Hubbry Logo
Unity (user interface)Unity (user interface)Main
Open search
Unity (user interface)
Community hub
Unity (user interface)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Unity (user interface)
Unity (user interface)
Unity (user interface)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Unity
Original authorCanonical Ltd.
DeveloperUnity7 Maintainers
Initial release9 June 2010; 15 years ago (2010-06-09)[1]
Stable release
7.7 / 24 December 2022
Repository
Written inUnity 2D: C++, JavaScript, QML
2.0–7.4: C, C++, Python, Vala[2]
UnityX: Fish
Operating systemUbuntu Unity
TypeGraphical shell
LicenseGPL v3, LGPL v3
Websiteunityd.org Edit this on Wikidata

Unity is a graphical shell originally developed by Canonical Ltd. for its Ubuntu operating system. It debuted in 2010 in the netbook edition of Ubuntu 10.10 and was used until Ubuntu 17.10. Following its discontinuation by Canonical in 2017, development of forks of Unity7 and Unity8 has continued – the latter was renamed Lomiri in February 2020.

Unity7 is the default desktop environment in Ubuntu Unity, an official flavor of Ubuntu since 2022. The maintainers of Ubuntu Unity and Unity7 have started working on the successor of Unity7, UnityX.[3]

It was part of the Ayatana project, an initiative with the stated intention of improving the user experience within Ubuntu.[4] It was initially designed to make more efficient use of space given the limited screen size of netbooks, including, for example, a vertical application switcher called the launcher, and a space-saving horizontal multipurpose top menu bar.[5][6] Unlike GNOME, KDE Plasma, Xfce, or LXDE, Unity is not a collection of applications. It is designed to use existing programs.[7]

Features

[edit]
Unity Desktop, pre-Ubuntu Unity redesign, if installed in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and below. This screenshot is specifically running Unity 7.5.1, on Ubuntu 20.04.

The Unity user interface consists of several components:[8]

  • Top menu bar: a multipurpose top bar, saving space, and containing:
    1. the menu bar of the active application
    2. the title bar of the main window of the active application, including the maximize, minimize and exit buttons
    3. the session menu,[9] including the global system settings, logout, and shut down
    4. the diverse global notification indicators including the time, weather, and the state of the underlying system.[8]
  • Launcher: a taskbar. Multiple instances of an application are grouped under the same icon, with an indicator showing how many instances are open.[10] The user has a choice whether or not to lock an application to the launcher. If it is not locked, an application may be started using the Dash or via a separately installed menu.[11]
  • Quicklist: the accessible menu of launcher items
  • Dash: a desktop search utility that enables searching for information both locally (e.g. installed applications, recent files, or bookmarks) and online (e.g. Twitter or Google Docs). It displays previews of the results.[12]
  • Head-up display (HUD): Allows hotkey searching for top menu bar items from the keyboard, without the need for using the mouse, by pressing and releasing the Alt key.[13]
  • Indicators: a notification area containing the clock, network status, battery status, and audio volume controls

Dash

[edit]
Dash, searching applications in Ubuntu 24.04

Dash is a desktop search utility with preview ability. It enables searching for applications and files. Dash supports search plug-ins, known as Scopes (formerly Lenses). Out of the box, it can query Google Docs, Ubuntu One Music Store, YouTube, Amazon, and social networks (for example, Twitter, Facebook, and Google+). Starting with Ubuntu 13.10, online search queries are sent to a Canonical web service which determines the type of query and directs them to the appropriate third-party web service. Pornographic results are filtered out.[14][15][16]

One of the new features of Unity in Ubuntu 12.10 is the shopping lens. As of October 2012, it sent search terms from the user's home lens to Canonical's servers via HTTPS,[16] which would forward them to Amazon which, as part of the search process, sends images of matching products to the lens via HTTP, with Canonical receiving a small commission upon a sale.[17]

Many reviewers criticized it: as the home lens is the natural means to search for content on the local machine, reviewers were concerned about the disclosure of queries that were intended to be local, creating a privacy problem.[16] The feature is active by default[16][17][18][19] (instead of opt-in) and many users could be unaware of it.

On 23 September 2012, Mark Shuttleworth defended the feature. He posted "the Home Lens of the Dash should let you find *anything* anywhere" and that the shopping lens is a step in that direction. He argued that anonymity is preserved because Canonical servers mediate the communication between Unity and Amazon and users could trust Ubuntu.[16][20] Ubuntu Community Manager Jono Bacon posted "These features are neatly and unobtrusively integrated into the dash, and they not only provide a more useful and comprehensive dash in giving you visibility on this content, but it also generates revenue to help continue to grow and improve Ubuntu."[21] Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols from ZDNet said the feature does not bother him and wrote "If they can make some users happy and some revenue for the company at the same time, that's fine by me."[19] Ted Samson at InfoWorld reported the responses from Shuttleworth and Bacon, but he still criticized the feature.[18]

On 29 October 2012, the Electronic Frontier Foundation criticized the problem. It argued that since product images were (as of October 2012) returned via insecure HTTP then a passive eavesdropper—such as someone on the same wireless network—could get a good idea of the queries. Also, Amazon could correlate the queries with IP addresses. It recommended Ubuntu developers make the feature opt-in and make Ubuntu's privacy settings more fine-grained. It noted that the Dash can be stopped from searching the Internet by switching off "Include online search results" in Ubuntu's privacy settings.[16][22]

On 7 December 2012, Richard Stallman claimed that Ubuntu contains spyware and should not be used by free software supporters. Jono Bacon rebuked him; he said that Ubuntu responded and implemented many of the requirements the community found important.[23][24][25]

Since September 2013, images are anonymized before being sent to the user's computer.[26]

A legal notice in the Dash informs users of the sharing of their data.[27] It states that unless the user has opted out, by turning the searches off, their queries and IP address will be sent to productsearch.ubuntu.com and "selected third parties"[17][28] for online search results. Ubuntu's Third Party Privacy Policies page informs all of the third parties that may receive users' queries and IP addresses, and states: "For information on how our selected third parties may use your information, please see their privacy policies."[16]

Soon after being introduced, doubts emerged on the conformance of the shopping lens with the European Data Protection Directive.[29][30] By late 2013, these doubts made the grounds for a formal complaint on the shopping lens filed with the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), the UK data privacy office. Almost one year later the ICO ruled in favour of Canonical, considering the various improvements introduced to the feature in the meantime to render it conformal with the Data Protection Directive.[31] However, the ruling also made clear that at the time of introduction the feature was not legal, among other things, since it lacked a privacy policy statement.

In March 2014, Michael Hall speaking for Canonical Ltd, indicated that in Unity 8 users will have to opt-in for each search, which will be conducted by opening a special scope and then choosing where to search, addressing previous criticism of its functionality.[32] As of April 2016, with the release of Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, the setting is off by default.[33]

Unity 2D

[edit]
Not to be confused with Unity (game engine).
Unity 2D showing the ability to run alongside different window managers and desktop environments

Initially Canonical maintained two discrete versions of Unity, which were visually almost indistinguishable but technically different.

Unity is written as a plugin for Compiz[34] and uses an uncommon OpenGL toolkit called Nux.[14] Being a plugin for Compiz gives Unity GPU-accelerated performance on compatible systems. It is written in the programming languages C++ and Vala.

Unity 2D was a set of individual applications[35] developed for environments that Compiz does not run on, such as when graphics card does not support OpenGL. They were written in the GUI building language QML from the widespread Qt framework.[36] By default Unity 2D used the Metacity window manager[35] but could also use accelerated window managers like Compiz or KWin. In Ubuntu 11.10, Unity 2D used Metacity's XRender-based compositor to achieve transparency effects.[citation needed] Starting with Ubuntu 11.10, Unity 2D replaced the classic GNOME Panel as the fall-back for users whose hardware could not run the Compiz version of Unity.[37]

Unity 2D was discontinued for the release of Ubuntu 12.10 in October 2012, as the 3D version became more capable of running on lower-powered hardware.[38]

Availability

[edit]

As Unity and the supporting Ayatana projects[39] are developed primarily for Ubuntu and Ubuntu was the first to offer new versions.

Outside of Ubuntu, other Linux distributors have tried to pick up Ayatana, with varying success. The Ayatana components require modification of other applications, which increases the complexity for adoption by others.

