Hubbry Logo
Administrative divisions of UkraineAdministrative divisions of UkraineMain
Open search
Administrative divisions of Ukraine
Community hub
Administrative divisions of Ukraine
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Administrative divisions of Ukraine
Administrative divisions of Ukraine
Administrative divisions of Ukraine
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on the
Subdivisions of Ukraine
Map of the subdivisions of Ukraine
First level
Second level
Third level
This sidebar:
Politics of Ukraine
Constitution
Presidency
Executive
Legislature
Judiciary
Local government
Elections
Foreign relations
See also
flag Ukraine portal

The administrative divisions of Ukraine (Ukrainian: Адміністративний устрій України, romanized: Administratyvnyi ustrii Ukrainy [ɐd⁽ʲ⁾min⁽ʲ⁾istrɐˈtɪu̯nɪj ˈust⁽ʲ⁾r⁽ʲ⁾ij ʊkrɐˈjinɪ]) are under the jurisdiction of the Ukrainian Constitution. Ukraine is a unitary state with three levels of administrative divisions: 27 regions (24 oblasts, two cities with special status and one autonomous republic), 136 raions (districts) and 1469 hromadas.[1][2]

The administrative reform of July 2020 merged most of the 490 legacy raions and 118 pre-2020 cities of regional significance into 136 reorganized raions, or districts of Ukraine. The next level below raions are hromadas.[3]

Following the annexations of Crimea and southeastern Ukraine by the Russian Federation, Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as well as portions of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts came under the de facto administration of the Russian Federation. Internationally, most states have not recognized the Russian claims.[4]

Overview

[edit]
See also: Local government in Ukraine

According to Article 133 of the Constitution of Ukraine as amended, the system of administrative and territorial organization of Ukraine consists of:

In an administrative reform in 2020, all populated places in the country (except for two cities with special status, Kyiv and Sevastopol) were resubordinated to raions.[6] The new figure of 136 raions includes 10 in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol; since September 2023, the Crimean raions are functional.[7]

Administrative divisions of Ukraine
Level of subdivision Territory Total
First autonomous republic 1
cities with special status 2
oblasts (regions) 24
Second raions (districts) 136
Third hromadas (territorial communities) 1469

First level

[edit]

There are three types of first-level administrative divisions: 24 oblasts (regions), 1 autonomous republic and 2 cities with special status.

Colour Description
  24 oblasts
 An oblast in Ukraine, sometimes translated as region or province, is the main type of first-level administrative division of the country. Ukraine is a unitary state, thus the oblasts do not have much legal scope of competence other than that which is established in the Ukrainian Constitution and by law. Articles 140–146 of Chapter XI of the constitution deal directly with local authorities and their competency.
  1 autonomous republic
 The administrative status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea is recognized in the Ukrainian Constitution in Chapter X: Autonomous Republic of Crimea and is governed in accordance with laws passed by Ukraine's parliament. In 2014, the autonomous republic was illegally annexed by Russia as the Republic of Crimea.[8]
  2 cities with special status
 There are two cities with special status: Kyiv and Sevastopol (occupied since 2014). Their administrative status is recognized in the Ukrainian Constitution in Chapter IX: Territorial Structure of Ukraine.[9] Unlike the oblasts and the autonomous republic, the cities with special status only have urban districts and are not subdivided into hromadas.

List

[edit]
Flag Coat of arms No. Name Area (km2) Population
(2021 estimate) 		Population density
(people/km2, 2021) 		Capital No. of raions No. of hromadas Location
1 Autonomous
Republic of Crimea 		26,081 1,967,259 75.43 Simferopol 10 —
2 Vinnytsia Oblast 26,513 1,529,123 57.67 Vinnytsia 6 63
3 Volyn Oblast 20,144 1,027,397 51.00 Lutsk 4 54
4 Dnipropetrovsk Oblast 31,974 3,142,035 98.27 Dnipro 7 86
5 Donetsk Oblast 26,517 4,100,280 154.63 Donetsk
(de jure)
Kramatorsk
(de facto) 		8 66
6 Zhytomyr Oblast 29,832 1,195,495 40.07 Zhytomyr 4 65
7 Zakarpattia Oblast 12,777 1,250,129 97.84 Uzhhorod 6 64
8 Zaporizhzhia Oblast 27,180 1,666,515 61.31 Zaporizhzhia 5 67
9 Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast 13,928 1,361,109 97.72 Ivano-Frankivsk 6 62
10 Kyiv Oblast 28,131 1,788,530 63.58 Kyiv 7 69
11 Kirovohrad Oblast 24,588 920,128 37.42 Kropyvnytskyi 4 49
12 Luhansk Oblast 26,684 2,121,322 79.50 Luhansk
(de jure)
Sievierodonetsk
(de facto, 2014–2022) 		8 37
13 Lviv Oblast 21,833 2,497,750 114.40 Lviv 7 73
14 Mykolaiv Oblast 24,598 1,108,394 45.06 Mykolaiv 4 52
15 Odesa Oblast 33,310 2,368,107 71.09 Odesa 7 91
16 Poltava Oblast 28,748 1,371,529 47.71 Poltava 4 60
17 Rivne Oblast 20,047 1,148,456 57.29 Rivne 4 64
18 Sumy Oblast 23,834 1,053,452 44.20 Sumy 5 51
19 Ternopil Oblast 13,823 1,030,562 74.55 Ternopil 3 55
20 Kharkiv Oblast 31,415 2,633,834 83.84 Kharkiv 7 56
21 Kherson Oblast 28,461 1,016,707 35.72 Kherson 5 49
22 Khmelnytskyi Oblast 20,645 1,243,787 60.25 Khmelnytskyi 3 60
23 Cherkasy Oblast 20,900 1,178,266 56.38 Cherkasy 4 66
24 Chernivtsi Oblast 8,097 896,566 110.73 Chernivtsi 3 52
25 Chernihiv Oblast 31,865 976,701 30.65 Chernihiv 5 57
26 Kyiv 839 2,962,180 3530.61 Kyiv 10 —
27 Sevastopol 864 385,870 446.61 Sevastopol 4 —

Autonomous republic

[edit]
Main article: Autonomous Republic of Crimea

The Autonomous Republic of Crimea (Ukrainian: Автономна Республіка Крим) geographically encompasses the major portion of the Crimean peninsula in southern Ukraine. Its capital is Simferopol. The Autonomous Republic of Crimea is the only region within Ukraine that has its own constitution.

