Hubbry Logo
Snake charmingSnake charmingMain
Open search
Snake charming
Community hub
Snake charming
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Snake charming
Snake charming
Snake charming
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Snake charmer in Jaipur (India) in 2007

Snake charming is the practice of appearing to hypnotize a snake (often a cobra) by playing and waving around an instrument called a pungi. A typical performance may also include handling the snakes or performing other seemingly dangerous acts, as well as other street performance staples, like juggling and sleight of hand. The practice was historically the profession of some tribesmen in India well into the 20th century but snake charming declined rapidly after the government banned the practice in 1972.[1][2] Snake-charmer performances still happen in other Asian nations such as Pakistan,[3] Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Malaysia. The tradition is also practiced in North African countries of Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia.

Ancient Egypt was home to one form of snake charming, though the practice as it exists today likely arose in India.[citation needed] It eventually spread throughout South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa. Despite a sort of golden age in the 20th century, the practice of snake charming has been declining since. This is due to a variety of factors, chief among them is the enforcement of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 in India banning ownership of snakes. In retaliation, snake charmers have organized in recent years, protesting the loss of their only means of livelihood, and the government has made some overtures to them. Snake charming is almost extinct in India.[1][4]

Many snake charmers live a wandering existence, visiting towns and villages on market days and during festivals. During a performance, snake charmers may take a number of precautions. The charmer typically sits out of biting range[5]: 251  and the snake is usually sluggish due to starvation or dehydration and reluctant to attack anyway. More drastic means of protection include removing the reptile's fangs or venom glands, drugging the snake,[5]: 251  or even sewing the snake's mouth shut.[6] The most popular species are those native to the snake charmer's home region, typically various kinds of cobras, though vipers and other types are also used.

Although snakes are able to sense sound, they lack the outer ear that would enable them to hear the music. They follow the movement of the charmer and the pungi that the charmer holds with his hands.[5]: 251  The snake considers the person and pungi a threat and responds to it as if it were a predator.

History

[edit]
"Snakecharmers," a chromolithograph by Alfred Brehm

The earliest evidence for snake charming comes from ancient Egyptian sources. Charmers there mainly acted as magicians and healers. Part of their studies involved learning the various types of snake, the gods to whom they were sacred, and how to treat those who were bitten by the reptiles. Entertainment was also part of their repertoire, and they knew how to handle the animals and charm them for their patrons, but experts in that tradition were deported and employed in royal courts in Assyria and Persia.[7][8]

One of the earliest records of snake charming appears in the Bible in Psalm 58:3–5: "The wicked turn aside from birth; liars go astray as soon as they are born. Their venom is like that of a snake, like a deaf serpent that does not hear, that does not respond to the magicians, or to a skilled snake-charmer."

Modern Snake charming originated in India.[9] Hinduism has long held serpents to be sacred; the animals are believed to be related to the Nagas, and many gods are pictured under the protection of the cobra.

The earliest snake charmers are believed to have been traditional healers by trade. As part of their training, they learned to treat snake bites.[7] Some also learned how to handle snakes, and people called on them to remove snakes from their homes. Snake charming became associated with the guru Baba Gulabgir.[10] These snake charmers were associated with exorcists, physicians, and magical healers.[7] The practice eventually spread to nearby regions, ultimately reaching North Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia.

Snake Charmers in Kolkata, 1945, by Norman Herfort

The early 20th century proved something of a golden age for snake charmers. Governments promoted the practice to draw tourism, and snake charmers were often sent overseas to perform at cultural festivals and for private patrons. In addition, the charmers provided a valuable source of snake venom for creating antivenins.[citation needed]

The practice is no longer legal in India[11] following changes to the Wildlife Protection Act. The law was originally passed in 1972, and aimed at preventing the export of snakeskins, introducing a seven-year prison term for owning or selling snakes.[12] Beginning in the late 1990s, however, the law was also applied to the snake charmers. As a result, Indian charmers were forced to move their performances to less-travelled areas such as small villages or face legal action.

In 2003, hundreds of snake charmers gathered at the temple of Charkhi Dadri in Haryana to bring international attention to their plight.[13] In December of the following year, a group of snake charmers stormed the legislature of the Indian state of Odisha with their demands while brandishing their animals. The Indian government and various animal-rights groups have acknowledged the problem. One suggested solution is to train the performers to be snake handlers, capturing and removing venomous snakes from city and suburban gardens.[14] In return, they could sell their traditional medicines as souvenirs. Another proposal would try to focus attention on the snake charmers' music and treat them like other street musicians.

Performance

[edit]
Snake charmers in Varanasi, India

Snake charmers typically walk the streets holding their serpents in baskets or pots hanging from a bamboo pole slung over the shoulder. Charmers cover these containers with cloths between performances. Dress in India, Pakistan and neighbouring countries is generally the same: long hair, a white turban, earrings, and necklaces of shells or beads. Once the performer finds a satisfactory location to set up, he sets his pots and baskets about him (often with the help of a team of assistants who may be his apprentices) and sits cross-legged on the ground in front of a closed pot or basket. He removes the lid, then begins playing a flute-like instrument made from a gourd, known as a been or pungi. As if drawn by the tune, a snake eventually emerges from the container; if a cobra, it may even extend its hood.

In the Western world, snake charming is very different. Western-style snake charmers use pythons and boa constrictors for their performances as they are not venomous. Western-style snake charmers do not use a musical instrument; instead they perform dance routines involving the snakes.[citation needed] These performances may be seen at carnivals, menageries, sideshows, and circuses.[5]: 252 

Snakes

[edit]

Traditionally, snake charmers use snakes that they have captured themselves in the wild. This task is not too difficult, as most South Asian and North African snakes tend to be slow movers.

