Hubbry Logo
The Poetic PrincipleThe Poetic PrincipleMain
Open search
The Poetic Principle
Community hub
The Poetic Principle
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
The Poetic Principle
The Poetic Principle
The Poetic Principle
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

"The Poetic Principle" is an essay by Edgar Allan Poe, written near the end of his life and published posthumously in 1850, the year after his death. It is a work of literary criticism, in which Poe presents his literary theory. It is based on a series of lectures Poe had given late in his lifetime.

Synopsis

[edit]

The essay argues that a poem should be written "for a poem's sake" and that the ultimate goal of art is aesthetic. He also argues against the concept of a long poem, saying that an epic, if it is to be worth anything, must instead be structured as a collection of shorter pieces, each of which is not too long to be read in a single sitting.

The essay critiques, sometimes rather sharply, the works of other poets of his time. His most common complaint is against didacticism, which he calls a "heresy", and allegory. He specifically targeted Henry Wadsworth Longfellow for his didacticism, something he would go on to call "the heresy of the didactic".[1] According to Poe, Longfellow's poetry was preachy, derivative, and thematically plagiarized. This would later give birth to what was known as "The Longfellow War".[citation needed] Although Poe is referring to poetry here, it is believed that Poe's philosophy against didacticism extends to fiction.[2]

Origins

[edit]

The essay was based on a lecture that Poe gave in Providence, Rhode Island at the Franklin Lyceum. The lecture reportedly drew an audience of 2,000 people.[3]

Some Poe scholars have suggested that "The Poetic Principle" was inspired in part by the critical failure of his two early poems "Al Aaraaf" and "Tamerlane", after which he never wrote another long poem. From this experience, Poe surmised that long poems are unable to sustain a proper mood or maintain a high-quality poetic form and are, therefore, inherently flawed.[4] Critics have suggested that this theory was written so that Poe could justify why "Al Aaraaf" and "Tamerlane" were unpopular.[5]

Publication history

[edit]

"The Poetic Principle" was published in the Home Journal, in the series for 1850, no. 36, August 31, 1850, with an introductory note by Nathaniel Parker Willis.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

The Poetic Principle

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Poetic Principle is an essay by American author , originally delivered as a in late 1848 and early 1849, and published posthumously on August 31, 1850, in the Home Journal with an introduction by N. P. Willis. In it, Poe articulates his of , defining it as "the rhythmical creation of " whose sole proper aim is to elevate the soul through an intense, unified emotional effect rather than to impart moral lessons or intellectual truths. Poe structures the essay as a critique of prevailing poetic misconceptions, beginning with a rejection of the "heresy of the Didactic," the notion that poetry must inculcate to possess merit—a view he attributes particularly to American critics. He argues that while may evoke a "pleasurable elevation of the ," it operates in the of the heart and , distinct from the of passion or the intellect's pursuit of truth. Central to his is the principle of unity: a poem must derive from a single, pre-established design, with every element contributing to one predominant effect, and Poe famously contends that "a does not exist," as extended works inevitably devolve into mere without sustaining poetic intensity. He advocates for brevity to achieve the "supernal Loveliness" that aspires to, drawing on the 's innate and longing for the sublime. The essay reflects his lifelong engagement with , echoing ideas from earlier works like "" and "The Rationale of Verse," and was later included in Rufus Wilmot Griswold's 1850 edition of Poe's collected works. Through examples of minor poems and contrasts with epic forms, Poe illustrates how true intertwines beauty with a melancholy elevation, cautioning against or diffuseness that dilute its power. This treatise remains a cornerstone of Poe's legacy, influencing modernist views on poetic form and purpose by prioritizing aesthetic purity over utility.