  • Arch Linux offers many Ayatana components, including Unity and Unity 2D, via an unofficial repository or through AUR.[40]
  • Fedora does not offer Unity in its default repositories because Unity requires unsupported patches to GTK.[41] However Unity 6 has been ported to Fedora 17 and can be installed through a branch in the openSUSE repositories where the patches are applied.[42] Newer Fedora and Unity versions are not supported.[43]
  • Frugalware had adopted Ayatana, including Unity and Unity 2D, as part of the development branch for an upcoming Frugalware release but the project is no longer maintained.[44]
  • openSUSE offers many Ayatana components for GNOME.[45] After the packager abandoned the project because of problems with the then-current version of Compiz,[46] new developers picked up the task and provide packages for openSUSE 12.2 (along with versions for Arch Linux and Fedora 17). Newer openSUSE and Unity versions are not supported.[43]
  • Manjaro has a Unity version of its distribution.[47]
  • Ubuntu Unity uses the Unity 7 desktop.[48][49]
  • Gentoo has a community-supported overlay to build the Unity7 interface.[50]

Development

[edit]

Unity was originally unveiled on 10 May 2010 during Ubuntu founder Mark Shuttleworth's keynote at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Brussels.[51] It was announced as the new interface of both Ubuntu Netbook Edition and a then-planned OEM platform called Ubuntu Light.[52] The new interface was also made available for download during the keynote and visitors of the summit could try it out on a Dell Mini 10v.[53] Shuttleworth cited philosophical differences with the GNOME team over the user experience to explain why Ubuntu would use Unity as the default user interface instead of GNOME Shell, beginning April 2011, with Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal).[54] Jono Bacon later explained that Ubuntu will continue to function with the GNOME interface with Unity as a variant of it.[55]

Canonical announced it had engineered Unity for desktop computers as well and would make Unity the default shell for Ubuntu in version 11.04.[56] GNOME Shell was not included in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal because work on it was not completed at the time 11.04 was frozen, but was available from a PPA,[57] and was available in Ubuntu 11.10 and later releases, through the official repositories.[58]

In November 2010, Mark Shuttleworth announced the intention to eventually run Unity on Wayland instead of the currently used X Window System,[59] although this plan has since been dropped, replacing Wayland with Mir for Unity 8.[60]

In December 2010, some users requested that the Unity launcher (or dock) be movable from the left to other sides of the screen, but Mark Shuttleworth stated in reply, "I'm afraid that won't work with our broader design goals, so we won't implement that. We want the launcher always close to the Ubuntu button."[61] However, with Ubuntu 11.10, the Ubuntu button was moved into the launcher. A third-party plugin that moved Unity 3D's launcher to the bottom was available.[62] An option to move the launcher to the bottom of the screen was officially implemented in Ubuntu 16.04.[63]

As of 2010, the Unity shell interface developers use a toolkit called Nux instead of Clutter.[64] Unity is a plugin of the Compiz window manager,[14] which Canonical states is faster than Mutter,[65] the window manager for which GNOME Shell is a plugin.

On 14 January 2011, Canonical also released a technical preview of a "2D" version of Unity based on Qt and written in QML.[36] Unity-2D was not shipped on the Ubuntu 11.04 CD, instead the classic GNOME desktop was the fall-back for hardware that could not run Unity.[66][67]

In March 2011, public indications emerged of friction between Canonical (and its development of Unity) and the GNOME developers. As part of Unity development Ubuntu developers had submitted API coding for inclusion in Gnome as an external dependency. According to Dave Neary, "... an external dependency is a non-GNOME module which is a dependency of a package contained in one of the GNOME module sets," and the reasons why libappindicator was not accepted as an external dependency are that "... it does not fit that definition," it has "... duplicate functionality with libnotify," (the current Gnome Shell default) and its CLA does not meet current GNOME policy.[68] Mark Shuttleworth responded,

This is a critical juncture for the leadership of Gnome. I'll state plainly that I feel the long tail of good-hearted contributors to Gnome and Gnome applications are being let down by a decision-making process that has let competitive dynamics diminish the scope of Gnome itself. Ideas that are not generated 'at the core' have to fight incredibly and unnecessarily hard to get oxygen... getting room for ideas to be explored should not feel like a frontal assault on a machine gun post. This is no way to lead a project. This is a recipe for a project that loses great people to environments that are more open to different ways of seeing the world ... Embracing those other ideas and allowing them to compete happily and healthily is the only way to keep the innovation they bring inside your brand. Otherwise, you're doomed to watching them innovate and then having to "relayout" your own efforts to keep up, badmouthing them in the process. We started this with a strong, clear statement: Unity is a shell for Gnome. Now Gnome leadership have to decide if they want the fruit of that competition to be an asset to Gnome, or not.[69][70][71]

Release

[edit]

In April 2011, Mark Shuttleworth announced that Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot would not include the classic GNOME desktop as a fall-back to Unity, unlike Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal. Instead Ubuntu 11.10 used the Qt-based Unity 2D for users whose hardware cannot support the 3D version.[37][72] However, the classic GNOME desktop (GNOME Panel) can be installed separately in Ubuntu 11.10 and later versions through gnome-panel, a package in the Ubuntu repositories.[73]

At the November 2011 Ubuntu Developer Summit, it was announced that Unity for Ubuntu 12.04 would not re-enable the systray, and would have better application integration, and the ability to drag lenses onto the launcher, and that the 2D version of Unity would use the same decoration buttons as the 3D version.[74]

Ubuntu TV showing Big Buck Bunny

A variant of Unity was planned to run on Ubuntu TV, an ultimately unreleased smart TV operating system demonstrated at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show.[75]

In July 2012, at OSCON, Shuttleworth explained some of the historical reasoning behind Unity's development. The initial decision to develop a new interface in 2008 was driven by a desire to innovate and to pass Microsoft and Apple in user experience with user interface that could be used across many device form factors, including desktops, laptops, tablets, smartphones and TVs. Shuttleworth said "The old desktop would force your tablet or your phone into all kinds of crazy of funny postures. So we said: Screw it. We’re going to move the desktop to where it needs to be for the future. [This] turned out to be a deeply unpopular process." Windows 8's Metro interface became an additional incentive for Unity development due to perceived inconsistency in the operating system's user experience.[76]

Later releases and Unity 8

[edit]

In March 2013 the plan to use the Mir display server was announced for future development of Unity, in place of the previously announced Wayland/Weston.[60][77][78][79]

In April 2015 it was announced that Unity 8 would ship as part of Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, or possibly later. It was also noted that this version of Unity would not visually differ much from Unity 7.[80]

In April 2016 Ubuntu 16.04 was released with Unity 7, not Unity 8, as the default user interface, though Unity 8 could be installed through the Ubuntu software repositories as an optional, preview package.[81] During an Ubuntu Online Summit, Canonical employees said that their goal is to ship Unity 8 as the default interface for Ubuntu 16.10, to be released in October 2016.[82] These plans are now changed and for now Unity 8 will come preinstalled with 16.10 but not as default.[83][needs update]

Discontinuation by Canonical and forks

[edit]

On 5 April 2017, Mark Shuttleworth announced that Canonical's work on Unity would end. Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, a year away from release at the time, would abandon the Unity desktop and employ the GNOME 3 desktop instead.[84] Development of Unity 7 was taken over by the Unity7 Maintainers team, and they released version 7.6 on 30 June 2022 as the first new version in 6 years.[85] Development of Unity8 continued separately under UBports as part of Ubuntu Touch – this fork was renamed to Lomiri in February 2020.[86]

In May 2020, Ubuntu Unity, a new unofficial Ubuntu version was first released, using the Unity7 desktop as its default environment.[48][49][87] It became an official Ubuntu flavor starting with version 22.10[88] and includes early support for Lomiri starting with version 24.04.[89]

Reception

[edit]

Early versions of Unity received mixed reviews and generated controversy. Some reviewers found fault with the implementation and limitations, while other reviewers found Unity an improvement over GNOME 2 with the further potential to improve over time.[53][90][91][92][93] Reception later improved upon the release of Ubuntu 12.10, with Jack Wallen of TechRepublic describing it as an "incredible advancement" and Jesse Smith describing it as "attractive" and saying that it had grown to maturity. Ryan Paul of Ars Technica said Unity was responsive, robust and had the reliability expected from a mature desktop shell,[94][95][96] though the Dash feature of Unity in Ubuntu 12.10 generated a privacy controversy.[97]

Pre-release

[edit]

Ubuntu 10.10

[edit]

In reviewing an alpha version of Unity, shortly after it was unveiled in the summer of 2010, Ryan Paul of Ars Technica noted problems figuring out how to launch additional applications that were not on the dock bar. He also mentioned a number of bugs, including the inability to track which applications were open and other window management difficulties. He remarked that many of these were probably due to the early stage in the development process and expected them to be resolved with time. Paul concluded positively, "Our test of the Unity prototype leads us to believe that the project has considerable potential and could bring a lot of value to the Ubuntu Netbook Edition. Its unique visual style melds beautifully with Ubuntu's new default theme and its underlying interaction model seems compelling and well-suited for small screens."[53][90] In an extensive review of Ubuntu 10.10 shortly after its release in October 2010, Paul made further observations on Unity, noting that "Unity is highly ambitious and offers a substantially different computing experience than the conventional Ubuntu desktop." He concluded that "The [application] selectors are visually appealing, but they are easily the weakest part of the Unity user experience. The poor performance significantly detracts from their value in day-to-day use and the lack of actual file management functionality largely renders the file selector useless. The underlying concepts behind their design are good, however, and they have the potential to be much more valuable in the future as unity matures."[91][92]

Ubuntu 11.04

[edit]

In March 2011, writer Benjamin Humphrey of OMG Ubuntu criticized the development version of Unity then being tested for Ubuntu 11.04 on a number of grounds, including a development process that is divorced from user experiences, the lack of response to user feedback, "the seemingly unbelievable lack of communication the design team has," and a user interface he described as "cluttered and inconsistent". Overall, however, he concluded that "Unity is not all bad... While a number of the concepts in Unity may be flawed from a design point of view, the actual idea itself is not, and Canonical deserve applause for trying to jump start the stagnant open source desktop with Unity when the alternatives do not evoke confidence."[90]

On 14 April 2011, Ryan Paul reviewed a pre-release build of Unity, praising its "close attention to detail" and citing the top menu bar and launcher as particular highlights. He criticized the process of finding applications not present on the launcher, along with the "distracting and largely superfluous" presentation of available uninstalled applications, concluding that Unity was potentially better than GNOME for regular usage while calling some of the changes "disorienting".[92] On release, he further criticized the lack of customization options.[98] In a more thorough review of Ubuntu 11.04, Paul commended Unity as a positive development for Ubuntu, but that more resources had to be invested to improve outstanding issues.[99]

