side chains), has lower density (0.92 g/cm³) and remains soluble in hydrocarbons, facilitating easier extrusion and molding. Cross-linked polymers, such as vulcanized rubber with sulfur bridges between chains, are insoluble and form rigid gels or thermosets that do not melt or flow upon heating, as the covalent junctions prevent dissolution or deformation. The distinction is crucial for understanding branching's role in polymer design, as it allows for enhanced processability without the irreversible network formation seen in cross-linking. According to Flory's gelation theory, branched polymers remain soluble and exhibit finite molecular weights below the gel point—the critical where an infinite network emerges—ensuring no gelation occurs if branching is controlled below this threshold (e.g., branching coefficient α < 0.5 in trifunctional systems). This prerequisite enables branched structures to balance improved flow characteristics with solubility, avoiding the insolubility and brittleness of cross-linked networks while differing from linear polymers' higher entanglement-driven viscosity.

Types of Branched Polymers

Long-Chain Branching

Long-chain branching (LCB) refers to the presence of side chains attached randomly to the primary polymer backbone, where these side chains are generally longer than the critical entanglement length (often >50 units in many polymers), though in , branches exceeding about 6 carbon atoms (~3 units) are classified as long-chain due to their origin from intermolecular , thereby influencing chain entanglement and overall molecular architecture more profoundly than shorter appendages. This structural feature contrasts with short-chain branching, as seen in (LDPE) derived from , where side chains are typically limited to 2-6 carbon atoms and primarily arise from intramolecular transfer during , reducing crystallinity without significantly altering melt . In LCB, the random, statistical distribution of branch points along the backbone leads to heterogeneous architectures, including trees and combs, which enhance shear-thinning behavior and processability in commercial applications. A prominent example of LCB occurs in LDPE produced via high-pressure free-radical of , where the process induces both short- and long-chain branches through mechanisms. Typical LDPE grades exhibit overall branching densities of 20-40 branches per 1000 carbon atoms, short-chain branches contribute to the material's distinctive low density (0.910-0.925 g/cm³) by reducing crystallinity, while LCB enhances extrudability compared to linear . This branching variability allows tailoring of properties like melt strength for film blowing and , making LDPE a staple in packaging and flexible tubing. Theoretical descriptions of LCB structures draw from random branching models, notably Flory's statistical approach, which treats branch formation as a probabilistic process where each unit has a fixed probability α of initiating a . The resulting for the number of branch points follows a for linear chains transitioning to tree-like structures, with the weight-average diverging at a critical branching coefficient α_c = 1/(f-1), where f is the average functionality. These models, extended by Zimm and Stockmayer, provide distributions for molecular dimensions and branching indices, enabling prediction of pre-gelation regimes in randomly branched systems without cross-links. Such frameworks are essential for interpreting the structural diversity in commercial LCB polymers, emphasizing the role of statistical variability in dictating macroscopic behavior.

Graft Copolymers and Branched Block Copolymers

Graft copolymers represent a key subclass of branched polymers, featuring a linear backbone to which side chains of a compositionally distinct are covalently attached at multiple points along the main . This , often described as comb-like, enables the integration of incompatible properties into a single material, such as combining the rigidity of a glassy backbone with the flexibility of elastomeric branches. Unlike random long- branching in homopolymers, which involves side chains of the same composition as the backbone, graft copolymers emphasize compositional heterogeneity in the branches for tailored functionality. Branched block copolymers extend the concept of block copolymers—macromolecules with covalently linked segments of different polymers—by incorporating non-linear topologies, such as multiple blocks emanating from junction points or integrated into graft structures, allowing for advanced morphologies like cylindrical or spherical domains in phase-separated systems. The synthesis of graft copolymers relies on controlled attachment strategies to achieve precise control over branching parameters, including grafting density and side-chain length. The "grafting from" approach involves activating functional groups on a pre-formed backbone to initiate of the side-chain monomers directly from those sites, enabling high grafting densities. In the "grafting to" method, pre-synthesized side-chain polymers bearing reactive end-groups are coupled to complementary functionalities on the backbone, though this can be limited by steric hindrance at higher densities. The "grafting through" technique employs macromonomers—pre-polymerized side chains with polymerizable end-groups—that copolymerize with backbone monomers to form the grafted structure in a single step, offering versatility in branch length control. These synthetic methods facilitate the production of graft copolymers with tunable properties, such as adjustable branch lengths that influence and mechanical behavior. A representative example is graft copolymers, where branches are grafted onto backbones to produce high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) materials. These grafts enhance impact resistance by creating rubbery domains that absorb energy during deformation, making HIPS widely used in and consumer . The branch lengths in such systems can be varied through conditions to optimize and processability.