On 16 March 2014, after the occupation of Crimea by the Russian military, a referendum on joining the Russian Federation was held. A majority of votes supported the measure. On 21 March 2014, the Russian Duma voted to annex Crimea as a subject into the Russian Federation. The Ukrainian government does not recognize the referendum or annexation of Crimea as legitimate. On 27 March, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 68/262 by 100 to 11 votes, recognizing the referendum as invalid and denying any legal change in the status of Crimea and Sevastopol.

Oblasts

[edit]
Main article: Oblasts of Ukraine

An oblast (Ukrainian: область; pl. області) is on the first level of the administrative division of Ukraine.

Most oblasts are named after their administrative center. Volyn and Zakarpattia oblasts, whose respective capitals are Lutsk and Uzhhorod, are named after the historic regions Volhynia and Transcarpathia.

Cities with special status

[edit]
Main article: City with special status

Two cities have special status (Ukrainian: міста зі спеціальним статусом): Kyiv and Sevastopol. Their special status puts them on the same administrative level as the oblasts, and thus under the direct supervision of the state via their respective local state administrations, which constitute the executive bodies of the cities. Following the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation, Sevastopol is controlled by Russia and is incorporated as a federal subject of Russia.[10][11]

Second level

[edit]

Raions

[edit]
Main article: Raions of Ukraine

Raions (Ukrainian: район; pl. райони) are smaller territorial units of subdivision in Ukraine. There are 136 raions.[12] Following the December 2019 draft constitutional changes submitted to the Verkhovna Rada by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, 136 new raions have replaced the former 490 raions of Ukraine.[13]

Urban districts

[edit]
Main article: Urban districts of Ukraine

An urban district is subordinate to the city administration.[14]

Third level

[edit]

Hromadas

[edit]
Further information: List of hromadas of Ukraine

The territorial hromadas (Ukrainian: територіальна громада; lit. 'territorial community'; pl. територіальні громади), or simply hromadas (Ukrainian: громада; pl. громади) were established by the Government of Ukraine on 12 June 2020 as a part of administrative reform that started in 2015.[15]

There are three types of hromadas: rural (Ukrainian: сільська громада), settlement (Ukrainian: селищна громада) and urban (Ukrainian: міська громада). There are 1469 hromadas in total (as of November 1, 2023).[16]

History

[edit]
Main articles: Development of the administrative divisions of Ukraine and Historical regions in present-day Ukraine

Cossack Hetmanate

[edit]

The Cossack Hetmanate was divided into military-administrative districts known as regimental districts (polks) whose number fluctuated with the size of the Hetmanate's territory. In 1649, when the Hetmanate controlled both the right and left banks, it included 16 such districts. After the loss of Right-bank Ukraine, this number was reduced to ten. The regimental districts were further divided into companies (sotnias), which were administered by captains (sotnyk).[17] The lowest division was the kurin.

Ukrainian People's Republic

[edit]
Zemlias of Ukraine in 1918

According to the Constitution of the Ukrainian People's Republic, the country was divided into zemlias (lands), volosts and hromadas (communities). This law was not fully implemented as on 29 April 1918 there was the anti-socialist coup in Kyiv, after which Pavlo Skoropadskyi reverted the reform back to the governorate-type administration.[18]

Soviet Ukraine

[edit]

Before the introduction of oblasts in 1932, Soviet Ukraine comprised 40 okruhas, which had replaced the former Russian Imperial governorate subdivisions.[19][20]

In 1932 the territory of the Soviet Ukraine was re-established based on oblasts. At the same time, most of the Western Ukraine at the time formed part of the Second Polish Republic and shared in the Polish form of administrative division based on voivodeships.[21]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Administrative divisions of Ukraine

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
's administrative divisions form a hierarchical system comprising 27 top-level units: 24 oblasts (regions), the , and two cities with special status, and . These units are further subdivided into raions (districts) and hromadas (territorial communities), reflecting a structure designed for centralized governance with local autonomy. A major decentralization reform enacted in consolidated the previous 490 raions into 136 larger districts and created approximately 1,470 hromadas, aiming to enhance local self-governance, fiscal efficiency, and service delivery amid post-Soviet institutional legacies. The system's functionality is profoundly affected by territorial disputes, as exercises de facto control over all of and since its —via a disputed referendum—and over substantial areas of , , , and oblasts following its 2022 full-scale invasion, while retains de jure title backed by and non-recognition of Russian claims by most states. This bifurcation has led to parallel administrative entities in contested zones, complicating governance, , and demographic .