The exact species of serpents used varies by region. In India, the Indian cobra is preferred, though some charmers may also use Russell's vipers. Indian and Burmese pythons, and even mangrove snakes are also encountered, though they are not as popular.[citation needed] In North Africa, the Egyptian cobra, puff adder, carpet viper and horned desert viper are commonly featured in performances.[6] In the UK, US and Europe pythons and boa constrictors are used to comply with Animal Handling and Animal Welfare Regulations.[citation needed]

Ethical concerns

[edit]

At home, snake charmers keep their animals in containers such as baskets, boxes, pots, or sacks.[citation needed]

For safety, some North African snake charmers stitch closed the mouth of their performing snakes, leaving just enough opening for the animal to be able to move its tongue in and out. Members of the audience in that region believe that the snake's ability to deliver venomous bites comes from its tongue, rather than fangs.[6] Snakes subjected to this practice soon die of starvation or mouth infection, and must be replaced by freshly caught specimens.[6] Venomoid surgery is used in India, where snakes are defanged and have their venom glands incapacitated; as well as having their mouth sewn shut being an option.[15][16] They are then also kept in boxes or bags for 30–45 days and dehydrated so that their muscles cramp (making them sluggish) and so that they will drink the milk offered by devotees at festivals (the milk is undigestible to the snake).[17]

Methods of dealing with the fangs include expert surgical removal of both the fangs and its replacement fangs, which has been done by some Native American and African snake charmers. This is done in order to prevent regrowth. Upon the loss of its fangs, a snake can quickly regrow them; barring extraordinary measures, pulled fangs are replaced within days. Fangs may also be plugged with wax or other material.[18]

Venomoid surgery is employed to remove the risk of injury or death when handled, but is considered unethical and illegal in some cases.[19] Most venomoid procedures consist of either removing the venom gland itself, or severing the duct between the gland and the fang. However, the duct and gland have been known to regenerate, and supposedly "safe" snakes have killed mice and successfully envenomated humans.[20]

In West Africa, charmers have been observed to treat the snake's body and mouth with herbs that paralyze the jaw muscles and cause inflammation of the venom glands.[18]

Members of the Pakkoku clan of Burma tattoo themselves with ink mixed with cobra venom on their upper body in a weekly inoculation which may protect them from the snake, though there is no scientific evidence of that.[18]

Lifestyle

[edit]

Snake charming is typically an inherited profession. Most would-be charmers thus begin learning the practice at a young age from their fathers. Members of the Sapera or Sapuakela castes, snake charmers have little other choice of profession. In fact, entire settlements of snake charmers and their families exist in some parts of India and neighbouring countries.[citation needed] In Bangladesh, snake charmers are typically members of the nomadic ethnic group Bede. They tend to live by rivers and use them to boat to different towns on market days and during festivals.

North African charmers usually set up in open-air markets and souks for their performances. In coastal resort towns and near major tourist destinations one can see snake charmers catering to the tourist market, but in most of the region they perform for the local audiences; an important part of their income comes from selling pamphlets containing various magic spells (in particular, of course, against snake bites).[6]

In previous eras, snake charming was often the charmer's only source of income. This is less true today, as many charmers also scavenge, scrounge, sell items such as amulets and jewelry, or perform at private parties to make ends meet. Snake charmers are often regarded as traditional healers and magicians, as well, especially in rural areas. These charmers concoct and sell all manner of potions and unguents that purportedly do anything from curing the common cold to raising the dead. Villagers and city dwellers alike often call on them to rid of snakes in houses.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Snake charming

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Snake charming is a tradition primarily in , where practitioners manipulate venomous snakes, especially the , to rear up from a basket and sway in response to the motion of a , a double-reed resembling a . The apparent "dance" stems from the snake's defensive tracking of the pungi’s visual movement rather than or musical influence, as cobras detect vibrations through their jawbones but have poor sensitivity to airborne sounds like those produced by the instrument. Originating in ancient amid Hindu reverence for serpents as sacred entities linked to deities like the Nagas—symbolizing fertility, underworld guardianship, and renewal—the practice likely evolved from healers demonstrating snake-handling skills to treat , blending with rudimentary knowledge. Performed by hereditary communities such as the Sapera, it served as a means of through public spectacles, often during festivals or as itinerant , underscoring snakes' cultural in rituals warding off misfortune. The tradition's defining controversies center on severe animal mistreatment, including routine defanging by breaking teeth, deflation via blunt insertion causing chronic infections, mouth-sewing, and deprivation of or to induce lethargy and docility, resulting in high mortality rates from or . These practices prompted 's Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 to outlaw snake ownership and performances, with full enforcement by the 1990s, displacing thousands of charmers and sparking protests over lost heritage despite government retraining efforts. Though diminished, clandestine operations persist, reflecting ongoing conflicts between of harm to wildlife and entrenched customary roles.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins

The practice of snake charming originated in ancient Near Eastern and Egyptian civilizations, where it emerged from the necessities of treating snakebites and incorporating serpents into and magical contexts, rather than as pure . In these societies, snakes symbolized both danger and , prompting the development of specialized in handling venomous like cobras, which informed techniques still used today, such as defanging or exploiting defensive postures. In , the earliest documented evidence dates to the BCE, with professionals termed ḥrp Srqt ("conjurer of Serqet," referencing the scorpion-and-snake Serqet) who controlled snakes through incantations, remedies, and physical manipulation to treat envenomations. These practitioners operated as healers and magicians, as evidenced by medical papyri detailing ophiological procedures, including the extraction of and expulsion of snake "demons." A key artifact is the (P. Brooklyn 47.218.48 and 85), dated to the 6th century BCE (Late Period), which outlines diagnostic and therapeutic methods for snakebites, emphasizing empirical observation of symptoms alongside magical rites. Statues like that of Djedherleefankh ( 46341, 4th century BCE) depict such figures in poses, underscoring their societal role during the Ptolemaic . In , snake control was integrated into the duties of exorcist-physicians (āšipu), known as mušlahhu ("one who brings the snake"), who addressed serpent threats via , , and rudimentary antidotes, as recorded in omen texts like Šumma ālu and Sakikkû. References appear in Neo-Assyrian inscriptions from the 8th–7th centuries BCE, such as those of (r. 681–669 BCE), where these experts were summoned for royal protection against snakes during campaigns. This profession blended proto-medical —observing snake behaviors and bite effects—with causal incantations to avert harm, forming a precursor to charming's manipulative elements. While less focused on performance, these practices prioritized verifiable control over snakes, influencing later traditions through trade and conquest.