Star-Shaped and Dendritic Polymers

Star-shaped polymers are a class of branched macromolecules characterized by a central core from which multiple linear polymer arms radiate outward in a symmetric, radial fashion, typically featuring 3 to 20 arms depending on the synthesis method. These structures differ from random or graft branching by their defined, multi-arm architecture, which enhances compactness and unique solution properties compared to linear analogs. Synthesis of star polymers can be achieved through two primary approaches: the arm-first method, where pre-formed linear polymer chains with reactive end-groups are coupled to a multifunctional core, often using techniques like atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP); and the core-first method, where arms are grown outward from a central initiator core via living polymerization, allowing precise control over arm length and number. The arm-first approach is versatile for incorporating diverse arm compositions, such as in miktoarm stars with chemically distinct arms, while core-first enables higher arm numbers but may limit core accessibility. A representative example is star-shaped poly() (PEO) polymers, which have been synthesized with 4 to 8 arms using core-first anionic and explored for applications due to their , low , and ability to form micelles for encapsulating hydrophobic therapeutics. These PEO stars exhibit reduced and improved over linear PEO, facilitating targeted delivery in biomedical contexts. Dendritic polymers represent an advanced form of highly symmetric branching, constructed through iterative processes that create layered, tree-like architectures emanating from a central core, with branching organized into discrete generations (denoted G0, G1, up to G5 or higher). Dendrimers, the perfectly branched , feature monodisperse structures with in terminal groups per generation, achieving a degree of branching (DB) of 1, where every branch point is fully utilized without defects. In contrast, hyperbranched polymers serve as imperfect analogs, formed via one-pot polycondensation with random branching, resulting in a DB less than 1, typically calculated for ABf_f systems (where f≥2f \geq 2) as: DB=2D2D+L\text{DB} = \frac{2D}{2D + L} where DD is the mole fraction of dendritic units and LL is the mole fraction of linear units, determined via NMR spectroscopy; for higher generations, DB approaches the ideal value more closely in controlled syntheses. The polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer family, pioneered by Donald A. Tomalia in the early 1980s through divergent synthesis starting from an ethylenediamine core and alternating Michael addition of methyl acrylate with amidation, exemplifies this architecture, yielding generations up to G10 with precisely 2n^n branches per generation nn. PAMAM dendrimers have been instrumental in establishing dendritic polymers for applications like gene transfection and imaging, owing to their uniform size (e.g., G5 PAMAM has a hydrodynamic diameter of ~5 nm) and high peripheral functionality for conjugation. Hyperbranched variants, such as those analogous to PAMAM, achieve DB values of 0.5–0.8, offering scalable alternatives with similar radial density but broader polydispersity.

Mechanisms of Branching Formation

Branching in Radical Polymerization

In free-, branching occurs primarily through to polymer during the propagation phase, where a growing radical abstracts a from the backbone of an existing polymer chain, creating a new radical center that can propagate and form a . This mechanism is distinct from and primarily affects the during chain growth. Chain transfer to polymer can be intramolecular (), leading to short-chain branches, or intermolecular, resulting in long-chain branches. involves a 1,5-hydrogen shift in systems, forming a stable tertiary midchain radical via a six-membered , after which addition creates a short branch. In contrast, intermolecular transfer between distinct chains produces long branches by linking growing chains at random points along the backbone. Key factors influencing branching include temperature and structure. Elevated temperatures (>80°C) enhance hydrogen abstraction rates, increasing in due to the accessibility of α-methylene hydrogens stabilized by the ester group. For instance, in n-butyl , predominates at higher temperatures, yielding 8–10 quaternary branch points per 100 units. type is critical; are prone to intramolecular transfer, while under favors intermolecular events for long-chain branching. In the production of (LDPE) via radical (1000–3000 atm, 150–300°C), intermolecular transfer results in 1–2 long-chain branches per 1000 carbon atoms, contributing to the polymer's characteristic properties. The kinetics of branching are quantified by the transfer constant Ctr=ktrkpC_{tr} = \frac{k_{tr}}{k_p}, where ktrk_{tr} is the rate constant for chain transfer to and kpk_p is the rate constant; typical values range from 10−410^{-4} to 10−510^{-5} in systems. The branching frequency can be expressed through rate equations incorporating CtrC_{tr}, with the rate of transfer Rtr=ktr[P∙][Polymer]R_{tr} = k_{tr} [P^\bullet] [Polymer], where [P∙][P^\bullet] is the propagating radical concentration; higher CtrC_{tr} correlates with increased branch density as conversion progresses. Termination mechanisms also influence branching outcomes. In radical polymerization, termination proceeds via disproportionation, which saturates one chain and leaves an end on the other without linking, or , which couples two radicals to form a single chain and can propagate branch structures into higher-molecular-weight species. The disproportionation-to- ratio varies by (e.g., higher disproportionation in acrylates), affecting the distribution of branches but playing a secondary role compared to transfer events.

