Hubbry Logo
PostgenderismPostgenderismMain
Open search
Postgenderism
Community hub
Postgenderism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Postgenderism
Postgenderism
Postgenderism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Graffiti advocating the abolition of gender
Part of a series on
Feminism
History
Waves
Timelines
Women's suffrage by country
Intersectional variants
Socialist
Multicultural
Other variants
Religious variants
Movements and ideologies
Concepts
Outlooks
Theory
Areas of study
By continent/country
Lists and categories
Lists
Categories
Part of a series on
Transgender topics
     
Gender identities
Health care practices
Rights and legal status
Society and culture
Events and awareness
Culture
Theory and concepts
By country
Rights
See also
Transhumanism
Issues
People
Influential works
Variants
Related topics

Postgenderism is a social, political and cultural movement which arose from the eroding of the cultural, psychological, and social role of gender, and an argument for why the erosion of binary gender will be liberatory.[1]

Postgenderists argue that gender is an arbitrary and unnecessary limitation on human potential, and foresee the elimination of involuntary psychological gendering in the human species as a result of social and cultural designations and through the application of neurotechnology, biotechnology, and assistive reproductive technologies.[citation needed]

Advocates of postgenderism argue that the presence of gender roles, social stratification, and gender differences is generally to the detriment of individuals and society. Given the radical potential for advanced assistive reproductive options, postgenderists believe that sex for reproductive purposes will either become obsolete or that all post-gendered humans will have the ability, if they so choose, to both carry a pregnancy to term and impregnate someone, which, postgenderists believe, would have the effect of eliminating the need for definite genders in such a society.[citation needed]

Cultural roots

[edit]

Postgenderism as a cultural phenomenon has roots in feminism, masculism, along with the androgyny, metrosexual/technosexual and transgender movements. However, it has been through the application of transhumanist philosophy that postgenderists have conceived the potential for actual morphological changes to the members of the human species and how future humans in a postgender society will reproduce. In this sense, it is an offshoot of transhumanism, posthumanism,[2] and futurism.[citation needed]

In the 19th century, Russian philosopher Nikolay Chernyshevsky believed that "people will be happy when there will be neither women nor men".[3]

Urania, a feminist journal privately published between 1916 and 1940, advanced the abolishment of gender;[4] each issue was headed with the statement: "There are no 'men' or 'women' in Urania."[5]

One of the earliest expressions of postgenderism was Shulamith Firestone's 1970 book The Dialectic of Sex. It argues,[6]

[The] end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of the first feminist movement, not just the elimination of male privilege but of the sex distinction itself: genital differences between human beings would no longer matter culturally. (A reversion to an unobstructed pansexuality Freud's 'polymorphous perversity'—would probably supersede hetero/homo/bi-sexuality.) The reproduction of the species by one sex for the benefit of both would be replaced by (at least the option of) artificial reproduction: children would be born to both sexes equally, or independently of either, however one chooses to look at it; the dependence of the child on the mother (and vice versa) would give way to a greatly shortened dependence on a small group of others in general, and any remaining inferiority to adults in physical strength would be compensated for culturally.

Gayle Rubin expresses in "The Traffic in Woman" (1975) her desire for "an androgynous and genderless (though not sexless) society, in which one's sexual anatomy is irrelevant to who one is, what one does, and with whom one makes love."[7]

Another important and influential work in this regard was socialist feminist Donna Haraway's essay, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century", in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp. 149–181. In this work, Haraway is interpreted as arguing that women would only be freed from their biological restraints when their reproductive obligations were dispensed with. This may be viewed as Haraway expressing a belief that women will only achieve true liberation once they become postbiological organisms, or postgendered.[citation needed] However, Haraway has publicly stated that their use of the word "post-gender" has been grossly misinterpreted.[8]

The term "postgenderism" is also used by George Dvorsky to describe the diverse social, political, and cultural movement that affirms the voluntary elimination of gender in the human species by applying advanced biotechnology and assisted reproductive technologies.[9]

Ideas

[edit]

Postgenderism in gender roles and sexuality

[edit]

According to George Dvorsky's article "Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary", postgenderists are not exclusively advocates of androgyny, although most believe that a "mixing" of both feminine and masculine traits is desirable—essentially the creation of androgynous individuals who exhibit the best of what females and males have to offer in terms of physical and psychological abilities and proclivities. Just what these traits are precisely is a matter of great debate and conjecture.[1] Here, postgenderism is not concerned solely with the physical sex or its assumed traits, but on the idea of eliminating or moving beyond gendered identities. In traditional gender constructs, one is either a man or woman, but in postgenderism one is neither a man nor woman nor any other assumed gender role—thus an individual in society is simply an agent of humanity who is to be defined (if at all) by one's actions.[1]

Dvorsky also states that postgenderists maintain that a genderless society does not imply the existence of a species uninterested in sex and sexuality, but rather that sexual relations and interpersonal intimacy can and will exist in a postgendered future in different forms.[1] Regarding potential assistive reproductive technologies, it is believed that reproduction can continue to happen outside of conventional methods, namely intercourse and artificial insemination. Advances such as human cloning, parthenogenesis, and artificial wombs may significantly extend the potential for human reproduction.[1]

These ideas also propose posthuman space will be more virtual than real. Individuals may be uploaded minds living as data patterns on supercomputers or users engaged in immersive virtual realities. Postgenderists contend that these types of existences are not gender-specific thus allowing individuals to morph their virtual appearances and sexuality at will.[1]

Postgenderism in humanist and socialist theory

[edit]

Postgenderism can overlap with discussions of gender in humanism, namely about how humanist attitudes toward gender can promote unequal gender binaries. Discussions of these ideas include how anthropocentrism defines essentialist qualities of humanity that are put upon gender—informing hierarchal social structures, like the patriarchy, that subjugate and dominate whoever becomes "non-human" within those hierarchies.[10] For postgenderists, or posthumanists discussing gender, this can mean breaking down the boundaries around what defines humanity by encouraging connections with nature and machines and expanding the possibilities for human identities by deprioritizing "natural" notions of gender through technological principles within gender movements, like xenofeminism and "object-oriented feminisms."[10]

