Hubbry Logo
UnderwritingUnderwritingMain
Open search
Underwriting
Community hub
Underwriting
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Underwriting
Underwriting
Underwriting
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Underwriting (UW)[1] services are provided by some large financial institutions, such as banks, insurance companies and investment houses, whereby they guarantee payment in case of damage or financial loss and accept the financial risk for liability arising from such guarantee. An underwriting arrangement may be created in a number of situations including insurance, issues of security in a public offering, and bank lending, among others. The person or institution that agrees to sell a minimum number of securities of the company for commission is called the underwriter.

History

[edit]

The term "underwriting" derives from the Lloyd's of London insurance market. Financial backers (or risk takers), who would accept some of the risk on a given venture (historically a sea voyage with associated risks of shipwreck) in exchange for a premium, would literally write their names under the risk information that was written on a Lloyd's slip created for this purpose.[2][3]

Securities underwriting

[edit]

In the financial primary market, securities underwriting is the process by which investment banks raise investment capital from buyers on behalf of corporations and governments by issuing securities (such as stocks or bonds). As an underwriter, the investment bank guarantees a price for these securities, facilitates the issuance of the securities, and then sells them to the public (or retains them for their own proprietary account).[4] This process is often seen in initial public offerings (IPOs), where investment banks help a corporation raise funds from the public. The underwriter is obligated to purchase the entire issue at a predetermined price before reselling the securities in the market.[5] Should they not be able to find buyers, they will have to hold some securities themselves. To reduce the risk, they may form a syndicate with other investment banks. Each bank will buy a portion of the security issue, and typically resell securities from that portion to the public.[6] Underwriters make their profit from the price difference (called "underwriting spread") between the price they pay the issuer and what they collect from buyers or from broker-dealers who buy portions of the offering.

The services provided in the process of underwriting include:

  1. Giving advice on whether to issue stocks or bonds, the timing of issuance (ideally, corporations should sell securities when they will obtain the highest possible price). Underwriters also have to determine at what price the security should be sold.[7]
  2. Filing documents: assisting companies with making the filings required by financial authorities. Companies issuing new securities to the general public must file a registration statement detailing their financial conditions, management, competition, industry, experience, funding purposes, and securities' risk assessment. A portion of this statement is reproduced in a document called a prospectus, which investors can access to obtain information about new securities.[8]
  3. Underwriting: A company sells the entire issue to the underwriter at an agreed price. The underwriter will then sell it to the public at a higher price to achieve a profit, to the extent that it does not retain part of the issue as a proprietary holding.[6]

Risk, exclusivity, and reward

[edit]

Once the underwriting agreement is struck, the underwriter bears the risk of being unable to sell the underlying securities, and the cost of holding them on its books until such time in the future that they may be favorably sold.

If the instrument is desirable, the underwriter and the securities issuer may choose to enter into an exclusivity agreement. In exchange for a higher price paid upfront to the issuer, or other favorable terms, the issuer may agree to make the underwriter the exclusive agent for the initial sale of the securities instrument. That is, even though third-party buyers might approach the issuer directly to buy, the issuer agrees to sell exclusively through the underwriter.

In summary, the securities issuer gets cash up front, access to the contacts and sales channels of the underwriter, and is insulated from the market risk of being unable to sell the securities at a good price. The underwriter receives a profit from the markup, plus the possibility of an exclusive sales agreement.

Also, if the securities are priced significantly below market price (as is often the custom), the underwriter also curries favor with powerful customers by granting them an immediate profit (see flipping), perhaps in a quid pro quo. This practice, which is typically justified as the reward for the underwriter for taking on the market risk, is occasionally criticized as unethical, such as the allegations that investment banker Frank Quattrone acted improperly in doling out hot IPO stock during the dot-com bubble.

In an attempt to capture more of the value of their securities for themselves, issuing companies are increasingly turning to alternative vehicles for going public, such as direct listings and SPACs.[citation needed]

Bank underwriting

[edit]

In banking, underwriting is the detailed credit analysis preceding the granting of a loan, based on credit information furnished by the borrower; such underwriting falls into several areas:

  • Consumer loan underwriting includes the verification of such items as employment history, salary and financial statements; publicly available information, such as the borrower's credit history, which is detailed in a credit report; and the lender's evaluation of the borrower's credit needs and ability to pay. Examples include mortgage underwriting.
  • Commercial (or business) underwriting consists of the evaluation of financial information provided by small businesses including analysis of the business balance sheet including tangible net worth, the ratio of debt to worth (leverage) and available liquidity (current ratio). Analysis of the income statement typically includes revenue trends, gross margin, profitability, and debt service coverage.

Underwriting can also refer to the purchase of corporate bonds, commercial paper, government securities, municipal general-obligation bonds by a commercial bank or dealer bank for its own account or for resale to investors. Bank underwriting of corporate securities is carried out through separate holding-company affiliates, called securities affiliates or Section 20 affiliates.[citation needed]

Of late, the discourse on underwriting has been dominated by the advent of machine learning in this space. These profound technological innovations are altering the way traditional underwriting scorecards have been built, and are displacing human underwriters with automation. Natural language understanding allows the consideration of more sources of information to assess risk than used previously.[9] These algorithms typically use modern data sources such as SMS / Email for banking information, location data to verify addresses, and so on. Several firms are trying to build models that can gauge a customer's willingness to pay using social media data by applying natural language understanding algorithms which essentially try to analyse and quantify a person's popularity / likability and so on, with the premise being that people scoring high on these parameters are less likely to default on a loan. However, this area is still vastly subjective.[citation needed]

Insurance underwriting

[edit]

Insurance underwriters evaluate the risk and exposures of potential clients. They decide how much coverage the client should receive, how much they should pay for it, and whether to accept the risk. Underwriting involves measuring risk exposure and determining the premium that needs to be charged to insure that risk. The function of the underwriter is to protect the company's book of business from risks that they feel will make a loss and issue insurance policies at a premium that is commensurate with the exposure presented by a risk.

Each insurance company has its own set of underwriting guidelines to help the underwriter determine whether or not the company should accept the risk. The information used to evaluate the risk of an applicant for insurance will depend on the type of coverage involved. For example, in underwriting automobile coverage, an individual's driving record is critical. However, the type of automobile is actually far more critical.[citation needed] As part of the underwriting process for life or health insurance, medical underwriting may be used to examine the applicant's health status (other factors may be considered as well, such as occupation and risky pursuits) and decide whether the policy can be issued on the standard terms applicable to the customer's age. The factors that insurers use to classify risks are generally objective, clearly related to the likely cost of providing coverage, practical to administer, consistent with applicable law, and designed to protect the long-term viability of the insurance program.[10]

Underwriters may choose to decline a risk, provide a quotation with adjusted premiums, or apply policy exclusions. Adjusted premiums typically include a loading factor,[11] which accounts for administrative costs, expected claims, and a margin for profit.[12] Policy exclusions, on the other hand, limit the circumstances under which claims can be made. Depending on the type of insurance product (line of business), insurance companies use automated underwriting systems to encode these rules, and reduce the amount of manual work in processing quotations and policy issuance. This is especially the case for certain simpler life or personal lines (auto, homeowners) insurance. Some insurance companies, however, rely on agents to underwrite for them. This arrangement allows an insurer to operate in a market closer to its clients without having to establish a physical presence.

