Hubbry Logo
Sacramento Municipal Utility DistrictSacramento Municipal Utility DistrictMain
Open search
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Community hub
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) is a community-owned electric utility serving Sacramento County and parts of Placer County.[3] It is one of the ten largest publicly owned utilities in the United States, generating the bulk of its power through natural gas (estimated 35.2% of production total in 2020) and large hydroelectric generation plants (29.1% in 2020). SMUD's green power (renewable) energy output was estimated as 33.8% in 2020.[4]

Key Information

SMUD owned the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station nuclear power plant, shut down by a vote of the utility's rate-payers in the late 1980s. Although the nuclear plant is now decommissioned, its now-unused iconic towers remain on the site. Solar arrays and the 500-megawatt Cosumnes gas-fired plant have risen in proximity to the towers.

SMUD's headquarters building, built in the late 1950s on the edge of the East Sacramento neighborhood, is notable for its mural by Sacramento artist Wayne Thiebaud. The mural wraps around the ground floor of the building and is accessible to the public. It is one of the earliest major works by the artist, and remains his largest installation to date.

History

[edit]
The decommissioned Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station

Created by a vote of Sacramento County residents on 2 July 1923 pursuant to the Municipal Utility District Act,[5][6] SMUD's ability to provide power to its customer-owners was stymied in the courts for nearly a quarter century by the investor-owned Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) of San Francisco.[7] A court ruling eventually sided with SMUD, which began providing power at the beginning of 1946.[7] SMUD is a public agency of the State of California, and as such is not subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's jurisdiction under the Federal Power Act.[8][9] Echoes of SMUD's fight to fulfill its original mandate from the voters have continued in more recent turf battles with PG&E. In the 1980s, residents of Folsom voted to join SMUD, with PG&E fighting the annexation in the courts. Folsom rate-payers are now part of SMUD. In 2006, PG&E successfully convinced SMUD rate-payers and rate-payers in Yolo County to vote down an annexation proposal that would have extended the public utility's service territory to include the Yolo County cities of West Sacramento, Davis and Woodland, along with territory between the three cities.

In February 2020, 75 project customers, including the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, received permanent federal water contracts for the Central Valley Project.[10][11]

Governance

[edit]
See also: Government of Sacramento County, California

SMUD is governed by a seven-member Board of Directors. Each member is elected by residents in a "ward" or constituency for four-year terms. As of January 2024 the directors[12] were:

  • Brandon Rose, Ward 1
  • Nancy Bui-Thompson, Ward 2
  • Gregg Fishman, Ward 3, Board Vice President
  • Rosanna Herber, Ward 4, Board President
  • Rob Kerth, Ward 5
  • David Tamayo, Ward 6
  • Heidi Sanborn, Ward 7

Facilities

[edit]
Loon Lake Reservoir

SMUD's electricity generation capacity derives from the watershed of the South Fork of the American River, called the "Upper American River Project (UARP)" in federal licensing documents. The project is an extensive complex of multiple retention dams, diversion dams, reservoirs, canals, tunnels and hydroelectric powerplants. The plants are run during hours of peak demand, though retaining sufficient flood control capacity dictates water releases to some extent.

From upstream to downstream, the District's UARP assets include:[13][14]

  • Rubicon Dam and Reservoir, 1,450 acre-feet (1.8 million cubic meters)
  • Buck Island Dam and Reservoir, 1,070 acre⋅ft (1.3 million m3)
  • Loon Lake Dam and Reservoir, built 1963, 76,200 acre⋅ft (94 million m3)
  • Gerle Creek Dam and Reservoir, 1,260 acre⋅ft (1.6 million m3)
  • Robbs Peak Reservoir, 30 acre⋅ft (37 thousand m3)
  • Ice House Dam and Reservoir, 45,960 acre⋅ft (57 million m3)
  • Union Valley Dam and Reservoir, built 1963, 277,290 acre⋅ft (340 million m3)
  • Junction Dam and Reservoir, 3,250 acre⋅ft (4.0 million m3)
  • Camino Dam and Reservoir, 825 acre⋅ft (1.0 million m3)
  • Brush Creek Dam and Reservoir, 1,530 acre⋅ft (1.9 million m3)
  • Slab Creek Dam and Reservoir, 16,600 acre⋅ft (20 million m3)

SMUD owns the first of potentially two natural gas power plants (the Cosumnes Power Plant, brought online in 2006 on property adjacent to the decommissioned Rancho Seco nuclear facility) as well as wind-powered and solar-powered electric generation facilities. In addition, the utility owns some small gas-fired peaker plants for meeting the highest energy demands, typically on Sacramento's notably blistering summer days.

SMUD is in the Advisory Council of the PHEV Research Center.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) is a community-owned, not-for-profit that generates, transmits, and distributes power to over 1.5 million customers across a 900-square-mile service territory encompassing Sacramento County and western .
Formed by voter approval in 1923 following a campaign to wrest control from private utilities, SMUD commenced operations on December 31, 1946, after acquiring Pacific Gas & Electric's local distribution system amid protracted legal and political disputes.
Its energy portfolio in 2023 derived from large hydroelectric (32.6%), (21.9%), solar (10.9%), (14.4%), geothermal (14.7%), (3.1%), and minor nuclear sources, yielding approximately 78% carbon-free generation.
SMUD pioneered utility-scale solar with the world's first such in and maintains leadership in energy efficiency and renewables, including a 2030 Zero Carbon Plan to phase out fossil fuels entirely.
A pivotal controversy arose with the , operational from 1974 until its decommissioning via public referendum in 1989 amid safety incidents, high costs, and operational failures that eroded public confidence.

History

Formation and Early Development (1923–1946)

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) was established by a vote of Sacramento County residents on July 2, 1923, under the provisions of California's Municipal Utility District Act of 1913, which enabled the formation of public s to acquire, construct, and operate systems for water, light, power, and other services. The initiative stemmed from widespread dissatisfaction with high electricity rates charged by the private (PG&E), prompting voters to approve the as a community-owned, not-for-profit entity aimed at securing lower-cost power through public control of local resources. Following formation, SMUD's early years involved extensive engineering studies and planning for infrastructure acquisition, but progress stalled amid political opposition and protracted legal disputes with PG&E, which resisted the district's efforts to condemn and purchase its local distribution system. In 1942, the California Railroad Commission established a valuation for PG&E's assets, which PG&E rejected, leading SMUD to initiate a condemnation proceeding in 1943 that resulted in a favorable ruling in 1945. PG&E pursued multiple appeals, exhausting available remedies to delay the transfer, reflecting broader tensions between private utilities and public takeovers during the era. The California Supreme Court rejected PG&E's final petition in March 1946, clearing the path for a sales contract signed in April of that year at the fixed price set years earlier. SMUD assembled an initial workforce exceeding 400 employees to prepare for operations, inheriting an aging PG&E system with components dating to 1895 and addressing service backlogs for approximately 3,000 waiting customers amid postwar material shortages in copper, vehicles, and skilled labor. The district commenced electric service on December 31, 1946, marking the end of over two decades of development hurdles and the start of direct provision in the region.

