Hubbry Logo
ChelydridaeChelydridaeMain
Open search
Chelydridae
Community hub
Chelydridae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chelydridae
Chelydridae
Chelydridae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Chelydrids
Temporal range: 70.6–0 Ma Late Cretaceous[1] to Recent
The common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Testudines
Suborder: Cryptodira
Clade: Chelydroidea
Family: Chelydridae
Gray, 1831[2]
Genera
Synonyms[3]
  • Chelydrae Gray, 1831:4[2]
  • Chelydridae Swainson, 1839:113[4]
  • Chelydradae Gray, 1869:178[5]

The Chelydridae is a family of turtles that has seven extinct and two extant genera. The extant genera are the snapping turtles, Chelydra and Macrochelys. Both are endemic to the Western Hemisphere. The extinct genera are Acherontemys, Chelydrops, Chelydropsis, Emarginachelys, Macrocephalochelys, Planiplastron, and Protochelydra.

Fossil history

[edit]
Chelydropsis murchisoni fossil remains (left: juvenile; right: adult)

The Chelydridae have a long fossil history, with extinct species reported from North America as well as all over Asia and Europe, far outside their present range. The earliest described chelydrid is Emarginachelys cretacea, known from well-preserved fossils from the Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous of Montana.[1] Another well-preserved fossil chelydrid is the Late Paleocene Protochelydra zangerli from North Dakota.[6] The carapace of P. zangerli is higher-domed than that of the recent Chelydra, a trait conjectured to be associated with the coexistence of large, turtle-eating crocodilians. Another genus, Chelydropsis, contains several well-known Eurasian chelydrid species that existed from the Oligocene to the Pliocene.[7] In South America, chelydrids (C. acutirostris) only occupy the northwestern corner of the continent, reflecting their recent arrival from Central America as part of the Great American Interchange.

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chelydridae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chelydridae is a family of freshwater turtles in the order Testudines, commonly known as snapping turtles due to their powerful, hooked jaws adapted for snapping at prey and defense. The family includes two genera—Chelydra (common snapping turtles) and Macrochelys (alligator snapping turtles)—encompassing six primarily native to , with some extending into northern . These turtles are distinguished by their large heads that cannot fully retract into the shell, rough and often moss-covered carapaces, long tails with saw-like keels, and webbed feet suited for aquatic life. Species in Chelydridae vary in size, with the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) typically reaching a carapace length of 8–14 inches (20–36 cm) and weighing 10–35 pounds (4.5–16 kg), while the alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) is the largest freshwater turtle in North America, growing up to 29 inches (74 cm) and exceeding 200 pounds (91 kg). They inhabit a range of slow-moving or stagnant freshwater environments, including rivers, lakes, ponds, swamps, and marshes with muddy bottoms and abundant vegetation for cover. As primarily aquatic ambush predators, they consume a diverse omnivorous diet of fish, crayfish, insects, amphibians, small mammals, birds, carrion, and plant matter, with the alligator snapping turtle notably using a worm-like tongue appendage to lure prey. Reproduction in Chelydridae involves females laying clutches of 4–52 eggs in nests dug on land during spring or summer, with incubation lasting 55–125 days depending on ; is reached at 4–21 years, and lifespans can exceed 40–80 years in the wild. While the is widespread and generally stable, the faces conservation challenges from habitat loss, , and historical overharvest, leading to its listing as threatened in parts of the . These turtles play key ecological roles as and predators in their habitats but are often persecuted due to their aggressive on land.

Taxonomy

Classification

Chelydridae is a family of turtles classified within the order Testudines, suborder Cryptodira, and superfamily Chelydroidea. Members of this family are primarily aquatic or semi-aquatic species characterized by a large head relative to body size, a powerful bite enabled by a kinetic lower jaw that allows for a wide gape, a reduced and often incomplete plastron, an elongated tail, and a non-retractile neck, all adaptations for an ambush predatory strategy involving rapid snapping at prey. The family was first described by in 1825 in his Synopsis of the genera of reptiles and Amphibia, with a description of some new species, with designated as the ; the genus itself was established by August Friedrich Schweigger in 1812 based on Testudo serpentina Linnaeus, 1758. No major synonyms exist for the family name, though historical classifications occasionally proposed subfamilies such as Chelydrinae (encompassing extant snapping turtles) and a separate grouping for larger forms like the alligator snapping turtle.

