Hubbry Logo
Dust stormDust stormMain
Open search
Dust storm
Community hub
Dust storm
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dust storm
Dust storm
Dust storm
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An aerial view of a sandstorm over the Namib Desert

A dust storm, also called a sandstorm, is a meteorological phenomenon common in arid and semi-arid regions.[1] Dust storms arise when a gust front or other strong wind blows loose sand and dirt from a dry surface. Fine particles are transported by saltation and suspension, a process that moves soil from one place and deposits it in another. These storms can reduce visibility, disrupt transportation, and pose serious health risks. Over time, repeated dust storms can reduce agricultural productivity and contribute to desertification.

The arid regions of North Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia and China are the main terrestrial sources of airborne dust. It has been argued that[2][unreliable source?] poor management of Earth's drylands, such as neglecting the fallow system, are increasing the size and frequency of dust storms from desert margins and changing both the local and global climate, as well as impacting local economies.[3]

The term sandstorm is used most often in the context of desert dust storms, especially in the Sahara Desert, or places where sand is a more prevalent soil type than dirt or rock, when, in addition to fine particles obscuring visibility, a considerable amount of larger sand particles are blown closer to the surface. The term dust storm is more likely to be used when finer particles are blown long distances, especially when the dust storm affects urban areas.

Causes

[edit]
Animation showing the global movement of dust from an Asian dust storm.

As the force of dust passing over loosely held particles increases, particles of sand first start to vibrate, then to move across the surface in a process called saltation. As they repeatedly strike the ground, they loosen and break off smaller particles of dust which then begin to travel in suspension. At wind speeds above that which causes the smallest to suspend, there will be a population of dust grains moving by a range of mechanisms: suspension, saltation and creep.[3]

A study from 2008 finds that the initial saltation of sand particles induces a static electric field by friction. Saltating sand acquires a negative charge relative to the ground which in turn loosens more sand particles which then begin saltating. This process has been found to double the number of particles predicted by previous theories.[4]

Particles become loosely held mainly due to a prolonged drought or arid conditions, and high wind speeds. Gust fronts may be produced by the outflow of rain-cooled air from an intense thunderstorm. Or, the wind gusts may be produced by a dry cold front: that is, a cold front that is moving into a dry air mass and is producing no precipitation—the type of dust storm which was common during the Dust Bowl years in the U.S. Following the passage of a dry cold front, convective instability resulting from cooler air riding over heated ground can maintain the dust storm initiated at the front.

In desert areas, dust and sand storms are most commonly caused by either thunderstorm outflows, or by strong pressure gradients which cause an increase in wind velocity over a wide area. The vertical extent of the dust or sand that is raised is largely determined by the stability of the atmosphere above the ground as well as by the weight of the particulates. In some cases, dust and sand may be confined to a relatively-shallow layer by a low-lying temperature inversion. In other instances, dust (but not sand) may be lifted as high as 6,000 m (20,000 ft). Dust storms are a major health hazard.

Drought and wind contribute to the emergence of dust storms, as do poor farming and grazing practices by exposing the dust and sand to the wind. Wildfires can lead to dust storms as well.[5]

One poor farming practice which contributes to dust storms is dryland farming. Particularly poor dryland farming techniques are intensive tillage or not having established crops or cover crops when storms strike at particularly vulnerable times prior to revegetation.[6] In a semi-arid climate, these practices increase susceptibility to dust storms. However, soil conservation practices may be implemented to control wind erosion.

Physical and environmental effects

[edit]
Dust storm in Sahara, painted by George Francis Lyon

A sandstorm can transport and carry large volumes of sand unexpectedly. Dust storms can carry large amounts of dust, with the leading edge being composed of a wall of thick dust as much as 1.6 km (5,200 ft) high. Dust and sand storms which come off the Sahara Desert are locally known as a simoom or simoon. The haboob is a sandstorm prevalent in the region of Sudan around Khartoum, with occurrences being most common in the summer.

The Sahara desert is a key source of dust storms, particularly the Bodélé Depression[7] and an area covering the confluence of Mauritania, Mali, and Algeria.[8] Sahara dust is frequently emitted into the Mediterranean atmosphere and transported by the winds sometimes as far north as central Europe and Great Britain.[9]

Saharan dust storms have increased approximately 10-fold during the half-century since the 1950s, causing topsoil loss in Niger, Chad, northern Nigeria, and Burkina Faso.[10] In Mauritania there were just two dust storms a year in the early 1960s; there are about 80 a year since 2007, according to English geographer Andrew Goudie, professor at the University of Oxford.[11][12] Levels of Saharan dust coming off the east coast of Africa in June 2007 were five times those observed in June 2006, and were the highest observed since at least 1999, which may have cooled Atlantic waters enough to slightly reduce hurricane activity in late 2007.[13][14]

Sydney shrouded in dust during the 2009 Australian dust storm.

Dust storms have also been shown to increase the spread of disease across the globe.[15] Bacteria and fungus spores in the ground are blown into the atmosphere by the storms with the minute particles and interact with urban air pollution.[16]

Short-term effects of exposure to desert dust include immediate increased symptoms and worsening of the lung function in individuals with asthma,[17][18] increased mortality and morbidity from long-transported dust from both Saharan[19] and Asian dust storms[20] suggesting that long-transported dust storm particles adversely affects the circulatory system. Dust pneumonia is the result of large amounts of dust being inhaled.