Branching in Step-Growth Polymerization

In , branching arises from the incorporation of multifunctional monomers with functionality f>2f > 2, enabling multiple reaction sites that lead to nonlinear architectures during condensation or addition processes. For example, in synthesis, triols such as react with difunctional acids like , where the additional hydroxyl group promotes random branching through successive esterification steps, resulting in hyperbranched structures rather than strictly linear chains. This mechanism contrasts with linear step-growth systems limited to bifunctional monomers (A-B or A-A + B-B), as the higher functionality introduces branch points that increase molecular complexity without requiring specialized initiators. A critical aspect of branching in these systems is the potential for gelation, where the transitions from a soluble, branched state to an insoluble network. Flory's statistical theory describes this , predicting the gel point—the critical pcp_c at which an infinite molecular weight network forms—as given by the equation: pc=1favg−1p_c = \frac{1}{f_{\text{avg}} - 1} where favgf_{\text{avg}} is the average functionality of the monomers. This formulation assumes random reaction probabilities and no cyclization, highlighting how increasing favgf_{\text{avg}} (e.g., from 2 to 3 via triols) lowers pcp_c, accelerating gelation and limiting the processable branched regime. Stockmayer extended this model to account for more general distributions, confirming the theory's applicability to polycondensation systems with branching units. Practical examples of controlled branching include hyperbranched polyamides synthesized via self-condensation of AB2_2 monomers in the 1990s, which feature one amine (A) and two carboxylic acid (B) groups for direct polyamidation. These structures avoid the iterative synthesis of perfect dendrimers while offering tunable branching for applications in nanomaterials.

Branching via Post-Polymerization Modification

Post-polymerization modification involves the intentional introduction of branches to pre-formed linear polymers through chemical reactions, enabling tailored architectures without altering the original synthesis conditions. This approach is particularly valuable for enhancing properties like compatibility and processability in commodity polymers such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE). Common methods include radical-initiated grafting and click chemistry, which allow precise control over branch density and type. Reactive grafting, often initiated by peroxides, is a widely used technique to introduce branches onto backbones. In the case of PP, dicumyl peroxide or benzoyl peroxide generates radicals on the polymer chain during reactive , facilitating the attachment of (MA) as short branches, typically at concentrations of 0.05–0.25 phr MA with 0.2–0.5 phr peroxide at 160°C. These radicals can also promote chain scission and recombination, leading to long-chain branching (LCB) alongside the primary grafts, though excessive peroxide (>0.4 phr) risks crosslinking and molecular weight reduction. This method has been industrially applied since the 1980s for producing maleic anhydride-grafted PP (PP-g-MA), which serves as a compatibilizer in blends like PP-PET, improving interfacial and morphology at 1–2.5% loading. Similarly, post-polymerization modification of linear PE to LCB-PE enhances melt strength for applications like . Using such as dilauroyl peroxide (DLP) or benzoyl peroxide (BPO) in solution-state processes at 125–135°C, radicals form on PE chains, enabling recombination to create LCB without significant crosslinking, as confirmed by in organic solvents. For instance, treating high-density PE (HDPE) with 0–6 wt% DLP increases complex and LCB index (up to 0.58), shifting processability from injection to grades, with melt-state variants commercialized since the via homogeneous radical reactions. Click chemistry offers a more precise alternative for attaching branches post-synthesis, leveraging high-yield reactions like copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC). This enables the grafting of functional side chains or polymers, such as alkyne-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone) to azide-bearing cores for star polymers, or azide-dendrons to poly(vinylacetylene) backbones for dendronized structures, achieving quantitative yields under mild conditions. Thiol–ene click reactions further allow UV-controlled attachment of branches like polylactide side chains to polymer scaffolds, facilitating dense architectures such as bottlebrush or hyperbranched glycopolymers. These methods provide superior control over branch density compared to radical approaches, minimizing side reactions and enabling bioorthogonal modifications for advanced materials. The primary advantage of post-polymerization branching lies in its ability to tune branch density independently of polymerization parameters, allowing retrofitting of existing polymers for specific performance needs, such as improved in PE or polarity in PP, while avoiding the complexities of in-situ branching during synthesis.