Two major categories of exclusion in insurance underwriting are moral hazard and correlated losses.[13] With a moral hazard, the consequences of the customer's actions are insured, making the customer more likely to take costly actions. For example, bedbugs are typically excluded from homeowners' insurance to avoid paying for the consequence of recklessly bringing in a used mattress.[13] Insured events are generally those outside the control of the customer, for example in life insurance, death by automobile accident is typically covered, but death by suicide is typically not covered. [citation needed] Correlated losses are those that can affect a large number of customers at the same time, thus potentially bankrupting the insurance company. This is why typical homeowner's policies cover damage from fire or falling trees (usually affecting an individual house), but not floods or earthquakes (which affect many houses at the same time).[13]

For all types of insurance underwriting, advice and assistance is often provided by reinsurers, who of course have an interest in accepting risks on appropriate terms. See Financial risk management § Insurance.

Other forms

[edit]

Continuous underwriting

[edit]

Continuous underwriting is the process in which the risks involved in insuring people or assets are being evaluated and analyzed on a continuous basis. It evolved from the traditional underwriting, in which the risks only get assessed before the policy is signed or renewed. Continuous underwriting was first used in workers' compensation, where the premium of the insurance was updated monthly, based on the insured's submitted payroll. It is also used in life insurance[14] and cyber insurance.[15][16]

Real estate underwriting

[edit]

Real estate underwriting is the evaluation of a real estate investment, either of equity ownership or of a real estate loan. The underwriting process generally involves a detailed analysis of expected cash flows, the local market, supply and demand, and risks such as the physical state of the property, environmental or geotechnical risks, zoning, taxes, and insurance. In the evaluation of a real estate loan, lenders assess both the risk of lending to a specific borrower as well as the risk of the underlying real estate. Loan underwriters use various metrics including debt service coverage ratio, loan-to-value ratio, and debt yield ratio to assess out whether the property is capable of making debt service payments.

Forensic underwriting

[edit]

Forensic underwriting is the "after-the-fact" process used by lenders to determine what went wrong with a mortgage.[17] Forensic underwriting is a borrower's ability to work out a modification scenario with their current lien holder, not to qualify them for a new loan or a refinance. This is typically done by an underwriter staffed with a team of people who are experienced in every aspect of the real estate field.

Sponsorship underwriting

[edit]
Main article: Underwriting spot

Underwriting may also refer to financial sponsorship of a venture, and is also used as a term within public broadcasting (both public television and radio) to describe funding given by a company or organization for the operations of the service, in exchange for a mention of their product or service within the station's programming.

Thomson Financial league tables

[edit]

Underwriting activity in the mergers and acquisitions, equity issuance, debt issuance, syndicated loans and U.S. municipal bond markets is reported in the Thomson Financial league tables.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Underwriting

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Underwriting is the process by which financial institutions evaluate and assume in exchange for a , typically involving the assessment of potential liabilities in contexts such as policies, securities issuances, and loans to determine eligibility, , and terms. This practice originated in the at in , where merchants would underwrite shares of for maritime voyages by signing their names beneath the details of the venture, thereby assuming proportional liability. Today, underwriting serves as a critical mechanism, enabling institutions to price products fairly while protecting against excessive losses, and it applies across diverse sectors including , capital markets, and banking. In the insurance industry, underwriting involves examining an applicant's risk profile—such as health history, occupation, or property details—to decide whether to provide coverage, classify the risk level, and set the appropriate premium and policy terms. Insurance underwriters, often certified professionals, analyze data from applications, medical records, and external sources to mitigate the insurer's exposure to claims, with decisions ranging from approval with standard rates to denial or modified conditions for high-risk cases. Regulatory frameworks, such as those from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), emphasize fair practices, including prohibitions on discrimination based on pre-existing conditions under the Affordable Care Act since 2014, ensuring broader access while maintaining solvency. This process not only groups policyholders into risk pools but also influences overall market stability by balancing premium income against expected payouts. In securities markets, particularly for initial public offerings (IPOs), underwriting entails investment banks purchasing shares from an issuing company and reselling them to investors, thereby assuming the risk of unsold inventory while facilitating capital raising. Underwriters form syndicates to distribute risk, conducting due diligence on the issuer's financials, market conditions, and valuation to recommend an offering price, often through firm commitment arrangements where they guarantee the sale or best efforts where they sell without purchase obligation. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees these activities to ensure disclosure and investor protection, with the process typically spanning 6 to 9 months and culminating in a public prospectus detailing the terms. Compensation for underwriters, usually 5-7% of proceeds, reflects the risk borne in stabilizing post-IPO trading and allocating shares primarily to institutional buyers. Beyond and securities, underwriting extends to lending, where banks or lenders review borrower worthiness, income, assets, and collateral to approve loans like , setting rates and conditions to minimize default . In , for instance, automated systems and manual reviews comply with federal guidelines under the , typically taking 40 to 50 days to balance efficiency with thorough . Across all forms, effective underwriting relies on , actuarial models, and to foster and informed decision-making.

Fundamentals

Definition and Etymology

Underwriting is the process by which an underwriter evaluates and assumes on behalf of another in exchange for a , primarily within the fields of and to enable transactions such as initial public offerings (IPOs), loans, or insurance policies. In this capacity, the underwriter assesses the potential liability associated with the transaction, determines appropriate terms and pricing, and guarantees coverage or purchase to mitigate for the principal parties involved. This risk assumption facilitates capital raising and protection against losses, serving as a foundational mechanism in across economic sectors. The term "underwriting" originates from practices at in during the late , where merchants and insurers would list details of shipping ventures on slips of paper and sign their names beneath them to indicate the portion of they agreed to bear. This act of subscribing "under" the risk description symbolized shared liability, evolving from informal maritime arrangements into the standardized terminology still used today. The practice, back to around , laid the groundwork for modern syndication in risk distribution. Within underwriting arrangements, a distinction exists between primary and secondary underwriters: the primary underwriter acts as the initial risk taker, often leading the evaluation and commitment, while secondary underwriters participate through syndication, sharing portions of the risk to diversify exposure. This structure allows for efficient scaling of large risks, with the primary entity coordinating the process and secondary participants contributing additional capacity. In contemporary non-financial contexts, underwriting extends to sponsorship models, such as when organizations provide funding to underwrite specific events or projects, assuming costs in exchange for promotional benefits, as seen in nonprofit for conferences or media productions.