Prolonged and unprotected exposure of the respiratory system in a dust storm can also cause silicosis,[21] which, if left untreated, will lead to asphyxiation; silicosis is an incurable condition that may also lead to lung cancer. There is also the danger of keratoconjunctivitis sicca ("dry eyes") which, in severe cases without immediate and proper treatment, can lead to blindness.[22]

Economic impact

[edit]

Dust storms cause soil loss from the drylands, and worse, they preferentially remove organic matter and the nutrient-rich lightest particles, thereby reducing agricultural productivity. Also, the abrasive effect of the storm damages young crop plants. Dust storms also reduce visibility, affecting aircraft and road transportation.[This paragraph needs citation(s)]

Dust can also have beneficial effects where it deposits: Central and South American rainforests get significant quantities of mineral nutrients from the Sahara;[23][24] iron-poor ocean regions get iron; and dust in Hawaii increases plantain growth. In northern China as well as the mid-western U.S., ancient dust storm deposits known as loess are highly fertile soils, but they are also a significant source of contemporary dust storms when soil-securing vegetation is disturbed.[This paragraph needs citation(s)]

On Mars

[edit]
Further information: Climate of Mars § Dust storms, and Atmosphere of Mars § Dust storms
Orbital view of a Martian dust storm

Dust storms are not limited to Earth and have also been known to form on Mars.[25] These dust storms can extend over larger areas than those on Earth, sometimes encircling the planet, with wind speeds as high as 25 m/s (60 mph). However, given Mars's much lower atmospheric pressure (roughly 1% that of Earth's), the intensity of Mars storms could never reach the hurricane-force winds experienced on Earth.[26] Martian dust storms are formed when solar heating warms the Martian atmosphere and causes the air to move, lifting dust off the ground. The chance for storms is increased when there are great temperature variations like those seen at the equator during the Martian summer.[27]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Dust storm

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A dust storm is a severe meteorological event in which strong winds lift vast quantities of fine dust particles from dry, barren surfaces, creating dense clouds that can span miles in width and height while drastically reducing visibility. These phenomena commonly occur in arid and semi-arid regions, propelled by gust fronts from thunderstorms or turbulent winds over loose soils with minimal vegetation cover. Dust storms transport particulates over hundreds or thousands of kilometers, influencing air quality, patterns, and ecosystems by depositing nutrients or contaminants far from source areas. Immediate hazards include zero-visibility conditions leading to traffic accidents and disruptions, alongside acute health effects such as respiratory irritation, exacerbated , and increased emergency visits for pulmonary issues. Long-term environmental consequences encompass , reduced agricultural productivity, and altered precipitation through interactions with clouds. Historically, the Dust Bowl storms of the 1930s in the United States stand out for their scale and socioeconomic fallout, where prolonged combined with poor generated "black blizzards" that buried machinery, destroyed crops, and displaced hundreds of thousands of residents. Modern occurrences, monitored via satellite, reveal increasing frequency in hotspots like the , , and Southwest Asia due to and climate variability, underscoring the need for predictive modeling and mitigation strategies.

Definition and Characteristics

Physical Properties and Formation Thresholds

Dust storms involve the atmospheric suspension of fine particulate matter, primarily dust particles derived from arid and semi-arid soils, with typical diameters ranging from less than 2 μm to over 50 μm, though particles smaller than 20 μm dominate long-range transport due to lower settling velocities. distributions during events often exhibit lognormal or normal patterns, varying with height above ground and storm intensity, with coarser fractions (>10 μm) concentrated near the surface and finer aerosols (<5 μm) lofted higher. These particles, mainly silicates, clays, and from weathered parent materials, possess irregular shapes and densities around 2.5–3.0 g/cm³, enabling prolonged suspension under turbulent flow but rapid deposition under calmer conditions. Initiation of dust storms demands wind speeds surpassing the entrainment threshold, defined by the velocity (u_{t}^) exceeding approximately 0.2–0.5 m/s, which corresponds to sustained 10-m wind speeds of 6–10 m/s or higher, contingent on surface characteristics such as and particle cohesion. content critically modulates this threshold; volumetric moisture below 2–5% minimizes forces between particles, allowing entrainment at lower velocities, whereas levels above 5–10% enhance cohesion and elevate u_{t}^ by up to 50% or more, suppressing emission. cover and aggregation further raise the threshold by increasing surface drag and binding forces, with bare, disturbed soils—such as those post-drought or —exhibiting the lowest resistance to aeolian lift. Empirical thresholds vary regionally; for instance, in East Asian deserts, dust emission frequencies rise sharply above wind speeds of 7–9 m/s under dry conditions.

Scale, Duration, and Visibility Impacts

Dust storms exhibit a wide range of scales, from localized events spanning tens of kilometers to regional and synoptic systems covering thousands of kilometers or more. Local dust storms, such as haboobs, typically form from outflows and extend horizontally up to a few hundred kilometers, with vertical heights reaching several kilometers. Larger synoptic-scale storms, driven by frontal systems or low-pressure troughs, can encompass areas exceeding 2,000 km in extent, as observed in classifications of dust events where regional storms surpass this threshold. Exceptional cases, like the June 2020 outbreak—dubbed the "Godzilla" plume—spanned the North Atlantic, transporting massive volumes of dust over intercontinental distances, with plume extents measured in thousands of kilometers via observations. Durations of dust storms vary inversely with their scale in many instances, though larger events can persist longer due to sustained meteorological forcing. Localized haboobs often last from minutes to a few hours, with dust concentrations peaking briefly before dissipation. Synoptic storms may endure for hours to several days; for example, shamal winds in the region have generated dust storms persisting up to five days. Prolonged events are documented in arid regions like , where dust storms have lasted up to 114 hours, driven by persistent wind regimes exceeding erosion thresholds. Dust particles can remain suspended post-storm for hours to days, extending indirect impacts, though active storm durations rarely exceed a week in terrestrial records. Visibility reductions define dust storms meteorologically, with horizontal visibility dropping to 1 km or less due to suspended particulate matter, often fine and clay particles under 50 µm in diameter. In intense events, visibility can approach zero meters, as fine scatters and absorbs light across visible wavelengths, severely impairing sightlines. This leads to immediate operational disruptions: halts from abrasion risks and obscured runways, road closures from traction loss and multi-vehicle collisions, and maritime hazards in coastal zones. For instance, the reduced Sydney's visibility to under 100 meters, grounding flights and halting port operations for hours. Such visibility impairments exacerbate safety risks, with empirical data from arid regions showing elevated accident rates during storms; drivers often experience sudden onset disorientation, contributing to crashes even at low speeds. Quantitatively, dust in severe storms can exceed values that attenuate visibility by orders of magnitude, with particle concentrations correlating directly to light extinction coefficients measured in field studies. These effects underscore the causal link between dust loading and perceptual hazards, independent of broader health or economic analyses.

