Hubbry Logo
Classifications of snowClassifications of snowMain
Open search
Classifications of snow
Community hub
Classifications of snow
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Classifications of snow
Classifications of snow
Classifications of snow
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Snow accumulation on ground and in tree branches in Germany
Snow blowing across a highway in Canada
Spring snow on a mountain in France

Classifications of snow describe and categorize the attributes of snow-generating weather events, including the individual crystals both in the air and on the ground, and the deposited snow pack as it changes over time. Snow can be classified by describing the weather event that is producing it, the shape of its ice crystals or flakes, how it collects on the ground, and thereafter how it changes form and composition. Depending on the status of the snow in the air or on the ground, a different classification applies.

Snowfall arises from a variety of events that vary in intensity and cause, subject to classification by weather bureaus. Some snowstorms are part of a larger weather pattern. Other snowfall occurs from lake effects or atmospheric instability near mountains. Falling snow takes many different forms, depending on atmospheric conditions, especially vapor content and temperature, as it falls to the ground. Once on the ground, snow crystals metamorphose into different shapes, influenced by wind, freeze-thaw and sublimation. Snow on the ground forms a variety of shapes, formed by wind and thermal processes, all subject to formal classifications both by scientists and by ski resorts. Those who work and play in snowy landscapes have informal classifications, as well.

There is a long history of northern and alpine cultures describing snow in their different languages, including Inupiat, Russian and Finnish.[1] However, the lore about the multiplicity of Eskimo words for snow originates from controversial scholarship on a topic that is difficult to define, because of the structures of the languages involved.[2]

Classification of snow events

[edit]

Snow events reflect the type of storm that generates them and the type of precipitation that results. Classification systems use rates of deposition, types of precipitation, visibility, duration and wind speed to characterize such events.

Snow-producing events

[edit]
Blizzard conditions with heavy snow, high winds and reduced visibility in New Jersey

The following terms are consistent with the classifications of United States National Weather Service and the Meteorological Service of Canada:[3]

  • Blizzard – Characterized by sustained wind or frequent gusts of 56 kilometres per hour (35 mph) or greater and falling or blowing snow that frequently lowers visibility to less than 400 metres (0.25 mi) over a period of 3 hours or longer.[4]
  • Cold front – The leading edge of unstable cold air, replacing warmer, circulating around an extratropical cyclone, which may cause instability snow showers or squalls.[5]
  • Extratropical cyclone (also nor'easter when in the North Atlantic) – May cause snow in the winter, especially in its northwest quadrant (in the Northern Hemisphere) where the wind comes from the northeast.[5]
  • Lake-effect snow (also ocean-effect snow) – Occurs when relatively cold air flows over warm lake (or ocean) water to cause localized, convective snow bands.[6][7]
  • Mountain snow – Orographic lift causes moist air to rise upslope on mountains to where freezing temperatures cause orographic snow.
  • Snow flurry – An intermittent, light snowfall event of short duration with only a trace level of accumulation.[8]
  • Snowsquall – A brief but intense period of moderate to heavy snowfall with strong, gusty surface winds and measurable snowfall.[9]
  • Thundersnow – Occurs when a snowstorm generates lightning and thunder. It may occur in areas that are prone to a combination of wind and moisture triggers that promote instability, often downwind of lakes or in mountainous terrain. It may occur with intensifying extratropical cyclones. Such events are often associated with intense snowfall.[10]
  • Warm front – Snow may fall as warm air initially over-rides cold in a warm front, circulating around an extratropical cyclone.[5]
  • Winter storm – May constitute any combination of sleet, snow, ice, and wind that accumulates 18 centimetres (7 in) or more of snow in 12 hours or less; or 23 centimetres (9 in) or more in 24 hours or 1.3 centimetres (0.5 in) of ice.[11]

Precipitation

[edit]
Wilson Bentley micrograph showing two classes of snow crystals, plate and column.
Snow crystal with a column capped with plates, which are growing rime ice.

Precipitation may be characterized by type and intensity.

Type

[edit]

Frozen precipitation includes snow, snow pellets, snow grains, ice crystals, ice pellets, and hail.[12] Falling snow comprises ice crystals, growing in a hexagonal pattern and combining as snowflakes.[13] Ice crystals may be "any one of a number of macroscopic, crystalline forms in which ice appears, including hexagonal columns, hexagonal platelets, dendritic crystals, ice needles, and combinations of these forms".[14] Terms that refer to falling snow particles include:

  • Ice crystals (also diamond dust) – Suspended in the atmosphere as needles, columns or plates at very low temperatures in a stable atmosphere.[15]
  • Ice pellets – Two manifestations, sleet and small hail, that result in irregular spherical particles, which typically bounce upon impact. Sleet comprises grains of ice that form from refreezing of largely melted snowflakes when falling through into a frozen layer of air near the surface. Small hail forms from snow pellets encased in a thin layer of ice caused either by accretion of droplets or by refreezing of each particle's surface.[16]
  • Hail – Forms in cumulonimbus clouds as irregular spheres of ice (hailstones) with a diameter of 5 mm or more.
  • Snowflake – Grows from a single ice crystal and may have agglomerated with other crystals as it falls.[17]
  • Snow grain (also granular snow) – Flattened and elongated agglomerations of crystals, typically less than 1 mm diameter, that include a range of crystal sizes and complexities to include a rime core and glaze coating. They typically originate in stratus clouds or from fog and fall in small quantities, not in showers.[18]
  • Snow pellets (also soft hail, graupel, tapioca snow) – Spherical or conical ice particles, based on a snowlike structure, with diameters between 2 mm and 5 mm. They form by accretion of supercooled droplets near or slightly below the freezing point and rebound off hard surfaces upon landing.[19]