Characterization and Measurement

Branching Index and Molecular Weight Analysis

The branching index, denoted as gg, serves as a key quantitative metric for assessing the extent of branching in polymers by comparing the conformational dimensions of branched and linear structures. Specifically, gg is defined as the ratio of the weight-average squared of the branched polymer to that of its linear counterpart at the same molecular weight: g=⟨Rg2⟩w,br⟨Rg2⟩w,ling = \frac{\langle R_g^2 \rangle_{w,br}}{\langle R_g^2 \rangle_{w,lin}}. Values of g<1g < 1 indicate a more compact structure due to branching, with lower values corresponding to higher degrees of branching; for instance, g≈0.1g \approx 0.1 signifies highly branched architectures. This parameter can be determined using light scattering techniques, where the molecular weight of the linear analog (Mw,linM_{w,lin}) is calculated for the polymer that would exhibit the same as the branched sample (Mw,brM_{w,br}), yielding g=Mw,linMw,brg = \frac{M_{w,lin}}{M_{w,br}} under conditions assuming Gaussian chain statistics. Complementing the branching index, molecular weight analysis often employs the intrinsic viscosity ratio g′=[η]br[η]ling' = \frac{[\eta]_{br}}{[\eta]_{lin}}, which quantifies the reduction in hydrodynamic volume caused by branching. Here, [η]br[\eta]_{br} and [η]lin[\eta]_{lin} are the intrinsic viscosities of the branched and linear polymers, respectively, measured at equivalent molecular weights; like gg, g′<1g' < 1 reflects a diminished hydrodynamic radius, with the ratio typically following an empirical relation g′≈gαg' \approx g^{\alpha} where α\alpha ranges from 0.5 to 1 depending on solvent quality and polymer architecture. This approach is particularly useful in size-exclusion chromatography coupled with viscometry, allowing indirect inference of branching from deviations in viscosity relative to linear standards. For example, in polyethylene samples, g′g' values below 0.8 have been associated with long-chain branching that alters solution behavior without direct structural visualization. These metrics originated from theoretical developments in the mid-20th century, with Zimm and Stockmayer establishing the foundational framework for gg in 1949 through of randomly branched chains. Subsequent work by Zimm and Kilb in 1959 extended this to g′g', incorporating hydrodynamic interactions for more practical measurements. However, both indices assume ideal Gaussian coil conformations, which may not hold in good solvents where effects prevail, potentially leading to overestimation of branching in non-theta conditions; polydispersity and irregular branching topologies further complicate interpretations, necessitating complementary techniques for validation.

Spectroscopic and Chromatographic Techniques

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) , particularly 13C NMR, serves as a cornerstone for identifying and quantifying branching in polyolefins by resolving specific carbon environments associated with branch points. In polyolefins like , 13C NMR distinguishes branch types through patterns, such as those arising from triad sequences (e.g., ethylene-hexene-ethylene or EHE triads), where short-chain branches like butyl or hexyl groups produce distinct signals in the 14-40 ppm range. Quantitative branch frequency is determined using methods like Randall's approach, which integrates peak areas relative to a reference signal (e.g., the γ carbon at 30.0 ppm) and normalizes to 1000 backbone carbons, enabling precise calculations of branches per 1000 carbons. High-field 13C NMR at 188.6 MHz or higher enhances resolution of overlapping signals from long-chain branches (LCBs), allowing detection down to low frequencies. Advanced variants like refocused insensitive nuclei enhanced by polarization transfer (RINEPT) coupled with anti-incredible natural abundance double quantum transfer experiment (anti-INADEQUATE) boost sensitivity for LCB detection in (LLDPE), achieving a 4.5-fold signal-to-noise improvement over standard methods and enabling quantification in ethylene-hexene copolymers with minimal overlap from short-chain branches. For example, in (LDPE), 13C NMR identifies butyl branches from backbiting, quantifying them at typically 15-30 branches per 1000 carbons with resolution sufficient for 0.1 branches per 1000 carbons using optimized conditions. Size-exclusion chromatography coupled with (SEC-MALS) provides insights into branched conformation by simultaneously measuring molecular weight and (R_g) across the elution profile. In branched s, SEC-MALS generates conformation plots comparing R_g of samples against linear standards, revealing contraction due to branching via the Zimm-Stockmayer equation, which estimates LCB frequency per . This method quantifies LCB content and distribution across the molecular weight range, correcting for short-chain branch effects using empirical calibration with linear copolymers, and achieves high precision for homopolymers and copolymers. Liquid chromatography at critical conditions (LC-CC) elucidates branch topology by tuning solvent-stationary phase interactions to render dependence negligible, allowing separation based on architectural differences like linear versus star or comb structures. In LC-CC, one segment becomes "invisible," enabling analysis of ing in copolymers such as polystyrene-polyisoprene, where retention reflects and rather than overall . For branched polyolefins and polyesters, LC-CC differentiates topologies by adsorption mechanisms, providing direct evidence of branch placement and multiplicity that complements indirect methods like branching indices.