Causes and Mechanisms

Meteorological Drivers

Strong surface winds, typically exceeding 15-25 m/s (54-90 km/h), constitute the primary meteorological force entraining and transporting dust particles into the atmosphere, with wind speeds generated by gradients and dynamic instabilities. These gradients arise from disparities in sea-level pressure, often amplified by the Coriolis effect, directing clockwise around high-pressure systems and counterclockwise around lows, thereby channeling winds across dust-prone arid surfaces. Convective processes, particularly thunderstorm outflows, drive localized dust storms known as haboobs, where downdraft-induced gust fronts propagate horizontally at speeds up to 100 km/h, scouring dry soils and reducing to near zero within minutes. Such events peak in arid regions during summer months when intense solar heating fuels development, with evaporative cooling in downdrafts enhancing momentum through density contrasts. Synoptic-scale systems, including cold fronts and extratropical cyclones, generate widespread dust storms by steepening baroclinic zones and postfrontal pressure surges, often yielding sustained winds from northerly or westerly directions in mid-latitude deserts. For example, rapid anticyclone intensification over continental interiors can produce postfrontal winds exceeding 20 m/s along southeast flanks, as observed in North American salt flats where cold air intersects dry source regions. Low-pressure troughs and associated undulations further intensify these gradients, with upper-level divergence promoting surface convergence and dust over vast areas. In subtropical contexts, seasonal pressure oscillations, such as those linked to monsoon retreats or cyclones, similarly catalyze regional outbreaks by funneling or cyclonic flows across erodible terrains.

Surface and Soil Preconditions

Dust storms require specific surface and conditions to initiate, primarily involving loose, fine-grained sediments that can be readily entrained by . The must contain a significant proportion of and clay particles, typically up to 50-60 μm in , as these sizes are most susceptible to aeolian transport due to their low settling velocity and ease of suspension. Coarser sands may initiate saltation but contribute less to long-range dust plumes, while finer particles dominate atmospheric loading during events. Soil moisture plays a critical role in binding particles and increasing the threshold friction velocity needed for ; emissions are negligible when volumetric soil moisture exceeds approximately 0.17 m³/m³, as capillary forces enhance inter-particle cohesion. Below a lower threshold of around 0.025 m³/m³, dry soils become highly erodible, with prolonged droughts exacerbating this by desiccating surface layers and reducing aggregate stability. Bare, crusted, or disturbed surfaces—such as those from or —further lower resistance by exposing unbound fines. Sparse vegetation cover is essential, as even modest plant density shelters the soil surface, reduces at ground level, and stabilizes particles through root networks and litter. Land uses like , intensive , or abandonment in arid regions diminish cover, increasing vulnerability; for instance, agricultural disturbances contribute minimally to global (<10%) but amplify local events by exposing tilled soils. Natural desert pavements or rocky surfaces provide some protection via armoring, but anthropogenic degradation often overrides this in dust-prone areas.

Types and Variations

Local and Convective Dust Storms (Haboobs and Dust Devils)

Local and convective dust storms originate from localized atmospheric instabilities driven by surface heating or thunderstorm outflows, distinguishing them from broader synoptic-scale events by their smaller spatial extent, typically spanning tens to hundreds of kilometers, and shorter durations of minutes to hours. These phenomena rely on convective processes where vertical motion lifts fine particulate matter from arid or semi-arid surfaces, requiring loose, dry soils with low cohesion thresholds—often particle sizes under 100 micrometers—for entrainment. Unlike regional storms, their intensity stems from microscale or density currents rather than frontal boundaries, leading to rapid onset and localized reductions to near zero over affected areas. Haboobs represent intense variants of convective dust storms, formed when evaporatively cooled downdrafts from thunderstorms generate a propagating current, or pool, that impinges on dry, erodible surfaces, producing gust fronts with speeds exceeding 50-100 km/h capable of suspending plumes up to 2-5 km high and several kilometers wide. This mechanism, first systematically observed in the of Africa, transfers momentum from the cold pool's leading edge to the surface, eroding soil via saltation bombardment where particles lofted to 1-2 meters impact and dislodge finer fractions. propagation speed correlates inversely with cold pool gradients, slowing over heterogeneous terrain but accelerating on uniform flats, as modeled in high-resolution simulations showing emission peaks within the head of the current. Notable examples include the 5 July 2011 event, where a outflow lofted over 10 million tons of , reducing visibility to under 100 meters across 100 km, and the April 2007 storms analyzed via runs validating radar-observed dust walls exceeding 3 km in height. These events underscore haboobs' role in 10-20% of annual emissions in monsoon-prone deserts, with from suspended aerosols further invigorating the cold pool. Dust devils, by contrast, emerge from fair-weather thermal in the , where diurnal solar heating generates buoyant updrafts over hotspots, inducing rotation through ambient shear or tilting of horizontal into vertical axes, forming transient vortices 10-100 meters in diameter and 100-1000 meters tall with tangential winds of 20-60 km/h. Unlike haboobs' organized fronts, dust devil genesis involves instability in the subcloud layer, with core temperatures 1-5°C warmer than surroundings due to adiabatic compression and reduced mixing, as measured in field campaigns revealing pressure drops of 1-10 hPa at the axis. They dissipate rapidly upon encountering cooler air or obstacles, lofting masses of 10-1000 kg per event, primarily from surfaces with friction velocities above 0.2 m/s, and occur at frequencies of 10-100 per km² daily in peak summer conditions over deserts like the southwestern U.S. or Martian analogs. Observational studies, including transects, classify most as weakly organized V-shaped funnels rather than columnar, with lifetimes under 10 minutes, contributing negligibly to global budgets but influencing local micrometeorology by enhancing turbulent mixing. While both phenomena exploit convective energy for dust mobilization, haboobs scale larger due to thunderstorm forcing—cold pool depths of 1-2 km versus dust devils' boundary-layer confinement—and pose greater hazards through sustained winds and broader coverage, as evidenced by comparative analyses showing haboob dust optical depths exceeding 2.0 compared to dust devils' under 0.1. Empirical thresholds for formation include surface temperatures over 40°C for dust devils and thunderstorm rainfall evaporation rates above 5 mm/h for haboobs, with below 2% critical in both cases to minimize cohesion.