Intensity

[edit]

In the US, the intensity of snowfall is characterized by visibility through the falling precipitation, as follows:[13]

  • Light snow: visibility of 1 kilometre (1,100 yd) or greater
  • Moderate snow: visibility between 1 kilometre (1,100 yd) and 0.5 kilometres (550 yd)
  • Heavy snow: visibility of less than 0.5 kilometres (550 yd)

Snow crystal classification

[edit]
An early classification of snowflakes by Israel Perkins Warren.[20]
Main article: Snowflake § Classification

Ice approximates hexagonal symmetry in most of its atmospheric manifestations of a crystal lattice as snow. Temperature and vapor pressure determine the growth of the hexagonal crystal lattice in different forms that include columnar growth in the axis perpendicular to the hexagonal plane to form snow crystals.[14] Ukichiro Nakaya developed a crystal morphology diagram, relating crystal shape to the temperature and moisture conditions under which they formed.[21] Magono and Lee devised a classification of freshly formed snow crystals that includes 80 distinct shapes. They are summarized in the following principal snow crystal categories (with symbol):[22]

  • Needle (N): Snow crystals may be simple or a combination of needles.
  • Column (C): Snow crystals may be simple or a combination of columns.
  • Plate (P): Snow crystals may be a regular crystal in one plane, a plane crystal with extensions (dendrites), a crystal with irregular number of branches, crystal with 12 branches, malformed crystal, radiating assemblage of plane branches.
  • Column and plate combination (CP): Snow crystals may be a column with plane crystal at both ends, a bullet with plane crystals, a plane crystal with spatial extensions at ends.
  • Side plane (S): Snow crystals may have extended side planes, some scalelike side planes, and some a combination of side planes, bullets, and columns.
  • Rime (R): Rimed crystals may be densely rimed crystals, graupel-like crystals, or graupel.
  • Irregular (I): Snow crystals include ice particles, rimed particles, broken pieces from a crystal, and miscellaneous crystals.
  • Germ (G): Crystals may be a minute column, hexagonal plate, stellar crystal, assemblage of plates, irregular germ, or other skeletal form.

Classifications of snow on the ground

[edit]

Classification of snow on the ground comes from two sources: the science community and the community of those who encounter it in their daily lives. Snow on the ground exists both as a material with varying properties and as a variety of structures, shaped by wind, sun, temperature, and precipitation.

Hoar frost on the snow surface from crystallized water vapor emerging on a cold, clear night
Cornice on an alp in France
Snowdrift in Gloucestershire
Sastrugi in Norway
Alpine firn in Austria
Penitentes under the night sky of the Atacama Desert
Suncups in England
Packing snow being rolled into a large snowball in Oxford, England.

Classification of snowpack material properties

[edit]

The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground describes snow crystal classification, once it is deposited on the ground, that include grain shape and grain size. The system also characterizes the snowpack, as the individual crystals metamorphize and coalesce.[23] It uses the following characteristics (with units) to describe deposited snow: microstructure, grain shape, grain size (mm), snow density (kg/m3), snow hardness, liquid water content, snow temperature (°C), impurities (mass fraction), and layer thickness (cm). The grain shape is further characterized, using the following categories (with code): precipitation particles (PP), machine-made snow (MM), decomposing and fragmented precipitation particles (DF), rounded grains (RG), faceted crystals (FC), depth hoar (DH), surface hoar (SH), melt forms (MF), and ice formations (IF). Other measurements and characteristics are used as well, including a snow profile of a vertical section of the snowpack.[23] Some snowpack features include:

  • Crust – A variety of processes can create a crust, a layer of snow on the surface of the snowpack that is stronger than the snow below, which may be powder snow. Crusts often result from partial melting of the snow surface by direct sunlight or warm air followed by re-freezing, but can also be created by wind or by surface water.[24] Snow travelers consider the thickness and resulting strength of a crust to determine whether it is "unbreakable", meaning that they will support the weight of the traveler or "breakable", meaning that it will not.[25]
Snow Crust about 6 cm thick in Austria
  • Depth hoar – Depth hoar comprises faceted snow crystals, usually poorly or completely unbonded (unsintered) to adjacent crystals, creating a weak zone in the snowpack. Depth hoar forms from metamorphism of the snowpack in response to a large temperature gradient between the warmer ground beneath the snowpack and the surface. The relatively high porosity (percentage of air space), relatively warm temperature (usually near freezing point), and unbonded weak snow in this layer can allow various organisms to live in it.[23]
  • Machine-made – Machine-made artificial snow has two classifications: round, polycrystalline particles, which are produced by the freezing of water droplets expelled from a snow cannon, and shard-like ice plates, which are produced by the shaving of ice.[23]
  • Surface hoar – Surface hoar is manifest as striated, usually flat, sometimes needle-like crystals, usually deposited as frost on a snow surface that is colder than the air. Crystals grow rapidly by transfer of moisture from the atmosphere onto the snow surface, which is cooled below ambient temperature by radiational cooling.[23] Subsequent snowfall can bury layers of surface hoar, incorporating them into the snowpack where they can form a weak layer.[26]

Classifications of snowpack surface and structure

[edit]

In addition to having material properties, snowpacks have structure which can be characterized. These properties are primarily determined through the actions of wind, sun, and temperature. Such structures have been described by mountaineers and others encountering frozen landscapes, as follows:[26]

