Hubbry Logo
SumOfUsSumOfUsMain
Open search
SumOfUs
Community hub
SumOfUs
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
SumOfUs
SumOfUs
SumOfUs
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

SumOfUs is a global non-profit advocacy organization and online community that campaigns to hold corporations accountable on issues such as climate change, workers' rights, discrimination, human rights, animal rights, corruption, and corporate power grab.[1] The organization renamed itself to Ekō in 2023.[2][3]

Key Information

Founding

[edit]

Australian-American activist Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman is the founder of SumOfUs and was its executive director from 2011 to 2016. In November 2016, Hannah Lownsbrough replaced Stinebricker-Kauffman as the executive director of SumOfUs. In January 2020, Emma Ruby-Sachs, the daughter of activist Clayton Ruby,[4] took over as the organization's new executive director.[5][6]

History

[edit]

SumOfUs was launched in 2011 with campaigns targeting Google's links to the US Chamber of Commerce,[7] a campaign to thank Starbucks for supporting same-sex marriage in the United States,[8] and calling on Apple to force its suppliers to treat their workers more ethically.[9]

The organization says that since its launch, it has expanded to have five million members.[10][11]

SumOfUs has staff in the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, Lithuania, Colombia and the Netherlands.

Notable campaigns and reports

[edit]

In December 2013, after pressure from SumOfUs members, major UK retailer Asos committed to stop selling Angora sourced from China after an undercover investigation revealed rabbits being plucked live for their fur. Other major UK retailers including Next, Primark, New Look and Ted Baker, and the entirety of Philip Green's Arcadia group which includes TopShop reported they had instructed suppliers to suspend sourcing of products using Angora fibre.[12] Inditex which owns the Zara stores subsequently elected to stop releasing collections that used Angora.[13]

In February 2014, SumOfUs demanded in a petition that "the cereal maker [Kellogg's] get tough with Wilmar or end its supply and distribution joint venture with the company".[14] Kellogg's subsequently committed to buy only sustainably sourced palm oil.

In 2015, SumOfUs helped to push airline companies such as Delta to stop shipping hunting trophies,[15] lobbied Canadian officials to charge Nestle responsible water rates for drawing water from public lands,[16] and helped get Standard Chartered Bank to cancel its financing of Adani's giant Australian coal mine.[17]

In January 2024, Ekō's released a report that assessed the impact of popular social media platforms on young users. The report documented over 33 million posts on Instagram and TikTok directing "problematic content directed at young users", including content promoting misogyny, suicide, and eating disorders.[18]

Following Israel's 9-day siege on Gaza in 2021, 140,000 Ekō members contacted one of the world's biggest sports brands, PUMA, to withdraw their sponsorship of the Israel Football Association. They met with the CEO of PUMA to get their message across. PUMA ended its relationship with the Israel Football Federation last year, months after the current Israeli invasion.[19] Boycott movements also led a long-running campaign calling for Puma to end its sponsorship of Israel's national soccer team, which began in 2018. While the German sports brand terminated its sponsorship deal in December.[20]

Methodology

[edit]

SumOfUs uses digital technology to organize and communicate globally, connecting consumers, workers and investors from around the world.[10]

One of SumOfUs' primary functions is to amplify other corporate accountability organizations' campaigns by launching rapid-response campaigns.[citation needed]

The online campaigning NGO operates using lean start-up methodology, by adapting the "minimum viable product"[21] model to the online campaigning field. SumOfUs mirrors corporations' global perspective and power base – and transcends national boundaries to take advantage of transnational companies' vulnerabilities.[21]

Financial contributors

[edit]

SumOfUs is a registered 501(c)(4) social welfare nonprofit. Around 85% of SumOfUs funds come from small donations from its members.[17] SumOfUs publishes the source of revenues every year on its web site.[22] According to the Form 990 SumOfUs filed for 2016, $631,515 was contributed by a single anonymous person.[23] According to the Form 990 SumOfUs filed for 2015, $595,000 was contributed by two anonymous donors.[24]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

SumOfUs

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Ekō, formerly SumOfUs, is a global non-profit organization founded in 2011 by Australian-American activist to challenge corporate influence through online consumer mobilization and campaigns targeting , labor conditions, and democratic accountability. The group rebranded to Ekō in 2023 to better reflect its international scope and emphasis on collective action. Headquartered in New York, it operates as a digital platform for petitions and pressure tactics, self-reporting a community of millions who participate in efforts to influence multinational corporations. Key activities include orchestrating boycotts, shareholder resolutions, and public shaming campaigns against companies accused of prioritizing profits over or worker welfare, with self-claimed successes such as prompting to phase out plastic straws in certain markets and contributing to the abandonment of Google's censored project in . These outcomes, however, often rely on the organization's own attributions, with limited independent verification of direct causation amid broader market or regulatory trends. The group's derives predominantly from small individual donations—over 313,000 contributions averaging $19 in 2023—supplemented by grants from progressive foundations like and Chorus, supporting an annual operation with assets around $867,000. Ekō's campaigns frequently advance environmentalist and labor agendas aligned with left-leaning priorities, such as curbing expansion and promoting reforms, but have faced criticism for employing hyperbolic narratives to drive micro-donation , potentially misleading supporters on campaign impacts. User reviews reflect dissatisfaction with persistent solicitations and perceived inefficacy, yielding a low average rating of 2.4 on independent platforms. Despite these critiques, the organization has sustained growth, evolving from U.S.-focused efforts to a multinational network influencing corporate policies in diverse sectors.