Extant genera and species

The family Chelydridae comprises two extant genera: and , both endemic to the and characterized by robust freshwater turtles with powerful jaws adapted for snapping prey. The genus , derived from chelydros meaning "water snake" or "," encompasses common snapping turtles known for their aggressive defensive behavior and broad distribution across North American freshwater systems. This genus includes a single , Chelydra serpentina (Linnaeus, 1758), the , with no currently recognized . In contrast, the genus Macrochelys, meaning "large turtle" from Greek makros (large) and chelys (turtle), includes the larger alligator snapping turtles, distinguished from Chelydra by their greater size, more pronounced dorsal ridges on the carapace, and a unique worm-like lingual lure on the tongue used to attract fish prey through aggressive mimicry. This lure, a fleshy appendage resembling a wriggling worm, is extended within the open mouth to entice prey close enough for a rapid snap. A taxonomic revision in 2014 (Thomas et al.) proposed elevating phylogeographic lineages within Macrochelys to full species status based on molecular, morphological, and geographic evidence from southeastern U.S. populations. While the study initially recognized three species, subsequent analyses (e.g., Folt & Guyer 2015; Turtle Taxonomy Working Group 2017) synonymized the central lineage (M. apalachicolae) with the western Macrochelys temminckii (originally described by Troost, 1835), distributed in rivers from Texas to Illinois and including central drainages. The eastern lineage, M. suwanniensis (Thomas et al., 2014), is confined to the Suwannee River system in Florida and Georgia. This split highlights distinct evolutionary histories shaped by Pleistocene drainage patterns, with each species facing conservation challenges due to habitat loss and historical overharvest; M. suwanniensis was listed as threatened by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2024.
GenusSpeciesCommon NameDistribution Notes
ChelydraC. serpentinaEastern and central
MacrochelysM. temminckiiWestern and central drainages (e.g., basin to Apalachicola)
M. suwanniensisSuwannee alligator snapping turtleEastern southeastern U.S. (Suwannee River)

Evolutionary history

Fossil record

The fossil record of Chelydridae, encompassing the total Pan-Chelydridae, originates in the Santonian stage, approximately 85 million years ago, with initial discoveries from North American localities indicating early pan-chelydrid forms such as fragmentary shell elements suggestive of basal members of the group. These early records, including isolated peripherals and costals from formations like those in the , document the emergence of stem chelydrids characterized by broad triturating surfaces adapted for a durophagous diet. By the stage, more complete specimens such as Emarginachelys cretacea from the in provide evidence of cryptodiran turtles assignable to Pan-Chelydridae, marking a transition toward more derived morphologies. Diversification accelerated in the across , with key taxa including Denverus middletoni from the early Puercan of the in and Protochelydra zangerli from the late Thanetian of , representing primitive chelydrids with ligamentous plastron-carapace attachments and smaller body sizes compared to later forms. Eocene and records feature genera like Chelydropsis, with species such as C. aubasi from the Middle Eocene () of Chéry-Chartreuve in , illustrating early Eurasian dispersal likely via land bridges. Fossils of stem chelydrids appear in North American Eocene- deposits, showing early developments toward macrocephalic skulls and robust limbs that characterize extant snapping turtles. The family includes at least seven extinct genera, such as Acherontemys, Chelydrops, Chelydropsis, Emarginachelys, Macrocephalochelys, Planiplastron, and Protochelydra, with Eurasian occurrences from the onward, including Chelydropsis decheni from Chattian deposits in . Notable fossil sites extend to the Phosphorites du in , yielding Oligocene-Miocene chelydrid remains, while the temporal range persists into the Pleistocene, as evidenced by chelydrid fragments from early Pleistocene localities like the Santa Fe River in and Térapa in , . Over time, evolutionary trends in Chelydridae reflect an increase in body size, from smaller forms like Denverus ( ~30-40 cm) to larger Miocene-Pleistocene Macrochelys species exceeding 1 meter, alongside enhanced aquatic adaptations such as deepened for bottom-walking and stronger jaw musculature for ambush predation in freshwater environments. These changes, observed across Laurasian deposits, underscore a shift from generalized durophagy in stem lineages to specialized aquatic lifestyles in crown-group taxa.

