Hubbry Logo
Spin iceSpin iceMain
Open search
Spin ice
Community hub
Spin ice
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Spin ice
Spin ice
Spin ice
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Figure 1. The arrangement of hydrogen atoms (black circles) about oxygen atoms (open circles) in ice. Two hydrogen atoms (bottom ones) are close to the central oxygen atom while two of them (top ones) are far and closer to the two other (top left and top right) oxygen atoms.

A spin ice is a magnetic substance that does not have a single minimal-energy state. It has magnetic moments (i.e. "spin") as elementary degrees of freedom which are subject to frustrated interactions. By their nature, these interactions prevent the moments from exhibiting a periodic pattern in their orientation down to a temperature much below the energy scale set by the said interactions. Spin ices show low-temperature properties, residual entropy in particular, closely related to those of common crystalline water ice.[1] The most prominent compounds with such properties are dysprosium titanate (Dy2Ti2O7) and holmium titanate (Ho2Ti2O7). The orientation of the magnetic moments in spin ice resembles the positional organization of hydrogen atoms (more accurately, ionized hydrogen, or protons) in conventional water ice (see figure 1).

Experiments have found evidence for the existence of deconfined magnetic monopoles in these materials,[2][3][4] with properties resembling those of the hypothetical magnetic monopoles postulated to exist in vacuum.

Technical description

[edit]

In 1935, Linus Pauling noted that the hydrogen atoms in water ice would be expected to remain disordered even at absolute zero. That is, even upon cooling to zero temperature, water ice is expected to have residual entropy, i.e., intrinsic randomness. This is due to the fact that the hexagonal crystalline structure of common water ice contains oxygen atoms with four neighboring hydrogen atoms. In ice, for each oxygen atom, two of the neighboring hydrogen atoms are near (forming the traditional H2O molecule), and two are further away (being the hydrogen atoms of two neighboring water molecules). Pauling noted that the number of configurations conforming to this "two-near, two-far" ice rule grows exponentially with the system size, and, therefore, that the zero-temperature entropy of ice was expected to be extensive.[5] Pauling's findings were confirmed by specific heat measurements, though pure crystals of water ice are particularly hard to create.

Figure 2. Portion of a pyrochlore lattice of corner-linked tetrahedra. The magnetic ions (dark blue spheres) sit on a network of tetrahedra linked at their vertices. The other atoms (e.g. Ti and O) making the pyrochlore crystal structure are not displayed. The magnetic moments (light blue arrows) obey the two-in, two out spin ice rule over the whole lattice. The system is thus in a spin ice state.

Spin ices are materials that consist of regular corner-linked tetrahedra of magnetic ions, each of which has a non-zero magnetic moment, often abridged to "spin", which must satisfy in their low-energy state a "two-in, two-out" rule on each tetrahedron making the crystalline structure (see figure 2). This is highly analogous to the two-near, two far rule in water ice (see figure 1). Just as Pauling showed that the ice rule leads to an extensive entropy in water ice, so does the two-in, two-out rule in the spin ice systems – these exhibit the same residual entropy properties as water ice. Be that as it may, depending on the specific spin ice material, it is generally much easier to create large single crystals of spin ice materials than water ice crystals. Additionally, the ease to induce interaction of the magnetic moments with an external magnetic field in a spin ice system makes the spin ices more suitable than water ice for exploring how the residual entropy can be affected by external influences.

While Philip Anderson had already noted in 1956[6] the connection between the problem of the frustrated Ising antiferromagnet on a (pyrochlore) lattice of corner-shared tetrahedra and Pauling's water ice problem, real spin ice materials were only discovered forty years later.[7] The first materials identified as spin ices were the pyrochlores Dy2Ti2O7 (dysprosium titanate), Ho2Ti2O7 (holmium titanate). In addition, compelling evidence has been reported that Dy2Sn2O7 (dysprosium stannate) and Ho2Sn2O7 (holmium stannate) are spin ices.[8] These four compounds belong to the family of rare-earth pyrochlore oxides. CdEr2Se4, a spinel in which the magnetic Er3+ ions sit on corner-linked tetrahedra, also displays spin ice behavior.[9]

Spin ice materials are characterized by a random disorder in the orientation of the moment of the magnetic ions, even when the material is at very low temperatures. Alternating current (AC) magnetic susceptibility measurements find evidence for a dynamic freezing of the magnetic moments as the temperature is lowered somewhat below the temperature at which the specific heat displays a maximum. The broad maximum in the heat capacity does not correspond to a phase transition. Rather, the temperature at which the maximum occurs, about 1 K in Dy2Ti2O7, signals a rapid change in the number of tetrahedra where the two-in, two-out rule is violated. Tetrahedra where the rule is violated are sites where the aforementioned monopoles reside. Mathematically, spin ice configurations can be described by closed Eulerian paths.[10][11]