Wind-induced

[edit]
  • Cornice – Wind blowing over a ridge can create a compacted snowdrift with an overhanging top, called a cornice. Cornices present a hazard to mountaineers, because they are prone to break off.[26]
  • Finger drift – A finger drift is a narrow snow drift (30 cm to 1 metre in width) crossing a roadway. Several finger drifts in succession resemble the fingers of a hand.[27]
  • Pillow drift – A pillow drift is a snow drift crossing a roadway and usually 3 to 4.5 metres (10–15 feet) in width and 30 cm to 90 cm (1–3 feet) in depth.[28]
  • Sastrugi – Sastrugi are snow surface features sculpted by wind into ridges and grooves up to 3 meters high,[29] with the ridges facing into the prevailing wind.[30]
  • Snowdrift – Snowdrifts are wind-driven accumulations of snow deposited downwind of obstructions.[31]
  • Wind crust – A layer of relatively stiff, hard snow formed by deposition of wind blown snow on the windward side of a ridge or other sheltered area. Wind crusts generally bond better to snowpack layers below and above them than wind slabs.[32]
  • Wind slab – A layer of relatively stiff, hard snow formed by deposition of wind blown snow on the leeward side of a ridge or other sheltered area. Wind slabs can form over weaker, softer freshly fallen powder snow, creating an avalanche hazard on steep slopes.[32]

Sun or temperature-induced

[edit]
  • Firn – Firn is dense, granular snow, which has been in place for multiple years but which has not yet consolidated into glacial ice.[33]
  • Névé – Névé is a young, granular type of snow which has been partially melted, refrozen and compacted, yet precedes the form of ice. This type of snow is associated with glacier formation through the process of nivation.[34] Névé that survives a full season of ablation turns into firn, which is both older and slightly denser.[33]
  • Penitentes – Penitentes are snow formations, found at high elevations, which form of elongated, thin blades of hardened snow or ice up to 5 meters in height, closely spaced and pointing towards the general direction of the sun. They are evolved suncups.[35]
  • Suncups – Suncups are polygonal depressions in a snow surface that form patterns with sharp narrow ridges separating smoothly concave quasi-periodic hollows. They form during the ablation (melting away) of snow from incident solar radiation in bright sunny conditions, sometimes enhanced by the insulating presence of dirt along the ridges.[36]
  • Yukimarimo – Yukimarimo are balls of fine frost, formed at low temperatures on the Antarctic Plateau during light or calm winds.[37]

Ski resort classification

[edit]

Ski resorts use standardized terminology to describe their snow conditions. In North America terms include:[38]

  • Base snow – Snow that has been thoroughly consolidated.
  • Frozen granular – Snow whose granules have frozen together.
  • Loose granular – Snow with incohesive granules.
  • Machine-made – Produced by snow cannons, and typically denser than natural snow.
  • New snow – Snow that has fallen since the previous day's report.
  • Packed powder – Powder snow that has been compressed by grooming or by ski traffic.
  • Powder – Freshly fallen, uncompacted snow. The density and moisture content of powder snow can vary widely; snowfall in coastal regions and areas with higher humidity is usually heavier than a similar depth of snowfall in an arid or continental region. Light, dry (low moisture content, typically 4–7% water content) powder snow is prized by skiers and snowboarders.[38] It is often found in the Rocky Mountains of North America and in most regions in Japan.[26]
  • Spring conditions – A variety of melting snow surfaces, including mushy powder or granular snow, which refreeze at night.
  • Wet – Warm snow with a high moisture content.

Informal classification

[edit]

Skiers and others living with snow provide informal terms for snow conditions that they encounter.

  • Corn snow – Corn snow is coarse, granular snow, subject to freeze-thaw.[26]
  • Crud – Crud covers varieties of snow that all but advanced skiers find impassable. Subtypes are (a) windblown powder with irregularly shaped crust patches and ridges, (b) heavy tracked spring snow re-frozen to leave a deeply rutted surface strewn with loose blocks, (c) a deep layer of heavy snow saturated by rain (although this may go by another term).[39]
  • Packing snow – Packing snow is at or near the melting point, so that it can easily be packed into snowballs and thrown or used in the construction of a snowman, or a snow fort.[40]
  • Slush – Slush is substantially melted snow with visible water in it.[41]
  • Snirt – Snirt is an informal term for snow covered with dirt, especially where strong winds pick up topsoil from uncovered farm fields and blow it into nearby snowy areas. Also, dirty snow left over from plowing operations.[42]
  • Spring snow – Spring snow describes a variety of temperature and moisture conditions with corn snow.[38]
  • Watermelon snow – Watermelon snow is reddish pink, caused by a red-colored green algae called Chlamydomonas nivalis.[43]

In various cultures

[edit]
See also: Eskimo words for snow

Not surprisingly, in languages and cultures where snow is common, having different words for distinct weather conditions and types of snowfall is desirable for efficient communication.[44] Finnish,[45] Icelandic,[46] Norwegian,[47] Russian,[48][49] and Swedish[50] have multiple words and phrases relating to snow and snowfall, in some cases dozens or even hundreds, depending upon how one counts.

Studies of the Sámi languages of Norway, Sweden and Finland, conclude that the languages have anywhere from 180 snow- and ice-related words and as many as 300 different words for types of snow, tracks in snow, and conditions of the use of snow.[51][52]

The claim that Eskimo–Aleut languages (specifically, Yupik and Inuit) have an unusually large number of words for "snow", has been attributed to the work of anthropologist Franz Boas. Boas, who lived among Baffin islanders and learnt their language, reportedly included "only words representing meaningful distinctions" in his account.[53] A 2010 study follows the sometimes questionable scholarship regarding the question whether these languages have many more root words for "snow" than the English language.[54][53]

See also

[edit]
  • Glacier – Persistent body of ice that moves downhill under its own weight
  • Ice – Frozen water; the solid state of water
  • METAR – Format for weather reports used in aviation – a format for reporting weather information
  • The wrong type of snow – Byword for euphemistic and pointless excuses

