Hubbry Logo
Black flying foxBlack flying foxMain
Open search
Black flying fox
Community hub
Black flying fox
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Black flying fox
Black flying fox
Black flying fox
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Black flying fox
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Chiroptera
Family: Pteropodidae
Genus: Pteropus
Species:
P. alecto
Binomial name
Pteropus alecto
Temminck, 1837
Subspecies
  • P. a. alecto
  • P. a. aterrimus
  • P. a. gouldi
  • P. a. morio
Black flying fox range
Roosting colony of Black Flying Fox in Perrin Park, Brisbane, Australia, in late afternoon. Children in an adjacent playground can be heard also.
recorded 9 September 2018
Problems playing this file? See media help.

The black flying fox or black fruit bat (Pteropus alecto) is a bat in the family Pteropodidae. It is among the largest bats in the world, but is considerably smaller than the largest species in its genus, Pteropus. The black flying fox is native to Australia, Papua New Guinea, and Indonesia. It is not a threatened species.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Juvenile specimens of this species from Moa Island in Torres Strait have been described as a separate species, Pteropus banakrisi.[2] This supposed species was known as the "Torresian flying fox" or "Moa Island fruit bat".

Description

[edit]

The black flying fox has short, black hair with a contrasting reddish-brown mantle, and a mean forearm length of 164 mm (6.46 in) and a mean weight of 710 g (1.57 lb). It is one of the largest bat species in the world, and has a wingspan of more than 1 metre (39 in).

Distribution

[edit]

Black flying foxes are native to Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, Northern Territory and Western Australia), Papua New Guinea (Western Province) and Indonesia (West Papua, Sulawesi, Sumba, and Savu).

Roosting habits

[edit]

During the day, individuals reside in large roosts (colonies or 'camps') consisting of hundreds to tens of thousands of individuals. They sometimes share their roosts with the grey-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus), the spectacled flying fox (P. conspicillatus), and/or the little red flying fox (P. scapulatus). They roost in mangroves, paperbark swamps, patches of rainforest and bamboo forests, and very rarely in caves or underneath overhangs.

Reproduction

[edit]

Black flying foxes breed once a year. A single young is born, and carried by its mother for the first month of life, after which it is left behind in the roost when the mother is out foraging at night.

Diet

[edit]
Black flying fox feeding on a palm, Brisbane, Australia

Black flying foxes eat pollen and nectar from native eucalyptus, lilypillies, paperbark, and turpentine trees. When native foods are scarce, particularly during drought, the bats may take introduced or commercial fruits, such as mangos and apples. This species had been known to travel up to 50 km (31 mi) a night in search of food. In residential areas, the species has adapted to eating introduced cocos palm trees as a substitute for scarcer native species - and now accounts for around 30% of the animals' food source. However, the high acidity of the palm fruits can prove toxic and may lead to death.[3]

Conservation

[edit]
Group in northern New South Wales, Australia

The black flying fox is not listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List; nevertheless, the species is exposed to several threats, including loss of foraging and roosting habitat, and mass die-offs caused by extreme temperature events.[4] Because climate change is predicted to make Australia hotter, the negative impacts this species faces from extreme temperature events are expected to grow into a larger problem.[5] According to one study, these animals begin to die once temperatures reach above 40°C.[5] Another study of records from wildlife rehabilitation clinics in Australia found that heat stress particularly affected black flying foxes compared to other flying fox species. Clinic records indicated that 46% of wildlife rescues of black flying foxes were due to heat stress, compared to 18% of grey-headed flying fox rescues and 8% of little red flying fox rescues.[6]

When present in urban environments, black flying foxes are sometimes perceived as a nuisance. Because their roosting and foraging habits bring the species into conflict with humans, it suffers from direct killing of animals in orchards and harassment and destruction of roosts. In Indonesia, this species is frequently consumed as bushmeat, with concerns that the population loss might not be sustainable.[7]

As a disease vector

[edit]

Negative public perception of the species has intensified with the discovery of three recently emerged zoonotic viruses that are potentially fatal to humans: Australian bat lyssavirus,[8] Hendra virus, and Menangle virus. However, only the Australian bat lyssavirus is known from two isolated cases to be directly transmissible from bats to humans.

Wildlife rescue

[edit]

Flying foxes often come to the attention of Australian wildlife care and rescue organisations, such as Wildcare Australia,[9] Orphan Native Animal Rear and Release Association Incorporated,[10] Wildlife Carers Darling Downs, Bat Care, Bat Rescue, Tweed Valley Wildlife Carers, and WIRES when reported as injured, sick, orphaned or abandoned. A very high proportion of adult flying fox injuries are caused by entanglement in barbed wire fences or loose, improperly erected fruit tree netting, both of which can result in very serious injuries and a slow, agonizing death for the animal if not rescued quickly.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Black flying fox

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) is a large species in the Pteropodidae, distinguished by its uniformly black fur, with occasional reddish-brown collars or eye rings, a head-body length of 23–28 cm, forearm length of 15–19 cm, wingspan exceeding 1 m, and adult weight ranging from 500–1000 g. Native to coastal regions of northern and eastern , extending from in to northern , as well as and parts of including , this inhabits tropical and subtropical rainforests, mangroves, eucalypt woodlands, and areas, often roosting in large colonies high in trees such as or mangroves during the day. Nocturnal and nomadic, Black flying foxes forage at dusk for nectar, pollen, and fruit from native plants like eucalypts, paperbarks, figs, and other species, playing a key ecological role in and while traveling distances of 6–11 km or more nightly; they mate in autumn, giving birth to a single pup in spring, which is weaned after five months and reaches around two years old. Classified as Least Concern by the IUCN due to its wide distribution and stable populations, the species faces localized threats from habitat clearance for , causing mass die-offs, and human conflicts including as orchard pests, though it also serves as a for viruses like Hendra, prompting concerns without evidence of deliberate transmission to humans.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Classification and Evolutionary Context

