Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Netbook
View on Wikipedia

A netbook is a class of small-sized and inexpensive laptops; the term were used throughout the late 2000s and early 2010s, designed mostly as a means of accessing the Internet and being significantly less expensive than full-sized laptops with lower or cut-down specifications.

At their inception in late 2007,[1] as smaller-than-typical laptop computers optimized for low weight and low cost,[2] netbooks began appearing without certain then-standard laptop features (such as an optical drive), and with less computing power than in full-sized laptops. They ranged in size from about 5" screen diagonal to 12", with a typical weight of about 1 kg (2.2 pounds), and were often significantly less expensive than other laptops.[3] Soon after their appearance, netbooks grew in size and features, and converged with smaller laptops and subnotebooks until the specifications were so similar that there was little distinction between the devices.[4] At their peak, the low cost gave them a significant portion of the laptop computer market.
When Windows 7 released, netbook manufacturers had to increase specifications in order for their devices to run it. This pushed netbooks into a market niche where they had few distinctive advantages over traditional laptops.[5] With these constraints and the increasing popularity of tablet computers in 2011, it led to declining sales of netbooks.[5][6] By the end of 2012, few new laptops were marketed as "netbooks", and the term disappeared from common usage.[7]
History
[edit]
While Psion had an unrelated netBook line of machines, the use of the broad marketing term "netbook", began in 2007 when Asus unveiled the Asus Eee PC. Originally designed for emerging markets, the 23 cm × 17 cm (9.1 in × 6.7 in) device weighed about 0.9 kg (2 lb) and featured a 7 in (18 cm) display, a keyboard approximately 85% the size of a normal keyboard, a solid-state drive and a custom version of Linux with a simplified user interface geared towards consumer use.[8] Following the Eee PC, Everex launched its Linux-based CloudBook; Windows XP and Windows Vista models were also introduced and MSI released the Wind—others soon followed suit.
The OLPC project followed the same market goals laid down by the eMate 300 eight years earlier.[9][10] Known for its innovation in producing a durable, cost- and power-efficient netbook for developing countries, it is regarded as one of the major factors that led more top computer hardware manufacturers to begin creating low-cost netbooks for the consumer market.[11]

When the first Asus Eee PC sold over 300,000 units in four months, companies such as Dell and Acer took note and began producing their own inexpensive netbooks. And while the OLPC XO-1 targets a different audience than do the other manufacturers' netbooks, it appears that OLPC is now facing competition. Developing countries now have a large choice of vendors, from which they can choose which low-cost netbook they prefer.[12]

By late 2008, netbooks began to take market share away from notebooks.[13] It was more successful than earlier "mini notebooks," most likely because of lower cost and greater compatibility with mainstream laptops.
Having peaked at about 20% of the portable computer market, netbooks started to slightly lose market share (within the category) in early 2010, coinciding with the appearance and success of the iPad.[14] Technology commentator Ross Rubin argued two and a half years later in Engadget that "Netbooks never got any respect. While Steve Jobs rebuked the netbook at the iPad's introduction, the iPad owes a bit of debt to the little laptops. The netbook demonstrated the potential of an inexpensive, portable second computing device, with a screen size of about 10 inches, intended primarily for media consumption and light productivity."[15] Although some manufacturers directly blamed competition from the iPad, some analysts pointed out that larger, fully fledged laptops had entered the price range of netbooks at about the same time.[16]
The 11.6-inch MacBook Air, introduced in late 2010, compared favorably to many netbooks in terms of processing power but also ergonomics, at 2.3 pounds being lighter than some 10-inch netbooks, owing in part to the integration of the flash storage chips on the main logic board.[17] It was described as a superlative netbook (or at least as what a netbook should be) by several technology commentators,[18][19][20] even though Apple has never referred to it as such, sometimes describing it—in the words of Steve Jobs—as "the third kind of notebook."[19] The entry-level model had an MSRP of $999,[19] costing as much as three or four times more than the average netbook.[15]
In 2011 tablet sales overtook netbooks for the first time, and in 2012 netbook sales fell by 25 percent, year-on-year.[21] The sustained decline since 2010 had been most pronounced in the United States and in Western Europe, while Latin America was still showing some modest growth.[22] In December 2011, Dell announced that it was exiting the netbook market.[23] In May 2012, Toshiba announced it was doing the same, at least in the United States.[24] An August 2012 article by John C. Dvorak in PC Magazine claimed that the term "netbook" was "nearly gone from the lexicon already", having been superseded in the market place largely by the more powerful (and MacBook Air inspired) Ultrabook—described as "a netbook on steroids"—and to a lesser extent by tablets.[25] In September 2012 Asus, Acer and MSI announced that they will stop manufacturing 10-inch netbooks.[26] Simultaneously Asus announced they would stop developing all Eee PC products, instead focusing on their mixed tablet-netbook Transformer line.[26]
With the introduction of Chromebooks, major manufacturers produced the new laptops for the same segment of the market that netbooks serviced. Chromebooks, a variation on the network computer concept, in the form of a netbook, require internet connections for full functionality. Chromebooks became top selling laptops in 2014. The threat of Google ChromeOS based Chromebooks prompted Microsoft to revive and revamp netbooks with Windows 8.1 with Bing. HP re-entered the non-Chromebook netbook market with the Stream 11 in 2014.[27].