Founding and Early Development

Inception and Founders

SumOfUs was founded in 2011 by , a dual Australian-American activist with prior experience in digital organizing across multiple continents. , who earned a in from , launched the organization as a nonprofit dedicated to holding multinational corporations accountable through mobilization. No co-founders are documented in available records, positioning as the sole originator of the initiative. The inception reflected a broader trend in early online , where Stinebrickner-Kauffman sought to build a empowering ordinary consumers to influence corporate behavior on issues like economic and environmental impact. Headquartered in New York, the entity began as a small U.S.-centric corporate accountability effort but was designed from the outset for international , leveraging digital tools to amass supporter engagement. Stinebrickner-Kauffman led as until November 2016, overseeing initial growth to a membership base that eventually reached millions.

Initial Launch and Objectives

SumOfUs launched in 2011 in New York City as a digital advocacy organization modeled after progressive groups like MoveOn, with the aim of mobilizing global online communities to challenge corporate influence. The initiative began as a small corporate accountability effort primarily targeting U.S.-based campaigns, seeking to harness consumer and public pressure against business practices deemed harmful to society and the environment. The organization's initial objectives focused on curbing the expanding power of multinational corporations by encouraging ethical behavior in areas such as , , and democratic governance. SumOfUs positioned itself as a "global consumer watchdog," running petitions and campaigns to influence companies to prioritize , fair worker treatment, and respect for public interests over short-term profits. This approach emphasized from consumers, employees, and investors to hold firms accountable, reflecting a that corporate decisions should align with broader societal benefits rather than unchecked market forces. Early efforts highlighted tensions between corporate affiliations and public values, such as pressuring tech giants over political ties, underscoring the group's strategy of using viral online mobilization to amplify demands for transparency and . These objectives were framed not as anti-business but as pro-accountability, though critics later noted the selective targeting often aligned with left-leaning priorities like and union support.

Organizational History

Growth Phase (2011-2015)

SumOfUs was established in 2011 as a digital advocacy organization aimed at mobilizing consumers to challenge corporate practices on economic, environmental, and social issues. Founded by , it initially operated primarily in the United States, employing an model to amplify pressure. The organization's early strategy emphasized rapid member acquisition through viral campaigns, enabling quick scaling without heavy reliance on traditional . By focusing on high-profile targets, SumOfUs achieved early visibility, with membership growing from zero at launch to substantial numbers within the first few years. A pivotal factor in this expansion was the success of initial campaigns, such as those pressuring financial institutions over fees and tech companies on labor conditions in supply chains. For instance, in 2012, SumOfUs launched a urging Apple to enforce ethical standards ahead of the iPhone 5 release, highlighting worker welfare in factories. These efforts, combined with targeted outreach and , drove exponential supporter engagement, as members were encouraged to sign petitions and share actions. The model proved effective in building a distributed network, with petitions often garnering hundreds of thousands of signatures in short periods. By January 2014, SumOfUs had amassed over 2.5 million members globally, reflecting a surge in online participation amid rising in corporate post-financial crisis. This growth coincided with involvement in broader environmental advocacy, including opposition to tar sands development, which drew funding and alliances from aligned nonprofits. Organizational capacity expanded modestly, with staff increases to handle campaign execution and member communications, though the core remained lean and digitally oriented. Membership reportedly approached 5 million by mid-decade, underscoring the phase's momentum before further internationalization.

Expansion and Key Milestones (2016-2022)

During 2016–2022, SumOfUs expanded its operational footprint internationally, maintaining staff presence in countries including the , , , and while growing its global membership from an estimated base in the low millions to nearly 17 million by 2020 and over 19 million by 2021. This period saw the addition of Dutch as an operating language to broaden outreach in . Financially, the organization reported revenue of $5.4 million from grants and contributions in 2017, increasing to $7.1 million in 2020 and $9.3 million in 2021, with corresponding rises in expenses and net assets reflecting scaled-up campaigning and administrative capacity. Key milestones included high-profile campaign victories attributed by the organization to member mobilization. In January 2021, SumOfUs pressured over data policies, coinciding with revisions to WhatsApp's terms that limited user with . By May 2021, over 125,000 members participated in actions against for Kids, contributing to 's decision to pause development amid widespread . In December 2021, advocacy efforts helped block French public funding for ' Arctic gas exploration project. SumOfUs also secured net-zero emissions commitments from Canada's three largest banks—, , and —through targeted pressure on financing. In parallel, the organization influenced to withdraw support for activities linked to Amazon deforestation in Brazil's region, following prior cuts of $6 billion in related financing. By 2022, SumOfUs announced plans to extend operations into the , building on over 100 partnerships with groups representing 71 million EU citizens. These developments underscored a shift toward intensified focus on accountability and digital harms, with membership actions exceeding 200,000 participants in select 2021 drives.

Rebranding to Ekō (2023 Onward)

In February 2023, SumOfUs rebranded to Ekō, with the change publicly announced via on February 7. The new name derives from a phonetic spelling of selected for its cross-linguistic resonance symbolizing the organization's collective power to amplify messages globally. Ekō maintains its headquarters and operational structure but emphasizes its expansion to a community of over 20 million supporters operating in seven languages. The rebranding stemmed from the view that the original "SumOfUs" name—a mathematical on aggregating individual actions—was increasingly limiting and failed to resonate with diverse international audiences as the group evolved beyond its U.S.-centric origins. To select the new identity, leadership generated a list of potential names, consulted members through voting, and collaborated with branding experts including Alt Studio for strategy and OPX Studio for visual design. Post-rebranding, Ekō has upheld its core mission of prioritizing people and the planet over corporate profits, continuing campaigns against corporate overreach in areas like environmental accountability and labor rights. Notable efforts include a May 2023 protest at Microsoft Build targeting AI ethics concerns via advertisements and billboards, the #HyundaiDriveChange coalition addressing the company's environmental impacts, and ongoing petitions for policies such as Ireland's Occupied Territories Bill to curb corporate ties to controversial territories. In 2024, Ekō filed an amicus brief in a U.S. Supreme Court case advocating for shareholder protections against executive overcompensation, underscoring its sustained focus on corporate governance. The organization reports no fundamental shifts in tactics or funding models, positioning the rebrand as an evolution to enhance global mobilization rather than a strategic pivot.

