Hubbry Logo
SipiniqSipiniqMain
Open search
Sipiniq
Community hub
Sipiniq
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sipiniq
Sipiniq
Sipiniq
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In Inuit culture, sipiniq (Inuktitut: ᓯᐱᓂᖅ; West Greenland Inuttut: sipineq, from sipi meaning "to split", plural sipiniit)[1][2] refers to a person who is believed to have changed their physical sex as an infant, but whose gender is typically designated as being the same as their perceived original sex.[3] In some ways, being sipiniq can be considered a third gender.[4] In Inuit Nunaat this concept is primarily attested in areas of the Canadian Arctic, such as Igloolik and Nunavik,[5] as well in Greenland such as Kitaamiut Inuit and Inughuit, though Iiviit used the words tikkaliaq and nuliakaaliaq.[2] The Netsilik Inuit used the word kipijuituq for a similar concept.[6]

Birth

[edit]

The change of sex could occur as a fetus while still in the womb, or at the moment of birth. For example, a newborn infant might be perceived as having a penis and testicles that "split open" at the moment of birth to become a vagina and labia. That infant would be socially designated as being male despite possessing sex organs usually perceived as female.[4] In a more complex example of a sex change that occurred before birth, one Inuk woman described having memories of being the soul of her own deceased maternal grandfather, who entered her own mother's uterus and became a male fetus. When the time came for birth, the fetus rejected being born male and was born physically as a female.[7]

Fieldwork conducted in the 1970s indicated that two-thirds of sipiniit were male infants who had become female, and were then designated as male (the reverse could occur, albeit more rarely).[1][5] Long and difficult births were often attributed to sipiniit infants.[8] Other physical signs that an infant was sipiniq include genital ambiguity (ranging from swelling due to edema to genitals with intersex features) and genitals blocked by mucus at birth.[9]

Socialization

[edit]

A sipiniq person was regarded socially as a member of their designated gender, in a process that has been termed "reverse socialization".[10] They would be named after a deceased relative of the designated gender, learn skills[11] and perform work associated with that gender, and wear traditional clothing tailored for that gender's tasks. An individual was usually treated as sipiniq until puberty, but in some cases they retained the role into adulthood and even after marriage.[1][4] Sipiniit were considered to be strong intermediaries between the natural and spiritual worlds, making them prime candidates for taking on the role of an angakkuq, or shaman. Many sipiniit married other sipiniit, but they could also marry cisgender individuals – being sipiniit reflected a gender role and not a sexuality.[1][4] Some Inuit reported a belief that women who were or had been sipiniit would give birth to sipiniit children themselves.[12]

Anthropological perspectives

[edit]

French anthropologist Bernard Saladin D'Anglure was responsible for much of the early scholarly research into sipiniit, beginning in the late 1970s.[1] He used the term "perinatal transsexuality" to describe the concept of a gender transition that could happen in the womb or at the moment of birth. He noted that the Inuit had an increased rate of female pseudohermaphroditism, which may have contributed to the origin of the concept of sipiniit. However, he also noted that it did not account for all or even most cases of sipiniit people, as most female pseudohermaphrodites were sterile, but most sipiniit were not.[7]

Some researchers have attempted to find demographic, economic, or psychological reasons for the designation of a child as sipiniq. It has been argued that sipiniq arose in order to help even out the sex ratio in families which only had children of a single gender. Saladin D'Anglure regarded such arguments as "impoverish[ing] the Inuit reality," and argued that reverse socialization among the Inuit originated from an underlying family ideal that reflected the balanced order of the universe in microcosm.[10] The ideal Inuit family consisted of a "male-female couple (spouses) and a brother-sister pair".[10] When the family unit did not accord with the ideological ideal, the family would employ reverse socialization or sipiniq designation of a newborn to restore balance.[13]

Canadian anthropologist Betty Kobayashi Issenman regarded the designation of a child as a sipiniq to be a spiritual practice whereby the child incorporated the spirit of the deceased relative, rather than an expression of the child being transgender.[5]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sipiniq