Donna Haraway's "The Cyborg Manifesto" creates a socialist and posthuman basis for dismantling social hierarchies, namely through "the utopian tradition of imagining a world without gender." Haraway discusses how her theoretical figure of the "cyborg" occupies a postgender world that is independent and illegitimate from Western structures of patriarchal domination and how modern technology can make that figure a social reality.[11] For postgender feminists, this involves manipulating forms of technology that shape binary control over gender — like biotechnology, immunology, and communication systems — to restructure or "recode" those narratives.[11] Moreover, Haraway's definitions, like her "informatics of domination," navigate social theories regarding gender, sexual bodies, and reproduction towards the virtual and technological to eliminate "organic" notions of essential social inequalities within gender and sex, which extending towards race and class, addressing intersectionality in postgenderism.[11]

Postgenderism in science fiction

[edit]

Science fiction can provide the means to express ideas of postgenderism through popular media, with literary or visual fiction media having the capability to explore the potential for technology to create postgender bodies and societies. The Cage of Zeus by Sayuri Ueda expresses a science-fiction postgender society where technological advancements allow people to alter their sex and gender however they desire. However, this fictitious society also appears as dystopian due to widespread discrimination against "Rounds," genetically engineered intersex people, describing the presence of discrimination between "natural" and "unnatural" gender identities.[12] Literary analysis of the book's postgender themes expresses potential problems that can arise from a society with postgender technologies, like the fetishization of postgender bodies, commercialized monopolization of gender identity, and limiting the possibilities of postgender expression to a strictly techno-biological basis.[12]

Analysis of postgenderism in science fiction films can emphasize how gender appears through inhuman entities. The realm of "alien feminism" mainly explores how science fiction films use posthuman subjects to critique stereotypical gendered identities in film.[13] Examples include Ex Machina (2014) in how the film presents the feminine-appearing cyborg character Ava (Alicia Vikander) as characterized by stereotypically feminine sexuality but is eventually revealed to be manipulating these traits to her advantage. According to that analysis, Ava's physical progression towards feminine humanity is artificial, allowing her to escape the forms of male dominance.[13] Another example is Under The Skin (2013), where an alien (Scarlett Johansson) takes the form of a human woman to murder men but later begins to experience and struggle with how gender is socially and violently imposed upon human female bodies, even when that body is inherently inhuman. The analysis concludes that these films do not wholly achieve postgender ideas but express postgenderism as a basis to resolve posthuman gender issues within science fiction.[13]

Marge Piercy, an American feminist writer, engages with these themes in her work Woman on the Edge of Time. In her novel a possible future is presented in which either sex can play either role in the childbearing process.[14]

Criticism

[edit]

Transfeminist Julia Serano criticizes the idea of "end of gender", pointing out the negative impact it has on transgender people. On one hand, they are taken up as "undermining the gender system", while on the other, they are regularly criticized for strengthening gender stereotypes. In her opinion, feminism should fight for "end of sexism", rather than "end of gender". At the same time, Serano questions what should be considered the end of gender and what a society without gender should look like. She asks the question: "Who gets to decide what is gender and what is not?"[15]

In Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, contributor Matthew J. Cull considers multiple formulations of gender abolitionism from varying perspectives and argues that they are uniformly transphobic and imperil trans lives.[16]

Novels with postgenderist themes

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Postgenderism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Postgenderism is a speculative philosophical position and social advocacy originating within thought, positing that advancing technologies such as artificial wombs, , and will enable humanity to transcend and ultimately eliminate binary roles and distinctions, thereby freeing individuals from the biological and social constraints associated with sex differences. Proponents, including ethicist James Hughes and George Dvorsky, argue in their 2008 essay that imposes unnecessary hierarchies and limitations, which emerging reproductive and cognitive technologies could render obsolete by decoupling reproduction from and allowing customizable identities beyond male-female binaries. This view extrapolates from observed prenatal influences on —shaped by genes and hormones—toward a future where such factors are engineered away, though it remains hypothetical without current empirical demonstration of feasibility or societal benefits. The concept draws from radical feminist critiques of and genderqueer challenges to binaries, framing postgenderism as a liberatory rather than mere equality within existing categories, yet it has drawn for potentially disregarding evolved sexual dimorphisms that underpin and social structures, as evidenced by persistent biological sex differences in outcomes across and cultures. Despite affiliations with progressive ideologies, postgenderism's reliance on unproven technological utopias highlights its divergence from empirically grounded policy, with no large-scale implementations or validated models to date, positioning it as a niche extension of rather than a mainstream . Critics from conservative and realist perspectives contend it risks undermining units and natalist incentives by prioritizing abstract over causal realities of , though advocates counter that such shifts could enhance human flourishing by mitigating gender-based inequities.