On 25 April 2011, the eve of the release of Ubuntu 11.04, reviewer Matt Hartley of IT Management criticized Unity, saying that the "dumbing down of the Linux desktop environment is bordering on insane".[100]

Release

[edit]

Ubuntu 11.04

[edit]

Reviewer Joey Sneddon of OMG Ubuntu was more positive about Unity in his review of Ubuntu 11.04, encouraging users, "Sure it's different—but different doesn't mean bad; the best thing to do is to give it a chance." He concluded that Unity on the desktop makes "better use of screen space, intuitive interface layouts and, most importantly, making a desktop that works for the user and not in spite of them."[101]

Following the release of Ubuntu 11.04 Canonical Ltd. founder Mark Shuttleworth indicated that, while he was generally happy with the implementation of Unity, he felt that there was room for improvement and that he "would not be satisfied unless we fixed many of [the early issues] in 11.10", further stating that Unity was "the best option for the average user" and that Ubuntu "had to choose a default position."[102]

Jesse Smith of DistroWatch criticized its lack of customization, menu handling and Unity hardware requirements, saying, "There's really nothing here which should demand 3D acceleration." He also noted that "The layout doesn't translate well to large screens or multiple-screen systems."[103] Jack M. Germain of Linux Insider indicated strong dislike for it, saying, "Put me in the Hate It category" and indicating that as development has proceeded he likes it less and less.[104]

Ubuntu 11.10

[edit]
Unity desktop in Ubuntu 11.10

More criticism appeared after the release of Ubuntu 11.10. In November 2011 Robert Storey writing in DistroWatch criticized Unity for taking up developer time to the point that Ubuntu's stability was negatively affected, calling it "kind of cute, but nothing to write home about."[105]

Developers of Ubuntu-based Linux distributions were interviewed about Unity by Datamation in a 2011 article, with the lead developers of Super OS and Tuquito intending to use the interface. Fully-free software distributions gNewSense and Trisquel omitted Unity as it mandated 3D graphics acceleration, and the ArtistX, Vinux and UberStudent projects declining to use it due to accessibility and usability concerns.[106]

Later assessments

[edit]
Unity desktop in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

Reviewing Ubuntu 12.04, Jesse Smith of DistroWatch wrote that previously "underwhelming" parts of Unity had "come together to form a whole, clear picture", highlighting the HUD as easy to use for novice users and versatile for power users, though citing inflexibility of Unity as a whole as an issue.[95] Jack Wallen of TechRepublic, who had been critical of earlier versions of Unity, wrote that he was "working much more efficiently" with the environment and called it an "incredible" advancement.[94] Ryan Paul praised Unity's responsiveness, robustness and reliability, highlighting the HUD as a feature which contributed to making it "even better in Ubuntu 12.04", while criticizing aspects of the user experience as "detract[ing] from [its] predictability and ease of use."[96]

Jack Wallen of TechRepublic, in reviewing the changes scheduled for Unity in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, concluded, "Ubuntu Unity is not the desktop pariah you once thought it was. This desktop environment has evolved into a beautiful, efficient interface that does not deserve the scorn and derision heaped upon it by so many."[107]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Unity (user interface)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Unity is a graphical shell developed by Ltd. for the operating system, serving as a user interface layer atop the desktop environment. Introduced initially for netbooks in 10.10 in October 2010, it emphasized efficient screen space utilization through a vertical launcher and overlay search mechanisms. It became the default desktop interface with 11.04 in April 2011, featuring key elements such as the persistent left-side Unity Launcher for application icons, the for integrated local and online content search via "lenses" or scopes, and the Heads-Up Display (HUD) activated by the for menu navigation through typed commands. These innovations aimed to streamline workflows and enable cross-device convergence, including experimental support for touch interfaces in later iterations like Unity 8 with the Mir display server. However, Unity sparked debates over its departure from conventional desktop paradigms, with the 's default online lenses—particularly the Amazon integration in 12.10—drawing sharp privacy critiques for transmitting user search terms to external servers without opt-in consent, prompting responses from privacy advocates and eventual disablement by default in subsequent releases. discontinued Unity as Ubuntu's flagship interface in 2017 with the shift to in 17.10, citing resource constraints and upstream alignment, though community-driven variants like Ubuntu Unity persist to maintain its codebase.

Overview

Design Principles and Goals

Unity's design principles originated from the Ayatana project, which sought to enhance the overall user experience in Ubuntu by prioritizing intuitive interactions and efficient resource use, particularly on resource-constrained devices like netbooks. The interface was engineered to optimize screen real estate through elements such as the persistent left-side Launcher for quick application access and the global menu bar, which relocated application menus to the top panel to minimize window clutter and facilitate touch-friendly operations. These choices stemmed from usability testing on mid-range hardware, where traditional desktop paradigms were found to hinder performance and flow on smaller displays. A core goal was achieving consistency across diverse form factors, enabling a unified and predictable behavior from netbooks and desktops to tablets and televisions, as part of Canonical's broader convergence strategy. This unification aimed to maintain simplicity and maintainability, reducing by standardizing interactions like search scopes and lenses, which integrated local files, web content, and applications into a single, searchable interface. Designers emphasized reducing "chrome"—decorative UI elements—to maximize content immersion, allowing users to focus on tasks without excessive navigation or window management overhead. Canonical's objectives included broadening Ubuntu's appeal to attract new users through innovative features like the Heads-Up Display (HUD) for command-based menu searching, while ensuring efficiency for power users via customizable shortcuts and keyboard-driven workflows. Iterative usability benchmarks every three months validated design decisions by measuring task completion rates and error frequencies, with goals centered on adoption—drawing in non-technical users—and retention through performant, "just works" experiences that prioritized speed over traditional file hierarchies. This approach diverged from prevailing desktop environments like , which Ubuntu viewed as misaligned with its focus on device-agnostic simplicity and search primacy.

Core Architectural Components

Unity's core architecture centers on the Compiz compositing window manager, which provides window management, decorations, and effects integration. The Unity shell operates primarily as a Compiz plugin known as "unityshell," responsible for rendering and managing key interface elements including the launcher sidebar, top panel, and dash overview. This plugin leverages Compiz's OpenGL-based capabilities to enable smooth animations and , distinguishing Unity from traditional GTK-based shells by embedding custom UI logic directly into the window manager layer. A custom rendering toolkit called Nux forms the foundation for Unity's unique visual components, handling the drawing of non-standard widgets like the auto-hide launcher and searchable using abstractions rather than relying solely on for consistency with Compiz's . Nux enables efficient, GPU-accelerated rendering of overlay elements, supporting features such as spread views and exposés without disrupting underlying application rendering. This approach, while performant on supported hardware, contributed to compatibility challenges on certain graphics drivers. The libunity library serves as the central integration layer, offering APIs for shell-wide functionalities including launcher icon management, application switching via (Basic Application's Management Framework), and session indicators. It facilitates communication between Unity components and underlying GNOME libraries, such as through D-Bus interfaces, while abstracting complexities like peer-to-peer data sharing via the Dee library for scopes and lenses. Additional services, like unity-panel-service, manage the top panel's menus and notifications independently to ensure responsiveness. This allowed iterative development but required tight coordination to avoid performance bottlenecks observed in early releases.

Historical Development

Origins and Canonical's Vision (2009-2010)

In response to the surge in netbook sales during 2008 and 2009, Canonical developed the Remix as an optimized variant of for devices with limited screen sizes and processing power. Released concurrently with 9.04 on April 23, 2009, this edition employed a modified desktop featuring a vertical application launcher and collapsible top panel to preserve vertical space and enhance usability on small displays. Early 2010 saw Canonical launch research into a dedicated graphical shell for netbooks, culminating in the announcement of Unity on May 10, 2010. described Unity as a , touch-oriented interface designed for rapid —targeting under 10 seconds for web access—and stateless operation focused on cloud-centric workflows with reduced emphasis on local file . The core vision prioritized efficient space utilization via a persistent left launcher for applications, integrated search via the overlay, and compatibility with emerging hardware trends, positioning Unity as an evolution beyond ad-hoc panel rearrangements. This effort aligned with Canonical's Ayatana initiatives, which had begun integrating enhancements like application indicators to foster a cohesive shell independent of upstream constraints. By mid-2010, Unity's netbook implementation gained traction among original equipment manufacturers for its performance on low-end hardware, prompting Canonical to extend its scope. On October 25, 2010, at the Ubuntu Developer Summit, Shuttleworth revealed plans to adopt Unity as the default interface for the standard Ubuntu desktop in version 11.04, driven by positive netbook feedback and strategic divergences from GNOME's trajectory, including performance issues with Mutter compositing and incompatible design priorities like global menubars. This decision underscored Canonical's ambition for a unified, device-agnostic user experience that maintained Ubuntu's reliance on the GNOME application stack while innovating at the shell level for consistency across netbooks, desktops, and future form factors.