Evolution in South Asia and the Middle East

Snake charming in South Asia traces its roots to ancient cultural reverence for serpents, particularly in India where snakes hold mythological significance as Naga deities associated with fertility and protection in Hindu traditions dating back to the Vedic period around 1500 BCE. Early practitioners likely combined snake handling with healing roles, using empirical knowledge of local flora for antivenom treatments following bites from species like the Indian cobra (Naja naja), a practice documented in ethnographic accounts of communities such as the Sapera and Kalbelia tribes. Over centuries, these skills evolved into public performances, with charmers capturing wild snakes during monsoon seasons when reptiles are more active and relocating them while demonstrating control to villagers, a custom persisting into the medieval era as noted in regional folklore. By the Mughal period (1526–1857 CE), snake charming had formalized as an itinerant profession in the , including modern-day and , where performers integrated rhythmic music from wind instruments akin to the to mimic defensive snake postures, drawing crowds at festivals and markets. In , the tradition shifted from communal snake removal by village-appointed handlers to hereditary entertainment, with charmers like those in northern regions maintaining oral histories of generational transmission since at least the . This evolution reflected causal adaptations to ecological realities—abundant snake populations in agrarian societies necessitating both control and spectacle—rather than mystical elements, though performers often invoked protective rituals grounded in local . In the , the practice originated in around 2000 BCE, where charmers functioned as healers and ritual specialists extracting venom or using snakes in therapeutic displays, as evidenced by tomb depictions and texts linking serpent control to divine favor. This expertise spread eastward via trade and conquest, reaching Neo-Assyrian courts (911–609 BCE) and later Achaemenid Persia (550–330 BCE), where Egyptian mušlaḫḫu—snake handlers—gained royal patronage for demonstrating control over cobras and vipers, possibly employing techniques like defanging or rhythmic cues to elicit swaying responses from ectothermic reptiles. Unlike South Asian variants tied to polytheistic worship, Middle Eastern iterations emphasized pragmatic utility in arid environments prone to venomous encounters, evolving into courtly entertainments that influenced regional without widespread until Hellenistic exchanges.

Colonial and Post-Colonial Spread

During the colonial period, snake charming spread beyond its primary regions in and through European encounters in colonized territories and subsequent importation as . British administrators and travelers in observed and recorded performances, fostering a stereotypical association of the subcontinent with the practice, as evidenced by 19th-century accounts of charmers entertaining at markets and festivals. This exposure extended to metropolitan centers via touring performers and exhibitions; for example, at the 1893 in , snake charmers from featured in the "Street in Cairo" attraction, drawing crowds to simulated colonial scenes. Similarly, the 1876 and later fairs imported charmers as part of "native village" displays, blending ethnographic spectacle with imperial promotion. In , the practice influenced art and theater, exemplified by French orientalist painter Jean-Léon Gérôme's (c. 1879), which depicted an Algerian youth handling a python to a , based on observations from and North African travels. Performers, often from or mimicking regional styles, appeared in circuses and music halls; late-19th-century British audiences were captivated by such acts, including those by women charmers in richly attired displays. These introductions rarely led to local adoption but reinforced exotic tropes in . Post-colonially, snake charming's dissemination slowed amid legal restrictions and modernization. 's Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 prohibited capturing and exhibiting wild snakes, effectively banning performances by the 1990s and displacing communities like the Saperas, though some continued illicitly for livelihoods. In , independent since 1956, the tradition endures in tourist-heavy areas like Marrakech's square, where charmers use cobras and flutes to solicit tips, adapting to economic incentives despite ethical critiques. Global reach remains marginal, limited to street acts or cultural festivals in places like , where charmers sourced snakes from into the mid-20th century, but animal laws and urbanization have curtailed expansion elsewhere.

Scientific Basis of the Performance

Snake Sensory Biology

Snakes exhibit specialized sensory adaptations that prioritize chemoreception and mechanoreception over audition and vision, reflecting their reliance on ambush predation and environmental cues rather than active pursuit. Vision in snakes is characterized by immovable eyes with fixed-focus lenses, necessitating head movements for targeting; most species possess dichromatic vision sensitive to blue and green wavelengths via cone opsins, but with limited acuity and color discrimination compared to diurnal vertebrates. This system excels at detecting motion and contrasts, aiding in threat assessment and prey tracking, though overall visual resolution is modest due to the absence of a fovea and reliance on spectacle-covered corneas. Auditory perception occurs without external ears or eardrums; instead, snakes detect low-frequency sounds (typically below 1000 Hz) through , where jaw quadrate vibrations transmit to the via the , enabling sensitivity to substrate-borne signals from prey footsteps or predators. Airborne sounds are perceived minimally, with recent electrophysiological studies confirming neural responses to frequencies up to 2000-3000 Hz in some , but this range excludes higher musical harmonics and lacks behavioral relevance for complex auditory stimuli. Vibration detection extends somatically across the body surface, integrating with tactile cues for spatial awareness. Chemoreception dominates snake sensory , mediated by the (Jacobson's organ), where a samples airborne and substrate chemicals, delivering them to sensory epithelia for and odor discrimination. This bimodal system—nasal for bulk olfaction and vomeronasal for discrete cues—facilitates trail-following, prey localization, and conspecific recognition with high precision, often superseding other modalities in nocturnal or cluttered habitats. In the context of snake charming, typically involving elapids like the (Naja naja), these sensory traits explain observed behaviors: the snake's and swaying constitute defensive displays triggered by visual motion of the instrument or charmer, interpreted as a threat, rather than or auditory charm, as the pungi's tones fall outside effective hearing ranges and elicit no species-specific response. Cobras retain acute motion detection and vibration sensitivity but lack pit organs, reinforcing reliance on visual and mechanosensory cues during diurnal performances.

Debunking the Musical Hypnosis Myth

The popular depiction of snake charming as a form of musical , where the snake enters a trance-like state induced by the sound of the (a reed instrument), lacks empirical support. Snakes, particularly cobras commonly used in performances, do not perceive or respond to music in a manner that suggests ; rather, their swaying motion represents an instinctive defensive posture to track potential threats. This behavior mimics preparation for striking, with the snake's hooded display and lateral undulations serving to assess and follow moving objects, such as the oscillating pungi basket or the charmer's body. Snakes possess limited auditory capabilities, lacking external ears and relying on conduction through the jawbone and to transmit vibrations to the , which primarily detects low-frequency ground-borne vibrations over 50-300 Hz rather than high-fidelity airborne sound. While a 2023 study demonstrated that death adders (Acanthophis antarcticus) and other species can detect and behaviorally respond to airborne sounds in the 200-300 Hz range—distinguishing them from vibrations—these responses involve alert orientation rather than trance induction, and the pungi's tones (typically 400-800 Hz) fall outside optimal sensitivity for most elapids. In charming contexts, controlled observations confirm that snakes remain unresponsive to stationary music playback but sway in sync with the visual movement of the instrument, even in silence, underscoring that auditory elements play a minimal role compared to visual cues. The myth persists due to anthropomorphic interpretation and the performative rhythm aligning charmer and snake motions for audience effect, but physiological evidence refutes hypnosis: electroencephalographic patterns in reptiles show no suppression of alertness akin to mammalian hypnosis, and post-performance snakes exhibit normal predatory responses when stimuli cease. This aligns with broader herpetological understanding that ophiophagy (snake-eating) instincts drive cobras to mirror conspecific movements, interpreting the pungi as a rival or prey rather than succumbing to sonic influence.