Core Principles

Underwriting rests on several foundational principles that guide across insurance, securities, and banking sectors. Central to these is due diligence, which requires thorough investigation of an applicant's financial history, operational details, and potential exposures to ensure informed decision-making. Another key principle is the prevention of adverse selection, where higher-risk applicants might disproportionately seek coverage or financing due to hidden , leading underwriters to implement screening mechanisms like detailed disclosures and verification processes to maintain portfolio balance. Similarly, reducing moral hazard—the incentive for insured or financed parties to engage in riskier behavior post-approval—involves structuring terms with deductibles, covenants, or monitoring clauses to align interests and minimize post-transaction losses. Finally, premium or fee determination is based on expected loss calculations, using probabilistic models to price risks such that revenues cover anticipated claims, defaults, or issuances while ensuring profitability. The general underwriting process follows a structured sequence applicable to diverse fields. It begins with application review, where initial submissions are screened for completeness and basic eligibility, often involving questionnaires on financial status or factors. This leads to , encompassing reports, medical exams (in ), financial statements, or market analyses to gather verifiable . Next comes , a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of probability and impact, incorporating historical data, , and interdependencies to classify as acceptable or excessive. The decision phase then determines whether to accept the , decline it, or modify terms—such as adjusting premiums, loan amounts, or coverage limits—to achieve a favorable risk-reward profile. Throughout and beyond approval, ongoing monitoring tracks changes in profiles via periodic reviews or covenants, enabling adjustments to prevent deterioration. A core challenge in underwriting is information asymmetry, where applicants possess private knowledge about their risks that underwriters lack, potentially leading to mispriced deals or market inefficiencies. To counter this, underwriters employ actuarial data in insurance—drawing on statistical models of loss probabilities from large datasets—and financial models in banking and securities, such as discounted cash flow analyses or credit scoring algorithms, to estimate true risk levels and balance exposure against returns. These tools promote transparency, with mandatory disclosures helping to reveal hidden risks like undisclosed liabilities in loan applications or pre-existing conditions in insurance policies. Ethical considerations underpin underwriting to ensure equitable practices. Fairness in demands that rates reflect objective assessments rather than arbitrary factors, avoiding undue burdens on vulnerable groups while complying with regulatory standards for transparency. Non-discrimination principles prohibit unfair bias against protected characteristics such as race, with regulations varying by , sector, and product; for example, in the U.S., state laws ban in rates and coverage, while may be used as a legitimate in actuarial for certain products like auto or , and the (2010) prohibits discrimination based on pre-existing conditions in . Underwriters must thus prioritize evidence-based evaluations to uphold access to financial products without systemic exclusion.

Historical Development

Origins in Maritime Insurance

The practice of in gained legal structure with the Marine Insurance Act of 1601, which established a specialized chamber of assurance at the Royal Exchange to arbitrate disputes arising from policies covering ships and merchandise against sea perils. This legislation formalized customary practices imported from Mediterranean traders, enabling merchants to transfer risks such as storms, , or capture to insurers, thereby facilitating expanding transatlantic and European . The Act's provisions emphasized for losses, laying the groundwork for shared risk assumption that defined early underwriting. By the late , marine underwriting coalesced around informal markets, with the Royal Exchange serving as a key venue for brokers and merchants to negotiate policies since its establishment in 1571. In 1688, Edward Lloyd's coffee house on Tower Street in emerged as a pivotal hub, attracting shipowners, merchants, and wealthy individuals seeking to insure voyages. Lloyd, a savvy entrepreneur, provided shipping news and hosted auctions, drawing crowds that transformed the venue into London's primary center for transactions by the 1690s. Central to this development was the "underwriting slip," a concise contractual detailing the insured vessel, value, voyage route, and specific perils, upon which multiple underwriters inscribed their signatures and the percentage of liability they accepted. This allowed risks to be distributed among syndicates of underwriters—groups of investors pooling capital to limit exposure—rather than borne by a single entity, a practice that originated in the coffee house gatherings and became standard by the early . The slip's efficiency enabled rapid agreement on terms, with premiums calculated based on the voyage's hazards, marking the birth of modern risk-sharing mechanisms in .

Evolution in Securities and Banking

The rise of securities underwriting in the was closely tied to the expansion of the American railroad industry, which required massive capital for construction and operations. Investment banking houses emerged to facilitate the issuance of railroad bonds and stocks, marking some of the earliest large-scale public offerings in the United States. By the 1830s and 1840s, railroads began listing shares on exchanges like the , with notable examples including the Mohawk and Hudson Railroad's 1831 offering, often considered among the first U.S. IPOs. Firms such as played a pivotal role, particularly from the 1880s onward, by reorganizing failing railroads and underwriting bonds to stabilize the sector; for instance, Morgan helped underwrite $40 million in bonds in 1880, helping to consolidate the industry and attract investor capital. In the 1920s, underwriting practices evolved with the formation of investment banking syndicates, which distributed risk and broadened market access for large issuances. These syndicates involved multiple banks pooling resources to underwrite and sell securities, a method that gained prominence amid the era's economic boom. A key example was the 1920 underwriting of General Motors Corporation stock, where a syndicate led by J.P. Morgan & Co. and including DuPont interests issued approximately 3.2 million shares to refinance and expand the automaker, raising tens of millions in capital and exemplifying how syndicates enabled the scaling of corporate finance. This structure not only mitigated individual bank exposure but also fueled the speculative fervor of the decade by efficiently channeling funds into industrial growth. Following the , which exposed vulnerabilities in short-term credit markets and led to widespread bank runs, commercial banks refined their underwriting processes for corporate loans to enhance stability. Banks began more rigorously assessing borrower creditworthiness, collateral, and repayment capacity, shifting from lending to structured evaluation frameworks. The establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 played a crucial role in this evolution by providing a and stabilizing credit markets through lending and operations, which encouraged banks to extend loans to corporations with greater confidence. For example, during the , the Fed's policies supported a surge in commercial lending, with corporate loans outstanding growing from about $4 billion in 1914 to over $20 billion by 1929, underscoring its impact on underwriting prudence. The 1929 stock market crash and ensuing profoundly reshaped underwriting by highlighting conflicts between commercial and investment banking activities. Widespread failures occurred as banks used depositor funds for speculative securities underwriting, amplifying losses when markets collapsed. In response, the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 mandated the separation of commercial banking (focused on deposits and loans) from (securities underwriting and trading), prohibiting commercial banks from affiliating with investment houses. This division aimed to protect depositors and prevent future crises, leading to the divestiture of securities affiliates by major banks like National City Bank and fundamentally altering underwriting structures until partial repeal in 1999.

