Hubbry Logo
States General of the NetherlandsStates General of the NetherlandsMain
Open search
States General of the Netherlands
Community hub
States General of the Netherlands
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
States General of the Netherlands
States General of the Netherlands
States General of the Netherlands
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The States General of the Netherlands (Dutch: Staten-Generaal [ˈstaːtə(ŋ)‿ɣenəˈraːl] ⓘ) is the supreme bicameral legislature of the Netherlands consisting of the Senate (Dutch: Eerste Kamer) and the House of Representatives (Dutch: Tweede Kamer). Both chambers meet at the Binnenhof in The Hague.

Key Information

The States General originated in the 15th century as an assembly of all the provincial states of the Burgundian Netherlands. In 1579, during the Dutch Revolt, the States General split as the northern provinces openly rebelled against Philip II, and the northern States General replaced Philip II as the supreme authority of the Dutch Republic in 1581. The States General were replaced by the National Assembly after the Batavian Revolution of 1795, only to be restored in 1814, when the country had regained its sovereignty. The States General was divided into a Senate and a House of Representatives in 1815, with the establishment of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. After the constitutional amendment of 1848, members of the House of Representatives were directly elected, and the rights of the States General were vastly extended, practically establishing parliamentary democracy in the Netherlands.

Since 1918, the members of the House of Representatives have been elected for four years using party-list proportional representation, while the 75 members of the Senate are elected by the States-Provincial every four years. On exceptional occasions such as the opening of the Parliament on the third Tuesday in September, or when an regent needs to be appointed if an heir to the crown is a minor [example needed] as stipulated by the Constitution or the Charter for the Kingdom, the two houses form a joint session known as the United Assembly of the States-General (verenigde vergadering). The president of the Senate serves as President of the States General during a United Assembly.

Etymology

[edit]

The archaic Dutch word staten originally related to the feudal classes ("estates", or standen in Dutch) in which medieval European societies were stratified; the clergy, the nobility and the commons. The word eventually came to mean the political body in which the respective estates were represented. Each province in the Habsburg Netherlands had its own staten. These representative bodies (and not their constituent estates)[1] in turn were represented in the assembly that came to be known as Staten-Generaal (a plurale tantum), or Algemene Staten (General States).[2]: 5–15  The English word "states" may have a similar meaning as the Dutch word staten, as in e.g. States of Jersey. The English phrases "States General" is probably a literal translation of the Dutch word.[3] Historically, the same term was used for the name of other national legislatures as, for example, the Catalan and Valencian Generalitat and the Estates General of France during the Ancien Régime.

Several geographic place names are derived from the States General. In 1609, Henry Hudson established Dutch trade in Staten Island, New York City and named the island Staaten Eylandt after the States General. Isla de los Estados, now an Argentine island, was also named after this institution, the Spanish name being a translation of the Dutch name. Abel Tasman originally gave the name Staten Landt to what would become New Zealand. Staaten River is a river in the Cape York Peninsula, Australia.

History

[edit]

Burgundian and Habsburg rule

[edit]

Historically, the convocation of the States General consisted of delegates from the States of the several provinces, like the States of Brabant, and dated from about the middle of the 15th century, under the rule of the Dukes of Burgundy. The first important session was the Estates General of 1464 that met on 9 January 1464 in Bruges, Flanders, on the initiative of the States of Holland, the States of Flanders, and the States of Brabant, with the initially reluctant agreement of Philip the Good.[2]: 31  Later, regular sessions were held at Coudenberg in Brussels, Brabant. The next important event was the convocation of the States General by the ducal Council for 3 February 1477 after the death of Charles the Bold. In this session the States General forced the grant of the Great Privilege by Mary of Burgundy in which the right of the States General to convene on their own initiative was recognised.[2]: 42ff.  The main function of the States General in these early years was to form a platform for the central government to discuss matters of general importance with the States of the provinces, especially the special subsidies known as beden or aides. Legislative and executive functions were still reserved for the Sovereign in these years.[2]: 29, 35–36, 97 

Dutch Republic

[edit]
The Great Assembly of the States General in 1651.

At the start of the Dutch Revolt the States General (who were then not continually in session) remained loyal to the overlord of the Habsburg Netherlands, Philip II of Spain (who did not have the title of King in the Netherlands, but held the title of duke and count in the several provinces, and was just a Lord of the Netherlands). In 1576 the States General as a whole, however, openly rebelled against the Spanish crown. In 1579 the States General split as a number of southern provinces, united in the Union of Arras returned to obedience, while other provinces, united in the Union of Utrecht continued the rebellion.[2]: 260–268, 288–296  In the 1581 Act of Abjuration, the northern States General replaced Philip II as the supreme authority of the northern Netherlands, which then became known as the United Provinces.[4]: 34 

This was a confederation in which most government functions remained with the provincial States (and local authorities, like the Vroedschappen). These delegated representatives to the States General as a kind of ambassadors acting with a mandate limited by instruction and obligatory consultation (last en ruggespraak). The States General, in which the voting was by province, each of the seven provinces having one vote,[5] took on many executive functions after the Council of State of the Netherlands had temporarily come under English influence, due to the Treaty of Nonsuch.[2]: 305–315 [6]: 293–294  The States General for this reason since 1593 remained continually in session until their dissolution in 1795. The presidency rotated weekly among the senior representatives of the provinces. Under the Union of Utrecht treaty the States General formally was the sovereign power, representing the Republic in foreign affairs and making treaties with foreign monarchs.[6]: 292–293  As such the honorific title of the States General collectively was Hoogmogende Heren (mightiest, or very mighty, lords).[7]

Due to the vagaries of the Eighty Years' War in which territories were lost and (partially) reconquered, not all territories that had originally signed up for the Union of Utrecht remained represented in the States General. The States of Brabant and of Flanders lost their representation after 1587 as most of their territory had been conquered by the Army of Flanders, and it was not restored after part of that territory (together with parts of the Duchy of Limburg) was reconquered by the Dutch Republic. The Drenthe territory was never directly represented in the States General. Twenty per cent of the new Republic's territory, known as the Generality Lands, was so under the direct rule of the Generality (generaliteit).[6]: 297–300  The Dutch East India Company and the Dutch West India Company were also under its general supervision; for this reason Staten Island in New York City (originally New Amsterdam) and Staten Island, Argentina (Discovered by Dutchman Jacob le Maire), are among places named after the Staten-Generaal.

