Hubbry Logo
Korean swordKorean swordMain
Open search
Korean sword
Community hub
Korean sword
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Korean sword
Korean sword
Korean sword
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The traditions of Korean bladesmithing and swordsmanship have served a central place in the military history of Korea for thousands of years. Although typical Korean land battles have taken place in wide valleys and narrow mountain passes, which favor use of spears and bows,[1] the sword found use as a secondary, close-quarters weapon, in addition to far more prominent role during sieges and ship-to-ship boarding actions. Higher quality, ceremonial swords were typically reserved for the officer corps as a symbol of authority with which to command the troops. Ceremonial swords are still granted to military officials by the civilian authority to this day.[2][clarification needed]

Korean swords typically fall into two broad categories, the geom, and the do.[3] The Geom is a double-edged weapon, while the Do is a single-edged weapon; although exceptions exist. In common parlance, all swords may be referred to as geom (검; 劍).

The history of the sword in Korea begins with bronze daggers of Bronze Age of which existing artifacts dates back to 10-9th century BCE. Iron use co-existed with Bronze use during the late Bronze Age.

The rarity of traditional Korean swords in the modern day has made them extremely valuable, with high demand from both museums and collectors.

History

[edit]

Early swords

[edit]
Further information: Hwandudaedo
Three Kingdoms era swords generally have a ring pommel. More elaborate swords hold images of dragons or phoenixes in the ring.
Silla era sword pommel
Ornamented sword made during the Silla period

Evidence of sword production dates to the transitional Late Bronze to Early Iron Age (c. 1st century BC), with an earthenware mold for a Bronze Sword found in South Gyeongsang Province.[4]

The earliest Korean sword type is the so-called Hwandudaedo or "ring-pommel sword," prevalent during the 1st to 6th centuries. Until the 3rd century, these swords were very rare and presumably reserved for royalty. They became more attainable in the later 4th and during the 5th century, and are found in many higher class tombs of this period. Their production declined in the 6th century.

By the last third of the Three Kingdoms period (i.e. 450 AD and beyond), steel making techniques had come from China (possibly during the Northern and Southern dynasties period in China) and were also employed in Korean swordmaking by all three Korean kingdoms (Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla).[citation needed] In 2013, a Chinese Character inscription was discovered on a 5th-century sword from the Geumgwanchong tomb in Gyeongju, North Gyeongsang Province. The scabbard of the sword has the inscription 尒斯智王 Yisaji-wang ("King Isaji").[5]

Long swords during the Korean Three Kingdoms period were used primarily by cavalry and commanders (who were also usually mounted), not infantry. At this time, land warfare consisted mostly of spearmen and bowmen on foot, mounted archers on horseback using two-handed bows, and mounted swordsmen with twin blades. Swords were not a primary weapon for all combat but were instead used mostly for shock attacks, defensive strokes, and for close-in fighting. Blades were heavy as they were made mostly of bronze and later iron, and pommels were often knobbed and used as balances or for very close-in work. Short swords may have been used in follow-up attacks, as short sword carriers were heavily armored.

During the Goryeo dynasty, a limited number of Korean swords were exported for trade missions in Asia. It is likely that Korean swordmaking was influenced by Mongol and Chinese weapon manufacture after Goryeo's submission as a Mongol vassal after 6 Mongol invasions ending in 1259.

Joseon Period (Hwando)

[edit]

History

[edit]

The sword used for combat during the Joseon Dynasty was called Hwando, and in the name 'Hwando (環刀)', 'Hwan(環)' is the Hanja meaning ring. There are differing opinions about the origin of the name. 《Yungwon Pilbi》 (융원필비, 戎垣必備), a military book published in 1813 states that it originated from a ring for tying the sheath to the waist.[6]

The name 'Hwando (環刀)' appears first in 《Goryeosa》. It is written that when an envoy from the Yuan Dynasty arrived in April 1277, King Chungnyeol sent Yi Jang-mu (이장무, 李藏茂) to Chungju city to make 1,000 sacks of Hwando.[7]

Carrying

[edit]

There were many ways to wear the Hwando, including using a belt called Tti-don (띠돈 메기), wearing it on the back (둘러메기), around the shoulder (뒤꽂이), and around the waist by tying a string to the ring of the scabbard (고리 메기). During the Joseon Dynasty, swords were often worn with the hilt pointing toward the back.

This method is mainly seen in countries that used cavalry as its main force. It is said that this method was designed because if the sword was worn with the hilt facing forward, the sheath at the back would hit the horse and hinder its movement when running fast on horseback. It also has the advantage of being more comfortable when shooting a bow because the hilt does not get in the way. This type of sword-wearing is a fairly common style of sword-wearing that appears in Mongolia, the Ming dynasty, the Qing dynasty.[citation needed]

Anatomy

[edit]
Korean sword nomenclature

The method in which the sword hilt faces backwards is mainly seen in attire using Tti-don, which makes it easy to turn the hilt, but it is difficult to know exactly when Tti-don was used in Korea. However, during the Yuan Intervention period, the mainstream in Mongolia was to kick the sword with the hilt facing forward. Also, in the Hwando paintings from the early Joseon Dynasty depicted in 《Sejong Silok》(世宗實錄) and the 《Gukjo-oyreui》(國朝五禮儀), there is only a ring for the scabbard and no bandon is depicted, and even in the royal tombs of the mid-Joseon Dynasty in the 16th and 17th centuries, figures wearing sword sheaths with rings are carved. Considering this, it appears that it was common until the mid-Joseon Dynasty to wear the sword with the hilt facing forward in a looped manner. The oldest Hwando where Tti-don is found is Yu Sŏngnyong's Hwando. Considering this, it is highly likely that the Tti-don and the method of kicking the sword with the hilt facing backwards were introduced starting around the mid-Joseon Dynasty under the influence of the Ming Dynasty or the Jurchen people.

The Hwando of the early Joseon Dynasty, as recorded in the 《Sejong Silok》(世宗實錄) and the 《Gukjo-oyreui》(國朝五禮儀), is not only greatly curved but also short in length. Looking at the blade length regulations for the Hwando recorded in 《Munjong Silok》(文宗實錄), it is 1.7 ja for infantry use and 1.6 ja for cavalry use, and the length of the handle is 2 gwon for infantry use and 1 gwon 3 ji for cavalry use.[8]

The overall shape of the blade is a curved, single-edged sword.[9] Due to partial heat treatment, there were faint patterns on the blade. The curvature varied, with some swords having a pronounced curve and others being almost straight.[9] Generally, it resembles a Japanese Katana, but unlike the Katana, there is often no distinct boundary line (yokote) at the tip of the blade, making the tip relatively ambiguous.[10]

Regarding cross-sections, there were triangular, single-plane pentagonal, pentagonal, and hexagonal types depending on the shape. However, due to durability issues, triangular swords were used for personal protection or assassination, like the changpogeom (창포검), while the military typically used Hwandos with hexagonal or pentagonal cross-sections.[9] There are very few single-plane pentagonal artifacts, and little is known about their advantages and disadvantages.

There is a record that when Koreans obtained a Japanese sword, they would grind down the back and side slopes (shinogi) to make the sides flat and the edge angular.[11] That shows the differences between Japanese sword and Hwando. However, most surviving Hwandos have clear angular ridges on the blade back, similar to the shinogi of a Japanese sword.[citation needed] The cross-sections of the hwandos unearthed from Dongnae Citadel were also pentagonal and hexagonal, and even swords from the Goryeo period excavated from Cheoin Fortress had angular blade backs.

Also there is a record that Japanese swords as having softer steel on the left and harder steel on the right,[11] with the left side of the blade ground obliquely, indicating a single-plane structure. However, typical Japanese swords do not have steel joined on both sides, and although there were single-plane types in Japan, they were not mainstream.

Locking system

[edit]

The lock can be pulled out as one of the characteristic styles of Hwando. Unlike swords from other cultures, the sword had a separate locking device, and there was very little chance that the sword would come out on its own even during vigorous activity. In the early Joseon Dynasty, a locking device called a Binyeojang (비녀장) was mainly used.[12] 'Binyeo (비녀)' of Binyeojang literally means Binyeo, the traditional Korean hairpin.

This was to prevent the sword from falling out of the scabbard, and the hole on the back of the shield was to secure the sword with a Binyeojang. Of course, it was not without its drawbacks. Additional processes were required for production, and of course there was a possibility of damage.[citation needed] And in fact, as it is not like there are no hobbyists in Hwando who can perform the minimal locking role, it is actually rather common for Hwando to also not have a locking device. It can be seen that the locking device was just one of the many styles of Hwando.[citation needed]

[edit]

Japanese sword in Korea

[edit]

History

[edit]
An Uchigatana made by Bizen Osafune. General Kwon Eung-su (권응수, 1546-1608), killed Japanese General Kihachi (喜八) and took it for use during the Imjin War. Its sheath and hilt have been modified to Hwando's style. It is currently on display in Jinju National Museum.