Magnetic monopoles

[edit]
Figure 3. The orientation of the magnetic moments (light blue arrows) considering a single tetrahedron within the spin ice state, as in figure 2. Here, the magnetic moments obey the two-in, two-out rule: there is as much "magnetization field" going in the tetrahedron (bottom two arrows) as there is going out (top two arrows). The corresponding magnetization field has zero divergence. There is therefore no sink or source of the magnetization inside the tetrahedron, or no monopole. If a thermal fluctuation caused one of the bottom two magnetic moments to flip from "in" to "out", one would then have a 1-in, 3-out configuration; hence an "outflow' of magnetization, hence a positive divergence, that one could assign to a positively charged monopole of charge +Q. Flipping the two bottom magnetic moments would give a 0-in, 4-out configuration, the maximum possible "outflow" (i.e. divergence) of magnetization and, therefore, an associated monopole of charge +2Q.

Spin ices are geometrically frustrated magnetic systems. While frustration is usually associated with triangular or tetrahedral arrangements of magnetic moments coupled via antiferromagnetic exchange interactions, as in Anderson's Ising model,[6] spin ices are frustrated ferromagnets. It is the very strong local magnetic anisotropy from the crystal field forcing the magnetic moments to point either in or out of a tetrahedron that renders ferromagnetic interactions frustrated in spin ices. Most importantly, it is the long-range magnetostatic dipole–dipole interaction, and not the nearest-neighbor exchange, that causes the frustration and the consequential two-in, two-out rule that leads to the spin ice phenomenology.[12][13]

For a tetrahedron in a two-in, two-out state, the magnetization field is divergent-free; there is as much "magnetization intensity" entering a tetrahedron as there is leaving (see figure 3). In such a divergent-free situation, there exists no source or sink for the field. According to Gauss' theorem (also known as Ostrogradsky's theorem), a nonzero divergence of a field is caused, and can be characterized, by a real number called "charge". In the context of spin ice, such charges characterizing the violation of the two-in, two-out magnetic moment orientation rule are the aforementioned monopoles.[2][3][4]

In Autumn 2009, researchers reported experimental observation of low-energy quasiparticles resembling the predicted monopoles in spin ice.[2] A single crystal of the dysprosium titanate spin ice candidate was examined in the temperature range of 0.6–2.0 K. Using neutron scattering, the magnetic moments were shown to align in the spin ice material into interwoven tube-like bundles resembling Dirac strings. At the defect formed by the end of each tube, the magnetic field looks like that of a monopole. Using an applied magnetic field, the researchers were able to control the density and orientation of these strings. A description of the heat capacity of the material in terms of an effective gas of these quasiparticles was also presented.[14][15]

The effective charge of a magnetic monopole, Q (see figure 3) in both the dysprosium and holmium titanate spin ice compounds is approximately Q = 5 μBÅ−1 (Bohr magnetons per angstrom).[2] The elementary magnetic constituents of spin ice are magnetic dipoles, so the emergence of monopoles is an example of the phenomenon of fractionalization.

The microscopic origin of the atomic magnetic moments in magnetic materials is quantum mechanical; the Planck constant enters explicitly in the equation defining the magnetic moment of an electron, along with its charge and its mass. Yet, the magnetic moments in the dysprosium titanate and the holmium titanate spin ice materials are effectively described by classical statistical mechanics, and not quantum statistical mechanics, over the experimentally relevant and reasonably accessible temperature range (between 0.05 K and 2 K) where the spin ice phenomena manifest themselves. Although the weakness of quantum effects in these two compounds is rather unusual, it is believed to be understood.[16] There is current interest in the search of quantum spin ices,[17] materials in which the laws of quantum mechanics now become needed to describe the behavior of the magnetic moments. Magnetic ions other than dysprosium (Dy) and holmium (Ho) are required to generate a quantum spin ice, with praseodymium (Pr), terbium (Tb) and ytterbium (Yb) being possible candidates.[17][18] One reason for the interest in quantum spin ice is the belief that these systems may harbor a quantum spin liquid,[19] a state of matter where magnetic moments continue to wiggle (fluctuate) down to absolute zero temperature. The theory[20] describing the low-temperature and low-energy properties of quantum spin ice is akin to that of vacuum quantum electrodynamics, or QED. This constitutes an example of the idea of emergence.[21]

Artificial spin ices

[edit]

Artificial spin ices are metamaterials consisting of coupled nanomagnets arranged on periodic and aperiodic lattices. [22] These systems have enabled the experimental investigation of a variety of phenomena such as frustration, emergent magnetic monopoles, and phase transitions. In addition, artificial spin ices show potential as reprogrammable magnonic crystals and have been studied for their fast dynamics. A variety of geometries have been explored, including quasicrystalline systems and 3D structures, as well as different magnetic materials to modify anisotropies and blocking temperatures.