The "southern" States General after 1579 were a continuation of the States General as they had been under the Habsburg Netherlands. After the (re)conquest of most of the territory of the States of Brabant and of Flanders these States again sent representatives to these States General for the Southern Netherlands, together with the "obedient" provinces of the Union of Arras. The southern States General only occasionally came in session, however. The last regular session was in 1634, when Philip IV of Spain dissolved them.[2]: 315–321 

The States General in both The Hague and Brussels came to an end after 1795. France annexed the South, while the parliament of the North disbanded itself in January 1796 and called for elections for the National Assembly, when the Batavian Republic was proclaimed.[8]: 12 

Kingdom of the Netherlands

[edit]

The name Staten-Generaal was resurrected in the title of subsequent Dutch parliaments in and after 1814, after the end of the annexation to the First French Empire by Napoleon I of France in 1813. These had, however, little resemblance to the States General under the Republic. Beginning with the Sovereign Principality of the United Netherlands the States General was a unicameral legislature, without executive functions, in which the 55 representatives no longer represented the States-Provincial (though those newly constituted entities elected them, now acting as electoral colleges), but the entire people of the Netherlands and without last en ruggespraak (the Netherlands had become a unitary state under the Batavian Republic and the federal structure of the Dutch Republic was not restored).[9]: 136  The States General became a bicameral legislature under the United Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1815, in which the 50 members of the Senate were appointed for life by the new King from the resurrected ridderschappen, representative bodies of the aristocracy, and the 110 members of the House of Representatives (55 for the North and 55 for the South) were elected by the States-Provincial (in their new form).[9]: 138 

After the Belgian Revolution of 1830 under the Kingdom of the Netherlands the States General remained bicameral, but after the revision of the Constitution of the Netherlands in 1848, the (now 39) members of the Senate were elected by the States-Provincial, and the members of the House of Representatives were directly elected in electoral districts (one for every 45,000 electors, so the number of members of that House became variable for a while). The House of Representatives became more powerful at the same time, as it received the important rights of inquiry and amendment, while its budgetary rights were strengthened. Formally, the position of the States General was strengthened, because henceforth the ministers of the Crown became politically accountable to them, making the role of the King largely ceremonial.[9]: 142–145 

With the constitutional revision of 1888 the number of members of the House of Representatives was fixed at 100, while the Senate was enlarged to 50 members. The suffrage was enlarged at the same time, but still limited to male citizens possessing a certain wealth. Universal male suffrage would be granted in 1917 and women would receive suffrage in 1919. At this occasion, the electoral system was changed to proportional representation. The States General were suspended from 1940 to 1945, during the German occupation. In 1956 the number of members of the Senate was enlarged to 75, and that of the House of Representatives to 150.[9]: 151, 153–155, 329 

Functions

[edit]
Tweede Kamer
  • 150 members
  • elected directly in general elections
  • term of office: 4 years
 Eerste Kamer
Verenigde Vergadering

(joint session of both houses)

King Willem-Alexander giving the annual speech from the throne in the Ridderzaal, 2015
This article is part of a series on
Politics of the Netherlands
State coat of arms of the Netherlands
Constitution
Monarchy
The King (list): Willem-Alexander

Council of Ministers of the Kingdom
Cabinet
Cabinet (list): Schoof
Prime Minister (list): Dick Schoof
Deputy Prime Ministers:
States General
Senate

House of Representatives
Judiciary
Elections
Recent elections

Referendums
Local government
Provinces

Municipalities
Foreign relations
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Related topics

The States General meets in joint session at least once a year, at the opening of the parliamentary year, when the king gives his Speech from the Throne on Prince's Day. On special occasions, such as when a States Generate vote on a marriage of a member of the royal house, an inauguration of the monarch, or the death of a member of the royal house, both houses also meet in a joint session (Verenigde Vergadering), with the president of the Senate presiding. They take place in the Ridderzaal (Hall of Knights) in the Binnenhof, except for the inauguration of the monarch, which occurs in the Nieuwe Kerk in Amsterdam. The rest of the time, the two chambers sit separately.

Constitutionally, all functions of the parliament are given to both houses, except for the rights of initiative and amendment, which only the Tweede Kamer has. The Joint Session also appoints the monarch if there is no heir to the throne and the regent is unable to exercise his or her powers.[10]

An important question is whether the relationship between cabinet and parliament should be dualistic or monistic. That is, whether ministers and leaders of governing parliamentary parties should prepare important political decisions. According to the dualistic position, members of parliament of governing parties should remain independent of the cabinet. The term "monism" is used to refer to a stance that important decisions should be prepared by the people of the governing coalition in order to promote political stability.

References

[edit]

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

States General of the Netherlands

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The States General of the Netherlands (Dutch: Staten-Generaal der Nederlanden) is the bicameral legislature of the Kingdom of the , consisting of the (Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal) and the (Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal). The comprises 150 members directly elected by every four years, while the has 75 members elected indirectly by the members of the twelve provincial councils. As the primary legislative body in the Dutch constitutional monarchy, the States General exercises powers to propose, amend, and pass laws, approve the national budget, and oversee the through debates, inquiries, and votes of no confidence, with the holding the dominant role in initiating legislation and government accountability. The functions mainly as a chamber of review, approving or rejecting bills passed by the House but without the authority to amend them or directly question ministers. Both chambers convene in at the complex, a symbolizing the continuity of Dutch parliamentary tradition dating back to assemblies first convened in 1464.

