Hubbry Logo
Sustainable Development Goal 6Sustainable Development Goal 6Main
Open search
Sustainable Development Goal 6
Community hub
Sustainable Development Goal 6
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sustainable Development Goal 6
Sustainable Development Goal 6
Sustainable Development Goal 6
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6 or Global Goal 6) declares the importance of achieving "clean water and sanitation for all". It is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations General Assembly to succeed the former Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). According to the United Nations, the overall goal is to: "Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all."[1] The goal has eight targets to be achieved by 2030 covering the main areas of water supply and sanitation and sustainable water resource management. Progress toward the targets will be measured by using eleven indicators.[2]

Key Information

The six key outcome targets to be achieved by 2030 include:

  1. Achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all;
  2. Achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations;
  3. Improve water quality, by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater (wastewater treatment) and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally;
  4. Substantially increase water-use efficiency across all sectors and ensure sustainable withdrawals and supply of fresh water to address water scarcity and substantially reduce the number of people suffering from water scarcity;
  5. Implement integrated water resources management (IWRM), at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate;
  6. Protect and restore water-related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, wetlands, rivers, aquifers and lakes.

The two means of implementing targets[3] are to expand international cooperation and capacity-building support to developing countries, and to support local engagement in sustainable and participatory water and sanitation management.[4]

Despite Official development assistance (ODA) disbursements to the water sector increasing to $9 billion in 2018.[5] the Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) of WHO and UNICEF reported in 2017 that 4.5 billion people still did not have safely managed sanitation.[6] In 2017 only 71 per cent of the global population used safely managed drinking water, and 2.2 billion persons were still without safely managed drinking water. Other water-related hazards related to flooding and drought also remain significant threats to human development and wellbeing.

Like the others, this Sustainable Development Goal is closely interwoven with the other SDGs. For example, access to clean water will improve health and wellbeing, leading to a progress in SDG3; and, better health leads to a higher school attendance, progressing SDG 4, improving quality education. Achieving SDG6 can only happen if other SDGs are also achieved.

Background

[edit]
Families collecting water from a water well in Niger

The United Nations (UN) has determined that access to clean water and sanitation facilities is a fundamental human right.[7] However, only a few countries have written the human right to water into enforceable legislation creating serious problems for people wishing to use legal means to promote better access.[8] Even in those countries, such as South Africa, with a clear constitutional commitment to the human right to water and sanitation it has proven difficult to obtain legal redress.

A review of the progress by the UN in 2020 found that "increasing donor commitments to the water sector will remain crucial to make progress towards Goal 6".[9]

In 2022, the OECD estimated that to achieve SDG 6, current global spending on water needs approximately $1 trillion per year.[10]

Targets, indicators and progress

[edit]
Further information: List of SDG targets and indicators
World map for Indicator 6.1.1 in 2022: Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services[11]
World map for Indicator 6.2.1a in 2022: Share of population using safely managed sanitation facilities[11]
World map for Indicator 6.2.1b in 2022: "Share of the population with basic handwashing facilities on premises"[11]

SDG 6 has eight targets including two so-called "implementing targets". Six of them are to be achieved by the year 2030, one by the year 2020, and one has no target year.[12] Each of the targets also has one or two indicators which will be used to measure progress. In total there are 11 indicators to monitor progress for SDG6.[13] The main data sources for the SDG 6 targets and indicators come from the Integrated Monitoring Initiative for SDG 6 coordinated by UN-Water.[4]

The six "outcome-oriented targets" include: Safe and affordable drinking water; end open defecation and provide access to sanitation, and hygiene, improve water quality, wastewater treatment and safe reuse, increase water-use efficiency and ensure fresh water supplies, implement IWRM, protect and restore water-related ecosystems. The two "means of achieving" targets are to expand water and sanitation support to developing countries, and to support local engagement in water and sanitation management.[4]

The first three targets relate to drinking water supply, sanitation services, and wastewater treatment and reuse.[12]

An SDG 6 Baseline Report in 2018 found that "less than 50 percent of countries have comparable baseline estimates for most SDG 6 global indicators".[4]: 31 

Target 6.1: Safe and affordable drinking water

[edit]

The full title of Target 6.1 is: "By 2030, achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all".[2]

This target has one indicator: Indicator 6.1.1 is the "Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services".[11]

The definition of "safely managed drinking water service" is: "Drinking water from an improved water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination."[14]: 8 

Target 6.2: End open defecation and provide access to sanitation and hygiene

[edit]

The full title of Target 6.2 is: "By 2030, achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations."[2]

Attending school and work without disruption supports education and employment. Therefore, toilets at school and the workplace are included in the second target ("achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all").

Equitable sanitation and hygiene solutions address the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations, such as the elderly or people with disabilities.[citation needed]

This target has one indicator: Indicator 6.2.1 is the "Proportion of population using (a) safely managed sanitation services and (b) a hand-washing facility with soap and water".[15]

The definition of "safely managed sanitation" service is: "Use of improved facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite."[14]: 8  Improved sanitation facilities are those designed to hygienically separate excreta from human contact.[14]: 6 

Ending open defecation will require the provision of toilets and sanitation for 2.6 billion people as well as behavior change of the population.[14] To meet SDG targets for sanitation by 2030, nearly "a third of countries will need to accelerate progress to end open defecation, including Brazil, China, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Pakistan".[16]: 79  This will require cooperation between governments, civil society and the private sector.[17]

Report from 2019 for Target 6.1 and 6.2

[edit]

Targets 6.1 and 6.2 are usually reported on together because they are both part of the WASH sector and have the same custodian agency, the Joint Monitoring Program for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP).[14]

In June 2019, the JMP released their 138-page report "Progress on household drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene 2000-2017: special focus on inequalities."[18]

Drinking water (Target 6.1)
[edit]

The report said that in 2017, 5.3 billion people—representing 71% of the population of the world—used a "safely managed drinking-water service—one that is "located on premises, available when needed, and free from contamination".[18]

By 2017, 6.8 billion people—representing 90% of the world's population—used "at least a basic service", which included "an improved drinking-water source within a round trip of 30 minutes to collect water".[18] However, in 2017, there were still 785 million people who lacked "even a basic drinking-water service, including 144 million people who [were] dependent on surface water."[18]

The report said that approximately 2 billion people used a "drinking water source contaminated with feces".[18] The report warned that diseases, including "diarrhoea, cholera, dysentery, typhoid, and polio" are transmitted by contaminated water, which cause about 485, 000 diarrhoeal deaths each year.[18] It cautioned that 50% of the global population will be "living in water-stressed areas" by 2025.[18]

By 2017, eighty countries provided access to clean water for more than 99% of their population.[19] From 2000 to 2017, the global population that lacked access to clean water decreased from nearly 20% to roughly 10%.[18]

Sanitation and hygiene (Target 6.2)
[edit]

As of 2017, 22% of health care facilities in the least developed countries had no water service, with similar numbers lacking sanitation and waste management services.[18]

The statistic in the 2017 baseline estimate by the JMP is that 4.5 billion people currently do not have safely managed sanitation.[14]

Unimproved sanitation example: pit latrine without slab in Lusaka, Zambia

Globally, the proportion of the population using safely managed sanitation services increased from 28 percent in 2000 to 45 percent in 2017. Latin America and the Caribbean, sub-Saharan Africa, and East and Southeast Asia recorded the largest increase. In total, there are still 701 million people around the world who still had to practice open defecation in 2017.[5] This number had reduced in 2020 to 673 million persons who practised open defecation.[9]

Target 6.3: Improve water quality, wastewater treatment, and safe reuse

[edit]

Target 6.3 is formulated as "By 2030, improve water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally".[2] This is also a sanitation-related target, as wastewater treatment is part of sanitation.