Operational Expansion and Nuclear Era (1947–1989)

On January 1, 1947, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) acquired the electric distribution system from Pacific Gas & Electric, inheriting an outdated infrastructure originating in 1895 to serve approximately 65,000 customers. The postwar economic boom, including War-driven expansion of Sacramento's military bases and suburban growth, tripled consumption during the , expanding the customer base to 170,000 by decade's end. adoption surged, with sales increasing 92% in 1959 alone, necessitating rapid system modernization. To secure reliable baseload power and reduce dependence on external suppliers, SMUD pursued hydroelectric development through the Upper American River Project (UARP). Following Federal Power Commission approval of a 50-year in 1957, construction commenced in 1958 across seven developments spanning over 81 river miles on the River, Silver Creek, and South Fork . The Jaybird Powerhouse initiated generation on May 1, 1961, with subsequent facilities coming online through the 1960s, yielding a total capacity of 688 megawatts from reservoirs including Loon Lake. By 1964, SMUD's customer count reached 625,000, prompting a 95% rebuild of the distribution network and three rate reductions to support growth. Anticipating further demand, SMUD initiated the nuclear era in the mid-1960s by acquiring 2,100 acres southeast of Sacramento for the , a 913-megawatt designed by . Construction began on April 1, 1969, with commercial operations commencing in April 1975 after dedication in October 1974. The plant peaked at full capacity in 1977, but encountered reliability issues amid the , a 1976 halving UARP output, and intensified regulatory oversight following the 1979 . Operational challenges at Rancho Seco, including safety concerns and escalating costs, culminated in a June 7, 1989, voter where 53.4% approved permanent shutdown, effective June 1989, marking the end of SMUD's nuclear generation phase. This decision reflected public apprehension over nuclear risks, despite the plant's role in meeting peak regional demand during expansion.

Decommissioning and Transition to Renewables (1990–Present)

Following the permanent shutdown of the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station on June 7, 1989, via a voter-approved referendum, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) initiated the decommissioning process in the early 1990s. The reactor was defueled by late 1989, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved SMUD's decommissioning funding plan on March 20, 1995. Active decommissioning activities commenced in 1997, with the SMUD Board of Directors approving full decommissioning in July 1999, targeting completion by 2008. Spent nuclear fuel was transferred to an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) by 2002, where 493 assemblies remain stored. Physical decommissioning concluded around 2008, though the NRC terminated the facility's license in 2018 after verifying radiological surveys and site remediation. The Rancho Seco decommissioning, costing approximately $592 million in 2024 dollars, marked SMUD's exit from nuclear power generation and prompted a strategic pivot toward diversified, lower-carbon energy sources. In parallel, SMUD launched its Greenergy green pricing program in 1997 to offer customers voluntary renewable energy options, followed by the adoption of an internal Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) in 2001 committing to increasing renewable procurement. By the late 1990s, SMUD transitioned to contractor-based solar incentives and expanded decentralized solar applications, aligning with broader sustainability goals including a 90% CO2 reduction target. In 2008, SMUD set a goal of 33% renewable power by 2020, surpassing California's state RPS requirements and achieving 24% renewables (20% RPS plus 4% ) by 2011. This progress supported integration of , and emerging storage technologies, driven by greenhouse gas regulations and RPS mandates. By 2021, SMUD announced its 2030 Zero Carbon Plan, aiming for zero carbon emissions across its —the most aggressive target among large U.S. utilities—through accelerated renewable additions, energy efficiency, and without reliance on nuclear revival. The plan emphasizes local investments in clean energy, projecting 90% emission reductions via proven technologies like solar and battery storage, with the remaining 10% addressed by future innovations. As of 2024, SMUD continues tracking progress toward this net-zero goal, incorporating projects such as repowering at Solano 2.

Governance and Administration

Board of Directors and Elections

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District is governed by a seven-member , with each member elected directly by customers within one of seven geographic wards comprising the utility's service territory spanning Sacramento County and portions of adjacent counties. Ward boundaries are delineated to reflect population distributions and are redrawn periodically following decennial to maintain balanced representation, as implemented after the 2020 U.S. with minor adjustments including expansions in certain areas like Ward 7. Directors serve staggered four-year terms in nonpartisan elections aligned with Sacramento County's even-year general elections, requiring candidates to reside in the ward they represent and limiting elections to voters qualified within that ward. In the November 5, 2024, general election, for instance, Ward 1 incumbent Brandon D. Rose received 54,769 votes to secure re-election, while Ward 5 incumbent Rob Kerth prevailed in a contest against challengers including Fatima Malik. The board's primary functions include establishing operational policies, core values, and long-term strategic objectives for the utility, overseeing executive management while ensuring accountability to ratepayers as public owners. Board leadership positions—president and —are elected annually by a majority vote of at least four members from among the directors, with terms running January through December. On January 3, 2025, Gregg Fishman (Ward 3) was elected president and Dave Tamayo for the 2025 term.

Management and Regulatory Framework

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) is managed by a seven-member , elected directly by customers within the district to staggered four-year terms. Each director represents a specific geographic ward and must reside within that ward, ensuring localized . The Board establishes district policies, approves annual budgets, sets electric rates, and oversees strategic initiatives, with public meetings held regularly to maintain transparency. Day-to-day operations are led by the executive management team, appointed by the Board, with Paul Lau serving as and General Manager since October 2020. Supporting roles include the , , and other senior executives responsible for areas such as grid operations, finance, and customer service. As a community-owned municipal utility district, SMUD is exempt from rate regulation and direct oversight by the (CPUC), which primarily governs investor-owned utilities. The Board holds sole authority to set rates and service charges without external governmental approval, fostering operational independence but tying accountability to customer elections and financial audits. SMUD remains subject to federal regulations, including those from the for wholesale power transactions and the for legacy nuclear-related matters, as well as state and federal environmental compliance requirements. Annual independent audits ensure fiscal responsibility, with results publicly reported.