Regional and Synoptic Dust Storms

Regional and synoptic dust storms encompass larger-scale phenomena than local convective events, arising from meso-alpha to synoptic systems that produce persistent strong over expansive arid terrains. These storms are characterized by spatial extents spanning hundreds to thousands of kilometers, durations of several hours to days, and widespread reductions often below 1 kilometer, driven by gradients associated with cyclones, fronts, troughs, and upper-level jets. Meteorological drivers include cold fronts displacing warm air masses over desiccated soils, generating gusts exceeding 20-30 m/s that erode and transport fine particles aloft. In contrast to localized haboobs tied to thunderstorm outflows, synoptic events feature broader atmospheric instability, such as undulations enhancing and dust lofting. Soil preconditions like low moisture and sparse vegetation amplify entrainment, with dust plumes capable of intercontinental transport. Prominent examples occur in major dust source regions. In the Sahara Desert, frontal systems and Red Sea Trough extensions trigger outbreaks affecting and beyond, with synoptic lows intensifying winds over loose . Gobi Desert storms, fueled by Mongolian vortices and northwesterly flows, routinely impact ; six such events originated in and reached northern in spring 2021, propelled by anomalous pressure patterns. In the , synoptic fluctuations like polar jet shifts have escalated dust activity; the March 2012 event across , , and featured winds of 25-30 m/s from jet positioning at 28-33° N, yielding elevated optical depths compared to subdued 2014 conditions. Australian regional storms, often from intense cold fronts, include the 22 November 2018 outbreak traversing to , markedly degrading air quality with particulate surges. These events underscore synoptic dominance in regional dust mobilization, distinct from isolated convective lifting.

Historical Occurrences

The Dust Bowl Era (1930s United States)

The Dust Bowl era encompassed a series of intense dust storms that ravaged the southern of the from approximately 1931 to 1939, with peak severity between 1934 and 1936. This period was characterized by prolonged conditions combined with widespread , affecting an estimated 100 million acres across parts of , , , , and . The region's , coupled with extensive plowing of native grasslands for production during the early , exposed loose topsoil to high winds, transforming fertile farmland into dust-laden wastelands. A primary exacerbating factor was the abandonment of traditional practices amid aggressive agricultural expansion following , when demand for wheat led farmers to cultivate marginal lands without adequate fallowing or . by cattle further compacted soil and reduced vegetative cover, while the lack of tree windbreaks allowed winds to strip away at rates exceeding 10 tons per acre annually in severely affected areas. Meteorological indicate that drought intensity reached extremes not seen since the late , with precipitation in parts of falling to less than 20 inches per year during 1934-1936, far below the long-term average of 25-30 inches. One of the most infamous events was the "Black Sunday" storm on April 14, 1935, when a massive front of dust originating from the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas engulfed the region, reducing visibility to near zero and depositing millions of tons of soil across the Plains and beyond. Winds gusted up to 60 miles per hour, carrying particulate matter as far as the Atlantic Coast, and eyewitness accounts described a wall of blackness advancing at speeds of 50-60 mph, prompting fears of biblical plagues among residents. This storm alone displaced an estimated 300 million tons of topsoil, exacerbating respiratory illnesses and livestock losses, with thousands of animals suffocating or starving due to buried feed sources. The socioeconomic fallout included the displacement of over 300,000-400,000 farmers and families, many migrating westward to in search of work, coining the term "Okies" for Oklahoma expatriates. Crop failures wiped out up to 75% of yields in 1935, contributing to farm foreclosures and deepening the Great Depression's impact in rural areas, where dropped by as much as 60% in affected counties. Health effects were profound, with "dust pneumonia" claiming hundreds of lives, particularly among children and the elderly, as fine silt infiltrated lungs and homes. In response, the U.S. government established the Soil Conservation Service in 1935 under the , promoting techniques such as , terracing, and shelterbelts of trees to restore soil stability. By 1938, federal programs had enrolled over 3 million acres in conservation practices, which helped mitigate storm frequency as rains returned, though full recovery spanned decades and underscored the interplay of natural variability and human land-use decisions in amplifying environmental disasters.

Other Major Events (Pre-Modern and Modern)

In ancient , frequent winter shamal dust storms, combined with a prolonged cold season, contributed to the collapse of the around 2200 BCE, as evidenced by oxygen isotope analysis of fossil corals from the indicating intensified arid conditions and storm frequency. These storms likely exacerbated and agricultural failure across the region's rain-fed farming areas, leading to societal breakdown. Historical records from document dust storm activity dating to the (221–207 BCE), with intensity varying in correlation with dynastic stability and land use changes; higher frequencies occurred during periods of political instability, such as the transition from the Ming to Qing dynasties, reflecting cycles of soil degradation and . Proxy records from northern over the past 500 years, including historical , show peaks in dust events during AD 1520–1580, AD 1610–1720, and AD 1870–2000, often linked to cold, dry winters and reduced vegetation cover. In modern times, the 2009 eastern Australian dust storm originated in regions of New South Wales and on September 23, sweeping across one-third of the continent and depositing an estimated 5–37 million tonnes of , with winds reaching 100 km/h and visibility reduced to near zero in , where red dust blanketed the city. This event, one of the largest recorded in since the , caused flight cancellations, power outages, and economic losses exceeding AUD 100 million from reduced and cleanup. A massive plume in June 2020, the most intense in nearly 50 years, originated in the and , transporting over 400 million tonnes of dust across the Atlantic to the and by June 25–28, suppressing formation and elevating particulate matter levels to hazardous thresholds (PM2.5 exceeding 150 μg/m³ in parts of the U.S.). observations confirmed its scale, with aerosol optical depth values surpassing 5 over the , highlighting the role of antecedent droughts in amplifying plume intensity. In March 2021, a mega dust storm swept northern from March 14–18, originating in the and , affecting over 10 provinces and reducing Beijing's visibility to under 100 meters with winds up to 40 m/s; it was classified as one of the strongest in a , linked to a strong and sparse spring vegetation, resulting in widespread respiratory issues and transport disruptions. Ground and satellite data indicated dust concentrations exceeding 10,000 μg/m³ in affected areas, underscoring vulnerabilities from and climate-driven arid trends.