Background and Development

Historical Context of Poe's Career

Allan Poe's early attempts at poetry, such as (1827) and Al Aaraaf, Tamerlane, and Minor Poems (1829), met with critical and commercial failure, shaping his later rejection of extended poetic forms. These works, influenced by and featuring Byronic heroes and fantastical visions, received little attention and underscored the challenges of sustaining narrative depth in verse, prompting Poe to favor brevity and unity in his mature theory. The negative reception reinforced his view that long poems diluted emotional impact, a principle he would articulate more fully in the late 1840s. By the 1840s, Poe's career was marked by persistent financial instability amid his growing literary reputation, as he juggled editorial positions to support himself and his family. He served as editor of Graham's Magazine in from 1841 to 1842, where he contributed influential reviews and stories, though his salary of $800 annually proved insufficient against mounting debts. In 1845, he became editor and partial owner of the Broadway Journal in New York, republishing much of his fiction there, but the publication folded in early 1846 due to financial woes, leaving him without steady income. This period of professional flux coincided with personal tragedy, as his wife, Virginia Clemm, succumbed to in January 1847, exacerbating his depression and financial strain. Amid these struggles, Poe navigated broader 19th-century American literary debates, where Romantic individualism clashed with emerging didactic trends emphasizing moral instruction in , as seen in the works of the like . Poe positioned himself against this "heresy of the Didactic," advocating for as an art of pure beauty and sentiment rather than utilitarian teaching, a stance rooted in his Romantic influences but distinct in its emphasis on aesthetic autonomy. To bolster his finances after Virginia's death, Poe increasingly turned to the , which he had begun in , delivering talks on and that allowed him to engage audiences directly and earn supplemental income, though these efforts yielded modest returns of around $100–$150 per engagement.

Lectures and Composition Process

The lecture series that formed the basis of "The Poetic Principle" began with Poe's delivery on December 20, 1848, at the Franklin Lyceum in Howard's Hall, , drawing an audience of approximately 1,500 people. This event marked the debut of the material, presented before a sold-out crowd that included the poet , who sat in the front row and later described being deeply fascinated by the content. The lecture was a financial and intellectual success for Poe, earning him $50 and generating positive buzz in local circles, though some observers noted his delivery as somewhat restrained in tone compared to the vigor of his written prose. Poe revisited the lecture on August 17, 1849, at the Exchange Concert Rooms in —referred to in some accounts as associated with the Richmond Institute—where admission was 25 cents and the venue filled to capacity with enthusiastic local supporters welcoming their native son. These 1849 lectures were part of efforts to raise capital for Poe's proposed literary magazine, . Contemporary reviews in the Richmond Whig and Daily Republican hailed it as one of the "richest intellectual treats" ever offered in the city, praising both the depth of Poe's analysis and the graceful quality of his voice and posture during delivery, which concluded to sustained applause. Later that month, Poe adapted the material for a presentation on September 14, 1849, in , before proceeding to his final public lecture on the topic on September 24, 1849, at the Exchange Hotel in Richmond, where the room was again packed, signaling strong ongoing interest in his ideas just weeks before his death. The transition from these oral presentations to a written essay involved significant adaptations and revisions, as Poe's original —prepared before the Providence —was lost during his travels in early , prompting him to rewrite the text from memory and notes for subsequent performances. This iterative process allowed Poe to refine the structure and emphasis, honing the core arguments through live audience interactions that informed subtle adjustments to phrasing and examples. The final version, drawn from the revised lecture script, was not published during Poe's lifetime; instead, it appeared posthumously in October 1850 in The Home Journal, with subsequent publication in Sartain's Union Magazine of Literature and Art later that month; the text was based on the edition prepared by for his Works of the Late (September 1850), with some editorial smoothing but preserving Poe's intent—though earlier manuscript variants remain unavailable due to the losses. This underscores how the lectures served as a testing ground, enabling Poe to strengthen his opposition to by incorporating responsive refinements from receptive crowds.

Content Summary

Critique of Didacticism

In "The Poetic Principle," launches a foundational against the prevailing 19th-century tendency to view as a vehicle for instruction, coining the term "heresy of the didactic" to describe this misguided approach. He describes this as a trend especially patronized by American and Bostonian critics, who assume that every poem should inculcate a and that poetical merit is to be judged by this standard, thereby subordinating aesthetic elevation to the dissemination of truth or ethical lessons and degrading 's intrinsic value. Poe argues that 's primary aim is not to impart morality or factual accuracy but to achieve an uplifting of the soul through the contemplation of , a supernal ideal that transcends utilitarian purposes. Poe directs this polemic specifically at contemporary American poets, implying that works like those of are products of this didactic influence. He cites the proem to Longfellow's "The Waif" as an example, praising its delicacy of expression, ingeniousness, melody, richness, and fragrance, while noting a lack of great range of and energy. This piece exemplifies of a secondary order for Poe, as it achieves noble sentiment and rhythmic grace to elevate the soul without overt moral instruction, though it falls short of the highest poetic intensity due to limited passion. He extends his discussion to illustrate how true avoids prosaic sermons disguised in verse by prioritizing indefinable aesthetic pleasure over ethical undertones. Central to Poe's attack is a sharp distinction between and , positioning the former as the domain of and passion, while consigning truth and logical exposition to the latter. , in his view, operates through rhythmical creation to evoke and sentiment, fostering a harmonious that delights without didactic intent; , by contrast, seeks to inform or persuade via rational . This separation underscores Poe's belief that conflating the two realms—by injecting axioms into verse—inevitably compromises poetry's elevating power, reducing it to an inferior mode of . Poe reinforces this critique by asserting that the transient nature of poetic excitement further undermines didactic ambitions in extended works: "I hold that a long poem does not exist... That degree of excitement which would entitle a poem to be so called at all, cannot be sustained throughout a composition of any great length. After the lapse of half an hour, at the very utmost, it flags—fails—a revulsion ensues—and then the poem is, in effect, no longer such." Didactic elements exacerbate this flaw, as their prosaic insertions prolong the piece beyond the soul's capacity for sustained aesthetic , blending verse with uninspired exposition.