Definition and Core Concepts

Fundamental Principles


Postgenderism maintains that human distinctions, arising from biological , represent an arbitrary constraint on individual potential and societal harmony. Advocates assert that these distinctions foster division, limit empathy across sexes, and perpetuate historical patterns of and inequality, such as patriarchal structures enabling male dominance over reproduction. George Dvorsky and James Hughes, in their 2008 analysis, argue that gender roles contribute to measurable disparities, including higher injury rates among males in risk-taking behaviors—four boys per girl on playgrounds—and reduced male due to suppressed . A core principle is the voluntary elimination of involuntary gendering through technological intervention, transforming gender traits from fixed biological imperatives into optional expressions of personal preference. This entails decoupling reproduction from via methods like (artificial wombs) and (), thereby obviating the need for complementary sexes in procreation. Postgenderists envision , including and hormone modulation from conception, alongside to reshape brain structures associated with gendered cognition, allowing fluid or absent gender identities without psychological dissonance. Unlike universal , this approach preserves diversity in traits but subordinates them to individual agency rather than normative binaries. The philosophy integrates with transhumanist ideals of , positing that cybernetic enhancements and virtual realities will further erode gender's salience by enabling radical body reconfiguration or disembodied existence. Dvorsky and Hughes contend this erosion, already underway through contraceptives, fertilization, and gender-transition technologies since the mid-20th century, promises liberation from gender-based oppression and expanded human capabilities, though they acknowledge ethical debates over and identity in such transformations. Proponents differentiate postgenderism from mere cultural deconstructionism by emphasizing technological transcendence over social alone, viewing biology as malleable rather than immutable. Postgenderism differs from in its narrow focus on transcending gender dimorphism as a core objective, whereas encompasses broader enhancements to human cognition, longevity, and physical capabilities without mandating the elimination of sex-based traits. Proponents like George Dvorsky and James Hughes position postgenderism as a targeted of transhumanist technologies, such as for altering gendered psychological predispositions and for decoupling reproduction from , arguing that retaining binary unnecessarily limits . In contrast to , particularly radical variants, postgenderism rejects ameliorating inequalities within existing gender roles in favor of their technological obsolescence. While early radical feminists like advocated cybernetic wombs to liberate women from biological reproduction—envisioned in her 1970 book as a means to dismantle patriarchal structures—postgenderism extends this by promoting universal access to gender-optional bodies, critiquing feminist goals as insufficiently ambitious for failing to address involuntary biological gendering. Dvorsky and Hughes emphasize that postgenderism avoids endorsing universal , instead enabling chosen gender traits, which diverges from feminist emphases on social reform over radical morphological redesign. Postgenderism is distinct from transgenderism, which typically involves individuals aligning their physical presentation or social role with an internal sense of an opposite binary gender through hormones, surgery, or social transition. advocates, such as those described by in her 1995 book Apartheid of Sex, frame transgenderism as a challenging rigid sex-gender norms within the binary framework, often seeking recognition of transitioned identities as authentic sexes. Postgenderists, however, view such transitions as interim steps toward eradicating the binary altogether, utilizing advanced technologies like or customizable virtual embodiments to render gender irrelevant rather than reassigning it. Unlike abolitionism in radical feminist or anarchist traditions, which seeks to dismantle social norms and hierarchies through cultural and political means while often preserving sex-based biological realities for analysis of , postgenderism insists on biotechnological intervention to neutralize dimorphic differences at their source. abolitionists like those critiqued by focus on ending performative roles without altering , potentially retaining sex categories for equity purposes. Postgenderism, by contrast, anticipates artificial gametes, , and cognitive reprogramming to make sex differences elective, arguing that purely sociocultural abolition leaves latent biological pressures unaddressed. This technological imperative sets it apart from theory's celebration of as an ongoing spectrum within human variability, positioning postgenderism as a endpoint beyond fluidity toward optionality unbound by dimorphism.

Historical Origins and Development

Early Influences in 20th-Century Thought

Shulamith Firestone's 1970 book : The Case for Feminist Revolution articulated one of the earliest explicit calls for transcending biological sex differences through , positing that women's stemmed from and could be resolved via artificial wombs and cybernetic systems to eliminate the "sex class" system. Firestone argued that engineering reproduction outside the body would dismantle the family unit and divisions, enabling a society where individuals are freed from innate physiological constraints associated with sex. This vision drew on Marxist frameworks but extended them to advocate for biotechnological intervention as the pathway to feminist liberation, influencing later postgenderist thought by framing as a means to optionalize or eradicate sex-based roles. Preceding Firestone, scientific futurists like in his 1929 essay The World, the Flesh, and the Devil speculated on humanity's escape from biological limitations, including extrauterine reproduction and morphological modifications that could render sex differences elective or obsolete in a post-biological existence. Bernal envisioned crystalline human forms and communal child-rearing decoupled from parental biology, presaging postgenderist emphases on , though his focus was broader transhumanist rather than targeted gender abolition. Similarly, J.B.S. Haldane's 1924 lecture Daedalus; or, Science and the Future introduced —gestation in mechanical devices—as a tool for gender equity by relieving women of pregnancy burdens, sparking debates on how such innovations might reshape sexual division of labor. Donna Haraway's 1985 "A Cyborg Manifesto" further developed these threads by conceptualizing the as a hybrid entity in a "post-gender world," rejecting binary oppositions of /, /, and / in favor of fluid, constructed identities unbound by organic determinism. Haraway critiqued essentialist while promoting technoscientific reconfiguration to dissolve gender categories, influencing postgenderism's integration of with anti-dualistic philosophy. These mid- to late-20th-century ideas, rooted in and speculative science, laid conceptual groundwork for postgenderism's later , though they often prioritized ideological over empirical validation of biological sex dimorphisms.

Emergence in Transhumanist Discourse (2000s Onward)

Postgenderism emerged as a distinct concept within discourse in the mid-2000s, formalized in the 2008 monograph Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary co-authored by George Dvorsky and James J. Hughes. This publication, affiliated with the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET), extrapolated ongoing technological trends—such as advancements in reproductive and neuropharmacology—to argue for the erosion of binary gender roles as liberatory for human potential. Dvorsky, a Canadian and Sentient Developments blogger, and Hughes, IEET's , positioned postgenderism as a subset of , emphasizing voluntary transcendence of biological sex dimorphism through tools like and customizable gametes. The monograph built on transhumanist principles of , extending them to gender by critiquing binary assignments as arbitrary constraints rooted in evolutionary necessities that technology could render obsolete. It referenced prior cultural examples of gender variance, such as historical third genders, but innovated by integrating them with 21st-century projections, including stem-cell-derived gametes enabling same-sex reproduction and brain-computer interfaces for psychological . Proponents viewed this as aligning with transhumanist advocacy for radical and enhancement, distinct from mere genderqueer identities by prioritizing technological abolition over social reform alone. In the ensuing discourse, postgenderism influenced transhumanist debates on , appearing in IEET publications and writings, though it remained a niche perspective amid broader focuses on and AI. Dvorsky further elaborated on it in essays, framing gender elimination as ethically permissible under consent-based enhancement paradigms, provided technologies like artificial wombs mature by the 2020s or 2030s. Critics within and outside questioned its feasibility and desirability, citing persistent biological dimorphisms, but the concept persisted in discussions of futures, as in Greg Egan's 1997 novel , which prefigured genderless digital entities.