The target has two indicators:[15]

  • Indicator 6.3.1: Proportion of domestic and industrial wastewater flows safely treated
  • Indicator 6.3.2: Proportion of bodies of water with good ambient water quality

The current status for Indicator 6.3.2 is that: "Preliminary estimates from 79 mostly high- and higher-middle income countries in 2019 suggest that, in about one quarter of the countries, less than half of all household wastewater flows were treated safely."[9]

Preserving natural sources of water is very important to achieve universal access to safe and affordabledrinking water.[citation needed]

A man selling drinking water

Target 6.4: Increase water-use efficiency and ensure fresh water supplies

[edit]

Target 6.4 is formulated as "By 2030, substantially increase water-use efficiency across all sectors and ensure sustainable withdrawals and supply of fresh water to address water scarcity and substantially reduce the number of people suffering from water scarcity."[2]

This target has two indicators:[15]

  • Indicator 6.4.1: Change in water-use efficiency over time
  • Indicator 6.4.2: Level of water stress: fresh water withdrawal as a proportion of available fresh water resources

Water Stress Indicator:[20]

Where:

TFWW = Total fresh water withdrawn, where year to which it refers will be provided

TRWR = Total renewable fresh water resources

EFR = Environmental flows requirements[21]

The current situation regarding water stress was summarized as follows: "In 2017, Central and Southern Asia and Northern Africa registered very high water stress – defined as the ratio of fresh water withdrawn to total renewable fresh water resources – of more than 70 percent". This is followed by Western Asia and Eastern Asia, with high water stress of 54 percent and 46 percent, respectively.[9]

Target 6.5: Implement IWRM

[edit]

Target 6.5 is formulated as: "By 2030, implement integrated water resources management at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate."[2]

The two indicators include:[15]

  • Indicator 6.5.1 Degree of integrated water resources management
  • Indicator 6.5.2 Proportion of transboundary basin area with an operational arrangement for water cooperation

A review in 2020 stated that: "In 2018, 60 percent of 172 countries reported very low, low and medium-low levels of implementation of integrated water resources management and were unlikely to meet the implementation target by 2030."[9]

[edit]

Target 6.6 is: "By 2020, protect and restore water-related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, wetlands, rivers, aquifers and lakes."[2]

It has one indicator: Indicator 6.6.1 is the "Change in the extent of water-related ecosystems over time".[15] This indicator monitoring methodology is framed around five sub-indicators:[22]

  1. spatial extent of water-related ecosystems (from satellite data)
  2. water quality of lakes and artificial water bodies (from satellite data)
  3. quantity of water (discharge) in rivers and estuaries (in situ data)
  4. water quality imported from SDG Indicator 6.3.2 (in situ data)
  5. quantity of groundwater within aquifers (in situ data)

Target 6.a: Expand water and sanitation support to developing countries

[edit]

Target 6.a is: "By 2030, expand international cooperation and capacity-building support to developing countries in water- and sanitation-related activities and programmes, including water harvesting, desalination, water efficiency, wastewater treatment, recycling and reuse technologies."[2]

It has one indicator: Indicator 6.a.1 is the "Amount of water- and sanitation-related official development assistance that is part of a government-coordinated spending plan".[15]

In April 2020 the UN progress report stated that "ODA disbursements to the water sector increased to $9 billion, or 6 per cent, in 2018, following a decrease in such disbursements in 2017".[9]

Target 6.b: Support local engagement in water and sanitation management

[edit]

Target 6.b is: "Support and strengthen the participation of local communities in improving water and sanitation management."[2]

It has one indicator: Indicator 6.b.1 is the "Proportion of local administrative units with established and operational policies and procedures for participation of local communities in water and sanitation management".[15]

Custodian agencies

[edit]

Custodian agencies are in charge of reporting on the following indicators:[14][4]

Challenges

[edit]
Further information: Water security and WASH § Challenges
Main article: Sustainable Development Goals § Challenges

Climate change

[edit]
Further information: WASH § Climate change, and Water security § Climate change

Climate change makes it harder to achieve SDG 6 Target 1 (universal access to safe drinking water).[23] This is because climate change can increase weather-related shocks, namely droughts, heavy rain and temperature extremes. This, in turn can cause damage to water infrastructure and water scarcity.[23]

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic

[edit]

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the ability of water utilities to meet SDG 6 by increasing losses on revenues that would otherwise be used to make investments.[24]

The COVID-19 pandemic has also greatly affected the urban poor living in the slums with little or no access to clean water.[25][26] The pandemic has shown the importance of sanitation, hygiene and adequate access to clean water to prevent diseases. According to the World Health Organization, handwashing is one of the most effective actions one can take to reduce the spread of pathogens and prevent infections, including the COVID-19 virus.[27]

Monitoring progress

[edit]

Implementation of the SDGs implies continuous monitoring and periodic evaluation to check whether the direction and pace of development are right.[28] High-level progress reports for all the SDGs are published in the form of reports by the United Nations Secretary General.[9] Additionally, updates and progress can also be found on the SDG website which is managed by the United Nations.[29]

In April 2020, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said: "Today, Sustainable Development Goal 6 is badly off track" and it "is hindering progress on the 2030 Agenda, the realization of human rights and the achievement of peace and security around the world".[30]

Academics and practitioners continue to debate exactly how best to assess progress towards SDG6, with some continuing to champion resource-based approaches whilst others prefer to emphasise experience-based metrics.[31] Experience-based metrics such as the "Household Water Insecurity Experiences" (HWISE) scale have proven a useful complement to resource-based approaches for assessing SDG progress, applied research of water insecurity dynamics, and monitoring and evaluation of development programmes.[32][33]

[edit]
Sustainable Development Goals

The SDGs are highly interdependent. Therefore, the provision of clean water and sanitation for all is a precursor to achieving many of the other SDGs.[34] WASH experts have stated that without progress on Goal 6, the other goals and targets cannot be achieved.[35][36]

For example, sanitation improvements can lead to more jobs (SDG 8) which would also lead to economic growth.[37] SDG 6 progress improves health (SDG 3) and social justice (SDG 16).[38] Recovering the resources embedded in excreta and wastewater (like nutrients, water, and energy) contributes to achieving SDG 12 (sustainable consumption and production) and SDG 2 (end hunger). Ensuring adequate sanitation and wastewater management along the entire value chain in cities contributes to SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) and SDG 1 (no poverty).[37]

Sanitation systems with a resource recovery and reuse focus are getting increased attention.[39] They can contribute to achieving at least fourteen of the SDGs, especially in an urban context.[37]

Organizations

[edit]

The Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) has made it its mission to help achieve Targets 6.2 and 6.3.[40][41] Global organizations such as Oxfam, UNICEF, WaterAid and many small NGOs as well as universities, research centers, private enterprises, government-owned entities etc. are all part of SuSanA and are dedicated to achieving SDG 6.[42]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sustainable Development Goal 6

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) is one of the 17 , adopted in 2015 as part of the 2030 Agenda for , with the aim of ensuring availability and sustainable management of water and for all by 2030. The encompasses eight focused on universal access to safe , adequate and , improved water quality through , increased water-use efficiency, integrated management, protection of water-related ecosystems, enhanced international cooperation, and community participation in water management improvements. Tracked by 11 indicators, SDG 6 addresses fundamental needs for human health, ecosystems, and economic productivity, recognizing water and pollution as barriers exacerbated by , , and climate variability. Progress toward SDG 6 has been uneven, with global coverage of safely managed services rising from 68% in 2015 to 74% in 2024, enabling 961 million additional people to gain access, yet leaving approximately 2 billion without it as of 2022. Similarly, safely managed reached only partial coverage, with 3.5 billion people lacking it in 2022, and persisting in regions with weak infrastructure. Official assessments indicate none of the targets are on track, necessitating a sixfold acceleration in progress and fivefold for to meet 2030 benchmarks, amid challenges like inadequate financing, governance failures, and institutional silos that undermine coordinated action. Critics highlight systemic issues, including broken international commitments and reluctance among states to prioritize over competing interests, which have slowed empirical gains despite substantial inflows. Peer-reviewed analyses underscore barriers such as in local , insufficient for monitoring, and trade-offs with other development priorities, questioning the goal's feasibility without radical shifts in policy enforcement and . While SDG 6 has mobilized partnerships and innovations in monitoring, its off-track status reflects causal realities of mismatched incentives and capacity deficits in low-income settings, where population pressures and compound access deficits.

Origins and Framework

Historical Context Preceding SDG 6

The Water Conference, held in , , from March 14 to 25, 1977, marked the first intergovernmental effort to address global water issues comprehensively, convening representatives from 116 governments to assess water resource status and recommend actions for supply, , and management. The resulting Mar del Plata Action Plan emphasized community water supply and as priorities, advocating for national programs to extend safe to underserved populations and highlighting the need for international cooperation in shared resources. This conference laid foundational principles for subsequent UN initiatives by recognizing and as barriers to development, though implementation varied widely due to limited funding and technical capacity in developing regions. Building on Mar del Plata recommendations, the UN proclaimed the period 1981–1990 as the International Supply and Decade through Resolution 35/18, aiming to provide safe and adequate to all people by 1990 via national strategies supported by international . The Decade mobilized over $100 billion in investments, extending improved water access to approximately 1.3 billion additional people and to 1 billion, yet it fell short of universality, achieving only about 77% global water coverage and 54% for by 1990, constrained by rapid , economic challenges, and uneven commitment from donor nations. The 1992 International Conference on Water and the Environment in , , advanced integrated approaches by issuing four guiding principles: recognizing freshwater as finite and vulnerable; prioritizing linking water and socioeconomic development; centering women's roles in water provision; and treating water as an economic good to encourage efficiency. These Dublin Principles influenced the Rio Earth Summit's , particularly Chapter 18 on water resources management, which called for integrated policies balancing supply, demand, and ecosystem protection. The , adopted in 2000, incorporated and into MDG 7 (Ensure environmental sustainability), with Target 7.C specifically committing to halve, by 2015, the proportion of the population without sustainable access to safe and basic relative to 1990 baselines. This target spurred progress, meeting the goal five years early in by reducing the unserved proportion from 24% to 12%, but lagged, with only a 28% reduction versus the 50% needed, leaving 2.4 billion without improved facilities by 2015 due to urban-rural disparities and inadequate ..pdf) These shortcomings, alongside emerging concerns over and efficiency absent from MDG metrics, underscored the limitations of siloed targets and propelled the evolution toward the more holistic SDG 6 framework.