Core Definition of Poetry

In Edgar Allan Poe's essay "The Poetic Principle," poetry is presented as an art form that transcends mere instruction or moralizing, focusing instead on the elevation of the human spirit. Poe asserts that "a poem deserves its title only inasmuch as it excites, by elevating the soul," emphasizing its capacity to induce a sense of supernal rather than appealing to the intellect or didactic purposes. This elevation occurs through an emotional and aesthetic response that stirs the soul to a heightened state of wonder, distinct from the rational pursuits of or . At the heart of Poe's definition lies the idea of poetry as "the Rhythmical Creation of Beauty," where rhythm serves as the essential mechanism for evoking this beauty. He describes this process as governed solely by , an innate faculty that discerns the Beautiful without reliance on logical or ethical . Unlike prose, which may convey truth through or argument, prioritizes the rhythmic expression of aesthetic ideals, exciting the soul through a direct, intuitive encounter with the supernal rather than through intellectual discourse. Poe further delineates the "Poetic Sentiment" as an instinctive and divine impulse residing deep within the human spirit, akin to "the desire of the moth for the star." This sentiment is portrayed as an immortal, inborn yearning for the Beautiful, separate from both reason and mere passion, as it originates from a higher, almost ethereal source. It manifests not as calculated emotion but as a pure, elevating force that connects the individual to the divine without the intermediary of moral instruction. Poe establishes a clear among pursuits, placing at the apex above and . While engages the Pure in the pursuit of Truth, and often blends intellect with moral sense, —through —invokes a direct apprehension of the divine Beautiful, free from didactic constraints. This positioning underscores poetry's unique role in fostering spiritual exaltation, rendering it superior in its ability to touch the soul's aspirational core without imposing ethical or rational agendas.

Advocacy for Brevity and Unity

In "The Poetic Principle," categorically rejects the notion of a , declaring it a "flat contradiction in terms" because sustained poetic excitement cannot endure beyond approximately half an hour. He argues that all excitements are transient due to a "psychal necessity," meaning that prolonged exposure leads to a revulsion where the initial elevation fades into depression, diluting the overall impression. This transience necessitates brevity to preserve the poem's capacity to excite the soul through beauty, as diffusion over extended length weakens the emotional impact. Central to Poe's structural prescription is the principle of unity, which he defines as the totality of effect or impression that must be experienced in a single sitting to avoid fragmentation. He relates this to classical ideas, adapting principles like those in Aristotle's Poetics to emphasize an indivisible, transient excitement that elevates the reader without interruption. For instance, he critiques John Milton's Paradise Lost as lacking true unity, suggesting it succeeds only when viewed as a series of shorter, independent poems rather than a cohesive epic. Poe illustrates the virtues of brevity and unity through praise for concise works that maintain intense effect, such as Alfred Tennyson's "Tears, Idle Tears," which he hails for its ethereal purity and ability to evoke profound sentiment without excess. This advocacy implicitly aligns with Poe's own poetic practice, where shorter forms like "The Raven" achieve unified impressions of melancholy elevation. Ultimately, Poe contends that no extended poem will regain popularity, as modern tastes demand the concentrated power of brief, organic wholes to sustain poetic beauty.