Etymology and Terminology

Historical and Linguistic Origins

The term Staten-Generaal, translating to "States General" in English, emerged in the to designate a supra-provincial assembly of delegates from the provincial staten—the representative bodies of (clergy, nobility, and commons) in the . The word staten derives from forms of Latin status, originally denoting social or political conditions but evolving to signify organized provincial assemblies or territorial entities with delegated authority. Generaal underscores the federal character of this , distinguishing it from localized provincial meetings, in line with similar medieval European terminology for estates-general bodies. Historically, the States General originated under Burgundian rule as an assembly convened by the dukes to address matters affecting multiple territories in the . The first recorded convening occurred in 1464, organized by (Philip III), , gathering envoys from 17 districts across the to deliberate on fiscal and administrative issues. This institution persisted under Habsburg successors following the 1482 death of , with her son Philip the Handsome and grandson Charles V (r. 1515–1555) summoning it periodically in cities like for taxation, warfare, and governance, though it lacked formal and served primarily in advisory capacities. Composition typically involved delegates from provincial states, reflecting a confederal structure rooted in feudal privileges rather than centralized .

Evolution in Official Usage

The term "Staten-Generaal" originated in the as the official designation for assemblies convened by Burgundian rulers, such as in 1464, comprising delegates from provincial estates (staten) representing towns, nobility, and clergy across the . This usage reflected a confederal where provinces retained , with the assembly serving as a consultative body for matters like taxation and war, evolving into a more permanent federal organ by the late during the Dutch Revolt. In the (1588–1795), "Staten-Generaal" became the standard official title for the sovereign assembly of the Seven United Provinces, authorized by the (1579) and formalized in the 1588 States General resolution, where delegates operated under binding instructions (last en ruggespraak) from their provincial states. During the (1795–1806) and subsequent Napoleonic regimes, the term fell out of official use, replaced by centralized revolutionary bodies like the National Representative Assembly (1796–1801), reflecting French-influenced unitary governance that dissolved provincial autonomy. The name was briefly revived in 1813 as the Sovereign Principality's provisional assembly amid the Napoleonic collapse, but the 1814 Constitution initially established a unicameral "Staten-Generaal" with 55 members indirectly elected by provincial councils, emphasizing limited powers under monarchical oversight. An 1815 constitutional amendment introduced the bicameral form, designating the as "Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal" (, 40–60 members appointed by the king) and the lower as "Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal" (, 110 members indirectly elected), restoring the term to signify continuity with republican while adapting to a . Subsequent constitutional revisions maintained "Staten-Generaal" as the official collective name for the bicameral . The Grondwet, establishing , retained the designation while expanding direct representation, prohibiting provincial instructions, and tying membership to (House: one per 45,000 inhabitants). Amendments in 1887 adjusted chamber sizes ( to 50, to 100), and revisions in 1917 and 1922 did not alter the terminology, which persisted through wartime suspensions (1940–1945) and postwar interim bodies (1945–1946). The current Grondwet (revised 1983) defines the Staten-Generaal in Article 1 as the primary representative body, comprising both chambers, with laws enacted jointly by government and Staten-Generaal (Article 81), underscoring its role in legislative sovereignty. In contemporary official usage, "Staten-Generaal" denotes the joint institution, as affirmed in parliamentary documents and the , though individual chambers are frequently referenced by their full titles in legal contexts, such as session protocols and oaths of office. This formal persistence contrasts with informal parlance favoring "parlement" or specific chamber names, yet the term symbolizes historical legitimacy, appearing in joint sessions (e.g., annual readings) and international representations of Dutch legislative authority. No substantive terminological shifts have occurred since 1815, reflecting constitutional stability amid electoral and structural reforms.

Historical Development

Origins under Burgundian and Habsburg Rule (15th-16th Centuries)

The States General emerged in the mid-15th century as an extraordinary assembly of delegates from the provincial estates of the , convened by Duke to address financial and succession needs amid ongoing wars with . The inaugural meetings occurred between January and March 1464 in Bruges, , and , where representatives from the , , and third estate (primarily urban delegates) of the 17 Low Country districts gathered to approve subsidies and affirm the inheritance rights of Philip's son, . These sessions built on earlier, less formal gatherings of states for economic coordination, marking a step toward broader political consultation in the fragmented Burgundian territories. Under (r. 1467–1477), the assembly was summoned more regularly to fund military campaigns and centralization policies, though it remained ad hoc and subordinate to ducal authority, with decisions focused on taxation rather than legislative initiative. Following Charles's death at the in 1477 and the brief rule of his daughter , the institution persisted after her marriage to Maximilian of Habsburg in the same year, transitioning to Habsburg oversight by 1482 upon Mary's death. Maximilian, as regent for their son Philip the Handsome, relied on the States General for loans during conflicts with and to quell urban revolts, such as those in , thereby embedding it in the governance of the inherited . In the early 16th century, under Philip the Handsome (r. 1506–1506, effectively brief) and his son Charles V (r. 1515–1555 in the ), the States General retained its consultative role, approving extraordinary taxes (aides) and ratifying key imperial integrations, including the 1548 Transaction of Augsburg that bound the 17 provinces more closely to Habsburg succession outside traditional feudal ties. Charles V, often absent due to his vast empire, delegated to regents like Margaret of Austria and Mary of Hungary, who negotiated with the assembly on fiscal matters, though its influence was limited by the ruler's prerogative to convene or ignore it. By the mid-16th century under Philip II (successor from 1556), invocations became rarer amid centralizing reforms; the 1558 session in saw demands for oversight of tax expenditures, but Philip ceased regular meetings after 1559, heightening provincial grievances over autonomy and finances.

Sovereign Role in the Dutch Republic (1581-1795)