Philosophical Underpinnings

Transhumanist and Posthumanist Foundations

Postgenderism emerges as a specific application of principles, which emphasize the use of advanced technologies to enhance capabilities and overcome biological limitations, including those associated with . Transhumanists advocate for , the right of individuals to modify their bodies through , , and genetic engineering, extending this liberty to the reconfiguration or elimination of gender-specific traits. This foundation posits that human sex differences, while evolutionarily adaptive for reproduction, impose unnecessary constraints in a technologically advanced society where reproduction can be decoupled from via and artificial wombs. In their 2008 essay "Postgenderism: Beyond the ," transhumanists George Dvorsky and James J. Hughes formalized postgenderism as an extrapolation of technologies eroding the biological, psychological, and social roles of , arguing for its eventual voluntary transcendence to achieve greater personal autonomy and equality. Dvorsky, a prominent transhumanist and editor at Sentient Developments, and Hughes, a sociologist and executive director of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET), frame postgenderism as a radical extension of feminist critiques of , positing that advanced reproductive technologies—such as and —could render binary obsolete by enabling customizable embodiments free from reproductive imperatives. They contend that postgender bodies, whether through full cyborgization or digital consciousness transfer, would prioritize cognitive and experiential enhancements over dimorphic specialization. Posthumanist thought complements these transhumanist foundations by challenging anthropocentric humanism's implicit , including gendered ontologies rooted in embodied norms. , as articulated in philosophical critiques since the late , deconstructs the subject as a fixed , advocating for hybrid, non-binary forms of existence that dissolve traditional oppositions like male/female. While focuses on optimistic technological augmentation, provides a theoretical scaffold for postgenderism by questioning the primacy of organic sex differences, envisioning futures where identity emerges from relational assemblages rather than . Proponents like Dvorsky integrate this by suggesting that postgenderism aligns with goals of transcending species-typical morphologies, though empirical feasibility remains tied to speculative advancements in and AI.

Intersections with Humanist and Socialist Theories

Postgenderism draws on socialist feminist thought, particularly Shulamith Firestone's 1970 analysis in , which posits that gender oppression stems from women's biological role in reproduction and class exploitation under , advocating cybernetic technologies like artificial wombs to liberate humanity from sex distinctions. Firestone contended that "the end goal of the feminist revolution must be... the elimination of the sex distinction itself," viewing technological transcendence of reproduction as essential for egalitarian socialism beyond mere role equalization. This aligns postgenderism with Marxist-inspired critiques of how biological dimorphism reinforces divisions of labor and power, proposing materialist solutions through rather than socioeconomic reform alone. Philosopher Alison Jaggar, in her 1983 socialist feminist framework, further intersects by endorsing the transformation of sexed physiological capacities—such as and —via to enable fluid, egalitarian access to human functions traditionally gendered. Postgenderists extend this to argue that persistent sex differences hinder collective equality, echoing socialist aims to dismantle hierarchical structures, though they emphasize individual morphological choice over state-directed uniformity. In humanist theories, postgenderism parallels Enlightenment-era emphases on rational self-overcoming and human flourishing by framing gender binaries as arbitrary barriers to potential, resolvable through technological enhancement. Proponents like James Hughes, a transhumanist advocating democratic distribution of enhancements, view transcending as advancing secular humanist goals of and capability expansion, free from . This intersection posits that equalizing access to postgender technologies would realize humanist ideals of universal human dignity, prioritizing empirical progress in and over essentialist views of sexed identity.

Proposed Technological Pathways

Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering

Proponents of postgenderism, such as James Hughes and George Dvorsky, propose that and could enable the transcendence of biological sex differences by allowing individuals to modify or eliminate sex-linked traits. In their analysis, they suggest gene therapies to selectively suppress genetic expressions tied to male or female dimorphism, such as those influencing secondary sexual characteristics or hormone production, potentially creating androgynous or customizable phenotypes. This approach extrapolates from emerging tools like CRISPR-Cas9, which as of 2023 has been used in limited human trials for monogenic diseases but remains far from routine germline editing for like sex differentiation due to off-target effects and mosaicism risks documented in preclinical studies. Genetic engineering is also envisioned to decouple from through gametogenesis (IVG), where somatic cells are reprogrammed into oocytes or , bypassing the need for opposite-sex gametes. Hughes and Dvorsky cite projected advancements in tissue cloning and stem cell-derived gametes, estimating feasibility within 20-30 years from , though as of , IVG has succeeded only in mice, with applications limited to ethical debates and early-stage halted by regulatory bodies like the FDA over safety concerns including epigenetic abnormalities.00345-6) Complementary biotechnologies, such as hormone modulation via engineered viruses or nanoparticles, could further erode binary roles by enabling dynamic control over traits like muscle mass or fat distribution, which are sexually dimorphic due to genes on the X and Y chromosomes. These proposals align with broader transhumanist goals of but face empirical hurdles rooted in the pleiotropic effects of sex-linked genes, such as SRY on the driving testis development, which cannot be simply "suppressed" without disrupting essential functions like or , as evidenced by disorders of sexual development (DSDs) where partial interventions yield high rates of and complications. Postgender advocates attribute current limitations to technological immaturity rather than inherent biological constraints, yet no peer-reviewed studies as of demonstrate scalable, safe engineering of post-sexual humans, with most applications confined to therapeutic corrections rather than elective redesign.