Educational use
[edit]In Australia, the New South Wales Department of Education and Training, in partnership with Lenovo, provided Year 9 (high school) students in government high schools with Lenovo S10e netbooks in 2009, Lenovo Mini 10 netbooks in 2010, Lenovo Edge 11 netbooks in 2011 and a modified Lenovo X130e netbook in 2012, each preloaded with software including Microsoft Office and Adobe Systems' Creative Suite 4. These were provided under Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's Digital Education Revolution, or DER. The netbooks ran Windows 7 Enterprise. These netbooks were secured with Computrace Lojack for laptops that the police can use to track the device if it is lost or stolen. The NSW DET retains ownership of these netbooks until the student graduates from Year 12, when the student can keep it. The Government of Trinidad and Tobago—Prime Minister Kamla Persad Bisseser—is also providing HP laptops to form 1 Students (11-year-olds) with the same police trackable software as above.
Greece provided all 13-year-old students (middle school, or gymnasium, freshmen) and their teachers with netbooks in 2009[28] through the "Digital Classroom Initiative". Students were given one unique coupon each, with which they redeemed the netbook of their choice, up to a €450 price ceiling, in participating shops throughout the country. These netbooks came bundled with localized versions of either Windows XP (or higher) or open source (e.g. Linux) operating systems, wired and wireless networking functionality, antivirus protection, preactivated parental controls, and an educational software package.
Hardware
[edit]
Netbooks typically have less powerful hardware than larger laptop computers and do not include an optical disc drive that contemporaneous laptop computers often had. Netbooks were some of the first machines to substitute solid-state storage devices, instead of the traditional hard disk drive commonly found on laptop and desktop computers at the time.[29] This was due to solid-state drives being smaller, more power efficient, and more shock resistant. Unlike modern solid-state drives, these early models often did not offer better performance.
Almost all netbooks supported Wi-Fi and some supported Mobile broadband.[30] Some also include Ethernet and/or modems.
Most netbooks used low-end, x86 processors focused on low power consumption. The majority of early netbooks typically used processors from the Intel Atom line, but some used competing processors from AMD, including netbook APUs,[31][32] or VIA Technologies, including the C7 and Nano. Some very low-cost netbooks use a system-on-a-chip Vortex86 processor designed for embedded systems.[33][34][35][36] A few netbooks used non-x86 processors based on ARM or MIPS architectures.[37][38]
Operating systems
[edit]Windows
[edit]Microsoft announced on April 8, 2008, that, despite the impending end of retail availability for the operating system that June, it would continue to license low-cost copies of Windows XP Home Edition to OEMs through October 2010 (one year after the release of Windows 7) for what it defined as "ultra low-cost personal computers"—a definition carrying restrictions on screen size and processing power.[39][40] The move served primarily to counter the use of low-cost Linux distributions on netbooks and create a new market segment for Windows devices, whilst ensuring that the devices did not cannibalize the sales of higher-end PCs running Windows Vista.[41] In 2009, over 90% (96% claimed by Microsoft as of February 2009) of netbooks in the United States were estimated to ship with Windows XP.[42][43]
For Windows 7, Microsoft introduced a new stripped-down edition intended for netbooks known as "Starter", exclusively for OEMs. In comparison to Home Premium, Starter has reduced multimedia functionality, does not allow users to change their desktop wallpaper or theme, disables the "Aero Glass" theme, and does not have support for multiple monitors.[44][45]
For Windows 8, in a ploy to counter ChromeOS-based netbooks and low-end Android tablets, Microsoft began to offer no-cost Windows licenses to OEMs for devices with screens smaller than 9 inches in size. Additionally, Microsoft began to offer low-cost licenses for a variant of the operating system set up to use Microsoft's Bing search engine by default.[27][46][47][48]
Windows CE has also been used in netbooks, due to its reduced feature set.[49]
Android
[edit]
Google's Android software platform, designed for mobile telephone handsets, has been demonstrated on an ASUS Eee PC and its version of the Linux operating system contains policies for mobile internet devices including the original Asus Eee PC 701.[50] ASUS has allocated engineers to develop an Android-based netbook.[51] In May 2009 a contractor of Dell announced it is porting Adobe Flash Lite to Android for Dell netbooks.[52] Acer announced Android netbooks to be available in Q3/2009.[53] In July 2009, a new project, Android-x86,[54] was created to provide an open source solution for Android on the x86 platform, especially for netbooks.