20th and 21st Century Advancements

Following , the experienced a significant that fueled a boom in securities underwriting, with the (NYSE) playing a central role in facilitating increased listings and trading of domestic equities and bonds to postwar reconstruction and consumer growth. This period marked a shift toward broader market participation, as the NYSE's infrastructure supported the underwriting of corporate securities that capitalized on industrial recovery and trends. The introduced a pivotal advancement in international securities underwriting through the emergence of the Eurobond market, which allowed issuers to bypass U.S. regulatory constraints like the 1963 Interest Equalization Tax that discouraged American investment in foreign securities. The market originated with the first Eurobond issuance in July 1963—a $15 million, 15-year bond by Italy's Autostrade for highway development, underwritten by a multinational and sold primarily in to avoid U.S. taxes. This innovation expanded global capital access, with issuance volumes growing from negligible amounts in the mid- to $3 billion by 1970, diversifying currencies beyond the U.S. dollar and enabling non-U.S. entities to tap international . Deregulation in the late further transformed underwriting by blurring lines between banking and securities activities. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 repealed key provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act, permitting commercial banks to underwrite and deal in securities, thus integrating functions and fostering financial conglomerates. This merger enhanced efficiency in underwriting processes but also increased systemic interconnections among financial institutions. Early computerization in the and revolutionized risk modeling in underwriting, particularly through the adoption of credit scoring systems that standardized assessments and reduced reliance on manual judgments. The score, introduced in 1989 by Fair Isaac Corporation, became a benchmark tool for evaluating borrower creditworthiness using algorithmic analysis of payment history, levels, and other factors. By the , automated underwriting systems incorporating these scores shortened processing times and shifted focus to statistical default predictions, enabling lenders to handle higher volumes while improving consistency in risk evaluation. The exposed weaknesses in underwriting standards, especially for mortgage-backed securities, where lax practices contributed to widespread defaults and market turmoil. In response, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 introduced reforms to strengthen underwriting integrity, including a retention requirement mandating that securitizers retain at least 5% of the in asset-backed securities to align originator incentives with long-term performance. These provisions, implemented through regulations like those for qualified residential mortgages, aimed to curb and ensure more rigorous in underwriting.

Underwriting in Capital Markets

Securities Underwriting Process

The securities underwriting process involves investment banks acting as intermediaries to facilitate the issuance of new equity or securities by corporations or governments, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements while minimizing for the . This process typically applies to initial public offerings (IPOs), follow-on offerings, and debt issuances such as bonds, where the underwriter assesses market conditions, structures the deal, and distributes the securities to investors. The process begins with issuer selection, where the issuing company identifies and hires one or more investment banks based on their expertise, track record, and ability to access investor networks; this often involves competitive bidding or negotiations to select lead underwriters. Following selection, due diligence is conducted, during which the underwriters thoroughly review the issuer's financial statements, operations, legal status, and risks to verify information and prepare the registration statement for regulatory approval, such as with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Next, pricing occurs, where underwriters determine the type, quantity, and price of securities based on market demand, comparable valuations, and issuer goals, often using book-building to gauge investor interest. The roadshow then takes place, involving presentations by the issuer's management to institutional investors to generate demand and refine pricing, typically after SEC review of the prospectus. After pricing is finalized, allocation assigns securities to investors, with the underwriter purchasing and reselling them as per the agreement. Finally, stabilization involves post-issuance activities where the lead underwriter may intervene in the secondary market to support the price and reduce volatility, often through over-allotment options or greenshoe provisions. Underwriting agreements outline the terms and risk allocation between the and underwriters, with three primary types: firm commitment, where the underwriter purchases the entire issue from the at a fixed and assumes the risk of reselling, providing certainty to the ; best efforts, in which the underwriter agrees to sell as many securities as possible without guaranteeing the full amount, shifting more risk to the ; and standby, used mainly for offerings where the underwriter commits to buying any unsold shares after shareholders exercise or decline their preemptive . Firm commitment is the most common for IPOs due to its risk transfer to the underwriter, while best efforts suits smaller or riskier . Large issuances often involve underwriter syndicates, groups of investment banks led by a bookrunner that coordinates the , allocates shares, and manages the process to distribute and leverage broader distribution networks. The bookrunner, typically the most reputable bank in , handles and stabilization while sharing fees with syndicate members. Performance in these roles is tracked via league tables published by data providers like (formerly ), which rank banks by metrics such as total deal volume and number of issues managed, influencing future mandates. For IPOs, the process introduces a private company to public markets, emphasizing extensive and roadshows to build confidence, as seen in the 1995 Netscape Communications IPO where lead underwriters and raised the offering price to $28 per share and increased shares to 5 million, resulting in a first-day surge that valued the company at over $2 billion. offerings for already public companies follow a similar streamlined process but with less regulatory scrutiny, focusing on quicker pricing and allocation to fund growth or acquisitions. In debt offerings, such as corporate bonds, the steps mirror equity but prioritize credit analysis and yield determination over equity valuation, often using negotiated through syndicates rather than auctions, to match issuer needs with fixed-income demand.

Risks, Rewards, and Structures

In securities underwriting within capital markets, underwriters face several primary that can impact their financial outcomes. arises when underwriters commit to purchasing securities but encounter weak investor demand, leading to unsold shares that must be held or sold at a loss. Underwriting risk is closely related, involving potential price drops in the aftermarket that diminish the value of allocated securities, particularly in firm commitment arrangements where the underwriter assumes full . includes exposure to lawsuits for misrepresentations or omissions in offering documents, actionable under , which prohibits fraud in connection with securities transactions and holds underwriters liable if they knowingly disseminate false information. To compensate for these risks, underwriters earn rewards through structured compensation. The primary reward is the underwriting spread, typically 7% of gross proceeds for initial public offerings (IPOs), representing the difference between the price paid to the and the price; this fee has remained stable due to market conventions and covers distribution efforts. Additional rewards include stabilization profits, derived from post-IPO activities where underwriters buy shares to support the price and later cover short positions at potentially lower costs, generating gains in successful stabilizations. Exclusivity fees, often manifested as enhanced management fees for lead underwriters in syndicates, provide further incentives for coordinating the offering and securing preferential roles. Mitigation strategies are embedded in common underwriting structures. The greenshoe option, or overallotment provision, allows underwriters to sell up to 15% more shares than initially planned, enabling them to cover short sales from the overallotment and stabilize prices without immediate inventory risk; this mechanism is included in nearly all U.S. IPOs to manage demand fluctuations. Indemnity clauses in underwriting agreements protect underwriters against losses from issuer misrepresentations, requiring the issuer to cover legal claims, liabilities, and expenses arising from inaccuracies in the prospectus or registration statement. Historical data underscores the varying success rates tied to underwriting structures. Firm commitment offerings achieve over 90% completion rates, as the underwriter's purchase obligation ensures the issuer receives funds regardless of public demand, barring rare pre-effective withdrawals. In contrast, best efforts arrangements exhibit more variable outcomes, with success rates around 75% in the 1980-1984 period, as 25% of attempted IPOs failed to meet minimum sales thresholds and were withdrawn.