Phylogenetic position

Chelydridae occupies a well-defined position within the suborder of the order Testudines, specifically as part of the infraorder Durocryptodira and the superfamily Chelydroidea. This placement is supported by both molecular and morphological analyses, which consistently recover Chelydridae as a monophyletic family distinct from other cryptodiran lineages such as Testudinoidea and Trionychia. Within Chelydroidea, Chelydridae forms the to Kinosternoidea, which includes the families (mud and musk turtles) and Dermatemydidae (river turtles). This relationship is corroborated by extensive mitogenomic and nuclear genomic data, highlighting shared derived traits like robust cranial morphology and adaptations for aquatic predation. Molecular phylogenies, drawing on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences and multiple nuclear genes such as RAG-1 and thousands of single-copy orthologs, indicate that Durocryptodira diverged approximately 182 million years ago (161–200 Ma HPD) during the . Subsequent cladogenesis within Durocryptodira positioned Chelydroidea basal to core testudinoids, with the specific split between Chelydridae and Kinosternoidea estimated at 72–86 million years ago in the . These timelines are derived from Bayesian divergence dating incorporating fossil calibrations, reconciling molecular clocks with the sparse but informative fossil record of early cryptodirans. Morphological data, including and shell characters, reinforce this topology, though early hypotheses based solely on sometimes suggested alternative affinities, such as proximity to sea turtles (Chelonioidea). Within Chelydridae, phylogenetic analyses recover the genus as basal to , forming a tight sister-group relationship upheld by both mtDNA and nuclear loci across multiple studies. This intrafamilial structure extends to the broader pan-chelydrid , which encompasses extant species and several extinct genera from the onward, such as Chelydropsis and newly described forms like Tavachelydra stevensoni from the early of , a stem-chelydrid with broad triturating surfaces indicating a durophagous diet. The pan-chelydrid topology remains stable in cladistic analyses combining molecular and evidence, underscoring the family's evolutionary conservatism. Key studies driving these insights include Thomson et al. (2021), which analyzed nuclear DNA from 591 individuals to affirm Chelydroidea's , and a 2023 phylogenomic analysis by Chen et al. integrating mitochondrial and nuclear genomes with fossilized birth-death models for precise dating. Updates in 2025, such as the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group checklist and descriptions of new fossils, continue to support these estimates.

Description

General morphology

Members of the family Chelydridae, commonly known as snapping turtles, exhibit a distinctive morphology adapted to an aquatic lifestyle, characterized by a robust, heavily armored shell and exposed extremities that enhance mobility. The family includes two extant genera, Chelydra and Macrochelys, both sharing core anatomical features that define their predatory nature. Their build emphasizes strength and ambush capability, with a large head and powerful jaws protruding from a partially enclosed body. The , or dorsal shell, is rough and keeled, featuring three prominent longitudinal ridges that run from anterior to posterior, providing structural reinforcement while maintaining a relatively low profile for hydrodynamic efficiency. These keels are more pronounced in juveniles and in , where they form sharp, elevated crests, whereas in they are lower and become smoother with age. The surface is typically dark brown to black, often covered by in the wild for , and lacks fully distinct epidermal scutes over the ridged areas, contributing to its rugged texture. The plastron, or ventral shell, is greatly reduced and cross-shaped, consisting of a small central plate connected to the via ligaments rather than rigid sutures, which permits flexibility and allows the limbs, , and neck to extend freely without full enclosure. This ligamentous attachment contrasts with the more ossified shells of many other families, enabling greater agility in . The head is disproportionately large and cannot be retracted into the shell, featuring a broad skull with a hooked, beak-like upper jaw adapted for crushing and tearing prey. Powerful temporalis and other adductor muscles support a rapid, snapping bite, with recorded forces reaching up to 1872 N in large Macrochelys individuals and up to 564 N in Chelydra individuals. The limbs are stout and partially webbed, with the feet bearing claws suited for propulsion in aquatic environments and traction on substrates. Males possess notably longer tails than females, often exceeding the carapace length, while Macrochelys uniquely features a worm-like lingual appendage on the tongue, used as a lure. The shell's bony core includes reduced neural elements in the carapace, contributing to its overall flexibility despite the dense cortical bone typical of chelydrid histology.