Adoption Process and UN Resolution

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 6 on clean and , emerged from the following the expiration of the (MDGs) in 2015. The MDGs had included targets for halving the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe and basic , but these were criticized for limited scope and uneven progress, particularly in and equity. In response, the initiated a comprehensive process in to formulate successor goals, emphasizing universality across all nations rather than focusing primarily on developing countries. This shift aimed to integrate economic, social, and environmental dimensions more holistically. The formulation of the SDGs involved extensive multistakeholder consultations, including national dialogues, thematic consultations, and inputs from , businesses, and academia, described as the most inclusive process in UN history. A pivotal role was played by the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals, established by the UN in 2012 and co-chaired by diplomats from and , which comprised 70 member states and proposed a framework of 17 goals and 169 targets in July 2014. This proposal, including SDG 6's focus on and management, underwent further refinement through intergovernmental negotiations led by the from January to August 2015, culminating in consensus on the final text. On September 25, 2015, during a high-level summit in New York, the UN unanimously adopted Resolution A/RES/70/1, titled "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for ," formally enshrining the 17 SDGs, including SDG 6, with a 2030 timeline. The resolution was endorsed by all 193 UN member states without dissent, marking a commitment to integrated action on water access, , , and ecosystem under SDG 6. Implementation began on January 1, 2016, with the goals integrated into national policies and monitored via global indicators.

Core Objectives and Philosophical Underpinnings

Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) aims to ensure availability and sustainable of and for all by 2030. This core objective addresses critical deficiencies in access to safe , adequate , and , which affect billions globally, while promoting efficient use, of water-related ecosystems, and integrated . The goal encompasses eight specific : universal access to safe and affordable (6.1); adequate and ending (6.2); improved through reduction (6.3); substantial increase in water-use efficiency and reduction in scarcity (6.4); implementation of integrated (6.5); and restoration of water-related ecosystems (6.6); enhanced international cooperation for water capacity-building (6.a); and support for participation in (6.b). These are measured by 11 indicators, focusing on empirical metrics like population coverage percentages and ratios. Philosophically, SDG 6 is underpinned by the 2030 Agenda for , adopted by the on September 25, 2015, which frames water and as integral to human dignity, , and environmental integrity. The agenda builds on the (MDGs), particularly MDG 7 on environmental sustainability, but shifts toward a universal applicability across all nations rather than solely targeting developing countries, emphasizing principles of universality, , and the integration of economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Central to this is the recognition of safe drinking water and as , affirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 64/292 in July 2010, which posits access as essential for realizing other rights like and adequate living standards. Causally, the framework posits that sustainable water management prevents and conflict, though highlights that local and economic incentives often drive outcomes more than top-down mandates. The underpinnings also reflect a commitment to , echoing the 1987 Brundtland Report's definition of as meeting present needs without compromising future generations' abilities to meet theirs, applied specifically to finite amid growing demands from and variability. This approach prioritizes restoration and minimization to maintain hydrological cycles, recognizing water's cross-cutting role in achieving other SDGs, such as zero hunger (SDG 2) and good health (SDG 3). However, the UN's emphasis on global cooperation and assumes state-led interventions can override local barriers, a premise critiqued for overlooking property rights and market mechanisms that have historically accelerated infrastructure development in resource-scarce regions. Overall, SDG 6's integrates anthropocentric welfare with ecocentric preservation, though implementation reveals tensions between aspirational equity and practical resource allocation constraints.

Targets and Indicators

Targets 6.1–6.3: Access, Sanitation, and Water Quality

Target 6.1 commits to achieving universal and equitable access to and affordable for all by 2030. This target emphasizes without financial barriers and standards to prevent risks from . Progress is monitored through indicator 6.1.1, which tracks the proportion of the using safely managed services. Safely managed services require an improved water source—such as piped supplies, boreholes, protected wells, or rainwater collection—that is located on , available when needed (sufficient quantity and at least 12 hours per day or four days per week), and free from fecal (e.g., E. coli absent) as well as priority chemicals like and per WHO guidelines. Verification of demands laboratory testing, but capacity constraints in low-income countries often result in reliance on self-reported access without checks, potentially overstating coverage. Target 6.2 focuses on achieving access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all by 2030, including ending open defecation and prioritizing women, girls, and vulnerable groups to address dignity, safety, and gender-specific risks like assault during collection. Indicator 6.2.1 measures the proportion of the population using (a) safely managed sanitation services and (b) handwashing facilities with soap and water. Safely managed sanitation entails an improved facility (e.g., flush/pour flush to piped sewer, septic tank, or pit latrine; ventilated improved pit latrine; composting toilet) that is not shared with other households and where excreta are either treated and disposed on-site or transported to off-site treatment. The handwashing component requires a facility with water and soap (or ash) at the dwelling, plot, or public space for basic hygiene to curb disease transmission. Target 6.3 aims to improve by 2030 through reducing , halting illegal dumping, curbing hazardous chemical releases, halving the proportion of untreated , and boosting and safe reuse. Dual indicators assess this: 6.3.1 gauges the proportion of domestic and industrial flows safely treated before environmental discharge, where safe treatment meets national standards or achieves at least secondary level (e.g., biological processes reducing by 70% and by 75%). Domestic includes blackwater and , while industrial covers effluents excluding cooling water. Indicator 6.3.2 evaluates the proportion of monitored water bodies (rivers, lakes, ) with good ambient quality, defined as at least 80% of measurements complying with country-specific target values for key physical, chemical, and biological parameters reflecting both natural and human impacts. Monitoring challenges persist, with limited data availability in many nations hindering accurate global assessments.

Targets 6.4–6.6: Efficiency, Management, and Ecosystems

Target 6.4 seeks to substantially increase water-use efficiency across all sectors by 2030 while ensuring sustainable withdrawals and supply of freshwater to address water scarcity and reduce the number of people affected by it. The associated indicators include 6.4.1, which tracks the change in water-use efficiency as the ratio of gross value added to total freshwater withdrawn (measured in USD per cubic meter), and 6.4.2, which assesses the level of water stress as the ratio of total freshwater withdrawn to total renewable water resources minus environmental flow requirements, expressed as a percentage:

where TFWW is total freshwater withdrawn, TRWR is total renewable water resources, and EFR is environmental flow requirements. Globally, water-use efficiency improved from 17.5 USD/m³ in 2015 to 21.5 USD/m³ in 2022, representing a 23% increase driven primarily by economic growth in manufacturing and services rather than sector-specific conservation. However, agriculture, which accounts for approximately 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, shows slower efficiency gains, and absolute water demand continues to rise with population growth and urbanization, potentially offsetting relative improvements. In 2020, about 2.4 billion people lived in water-stressed countries (level of water stress exceeding 25%), with projections indicating worsening scarcity in regions like the Middle East and North Africa due to climate variability and overexploitation. Target 6.5 calls for the implementation of integrated water resources management (IWRM) at all levels by 2030, including where appropriate, to promote coordinated planning across sectors and borders. Indicator 6.5.1 measures the degree of IWRM implementation on a scale from 0 to 100, encompassing enabling environments, institutions, and management instruments. As of 2023, global IWRM implementation stood at 57%, up from 49% in 2017, but this pace falls short of the linear trajectory needed for full implementation by 2030, with averaging only 45%. Indicator 6.5.2 tracks the proportion of and lake basins with operational arrangements for ; in 2022, this covered about 60% of international basins by area, though enforcement remains uneven due to geopolitical tensions and capacity gaps in . Challenges include fragmented , where national policies often prioritize short-term extraction over holistic basin management, exacerbating conflicts in shared aquifers and rivers like the and . Target 6.6 requires protecting and restoring water-related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, , rivers, aquifers, and lakes, by 2020—a deadline that has passed without achievement. Indicator 6.6.1 monitors changes in the extent of these ecosystems using data, revealing ongoing degradation: from 2016 to 2023, over 20% of monitored lakes and reservoirs experienced surface area loss due to , , and hydrological alterations, while extent declined by an average of 35% since 1970 in reporting regions. UNEP assessments indicate that efforts to halt degradation must be scaled up urgently, as , construction, and conversion continue to impair services like and flood regulation, affecting downstream and . In and , where data coverage is limited, river fragmentation from has reduced connectivity by up to 50% in major basins, underscoring institutional underinvestment and the need for restoration funding exceeding current levels. Overall, these targets face compounded pressures from climate-induced variability, population-driven demand, and policy silos, with UN data signaling that current trajectories will not meet 2030 benchmarks without accelerated, evidence-based interventions.