Power Generation and Infrastructure

Current Generation Portfolio

As of 2023, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District's (SMUD) power supply mix for its territorial customers consisted of 40% eligible (RPS) sources, 22% large hydroelectric, and 38% , with no nuclear, , or components. This composition excludes certain unbundled credits used solely for compliance and reflects the utility's dispatchable and contracted resources to meet demand for approximately 1.5 million customers. SMUD's portfolio emphasizes owned hydroelectric assets alongside contracted renewables and gas-fired generation for reliability, with total output from controlled plants projected at 7,700 GWh in 2024. Hydroelectric power forms a foundational element, accounting for 22% of the mix through the Upper American River Project (UARP), which includes 11 reservoirs and nine powerhouses providing about 16% of needs in a normal , supplemented by contracts for an additional 6%. The UARP's run-of-river and storage facilities, such as those near Loon Lake, deliver variable output dependent on Sierra Nevada , contributing to low marginal costs during high-precipitation periods. Renewable sources under RPS eligibility comprise 40%, diversified across (18%), geothermal (13%), solar (6%), and (2%), and small eligible hydro (1%). generation includes a 230 MW Solano County facility with 107 turbines and a 200 MW contract since 2019; solar capacity exceeds 340 MW from utility-scale projects like Rancho Seco and over 210 MW from customer rooftop installations; geothermal draws from 52 MW annual contracts. utilizes agricultural and forestry waste alongside dairy digester outputs. These intermittent resources are balanced by 1,000 MW of capacity across plants including Cosumnes (combined-cycle), Campbell, Procter, and peaking units, ensuring grid stability amid California's variable demand and renewable integration challenges.
Power Source CategoryPercentage (2023)Key Components
RPS Eligible Renewables40%Wind (18%), Geothermal (13%), Solar (6%), Biomass/Biogas (2%), Eligible Hydro (1%)
Large Hydroelectric22%UARP and contracts
38%Owned plants (e.g., Cosumnes)
Nuclear/Coal/Petroleum0%None
Wholesale market purchases supplement the owned and long-term contracted portfolio, incorporating unspecified sources as needed, though these comprised 0% in the reported mix. The intensity stood at 356 lbs CO2e per MWh, driven primarily by gas , with biogenic emissions from excluded. SMUD maintains no active nuclear generation following the 1989 decommissioning of Rancho Seco.

Major Facilities and Assets


SMUD's major facilities encompass a diverse portfolio centered on hydroelectric generation, natural gas-fired plants, and expanding solar photovoltaic installations, supplemented by systems. The Upper American River Project (UARP) stands as the utility's largest owned asset, featuring 11 reservoirs—including Loon Lake—and 9 powerhouses with a total installed capacity of 688 megawatts. Located along the upper in the Sierra Nevada, the UARP generates approximately 1.8 billion kilowatt-hours annually in a normal , accounting for about 16% of SMUD's power needs. This run-of-river system operates under a 50-year license issued in July 2014, emphasizing flexible, low-emission dispatchable power. Complementing hydroelectric assets, SMUD maintains a fleet of five natural gas-fired power plants—Cosumnes, Campbell, Procter, Carson, and McClellan—with a combined capacity of 1,000 megawatts, providing baseload and peaking capabilities. The Cosumnes Power Plant, a modern combined-cycle facility southeast of Sacramento, contributes significantly to this capacity and entered commercial operation in 2006 adjacent to the decommissioned Rancho Seco site. These plants ensure grid reliability amid variable renewables, though SMUD plans to retire or repower portions by 2025 to align with carbon reduction goals. In renewable solar assets, SMUD owns over 340 megawatts of utility-scale photovoltaic capacity as of recent reports, powering more than 90,000 homes annually. Key facilities include Rancho Seco Solar II, a 160-megawatt PV array operational since 2021 on land adjacent to the former nuclear station, incorporating agrivoltaic practices with sheep grazing under panels. The utility pioneered large-scale solar with its 1984 installation and continues expansion, such as the proposed Oveja Ranch Solar Project—a 75-megawatt PV and battery storage facility in southeastern Sacramento County slated for commercial operation in 2028. Additionally, SMUD has secured power purchase agreements for battery , including the 160-megawatt/640-megawatt-hour Dry Creek system in Sacramento County, announced in June 2025, to enhance grid stability and renewable integration. These assets collectively support SMUD's infrastructure for serving over 1.5 million customers across a 1,500-square-mile territory.

Transmission, Distribution, and Grid Modernization

SMUD operates a transmission network consisting of approximately 473 circuit miles of lines at voltages of 69 kV, 115 kV, and 230 kV, supported by 10 bulk substations. This interconnects with regional grids, including lines such as the 230 kV/115 kV connection between Elverta and Natomas substations, to deliver power from sources to distribution points. Reliability criteria mandate that system voltages remain within 5% of nominal levels under normal conditions, with processes emphasizing coordinated expansion to accommodate load growth and renewable integration. The distribution system includes over 6,000 circuit miles of lines, primarily at 12 kV to 21 kV, feeding 228 substations and serving about 1.5 million customers across a 1,400-square-mile territory. Step-down transformers at substations convert transmission voltages to distribution levels, enabling delivery to residential, commercial, and industrial loads while adhering to standards for and fault protection. Grid modernization efforts focus on enhancing reliability, integrating renewables, and enabling two-way power flows through initiatives like SmartSacramento, which deployed advanced metering (AMI) across its service area starting in the late 2000s, integrated with distribution management systems for real-time monitoring and outage response. In 2023, SMUD received a $50 million federal grant from the Department of Energy's Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnerships program to fund advanced technologies such as grid automation and sensors, though the award faced cancellation by the Trump administration in October 2025 amid policy shifts prioritizing fiscal restraint over subsidized expansions. Complementary projects include dynamic line rating (DLR) pilots since 2021 to unlock additional transmission capacity without new construction, potentially accommodating more renewables by dynamically assessing line thermal limits based on real-time weather data. Further advancements incorporate distributed energy resource (DER) planning, with holistic assessments estimating $150–200 million in annual customer/third-party DER investments, and tools like the NREL-developed launched in March 2025 to streamline solar interconnections, reducing engineering review times from weeks to hours. Load compliance plans aim to transition from centralized to decentralized systems via intelligent switches and sensors, targeting reduced outage durations and load cycling during peaks. These measures address causal challenges like variable renewable outputs and rising demands, prioritizing empirical grid stability over unsubstantiated mandates.