Size and variation

Members of the Chelydridae family exhibit considerable variation in body size, with measurements typically reported as straight carapace length (SCL), measured in a straight line from the nuchal scute to the posterior edge of the pygal scute, though curved carapace length (CCL) is sometimes used to account for shell curvature. The northern common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), one of three species in its genus, reaches adult SCLs of 20–47 cm and weights of 4.5–16 kg, though exceptional individuals can exceed 49 cm SCL and 39 kg. Other Chelydra species show similar size ranges, with some southern populations attaining slightly larger maximum sizes. In contrast, the alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii), one of three species in its genus, is notably larger and more robust, with adults attaining SCLs of 40–80 cm and weights up to 100 kg, including a verified record of 113 kg for a male specimen; congeners like M. suwanniensis and M. apalachicolae exhibit comparable dimensions but may vary regionally. Growth in chelydrids is indeterminate, continuing throughout life at a decelerating rate after , which allows for substantial size increases in older individuals. Age estimation often relies on counting annual growth rings in scutes or long bones, particularly effective for juveniles but less accurate in adults due to ring crowding and erosion; this method has been validated for C. serpentina up to about 20 years. is reached at 12–20 years, varying by and —males typically mature later (around 20 years at ~31 cm SCL) than females (around 12 years at ~28 cm SCL)—with northern populations delaying maturity relative to southern ones; similar patterns occur in other species but with geographic variation. Intraspecific and intergeneric variations are pronounced, including where males are larger than and possess longer tails for reproductive functions. Geographic clines show larger body sizes in southern populations of C. serpentina, aligning with a negative between female body and (following James's rule), potentially driven by overwintering physiology or oxygen limitations rather than reproductive seasonality. Across genera, displays greater overall robustness and maximum size compared to Chelydra, reflecting adaptations to distinct ecological niches within the family.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic range

The family Chelydridae, comprising the genera and , is natively distributed across eastern , with extensions into northern for certain Chelydra species. The common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) occupies a broad native range spanning southeastern , including and southern , southward through the eastern and east of the , and extending into northern as far as and northern . In contrast, the alligator snapping turtles of the genus Macrochelys are more restricted, occurring primarily in the from southern and southward to eastern , , and Georgia, with Macrochelys temminckii (the nominate species) distributed across much of this range excluding the easternmost drainages, Macrochelys suwanniensis endemic to the basin in and Georgia, and Macrochelys apalachicolae confined to the system and adjacent drainages in the and adjacent Georgia and . Introduced populations of Chelydra serpentina have established outside this native range, including in western (such as , , and western Canadian provinces), Europe (e.g., the , , and the ), and (e.g., , the , , and ), primarily through releases from the pet trade. Widespread introduced populations of Macrochelys species are documented in , where they are established and invasive, though isolated releases have also occurred elsewhere. Historically, the range of Chelydridae has contracted in some areas due to habitat alterations, with current distributions more fragmented than in pre-colonial times, particularly for Macrochelys species in riverine systems. Fossil records indicate past extensions beyond modern ranges, including Pleistocene occurrences in and . The species of Macrochelys occupy distinct, non-overlapping river basins in the .

Habitat requirements

Members of the Chelydridae primarily inhabit slow-moving freshwater environments, including rivers, lakes, swamps, marshes, and backwaters, where soft, muddy bottoms predominate. These habitats offer essential cover through dense aquatic , submerged logs, and brush, facilitating predation and concealment. High turbidity in these waters enhances , as the turtles' dark, algae-covered shells blend seamlessly with the murky substrate. Chelydrids exhibit broad tolerance to temperature fluctuations, remaining active in waters ranging from 5°C during cooler periods to approximately 30°C in warmer seasons, with occurring below 5°C in northern ranges. requirements are flexible, encompassing freshwater systems and, in the case of Chelydra serpentina, occasional brackish conditions in coastal estuaries. This adaptability allows persistence in varied aquatic settings, though they avoid fast-flowing or clear streams lacking sufficient cover. Microhabitat utilization emphasizes submerged refuges; turtles rarely bask and spend most of their time underwater, burrowing into mud for overwintering to endure low oxygen and cold. Genus-specific preferences differ: species favor deeper channels, sloughs, and oxbows with structural cover like fallen trees, while demonstrates greater versatility across shallower ponds, marshes, and sluggish streams.