Overview

Constitutional basis and unitary structure

The , adopted by the on June 28, 1996, and effective from that date, defines the country as a unitary whose territorial organization prioritizes the unity and indivisibility of its state territory. Article 132 explicitly bases this structure on the principles of , a balance between centralization and in the exercise of state power, and accommodations for the administrative-territorial features of the and the special status of as the capital. This framework rejects , vesting ultimate and authority in central institutions while delegating limited administrative functions to subnational levels, ensuring that local entities operate within nationally uniform legal and policy parameters. In practice, Ukraine's unitary design centralizes key powers such as defense, , monetary regulation, and standards for and under national control, as outlined in Articles 85 and 92, which enumerate exclusive competencies of the and central executive bodies. Subnational divisions, including oblasts and the , possess no independent constitutional or right to , with their derived solely from delegated subject to central oversight and potential dissolution by presidential in cases of non-compliance or , per Article 118. This structure underscores causal mechanisms of where local self-government, guaranteed under Article 140 as a right to resolve local issues independently within the , remains subordinate to state guarantees of conformity and funding, preventing fragmentation. Amendments introduced via the 2014-2016 decentralization reforms, including changes to Articles 132 and 140 ratified on February 2, 2016, enhanced local fiscal and community-level administration without altering the unitary core, as confirmed by the Venice Commission's assessment that these shifts promote while preserving national unity and prohibiting asymmetric federal elements. Empirical data from post-reform implementation shows increased local budgets—rising from 20% of consolidated expenditures in 2014 to over 40% by 2020—but with central transfers comprising the majority and national laws overriding local norms in conflicts, reinforcing the non-federal hierarchy. Thus, Ukraine's administrative divisions function as extensions of central authority, designed to maintain territorial cohesion amid diverse regional identities.

Hierarchical levels and decentralization principles

Ukraine's administrative system operates as a , with its territory indivisible and state power exercised through a combination of centralization and (Constitution, Articles 2 and 132). The de jure hierarchy comprises three subnational tiers: first-level divisions including 24 oblasts, the , and cities with special status ( and ) as outlined in Article 133; second-level raions, reduced to 136 through the 2020 administrative reform that consolidated smaller districts for greater efficiency; and third-level hromadas (territorial communities), totaling 1,469, which constitute the foundational units directly representing residents of villages, settlements, and cities. Decentralization principles, grounded in Articles 140–146 of the , affirm local self-government as a guaranteed right of territorial communities to resolve issues of local importance independently via elected councils and executive bodies, such as village, settlement, or city heads elected for four-year terms. These bodies manage communal property, approve local budgets derived from retained taxes, fees, and state transfers, and develop programs addressing regional needs, with the state obligated to provide financial support and compensation for delegated functions (Articles 142–143). The framework incorporates , devolving authority to the most proximate effective level to enhance responsiveness, while ensuring balanced development and unity across historical, economic, and ethnic considerations (Article 132). Reforms since 2014 have advanced these constitutional mandates through laws promoting voluntary hromada amalgamation—forming over 1,400 capable communities by 2020—and fiscal enhancements, such as Budget and Tax Code amendments that quadrupled local revenues from UAH 68.6 billion in 2014 to UAH 275 billion in 2019, enabling improved service provision like and . Central oversight persists, permitting suspension of unlawful local decisions subject to (Article 144), but the emphasis remains on empowering communities per the European Charter of Local Self-Government, which Ukraine ratified, to prioritize resident interests without fragmenting national .

De Jure First-Level Divisions

Oblasts

Ukraine comprises 24 as its principal first-level administrative divisions, excluding the and the cities with special status of and . These oblasts form the core of the country's unitary territorial structure, each functioning as a regional entity with defined boundaries and administrative responsibilities under the . The oblast system originated in the Soviet period, with the term "oblast" first applied in 1932 when the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic replaced prior okruha districts with an initial seven oblasts to streamline governance and economic planning. Subsequent expansions and reorganizations occurred through the 1930s and 1940s, incorporating territories from Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia post-World War II, resulting in the current configuration of 24 oblasts by Ukraine's independence in 1991. Governance of each oblast is dual-layered: executive authority resides with the oblast state administration, headed by a governor (or head of military-civil administration during wartime) appointed by the President, while representative functions are exercised by the elected oblast council. These bodies manage regional services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and economic development, subject to national laws and decentralization reforms enacted since 2014 to enhance local autonomy. The 24 oblasts, listed alphabetically with their administrative centers, are:
OblastAdministrative Center
(de facto)
[Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast](/page/I plain textIvano-Frankivsk_Oblast)
Khmelnytskyi
Kirovohrad OblastKropyvnytskyi
Kyiv
Sievierodonetsk (de facto)
Lviv
Mykolaiv
Odesa
Poltava
Rivne
Sumy
Ternopil
Vinnytsia
De jure, all oblasts encompass their full internationally recognized territories, though portions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia oblasts remain under Russian occupation as of 2025, complicating administrative control without altering legal boundaries.

Autonomous Republic of Crimea

The (Ukrainian: Автономна Республіка Крим) constitutes a first-level of , distinct from the 24 oblasts due to its autonomous status, which grants it limited over regional affairs while remaining an inseparable part of the . Encompassing the Crimean Peninsula and associated islands in the Black Sea, it spans an area of 26,081 square kilometers. As per the (Article 134), the republic resolves issues delegated by Ukrainian law, including adoption of a regional constitution approved by 's , but exercises no authority over national defense, foreign policy, or customs. Restoration of Crimea's autonomy occurred via a , 1991, , where a of participants endorsed reinstating the pre-1945 Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic's status within a renewed union framework, amid the Soviet Union's dissolution. Following 's on August 24, 1991, and a December 1, 1991, all-Ukrainian affirming (with Crimean turnout at 60% and 54% approval), the integrated as an autonomous entity. The 1996 formalized this in Chapter V (Articles 134–139), delineating the as the legislative body empowered to enact regional laws, resolutions, and budgets, subject to alignment with national legislation, while the serves as the executive. A dedicated Crimean constitution, adopted December 23, 1998, and approved by Ukraine's parliament, further specifies internal organization. De jure administrative subdivisions within the follow Ukraine's 2020 decentralization reform (Law No. 562-IX), which restructured all territories, including occupied areas, into 10 raions: Bahchisaraiskyi, Bilohirskyi, , Yevpatoriia, , Krasnohvardiiskyi, Krasnoperekopskyi, , Feodosiia, and . These raions encompass urban and rural hromadas (territorial communities) as third-level units, with cities like (the capital) holding municipal status. Pre-reform, the republic comprised 14 raions and 11 city municipalities, but the updated framework consolidates governance for efficiency, though implementation remains nominal in occupied zones. Population estimates from Ukraine's State Statistics Service, based on the 2001 census adjusted to 2014, place residents at approximately 2.35 million, predominantly ethnic (58%), (24%), and (12%). Governance operates through the (100 deputies, elected every five years ), which holds sessions in and appoints the head of the , with the retaining veto power over regional acts conflicting with national law ( Article 136). The autonomy's design balances ethnic and regional interests—reflecting historical Russian-majority demographics—against unitary control, prohibiting or independent . Since 2014, Ukraine maintains a structure, declaring post-annexation institutions illegitimate and applying national laws extraterritorially to assert sovereignty.