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto Temminck, 1837) is classified in the kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Mammalia, order Chiroptera, suborder , family Pteropodidae ( fruit bats), subfamily Pteropodinae, genus (flying foxes). The species comprises at least two , P. a. alecto and P. a. gouldii, distributed across its range in and . Pteropus is the largest in Pteropodidae, encompassing 63–65 extant species characterized by large body size, reliance on vision for navigation, and absence of laryngeal echolocation, distinguishing them from the microbats (). Phylogenetically, P. alecto occupies a distinct terminal within the monophyletic genus , as resolved by multi-locus analyses incorporating mitochondrial and nuclear markers from 50+ Pteropus species. This radiation likely originated in , with subsequent dispersals driving diversification across islands and continents, including where P. alecto resides; divergence times for deep Pteropus splits are estimated at 10–20 million years ago based on calibrated molecular clocks, though exact placement of P. alecto relative to continental vs. insular clades requires further sampling. The Pteropodinae, including Pteropus, exhibits rapid linked to insular and body size variation, with P. alecto exemplifying large-bodied frugivores adapted to tropical forests. The evolutionary history of Pteropodidae traces to the early Eocene–Oligocene (ca. 35–50 million years ago), when megabats diverged from other chiropterans, as inferred from sparse fossils like Archaeopteropus and molecular phylogenies supporting as a clade uniting megabats with rhinolophoid microbats. However, lacks pre-Holocene fossils, implying geologically recent emergence (–) amid Pleistocene climate fluctuations that facilitated island hopping and mainland recolonization. This paucity of direct evidence underscores reliance on genetic data for reconstructing phylogeny, revealing low interspecies divergence in some lineages consistent with ongoing or cryptic diversification.

Genetic and Phylogenetic Relationships

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) is classified within the genus Pteropus of the family Pteropodidae, subfamily Pteropodinae, a group of Old World fruit bats characterized by non-echolocating, frugivorous habits. Phylogenetic reconstructions using concatenated mitochondrial (cytochrome b and 12S rRNA) and nuclear (RAG1, von Willebrand factor, BRCA1) loci confirm the monophyly of Pteropus, with P. alecto embedded among ~50 sampled congeners in analyses spanning the genus's Indo-Pacific radiation. These studies reveal a pattern of short terminal branches for individual species, signaling rapid, star-like diversification bursts during the Pleistocene, likely driven by island colonization and habitat shifts rather than adaptive radiations. Updated phylogenies incorporating five loci (CYTB, , , RAG2, STAT5A) across 53 Pteropus species (93% of recognized diversity) reinforce genus-level with high bootstrap support (>98%), while resolving interspecific relationships variably. For P. alecto, specimens from Australian versus Sulawesi populations show discordant placements, suggesting possible cryptic lineages, ongoing gene flow, or taxonomic revision needs, though the species aligns broadly with Australasian and Southeast Asian clades. Comparative genome sequencing places P. alecto in tight affinity with large-bodied relatives like P. vampyrus (), based on whole-genome alignments highlighting shared derived traits in metabolic and immune loci. Population-level genetics underscore P. alecto's evolutionary resilience, with whole-genome resequencing of 50 individuals yielding 72.2 million high-quality SNPs and diversity exceeding typical mammalian levels, coupled with low indicative of large effective population sizes. Demographic inferences reveal >100-fold fluctuations over the past million years, tied to Pleistocene glacial cycles and events like the Toba eruption ~74,000 years ago, followed by rapid recoveries; adaptive signals enrich in metabolic pathways but show limited recent selection. The complete mitochondrial , at 16,739 bp encoding standard features (13 proteins, 22 tRNAs, 2 rRNAs), supports these findings and enables fine-scale barcoding, though mtDNA alone underestimates nuclear diversity.

Physical Characteristics

Morphology and Anatomy

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) possesses a robust, fur-covered body with predominantly black pelage, occasionally featuring lighter hairs that impart a frosted appearance to the belly and a rusty or reddish collar encircling the neck and upper back. The head exhibits a dog-like muzzle, large dark eyes often rimmed with faint brown or red-brown fur, prominent rounded ears, and unfurred lower legs. These bats lack a tail, a characteristic feature of the genus Pteropus. The wings consist of a thin, hairless patagium extending from the sides of the body to the elongated digits of the manus, ankles, and absent tail region, enabling sustained flight. Claws are present on the first digit (thumb) of the wing and on digits I and II of the hind foot, facilitating gripping during roosting and foraging. The wing membrane includes propatagium (from neck to shoulder), chiropatagium (body to fingers), and plagiopatagium (body to legs), with minimal uropatagium due to tail absence; a calcar may support residual membrane near the ankles. Cranially, the skull supports large orbits for enhanced vision, adapted to nocturnal and crepuscular activity, with dentition suited to frugivory: dental formula 2/2, 1/1, 3/3, 3/3 (total 34 teeth), featuring simple, peg-like molars and prominent canines for grasping fruit. Internally, the gastrointestinal tract comprises a short esophagus, simple unilocular stomach, elongated coiled small intestine for nutrient absorption from fruit, absent caecum, and short colon, reflecting adaptations to a diet of pulpy fruits and nectar with rapid transit times. The lungs are comparatively voluminous, supporting high metabolic demands of flight, as observed in morphometric studies across Pteropus species.

Size, Weight, and Sexual Dimorphism

The black flying fox ( alecto) is among the larger species of fruit bats, exhibiting a head-body length ranging from 230 to 280 mm and a length of 153 to 191 mm. Its measures approximately 1 m, enabling efficient flight over long distances in search of food. Adult body mass typically falls between 500 and 1000 g, reflecting variability influenced by factors such as age, nutrition, and reproductive status. Sexual size dimorphism is minimal in P. alecto, with males and females achieving comparable adult dimensions overall. Males may exhibit subtle advantages in certain cranial measurements, potentially linked to intrasexual , though body mass and linear dimensions show no pronounced differences between sexes. Growth trajectories indicate that females reach adult size in 14.8 to 17 months, while males require 16.3 to 18 months, suggesting prolonged male development without resulting in significant size disparity. This pattern aligns with observations in related species, where male-biased dimorphism in specific traits contrasts with the female-larger trend common in many bats.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) has a wide distribution across the Australasian region, spanning from to . It occurs in , including Sulawesi, the Moluccas, the Lesser Sundas, , and the Aru Islands; , encompassing the mainland and surrounding islands such as the ; and northern . In Australia, the species is primarily found in coastal and near-coastal areas from Shark Bay in eastward across the and , extending south to the Bellinger River in northern . Its latitudinal range approximates 0° to 29°S. Populations in southeastern Australia have exhibited range expansion southward into New South Wales and Victoria since the late 1990s, attributed to increased availability of flowering and fruiting trees, suitable roosting sites, and possibly climate-driven shifts in food resources. The species is classified as Least Concern by the IUCN due to its broad distribution and lack of evidence for significant population declines across its range, though local threats vary by region.