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sipiniq is a in traditional cosmology denoting an believed to have spontaneously altered its physical at or shortly after birth, often interpreted as a shift from the presumed fetal sex—typically a male fetus becoming female, with the child then raised socially as male. These individuals, drawn from ethnographic accounts among groups like the Iglulik and , were integrated into by adopting the roles, names, and attire of their assigned , frequently exhibiting traits valued in hunters or shamans, such as enhanced spiritual sensitivity or skill in male-dominated tasks. Anthropologist Bernard Saladin d'Anglure, through decades of fieldwork in beginning in the 1950s, documented sipiniq within broader narratives of tied to and rebirth, emphasizing rituals to "stabilize" ambiguous newborns and the cultural acceptance of such figures as bridging binary sexes in a cosmology where souls could influence embodiment. While these beliefs facilitated social adaptation in resource-scarce environments—contrasting with documented practices like selective that skewed adult sex ratios toward males—modern scholarly interpretations often frame sipiniq as precolonial evidence of gender diversity, though reliant on oral histories susceptible to retrospective bias in post-contact retellings.

Etymology and Definition

Linguistic Origins

The term sipiniq (Inuktitut: ᓯᐱᓂᖅ) derives from the Inuktitut root sipi, which literally means "to split," evoking the notion of a physical division or transformation of genital organs during birth. The plural form is sipiniit, while in West Greenlandic Inuttut it appears as sipineq. This etymology underscores a direct linguistic tie to observed or believed anatomical changes without implying abstract symbolism. The word is attested primarily in dialects of spoken by central Canadian groups, including the Iglulik () dialect, where ethnographic documentation has preserved its usage. Variations in , such as sipiniit for plural or individuals, reflect phonetic adaptations across related . Early 20th-century ethnographers, building on oral traditions, first recorded the term in written form during fieldwork among communities, with systematic analysis emerging in mid-century studies that linked it explicitly to sipi. For instance, anthropological accounts from the 1960s onward confirmed its roots in narratives of infant physiology, distinguishing it from broader or shamanic terminology.

Core Concept

Sipiniq constitutes a traditional cosmological belief in a sex transformation of an during birth, most frequently from to , whereby the fetal is absorbed internally to develop into a , yielding a biological despite the prior configuration. This process is attributed to precipitating factors such as fetal , prolonged or arduous delivery, or other birth complications, manifesting as an abrupt, metaphysical reconfiguration rather than gradual development. Regarded as an exceedingly rare phenomenon, sipiniq represents an anomalous exception within understandings of determination, distinct from any pervasive cultural acceptance of or elective role adoption. Unlike voluntary gender expressions—such as individuals assuming cross- behaviors through personal agency—sipiniq entails a non-volitional, fated alteration, with social rigidly anchored to the initially perceived at , reflecting the transformative event's finality. This fixation underscores the belief's emphasis on immutable post-birth alignment, precluding ongoing variability.

Traditional Inuit Beliefs

Belief in Infant Sex Change

In traditional Inuit cosmology among groups such as the Iglulik, sipiniq denotes the belief that an could undergo a spontaneous physical transformation during late or the birth process itself, often interpreted as the action of spiritual forces or the autonomous agency of the fetus's body parts. This phenomenon was typically described as a shift from male to female, with the reportedly retracting or being absorbed internally to form a , as observed by midwives during delivery. Such beliefs aligned with Inuit animism, a positing that all elements of the body, including sex organs, harbored independent spirits or vital forces capable of independent action and , independent of the overarching soul () that otherwise predetermined at conception. Ethnographic records from the late , drawing on oral histories collected in , recount specific instances where fetuses exhibited traits prenatally—such as through maternal sensations or divinations—only for these to invert at birth without external intervention, attributed to the inua (spirit-owner) of the genitalia asserting dominance. These accounts emphasized the rarity of sipiniq, occurring in a small fraction of births amid a normative framework where binary sex determination via the atiq was presumed stable in the vast of cases, with unambiguous or outcomes at delivery.

Identification Criteria

In traditional beliefs, particularly among the Iglulik, identification of a sipiniq infant centered on observable physical changes during or immediately after birth, where the newborn initially presented with genitalia that appeared to retract, split open, or transform into genitalia. This phenomenon was interpreted as a , often from to , and was distinguished from mere ambiguity by the perceived dynamic alteration rather than static traits. Elder women, serving as midwives, were primarily responsible for noting these signs during delivery, sometimes invoking rituals to attempt stabilization of the genitalia if the change seemed imminent. Shamans (angakkuq) could become involved post-birth if the transformation was confirmed, performing ceremonies to affirm or influence the 's destined sex, reflecting the belief in spiritual forces governing such events. Behavioral indicators at birth were minimal, as relied heavily on these genital observations rather than later traits. To preserve lineage continuity, the —despite the female outcome—was named after a deceased male relative, embodying the (name-soul) of that individual and signaling the child's social designation as male. Ethnographic records from Iglulik in the describe these identifications as anecdotal and infrequent, with no quantified population incidence available, though researchers noted them as exceptional rather than routine occurrences in oral histories and community accounts.