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Classifications of snow

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Classifications of snow encompass systematic frameworks used in , , and to categorize snow based on its crystal morphology during , its stratigraphy and grain evolution after deposition, and its physical properties such as density, hardness, and water content. These systems facilitate standardized observations for applications including , water resource management, and risk assessment. The primary classification for falling snow focuses on ice crystal shapes, with the International Commission on Snow and Ice establishing seven principal types in 1951: plates, stellar crystals, columns, needles, spatial dendrites, capped columns, and irregular forms. This system, influenced by earlier work such as Ukichiro Nakaya's 1954 identification of 41 morphological types based on growth conditions like and , was expanded by Magono and Lee's 1966 classification into 80 subtypes, emphasizing variations in branching, riming, and aggregation. Additional precipitation forms include (soft hail pellets formed by riming), rime frost (opaque ice from supercooled droplets), and hoarfrost (delicate crystals from direct vapor deposition). For snow on the ground, the International Classification for Seasonal on the Ground (ICSSG), published in 2009 by under the International Association of Cryospheric Sciences (IACS), provides a comprehensive standard for describing evolution through . Originating from 1954 guidelines by the International Association of Scientific Hydrology and revised in 1990, the ICSSG delineates nine main grain types—precipitation particles (PP), machine-made snow (MM), decomposing and fragmented precipitation particles (DF), rounded grains (RG), faceted crystals (FC), depth hoar (DH), surface hoar (SH), melt forms (MF), and ice formations (IF)—along with subclasses based on shape, size, and bonding. stratigraphy under this system profiles vertical layers in snow pits, accounting for processes like equilibrium (slow rounding at low gradients) and kinetic (faceted growth under steep gradients), while measuring properties such as layer thickness, , (using hand-test indices), , and . These classifications extend to broader snowpack features, including new snow (fresh, low-density deposits), (intermediate granular stage toward glacier ice), and surface phenomena like crusts (hardened tops from melting or wind) or cornices (overhanging accumulations). By enabling consistent data exchange—supported by international data exchange formats such as CAAML (Canadian Avalanche Association )—they underpin global research on seasonal snow cover, which blankets about 46 million square kilometers annually and influences , ecosystems, and freshwater supplies.

Atmospheric Snow Classifications

Snow Crystal Morphology

Snow crystal morphology refers to the diverse physical shapes and structures that individual ice crystals adopt during their formation in the atmosphere, primarily through vapor deposition onto a site such as a particle. These morphologies arise from the interplay of , (), and atmospheric conditions, influencing the crystal's branching, , and overall habit. Typical sizes range from 0.1 to 5 in diameter, with hexagonal reflecting the underlying lattice structure. The foundational classification of snow crystal morphologies was developed in the 1930s by Japanese physicist Ukichiro Nakaya, who grew crystals in a under controlled conditions to mimic atmospheric processes. Nakaya's work identified seven major forms—stellar crystals, columns, plates, , spatial dendrites, capped columns, and irregular crystals—based on temperature and levels; for instance, low at temperatures between -5°C and -10°C favored simple prisms, while higher produced branched stellar plates. His observations of over 3,000 natural crystals and lab replications established the "Nakaya diagram," linking morphology to environmental factors like slow growth yielding columns and rapid growth forming dendrites. Building on Nakaya's framework, Choji Magono and Chung Woo Lee introduced a more detailed system in , categorizing 80 morphological types into eight principal groups: columns, plates, combination of columns and plates, spatial dendrites, dendrites, radiating assemblages of plates, irregular , and germ of . Examples include dendritic crystals forming at around -15°C under high , sector plates at -10°C to -12°C, and hollow columns at -5°C to -8°C with moderate ; the system includes diagrams illustrating formation conditions and accounts for asymmetries or modifications in natural settings. Modern refinements to snow crystal morphology classifications incorporate rimed (ice-coated) and aggregate (clumped) forms, recognizing their prevalence in real atmospheric conditions beyond pristine habits. A global expanded this to 121 categories, improving descriptions of complex particles. Recent updates, such as those informed by the International Association of Cryospheric Sciences (IACS) standards and observational databases, emphasize the physics of vapor deposition—where molecules attach anisotropically to crystal facets—and environmental influences like that can distort shapes during growth. Key concepts include branching patterns driven by in diffusion fields, leading to dendritic structures, and the near-perfect six-fold in low-turbulence environments. The growth rate of snow crystals is often modeled using diffusion-limited kinetics, where the radius rr evolves according to the approximate equation: drdt=DΔμrρ\frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{D \Delta \mu}{r \rho} Here, DD is the diffusion coefficient of water vapor in air, Δμ\Delta \mu is the chemical potential difference (related to supersaturation), and ρ\rho is the density of ice; this form highlights how growth slows with increasing size due to vapor diffusion constraints around protrusions.