Following the Act of Abjuration on July 26, 1581, the States General of the northern provinces formally deposed Philip II of Spain, assuming supreme authority over the emerging Dutch Republic and replacing the monarch as the collective sovereign body. This declaration, issued by delegates from Holland, Zeeland, Utrecht, and other aligned provinces, justified the deposition on grounds of Philip's tyrannical rule, including violations of oaths to maintain provincial privileges and the imposition of excessive taxes without consent. The Act prohibited the use of Philip's name, seal, or arms in official matters, effectively vesting sovereignty in the States General as the federal assembly representing the United Provinces. The Union of Utrecht, signed on January 23, 1579, laid the groundwork for this structure by uniting the provinces in a defensive alliance while preserving individual provincial and religious tolerances. Under this framework, the States General operated as a confederal body without a centralized executive, with its delegated to the Council of State; resided primarily with the provinces, which retained control over internal affairs, taxation, and , requiring unanimous or near-unanimous consent for federal decisions to bind the whole. From 1593, the States General convened in permanent session in , evolving into the Republic's highest organ for coordinating collective interests. In exercising sovereign powers, the States General held exclusive authority over foreign relations, declarations of , maintenance of the and , and administration of general tariffs and colonial enterprises. It negotiated treaties—such as the with in 1609—and managed alliances, with foreign powers recognizing the assembly as the Republic's sovereign representative, as evidenced by diplomatic exchanges treating it as the . Military commands, including admiralty appointments, fell under its purview, though provincial quotas funded forces, often leading to fiscal disputes that underscored the confederation's decentralized nature. This sovereign role was not absolute; internal divisions, particularly between Holland's mercantile interests and other provinces, frequently paralyzed decision-making, as seen in the 1618-1619 crisis where the States General mediated religious conflicts but deferred to provincial vetoes on enforcement. The execution of Johan van Oldenbarneveldt in 1619 by Prince Maurice highlighted tensions between the States General's federal ambitions and stadtholder influence, yet the assembly retained its position as the Republic's diplomatic face until the in 1795. Over the period, it adapted to sustain the Republic's independence amid wars like the (1568-1648), but its confederal weaknesses contributed to inefficiencies in mobilizing resources against later threats from and .

Establishment in the Kingdom of the Netherlands (1815 Onward)

The States General was reestablished as a bicameral in the Kingdom of the Netherlands through a constitutional revision promulgated in 1815, following the inclusion of the (modern ) into the realm after the . This amendment to the 1814 constitution, enacted under King William I on March 16, 1815—when he proclaimed himself king—divided the assembly into the First Chamber (Eerste Kamer) and the Second Chamber (Tweede Kamer) to accommodate the enlarged kingdom's diverse interests and provide a mechanism for legislative review. Prior to this, from 1814 to 1815, the States General operated as a unicameral body with 55 members indirectly elected by provincial councils. The First Chamber comprised 55 members appointed by the king from double nominations by the provincial estates, designed as a body of notables to scrutinize and amend bills originating from the Second Chamber without initiating legislation itself. Members served six-year terms, with one-third rotating every two years, emphasizing stability and elite oversight reflective of the era's monarchical . The Second Chamber consisted of 110 members elected indirectly by the provincial assemblies, granting it primary legislative initiative while still limiting direct popular input to maintain control by established provincial elites. Article 88 of the 1815 constitution mandated that the States General represent the entire people of the , yet its functions were curtailed: it could deliberate on budgets, treaties, and laws but required royal sanction for enactment, with the king retaining veto power and ministers accountable solely to rather than the assembly. This structure positioned the States General as a consultative within a strongly centralized , diverging from the sovereign role it held in the and aligning with post-Vienna emphasis on monarchical stability. The chambers convened in , marking the institutionalization of parliamentary proceedings in the complex.

Reforms in the 19th and 20th Centuries

The 1848 constitutional revision, spearheaded by liberal statesman , marked a pivotal shift in the States General's structure and powers, establishing direct elections for the Second Chamber (Tweede Kamer) from a limited electorate of male citizens aged 25 and over who paid a specified amount in direct taxes, thereby expanding participation beyond the indirect, provincial-based system of 1815. This reform also introduced ministerial responsibility to , curtailing the monarch's direct executive dominance and laying the groundwork for a where the government could be held accountable through motions. The First Chamber (Eerste Kamer), or , transitioned from royal appointment to election by provincial assemblies, with members serving six-year terms to provide a check on while representing provincial interests. Subsequent 19th-century adjustments focused on broadening for the Tweede Kamer, with incremental expansions in 1851 and 1887 that slightly lowered property qualifications, though the electorate remained under 10% of adult males until the century's end, prioritizing tax-paying capacity to ensure representatives reflected propertied stakeholders. The dropped to 23 in 1896 alongside minor income threshold reductions, reflecting liberal pressures for wider male participation amid industrialization, yet maintaining exclusions for the poor and women to preserve deliberative stability. In the early , electoral reforms democratized the States General further: the 1917 constitutional amendment adopted for Tweede Kamer elections, replacing the plurality system to better reflect diverse political views and mitigate large-party dominance, with implementation in the 1918 elections. This coincided with universal male , enfranchising all men aged 23 and over regardless of , dramatically increasing the electorate from about 400,000 to over 1.6 million voters. Women's active followed in 1919 via legislation by Henri Marchant, granting voting to females aged 23 and over, effective for the 1922 elections and extending to candidacy, though the Eerste Kamer's via male-dominated provincial councils delayed full in senatorial representation. Later 20th-century changes emphasized procedural efficiency over structural overhaul; the lowered to 18 in 1972 for both chambers, aligning with broader youth enfranchisement trends, while the Eerste Kamer's role solidified as a revising body without initiating . These reforms collectively transformed the States General from a consultative assembly under monarchical oversight into a of , driven by liberal and socialist advocacy for inclusivity balanced against concerns for electoral fragmentation.

Composition and Structure

House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer)

The House of Representatives, or Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, forms the lower house of the Netherlands' bicameral States General, serving as the primary forum for direct representation of the Dutch populace. It comprises 150 members of parliament (MPs), known as leden van de Tweede Kamer, who are elected nationwide via open-list proportional representation, ensuring seats are allocated proportionally to parties' vote shares using the largest remainder method after applying an effective electoral threshold of approximately 0.67% of valid votes. Elections occur at least every four years on the third Wednesday in March, though the term can end prematurely if the House passes a motion of no confidence in the cabinet, prompting dissolution and snap elections, as occurred in November 2023 following the collapse of the fourth Rutte cabinet. Eligible voters include Dutch citizens aged 18 and over residing in the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten, or abroad if registered, with MPs required to be Dutch nationals aged 18 or older, nominated by political parties or independently. The system favors multi-party coalitions, reflecting the Netherlands' fragmented political landscape, where no single party has secured a majority since proportional representation was fully implemented in 1918. Structurally, the House operates through a presiding Speaker (voorzitter), elected by secret ballot among MPs for the full term, who maintains order, schedules debates, and represents the chamber externally; the current Speaker, as of late 2023, is Martin Bosma of the Party for Freedom (PVV). It convenes in the Binnenhof in The Hague, divided into plenary sessions for lawmaking and readings, and 16 to 20 permanent committees specializing in policy areas like finance, foreign affairs, and justice, where MPs conduct detailed scrutiny of government proposals and summon ministers for questioning. Unlike the upper Senate, the House holds initiative powers, including proposing bills, amending legislation, approving budgets, and ratifying treaties, positioning it as the dominant legislative body in the States General.