Targets 6.a–6.b: International Support and Local Participation

Target 6.a calls for enhanced international cooperation and capacity-building assistance to developing countries by 2030, targeting - and -related programs such as harvesting, , efficiency improvements, , recycling, and reuse technologies, alongside support for integrated management aligned with national plans. The associated indicator tracks the amount of (ODA) for and integrated into recipient governments' coordinated spending plans. Total ODA disbursements to the sector reached $8.7 billion in 2023, down marginally from $8.9 billion in 2022, reflecting limited growth amid rising global demands. Between 2015 and 2021, the share of water-related ODA channeled through recipient governments increased from 60.2% to 71.8%, suggesting better alignment with local priorities but insufficient to offset broader shortfalls in SDG 6 financing. Multilateral and bilateral initiatives, including those from the World Bank and members, have prioritized capacity-building in technologies like , yet total ODA for and remains below the estimated $114 billion annually needed for universal access by 2030. In 2023, (DAC) ODA overall hit $223.3 billion, but water-specific allocations have not scaled proportionally to and urbanization pressures in low-income countries. Target 6.b emphasizes strengthening roles in and to foster sustainable outcomes. The indicator measures the proportion of local administrative units with operational policies for community participation; globally, this exceeded 70% of countries since 2016, indicating widespread formal adoption but limited evidence of deepened engagement or measurable impacts on service delivery. Studies of , , and hygiene (WASH) interventions in regions like show that incorporating community-led operation and maintenance can improve usage and system longevity by 20-50% compared to top-down approaches, though sustained participation often falters due to inadequate and . In practice, programs like community-managed water points in rural demonstrate higher accountability when locals oversee repairs and tariffs, yet broader assessments reveal persistent gaps: only about 40% of such initiatives report active, ongoing input beyond initial planning phases. Despite policy prevalence, empirical data from 2023 UN reports underscore that local participation has not accelerated progress toward SDG 6 targets, with billions still lacking basic services amid institutional barriers to genuine empowerment.

Indicator Framework and Measurement Challenges

The global indicator framework for SDG 6 comprises 11 indicators aligned with its eight targets, as established by A/RES/71/313 adopted on July 6, 2017, and refined by the UN Statistical Commission. These indicators emphasize measurable outcomes such as access to services, , and protection, with custodians including WHO/UNICEF for (6.1.1), (6.2.1), and (6.2.2); UNEP for (6.3.2), integrated management (6.5.1), and condition (6.6.1); and FAO for water stress (6.4.2) and efficiency (6.4.1). Key examples include Indicator 6.1.1, tracking the proportion of the population using safely managed services (defined as improved sources free from , available on premises, and within 30 minutes' collection time); Indicator 6.3.2, measuring the proportion of bodies of water with good ambient based on dissolved oxygen, , and nutrient levels; and Indicator 6.5.1, assessing the degree of integrated management implementation via a 0-100 scoring system derived from national questionnaires on policy, management, and financing. This framework relies on tier classification: Tier I indicators (e.g., 6.1.1) have established methodologies and data availability, while Tier II (e.g., 6.6.1 on extent) lack full global datasets, and Tier III (now resolved for most) previously needed methodological development. Measurement challenges stem primarily from inconsistent , limited national capacities, and methodological gaps, particularly in low-income and rural settings where over 40% of SDG 6 data remains unavailable or outdated as of 2023. Household surveys like Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) and Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), conducted every 3-5 years in many countries, form the backbone for access indicators (6.1.1, 6.2.1, 6.2.2), but infrequency leads to reliance on modeling by bodies like the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme, introducing estimation uncertainties—e.g., global safely managed sanitation coverage is extrapolated from partial data, potentially understating rural deficits. For environmental indicators like 6.3.2 and 6.6.1, sparse monitoring networks (e.g., fewer than 10% of rivers and lakes in have regular quality assessments) result in incomplete baselines, with UNEP's 2024 mid-term review noting insufficient stations and inconsistent protocols hindering trend analysis. Integrated indicators such as 6.5.1 depend on subjective self-reporting via UN questionnaires, raising concerns over harmonization and potential over-optimism, as national scores often exceed independent audits. Further complications arise from definitional ambiguities and external pressures; "safely managed" criteria require verifying treatment and , yet many countries lack microbiological testing , leading to proxy-based approximations that may inflate figures. variability and exacerbate data gaps for efficiency metrics (6.4.1, 6.4.2), where use data from agricultural and industrial sectors is often unverified due to metering deficiencies—e.g., FAO estimates global stress via total freshwater withdrawal over available renewable resources minus environmental flows, but subnational disaggregation is rare. While innovations like and offer supplements (e.g., satellite-derived ecosystem change for 6.6.1), their integration remains limited by validation needs and costs, with a 2021 analysis highlighting that without accelerated capacity-building, over 30% of SDG 6 targets will evade reliable tracking by 2030. These issues underscore systemic reliance on voluntary national reporting, which peer-reviewed critiques attribute to underinvestment in statistical systems rather than inherent target flaws.

Empirical Progress and Assessments

Since the adoption of SDG 6 in , global coverage of safely managed services—defined as water from an improved source located on premises, available when needed, and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination—rose from 68% to 74% by , enabling 961 million additional people to access such services. This equates to an annual increase of about 1.2 percentage points, though 2.1 billion people, or one in four globally, remained without safely managed in . Progress accelerated in rural areas, where coverage improved more substantially than in urban settings, reflecting targeted interventions but also highlighting urban infrastructure bottlenecks amid . Safely managed sanitation services—encompassing improved facilities that safely dispose of without or untreated discharge—saw global coverage climb from 48% in to 58% in , with 1.2 billion people gaining access. By 2022, this stood at 57%, leaving 3.4 billion without such services, predominantly in rural and low-income contexts where shared or unimproved facilities prevail. Rural gains outpaced urban ones, but overall rates remain half those of , underscoring persistent challenges in and disposal . Regionally, disparities are stark, with and achieving over 94% coverage for safely managed by 2022, compared to , where urban coverage reached only 54% and overall rates hovered below 60%, hampered by arid conditions, conflict, and limited investment. Southern Asia recorded faster gains, driven by large-scale programs in countries like , lifting access from around 60% to over 70% in some estimates, though lags at under 50% due to cultural and density factors. fared better intermediately, with nearing 80% and around 60-70% by 2022, benefiting from established utilities but strained by inequality and informal settlements. These trends, tracked via household surveys by the WHO/ Joint Monitoring Programme, reveal that while absolute numbers improved, per capita progress slowed in high-burden regions due to demographic pressures and uneven aid distribution.

Achievements in Specific Metrics

Global coverage of safely managed services under target 6.1 rose from 68 percent of the in 2015 to 74 percent in 2024, providing access to an additional 961 million people. This progress reflects expanded infrastructure in rural and urban areas, though disparities persist between regions, with lagging at around 40 percent coverage. For safely managed sanitation services under target 6.2, coverage increased from 48 percent in 2015 to 58 percent in 2024, benefiting 1.2 billion more individuals through improved facilities and reduced . Basic handwashing facilities with soap and water at home advanced from 52 percent to higher levels, contributing to hygiene gains amid ongoing challenges in densely populated low-income settings. Water-use efficiency, measured by indicator 6.4.1, improved globally by 23 percent between 2015 and 2022, driven primarily by in and agricultural sectors that water withdrawals from . Implementation of integrated under target 6.5 reached a global average of 54 percent by recent assessments, up from 49 percent in , indicating modest advancements in policy coordination and transboundary agreements. Progress on for target 6.3 shows that the proportion of untreated wastewater discharged has declined in monitored regions, with some countries achieving over 50 percent treatment rates through upgraded facilities, though comprehensive global data remains limited. These metrics highlight incremental gains from targeted investments, yet fall short of the exponential acceleration required for universal access by 2030.