Precipitation Particle Types

Precipitation particle types refer to the diverse forms that frozen hydrometeors take during their descent through the atmosphere, influenced by cloud microphysics, temperature profiles, and interactions with supercooled water. The (WMO) provides a standardized framework for classifying these particles in its , which distinguishes between pristine ice crystals, aggregated forms, rimed particles, and transitional types based on morphology, formation processes, and environmental conditions. This system, originally detailed in WMO publications from the mid-20th century and refined through ongoing meteorological standards, includes codes for observation in reports, such as those in the format for present . Updates to related guidelines emphasize consistency in describing particle characteristics during fallout, though precipitation-specific codes remain anchored in the definitions, with the 2009 International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground (ICSSG) by the International Association of Cryospheric Sciences providing complementary detail on fallout particles. Key types include pristine crystals, which are unrimed ice structures formed by vapor deposition in cold clouds; rimed crystals, where supercooled droplets freeze onto the crystal surface, leading to soft (lightly rimed, opaque, and fragile) or hard (heavily rimed, more rounded and dense); aggregates, known as snowflakes, consisting of 2 to over 100 bonded crystals; and transitional forms like sleet or , which are small, hard ice spheres formed by refreezing of partially melted snow. Dry snow pellets are brittle, white, opaque particles up to 4 mm in diameter, formed by riming in convective clouds without surface melting, while wet snow grains are smaller (≤1 mm), opaque, and elongated particles that occur when pellets partially melt near the ground, often under above-freezing surface temperatures. Distinctions are based on riming degree—light (minimal droplet accretion), moderate (partial obscuring of crystal structure), or heavy (dense, rounded form)—and thermal regimes, with dry forms prevalent below 0°C and wet forms indicating above that threshold. Aggregates form primarily through the collision-coalescence , where ice crystals collide and adhere due to surface properties, particularly in clouds with temperatures between -15°C and 0°C, where is "stickier" from quasi-liquid layers on crystal surfaces. This is enhanced in turbulent conditions, such as those in warm-frontal systems, leading to fluffy, low-density particles that dominate heavy snowfall events. For instance, storms along the U.S. East Coast often produce abundant aggregates due to persistent moisture and mild mid-level temperatures, resulting in rapid accumulation from loosely bound crystal clusters. Wet snow arises when particles encounter surface air temperatures exceeding 0°C, causing and adhesion upon impact, while sleet develops as a transitional form when snow melts in a warm layer aloft (>0°C) and refreezes in colder air below, forming solid 1-5 mm in diameter. Quantitatively, aggregate snowflakes exhibit distributions with diameters typically ranging from 1 to 10 mm, depending on the number of constituent and atmospheric , as observed in disdrometer measurements during diverse snowfall events. Fall speeds of these particles vary with size and density, approximated by the Stokes equation for small, low-Reynolds-number objects: v=2r2g(ρi−ρa)9ηv = \frac{2 r^2 g (\rho_i - \rho_a)}{9 \eta} where vv is the , rr is the particle radius, gg is , ρi\rho_i and ρa\rho_a are the densities of and air, respectively, and η\eta is air ; this yields velocities of 0.5-2 m/s for typical aggregates, slower than raindrops due to their porous structure. Pristine serve as precursors to these complex forms, growing initially in supersaturated conditions before undergoing riming or aggregation during descent.

Snowfall Event Intensity and Duration

Snowfall event intensity refers to the rate at which snow accumulates, typically measured in terms of liquid water equivalent (LWE) per hour, while duration encompasses the temporal extent of the , both critical for meteorological , planning, and assessing societal impacts such as transportation disruptions and risks. These classifications help distinguish between minor flurries and major storms, enabling timely warnings. Intensity is often gauged using automated weather stations or , with LWE providing a standardized metric that accounts for snow density variations. Meteorological conventions commonly categorize snowfall intensity based on LWE rates: light snowfall is defined as less than 1 mm/h, moderate as 1–2.5 mm/h, and heavy as greater than 2.5 mm/h. , the (NWS) issues advisories tied to accumulation thresholds rather than hourly rates alone; a Winter Storm Watch is typically issued for expected snowfalls of 13–15 cm (5–6 inches) in 12–24 hours, escalating to a Warning for 15 cm (6 inches) or more in 12 hours or 25 cm (10 inches) in 24 hours, varying slightly by region to reflect local impacts. These scales emphasize water equivalent to normalize comparisons across differing snow densities, where a 10:1 snow-to-water ratio implies 10 cm of snow equates to 1 cm of LWE. Event types further refine classifications by incorporating meteorological dynamics. A blizzard combines heavy snowfall or blowing snow with sustained winds of at least 56 km/h (35 mph) and visibility reduced to less than 400 m (0.25 miles) for three or more hours, posing severe risks from . Lake-effect snow events arise from cold air masses traversing relatively warm lake surfaces, such as the , producing localized, intense bands of narrow snowfall with rates exceeding 2.5 cm/h (1 inch/h) over downwind shores. In contrast, synoptic storms involve large-scale atmospheric systems, like extratropical cyclones, delivering widespread moderate to heavy snow over hundreds of kilometers through frontal lifting mechanisms. Duration categories include short events lasting less than 6 hours, such as snow squalls with rapid onset and intense bursts, and prolonged events exceeding 24 hours, often associated with stalled fronts in synoptic systems. Recent NWS standards, updated in 2023 to better address variable storm structures, incorporate climate variability factors like shifting patterns influenced by phenomena such as La Niña, which can amplify event intensity and duration in certain regions during the 2025–2026 winter. These updates also highlight emerging risks like events, where sudden drops below 0°C during or immediately after lead to rapid formation on surfaces, complicating . Quantitative assessment of total accumulation often uses simplified models, such as S=I×t×(1−m)S = I \times t \times (1 - m), where SS is total snow water equivalent (mm), II is average intensity (mm/h), tt is duration (h), and mm is a melt factor (0–1) accounting for temperatures near 0°C; more advanced implementations, like the NWS SNOW-17 model, integrate these via degree-day methods with seasonal melt factors ranging from 1.4 mm/°C/day (minimum) to 6.0 mm/°C/day (maximum). Historical examples illustrate these classifications' evolution. The was a prolonged multi-day synoptic event, dumping up to 1 m (3 feet) of snow along the U.S. East Coast with gale-force winds, resulting in over 400 deaths and paralyzing cities like New York for weeks. In contrast, modern rapid-onset events, such as intense winter storms in the mid-latitudes, are increasingly influenced by Arctic amplification—where the Arctic warms nearly four times faster than the global average—disrupting stability and promoting sudden, heavy snowfall bursts over shorter durations.