Senate (Eerste Kamer)

The Senate, formally the Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, forms the upper house of the Netherlands' bicameral parliament and consists of 75 members serving four-year terms. These senators represent provincial interests indirectly, as they are elected by the members of the twelve provincial councils and an electoral college comprising delegates from the special municipalities of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba. Elections employ a proportional party-list system, ensuring seats are allocated based on the composition of the electing bodies following provincial polls, which occur every four years. Structurally, the Senate convenes in the in and is led by a president elected from its ranks, who chairs sessions and oversees procedural matters. It organizes into standing committees aligned with policy areas to facilitate detailed scrutiny of legislation, mirroring committees in the while focusing exclusively on review functions. Unlike the , the Senate cannot initiate bills, propose amendments, or directly question ministers, positioning it as a chamber of reflection that assesses the overall merit and implications of proposed laws. In its compositional design, the mechanism ties senatorial representation to subnational electoral outcomes, providing a stabilizing counterbalance to the directly elected by incorporating regional perspectives into national lawmaking. This setup, reduced to 75 seats since reforms in , underscores the Senate's limited but deliberate role in preventing hasty or poorly considered legislation from advancing. Senators must meet standard parliamentary eligibility criteria, including Dutch nationality and a minimum age of 18, ensuring broad access while maintaining the chamber's advisory character.

Election and Representation

Direct Elections for the House of Representatives

The (Tweede Kamer) comprises 150 members elected directly by Dutch voters through a system of in a single nationwide constituency. This structure, established under the Dutch Constitution and the Elections Act, prioritizes broad proportionality by allocating seats via the largest remainder method after applying the (total valid votes divided by 150 seats). Elections occur at least every four years, though the body may be dissolved early by the government with parliamentary approval, triggering snap elections as seen in the upcoming vote on October 29, 2025. Eligible voters must be Dutch nationals aged 18 or older on election day, registered in the (either as residents or non-residents abroad), and not legally disqualified (e.g., due to guardianship or criminal convictions barring voting rights). Approximately 14 million voters qualified for the 2023 election, with non-resident Dutch citizens able to vote by mail or proxy. Voting is voluntary, conducted by on a Wednesday, with polling stations open from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.; voters receive a personalized polling card at least 14 days prior, which must be presented alongside identification. Voters select either a or a specific on a party's , enabling preferential voting that can alter the default party ranking if a secures at least one-sixth of the party's total votes (a "preference threshold" adjusted periodically). Parties must submit lists to the Electoral Council (Kiesraad) at least 43 days before the election, meeting requirements such as including at least as many as seats sought plus substitutes. An informal exists at around 0.67% of valid national votes (equivalent to one seat), though no formal barrier applies, allowing small parties representation if they surpass this level; this low hurdle reflects a historical emphasis on inclusivity over stability, contributing to fragmented parliaments with 10-15 parties often gaining seats. Post-election, the Kiesraad verifies results within days, allocates seats proportionally, and certifies the outcome; turnout has averaged 77-80% in recent cycles, with final composition determining negotiations. This direct mechanism ensures the Tweede Kamer reflects diverse voter preferences, though critics argue the nationwide district amplifies minor parties, complicating coalitions.

Indirect Elections for the Senate

The Eerste Kamer, the of the States General, comprises 75 members elected indirectly every four years through a system based on party lists. These elections occur within three months following the direct elections for the 12 provincial councils, with the most recent held on 30 May 2023 after provincial voting on 15 March 2023. The electors consist of the approximately 570 members of the provincial councils, supplemented by members of three electoral colleges representing the special municipalities of , , and Saba in the . Provincial council members convene as electoral colleges, chaired by their respective leaders, to cast votes for Senate candidates nominated on national party lists submitted 34 days prior to the vote at 3:00 p.m. is permitted via written authorization, and the process employs indirect without an , allowing seats to be allocated via the to reflect the distribution of weighted votes. Each elector's vote carries a weight proportional to the population of their , granting greater influence to members from more populous regions such as or compared to smaller ones like or ; this weighting ensures the system approximates national demographic balances while incorporating regional input. Since a constitutional revision, the entire is renewed simultaneously every four years, aligning with the provincial cycle but decoupled from elections to provide staggered oversight. In practice, provincial councilors vote predominantly along national party lines, rendering Senate composition a downstream outcome of provincial results, where by citizens—often focused on blocking or supporting national coalitions—can decisively shape the upper house's partisan makeup. This indirect mechanism, rooted in federal-like territorial representation, contrasts with the direct popular vote for the Tweede Kamer, emphasizing the 's role as a revising chamber rather than a primary legislative originator.

Powers and Legislative Functions

Core Legislative Authority

The core legislative authority of the States General resides in its bicameral composition, where the House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) and Senate (Eerste Kamer), in conjunction with the Government, enact statutes pursuant to Article 81 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which stipulates that "Acts of Parliament shall be enacted jointly by the Government and the States General." This shared authority underscores a parliamentary system where legislative initiative and passage require cooperation between the elected chambers and the executive, with the Government typically proposing the majority of bills to align policy with its agenda. Bills, or "wetsvoorstellen," may be introduced by or on behalf of the Government (representing the King under Article 82) or by the House of Representatives, granting the latter a right of initiative independent of executive direction. The House of Representatives exercises primary scrutiny, conducting detailed debates, proposing amendments, and voting on modifications, which can significantly shape legislation before it advances. In contrast, the Senate possesses a more restrained role, limited to approving or rejecting bills in their entirety without the power to amend, serving as a chamber of reflection to assess constitutional compliance, financial implications, and policy coherence rather than detailed policymaking. This asymmetry reflects the Senate's indirect election and smaller size (75 members versus 150 in the House), emphasizing quality control over origination. The legislative process mandates sequential passage through both chambers following advisory review by the , which provides non-binding recommendations on legality and efficacy, ensuring bills address potential administrative or judicial issues prior to parliamentary deliberation. Upon bicameral approval, the bill receives from the (formally, but in practice by the ) and is published in the Bulletin of Acts and Decrees to enter into force, typically after a specified date. Exceptions include budget laws and certain procedural matters that may bypass full Senate amendment restrictions, but core statutes require affirmative votes from a simple majority in each chamber. This framework, unaltered in fundamentals since the 1983 constitutional revision, prioritizes the House's responsiveness to public mandate while leveraging the Senate's to prevent hasty or flawed enactments.