For example, polymer magnetic composites comprising 2D lattices of droplets of solid-liquid phase change material, with each droplet containing a single magnetic dipole particle, form an artificial spin ice above the droplet melting point, and, after cooling, a spin glass state with low bulk remanence. Spontaneous emergence of 2D magnetic vortices was observed in such spin ices, which vortex geometries were correlated with the external bulk remanence. [23]

Future work in this field includes further developments in fabrication and characterization methods, exploration of new geometries and material combinations, and potential applications in computation,[24] data storage, and reconfigurable microwave circuits.[25] In 2021 a study demonstrated neuromorphic reservoir computing using artificial spin ice, solving a range of computational tasks using the complex magnetic dynamics of the artificial spin ice.[26] In 2022, another studied achieved an artificial kagome spin ice which could potentially be used in the future for novel high-speed computers with low power consumption.[27]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Spin ice

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Spin ice is a class of geometrically frustrated magnetic materials, typically rare-earth pyrochlore oxides such as Dy₂Ti₂O₇ and Ho₂Ti₂O₇, in which the local magnetic moments (spins) on a corner-sharing tetrahedral lattice exhibit a highly degenerate analogous to the proton disorder in water ice, governed by "2-in-2-out" ice rules that minimize nearest-neighbor interactions on each . This arises from competing ferromagnetic exchange and dipolar interactions, preventing long-range magnetic order even at and resulting in a residual zero-point of approximately (1/2) R ln(3/2) per spin, directly measured in experiments and matching Pauling's estimate for water ice. The concept of spin ice was first proposed in 1997 to explain neutron scattering and thermodynamic data in Ho₂Ti₂O₇, where the system's behavior defied conventional magnetic ordering due to the pyrochlore lattice's inherent geometric constraints. Key characteristics include the emergence of emergent magnetic monopoles as quasiparticles when the ice rules are violated by thermal fluctuations or applied fields, leading to Coulomb-like interactions and fractionalized excitations that mimic aspects of quantum electrodynamics in a classical setting. These properties have made spin ice a paradigmatic example of strongly correlated magnetism, with extensions to quantum spin ice variants incorporating quantum tunneling and to artificial realizations in nanomagnetic arrays. Experimental probes, including specific heat, muon spin relaxation, and neutron scattering, have confirmed the disordered yet correlated spin configurations, highlighting spin ice's role in understanding exotic phases like spin liquids and monopole soups.

Introduction

Definition and basic principles

Spin ice is a class of geometrically frustrated magnetic materials characterized by highly degenerate ground states, where the magnetic moments (spins) on a pyrochlore lattice exhibit disorder analogous to the proton configurations in water ice. In these systems, the rare-earth ions carry large Ising-like magnetic moments that are constrained by strong local crystal-field anisotropy to point along the bonds of the underlying tetrahedral lattice, specifically the local ⟨111⟩\langle 111 \rangle directions. This constraint results in no unique minimal-energy spin configuration, mirroring the positional disorder of hydrogen atoms in the hydrogen-bonded network of water ice as described by Pauling. The in spin ice arises from competing interactions, primarily nearest-neighbor ferromagnetic exchange and long-range dipolar couplings between the magnetic moments, which prevent the establishment of long-range magnetic order even at temperature. These interactions favor local configurations where two spins point into and two point out of each (the "two-in, two-out" rule), leading to an extensive manifold of degenerate ground states. A hallmark of spin ice is the presence of zero-point (residual) entropy at low temperatures, arising from the macroscopic degeneracy of the ground state and quantified by Pauling's approximation as S=12NkBln⁡32S = \frac{1}{2} N k_B \ln \frac{3}{2}, where NN is the number of spins and kBk_B is Boltzmann's constant. Thermodynamically, this manifests as a broad peak in the specific heat capacity at low temperatures rather than a sharp phase transition indicative of ordering. Prominent examples of spin ice materials include the pyrochlore oxides dysprosium titanate (Dy2_2Ti2_2O7_7) and holmium titanate (Ho2_2Ti2_2O7_7), which were the first experimentally confirmed instances, along with dysprosium stannate (Dy2_2Sn2_2O7_7) and holmium stannate (Ho2_2Sn2_2O7_7). Additional compounds exhibiting spin ice behavior are praseodymium stannate (Pr2_2Sn2_2O7_7) and the spinel-structured cadmium erbium selenide (CdEr2_2Se4_4), the latter representing a departure from the pyrochlore lattice geometry.