During the Imjin War (1592-1598), the Joseon Army confiscated Japanese swords.[13] However, the Japanese sword introduced during this period was not the origin of the Hwando. The Hwando and the Japanese Sword are similar in appearance, but in the Joseon dynasty, there was a clear distinction between the Hwando and the Japanese sword.[14][15]

According to historical relics, the Hwando and Japanese sword evolved independently since Goryeo dynasty and took on similar shapes with Katana before the Imjin War.[16] This can be described as convergent evolution, and historical documents show that the Hwando was influenced by the Central Asian Sabre that came through the Yuan dynasty[17][18] to the Goryeo dynasty rather than the influence of the Japanese sword. Although it is not recorded in the documents, some historians speculate that Joseon craftsmen making Hwando may have adopted some of the styles of Japanese swords through the Imjin War.[citation needed]

Typology

[edit]

Introduction

[edit]

Geom (검; 劍) is the Korean word for "sword;" it is typically used of double-edged swords, but is also applied to single-edged swords. Yedo (예도; 銳刀) is the specific term for a single-edged sword.

Elements of the Korean sword include: geomjip or scabbard, most often of lacquer; hyuljo or fuller (most genuine Korean swords didn't have a fuller); hwando magi or collar; ho in or collar; kodeungi or hand guard; a ring-design pommel; tassels; a round and wide designed sword guard, or a straight lotus design.[19]

Various examples of Korean sword design

[edit]

Many different types of Do and Geom exist,[20] ranging from very simple forms found in many nations to unique and artistic designs found solely in Korea.

  • Jikdo, literally "straight sword."[21]
  • Janggeom (Korean: 장검; Hanja: 長劍): literally "long sword."
  • Jingum, literally "true sword." Typically used to signify a blade that is meant for combat, rather than for ceremonial or spiritual purposes.
  • Changpogeom, a sword named after the calamus plant (changpo in Korean). The sword is designed to reflect the design of the plant, with a double sided blade tapering to a narrow tip.
  • Hwandudaedo (Korean: 환두대도; Hanja: 環頭大刀) or "ring-pommel sword) is a type of single-edged sword used during the Three Kingdoms era.
  • Geom is the generic term for "sword," but more specifically also refers to a shorter straight-blade, double-edged sword with a somewhat blunted tip which distinguishes this weapon from its Chinese counterpart, the jian. As a badge of status rather than a weapon, the Geom was often heavily decorated both on its scabbard and grip as well as with engravings and inscriptions on its blade.[22]
  • Do, commonly referred to as a Hwando or "military sword," was a single-edged sword, used as a sidearm for the Korean soldier well into the 19th century. Sometimes referred to as a "short sword," relative to the larger sized two-handed Sangsoodo, its length of 24 to 34 in (61 to 86 cm) was comparable to that of the two-handed Japanese Katana which may have been the inspiration for the Ssangsoodo. Reports found in the "Book of Corrections," a Korean record of the Imjin Warum (1592–1598), state that Japanese swords taken in combat were readily pressed into service by simply trimming the length of the hilt. Forged of carbon steel the Do has a single-edged, curved blade, a sword guard, and a grip typically of wood. Earlier practice saw the Do suspended from a cord (Jul) and with a simple metal hanger which allowed the soldier to speedily discard his sheath. In later practice, the sword was suspended from a girdle or belt but retained a simple metal quick-release clip.[22]
  • The Ssangsudo (Korean: 쌍수도; Hanja: 雙手刀) is a double-handed single-edged sword used for a limited time in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. Chinese literature and history both ascribe its adoption as a weapon on the Asian mainland to General Qi Jiguang (1528–1588) who is said to have taken Wokou pirate prisoners during his campaigns in Southern China. Qi Jiguang wrote about the sword in his manual the Record of Military Training or Lianbing Shi Ji (練兵實紀) and recommended its use as part of the defense along China's northern border. Since General Qi's other famous training manual, the Jixiao Xinshu (紀效新書), was used in the revamping of the Korean Military it followed that this weapon came highly recommended. Nor did the Koreans overlook that oversized swords had been used by Japanese soldiers during the recent conflict as well as during their own experiences with the Wakou. Intended by General Qi to be carried into combat on wagons or by individuals who drew each other's weapon, the Ssangsoodo measured an overall length of 6 ft (180 cm), 2 ft (61 cm) of which were to be the grip and another 2 ft (61 cm) forward of the handle to be sheathed in brass or copper. Undoubtedly the length and weight of the sword, and the high level of training necessary to wield it, made the sword impractical as a common part of the Korean arsenal. It is also useful to note that the Ming dynasty, which saw this weapon added to its own military, fell to Manchu invaders some 50 years later.[23]
  • The Hyup Do or "spear sword" is found in Book Three, Chapter seven. Though commonly taken for a polearm after the fashion of the Japanese Naginata, the text of the Muyedobotongji relates that "the handle is about 4 ft (120 cm)....weighs about 4 lb (1.8 kg).....the illustration in this book is corrected according to the Mubiji and the Japanese Jang Do. They are the same." It is reasonable to conclude that the Hyup Do was much closer to the Japanese Nagamaki.[24]
Korean Wol-Do (L) displayed with its Chinese equivalent (R).
  • The *Woldo (Korean: 월도; Hanja: 月刀) was a bladed polearm, like its Chinese counterpart the Yaoyindao commonly decorated with a tassel or feather affixed to a prominence on the spine of the blade which assisted the person wielding the weapon with identifying the blade's center of mass. According to the Muyedobotongji, "the length of the handle is 6.4 ft (200 cm); the length of the blade is 2.8 ft (85 cm). The weight is about 3.15 lb (1.43 kg)."[25]
  • Ssangdo or Ssanggeom (Korean: 쌍도; Hanja: 雙刀; Korean: 쌍검; Hanja: 雙劍) This literally means "Twin Swords." It can vary from twin long swords or twin short swords. These techniques can also be used on horseback as 'Masang ssanggeom.' The Korean cavalry was famous for using Twin Sword techniques on horseback, while balancing on the horse with grace. Ssangyunggeom are twin swords which are carried in a single scabbard. The sheath is twice as wide because it needs room for the second sword. The sword's length varies from 3 to 4 ft (91 to 122 cm). Usually these swords were double-edged and made entirely of Iron (including the scabbard).
  • Hyeopdo (Korean: 협도; Hanja: 俠刀) This is also a large crescent blade that is similar to the 'Pudao' but wider and thicker. A tassle is attached to the end of the blade.
  • Hwando (Korean: 환도): This is a single-edged short sword which was strictly used with one hand. This was a common sidearm for many soldiers during the Joseon era.
  • Unggeom (Korean: 웅검): This is a single-edged long sword that was used with one or two hands. This was another common side arm for many soldiers during the Joseon era.
  • Samgakdo (Korean: 삼각도; Hanja: 三角刀): The samgakdo is a recently used terminology for swords used for mat cutting. The cross section of the sword is triangular in shape; hence the name Samgakdo (which means three-sided sword).
  • For martial arts students learning sword forms or Geombeop/Geomsul, practice wood swords or mokgeom are most often used; then those made out of carbonized bamboo or Juk-do; lastly compression sponge, single or double-edged, with or without blood grooves. Modern sword and knife sparring commonly makes use of plastic blades.
  • Chilseonggeom (Korean: 칠성검; Hanja: 七星劍): The name of this sword translates as "seven star sword" and it could be either single-edged or double-edged. It is primarily known for its use by Buddhist practitioners. Almost all of these swords had constellation engravings on the blades (usually the Big Dipper, although depiction of any 7 star cluster isn't uncommon).
  • Sainchamsageom: This sword's name literally means 'Great Four Tiger Sword.' This is a ceremonial sword that is used for demon slaying and Shamanistic rituals.[26] The ingeom (Tiger Swords) were usually of the same designs but of different strengths. They were all made according to the Year, Month, Week, Day, and Hour of the Tiger.[26] Other examples include the sam-ingeom or 'Three Tiger Sword,' and the i-ingeom or 'Two Tiger Sword.'[clarification needed]
  • Samjeongdo (Korean: 삼정도; Hanja: 三精刀) the sword given to newly promoted Korean military generals each year by the Ministry of National Defense.
  • The Seven-Branched Sword is a peculiar specimen forged in Baekje in the order of the king. There is a theory that this is a sword that was to be a gift presented to the emperor of Japan. There was no handle found for the blade nor was there a scabbard found for it while it was being excavated.

Korean swordsmanship

[edit]
Main article: Korean swordsmanship

The study of Korean sword as a weapons system is commonly called Geom Beop (literally "Sword Law")

During the Joseon period, swords also had ranks depending on who wielded them and what their purpose was. The highest ranking of these swords was known as the Byeol-ungeom (Korean: 별운검; Hanja: 別雲劍), literally meaning "cloud-splitting sword." Only two such swords existed and were wielded by the King's two bodyguards, who always stood on either side of him and held the nobility title of Un'geom (Korean: 운검; Hanja: 雲劍).[citation needed]

Master swordsmen:

  • General Kim Yu-sin, was said to have been given an engraved sword and sacred books by the gods, and helped to unify Korea under Silla. His most famous son, Kim Wonsul, was a noted swordsman who fought against the Tang dynasty armies in the late Three Kingdoms period.
  • Ch'ŏk Chun-gyŏng was a civil official and swordsman of Goryeo who became famous for his feats in the Jurchen Invasion of 1104.
  • Baek Dong Soo was a swordsman and martial artist who became a folk hero when his group protected King Jeongjo from assassination attempts. His most notable work, Muyedobotongji (illustrated manual of Korean martial arts).