Social Roles and Integration

Gender Assignment and Socialization

In traditional beliefs, sipiniq referred to infants perceived to have undergone a sex change from to during birth or delivery, with their social assigned as to reflect the original fetal . This assignment was reinforced through the naming system, where the child inherited the name-soul of a deceased relative, embedding them within the male lineage and spiritual continuity despite observable female . Midwives and elders monitored births for signs of such transformation, such as genital , to affirm the male designation and prevent reversion. Socialization of sipiniq children emphasized conformity to norms from infancy, including in boys' attire and early exposure to male-oriented activities like tool handling, overriding biological markers until or prompted potential adjustments. Community enforcement was strict, with parents and kin directing upbringing to align with the presumed essence, as deviation risked disrupting structures and task divisions essential for survival in conditions. This practice prioritized causal continuity of the soul's original gender over anatomical reality, viewing the change as a temporary instability resolved through social reaffirmation rather than a basis for fluid identity. Ethnographic accounts from in the 1970s indicate such individuals comprised about 2% of the population, integrated via this rigid framework to maintain binary role stability.

Occupational and Familial Duties

Sipiniq individuals, believed to have undergone a sex change from to at birth, were raised in male social roles and expected to contribute to subsistence activities traditionally assigned to men, including expeditions, driving, care, and construction. For instance, Iqallijuq, documented in during the 1970s, accompanied her stepfather on hunts and mastered these skills while dressed as a until . Such duties aligned with the economy's reliance on sealing, , and caribou , where physical endurance was essential, though sipiniq adapted despite limiting strength or reproductive contributions to patrilineal continuity. In familial contexts, sipiniq preserved male lineage by bearing names of deceased male relatives and fulfilling provider roles that sustained networks, such as supplying and hides to extended families, without invoking third-gender exemptions from labor norms. This integration emphasized for perceived anomalies rather than privileged status; anthropological fieldwork in from 1971–1973 recorded sipiniit as approximately 2% of the population, performing these duties routinely alongside males. Biological constraints, including inability to father children, necessitated reliance on adoptive or reincarnative naming practices to maintain (name-soul) transmission, ensuring cultural continuity without altering core obligations. Some sipiniq later shifted to female tasks like or post-puberty, reflecting pragmatic rather than rigid categorization.

Relationships and Reproduction

Marriage Patterns

In traditional Inuit society of the Iglulik region, sipiniq individuals participated in marriage arrangements similar to those of other community members, with parents or elders deciding pairings often at or shortly after birth. These unions followed standard and residential patterns, lacking distinct rituals or elevations that set them apart from typical marriages. Ethnographic accounts indicate no prohibitions against sipiniq forming partnerships with individuals of unambiguous biological sex, allowing integration into broader familial networks that reinforced camp cohesion. Male-socialized sipiniq, biologically female due to the believed sex transformation at birth, typically paired with women in roles aligning with their social designation as men. Such marriages held full social validity within the community but produced no , as the individuals lacked male reproductive capacity; this absence affected patrilineal descent but did not undermine the partnership's role in alliance-building or household duties. Documented cases from Iglulik, where sipiniq comprised approximately 2% of the population in the , show these unions contributing to group stability without special communal recognition.

Fertility and Lineage Considerations

In kinship systems, individuals classified as sipiniq—typically those exhibiting a believed sex transformation at birth, such as from to female anatomy while retaining a male-associated soul ()—faced biological constraints on when socialized into male roles. Those with female genitalia but raised as males could not children, rendering them infertile in the context of patrilineal expectations for household perpetuation. This limitation was addressed through widespread custom , a practice documented as occurring in up to 40-50% of families in some communities, which transferred children between kin networks to maintain labor balance and social continuity without reliance on biological progeny. Lineage preservation emphasized the , or reincarnated name-soul derived from deceased ancestors, over genetic transmission. The atiq could manifest in a sipiniq individual regardless of anatomical , ensuring spiritual continuity through naming rituals that linked the child to prior incarnations, thereby bypassing biological . Ethnographic records from in the 1970s, where sipiniit (plural) comprised about 2% of births, show no attribution of elevated shamanistic status to their reproductive limitations; instead, roles focused on practical duties like (for male-socialized) or (for female-socialized), integrated into family units via or soul-based . This underscores a cultural framework where soul essence trumped physical reproduction in sustaining lineage.