Snowpack and Ground Snow Classifications

Internal Snowpack Structure and Layers

The internal structure of a snowpack consists of vertically stacked layers that reflect successive events, post-depositional , and environmental influences, forming a stratigraphic profile critical for assessing stability and water retention. These layers vary in thickness, typically from millimeters to tens of centimeters, and evolve over time through processes like , vapor transport, and compaction. Understanding this layering is fundamental to and forecasting, as weak interfaces between layers can lead to failure under load. The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground (ICSSG), established by Fierz et al. in 2009 under the International Association of Cryospheric Sciences (IACS), standardizes the description of layers and remains the primary framework as of 2025, with a in preparation by the IACS Working Group on Snow Classification. This system standardizes the description of layers using 9 main grain form classes (with subclasses), (measured in millimeters), and bonding strength (classified as good or poor, indicating cohesive or weak interfaces). Examples include precipitation particles (unmetamorphosed fresh ), wind slabs (dense, compacted wind-transported snow with rounded grains), and melt-freeze crusts (thin, impermeable layers from diurnal freezing). Other types encompass decomposing and fragmented precipitation particles (disintegrated fresh ), rounded grains (equi-dimensional from isothermal metamorphism), faceted crystals (angular from moderate gradients), depth hoar (large, plate-like facets from strong gradients), surface hoar (delicate frost crystals buried by later ), melt forms (granular from ), layers (from or hoar metamorphism), and (saturated, water-soaked base). Layer formation begins with the sequential deposition of atmospheric particles, which initially retain their morphology before undergoing driven by gradients, differences, and . In shallow snowpacks, particularly in or arid regions, depth hoar develops preferentially at the base where steep gradients (often exceeding 10°C/m or 1°C per 10 cm depth) promote kinetic growth of faceted crystals through sublimation and vapor redeposition, creating weak, low-density layers prone to . The of these layers evolves over time through compaction and metamorphic in dry snow regimes. Key properties for classifying and evaluating layers include the hand hardness index, a qualitative scale from 1 (fist penetrates easily, indicating soft snow) to 5 (pencil required for penetration, denoting hard layers), and ram resistance, quantified via rammsonde devices that measure the force (in newtons) or critical depth of penetration to gauge layer strength and stability. Regional variations significantly influence layering: maritime snowpacks, common in coastal areas like the Pacific Northwest, develop deeper, denser profiles with frequent cohesive rounded-grain layers due to mild temperatures and high precipitation rates; in contrast, continental snowpacks in interior mountain ranges, such as the Rockies, feature shallower accumulations with prominent weak faceted and depth hoar layers from extreme cold and low humidity, exacerbating temperature gradients. Profiling techniques traditionally involve manual snow pits, where a vertical wall is excavated to expose the full profile for visual, tactile, and instrumental analysis of layer interfaces. Recent protocols advance this with automated profiling sondes, such as UAV-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR), enabling non-destructive, high-resolution mapping of layer boundaries and properties over larger areas, integrating dielectric contrasts from radar reflections.

Snowpack Material Properties

Snowpack material properties encompass the intrinsic physical and thermal attributes of as a , crucial for applications in , , and engineering design. These properties, such as , thermal conductivity, and grain characteristics, evolve through and environmental influences, enabling predictions of water retention, , and structural stability independent of vertical layering. serves as a fundamental property, quantifying the per unit of and influencing its mechanical and hydrological behavior. New typically exhibits densities ranging from 50 to 200 kg/m³ due to its loose, airy structure immediately after deposition. Settled , after compaction by or time, reaches 200 to 400 kg/m³, reflecting increased bonding and reduced air content. , an intermediate stage toward , exceeds 550 kg/m³, approaching the of solid at around 830 kg/m³. These classifications are determined through core sampling, where a cylindrical sampler extracts a known of for , providing bulk or layer-specific densities with high precision. Thermal properties govern through the , critical for modeling energy balance in cold regions. Thermal conductivity (k) of varies from 0.1 to 2.5 W/m·K, strongly correlating with —lower for fresh, low- (around 0.1 W/m·K) and higher for dense (up to 2.5 W/m·K)—while also depending on , with values increasing as temperatures approach the . further modulates these properties; dry maintains less than 1% liquid water by volume, preserving low conductivity and high insulation, whereas wet exceeds 8%, enhancing and promoting melt . These scales distinguish regimes from dry (negligible liquid) to soaked, affecting overall pack stability. Grain classifications, standardized by the International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground (ICSSG), describe snow's microstructural elements, including shape and size, which dictate permeability and strength. Common shapes include rounded grains (smooth, equidimensional), faceted crystals (angular, prism-like), and dendritic forms (branched, from initial ), with sizes typically spanning 0.1 to 5 mm—finer for fresh snow and coarser for metamorphosed layers. drives these changes: equi-temperature metamorphism, under weak gradients (<10°C/m), promotes rounding and bonding via vapor diffusion based on curvature differences, yielding compact, rounded grains. In contrast, temperature-gradient metamorphism (>10–46°C/m) fosters and depth hoar through preferential vapor transport from warmer to colder regions, creating weak, angular structures. Ongoing revisions to IACS standards, with an updated ICSSG in preparation as of , aim to integrate these properties for enhanced modeling, incorporating permeability (air and water flow resistance) and (surface reflectivity, typically 0.8–0.9 for fresh ) to refine simulations of snow-atmosphere interactions. Permeability, often 10^{-9} to 10^{-12} , links to and , enabling accurate forecasting of vapor and energy exchange. Water flow in wet follows , expressed as q=−K∇h\mathbf{q} = -K \nabla h where q\mathbf{q} is the flux vector (m/s), KK is hydraulic conductivity (m/s), and ∇h\nabla h is the hydraulic head gradient (dimensionless), quantifying percolation rates critical for meltwater routing.