ChromeOS
[edit]In 2011, Google introduced ChromeOS, a Linux-based operating system designed particularly for netbook-like devices marketed as "Chromebooks". The platform is designed to leverage online services, cloud computing, and its namesake Chrome web browser as its shell—so much so that the operating system initially used a full screen web browser window as its interface, and contained limited offline functionality.[55][56] Later versions of ChromeOS introduced a traditional desktop interface[57] and a platform allowing "native" packaged software written in HTML, JavaScript, and CSS to be developed for the platform.[58]
Other
[edit]Netbooks have sparked the development of several Linux variants or completely new distributions, which are optimized for small screen use and the limited processing power of the Atom or ARM processors which typically power netbooks. Examples include Ubuntu Netbook Edition, EasyPeasy, Joli OS and MeeGo. Both Joli OS and MeeGo purport to be "social oriented" or social networking operating systems rather than traditional "office work production" operating systems. Netbook users can also install other UNIX-based operating systems such as FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Darwin.[59]
Since 2010, major netbook manufacturers no longer install or support Linux in the United States. The reason for this change of stance is unclear, although it coincides with the availability of a 'netbook' version of Windows XP, and a later Windows 7 Starter and a strong marketing push for the adoption of this OS in the netbook market. However, companies targeting niche markets, such as System76 and ZaReason, continue to pre-install Linux on the devices they sell.
The Cloud operating system attempted to capitalize on the minimalist aspect of netbooks. The user interface was limited to a browser application only.
Mac OS X has been demonstrated running on various netbooks as a result of the OSx86 project,[60] although this is in violation of the operating system's end-user license agreement.[61] Apple has complained to sites hosting information on how to install OS X onto non-Apple hardware (including Wired and YouTube) who have reacted and removed content in response.[62] One article nicknamed a netbook running OS X a "Hackintosh."
Use
[edit]A June 2009 NPD study found that 60% of netbook buyers never take their netbooks out of the house.[63]
Special "children's" editions of netbooks have been released under Disney branding; their low cost (less at risk), lack of DVD player (less to break) and smaller keyboards (closer to children's hand sizes) are viewed as significant advantages for that target market. The principal objection to netbooks in this context is the lack of good video performance for streaming online video in current netbooks and a lack of speed with even simple games. Adults browsing for text content are less dependent on video content than small children who cannot read.