Environmental Policies and Sustainability

Carbon Reduction Goals and Strategies

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) adopted the 2030 Zero Carbon Plan on June 16, 2022, as its Integrated Resource Plan, targeting zero carbon emissions from its by 2030, a decade ahead of California's statewide 100% clean mandate. This ambition builds on a 2020 and prior commitments, such as a 2018 plan for carbon neutrality by 2040. The plan emphasizes a diverse portfolio to ensure reliability while minimizing costs to ratepayers, prioritizing renewables and storage for approximately 90% of decarbonization, with addressing the remainder. Core strategies include expanding utility-scale renewables such as , hydroelectric, geothermal, and ; deploying battery storage and systems; and promoting energy efficiency programs. SMUD incentivizes customer-side measures like rooftop solar (currently 397 MW from over 59,000 systems) and battery adoption (14 MW from more than 2,200 customers), alongside fleet and renewable diesel for Scope 1 emissions. For the final emissions reductions, the utility explores carbon capture and sequestration, green production (through partnerships like ARCHES), and biofuels, evaluating full lifecycle emissions to avoid shifting burdens elsewhere. These approaches integrate with , such as Sacramento's climate commission initiatives, and leverage non-ratepayer funding sources. Progress toward the target includes achieving 78% carbon-free power in 2023, with ongoing reductions tracked via quarterly gas plant emissions (e.g., 635,000 metric tons CO2e in Q1 2025 and 447,000 in Q2 2025). Key projects contribute significantly: the completed Solano 4 (85.5 MW, generating 303,000 MWh annually); Sloughhouse solar (50 MW, 124,000 MWh/year); and geothermal expansion (100 MW, operational since 2023). In-progress developments, such as the Country Acres solar-plus-storage facility (344 MW, expected 637,000 MWh/year and 248,000 metric tons CO2e reduction annually by 2027), underscore the scale of deployment. Storage additions, like the 4 MW project completed in 2023, enhance grid flexibility. Challenges persist in balancing rapid decarbonization with system reliability and affordable rates, necessitating a mix beyond intermittent renewables, as renewables and storage alone may cap at 90% without advancements in long-duration storage or alternatives. SMUD's Scope 2 emissions are fully offset via credits, while Scope 3 efforts focus on , though full zero-carbon attainment hinges on scalable, low-emission innovations for residual needs. Annual progress reports and power content labels provide transparency on these metrics.

Renewable Energy Integration and Projects

SMUD pursues integration through a combination of utility-scale and , battery storage for intermittency management, and grid enhancements to accommodate variable output from solar and resources. The utility's 2030 Zero Carbon Plan targets elimination of from its by 2030, requiring the addition of approximately 3,000 megawatts of renewables and storage capacity. In 2023, SMUD's was 78 percent carbon-free, reflecting progress from hydroelectric baseload, expanded solar and procurement, and geothermal contracts. Hydroelectric power forms a cornerstone of SMUD's renewable portfolio, supplying about 22 percent of its needs via owned facilities and contracts. The Upper Project (UARP), operated by SMUD since the , features 11 reservoirs—including Loon Lake—and nine powerhouses with a total installed capacity of 688 megawatts. In an average , the UARP generates 1.8 billion kilowatt-hours, sufficient for roughly 180,000 homes. A 50-year license, issued in 2014, governs operations with provisions for environmental flows and recreation. Solar photovoltaic installations contribute over 340 megawatts of utility-scale capacity, powering more than 90,000 homes annually, with customer rooftop systems adding 210 megawatts from over 28,000 participants. Key projects include the Rancho Seco Solar facility and onsite arrays at SMUD's East Campus and headquarters; since 2021, over 300 megawatts of solar and related storage have come online, with nearly 600 megawatts planned by 2026. The Consumnes Power Plant incorporates technology, aligning operational temperatures with existing inlets for hybrid . Wind energy procurement totals around 430 megawatts, including 230 megawatts from the Solano Wind Farm's 107 turbines in the Montezuma Hills (operational since 1994) and a 200-megawatt contract from facilities since 2019. The Solano 4 project, completed in 2024, upgraded 23 older turbines to 19 V150 units, boosting that site's capacity to 85.5 megawatts and contributing to a cumulative Solano expansion toward 300 megawatts. Complementary sources include 52 megawatts of under long-term contracts and from dairy digesters and waste processing. Battery storage projects enhance renewable dispatchability; in June 2025, SMUD entered a for the 160-megawatt, 640-megawatt-hour Dry Creek Energy Storage system, charged primarily from grid renewables to firm supply during peaks. Approximately 950 megawatts of renewables and storage developments remain in progress, targeted for completion by 2026, supporting California's while addressing variability through integrated resource planning.

Financial Performance and Rates

Revenue, Expenses, and Budgeting

SMUD derives the majority of its revenues from retail sales of electricity to approximately 1.5 million customers in Sacramento County and adjacent areas, with residential customers accounting for roughly 50% of annual revenue. In fiscal year 2024, total operating revenues reached $1,962 million, broken down as residential sales at $892 million, commercial and industrial at $882 million, wholesale at $223 million, and other revenues at $55 million, after adjustments of -$90 million. Non-operating revenues, primarily investment income, contributed an additional $169 million. For comparison, 2023 operating revenues were $1,931 million, with residential at $789 million and commercial/industrial at $806 million.
Category (in millions)2024 Operating Revenues2023 Operating Revenues2024 Operating Expenses2023 Operating Expenses
Residential$892$789--
Commercial/Industrial$882$806--
Wholesale/Other$278$359--
Adjustments-$90-$56--
Total Operating$1,962$1,931--
Purchased Power--$410$452
Production--$361$358
--$273$268
G&A/ Services--$385$306
/Public Good/Other--$375$364
Total Operating Expenses--$1,804$1,748
Operating expenses in 2024 totaled $1,804 million, with purchased power at $410 million reflecting reliance on external supply amid variable generation output, production costs at $361 million for owned assets, and at $273 million for infrastructure amortization. expenses stood at $102 million, contributing to a positive change in net position of $225 million. These figures underscore SMUD's customer-funded model, where revenues must cover costs without taxpayer subsidies, influenced by factors like wholesale market prices and regulatory mandates for renewables. SMUD's budgeting process entails annual preparation by , incorporating load forecasts (e.g., 10,500 GWh sales projected for 2025), assumptions from approved rates, and expense projections tied to operations, capital needs, and debt obligations. The reviews and approves the budget via resolution, as with the $2.3 billion authorization for 2025, allocating $1,464 million to operations and maintenance (including $610 million for commodities like purchased power), $612 million to capital projects such as grid modernization and solar installations, and $205 million to debt service on $1.58 billion in outstanding bonds. This framework prioritizes financial metrics like positive ($117 million projected for 2025) and reserve maintenance, with contingencies at 10% of operating expenses to address uncertainties in fuel costs or regulatory changes. Budgets are adjusted via delegated CEO authority for variances, ensuring alignment with self-sustaining operations.