Oversight, Budget, and Treaty Powers

The States General exercises oversight primarily through the , which holds the government accountable via mechanisms such as oral and written questions to ministers, interpellations, and investigative committees. The House can summon ministers for debates on policy implementation and government actions, ensuring transparency in administration. The plays a more limited role in oversight, focusing instead on reviewing the quality of rather than direct executive scrutiny, though it can reject bills that fail constitutional standards. Parliamentary committees in the House, covering areas like , , and , conduct detailed inquiries into government operations, including oversight. The States General holds authority over the national , with the scrutinizing, amending, and approving budget bills submitted by the annually before the new . These bills detail departmental expenditures and revenues, allowing the House to propose cuts or reallocations during debates, often tied to presentations in September. The reviews approved House budgets without amendment powers, able only to approve or reject them entirely, serving as a check against fiscal overreach. Rejection of a budget, though rare, would necessitate government renegotiation, as parliament must approve expenditures before implementation to maintain fiscal accountability. Under Article 91 of the , the States General must approve treaties before the Kingdom is bound, with both chambers voting on approval acts submitted by the after signing. Exceptions requiring no approval are defined by law, such as certain trade or administrative agreements, but most substantive treaties—like those on , defense, or taxation—demand parliamentary consent to ensure alignment with national interests. The House initiates debate and amendments to treaty bills, while the Senate provides final veto power, reflecting its revising function; follows only post-approval publication. This process has applied to key agreements, including EU treaties and bilateral pacts, underscoring parliament's role in sovereignty.

Interaction with Executive and Judiciary

The House of Representatives holds the executive branch accountable primarily through daily parliamentary questions, interpellations, and plenary debates that scrutinize ministerial policies and decisions. Ministers and state secretaries must respond to these inquiries, and the House can initiate motions of no , which, if passed, compel the of the individual minister or the entire cabinet. This mechanism enforces governmental responsibility to , as the cabinet derives its legitimacy from maintaining the of the House, though not formally required for the Senate. The Senate's interaction with the executive is limited to legislative scrutiny, where it reviews bills for legal coherence, enforceability, and alignment with broader policy without the power to amend them or vote on budgets, treaties, or confidence matters. It can reject deemed unfeasible, indirectly pressuring the to revise proposals, but lacks direct tools like questioning ministers or initiating inquiries. This restrained oversight reflects the Senate's design as a rather than confrontation, preserving executive stability while checking hasty reforms. Interaction with the judiciary emphasizes independence under , with the States General influencing it mainly through legislation on court organization, procedures, and funding rather than operational oversight. The plays a specific role in judicial appointments by drawing up a list of three candidates for each vacancy on the (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden), from which the appoints one for life upon ministerial countersignature. Lower court judges are appointed by royal decree on recommendations from the judiciary itself, bypassing direct parliamentary involvement to safeguard impartiality. Parliament cannot review or overturn judicial rulings, and the absence of authority for courts reinforces legislative supremacy in interpreting the .

Role in Governance and Political Dynamics

Bicameral Checks and Coalition Formation

The bicameral structure of the States General provides a of checks where the (Eerste Kamer) reviews legislation passed by the (Tweede Kamer), with the authority to approve or reject bills but not to amend or initiate them. This review process ensures scrutiny of legislative quality and feasibility, acting as a safeguard against hasty or poorly drafted laws originating from the House. The 's role is primarily one of reflection, focusing on the overall coherence and constitutional alignment of proposals after detailed examination in committees and plenary sessions. In coalition formation, which follows House elections and requires assembling a majority of at least 76 seats in the 150-seat to support the cabinet, the 's composition—determined indirectly through provincial council elections every four years—introduces an additional layer of constraint. Coalitions must anticipate potential opposition, as the upper house's 75 members can block even if the cabinet holds a , compelling negotiators to seek broader consensus or moderate policy platforms during cabinet formation talks led by an appointed by the king. For instance, after the March 2023 provincial elections, the resulting shifted toward opposition strength, depriving the prospective right-wing coalition of a and forcing reliance on cross-party deals for legislative passage. This dynamic has historically impacted governance stability, as seen in the second Rutte cabinet (2012–2017), which operated with a minority by forging agreements with opposition parties to secure major bills like labor market reforms. More recently, in January 2024, the approved a distributing asylum seekers across municipalities despite resistance from far-right parties poised to enter a , illustrating how upper house checks can override House-aligned coalition preferences and enforce regional equity considerations. Such instances underscore the 's function in tempering House-driven agendas, often requiring cabinets to prioritize negotiable policies to avoid deadlocks.