Historical background

The concept of spin ice originated from analogies drawn between the disordered hydrogen bonding in water ice and frustrated magnetic systems. In 1935, Linus Pauling calculated the residual entropy of ordinary ice Ih, proposing that each satisfies the "ice rule" by forming two short (covalent) and two long (hydrogen) bonds with neighboring oxygens, leading to a residual entropy per of S=Nkln⁡32S = Nk \ln \frac{3}{2}, where NN is the number of and kk is Boltzmann's constant; this approximation arises from the fact that only 6 out of 16 possible proton configurations per satisfy the rule, yielding a macroscopic degeneracy. This rule provided a foundational model for understanding in geometrically constrained systems. The extension to magnetic systems began in 1956 when suggested that frustrated antiferromagnets on a pyrochlore lattice—formed by corner-sharing tetrahedra—could exhibit analogous behavior, where Ising pointing along local <111> directions obey a two-in/two-out rule, resulting in extensive degeneracy and no long-range order at low temperatures. This idea highlighted the role of geometric in stabilizing disordered ground states. In 1984, I. A. Ryzhkin developed pseudo-spin Hamiltonians for water that incorporated long-range dipolar interactions, effectively mapping the proton configurations to a dipolar spin model and foreshadowing the microscopic physics of later magnetic realizations. (Note: the 1984 work is discussed in the context of ice physics but directly analogous to spin Hamiltonians as per later analyses.) Experimental confirmation of spin ice behavior emerged in 1997 with specific heat measurements on the pyrochlore compound Ho₂Ti₂O₇ by A. P. Ramirez et al., revealing a power-law at low temperatures indicative of a highly degenerate, frustrated without magnetic ordering. This was solidified in 1999 when Ramirez and colleagues measured the of Dy₂Ti₂O₇ down to 0.05 K, confirming the Pauling entropy value of approximately (1/2) R ln(3/2) per spin, where R is the , thus establishing these materials as the first experimental realizations of spin ice. Subsequent theoretical and experimental advances in 2008–2009 predicted and observed emergent magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Claudio Castelnovo, Roderich Moessner, and Shivaji L. Sondhi theoretically showed that spin flips in the two-in/two-out configurations create excitations behaving as Coulomb-interacting magnetic monopoles within the dipolar spin ice model of Dy₂Ti₂O₇. This was experimentally verified in 2009 through neutron scattering by D. J. P. Morris and colleagues, who observed Dirac string correlations and monopole-like scattering features in Dy₂Ti₂O₇ under applied fields. Post-2010 developments included the 2012 identification of quantum spin ice in Pr₂Sn₂O₇, where transverse exchange mixes the effective Ising states, leading to and potential spin liquid behavior, as detailed in crystal-field and low-energy spectroscopy studies. Concurrently, starting in 2006, Cristiano Nisoli and collaborators pioneered artificial spin ices using nanoscale ferromagnetic islands arranged on frustrated lattices, enabling direct visualization and control of ice-rule configurations and excitations.

Theoretical Foundations

The spin ice rule and lattice geometry

The pyrochlore lattice underlying spin ice systems consists of a network of corner-sharing tetrahedra formed by rare-earth ions at the vertices, such as Dy³⁺ ions in the compound Dy₂Ti₂O₇, which exhibit strong single-ion anisotropy that confines their magnetic moments to effective Ising-like states along local ⟨111⟩ directions pointing toward the centers of the tetrahedra. This lattice geometry inherently frustrates magnetic ordering due to the tetrahedral coordination, where each spin interacts equally with three neighbors within a tetrahedron. The nearest-neighbor in the effective is antiferromagnetic, characterized by a positive Jeff>0J_\mathrm{eff} > 0, which favors configurations that minimize the energy on each . This leads to the emergence of the spin ice rule, wherein the of every satisfies a "2-in, 2-out" arrangement: exactly two Ising spins (σi=±1\sigma_i = \pm 1) point inward and two point outward, analogous to the proton disorder in water . Such configurations are highly degenerate, with the rule enforced locally to achieve the lowest energy without long-range order. Long-range dipolar interactions play a crucial role in stabilizing the spin ice phenomenology, with the dipolar coupling strength D>0D > 0 (typically on the order of a few ) acting ferromagnetically at short ranges but introducing over longer distances due to its 1/r31/r^3 decay. When incorporated alongside the nearest-neighbor exchange, these dipolar terms yield an effective model that is classically mappable to the Pauling model of water , preserving the 2-in, 2-out rule as the dominant ground-state manifold. The effective Hamiltonian for the system can be expressed as H=Jeff∑⟨ij⟩σiσj+∑i<jDrij3[σiσj−3(σir^ij)(σjr^ij)],H = J_\mathrm{eff} \sum_{\langle i j \rangle} \sigma_i \sigma_j + \sum_{i < j} \frac{D}{r_{ij}^3} \left[ \sigma_i \sigma_j - 3 (\sigma_i \hat{r}_{ij}) (\sigma_j \hat{r}_{ij}) \right], where the first term captures the antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor Ising exchange, and the second accounts for the anisotropic dipolar corrections, with rijr_{ij} the distance between sites ii and jj, and r^ij\hat{r}_{ij} the unit vector along their separation. In the dumbbell model projection, each Ising spin is represented as a pair of opposite magnetic charges (a "dumbbell") located near the centers of adjacent tetrahedra along the local ⟨111⟩ axis, such that the 2-in, 2-out ice rule corresponds to zero net charge at each tetrahedral vertex, enforcing the constraint through an analogy to in electrostatics. This representation highlights the lattice's bipartite diamond sublattice structure, where charge conservation underlies the model's solvability.