Rate Structures and Customer Costs

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) structures its residential rates around time-of-use pricing to reflect varying costs of generation and , with options including the standard Time-of-Day (TOD) Rate, Time-of-Day (Low Use) Rate for qualifying customers (under 270 kWh/month and 125-amp panel or smaller), Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) variant, and a simpler Fixed Rate plan. Effective January 1, 2026, all residential plans include a System Infrastructure Fixed Charge of $27 per month ($17 for Low Use plan) to recover distribution and transmission costs. Variable energy charges are assessed per (kWh) and differ by season (summer: June–September; non-summer: October–May) and time period, with weekdays from 5–8 p.m., mid-peak weekdays noon to (excluding peak), and off-peak for all other hours; no usage-based tiers apply beyond these temporal distinctions.
Rate PlanSummer (Jun–Sep) Rates ($/kWh)Non-Summer (Oct–May) Rates ($/kWh)
Time-of-DayOff-Peak: 0.1550; Mid-Peak: 0.2139; Peak: 0.3765Off-Peak: 0.1285; Peak: 0.1776
Time-of-Day (Low Use)Off-Peak: 0.1920; Mid-Peak: 0.2514; Peak: 0.4154Off-Peak: 0.1654; Peak: 0.2148
Critical Peak PricingOff-Peak: 0.1350; Mid-Peak: 0.1939; Peak: 0.3765; Peak Events: up to 0.5000Off-Peak: 0.1285; Peak: 0.1776
Fixed RateAll hours: 0.2189All hours: 0.1371
Discounts reduce effective costs for qualifying customers, including variable low-income assistance via the Energy Assistance Program Rate, a $15 monthly medical equipment credit, a 1.5¢/kWh charging credit (midnight–6 a.m., excluding Fixed Rate), and a 7.4¢/kWh solar or storage export credit (excluding Fixed Rate). For an average residential usage of 750 kWh monthly, the typical bill totals $149 as of January 1, 2026, encompassing fixed charges, rates, and minimal surcharges such as a $0.0003/kWh state-mandated adjustment (with no hydrogeneration charge). SMUD's rates are among the lowest in California. Commercial and industrial rates follow a parallel structure with time-of-day elements, demand charges based on peak kW usage, and tiered applicability by load size (e.g., small commercial up to 299 kW under CI-TOD1 schedule), enabling cost recovery aligned with infrastructure strain. These rates average 50.3% lower than Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) equivalents, with small commercial service 58.4% below PG&E and large (1,000+ kW) 42.7% below. SMUD's nonprofit municipal status facilitates these lower costs by avoiding investor returns.

Controversies and Challenges

Rancho Seco Nuclear Plant Debacle

The , a 913-megawatt located near Herald, , was constructed by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and began commercial operation on April 17, 1975. Initial construction costs reached approximately $375 million in 1974 dollars. The facility aimed to provide baseload power to SMUD's service area but encountered persistent operational difficulties, including frequent automatic shutdowns known as scrams, with over 100 such events reported during its operational history, contributing to a low and elevated maintenance expenses. A significant safety incident occurred on December 26, 1985, when a failure in the plant's core cooling led to a loss of cooling water, prompting an automatic and a three-month shutdown for investigations by the (NRC). This event, among others, heightened public concerns over radiological releases, contaminated water discharges, and the plant's reliability, as documented in NRC reports and local opposition campaigns. By 1986, Rancho Seco had been offline for substantial periods, exacerbating SMUD's first budget deficit and forcing reliance on costlier purchased power, with cumulative costs exceeding $1.1 billion since startup while generating electricity that would have otherwise cost $1.9 billion from external sources. Public opposition culminated in a June 6, 1989, , Measure B, where Sacramento County voters approved permanent shutdown by a margin of 53.4% to 46.6%, marking the first instance of a U.S. voting to close an operating . SMUD entered hot shutdown on June 7, 1989, followed by defueling and transition to cold shutdown. The decision, driven by safety and economic critiques despite SMUD board commitments to abide by the vote, led to immediate cessation of power generation and long-term financial burdens on ratepayers through replacement power purchases and decommissioning obligations. Decommissioning proceeded under NRC oversight in mode, with SMUD opting for delayed dismantlement due to insufficient trust fund balances at shutdown. Total decommissioning costs approximated $498.8 million, encompassing , , and site restoration, with operations spanning from 1991 licensing to license termination in 2010. The process included handling spent fuel storage, annual maintenance expenses for used fuel rods exceeding $4.5 million, and eventual transfer of waste to federal repositories, imposing ongoing fiscal strain on SMUD estimated in the hundreds of millions beyond initial projections of $250 million to $1 billion. This outcome underscored challenges in nuclear economics and , as the abrupt closure amplified replacement energy costs and deferred site reuse until post-2019 redevelopment into renewable facilities.

Rate Hikes, Reliability, and Cost Pressures

SMUD has pursued a series of measured rate increases to fund escalating operational and capital expenditures. A 2% base rate adjustment took effect on January 1, 2023, followed by multiple 2.75% increments in 2024 and 2025, including stages on January 1, May 1, and additional dates to support financial stability. In June 2025, the board approved proposals for 3% hikes in both 2026 and 2027, projecting an average monthly bill increase of $4.35 to $5.50 for residential customers starting January 1, 2026, while committing to cap future adjustments at or below through 2030. These adjustments stem from intensified cost pressures, including a five-year capital improvement program estimated at $2.8 billion—nearly double the $1.6 billion spent in the prior period—driven by grid hardening against wildfires, disruptions, labor shortages, and material . The 2025 of $2.3 billion allocates substantial funds to operations, , and reliability enhancements amid broader challenges like achieving zero-carbon goals without excessive rate volatility. affirmed SMUD's AA credit outlook in 2025, noting declining leverage to 4.5x net debt-to-fixed charges and exceeding 150 days' cash on hand, though sustained capital demands pose ongoing fiscal strain. Reliability remains a core focus, with investments mitigating outage risks in a region prone to and grid stress, though isolated incidents persist. SMUD maintains real-time outage tracking and rapid response protocols, reporting no widespread blackouts comparable to those affecting investor-owned utilities in . Customer feedback highlights occasional disruptions from localized equipment failures or storms, but systemic metrics show healthy performance, bolstered by proactive infrastructure upgrades. Despite these efforts, rate pressures indirectly tie to reliability imperatives, as deferred maintenance or underinvestment could exacerbate vulnerabilities, per internal cost analyses. Overall, SMUD's rates average 18¢ per kWh, positioning them among California's lowest and over 50% below neighboring private utilities like PG&E, where peak pricing can reach 47¢ per kWh. This comparative affordability persists amid hikes, reflecting efficiencies as a customer-owned municipal entity, though sustained cost escalation from regulatory and environmental mandates tests long-term balance.