Biology and ecology

Diet and feeding behavior

Members of the family Chelydridae are opportunistic carnivores that primarily consume aquatic prey, including , amphibians, such as and , and carrion, with occasional ingestion of plant material like vegetation and seeds. In Chelydra serpentina, the diet consists mainly of animal matter, with juveniles targeting small aquatic and larvae, while adults incorporate a broader range including terrestrial and aquatic plants. Similarly, Macrochelys temminckii exhibits a carnivorous diet dominated by (comprising up to 80% of occurrences in some populations), followed by , mollusks, other turtles, and mammals like , reflecting their scavenging tendencies. Feeding strategies in Chelydridae emphasize predation, facilitated by cryptic positioning in aquatic environments and rapid extension of the neck to strike prey. Chelydra serpentina employs a snap-and-swallow technique, using its powerful jaws to seize and consume items whole or in large pieces, often generating to aid capture. In contrast, Macrochelys temminckii utilizes a unique passive lure—a vermiform, worm-like on the —to attract , which is protruded within the open mouth during motionless waits, a observed even in neonates responding to visual and chemical cues from potential prey. Dietary patterns show ontogenetic shifts, with juveniles of both genera being more piscivorous and reliant on smaller, mobile aquatic prey, whereas adults expand to include larger, harder-shelled items and carrion due to increased size and strength. Seasonal variations occur, with greater terrestrial in spring for emerging and , shifting to predominantly aquatic predation in summer when water bodies support abundant and . These adaptations align with the robust morphology of Chelydridae, enabling efficient processing of diverse, often tough prey.

Reproduction and development

Members of the Chelydridae family exhibit polygynous systems, where males compete aggressively for access to females through biting and physical confrontations during the breeding season. In common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina), occurs from April to November, with peak activity in late spring to early summer when water temperatures rise; males mount the female's , grasping it firmly with their claws and often biting her head or neck to maintain position during copulation. Alligator snapping turtles (Macrochelys temminckii) follow a similar pattern, with in early spring; males similarly mount and grasp the female's shell using all four feet. in both species involves tactile and aggressive displays, though specific head-bobbing behaviors are less documented compared to other turtle families. Nesting typically occurs in late spring to early summer, with females migrating overland—sometimes distances exceeding 1 km—to upland sites featuring loose sand, soil, or vegetated areas suitable for excavation. For C. serpentina, nesting peaks from mid-May to early June; females construct flask- or bowl-shaped cavities 3–8 inches deep, depositing 20–45 eggs (range 4–100) per , which are leathery, cream-colored, and ping-pong-ball-sized. In M. temminckii, females lay 10–60 eggs in similar sand-based nests during May to June, often biennially rather than annually. Clutch size correlates positively with female body size in both species, reflecting energy investment in . Egg incubation lasts 75–95 days in C. serpentina and 100–140 days in M. temminckii, varying with temperature and moisture; hatchlings emerge in late summer to early fall, measuring 2–3 cm in length and appearing immediately independent without . Sex determination is -dependent (TSD), a typical of chelydrids, following II, where low and high incubation temperatures produce females, and intermediate temperatures (approximately 25–27°C) produce males. A similar TSD II is observed in M. temminckii. This has been documented in C. serpentina. Chelydrids display slow life histories with delayed maturity and low annual reproductive output, enhancing resilience to high juvenile mortality; C. serpentina reaches at 4–7 years (males earlier than females), while M. temminckii matures at 11–13 years. exceeds 30 years in the wild for both species, with records up to 47 years for C. serpentina and up to 70 years for M. temminckii in the wild, with individuals in captivity living longer than 100 years, supporting infrequent nesting (annual in C. serpentina, often biennial in M. temminckii).