Habitat Requirements and Adaptations

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) occupies tropical and subtropical habitats across northern and eastern , coastal regions of Indonesia, and , typically within 250 km of the coast but extending inland where suitable vegetation persists. Preferred environments include rainforests, eucalypt open forests, woodlands, mangroves, paperbark swamps, and stands, with roosting sites selected for proximity to water bodies and seasonal food sources such as flowering trees. Roosts form in large, dense colonies high in tree canopies—often 12–16 m in bamboo or over 18 m in rainforests—with individuals spaced approximately 1 m apart for thermoregulation and predator avoidance; seasonal shifts favor bamboo during dry periods and rainforests during wet and pre-monsoon build-up seasons to align with resource pulses. These camps, sometimes shared with sympatric flying fox species, are commonly established in mangrove islands at river estuaries or gallery forests, minimizing exposure while facilitating rapid dispersal to foraging grounds up to 50 km away. Key adaptations include high mobility, with documented flights exceeding 1,500 km across multiple roosts to track ephemeral nectar and fruit availability, supported by a large body mass of 500–1,000 g and wing morphology optimized for efficient gliding over fragmented landscapes. Dietary generalism enables exploitation of diverse plants—such as Eucalyptus in dry seasons and Melaleuca during build-up—while behavioral flexibility allows persistence in human-modified areas, including urban parks and orchards, amid habitat loss from clearing. This resilience to environmental variability and anthropogenic pressures underscores the species' capacity to maintain populations in increasingly altered ecosystems, though ongoing fragmentation poses risks to roost stability.

Behavior and Ecology

Roosting and Social Behavior

Black flying foxes (Pteropus alecto) are highly gregarious, forming large communal roosts or camps during the day that can comprise hundreds to hundreds of thousands of individuals, reflecting their social nature and dependence on collective aggregation for , predator avoidance, and information sharing. These roosts typically occur in tall trees of riparian zones, mangroves, or rainforests, where bats hang inverted from branches, often in exposed positions rather than dense foliage, spacing themselves closely—less than 1 m apart in some habitats like bamboo thickets. Individuals exhibit strong roost fidelity, frequently returning to the same branch or location across days or seasons, which minimizes energy expenditure and maintains social bonds. Social organization within roosts is structured, with distinct spatial segregation: all-male trees for non-breeding or territorial males, sub-adult clusters, and mixed areas housing family units of mothers with dependent pups, alongside unrelated adults. Diurnal behavior is predominantly sedentary, with bats spending most of the day in a "hang relaxed" posture—limbs extended, head down—for resting and energy conservation; movement is minimal after dawn arrivals, limited to occasional shifts for grooming, allogrooming, or vigilant "hang alert" scans of surroundings. Vocalizations, including squeals and chatters, facilitate communication during squabbles over space or perches, while agonistic displays—wing flapping, biting, or chasing—resolve conflicts, particularly in dense aggregations. During breeding periods, intensify as dominant males establish and defend small territories (defined by proximity to nearest neighbors) within , using aggressive postures and vocal threats to attract females and deter rivals, thereby shaping hierarchies. interactions emphasize maternal care, with females carrying newborns clinging to their fur or teats initially, transitioning to nearby roosting as pups develop flight capability around 3-4 months; sub-adult males often form groups, exhibiting play-fighting that hones . Males generally show higher inter-roost mobility than females, potentially for mate searching or scouting, underscoring sex-based differences in social ranging. This fission-fusion structure allows flexibility, with subgroups forming and dissolving based on seasonal availability or disturbance, yet core social ties persist through repeated associations.

Foraging and Migration Patterns

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) exhibits nocturnal foraging behavior, departing roosts at dusk to feed primarily on nectar, pollen, and fruit from native trees such as eucalypts, paperbarks, and turpentines, as well as introduced species when available. Individuals return to roosts at dawn after traveling distances that vary with food patch quality and proximity, with radio-tracking studies in suburban Brisbane revealing average nightly foraging ranges of up to 20 km during summer and winter seasons between 1998 and 2000. Females typically forage farther from roosts than males, reflecting sex-specific energy demands, while both sexes prioritize energy-rich blossoms during peak flowering periods. Foraging strategies align with in seasonal environments, where P. alecto selects patches based on bloom density and nutritional yield, often shifting to urban or non-native resources amid . In northern Australian landscapes, such as the , bats exploit ephemeral resources like wet-season fruits and dry-season mangroves, with data indicating resource-tracking drives nightly commutes rather than fixed routes. Winter roost occupancy in does not correlate strongly with native or non-native availability, suggesting additional factors like thermal regulation influence alongside food. Migration patterns in P. alecto are characterized by nomadic, food-driven movements rather than rigid seasonal migrations observed in congeners like the . Populations exhibit local migrations, with camp sizes in Darwin fluctuating inversely between northern and southern sites, correlating with regional flowering synchrony. and radio-telemetry reveal annual travel distances of 1,427–1,887 km across networks of up to 755 roosts, including cross-border shifts between and . Seasonal roost transitions occur from and sites in the to rainforests in the , enabling exploitation of pulsed resources while minimizing energy expenditure. These patterns underscore P. alecto's adaptability to heterogeneous tropical and subtropical habitats, with males more prone to inter-roost dispersal than females.