Defensive Behaviors Mimicking "Charm"

The behaviors exhibited by snakes during traditional charming performances, such as the swaying and rearing of cobras, primarily constitute instinctive defensive responses rather than any form of or musical influence. Snakes lack external ears and are largely insensitive to airborne sounds like music from the instrument, instead detecting vibrations primarily through ground contact or their jawbones, which play minimal role in the performance dynamic. The snake's head movements track the lateral swaying of the , interpreting it as a potential akin to a predator or rival, prompting a strike-ready posture. In cobras ( species), this manifests as hood expansion and vertical elevation, standard antipredator displays evolved to intimidate via increased apparent size and aposematic signaling. These actions deter threats by mimicking an attack preparation, with the snake fixating on and mirroring the instrument's motion to maintain orientation toward the stimulus. Experimental observations confirm snakes exhibit identical responses to non-musical moving objects, such as a hand or stick, underscoring the visual cue primacy over auditory input. Performers exploit this by positioning outside strike range—typically 1-2 meters for cobras—and often using debilitated snakes, starved or dehydrated to reduce aggression and energy for actual strikes, further enhancing the . This mimicry of "charm" aligns with broader elapid (cobra family) , where defensive posturing prioritizes threat assessment over offense unless provoked. , for instance, correlates with heightened alertness, not trance, and dissipates absent continued provocation. Historical accounts and modern analyses refute mystical interpretations, attributing the spectacle to behavioral exploitation rather than supernatural or acoustic influence.

Performance Elements

Instruments and Rhythms

The principal instrument in traditional snake charming, especially within South Asian practices, is the (also known regionally as been, bin, or murali), a double-reed crafted from a hollowed resonator attached to two pipes, each fitted with a vibrating reed. The performer exhales steadily into a mouthpiece atop the gourd, generating a persistent drone from one pipe while fingering the other to produce variable pitches and a distinctive shrill, reedy that evokes nasal tones. Constructed from natural materials including , wood, and reeds bound with or , the pungi measures approximately 24 cm in length and facilitates undulating motions synchronized with the charmer's body sway during performances. The rhythms performed on the pungi consist of repetitive, cyclical patterns featuring sustained drones punctuated by sharp, staccato bursts and glissandi, creating a hypnotic ostinato that aligns with the perceived "dance" of the snake. These sequences, often derived from oral traditions in communities like those of Rajasthan's sapera caste, employ pentatonic scales with microtonal inflections reminiscent of regional folk repertoires, such as those associated with festivals like Nag Panchami. Charmers assert that specific melodic motifs—transmitted paternally over generations—elicit responses from serpents, though empirical observations attribute any synchronization to visual tracking of the instrument's movement rather than auditory perception, as snakes possess limited hearing capabilities attuned primarily to ground vibrations. In Middle Eastern and North African variants, analogous instruments like the double-reed zamr or ghaita—framed wood or metal pipes producing similarly piercing drones—accompany performances with comparable rhythmic structures, emphasizing modal progressions over fixed tempos to sustain audience engagement. The pungi's use has diminished since India's Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 curtailed the capture and exhibition of protected snake species, confining its application to cultural demonstrations or recordings devoid of live reptiles.

Handling and Presentation Techniques

Snake charmers present their subjects primarily through a staged interaction that exploits the reptile's natural defensive responses. The performer typically seats themselves cross-legged or with legs extended on the ground before a covered basket or pot containing the snake, maintaining a distance exceeding the animal's strike range, which for an ( naja) averages about 50-60% of its body length. Upon unveiling the container and initiating play on the —a double-reed —the snake rears upward, often flaring its hood if a , and sways laterally, visually following the undulating motion of the instrument rather than responding to auditory stimuli, as snakes lack functional external ears and have limited hearing capabilities. Handling during performances emphasizes minimal direct contact to reduce injury risk, with the snake largely self-presenting in its agitated posture once elicited from confinement. When necessary, such as for initial placement or retrieval, charmers grasp the snake firmly by the , leveraging the appendage's distance from the venomous fangs to control orientation and prevent or striking toward the handler's body. This -hold technique allows the snake's head to be directed away or downward, facilitating safe transport while the body dangles under its own weight. In advanced displays, familiarized snakes may be draped over the performer's shoulders or arms post-swaying, but such contact relies on prior defanging or gland extraction to avert , though these modifications compromise the snake's long-term health. Performers enhance the visual spectacle through coordinated and costume, often clad in vibrant turbans and robes, while exaggerating movements to amplify the snake's tracking response and sustain audience engagement. These techniques, rooted in empirical observation of serpentine behavior rather than , underscore the performance's reliance on predictable instinctual reactions over genuine or auditory influence.

Snakes and Their Preparation

Primary Species Employed

The (Naja naja), also known as the spectacled cobra, is the most commonly employed species in snake charming performances across , particularly in and , due to its distinctive hood flare that mimics responsiveness to the charmer's music during defensive posturing. This species, native to the , accounts for an estimated 10,000 human fatalities annually from bites in alone, underscoring its potency and the risks inherent in its handling by charmers. The (Daboia russelii) ranks as a secondary but frequently used venomous in Indian snake charming traditions, prized for its aggressive strikes and high yield despite lacking a hood; it is often captured from rural areas and integrated into performances alongside cobras by communities like the Saperas. Responsible for the majority of India's snakebite deaths—surpassing even cobras in some regions—this viper's inclusion highlights charmers' preference for locally abundant, highly dangerous serpents to enhance spectacle and perceived authenticity. In North African and Middle Eastern contexts, such as , the (Naja haje) predominates, selected for its large size, potent neurotoxic venom, and similar behavior that facilitates the illusion of musical enthrallment; this has been central to performances since ancient times, often sourced from desert regions. Less commonly, non- venomous snakes like puff adders or vipers appear regionally, but remain iconic across traditions for their visual and behavioral suitability to the art form.