Mission, Ideology, and Principles

Stated Core Goals

Ekō (formerly ) articulates its primary objective as fostering a global community dedicated to limiting corporate influence and compelling corporations and governments to prioritize human welfare and over financial gains. The explicitly states: "Ekō is a global community of millions who are committed to ensuring corporations and governments prioritize people and planet over profit." This vision encompasses advocating for a "fairer, more sustainable economy" by mobilizing supporters against practices deemed exploitative, such as and labor abuses. Key stated goals include challenging corporate accountability across multiple domains, including animal rights and protection, environmental , human and workers' rights, equitable trade and finance, , racial and economic , opposition to privatization of services, mitigation of climate impacts, , and shareholder advocacy. These objectives are pursued through to pressure entities into adopting policies aligned with social and ecological priorities, with the organization claiming involvement from over 23 million individuals since its inception in 2011. SumOfUs's foundational aim, as outlined in its early documentation, centered on organizing consumers and citizens to influence corporations toward economic and welfare enhancements.

Ideological Underpinnings and Worldview

SumOfUs, rebranded as Ekō in 2023, espouses a centered on limiting corporate influence to achieve economic and environmental equity, positing that unchecked corporate power undermines democratic and public welfare. The organization asserts that governments must prioritize citizens over corporate interests, advocating for policies that enforce corporate accountability in areas such as , consumer protections, and ecological sustainability. This perspective frames multinational corporations as primary drivers of systemic harms, including environmental degradation and worker exploitation, necessitating global grassroots mobilization to compel regulatory reforms and behavioral changes. Ideologically aligned with progressive principles, Ekō's approach integrates intersectional considerations, as evidenced by its development of a promoting language that supports cross-sector power-building and inclusive narratives around issues. Campaigns consistently target business practices deemed misaligned with left-leaning priorities, such as pressuring firms to adopt stringent environmental standards or measures, reflecting a belief in over market self-regulation. This orientation critiques free-market dynamics as favoring at the expense of broader societal benefits, favoring interventionist strategies to redistribute power toward affected communities. Underlying this stance is a causal framework attributing global inequities to corporate dominance rather than individual or structural factors like incentives or innovation barriers, with empirical focus on case-specific victories like reversals on or chemical use. While self-presented as non-partisan for "people and planet over profits," external analyses characterize it as advancing left-wing ideological goals through targeted corporate shaming and alliance-building with aligned NGOs.

Methods and Operations

Campaign Tactics and Mobilization

SumOfUs, now operating as Ekō, primarily mobilizes its global community of millions through digital platforms, leveraging alerts and online petitions to drive rapid member engagement against targeted corporations and governments. Members are prompted to sign petitions amassing hundreds of thousands of signatures, such as over 170,000 demanding the resignation of Bayer-Monsanto's CEO in 2019 or 209,000 opposing WhatsApp's data policy changes in 2021. These actions often coincide with coordinated and campaigns, including thousands of targeted messages to decision-makers, as seen in 2,000 emails to managers for a Saputo food waste initiative or 1,600 emails and tweets to the U.S. Forest Service. Shareholder activism forms a core tactic, where the organization files resolutions at annual general meetings to pressure companies on environmental and social issues, mobilizing supporters to vote or lobby institutional investors. In 2019, this yielded 25% shareholder support for PepsiCo's accountability resolution and 42% for Saputo's reduction. Similar efforts in 2021 targeted and , alongside outreach to state-run pension funds for . These campaigns extend to encouraging boycotts or service disruptions, such as over 80,000 account deactivations during a global day of action. Complementing digital efforts, SumOfUs organizes in-person protests and symbolic stunts to amplify visibility, including demonstrations outside corporate headquarters like PayPal's Berlin office or JP Morgan Chase locations, and creative actions such as mobile billboards at the U.S. Capitol targeting Facebook or delivering an oil drum to Lloyd's of London chairman. A 2021 protest featuring a 5,000-pound iceberg outside the Capitol highlighted climate concerns. This hybrid approach draws on a member base exceeding 19 million by 2021, fostering collective pressure through scalable, low-barrier online actions escalated to high-impact offline events when needed.

Research and Reporting Practices

Ekō (formerly SumOfUs) conducts primarily through in-house investigative teams that employ direct with targeted platforms and services to document alleged failures and harms. Researchers often simulate vulnerable user profiles, such as adolescent accounts on , to observe algorithmic recommendations and search results, identifying networks of content promoting , incel ideologies, or drug sales accessible to minors. For instance, in a 2023 analysis of , investigators located at least 18 accounts selling substances like and Xanax via easily discoverable posts, compiling evidence through screenshots and links to verify exposure risks. In virtual environments, the methodology involves team members entering platforms like Meta's Horizon Worlds with new avatars to record real-time interactions, revealing instances of virtual harassment or assault simulations occurring within hours of login. A May 2022 report detailed multiple such encounters, including groping and explicit propositions, supported by logs, timestamps, and narrative descriptions rather than aggregated statistical data. Similar qualitative approaches extend to hashtag-based content audits on Instagram and TikTok, where searches under youth-targeted tags uncovered over 33 million posts with problematic material, though without disclosure of sampling parameters or automation tools used. Reporting practices center on producing accessible PDF documents that integrate firsthand with interpretive framing findings as systemic corporate , often timed for maximum impact such as pre-shareholder voting periods. These outputs prioritize goals, demanding reforms or measures, and are disseminated via press releases to media and community networks exceeding 23 million members. While drawing on empirical observations, the absence of external validation, randomized controls, or quantitative rigor distinguishes this from academic standards, aligning instead with activist aimed at mobilizing consumer and investor pressure.