Cities with special status

Ukraine's Constitution designates Kyiv and Sevastopol as cities with special status, classifying them as first-level administrative divisions alongside oblasts and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. This status exempts them from subordination to any oblast, placing them directly under oversight while granting expanded local powers equivalent to those of oblast-level entities. Kyiv's special status is elaborated in the Law "On the Capital of Ukraine – Hero City ," adopted on January 15, 1999, and subsequently amended. The law establishes 's functions as both the national capital—hosting central state bodies, foreign embassies, and key institutions—and a with autonomous local administration. is dualistic: the , elected by residents, handles legislative matters for the territorial community, while the Kyiv City State Administration executes state policies and local executive functions. The head of the administration, who concurrently serves as mayor, combines appointed presidential authority with an elected mandate, though martial law since February 24, 2022, has centralized certain powers. This framework reflects 's historical designation as a Hero City for its role in defense, emphasizing its strategic administrative independence. Sevastopol's special status, also enshrined in the Constitution since 1996, mirrors Kyiv's in principle, providing for separate administration from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea with its own city council and executive bodies. However, no dedicated implementing law equivalent to Kyiv's has been enacted, as Sevastopol retained Soviet-era closed-city privileges focused on its naval base until Russia's annexation of Crimea in March 2014. De jure, Ukrainian law maintains Sevastopol's status as a distinct entity with republican-level subordination, but Russian occupation has prevented operationalization, leading to parallel Russian-administered structures unrecognized internationally except by a few states. United Nations General Assembly resolutions affirm Sevastopol's Ukrainian sovereignty, rejecting alterations to its status.

De Facto Administrative Control

Russian-occupied territories

The Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine include the full extent of the and the city of , seized by Russian forces in February-March 2014, as well as substantial portions of , , , and oblasts, with occupations expanding significantly after the February 24, 2022, . As of August 2025, Russian military control extends over approximately 114,500 square kilometers, representing 19% of 's total territory (excluding , which alone accounts for about 3% of pre-2014 Ukrainian land). These areas feature Russian administration through integrated federal subjects or proxy entities, though control remains incomplete in (roughly 60% held), (about 70% post-2022 counteroffensives), and (similarly partial), while is nearly fully occupied. Russia formalized its claims via annexation of on , 2014, following a held amid presence, which reported 97% approval but lacked independent verification and was rejected internationally as illegitimate. operates as the Republic of Crimea, a constituent republic of , with designated a ; Russian authorities have imposed federal laws, rouble , and passportization policies, while suppressing Ukrainian administrative functions and Crimean Tatar autonomy structures. In and , pro-Russian separatist administrations ( and People's Republics) emerged in May 2014 with direct Russian support, controlling limited areas until 2022 expansions; recognized these entities on February 21, 2022, and annexed the entire claimed territories on September 30, 2022, integrating them as federal subjects despite ongoing Ukrainian control over pockets like parts of Pokrovsk district. Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts saw rapid Russian advances in March 2022, enabling occupation of key cities like (until November 2022 liberation of the regional capital) and Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant; sham referendums in late September 2022 preceded the same-day decree, purporting to join claimed full oblasts to as subjects, though Ukrainian forces retain the western Kherson right-bank and northern Zaporizhzhia areas. De facto governance in these zones relies on Russian military-civil administrations, which enforce federal legislation, conduct forced into Russian forces, and facilitate demographic shifts via civilian deportations (estimated at over 1.6 million to Russia proper) and incentives for relocation. Ukraine's government administers these regions in absentia through exiled structures and military governance in recaptured zones, rejecting all annexations as violations of sovereignty under the 1994 and UN Charter.
Occupied TerritoryInitial OccupationAnnexation ClaimApproximate Control Level (2025)
& February-March 2014March 18, 2014100%
2014 (expanded 2022)September 30, 2022Near 100%
2014 (expanded 2022)September 30, 2022~60% (advances ongoing)
March 2022September 30, 2022~70%
March 2022September 30, 2022~70%
Internationally, the annexations lack recognition beyond and a handful of allies, with UN resolutions (e.g., ES-10/7 on in 2014 and ES-11/4 on 2022 annexations) affirming Ukrainian and deeming the seizures temporary occupations under , prohibiting permanent alterations like forced administrative restructuring. Russian control relies on sustained military presence, with documented advances in as late as October 2025, but faces attrition from Ukrainian incursions and sanctions limiting integration.