Venom Neutralization Practices

Snake charmers primarily render venomous snakes safer for handling through crude surgical interventions, including defanging and venom gland manipulation, performed without or sterile conditions. These methods aim to prevent during performances but often result in severe animal suffering and high mortality rates. Defanging involves using tools such as or to grasp, twist, and break off the snake's fangs at their base, typically targeting species like the (Naja naja) or (Naja haje). This procedure must be repeated periodically, as fangs regrow within weeks due to the snake's natural replacement cycle, similar to in mammals. In regions like and , charmers apply this to wild-captured venomous snakes, with estimates indicating thousands of individuals affected annually; for instance, Moroccan charmers harvest around 4,500 snakes per year, many of which are defanged for use. To address fang regrowth and achieve longer-term neutralization, some practitioners extract or destroy the venom glands by reaching into the snake's to puncture, , or pull out the paired glands located posterior to the eyes. This "venomoid" procedure, akin to informal venomoid surgery, disables production but compromises the snake's ability to subdue prey or lubricate swallowed food with saliva-like secretions, leading to feeding difficulties. Among communities like the snake charmers in , both fangs and glands are routinely removed to minimize bite risks during shows. These practices inflict substantial harm, with defanged or gland-altered snakes prone to bacterial infections from unsterile tools, exacerbated by poor post-procedure care including confinement in baskets without veterinary intervention. often starve or succumb to weakness within one month, necessitating frequent replacement from populations. In , rescued snakes from charmers exhibit these mutilations, with survival rates low even in rehabilitation; gland damage permanently impairs hunting capacity, as the glands contribute to prey immobilization and digestion facilitation.

Risks and Mitigation

Hazards to Performers

Snake charmers incur substantial risks of from bites inflicted by the venomous snakes they manipulate, such as Indian cobras (Naja naja) and Russell's vipers (Daboia russelii), which are staples of traditional performances. These hazards persist despite prevalent mitigation techniques like manual defanging—entailing the breaking or extraction of fangs—or rudimentary gland manipulation, as fangs regrow within days and incomplete procedures leave residual delivery capacity intact. Such unreliability has resulted in numerous fatalities among practitioners, including a 2023 incident in where a charmer died after his pet bit him during an attempt to kiss the snake at a village show, and a 2022 case in an unspecified location where another performer succumbed following bites to the finger and mouth while handling a . In communities like Bangladesh's snake charmers, rates are elevated due to frequent close-contact handling; a 2023 study documented 31 of 38 surviving bite victims being envenomated during active performances, with an additional five deaths attributed to similar incidents among interviewed families. Performers often forgo timely medical intervention, favoring traditional herbal remedies or self-treatment to evade stigma and costs, which exacerbates outcomes given the neurotoxic and hemotoxic effects of and viper venoms, respectively. Secondary complications include local tissue , systemic organ failure, and allergic reactions to when eventually sought, though access barriers compound the peril. Beyond , performers encounter physical strains from prolonged , repetitive motions, and wrangling agitated reptiles, potentially leading to musculoskeletal injuries or exhaustion, particularly in nomadic lifestyles involving travel with live cargo. Bites from ostensibly neutralized snakes can still transmit bacteria, fostering infections like , while handling stressed animals heightens strike probability during capture or display setups. Historical records, such as a cobra bite hospitalizing a U.S. circus performer mid-show, underscore that even experienced handlers remain vulnerable to reflexive strikes misinterpreted by audiences as part of the act.

Broader Public and Environmental Risks

Snake charming practices, often conducted in public spaces with venomous species such as cobras, pose risks to bystanders through potential escapes or aggressive reactions from handled reptiles, despite common defanging or venom extraction methods that may not be reliably effective over time. In regions like and , where performances historically drew crowds, inconsistent neutralization increases the chance of bites if snakes recover venom production or are mishandled, though documented public incidents remain infrequent due to the snakes' conditioned defensive posturing rather than pursuit. The illegal nature of the trade in many jurisdictions exacerbates public hazards, as underground operations evade veterinary oversight and may involve untreated or recaptured snakes, heightening unpredictability during street performances. departments in routinely seize snakes from charmers, underscoring ongoing exposure risks in festivals like Shravan, where crowds interact closely with exhibited animals. Environmentally, the demand for snakes in charming drives unsustainable wild capture, depleting populations of targeted species like the Egyptian cobra (Naja haje) and (Naja kaouthia), with hunters prioritizing larger individuals that skews demographics and reduces reproductive capacity. In , prohibited since the 1972 Wildlife Protection Act but persisting illicitly, annual seizures—such as 50 snakes in 2021 and 17 in 2024—indicate persistent poaching pressure that contributes to localized declines in serpent . Such harvesting disrupts ecological balance, as snakes serve as key predators of , preventing agricultural pests and vectors; diminished populations in affected areas like rural and thus indirectly amplify human-wildlife conflicts and crop losses. Conservation analyses highlight that this exploitation, compounded by habitat loss, threatens species viability without captive breeding alternatives in traditional practices.

Cultural and Societal Context

Religious Symbolism and Traditions

In , snakes, particularly , symbolize eternity, rebirth through periodic shedding of skin, and guardianship of subterranean treasures, often depicted as semi-divine beings intertwined with major deities. Lord Shiva is portrayed with a coiled around his neck, signifying mastery over fear and death, while rests upon the serpent , representing cosmic stability and infinity. These associations elevate snakes from mere reptiles to emblems of , , and protective forces against misfortune in agrarian societies prone to venomous encounters. Snake charming integrates into this framework as a ritualistic practice, where performers are regarded as spiritually attuned individuals capable of communing with nagas, thereby invoking divine benevolence and averting serpentine curses. In traditions, charmers handle cobras during ceremonies, embodying a synthesis of empirical snake-handling and devotional symbolism, often perceived as healers who derive mystical from their serpentine affinity. The festival of Nag Panchami, celebrated annually on the fifth day of the Shravana month's bright half (typically July or August), exemplifies these traditions through widespread serpent veneration. Devotees offer milk, turmeric, and flowers to snake idols or live specimens, with charmers facilitating displays of cobras to symbolize appeasement of nagas and prevention of bites, rooted in myths like that of Astika, who saved serpents from sacrifice. In regions such as and , processions feature live snakes carried by charmers, underscoring their communal role in reinforcing Hindu beliefs about serpents as harbingers of renewal and safeguards against calamity. Such practices persist in rural areas, blending with religious observance to maintain cultural reverence for snakes despite modern legal constraints.