Daily and Seasonal Activity Cycles

The black flying fox, Pteropus alecto, maintains a strictly nocturnal lifestyle, roosting communally during daylight hours in camps consisting of thousands of individuals, where the predominant activities are sleeping (accounting for 41.53% of observed diurnal behaviors), grooming, and limited social interactions such as agonistic displays or vocalizations. Nighttime activity shifts to foraging, with feeding comprising 16.17% of nocturnal observations, focused on , , and from canopy trees, often commencing shortly after sunset in response to twilight duration for visual . This aligns with reduced predation risk and peak resource availability under darkness, as P. alecto relies on acute vision rather than echolocation. Seasonal variations in activity are driven by monsoonal climate patterns in , where P. alecto shifts roosting sites from dry-season bamboo thickets and mangroves (May–October) to wet-season (November–April) , correlating with synchronized flowering and fruiting events. ranges expand during resource pulses, such as eucalypt blossom in dry periods or rainforest fruits in wet phases, with radio-tracked individuals covering up to 50 km nightly but exhibiting higher mobility (e.g., roost relocations every 1–3 months) to track these ephemeral food sources across , woodland, and riparian habitats. Physiological markers, including body condition and levels, fluctuate accordingly, peaking in stress during dry-season scarcity and declining with wet-season abundance, underscoring resource-driven behavioral plasticity without marked sex differences. These patterns enable persistence in heterogeneous landscapes, though urban encroachment may disrupt traditional cycles by providing supplemental exotic fruits year-round.

Reproduction and Life History

Breeding Biology

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) exhibits seasonal reproduction synchronized with periods of peak food availability, particularly flowering and fruiting events, to support lactation and juvenile survival. Mating typically occurs from February to April across much of its range, with males establishing individual territories on tree branches to attract females during this period. Little detailed information exists on the precise mating system, though observations suggest promiscuity without paternal care, as males do not provide resources to females or offspring. Gestation lasts approximately six months, resulting in births timed to coincide with maximal plant productivity. In northern Australian populations (around 12°S latitude), most pups are born between and March, while in southern eastern (around 27°S), the peak shifts to October–November; a smaller proportion of births occur outside these windows in both regions, indicating some reproductive plasticity. Females produce only one offspring per year, reflecting a low reproductive rate adapted to the ' longevity and environmental stability in tropical and subtropical habitats. This latitudinal variation in breeding enables P. alecto to exploit diverse from equatorial regions to 29°S, with the flexibility likely contributing to its wide distribution; however, disruptions to floral resources from variability or loss can desynchronize and elevate juvenile mortality.

Juvenile Development and Mortality

Juveniles of Pteropus alecto are born following a period of approximately 180-190 days, typically in February in , with mothers giving birth to a single pup. Pups are altricial at birth, weighing around 50-70 grams with sparse fur and closed eyes, and remain fully dependent on maternal care for the initial weeks. Mothers carry pups attached to their teats during foraging flights for the first 2-4 weeks, after which pups develop sufficient strength to cling to branches in the roost while females leave to feed and return to nurse. Pups open their eyes at about 10-14 days and begin limited wing flapping by 3-4 weeks, progressing to first flights around 6-8 weeks of age. Weaning occurs between 3-5 months, with pups transitioning to self-foraging as they achieve nutritional independence, though full behavioral autonomy may extend to 5-6 months. Growth is relatively slow, with juveniles reaching subadult size by 12 months, but sexual maturity is delayed until 24-30 months for females and slightly later for males, who attain larger body masses (up to 900 grams versus 600-700 grams for females). Mortality is exceptionally high during the juvenile phase, with overall survival from birth to adult size estimated at 30% for females and 37% for males, based on banding data from (n=846 females, n=990 males). This equates to annual juvenile mortality rates of approximately 40-45%, driven primarily by maternal abandonment, particularly during exceeding °C, which can lead to mass pup die-offs through and . Other causes include predation by raptors or snakes, nutritional stress from maternal failures, and infectious diseases, with pups under 3 months being most vulnerable due to limited mobility and thermoregulatory capacity. Despite these losses, populations persist through high , though ongoing climate-induced heat stress exacerbates early mortality.

Diet and Trophic Role

Primary Food Sources

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) is primarily a nectarivore and frugivore, with its diet consisting mainly of nectar, pollen, and fruits from native Australian flora. In Australia, the principal food sources include blossoms from Eucalyptus, Banksia, and Melaleuca species, which provide abundant nectar and pollen during flowering seasons. These bats also consume fruits from rainforest trees, such as figs (Ficus spp.) and other native species, with dietary analyses identifying remains from up to 23 rainforest plants. Seasonal availability drives foraging preferences, with and dominating in wet seasons when trees flower profusely, while s become more critical in dry periods. In tropical regions of , the species exploits a mix of monsoon-dependent flowering events and persistent sources, exhibiting generalist tendencies by switching between food types based on . Although opportunistic feeding on cultivated like mangoes occurs, native vegetation forms the core of their trophic niche, supporting energy needs for high-metabolic flight and reproduction. Pollen DNA metabarcoding studies confirm heavy reliance on family plants (e.g., eucalypts) for , alongside fruits from and other families, underscoring their role as pollinators and seed dispersers. In urban expansions, access to exotic fruits supplements but does not displace primary native sources, as evidenced by stable isotope analyses of .

Ecological Interactions and Impacts

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) serves as a key and seed disperser in tropical and subtropical ecosystems of , , and surrounding islands. By foraging on and from native flowering plants, it transfers between trees, promoting cross- and essential for health. This role is particularly vital for plants with generalized pollination syndromes, where P. alecto's mobility enables across fragmented habitats. Through consumption of ripe , the species disperses intact via endozoochory, often depositing them far from parent trees—up to several kilometers—via during flight. Studies on pteropodid bats, including P. alecto, indicate this process enhances establishment in disturbed or secondary forests, aiding regeneration of canopy like figs and eucalypts. Long-distance dispersal by flying foxes contributes to extensive seed shadows, reducing competition among siblings and maintaining dynamics in rainforests. In the seasonal tropics, P. alecto tracks synchronous fruiting events, synchronizing its movements with resource pulses and thereby influencing recruitment patterns across heterogeneous landscapes. Ecologically, P. alecto exhibits mutualistic interactions with numerous plant taxa but faces predation from raptors such as wedge-tailed eagles (Aquila audax) and snakes at roosts, which can regulate colony sizes. High-density roosting in mangroves and riparian zones may locally suppress growth through guano deposition and trampling, though this nutrient input often benefits . Negative impacts arise in agroecosystems, where on commercial fruits like mangoes and lychees causes crop losses estimated in millions of Australian dollars annually, prompting interventions such as netting and, until phased out in 2026, shooting permits. conversion for disrupts these interactions, reducing available native and potentially intensifying reliance on cultivated crops.