Initial Rollout and Early Versions (2010-2011)

first previewed Unity on May 10, 2010, introducing it as a lightweight desktop shell optimized for netbooks and touch-enabled devices, with a focus on a simplified launcher and panel for smaller screens. This early iteration was targeted for inclusion in the Ubuntu Netbook Edition, emphasizing efficient use of vertical space and integration with Compiz for . Unity made its initial public rollout in Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat), released on October 10, 2010, where it served as the default interface exclusively for the Netbook Edition. This version featured a vertical application launcher on the left side of the screen, a top panel with system indicators, and basic search functionality via the , marking Canonical's shift away from the GNOME-based interface used in prior netbook releases. On October 25, 2010, founder announced that Unity would become the default for both and standard desktop editions in the upcoming 11.04 (Natty ), diverging from to pursue Canonical's vision of a convergent, device-agnostic shell. Development previews and betas followed, incorporating feedback on usability, with Unity leveraging NUX (a custom toolkit) for rendering and Mutter/Compiz for window management. Ubuntu 11.04 launched on April 28, 2011, delivering the first stable desktop deployment of , which included enhanced integration for application launching and file browsing, alongside global menu support in the top panel. Early implementations relied on 3D acceleration via Compiz, with fallback options limited, leading to performance considerations on lower-end hardware during this phase.

Iterative Improvements and Peak Adoption (2011-2016)

Following its initial introduction, Unity received iterative refinements across Ubuntu releases from 11.10 to 16.04, focusing on , , and compatibility. Ubuntu 11.10, released October 13, 2011, added a 2D rendering option using Qt for systems lacking support, addressing early criticism over 3D requirements. These updates stabilized the shell, with subsequent versions emphasizing search integration and customization. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, launched April 26, 2012, introduced the Heads-Up Display (HUD), a keyboard-driven interface replacing static menus by allowing users to type queries for dynamic menu access. The HUD, previewed in January 2012, aggregated application menus into a searchable overlay, prioritizing recent actions based on usage patterns to enhance efficiency. This LTS release marked a maturation point, with improved Compiz integration for effects like window spreading. Further enhancements in Ubuntu 13.10 included Smart Scopes in the Dash, enabling inline previews and online content integration directly from the launcher for quicker information retrieval. By Ubuntu 14.04 LTS in April 2014, the launcher supported icon scaling down to 24 pixels, alongside refined animations and better multi-monitor handling. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, released April 21, 2016, permitted repositioning the launcher to the bottom of the screen, catering to users preferring traditional layouts while maintaining core Unity paradigms. These developments culminated in peak adoption during the LTS cycles of 12.04 and 14.04, where Unity's polished interface contributed to Ubuntu's leading position among distributions for desktop use, though overall desktop remained below 2% globally. Canonical's focus on convergence previews in later releases like 16.04 foreshadowed shifts, but Unity 7 established as the refined, widely deployed iteration by 2016.

Convergence Initiative with Unity 8 (2016-2017)

In 2016, Canonical advanced development of Unity 8 as the foundation for its convergence strategy, aiming to create a unified shell capable of seamlessly adapting across devices including smartphones, tablets, and desktops. The initiative sought to enable "convergence," where a running could connect to an external monitor, keyboard, and input peripherals to transform into a full without requiring separate hardware or software stacks. This approach relied on Unity 8's modular architecture, built atop the display server, to support touch, , and keyboard inputs while scaling applications dynamically based on screen size and context. Progress in 2016 included the release of a developer preview of Unity 8 in 16.10 on October 13, allowing users to test the session alongside the stable Unity 7 default. The preview demonstrated apps scaling from phone-sized interfaces to desktop layouts, with features like adaptive and cross-input compatibility, though it remained experimental and not recommended for production use due to ongoing stability issues. Earlier in May 2016, Canonical had delayed full adoption, confirming Unity 8 would not become the default in 16.10 but would ship as an optional session, reflecting challenges in achieving reliability for broad deployment. Development emphasized Mir's role in handling multiple displays and input methods, with end-of-year reviews highlighting previews for kiosk modes and further shell refinements. By early 2017, despite these efforts, Canonical determined the convergence vision lacked sufficient market traction, particularly from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for Ubuntu-based mobile devices. On April 5, 2017, Canonical founder announced the end of investment in Unity 8, the associated phone platform, and convergence initiatives, citing a strategic pivot to higher-growth areas like cloud and IoT where Ubuntu had demonstrated commercial viability. Unity 7 would continue receiving maintenance until at least 2021, but the default desktop for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS would revert to , effectively halting Canonical's push for a convergent Unity shell. This decision followed years of development since Unity 8's conceptual origins around 2013, underscoring the initiative's failure to achieve ecosystem-wide adoption amid competition from established mobile platforms.

Key Features

Launcher, Dash, and Search Integration

The Unity Launcher consists of a persistent vertical panel on the left edge of the screen, optimized for quick access to pinned and running applications. Introduced in the Ubuntu Netbook Edition of 2010, it prioritizes touch-friendly design by remaining always visible without autohide options, accommodating accordion layouts to display up to 40 icons on a 600-pixel-wide screen in expanded state. Users pin applications via drag-and-drop or right-click menus for customized persistence, while running instances show visual indicators such as progress bars for downloads or tilted icons highlighting the focused window. Navigation employs mouse wheel scrolling, edge-based auto-scroll, and inertial dragging for efficient icon traversal, with the Super key revealing numbered shortcuts for keyboard-driven launches. Integrated with the Launcher, the Dash activates as a full-screen overlay upon clicking its dedicated top icon or pressing the Super key, serving as a central hub for application launching and content discovery. Designed initially for constraints in , it draws inspiration from console interfaces to deliver a media-rich, device-like experience that maximizes vertical screen real estate by minimizing traditional panels. The Dash aggregates local applications, files, and online content into searchable views, supporting transitions from stateless, instant-on sessions to full file management workflows. Search functionality within the Dash leverages a modular system of lenses and scopes for comprehensive query handling across disparate sources. Lenses function as selectable channels or views—such as applications, files, or music—directing user input, while scopes operate as backend providers querying specific datasets, including local directories or remote services like YouTube and Amazon. Enhancements in Ubuntu 13.04 introduced smart scopes that dynamically activate based on query semantics, for example routing "The Beatles" to music and video scopes for blended local and ranked online results. Users control scope behavior with filters for local-only searches (via Super+F) and enable direct actions like purchasing media through Ubuntu One integrations, though early implementations faced privacy concerns over unprompted web queries.

Heads-Up Display (HUD) and Menu Systems

The Unity desktop environment employs a global menu system, wherein application menus are consolidated into a dedicated top panel bar rather than embedded within individual titlebars, thereby maximizing vertical screen particularly on smaller displays. This design, inherited from the initial Netbook Edition rollout in 10.10 on , 2010, leverages the AppMenu indicator to dynamically display the menus of the currently focused application in the panel, akin to macOS's approach but adapted for via DBus communication with supporting applications. Applications must export their menu structures through compatible toolkits like or Qt with appropriate plugins; unsupported legacy apps revert to local menus within their windows. This separation enhances workspace efficiency but requires users to glance upward for menu access, a justified by Canonical's emphasis on screen preservation in constrained environments. Complementing the global menu, the Heads-Up Display (HUD) serves as an intent-based, search-driven overlay for rapid menu navigation, introduced by Canonical on January 24, 2012, and first shipped in 12.04 LTS released April 26, 2012. Activated by tapping the Super ( followed by typing or directly via the in focused applications, the HUD presents a transient, semi-transparent search field that indexes and queries the active app's menu hierarchy—including actions, submenus, and even contextual options—without requiring mouse-driven dropdown traversal. As users type queries (e.g., "save" in a text editor), results populate dynamically with previews of matching items, grouped by relevance and category, enabling selection via keyboard navigation or mouse click; this reduces by prioritizing semantic intent over hierarchical browsing. The HUD aggregates data from the global menu exporter, supporting over 90% of native apps by Unity 5.0 in early 2012, though compatibility varies for third-party software lacking menu export. In practice, the HUD extends beyond mere menu lookup to facilitate command discovery, such as surfacing "Export to PDF" under a buried File submenu, with real-time filtering that adapts to partial inputs and learns from usage patterns via Unity's session caching. Critics noted initial performance overhead on older hardware due to on-demand menu parsing, addressed in subsequent updates like Unity 5.4 in February , which optimized indexing for sub-100ms latency. For developers, integration involves exporting actions via HUD-compatible APIs in libhud or indicator-appmenu, allowing custom intents beyond standard menus, though adoption waned post-2017 as Canonical shifted focus, leaving the feature stable in Unity 7 branches maintained by community forks like . This combination of global menus and HUD aimed to evolve desktop interaction toward predictive, keyboard-centric paradigms, though empirical usability studies from indicated mixed , with power users favoring its while novices preferred traditional dropdowns for .

Scopes, Lenses, and App Integration

Scopes in the Unity interface serve as modular search providers that enable the to aggregate and query content from diverse sources, including local applications, files, web services, and online platforms. Introduced as part of Unity's search , scopes replaced or evolved from earlier lens mechanisms, allowing dynamic content discovery without traditional file browser navigation. Each scope acts as a backend engine, processing user queries and returning categorized results for display in the Dash. Lenses, originally distinct components in early Unity versions from 2010 to around 2013, functioned as frontend filters or views that organized and presented data retrieved by scopes. A lens would channel a search query to one or more scopes and render the results in a tailored interface, such as dedicated panels for , or applications. Over time, the terminology consolidated under "scopes," with lenses becoming integrated or deprecated in favor of unified scope definitions that handle both and presentation. This shift facilitated broader applicability, including in 8's convergence efforts for desktop and mobile. By 14.04 in April 2014, scopes supported remote activation and preview cards, enhancing non-intrusive content access. App integration with scopes and lenses allows developers to expose application-specific content directly within the search ecosystem. Applications can implement scope APIs to register as searchable providers, enabling users to query app —such as contacts from an or media from a player—via natural language input in the . This integration leverages Unity's Clickscope framework for packaging scopes as installable components, often distributed through the . For instance, third-party scopes for services like or Amazon were bundled or added post-installation, pulling live results into the interface. Developers use C++ or other supported languages via the unity.scopes library to define query handlers, result metadata, and preview layouts, ensuring seamless embedding without launching the full app. In Unity 7, maintained through 2023, this system supported over 50 default and community scopes, promoting a unified search experience across local and cloud resources.