Digital and Grassroots Strategies

SumOfUs, rebranded as Ekō, primarily relies on digital platforms for mobilization, leveraging online petitions, email alerts, and to engage a global supporter base exceeding millions. The organization's community petition platform enables users to create and promote targeted campaigns against corporate entities, facilitating rapid collection of signatures and public pressure. This approach reached 2.5 million members by January 2014, with petitions directed at companies such as , Apple, and to influence business practices. Email campaigns form a core tactic, sending targeted alerts to subscribers urging actions like signing petitions, contacting corporations, or donating, which drive repeat engagement and funding. amplification extends reach, creating reputational risks for targets by flooding platforms with campaign content and encouraging shares to escalate visibility. These digital tools support coordinated global efforts, such as boycotts or shareholder pressure, positioning supporters as consumers, workers, or investors exerting economic leverage. Grassroots elements complement digital operations by fostering offline spillover, where online signatories are prompted to participate in local protests, rallies, or direct actions against targeted firms. Ekō's model emphasizes empowering individuals to initiate community-driven petitions that bridge virtual coordination with real-world mobilization, though empirical studies indicate variable success in converting digital participation to sustained local organizing. This hybrid strategy aligns with broader digitally-native advocacy trends, prioritizing scalable online actions over traditional hierarchical structures.

Financial Model

Primary Funding Sources

Ekō (formerly SumOfUs) derives the majority of its funding from individual donors, with comprising a substantial supplementary portion. According to its financial disclosures for fiscal years 2021–2023, individual contributions accounted for 67.4% ($5,919,338) in 2023, 67.6% ($6,871,845) in 2022, and 78.5% ($7,297,046) in 2021, often in small amounts averaging around $17 per donation in recent years. The organization emphasizes that these donations form the core of its support base, enabling rapid response to campaigns without reliance on corporate or governmental , which it explicitly rejects to maintain from entities it targets. Foundational grants represent 21–30% of total income in the same period, totaling $1.98 million in 2021, $3.05 million in 2022, and $2.37 million in 2023. Key providers include the Tides Foundation, which has issued multiple six-figure grants; the Open Society Foundations, with which Ekō maintains partnerships; the David and Lucile Packard Foundation; the Sunrise Project; the Park Foundation; and others such as Luminate, Reset, Mighty Earth, and the Hull Family Foundation. These entities, often aligned with progressive philanthropic networks, support Ekō's focus on corporate accountability and environmental advocacy, though their ideological leanings—such as Open Society's emphasis on open societies and Tides' role as a fiscal sponsor for left-leaning causes—have drawn scrutiny for potential influence on organizational priorities.
YearTotal IncomeIndividuals (%)Foundations (%)Other (%)
2023$8,775,98467.427.15.5
2022$10,166,37867.630.02.4
2021$9,300,23378.521.30.2
Ekō publishes annual filings, which detail aggregate contributions but redact individual donor names for ; for instance, its return showed total revenue of $5,788,722, with contributions comprising 98% and several undisclosed donors giving between $5,000 and $271,000. This model sustains operations across global campaigns, with expenses closely tracking revenue at levels like $6.6 million in 2020.

Revenue, Budget, and Donor Base

Ekō, formerly known as SumOfUs, derives its revenue primarily from grants, contributions, and individual donations, with reaching $10.2 million in 2022 before declining to $8.7 million in 2023. Expenses in those years totaled $11.1 million and $10.4 million, respectively, resulting in operating deficits of $0.8 million and $1.7 million. Historical data shows steady growth in revenue from $5.8 million in 2019 to $9.3 million in 2021, driven largely by unrestricted and restricted contributions exceeding $9.3 million in the latter year. The organization's budget allocates the majority to campaign activities, accounting for 67% of spending in 2023, 79% in , and 76% in , with the remainder divided between management operations (13-21%) and (7-11%). As a 501(c)(4) social welfare entity, Ekō maintains no corporate or governmental , emphasizing independence from such influences.
Fiscal YearRevenueExpenses
2019$5,788,722$5,785,935
2020$7,110,840$6,605,040
2021$9,300,233$8,481,977
2022$10,225,772$11,050,514
2023$8,714,918$10,365,880
Ekō's donor base comprises millions of individual members globally, who provide the stated majority of funds through small, recurring donations, supplemented by institutional grants. The organization reports that individuals contributed 67.4% of 2023 funding, 67.6% in 2022, and 78.5% in 2021, while foundations accounted for 27.1%, 30%, and 21.3%, respectively. Notable foundation support includes a $1.1 million grant from the Tides Foundation in 2023 for equity and human rights initiatives, alongside partnerships with the Open Society Foundations, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and others such as the Packard Foundation and Luminate. Due to its 501(c)(4) status, IRS Form 990 filings do not disclose individual donor identities, preserving anonymity for contributions. Ekō publishes annual audits and Form 990s on its website to affirm transparency in fund usage.