Impacts

Environmental and Ecological Effects

Dust storms accelerate in arid and semi-arid regions by entraining fine particles through turbulent winds, stripping away nutrient-rich and exposing infertile subsoil layers, which diminishes land productivity over time. This process exacerbates , as repeated erosion reduces soil organic matter and water-holding capacity, creating feedback loops that hinder vegetation regrowth. In vulnerable ecosystems, annual soil losses from dust events can exceed 10 tons per , contributing to and long-term landscape degradation. On vegetation, dust storms inflict direct mechanical abrasion, scouring leaves and stems, which impairs and stunts growth; fine particles also clog stomata, reducing and increasing plant water stress. Seedlings and low-lying crops may become buried under deposited sediments, leading to higher mortality rates and shifts in composition toward more resilient, sparse species. These impacts cascade to , as and burial disrupt pollinator habitats and microbial communities essential for nutrient cycling, potentially lowering in affected grasslands and shrublands. Conversely, long-range dust transport can enrich distant ecosystems through nutrient deposition; for instance, delivers approximately 28 teragrams annually to the , supplying bioavailable (about 22,000 metric tons per year) and iron that counteract soil nutrient depletion and sustain rainforest productivity. Such inputs support in phosphorus-limited environments, influencing and microbial activity, though excessive deposition may alter local pH and favor over native flora. In marine-adjacent ecosystems, dust-derived iron fertilizes phytoplankton blooms, enhancing lower trophic levels but risking hypoxic zones from organic matter decay.

Health and Human Physiological Consequences

Dust storms expose humans to elevated concentrations of particulate matter, primarily PM10 and PM2.5, which can penetrate the and trigger inflammatory responses. Fine particles from dust events, often laden with silica, metals, and microbes, deposit in the alveoli, causing and epithelial damage that impairs and ciliary function. These effects manifest acutely as irritation and chronically as structural remodeling in repeated exposures. Respiratory consequences dominate documented outcomes, with dust inhalation exacerbating attacks, , and through and mucus hypersecretion. Studies in arid regions report up to a 44.9% focus on respiratory morbidity, including increased emergency department visits for lower respiratory infections and reduced forced expiratory volume in vulnerable populations. Fungal elements in dust, such as species, can precipitate acute infections like valley fever in immunocompromised individuals during intense storms. Cardiovascular impacts arise from systemic translocation of ultrafine particles into the bloodstream, elevating , heart rate variability disruptions, and risks of or . Epidemiological data link dust events to a 2.33% heightened mortality from circulatory diseases, attributed to and prothrombotic states induced by particulate-induced inflammation. In southwestern U.S. analyses, dust storms correlated with increased admissions, independent of concurrent pollutants. Ocular and dermal effects include and abrasions from coarse particles, while indirect risks encompass pathogen transport leading to gastrointestinal or vector-borne illnesses in dust-affected areas. Overall mortality rises modestly during events, with non-accidental deaths increasing by 7.4% at lag 2 days in some cohorts, disproportionately affecting the elderly and those with comorbidities. Long-term exposure in dust-prone regions associates with progression and premature mortality, underscoring dose-response relationships in particle composition and duration.

Economic and Infrastructural Disruptions

Dust storms inflict substantial economic losses globally, estimated at billions annually through direct damages and indirect disruptions. In the United States, erosion and dust events caused $154 billion in damages in 2017 alone, encompassing losses to , property, and other sectors, with figures likely higher in subsequent years due to increasing frequency. This includes $10 billion in losses from nutrient depletion and $40 billion in residential and damages from deposition and abrasion. Agricultural sectors bear heavy costs from erosion and reduced crop yields, with dust storm frequency linked to productivity declines of 1.5% to 24% across various crops, depending on exposure and management practices. In arid regions like , sand and dust accumulation on incurs annual repair and maintenance expenses exceeding $9 million, primarily affecting roads, buildings, and utilities through abrasion and . Cleaning infiltrated dust from homes, vehicles, and public facilities adds further burdens, as seen in the 2009 dust storm, where household and commercial cleanup costs totaled approximately A$299 million. Transportation networks face acute disruptions from zero-visibility conditions, leading to road accidents, rail halts, and aviation delays or cancellations. The same event imposed A$10.8 million in losses from grounded flights and A$7.5 million in broader productivity shortfalls via and halted operations. vulnerabilities extend to energy systems, where dust reduces solar photovoltaic by coating panels, diminishing output in dust-prone areas like . Overall, these events compound infrastructural wear, necessitating investments in resilient designs such as reinforced barriers and dust-suppressing coatings to mitigate recurrent damages.