Role in Disease Dynamics

Pathogens and Reservoirs

The black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) acts as a for (HeV), a zoonotic paramyxovirus first identified in in 1994 that causes acute respiratory and neurological disease with near-100% fatality in horses and humans upon spillover. Seroprevalence studies have detected HeV-neutralizing antibodies in up to 50-80% of P. alecto populations across eastern , with active documented in , feces, and aborted fetuses, particularly during periods of physiological stress such as food scarcity or extreme heat. Experimental infections confirm that P. alecto sustains HeV replication without clinical signs of disease, supporting its role as a non-pathogenic host rather than an incidental carrier. While all four Australian Pteropus carry HeV, P. alecto exhibits the highest excretion rates and is most frequently implicated in spillover events to intermediate equine hosts. P. alecto has also been associated with (ABLV), a rhabdovirus phylogenetically related to , first isolated from a 5-month-old juvenile P. alecto in sub-tropical in 1996. Low-level ABLV prevalence (typically <1% RNA detection, 5-10% seroprevalence) persists in P. alecto colonies, with sporadic detections in oral swabs and tissues, though bats rarely show neurological symptoms. Human cases (four documented since 1996, all fatal) have followed bites or scratches from infected bats, underscoring direct transmission risk without intermediate hosts. Reservoir status for ABLV in P. alecto relies on isolation and serological data, but longitudinal studies indicate intermittent shedding tied to rather than chronic infection. Emerging evidence points to P. alecto harboring bacterial pathogens, including relapsing fever-associated Borrelia species; a 2025 study detected Borrelia DNA in 2% of screened P. alecto tissues from Australian colonies, suggesting potential vector-independent reservoir capacity, though transmission pathways remain unclarified. P. alecto kidney cells demonstrate susceptibility to influenza A viruses (e.g., H1N1 and H5N1 strains), enabling replication without cytopathic effects, but field evidence for natural reservoir status is limited to serological cross-reactivity rather than confirmed endemic circulation. Meta-analyses of bat-virus associations caution that while P. alecto supports persistent infections for select pathogens like HeV, claims of broad reservoir roles for others (e.g., henipaviruses beyond HeV) often lack robust proof of maintenance without external amplification. No clinical disease manifestations in P. alecto underpin its tolerance, linked to upregulated antiviral pathways such as constitutive interferon-alpha expression and dampened inflammasome responses.

Spillover Mechanisms and Risks

Spillover of pathogens from Pteropus alecto (black flying fox) to humans typically involves intermediate hosts rather than direct transmission, with (HeV) representing the primary documented zoonotic threat in . HeV, a , is excreted by infected bats in , , and feces, contaminating pastures, feed, or water sources where graze or are stabled beneath roosts. Horses ingest or inhale the virus, leading to acute respiratory or neurological disease with case fatality rates exceeding 50% in equines; subsequent infections occur through close contact with infected horses' bodily fluids, such as during veterinary care or handling, with human fatality rates approaching 60% based on limited cases (seven human infections recorded as of 2022, four fatal). Ecological drivers amplify spillover risk for HeV, including and , which force bat aggregations into peri-urban areas, increasing roost density and under nutritional stress from food . of 25 years of Australian data (1996–2020) links land-use changes, such as urban expansion, to heightened bat-horse proximity and HeV spillovers, with 60 equine cases identified, predominantly in subtropical and . No evidence supports direct bat-to-human HeV transmission, though theoretical risks exist via mucosal exposure to fresh excreta; surveillance detects HeV in bat urine at rates up to 10% during pulses linked to and waning immunity. Beyond HeV, P. alecto harbors other viruses with potential spillover, including (ABLV), a rabies-related pathogen transmitted via bat bites or scratches, causing four human fatalities in since 1996 despite rare exposures. dynamics, including (NiV) analogs, involve bat population outbreaks driven by density increases and viral recrudescence, though NiV spillovers are documented in Asian species rather than Australian P. alecto. Emerging coronaviruses and paramyxoviruses have been detected in P. alecto tissues, but no confirmed spillovers to humans; risks escalate with anthropogenic pressures like roost disturbance, which may prompt dispersal and excreta dispersal. Overall risks remain low for humans due to indirect transmission pathways and effective equine (available since 2012, reducing spillovers by over 90% in vaccinated populations), yet unvaccinated horses in bat-frequented areas sustain amplification potential. Climate warming projections suggest expanded ranges northward, potentially increasing HeV spillover zones by 2050, underscoring the need for ecological monitoring over , which lacks empirical support for risk reduction.