Impacts on governance and international recognition

The Russian occupation of since March 2014 and significant portions of , , , and oblasts since February 2022 has created a bifurcated reality in Ukraine, where de jure sovereignty remains with but de facto control is exercised by over roughly 18% of Ukraine's . This disparity undermines Ukraine's unitary administrative framework by severing central oversight of local institutions, including raions and hromadas in affected areas, leading to halted reforms initiated in 2020 and disrupted delivery of public services such as and healthcare under Ukrainian law. Ukrainian authorities continue to appoint oblast governors and maintain nominal administrative operations from -controlled territories or , but this results in ineffective enforcement of national policies, fiscal allocation challenges, and a vacuum that exacerbates internal displacement of over 6 million citizens from these regions. In occupied zones, Russia has imposed parallel administrative structures, designating annexed territories as federal subjects or integrating them into existing Russian oblasts, with policies enforcing Russian citizenship, language, and curricula to facilitate and . These measures, including forced passportization affecting hundreds of thousands and suppression of Ukrainian governance bodies, have fostered a climate of marked by arbitrary detentions and violations, as documented in reports covering the period up to March 2024. For , this erodes the hierarchical integrity of its divisions, complicating accountability and coordination, while enabling to extract resources and conscript locals into its forces, further straining Kyiv's military and economic resilience. Internationally, Ukraine's administrative divisions, including occupied oblasts and the , retain near-universal recognition within the 1991 borders, with the and most states rejecting Russian annexations—formalized via sham referenda in September 2022—as illegitimate under the UN Charter. The , , and allies have affirmed non-recognition through resolutions and sanctions, viewing the occupations as aggression that preserves Ukraine's territorial integrity despite losses. This stance enhances Ukraine's access to aid and diplomatic leverage but highlights tensions in peace negotiations, where Russian demands for recognition of control over four full oblasts remain unmet, perpetuating governance instability and hindering post-conflict reintegration.

Subnational Divisions

Second-level raions and urban districts

The administrative reform of unified Ukraine's second-level divisions under (райони), reducing their total from 490—comprising rural, urban, and settlement —to 136 larger entities designed for greater fiscal viability and service delivery coordination. This restructuring merged former with cities and urban settlements of significance, eliminating separate second-level urban categories in most cases while incorporating urban territories into boundaries. now encompass both rural and urban areas within each , the (, with 10 ), and cities with special status; for instance, is subdivided into 10 , and () into 4 urban-oriented functioning as second-level units. Raion governance involves a state administration, appointed by the president and overseeing such as suballocation, , and inter-hromada coordination, alongside elected raion councils with advisory roles on . Post-reform, raions lack direct taxation authority, with primary powers devolved to third-level hromadas, limiting raions to supportive roles in areas like oversight, healthcare facility management, and emergency services across amalgamated territories averaging 3,000–5,000 square kilometers. In predominantly urban contexts, such as oblast centers, raions retain administrative districts (e.g., Kyiv's 10) that handle localized and utilities, effectively serving as urban districts equivalent to rural s in hierarchical function. The reform's implementation, effective from July 1, 2021, aimed to address pre-existing fragmentation where small raions lacked capacity for self-sufficiency, evidenced by prior data showing over 300 units with populations under 50,000 unable to fund basic services independently. , the 136 raions maintain this structure despite territorial disruptions, with boundaries adjusted via parliamentary laws specifying mergers (e.g., Ukraine's No. 562-IX delineating oblast-specific configurations). This consolidation supports causal links to improved resilience, as larger units facilitate resource pooling amid external pressures, though empirical outcomes remain under evaluation through state audits.

Third-level hromadas and local communities

Hromadas, or amalgamated territorial communities, constitute the third level of Ukraine's administrative hierarchy, serving as the primary units of local self-government below raions. Formed through the decentralization reform initiated in and finalized with the 2020 administrative , hromadas consolidate multiple settlements—such as villages, urban-type settlements, or cities—into cohesive entities empowered to manage local resources, budgets, and services independently from higher tiers. This reform reduced the number of basic administrative units from over 11,000 pre-2015 entities to a more efficient structure, enhancing fiscal autonomy and decision-making at the level. As of 2025, Ukraine maintains 1,469 hromadas , distributed across urban, settlement, and rural types determined by the status of their administrative center: urban hromadas are centered in cities, settlement hromadas in urban-type settlements (selyshche), and rural hromadas in villages. Each type reflects varying population densities and economic capacities, with urban hromadas typically possessing greater revenue bases from local taxes and enterprise income, while rural ones rely more heavily on state transfers for infrastructure and services. Hromadas exercise authority over essential functions, including , healthcare facilities, communal roads, , and social assistance, funded through a combination of local levies (e.g., property taxes) and formula-based allocations from national budgets. Governance within a hromada centers on an elected council, comprising deputies from constituent settlements proportional to population, and a directly elected head (golova) who chairs the executive committee. Councils approve budgets, development plans, and , while heads implement policies and represent the community externally. To address dispersed populations, hromadas may establish starostynskyi (elder) districts for outlying villages, where appointed starostas (elders) handle local representation, administrative services, and coordination without independent fiscal powers. This structure promotes , delegating decisions closest to affected residents, though wartime military administrations have temporarily superseded civilian bodies in 197 frontline or high-risk hromadas as of mid-2024, prioritizing security over routine . Local communities, as subunits of hromadas, encompass the individual settlements (e.g., single villages or clusters) that retain cultural and historical identities but cede most to the parent hromada. These communities lack separate legal personalities for self-government post-amalgamation, instead participating via seats and referenda on hyper-local issues like cultural preservation or minor . The 2020 reform abolished prior village/town councils, channeling their roles into hromadas to curb fragmentation and improve service delivery efficiency, though critics note uneven capacity in smaller rural communities, where limited expertise hampers implementation of devolved powers. Empirical data from post-reform audits indicate hromadas' own revenues rose by over 50% between 2015 and 2020, underscoring fiscal empowerment, yet disparities persist, with urban hromadas generating seven percentage points higher self-funding ratios than rural counterparts.