Contemporary swords

[edit]

Only by the mid-1990s did Korean swordmaking come back to expert levels comparable to the Joseon era.[citation needed] Haedong jingeom (해동진검; 海東陣劍) This literally means 'East Asian Practical Sword' is the neologistic term for current-day swords for "revivals" of Korean swordsmanship.

Sword ownership in Korea is currently restricted (private weapons ownership was culturally frowned upon and largely restricted during other times in Korean history, particularly during the Joseon era and the Japanese occupation period - albeit for different reasons in either period), and there are very few traditional sword collectors in Korea today.[citation needed] General/flag-grade officers are given dress swords upon assuming command in the South Korean army. Despite restrictions on sword ownership and a lingering social preference against armed martial arts (dating at least to the Joseon era), practical sword fighting is enjoying a small revival amongst elite military regiments, and fencing is once again attracting interest in Korean universities.

Sword producers

[edit]
  • Hong Seok-hyeon in Paju, Gyeonggi province, makes swords by hand.[27]
  • Lee Sang Seon in Munkyong City, Kyongsangbukdo Province
  • Lee Eun-cheul in Yeoju, Kyonggi Province
  • Kang Cheul Kyu in Pocheon, Kyongki Province 전통한얼도검 제작소

Authentic reproductions

[edit]

In 2006, swords bestowed on newly promoted brigadier generals were changed from the single-edged curved samjeongdo, which was considered to be a traditional Korean sword, to the double-edged straight samjeong-geom claiming that the samjeongdo is similar to the "Western sword" and not reflecting the traditional Korean sword. Samjeongdo had been given to brigadier generals since 1983.[28][29]

In November 2015, the Statue of Admiral Yi Sun-Shin erected in Parliament was replaced with a newly created authentic statue. The sword of the statue was longer than the traditional Korean sword and more resembled the Japanese sword. [30][31]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Korean sword

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Korean swords, known collectively as geom (검), refer to the traditional bladed weapons developed on the Korean Peninsula from prehistoric times through the early modern era, characterized primarily by straight, double-edged blades suited for thrusting and cutting in infantry and ceremonial contexts. Originating with bronze dagger-axes and short swords in the Bronze Age around 3000 years ago, they transitioned to forged iron constructions during the Three Kingdoms period (57 BCE–668 CE), featuring ring-pommel hilts (hwandudaedo) that reflected both local innovations and influences from continental Eurasian steppe cultures via trade and migration. In the Goryeo Dynasty (918–1392), sword production advanced with pattern-welded techniques for durability, though swords played a secondary role to in Korean military doctrine, limiting their proliferation compared to bows and composite arrows. By the Dynasty (1392–1910), single-edged, curved hwando sabers became the standard for mounted and foot soldiers, mass-produced under state armories like the Gungigam, while straight ingeom variants persisted for royal and ritual purposes, often adorned with symbolic motifs denoting status and Confucian virtues. Surviving artifacts, such as those from tombs, reveal high-quality steel lamination and ergonomic designs optimized for the peninsula's terrain and combat styles, underscoring swords' evolution from prestige items to practical arms amid dynastic shifts and foreign invasions.

History

Bronze and Iron Age Origins

The earliest evidence of bladed weapons in Korea dates to the , approximately 1500–300 BCE, with bronze daggers serving as precursors to later swords. These artifacts, primarily from the Liaoning-type bronze dagger culture originating in and extending to the Korean , include short blades used for and ritual purposes, alongside spearheads and arrowheads. Korean variants evolved into narrower, slender forms known as pipa-shaped or Gojoseon daggers, characterized by a broad, leaf-shaped and lute-like outline, appearing from the fifth to fourth century BCE. Archaeological finds, such as those from sites in including Jangsu, indicate regional centers of bronze sword production, with blades often cast rather than forged, reflecting technological diffusion from continental . These bronze weapons coexisted with stone blades, including polished stone swords up to 52 cm long recovered from dolmens dated 1000–300 BCE, suggesting a gradual metallurgical transition. Bronze daggers from assemblages like Daegok-ri in Hwasun include multiple examples alongside axes and mirrors, pointing to elite burials and ceremonial use rather than mass warfare. The in Korea, beginning around 300 BCE, introduced that paralleled production, with iron artifacts appearing alongside lingering forms into the early centuries CE. Early iron blades, likely influenced by techniques, emerged in the fourth to first centuries BCE, marking a shift toward more durable, forgeable swords capable of longer edges. Sites like Sinpung in Wanju yield swords from early contexts, analyzed for microstructure showing corrosion-resistant alloys, indicating continued refinement amid the iron transition. Earthenware molds for swords from the late to early , circa first century BCE, demonstrate persistent casting methods even as iron swords began supplementing them in proto-state societies. This dual-metal phase laid foundational craftsmanship for subsequent periods, prioritizing functionality over ornamentation in a landscape of tribal conflicts and migrations.

Three Kingdoms and Unified Silla Period

The Three Kingdoms period (57 BCE–668 CE) marked the emergence of iron swords on the Korean Peninsula, supplanting earlier bronze daggers and swords with more durable, mass-producible weapons suited to warfare among Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla. Archaeological excavations from tombs and forts, such as those at Gui, Acha-4, Mongchon, and Mahari, have yielded over a hundred iron sword examples, often featuring straight blades and ring pommels. The hwandudaedo, a single-edged sword with a distinctive ring pommel sometimes adorned with dragon or phoenix motifs, represented an early indigenous design, likely influenced by continental steppe and Chinese technologies but adapted for local cavalry and infantry use. Double-edged geom swords also appeared, though less dominant than single-edged do variants, with blades typically 70–90 cm long forged from folded iron to enhance strength and flexibility. Excavations in Baekje tombs, such as Suchon-ri Tomb No. II-1, reveal swords with bell-shaped fittings and ornamental elements indicative of elite status, while Gaya confederation sites in and produced iron swords (鐵劍) paralleling those of the major kingdoms. examples from tombs often featured gold decoration, including dragon patterns and phoenix engravings on the pommel, underscoring their ceremonial as well as martial roles among the warrior youth. Following unification in 668 CE, the period (668–935 CE) saw continuity in sword typology, with ring-pommel designs persisting amid relative that reduced martial emphasis but preserved artisanal traditions. Ornate swords from sites, like the Gyerim-ro , incorporated inlays and intricate hilts, reflecting Silla's goldsmithing prowess and cultural synthesis post-conquest. Iron swords remained standard military issue, including jedok geom and bonguk geom for standardized troops, though textual records suggest a decline in specialized by the late period due to Buddhist influences and reduced warfare. Production techniques emphasized differential hardening, enabling resilient edges, as evidenced by preserved blades from palace and contexts.

Goryeo Dynasty Developments

During the Goryeo Dynasty (918–1392), sword designs evolved from precedents, maintaining double-edged geom for ceremonial and use while increasingly incorporating single-edged, curved blades adapted for combat amid expanded mounted warfare and continental interactions. Advances in ironworking enabled lighter, more resilient constructions, with blades often featuring tapered profiles for thrusting and slashing versatility. The Mongol invasions (1231–1270), which forced into vassalage by 1259, profoundly shaped sword typology by introducing nomadic steppe influences, including shorter sabers optimized for horseback maneuverability over prolonged infantry engagements. These do-style weapons, precursors to later hwando, emphasized single-edged curvature for draw-and-cut efficiency, diverging from earlier straight blades to suit hybrid Korean-Mongol tactical demands. Archaeological finds from military sites corroborate angular blade backs and simplified fittings, prioritizing durability over ornate Silla-era decoration. Sword exports during diplomatic missions to highlighted Goryeo craftsmanship, with records indicating limited but valued trade in high-quality blades, though domestic production focused on standardization rather than mass . Post-invasion recovery under kings like Gongmin (r. 1351–1374) sustained these adaptations, blending indigenous forging with assimilated techniques for resilient steel tempering, as evidenced by replicated Goryeo-era swords achieving comparable edge retention in modern tests.

Joseon Dynasty Evolution

The hwando, a with a gentle curve or straight blade, became the predominant military sidearm during the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1897), reflecting a shift toward practical, efficient weaponry suited for foot soldiers. Forged from for durability, it featured a wooden often wrapped in or reinforced with shark skin and , paired with a metal-edged bearing rings (hwan) for securing cords to the belt—allowing the hilt to rest behind the body and the sheath in front for unobstructed or movement. Typical blade lengths hovered around 70 cm, enabling one-handed use in conjunction with a during close combat. Standardization efforts intensified in the mid-15th century amid conflicts with Jurchen tribes, promoting uniform designs for mass production to bolster defenses, though ornate variants with gold, silver, or jade inlays persisted for elite or ceremonial use. The Imjin War (1592–1598) against Japanese invaders catalyzed further evolution: blade lengths extended to approximately 90 cm to counter the reach of Japanese katana-wielding troops, while captured enemy swords informed the adaptation of ssangsudo systems—paired long (up to 120 cm) and short blades wielded by elite warriors, blending indigenous techniques with Ming Chinese changdao influences rather than direct Japanese replication. Double-edged geom swords, inherited from Goryeo traditions, retained ceremonial prominence as badges of office for Confucian scholars and officials, often straight-bladed and symbolic rather than combat-oriented. By the late Joseon era, as archery dominated military doctrine and civil priorities eclipsed martial ones, hwando blades shortened to about 50 cm, emphasizing portability and status over battlefield efficacy, with royal variants like the ingeom incorporating tiger motifs to denote authority.