Shortfalls and Projection Failures

The ' Report 2024 assesses SDG 6 as off-track, with global progress rates insufficient to achieve universal access to safe , , and by 2030. As of 2022, 2.2 billion people—nearly 28 percent of the global population—lacked safely managed services, while 3.4 billion lacked safely managed and 1.7 billion basic handwashing facilities. At prevailing annual improvement rates averaging less than 1 percent since 2000, projections indicate that approximately 1.6 billion individuals will still lack safe and 2.8 billion safe by the target year, falling short of the zero-access goal. ![Share of the population using safely managed drinking water, OWID.svg.png][center] Target-specific shortfalls exacerbate these gaps: progress on safely managed has decelerated in and parts of , where growth outpaces infrastructure expansion, leaving practices entrenched for over 400 million people. Integrated management implementation has advanced minimally, rising from 49 percent of countries in 2017 to 57 percent by 2022, far below the levels required for sustainable withdrawal and efficiency under 6.4 and 6.5. remains inadequate, with only about 60 percent of global wastewater safely treated before discharge, contributing to degradation and failure to protect water-related as per target 6.6. Initial 2015 projections for SDG 6, embedded in the 2030 Agenda, anticipated linear scaling of pre-existing Millennium Development Goal gains, but empirical trajectories reveal overoptimism, as conflict disruptions, pressures, and shortfalls—averaging under 0.2 percent of GDP in low-income countries—have halved expected . Mid-term evaluations, including the 2023 UN-Water report, confirm the need for a fourfold increase in progress rates to approximate targets, a threshold unmet due to stagnant donor commitments and inertia in water-scarce regions. These failures underscore systemic underestimation of causal barriers, rendering 2030 universality unattainable without paradigm shifts in .

Governance and Implementation Barriers

Institutional and Policy Failures

Institutional fragmentation remains a primary barrier to effective and under SDG 6, with overlapping mandates among agencies leading to duplicated efforts and gaps. In many developing countries, involves multiple ministries and subnational entities without clear delineation of responsibilities, resulting in inefficient and delayed project execution. For instance, coordination failures have contributed to persistent high losses, estimated at 126 billion cubic meters annually worldwide, equating to economic costs of USD 39 billion, as utilities struggle with leakages and unmetered supply due to weak regulatory oversight. These structural issues are compounded by insufficient institutional capacity, including shortages of technical expertise and short leadership tenures—such as average CEO terms of 18 months in some utilities—which undermine and continuity. Policy shortcomings exacerbate these institutional weaknesses by prioritizing ambitious targets over feasible implementation mechanisms, often disconnecting global SDG frameworks from local contexts. Policies frequently emphasize capital investments in infrastructure while neglecting operations and maintenance, with projections indicating that operation and maintenance costs will surpass capital expenditures by a factor of 1.6 by 2029, straining already limited budgets. In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, national water policies have failed to enforce standards consistently, leading to uneven service delivery; for example, urban areas receive disproportionate funding compared to rural regions, perpetuating access disparities where 30% of the global population still lacks safely managed drinking water as of 2023. Moreover, the top-down nature of SDG-aligned policies overlooks subnational governance variations, creating contradictions when local realities—such as varying administrative capacities—clash with uniform indicators, as evidenced in case studies from Latin America and Asia where decentralized management has faltered without adaptive local regulations. Specific policy and institutional lapses have amplified vulnerabilities to shocks, as seen in Pakistan's 2022 floods, where inadequate disaster preparedness policies and fragmented early warning systems worsened impacts on water , displacing millions and contaminating supplies. Similarly, Libya's 2023 dam collapse, triggered by neglect in protocols amid institutional , highlighted decades of policy inaction on aging , resulting in over 4,000 deaths and widespread breakdowns. These failures underscore a broader misgovernance pattern, where inconsistent enforcement and lack of stakeholder deter private investment, widening the funding gap estimated at USD 30 billion to USD 1.1 trillion annually for SDG 6 fulfillment. Without reforms to streamline institutions and align policies with evidence-based, context-specific strategies, projections indicate that universal access targets by 2030 remain unattainable, perpetuating reliance on emergency responses over sustainable systems.

Corruption and Mismanagement in Developing Contexts

In developing countries, in the and sector manifests primarily through irregularities, for connections, and of project funds, resulting in substandard and delayed service delivery that impede SDG 6 targets. According to estimates from the World Bank, 20 to 40 percent of public finances allocated globally to the sector, including in and , are lost to corruption and dishonest practices, exacerbating shortages in safe and facilities. These losses disproportionately affect rural and low-income populations, as funds intended for boreholes, treatment plants, and piped systems are diverted, leading to incomplete projects or facilities that fail prematurely due to inferior materials selected via kickback schemes. Mismanagement compounds these issues through weak oversight and , where political elites prioritize urban or connected areas over underserved regions, as documented in South Asian water utilities where corrupt behaviors inflate costs by up to 30 percent and reduce service coverage. In , for instance, chronic within state water agencies has contributed to epileptic power supply disruptions in treatment operations and poor maintenance of distribution networks, stalling progress on universal access despite international inflows. reports highlight how such practices in force citizens to pay unofficial bribes for basic access, while falsified inspections allow contaminated supplies to persist, directly undermining health-related SDG 6 indicators. Efforts to mitigate these barriers, such as integrity pacts in , have shown limited success without independent audits, as grand corruption in utility contracts often involves between officials and contractors, per World Bank analyses of African and Asian projects. Overall, these failures explain persistent shortfalls in SDG 6 metrics, with estimated to generate "water " by reducing service availability and quality, particularly for the poorest households who lack against petty .

Demographic and Urbanization Pressures

Rapid population growth exacerbates pressures on water resources essential to SDG 6, as larger populations increase total demand for freshwater withdrawals and sanitation infrastructure. The global population, which stood at approximately 7.8 billion in 2020, is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, with nearly all growth occurring in developing regions where water infrastructure is already strained. This demographic expansion correlates directly with heightened water withdrawals, outpacing improvements in per capita access in many areas and contributing to persistent absolute numbers of people—around 2.2 billion in 2024—lacking safely managed drinking water despite proportional gains since 2015. Urbanization intensifies these challenges by concentrating in cities, where demand surges without commensurate expansion of supply systems. The global urban population facing is expected to double from 930 million in 2016 to between 1.7 and 2.4 billion by 2050, driven by migration to urban centers in and . In these regions, unplanned urban expansion often results in informal settlements or slums, where up to 40% of new urban dwellers reside without access to piped or adequate , leading to reliance on informal vendors and heightened risks of . Such settlements amplify sanitation deficits, with untreated wastewater overwhelming limited facilities and contributing to depletion and vectors in densely packed areas. These pressures manifest regionally with acute severity in low-income countries, where rates exceed 2% annually and urban lags decades behind needs. In , for instance, 63% of the lacks basic services amid rapid , while in , combined demographic and urban trends have intensified degradation through industrial effluents and untreated . Projections indicate that without adaptive measures, these dynamics could leave nearly 6 billion people experiencing by 2050, underscoring how demographic and urban shifts offset infrastructural advancements and hinder SDG 6 targets.

Environmental and External Challenges

Climate Variability Impacts

Climate variability, including shifts in patterns, intensified , and more frequent floods, disrupts the hydrological cycle essential for clean water provision and under SDG 6. These changes reduce freshwater availability, degrade , and damage , particularly in developing regions where baseline access is limited. Globally, approximately 4 billion people experience severe for at least one month per year, a condition exacerbated by drought frequency that has increased in areas like the Mediterranean and . Droughts diminish surface and , leading to depleted sources and heightened competition for remaining supplies. In , the 2017 drought was twice as likely due to anthropogenic warming, severely curtailing access for millions reliant on rain-fed systems. Empirical assessments in , a representative developing context, show 63% of community sources depleted and 5% fully dried up amid prolonged dry spells between 1994 and 2024, rendering 68% of taps only partially functional. Such reductions strain efforts, as low volumes hinder practices and increase risks from inadequate flushing. Floods, conversely, overwhelm sanitation systems and contaminate water bodies through overflows and sediment-laden runoff. In , the 2017 floods—doubled in probability by influences—affected over 220,000 hectares of land, with associated inundation leading to widespread fecal contamination of and surface sources. Globally, heavy events have increased for 709 million people, correlating with elevated incidences of waterborne diseases; for example, floods elevate risk by 22% in affected Chinese populations. Infrastructure vulnerability is acute in low-income settings, where economic damages from floods could rise 4–5 times under 4°C warming compared to 1.5°C scenarios. Water quality deteriorates under both extremes: droughts concentrate pollutants, while floods introduce and pathogens, with 10% of the global population facing quality issues tied to events from –2010. In sanitation terms, floods and sea-level interactions threaten low-lying areas, projecting up to 2.2 million additional E. coli cases in by 2100 under moderate warming. These dynamics could yield 48,000 extra annual child deaths from by 2030 without adaptive measures. In and , where 2 billion lack safely managed and 771 million lack basic as of 2020, such variability amplifies vulnerabilities, with one in four people already denied safe water access amid intensifying events. Projections indicate escalating risks, with a potential 40% global freshwater shortfall by 2030 and doubled agricultural likelihood at 1.5°C warming in vulnerable regions. , in particular, confronts severe water stress by 2025 from lingering and devastating floods, underscoring the need for resilient, localized adaptations over generalized targets. While models carry uncertainties in forecasts—up to 40% variability at higher warming levels—observed trends confirm causal links between variability and SDG 6 shortfalls in resource-poor contexts.