Frustration, degeneracy, and residual entropy

In spin ice systems, geometric frustration arises from the corner-sharing tetrahedral geometry of the pyrochlore lattice, where the effective antiferromagnetic interactions between Ising spins pointing along local ⟨111⟩\langle 111 \rangle directions cannot be simultaneously minimized across all bonds. This incompatibility leads to a proliferation of low-energy configurations, resulting in a macroscopically degenerate ground state with approximately W≈(3/2)N/2W \approx (3/2)^{N/2} accessible states, where NN is the number of magnetic sites. The frustration prevents the system from selecting a unique ordered state, maintaining disorder even at absolute zero temperature. The degeneracy manifests as a nonzero residual entropy, first approximated using Pauling's method originally developed for water ice. Assuming the tetrahedra act independently, each has 6 valid "2-in/2-out" configurations out of 16 possible spin arrangements, yielding an entropy per spin of S=12NkBln⁡(3/2)≈0.202NkBS = \frac{1}{2} Nk_B \ln(3/2) \approx 0.202 Nk_B. This value represents the configurational freedom locked in at low temperatures due to the ice rule satisfaction. Exact calculations via Monte Carlo simulations employing efficient loop update algorithms, which sample the constrained manifold ergodically, confirm the Pauling approximation to high precision, with the ground-state entropy deviating by less than 10−3kB10^{-3} k_B per spin. Thermodynamically, this frustration produces a broad hump in the specific heat capacity around 1 K, reflecting the gradual release of entropy through short-range spin correlations without any sharp transition to long-range order. The residual entropy in spin ice parallels that of water ice but benefits from the magnetic degrees of freedom, enabling direct experimental access via muon spin relaxation (μ\muSR) and neutron scattering to probe the persistent disordered state and correlated dynamics.

Natural Spin Ice Materials

Key compounds and structural properties

Spin ice behavior is primarily realized in rare-earth pyrochlore oxides with the general formula A2B2O7A_2B_2O_7, where the AA-site consists of magnetic rare-earth ions such as Dy3+^{3+} or Ho3+^{3+}, and the BB-site is occupied by non-magnetic cations like Ti4+^{4+} or Sn4+^{4+}. These materials feature a corner-sharing tetrahedral network of AA-site ions, which enforces geometric frustration essential for the spin ice state. The magnetic ions exhibit strong single-ion easy-axis anisotropy along the local ⟨111⟩\langle 111 \rangle directions connecting the centers of the tetrahedra to their vertices, effectively mapping the system to a classical ; this anisotropy arises from crystal-field effects and is quantified by a g-factor ratio g∥/g⊥>10g_\parallel / g_\perp > 10. The archetypal compound is Dy2_2Ti2_2O7_7, first identified through measurements revealing a zero-point matching the Pauling value for ice (S=(R/2)ln⁡(3/2)S = (R/2) \ln(3/2) per spin). In this material, the Curie-Weiss temperature is θCW≈+1\theta_{CW} \approx +1 K, while the spin freezing scale Tf≈0.1T_f \approx 0.1 K, resulting in a frustration parameter f=∣θCW∣/Tf≈10f = |\theta_{CW}| / T_f \approx 10 that highlights the strong suppression of magnetic ordering. Another key compound, Ho2_2Ti2_2O7_7, also obeys the spin ice rule but displays more significant quantum tunneling effects at sub-kelvin temperatures due to the non-Kramers nature of the Ho3+^{3+} ion, with θCW≈+1.9\theta_{CW} \approx +1.9 K and a comparable TfT_f. Additional classical spin ice realizations include Dy2_2Sn2_2O7_7 and Ho2_2Sn2_2O7_7, where the replacement of Ti with Sn weakens the long-range dipolar interactions relative to nearest-neighbor exchange, yet preserves the disordered . Among quantum variants, Pr2_2Ir2_2O7_7 emerges as a candidate for quantum , featuring effective moments on a pyrochlore lattice coupled to itinerant conduction electrons. Similarly, Yb2_2Ti2_2O07_07 shows -like frustration but develops partial magnetic ordering at low temperatures. More recently, Ce2_2Sn2_2O7_7 has been identified as a quantum candidate, with neutron scattering revealing pinch-point singularities and evidence of fractionalized excitations as of 2023. While non-pyrochlore systems like kagome-lattice jarosites exhibit analogous , classical is predominantly associated with these pyrochlores. High-quality single crystals of spin ice pyrochlores are essential for detailed studies, as stoichiometric deviations or impurities can lift the degeneracy and induce ordering; they are commonly grown via the optical floating-zone method in inert or reducing atmospheres to maintain phase purity.