Japanese Colonial Period and Post-Liberation

During the Japanese colonial period from 1910 to 1945, Korean sword production and traditional faced severe suppression as part of broader efforts to eradicate native cultural practices and impose Japanese assimilation. Korean , including those involving geom and do swords, were largely banned for civilians, with practitioners forced underground or compelled to adopt Japanese equivalents like . Many existing Korean swords were confiscated, melted down, or lost from national armories, leading to a sharp decline in both artifacts and craftsmanship knowledge. Japanese authorities promoted in schools and police training, framing it as a superior imperial martial art while denigrating Korean traditions as primitive or obsolete. This contributed to the stagnation of indigenous sword-making techniques, which had already waned under late , with traditional forges ceasing operations by the early 20th century. Following liberation in 1945, the Korean peninsula's division and subsequent (1950–1953) further disrupted any immediate recovery of sword arts, as military priorities shifted to modern firearms and reconstruction efforts marginalized traditional weaponry. Sword-making remained dormant, with surviving knowledge fragmented among elderly practitioners and expatriates. In the post-war era, particularly from the onward in , a nationalist revival emerged, driven by cultural preservation movements and the resurgence of haedong geom (海東劍), a reconstructed system emphasizing historical Korean techniques over Japanese influences. Modern forges began producing replica geom and hwando using revived Joseon-era methods, incorporating high-carbon steel folding and differential hardening akin to earlier dynasties, though adapted with contemporary tools for precision. This revival extended to martial applications, with schools teaching forms like jedok geom—documented in 1759 military manuals and reinterpreted for two-handed and paired-sword techniques—focusing on practical combat efficiency rather than ritual. Organizations such as the Korea Traditional Martial Arts Association integrated sword training into curricula, emphasizing empirical reconstruction from artifacts and texts, though gaps persist due to colonial-era losses. North Korea maintained limited state-sponsored preservation, but details remain scarce, with emphasis on ideological narratives over technical dissemination. By the 21st century, artisanal production yielded high-quality blades for collectors and practitioners, often exceeding 60 cm in length with ornate fittings, signaling a partial restoration of Korea's metallurgical heritage.

Design and Construction

Blade Forging and Materials

Korean sword blades originated from in the prehistoric era but shifted to during the , with evidence of iron swords dating to the 4th century BCE. By the period (57 BCE–668 CE), blades were forged from iron using folding and hammering techniques imported from China's , producing straight, double-edged geom suitable for infantry combat. Steel production advanced in ancient Korea, with high-carbon content iron distinguishing Korean metallurgy from contemporaries in and . Metallurgical analysis of Koguryo kingdom swords reveals : two layers of white , one of , and two of high-carbon , achieved through direct of into iron blooms followed by forging to combine and refine the materials. These blooms were hammered to consolidate impurities and distribute carbon, often folded multiple times to enhance homogeneity and strength, a process that mitigated the inconsistencies of iron. Forging emphasized durability for piercing armor, with blades shaped by repeated heating and hammering on an anvil to form the tang, edge, and point. Differential heat treatment, introduced via Chinese influences and later refined under Mongolian contact during the Goryeo Dynasty, involved coating the spine with clay or red clay mixture before quenching in water, hardening the edge to approximately 60 HRC while keeping the spine softer and more flexible to prevent brittleness. This technique produced a subtle hamon line, prioritizing functional resilience over aesthetic patterns seen in Japanese counterparts. In the Joseon Dynasty, materials remained high-carbon , but production stagnated due to Confucian emphasis on civil , limiting to maintenance of folding and methods. Blades typically measured 60–80 cm in length, with cross-sections optimized for thrusting—flat or diamond-shaped for geom—ensuring balance between weight and rigidity.

Hilt, Guard, and Pommel Features

The hilt of traditional Korean swords typically comprised a grip with a wooden core, wrapped in silk, leather, or ray skin to provide secure handling during or use. This construction allowed for two-handed operation in many designs, enhancing control and leverage, particularly in longer geom variants. Guards, often termed apji in Korean nomenclature, were characteristically large and made of metal such as iron or , functioning primarily to prevent the user's hand from slipping onto the sharp edge during strikes. These guards varied from simple disk shapes in utilitarian military swords to more elaborate openwork forms in ceremonial pieces, with examples from the period featuring protective flanges or pierced designs for weight reduction. Pommels served dual purposes of counterbalancing the blade for stability and as decorative elements signifying status, frequently cast in bronze during early periods like Silla and Goguryeo. The iconic ring-pommel (hwandu) of hwandudaedo swords from the 1st to 7th centuries CE exemplified this, with looped bronze terminals adorned via lost-wax casting, inlays of gold or silver, and motifs like dragons or phoenixes denoting elite ownership. In Joseon-era swords, pommels shifted toward simpler iron or brass caps secured by tang rivets through a single hole, prioritizing functionality over ornamentation. Assembly involved peening the tang through hilt components, sometimes reinforced with copper pegs for durability.

Scabbard, Locking Systems, and Accessories

The , referred to as gambang in Korean, was primarily made from , often reinforced with shark skin, cloth, or for durability and protection of the . Ornate examples, such as those associated with hwando swords, featured sheaths carved from shell, allowing partial visibility of the , or edged with metal to prevent wear during carrying. Fittings incorporated , , silver, iron, and pigments, with dimensions varying by period; a 16th–19th century example measured approximately 79.4 cm in length when including the sword. Locking systems ensured the blade remained secure within the during movement. Prior to the mid- period, the binyeojang method employed a hairpin-shaped ring inserted into a hole near the scabbard's throat to prevent dislodgement, drawing from traditional hairpins. From the mid-to-late era onward, button-type mechanisms appeared on hwando swords, providing a more reliable catch activated by pressing a fitted . These developments addressed practical needs in mounted or pedestrian combat, where friction alone proved insufficient against jolts. Accessories included sageo-style cords for lashing the to the belt or body, facilitating stable carry with the positioned rearward and sheath forward for quick draws, as seen in hwando designs. Metal rings termed hwan were affixed to the for cord attachment, enhancing portability. Additional fittings, such as decorative mounts with semi-precious stones from Silla-era excavations (circa CE), protected the tip and throat while signifying status. These elements reflected functional adaptations influenced by Chinese designs, prioritizing balance and rapid deployment over elaborate suspension systems.

Regional and Temporal Variations in Craftsmanship

Korean sword craftsmanship evolved significantly across historical periods, transitioning from cast bronze ritual weapons to forged steel blades optimized for warfare. In the Three Kingdoms period (57 BCE–668 CE), early swords like the hwandudaedo were primarily cast in bronze using molds, featuring ring pommels and decorative motifs such as dragons and phoenixes, serving as elite status symbols influenced by continental East Asian styles. Later in this era, techniques shifted to forging iron swords for enhanced durability, with steel emerging toward the end; Gaya confederacy smiths were noted for superior metalwork, while Baekje examples like King Muryeong's sword (6th century) displayed intricate designs, suggesting localized refinements in hilt ornamentation across kingdoms like Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla. During the dynasty (918–1392), craftsmanship adapted to demands, favoring curved single-edged sabres forged with influences from Mongolian and Chinese metallurgy, resulting in diversified blade profiles suitable for mounted combat while retaining double-edged geom for ceremonial purposes. techniques were employed to harden edges, though Korean methods diverged from Japanese multilayering by emphasizing broader, thinner blades for slashing efficacy. Regional production likely centralized in royal workshops, minimizing stark geographic variances but incorporating influences via northern trade routes. In the Joseon dynasty (1392–1910), sword making prioritized practical military hwando (approximately 70 cm single-edged sabres) with less ornate features compared to prior eras, featuring straighter or minimally curved profiles distinct in shape and length from contemporaneous Chinese and Japanese . Forging continued with traditional smelting and tempering of iron into steel, yielding wider blades for infantry versatility, as documented in military manuals like the Muye Dobo Tongji (1790s); this period's output emphasized standardization over regional experimentation, reflecting centralized Confucian governance. Overall, temporal shifts correlated with tactical needs—from ritualistic casting to forged combat utility—while regional differences were most pronounced in the fragmented era before unification streamlined techniques.

Typology

Double-Edged Geom Variants

The geom (검), characterized by its straight, double-edged blade, formed the foundational double-edged sword type in Korean metallurgy from the Proto- period onward, typically measuring 60-80 cm in blade length with a one-handed grip. Influenced by Chinese designs, early examples like the (환두대도) featured ring-shaped pommels for lanyard attachment and decorative motifs such as dragons or phoenixes denoting elite status, prevalent during the era (57 BCE–668 CE). These iron-forged blades prioritized thrusting and slashing versatility in close-quarters combat among and . In the Goryeo Dynasty (918–1392), the jikdo (직도), a straight double-edged variant, persisted as a warrior's sidearm, though gradually supplanted by single-edged do types amid Mongol influences favoring curved blades for mounted warfare. By the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910), combat geom evolved into ceremonial forms like the bonguk geom (봉국검), resembling Eastern with refined tempering for symbolic rather than practical use, as documented in military manuals such as the Muye Dobo Tongji (1790). Specialized geom variants emerged for ritual purposes, including the chilseonggeom (칠성검), a near-straight blade approximately 24 inches long engraved with constellations for protective symbolism, employed in Joseon-era Buddhist and shamanic rites to invoke health and warding. The ingeom (인검), or sword, served talismanic roles with blades forged during auspicious tiger-aligned astrological periods; subtypes like the saingeom (사인검), aligned across year, month, day, and hour, were reserved for royal exorcisms. A unique Baekje artifact, the chiljido (칠지도) from the 4th century, incorporated seven symbolic branches on its double-edged form as a diplomatic gift to , embodying anti-invasion . These variants underscore the geom's transition from battlefield utility in early kingdoms—evidenced by archaeological finds of over 100 ring-pommel in tombs—to Joseon's emphasis on ritual efficacy, where blade quality reflected Confucian hierarchy over martial innovation. Despite declining prevalence against single-edged alternatives, geom retained symbolic prestige, with high-carbon steel construction ensuring durability in preserved exemplars analyzed at the .