Resource Overexploitation and Ecosystem Degradation

Overexploitation of resources has intensified , undermining efforts to achieve universal access to clean under SDG 6. Globally, groundwater levels in approximately 30% of monitored have shown accelerated declines since 2000, with 21 out of 37 major aquifers being depleted faster than they can recharge. Per capita groundwater use has risen by 22.6% from 124 cubic meters in 1950 to 152 cubic meters in 2021, driven primarily by agricultural and urban demands in arid regions. This depletion reduces reliable sources for and infrastructure, particularly in and the , where aquifer drawdown has led to well failures and saline intrusion, contaminating freshwater supplies. Ecosystem degradation, including wetland loss and , further compromises and availability by diminishing natural filtration and regulation processes. , which historically filtered pollutants and moderated floods, have been reduced by over 90% in regions like , resulting in elevated , overloads, and metal in downstream waters. exacerbates this by increasing and runoff, raising and pollutant levels in rivers and ; for instance, up to 80% forest loss in catchments can degrade through heightened and inflows. In half of the world's countries, freshwater ecosystems such as rivers, lakes, and aquifers are degraded, amplifying persistence and hindering sanitation efficacy by overloading treatment systems. These pressures interact causally: often precedes damage, as excessive pumping alters hydrological flows and promotes land subsidence, while degraded reduce recharge rates, perpetuating cycles. In developing contexts, this has stalled SDG 6 progress, with degraded systems contributing to persistent risks despite investments. Empirical assessments indicate that without addressing these drivers—such as through reduced extraction and restoration—water-related targets will remain unmet, as natural buffers against and diminish.

Pandemic and Crisis Disruptions

The disrupted progress toward Sustainable Development Goal 6 by diverting financial and human resources from routine , , and (WASH) infrastructure development to immediate pandemic response efforts, including hand hygiene promotion and monitoring for viral detection. Lockdowns and mobility restrictions halted maintenance activities and supply chains for spare parts and materials, leading to operational challenges such as reduced on-site workforce capacity— for instance, one utility in cut staff from 500 to 170 to enforce — and increased health risks for essential WASH workers. These disruptions contributed to a projected 7% decline in capital expenditures for the sector in 2020, delaying new projects and exacerbating vulnerabilities in densely populated informal settlements where inadequate heightened outbreak risks. Revenue shortfalls further compounded setbacks, with utilities experiencing an average 15% drop in collections due to emergency billing suspensions and economic hardships, straining the ability to sustain services amid heightened domestic demand for practices. At the pandemic's outset, approximately 3 in 10 globally lacked access to and at home for handwashing, underscoring pre-existing gaps that impeded containment measures and stalled broader SDG 6 advancements. In educational settings, where one in two schools lacked basic services, global closures disrupted monitoring and upgrades, with only 58% of schools having basic facilities by 2021, necessitating accelerated investments to recover lost momentum. Overall, these effects risked derailing the trajectory toward universal access by 2030, as resource reallocation prioritized short-term survival over long-term infrastructure resilience. Beyond pandemics, armed conflicts and humanitarian crises have inflicted acute damage on systems, destroying treatment facilities, polluting sources, and restricting access to safe water points for millions in affected regions. In protracted conflicts, such as those in and Gaza, infrastructure breakdowns have led to widespread service interruptions, with populations in fragile, conflict, and violence-affected settings—comprising 23% of the global total—facing heightened barriers to SDG 6 targets due to targeted attacks, displacement, and aid diversion. These disruptions not only reverse incremental gains in coverage but also amplify risks through and inadequate , demanding specialized humanitarian interventions that compete with developmental funding for sustainable progress. , often compounding crises, similarly overwhelm under-resourced systems, as seen in flood-damaged networks that hinder equitable service recovery and perpetuate cycles of vulnerability in low-income contexts.

Criticisms and Alternative Perspectives

Overreliance on Centralized Planning

The pursuit of SDG 6 has predominantly relied on centralized planning mechanisms, wherein national governments formulate policies and allocate resources in alignment with UN-prescribed targets and indicators, often prioritizing uniform global metrics over context-specific adaptations. This top-down structure assumes that higher-level authorities possess sufficient information to direct and interventions effectively across diverse locales, yet it frequently encounters the problem wherein dispersed, tacit local insights—such as community-specific usage patterns, terrain variations, and cultural practices—cannot be adequately centralized or utilized. Hayek's analysis of economic coordination highlights how such planning falters due to the impossibility of aggregating fragmented in real time, a dynamic equally applicable to resource-intensive sectors like management where misallocations lead to inefficiencies. Empirical assessments of governance in developing contexts reveal that centralized approaches exacerbate institutional challenges, including mismatched based on outdated population data and reluctance among stakeholders to collaborate beyond siloed bureaucracies. For example, in regions pursuing SDG 6 compliance, top-down policymaking has been undermined by partisan influences, administrative inertia, and regulatory gaps that hinder responsive implementation at the level. These shortcomings contribute to stalled progress, as evidenced by the UN's acknowledgment that global efforts remain off track, with only partial advancements in safely managed services despite billions in pledged financing. Quantitative reviews of sanitation initiatives further demonstrate the comparative underperformance of centralized models, where large-scale, government-driven programs yield lower gains in access compared to bottom-up alternatives that leverage community-led . Exploratory analyses indicate that decentralized strategies, by incorporating local participation, achieve higher effectiveness in expanding water and coverage, often at reduced from failures in expansive networks. Overreliance on central planning thus perpetuates a cycle of unmet targets, as seen in persistent gaps in and equitable access, underscoring the need for hybrid models that devolve authority to mitigate these inherent coordination deficits.

Efficacy of UN-Led Metrics and Reporting

The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) serves as the primary UN-led mechanism for tracking progress on SDG 6 targets related to , , and , relying on household surveys, censuses, and administrative data from national sources to generate global estimates. These metrics classify services into ladders such as "safely managed," "basic," and "," with JMP estimates indicating global coverage of safely managed rose from 61% in 2000 to 73% in 2022, and safely managed from an estimated low base to 54% by 2022. However, the efficacy of this system is undermined by persistent challenges, including incompleteness, outdated information, and lack of verification, which affect over half of SDG indicators in regions like and lead to biased progress assessments. Significant discrepancies between national government reports and JMP estimates highlight reliability issues, particularly for coverage in developing countries. In , government figures often exceed JMP estimates, with statistical tests confirming meaningful differences not attributable to definitional leniency but rather to variations in data sources, collection quality, and analytical methods—suggesting potential overreporting to align with political or funding incentives. For instance, in , national data reported higher access than JMP's 77% improved facilities estimate, reflecting broader patterns where self-reported administrative data lacks independent validation. Studies in countries like further indicate that self-reported measures for and access overestimate functionality, as they fail to capture actual or usage, necessitating alternatives like observational verification for accuracy. These limitations stem from low institutional capacity in many developing nations, where nearly 60% of UN member states report insufficient data for comprehensive SDG 6 monitoring, compounded by reliance on national submissions without robust ground-truthing. Global aggregation overlooks subnational governance realities, such as local mismanagement or uneven implementation, resulting in metrics that prioritize aspirational targets over causal drivers of failure. Consequently, while JMP reporting facilitates cross-country comparisons, its efficacy in driving targeted interventions is reduced, as incomplete datasets obscure true bottlenecks and enable optimistic narratives despite UN acknowledgments that current progress rates must accelerate 6- to 16-fold in low-income countries to meet 2030 goals. Enhanced verification, disaggregated local data, and integration of non-traditional sources like satellite monitoring could mitigate these flaws, but systemic biases toward unverified national inputs persist.