Predation and interactions

Eggs and juveniles of Chelydridae species, such as the (Chelydra serpentina) and the (Macrochelys temminckii), face high predation rates from mammals including raccoons (Procyon lotor), (Mephitis mephitis), (Neovison vison), and foxes, as well as birds and fish. Nest predation can reach up to 84% in some populations, primarily due to these opportunistic predators targeting vulnerable nests during the breeding season. Adults are more defended but remain susceptible to larger predators like alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) and river otters (Lontra canadensis), particularly in overlapping habitats, though human activities pose the greatest threat to mature individuals. Interspecific interactions among Chelydridae and other freshwater turtles often involve competition for limited resources, such as foraging areas and shelter, though differences in behavior reduce direct conflict with basking species like red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans). For instance, snapping turtles, which rarely bask and prefer ambush foraging, experience less overlap with sliders but may compete with painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) for invertebrate prey and benthic habitats, with dietary and activity differences mitigating intense rivalry. Symbiotic associations include ectoparasitic leeches (Placobdella spp.), which commonly attach to the and plastron of snapping turtles, feeding on blood and potentially transmitting hemoparasites, though turtles exhibit behaviors like limited basking to dislodge them. Chelydridae serve as apex predators in many freshwater ecosystems, regulating populations of , amphibians, and through opportunistic scavenging and predation, which helps maintain trophic balance. Their scavenging contributes to by consuming carrion and facilitating the transfer of and other elements from terrestrial to aquatic systems, historically amplified by the of their own large carcasses in rivers. Human interactions exacerbate mortality in Chelydridae populations, with adults frequently harvested for meat or used as bait in recreational fishing for species like catfish, leading to direct removal from wild stocks. Road mortality is a significant threat, particularly for females crossing highways to nest, where vehicle collisions can account for substantial adult losses during peak migration periods.

Conservation

Population status

The common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), the most widespread species in the family Chelydridae, is assessed as Least Concern globally by the , reflecting its broad distribution across , though populations are decreasing overall due to habitat loss and other pressures. In , NatureServe ranks it as G4G5 (Apparently Secure), indicating it remains relatively abundant in many areas, but regional declines have been documented, such as over 80% population reductions in urbanized wetlands from sustained road mortality. Northern populations, including those in , , show stability with no significant long-term declines evident from mark-recapture studies spanning decades. Species in the genus —comprising three recognized species (M. temminckii, M. suwanniensis, and M. apalachicolae)—face precarious statuses. The western alligator snapping turtle (M. temminckii) is classified as Endangered by the IUCN as of 2025, with populations declining by an estimated 30-50% over the past three generations due to historical overexploitation and . The Suwannee alligator snapping turtle (M. suwanniensis) is assessed as Vulnerable by the IUCN and was listed as Threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 2024, reflecting severe reductions exceeding 80% in portions of its limited range in and Georgia river systems. Similarly, the Apalachicola alligator snapping turtle (M. apalachicolae) has been proposed for Threatened status under the ESA as of 2024-2025, with populations diminished by up to 80% in isolated southeastern U.S. drainages; it lacks a separate IUCN assessment but is considered at high risk. Population monitoring for Chelydridae relies on methods such as baited hoop-net trapping for direct headcounts and environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling for non-invasive detection, with eDNA proving cost-effective for confirming presence in large river systems. Genetic studies reveal low diversity in Macrochelys populations within isolated rivers, such as the Suwannee and Apalachicola basins, where microsatellite analyses indicate reduced allelic richness and heightened vulnerability to further declines. Overall trends show stability for C. serpentina in northern ranges but severe, ongoing declines for Macrochelys species across their southeastern U.S. distributions.