Controversies and Debates

Role of Human Land Management vs. Natural Cycles

Dust storms arise from the interaction of meteorological conditions—such as strong winds, low soil moisture, and aridity—with surface characteristics, prompting debate over whether human land management practices primarily drive their occurrence or merely exacerbate natural cycles of drought and wind erosion. Geological records indicate that dust mobilization has been a recurrent natural phenomenon throughout Earth's history, independent of anthropogenic influence; for instance, dust deposition rates were markedly higher during the last glacial period compared to the current interglacial, as evidenced by sediment cores showing elevated aeolian inputs across vast regions. Similarly, a 10,000-year reconstruction from Great Plains lake sediments reveals periodic peaks in dune activity and dust storm intensity correlating with severe multi-decadal droughts around 2.5 and 3.8 thousand years ago, driven by fluctuations in precipitation and vegetation cover without modern human intervention. These findings underscore that natural climatic variability, including orbital forcings and atmospheric circulation patterns, has long generated dust events in arid and semi-arid zones. Human land management, however, can significantly amplify dust emissions by altering soil stability and vegetation, particularly in marginal ecosystems. In the 1930s Dust Bowl of the United States, severe droughts from 1930 to 1936 affected 100 million acres, but deep plowing of native grasslands for wheat monoculture, combined with over-reliance on summer fallow and inadequate crop rotation, exposed topsoil to wind erosion, transforming episodic dry spells into catastrophic storms that carried billions of tons of dust eastward. Modeling studies confirm that land degradation from these practices not only initiated but intensified the drought through reduced evapotranspiration and altered regional albedo, contributing up to 30% more precipitation deficit than natural variability alone. In the Sahel region of Africa, overgrazing by expanding livestock populations and woody vegetation clearance for fuelwood and agriculture have degraded soils since the mid-20th century, increasing wind erosion rates and dust storm frequency during dry seasons; satellite observations link a 20-30% loss in vegetative cover to heightened Saharan dust outflows affecting distant ecosystems. Globally, approximately 25% of current dust emissions stem from such anthropogenic sources, including unsustainable irrigation and tillage that compact soils and diminish organic matter. The controversy centers on attribution: while natural cycles provide the requisite dry conditions and winds—evident in pre-industrial records—empirical data from proxies and meteorological observations show that changes have elevated dust storm susceptibility in populated , with fallow farmlands and degraded pastures emerging as dominant sources in regions like the U.S. Midwest and . Frequency trends since 1986 indicate a modest global increase of 0.02% per year in events, partly tied to loss from rather than solely climatic shifts, though disentangling these requires caution given observational biases in historical data. Proponents of a dominant role cite cases like the Sahel's , where policy failures in management reversed partial recoveries during wetter decades, yet critics note that core sources remain naturally barren, and restoration efforts, such as , demonstrate reversible anthropogenic contributions without negating underlying aridity cycles. Ultimately, causal realism favors viewing mismanagement as a multiplier rather than a primary originator, as storms predate widespread and persist in uninhabited deserts.

Influence of Climate Variability and Anthropogenic Climate Change

Natural climate variability, encompassing interannual fluctuations in , temperature, and regimes, exerts a primary control on dust storm and intensity. Strong surface , often exceeding 20 m/s in source regions, are the dominant driver of dust mobilization, with maximum and mean wind speeds accounting for the majority of variability in Asian dust activity over recent decades. Drier soil conditions and elevated surface temperatures, which reduce vegetation cover and soil cohesion, further amplify dust emissions during anomalous dry periods, as observed in northern during spring 2021 and 2023 events. Decadal-scale oscillations, such as shifts in the or , correlate with prolonged droughts that enhance dust storm occurrences, though empirical records show no uniform global trend in over the 20th century, with regional hotspots like the exhibiting cycles tied to variability rather than monotonic change. Long-term observational data reveal mixed trends in dust storm days, with increases noted in parts of the and Southwest Asia after 2009, attributed to episodic wind strengthening and deficits. In , climatic shifts including reduced rainfall and higher have been linked to heightened dust mobility, with statistical models indicating a positive between anomalies and dust indices over 1997–2019. Conversely, some regions display declines; for instance, cyclone-driven dust storms in are projected to decrease through 2100 under current climate trajectories, reflecting weakened synoptic forcing. These patterns underscore that natural variability—rather than a singular directional trend—governs much of the observed flux, with empirical indices like the Dust Storm Index confirming decadal oscillations over multi-year baselines in dust belt areas. Anthropogenic climate change, driven by greenhouse gas emissions, introduces potential modifications to dust dynamics through altered hydrological cycles and atmospheric circulation, but empirical evidence remains regionally heterogeneous and does not support a global intensification. In arid Central Asia, observed warming since the mid-20th century has weakened dust storm intensity by diminishing north-south temperature gradients, thereby reducing wind speeds essential for erosion; reanalysis data from 1961–2018 show a statistically significant decline in dust days concurrent with a 1–2°C temperature rise. Globally, recent warming trends correlate with attenuated dust activity, as stabilized lower atmospheres suppress convective lifting and aeolian transport, countering expectations of dust increases from soil drying alone. Peer-reviewed analyses of surface observations indicate no robust attribution of rising dust emissions to anthropogenic forcing, with projections of future aridity-driven upticks in regions like the southwestern United States remaining model-dependent and unverified by post-2000 records. While some reports claim heightened dust storm severity from anthropogenic warming via expanded drylands, these often rely on simulations rather than direct measurements and frequently entangle climate signals with land-use degradation, which independently contributes 19–25% of total dust emissions through practices like overgrazing and tillage. In and , where dust sources dominate global emissions (over 50%), observed weakening challenges narratives of uniform escalation, highlighting the primacy of circulation changes over precipitation deficits in net dust budgets. Uncertainty persists in attribution, as natural decadal modes can mimic anthropogenic signals, necessitating disentanglement via event attribution studies that currently yield inconclusive results for dust-specific extremes.

Mitigation and Adaptation

Agricultural and Soil Conservation Techniques

Agricultural and soil conservation techniques aim to minimize wind by protecting from exposure, enhancing structure, and reducing tillage intensity, thereby mitigating dust storm formation. During the Dust Bowl era, the U.S. Service, established in 1935, promoted practices such as , which aligns field operations with natural topography to form ridges that slow wind and water flow, reducing loss. Contour farming has been shown to decrease by up to 50% compared to up-and-down slope methods by trapping particles and residues. Shelterbelts, consisting of tree rows planted as windbreaks, were extensively implemented under President Franklin D. Roosevelt's initiative from 1934 to 1942, with approximately 220 million trees installed across the to interrupt wind speeds and stabilize . These barriers reduce wind velocity sufficiently to limit the lifting of soil particles, with effectiveness enhanced by continuous, gap-free planting. Complementary methods included strip cropping and terracing on acquired erosion-prone lands, which alternated crops with sod strips to anchor and demonstrated viability in halting dust sources. In contemporary , conservation —encompassing no-till and reduced-till systems—preserves crop residues on the surface to shield against wind , significantly lowering dust storm risks in vulnerable regions. Integrating cover crops with these practices boosts , maintains continuous root systems, and minimizes bare periods, as evidenced by programs incentivizing such adoption to avert events akin to historical disasters. and diverse planting further enhance resilience by improving soil aggregation and reducing vulnerabilities to wind detachment. These techniques collectively address causal factors like excessive and fallowing, prioritizing empirical protection over intensive cultivation.