Publication and Editions

Initial Posthumous Release

"The Poetic Principle" was first published posthumously on , 1850, in the Home Journal, a prominent New York literary weekly co-edited by and George Pope Morris. As a friend of Poe and co-editor of the periodical, Willis facilitated the essay's appearance by including an introductory note that highlighted its merits as one of a series of critiques on drawn from Poe's forthcoming collected works, edited by , and described it as a "rich intellectual treat" certain to captivate enthusiasts. This release occurred less than a year after Poe's death on October 7, 1849, with the text derived from a manuscript Poe had revised from his notes delivered in cities including Providence, New York, , , and Richmond during 1848 and 1849. The full essay was serialized in a single issue of the Home Journal without illustrations or accompanying artwork, targeting the publication's discerning readership among the literary and cultural elites of the . It was reprinted shortly thereafter in the October 1850 issue of Sartain's Union Magazine of Literature and Art, noted as from the "unpublished manuscript of Edgar A. Poe."

Subsequent Reprints and Translations

Following its initial appearance, "The Poetic Principle" was reprinted in 1850 as part of Wilmot Griswold's edition of The Works of the Late , volume 3, which collected Poe's essays despite Griswold's well-documented antagonism toward the author and his unflattering memoir of Poe's life. In the , the essay gained wider accessibility through inclusion in major scholarly compilations, such as volume 28 of The (1909–1910), edited by Charles W. Eliot, where it appeared alongside other key English and American essays to represent Poe's critical voice. Similarly, it featured prominently in the Library of America's 1984 collection : Essays and Reviews, edited by G. R. Thompson, which provided a comprehensive scholarly edition of Poe's nonfiction with annotations emphasizing its theoretical significance. Translations expanded the essay's global reach, beginning with French adaptations that drew directly from Poe's text. In 1856, Charles Baudelaire incorporated substantial passages from "The Poetic Principle" into his "Notes Nouvelles sur Edgar Poe," presenting them as original insights in the to his translation of Poe's Histoires Extraordinaires; this partial rendering profoundly influenced the French Symbolist movement by aligning Poe's aesthetics with emerging poetic ideals. Full French translations followed, including Félix Rabbe's 1887 version in Edgar Poë: Derniers Contes. German and Spanish editions emerged in the early as part of broader Poe collections, further disseminating the essay across and , though specific translators for these versions remain less documented in early printings. In the late 20th century, digital platforms enhanced the essay's availability, with offering free access to the full text as part of The Works of , Volume 5 (first digitized around 2000, building on earlier efforts from the ). It also appears in numerous modern academic anthologies, such as Frederick C. Prescott's 1909 Selections from the Critical Writings of and later volumes in series like the Norton Critical Editions, ensuring its ongoing use in literary studies.

Critical Analysis

Theoretical Principles of Beauty and Sentiment

In Allan Poe's "The Poetic Principle," the titular concept is presented as an innate human faculty, an "immortal instinct" embedded in the spirit that drives individuals toward the apprehension of supernal , representing a romanticized pursuit of divine beyond the material world. This principle operates through , distinct from intellect or moral sense, enabling the to experience a "pleasurable elevation, or excitement" that aligns with a higher, ethereal realm, often interpreted as echoing Platonic ideals of eternal forms but infused with Romantic emotional intensity. Poe describes it as the "Human Aspiration for Supernal Beauty," a fundamental urge that manifests in as the rhythmical creation of beauty, fostering a transient connection to the divine without full attainment. Central to this theory is Poe's conception of beauty as residing in "the realm of the indefinite," where it evokes a profound melancholy stemming from the soul's inability to fully grasp the supernal joys it glimpses. Rather than providing resolution, offers "brief and indeterminate glimpses" of these rapturous elements, prompting a "petulant, impatient sorrow" that blends with an undercurrent of , as the indefinite heightens the emotional thrill without satisfying it completely. This melancholy is not mere but a "pleasurable sadness," arising from the struggle to reach the " above," akin to the moth's desire for the star, which Poe posits as the essence of poetic sentiment. Scholars note that this framework subordinates empirical truth—characterized by "cool reason"—to the "warm sentiment" of , ensuring avoids by prioritizing emotional and spiritual elevation over instructional clarity. Poe illustrates these principles through the mechanics of and meter, which generate an "elevating excitement" that is inherently transient, mirroring the indefinite quality of itself. In , these elements create a "rhythmical flow" that voluptuously enhances the soul's response, as seen in his of verses where meter adapts to themes of wild or fanciful verge, producing a melodious thrill that sustains poetic intensity without prolongation. This excitement, vital to the poetic effect, elevates the reader momentarily to the supernal, but its brevity—reinforcing unity—prevents dilution, ensuring the sentiment remains pure and unresolved. Thus, and meter serve as tools for evoking the core tension between attainable sentiment and elusive , underscoring Poe's view that true thrives on this ephemeral elevation.