Cybernetic and Morphological Freedom Approaches

, a concept advanced by transhumanists including in her 1990 Transhumanist Manifesto and elaborated by , asserts an individual's right to alter their body's form, function, and cognitive capacities beyond inherited biological limits, encompassing enhancements like prosthetics and genetic modifications. In postgenderist frameworks, this principle facilitates the obsolescence of binary sex differences by permitting custom morphologies—such as agender synthetic bodies or fluid —through technologies like and hormone modulation, rendering genital and secondary sex traits elective rather than deterministic. Proponents, including James Hughes, contend that such freedoms would expand self-expression, with options constrained solely by technological feasibility and personal volition. Cybernetic approaches extend by fusing organic and mechanical systems, enabling configurations that bypass biological imperatives tied to gender. Postgenderists reference Donna Haraway's 1985 to advocate hybrid entities embodying androgynous liberation, where neural implants and nano-networks—projected by for deployment around 2045—allow sensory experiences in virtual realms untethered from dimorphic bodies. Specific proposals include brain-computer interfaces for controlling gender-neutral avatars and chemical implants for suppressing sex-linked behaviors, such as aggression or nurturing instincts, thereby eroding psychological gender roles. Ultimate cybernetic transcendence involves mind uploading, transferring consciousness to non-biological substrates, as explored in George Dvorsky and James Hughes' 2008 analysis, where digital entities in simulated environments, akin to those in Greg Egan's 1997 novel , exhibit amorphous identities devoid of sex-based distinctions. These pathways, while reliant on nascent fields like and , aim to dissolve as a fixed category, prioritizing individual agency over evolutionary constraints.

Biological Realities and Empirical Challenges

Innate Sex Differences in Biology and Behavior

Humans exhibit innate sex differences originating from genetic mechanisms, primarily the presence of the in males, which contains the SRY gene responsible for initiating testicular development and subsequent male phenotypic differentiation around the 6th week of . This binary genetic foundation leads to divergent gonadal development—testes in males producing higher levels of testosterone, and ovaries in females producing higher and progesterone—resulting in dimorphic reproductive and secondary . Prenatal exposure to hormones further entrenches these differences, influencing neural and behavioral development independently of postnatal . Physiological disparities are pronounced in body composition and performance. Males, on average, possess 40-50% greater upper-body strength and 20-30% greater lower-body strength than females, attributable to higher testosterone-driven muscle mass and skeletal robustness, with these gaps emerging post-puberty and persisting across populations. Global averages show males exceeding females in height by approximately 13 cm (about 5 inches), with corresponding differences in bone density and cardiovascular capacity that enhance male endurance in high-intensity activities. These traits align with evolutionary pressures from male-male competition, as evidenced by greater male variance in physical metrics, rather than environmental factors alone. Neuroscience reveals structural dimorphisms in the , with males exhibiting larger total intracranial volume (by 8-13%) and disproportionate enlargements in regions like the and after controlling for overall size. Females show relatively larger volumes in the hippocampus and certain frontal-parietal areas implicated in and . Functional differences include sex-specific connectivity patterns, with males demonstrating stronger intra-hemispheric suited to spatial tasks and females inter-hemispheric aiding integration of verbal and emotional . Meta-analyses confirm these patterns hold across diverse samples, suggesting genetic and hormonal influences over cultural variance. Behavioral differences manifest robustly in , , and interests, rooted in evolutionary adaptations to reproductive roles. Males display higher sensation-seeking and risk-taking, with a yielding a moderate-to-large (d ≈ 0.5-0.8), linked to for competitive traits. Females score higher on traits like and in Big Five inventories, while males excel in systemizing (analyzing rule-based systems) over empathizing (intuitive understanding of emotions), per the Empathizing-Systemizing theory supported by cross-cultural data. Vocational interests diverge sharply, with males preferring "things-oriented" fields (e.g., ) and females "people-oriented" ones (e.g., ), evidenced by a large meta-analytic effect (d = 0.93) consistent from and influenced by prenatal androgens. Twin studies indicate moderate-to-high (40-60%) for these sex-differentiated traits, with minimal attenuation in shared environments, underscoring genetic causation over .

Evidence from Genetics, Neuroscience, and Evolutionary Psychology

Genetic studies reveal that directly influence brain development and behavioral traits, with the Y chromosome's SRY initiating gonadal differentiation and contributing to downstream effects on neural . Over 1,000 genes on the exhibit sexually dimorphic expression, affecting traits such as and through mechanisms including dosage compensation failures and hormone-responsive elements. Epigenetic modifications, influenced by sex-specific patterns, further amplify these differences, as evidenced by reviews showing female-biased linked to X-chromosome protective effects against . Neuroscience research demonstrates consistent structural sex differences in the from birth, with s exhibiting approximately 10-12% larger total brain volumes and intracranial capacities, persisting after correction for body size. Meta-analyses confirm dimorphisms in subcortical regions, including larger amygdalae associated with emotional processing and threat response, and advantages in hippocampal connectivity linked to . reveals sex-specific activation patterns during cognitive tasks, such as greater reliance on visuospatial networks and integration of limbic-prefrontal circuits, underscoring innate variances in neural wiring independent of . Evolutionary psychology posits that sex differences arise from adaptive pressures over human history, particularly parental investment theory, where females' higher obligatory and select for choosier mate preferences emphasizing resource provision. of over 10,000 participants in 37 cultures show universal male preferences for and as cues, contrasting female valuations of status and ambition, with effect sizes around d=0.8-1.0. These patterns, replicated in longitudinal , reflect anisogamy's causal role—sperm's abundance versus scarcity—driving divergent reproductive strategies, including risk-taking and female selectivity, as supported by meta-analyses of behavioral spanning decades.