Technological and Policy Interventions

Technological interventions for dust storms emphasize monitoring, forecasting, and direct suppression of airborne particles. The World Meteorological Organization's Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System (SDS-WAS), established in , integrates data from over 25 global and regional models, satellites, and ground sensors to produce daily dust forecasts, enabling proactive measures like public alerts and reduced outdoor activities during high-risk periods. Similarly, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts employs high-performance atmospheric modeling to predict dust transport, drawing on real-time observations to improve accuracy in regions prone to transboundary storms. Soil stabilization technologies target source prevention by binding erodible surfaces. , such as those forming networks between particles, enhance cohesion on roads and bare lands, reducing lift-off by up to 90% in treated areas according to field tests. Emerging methods use microbial-induced precipitation to solidify sand dunes, offering a low-carbon alternative that has shown efficacy in lab and field trials for controlling emissions in arid zones. These approaches complement mechanical barriers but require site-specific application to avoid unintended ecological shifts. Policy interventions focus on regulatory frameworks and international coordination to enforce mitigation. The United Nations Convention to Combat (UNCCD) Policy Advocacy Framework, released in 2022, recommends integrating sand and dust storm definitions into national laws, alongside incentives for sustainable to curb anthropogenic contributions like . In 2024, the European Commission's guideline urged embedding early warning s into agriculture, health, and transport policies, citing reduced socioeconomic costs from timely interventions. Nationally, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla's 2024 bill proposed a dedicated federal , addressing gaps in arid regions like the Southwest where dust events have intensified. Such policies prioritize empirical monitoring over unsubstantiated attributions, though implementation varies due to jurisdictional challenges in transboundary dust flows.

Extraterrestrial Dust Storms

Martian Dust Storms and Their Dynamics

Martian dust storms arise from winds exceeding threshold velocities that lift fine, loose particles—typically 1-10 micrometers in diameter—from the surface into the thin atmosphere, where low (about 38% of Earth's) and reduced air pressure (0.6% of Earth's) allow particles to remain aloft for weeks or months. These events range from localized dust devils and small-scale storms to regional outbreaks and rare planet-encircling global storms, which can last several months, envelop the planet in red dust, raise atmospheric dust opacity to levels that obscure surface features from , and block sunlight to solar panels, causing energy shortages for habitats and equipment. Dust particles exhibit electrostatic charging, promoting aggregation and adhesion to surfaces, which influences storm persistence and fallout patterns. The dynamics of these storms are driven primarily by seasonal solar heating during Mars' southern spring and summer (solar longitude Ls ≈ 180°–360°), when perihelion alignment intensifies insolation and generates strong meridional temperature gradients, fueling baroclinic waves and convergence zones near the receding south polar cap. Initial dust lifting often occurs along the polar cap periphery or in low-lying basins like , where topographic lows amplify wind speeds; subsequent lofting involves semi-regular "B"-type storms with poleward dust plumes injecting material above 50 Pa pressure levels, creating positive feedbacks through radiative heating that further destabilizes the atmosphere and propagates storms equatorward. Global storms, such as the 2018 event (Mars Year 34), emerge when multiple regional outbreaks merge, elevating planetary dust loading and inducing large-scale circulation changes, including dust tides that drive rapid meridional transport and alter global wind patterns. Observationally, dust storm frequency varies interannually, with regional events occurring predictably each southern summer but global storms recurring irregularly every 2–3 Mars years (approximately 3.5–5.5 Earth years), as documented since telescopic observations and confirmed by missions like Mariner 9 (1971 global storm) and Viking orbiters. These storms profoundly impact atmospheric dynamics by heating the lower atmosphere—raising temperatures by up to 50–100 K—and expanding the Hadley cells, which redistribute heat and trace gases globally; however, they also degrade visibility to near zero at the surface and reduce solar irradiance by 50–90% during peaks, critically affecting rover operations, as seen in the Spirit rover's power loss and Opportunity's mission-ending failure in 2018 due to dust-covered solar panels depleting batteries. Recent models highlight underappreciated near-surface wind strengths, exceeding 20–30 m/s in some cases, underscoring the role of dust devils in initiating and sustaining lofting.