Experimental measurements and validations

Specific heat measurements on Dy₂Ti₂O₇ at low temperatures, extending down to approximately 0.07 , confirmed the persistence of configurational disorder without long-range magnetic ordering, with the recovered approaching (1/2)Rln⁡(3/2)(1/2) R \ln(3/2) as predicted for the ice-rule configurations. Neutron scattering experiments provided direct evidence for the enforcement of the 2-in, 2-out spin ice rule in Dy₂Ti₂O₇ through diffuse magnetic patterns that matched simulations of short-range correlated states. These measurements, conducted at temperatures below 1 K, highlighted the absence of Bragg peaks indicative of order and instead showed broad, structured diffuse intensity reflecting the projected ice correlations onto the lattice. Further analysis of the revealed pinch-point singularities at specific points, such as (0,0,2), signaling the emergence of a phase with long-range spin correlations despite local disorder. Muon spin relaxation (μSR) studies on polycrystalline Dy₂Ti₂O₇ demonstrated a persistent, temperature-independent relaxation rate down to 20 mK, indicating ongoing spin dynamics and the lack of static magnetic freezing. In zero-field conditions, the muon asymmetry showed no development of a spontaneous field distribution characteristic of long-range order, instead maintaining a dynamic, disordered response that aligns with the frustrated spin ground state. Magnetization measurements along the direction in Dy₂Ti₂O₇ exhibited a plateau at approximately one-third of the saturation value up to a critical field Hc≈0.6H_c \approx 0.6 T, beyond which a transition to a field-induced ordered state occurs. This ordering, observed below 0.5 K, was interpreted through an to a plasma of magnetic monopoles, where the applied field suppresses defects in the manifold, leading to a structured configuration with reduced . AC susceptibility data for Dy₂Ti₂O₇ displayed a broad peak in the real part around 1 K, reflecting the characteristic energy scale of spin flip processes without evidence of a sharp . This feature, persisting across frequencies up to 1 kHz, underscored the diffusive dynamics of the spin ice state rather than cooperative freezing. Early experimental investigations between 1997 and 2000 on Ho₂Ti₂O₇ and Dy₂Ti₂O₇ established the classical nature of their low-temperature behavior, with specific heat and susceptibility data showing and no ordering down to millikelvin temperatures in Dy₂Ti₂O₇, contrasting slightly with the more quantum-influenced fluctuations in Ho₂Ti₂O₇ due to differences in crystal-field excitations. These studies highlighted the dominance of classical dipolar interactions and geometric in both compounds, laying the foundation for the spin ice model.

Emergent Phenomena

Magnetic monopoles

In spin ice systems, magnetic monopoles emerge as quasiparticles arising from local violations of the 2-in, 2-out ice rule, where defects in the spin configuration on a create effective magnetic charges at the vertices. These defects fractionalize the magnetic dipoles into separated positive and negative charges, leading to string-like correlations characteristic of the phase, where the spins' dipolar interactions mimic . Theoretically, this phenomenon is framed by mapping the spin ice Hamiltonian to in a coarse-grained "spin space," treating the magnetic moments as sources of an emergent H\mathbf{H} with ∇⋅H=ρm\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H} = \rho_m, where ρm\rho_m is the monopole density. For a single , the monopole density is given by ρm=12∑i=14σi\rho_m = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^4 \sigma_i, with σi=±1\sigma_i = \pm 1 denoting outgoing (+1) or incoming (-1) spin orientations from the tetrahedron center; this yields ρm=±1\rho_m = \pm 1 for 3-out-1-in or 3-in-1-out configurations, corresponding to a monopole or antimonopole. The magnitude of these emergent charges is Q≈5 μB A˚−1Q \approx 5 \, \mu_B \, \AA^{-1}, derived from the rare-earth ion's dipolar moment m≈10 μBm \approx 10 \, \mu_B for Dy3+^{3+} and the characteristic ∼3.5 A˚\sim 3.5 \, \AA. Experimental evidence for these monopoles was first reported in 2009 through diffuse neutron scattering experiments on Dy2_2Ti2_2O7_7 at temperatures between 0.6 K and 2.0 K, revealing diverging correlation lengths and diffusive propagation consistent with deconfined monopoles. Under applied , these monopoles exhibit directed currents, with field-induced spin flips generating monopole-antimonopole pairs analogous to Dirac strings in monopole theory, enabling observable transport signatures. Unlike hypothetical fundamental magnetic monopoles, which would carry quantized charges in units dictated by Dirac's condition, emergent monopoles in spin ice carry integer multiples of a fundamental charge qm≈2m/adq_m \approx 2m / a_d (with ada_d the separation), tunable by material parameters such as pressure.