Influence on National Policy and Stability

The States General shapes national policy through the House of Representatives' powers to initiate, amend, and pass , coupled with the 's unconditional authority, which compels the to craft bills resilient to upper-house scrutiny. This dynamic often results in policy modifications to address regional or long-term viability concerns, as the —elected indirectly via provincial councils—prioritizes constitutional alignment over partisan expediency. For example, on September 26, 2023, the rejected the "Work Where You Want" Act after its passage in the House, arguing it unduly restricted employers' operational flexibility without adequate safeguards for productivity or team cohesion. In another case, on February 13, 2024, the vetoed to phase out for solar installations from 2025 to 2031, citing risks to energy affordability and investment incentives amid grid capacity constraints. These instances illustrate the 's role as a stabilizing filter, rejecting approximately 1-2% of bills annually while rarely invoking vetoes frivolously. Fiscal policy falls under rigorous parliamentary control, with the approving and amending the annual budget bill, which outlines revenues, expenditures, and debt limits, thereby directing allocations toward priorities like defense (2.1% of GDP in 2024) or social security (over 30% of total spending). The Senate's subsequent veto power ensures fiscal proposals withstand broader review, contributing to the ' track record of maintaining deficits below 3% of GDP post-2008 crisis through enforced medium-term frameworks. Treaty ratification, including EU fiscal pacts, similarly requires States General consent, allowing to condition international commitments on domestic impacts, such as adjustments to the stability mechanism in 2012. The bicameral system's emphasis on majority in the promotes continuity via negotiations but can undermine short-term stability in fragmented assemblies. Governments must secure support for survival, enabling no- motions to oust cabinets—invoked successfully 14 times since 1918—yet often yields multiparty prone to deadlock. Following the November 22, 2023, elections, formation of the Schoof cabinet required 223 days of talks among four parties, reflecting points that delay but vet extremes. The cabinet's June 3, 2025, collapse over asylum disputes triggered snap elections, highlighting how parliamentary and requirements enforce at the cost of frequent turnover (average cabinet duration 1,460 days since 1945). Nonetheless, this structure fosters causal resilience by diffusing power, averting unilateral executive overreach, and embedding regional input via the , which has sustained democratic continuity through 20th-century crises like .

Criticisms, Controversies, and Reform Proposals

Debates on Bicameralism and Senate Efficacy

The Senate of the States General, indirectly elected by provincial councils every four years, is constitutionally intended to serve as a chambre de réflexion, scrutinizing bills passed by the for legal quality, constitutional adherence, and without the authority to initiate or amend legislation. This design stems from the absence of judicial constitutional review in the , positioning the as an safeguard against flawed laws. However, quantitative analysis of voting from 2000 to 2015 indicates limited fulfillment of this role, with senators exhibiting high party cohesion—deviating from party positions in only 12-15% of votes on average—and rarely blocking bills on reflective grounds alone, suggesting a shift toward partisan arena behavior. Criticisms of the Senate's efficacy center on its perceived obsolescence and obstructionism in a fragmented political landscape, where its veto power has delayed or derailed agendas without commensurate public accountability due to . The Venice Commission's 2024 report on notes no active debate on dismantling the bicameral system but highlights "widespread criticism of the usefulness of the Senate" in Dutch discourse, attributing this to its part-time nature and limited tools for oversight, such as restrained budget scrutiny. Constitutional law experts, including Wim Voermans in January 2025, have argued that the chamber's increasing politicization—evident in bloc rejections tied to dynamics—undermines legislative efficiency, as seen in post-2010 deadlocks where Senate opposition contributed to instability. Reform proposals, including direct election, expanded powers, or outright abolition, have recurred since the 1983 constitutional revision, driven by parties across the spectrum. The (PVV), led by , explicitly calls for Senate abolition to eliminate delays and enhance , aligning with its platform for referendums and streamlined governance. Social democrats historically advanced abolition bills in the , citing representational deficits, while (D66) favors electoral reforms to bolster legitimacy without unicameralism. Proponents of retaining counter that the Senate's vetoes—used in under 5% of bills annually—prevent hasty or poorly vetted policies, providing causal checks on executive overreach in a consensus-driven system. Yet, of infrequent but high-impact blocks, such as those stalling or migration reforms amid provincial-urban divides, fuels arguments that distorts policy responsiveness to national majorities. Ongoing discussions, as in 2019 constitutional review committees, emphasize adapting to modern fragmentation rather than preservation for its own sake.

Challenges from Political Fragmentation and Recent Deadlocks

The ' proportional representation system, with a low 0.67% , fosters extensive political fragmentation in the States General, particularly in the (Tweede Kamer), where seats are typically divided among numerous parties, often exceeding ten effective competitors. This multiparty landscape necessitates broad coalitions for governance, amplifying negotiation complexities and risks of deadlock, as no single party has secured an absolute majority since 1901. Such fragmentation has manifested in protracted cabinet formations, underscoring governance instability. After the November 22, 2023, , in which the (PVV) won 37 of 150 seats amid splintered results, coalition talks stalled for over seven months despite multiple exploratory rounds, delaying the Schoof cabinet's swearing-in until July 2, 2024. This episode followed the 2021-2022 formation, which endured 299 days of impasse before the emerged, highlighting systemic delays averaging longer than in prior decades. Recent deadlocks extend beyond formations to coalition ruptures, exacerbating legislative bottlenecks. The Schoof government collapsed on June 3, 2025, when PVV leader withdrew over unresolved migration disputes, reverting to caretaker status and prompting snap elections scheduled for October 29, 2025. In the (Eerste Kamer), indirect elections via provincial councils introduce misalignment risks, as evidenced by its occasional vetoes on House-passed bills, such as initial hesitations on asylum reforms, further impeding coherence amid polarized fragmentation. These dynamics contribute to chronic instability, with governments operating in during deadlocks, limiting decisive action on pressing issues like and migration, while analysts predict persistent fragmentation hindering stable majorities in foreseeable elections.