Historical Evolution

Pre-modern and Cossack Hetmanate divisions

In the Kievan Rus' era, spanning roughly the 9th to 13th centuries, the lands encompassing much of modern central and northern Ukraine were divided into semi-autonomous principalities ruled by princes (kniazi), with as the central power. These principalities, such as those of , , and Pereyaslav, functioned as primary administrative and territorial units, often subdivided into volosts—districts managed by local elders or appointed officials for taxation, justice, and military mobilization. Following the Mongol invasion in the 1240s, which fragmented Rus' principalities, these territories fell under the suzerainty of the , with local governance retained through surviving princely appanages but increasingly oriented toward tribute collection rather than cohesive administration. By the 14th century, Lithuanian expansion incorporated key Ukrainian regions, including Chernihiv in the 1350s, and Kyiv, Pereyaslav, and Podolia in the 1360s, organizing them as frontier lands (podolia) under grand ducal appointees while preserving elements of Ruthenian customary law and local boyar elites. The Union of Krewo in 1385 and subsequent partitions with Poland integrated Volhynia into Lithuanian-Polish spheres, but administrative continuity emphasized regional elderships over rigid hierarchies. After the Union of Lublin in 1569, most Ukrainian territories transferred to the Polish Crown, restructured into voivodeships (województwa)—large provinces like the Kyiv, Braclav, Podolian, and Volhynian voivodeships—each headed by a voivode appointed by the king, with powiats (counties) as subdivisions for local courts and taxation, overlaying a manorial system dominated by Polish nobility. This Polish-Lithuanian framework prioritized noble estates (latifundia) and urban charters (magdeburg rights) for towns, fostering social stratification that fueled Cossack discontent by the mid-17th century. The emerged in 1648 amid Bohdan Khmelnytsky's uprising against Polish rule, establishing a proto-state in with the as supreme military and civil authority, advised by a council of starshyna (officer elite). Its core administrative divisions were regimental districts (polky), military-territorial units led by colonels (polkovnyky), which combined governance, taxation, and defense; the number fluctuated, reaching 16 regiments across both riverbanks by the 1649 Treaty of Zboriv, but stabilizing at around 10 in after the 1667 Andrusovo partition ceded Right-Bank lands to . Each regiment encompassed multiple sotni (hundreds or companies), smaller units headed by sotnyks responsible for local muster, justice, and revenue from villages (selyshcha), with urban centers retaining self-governing councils. The 1654 Treaty of Pereiaslav placed the Hetmanate under Russian tsarist protection, initially preserving Cossack autonomy through the hetman's chancellery in (later ), but subsequent "eternal articles" and partitions progressively subordinated it, culminating in the abolition of the hetmanate in 1764 and integration into Russian guberniyas by 1781–1783. This structure emphasized Cossack martial traditions over centralized bureaucracy, enabling rapid mobilization but vulnerable to internal factionalism and external interference.

Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic structure

The (UkrSSR), established in 1919 as a constituent republic of the , initially adopted the pre-revolutionary gubernia (province) and (county) system for its administrative-territorial organization, with approximately 8–9 guberniyas covering its territory. These units were subdivided into uezds, which served as intermediate administrative levels managed by executive committees under Soviet control. This structure facilitated centralized planning and local governance through soviets (councils) at various levels, though it was short-lived amid ongoing civil war disruptions and territorial fluctuations. In 1923, the gubernia and system was abolished, and okruhas (districts) were introduced as the primary intermediate administrative units, initially numbering 53 and later consolidated to 41 by 1925. Each okruha was subdivided into raions (districts) and urban settlements, with executive committees overseeing economic and administrative functions aligned with Soviet policies like . The okruha system aimed to decentralize management for industrialization and collectivization but proved inefficient, leading to their gradual abolition between 1930 and 1932, after which raions reported directly to republican authorities. The modern (province) system was formalized in 1932 with the creation of initial oblasts such as and on 27 February, on 17 July, and others including Dnipropetrovsk, , , and , totaling seven major units by late 1932. became the standard first-level subdivisions, each governed by oblast soviets and executive committees under direction, further divided into raions (typically 15–30 per ), cities of oblast subordination, and lower units like rural soviets (selsoviets). This hierarchy emphasized vertical control from via the republican level, with raions handling local agriculture, industry, and administration. Post-World War II expansions incorporated annexed territories: in 1939–1940, western regions added Drohobych, Stanyslaviv (later ), Ternopil, and Chernivtsi oblasts; further adjustments included Kirovohrad in 1939 and in 1944. The Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, transferred from the Russian SFSR in 1954, was reorganized as Oblast, contributing to a total of 25 oblasts by the . Cities like (republican subordination from 1934) and Sevastopol operated with special status outside oblast frameworks. Minor reforms, such as mergers (e.g., into in 1954, Drohobych into in 1959) and renamings, refined boundaries for economic efficiency, but the 25-oblast structure persisted until independence in 1991. Autonomous units, like the Moldavian ASSR (until 1940), highlighted ethnic accommodations within the Soviet federal model.