Economic Livelihoods and Community Roles

Snake charming has historically provided the primary economic livelihood for hereditary communities such as the Sapera in northern , where performers earned income through public displays at festivals, markets, and villages, supplemented by tips from spectators and occasional fees for snake removal or bite treatment services. These semi-nomadic groups, often residing in outskirts camps, maintained stocks of three to four snakes per performer to sustain varied shows, with daily team earnings averaging around 75 rupees (approximately $5 USD) as of the late after deducting costs for snake maintenance and bribes to authorities. Within their communities, snake charmers held roles as ritual specialists and healers, performing during Hindu festivals like Nag Panchami to invoke snake deities and applying traditional remedies for venomous bites, which reinforced their social status tied to perceived mystical affinities with serpents. This profession, passed down through castes like the Jogi-Nath and Sapera, intersected with ethnobotanical practices, including the sale of herbal antidotes and lucky stones, though such supplements rarely exceeded performance revenue. Amendments to India's Wildlife Protection Act in 1972, with stricter enforcement in the 1990s prohibiting snake capture and exhibition, dismantled this economy, impacting an estimated 800,000 practitioners and driving widespread , with mean monthly incomes dropping to as low as 819 rupees (about $10 USD) in surveyed areas by the early . Many transitioned to low-wage alternatives such as agricultural labor, pulling, vending, or urban scavenging, exacerbating dependency ratios and educational deficits in de-notified nomadic tribes. Some communities have adapted by repurposing skills for snake rescue operations, earning commissions of around 4,800 rupees ($58 USD) monthly from wildlife agencies for capturing and relocating venomous , or serving as barefoot conservation educators to mitigate human-snake conflicts. These shifts, while providing marginal stability, have eroded traditional community cohesion, with practitioners lamenting the loss of cultural autonomy amid legal and economic pressures.

Controversies

Animal Welfare Criticisms

Snake charmers commonly defang venomous species such as the (Naja naja) by manually extracting fangs or cauterizing venom glands, procedures performed without anesthesia that inflict acute pain and elevate risks of and tissue . Regrowth of fangs necessitates repetition every few weeks, perpetuating chronic injury and impairing the snake's ability to capture prey, often leading to or reliance on milk or small animals, which can cause digestive distress. organizations report that these mutilations contribute to high mortality, with many snakes surviving only weeks in captivity due to compounded health decline. Additional practices include sewing snake mouths partially shut to prevent biting during performances, restricting feeding and hydration, and confining animals in cramped baskets or pots for extended periods, denying opportunities for natural , movement, or hiding that scientific assessments identify as essential for welfare. Performers often withhold food to induce , mimicking a "charmed" state responsive to flute-like instruments (pungi), though this exploits the snake's defensive swaying rather than , exacerbating dehydration and metabolic stress. Reports from rescues in document emaciated, dehydrated specimens with untreated wounds upon confiscation, underscoring systemic neglect absent veterinary intervention. These methods have prompted legal actions, including India's 1972 Wildlife Protection Act prohibiting wild animal exploitation partly on cruelty grounds, with enforcement citing evidence of welfare violations over cultural claims. While practitioners assert minimal harm through traditional handling, empirical observations from veterinary examinations reveal elevated cortisol-equivalent stress indicators and pathologies inconsistent with healthy reptilian physiology, prioritizing spectacle over species-specific needs. In , snake charming has been illegal since the passage of the Wildlife (Protection) Act on September 9, 1972, which prohibits the hunting, capture, possession, and exhibition of scheduled wild animals, including venomous snakes commonly used in performances such as cobras and vipers. The legislation aimed to curb exploitation of for commercial purposes, including the in snake skins and live animals for entertainment, amid declining snake populations due to over-capture. Amendments in further reinforced restrictions by explicitly outlawing performances involving protected , with penalties including fines up to 25,000 rupees (approximately $300 USD as of 2025 exchange rates) and imprisonment up to three years for violations. Enforcement of the ban has proven challenging, particularly in rural areas where snake charmers from communities like the Sapera and Nath often continue the practice clandestinely, citing economic necessity and local demand for snake removal services. Raids by forest officials and police occur sporadically; for instance, in 2011, authorities in arrested charmers possessing cobras, highlighting ongoing illegal trade networks supplying snakes to performers. Despite these efforts, surveys indicate that over 70% of traditional snake charmer families in regions like and remain partially dependent on the activity as of 2024, often evading detection by using non-venomous or captive-bred substitutes where possible. In contrast, snake charming remains legal in , where no equivalent nationwide ban exists, allowing practitioners to operate openly as a means of , though local regulations on venomous species handling apply. Internationally, restrictions vary; for example, wildlife protection laws in countries like and permit limited performances under supervised conditions, but broader statutes in the and effectively prohibit importation or exhibition of mistreated exotic snakes, limiting the practice to informal or tourist contexts. These measures stem from concerns over and zoonotic disease risks, with organizations like the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) indirectly influencing bans by regulating snake trade since 1975.

Defenses from Practitioners and Cultural Preservationists

Practitioners of snake charming, particularly in where the practice has deep historical roots, defend it as an inherited family trade passed down through generations, essential for their economic survival amid limited alternative employment options. Many charmers, belonging to communities like the Sapera or Bediya castes, argue that the 1972 Wildlife Protection Act—which prohibits capturing, owning, and performing with wild snakes—has deprived thousands of their sole means of income without providing viable rehabilitation programs, leaving families in poverty. They contend that their expertise in handling venomous species, such as the (Naja naja), serves a practical public benefit by responding to calls for snake removal from homes, especially during seasons when floods drive reptiles into human settlements, thereby reducing wild snakebite incidents in rural areas. Cultural preservationists emphasize snake charming's role in safeguarding intangible heritage tied to Hindu traditions, where serpents symbolize deities like Naga and are revered in festivals such as Nag Panchami, with the practice dating back centuries as a ritualistic performance linked to mythology and community identity. They warn that outright bans risk the extinction of associated artisanal skills, including the crafting and playing of the pungi (or been), a wind instrument central to performances whose unique sound is integral to the tradition and unlikely to be preserved otherwise. Preservation advocates, including some anthropologists, argue that regulated forms could promote eco-tourism and educate on snake ecology, countering the notion that the practice inherently harms conservation by highlighting charmers' informal knowledge of serpent behavior, which has historically contributed to local venom extraction for antivenom production. Critics of bans from this perspective assert that enforcement has driven the trade underground, increasing risks rather than eliminating them, without empirical evidence that prohibition has boosted wild snake populations. In protests against stricter enforcement, such as the 2009 rally in where hundreds of charmers demonstrated, participants have voiced that the fosters respect for snakes rather than exploitation, with many defanging or de-venomizing captives humanely using traditional methods to minimize harm during shows. Preservationists further contend that Western-influenced campaigns overlook the cultural context, where snakes are not viewed solely as victims but as partners in a symbiotic rural livelihood system that has sustained communities for over 2,000 years. Despite these arguments, practitioners acknowledge adaptations like using non-venomous substitutes in some performances to comply partially with laws, yet maintain that full revival requires policy recognition of their role in awareness.