Surface and Metamorphic Features

Surface and metamorphic features encompass alterations to the uppermost layers of snow due to wind, thermal gradients, and other environmental processes, influencing thermal insulation, surface erosion, and interactions with overlying snow. These features form through dynamic metamorphism, where snow crystals evolve in response to external forces, creating distinct textures and structures that can persist or evolve over time. Wind-induced features arise primarily from drifting and when wind speeds exceed 5 m/s, initiating snow saltation and compaction. Sastrugi consist of sharp, eroded ridges and furrows aligned perpendicular to the prevailing , often reaching heights of up to 3 meters, sculpted by on windward faces and deposition on leeward sides. crusts form as dense, compacted layers typically 1-10 cm thick through wind packing of surface grains, creating a hard, smooth overlay that enhances resistance to further . dunes develop from accumulated drifted snow in transverse or longitudinal patterns, with bedform wavelengths scaling with wind intensity, as observed in polar regions where sustained winds redistribute fresh snowfall. Thermal-induced metamorphism drives changes via temperature gradients and diurnal cycles, particularly in transitional melt zones. Sun crusts emerge as a melt-refreeze layer on the surface, where daytime solar radiation causes followed by nocturnal refreezing, resulting in a firm, icy cap that can span several centimeters in thickness. Depth hoar forms through basal driven by vapor under strong vertical gradients, producing large, angular crystals at the snowpack base that weaken cohesion but influence surface stability when exposed. In regions with diurnal swings, such as mid-latitude mountains, these cycles accelerate melt-refreeze processes, amplifying crust formation and altering surface . Other notable features include hoar frost surfaces and penitentes, classified by their morphological and mechanical properties. Surface hoar develops as feathery ice crystals via direct vapor deposition when the snow surface cools below the air frost point, often under calm, clear nights, forming fragile, up to several millimeters tall plumes. Penitentes appear as elongated, blade-like spikes up to 5 meters high in arid, high-altitude environments, resulting from differential sublimation enhanced by solar radiation and low humidity, with blades oriented toward the sun's path. These features are differentiated by thickness (e.g., thin <1 cm friable layers versus thicker supportive ones) and , such as breakable crusts that shatter under light load compared to support crusts that bear skier weight without fracturing. Quantitative assessment of these features relies on penetration tests to measure crust strength, where devices like constant-speed penetrometers record resistance forces, revealing variations from 0.1 to over 10 kPa depending on formation conditions. Recent 2025 research uses combined with and snow probe data to estimate snow depth and infer surface at high resolutions below 1 meter, improving large-scale monitoring in alpine and polar settings.

Applied and Cultural Snow Classifications

Practical Classifications in Recreation and Safety

In recreational activities such as and , snow conditions on pistes are classified to inform participants about suitability and required techniques, with common categories including , packed powder, icy, and moguls. refers to fresh, uncompacted that is light and deep, offering buoyant flotation but demanding wider turns to avoid sinking; this condition is prized for its softness and speed but can challenge balance for novices. Packed powder describes that has been groomed or trafficked into a firm yet forgiving surface, providing consistent edge grip ideal for carving; machine grooming often creates "" ridges for enhanced control. Icy conditions arise from refrozen or wind-hardened , resulting in a slick, low-friction surface that increases fall risk and requires precise edging; these are prevalent after freeze-thaw cycles. Moguls form as irregular bumps in ungroomed areas from repeated skier impacts, testing and absorption skills through rhythmic navigation of the undulating . Resorts often supplement these with informal 1-10 scales for groomed run quality, where 1 indicates unskiable ice or thin cover and 10 denotes pristine, deep or perfectly maintained , helping users select runs via apps or signs. Avalanche forecasting employs stability classifications to assess snowpack integrity, particularly focusing on weak layers that can trigger slides, with tools like the Canadian Layer Form and Layer Flow profiles used by forecasters to evaluate bonding and deformation potential in buried interfaces such as surface hoar or facets. The Layer Form assesses the structural continuity of weak layers across slopes, while Layer Flow examines their deformability under load, aiding in identifying propagation-prone zones; these are integral to Canadian Avalanche Association protocols for backcountry safety. Public warnings standardize danger into a 1-5 scale adopted by the Swiss Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF) and the European Avalanche Warning Services (EAWS), where level 1 (low) indicates stable snow with minimal triggering likelihood, level 2 (moderate) suggests isolated slabs possible on steep terrain, level 3 (considerable) warns of widespread avalanches from small triggers, level 4 (high) expects frequent large slides, and level 5 (very high) signals imminent massive releases; this scale integrates snowpack tests, weather, and observations for daily bulletins. Beyond recreation, practical classifications guide transportation and ; for road clearance, drifting snow denotes wind-blown accumulations that reduce visibility and form hazardous piles, contrasting with packed snow, which bonds to pavement as a dense, slippery layer resistant to plowing and often requiring salting or sanding for traction. In , snow water equivalent (SWE) quantifies potential for supply forecasting, calculated as SWE=ρ×d\text{SWE} = \rho \times d, where ρ\rho is snow density and dd is depth; this metric, measured via snow pillows or probes, informs operations and planning by estimating seasonal runoff volumes. As of 2025, enhances these classifications through real-time apps, integrating sensor data, satellite imagery, and to predict conditions and risks; for instance, ' My Epic app uses AI to deliver personalized recommendations based on dynamic analyses.