Societal and Reproductive Implications

Effects on Family Structures and Reproduction

Postgenderism advocates the use of biotechnologies, including artificial gametes, , and (extracorporeal gestation in artificial wombs), to render biological sex irrelevant for reproduction, thereby enabling offspring creation through any combination of genetic contributors without traditional male-female partnerships or gestational roles. Proponents, such as transhumanist thinkers George Dvorsky and James Hughes, contend that these advancements would eliminate involuntary biological constraints on formation, allowing fluid or non-parental arrangements like communal rearing or single-individual reproduction, potentially fostering greater individual and reducing gender-based divisions in caregiving. Such decoupling of reproduction from sexual dimorphism and pair-bonding could erode the model, as sex loses its reproductive purpose and monogamous structures diminish in rationale, according to critics who highlight parallels in societies where is technologically mediated, leading to increased or fragmented kinship ties. , in particular, is projected to redefine parenthood by bypassing gestational bonds, potentially shifting child-rearing toward state or technological oversight, as seen in speculative analyses of full enabling embryos to develop independently of human carriers. Empirical evidence from family structure research, however, underscores risks to child well-being in non-nuclear arrangements, with meta-analyses showing children in intact two-biological-parent households achieving superior outcomes in emotional regulation, , , and physical health compared to those in single-parent, , or multi-partner configurations—effects attributed to greater stability, resource pooling, and continuity rather than mere with structure. For instance, longitudinal data from over 75,000 Norwegian children indicate that paternal multiple-partner fertility correlates with diminished educational performance, even when controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting that postgenderist fragmentation of parental roles might amplify such deficits. On a societal scale, postgenderist reliance on assisted reproduction could intensify fertility declines already evident in high-technology adoption contexts, where global rates have fallen below replacement levels (e.g., 1.6 births per in the as of 2022), as natural incentives for formation wane amid prolonged infertility or preference for engineered , potentially straining sustainability without compensatory policies. Critics from evolutionary and conservative perspectives argue this undermines causal linkages between , kin selection, and social cohesion, with no peer-reviewed projections validating postgenderist claims of equivalent or superior outcomes in tech-mediated .

Potential Impacts on Social Cohesion and Identity

Postgenderism posits that transcending binary gender distinctions through technological means could foster greater individual autonomy and reduce conflicts rooted in sex-based hierarchies, potentially strengthening social bonds by eliminating divisive stereotypes. Proponents, including George Dvorsky and James Hughes, argue that dyadic gender roles currently hinder personal fulfillment and societal progress, suggesting that postgender approaches would liberate individuals from imposed identities, allowing for more fluid, self-determined social interactions. This vision implies enhanced cohesion through shared post-biological humanity, where reproduction and roles are decoupled from sex, minimizing patriarchy-linked oppressions. However, empirical observations of gender nonconformity indicate risks of heightened and identity instability, which postgenderism might amplify on a societal scale. Studies document that individuals identifying outside binary norms face elevated , contributing to poorer outcomes, including increased psychological distress and internalized rejection processing. For instance, gender fluid youth experience adverse effects partly due to familial and institutional non-acceptance, alongside inherent challenges in navigating binary social structures. Gender non-conforming adults in binary-dominant societies report diminished social , suggesting that eroding collective gender cues could exacerbate isolation rather than unity, as shared identities facilitate group trust and . Broader causal dynamics reveal potential fragmentation: innate sex differences underpin complementary social roles that sustain cohesion, such as division of labor in reproduction and risk-taking behaviors, and dismantling these without biological equivalence may induce systemic anomie. Public surveys reflect ambivalence, with 36% viewing evolving gender norms as complicating men's life satisfaction, hinting at relational strains that could erode familial and communal ties central to societal stability. While postgenderism remains speculative, lacking direct longitudinal data, analogies from current gender shifts—marked by polarized debates and rising identity-based conflicts—underscore risks of weakened collective identity, where fluid selves prioritize individualism over interdependent norms. Sources advocating fluidity often emanate from ideologically aligned academic circles, potentially underemphasizing these tensions in favor of normative aspirations.

Criticisms from Diverse Perspectives

Biological and Evolutionary Critiques

Biological critiques of postgenderism emphasize the binary foundation of in mammals, defined by the production of small () or large (ova) gametes, a dimorphic system arising from over a billion years ago and remaining evolutionarily stable due to its role in and adaptive advantages in variable environments. Postgenderist proposals to transcend this via cybernetic or genetic interventions overlook that is not merely a but a causal prerequisite for , with rare conditions (affecting ~0.018% of births in ways that alter gamete production) representing developmental anomalies rather than a spectrum undermining the binary. Evolutionary biologists argue that engineering or androgynous forms would require suppressing entirely, potentially reverting to less efficient asexual modes that lack the diversity benefits of , as evidenced by the persistence of in complex eukaryotes despite its twofold cost. From an evolutionary perspective, sexual dimorphism in humans—manifesting in morphology, , and behavior—stems from differential , where females' greater and costs select for choosiness and nurturing traits, while males' lower costs favor and risk-taking, patterns conserved across and humans via natural and . These differences are empirically robust, with meta-analyses showing moderate to large effect sizes in traits like (males ~50% stronger upper body), , and , influenced by prenatal testosterone and heritable genetic factors, persisting even after controlling for . Postgenderism's vision of ignores the fitness costs of decoupling these traits from sex, as evolutionary mismatches (e.g., via hormone therapies) correlate with elevated health risks, including cardiovascular issues and , without eliminating underlying dimorphic predispositions wired by millions of years of selection. Critics contend that transhumanist redesigns assume neutral plasticity, yet simulations and comparative studies indicate dimorphism's stability, with reversals rare and often maladaptive in stable lineages. Evolutionary psychology further critiques postgenderism by highlighting universal sex-differentiated mating strategies—females prioritizing resources and commitment, males emphasizing fertility cues—that enhance and resist cultural erasure, as demonstrated in involving over 10,000 participants from 37 cultures. Attempts to abolish roles via may disrupt these adaptations, leading to reduced pair-bonding or viability, akin to how enforced in dimorphic species alters variance in without eliminating underlying drives. While postgenderists invoke to bypass , empirical data from in model organisms show pleiotropic effects, where altering sex-linked traits often compromises overall viability, underscoring causal realism: human design cannot fully evade selection pressures without risking extinction-level trade-offs.