Epidemiological Evidence and Case Studies

Epidemiological surveillance of Pteropus alecto populations has identified the species as a key for (HeV), with seroprevalence rates of neutralizing antibodies ranging from 20-50% in sampled bats across eastern , varying by season and location. detection studies indicate active infection prevalence of 1-5% in oral swabs and urine, peaking in winter and spring, correlating with lower body condition and sub-adult age classes, which sustain population-level transmission through immunological naïveté. These patterns align with empirical data from longitudinal sampling, showing HeV dynamics driven by bat foraging stress and rather than inherent viral pathogenicity in the reservoir. Spillover events from P. alecto to , the primary intermediate host, have been documented in 59 cases between 1994 and 2020, predominantly in subtropical and , with 102 equine fatalities and seven human infections, four fatal. A 2021 case in involved a HeV genotype 2 (HeV-g2) spillover from P. alecto, marking the southernmost equine death and highlighting southward range expansion linked to climate-driven bat dispersal. Long-term analysis of 25 years of data attributes increased spillover risk to rapid and native loss, which force P. alecto into urban roosts and heighten equine exposure via contaminated feed or secretions, independent of roost disturbance interventions. No direct human-to-human transmission has occurred, underscoring intermediary hosts in causal chains. For (ABLV), P. alecto serves as a , with the virus first isolated in 1996 from a neurologically symptomatic juvenile near . Serological evidence shows low prevalence (under 1%) in wild populations, but outbreaks occur sporadically; a 2019 cluster involved 11 captive P. alecto pups dying over 11 days from confirmed ABLV infection, linked to maternal transmission. Human cases stem from bites or scratches, with four fatalities in as of July 2025, including a recent infection from an unidentified species, emphasizing efficacy when administered promptly. Clinical signs in infected P. alecto include aggression, , and , mirroring rabies-like pathology observed in a captive juvenile case progressing over nine days to death. ABLV detection remains rare, with eight cases reported nationwide in the first half of 2025, underscoring underreporting risks in .

Human-Wildlife Interactions

Agricultural and Economic Conflicts

Black flying foxes (Pteropus alecto) forage on , , blossoms, and fruits from both native vegetation and cultivated crops, resulting in direct consumption and physical damage to ripening produce in commercial orchards. This behavior is particularly pronounced in northern and eastern , where the species overlaps with fruit-growing regions such as and , targeting crops including mangoes, stone fruits, and lychees. from agricultural expansion exacerbates these incursions, as reduced native food availability drives bats toward reliable, human-provided sources during seasonal shortages. Economic losses from flying fox damage, including contributions from P. alecto, are estimated at approximately $20 million annually to Australia's commercial fruit industry, encompassing reduced yields and market value from scarred or dropped fruit. In , where black flying foxes are among the primary vertebrate pests affecting , such impacts cost primary producers millions of dollars each year, prompting investments in protective measures. These figures account for not only direct crop losses but also like premature harvesting to evade foraging peaks. Mitigation strategies include full-exclusion netting, which growers report as effective but capital-intensive, often requiring subsidies to offset installation and maintenance expenses exceeding initial crop value in smaller operations. In , damage mitigation permits have authorized limited lethal control, with hundreds issued annually for black flying foxes prior to phased restrictions, reflecting tensions between economic imperatives and ecological considerations. Non-lethal deterrents like or have shown variable efficacy and high recurring costs, underscoring unresolved conflicts where growers bear disproportionate burdens amid constraints favoring bat conservation.

Urban Coexistence Challenges

The establishment of large roosts by Pteropus alecto in urban areas of eastern , such as and , has intensified human-wildlife conflicts over the past two decades, driven by and the availability of native vegetation and supplementary food sources like fruiting trees in parks and backyards. These roosts, often comprising thousands of individuals in dense clusters spaced approximately 30 cm apart in canopy trees, result in substantial disturbances to residents, including persistent from vocalizations such as shrill calls and screams peaking during mating season (February–April) and audible in the 4–6 kHz range. Odor and mess from guano accumulation further exacerbate amenity loss, with droppings and corroding structures, fouling vehicles, and creating slippery public walkways that necessitate ongoing cleanup efforts by local councils. Scent-marking behaviors, including males rubbing odorous scapular gland secretions on branches during grooming and territorial displays, contribute to pervasive smells in residential proximity, compounding complaints about reduced usability of nearby parks and gardens. raids on urban trees, such as figs and palms, lead to property damage and minor economic losses for homeowners, though these are secondary to roost-related issues. Public health apprehensions, particularly regarding Pteropus alecto's role as a reservoir for and , heighten tensions despite low direct transmission risks to humans—Hendra typically spills over via horses, and lyssavirus cases remain rare (fewer than 10 human infections since 1996). Community surveys indicate that up to 20% of respondents overestimate direct zoonotic threats, fueling demands for roost dispersal amid broader amenity disruptions. These challenges persist as urban expansion overlaps with roost sites, with management options like habitat modification often proving ineffective or ecologically disruptive.

Management Interventions and Debates

Management interventions for black flying foxes (Pteropus alecto) in primarily focus on mitigating conflicts in urban and agricultural areas through non-lethal strategies outlined in regional management plans. Local governments, such as those in , adopt tiered approaches starting with community education on bat ecology and roost maintenance to reduce attractiveness of sites, including trimming vegetation and installing buffers between roosts and human habitation. Dispersal techniques, permitted under strict guidelines, involve non-harmful deterrents like noise, lights, or water sprays to encourage bats to relocate, but activities must avoid breeding seasons (typically to May) to minimize stress on pups. is rarely authorized and limited to specific licenses for crop protection, with proponents arguing it addresses immediate economic losses from fruit damage, though implementation is constrained by federal protections under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Debates center on the and of these interventions, with indicating dispersal succeeds in only about 17% of attempts, as bats frequently return or shift to nearby sites, exacerbating conflicts elsewhere and incurring high costs in resources and time. Critics, including conservation biologists, contend that fails to curb populations due to the ' high mobility and rapid reproductive rates, potentially increasing disease spillover risks like by stressing bats and disrupting social structures, while ignoring their role as pollinators and seed dispersers. Proponents of lethal control, often from agricultural sectors or certain politicians, highlight quantifiable crop losses—estimated at millions annually in —and question the ecological benefits amid observed population irruptions linked to changes, though studies show modifications like enhancement yield more sustainable outcomes without trade-offs. Community surveys reveal majority opposition to (over 70% in some urban polls), favoring and coexistence, reflecting tensions between short-term human interests and long-term stability.