Underwriting in Banking

Loan and Credit Underwriting

and underwriting in banking involves a structured to assess borrower creditworthiness and mitigate default before approving or credit facilities. This process aligns with core principles by analyzing repayment capacity, collateral adequacy, and overall financial health. In commercial loan underwriting, the process begins with the borrower's application, where banks review submitted applications against internal policies to verify assets, liabilities, and intended use of funds. follows, examining current and historical statements for trends in , , and contingent liabilities to determine repayment sources. Collateral valuation is then conducted, appraising assets like receivables, , and at values adjusted for market conditions, with verification of and requirements. Finally, covenants are set in agreements, including financial ratios and collateral maintenance terms, which are monitored post-approval to ensure compliance. Retail credit underwriting, particularly for mortgages and personal loans, increasingly relies on automated scoring systems to evaluate individual borrowers efficiently. Lenders pull reports from bureaus such as , , and to generate scores, with scores—ranging from 300 to 850—being widely used to predict repayment probability based on factors like payment history and credit utilization. These scores inform automated decisions on approval, loan amounts, and interest rates, streamlining the process for high-volume consumer lending while reducing manual review for low-risk applicants. For mortgages, scores help classify borrowers into risk tiers, such as subprime (below 620), influencing terms under guidelines from agencies like the . Syndicated loans extend underwriting to large-scale facilities where a assumes initial risk and distributes portions to participant banks. The conducts primary underwriting, including on borrower finances and collateral, similar to a securities underwriter, before syndicating shares through commitments from other lenders. This structure is common for loans exceeding $100 million shared among multiple institutions, designated as Shared National Credits, allowing risk diversification while the lead bank monitors ongoing compliance. Project finance underwriting for infrastructure projects emphasizes non-recourse or limited-recourse structures, where repayment depends on project cash flows rather than sponsor balance sheets. The process starts with feasibility studies and environmental impact assessments to confirm bankability, followed by risk allocation among sponsors, contractors, and off-takers via long-term contracts tied to international benchmarks. Financial modeling assesses capital expenditures, revenues, and debt service under stress scenarios, often capping loan-to-value ratios at 60% to limit exposure, with special purpose vehicles isolating project risks. This approach has funded major like power plants and transportation networks, prioritizing operational viability over general corporate . The 2000s subprime mortgage boom illustrates underwriting failures in retail credit, where lax standards fueled a . Lenders extended high-risk loans to borrowers with poor credit via automated approvals and minimal documentation, repackaging them into mortgage-backed securities that underestimated default risks amid rising home prices. When prices declined post-2006, defaults surged, leading to lender failures like in 2007 and contributing to the 2007-2009 recession through reduced lending and economic contraction. This crisis prompted stricter underwriting regulations, including enhanced FICO-based risk assessments and oversight by bodies like the .

Evaluation Criteria

In banking underwriting, evaluation criteria encompass a structured assessment of a borrower's worthiness to determine the risk of default and ensure alignment with the lender's . These criteria integrate both quantitative metrics, derived from and ratios, and qualitative judgments to provide a holistic view of repayment capacity. Underwriters apply these standards during the phase of the process, where they review borrower documentation to recommend approval, denial, or conditional terms. A foundational framework for this evaluation is the 5 Cs of credit, which include character, capacity, capital, collateral, and conditions. Character assesses the borrower's willingness to repay, often through , references, and reputation. Capacity evaluates the ability to generate sufficient income for debt service, focusing on projections. Capital examines the borrower's equity contribution and financial reserves to absorb losses. Collateral reviews assets pledged as security to mitigate lender risk. Conditions analyze external factors like economic trends and purpose that could impact repayment. This model, widely adopted since the mid-20th century, guides underwriters in balancing subjective and objective elements. Quantitative criteria provide measurable benchmarks for risk assessment. The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio, calculated as monthly debt payments divided by gross monthly income, typically caps at 36% for total debt, with allowances up to 45% for stronger profiles to ensure affordability. The loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, the loan amount divided by the appraised value of collateral, limits exposure by requiring lower ratios (e.g., 80% or less) for higher-risk loans to protect against value declines. The debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), net operating income divided by total debt service, requires a minimum of 1.25 in commercial underwriting, indicating income covers obligations with a 25% buffer against variability. These ratios establish scale for credit decisions, prioritizing solvency over exhaustive financial details. Qualitative factors complement these metrics by addressing non-numerical risks. Industry risks evaluate sector-specific vulnerabilities, such as cyclical downturns in , to gauge stability. Management quality scrutinizes leadership experience, , and operational competence, as poor can undermine financial health. Economic forecasts incorporate like GDP growth or trends to predict repayment challenges. These elements, informed by expert judgment, adjust quantitative scores for contextual nuances. The accords influence underwriting by imposing risk-based capital requirements, compelling banks to assign higher capital against riskier exposures. Under these standards, underwriters must classify loans using standardized or internal ratings to calculate risk-weighted assets, ensuring decisions support overall capital adequacy (e.g., minimum 8% total capital ratio). This framework, implemented post-2008 crisis, promotes conservative underwriting to enhance banking resilience without prohibiting lending to viable borrowers.

Insurance Underwriting

Risk Classification and Pricing

In insurance underwriting, risks are categorized into distinct classes to assess the likelihood and magnitude of potential losses, enabling insurers to apply appropriate premiums. The primary risk classes include preferred, standard, and substandard, with preferred risks representing the lowest hazard levels—such as applicants with excellent health and low-risk lifestyles—who receive the most favorable rates. Standard risks encompass typical applicants with average health and lifestyle factors, while substandard risks involve higher hazards, often subdivided into tables (e.g., Table A through H) for graduated premium surcharges based on elevated mortality or loss potential. These classifications are facilitated by standardized tools like the Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating manuals, which provide classification codes and guidelines for grouping similar risks in property, casualty, and other lines, ensuring consistent and equitable premium assignments across insurers. Premium pricing in underwriting builds on these classifications by calculating the expected cost of coverage and adding necessary adjustments for operational . The core component is the pure premium, which estimates anticipated losses per unit of exposure, derived from historical on claim and severity. A standard representation of the pure premium is given by the equation: Pure Premium=[Frequency](/page/Frequency)×Severity\text{Pure Premium} = \text{[Frequency](/page/Frequency)} \times \text{Severity} Here, is the expected number of claims per unit of exposure, and severity is the per claim, forming the pure premium base before adding loadings for administrative expenses, such as underwriting and claims handling, and a margin for profit to arrive at the gross premium. Insurers often use a target (expected claims as a proportion of premium) and to determine the indicated premium via gross premium = pure premium / (1 - target - ). This model ensures premiums are actuarially sound, balancing risk coverage with insurer viability, and is adjusted periodically using loss experience and regulatory filings. Several key factors influence risk classification, tailoring the assessment to the applicant's profile and environmental context. Age is a primary determinant, as older individuals generally face higher mortality or morbidity risks, leading to elevated classifications. history, including medical records and pre-existing conditions, is scrutinized through exams or questionnaires to identify vulnerabilities that could increase claim likelihood. Occupation plays a critical role, with high-risk professions like or resulting in substandard ratings due to injury potential, while location-based hazards—such as exposure to in flood-prone areas—further modify the class by incorporating geographic data. To manage high-risk elements without outright declining coverage, underwriters employ exclusions and riders as modifications to the standard policy terms. Exclusions explicitly omit certain perils or conditions from coverage, such as pre-existing issues or hazardous activities, thereby reducing the insurer's exposure to unpredictable losses. Riders, conversely, are optional endorsements that either add limited for specific risks (e.g., a of premium for ) or adjust exclusions to broaden or narrow scope, allowing customized policies for substandard risks while maintaining pricing integrity. These tools ensure that coverage aligns with the assessed profile, promoting fairness and preventing .