Conservative and Traditionalist Objections

Conservatives and traditionalists, particularly those rooted in Abrahamic faiths, contend that postgenderism fundamentally contravenes divine creation narratives, which establish humanity as sexually dimorphic by design. In the tradition, Genesis 1:27 describes God forming mankind "," implying inherent, complementary purposes for each sex in procreation, formation, and societal order, rather than technological transcendence or abolition of these distinctions. This perspective views efforts to engineer a postgender state—through cybernetic enhancements or genetic modifications—as hubristic rebellion against the Creator's blueprint, akin to ancient prohibitions against or confusing sexes in Deuteronomy 22:5, which underscore the moral imperative to honor biological reality. Traditionalist critiques further emphasize that gender distinctions are not arbitrary social constructs but evolved, functional adaptations essential for human survival and cultural continuity. enables specialized roles—men in protective and provisioning capacities, women in nurturing and bearing —that have historically underpinned stable families and communities, with empirical showing higher child outcomes in intact, biologically complementary parental units. Postgenderism, by seeking to dissolve these roles via , is seen as accelerating demographic crises, such as fertility rates below replacement levels (e.g., 1.3 births per woman in as of 2023), which threaten civilizational viability without natural reproductive incentives. From a causal standpoint, traditionalists argue that ignoring innate sex-based differences invites psychological and social pathologies, as evidenced by elevated risks in environments prioritizing identity fluidity over biological norms. Religious authorities, including Catholic doctrine, frame such ideologies as anthropocentric distortions that undermine dignity by severing identity from embodied , prioritizing individual autonomy over intergenerational duties like begetting and raising children within covenantal marriages. These objections prioritize empirical patterns of thriving—rooted in millennia of —over speculative utopian , warning that postgender pursuits could erode the very relational frameworks that foster and communal resilience.

Feminist and Identity Politics Counterarguments

Feminist critiques of postgenderism often center on its dismissal of biological sex as the foundational material reality of women's , arguing that technological transcendence cannot erase the empirical persistence of sex-based differences in , physicality, and . Materialist feminists, such as those influenced by thinkers like , emphasize that operates through the exploitation of female reproductive capacity and sex-specific vulnerabilities, which postgenderist visions like or customizable bodies fail to address without reinforcing male dominance over women's autonomy. For instance, suspicions among feminists regarding assisted reproductive technologies highlight their potential as tools for patriarchal control, extending historical patterns of of women's bodies rather than dismantling them. Gender-critical philosophers like further contend that postgenderism's aim to abolish sex-specific norms ignores causal realities rooted in dimorphism, where biological events such as and male-typical patterns generate adaptive social protections for women that cannot be voluntarily eradicated without or harm. cites empirical evidence from attempts like Mao's , where enforced led to increased burdens on women, including higher rates from ignored reproductive needs, demonstrating that sex differences reemerge spontaneously and that their denial disadvantages females. This perspective aligns with critiques that postgenderism prioritizes speculative transhumanist futures over immediate empirical challenges, such as sex-based statistics showing 80-90% of perpetrators as male across datasets, which tech modifications may not equitably resolve given access disparities. From standpoints, particularly within intersectional frameworks, postgenderism is faulted for eroding the discrete group identities necessary for political mobilization against overlapping oppressions. By dissolving gender categories, it undermines the coalitional basis for advocating sex-specific rights, such as women's shelters or , which rely on recognizing immutable biological classes amid intersecting factors like race and class. Critics argue this universalist approach risks neutralizing the causal specificity of harms—e.g., rates in certain cultures tied to —favoring abstract over evidence-based group remedies, potentially fragmenting movements that have historically leveraged identity for gains like or anti-discrimination laws.

Cultural and Fictional Depictions

Themes in Science Fiction Literature

Science fiction literature has depicted postgenderist themes primarily through transhumanist lenses, where technologies such as genetic modification, cybernetic enhancements, and mind uploading enable the transcendence of biological sex differences. These narratives often portray societies in which gender roles dissolve, reproduction occurs via artificial means, and identity is decoupled from physical form, allowing for fluid or absent gender expressions. Greg Egan's Distress (1995) illustrates an era of widespread gender customization via advanced surgeries and genetic therapies, where individuals increasingly adopt androgynous or non-binary forms alongside those transitioning away from the binary altogether. The novel examines how such technologies proliferate in a world, leading to a cultural shift where traditional norms become relics, though not without social tensions around identity and authenticity. In Egan's (1997), posthumans exist as distributed software intelligences who inhabit virtual or robotic bodies, rendering biological irrelevant as entities freely select or forgo sexed avatars for reproduction and interaction. This depiction underscores themes of radical , where persists independently of corporeal constraints, but also probes philosophical questions about the persistence of human drives in genderless substrates. Iain M. Banks' , commencing with (1987), presents a postgender engineered through and genetic intervention, enabling citizens to alter sex, adopt multiple genders, or remain androgynous at will, with no societal premium on dimorphism. Reproduction relies on artificial , freeing social structures from sex-based divisions, though the series critiques potential ennui and ethical dilemmas in such engineered transcendence. These works collectively highlight postgenderism's speculative allure as a means to eradicate sex-linked inequalities, yet they also evoke cautions regarding the erosion of innate dimorphisms, often through characters grappling with residual biological imperatives or the homogenization of experience.