Policy Debates on Mandates and Subsidies

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) operates under California's (RPS), which mandates that utilities procure 60% of their electricity from eligible renewable sources by 2030 and achieve 100% clean energy by 2045, as established by Senate Bill 100 in 2018. SMUD's integrated resource plans outline procurement strategies to meet these targets, including contracts for , and storage, with an RPS cost adder incorporated into rate calculations to cover above-market expenses for compliance. Critics, including ratepayer advocates, argue that these mandates drive up s through intermittent generation requiring expensive backups like natural gas peaker plants and battery storage, contributing to SMUD's proposed rate increases of 2.75% in 2024 and ongoing hikes tied to environmental compliance. Debates over subsidies have centered on SMUD's net energy metering (NEM) program, which historically credited rooftop solar owners for excess power at retail rates, effectively subsidizing them at the expense of non-solar customers who bore higher fixed costs. In September 2021, SMUD's board unanimously approved cuts to these credits by approximately 44%, reducing compensation from about 13 cents per kWh to 7.4 cents, with further retroactive adjustments planned for 2031 to align with avoided costs rather than full retail value. Solar industry groups and environmental advocates, such as the Solar Rights Alliance, condemned the move as undermining and violating implicit incentives that encouraged solar adoption, potentially slowing California's RPS progress despite SMUD's overall utility-scale renewable investments. Proponents of the reductions, including SMUD officials, contend that generous NEM acted as a regressive favoring higher-income households with suitable rooftops, inflating rates for low-income and renter customers by an estimated 10-20% of bill increases statewide, based on analyses of cross-subsidization dynamics. These changes mirror broader reforms under NEM 2.0 and 3.0, which faced lawsuits from solar interests claiming procedural flaws, though empirical data from post-reform periods show rooftop solar installations declining sharply—by up to 80% for new private residences—while utility-scale projects continued to expand without similar rate distortions. SMUD's approach prioritizes long-term RPS compliance through centralized procurement, avoiding the equity issues of distributed subsidies, amid ongoing public comments on its Zero Carbon Plan highlighting tensions between affordability and mandate-driven goals.

Achievements, Recognition, and Comparisons

Operational and Sustainability Awards

In 2023, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) ranked first in the J.D. Power U.S. Electric Utility Residential Sustainability Index, which assesses customer perceptions of utilities' climate sustainability efforts across awareness, support, engagement, and advocacy among the 35 largest U.S. providers serving over 500,000 residential customers each. This marked SMUD as the first utility to earn J.D. Power's Certified Sustainability Leader designation, based on verified alignment with index criteria for environmental performance. SMUD also earned an A- rating from CDP in 2023 for its disclosures and actions, reflecting strong performance in emissions reduction strategies and low-carbon transition planning as evaluated by the nonprofit's global standard. The National Public Utilities Council awarded SMUD its Clean Energy Community Advocacy Award that year for outreach tied to the utility's 2030 Zero Carbon Plan, emphasizing public engagement in decarbonization goals. Additionally, presented SMUD with the 2023 Earthfirst Award for Excellence in Sustainability, recognizing the utility's use of applications to support customer decarbonization programs under the 2030 Clean Energy Vision. On the operational front, SMUD achieved re-accreditation as a Right-of-Way Steward from the Right-of-Way Stewardship Council in 2023, validating its integrated vegetation management practices for electric transmission rights-of-way, which prioritize , , and reliability to minimize outage risks from overgrowth. As a founding member since 2014 and one of only seven accredited utilities nationwide, SMUD's program integrates data-driven monitoring, selective use, and habitat enhancement to sustain grid performance while reducing ecological impacts. These recognitions underscore SMUD's focus on verifiable metrics for both outcomes and operational resilience, though broader reliability awards remain limited compared to sustainability honors.

Customer Satisfaction and Service Metrics

SMUD has consistently ranked highly in customer satisfaction surveys conducted by , particularly among business customers in . For the thirteenth time since 2010, it scored highest among utilities in the U.S. Electric Utility Business Customer Satisfaction Study, achieving 796 out of 1,000 points in the evaluation covering factors such as power quality and reliability, billing and , and corporate citizenship. In residential contexts, SMUD ranked first in the 2023 [J.D. Power](/page/J.D. Power) U.S. Electric Utility Sustainability Index, assessing customer perceptions of efforts including emissions reduction and renewable integration. Additionally, in the 2024 study on public power utilities' brand appeal, SMUD placed third overall with a score of 729, behind Public Utilities and . Service reliability metrics for SMUD adhere to IEEE Standard 1366, tracking indices such as the System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI, average minutes of outage per customer annually) and (, average outages per customer annually). In 2023, SMUD met thresholds for both SAIDI and SAIFI across its system. For 2024, SAIDI excluding major events (e.g., wildfires or storms) was 75.6 minutes, surpassing internal targets where lower values indicate better performance. Historical data show variability; for instance, system-wide SAIDI in 2015 was approximately 70.9 minutes, rising to higher values in subsequent years influenced by and factors. Outage incidents remain infrequent relative to customer base, with recent peaks affecting less than 0.11% of SMUD's approximately 625,000 customers over 72-hour periods. SMUD's emphasis on proactive and grid modernization contributes to these outcomes, though major events can elevate annual SAIDI and , as seen in preliminary 2025 figures including major disruptions at 228 minutes SAIDI and 1.43 . Specific customer complaint volumes on service issues are not publicly detailed in aggregated form, but executive statements attribute high satisfaction partly to reliable delivery amid California's grid challenges.