Key Campaigns and Initiatives

Environmental and Climate Efforts

SumOfUs has conducted numerous campaigns targeting corporate contributions to , particularly focusing on financing and . In 2022, the organization highlighted that major global banks provided $673 billion in funding to the industry, advocating for through petitions and shareholder resolutions. These efforts included pressuring insurers like to cease underwriting offshore oil drilling in vulnerable areas such as , citing risks to climate stability and local ecosystems. A significant initiative involved policies, such as urging the to abandon investments; in February 2021, over 55,000 SumOfUs members signed a directed at the ECB's . Similarly, the group campaigned against the Banque de to decarbonize and exclude from collateral frameworks, emphasizing the central bank's role in amplification. In partnership with organizations like Stand.earth, SumOfUs targeted denim brands including and for high carbon emissions and environmental impacts in supply chains, demanding transparency and reduction commitments. Deforestation prevention formed another pillar, with actions against companies linked to and cocoa production. SumOfUs advocated for in cocoa sourcing to halt rainforest destruction in regions like and , criticizing Cadbury/Mondelez for inadequate policies. Efforts extended to protecting Indonesia's Leuser by pressuring banks to enforce and no-deforestation standards in financing. In a notable outcome, in May 2023, SumOfUs collaborated with to successfully petition the UN , resulting in the removal of three companies due to inconsistencies in their emissions reduction plans. During the recovery phase in 2020, SumOfUs pushed for EU green finance strategies to redirect funds from fossil fuels toward clean energy, linking resilience to protection and . The organization also addressed sector-specific emissions, such as fast food's role in global warming via and supply chains, based on reports estimating catalytic effects on temperature rise. These campaigns relied on grassroots mobilization, with members challenging banks like TD Bank to align with peers shifting away from fossil fuels through .

Corporate and Economic Accountability

SumOfUs has launched multiple campaigns targeting corporations for economic malpractices, including exploitative labor conditions, irresponsible investment decisions by financial institutions, and governance failures that prioritize short-term profits over stakeholder interests. These efforts often leverage consumer pressure, resolutions, and petitions to demand reforms such as fair wages, withdrawal from harmful financing, and enhanced transparency in financial reporting. The organization's approach emphasizes using —through boycotts, calls, and with regulators—to enforce , with a focus on how corporate economic behaviors impact workers and communities globally. A foundational campaign addressed worker exploitation, advocating for justice in labor disputes as one of SumOfUs's earliest initiatives, which involved mobilizing supporters to pressure companies on wage theft and unsafe conditions. In the financial sector, SumOfUs targeted banks for projects with adverse economic ripple effects, such as Standard Chartered's in a mine threatening Australia's ; the bank ultimately abandoned the project following advocacy efforts. Similarly, in , SumOfUs campaigned against Dutch development bank FMO's financing of the Agua Zarca dam, which contributed to community displacement and violence, leading to FMO's withdrawal of funds after the 2016 murder of activist Berta Cáceres. On , SumOfUs coordinated the #MakeMarkListen campaign in May 2022, rallying over 40 organizations to urge reforms at ahead of its annual general meeting on May 25, including stronger oversight of executive decisions affecting economic equity and user data monetization. The group has also pursued shareholder advocacy, collaborating on resolutions like a 2020 push at Apple to improve due diligence in supply chains, which intersect with economic accountability by addressing labor cost-cutting in global operations. In 2012, SumOfUs partnered with the Prison Policy Initiative to advocate for regulation of the prison telephone industry, challenging monopolistic pricing that extracted excessive fees from inmates' families, resulting in proposed rate caps. SumOfUs has critiqued as a core economic issue, campaigning against corporations dodging fiscal responsibilities that undermine public revenues for social programs, though specific outcomes in this area often involve broader coalitions rather than isolated victories. These initiatives reflect a of amplifying economic leverage through mobilization, with reported wins including project halts and policy shifts, though independent verification of long-term impacts varies.

Human Rights and Social Campaigns

SumOfUs, operating as Ekō since its rebranding, has prioritized campaigns against corporate practices enabling abuses, including forced labor, suppression of activists, and exploitation of vulnerable workers and indigenous communities. These efforts often involve petitions, , and public pressure to compel companies to audit supply chains or alter policies, framing corporate complicity as a driver of violations in regions with weak . A key initiative targeted in Southeast Asia's fruit industry. In 2014, SumOfUs launched a campaign defending British researcher Andy Hall, prosecuted under Thai laws after his exposed forced labor, labor, and unsafe conditions at Natural Fruit, a supplier to Dole. The , urging Dole to advocate for dropped charges, amassed over 300,000 signatures from global supporters. Despite partial dismissals of charges due to procedural flaws, Hall endured multiple trials and fled in 2016 after a , underscoring persistent risks to whistleblowers in export-oriented agriculture. In technology supply chains, SumOfUs pressured in 2017 over ties to Indonesian firm PT Korindo, accused of rainforest clearance via burning—displacing communities and violating —for nickel sourcing in Galaxy Note 8 batteries. Collaborating with Mighty Earth, the campaign prompted to terminate the , citing environmental and social risks. Shareholder advocacy featured prominently in a 2020 Apple campaign addressing the company's removal of VPN apps from its App Store, seen as aiding state and undermining of expression. Backed by 135,000 petition signers and a resolution supported by over 40% of shareholders, it led Apple to publish a human rights policy in August 2020, explicitly committing to uphold globally, though critics noted limited enforcement against host-country laws. Campaigns also addressed indigenous rights tied to extraction. In , SumOfUs highlighted Smurfit Kappa's operations for contributing to loss and community displacement, including threats to defenders; the effort amplified local reports of violations documented in 2022 studies. Broader social initiatives included pushing in 2022 to sever links with a in Israeli settlements, citing exploitation of Palestinian laborers lacking union , resulting in the company's . Other actions focused on corporate facilitation of repression, such as 2019-2020 petitions against Google's potential compliance with Chinese surveillance tools, urged by Tibetan and Uyghur activists to prioritize over market access. Similarly, faced 2023 shareholder pressure from SumOfUs for transparency on supply chain abuses, though no policy shift was immediately confirmed. These campaigns emphasize consumer leverage but rely on self-reported metrics, with outcomes varying by corporate responsiveness and legal contexts.