Conservation and Population Dynamics

The Black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) is classified as Least Concern on the , reflecting a global population that does not meet criteria for threatened categories due to its wide distribution across , , and , with no evidence of significant decline. This assessment accounts for the species' adaptability to varied habitats, including urban areas, and high indicative of population health. In , P. alecto is not listed as threatened under federal legislation or in most states, including where it was removed from threatened schedules in August 2008 following evaluations of stable or increasing numbers. Recent reviews confirm expansion in both range extent and abundance within , attributed to southward shifts in distribution and utilization of anthropogenic food sources. Population trends are monitored through the National Flying-fox Monitoring Program, which conducts roost censuses and tracks camp occupancy; data for P. alecto show persistence in core northern and eastern Australian regions without the declines observed in sympatric species like the . Roost counts occasionally exceed 40,000 individuals in single camps, supporting estimates of robust local abundances, though precise global totals remain challenging due to nomadic behavior and overlapping ranges. Overall, trends suggest stability or localized growth, contrasting with broader Pteropodid declines driven by habitat loss elsewhere.

Identified Threats and Causal Factors

The primary threats to Pteropus alecto populations include habitat loss from agricultural expansion and urbanization, which reduces critical roosting and foraging sites such as riparian forests and native vegetation corridors. Clearing for farmland has particularly impacted winter habitats, forcing bats into fragmented landscapes and increasing reliance on human-modified environments. These changes are driven by ongoing land-use intensification across , , and , where the species' range overlaps with growing human settlements. Extreme weather events exacerbated by climate change, notably heat stress during prolonged high temperatures, cause significant mortality, with black flying foxes showing high vulnerability due to their exposed daytime roosting behavior. For instance, in southeast camps during a heat event, black flying foxes comprised 96% of recorded deaths, reflecting over 50% mortality in affected colonies and linking to rising frequencies of such anomalies. Causal factors include altered seasonal patterns and intensified droughts, which diminish food availability and compound physiological stress in this megachiropteran. Human persecution, including illegal shooting and camp disturbance in response to depredation on orchards, further pressures local populations, though enforcement varies by region. This conflict arises from bats' nomadic foraging, which brings them into agricultural areas during fruiting seasons, prompting retaliatory actions despite legal protections under Appendix II. While global populations remain stable enough for Least Concern status on the , these localized threats contribute to uneven declines, particularly in Australian subpopulations.

Policy Responses and Efficacy Critiques

In Australia, the Black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) is protected under state legislation, such as Queensland's Nature Conservation Act 1992, where it is classified as Least Concern, allowing for management interventions in cases of agricultural damage or urban conflicts while prohibiting unlicensed harm. Federally, it falls under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, which regulates impacts on flying foxes but permits licenced culling or dispersal for property protection, reflecting its non-threatened status compared to congeners like the Grey-headed flying fox. In New South Wales, it was delisted from vulnerable status in 2008 after assessments showed populations exceeding listing thresholds, enabling more flexible local management. Common interventions include camp dispersal via noise, lights, or habitat modification to relocate roosts from urban or horticultural areas, as trialled in multiple Australian sites since the . Licenced culling targets individuals causing verified crop losses, capped annually (e.g., up to 300 in some permits), though proponents argue it mitigates economic damages estimated at millions in fruit industries. Habitat buffering and education campaigns form non-lethal policies, promoting tree netting and public awareness to reduce conflicts without population-level impacts. Critiques highlight limited long-term efficacy of dispersals, with flying foxes returning to 83% of sites post-intervention due to their mobility and resource-seeking , often necessitating repeated, resource-intensive efforts. Only 23% of documented dispersal attempts since 2010 resolved community conflicts sustainably, frequently requiring irreversible that contravenes conservation principles for mobile species. Culling achieves merely transient local reductions, as recolonization occurs rapidly—within weeks—given the species' nomadic patterns spanning hundreds of kilometers, rendering it ineffective for or damage prevention without addressing underlying . Relocation efforts, such as the 2007 Maclean case involving government-funded netting and aversion stimuli, incurred high costs (over AUD 100,000) but failed to prevent roost re-establishment nearby, exacerbating tensions without verifiable benefits. Overall, policies prioritize short-term conflict alleviation over evidence-based habitat restoration, with critics noting that unmitigated urban expansion drives roost shifts, undermining intervention success absent broader land-use reforms.