Threats and management

Chelydridae species, particularly the ( temminckii) and its congeners, face significant anthropogenic threats that have contributed to population declines across their ranges. from dams, channelization, , and drainage disrupts aquatic and riparian ecosystems essential for these , limiting movement and access to foraging and nesting sites. for the international and trade remains a critical risk, with over 200,000 exported from the between 2013 and 2019, exacerbating historical overharvest that peaked in the 1960s and 1970s. in recreational and gear, such as trotlines and hooks, accounts for up to 65% of reported mortality incidents, with 39% of affected individuals dying from injuries like or entanglement. Climate change poses additional challenges by altering hydrological regimes and patterns, which can reduce nesting success through increased flooding that washes away nests or droughts that limit suitable nesting sites and water availability. For common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina), projected warming is expected to expand suitable habitats northward, potentially leading to range shifts, while elevated temperatures may skew sex ratios toward females due to , impacting long-term population viability. These changes compound stressors, as altered patterns increase nest predation risks during vulnerable periods. Conservation management efforts focus on legal protections, habitat interventions, and population augmentation to mitigate these threats. In the United States, the Suwannee alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys suwanniensis) was listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in June 2024, with a Section 4(d) rule allowing incidental take from state-approved forest management practices while prohibiting activities like unregulated fishing bycatch. The alligator snapping turtles (Macrochelys spp.) are regulated under CITES Appendix II as of February 2025, requiring export permits to monitor trade and prevent illegal harvesting. Head-start programs, which rear hatchlings to juveniles before release, combined with habitat restoration initiatives like removing barriers to improve river connectivity, have been implemented in states such as Texas and Louisiana to bolster populations. Ongoing research emphasizes innovative monitoring and recovery techniques, including 2025 environmental (eDNA) protocols developed in to detect alligator snapping turtle presence in streams with high sensitivity, enabling non-invasive population assessments. Reintroduction efforts in , involving post-release monitoring of repatriated individuals, have shown initial survival successes, informing scalable conservation strategies across fragmented habitats. These approaches highlight the need for continued investment in threat mitigation to ensure the persistence of Chelydridae species.