References

  1. https://www.government.nl/topics/parliament/senate-and-house-of-representatives
  2. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/begrip/english_2
  3. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/how-parliament-works/democracy-netherlands
  4. https://www.staten-generaal.nl/begrip/the_states_general
  5. https://www.yourdictionary.com/states-general
  6. https://goetgevonden.nl/en/background/the-states-general/the-origins-of-the-states-general/
  7. https://historiek.net/staten-generaal-geschiedenis/75297/
  8. https://www.denederlandsegrondwet.nl/id/vh8lnhrsr2yz/de_grondwet_van_1814
  9. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/begrip/geschiedenis_eerste_kamer
  10. https://www.staten-generaal.nl/begrip/geschiedenis
  11. https://www.parlement.com/staten-generaal
  12. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/grondwet-en-statuut/175-jaar-grondwet
  13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02606755.2024.2389671
  14. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transactions-of-the-royal-historical-society/article/prince-and-states-general-charles-v-and-the-netherlands-15061555-the-prothero-lecture/EF8B8B6CB3F5FBEA892455C45706CB0F
  15. https://www.newnetherlandinstitute.org/history-and-heritage/additional-resources/dutch-treats/the-act-of-abjuration
  16. https://www.age-of-the-sage.org/history/dutch_independence_1581.html
  17. https://www.justworldnews.org/2021/03/02/1581-netherlands-secedes-from-the-spanish-empire/
  18. https://www.constitution.org/1-Constitution/cons/dutch/Union_Utrecht_1579.html
  19. https://academic.oup.com/book/10549/chapter/158481561
  20. http://www.dircost.unito.it/cs/docs/netherlands%25201815.htm
  21. https://antislaverylaw.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Netherlands-Constitution.pdf
  22. https://opil.ouplaw.com/page/932
  23. https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/netherlands1.html
  24. https://www.canonvannederland.nl/en/grondwet
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24438612
  26. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/id/vkqidrcykkun/document_extern/the_dutch_senate_unfolded/f=/vkqidruoyfo3.pdf
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378877426_The_Myth_of_Individual_Suffrage_The_Voting_Rights_of_Men_Women_and_Households_in_the_Netherlands_in_the_Nineteenth_Century
  28. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27944/chapter/211879247
  29. https://electoral-reform.org.uk/why-did-the-netherlands-adopt-nationwide-proportional-representation/
  30. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Netherlands/The-Kingdom-of-the-Netherlands-1814-1918
  31. https://dutchreview.com/culture/history/womens-suffrage-in-the-netherlands/
  32. https://nimd.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Dutch-Political-System.pdf
  33. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/64430180/2021_OUP_II_NETHERLANDS_edited2021_revised_LB.pdf
  34. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/elections
  35. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/c/557586.pdf
  36. http://archive.ipu.org/parline/reports/2232.htm
  37. http://www.epgencms.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/upload/7cf6cf36-3753-4fd2-9218-1beeb7098304/Factsheet_NL_-_Senate_27052019.pdf
  38. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/eu/id/vi21lixhu4ou/document_extern/brochure_ek_engels_inclusief_europa/f=/vipzb4k9v6vk.pdf
  39. https://www.leideninternationalcentre.nl/get-advice/blogs/guide-to-the-dutch-elections-2025
  40. https://www.government.nl/topics/elections/voting-in-house-of-representatives-elections
  41. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/how-parliament-works/elections/voting
  42. https://academic.oup.com/book/26299/chapter/194575193
  43. https://english.kiesraad.nl/elections/elections-of-the-house-of-representatives
  44. https://www.coe.int/en/web/electoral-assistance/elecdata-netherlands
  45. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2024/07/31/the-netherlands-shows-the-democratic-pitfalls-of-proportional-representation/
  46. https://english.kiesraad.nl/elections/elections-of-the-senate
  47. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Netherlands_2008?lang=en
  48. https://archive.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/ctrlparlementaire/2231_F.htm
  49. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/members_of_parliament/committees
  50. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/how-parliament-works/democracy-netherlands/duties-and-rights/right-approve-and-amend-budget-bills
  51. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/how-parliament-works/princes-day-accountability-day/presentation-national-budget-and-budget
  52. https://english.rekenkamer.nl/latest/news/2025/04/03/the-possibilities-and-uncertainties-of-parliaments-rejection-of-a-budget
  53. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Netherlands_2008
  54. https://www.government.nl/topics/treaties/the-difference-between-signing-and-ratification
  55. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/contact-and-visit-house/frequently-asked-questions
  56. https://www.ipu.org/Parline/reports/CtrlParlementaire/2231_F.htm
  57. https://www.government.nl/topics/parliament
  58. http://dutchcivillaw.com/legislation/constitution066.htm
  59. https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/factsheets/rvdr_the_netherlands.pdf
  60. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/prohibition-on-constitutional-review-by-the-judiciary-in-the-netherlands-in-critical-perspective-the-case-and-roadmap-for-reform/170788EBDC4F5BD9B1CC8D19A3E6E6C9
  61. https://www.government.nl/government/about-the-government/forming-a-new-government
  62. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/in-the-media/2023/06/merge-the-dutch-senate-and-house-of-representatives
  63. https://www.tomlouwerse.nl/publication/2021-louwerse-timmermans/2021-louwerse-timmermans.pdf
  64. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/dutch-senate-defies-prospective-government-parties-over-migration-law-2024-01-16/
  65. https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/dutch-senate-rejects-work-where-you-want-act
  66. https://www.pv-tech.org/the-netherlands-rejects-bill-to-phase-out-net-metering-scheme/
  67. https://www.government.nl/topics/parliament/relationship-between-government-and-parliament
  68. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/news/elections-and-new-cabinet
  69. https://ecre.org/op-ed-the-fall-of-the-dutch-government-that-took-longer-than-expected/
  70. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/652525912/A_political_arena_or_a_chambre_de_r_flexion_An_examination_of_the_reflective_role_of_Dutch_senators.pdf
  71. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13572334.2020.1795379
  72. https://www.venice.coe.int/files/Bicameralism/T03-E.htm
  73. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/in-the-media/2025/01/role-of-the-senate-in-the-netherlands-is-too-political
  74. https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/the-state-of-the-right-the-netherlands/
  75. http://constitutionnet.org/news/reforming-dutch-constitution-ensure-future-readiness-its-democracy
  76. https://think.ing.com/articles/dutch-election-preview-looking-for-solutions-to-structural-issues/
  77. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2019/12/dont-be-afraid-political-fragmentation
  78. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/dutch-government-formation-still-puzzle-12-weeks-after-election-2024-02-12/
  79. https://www.eunews.it/en/2024/07/02/netherlands-new-right-wing-government/
  80. https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-8852.12392
  81. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0r1x5yyd5wo
  82. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/4/why-did-the-dutch-government-collapse-and-whats-next
  83. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/what-expect-dutch-election-2025-10-22/
  84. https://nltimes.nl/2023/10/31/dutch-senate-declares-asylum-distribution-law-controversial
  85. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2025/09/how-can-the-netherlands-form-a-stable-government
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.