Performance Relative to Private Utilities

SMUD's residential electricity rates averaged approximately 18 cents per in 2024, remaining over 50% lower than those of neighboring investor-owned utility PG&E, which charged around 38 cents per for comparable service. This disparity persists across customer classes, with small commercial rates 55.4% lower and medium commercial rates 59.2% lower than PG&E equivalents, reflecting SMUD's municipal structure that avoids dividends and certain taxes borne by investor-owned utilities. Publicly owned utilities like SMUD have maintained relative price stability since 2019, with minimal rate adjustments, in contrast to investor-owned utilities' 44-80% residential rate increases (inflation-adjusted) driven by and regulatory costs. On reliability, SMUD achieved a System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) of 70.9 minutes and System Average Interruption Frequency Index () of 1.35 interruptions per customer in 2016, metrics that have consistently met or exceeded internal targets excluding major events, such as a SAIFI of 1.28 in 2022. These figures outperform PG&E's historical benchmarks, where SAIDI and SAIFI have been elevated due to extensive rural infrastructure and wildfire-related outages, though direct CPUC-reported comparisons highlight publicly owned utilities' edge in urban-focused service territories with lower catastrophic risk exposure. SMUD's distribution system reliability supports high , ranking first among utilities in J.D. Power's 2023 business satisfaction survey with a score of 796 out of 1,000. In terms of and cost management, SMUD's publicly owned model enables lower transmission and distribution expenses relative to scale, with modest increases in operations and post-2019 compared to investor-owned utilities' sharp rises from grid hardening and legal liabilities. While investor-owned utilities face incentives for capital-intensive investments to satisfy shareholders, SMUD prioritizes affordability, allocating funds directly to service without profit extraction, resulting in electric costs comprising only 1.6% of Sacramento's as of 2025. However, this can introduce risks of political influence on decision-making, though empirical data in indicate publicly owned utilities like SMUD deliver superior cost and reliability outcomes versus investor-owned counterparts amid shared regulatory pressures.