References

  1. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide/eastern-snapping-turtle
  2. https://www.fws.gov/species/alligator-snapping-turtle-macrochelys-temminckii
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=info&id=8475
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chelydra
  5. https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/52222/1/192.pdf
  6. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/f4a04b75-6ba3-45bb-8407-ade98d7a6f9e/download
  7. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=chelydra&species=serpentina
  8. https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/mhaaramo/metazoa/deuterostoma/chordata/reptilia/testudinata/chelydridae.html
  9. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Chelydra&species=serpentina
  10. https://cnah.org/taxon.aspx?taxon=Chelydra_serpentina
  11. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3786.2.4
  12. https://doi.org/10.3854/crm.7.checklist.atlas.v8.2017
  13. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/06/27/2024-13946/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-threatened-status-for-the-suwannee-alligator-snapping
  14. https://srelherp.uga.edu/turtles/alligator-snapping-turtle/
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301536323_A_Review_of_the_Fossil_Record_of_Turtles_of_the_Clade_Pan-Chelydridae
  16. https://sjpp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13358-025-00375-4
  17. https://archive.org/download/biostor-1135/biostor-1135.pdf
  18. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25001
  19. https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1920&context=gjs
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348819589_First_record_of_fossil_chelydrid_and_trionychid_turtles_Testudines_from_the_Pleistocene_of_Sonora_Mexico
  21. https://iucn-tftsg.org/wp-content/uploads/crm.10.checklist.atlas_.v10.2025.pdf
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790323000738
  23. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/71/6/1331/6543627
  24. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2012215118
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15964217/
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261556927_Taxonomic_assessment_of_Alligator_Snapping_Turtles_Chelydridae_Macrochelys_with_the_description_of_two_new_species_from_the_southeastern_United_States
  27. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Chelydridae/
  28. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Macrochelys_temminckii/
  29. https://www.sdherps.org/species/chelydra_serpentina
  30. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Chelydra_serpentina/
  31. https://doc.rero.ch/record/200122/files/PAL_E3900.pdf
  32. https://bioone.org/journals/southeastern-naturalist/volume-22/issue-sp12/058.022.0sp1228/Bite-Force-Scaling-across-Size-Classes-in-the-Alligator-Snapping/10.1656/058.022.0sp1228.full
  33. https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/alligator-snapping-turtle
  34. https://accstr.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/98/Bolten_Tech_Man_1999.pdf
  35. https://digimorph.org/specimens/Chelydra_serpentina/
  36. https://webapps.fhsu.edu/ksherp/account.aspx?o=35&t=107
  37. https://parcplace.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Alligator-Snapping-Turtle_BMP_Final_508.pdf
  38. https://www.herpconbio.org/Volume_18/Issue_1/Suriyamongkol_etal_2023.pdf
  39. https://portal.ct.gov/deep/wildlife/fact-sheets/common-snapping-turtle
  40. https://virginiaherpetologicalsociety.com/reptiles/turtles/eastern-snapping-turtle/index.php
  41. https://fieldguide.mt.gov/speciesDetail.aspx?elcode=ARAAB01010
  42. http://rollinson.eeb.utoronto.ca/files/2020/11/PDF-27.pdf
  43. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103761/Chelydra_serpentina
  44. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry/cosewic-assessments-status-reports/snapping-turtle-2008.html
  45. https://www.tortoise.org/archives/snapping.html
  46. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102590/Macrochelys_temminckii
  47. https://www.reabic.net/journals/bir/2020/2/BIR_2020_Koo_etal.pdf
  48. https://belgianjournalofzoology.eu/BJZ/article/download/180/265/455
  49. https://www.britannica.com/animal/alligator-snapping-turtle
  50. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/16/2057
  51. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/download/66240.pdf
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361566922_Introduction_to_the_Snapping_Turtles_Family_Chelydridae
  53. https://meridian.allenpress.com/ccb/article/20/2/184/472358/Distribution-and-Relative-Abundance-of-the
  54. https://www.fnai.org/PDFs/FieldGuides/Macrochelys_temminckii.pdf
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306456589900272
  56. https://hhltmaine.org/10718/nature-notes-common-snapping-turtle/
  57. https://www.austinsturtlepage.com/Care/cs-commonsnapper.htm
  58. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/book/nrs_2022_brown-d_001.pdf
  59. https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/WildlifeHabitat/Herps/6793
  60. https://www.flivverparking.org/MIWildHab/Species/ARAAB01010.html
  61. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v129i4.1764
  62. https://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/assets/Resources/Publications/Rockefeller_Research/Terrapins_tortoises_turtles/elsey_2006_food_habits_alligator_snapping_turtle.pdf
  63. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb01022.x
  64. https://dnr.illinois.gov/education/wildaboutpages/wildaboutturtles/watsnappingturtle.html
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279888517_Reproduction_and_nesting_ecology_of_Snapping_Turtles_Chelydra_serpentina_in_southeastern_Michigan
  66. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/216/5/751/11898/Temperature-dependent-sex-determination-modulates
  67. https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1017/S0952836904006120
  68. https://genomics.senescence.info/species/entry.php?species=Chelydra_serpentina
  69. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide/alligator-snapping-turtle
  70. https://auth1.dpr.ncparks.gov/reptiles/view.php?checklist_number=151.0
  71. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=honors202029
  72. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2593/
  73. https://pricelab.ca.uky.edu/files/mccoy_et_al._2007.pdf
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8366836/
  75. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/missing-dead-lost-role-animal-remains-nutrient-cycling-north-american-rivers
  76. https://research.uga.edu/news/animal-carcasses-were-source-of-river-nutrients/
  77. https://mdc.mo.gov/magazines/conservationist/1996-06/common-snapping-turtles-catching-cleaning-eating
  78. https://webapps.fhsu.edu/ksHerp/bibFiles/22469.pdf
  79. https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/etd/pdf/Dekker_idaho_0089N_10514.pdf
  80. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecs2.2396
  81. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/21647/97465067
  82. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/193957/193961
  83. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/edn3.525
  84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371589404_Anthropogenic_Threats_to_Alligator_Snapping_Turtles_Chelydridae_Macrochelys
  85. https://www.fws.gov/story/ancient-reptiles-need-modern-regulations-case-including-us-turtles-cites-appx-ii
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198942400341X
  87. https://phys.org/news/2018-04-pollution-shift-female-to-male-ratios-snapping.html
  88. https://cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php
  89. https://ntmwd.com/269/Protected-Species
  90. https://comptroller.texas.gov/programs/natural-resources/docs/reports/ASTeDNAFinalReport2025-8-21-25.pdf
  91. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Monitoring_of_repatriated_and_resident_alligator_snapping_turtles_Macrochelys_temminckii_in_east_Texas/29614454
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.