Connections to Poe's Broader Philosophy

"The Poetic Principle" extends the methodical approach to artistic creation outlined in Poe's earlier essay "The Philosophy of Composition" (1846), where he describes poetry as a deliberate process aimed at achieving a unified effect on the reader. In "The Philosophy of Composition," Poe argues that the writer must begin with the intended impression—such as melancholy beauty—and construct every element, from tone to refrain, to sustain it without interruption, limiting the work to a single sitting for totality of impact. This principle of unity of effect, exemplified in the composition of "The Raven," directly informs "The Poetic Principle," where Poe applies it to poetry theory by insisting on brevity and structural coherence to evoke an elevating excitement of the soul, rejecting diffuse forms that dilute the aesthetic response. Poe's essay also aligns with the cosmological framework of "Eureka" (1848), sharing an emphasis on intuitive truth as superior to rational deduction, with poetry serving as a microcosm of universal harmony. In "Eureka," Poe posits that genuine insight into the universe's unity and diffusion arises from intuitive apprehension rather than analytical reasoning, viewing creation as a divine aesthetic process. "The Poetic Principle," composed shortly after, echoes this by framing poetry as an intuitive aspiration toward supernal beauty, a transcendent unity that mirrors the cosmos's underlying oneness and reflects the soul's alignment with divine order. Scholars note this shared theological undertone, where both works elevate aesthetic intuition as a pathway to cosmic and spiritual truth. The essay represents an evolution in Poe's criticism, shifting from defensive reviews of his gothic tales in the 1830s and 1840s—where he justified horror and the as vehicles for psychological depth—to a purified unburdened by justification. Early pieces, such as reviews in the Southern Literary Messenger, often defended his short fiction against charges of morbidity by highlighting its emotional intensity and formal innovation. By "The Poetic Principle," Poe transcends these defenses, articulating an abstract doctrine of beauty as poetry's sole province, detached from moral or didactic aims, and focused on rhythmical elevation.

Reception and Influence

Contemporary Critical Responses

Upon its initial publication in the Home Journal on August 31, 1850, "The Poetic Principle" received praise from early admirers, including an introductory note by editor , who highlighted its eloquence. , Poe's literary executor, included the essay in the third volume of his 1850 edition of Poe's Works, despite his overall negative portrayal of Poe in the accompanying memoir; this inclusion was seen as a mixed endorsement, preserving the text amid Griswold's efforts to shape Poe's posthumous reputation. Critics contemporaneously accused the essay of serving as self-justification for Poe's preference for short-form , arguing that its emphasis on brevity and unity of effect rationalized the limited popularity of his own longer early works like "Al Aaraaf" and "Tamerlane." This perception tied into Poe's ongoing "Longfellow War," where the essay's critique of didactic echoed Poe's earlier attacks on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's moralistic style, framing Poe's aesthetic principles as a defensive extension of personal rivalries. In 1850s reviews, the Southern Literary Messenger commended Poe's theoretical boldness in his lectures on "The Poetic Principle," with John Moncure Daniel noting them as a "paper of great power" that showcased Poe's distinctive analytical strengths, even as it revealed his characteristic flaws. Northern critics, however, often viewed it as eccentric, dismissing Poe's rigid insistence on poetry's exclusive pursuit of beauty—without moral or intellectual instruction—as an outlier in the era's more utilitarian literary standards. Post-publication debates in periodicals, such as those in the Southern Literary Messenger and broader literary journals, frequently linked the essay to Poe's 1840s plagiarism accusations against Longfellow, portraying "The Poetic Principle" as a culmination of that conflict by reasserting Poe's opposition to borrowed or imitative poetic forms under the guise of aesthetic theory.