Anthropological Documentation

Early Ethnographic Records

One of the earliest detailed ethnographic accounts of sipiniq emerged from Dufour's fieldwork among the in the mid-1970s, where she described it as a phenomenon involving infants believed to undergo a physical sex change shortly after birth, most commonly from to . Dufour's observations, published in 1975, drew from direct interviews and community narratives in northern and Iglulik regions, noting that such transformations were attributed to spiritual or fetal decisions rather than observable medical processes. These reports emphasized cultural acceptance of the belief, with affected individuals raised in the gender corresponding to their post-transformation , though Dufour highlighted the reliance on retrospective oral testimonies without independent physiological confirmation. Pre-1950s documentation remains sparse, with polar explorer journals from the late 19th and early 20th centuries offering no explicit references to sipiniq despite extensive interactions; instead, such sources focused on survival practices and , potentially overlooking or misinterpreting gender-related s due to ethnocentric lenses. Early 20th-century collections of oral traditions, such as those from expeditions, occasionally alluded to fluid concepts tied to or atiq (name-soul) inheritance, but these predated formalized sipiniq terminology and prioritized mythological over case-specific details. Dufour's work thus represents a pivotal shift toward documenting sipiniq as a distinct cultural construct rooted in Iglulik oral histories, underscoring the phenomenon's emphasis on in spontaneous change over empirical transformation evidence.

Key Studies and Researchers

Rose Dufour's 1975 study, "Le phénomène du Sipiniq chez les d'Iglulik," published in Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec, represents one of the earliest systematic examinations of sipiniq based on direct interviews with Iglulik informants. Dufour documented reported cases of sex transformation during birth, primarily from male to female, with the child subsequently raised according to the observed genitalia despite initial perceptions. The research emphasized qualitative narratives from a small cohort of elders, limiting generalizability due to non-random sampling and absence of quantitative validation, though it provided foundational ethnographic detail on the phenomenon's cultural embedding. Bernard Saladin d'Anglure, a French anthropologist, advanced documentation through fieldwork in communities during the late 1970s, integrating sipiniq into analyses of cosmology and in publications such as those in Études/Inuit/Studies. His work, including explorations of linked to rebirth cycles, drew on extended and consultations with shamans, revealing sipiniq as a perceived biological event tied to spiritual precedents rather than mere . Methodological strengths included cross-verification across informants, but constraints persisted from small-scale and reliance on translators, which could distort -specific gender and cosmological nuances. These studies underscore the challenges in anthropological inquiry into sipiniq, where informant recall and interpretive introduce variability; Dufour's interview-based approach offered immediacy but lacked longitudinal tracking, while d'Anglure's cosmological framing enriched at the expense of empirical corroboration beyond . Subsequent citations in peer-reviewed affirm their influence, though both highlight the rarity of documented cases—often fewer than a dozen per community—necessitating cautious extrapolation.