Post-independence developments and 2020 reform

Upon declaring independence on December 1, 1991, Ukraine retained the administrative framework established during the Soviet era, comprising 24 s, the , and the cities of and with special status, subdivided into approximately 490 raions and over 20,000 rural councils. The top-level divisions experienced no structural alterations in the initial post-independence period, reflecting continuity amid economic and political transitions, though minor adjustments occurred at lower levels, such as the merger or abolition of a handful of raions in the and early to address inefficiencies. legislation enacted in 2015 prompted the renaming of numerous raions, settlements, and streets to remove Soviet-era references, but these changes did not modify boundaries or hierarchical levels. Decentralization efforts gained momentum following the 2014 Euromaidan Revolution, driven by constitutional amendments and legislation that devolved fiscal and service-delivery powers to local levels, including the voluntary amalgamation of over 1,400 territorial communities (hromadas) by 2020 to form larger, financially viable units capable of managing , healthcare, and . This process, supported by international donors and aligned with goals, increased local budgets from 10% of GDP in 2014 to nearly 30% by 2020, fostering greater regional autonomy while preserving the framework. The 2020 administrative-territorial reform marked a pivotal consolidation, enacted through Law No. 562-IX on April 16, 2020, which delineated territories and administrative centers, establishing them as the foundational units of local self-government. Complementing this, Resolution No. 807-IX of July 17, 2020, restructured raions by merging the existing 490 into 136 larger entities (including 10 in ), effective January 1, 2021, to reduce administrative overlap, enhance coordination between hromadas and , and improve service delivery efficiency amid fiscal constraints. This reconfiguration, part of broader , aimed to rationalize governance layers without altering oblast boundaries, though implementation faced challenges from the ongoing conflict in eastern regions.

Controversies and Disputes

Status of Crimea and Sevastopol

The Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol are recognized by Ukraine's constitution as integral administrative units within its territory, with Crimea holding autonomous status and Sevastopol designated as a city with special status directly subordinate to the central government. Following the 2014 Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine, unmarked Russian military personnel began occupying key sites in Crimea starting late February 2014, leading to the ousting of local Ukrainian authorities and the installation of a pro-Russian provisional government. A referendum on March 16, 2014, purportedly approved Crimea's secession from Ukraine and reunification with Russia, with official results claiming 96.77% support on an 83.1% turnout, though conducted under Russian military presence without Ukrainian authorization. Russia formally incorporated Crimea as the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as a via a signed on March 18, 2014, integrating them into its federal structure with Sevastopol serving as the base for the Russian Black Sea Fleet under prior lease agreements extended indefinitely. Ukraine deems this illegal occupation, maintaining administrative claims over the territories and prohibiting official interactions with Russian-installed bodies. Internationally, the adopted Resolution 68/262 on March 27, 2014, affirming Ukraine's within its 1991 borders, declaring the invalid, and urging states not to recognize any status change resulting from it, with 100 votes in favor, 11 against, and 58 abstentions. De facto, Russia exercises full control over Crimea and Sevastopol, subdividing them into municipal districts and cities of regional significance under , while Ukraine and most UN member states, including the and , withhold recognition of Russian sovereignty, viewing the territories as temporarily occupied. This dispute has persisted into the broader -Ukraine conflict, with Russia utilizing Sevastopol as a key naval hub and Crimea for , while Ukraine enforces restrictions on crossing the administrative boundary and seeks international isolation of the . The non-recognition policy stems from adherence to principles of under , including the 1994 where Russia pledged to respect Ukraine's borders, though Russia justifies the on grounds of and historical ties, claims contested due to the coercive context of the takeover.

Donbas separatist entities and partial occupations

The Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People's Republic (LPR) emerged as self-proclaimed entities in April and May 2014, respectively, when pro-Russian separatists seized administrative buildings in Donetsk and Luhansk amid protests against Ukraine's post-Euromaidan government. The DPR declared independence on April 7, claiming authority over the entirety of Donetsk Oblast (approximately 26,517 km²), while the LPR followed on May 12, asserting control over Luhansk Oblast (26,684 km²). These declarations lacked recognition from Ukraine or the international community, which attributed their formation to Russian orchestration and military support, including unmarked "little green men" and subsequent hybrid warfare tactics. Russia formally recognized both entities on February 21, 2022, prior to its full-scale invasion, and purported to annex them on September 30, 2022, following referendums widely condemned as coerced and illegitimate, with turnout and approval figures reported at over 90% by occupation authorities but rejected by independent observers. In the territories under their de facto control, the DPR and LPR initially mirrored elements of Ukraine's pre-2020 raion system but adapted it to their , dividing into cities, urban districts, and rural districts under appointed or elected councils. Post-annexation, Russian federal laws integrated these areas into Russia's administrative framework, establishing military-civil administrations initially, followed by alignment with Russian municipal standards, including the creation of courts and executive bodies. For example, federal laws enacted in 2023 regulated judicial structures across the DPR and LPR, subsuming them under Russian oversight while retaining nominal republican statuses. The LPR formalized its subdivisions via a March 2023 law establishing 14 cities of republican significance and 17 s, facilitating and security enforcement. Control remains fluid due to ongoing hostilities, with Russian forces—operating through these entities—holding about 60% of and nearly 100% of as of August 2025, per geolocated assessments. Ukraine classifies the DPR- and LPR-held areas as temporarily occupied, refusing to acknowledge their administrative alterations and continuing to apply its national divisions to the full s. Under Ukraine's 2020 reform, comprises 8 raions (e.g., Pokrovsk and Kramatorsk raions, both partially occupied) and 2 independent urban hromadas ( and cities), with hromadas serving as the base-level units for governance in Ukrainian-controlled pockets. has 5 raions, nearly all occupied except minor frontline segments, where Ukraine administers residual hromadas focused on defense and . Partial occupations in denote these interstitial zones—primarily western cities like Pokrovsk (population ~60,000 pre-) and surrounding areas—where Ukrainian forces maintain control amid encirclement threats, with Russian advances aiming for full oblast consolidation as a stated objective. These areas face disrupted services, internal displacement of over 1.5 million from Donetsk alone since 2014, and contested resource extraction, such as mines vital to the region's industrial base. Russian integration efforts include Russification policies, such as mandatory Russian-language education and passportization, affecting over 2 million residents coerced into accepting Russian documents since 2019, though empirical data on voluntary uptake is scarce and contested by human rights reports citing duress. Ukraine's structures, like oblast military administrations, coordinate from bases in controlled territories (e.g., for ), rejecting separatist claims as null under , including UN General Assembly resolutions affirming 's territorial integrity. Ongoing fighting, with Russian gains averaging 168 square miles monthly in 2025, underscores the provisional nature of these divisions, where de facto control diverges from legal assertions on both sides.