Impact and Outcomes

Documented Achievements

SumOfUs participated in campaigns with the Coalition of Immokalee Workers that pressured to sign the Fair Food Agreement on February 9, 2012, committing the retailer to improved wages, working conditions, and a premium paid to tomato suppliers for farmworker welfare in . In 2021, SumOfUs collaborated with the International Campaign for the Rohingya on a urging jewelers to halt sourcing of Burmese rubies amid concerns following Myanmar's military coup; this effort contributed to Cartier's decision to suspend ruby purchases from the country. As part of the European Save the Bees Coalition, SumOfUs advocated for restrictions on pesticides, aligning with the European Union's April 2018 renewal of a partial ban on three such chemicals—imidacloprid, , and —produced by , to mitigate risks to pollinators. These outcomes reflect SumOfUs's role in multi-stakeholder , though comprehensive independent assessments of their isolated causal contributions remain limited.

Empirical Effectiveness and Failures

SumOfUs has reported numerous campaign victories, primarily through self-assessments in annual reports, focusing on corporate policy changes in areas like and . For instance, in 2020, the organization claimed success in pressuring U.S. Customs and Border Protection to block imports from Malaysian firm due to of forced labor, marking a rare instance of direct regulatory intervention linked to their . Similarly, their efforts contributed to the Investment Board divesting from U.S. companies in 2019, following a multi-year pressure campaign involving shareholder actions and public petitions. However, independent verification of causal impact remains sparse, as outcomes often involve coalitions of NGOs and may coincide with broader market or regulatory pressures rather than SumOfUs actions alone. In labor accountability, SumOfUs participated in campaigns leading to agreeing to pay outstanding wages to Kizone factory workers in in 2013, after public protests and petitions highlighted unpaid dues following factory closure. Environmental efforts, such as those against 's water extraction, yielded partial wins, including ballot initiatives in in 2015 that garnered three times the required signatures to challenge permits, contributing to temporary halts or sales of operations in regions like and . Yet, continues global extraction practices, suggesting these outcomes were localized and reversible, with no comprehensive data isolating SumOfUs's role from local or legal challenges. Palm oil campaigns have pressured brands like and to adopt no- policies since 2015, but field investigations reveal persistent illegal clearing linked to suppliers, indicating limited long-term efficacy in halting . Empirical evaluations of SumOfUs's overall effectiveness are constrained by methodological challenges in work, as noted by founder , who has emphasized the difficulty in attributing policy or corporate shifts to specific campaigns amid factors like concurrent efforts by other groups. A NYU Wagner capstone project on SumOfUs's digital campaigning highlighted reliance on qualitative stakeholder interviews and criteria for agenda-setting and policy influence, but lacked quantitative metrics like success rates or cost-effectiveness ratios, underscoring gaps in rigorous, independent assessment. No peer-reviewed studies quantify net impact, with self-reported metrics—such as signatures or media mentions—serving as proxies that do not reliably predict behavioral change. Failures and limitations are evident in campaigns where targeted practices persisted despite mobilization. For example, efforts against supplements in the early 2010s generated petitions but failed to secure corporate commitments or sales halts, with outreach to campaign targets yielding no verifiable shifts. Allegations of manipulative tactics, such as exaggerated claims in ads to boost micro-donations, have undermined , potentially reducing long-term influence by alienating stakeholders. Broader critiques point to temporary wins without systemic change; palm oil advocacy since 2007 has influenced brand pledges, but deforestation rates in and remain high, with certifications like RSPO criticized for inadequate enforcement. SumOfUs's rebranding to Ekō in coincided with donor scrutiny over sustained impact, reflecting internal recognition of evaluation needs amid unproven scalability of digital tactics.

Criticisms and Controversies

Tactical and Ethical Challenges

SumOfUs has faced criticism for employing tactics that prioritize emotional manipulation over substantive policy engagement, often relying on hyperbolic online petitions and crowdfunding appeals to drive micro-donations from supporters. In a 2018 campaign titled "The Death of Bees," the organization sent emails claiming that bee-killing pesticides faced threats from corporate lobbyists, urging donations to counter them, but the narrative misrepresented the issue by ignoring that targeted crops like sugar beets do not flower significantly and involved no major corporate lobbying, only farmer advocacy and a Belgian minister's decision. Critics argue such tactics exploit vulnerable individuals' fears without providing evidence-based alternatives, as seen in a glyphosate campaign against a German rail company that failed to propose safer weed control methods, potentially hindering practical solutions. Tactically, SumOfUs's approach has been faulted for superficiality, favoring petitions that encourage ongoing consumer engagement and —such as demanding "ethical iPhones" from Apple—over disruptive measures like boycotts or , which could pressure systemic change. This has led to accusations of delaying accountability, as corporations can respond with minor concessions (e.g., Google's exit from the U.S. following a ) while profits and exploitative practices continue unabated. With a lean staff of 36 in 2016, much of it dedicated to non-campaign roles like for donation harvesting, the organization has been critiqued for piggybacking on partners' efforts and claiming undue credit for outcomes, rather than investing in rigorous policy advocacy. Ethically, SumOfUs's funding model raises concerns about transparency and independence, with partnerships and grants from entities like the , , and —providers of six-figure sums—potentially aligning campaigns with donor priorities over grassroots imperatives. The organization shared $4.6 million in expenditures in 2016 without detailed public breakdowns on campaign allocations or staff salaries, and it delayed registration in the European Commission's Transparency Register until October 2017, despite EU institutions. Detractors, including independent analysts, contend this opacity, combined with deceptive claims in appeals (e.g., falsely attributing wins to SumOfUs influence), undermines credibility and treats supporters as revenue sources rather than informed actors. Such practices, rooted in a promotion of "ethical ," are viewed by some as ethically compromised for preserving exploitative systems under the guise of reform, funded by elite foundations tied to those systems.