Interpretations and Debates

Cultural Significance in Inuit Society

In Inuit society, sipiniq functioned primarily as a cosmological explanation for rare instances of perceived sex change in utero, allowing communities to assign such individuals to a fixed binary opposite their apparent at birth, thereby integrating anomalies into essential labor divisions without disrupting social cohesion. This practice aligned with the adaptive necessities of life, where rigid male and female domestic roles maximized survival odds in resource-scarce environments; by reclassifying a biologically female infant as socially male if believed to have originated as male, sipiniq ensured the individual fulfilled productive duties matching the "intended" sex, rather than idling or creating role ambiguity. Empirical accounts from ethnographic fieldwork indicate sipiniq cases were exceptional, not normative, with no population-level data supporting prevalence beyond anecdotal or mythological reports— Saladin d'Anglure's estimate of roughly 2% derives from interpretive cosmology rather than verification, and documented instances remain sparse in pre-contact records. These individuals received no elevated ritual or ; instead, they were socialized strictly within binary norms, performing tasks, wearing attire, and receiving names aligned with the assigned , underscoring a mechanism for exception-handling that reinforced rather than challenged dichotomous structures. Interpretations positing sipiniq as evidence of a "third gender" or pre-colonial gender fluidity lack substantiation in primary Inuit testimonies, which consistently frame sex and gender as fundamentally binary categories, with sipiniq as a variant accommodated within them to avert disequilibrium—claims of inherent acceptance or spiritual prestige often reflect modern anthropological overlays rather than indigenous causal logics prioritizing group functionality over individual variance. This binary-preserving role counters narratives of widespread fluidity, as causal analysis reveals that in small, kin-based bands facing high mortality, deviations threatening role specialization would undermine viability, favoring assimilation over innovation.

Comparisons to Biological Anomalies

In cultural beliefs, sipiniq was attributed to a sex transformation occurring or at birth, typically converting a into a female, with the allegedly absorbed to form a . This cosmological explanation, rooted in concepts like the (name-soul) that could transcend during rebirth, prioritized spiritual causation over observable . Ethnographic records, such as those from Bernard Saladin d'Anglure's fieldwork among the of in the 1970s, describe sipiniq as rare but integrated into social roles, with the child raised strictly in the adopted to fulfill communal needs, like balancing ratios in small bands. No pre-contact or early post-contact accounts document physical examinations revealing anatomical anomalies, such as ambiguous genitalia, underscoring the primacy of belief systems in interpreting human variation absent modern diagnostics. Speculative comparisons have been drawn to biological conditions, where genital ambiguity at birth—potentially from disorders like (CAH), affecting approximately 1 in 15,000 births worldwide and causing excess that virilizes female genitalia—might have been misperceived as a dynamic shift. However, such parallels remain unverified in contexts; CAH prevalence data from populations show no elevated rates correlating with sipiniq reports, and traditional healers lacked tools to distinguish hormonal etiologies from . Causal realism suggests that if biological anomalies contributed, they would manifest as static developmental errors rather than the fluid, intentional change described in oral traditions, which served adaptive functions like ensuring reproductive viability in harsh environments with high rates. Absent empirical confirmation, these analogies highlight how pre-modern societies reframed rare phenotypes through animistic lenses, without the empirical dissection enabling today's distinctions between dimorphism exceptions and cultural constructs. Unlike modern paradigms advocating or delayed binary assignment for or dysphoric individuals, sipiniq entailed immediate, irreversible socialization into a fixed , often male-associated in despite female presentation, to integrate the individual productively into kin networks. This early fixation, documented in 20th-century ethnographies, prioritized causal stability—aligning the child's with observed traits for shamanic or familial harmony—over exploratory , reflecting ecological pressures where s were tied to survival tasks like or . Such practices underscore a binary framework with pragmatic exceptions, diverging from post-1960s Western emphases on and models, which lack equivalent evidence from indigenous records emphasizing resolution over ongoing ambiguity.

Criticisms and Skepticism

Empirical Evidence and Verifiability

Accounts of sipiniq derive primarily from ethnographic fieldwork, such as that conducted by anthropologist Bernard Saladin d'Anglure among in the 1970s, where informants reported infants spontaneously altering external genitalia during or shortly after birth, as observed by midwives. These narratives, preserved in oral traditions, lack corroboration through objective measures like autopsies, histological examinations, or genetic assays, rendering them unverifiable by modern standards. No peer-reviewed studies document preserved tissues or longitudinal medical records confirming anatomical in purported sipiniq individuals. Biological determinism undermines claims of postnatal sex mutability: human sex is established at fertilization via chromosomal complement—typically XX for females and XY for males, with the SRY gene on the Y chromosome initiating gonadal differentiation into testes by week 7 of gestation. This process yields immutable gamete production (ova or ), unaffected by anecdotal reports of transient genital ambiguity, which may reflect observational errors, conditions like , or cultural interpretations rather than true sex change. Spontaneous reversal postnatally contradicts established , as no endogenous mechanism exists to reprogram somatic sex characteristics or chromosomes without lethal genetic instability. Assertions of sipiniq frequency or societal integration, often cited in anthropological texts as common enough to influence marriage patterns, absent quantitative ethnographic censuses or demographic data from pre-contact populations. Early explorer logs and missionary records from the , while noting fluidity, provide no systematic tallies or biological validations, highlighting reliance on , potentially biased recollections prone to in shamanistic contexts. This evidentiary gap favors interpreting sipiniq as explanatory of rare anomalies over empirically substantiated phenomenon.