Window Management and Compiz Effects

Unity's window management is powered by Compiz, an OpenGL-based compositing window manager that replaced Mutter in October 2010 to improve performance through direct graphics hardware utilization and resolve plugin system limitations in Mutter. Compiz handles core operations such as window placement, resizing, minimizing, maximizing, and switching, integrating seamlessly with Unity's shell via the Unity plugin to enforce consistent behaviors like automatic maximization of certain applications unless overridden. Users can snap windows to screen edges by dragging them, enabling side-by-side multitasking, while keyboard shortcuts like Super+Ctrl+Left/Right facilitate quick resizing and positioning. Compiz supports multiple workspaces, accessible via a switcher activated by Ctrl+Alt+Down, allowing windows to be moved between them through drag-and-drop or shortcuts. configurations are managed natively, with windows assignable to specific displays and the ability to span across them, though primary display prioritization applies for Unity elements like the launcher. Advanced placement rules, configurable via CompizConfig Settings Manager (CCSM), dictate window behavior on launch, such as centering or stacking to avoid overlaps. For visual effects, Compiz enables hardware-accelerated by default in Unity, including fade-in/fade-out animations for window minimization and restoration, drop shadows, and transparency on inactive windows to enhance . Minimization triggers a genie-like effect where windows collapse into the launcher icon, while shake-to-minimize (enabled via CCSM) hides windows by shaking their titlebar. More elaborate effects, such as wobbly windows during resizing or a rotating desktop cube for workspace , require manual activation in CCSM and compatible graphics hardware, as they were not enabled by default to prioritize stability and performance over visual flair. These effects leverage for smooth rendering but can be toggled or customized per plugin, with Unity's integration ensuring compatibility without disrupting core functionality.

Variants and Technical Implementations

Unity 2D for Legacy Hardware

Unity 2D served as a fallback implementation of the Unity user interface for systems without hardware-accelerated support, targeting low-end netbooks and legacy hardware incapable of running the primary Compiz-based Unity 3D shell. Developed using the Qt toolkit, it replicated core Unity elements like the launcher, , and global menu without relying on 3D compositing effects, thereby reducing resource demands and enabling functionality on graphics-constrained setups. By default, Unity 2D employed the window manager for non-compositing operations, contrasting with the effects-heavy Compiz integration in Unity 3D, which prioritized visual animations over broad compatibility. Introduced as an installable package in Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal) on April 28, 2011, Unity 2D addressed early adoption barriers for Unity on older hardware, where the 3D variant's prerequisites often triggered fallback to the classic 2 interface. Users could select the Unity 2D session at login, ensuring access to Unity's scoped search and HUD features in a 2D-rendered environment, though it omitted advanced Compiz plugins like wobbly windows or cube desktops. This variant maintained parity in where possible, such as panel integration and application spreading, but prioritized stability over the immersive effects of its 3D counterpart. Canonical discontinued Unity 2D with the release of Ubuntu 12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) on October 18, 2012, citing improved graphics capabilities across consumer hardware that rendered the separate 2D branch obsolete. Prior to removal, it remained available in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin), supporting extended maintenance until 2017 for legacy deployments. The decision stemmed from the maintenance overhead of dual codebases—Qt for 2D versus Nux/Compiz for 3D—and a shift toward mandating 3D acceleration, with affected users defaulting to Unity 3D or lighter alternatives like Xfce for truly obsolete systems. Post-discontinuation, no official backports or revivals occurred, reflecting Canonical's focus on unified development under the increasingly viable 3D Unity framework.

Unity 7 as the Stable Branch

Following Canonical's abandonment of Unity 8 for desktop environments in April 2017, Unity 7 was retained as the stable, production-ready branch of the Unity user interface. Unity 8's focus on cross-device convergence introduced complexities that hindered its desktop viability, prompting developers to prioritize Unity 7's reliability for traditional PC use. Unity 7, which powered Ubuntu releases from 11.10 through 16.10, entered a maintenance phase post-2017 but benefited from community efforts to sustain its functionality. By 2022, active development resumed under the project, culminating in the Unity 7.6 stable release on , which introduced accent color customization, theme enhancements, and a redesigned while maintaining with 22.04 LTS. This release marked the first major update to since version 7.4 in 2016, reducing memory utilization compared to prior iterations and addressing long-standing integration issues with modern kernels. Subsequent maintenance included 7.7, released on December 24, 2022, which further refined stability for ongoing deployments in the Ubuntu flavor. As the stable branch, Unity 7 emphasizes core features like the launcher, HUD, and Compiz-based window management without the experimental scopes or display server of Unity 8, ensuring consistent performance on x86 hardware. Community maintainers, including contributors to the Launchpad repository, have focused on bug fixes and minor enhancements to support its use in non-LTS Ubuntu versions up to 23.04 and beyond via third-party packaging.

Lomiri as the Evolution of Unity 8

Following Canonical's discontinuation of Unity 8 development in 2017, the UBports community forked the codebase to sustain support for on mobile devices, preserving its Qt-based architecture and convergence features originally intended for seamless operation across desktops, tablets, and phones. This transition marked the shift from corporate-led to community-driven maintenance, with UBports focusing on stabilizing the shell for production use while addressing Canonical-era dependencies that hindered broader distribution packaging. In February 2020, the project was renamed Lomiri to resolve naming conflicts with the Unity game engine, simplify pronunciation, and remove Ubuntu-specific branding in components like the UI toolkit, enabling easier integration into distributions such as Debian and Fedora without legal or proprietary entanglements. The rename involved updating repositories and QML imports while maintaining backward compatibility for existing Ubuntu Touch installations, allowing developers to continue leveraging the core shell without major disruptions. Lomiri's evolution emphasizes enhanced portability and modernity, including a full migration to Qt6 for improved performance, integration with Mir display server version 2.20.2, and native Wayland compositing as a lightweight, touch-optimized environment adaptable to diverse hardware. By February 2023, it achieved desktop viability on unstable (Sid) and testing (Trixie), decoupling from constraints and positioning it for inclusion in Debian 14 (Trixie) as a convergent shell with approximately 135 Debian packages and over 200 resolved issues toward production readiness. In May 2024, an experimental Lomiri variant based on 24.04 (Noble Numbat) was released, extending its scope to standard PC desktops alongside mobile ports in , , and others, though noted as non-long-term-supported.

Deployment and Availability

Integration in Ubuntu Releases

Unity was introduced as the default desktop environment in Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal), released on April 28, 2011, marking a shift from the GNOME 2-based interface used in prior versions to Canonical's custom shell built on Compiz and Nux. This integration aimed to unify the desktop and netbook experiences, with Unity replacing the traditional GNOME panels and introducing the Dash launcher and global menu. Subsequent releases from Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot, October 13, 2011) through Ubuntu 17.04 (Zesty Zapus, April 13, 2017) retained Unity 7 as the standard interface, incorporating iterative refinements such as improved search scopes in 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin, April 26, 2012) and enhanced HUD functionality in later cycles. Long-term support (LTS) versions like 12.04, 14.04 (Trusty Tahr, April 17, 2014), and 16.04 (Xenial Xerus, April 21, 2016) provided stability for enterprise deployments, with Unity receiving security updates aligned to Ubuntu's five-year LTS commitment. Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark, October 19, 2017) ended Unity's tenure as the default, as Canonical transitioned to GNOME Shell on Wayland for improved hardware compatibility and upstream alignment, rendering Unity optional via third-party repositories thereafter. Following Canonical's discontinuation of Unity development in July 2017, community efforts preserved its availability; users could install Unity 7 packages on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver, April 26, 2018) and later releases until repositories were deprecated around Ubuntu 20.04. Post-2017 integration shifted to the flavor, initially launched as a community remix with 20.04 LTS on May 7, 2020, backporting Unity 7 to modern bases for compatibility with newer kernels and graphics stacks. This flavor evolved through interim releases like 20.10 (October 22, 2020) and 21.10 (October 14, 2021), addressing dependency issues and adding minor UI tweaks, before gaining official flavor status in 22.10 (, October 20, 2022). As of 2024, 24.04 LTS (Noble Numbat base, April 25, 2024) and 24.10 continue this lineage, supporting Unity 7.7 with updates for contemporary hardware while maintaining the original interface paradigms. These flavors integrate Unity via customized ISOs, ensuring seamless installation alongside 's core repositories but without Canonical's direct maintenance.

Ports to Other Distributions

The Unity desktop environment, originally developed by for , has seen limited ports to non- Linux distributions, primarily driven by community maintainers after ceased active development in 2017. These efforts focus on Unity 7, the final stable branch, adapting its components—such as the launcher, HUD, and Compiz integration—for independent package managers and system configurations. Ports remain niche due to Unity's historical dependencies on Ubuntu-specific libraries and theming, requiring manual resolution of build dependencies and potential compromises in functionality like Wayland support. In November 2022, the Unity maintenance team released the first official port of Unity 7.6 to , porting key packages including unity-control-center, unity-settings-daemon, and associated indicators directly from repositories while addressing Arch-specific packaging needs. This port enables full installation via the Arch User Repository (AUR) or custom repositories, allowing users to select Unity as a session at login after installing prerequisites like Compiz and Nux. Early adopters reported successful operation on Arch derivatives like , though some users noted minor issues with theming or plugin stability on rolling-release updates. Informal ports exist for Gentoo, leveraging its Portage system to compile Unity components, as noted in community discussions from 2024, though these require ebuild maintenance and may lag behind Arch's updates. Efforts for Debian-based systems outside are feasible via backports but often inherit 's package ecosystem, reducing their independence. Compatibility with RPM-based distributions like remains unofficial and challenging; while historical repositories existed as early as 2012, recent attempts encounter unresolved dependencies and lack maintainer support, with no Wayland compatibility exacerbating issues on modern releases. Similarly, openSUSE users face barriers without dedicated ports, limiting widespread adoption beyond Arch.