Effects on Polymer Properties

Rheological and Viscoelastic Impacts

Branching in polymers, particularly long-chain branching (LCB), significantly influences rheological behavior by altering entanglement and mobility, leading to increased zero-shear viscosity compared to linear counterparts at equivalent weight-average molecular weight (M_w). For linear polymers, zero-shear viscosity (η_0) scales as η_0 ∝ M_w^{3.4} in the entangled , whereas branched structures exhibit an adjusted exponent of 3.6–4.0 due to increased chain ends and more compact conformations that dilute entanglements. This increase is exemplified in (LDPE), which contains random LCB and displays higher zero-shear than (HDPE), a linear , at comparable M_w; however, LDPE's stronger at processing shear rates facilitates easier flow in applications. In contrast, sparse LCB elevates η_0 by enhancing entanglements, and the net effect in branched systems like LDPE is a viscosity increase at low shear, with improved flowability at high shear due to pronounced . Viscoelastic properties are profoundly affected, with LCB inducing strain-hardening in extensional flows, where transient extensional rises above three times the zero-shear value, unlike the linear response in unbranched polymers. This hardening arises from branch points anchoring chains, stretching arms preferentially and boosting melt strength, critical for processes like . Oscillatory rheometry, measuring the relaxation modulus G(t), reveals broader relaxation spectra and longer terminal relaxation times in branched polymers, reflecting slower disentanglement due to branch constraints. Theoretical frameworks extend models, such as the Doi-Edwards tube model for linear chains, to branched architectures by incorporating branch-point dynamics and constraint release. Modifications like the pom-pom model account for LCB by treating branches as confined arms within the tube, predicting enhanced and extensional hardening observed experimentally in LCB polyethylenes. These models underscore industrial implications, where controlled branching optimizes processability without sacrificing molecular weight.

Thermal and Mechanical Property Changes

Branching in s can affect the temperature (T_g) depending on the polymer type and branch nature; while additional chain ends may enhance segmental mobility and lower T_g in some systems, branches can also restrict motion like bulky side groups, potentially increasing T_g. For instance, in , T_g is slightly higher for branched forms like (LDPE, ≈ -110 °C) compared to linear (HDPE, ≈ -125 °C), reflecting the influence of branch points on local dynamics. Similarly, melting temperatures (T_m) are lowered due to imperfect induced by branches; (LDPE), with its branched structure, exhibits a T_m of approximately 105–115°C, in contrast to the 120–130°C for (HDPE), which has a more linear architecture. In dendritic polymers, the highly branched architecture often results in a broadened , spanning 20–30°C or more, owing to the heterogeneity in chain end densities and internal crowding that creates a distribution of relaxation environments. This broadening, observed in phosphorus-containing dendrimers, arises from generational variations and complex relaxations during the transition. Mechanically, branching typically enhances impact strength and by promoting energy dissipation through branch-induced chain entanglements and reduced crystallinity, though it often lowers the tensile modulus due to decreased alignment under load. Star-shaped polymers, for example, demonstrate improved elongation at break and strain hardening, contributing to elastomeric behavior with ultimate tensile strengths up to 33 MPa and elongations exceeding 1400% in aliphatic systems. These changes complement rheological enhancements in flow properties, enabling better processability without sacrificing overall durability.