Dynamical excitations and other quasiparticles

In classical spin ice systems, low-energy dynamics arise primarily from local spin flips that create and annihilate pairs of emergent magnetic monopoles. A spin flip at a vertex alters the local "2-in-2-out" configuration to "3-in-1-out" or "1-in-3-out," generating a monopole-antimonopole pair whose separation and propagation occur through successive vertex flips across the lattice. This process results in diffusive monopole transport, characterized by a diffusion constant D≈0.1a2/[τ](/page/Tau)D \approx 0.1 a^2 / [\tau](/page/Tau), where aa is the and τ\tau represents a typical spin-flip timescale on the order of the inverse attempt frequency. Such dynamics underpin the slow relaxation and AC susceptibility observed in materials like Dy2_2Ti2_2O7_7, where monopoles act as the dominant charge carriers in the emergent phase. Beyond monopole diffusion, the Coulomb phase hosts collective excitations in the form of transverse spin waves, often termed "spin ice magnons," which propagate with a linear ω∼k\omega \sim k reminiscent of photons in . These modes emerge from the projection of dipolar interactions onto the degenerate manifold of spin ice configurations, yielding gapless excitations that mediate long-wavelength correlations. Inelastic experiments confirm their presence as broad, dispersive continua at low energies, distinguishing them from gapped single-particle flips. Quantum effects become prominent in non-Kramers doublets like those in Pr3+^{3+}-based pyrochlores, where transverse exchange couplings introduce quantum fluctuations that partially lift the classical degeneracy. In compounds such as Pr2_2Zr2_2O7_7, these interactions stabilize a U(1) quantum spin liquid, featuring deconfined spinon excitations that fractionalize the spin degrees of freedom and couple to emergent gauge fields. The resulting spectrum includes a spinon continuum alongside photon-like modes, observable via specific heat and neutron scattering signatures of the gapped yet fractionalized quasiparticles. Early evidence for such fractionalized excitations came from inelastic neutron scattering on Pr2_2Sn2_2O7_7 in 2012, which revealed a low-energy continuum inconsistent with conventional spin waves but matching predictions for deconfined spinons in a quantum spin ice manifold. This continuum persists down to millikelvin temperatures, highlighting the robustness of the quantum disordered state against thermal broadening. Further dynamical richness appears in iridate spin ices, where theoretical models predict signatures of topological magnon bands, including chiral edge modes from Berry curvature in the dispersion. At even lower temperatures, some quantum spin ice candidates exhibit crossovers to ordered phases driven by RKKY interactions, which introduce long-range couplings that favor multipolar order over the spin liquid state. In Pr-based systems, these indirect exchanges compete with short-range dipolar terms, inducing antiferro-quadrupolar or octupolar ordering that gaps the spinon spectrum. Recent experiments as of 2024 have demonstrated proximity effects of emergent fields from spin ice in oxide heterostructures, revealing two-dimensional monopole gases at interfaces that enhance interactions.

Artificial Spin Ices

Fabrication techniques and geometries

Artificial spin ice (ASI) consists of lithographically patterned arrays of single-domain ferromagnetic nanomagnets, typically elongated islands of (Ni81Fe19) with dimensions on the order of 200-500 nm in length and 50-100 nm in width, arranged on a substrate to mimic the and interactions of frustrated spin systems like the pyrochlore lattice. These nanomagnets are designed such that their shape anisotropy enforces Ising-like magnetic moments aligned along the long axis of each island, enabling dipolar interactions that simulate the spin ice rule. Common substrates include with a native layer, providing a stable base for deposition. The primary geometries for ASI are two-dimensional lattices, with the serving as a planar analog to the three-dimensional pyrochlore structure, featuring nanomagnets arranged at 90-degree angles around vertices to create frustrated vertices with two-in/two-out configurations. Other 2D geometries include the kagome lattice, which introduces triangular , and more complex arrangements like the or Santa Fe lattices for tunable vertex types. For three-dimensional realizations, geometries extend to stacked multilayer s or fully 3D diamond-bond networks, achieved by layering 2D arrays with insulating spacers or direct 3D patterning to enhance interlayer interactions. Aperiodic geometries, such as those based on Penrose tilings, have also been explored to allow spatially varying levels. Fabrication of ASI typically employs (EBL) to pattern the nanomagnet arrays with sub-100 nm resolution, followed by thermal evaporation or for depositing the ferromagnetic material, and a lift-off process to remove excess resist. In the seminal 2006 realization of square ASI by Nisoli et al., a double-layer resist of PMGI and PMMA was exposed via EBL on a substrate, followed by deposition of 25 nm thick islands (80 nm × 220 nm) and a 3 nm aluminum capping layer to prevent oxidation, with lift-off in acetone yielding arrays up to 176 µm × 176 µm. Challenges in this process include achieving uniformity across large arrays, minimizing edge effects from imperfect lift-off, and controlling island shape to ensure single-domain behavior, often addressed by optimizing resist thickness and deposition rates. For 3D ASI, post-2015 advancements utilize two-photon lithography (TPL) with femtosecond lasers to create polymeric scaffolds of negative-tone resists like IP-DIP, which are then conformally coated with 40-50 nm via thermal evaporation, forming crescent-shaped magnetic nanowires in diamond-like lattices. This method enables resolutions below 200 nm but faces challenges such as structural collapse during development and oxidation of the magnetic layer, mitigated by oxygen plasma etching and protective aluminum caps. Alternative 3D approaches include focused electron beam induced deposition (FEBID) for direct patterning using organometallic precursors. Interactions in ASI can be tuned by varying island size and spacing to emphasize long-range dipolar over short-range exchange, or by incorporating bicomponent designs with differing materials (e.g., CoFe and NiFe) for asymmetric vertices. Additional tunability is achieved through integrated capacitors or microwave-assisted processes to modulate dynamic .