Underwriting Guidelines

Insurance underwriting guidelines establish standardized procedures to ensure fair, consistent, and ethical by underwriters, balancing insurer with consumer protections. These guidelines encompass both manual and automated systems, regulatory frameworks, and mechanisms like to manage large exposures. In practice, they guide decisions on policy issuance, drawing from industry standards that prohibit discriminatory practices and promote transparency. Manual underwriting involves human evaluators reviewing applications, medical records, and other to assess risks, often taking weeks for complex cases due to the need for detailed . This approach allows for nuanced in high-risk scenarios but is labor-intensive and prone to inconsistencies. In contrast, automated underwriting systems leverage algorithms, analytics, and to process applications rapidly, enabling straight-through processing () where low-risk policies are approved without human intervention, reducing turnaround times from days to minutes. STP is particularly effective for standard, low-risk policies, such as or auto insurance, by integrating external sources like credit reports and to streamline decisions while reserving manual review for exceptions. In the United States, the (NAIC) develops model laws and guidance to promote uniform underwriting practices across states, including requirements for insurers to file and update underwriting guidelines with state departments. The NAIC's Accelerated Underwriting (A) Working Group has issued regulatory guidance emphasizing fair, transparent, and secure use of data in expedited processes, ensuring non-discriminatory outcomes. Complementing this, the (ACA) of 2010 prohibits anti-discrimination in underwriting, banning practices like denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on pre-existing conditions or status for most plans, thereby enforcing equitable access under Section 1557. These ACA rules apply specifically to ; life and property-casualty insurance underwriting must comply with separate state and federal laws prohibiting discrimination based on protected characteristics such as race, gender, or disability, but permits based on and other actuarial factors. Reinsurance plays a critical role in underwriting guidelines by allowing primary insurers to transfer portions of large or aggregated risks to reinsurers, thereby stabilizing their portfolios and enabling coverage of high-value policies. involves case-by-case agreements where the reinsurer individually underwrites and accepts or rejects specific risks, offering flexibility for unique or high-exposure cases like a single large . , however, provides automatic coverage for an entire portfolio or class of risks under predefined terms, reducing administrative burden for routine exposures such as a of personal auto policies. These arrangements are governed by guidelines ensuring clear contractual terms and risk-sharing limits to prevent overexposure. A representative example of underwriting guidelines in action is in , where applicants undergo a multi-step process to classify risks into categories like preferred or standard. This typically begins with a detailed on and , followed by a medical exam conducted by a paramedical service to measure , blood, and urine for indicators of conditions like or heart disease. Underwriters then consult the Medical Information Bureau (MIB) database, a shared resource among over 800 U.S. and Canadian insurers, to check for prior applications, reported medical issues, or lapses that could signal undisclosed risks, with codes remaining active for up to seven years. This integrated approach ensures comprehensive evaluation while adhering to privacy laws like HIPAA.

Other and Emerging Forms

Real Estate and Forensic Underwriting

Real estate underwriting involves a detailed evaluation of property-related risks prior to approving commercial mortgages, focusing on the borrower's and the asset's viability as collateral. Key components include appraisal reviews to determine the property's , often using income capitalization methods such as dividing net operating by a cap rate, searches to confirm clear ownership and absence of liens, and environmental assessments like Phase I reports to identify potential contamination liabilities that could impact value or lender exposure. Lenders typically cap loan-to-value (LTV) ratios at 75% for most commercial properties to mitigate , ensuring the loan amount does not exceed 75% of the appraised value, though this can vary by property type such as up to 80% for stabilized multifamily assets. Forensic underwriting, in contrast, is a retrospective investigative process applied after loan origination to analyze past underwriting decisions, loan documents, and performance data for irregularities, particularly fraud or non-compliance. It entails scrutinizing historical records, such as original appraisals and borrower representations, to uncover misstatements or violations of lending standards, often commissioned for litigation, regulatory audits, or loss mitigation efforts. This approach employs techniques to trace discrepancies, like inflated property values or undisclosed second liens, aiding in fraud detection and recovery proceedings. The primary distinction between and forensic underwriting lies in their temporal orientation: real estate underwriting is prospective, assessing future risks to inform loan approval decisions, whereas forensic underwriting is , examining completed transactions to diagnose failures or improprieties after the fact. While both rely on similar data like appraisals and title records, the former emphasizes predictive metrics such as LTV and debt service coverage, and the latter prioritizes evidentiary analysis for legal or corrective purposes. A notable example of forensic underwriting emerged in the aftermath of the , where post-crisis reviews of subprime mortgages revealed systemic underwriting lapses, including widespread misreporting of loan characteristics like occupancy status and second liens in nearly 49% of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. These investigations, supported by loan-level data and comparisons to automated valuation models, exposed how originators and underwriters facilitated , contributing to higher default rates and prompting over $137 billion in U.S. Department of Justice settlements with major banks.