Market-Oriented and Decentralized Alternatives

Market-oriented approaches to and emphasize price signals, private investment, and to incentivize efficient resource use and service delivery, contrasting with centralized by relying on voluntary exchanges and local . Proponents contend that such mechanisms align individual incentives with conservation and , as users face the full costs of consumption and providers compete on and affordability. from water markets in the U.S. semiarid West demonstrates that tradable facilitate reallocation to higher-value uses, reducing overall consumption by 10-20% in some basins through voluntary transfers. Establishing secure property rights in water resources has been shown to curb overextraction of common-pool assets, with a study of Chilean irrigation districts finding that formalized rights reduced groundwater overuse by enabling efficient trading and investment in maintenance. In developing contexts, market-based sanitation programs, such as those promoting affordable household toilets through local suppliers, have scaled access rapidly; for instance, Population Services International reported sales of 760,000 units across 13 countries by 2025, driven by demand-responsive financing rather than subsidies alone. These models prioritize aspirational, low-cost products, achieving uptake rates up to 30% higher than traditional aid-driven efforts in rural areas. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems, often managed by local entities or private operators, offer flexibility for remote or urban fringe areas where centralized proves costly or infeasible. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency case studies highlight successes in clustered systems serving small communities, where on-site technologies like advanced septic variants have lowered treatment costs by 40-60% compared to piped networks and improved quality through tailored monitoring. In and similar settings, privatization of water kiosks and small-scale providers has expanded access, with a World Bank analysis of privatized services in linking the shift to an 8% drop in child mortality from waterborne diseases between 1990 and 2000, attributed to expanded coverage and maintenance incentives. However, outcomes depend on regulatory frameworks enforcing competition and accountability, as evidenced by mixed results in where welfare gains occurred primarily in municipalities with strong oversight. Private sector involvement in , such as container-based systems or modular treatment units, further exemplifies by enabling community-level deployment without reliance on national grids. Firms like Sanivation have integrated , treatment, and in Kenya's slums, converting fecal into sold locally, which recoups costs and reduces environmental discharge by up to 90% in pilot sites. These alternatives underscore causal links between incentivized local action and measurable gains in access and , though scalability requires addressing barriers like initial capital access for small operators.

Interlinkages and Broader Implications

Connections to Other SDGs

Access to clean and under SDG 6 supports SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by reducing the incidence of waterborne diseases such as , which causes approximately 485,000 deaths annually among children under five, primarily in low-income regions with inadequate . Empirical analyses confirm synergies, with improved and infrastructure correlating with lower rates and better overall health outcomes across 193 countries from 2000 to 2015. SDG 6 interlinks with SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) through and agricultural water use, where efficient water management enhances crop yields and ; studies identify causal dependencies, noting that exacerbates hunger in regions reliant on rain-fed , affecting over 2.4 billion as of 2022. Progress in SDG 6 targets, such as sustainable withdrawal and efficiency (6.4), directly bolsters SDG 2 targets on by mitigating impacts on food production. Connections to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) arise from water's role in generation, which supplied 16.2% of global in 2022, and in power plant cooling, where competing demands can create trade-offs; basin management reveals both synergies in expansion and conflicts over . Similarly, SDG 6 aids SDG 13 () by enabling adaptive water infrastructure against variability, with integrated approaches reducing vulnerability in 80% of assessed climate-sensitive targets. Urban water systems under SDG 6 align with SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), as safely in cities prevent flooding and support resilient ; from 2022 shows that 2.2 billion people lack safely managed , disproportionately impacting urban poor. Ecosystem protection in SDG 6, including wastewater treatment (target 6.3), synergizes with SDG 14 (Life Below Water) and SDG 15 (Life on Land) by preserving freshwater habitats, with analyses indicating positive interactions for 77% of related targets, though from untreated effluents poses ongoing trade-offs.

Economic Costs and Incentives

Achieving the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) targets of Sustainable Development Goal 6 requires substantial global investment, estimated at approximately $114 billion annually through 2030, according to a World Bank analysis covering capital expenditures for infrastructure such as piped networks and treatment facilities, operational costs, and maintenance. This figure represents roughly three times current spending levels in developing countries, with low-income nations bearing the highest per capita burdens due to extensive gaps in basic services; for instance, capital costs for rural sanitation and water supply can exceed operational expenses by factors of 2-3 in underserved regions. These estimates exclude indirect costs like those from environmental restoration or climate adaptation, potentially understating totals amid rising demands from population growth and urbanization. Economic incentives for SDG 6 investments stem primarily from quantified returns on and productivity gains, with and analyses indicating that every $1 invested yields $4.30 in benefits through averted medical expenses, reduced mortality, and enhanced workforce participation. Sanitation-focused studies project even higher multiples, up to $9 per dollar, by curbing disease burdens like diarrheal illnesses that impose annual global losses exceeding $200 billion in productivity. However, these projections assume efficient implementation, which empirical evidence challenges; in and service delivery can inflate connection costs by up to 30% and divert funds, eroding net returns in corrupt-prone environments common in low-governance contexts. Aid inflows for , while intended to bridge gaps, often exhibit inefficiencies, with perceived levels correlating to diminished impacts on access improvements. To align incentives with , policies emphasizing cost-recovery mechanisms—such as volumetric pricing and user tariffs—promote conservation and self-financing, countering tendencies toward overuse under subsidized or free provision models that strain resources and longevity. Public-private partnerships have demonstrated viability in scaling where governments lack capacity, potentially mobilizing up to $45 billion yearly from private sources, though regulatory frameworks must mitigate risks of inequitable access or profit-driven neglect of unprofitable rural areas. Centralized funding approaches, however, face criticism for misallocating resources due to weak , underscoring the need for decentralized, market-oriented reforms to enhance over top-down mandates.

Long-Term Sustainability Debates

Projections indicate that global water demand will rise by approximately 55% by 2050, driven primarily by , , and agricultural expansion, intensifying pressure on finite freshwater resources and challenging the long-term viability of universal access under SDG 6. This escalation is expected to leave at least one in four people facing recurring water shortages, with urban populations in water-scarce regions potentially doubling to 1.7–2.4 billion individuals. Debates persist on whether SDG 6's emphasis on expanded access adequately accounts for these dynamics, as critics highlight that short-term infrastructure gains may mask underlying , where withdrawal rates already exceed natural recharge in many basins. Groundwater depletion represents a core flashpoint in these discussions, with global excess withdrawal over recharge forecasted to reach 887 cubic kilometers by 2050—61% higher than levels—and annual extraction rates climbing to around 1,250 cubic kilometers. As many as 1.8 billion people could reside in areas of full or near-total depletion by mid-century, particularly in regions reliant on non-renewable aquifers for and drinking supplies. Proponents of SDG 6 argue for integrated and recharge initiatives to mitigate this, yet skeptics contend that without enforceable limits on extraction—often tied to subsidized —such measures fail to reverse trends, as evidenced by ongoing declines in major aquifers despite policy frameworks. This raises questions about the of targets (SDG 6.2), which depend on stable volumes for treatment and distribution. Wastewater management further fuels debates, as only about 60% of reported global flows receive safe treatment (at least secondary level), leaving vast untreated volumes to pollute surface and groundwater sources. Challenges include inadequate infrastructure capacity and the heterogeneity of pollutants from industrial and domestic sources, complicating scalable, cost-effective reuse essential for closing water loops in scarcity-prone areas. While SDG 6.3 aims to halve untreated wastewater by 2030, projections of rising urban generation—coupled with climate-induced variability—suggest persistent risks to ecosystem integrity and human health, prompting arguments for prioritizing advanced technologies like membrane bioreactors over expansive but maintenance-vulnerable centralized systems. Institutional and shortcomings amplify these concerns, with numerous rural and peri-urban schemes collapsing post-installation due to shortfalls, poor operation, and weak local , undermining long-term service delivery. In developing contexts, over-extraction and persist amid rapid demographic shifts, as seen in India's struggles with overuse despite SDG-aligned policies. Debates contrast top-down UN metrics, which track access but underemphasize depletion rates, against calls for decentralized, incentive-based approaches—such as volumetric —to foster conservation and innovation, though implementation barriers in low-capacity settings remain unresolved. Overall, while technological optimism posits and recycling as pathways, empirical trends in resource drawdown indicate that SDG 6's ambitions may strain against biophysical limits absent transformative shifts in usage patterns.