Cultural and Informal Naming Systems

Cultural and informal naming systems for snow vary widely across societies, often rooted in practical needs, environmental adaptation, and aesthetic appreciation rather than scientific precision. These systems highlight how communities perceive and interact with snow in daily life, , and recreation. In and of , snow terminology is rich and context-specific, debunking the exaggerated myth of hundreds of distinct words while affirming a vocabulary of approximately 20 to 50 terms that differentiate snow by its form, state, and utility. For example, qanik describes lightly falling snow, and aput refers to the snow accumulated on the ground. Comparative linguistic analysis across 616 languages confirms that exhibit an exceptional density of snow-related terms, reflecting adaptations to a snow-dominated environment. The of northern and employ traditional snow classifications integral to , with terms emphasizing qualities that affect animal movement and foraging. Notably, seaŋáš denotes coarse-grained, depth-hoar snow that allows to paw through to underlying vegetation, a feature vital for winter survival. Ethnographic research documents over a dozen such categories, blending descriptive accuracy with generations of herding knowledge. In English-speaking regions, particularly among North American skiers and snowboarders, informal names capture snow's recreational appeal, such as for dry, loose, uncompacted fresh snow; for wet, heavy, partially melted accumulations; and corn for rounded granules formed by diurnal freeze-thaw cycles, favored for its carveable surface in late-season conditions. Regional variants like champagne powder celebrate the ultra-light, dry flakes synonymous with high-altitude resorts in the . Japanese cultural views on snow align with wabi-sabi, the aesthetic embracing impermanence and subtle imperfection, where snow's ephemeral beauty—melting forms and transient landscapes—evokes a profound sense of life's fleeting harmony. This philosophy permeates literature, art, and seasonal rituals, such as viewing snow-draped gardens as symbols of quiet transience. On modern social media platforms, trends amplify informal slang like #deeppowder and #powday, used by winter sports communities to denote abundant, skiable fresh snow and foster shared excitement over storm events. These hashtags, surging in popularity during peak seasons, reflect how digital culture adapts traditional terms for global, real-time engagement.

References

  1. https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/snow/science-snow
  2. https://cryosphericsciences.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/snowclass_2009-11-23-tagged-highres.pdf
  3. https://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/class/class-old.htm
  4. https://cryosphericsciences.org/publications/snow-classification/
  5. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-formation-of-snow-crystals
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/ukichiro-nakaya19001962/24EF3740A5C1D7F4606A247B180BF100
  7. https://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/publist/engsci2.pdf
  8. https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2115/8672
  9. https://www.patarnott.com/atms360/pdf_atms360/class2015/MaganoLeeSnow.pdf
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169809513001841
  11. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01269-7
  12. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.08528
  13. https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/943.pdf
  14. https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=BLIZZARD
  15. https://www.weather.gov/safety/winter-lake-effect-snow
  16. https://www.weather.gov/dtx/winter_defs
  17. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/winter/types/
  18. https://www.foxweather.com/weather-news/winter-storm-warning-criteria-nws-new
  19. https://www.weather.gov/media/owp/oh/hrl/docs/22snow17.pdf
  20. https://www.britannica.com/event/Great-Blizzard-of-1888
  21. https://www.nsf.gov/news/rapid-arctic-warming-likely-drives-extreme-winter
  22. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186462
  23. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009JF001269
  24. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.avalancheassociation.ca/resource/resmgr/itp_Wx_CD/Intro_Papers/SnowAvalancheClimates_Armstr.pdf
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390334301_UAV-BORNE_GROUND_PENETRATING_RADAR_FOR_AVALANCHE_FORECASTING
  26. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacier-processes/from-snow-to-glacier-ice/
  27. https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/10/371/2016/tc-10-371-2016.pdf
  28. https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/13/1843/2019/tc-13-1843-2019.pdf
  29. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022MS002998
  30. https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/2520/5771/
  31. https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/7/1915/2013/
  32. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/theory-of-water-percolation-in-snow/960C15627D9F8370BF92D23E388727AD
  33. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Classification-of-Snow-Metamorphism-Sommerfeld-Lachapelle/03fb7b038bb1790c7a9de4a65008975ac58ad5dc
  34. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015JF003529
  35. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2012JC008192
  36. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annals-of-glaciology/article/energy-balance-and-formation-of-sun-crust-in-snow/B0765BA3E80CFC70F8B6AB840893B8C8
  37. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/64/6/1520-0477_1983_064_0602_spmits_2_0_co_2.pdf
  38. https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/3/31/2009/tc-3-31-2009.pdf
  39. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009wr008198
  40. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/on-the-formation-of-snow-penitentes/B295C525E57B57785BE389557272DF9D
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annals-of-glaciology/article/constantspeed-penetrometer-for-highresolution-snow-stratigraphy/5D0A9FDD8CF4754303D1A2B09634335B
  42. https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/3123/2025/
  43. https://investors.vailresorts.com/news-releases/news-release-details/vail-resorts-announces-my-epic-assistant-my-epic-app-powered
  44. https://theconversation.com/do-inuit-languages-really-have-many-words-for-snow-the-most-interesting-finds-from-our-study-of-616-languages-252522
  45. https://www.uaf.edu/anlc/research-and-resources/resources/archives/inuit_snow_terms.php
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165232X12001863
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Sami-snow-categories-used-in-our-fieldwork-and-their-relevance-for-reindeer-herding-Main_tbl1_281308904
  48. https://www.redbull.com/us-en/different-types-of-snow
  49. https://www.skiutah.com/blog/authors/annie-davis/guide-to-snow-types-and-what-it-means-for-your/
  50. https://www.tofugu.com/japan/wabi-sabi/
  51. https://www.dopesnow.com/mag/snowboard-slang/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.