Ideological and Scientific Critiques

SumOfUs has faced ideological critiques for advancing a progressive agenda that prioritizes over balanced economic considerations, often portraying multinational enterprises as inherently exploitative while downplaying the role of market incentives in innovation and . Critics from free-market perspectives argue that the organization's campaigns selectively target industries like fossil fuels and , aligning with left-leaning priorities such as wealth redistribution and regulatory expansion, without equivalent scrutiny of state-owned entities or alternative economic models that have lifted billions from through . This approach, according to analyst David Zaruk, reflects a dogmatic opposition to industrial progress, framing corporate activity as a failing rather than a driver of societal benefits like affordable food and energy. On scientific grounds, SumOfUs has been accused of promoting unsubstantiated claims in environmental campaigns, particularly regarding pesticides, by prioritizing alarmist narratives over from regulatory assessments. In , the group launched a "The Death of Bees" email campaign attributing widespread bee declines to neonicotinoid use on sugar beets, despite the crop's non-flowering nature rendering it irrelevant to pollinators, thus misrepresenting causal links established in peer-reviewed studies showing minimal impact from such applications. Zaruk, a policy analyst with experience in EU science communications, described this as an anti-science tactic, exploiting public fears to solicit micro-donations without acknowledging data from bodies like the , which have repeatedly affirmed the safety of substances like under regulated use. Further critiques highlight SumOfUs's glyphosate opposition as ideologically motivated , ignoring over 50 years of toxicological data and epidemiological evidence failing to link the to cancer at environmental exposure levels, as validated by agencies including the U.S. EPA and WHO's IARC re-evaluations. The organization's crowdfunding for legal challenges against EU approvals, such as in cases, has been faulted for bypassing scientific dialogue in favor of precautionary fearmongering, potentially undermining without viable alternatives, as evidenced by yield drops in regions enforcing similar bans. These tactics, Zaruk contends, deceive supporters by fabricating urgency and victories, eroding trust in evidence-based policymaking.

Organizational Responses and Defenses

SumOfUs has defended its from corporate influence by asserting that its derives predominantly from small, recurring donations by individual members worldwide, a model intended to align campaigns with public priorities rather than large donors or foundations. This structure, the organization claims, facilitates grassroots-driven activism free from external agendas, countering accusations of leveled by critics who point to ties with progressive networks like the . In addressing tactical concerns, such as allegations of manipulative practices to boost micro-donations, SumOfUs emphasizes the scale of member engagement—over 15 million supporters—as validation of its rapid-response approach, which amplifies smaller NGOs' efforts against corporate misconduct. The group has not publicly rebutted specific claims of deception, like those from science communicator David Zaruk regarding anti-pesticide campaigns, opting instead to highlight verifiable corporate concessions, such as supplier policy shifts on . Responses to ideological critiques, including assertions of bias against scientific consensus on issues like glyphosate safety, involve SumOfUs reiterating reliance on peer-reviewed studies documenting health and environmental risks, while framing opponents as industry-funded entities prioritizing profits. In shareholder proposals and public filings, the organization defends its advocacy by demanding transparency from targets, mirroring calls for accountability applied to itself through annual impact reports detailing donation inflows and campaign metrics.