Current Status and Prospects

Ongoing Practices and Declines

Despite legal prohibitions in under the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972, as amended in 1991 to ban the capture, possession, and exhibition of wild snakes, snake charming persists illegally among some rural communities, particularly during festivals such as Nag Panchami, where performers may use defanged or captive-bred specimens to evade enforcement. In , the practice remains a generational occupation in regions like and the , where charmers handle venomous species such as cobras for street performances, though it relies on tips from onlookers and faces challenges from urbanization reducing traditional audiences. North African countries like sustain public displays in tourist hubs such as Marrakech's square, employing up to 77 charmers sharing spaces with cobras and puff adders to attract visitors, often without fangs removed to heighten spectacle. The profession has declined sharply in , where an estimated 800,000 practitioners were impacted by the 1990s bans, prompting many to transition to alternative livelihoods like rickshaw driving or street vending, while others resort to using rubber replicas to simulate performances without risking legal penalties. Contributing factors include habitat loss from and , which have reduced wild snake availability, alongside competition from modern entertainment like that erodes public interest in live shows. In Pakistan's province, nomadic charmers report fewer successors entering the trade due to insufficient support and shifting youth preferences toward urban jobs. Moroccan practices, tied to tourism revenue, contribute to localized snake population declines in northern regions from over-exploitation, with historical estimates indicating unsustainable capture rates for performances. Overall, global numbers have dwindled from historical peaks, with practitioners numbering under one million in alone by the early and continuing to fall.

Debates on Alternatives and Revival

Proponents of alternatives to traditional snake charming emphasize transitioning practitioners to roles that leverage their expertise in snake handling while minimizing animal harm, such as wildlife rescue and venom extraction for production. Organizations like Wildlife SOS have rehabilitated former charmers by training them as snake rescuers, enabling them to capture and relocate nuisance snakes humanely rather than defanging or confining them for performances; this approach has integrated hundreds of ex-charmers into conservation efforts since the early 2000s, providing sustainable livelihoods amid declining for charming. In , state initiatives as of 2008 proposed teaching charmers venom extraction techniques, arguing that their traditional knowledge could contribute to medical supplies without relying on wild captures for shows, though implementation has been limited by funding and outreach challenges. Critics of such alternatives contend that they fail to address the cultural void left by bans, as rescued snakes or lab work lacks the performative and communal elements central to communities like the Sapera or Bedia tribes, potentially leading to incomplete economic rehabilitation since many charmers possess no formal for alternative trades. Government amnesties for existing post-1972 Wildlife Protection Act have accommodated limited possession but prohibited new captures, yet empirical data shows persistent underground practices, with seizures like 69 snakes in in August 2025 indicating alternatives have not fully supplanted the tradition. Revival debates center on amending India's Wildlife Protection Act to permit regulated, non-harmful performances, with groups like the Bedia Federation advocating in 2011 for legal tweaks to preserve the art as , citing charmers' role in local snake control and folk traditions tied to Hindu festivals like Nag Panchami. Practitioners defend revival by highlighting ecological benefits, such as their historical function in reducing human-snake conflicts through targeted removals, which some studies suggest tribal knowledge sustains local snake populations better than bans alone, though evidence remains anecdotal amid broader habitat loss drivers. Protests, including a 2009 rally of nearly 1,000 charmers in demanding license reforms, underscore livelihood crises, with many reporting destitution after the 1991 ban amendment outlawed performances. Opponents of revival prioritize verifiable animal welfare data, noting defanging causes chronic infections and shortens lifespans to under two years due to improper care, as documented in Moroccan and Indian cases, arguing that cultural claims do not justify perpetuating when non-lethal alternatives like or digital simulations could sustain performances. Conservation analyses question revival efficacy, as bans since 1972 correlate with stabilized populations of like the (Naja naja), though urban expansion poses greater threats than charming's limited scale. Efforts among Rajasthan's Kal Beliya gypsies to adapt via snake-themed dance and crafts represent hybrid revivals, preserving motifs without live animals, yet these remain marginal against enforcement priorities.