Single-Edged Do and Hwando Types

The term "do" in Korean sword typology refers to single-edged blades, distinguishing them from double-edged "geom" swords, with designs often reflecting practical adaptations for slashing in mounted or close-quarters combat influenced by continental Asian traditions. Single-edged do appeared as early as the period (57 BCE–668 CE), exemplified by the , a straight-bladed form with ring-shaped pommels and minimal guards, used by warriors in and other states for versatility alongside spears and bows. By the dynasty (918–1392), do variants incorporated more refined forging techniques, but they remained secondary to geom until military reforms emphasized lighter sidearms. The hwando (환도), or "ring sword," named for the metal rings (hwan) on its scabbard used to secure tying cords, emerged as the standardized military do during the Joseon dynasty (1392–1910), serving as a primary sidearm for infantry, cavalry, and palace guards. Blades measured approximately 70 cm in length, though extended to 90 cm during the Imjin War (1592–1598) for enhanced reach against Japanese invaders before being shortened for mobility; the profile was straight or gently curved, single-edged for efficient cutting, and forged from high-carbon steel for durability without excessive weight. Hilt construction featured wooden cores wrapped in shark skin, hemp cloth, or lacquered materials for grip, often paired with simple iron guards and pommels; scabbards included reinforcing rings and, for elite users, decorative inlays of gold, silver, or jade, with variants like the daemobogeom showcasing translucent sea turtle shell sheaths to display the blade. Hwando were carried edge-up on the left waist or side, with the hilt positioned behind the body and scabbard forward to enable rapid draws compatible with or use, reflecting tactical doctrines prioritizing over standalone swordplay. Production was overseen by state armories like the Gungigam, ensuring uniformity for mass issuance to soldiers, though high-ranking officers received ornate versions—such as orange-lacquered for royal aides or for generals—to denote status. This design's emphasis on lightness and quick deployment proved effective in defensive warfare, including against Mongol and Japanese incursions, though post-17th century adoption diminished its frontline role.

Long and Specialized Swords

The Ssang Soo Do, also referred to as Jangdo or Janggeom, represents a prominent example of a long sword in Korean military tradition, characterized by its two-handed design and substantial length suitable for extended reach in combat. Employed during the Joseon dynasty (1392–1897), particularly by naval commander Yi Sun-sin in the late 16th century amid the Imjin War against Japan, these swords drew influence from Ming Chinese techniques outlined in military manuals like the Muye Dobo Tongji. Typical specimens measured approximately 197.5 cm in overall length and weighed around 5 kg, enabling powerful sweeping and thrusting motions against armored foes or on naval decks. Specialized long-bladed weapons extended beyond standard infantry swords into hybrid forms, such as the Hyeopdo, a polearm-sword combining a single-edged blade with an elongated haft for battlefield versatility. Dating to the period (57 BCE–668 CE) and refined in later dynasties, the Hyeopdo featured a blade around 63 cm long mounted on a 1.5 m wooden pole, allowing infantry or cavalry to execute slashing and hooking maneuvers against mounted opponents or formations. Similarly, the , translating to "moon blade," functioned as a heavy pole weapon akin to the Chinese guandao, with a curved, single-edged blade optimized for chopping and thrusting; it was wielded by elite kingdom warriors like the during the medieval era, leveraging its weight for penetrating armor in close-quarters engagements. Ceremonial and ritual swords constituted another specialized category, often diverging from practical combat utility to emphasize symbolic or spiritual functions while retaining elongated forms. The Saingeom, or Four-Tiger Sword, forged exclusively during rare alignments of year, month, day, and hour corresponding to the in the , served kings in shamanistic rites to exorcise demons and avert national calamities. The Ingeom, known as the Tiger Sword, shared talismanic properties, crafted in tiger-year cycles to embody protective power against malevolent forces. Ancient artifacts like the Chiljido, a dispatched as a diplomatic gift from Baekje's King Geunchogo to around 372 CE, exemplified early specialized designs symbolizing divine authority and warding off invasions, its tree-like prongs evoking sacred motifs rather than conventional cutting edges. These variants underscore how Korean swordcraft adapted length and form to metaphysical roles, prioritizing astrological timing and incantations in production over mass battlefield deployment.

Usage and Swordsmanship

Historical Carrying and Combat Deployment

In ancient and medieval Korea, swords such as the early (ring-pommel swords) from the period (c. 57 BCE–668 CE) were carried suspended from wide belts using leather straps or cords attached to rings, positioning the for quick right-handed draw by or . This method persisted into the Dynasty (918–1392), where curved sabres adapted for mounted warfare were often slung low on the left side via metal hangers, allowing riders to discard the in entanglement risks during charges. During the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910), the hwando—a lightweight, single-edged with a 70 cm blade—became the standard military sidearm, worn on the waist or side with the angled behind the body for unobstructed movement under armor and alongside bows or shields. Soldiers secured it via cords or hangers to dae (broad belts), enabling rapid deployment while carrying; for horseback use, strings tied it securely to prevent bouncing, prioritizing balance over constant readiness given archery's dominance in formations. Elite variants like ssangdo (twin swords) employed additional methods such as shoulder slings or back mounts for dual-wield accessibility in specialized units. In combat deployment, Korean swords functioned as secondary weapons in armies emphasizing composite bows and spears, reserved for close-quarters after ranged volleys depleted enemy cohesion. Three Kingdoms-era geom (double-edged swords) saw use in phalanxes and assaults, with ring-pommel designs aiding one-handed thrusts alongside shields. cavalry deployed sabres in fluid charges against Mongol incursions (1231–1259), leveraging curvature for slashing from horseback, though swords accounted for fewer kills than due to nomadic tactics favoring mobility. Joseon hwando emphasized utility in defensive warfare, such as during the Imjin War (1592–1598), where they enabled one-handed cuts and parries, freeing the off-hand for reins, flags, or secondary tools amid dense infantry clashes. Military manuals like the Muyedobotongji (1790) codified techniques including masang ssanggeom (mounted twin-sword fighting) for elites, involving circular sweeps and thrusts against unarmored foes, but empirical battlefield efficacy remained limited by gunpowder adoption—swords comprised under 20% of documented close-combat fatalities in late-dynasty records, overshadowed by muskets and spears. Wol-do (crescent blades) supplemented this in mounted shock tactics, hooking enemy weapons or limbs for dismounting opponents. Overall, deployment prioritized versatility over specialization, reflecting Korea's terrain-driven warfare where swords augmented rather than led engagements.

Traditional Techniques and Forms

The Muyedobotongji, compiled in 1790 under Joseon King Jeongjo, serves as the primary historical compendium of traditional Korean sword techniques, drawing from indigenous practices, Ming Chinese manuals encountered during the Imjin War (1592–1598), and adaptations of Japanese methods studied post-invasion. This illustrated text outlines swordsmanship (geomdo) across volumes focused on infantry and mounted combat, emphasizing practical maneuvers for warfare rather than ritualized display, with techniques tailored to Korean blade geometries like the double-edged geom and single-edged do. Techniques prioritize leverage from body mechanics, incorporating stances with low centers of gravity for stability, fluid footwork to evade and reposition, and integrated hand grips shifting between one- and two-handed for versatility in armored combat. Key methods include ssang su do (two-handed long sword), which employs overhead cleaves, diagonal slashes, and sweeping parries derived from Qi Jiguang's Ming-era long-saber training, executed with full hip rotation for penetrating armor via kinetic chaining from legs to blade. Ssang geom (double swords) techniques feature synchronized strikes—such as crossing guards for deflection followed by lateral cuts—effective in dense formations or on horseback (masang ssang geom), where riders maintain balance through reins in one hand and coordinated blade arcs in the other. Ye do (sharp sword) variants, applicable to both geom and hwando, stress rapid draw-strikes (bonguk geom beop style) and thrusting feints transitioning to hacks, reflecting causal advantages of curved tips for hooking shields or limbs in melee. Jedok geom (commander sword), adapted from Ming general Li Rusong's waist-worn style during the Imjin campaigns, incorporates probing thrusts and ripostes suited to roles, blending Korean hwarang heritage with continental precision for dueling officers. While not codified as symmetric poomsae sequences like later empty-hand arts, the manual's woodblock illustrations depict chained techniques forming de facto training forms—e.g., 20–30 movement progressions in ssang su do chapters—prioritizing empirical efficacy over aesthetic symmetry, with Korean modifications enhancing for shorter, thicker blades compared to slender Chinese . Mounted forms, original to the text, integrate wol do (crescent blade) sweeps for dismounting foes, underscoring cavalry realism absent in pedestrian Chinese derivations. These methods, verified through drill records, favored cutting dominance (e.g., slashing to sever limbs or unhorse) over pure thrusting, aligning with biomechanical realities of edged weapons in humid, rugged terrain.