Mobile and Convergence Adaptations

Unity's architecture incorporated touch-friendly elements from its inception, facilitating adaptations for mobile devices and convergence scenarios where a single operating system could seamlessly transition between phone, tablet, and desktop modes. Canonical developed Ubuntu Touch, a mobile operating system leveraging Unity 8 as its graphical shell, announced in 2013 as an extension of the Unity interface optimized for smaller screens and gesture-based interactions. The interface featured a simplified Dash for app launching via swipes, auto-hiding HUD elements to maximize display area, and scopes tailored for mobile content discovery, such as integrating notifications and recent activities into a unified overlay. Convergence adaptations centered on Unity 8's use of the display server to enable dynamic UI scaling and peripheral detection, allowing devices to adapt based on connected hardware. When a like a smartphone was docked to an external monitor, keyboard, and mouse, Unity 8 would switch to a desktop-like windowed mode, supporting multitasking with resizable application windows and desktop software containers such as for running traditional apps. This was demonstrated in 2015 with features like multi-screen support and app continuity, where phone-optimized applications expanded to full desktop functionality without restarting. Ports targeted hardware including devices and phones, with initial developer previews released in 2013 and beta versions by 2015, aiming for a unified ecosystem across smartphones, tablets, and PCs. Ubuntu's convergence vision extended to televisions and embedded devices, with Unity adaptations for larger displays emphasizing navigation and media-focused scopes, as prototyped in Ubuntu TV interfaces that hid desktop elements in favor of full-screen content grids. These mobile and convergence implementations relied on Qt-based components for cross-device rendering, prioritizing over heavy customization to support resource-constrained hardware, though development emphasized empirical testing on real devices rather than simulated environments. By 2016, Unity 8 previews included convergence-specific enhancements like adaptive input handling, where touch gestures coexisted with /keyboard inputs in hybrid setups.

Reception and Controversies

Positive Assessments and Innovations

Unity's launcher, positioned vertically on the left side of the screen, provided an efficient dock-like interface for quick access to favorite applications and the overview, reducing clutter on smaller displays and improving for users with limited screen . This design element, introduced in 11.04 on April 28, 2011, was optimized for netbooks and touch-enabled devices, enabling seamless interaction across hardware types. A key innovation was the Heads-Up Display (HUD), debuted in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on April 26, 2012, which allowed keyboard-driven searching of application menus without relying on mouse navigation, enhancing accessibility and speed for power users. Reviewers noted the HUD's responsiveness, describing it as a "genuinely innovative" tool that streamlined menu access in a robust desktop environment. Similarly, the global menu bar relocated application menus to the top panel, promoting consistency across windows and freeing horizontal space, which contributed to Unity's reputation for efficient multitasking. The with smart scopes integrated local file searches, application launching, and online content retrieval—such as weather or updates—into a unified search , representing an early attempt at blending desktop and web services. This feature, refined through Ubuntu 12.10 on October 18, 2012, was praised for its productivity gains, with assessments highlighting Unity's overall stability and visual polish as making it one of the most efficient interfaces available. Tech analysts have retrospectively affirmed Unity's enduring appeal, citing its elegant design and performance as superior for focused computing tasks compared to more resource-intensive alternatives.

Criticisms of Usability and Customization

Unity's design philosophy prioritized a streamlined, consistent over extensive , which led to widespread complaints about restricted customization options relative to predecessors like 2 or competitors such as . Users accustomed to desktops' traditional flexibility often described the interface as inflexible, with limited built-in tools for modifying core elements like the launcher position, panel layouts, or window decorations without relying on third-party extensions or Compiz tweaks. For instance, early implementations in 11.04 (released April 2011) offered minimal configuration for aspects such as the preview or scope integrations, prompting designers to defend the approach as intentional to avoid configuration overload while promising future enhancements. This stance contrasted with user surveys from 2011, where respondents highlighted Unity's "lack of customization" as a primary shortcoming, viewing it as a departure from open-source norms of user control. Usability critiques centered on features like the global menu and Heads-Up Display (HUD), which aimed to optimize screen real estate but disrupted established workflows. The global menu, which consolidated application menus into the top panel rather than embedding them in windows, was faulted for incompatibility with setups, as menus failed to migrate with windows moved to secondary displays, requiring users to glance away from content. Reviewers in 2012 noted this as ill-suited for power users, who preferred local menus for rapid, context-aware access without altering focus. Similarly, the HUD—a search-driven alternative introduced in Ubuntu 12.04 (April 2012)—prioritized keyboard efficiency for command discovery but was seen as opaque for novices or those unfamiliar with search-based navigation, exacerbating a for traditional menu reliant users. The left-aligned launcher sidebar drew further usability ire for its fixed positioning and auto-hide behavior, which some found space-consuming on smaller screens or distracting during window management, with limited options to resize icons or filter pinned items natively. Persistent annoyances persisted into later iterations like 11.10 (October 2011), where reviewers documented interruptions from these elements despite improvements. Overall, these choices reflected Canonical's convergence goals for desktop-to-mobile parity, but empirical user feedback indicated they compromised discoverability and adaptability for desktop-centric tasks, contributing to Unity's polarizing reception among communities valuing ergonomic flexibility.

Commercial and Privacy Backlash

The integration of commercial affiliate features into Unity's , particularly the shopping lens introduced in Ubuntu 12.04 and expanded in subsequent releases, drew significant criticism for prioritizing revenue generation over user autonomy. Canonical partnered with Amazon to display product recommendations alongside local search results, earning commissions via affiliate links; this was explicitly framed by Canonical founder as a means to fund open-source development amid limited traditional revenue models for distributions. However, the feature blended remote queries seamlessly with on-device searches, often without clear user disclosure, leading to accusations of injecting advertisements into core system functionality. Privacy concerns intensified with 12.10's release on October 18, 2012, when the lens was enabled by default and transmitted search terms—including potentially sensitive or non-commercial queries—to Canonical's servers and Amazon for processing, sometimes loading thumbnails directly from Amazon's domains. The (EFF) documented instances of unintended data leaks, noting that the system could expose user inputs to third parties without granular opt-in controls, effectively turning the desktop search into a tracking vector. Critics, including advocate , labeled as "malicious software" due to these non-consensual data transmissions, arguing they violated principles of user sovereignty in open-source ecosystems. User backlash manifested in widespread protests, with forums and communities sharing guides to purge the unity-lens-shopping package, which removed the feature but risked breaking dependencies. In response, Canonical introduced opt-in toggles by Ubuntu 13.04 and decoupled online results from default searches in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (April 2016), effectively disabling remote queries unless explicitly enabled. The UK's ruled in August 2014 that the lens complied with data protection laws, citing anonymized query handling, though this did little to quell perceptions of overreach among privacy-focused users. These developments contributed to broader skepticism toward 's commercial strategies, accelerating user migrations to ad-free alternatives like or community-driven distributions.

Comparative Evaluations Against Alternatives

Unity's resource footprint has been evaluated as lighter than 's in idle RAM usage, with approximately 335 MB compared to 's 408 MB on comparable Ubuntu setups, though both exceed lighter alternatives like certain configurations of at around 394 MB. This positions Unity favorably for memory efficiency against heavier environments like , which prioritizes minimalism but incurs higher overhead from Wayland transitions and extensions, but less so against traditional desktops like MATE (376 MB) or (348 MB). KDE Plasma, at 347 MB, offers similar baseline usage but scales better under load due to modular components. In performance benchmarks, Unity lagged behind competitors in computational tasks. A 2012 Phoronix test suite on Ubuntu 12.10 showed Unity's Compiz-based compositor yielding slower results across CPU, GPU, and I/O workloads compared to , , , and , with no scenario where Unity outperformed the field, attributed to its 3D acceleration demands. Earlier evaluations, such as a 2011 task-based comparison, ranked Unity behind GNOME 2 and for default workflow efficiency in basic operations like file management and application launching, where KDE's configurability provided more options. Usability assessments highlight Unity's strengths in integrated search via Scopes and the , offering a unified app and content discovery superior to GNOME's default overview in consistency for ecosystems, but divisive for users accustomed to traditional taskbars in or MATE. The global menu and HUD streamlined menu navigation for some, reducing mouse travel, yet restricted power users versus Plasma's extensive panel and widget customization or GNOME's extension-driven adaptations. Qualitative scores rate Unity's usability at 3/5, trailing (5/5) and /MATE/ (4/5), with criticisms centering on its deviation from desktop norms leading to a steeper for migrants from Windows-like interfaces. Customization in Unity is more constrained than in KDE or XFCE, lacking native deep theming or layout overhauls without third-party tools, scoring 3/5 against KDE's 5/5 for widget-based personalization. Features like convergence support for mobile-desktop unity outpaced static desktops like Cinnamon but fell short of KDE's integrated tools for and monitoring. Overall, Unity excelled in scoped, opinionated workflows for novice-to-intermediate users but underperformed in flexibility and raw speed relative to modular alternatives, influencing its niche appeal post-discontinuation.