References

  1. https://www.consumerreports.org/about-us/our-people/our-board/taren-stinebrickner-kauffman/
  2. https://www.eko.org/about/
  3. https://www.eko.org/eko/
  4. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/102538-54
  5. https://thehumaneleague.org.uk/article/sumofus-joins-the-fight
  6. https://studentsforafreetibet.org/tibet-campaigners-laud-success-after-google-confirms-no-plans-to-offer-a-search-engine-in-china/
  7. https://www.eko.org/about/funding
  8. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/452513966
  9. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/sumofus/
  10. https://risk-monger.com/2018/07/02/how-sumofus-manipulate-and-deceive-vulnerable-people/
  11. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.sumofus.org
  12. https://personaldemocracy.com/speaker/taren-stinebrickner-kauffman/
  13. https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2020/11/18/money-talks-stinebrickner-kauffman-progressive.html
  14. https://bridgepartnersllc.com/placements/taren-stinebrickner-kauffman/
  15. https://www.newmediaventures.org/tools_for_change/details/taking-off-how-sumofus-and-crowdtangle-grew-to-scale
  16. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/sumofus
  17. https://www.eko.org/
  18. https://securesustain.org/abstract/eko/
  19. https://www.linkedin.com/company/ekomovement
  20. https://www.consumerreports.org/media-room/press-releases/2020/10/consumer-reports-welcomes-four-leaders-to-board-of-directors/
  21. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/activists-petition-apple-for-ethical-iphone-5/
  22. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/sumofus-online-petition-site-passes-25-million-members/2014/01/08/8800b348-7878-11e3-af7f-13bf0e9965f6_story.html
  23. https://financialpost.com/opinion/its-the-same-old-tar-sands-campaigner
  24. https://www.eko.org/images/2021%2520SumOfUs%2520Annual%2520Report.pdf
  25. https://www.eko.org/images/funding/2021_audited_financial_statements.pdf
  26. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2021/03/25/bitcoin-extends-longest-losing-run-since-december-live-updates/
  27. https://www.instagram.com/p/CoXLGo_Mnkt/
  28. https://opx.studio/project/eko
  29. https://www.thurrott.com/microsoft/283436/ai-activists-to-target-microsoft-at-build-2023
  30. https://www.facebook.com/Eko.Movement/
  31. https://home.eko.org/en/campaigns
  32. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-980/327324/20241001172113918_23-980%2520Amicus%2520Brief.pdf
  33. https://www.eko.org/storyofus/
  34. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/SumOfUs
  35. https://home.eko.org/en/about
  36. https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.sumofus.org/images/SUMOFUS_PROGRESSIVE-STYLEGUIDE.pdf
  37. https://www.eko.org/images/SumOfUs%202019%20Annual%20Report.pdf
  38. https://www.eko.org/images/2021%20SumOfUs%20Annual%20Report.pdf
  39. https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.sumofus.org/images/eko_Tiktok-Report_FINAL.pdf
  40. https://www.eko.org/images/Metaverse_report_May_2022.pdf
  41. https://www.commondreams.org/news/children-and-social-media
  42. https://www.eko.org/media/new-research-documents-sexual-assault-within-hours-of-entering-metas-virtual-reality-platform
  43. https://www.eko.org/media
  44. https://community.sumofus.org/
  45. https://labornotes.org/2013/07/tools-and-tactics-win-online
  46. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/20786/2/FullText.pdf
  47. https://www.tectonica.co/posts/digital-scam-or-superpower
  48. https://www.fundraiso.ch/en/organisations/eko-sumofus
  49. https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/datacard/sumofus?rid=884107633752-88
  50. https://www.eko.org/images/funding/2019_990_SumOfUs.pdf
  51. https://act.sumofus.org/go/662961?t=17&akid=134652%252E22548938%252EQ2zQ35
  52. https://global.insure-our-future.com/campaign-groups-demand-lloyds-stop-insuring-offshore-oil-drilling-in-the-bahamas/
  53. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2021/01/26/monetary-policy-and-fossil-fuels-the-banque-de-france-torn-between-its-need-to-act-and-desire-to-wait/
  54. https://stand.earth/press-releases/new-campaign-targets-top-denim-companies-over-carbon-emissions-environmental-impact/
  55. https://actions.sumofus.org/a/cadbury-no-more-rainforest-destruction-for-cocoa?source=homepage
  56. https://act.sumofus.org/go/594225?t=14&akid=99022%252E7636113%252EskSlJ3
  57. https://toxicbonds.org/three-adani-group-companies-booted-from-un-science-based-targets-initiative/
  58. https://actions.sumofus.org/a/green-deal-covid-19-recovery
  59. https://act.sumofus.org/go/445162?t=16&akid=53135%252E7636113%252EGK25hQ
  60. https://home.eko.org/media/activist-group-challenges-td-bank-to-keep-up-with-banking-sectors-shift-from-fossil-fuels
  61. https://www.sumofus.org/about
  62. https://actions.sumofus.org/a/chip-in-to-help-protect-workers-rights
  63. https://www.sumofus.org/media/more-than-40-organizations-join-national-effort-to-demand-corporate-governance-reforms-at-meta/
  64. https://rankingdigitalrights.org/mini-report/its-time-to-bring-down-the-barriers-blocking-shareholders-on-human-rights/
  65. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/phones/petitionpr.html
  66. https://www.freshfruitportal.com/news/2014/08/31/thailand-300000-sign-petitions-to-drop-charges-against-andy-hall/
  67. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37896421
  68. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/sumofus-campaign-in-support-of-andy-hall-call-for-dole-to-use-its-influence-to-push-for-charges-to-be-dropped/
  69. https://mightyearth.org/article/samsunghangsuponkorindo/
  70. https://www.eko.org/media/apple-adopts-landmark-new-human-rights-policy-following-shareholder-pressure
  71. https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/09/04/apple-announces-new-commitment-to-human-rights
  72. https://fortune.com/2020/09/04/apple-china-censorship-human-rights/
  73. https://www.eko.org/media/indigenous-leader-slams-one-of-worlds-biggest-packaging-manufacturers-for-destroying-rainforest-and-displacing-indigenous-communities
  74. https://act.sumofus.org/go/636685?t=18&akid=112435%252E12381047%252ExI-5GB
  75. https://www.sumofus.org/media/tibetan-uyghur-and-chinese-activists-urge-google-respect-human-rights-dont-do-chinas-dirty-work
  76. https://actions.sumofus.org/a/kelloggs-shareholders
  77. https://www.alternet.org/2012/02/victory_trader_joes_signs_fair_food_agreement_promising_better_conditions_for_workers
  78. https://towardfreedom.org/global-news-and-analysis-global-news-and-analysis/immokalee-workers-claim-victory-with-trader-joes-deal/
  79. https://www.workers.org/2012/us/picket_line_0531/
  80. https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ethicalcampaigns/boycotts/history-successful-boycotts
  81. https://www.farmprogress.com/farm-business/reaction-to-eu-neonicotinoid-ban
  82. https://wagner.nyu.edu/education/capstone/projects/impact-evaluation-for-digital-campaigning
  83. https://thetyee.ca/News/2019/07/08/CPP-Sells-Shares-US-Prison-Companies/
  84. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstreams/e1811cdc-10c9-4a95-9040-a0c755bf22ba/download
  85. https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2015/12/08/precedent-setting-campaign-block-nestle-and-others-bottling-water-oregon-county
  86. https://news.mongabay.com/2015/01/fake-doritos-ad-pressures-pepsi-over-palm-oil-policy/
  87. https://commonslibrary.org/tip-you-know-nothing-campaigners/
  88. https://www.newhope.com/industry-news/social-campaign-aims-to-stop-krill-supplement-sales
  89. https://content.forourclimate.org/files/research/eewmFUe.pdf
  90. https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2012/03/28/sumofus-are-corporate-whores-some-of-us-are-not/
  91. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2023/11/29/viewpoint-activists-shift-tactics-on-glyphosate-attacking-independent-european-science-oversight-agencies-that-have-unanimously-found-the-herbicide-safe/
  92. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/04/24/us-ngos-exploiting-europes-precautionary-chemophobia-ban-glyphosate-gmos/
  93. https://www.thenewlede.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/USTR_175_FY19_065_Redacted-opt.pdf
  94. https://action.eko.org/a/support-sumofus-in-2018-with-a-special-monthly-gift
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.