Military Applications and Effectiveness

Korean swords functioned primarily as auxiliary weapons in military operations, reserved for close-quarters engagements, charges, and elite units, while primary reliance fell on , spears, and later firearms due to Korea's terrain-favored defensive tactics emphasizing ranged . In the period (c. 57 BCE–668 CE) and dynasty (918–1392), double-edged geom and emerging single-edged sabers were deployed by mounted warriors and commanders to exploit breakthroughs after arrow barrages, but infantry formations prioritized composite bows and polearms for their superior reach and penetration against armored foes. Effectiveness in these eras stemmed from integration with horse , enabling decisive cuts in fluid skirmishes, though swords alone rarely turned battles amid Korea's mountainous landscapes that discouraged mass melee. During the Joseon dynasty (1392–1897), single-edged hwando and do variants served as sidearms for officers and spearmen, with specialized forms like the ssangdo (twin swords) equipping elite "killing units" (salsu) for protecting reloading musketeers in linear formations adapted from Chinese tactics. These units provided defensive screens during the Imjin War (1592–1598), where Korean forces engaged Japanese invaders in hand-to-hand fighting after initial arquebus volleys, but swords proved inferior to enemy firearms in open engagements, contributing to early territorial losses like the fall of Seoul within three weeks. Empirical shifts post-invasion underscore limitations: musketeer numbers surged from 500 in 1593 to 6,350 by 1658, comprising 80% of forces by 1682 as swordsmen declined, reflecting firearms' 4–5 rounds-per-minute rate outpacing blade-based counters. Overall effectiveness hinged on contextual factors rather than inherent superiority; Korean swords excelled in disciplined, small-scale pushes or ceremonial roles symbolizing command, but reveals tactical —favoring defensive fortifications and naval innovations like turtle ships—minimized melee reliance, rendering swords non-decisive in major conflicts against numerically superior or gun-equipped adversaries. Historical records indicate no large-scale sword victories independent of ranged support, with post-Imjin adaptations prioritizing over blade refinements despite influences from captured Japanese designs. By the late , institutional reforms further marginalized swords, aligning military efficacy with technological imports over traditional edged weapons.

Cultural and Symbolic Role

Ritual and Ceremonial Uses

In ancient Korea, during the Proto-Three Kingdoms to periods (circa 1st millennium BCE to 6th century CE), swords like the functioned primarily as symbols of rank and elite identity rather than practical weapons, often interred in tombs with elaborate motifs such as dragons and phoenixes on gold hilts, as evidenced in burials. These artifacts underscore the ceremonial prestige attached to blades, linking them to rulership and protections. During the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910), hwando swords evolved ceremonial variants denoting status, with orange sheaths reserved for the king's aides and black for others, sometimes embellished with gold, silver, or jade; the daemobogeom, featuring a shell hilt, exemplifies artistic court pieces preserved in museums like Hwaseong. In the Great Korean Empire era, such swords symbolized trust and authority, as seen in diplomatic gifts like the 2017 presentation of a late hwando from Russian President Putin to Korean President . Specialized geom-type swords held ritualistic roles in shamanistic practices, particularly the saingeom (Four Tiger Sword), forged during auspicious lunar alignments and used exclusively by kings for demon-slaying ceremonies to ward off evil spirits, embodying protective spiritual power derived from symbolism. These blades, blending Confucian virtue with folk , were not for combat but reinforced royal and spiritual authority, reflecting persistent beliefs in swords' capacity to repel malevolence in royal courts.

Symbolism in Korean Society and Warfare

In ancient Korean societies, particularly during the period (57 BCE–668 CE), swords like the functioned as potent symbols of elite status and political authority, with ornate examples featuring and phoenix motifs on gold hilts signifying the bearer's command over vast power structures. These ring-pommel swords, prevalent from the 1st to 4th centuries CE, prioritized emblematic rank over battlefield pragmatism, often buried in royal tombs to affirm the deceased ruler's dominion. In warfare, such blades embodied leadership and centralized control, as evidenced by their association with Baekje kings like Muryeong (r. 501–523 CE), whose tomb sword underscored the weapon's role in legitimizing martial hierarchies. During the Goryeo (918–1392 CE) and (1392–1897 CE) dynasties, swords retained their military symbolism as markers of hierarchy, with high-ranking officers wielding specialized types like the jedok geom—a straight, single-edged blade up to 6 feet long reserved for admirals and generals to denote strategic command. Iron swords, evolving from earlier bronze forms, carried enduring connotations of power acquisition and retention, reflecting the ceaseless pursuit of dominance in conflicts such as those against Mongol invasions (1231–1259 CE). In societal contexts, the choice of materials—gold or gilt-bronze hilts for nobility—signaled social elevation, distinguishing warriors from common soldiers and reinforcing Confucian ideals of disciplined valor. By the late era and into the Great Korean Empire (1897–1910 CE), swords like the hwando shifted toward ceremonial symbolism, representing oaths of loyalty and mutual trust among allies, as seen in diplomatic gifts that evoked ancestral pacts. Twin swords (ssangdo) among royal guards symbolized martial prestige rather than active combat, aligning with a society where sword-bearing conferred honorific status amid declining warfare roles. This evolution highlighted swords' dual function: in warfare, as emblems of tactical authority and resolve; in broader society, as enduring icons of hierarchical order and ethical duty.

Depictions in Art, Literature, and Folklore

In ancient tomb murals dating from the 4th to 6th centuries CE, warriors are frequently portrayed wielding ring-pommel swords, often in dynamic combat scenes that highlight their role as primary melee weapons alongside bows and spears. These frescoes, such as those excavated in present-day and , depict mounted fighters with straight or slightly curved blades suspended from belts, reflecting the tactical integration of swords in cavalry engagements during the period. Joseon-era paintings, including genre works from the 18th and 19th centuries, illustrate ceremonial sword dances known as geommu, where performers execute synchronized routines with paired geom blades to rhythmic music, symbolizing harmony between martial discipline and artistic expression. These depictions, found in albums like those by artist Kim Hongdo (Hyewon), emphasize the swords' ornate hilts and the dancers' flowing robes, underscoring the transition of swords from battlefield tools to elements of courtly performance by the late dynasty. In Central Asian murals like those at (7th century CE), Korean envoys or mercenaries appear with swords hung obliquely from their waists, suggesting cross-cultural exchanges in sword-bearing conventions among steppe warriors and East Asian forces. Historical texts from the era, such as chronicles recording Baekje's diplomatic gifts, describe the presented to the Yamato king in 372 CE as a ornate geom variant with seven prongs on the blade, interpreted as a symbol of divine authority and ritual power rather than practical combat utility. This artifact, now housed in Japanese repositories, recurs in annals as evidence of inter-kingdom alliances and the export of advanced Korean swordsmithing techniques. Joseon military manuals like the Muye Dobo Tongji (1790 CE), compiled from Ming Chinese and indigenous sources, detail sword forms for geom and hwando, including illustrations of stances and strikes that informed later haedong gumdo reconstructions, portraying swords as extensions of the practitioner's intent in both dueling and formation tactics. Korean folklore embeds swords in tales of shamanistic and heroic quests, with the saingeom or four-tiger sword from the period depicted as a ceremonial blade etched with tiger motifs to repel malevolent spirits, its four prongs evoking protective deities in ritual narratives passed through oral traditions and palace records. Blades like the ingeom ( sword) feature in legends as talismans warding evil, their engravings invoking the tiger's ferocity to safeguard rulers and warriors against supernatural threats. Mythic accounts from the Silla kingdom associate sword origins with foundational legends, where bronze geom prototypes served as emblems of sovereignty in creation myths akin to those involving Dangun, though empirical evidence prioritizes their evolution from LIA bronze daggers over purely legendary fabrication.

Influences and Comparisons

Chinese and Continental Asian Influences

The development of Korean iron sword forging techniques was directly influenced by methods originating in China during the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), where folded and forged iron production spread to the Korean peninsula through trade and migration routes. These advancements enabled the transition from bronze daggers to functional iron blades by the Three Kingdoms period (57 BCE–668 CE), with archaeological finds of straight, double-edged swords mirroring Chinese jian designs in form and construction. Ring-pommel swords (hwandudaedo), prevalent from the 1st century BCE, exhibit continental stylistic elements traceable to Chinese prototypes, featuring decorative motifs and pommel shapes that diffused across East Asia. During the dynasty (918–1392 CE), repeated Mongol invasions—culminating in six campaigns between 1231 and 1259 CE—imposed vassalage and facilitated the adoption of Central Asian and Chinese-influenced metallurgy, including enhanced steel folding for durability in mounted combat. This period saw the integration of curved, single-edged dao-like swords alongside straight geom, with mountings and hilts reflecting (1271–1368 CE) Chinese aesthetics adapted for Korean warfare. Evidence from Goryeo artifacts indicates hybrid designs, such as reinforced guards and scabbards suited to nomadic tactics, underscoring causal transmission via military subjugation rather than independent evolution. Continental influences extended beyond direct Chinese models to include steppe traditions via Mongol intermediaries, evident in the proliferation of heavier, broader blades optimized for slashing from horseback, contrasting earlier infantry-focused Korean weapons. Post-Mongol recovery preserved these techniques, with Joseon-era (1392–1897 CE) forges retaining folded processes derived from Han innovations, though adapted to local materials and preferences. Such exchanges highlight Korea's position as a conduit for Asian metallurgical knowledge, with empirical artifact analysis confirming stylistic and technical borrowings over indigenous invention in key phases.