Discontinuation and Legacy

Canonical's Shift to GNOME (2017)

In April 2017, Canonical announced the cessation of its investment in the Unity8 desktop shell, which had been developed to enable convergence between mobile and desktop environments, and declared its intention to revert Ubuntu's default desktop environment to starting with the Ubuntu 18.04 LTS release. This decision, articulated by Canonical founder , followed six years of Unity as Ubuntu's primary interface since its introduction in Ubuntu 11.04 in 2011, and reflected a strategic pivot away from consumer-facing innovations that had not achieved sufficient market traction. Shuttleworth described the move as personally challenging but driven by "commercial constraints," emphasizing Canonical's need to prioritize areas of proven revenue generation, such as cloud infrastructure, devices, and server deployments, over the underperforming convergence initiative. The shift marked the end of Canonical's bespoke desktop development efforts, with Unity7—the non-convergence version used in desktop —receiving no further upstream advancements from the company, though existing installations would continue to function without updates. In practice, the transition began earlier with the release of 17.10 in October 2017, which adopted 3.26 as its default desktop on Wayland, serving as a non-LTS preview before the stable LTS implementation in 18.04 (Bionic Beaver) in April 2018. committed to contributing to 's upstream development rather than maintaining a proprietary fork, including features like improved Wayland support and session management, to align with broader ecosystem standards. This realignment was underpinned by the failure of Unity8 to secure partnerships with hardware manufacturers for convergent devices, despite demonstrations at events like , leaving Canonical without the ecosystem momentum needed to sustain the project commercially. By November 2017, Canonical formalized its renewed focus on by joining the GNOME Foundation's Advisory Board, signaling a collaborative rather than competitive stance toward the project. The decision freed resources for Canonical's core competencies in enterprise , where Ubuntu held dominant market share in public cloud deployments, but it also relinquished the distinctive Unity had offered, such as its global menu and launcher-based workflow.

Factors Contributing to Abandonment

Canonical's decision to abandon Unity stemmed primarily from commercial imperatives, as the project failed to generate sufficient revenue to justify ongoing investment amid the company's need for financial sustainability and preparation for potential public listing. , Canonical's founder, articulated that substantial projects without a clear commercial angle could not be sustained, particularly as the firm pivoted toward profitability in enterprise sectors like cloud infrastructure and IoT. This shift was necessitated by the recognition that Unity's development, especially Unity 8, diverted resources from high-growth areas where Ubuntu already commanded and customer revenue. A core factor was the collapse of the convergence strategy, which envisioned a unified interface across desktops, phones, and tablets but encountered insurmountable market barriers. Shuttleworth conceded misjudging both the technical feasibility of convergence—where the industry favored siloed ecosystems or proprietary platforms over cross-device —and reception, which perceived Unity's innovations as divisive fragmentation rather than unifying progress. The initiative, reliant on Unity 8, achieved negligible commercial traction, with device manufacturers opting for established mobile operating systems, rendering the phone and tablet ambitions unviable by 2017. Resource intensity further exacerbated the issue, as maintaining Unity—particularly the bespoke Unity 8 shell and associated components like the display server—imposed high engineering costs without commensurate returns. By reverting to the desktop for 18.04 LTS in April 2018, offloaded maintenance to a mature, community-backed environment, freeing engineering efforts for server and embedded systems where the company reported breaking even commercially by late 2017. Shuttleworth described the engineering of 8 as "spectacularly good" but ultimately unsustainable, emphasizing that emotional attachment could not override pragmatic business calculus. While user criticisms of Unity's usability, such as its launcher and global menu, had fueled earlier backlash since its debut, Canonical's official rationale centered on economics rather than feedback, noting sustained user interest but prioritizing investor-aligned profitability over desktop experimentation. This abandonment marked a broader recalibration, ending custom shell development to leverage upstream contributions, though it preserved Unity 7 support until the April 2021 end-of-life for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.

Community Forks and Ongoing Maintenance

Following Canonical's discontinuation of Unity development in 2017, community-driven efforts emerged to sustain both the Unity7 desktop shell and the Unity8 convergence interface. The project, initiated by independent developers, repackaged Unity7 for ongoing desktop use, releasing distributions such as 24.04 in April 2024 featuring Unity7 version 7.6 and 6.8, followed by 24.10 in October 2024 with Unity7 7.7 and kernel 6.11. This project achieved official flavor status within the Ubuntu ecosystem by October 2022, enabling continued packaging, bug fixes, and compatibility updates for modern Ubuntu releases, though core code enhancements remain limited compared to Canonical's era. Unity7 maintenance focuses on stability rather than major innovations, with contributors addressing integration issues for newer hardware and software stacks via forums and threads, including calls for developer support since 2017. Ports to non-Ubuntu distributions, such as a Gentoo overlay for building Unity7 components, demonstrate niche persistence but lack widespread adoption. For the Unity8 shell, originally designed for cross-device convergence, the UBports community forked and rebranded it as Lomiri in February 2020 to avoid trademark conflicts, continuing development primarily for on mobile devices. Lomiri, a Qt-based Wayland compositor, receives regular updates through UBports' repositories, with the latest commits as of 2023 emphasizing touch-to-desktop adaptability, though full desktop functionality remains experimental and not production-ready for laptops or workstations. Efforts to install Lomiri sessions on existing desktops via community guides persist, but adoption is confined to embedded and mobile ports like , reflecting resource constraints in a volunteer-driven model. Overall, these forks preserve Unity's core features amid declining momentum, prioritizing legacy support over expansive evolution.

Broader Impact on Linux Desktop Evolution

Unity's introduction in 2010 as a shell for netbooks and its expansion to full desktop use in 11.04 marked a significant shift toward app-centric, vertically oriented interfaces optimized for smaller screens and touch input, challenging the horizontal paradigms dominant in prior environments like 2 and 3. This design, emphasizing a persistent launcher and overlay for search and multitasking, prioritized convergence across devices—desktops, tablets, and phones—over extensive customization, influencing subsequent efforts in adaptive UIs such as 's Shell extensions and Plasma's touch-friendly modes. The abandonment of Unity by Canonical in April 2017, following the failure of its convergence vision amid low adoption, redirected resources to 3.x, which incorporated lessons from Unity's scoped search and global menu concepts into its Activities Overview and app grid, though retaining greater emphasis on gestures and extensions for flexibility. This pivot highlighted the risks of proprietary extensions to upstream toolkits—Unity's Compiz-based implementation diverged from standard theming, complicating maintenance—and spurred broader community insistence on DEs adhering closer to norms, as seen in KDE's accelerated maturation of Plasma 5 for stability and configurability post-2014. Community forks, including Ubuntu Unity's revival with version 7.6 in testing by May 2022 and ongoing maintenance of Unity7 as a Compiz plugin, preserved elements like the Heads-Up Display (HUD) for efficient menu navigation, demonstrating open-source resilience against corporate discontinuation and sustaining niche demand for streamlined, non-GNOME alternatives. These efforts, alongside Lomiri (formerly Unity8) for mobile, contributed to Linux desktop evolution by exemplifying fork-driven preservation, which reinforced user agency in DE selection and indirectly boosted derivatives like Cinnamon in Linux Mint, which blended traditional panels with modern polish to address Unity's perceived usability gaps. Overall, Unity's tenure underscored causal trade-offs in desktop design: aggressive for convergence accelerated touch and search integrations across ecosystems but alienated power users, fostering a more fragmented yet choice-rich landscape where DEs like Plasma gained traction for balancing defaults with tweaks, as evidenced by rising distro variants post-2017 prioritizing extensibility over unified shells.