References

  1. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/about/k-12-education/dust-ash-fire-smoke/what-dust-storm
  2. https://www.weather.gov/safety/wind-dust-storm
  3. https://wmo.int/topics/sand-and-dust-storms
  4. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/strong-winds-sweep-desert-dust-across-the-persian-gulf
  5. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/its-dusty-world-noaa-satellites-help-us-keep-track-of-it
  6. https://research.noaa.gov/how-deadly-are-dust-storms/
  7. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sand-and-dust-storms
  8. https://www.lung.org/clean-air/emergencies-and-natural-disasters/dust-storms
  9. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/54889/noaa_54889_DS1.pdf
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8150667/
  11. https://drought.unl.edu/dustbowl/
  12. https://www.weather.gov/oun/events-19350414
  13. https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-highlights-hotspots-health-hazards-and-economic-cost-of-sand-and-dust-storms
  14. https://www.arl.noaa.gov/news-pubs/arl-news-stories/fengsha/
  15. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jgrd.50855
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Dust-particles-average-size-distributions-during-the-four-different-meteorological_fig12_288074233
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0004698187902058
  18. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/9161/
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31467
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/dust-storm
  21. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006JD007988
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4072227/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016706119328800
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963725000023
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6192056/
  26. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/agrmet/60/5/60_481/_pdf
  27. https://www.weather.gov/media/psr/Dust/2020/1_Rogers_Dust_Storm_Presentation_DustWorkshop2020.pdf
  28. https://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/propagation/mars/MarsPub_sec5.pdf
  29. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/study-on-historical-saharan-dust-outbreaks-from-rainfall-and-sedimentary-rocks-released-online-in-the-bulletin-of-the-american-meteorological-society/
  30. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/146913/a-dust-plume-to-remember
  31. https://ecology.wa.gov/blog/july-2024/dust-storms-how-to-protect-yourself
  32. https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/storms/dust-storm3.htm
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720374830
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/dust-storm
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584425000352
  36. https://www.ecomena.org/effects-sand-dust-storms/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755727/
  38. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JD036272
  39. https://artsci.tamu.edu/news/2025/03/what-causes-the-powerful-winds-that-fuel-dust-storms-wildfires-and-blizzards.html
  40. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC%252000-6A%2520Chap%25204-6.pdf
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169809516307293
  42. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JGRD..12838089X/abstract
  43. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017JD026672
  44. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-62362024000100027
  45. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/11/1435
  46. https://www.unccd.int/media/46003/open
  47. https://wesr.unep.org/media/docs/assessments/global_assessment_of_sand_and_dust_stormsx.pdf
  48. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD044005?af=R
  49. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2003gl019216
  50. https://cales.arizona.edu/oals/ALN/aln51/chavez.html
  51. https://vandenheever.atmos.colostate.edu/vdhpage/papers/Bukowski-vdH-JAS-2022.pdf
  52. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/14125/noaa_14125_DS1.pdf
  53. https://opensky.ucar.edu/system/files/2024-08/articles_22200.pdf
  54. https://vandenheever.atmos.colostate.edu/vdhpage/papers/Bukowski-vdH-JGR-2021.pdf
  55. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JD028486
  56. https://science.nasa.gov/resource/dust-devil-schematic/
  57. https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/7/1/12
  58. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/context/physics_facpubs/article/1199/viewcontent/Jackson___dust_devil_populations_typeset__orig_MS_.pdf
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Different-generic-types-of-synoptic-scale-dust-storms-here-depicted-for-the-northern_fig5_276847600
  60. http://dust.swclimatehub.info/2.3
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963724000417
  62. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-62362023000300124
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107411/
  64. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/great-depression-and-world-war-ii-1929-1945/dust-bowl/
  65. https://fdr.blogs.archives.gov/2018/06/20/fdr-and-the-dust-bowl/
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4015056/
  67. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/10/191024093606.htm
  68. https://www.foxnews.com/science/ancient-mesopotamian-empire-collapsed-dust-storm
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14765-4
  70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11430-020-9730-2
  71. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia12239-australias-red-dawn/
  72. https://theconversation.com/raining-one-week-dusty-the-next-how-did-a-dust-storm-make-it-all-the-way-to-rainy-sydney-251600
  73. https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2020/06/saharan-dust-cloud-was-most-intense-in-decades/
  74. https://wmo.int/media/news/severe-sand-and-dust-storm-hits-asia
  75. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/104/4/BAMS-D-22-0151.1.xml
  76. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.2650
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0341816222005616
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111001682500554X
  79. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/83ee0568-769a-454d-a69e-e94fb8309c85/content
  80. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL063040
  81. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/17/2673/
  82. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020GB006536
  83. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022GH000728
  84. https://pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/431
  85. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2830116
  86. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021RG000763
  87. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42530-w
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247357/
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5089887/
  90. https://www.utep.edu/newsfeed/2025/february/dust-storms-and-wind-erosion-cause-154-billion-in-damages-annually-utep-study-shows.html
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9901775/
  92. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010200
  93. https://www.publish.csiro.au/rj/fulltext/RJ12085
  94. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124458/?ln=en
  95. https://ucdust.ucsd.edu/impacts/
  96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257708670_The_geologic_records_of_dust_in_the_Quaternary
  97. https://eas2.unl.edu/~dloope/pdf/Miao.pdf
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002962918301010
  99. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0810200106
  100. https://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/16124
  101. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JD034687
  102. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02306-0
  103. https://www.sara-conservation.com/blog-content/weathering-the-dust-bowl
  104. https://livinghistoryfarm.org/farming-in-the-1930s/crops/contour-plowing/
  105. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/contour-farming-7-shocking-soil-water-benefits
  106. https://www.chesapeakeconservation.org/lightning-update/looking-back-to-look-forward-220-million-trees-planted/
  107. https://www.montana.edu/extension/lila_extn/WindbreaksandShelterbeltsArthereallyworthit.html
  108. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/1053
  109. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2489/jswc.2023.0619A
  110. https://www.striptillfarmer.com/articles/5998-dust-storms-identifying-farm-solutions
  111. https://www.farmprogress.com/conservation-and-sustainability/dust-storms-resurface-farmers-urged-to-adopt-soil-health-practices-to-prevent-erosion
  112. https://www.wcbu.org/local-news/2023-05-24/cover-crops-and-conservation-tillage-could-reduce-likelehighway-dust-storms
  113. https://www.noble.org/legacy/2021-summer/soil-erosion-preventing-another-dust-bowl/
  114. https://community.wmo.int/en/activity-areas/gaw/science-for-services/sds-was
  115. https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/collaboration-key-combating-sand-and-dust-storms
  116. https://stories.ecmwf.int/forecasting-dust-storms/index.html
  117. https://envirotacinc.com/how-soil-stabilization-helps-minimize-dust-storm-effects/
  118. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.202403961
  119. https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2023-11/20220701_Policy-Advocacy-Framework-Sand-Dust-Storms.pdf
  120. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/guideline-integration-sand-dust-storm-management-key-policy-areas_en
  121. https://sd18.senate.ca.gov/news/senator-padilla-introduces-measure-creating-dust-storm-forecasting-and-warning-system
  122. https://www.preventionweb.net/news/how-can-we-mitigate-impacts-dust-storms
  123. https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/the-fact-and-fiction-of-martian-dust-storms/
  124. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190027303/downloads/20190027303.pdf
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103523001197
  126. https://www.universetoday.com/articles/the-winds-on-mars-are-stronger-than-we-thought
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.