Japanese Sword Interactions and Distinctions

Early exchanges between Korean and Japanese sword-making occurred during the 3rd to 8th centuries CE, when Korean and Chinese artisans migrated to Japan, introducing continental techniques such as pattern welding and straight-bladed designs that laid foundational influences on nascent Japanese metallurgy. These interactions, facilitated by migrations from kingdoms like Baekje, contributed to Japan's Kofun-period (250-538 CE) sword development, including straight chokuto blades, though Japan subsequently innovated independently toward curved tachi by the 10th century. During the Imjin War (1592-1598), Japanese forces wielded katana that impressed Korean observers with their sharpness and resilience against armor, leading to the capture of thousands of blades and subsequent analysis by Korean smiths, which prompted limited adoption of Japanese tempering methods in Joseon-era forges. In the , Japanese colonial rule (1910-1945) disseminated practices to Korea, evolving into —a bamboo-sword retaining Japanese forms but rebranded post-liberation to emphasize indigenous roots, amid nationalist efforts to minimize perceived foreign derivation. Claims of direct Korean origination for the , such as through hwando designs, lack archaeological or textual support; instead, hwando emerged from indigenous Korean adaptations of Chinese sabers by the , predating significant Japanese stylistic impact. Distinctions in blade geometry are pronounced: Korean geom typically featured straight or mildly curved profiles with potential double-edging for thrusting versatility, suited to mounted and influenced by continental warfare, whereas the Japanese katana emphasized a pronounced single-edged curve optimized for draw-and-slash cuts in close-quarters duels. Korean jingum, a later single-edged type, often exhibited wider, thinner blades than equivalents, reflecting adaptations for lighter use rather than the katana's rigid hamon-hardened edge for parrying. Forging diverged in emphasis—Japanese methods prioritized and differential hardening for aesthetic hamon patterns, yielding blades prized for symbolic purity, while Korean techniques incorporated more pragmatic from earlier eras, prioritizing for military needs over individualized artistry. These differences stemmed from divergent resource constraints and combat doctrines: Japan's island isolation fostered specialized, labor-intensive refinement, contrasting Korea's exposure to vast and Chinese influences favoring functional durability over ritualistic perfection.

Debates on Indigenous Innovation vs. Derivation

The origins of Korean swords trace to daggers dating to the 10th-9th centuries BCE, with forms exhibiting parallels to northeastern Chinese Liaoning-type weapons, suggesting initial derivation through regional rather than isolated invention. Archaeological finds, such as narrow daggers, display local stylistic adaptations like elongated hilts, yet these build upon pipha-shaped prototypes associated with continental cultures, indicating adaptation over pure indigenous creation. During the and period (circa 57 BCE-668 CE), straight double-edged swords dominated, with ring-pommel designs directly mirroring Chinese influences introduced via northwestern commanderies and trade routes. However, metallurgical analysis of artifacts reveals innovative steel production by layering white and , then heating above the 's to achieve fusion, yielding blades with superior hardness and flexibility not merely replicated from imported Chinese techniques. This co-fusion method, evidenced in microstructural examinations of excavated swords, demonstrates empirical advancements in pattern-welded equivalents tailored to Korean favoring longer, thrusting weapons. Proponents of greater indigenous cite these refinements and persistent straight-blade preferences—contrasting with evolving Chinese curves—as evidence of causal adaptations driven by Korea's mountainous and warfare styles, rather than wholesale derivation. Conversely, critics, drawing from comparative , emphasize that foundational forms, pommel styles, and early ironworking disseminated from via migrations and conquests, with Korean developments representing refinements within a shared East Asian technological continuum. Nationalist interpretations in some Korean historical narratives overstate autonomy, potentially influenced by modern , but peer-reviewed metallurgical studies affirm local ingenuity in material processing while underscoring derivative morphologies. In later eras, (918-1392) curved swords emerged under Mongol suzerainty, blending steppe derivations with prior straight traditions, further illustrating hybrid evolution over originality. Dynasty (1392-1910) standardization in texts like the Muye Dobo Tongji (1790) codified these hybrid forms, prioritizing functional efficacy in mounted and paired techniques, yet retained continental ergonomic roots. Overall, while debates persist, archaeological and data privilege a model of derivation tempered by verifiable Korean innovations in forging composites and tactical adaptations.

Modern Context

Revival of Swordsmanship Practices

Following the end of Japanese colonial rule in 1945, , which had been marginalized by the dominance of firearms since the and further suppressed under occupation, saw initial revival efforts through the establishment of in June 1948 in . , meaning "sword way," adapts protective gear, bamboo swords (jukdo), and wooden practice swords (mokgeom) in a manner akin to Japanese but incorporates Korean terminology and draws on historical texts like the Muyedobotongji to emphasize indigenous techniques traced to warriors of the 6th century. This system focuses on forms (hyung), (geomsi), and philosophical training, serving as an early post-war vehicle for reclaiming Korean martial identity amid cultural revival movements. A more targeted reconstruction of traditional practices accelerated in the 1970s with the rediscovery of the Muyedobotongji, a 1790 Joseon-era manual compiling sword methods such as bongukgeom (native Korean straight sword techniques) and waegeom (adapted Japanese styles), alongside earlier texts like the Muyesinbo of 1759. Key figures including Kim Gwang-suk, who trained under Yoon Myeong-deok and published analyses starting in 1987, founded the Korea Sibpalki Association in 1981 to revive 18-weapon arts, including , through textual interpretation and lineage-based transmission where possible. Parallel efforts, such as Lim Dong-gyu's prison-based reconstructions from manual illustrations, highlight a reliance on due to interrupted oral traditions, sparking debates over fidelity to original dynamics versus interpretive innovation. Haedong Gumdo, formalized in 1984 by founder Kim Jeong-Ho through the Korean Haidong Gumdo Federation, exemplifies this reconstructive approach by drawing on ancient battlefield techniques purportedly from Goguryeo-era sources and manuals like Bonguk Geom Beop, emphasizing fluid, one- and two-handed cuts, forms (seonbeop), and mat cutting (jageum) with live blades in advanced training. Unlike Kumdo's upright stances, Haedong Gumdo prioritizes low, mobile postures for mounted and dismounted combat simulation, though its techniques represent a modern synthesis rather than unbroken lineage, as direct historical transmission lapsed centuries prior. By the , such schools had proliferated, with Haedong Gumdo expanding to over 50 countries via international federations, fostering practices that blend physical conditioning, , and cultural preservation. These revivals prioritize empirical reconstruction from verifiable texts over speculative ancient lineages, enabling contemporary in dojos worldwide while acknowledging the causal of colonial suppression and technological shifts in ' near-extinction. Debates persist on methodological accuracy, with some lineages claiming partial oral continuity and others pure textual revival, but the emphasis remains on practical efficacy in forms, cutting tests, and light-contact to approximate historical functionality.

Contemporary Production and Artisanal Forging

In contemporary Korea, the production of swords, known as geom, remains a niche artisanal craft practiced by a limited number of master smiths dedicated to reviving techniques lost during the Japanese colonial era (1910–1945) and subsequent modernization. These artisans hand-forge blades using traditional methods, such as smelting iron in small furnaces fueled by oak-wood charcoal to yield low-phosphorus and low-sulfur metal that enhances weldability, rust resistance, and overall durability. Unlike historical mass production for military use, modern forging prioritizes precision craftsmanship for ceremonial, martial arts practice, and collector purposes, with processes involving repeated hammering, tempering, and assembly that can span months to a year per sword. Prominent among these smiths is Lee Eun-cheol, recognized as Korea's sole traditional sword master as of the early , who operates from a 33-square-meter workshop near Mount Hyemok in . Lee, who began his efforts around the late , reconstructs ancient designs like the Baekje-period baekjesingum (1st–7th centuries CE) and the chiljido through self-directed research, including consultations with blacksmiths and visits to Japanese forges. His blades emphasize balance as a core principle, achieved through meticulous folding and shaping to replicate the functional geometry of pre-modern Korean swords, which were often double-edged and optimized for cutting efficiency rather than thrusting. By 2018, Lee's work had restored elements of the "forgotten art" of ancient Korean sword-making, producing functional replicas that withstand rigorous testing. Other artisans, such as Hong Seok-hyeon, contribute to this revival by crafting replicas of Joseon-era (1392–1910) types like the saingeom (molded blades for ceremonial use) and Three Kingdoms-period hwandudaedo (ring-pommel swords), as well as functional pieces for geomdo (traditional ). Hong's process includes hammering, carving, inlaying, and painting, often completed single-handedly, with premium ancient-style swords requiring approximately one year of labor and priced between 700,000 won (about $550 in 2005) and 20 million won (about $15,700). These efforts face challenges including limited governmental support and a scarcity of apprentices, underscoring the craft's endangered status amid broader disinterest in manual . Despite this, the output maintains comparability to historical standards in material integrity and edge retention, supporting renewed interest in Korean martial traditions since the 1970s.