References

  1. https://www.loststory.net/nature/truth-behind-snake-charming
  2. https://smart.dhgate.com/why-do-cobras-react-to-music-snake-charming-explained/
  3. https://www.ancient-origins.net/videos/indian-snake-charming-0019446
  4. http://www.sahapedia.org/saperas-snake-charming-community-of-india-0
  5. https://www.peta.org/news/taking-charm-snake-charmers/
  6. https://fsrn.org/2017/04/snake-charmers-in-india-lament-loss-of-culture-following-outlawing-of-their-practice/
  7. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/varanasi/more-trouble-in-store-for-snake-charmers/articleshow/9201340.cms
  8. https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-snake-charmers-in-india-defy-local-laws-2019-10
  9. https://hal.science/hal-03190184/document
  10. https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/opencollection/archives/set/112
  11. https://beforest.co/blogs/snakes-india-a-mythological-link/
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309533975_An_overview_of_Fast_declining_Snake_Charmers_in_India
  13. https://www.chaighai.com/blogs/news/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-deadly-art-of-snake-charming
  14. https://www.dhakatribune.com/feature/350924/the-ancient-art-of-snake-charming
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368753129_Attitudes_and_behaviors_toward_snakes_in_the_snake_charmer_community_A_case_from_northern_Bangladesh
  16. https://margaritamischief.com/snake-charming-the-sad-truth-you-need-to-know/
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349740657_Charming_Snakes_and_Kings_from_Egypt_to_Persia
  18. http://markalburgermusichistory.blogspot.com/2010/10/sol-bloom-1870-1949-snake-charmer.html
  19. https://artblart.com/tag/snake-charmer/
  20. https://smarthistory.org/jean-leon-gerome-snake-charmer/
  21. https://womenshistorynetwork.org/women-performers-their-writhing-reptiles-and-that-wrought-indian-connection-debanjali-biswas/
  22. https://www.niua.in/sites/default/files/2025-07/2021_1_%2520Snake%2520Charmers%2520of.pdf
  23. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/snake-charming-and-the-exploitation-of-snakes-in-morocco/7B77F8BFD9122A1F61FD9A9830FD946C
  24. https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=382a4f4b-b855-40be-86fb-327cb873ad66
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27535583/
  26. https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/news/do-snakes-have-ears-and-other-sensational-serpent-questions
  27. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/54/2/349/21718/Physiological-Basis-for-Detection-of-Sound-and
  28. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/snakes-can-hear-you-scream-new-research-reveals/
  29. https://www.science.org/content/article/vibrating-skulls-help-snakes-hear
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23348039/
  31. https://blog.zoo.org/2014/10/why-do-snakes-stick-out-their-tongues.html
  32. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=jscas
  33. https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-11/fyi-can-snakes-really-be-charmed-music/
  34. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Naja_naja/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8829814/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9928108/
  37. https://reptileexplorer.com/reptile-insights/reptile-myths-vs-facts/snake-charming-myth-busted/
  38. https://www.thedailyjagran.com/did-you-know/do-snakes-really-hear-the-flute-know-the-truth-behind-this-famous-claim-10267713
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618210/
  40. https://study.com/academy/lesson/snake-charmer-history-facts.html
  41. https://creation.com/snake-charming-and-bible-accuracy
  42. https://www.britannica.com/animal/reptile/Striking-and-biting
  43. https://collections.bowers.org/objects/143863/wind-instrument-for-snake-charming-pungi
  44. https://www.uncoveringsound.com/instruments-music-of-indian-snake-charmers/
  45. https://a-z-animals.com/blog/how-snake-charmers-hypnotize-cobras/
  46. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb9fLdNPv_Y
  47. https://frederic-38110.medium.com/the-snake-charmers-secret-bd02f1914073
  48. https://thinkwildlifefoundation.com/death-away-from-home-the-ugly-side-of-snake-charming/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10545105/
  50. https://news.wildlifesos.org/50-snakes-seized-from-snake-charmers-during-shravan/
  51. https://news.wildlifesos.org/74-snakes-seized-from-snake-charmers-during-shravan-month/
  52. https://news.wildlifesos.org/the-cruel-association-of-snakes-with-shravan/
  53. https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/snake-charming-a-profession-of-little-charm-1.998823
  54. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12345073/Horrifying-moment-snake-charmer-fatally-bitten-pet-cobra-trying-kiss-village-Indonesia.html
  55. https://www.newsweek.com/snake-charmer-dies-playing-cobra-bitten-finger-mouth-1706822
  56. https://www.mcall.com/2001/03/26/cobra-bites-circus-snake-charmer-some-at-allentown-performance-thought-incident-was-part-of-act-but-attack-sends-man-to-hospital/
  57. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/indore/17-snakes-rescued-from-charmers-by-forest-department/articleshow/112414486.cms
  58. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/02/india-endangeredspecies
  59. https://www.georgeinstitute.org/our-impact/policy-statements-and-recommendations/snakes-the-ecosystem-and-us-its-time-we-change
  60. https://redinational.com/what-role-do-snakes-play-in-the-ecosystem/
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320852985_Snake-charming_in_Morocco_an_evaluation_of_the_conflict_between_tradition_and_conservation_concerns_today
  62. https://www.hinduwebsite.com/buzz/symbolism-of-snakes-in-hinduism.asp
  63. https://thewondernepal.com/articles/the-tradition-of-worshipping-snakes-in-naag-panchami-a-comprehensive-article/
  64. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/snake-charmer
  65. https://divinehindu.com/festivals-pujas/nag-panchami-worship-wisdom-and-spiritual-meaning/
  66. https://theindianpanorama.news/spirituality/nag-panchami-the-sacred-day-of-the-serpent-gods/
  67. https://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0404/p10s01-wosc.html
  68. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-04-16-mn-2359-story.html
  69. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/governance/no-sway-for-education-to-haryana-snake-charmers-the-sapera-community-has-been-left-far-behind-88497
  70. https://ojs.unito.it/index.php/kervan/article/view/12263
  71. https://pressinstitute.in/grassroots/taking-the-snake-out-of-snake-charming/
  72. https://media.rufford.org/media/project_reports/2-88.08.03%2520Detailed%2520Final%2520Report.pdf
  73. https://www.academia.edu/26065942/Demographic_and_Socio_cultural_Profile_of_Snake_Charmers_A_Case_Study_of_Murshidabad_District_West_Bengal
  74. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/governance/from-snake-charmers-to-agricultural-labourers-a-case-of-haryana-s-saperas-84359
  75. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/longform/2024/1/13/no-money-for-meat-so-we-eat-rats-the-indian-snake-catcher
  76. https://www.wti.org.in/news/snake-charmers-as-barefoot-conservation-educators/
  77. https://www.wti.org.in/resource_centre/biodiversity-livelihoods-the-law-the-case-of-the-jogi-nath-snake-charmers-of-india/
  78. https://www.npr.org/2011/08/08/139086119/in-india-snake-charmers-are-losing-their-sway
  79. https://kbr.id/articles/indeks/taking_the_snakes_out_of_snake_charming
  80. https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/indian-snake-charmers-refusing-to-change-their-tune-1.2041361
  81. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/pakistani-snake-charmers-hold-council-for-survival-idUSISL265897/
  82. https://www.petaindia.com/issues/animals-in-entertainment/whats-wrong-with-forcing-animals-to-perform-in-shows/
  83. https://www.nature.com/articles/news020715-5
  84. https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2003-12-05-6-snake-66306632/542386.html
  85. https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/123790/Snake-charmers-bite-back-over-work-ban
  86. https://snakes-store.com/blogs/snake-blog/snake-charming
  87. https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2015/vol1issue11/PartG/1-11-54.pdf
  88. https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-snake-charmers-risk-their-lives-to-earn-a-living/video-68436517
  89. https://www.arabnews.com/node/1818936/pakistan
  90. https://www.ethnobiology.net/reflecting-on-the-snake-tracking-trip-during-the-18th-international-society-of-ethnobiology-congress-in-marrakech-morocco/
  91. https://m.economictimes.com/uncharming-life-of-snake-charmers/articleshow/8076528.cms
  92. https://thebetterindia.com/99468/snake-charmers-snake-rescuers/
  93. https://www.indiatoday.in/web-exclusive/story/new-hope-for-snake-charmers-31264-2008-10-09
  94. https://news.wildlifesos.org/uttar-pradesh-forest-department-in-a-joint-operation-with-wildlife-sos-seized-69-snakes-from-snake-charmers/
  95. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/riFfrZafACcNAfkNE4c9uL/Past-Present-Future--Bandunath-The-snake-charmer.html
  96. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2063026
  97. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna29238327
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311851291_Snake_charming_and_the_exploitation_of_snakes_in_Morocco
  99. https://maverickbird.com/india/west/rajasthan-india-3/kal-beliya-the-snake-charming-gypsies-of-rajasthan/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.