References

  1. http://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal6
  2. https://globalgoals.org/goals/6-clean-water-and-sanitation/
  3. https://sdg6data.org/en
  4. https://data.unicef.org/resources/jmp-report-2025/
  5. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/Goal-06/
  6. https://sustainableearthreviews.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42055-023-00067-2
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9396604/
  8. https://www.ielrc.org/content/e7701.pdf
  9. https://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/bibliography/UN/Mar_del_Plata_Report.pdf
  10. https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unga/1980/en/9530
  11. https://www.ircwash.org/resources/international-drinking-water-supply-and-sanitation-decade-end-decade-review-december-1990
  12. https://www.ielrc.org/content/e9209.pdf
  13. https://www.gwp.org/contentassets/05190d0c938f47d1b254d6606ec6bb04/dublin-rio-principles.pdf
  14. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/millennium-development-goals-%28mdgs%29
  15. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda-retired/
  16. https://www.cepal.org/en/topics/2030-agenda-sustainable-development/about-2030-agenda-sustainable-development
  17. http://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  18. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf
  19. https://press.un.org/en/2015/ga11688.doc.htm
  20. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/
  21. https://unric.org/en/sdg-6/
  22. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2022/702576/EXPO_IDA%282022%29702576_EN.pdf
  23. https://www.unep.org/topics/sustainable-development-goals/why-do-sustainable-development-goals-matter/goal-6
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621027190
  25. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal6
  26. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/
  27. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-06-01-01.pdf
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-020-00085-z
  29. https://sdgs.unep.org/article/sdg-indicator-621
  30. https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/percentage-of-population-using-safely-managed-sanitation-services-including-a-hand-washing-facility-with-soap-and-water-%28sdg-6.2.1%29
  31. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-06-03-01.pdf
  32. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-06-03-02.pdf
  33. https://sdg6data.org/indicator/6.3.2
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5681707/
  35. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/extended-report/Extended-Report-2025_Goal-6.pdf
  36. https://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals-data-portal/data/indicators/641-change-in-water-use-efficiency-over-time/en
  37. https://sdgs.unep.org/node/561
  38. https://unepdhi.org/sdg-651-2024-progress-report-launched/
  39. https://unece.org/environmental-policy/water/transboundary_water_cooperation_reporting
  40. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/progress-integrated-water-resources-management-mid-term-status-sdg-indicator-651-and-acceleration-needs-special-focus-climate-change
  41. https://sdg6data.org/indicator/6.6.1
  42. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/progress-sdg-6-indicators
  43. https://www.waterdiplomat.org/story/2024/10/three-sdg-6-indicator-progress-reports-highlight-degradation-water-related-ecosystems
  44. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/amount-of-water--and-sanitation-related-official-development-assistance-that-is-part-of-a-government-coordinated-spending-plan
  45. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/extended-report/Extended-Report_Goal-6.pdf
  46. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/official-development-assistance-oda.html
  47. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/publication/global-water-security-and-sanitation-partnership-annual-report-2023
  48. https://www.oecd.org/en/events/2025/01/official-development-assistance-oda-2023-final-figures.html
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8640661/
  50. https://iwaponline.com/aqua/article/72/8/1373/96200/Community-perceptions-participation-and
  51. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2023/2023_Factsheets.pdf
  52. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/
  53. https://ourworldindata.org/sdgs/clean-water-sanitation
  54. https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/9n4uzkg3
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791624000344
  56. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/mid-term-status-sdg-6-indicators-632-651-661-2024
  57. https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/monitoring-water-related-ecosystems-with-earth-observation-data-in-support-of-sustainable-development-goal-sdg-6-reporting/
  58. https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1809&context=journal
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X19300348
  60. https://data.unicef.org/topic/water-and-sanitation/drinking-water/
  61. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/goal-06/
  62. https://data.unicef.org/topic/water-and-sanitation/sanitation/
  63. https://data.unicef.org/resources/jmp-report-2023/
  64. https://data.who.int/indicators/i/5131A52/1548EA3
  65. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.H2O.SMDW.UR.ZS
  66. https://washdata.org/
  67. https://www.who.int/news/item/26-08-2025-1-in-4-people-globally-still-lack-access-to-safe-drinking-water---who--unicef
  68. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2024.pdf
  69. https://unsceb.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/Global-Acceleration-Framework.pdf
  70. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2025.pdf
  71. https://www.unwater.org/publications/sdg-6-synthesis-report-2023
  72. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/guide/topic-guide-on-corruption-in-water-and-sanitation-sector/4498
  73. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2013/03/14/africa-corruption-dirties-water
  74. https://www.u4.no/publications/the-impact-of-corruption-on-access-to-safe-water-and-sanitation-for-people-living-in-poverty.pdf
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X03001979
  76. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/sustainable-development-goal-six-sdg-6-water-and-sanitation-impacton-nigeria-assessing-the-intersection-with-public-health-and-globalization-a-systematic-literature-review/
  77. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Water-and-corruption-in-Latin-America_2021_PR.pdf
  78. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/world-water-day-corruption-in-the-water-sectors-costly-impact
  79. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/313071468162258816/improving-transparency-integrity-and-accountability-in-water-supply-and-sanitation-action-learning-experiences
  80. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdgatlas/goal-6-clean-water-and-sanitation/
  81. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/goal-06/
  82. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/goal-06/
  83. https://www.who.int/health-topics/urban-health
  84. https://www.unesco.org/en/wwap/wwdr/2019
  85. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3582&context=theses
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024136778
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X25002515
  88. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-019-0039-9
  89. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/chapter/chapter-4/
  90. https://iwaponline.com/washdev/article/doi/10.2166/washdev.2025.138/109733/Climate-change-impacts-on-water-sanitation-and
  91. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/africa/state-of-africas-environment-2025-changes-in-global-water-cycle-to-have-adverse-impact-on-continent
  92. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/world-groundwater-levels-showing-accelerated-decline-study-2024-01-24/
  93. https://interconnectedrisks.org/2023/tipping-points/groundwater-depletion
  94. https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13376
  95. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06879-8
  96. https://mywaterquality.ca.gov/wetland-monitoring/where-are-wetlands.html
  97. https://www.ck12.org/flexi/earth-science/fresh-water-ecosystems/how-does-the-loss-of-wetlands-affect-water-quality/
  98. https://www.hydroviv.com/blogs/water-smarts/how-deforestation-impacts-water-quality
  99. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135422006741
  100. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/half-worlds-countries-have-degraded-freshwater-systems-un-finds
  101. https://www.renewablematter.eu/en/sdg6-un-half-the-worlds-countries-have-degraded-freshwater-systems
  102. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240057258
  103. https://www.ifc.org/content/dam/ifc/doc/mgrt/the-impact-of-covid-water-sanitation-final-web.pdf
  104. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/billions-people-will-lack-access-safe-water-sanitation-and-hygiene-2030-unless
  105. https://washdata.org/report/jmp-2022-wins-data-update-pandemic-preparedness
  106. https://www.unicef.org/supply/stories/building-access-clean-water-support-sustainable-development-goal-6
  107. https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/call-action-survival-resilient-wash-0
  108. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-025-06763-7
  109. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/clean-water-and-sanitation
  110. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-018-0003-0
  111. https://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/hykKnw.html
  112. https://iwaponline.com/wp/article/25/4/359/94020/Need-to-adopt-scaled-decentralized-systems-in-the
  113. https://m.kuow.org/stories/the-u-n-plan-to-improve-the-world-by-2030-is-failing-does-that-make-it-a-failure
  114. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/CMS/Portals/0/PDF%2520reviews%2520and%2520summaries/SANITATION%25202016%2520Annamalai.pdf
  115. https://earth-perspectives.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2194-6434-1-5
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X25000266
  117. https://iwaponline.com/washdev/article/8/3/481/39048/Impact-of-sanitation-monitoring-approaches-on
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720350452
  119. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26268/revisions/w26268.rev2.pdf
  120. https://www.lincolninst.edu/app/uploads/legacy-files/pubfiles/water-rights-and-markets-us-efficiency-equity_0.pdf
  121. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/population-services-international_sanitationforall-globalhealth-sustainablesolutions-activity-7366061915527184385-bWxD
  122. https://marketbookshelf.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Sanitation_EvidenceSeries_Jun2016.pdf
  123. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/decentralized-case-studies-2012.pdf
  124. https://ppp.worldbank.org/case-studies-and-lessons-learned-water
  125. https://publications.iadb.org/en/does-society-win-or-lose-result-privatization-provision-public-services-and-welfare-poor-case-water
  126. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/blog/3-water-and-sanitation-innovations-that-could-be-game-changers-in-advancing-global-health/
  127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624203404
  128. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017ef000632
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10208324/
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338151/
  131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987125001574
  132. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/938
  133. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44679-w
  134. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1561945/full
  135. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/publication/the-costs-of-meeting-the-2030-sustainable-development-goal-targets-on-drinking-water-sanitation-and-hygiene
  136. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/cfbfaf80-3930-5ffd-a5bf-6ded12a1340e
  137. https://unctad.org/news/unctad-counts-costs-achieving-sustainable-development-goals
  138. https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/11/484032
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3212862/
  140. https://www.transparency.org/en/press/20080624-corruption-in-the-water-sector-is-an-overlooked-threat-for-develop
  141. https://scispace.com/pdf/constraints-on-foreign-aid-effectiveness-in-the-water-3ljowqzscq.pdf
  142. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/5a88d959-df63-5441-9979-292479e2f247/download
  143. https://blueprint.unglobalcompact.org/sdgs/sdg06/
  144. https://worldgbc.org/article/the-water-paper/
  145. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/imminent-risk-global-water-crisis-warns-un-world-water-development-report-2023
  146. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37989720/
  147. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf0630
  148. https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/groundwater-depleted-2050-1.3897964
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003981
  150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427122000729
  151. https://iwaponline.com/washdev/article/15/5/427/108147/Barriers-to-the-sustainability-of-rural-water
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.