Reproductions, Collectibility, and Cultural Preservation

Modern reproductions of historical Korean swords, such as the and , are crafted by specialized artisans using techniques approximating traditional forging methods, often for practitioners of Haedong Gumdo and collectors seeking functional or decorative pieces. These handmade blades, available from producers like Sword N Armory and MartialArtSwords.com, feature straight or single-edged designs with attention to historical proportions, though they typically employ modern high-carbon steels rather than period-specific iron smelting. Antique Korean swords command significant collectibility due to their scarcity, with surviving examples from the and periods primarily held in museums or private collections, fetching prices upward of $2,000 for well-preserved officer's swords at auctions. Rare variants like the Chilseong Geom or Saingeom are particularly prized for their symbolic engravings and , though forgeries and reproductions complicate , emphasizing the need for metallurgical to verify traditional pattern-welded forging. Cultural preservation efforts center on institutional safeguarding and revival of craftsmanship, with designating artifacts like Yi Sun-sin's inscribed swords as National Treasures in August 2023, noting their intact condition despite centuries of age. Bladesmiths such as Lee Eun-cheol continue traditional tempering and smelting in workshops, producing blades that maintain historical balance and edge hardness to transmit techniques amid modernization. The Cultural Heritage Administration oversees excavation and conservation of tomb-found swords, like those from Silla-era sites, ensuring their study and display in institutions such as the National Museum to document indigenous metallurgical innovations.

References

  1. https://swordis.com/blog/types-of-korean-swords/
  2. https://www.swordsofkorea.com/history.htm
  3. https://www.martialartswords.com/blogs/articles/korean-swords-produced-during-the-three-kingdoms-period
  4. https://sbg-sword-forum.forums.net/thread/25260/research-on-korean-swords
  5. https://www.martialartswords.com/blogs/articles/a-short-history-of-korean-swords-from-deep-antiquity-to-the-handbooks-of-joseon
  6. https://mehanhapkido.com/ancient-korean-swords-and-sword-arts-part-1/
  7. http://www.ijkaa.org/v.1/0/6/68
  8. http://www.ijkaa.org/v.7/0/78/121
  9. https://www.museum.go.kr/ENG/contents/E0403000000.do?schM=relic_represent_view&relicId=4379
  10. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/2719512
  11. https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtefactPorn/comments/1mvxgdt/a_polished_stone_sword_excavated_from_a_dolmen_in/
  12. https://smarthistory.org/assemblage-of-artifacts-from-the-daegok-ri-site-hwasun/
  13. https://donwagner.dk/KoreanFe/KoreanFe.html
  14. https://www.taekwondopreschool.com/muyesinbo_ssangsudo.html
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304129098_N_ERDENE-OCHIR_WEAPONS_OF_THE_THREE_KINGDOMS_PERIOD_OF_KOREA_IN_THE_SEOUL_NATIONAL_UNIVERSITY_MUSEUM_Studia_Archaeologica_Tomus_XXXII_Fasc_11_UB_2012_Tal_176-201
  16. https://www.korea.net/NewsFocus/Culture/view?articleId=126536
  17. http://www.ijkaa.org/v.16/0/41/6
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388863216_A_Study_on_the_Sword_and_Spear_of_Gaya_Excavated_in_Gimhae_and_Busan
  19. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Korean_swordsmanship
  20. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Korean_sword
  21. https://www.ijkaa.org/assets/pdf/15/jkaa-13-67.pdf
  22. https://swordskingdom.com/exploring-the-rich-heritage-of-korean-swords/
  23. https://min.news/en/news/7e7f082091b90c13adee66659a7ba862.html
  24. https://sevenswords.uk/types-of-swords-korea/
  25. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/lifestyle/koreanheritage/20150318/swordsmithing
  26. http://www.kocis.go.kr/eng/webzine/201812/sub06.html
  27. https://koreanmartialarts.substack.com/p/when-swords-cross-borders-how-japanese
  28. https://sevenswords.uk/ssangsudo/
  29. https://www.kuksoolwon.com/history/modern-history/
  30. https://www.itftaekwondo.com/korean-martial-arts/
  31. http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=6919
  32. https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/53429-korean-swords/
  33. https://gregorybrundage.tripod.com/koreanswords/koreanswordhistory.html
  34. https://www.taekwondopreschool.com/muyesinbo_ssanggeom.html
  35. https://mas-swords.myshopify.com/de/blogs/articles/contemporary-korean-swords-the-revival-of-swords-in-korea
  36. https://www.amazon.com/Joseon-Korean-Swordsmanship-Source-Jedok/dp/0228886325
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1044580305000094
  38. https://www.martialartswords.com/blogs/articles/a-look-back-at-the-history-of-korean-swords
  39. https://www.facebook.com/groups/290129349137313/posts/641398897343688/
  40. https://www.martialartswords.com/blogs/articles/characteristics-of-traditional-korean-swords-1
  41. https://sevenswords.uk/hwandudaedo/
  42. https://www.academia.edu/116638618/A_Study_on_the_Workmanship_and_Regionality_of_the_Swords_of_the_Three_Kingdoms_Period
  43. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/27934
  44. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1065012154280719/posts/1924044255044167/
  45. https://www.facebook.com/groups/ChineseMilitaryHistoryGroup/posts/8366019880129757/
  46. https://sbg-sword-forum.forums.net/thread/1648
  47. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2012/11/13/artsDesign/Bladesmith-embraces-tradition-to-produce-the-cutting-edge/2962276.html
  48. https://www.hanbonforge.com/blog/The-difference-between-Korean-swords-and-Japanese-swords
  49. https://mas-swords.myshopify.com/blogs/articles/a-short-history-of-korean-swords-from-deep-antiquity-to-the-handbooks-of-joseon
  50. https://www.museum.go.kr
  51. https://sword-site.com/thread/1052/history-characteristics-korean-swords
  52. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/3197696
  53. https://www.taekwondopreschool.com/muyesinbo_hyeopdo.html
  54. https://www.martialartswords.com/blogs/articles/sword-spotlight-the-korean-woldo
  55. https://www.taekwondopreschool.com/muyesinbo_woldo.html
  56. https://sevenswords.uk/hwando/
  57. https://sevenswords.uk/joseon-ssangdo-swords-korea/
  58. https://www.taekwondopreschool.com/muyedobotongji.html
  59. http://www.turtlepress.com/training/the-origins-of-the-muye-dobo-tongji
  60. https://www.chineselongsword.com/korean
  61. https://fivemoodovalues.wordpress.com/history/muye-dobo-tongji/
  62. https://www.chineselongsword.com/koreandoublehandsaber
  63. https://www.chineselongsword.com/koreandoubleswords
  64. https://www.chineselongsword.com/koreancommandersword
  65. https://www.tota.world/article/158/
  66. https://koreanhistory.humspace.ucla.edu/items/show/34
  67. https://sevenswords.uk/saingeom/
  68. https://www.museum.go.kr/ENG/contents/E0403000000.do?schM=relic_represent_view&relicId=1968
  69. https://webzine.museum.go.kr/eng/sub.html?amIdx=16049
  70. https://webzine.museum.go.kr/eng/sub.html?amIdx=16018
  71. http://www.ijkaa.org/v.9/0/8/136
  72. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/25110
  73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41913393
  74. https://m.economictimes.com/magazines/panache/slice-of-history-legendary-swords-and-the-kings-who-brandished-them/the-seven-branched-sword/slideshow/64170485.cms
  75. https://romanceofmen.com/blogs/chinese-weapons/ages-of-edge-the-transformation-of-chinese-swords-across-dynasties
  76. https://journals.colorado.edu/index.php/coasianstudies/article/download/3065/Swords
  77. https://www.kultofathena.com/katana-history-and-techniques/
  78. http://www.maltatangsoodo.com/uploads/8/4/7/6/8476117/the_peculiar_relationship_between_korean__japanese_swordsmanship.pdf
  79. https://www.quora.com/Was-Japans-sword-making-technology-superior-to-Koreas-during-a-certain-time-period-If-so-what-were-the-reasons-for-this
  80. https://mas.cardiffuniversitypress.org/articles/10.18573/mas.63
  81. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/gk90zf/i_was_told_in_a_korean_martial_arts_class_that/
  82. https://katana.store/blogs/katana-vs/korean-sword-vs-katana
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248495396_Steel_making_in_the_ancient_Korean_Kingdom_of_Koguryo
  84. https://www.ijitee.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i8s2/H10340688S219.pdf
  85. https://www.scottshaw.com/kumdo.html
  86. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6639/663972805013/html/
  87. https://www.martialartscollege.org/gumdo-the-way-of-the-sword.html
  88. https://www.rockholdkarate.com/blog/way-of-the-sword
  89. https://www.ushaidong.org/history.html
  90. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2005/04/03/features/Keeping-an-ancient-craft-alive/2550317.html
  91. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/video/news/20181216/swordsmithing-master-restores-ancient-swordmaking-skill
  92. https://gregorybrundage.tripod.com/koreanswords/koreanswordmanufacturers.html
  93. https://www.swordnarmory.com/sword/handmade-sword/handmade-korean-sword/
  94. https://www.martialartswords.com/
  95. https://www.ebay.com/b/Sword-Korean-Antiques/162979/bn_107658962
  96. https://sevenswords.uk/chilseong-geom-seven-star-sword/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.