Continuous and Event Sponsorship Underwriting

Continuous underwriting represents an evolving approach in the insurance and financial sectors, where risk assessments occur on an ongoing basis rather than solely at policy inception or renewal. This method leverages real-time data, analytics, and technology to dynamically monitor and adjust coverage parameters as circumstances change, enabling more precise risk management and pricing. In the context of investment-linked products like variable annuities, continuous underwriting involves perpetual review of guarantees such as death benefits or minimum income streams, which must adapt to fluctuations in underlying asset values, such as those from subaccounts invested in equities or bonds. Insurers employ hedging strategies and reserve adjustments to mitigate the financial exposure from market volatility, ensuring the sustainability of these guarantees over the policy's life. For mutual funds within variable annuity structures, this process extends to ongoing evaluation of portfolio risks, where issuers continuously assess shifts and to maintain compliance with regulatory capital requirements and protect policyholder interests. Dynamic modeling underpins these efforts, incorporating predictive algorithms to forecast potential drawdowns and trigger proactive interventions, such as rebalancing or premium adjustments. This contrasts with static underwriting by allowing for immediate responsiveness to economic indicators, thereby reducing the likelihood of under-reserving during downturns. The adoption of continuous underwriting in these products has grown with advancements in , though it raises challenges related to data privacy and computational demands. Event sponsorship underwriting, distinct from traditional insurance, refers to the risk evaluation process undertaken by corporations when providing financial backing for specific media programs, cultural events, or large-scale gatherings like the Olympics. Sponsors act as underwriters by analyzing potential brand alignment, reputational hazards, and expected return on (ROI) before committing funds, often in exchange for promotional acknowledgments rather than direct . For instance, in Olympic sponsorships, companies assess geopolitical risks, event cancellation probabilities, and audience engagement metrics to quantify exposure, setting limits on financial commitments to avoid overextension. The processes for event sponsorship underwriting emphasize exposure limits and , where sponsors model worst-case outcomes such as boycotts, scandals, or low attendance that could erode brand value. ROI calculations typically incorporate metrics like media value equivalents and sentiment tracking, ensuring sponsorships align with long-term goals. A representative example is the underwriting of major tours, where sponsors or insurers cover cancellation risks arising from artist illness, venue issues, or external threats like or concerns, thereby safeguarding investments in production and promotion costs. This form of underwriting promotes stability for event organizers while allowing sponsors to mitigate financial and reputational downsides through contractual safeguards and layers.

Fintech, AI, and Regulatory Developments

innovations have significantly transformed underwriting processes by leveraging and alternative data sources to enhance efficiency and accessibility. In platforms like , automated underwriting systems streamline loan approvals by analyzing borrower data in real-time, reducing processing times from days to minutes and enabling broader access to credit without traditional intermediaries. Similarly, technology facilitates transparent syndication in by creating immutable records of loan participations and risk assessments, allowing multiple lenders to collaborate securely on large-scale deals while minimizing and settlement delays. Artificial intelligence, particularly , has introduced predictive capabilities to underwriting in both and credit sectors. In , companies such as Lemonade employ AI algorithms to generate instant policy quotes and coverage by evaluating instantaneously, achieving approval rates for simple claims in seconds and improving risk prediction accuracy over time through continuous model refinement. For credit scoring, AI models incorporate alternative sources, including activity and digital footprints, to assess creditworthiness for underserved populations, thereby increasing approval rates and lowering default risks compared to traditional FICO-based methods. Regulatory frameworks have evolved post-2020 to address the risks posed by these technologies, emphasizing oversight for high-impact applications. The European Union's AI Act, which entered into force in August 2024 and classifies AI systems used in credit underwriting and insurance risk assessment as high-risk, with obligations for such systems applying from August 2026, mandating rigorous conformity assessments, transparency in decision-making, and human oversight to prevent discriminatory outcomes. In the United States, the New York Department of Financial Services (NY DFS) issued final guidelines in 2024 requiring insurers to implement governance frameworks for AI in underwriting and pricing, including bias testing and explanations of automated decisions to ensure fairness and compliance with anti-discrimination laws. The UK's (FCA) launched a 2025 AI sandbox initiative, enabling firms to test underwriting innovations in a controlled environment with regulatory waivers, fostering safe experimentation while monitoring for systemic risks. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in deploying AI for underwriting, particularly around and privacy. To mitigate in AI models, insurers and lenders must employ techniques such as diverse curation and algorithmic audits, as unfair biases in training can perpetuate discriminatory lending practices, with studies showing that loan applicants of color were 40%–80% more likely to be denied than counterparts in systems using algorithmic underwriting. privacy regulations like the EU's GDPR and California's CCPA impose strict requirements on AI underwriting tools, necessitating consent for alternative usage, data minimization, and breach notifications to protect consumer information from unauthorized processing in automated risk evaluations.