References

  1. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us
  2. https://www.ase.org/profile/sacramento-municipal-utility-district
  3. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Company-Information/Our-History
  4. https://www.smud.org/SMUDPCL
  5. https://cleanpowercity.org/news/where-does-smud-get-your-power/
  6. https://www.dupont.com/content/dam/dupont/amer/us/en/photovoltaic/public/documents/SMUD_Solar_Power_Plant%2520_Case_Study.pdf
  7. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2030-Clean-Energy-Vision
  8. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/npdes/docs/utilityvaults/ppplans/smud.pdf
  9. https://ibew1245.com/education/history-of-our-union/sacramento-municipal-utility-district/
  10. https://ibew1245.com/chapter-42-organizing-the-sacramento-municipal-utility-district/
  11. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/Power-Sources/Upper-American-River-Project
  12. https://ibew1245.com/2018/09/28/powering-sacramento-at-the-upper-american-river-project/
  13. https://www.epri.com/research/products/1015121
  14. https://world-nuclear.org/nuclear-reactor-database/details/Rancho-Seco-1
  15. https://www.capradio.org/articles/2019/11/05/thirty-years-after-sacramento-voted-to-shut-it-down-rancho-seco-reinventing-itself-while-dealing-with-nuclear-past/
  16. https://curie.pnnl.gov/system/files/Rancho_Seco.pdf
  17. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1808/ML18081A579.pdf
  18. https://decommissioningcollaborative.org/rancho-seco/
  19. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/826406
  20. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2311/ML23115A172.pdf
  21. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Going-Green/Solar-and-Storage/SMUD-RPS-Guidebook---FINAL-1.ashx
  22. https://sari-energy.org/PageFiles/What_We_Do/activities/SAWIE/Executive_Exchange_May_2009/Presentations/May%252020/SMUDRenewableEnergyandAdvTech.pdf
  23. https://www.vermontlaw.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SMUD-Report-Final-120618.pdf
  24. https://saclafco.saccounty.gov/SphereofInfluenceInformation/Documents/K_99_DEIR/3.6%2520Energy.pdf
  25. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/hpsp_smud_storage_program.pdf
  26. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2030-Clean-Energy-Vision/Zero-carbon-frequently-asked-questions
  27. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2030-Clean-Energy-Vision/Zero-Carbon-Plan-public-comments
  28. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2030-Clean-Energy-Vision/Emission-and-zero-carbon-program-information/2024-Emission-and-zero-carbon-program-information
  29. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Company-Information/Board-of-Directors
  30. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/SMUDs-Territory-Map
  31. https://www.advocatesforardenarcade.com/smud-2020-census-redistricting
  32. https://elections.saccounty.gov/ElectionInformation/Documents/2024-November-General/Positions-Up-Nov-2024.pdf
  33. https://results.saccounty.gov/resultsSW.aspx?type=CTY&map=MPRC&shape=Nov2024
  34. https://elections.saccounty.net/ElectionInformation/Documents/2024-November-General/Results-11082024.pdf
  35. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Company-Information/Strategic-Direction/GP-5.ashx
  36. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2025/2025/Gregg-Fishman-elected-SMUD-Board-President
  37. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2025/2025/Tamayo-elected-SMUD-Board-Vice-President
  38. https://saclafco.saccounty.gov/Meetings/Documents/2009/september/sac_019978.pdf
  39. https://californialocal.com/localnews/placer/ca/government/show/149-sacramento-municipal-utility-district/elected_body/122-board-of-directors/
  40. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Company-Information/Executive-management
  41. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Company-Information/Reports-and-Documents/2025/SMUD-2024-Audited-Financial-Statements.ashx
  42. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2313/ML23137A144.pdf
  43. https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=253402&DocumentContentId=88616
  44. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/Power-Sources
  45. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/Power-Sources/Upper-American-River-Project/Hydro-Relicensing
  46. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/Power-Sources/Upper-American-River-Project/Hydropower
  47. https://www.energy.ca.gov/powerplant/combined-cycle/cosumnes-power-plant
  48. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Company-Information/Reports-and-Statements/2021-Annual-Report/Building-a-Clean-PowerCity
  49. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/Power-Sources/Rancho-Seco-Solar-II-Development
  50. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/Power-Sources/Oveja-Ranch-Solar-Project
  51. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2025/2025/SMUD-and-DESRI-announce-640-MWh-clean--energy-storage-project
  52. https://usea.org/sites/default/files/event-file/500/USEA_SMUD_Short_Overview_5-6-2010.pdf
  53. https://saclafco.saccounty.gov/Documents/sac_006548.pdf
  54. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/11/f68/final-eis-0323-s1-sacramento-voltage-support-2008.pdf
  55. http://www.oasis.oati.com/SMD1/SMD1docs/SMUD_new_Attachment_K1_021717.pdf
  56. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Design-and-Constructions-Services/Small-Cell-Antennas-on-SMUD-Distribution-Poles-Updated.ashx
  57. https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact-Reports/SMUD-Substation-E/SMUD_StationE_PublicDraftISMND_12-31-13_Compiled.pdf
  58. https://www.energy.gov/oe/articles/arra-sgig-sacramento-municipal-utility-district
  59. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Research-and-Development/SmartSacramento
  60. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2023/2023/SMUD-announces-%2450-million-grant-to-support-advanced-smart-grid-technologies
  61. http://bera.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-bera-condemns-trump-administration-s-cancellation-of-50-million-smart-grid-grant-for-sacramento-municipal-utility-district
  62. https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/power-grid/transmission/smud-using-dlr-to-hopefully-identify-more-capacity-for-renewables-on-existing-transmission/
  63. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/smuds-holistic-der-planning-process-could-set-new-standard-for-utilities/444707/
  64. https://www.nrel.gov/grid/news/program/2022/nrel-and-smud-launch-groundbreaking-automation-tool-for-interconnecting-customer-solar-to-the-grid
  65. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2023-Sustainability-Report/2023-sustainability-grants
  66. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Research-and-Development
  67. https://www.energy.ca.gov/filebrowser/download/6371?fid=6371
  68. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/smud-aims-for-carbon-neutrality-by-2030-in-new-climate-emergency-declaratio/581883/
  69. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2030-Clean-Energy-Vision/Emission-and-zero-carbon-program-information
  70. https://kestrelesg.com/smud-issues-first-kestrel-verified-green-commercial-paper/
  71. https://www.wapa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/SMUD-5YR-IRP.pdf
  72. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2023-Sustainability-Report
  73. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2025/2025/SMUD-helps-residential-customers-reach-electrification-milestone
  74. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/project-profile-sacramento-municipal-utility-district-consumnes-power-plant-solar
  75. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2024/2024/New-wind-turbines-begin-spinning-advancing-SMUDs-zero-carbon-promise
  76. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-rates-sacramento-municipal-utility-district-ca-electric-rev-bonds-aa-outlook-stable-23-05-2025
  77. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Company-Information/Reports-and-Documents/2025/SMUD-2025-Budget-Book.ashx
  78. https://www.smud.org/Rate-Information/Residential-rates
  79. https://www.smud.org/Rate-Information
  80. https://www.smud.org/Rate-Information/Business-rates
  81. https://www.smud.org/Rate-Information/Compare-rates
  82. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2006/ML20062A854.pdf
  83. https://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk15356/files/media/documents/ENV-13-2-articles-sabey.pdf
  84. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-08-31-me-15083-story.html
  85. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/08/us/voters-in-a-first-shut-down-nuclear-reactor.html
  86. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/rancho-seco-nuclear-generating-station
  87. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-06-08-mn-1913-story.html
  88. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0322/ML032260147.pdf
  89. https://sacgrandjury.org/docs/reports/06-07/report-6-rancho-seco-power-plant.pdf
  90. https://www.smud.org/Rate-Information/Rate-archive
  91. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Company-Information/Reports-and-Statements/GM-Reports-on-Rates-and-Services
  92. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article309078580.html
  93. https://www.facebook.com/FolsomTimes/posts/smud-approves-two-future-rate-hikes-citing-infrastructure-and-wildfire-costs-as-/713915041570349/
  94. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-rates-sacramento-municipal-utility-district-ca-electric-rev-bonds-aa-outlook-stable-21-03-2024
  95. https://www.smud.org/ps/-/media/Documents/Rate-Information/2026-2027-Rate-Action/Rates-Workshop1-2025-04-30-transcript.ashx
  96. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Rate-Information/2024-2025-Rate-Action/20230713-SMUD-Rates-Workshop-1-transcript.ashx
  97. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-affirms-sacramento-municipal-utility-district-ca-electric-rev-bonds-at-aa-outlook-stable-12-03-2025
  98. https://www.smud.org/Customer-Support/Outage-FAQs
  99. https://myaccount.smud.org/manage/outage
  100. https://www.energysage.com/local-data/electricity-cost/ca/sacramento-county/sacramento/
  101. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article262822683.html
  102. https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/electrical-energy/electric-power-procurement/rps/rps-compliance-rules-and-process
  103. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Company-Information/Reports-and-Documents/GM-Reports/2025/2024-Rate-Study.ashx
  104. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4950
  105. https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article254314083.html
  106. https://solarrights.org/blog/2021/08/26/inside-smuds-proposal-to-gut-rooftop-solar/
  107. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/breaking-rooftop-solars-distortions-smud-readies-community-program-for-ca/572569/
  108. https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article256552966.html
  109. https://energyathaas.wordpress.com/2025/01/27/guess-what-didnt-kill-rooftop-solar/
  110. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/News-and-Media/2023/2023/SMUD-named-nations-most-sustainable-utility-in-2023-JD-Power-index
  111. https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2023-sustainability-index
  112. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership
  113. https://www.smud.org/Corporate/Environmental-Leadership/2023-Sustainability-Report/2023-sustainability-awards
  114. https://www.oracle.com/corporate/customers/awards/sustainability/
  115. https://rowstewardship.org/newsdetail.php?id=63f4c53ab9550
  116. https://www.publicpower.org/periodical/article/public-power-utilities-earn-high-marks-jd-power-brand-appeal-index-study
  117. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Board-Meetings-and-Agendas/2023/June/Exhibit-to-Agenda-Item-1---SD-4-Reliability-Board-Monitoring-Report.ashx
  118. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Board-Meetings-and-Agendas/2024/June/2024-06-12_Exhibit-to-Agenda-Item-1.ashx
  119. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Company-Information/Reports-and-Documents/GM-Reports/2025/GM-Report-Figures-and-Tables.ashx
  120. https://findenergy.com/providers/sacramento-municipal-utility-district/power-outage/
  121. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Board-Meetings-and-Agendas/2025/June/Exhibit-to-Agenda-Item-1--SD4-Reliability.ashx
  122. https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/112460/witnesses/HHRG-117-CN00-Wstate-LauP-20210420.pdf
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104061902500020X
  124. https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Board-Meetings-and-Agendas/2023/June/Policy-Info-Packet--Jun-7-2023.ashx
  125. https://www.smud.org/-/media/About-Us/Newsletters/Reports-and-Statements/2018-Annual-Report/Reliability.ashx
  126. https://www.sjsu.edu/urbanplanning/docs/community-planning-reports/Ralph%2520Robinson%2520Final%2520Planning%2520Report%25205_11.pdf
  127. https://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1158&context=all_doctoral
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.