References

  1. https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/ubuntu-unity-vs-gnome-choosing-right-ubuntu-experience-your-workflow
  2. https://www.osnews.com/story/23944/ubuntu-to-switch-to-unity-on-desktop/
  3. https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/04/best-unity-desktop-features
  4. https://canonical.com/blog/16-10-brings-unity-8-to-desktop-and-more-snap-installations
  5. https://elvira.canonical.com/blog/unity8-uses-mir
  6. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/privacy-ubuntu-1210-amazon-ads-and-data-leaks
  7. https://www.zdnet.com/article/shuttleworth-defends-ubuntu-linux-integrating-amazon/
  8. http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/01/ubuntu-online-search-feature-disabled-16-04
  9. https://ubuntu.com/blog/switching-from-unity-to-gnome-shell-first-challenges
  10. https://itsfoss.com/keeping-ubuntu-unity-alive/
  11. https://canonical.com/blog/usability-testing-of-unity
  12. https://ubuntu.com/blog/introduction-to-unity-launcher
  13. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UnityNextSpec
  14. https://ubuntu.com/blog/the-unity-design-process-and-how-you-can-play-a-part-in-it
  15. https://ubuntu.com/blog/author/mark-shuttleworth
  16. https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/user-testing-of-unity-reveals-some-surprising-results
  17. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity
  18. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2009-April/000122.html
  19. https://www.linux.co.cr/distributions/review/2009/0420-b.html
  20. https://canonical.com/blog/unity-and-ubuntu-light
  21. http://www.mupuf.org/blog/2009/11/08/on_freedom_part_1/
  22. https://canonical.com/blog/hello-unity
  23. https://tombuntu.com/index.php/2010/05/10/first-look-at-the-ubuntu-unity-desktop-environment/
  24. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2010-October/000139.html
  25. https://www.linux-netbook.com/video/a-quick-look-at-unity-in-ubuntu-netbook-edition-1010/
  26. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/10/shuttleworth-unity-shell-will-be-default-desktop-in-ubuntu-1104/
  27. https://www.pcworld.com/article/504223/article-3057.html
  28. https://flossstuff.wordpress.com/2011/04/24/ubuntu-11-04-natty-narwhal-release-date-28th-april/
  29. https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-new-ubuntu-desktop-unity/
  30. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/05/precision-and-purpose-ubuntu-12-04-and-the-unity-hud-reviewed/
  31. https://www.pcworld.com/article/473843/ubuntu_linuxs_new_hud_interface_will_do_away_with_menus.html
  32. https://itsfoss.com/new-features-ubuntu-1404/
  33. https://ostechnix.com/here-is-the-list-of-major-changes-in-ubuntu-16-04-lts/
  34. https://canonical.com/blog/canonical-releases-ubuntu-16-10
  35. https://www.linuxinsider.com/story/shuttleworth-gives-up-hope-for-convergence-breakthrough-84445.html
  36. https://ubuntu.com/blog/mir-2016-end-of-year-review
  37. https://www.infoworld.com/article/2251081/why-is-ubuntus-unity-8-development-taking-so-long.html
  38. https://www.pcworld.com/article/414712/convergence-delayed-unity-8-wont-be-the-default-desktop-in-ubuntu-1610.html
  39. https://canonical.com/blog/growing-ubuntu-for-cloud-and-iot-rather-than-phone-and-convergence
  40. https://www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-Dropping-Unity
  41. https://canonical.com/blog/introduction-to-unity-launcher
  42. https://canonical.com/blog/searching-in-the-dash-in-ubuntu-13-04
  43. https://askubuntu.com/questions/10937/why-is-desktop-unity-using-the-global-application-menu
  44. https://unityd.org/
  45. https://ubuntu.com/blog/introducing-the-hud-say-hello-to-the-future-of-the-menu
  46. https://www.theregister.com/2012/01/24/ubuntu_hud/
  47. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/HUD
  48. https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/02/unity-5-4-lands-in-precise-brings-hud-video-lens-minor-ui-changes
  49. https://www.linuxtoday.com/news/all-you-need-to-know-about-ubuntu-scopes-2/
  50. https://www.networkworld.com/article/934672/what-the-heck-are-ubuntu-unitys-scopes.html
  51. https://askubuntu.com/questions/65369/what-are-differences-between-a-lens-and-scope
  52. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1201/UnityLenses
  53. https://www.datamation.com/open-source/scopes-and-swipes-or-how-i-learned-to-love-ubuntus-unity/
  54. https://phone.docs.ubuntu.com/en/scopes/api-cpp-current/unity.scopes
  55. https://canonical.com/blog/cleaning-up-scopes-settings
  56. https://askubuntu.com/questions/11399/how-to-use-compiz-as-the-window-manager-for-unity
  57. https://medium.com/hackernoon/how-to-turn-unity-into-a-tiling-window-manager-e915512cd4cf
  58. https://www.answeroverflow.com/m/1199982385790472212
  59. https://ubuntuunity.org/
  60. https://www.howtogeek.com/101006/how-to-tweak-unity-on-ubuntu-with-the-compizconfig-settings-manager/
  61. https://itsfoss.com/compiz/
  62. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6zp152ik9A
  63. https://askubuntu.com/questions/428037/how-to-enable-visual-effects-compiz-without-disabling-unity
  64. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CompositeManager
  65. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity2D
  66. https://askubuntu.com/questions/34913/what-is-the-difference-between-unity-2d-and-unity-3d
  67. https://linux.fandom.com/wiki/Unity_2D
  68. https://mygeekopinions.blogspot.com/2011/07/how-to-install-unity-2d-in-ubuntu-1104.html
  69. http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/08/unity-2d-removed-from-ubuntu-12-10
  70. https://askubuntu.com/questions/176634/unity-2d-support-dropped-in-12-10-what-now
  71. https://askubuntu.com/questions/134346/why-is-unity-2d-being-discontinued
  72. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2012-August/035632.html
  73. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/unity-7-continuation-call-for-developers-and-supporters/736
  74. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/unity-7-6-stable-release/29312
  75. https://linuxiac.com/unity-7-6-desktop-environment-released/
  76. https://9to5linux.com/ubuntu-unity-22-04-1-released-with-the-latest-unity-7-6-desktop-environment
  77. https://askubuntu.com/questions/1469592/ubuntu-22-04-lts-installed-unity-7-5-from-universe-how-to-switch-to-unity-7
  78. https://handwiki.org/wiki/Software:Lomiri
  79. https://ubports.com/lomiri
  80. https://ubports.com/blog/ubports-news-1/lomiri-new-name-same-great-unity8-115
  81. https://itsfoss.com/unity8-lomiri/
  82. https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/27/lomiri_desktop_on_debian/
  83. https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/09/ubuntu_unity_2404_plus_lomiri/
  84. https://www.educba.com/ubuntu-unity/
  85. https://distrowatch.com/ubuntuunity
  86. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/05/ubuntu-18-04-the-return-of-a-familiar-interface-marks-the-best-ubuntu-in-years/
  87. https://mangolassi.it/topic/15357/ubuntu-17-10-released
  88. https://askubuntu.com/questions/955198/whats-going-to-happen-to-the-unity-desktop-environment-and-default-ubuntu-versi
  89. https://ubuntuunity.org/posts/ubuntu-unity-becomes-an-official-flavor/
  90. https://distrowatch.com/11958
  91. https://linuxiac.com/ubuntu-unity-is-likely-to-become-the-next-official-ubuntu-flavor/
  92. https://unityd.org/unity-on-arch
  93. https://linuxiac.com/how-to-install-unity-desktop-environment-on-arch-linux/
  94. https://www.debugpoint.com/install-unity-desktop-arch-linux/
  95. https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1c4zrb5/unity_desktop_in_2024_whats_youre_opinion/
  96. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=125423
  97. https://discuss.techlore.tech/t/is-the-current-unity-desktop-environment-safe-for-daily-use-on-linux-distros/6202
  98. https://www.zdnet.com/article/canonical-edges-closer-to-mobile-desktop-os-convergence/
  99. https://ubuntu.com/blog/unity8-uses-mir
  100. https://canonical.com/blog/whats-new-in-ubuntu-15-10-desktop-and-devices
  101. https://itsfoss.com/ubuntu-touch/
  102. https://www.zdnet.com/article/ubuntu-linux-11-10-unity-comes-of-age-review/
  103. https://www.zdnet.com/article/whats-coming-in-ubuntus-new-unity-linux-desktop/
  104. https://www.zdnet.com/article/ubuntu-developing-new-unity-ui-instant-on-versions-for-netbook/
  105. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/ubuntu-unity-22-04-linux-desktop-distribution-productive-elegant/
  106. https://www.zdnet.com/article/ubuntu-unity-still-has-one-of-my-favorite-pc-interfaces-of-all-time/
  107. https://www.phoronix.com/review/gnome_survey_part4/9
  108. https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/ubuntu-desktop-designers-clarify-on-configurability
  109. https://www.phoronix.com/review/gnome_survey_part5/3
  110. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2011/10/desktop-dreams-ubuntu-1110-reviewed/
  111. https://news.softpedia.com/news/Canonical-We-Have-Root-Trust-Us-294538.shtml
  112. https://www.theregister.com/2012/10/18/ubuntu_12_10_review/
  113. https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/10asnf/ubuntu_will_now_have_amazon_ads_preinstalled/
  114. https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/ubuntu-12-10-amazon-search-triggers-wave-of-protest-for-privacy-concerns
  115. http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2014/08/unity-shopping-lens-is-legal-says-ioc-uk
  116. https://www.datamation.com/open-source/ubuntu-12-10-the-controversies-continue/
  117. https://eylenburg.github.io/de_comparison.htm
  118. https://www.phoronix.com/review/ubuntu_1210beta_desktops
  119. https://www.datamation.com/open-source/gnome-vs-kde-vs-unity-performing-seven-basic-tasks/
  120. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/04/ubuntu-unity-is-dead-desktop-will-switch-back-to-gnome-next-year/
  121. https://canonical.com/blog/ubuntu-17-10-releases-with-gnome-kubernetes-1-8-minimal-base-images
  122. https://blogs.gnome.org/foundation/2017/11/01/canonical-joins-gnome-foundation-advisory-board/
  123. https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/10/why-did-ubuntu-drop-unity-mark-shuttleworth-explains
  124. https://itsfoss.com/ubuntu-unity-shutdown/
  125. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31957054
  126. https://askubuntu.com/questions/945142/why-are-unity-7-and-unity-8-discontinued-now
  127. https://distrowatch.com/12122
  128. https://github.com/c4pp4/gentoo-unity7
  129. https://github.com/ubports/unity8
  130. https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Lomiri
  131. https://forums.ubports.com/topic/10250/install-uninstall-lomiri-session-on-your-linux-desktop-tablet
  132. https://www.linuxinsider.com/story/gnome-3-vs-unity-a-schism-in-the-making-72737.html
  133. https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/04/unity_trinity_desktops/
  134. https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/04/05/1812232/canonical-killing-unity-for-ubuntu-linux-will-switch-to-the-superior-gnome
  135. https://lobste.rs/s/kz0jpg/everyone_seems_forget_why_gnome_gnome_3
  136. https://news.itsfoss.com/unity-7-6-testing/
  137. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39490879
  138. https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/linux-alternate-reality-ubuntu-with-plasma.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.