Influence on Crystallinity and Morphology

Branching in polymers introduces structural irregularities that significantly disrupt the formation of ordered crystalline domains, acting as defects that hinder chain packing and reduce overall crystallinity. In semi-crystalline polymers like , short-chain branches prevent close alignment of polymer chains, leading to lower degrees of crystallinity compared to their linear counterparts; for instance, (LDPE) with substantial branching exhibits 40-60% crystallinity, while (HDPE) achieves 70-90% due to minimal branching. This reduction arises because branches exclude segments from incorporating into crystal lattices, effectively lowering the crystalline fraction and promoting amorphous regions. In addition to direct disruption of , branching diminishes the density of tie chains—interlamellar bridges that connect adjacent lamellae and enhance mechanical integrity in semi-crystalline structures. By shortening the effective linear segments available for folding and bridging, branches limit tie-chain formation, resulting in a looser interlamellar network and further compromised crystalline organization. (SAXS) studies confirm this effect, showing reduced long-period spacing and fewer tie-chain contributions in branched systems during crystallization. The morphological consequences of branching extend to altered nanoscale organization, where lamellar thickening is inhibited due to the steric hindrance from side chains, preventing efficient chain folding and perfection of crystal layers. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and SAXS analyses reveal that branched polymers often deviate from the classic folded-chain lamellar model, instead adopting fringed micelle-like structures with disordered, micellar aggregates of crystalline domains embedded in amorphous matrices. This morphology is particularly evident in systems with high branch content, where crystallites form smaller, less oriented bundles rather than extended lamellae. Hyperbranched polymers exemplify extreme cases of branching-induced amorphicity, remaining predominantly non-crystalline even when derived from monomers capable of forming crystalline linear analogs, due to the dense, globular architecture that precludes regular packing. In branched copolymers, this can lead to microphase separation, where incompatible branched segments drive domain formation, further modulating morphology beyond simple crystallinity reduction.

References

  1. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/1polymer/terms.html
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5325128/
  3. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c00286
  4. https://www.eng.uc.edu/~beaucag/Classes/Properties/Hyperbranched%20Polymers%20Review%202009.pdf
  5. https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/principles-detection-and-characterization-branching-synthetic-and-natural-polymers-mals
  6. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/matse81/node/2210
  7. https://web.pdx.edu/~wamserc/C336S08/29notes.htm
  8. http://www.chem.ucla.edu/harding/IGOC/B/branched.html
  9. https://www.nature.com/articles/160900a0
  10. http://scholle.oc.uni-kiel.de/lind/iteach/kh_struct/kh_struct_eng_kap3.pdf
  11. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01856a061
  12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/actp.1997.010480105
  13. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/11/2/45/181655/Theory-of-Molecular-Size-Distribution-and-Gel
  14. https://employees.csbsju.edu/cschaller/Principles%20Chem/macromolecules/MMarchitecture.htm
  15. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Polymers/Properties_of_Polymers
  16. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/29783/DISSERTATION_SerkanUnal_pdf.pdf
  17. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04357
  18. https://www.essentialchemicalindustry.org/polymers/polyethene.html
  19. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/py/d1py00089f
  20. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00008
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/star-polymer
  22. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01597
  23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00914037.2021.1981319
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079670009000422
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365920302534
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4074873/
  27. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/09604
  28. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ma00163a029
  29. http://web.mit.edu/course/10/10.569/www/Tomaliadendrhistory.pdf
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11301287/
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359028697800101
  32. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01649
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/marc.200900450
  34. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01120a005
  35. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ma071413o
  36. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01856a062
  37. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/py/d3py01399e
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7915049/
  39. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0518%2819991015%2937%3A20%3C3817%3A%3AAID-POLA10%3E3.0.CO%3B2-V
  40. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00251
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451929423004096
  42. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ma990009p
  43. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00829
  44. http://publications.iupac.org/pac/1988/pdf/6009x1403.pdf
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386105004684
  46. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac010072o
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0167732220371981
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Effect-of-MW-and-branching-on-zero-shear-viscosity-for-polymer-melts-Beyond-a-critical_fig3_343106627
  49. http://polymerphysics.net/pdf/JNonCrystSolids_235-237_709_98.pdf
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386198003188
  51. https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/47/3/717/239766/Separating-the-effects-of-sparse-long-chain
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7927097/
  53. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2011/sm/c0sm00891e
  54. https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/63/2/361/241164/Review-on-tube-model-based-constitutive-equations
  55. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00018730210153216
  56. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/py/c3py00896g
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009250907009189
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5651846/
  59. https://hal.science/hal-01308056v1/document
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386421003118
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014305704003374
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969722015510
  63. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-020-09931-1
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386115300896
  65. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02000
  66. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ma00167a015
  67. https://hal.science/hal-03872298/document
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0032386114011367
  69. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/28064/09LITREVETD.PDF
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079670001000181
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6017023/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.