References

  1. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68f0de991c9076042263ef60/Ukraine_Toponymic_Factfile.pdf
  2. https://www.worldstatesmen.org/Ukraine_prov.html
  3. https://en.hromady.org/about/lginua/
  4. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04122416v1/document
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348086412_SUBREGIONAL_LEVEL_OF_ADMINISTRATIVE_AND_TERRITORIAL_REFORM_IN_UKRAINE_DEBATABLE_ASPECTS
  6. https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-june-25-2025
  7. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-august-5-2025/
  8. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-ukr
  9. https://rm.coe.int/constitution-of-ukraine/168071f58b
  10. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD%282015%29028-e
  11. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/ukraines-subregions-transition-misalignment-funding-and-mandates
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-new-territorial-structure-of-Ukraine-in-2020-including-136-rayons-29-710_fig3_371952476
  13. https://www.gmfus.org/news/power-partnership-international-supporters-ukraines-local-reconstruction
  14. https://decentralization.ua/en/about
  15. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2019-09-24-UkraineDecentralization.pdf
  16. https://alchetron.com/Oblasts-of-Ukraine
  17. https://www.en.hromady.org/about/lginua/
  18. https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Ukraine.aspx
  19. https://help.unhcr.org/ukraine/list-of-oblast-state-administrations/
  20. https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-report-on-international-religious-freedom/ukraine/russia-occupied-territories-of-ukraine
  21. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Ukraine_2019?lang=en
  22. https://www.citypopulation.de/en/ukraine/admin/01__krym/
  23. https://ukraineworld.org/en/articles/opinions/crimea-autonomy-annexation
  24. http://2001.ukrcensus.gov.ua/eng/regions/reg_crym/
  25. https://2021-2025.state.gov/reports/2021-report-on-international-religious-freedom/ukraine/crimea/
  26. https://www.svi-bz.org/uploads/tx_bh/251/constitution_of_ukraine.pdf
  27. https://rm.coe.int/2020-09-08-assessment-new-draft-law-2143-3-congress-advisor/16809f811a
  28. https://www.rada.gov.ua/en/news/News/News%25202/33658.html
  29. https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/79/184
  30. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/ukraine/russia-occupied-territories-of-ukraine
  31. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0l0k4389g2o
  32. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/how-much-territory-does-russia-control-ukraine-2025-08-14/
  33. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/21/mapping-the-ukraine-regions-voting-on-joining-russia
  34. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-24-2025/
  35. https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2024C38/
  36. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-occupation-update-october-23-2025/
  37. https://freedomhouse.org/country/russian-occupied-territories-ukraine/freedom-world/2025
  38. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/03/un-report-details-climate-fear-occupied-areas-ukraine-russian-federation
  39. https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/2025/3/fitzpatrick-bipartisan-coalition-introduce-resolution-affirming-us-non-recognition-of-russian-occupied-ukrainian-territory
  40. https://globalnation.inquirer.net/290158/russia-says-still-seeking-international-recognition-for-occupied-ukraine
  41. https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/6/1/6
  42. https://www.salto-youth.net/eecamanualukraine/
  43. https://garymarks.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13018/2021/03/Ukraine-combined.pdf
  44. https://ppr.lse.ac.uk/articles/10.31389/lseppr.87
  45. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/decentralization-challenges-to-local-level-governance-under-martial-law-in-ukraine/
  46. https://www.decentralization.ua/en/glossary
  47. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/explaining-ukraines-resilience-to-russias-invasion-the-role-of-local-governance-and-decentralization-reform/
  48. https://github.com/kse-ua/KSE-Loc-Data-Hub
  49. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.12827
  50. https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/Lithuanian-and-Polish-rule
  51. https://www.britannica.com/event/Union-of-Lublin
  52. https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-autonomous-hetman-state-and-Sloboda-Ukraine
  53. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Cossack_Hetmanate
  54. https://www.britannica.com/topic/hetman
  55. https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CC%5CO%5CCounty.htm
  56. https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CO%5CK%5COkruha.htm
  57. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2019/09/ukraines-decentralization-reforms-2014
  58. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04122416/document
  59. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2018/06/maintaining-the-momentum-of-decentralisation-in-ukraine_g1g8e51c.html
  60. https://www.nalas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Status-Report-Decentralisation-and-Local-Public-Administration-Reform-in-Ukraine.pdf
  61. https://uareforms.org/en/reforms/Decentralization
  62. https://mfa.gov.ua/en/temporary-occupation-autonous-republic-crimea-and-city-sevastopol
  63. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/why-was-crimea-taken-so-easily
  64. https://www.britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-crisis-in-Crimea-and-eastern-Ukraine
  65. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_68/262
  66. https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/ukraine/crimea
  67. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/06/16/russia-s-illegal-annexation-of-crimea-and-the-city-of-sevastopol-eu-renews-restrictive-measures-until-23-june-2026/
  68. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/20/crimea-anniversary-war-ukraine
  69. https://www.rferl.org/a/crimea-ukraine-russia-history/33506266.html
  70. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-breakaway-regions-russia-donbas-donetsk-luhansk/
  71. https://en.kremlin.ru/acts/news/71736
  72. https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=148819
  73. https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/14/world/mapping-key-regions-ukraine-intl-vis
  74. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-19-2025/
  75. https://kyivindependent.com/putin-reemphasized-full-donetsk-control-as-key-to-any-deal-while-signaling-possible-compromises-on-zaporizhzhia-and-kherson-oblasts-in-trump-call-wp-reports/
  76. https://www.monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/b0003dvb
  77. https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-review/russia-review-oct-17-24-2025
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.