Observed behaviors and potential applications

In artificial spin ices, emergent magnetic monopoles have been observed in two-dimensional configurations since theoretical proposals in 2009, with direct real-space imaging achieved in kagome lattices using (PEEM), revealing monopole-antimonopole pairs connected by Dirac strings. Vertex correlations, indicative of frustrated interactions and ice-rule compliance, have been probed through magneto-optical (MOKE) measurements in square lattices, showing collective magnetization responses that distinguish type-I (charge-neutral) and type-II (monopole-like) vertices during field-driven reversals. Reconfigurable spin states in artificial spin ices are achieved by applying external magnetic fields or spin-transfer torques from currents, allowing selective flipping of nanomagnet moments to create logic gates such as , and NOT operations embedded within the lattice. In kagome artificial spin ices, these manipulations generate emergent magnetic fields analogous to those in systems, enabling tunable frustration and propagation as demonstrated in 2011 experiments. Recent advances include the 2022 demonstration of neuromorphic computing via reconfigurable training and reservoir processing in artificial spin-vortex ices, where spin-wave fingerprinting enables nonlinear responses for tasks like with high accuracy in spoken digit classification. In 2022, high-field studies of natural spin ice melting in compounds like Tb₂Sn₂O₇ revealed field-induced transitions from ordered to disordered states, inspiring designs for artificial spin ices with enhanced stability and controlled degeneracy. By 2024, three-dimensional artificial spin ices enabled volumetric networks of interacting monopoles, as highlighted in a dedicated AIP focus issue, allowing for complex 3D monopole currents and topological charge transport. In 2025, clocking of emergent magnetic monopoles was demonstrated in square artificial spin ice, advancing control over monopole dynamics. Potential applications encompass low-power data storage leveraging stable monopole configurations as memory bits, with proposals for monopole-based encoding offering robustness against thermal noise due to their Coulombic interactions. Reconfigurable metamaterials based on artificial spin ices enable dynamic microwave filtering through tunable magnonic band structures, where field-induced state changes alter propagation bands in the GHz regime for signal processing. These systems also serve as platforms for quantum simulation, mimicking frustrated quantum magnets to study exotic phases like spin liquids. Challenges in implementation include controlling edge disorder and defects that disrupt monopole mobility, addressed through improved lithographic precision and thermal annealing protocols. Scaling to larger arrays remains limited by fabrication uniformity, but advances in multilayer stacking have enabled arrays exceeding 10⁴ elements with preserved correlations. Hybrid systems integrating artificial spin ices with superconductors facilitate interactions between magnetic monopoles and flux vortices, enabling programmable pinning and rectification effects for vortex-based logic. Proposals for quantum artificial spin ices using arrays of superconducting loops date back to the 1990s, with recent realizations using superconducting qubits in 2021 enabling tunable quantum fluctuations via flux quantization, potentially hosting quantum monopoles and simulation of quantum spin ice ground states.

References

  1. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2554
  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/20619
  3. https://web.physics.utah.edu/~starykh/phys7910/lectures/lecture-spin-ice.pdf
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06433
  5. https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2772
  6. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01315a102
  7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19113519/
  8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20867332/
  9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01315a102
  10. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06433
  11. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3430
  12. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-023-02192-9
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022024810010298
  14. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1178868
  15. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.00979
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235740583_Brownian_Motion_and_Quantum_Dynamics_of_Magnetic_Monopoles_in_Spin_Ice
  17. https://hal.science/hal-01541666/document
  18. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.1325
  19. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.247201
  20. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.02734
  21. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.2193
  22. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adk6308
  23. https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1473
  24. https://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~pchandra/physics681/art.spinice.pdf
  25. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06548
  26. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/125/22/220501/3322196/Focus-on-three-dimensional-artificial-spin-ice
  27. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0176907
  28. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/171358/1/HardingPhD.pdf
  29. https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.3937
  30. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys1794
  31. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.180412
  32. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/abbf21
  33. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-022-01107-4
  34. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/ac7fdf
  35. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/qwx8-kkt9
  36. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apm/article/8/4/040911/123064/Dynamics-of-reconfigurable-artificial-spin-ice
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41235-4
  38. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abe2824
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.