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/underwriting
  2. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/underwriting.asp
  3. https://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/supervision-and-examination/credit/commercial-credit/underwriting.html
  4. https://content.naic.org/glossary-insurance-terms
  5. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/insurance-underwriters.htm
  6. https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-aca/pre-existing-conditions/index.html
  7. https://content.naic.org/insurance-topics/credit-based-insurance-scores
  8. https://www.sec.gov/files/ipo-investorbulletin.pdf
  9. https://www.sec.gov/answers/ipodiff.htm
  10. https://www.sec.gov/resources-small-businesses/capital-raising-building-blocks/types-registered-offerings
  11. https://www.bankrate.com/mortgages/steps-in-underwriting-process/
  12. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-real-estate-underwriting.asp
  13. https://www.hampden.co.uk/about-lloyds
  14. https://thebasispoint.com/where-the-term-underwriting-comes-from/
  15. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/underwriter-syndicate.asp
  16. https://www.givemomentum.com/nonprofit-fundraising-glossary/underwriting
  17. https://www.iais.org/uploads/2025/05/IAIS-ICPs-and-ComFrame-December-2024.pdf
  18. https://www.nber.org/reporter/2011number3/selection-and-asymmetric-information-insurance-markets
  19. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asymmetricinformation.asp
  20. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/moralhazard.asp
  21. https://www.investopedia.com/insurance-underwriting-guidelines-discrimination-5203311
  22. https://content.naic.org/cipr_topics/topic_unfair_discrimination
  23. https://www.iii.org/publications/insurance-handbook/brief-history
  24. https://www.europeanlink.gr/information/history
  25. https://www.econsoc.hist.cam.ac.uk/docs/CWPESHnumber30November2017.pdf
  26. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004510265/BP000011.xml
  27. https://www.lloyds.com/about-lloyds/history
  28. https://www.lr.org/en/about-us/who-we-are/our-history/edward-lloyd-coffee-house/
  29. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1967/may/lloyds-london-and-world-maritime-traditions
  30. https://www.lloyds.com/about-lloyds/history/the-trans-atlantic-slave-trade/lloyds-marine-insurance-and-slavery
  31. https://riskresource.com/newsletters/the-history-of-insurance-underwriting-explained-in-2-minutes/
  32. https://www.library.hbs.edu/hc/railroads/finance.html
  33. https://www.americanheritage.com/general-general-motors
  34. https://leadershipnow.com/GeneralMotorsExcerpt.html
  35. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/panic-of-1907
  36. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/glass-steagall-act
  37. https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/april-1995/commercial--investment-banking-should-this-divorce-be-saved
  38. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11295/c11295.pdf
  39. https://www.vciinstitute.com/blog/when-wall-street-crossed-main-street
  40. https://www.icmagroup.org/about-icma/history/history-of-the-eurobond-market/
  41. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-bulletin/1991/the-international-bond-market.pdf
  42. https://www.occ.treas.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/economics/working-papers-archived/pub-econ-working-paper-2000-5.pdf
  43. https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/april-2000/a-new-universe-in-banking-after-financial-modernization
  44. https://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/rptcongress/creditscore/general.htm
  45. https://www.clevelandfed.org/-/media/project/clevelandfedtenant/clevelandfedsite/publications/working-papers/2018/wp-1816-technological-innovation-in-mortgage-underwriting-pdf.pdf
  46. https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/cfr/bank-research-conference/annual-18th/21-furfine.pdf
  47. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr533.pdf
  48. https://www.wallstreetprep.com/knowledge/raising-capital-and-security-underwriting/
  49. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career-map/sell-side/capital-markets/underwriting-overview/
  50. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/financial-data/deals-data/investment-banking-league-tables
  51. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/09/business/underwriters-raise-offer-price-for-netscape-communications.html
  52. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/underwriting-risk.asp
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092911991100006X
  54. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/rule_10b-5
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056007000391
  56. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~eofek/PhD/papers/A_Stabilazition_JF.pdf
  57. https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/XE1RB1QS000000/capital-markets-drafting-guide-underwriting-the-offering-overvie
  58. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/equities/overallotment-greenshoe-option-ipo/
  59. https://www.bloomberglaw.com/external/document/XEQTHRRG000000/capital-markets-drafting-guide-underwriting-agreements-indemnifi
  60. https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/IPOs-Underwriting.pdf
  61. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/jef/vol3/iss1/5/
  62. https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/commercial-loans/pub-ch-commercial-loans.pdf
  63. https://www.federalreserve.gov/creditreports/pdf/credit_reports_scores_2.pdf
  64. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-fico-score-en-1883/
  65. https://www.fdic.gov/bank-examinations/fair-lending-implications-credit-scoring-systems
  66. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/consumer-credit-trends/mortgages/borrower-risk-profiles/
  67. https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/efa/efa-project-syndicated-loan-portfolios-of-financial-institutions.htm
  68. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr922.pdf
  69. https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2017/nr-ia-2017-152.html
  70. https://www.exim.gov/solutions/project-and-structured-finance/guidelines-for-submitting-successful-application
  71. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/projectfinance.asp
  72. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/subprime-mortgage-crisis
  73. https://www.cdfifund.gov/system/files/documents/consumer-loan-underwriting-presentation.pdf
  74. https://www.canr.msu.edu/resources/bulletin-e-3428-farm-loans-and-credit-underwriting
  75. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-debt-to-income-ratio-en-1791/
  76. https://selling-guide.fanniemae.com/sel/b3-6-02/debt-income-ratios
  77. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-loan-to-value-ratio-and-how-does-it-relate-to-my-costs-en-121/
  78. https://selling-guide.fanniemae.com/sel/b2-1.2-01/loan-value-ltv-ratios
  79. https://ww2.jacksonms.gov/libweb/GZx3IM/2OK040/BusinessLineOfCreditUnderwritingGuidelines.pdf
  80. https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/rating-credit-risk/pub-ch-rating-credit-risk.pdf
  81. https://www.fdic.gov/bank-examinations/credit-risk-grading-systems-observations-horizontal-assessment
  82. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d424.pdf
  83. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf
  84. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/09/18/2023-19200/regulatory-capital-rule-large-banking-organizations-and-banking-organizations-with-significant
  85. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insurance-risk-class.asp
  86. https://fidelitylife.com/life-insurance-basics/whole-life-insurance-101/life-insurance-rating-classes-how-do-they-work/
  87. https://www.irmi.com/articles/expert-commentary/the-iso-classification-system-and-the-cgl-policy
  88. https://www.verisk.com/products/forms-rules-and-loss-costs/
  89. https://openacttexts.github.io/Loss-Data-Analytics/ChapPremiumFoundations.html
  90. https://www.insuranceexamguides.com/rate-making-methods/
  91. https://www.casact.org/sites/default/files/database/studynotes_scholfield5.pdf
  92. https://www.quotacy.com/what-are-life-insurance-risk-classifications/
  93. https://fidelitylife.com/life-insurance-basics/life-insurance-101/factors-that-affect-life-insurance-premiums/
  94. https://www.acli.com/-/media/acli/public/files/pdfs-public-site/public-consumer-info/070819_understandingriskclassification.pdf
  95. https://www.rgare.com/knowledge-center/article/global-health-brief--examining-health-insurance-exclusions
  96. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/commercial-lending/commercial-loan/
  97. https://propertymetrics.com/blog/how-commercial-real-estate-loan-underwriting-works/
  98. https://www.crefcoa.com/commercial-lending-ratios.html
  99. https://definitions.uslegal.com/f/forensic-underwriting/
  100. https://noteservicingcenter.com/forensic-underwriting-uncovering-hidden-property-risks-in-private-mortgage-notes/
  101. https://lenderscompliancegroup.com/forensic-mortgage-audit/
  102. https://oneappraisalgroup.com/how-does-a-retrospective-appraisal-differ-from-a-current-appraisal/
  103. https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=13538
  104. https://www.getstrada.com/glossary/continuous-underwriting
  105. https://www.insurancethoughtleadership.com/underwriting/promise-continuous-underwriting
  106. https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2017/384
  107. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27577/w27577.pdf
  108. https://www.indiainsurtech.com/continuous-underwriting-real-time-insurance-backed-by-ai-data
  109. https://www.businessinsurance.com/and-now-a-word-for-sporting-event-sponsors-risks/
  110. https://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/features/olympic-sized-risks/
  111. https://beinsure.com/concert-cancellations-insurance-industry/
  112. https://www.risk-strategies.com/industries/entertainment/event-cancellation-and-non-appearance
  113. https://a16z.com/fintechs-second-wave-lenders-in-disguise/
  114. https://www.kadena.io/perspectives/lending-on-kadena-automating-loan-syndication-with-blockchain-smart-contracts
  115. https://gyriz.com/top-5-insurance-startups-using-ai-for-underwriting-in-2024/
  116. https://misq.umn.edu/misq/article/48/4/1803/2314/The-Effect-of-AI-Enabled-Credit-Scoring-on
  117. https://www.teradata.com/insights/data-analytics/alternative-data-in-credit-underwriting
  118. https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/19cwd6qx
  119. https://www.alstonprivacy.com/nydfs-issues-final-circular-letter-guidance-on-use-of-ai-in-insurance-underwriting-and-pricing/
  120. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-allows-firms-experiment-ai-alongside-nvidia
  121. https://themarkup.org/denied/2021/08/25/the-secret-bias-hidden-in-mortgage-approval-algorithms
  122. https://www.internetlawyer-blog.com/artificial-intelligence-and-data-privacy-navigating-ccpa-cpra-and-gdpr/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.