Long-Term Impact on Literary Theory

Baudelaire's 1856 essay "Notes Nouvelles sur Edgar Poe" appropriated key passages from "The Poetic Principle," presenting Poe's ideas on poetry as the rhythmical creation of beauty as his own and thereby introducing them to European audiences, profoundly shaping the French Symbolist movement. Baudelaire integrated Poe's emphasis on evoking supernal beauty through suggestion rather than didactic statement into his own criticism, such as in "New Notes on Edgar Poe." This influence extended to Stéphane Mallarmé, who adopted Poe's premise that poetry evokes eternal states via discrete symbols and internal associations, prioritizing mystery and implication over explicit narrative. Paul Verlaine further echoed these principles by rejecting rhetorical description in favor of short, evocative forms that suggest emotion and beauty indirectly, aligning with Poe's advocacy for unity and brevity in poetic effect. In American literary criticism, "The Poetic Principle" contributed to the foundations of through Poe's doctrine of unity of effect, which emphasized the organic wholeness of a poem as essential to its aesthetic impact. and other New Critics, such as W.K. Wimsatt, drew on this concept to advocate for that treats the text as a self-contained artifact, free from external biographical or historical paraphrase, viewing Poe's refinement of these ideas—despite critiquing its Kantian vagueness—as a precursor to their formalist methods. This approach reinforced the essay's role in promoting literary autonomy, where poetry's value lies in its internal coherence and elevation of beauty over moral or intellectual instruction. The essay's principles extended into modernism and beyond, influencing imagist poetics through Ezra Pound's admiration for Poe's insistence on concise, unified effects that prioritize precise over didactic excess. Pound incorporated elements of this brevity in imagism's direct treatment of the object, echoing Poe's rejection of long, diffuse forms in favor of concentrated beauty. In postmodern poetics, scholars have traced the essay's impact on explorations of fragmentation and linguistic play, as seen in connections to Charles Olson's projective verse, where Poe's focus on rhythmic creation anticipates experimental disruptions of traditional form. Feminist critiques, however, have challenged Poe's idealization of melancholy beauty, arguing that it contaminates the "supernal" feminine ideal with themes of loss and , reinforcing patriarchal tropes of women as ethereal yet doomed objects. Recent 21st-century scholarship continues to analyze "The Poetic Principle" for its proto-deconstructionist implications, particularly Poe's views on language as a medium for indeterminate beauty that resists fixed truth or moral closure. Studies from the 2010s onward highlight how Poe's separation of poetry from intellect prefigures deconstructive emphases on the instability of signs and the endless deferral of meaning in aesthetic experience. For instance, examinations of the essay's triad of intellect, taste, and moral sense reveal Poe's anticipation of linguistic theories where beauty emerges from the tension between presence and absence, influencing contemporary discussions of poetics in global literature.

References

  1. https://www.eapoe.org/works/essays/poetprnb.htm
  2. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2151/2151-h/2151-h.htm
  3. https://www.eapoe.org/works/info/petpp.htm
  4. https://www.eapoe.org/geninfo/poepoet.htm
  5. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/edgar-allan-poe
  6. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/poe-edgar-allan-1809-1849/
  7. https://www.eapoe.org/pstudies/ps1980/p1982101.htm
  8. https://edgarallanpoeri.com/the-franklin-lyceum/
  9. https://poemuseum.org/the-poetic-principle-a-rich-intellectual-treat/
  10. http://worldofpoe.blogspot.com/2013/02/poe-hits-lecture-circuit.html
  11. http://poecalendar.blogspot.com/2009/09/last-lecture.html
  12. https://iep.utm.edu/aristotle-poetics/
  13. https://www.eapoe.org/works/levine/sslcti01.htm
  14. https://www.eapoe.org/works/essays/poetprnc.htm
  15. https://www.eapoe.org/works/editions/griswold.htm
  16. https://www.loa.org/books/91-essays-amp-reviews/
  17. https://journals.openedition.org/palimpsestes/1049
  18. https://www.eapoe.org/papers/psblctrs/pl19411.htm
  19. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2151
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328668327_Poe%27s_Moral_Aesthetic
  21. https://www.eapoe.org/works/essays/philcomp.htm
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41506296
  23. https://www.eapoe.org/papers/misc1900/19180401.htm
  24. https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/6913/1/Lopez_ETD.pdf
  25. https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/rals/article/23/1/28/261776/The-Little-War-and-Longfellow-s-Dilemma-New
  26. https://www.eapoe.org/papers/misc1827/18500300.htm
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2712883
  28. https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/utq.14.4.414?download=true
  29. https://literariness.org/2020/12/12/symbolism/
  30. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/215156160.pdf
  31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-literary-criticism/literary-autonomy-the-growth-of-a-modern-concept/A58FD4B80B86DA0D57A98CBC25F7D857
  32. https://scarriet.wordpress.com/category/ezra-pound/
  33. https://www.uoanbar.edu.iq/eStoreImages/Bank/6487.pdf
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/4/102
  35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45297289
  36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3199458
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356995495_%27Making_New%27_and_%27Attention%27_in_Poe%27s_%27Poetic_Principle%27_and_Olson%27s_%27Projective_Verse%27
  38. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-literary-criticism/theories-of-poetry/A4CF309A597FD46974742E30B12ADA23
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.