Risks of Modern Projections

Modern reinterpretations of sipiniq, particularly in activist discourse and as of 2025, frequently recast the practice as evidence of pre-colonial endorsement of or -like acceptance, aligning it with contemporary narratives of diverse identities. For instance, discussions frame sipiniq individuals as embodying split or changed from birth, drawing parallels to modern experiences without acknowledging the underlying belief in a singular, irreversible physical transformation—typically from to —leading to a fixed social role opposite the apparent biology. This overlooks ethnographic indicating that sipiniq children were rigidly socialized into the gender of their presumed pre-natal , performing corresponding tasks (e.g., hunts, ) and receiving names from deceased kin of that gender to ensure lineage continuity. Anthropological analyses influenced by prevailing institutional biases toward spectrum-based models exacerbate these risks, projecting Western constructs of elective fluidity onto exceptions rooted in binary cosmology and survival imperatives. Traditional accounts emphasize sipiniq as a rare, cosmologically determined anomaly—often linked to shamanic intervention or fetal transformation—resolved through permanent role assignment to maintain household balance in resource-scarce conditions, not as validation of personal exploration. Such impositions can distort source materials, as seen in selective emphases on "third sex" elements while downplaying the practice's integration into patrilineal or matrilineal naming-soul () systems that reinforced binary norms. This mirrors broader critiques of cultural appropriation in Indigenous , where modern fluidity paradigms eclipse adaptive, context-specific mechanisms. A truth-oriented approach prioritizes empirical to these fixed-role dynamics, recognizing sipiniq as a pragmatic cultural tool for anomalies (e.g., ambiguous genitalia or behavioral deviations) rather than proto-endorsement of identity variance. Misprojection not only anachronizes practices but undermines causal understanding of how rigid binaries facilitated resilience in isolated, kin-dependent societies, potentially fueling unsubstantiated claims of universal historical .

References

  1. https://www.persee.fr/doc/emong_0766-5075_1995_num_26_1_1066
  2. https://transreads.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021-07-23_60fa0ef1b4064_InuitStoriesofBeingandRebirthGenderShamanismandtheThirdSexbyDAnglureBernardSaladinz-lib.org_.pdf
  3. https://uofmpress.ca/books/authors/bernard-saladin-danglure
  4. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.3138/9781442670761-009/html
  5. https://shs.cairn.info/article/E_RDM_039_0197?lang=en
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2744084
  7. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/etudinuit/2006-v30-n1-etudinuit1810/016151ar.pdf
  8. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3138/9781442670761-009/html
  9. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/etudinuit/2006-v30-n1-etudinuit1810/016151ar/
  10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1043851/
  11. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/as/2007-v31-n3-as2313/018381ar/
  12. https://uofmpress.ca/books/inuit-stories-of-being-and-rebirth
  13. https://belongingnetwork.com/article/inuit-custom-adoption/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4438859/
  15. https://leapintothevoidwithme.wordpress.com/2016/04/09/kinship/
  16. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520915442-005/html
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42869568
  18. https://dokumen.pub/amerindian-rebirth-reincarnation-belief-among-north-american-indians-and-inuit-9781442670761.html
  19. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/congenital-adrenal-hyperplasia/symptoms-causes/syc-20355205
  20. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17817-congenital-adrenal-hyperplasia
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18787377/
  22. https://www.nas.org/academic-questions/33/2/in-humans-sex-is-binary-and-immutable
  23. https://acpeds.org/sex-is-a-biological-trait-of-medical-significance/
  24. https://www.instagram.com/p/DIjupOaTfgR/
  25. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/ijih/article/download/36363/29726/103806
  26. https://culturallyboundgender.wordpress.com/2013/03/09/toward-an-end-to-appropriation-of-indigenous-two-spirit-people-in-trans-politics-the-relationship-between-third-gender-roles-and-patriarchy/
  27. https://scholarworks.alaska.edu/bitstream/handle/11122/12535/Apok_C_2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.