Representations in Media and Contemporary Discourse

Postgenderism has limited direct representations in , appearing primarily in niche literature that explores technological transcendence of binaries. In Sayuri Ueda's novel The Cage of Zeus (2005), postgender technologies enable the of biological sex differences, portraying a society where genetic engineering and cybernetic enhancements abolish traditional roles to mitigate social conflicts. This depiction aligns with postgenderist advocacy for technology-driven erosion of as a prerequisite for human advancement. Similarly, Ursula K. Le Guin's (1969) examines postgender through the ambisexual Gethenians, whose cyclical biology suspends fixed , prompting reflections on identity beyond binary norms, though without explicit technological intervention. In television, the BBC series Years and Years (2019) draws parallels between transhumanist body modifications and experiences, envisioning futures where biotechnological "upgrades" challenge flesh-bound gender constraints, as articulated by characters pursuing radical self-alteration. Such portrayals often frame postgenderism within broader transhumanist narratives, emphasizing enhancement over preservation of . Mainstream films rarely engage postgenderism explicitly, with discussions instead surfacing in analyses of androgynous figures like Tilda Swinton's roles, which evoke postgender aesthetics through fluid embodiment but stop short of advocating gender abolition. Contemporary discourse on postgenderism remains confined to transhumanist and academic circles, where proponents like George Dvorsky and James Hughes argue in their 2008 essay that advancing biotechnologies—such as reproductive cloning, , and —will render involuntary biological obsolete, liberating individuals from dimorphic limitations. This view posits differences as impediments to equality and potential, projecting a future where customizable bodies eliminate sex-based disparities. Critics, including philosopher , contend that postgenderism overlooks the constitutive role of sexual difference in human subjectivity, warning that its technological utopianism risks commodifying identity without addressing underlying power dynamics. In feminist debates, postgenderism garners mixed reception; while aligned with poststructuralist aims to dismantle binaries, it faces resistance from those prioritizing sex-based analysis, as evidenced by scholarly critiques viewing it as overly optimistic about technology's capacity to resolve material inequalities. Transhumanist outlets like highlight how postgender aspirations intersect with emerging prejudices, noting that while advances in technologies expand choices, full transcendence could exacerbate divides between enhanced and unenhanced populations. Overall, discourse underscores postgenderism's speculative nature, with empirical support drawn from trends in assisted reproduction and prosthetics rather than widespread adoption.

References

  1. https://ieet.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/IEET-03-PostGender.pdf
  2. https://theinterim.com/issues/society-culture/post-genderism/
  3. https://transhumanism.fandom.com/wiki/Transgenderism
  4. https://kathleenstock.substack.com/p/lets-abolish-the-dream-of-gender
  5. https://gizmodo.com/rip-futurist-shulamith-firestone-who-hailed-artificial-5939856
  6. https://www.academia.edu/7553496/Postgenderism_Beyond_the_Gender_Binary
  7. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/831370c3-0ea6-42f5-aa4f-7d568e7c02e2/content
  8. https://daily.jstor.org/on-the-history-of-the-artificial-womb/
  9. https://www.sfu.ca/~decaste/OISE/page2/files/HarawayCyborg.pdf
  10. http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2008/03/postgenderism-beyond-gender-binary.html
  11. https://philarchive.org/rec/HUGPBT
  12. https://www.genealogy-critique.net/article/id/10863/
  13. https://www.humanityplus.org/the-transhumanist-manifesto
  14. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anders-sandberg-morphological-freedom
  15. https://acpeds.org/sex-is-a-biological-trait-of-medical-significance/
  16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36423797/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3166361/
  18. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859931/full
  19. https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP284198
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3969295/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2711771/
  22. https://bsd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13293-022-00448-w
  23. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep02486
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6275492/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19883140/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7012279/
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09249-3
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3030621/
  29. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1340108/full
  30. https://genus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41118-023-00181-1
  31. https://bsd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13293-024-00657-5
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11550254/
  33. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/10/buss-1989-sex-differences-in-human-mate-preferences.pdf
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4030876/
  35. https://theconversation.com/artificial-wombs-could-someday-be-a-reality-heres-how-they-may-change-our-notions-of-parenthood-217490
  36. https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-021-00630-6
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6240988/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3171291/
  39. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288112
  40. https://read.dukeupress.edu/demography/article/59/1/389/293756/Fathers-Multiple-Partner-Fertility-and-Children-s
  41. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34874/chapter/298336220
  42. https://ifstudies.org/blog/family-structure-and-childrens-health/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357689533_Postgenderism_Beyond_the_Gender_Binary
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5044929/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7441311/
  46. https://dah-journal.com/dah/article/view/152
  47. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02453-x
  48. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2024/10/17/views-of-the-impact-of-changing-gender-roles/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8564221/
  50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bies.202200173
  51. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2023.1211
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480807/
  53. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-advances/article/can-evolutionary-thinking-shed-light-on-gender-diversity/459D9AC90C56D00D3C981BBD791E499B
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5856903/
  55. https://www.focusonthefamily.com/parenting/a-biblical-perspective-on-transgender-identity-a-primer-for-parents-and-strugglers/
  56. https://clearlyreformed.org/4-reasons-why-the-bible-does-not-support-transgenderism/
  57. https://journal.rts.edu/article/transgenderism-christian-perspective/
  58. https://bismarckdiocese.com/news/a-theological-response-to-gender-ideology
  59. https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/resources/what-is-the-christian-response-to-transgenderism/
  60. https://www.heritage.org/civil-society/commentary/why-identity-politics-causing-war-among-feminists
  61. https://bookriot.com/transhumanist-sci-fi-books/
  62. https://www.academia.edu/12994524/Imagining_the_Future_of_Gender_through_Science_Fiction
  63. https://reactormag.com/single-gender-planets-in-science-fiction/
  64. https://selfawarepatterns.com/2025/07/19/the-left-hand-of-darkness/
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325684333_Human_Transcendence_A_Linguistic_Approach_to_Posthumanism_in_Science_Fiction_Novels
  66. https://doaj.org/article/450aaa54b0eb4e859eef7ff4dad5f9ef
  67. https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/56e8fd8869760.pdf
  68. http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2021/4/4/i-dont-want-to-be-flesh-feminist-transhuman-futures-in-years-and-years-part-one
  69. https://girlsontopstees.com/en-us/blogs/read-me/25-years-of-androgyny-tilda-swinton-and-a-new-kind-of-postgenderism
  70. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y06FQ1Haf4g
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485122001313
  72. https://theconversation.com/transgender-transhuman-technological-advances-offer-increased-choices-but-also-create-new-prejudices-121378
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.