References

  1. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Pteropus_alecto/
  2. https://australian.museum/learn/animals/mammals/black-flying-fox/
  3. https://wildlife.org.au/news-resources/educational-resources/species-profiles/mammals/flying-foxes/black-flying-fox/
  4. https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/animals/living-with/bats/flying-foxes/roost-monitoring-locations/flying-fox-roost-monitoring-and-locations/black-flying-fox
  5. https://animalia.bio/black-flying-fox
  6. https://aawhg.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/australian-pteropus-species-fact-sheets-v1.1.pdf
  7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=info&id=9402
  8. https://www.mammaldiversity.org/taxon/1004450/
  9. https://itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=947421
  10. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/3402/
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790314001092
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7546435/
  13. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2025.0743
  14. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-11-281
  15. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/70/6/1077/6161783
  16. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01807/full
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1673852723001121
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24438271/
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/pteropus-alecto
  20. https://cokesmithwildlife.com/genus-pteropus-australian-flying-foxes
  21. https://www.publish.csiro.au/zo/ZO9850625
  22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1682957/
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248902047_The_black_flying-fox_Pteropus_alecto_in_north_Australia_juvenile_mortality_and_longevity
  24. https://www.publish.csiro.au/zo/zo98023
  25. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/91/1/38/835893
  26. https://www.ecologyasia.com/verts/bats/black-flying-fox.htm
  27. https://threatenedspecies.bionet.nsw.gov.au/profile?id=10696
  28. https://tolgabathospital.org/bats/black-flying-fox/
  29. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/18715/22080057
  30. https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/files/44459620/Thesis_CDU_6218_Palmer_C.pdf
  31. https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-020-00829-w
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8495814/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43442505_Behaviour_of_the_Black_Flying_Fox_Pteropus_alecto_1_An_Ethogram_of_Behaviour_and_Preliminary_Characterisation_of_Mother-Infant_Interactions
  34. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-chiropterologica/volume-4/issue-2/001.004.0203/Behaviour-of-the-Black-Flying-Fox-Pteropus-alecto--1/10.3161/001.004.0203.pdf
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43442741_Behaviour_of_the_Black_Flying_Fox_Pteropus_alecto_2_Territoriality_and_Courtship
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5487794/
  37. https://www.publish.csiro.au/wr/pdf/wr01117
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5883002/
  39. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2024.1483865/full
  40. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/native-animals/native-animal-facts/land-mammals/flying-foxes
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240510062_Flying-foxes_Pteropus_alecto_and_P_scapulatus_in_the_Darwin_region_north_Australia_Patterns_in_camp_size_and_structure
  42. https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/studentTheses/ecology-of-the-black-flying-fox-pteropus-alecto-in-the-seasonal-t
  43. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1c79/34d76b330d07b9c196b7da1050a26d048dcc.pdf
  44. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-chiropterologica/volume-4/issue-2/001.004.0203/Behaviour-of-the-Black-Flying-Fox-Pteropus-alecto--1/10.3161/001.004.0203.full
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347207005349
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248883483_Seasonal_roosts_and_foraging_movements_of_the_black_flying_fox_Pteropus_alecto_in_the_Northern_Territory_resource_tracking_in_a_landscape_mosaic
  47. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1017/S0952836901000486
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7087910/
  49. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-chiropterologica/volume-4/issue-2/001.004.0204/Behaviour-of-the-Black-Flying-Fox-Pteropus-alecto--2/10.3161/001.004.0204.pdf
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248902229_Reproduction_growth_and_maturity_in_the_black_flying-fox_Pteropus_alecto_Megachiroptera_Pteropodidae
  51. https://meridian.allenpress.com/rzsnsw-other-books/book/601/chapter/12049812/The-reproductive-biology-and-intrinsic-capacity
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Vardon/publication/248902229_Reproduction_growth_and_maturity_in_the_black_flying-fox_Pteropus_alecto_Megachiroptera_Pteropodidae/links/54c9c1d90cf2f0b56c2482e2/Reproduction-growth-and-maturity-in-the-black-flying-fox-Pteropus-alecto-Megachiroptera-Pteropodidae.pdf
  53. https://www.publish.csiro.au/wr/pdf/WR24107
  54. https://batrescue.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Orphan-Training-Manual.pdf
  55. https://www.publish.csiro.au/pc/PC21003
  56. https://wildlifehealthaustralia.com.au/Incidents/Incident-Information/incident-flying-fox-pup-mortalities-2023
  57. https://www.animalecologylab.org/ff-heat-stress-forecaster.html
  58. https://www.publish.csiro.au/zo/fulltext/ZO20085
  59. https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/animals/living-with/bats/flying-foxes/about-flying-foxes/importance-of-flying-foxes
  60. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/species/flying-fox-law
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5587229/
  62. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/05-0386
  63. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.641411/full
  64. https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/animals/living-with/bats/flying-foxes/managing-impacts-of-flying-foxes/damage-mitigation-permits-for-crop-protection
  65. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Former_Committees/Environment_and_Energy/Flyingfoxmanagement/Report/section?id=committees%252Freportrep%252F024037%252F24314
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10073794/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1539106/
  68. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182171
  69. https://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/hendra.pdf
  70. https://faculty.wallin.wwu.edu/envr325/Eby_etal_2023_Pathogen_spillover_driven_by_rapid_changes_in_bat_ecology_Nature.pdf
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7107893/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7123318/
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37621136_The_Ecology_of_Hendra_virus_and_Australian_bat_lyssavirus
  74. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/articles/issue/31/7/table-of-contents
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4634287/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222010549
  77. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03128-0
  78. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05506-2
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6778453/
  80. https://wildlifehealthaustralia.com.au/Portals/0/ResourceCentre/FactSheets/Mammals/Hendra_virus_and_Australian_Wildlife.pdf
  81. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125881
  82. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2000429117
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7102861/
  84. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-023-01642-w
  85. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-08065-z
  86. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Hendra-Virus-An-Emerging-Zoonotic-Threat-in-a-Warming-World.aspx
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1286457901013843
  88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31364577/
  89. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/time-of-year-age-class-and-body-condition-predict-hendra-virus-infection-in-australian-black-flying-foxes-pteropus-alecto/8F97A3636A0AF71C656F7F0CC895488B
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9045453/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9768785/
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771420303086
  93. https://www.csiro.au/en/research/health-medical/diseases/infectious-diseases/australian-bat-lyssavirus
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8894131/
  95. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-04/what-is-lyssavirus-rare-bat-disease-australia/105489394
  96. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/14850
  97. https://wildlifehealthaustralia.com.au/Portals/0/ResourceCentre/BatHealth/Bat%2520Stats%2520June%25202025.pdf
  98. https://www.chrc.qld.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Flying-Fox-Management-Plan.pdf
  99. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-25220-9_13
  100. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/flying-foxes-commercial-crop-damage-annual-report-190720.pdf
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277141500004X
  102. https://www.ecolsoc.org.au/?hottopic-entry=managing-tensions-around-urban-flying-fox-roosts
  103. https://www.charterstowers.qld.gov.au/files/assets/public/v/1/forms-publications/documents/corporate-publications/flying-fox-management-plan.pdf
  104. https://rainforest-crc.jcu.edu.au/issues/ITFL_flyingfox.pdf
  105. https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/221022/Guideline-Roost-Management.pdf
  106. https://www.publish.csiro.au/zo/ZO20043
  107. https://www.nespthreatenedspecies.edu.au/media/lpxew1v3/flying-fox-report_web.pdf
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3411823/
  109. https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Olival_Cull_EH-2015.pdf
  110. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.26
  111. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/10/2/39
  112. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37182682/
  113. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-09/sc-black-flying-fox-pteropus-alecto-review-report.pdf
  114. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/species/flying-fox-monitoring
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2596826/
  116. https://www.lfwseq.org.au/deadly-recipe-flying-foxes-extreme-heat-climate-change/
  117. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/threatened-species/nsw-threatened-species-scientific-committee/determinations/final-determinations/2008-2010/black-flying-fox-pteropus-alecto-removal-from-vulnerable-species-list
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290311154_The_outcomes_and_costs_of_relocating_flying-fox_camps_Insights_from_the_case_of_Maclean_Australia
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.