Netbooks offer several distinct advantages in educational settings. First, their compact size and weight make for an easy fit in student work areas. Similarly, their small size makes netbooks easier to transport than heavier, larger sized traditional laptops. In addition, prices ranging from $200–$600 mean the affordability of netbooks can be a relief to school budget makers. Despite the small size and price, netbooks are fully capable of accomplishing most school-related tasks, including word processing, presentations, access to the Internet, multimedia playback, and photo management.[64]
Trademarks and Psion lawsuit
[edit]
In 1996 Psion started applying for trademarks for a line of netBook products that was later released in 1999.[65] International trademarks were issued (including U.S. Trademark 75,215,401 and EUTM 000428250) but the models failed to gain popularity[66] and were discontinued by the time modern netbooks came about (except for providing accessories, maintenance and support to existing users).[67] Similar marks were recently rejected by the USPTO citing a "likelihood of confusion" under section 2(d).[68][69][70]
Despite expert analysis that the mark is "probably generic",[71] Psion Teklogix issued cease and desist letters on December 23, 2008.[72][65][73] This was heavily criticized,[74][75][76] prompting the formation of the "Save the Netbooks" grassroots campaign which worked to reverse the Google AdWords ban, cancel the trademark and encourage continued generic use of the term.[66] While preparing a "Petition for Cancellation" of U.S. Trademark 75,215,401 they revealed[77] that Dell had submitted one day before[78] on the basis of abandonment, genericness and fraud.[79] They later revealed Psion's counter-suit against Intel, filed on February 27, 2009.[80]
It was also revealed around the same time that Intel had also sued Psion Teklogix (US & Canada) and Psion (UK) in the Federal Court on similar grounds.[81] In addition to seeking cancellation of the trademark, Intel sought an order enjoining Psion from asserting any trademark rights in the term "netbook", a declarative judgment regarding their use of the term, attorneys' fees, costs and disbursements and "such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper".[82]
On June 2, 2009, Psion announced that the suit had been settled out of court. Psion's statement said that the company was withdrawing all of its trademark registrations for the term "Netbook" and that Psion agreed to "waive all its rights against third parties in respect of past, current or future use" of the term.[83]
See also
[edit]- Comparison of netbooks
- Chromebook
- Mobile phone
- Mobile broadband
- Mobile Internet device (MID)
- Mobile modem
- Nettop, a desktop equivalent of the netbook
- Pay As You Go (phone)
- PDA
- Smartbook
- Smartphone
- SIM card
- Subnotebook
- Tablet computer
- Tethering
- Thin PC
- Ultra-mobile PC (UMPC), a form factor smaller than the netbook
References
[edit]- ^ "What was the first netbook?". Computerworld. May 11, 2009. Archived from the original on January 30, 2011. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
- ^ "Cheap PCs Weigh on Microsoft". The Wall Street Journal. Business Technologies blog. December 8, 2008.
- ^ a b Netbook Trends and Solid-State Technology Forecast (PDF). pricegrabber.com. p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 26, 2009. Retrieved January 28, 2009.
- ^ Ogg, Erica (August 20, 2009). "Time to drop the Netbook label". CNN. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
- ^ a b Charles Arthur (December 31, 2012). "Sayonara, netbooks: Asus (and the rest) won't make any more in 2013". The Guardian. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
- ^ Caulfield, Brian (November 28, 2011). "The NetBook Is Dead, The iPad Killed It, Don't Buy One". Forbes. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
- ^ Arthur, Charles (December 31, 2012). "Asus (and the rest) won't make any more in 2013". The Guardian.
- ^ Bajarin, Tim (September 12, 2008). "Netbooks vs. Notebooks". PCMagazine.
- ^ Edwards, Benj (December 21, 2012). "The Forgotten eMate 300 -- 15 years later". MacWorld.
- ^ "Apple eMate 300 Quick Fact Sheet". Apple. 1996.
- ^ "OLPC: The History Of One Laptop Per Child". TechRadar. Archived from the original on November 17, 2011.
- ^ Kraemer et al.: "One Laptop Per Child: Vision vs. Reality", Communications of the ACM, June 2009.
- ^ Ian Lamont (October 4, 2008). ""Netbooks" Move Up In Notebook Rankings". Slashdot. Retrieved October 23, 2008.
- ^ "Apple's iPad nabs Netbook market share".
- ^ a b Ross Rubin (July 8, 2012). "Switched On: The Netbook Legacy". Engadget.
- ^ Tim Bajarin (January 30, 2012). "Are Netbooks Finally Dead?". PC Magazine.
- ^ Mark Spoonauer (October 21, 2010). "Apple 11-inch MacBook Air Review". Laptopmag.
- ^ Chris Nuttall. "MacBook Air – my new favourite netbook". Financial Times.
- ^ a b c "MacBook Air a great Windows Netbook, for a price". CNET.
- ^ "MacBook Air 11-inch: What a netbook should look like". ZDNet.
- ^ Arthur, Charles (February 3, 2012). "Netbooks plummet while tablets and smartphones soar, says Canalys". The Guardian.
- ^ Loyd Case (February 21, 2012). "Are Netbooks Dead? The Prognosis Is Grim Netbook sales are declining precipitously". PC World.
- ^ Melanie Pinola (December 16, 2011). "Dell Abandons Netbooks in Favor of Ultrabooks". PC World.
- ^ Fingas, Jon (May 25, 2012). "Toshiba bows out of netbooks in the US, sees Ultrabooks as the wave of the future". Engadget.com. Retrieved December 21, 2013.
- ^ John C. Dvorak (August 23, 2012). "Where Did All the Netbooks Go?". PC Magazine.
- ^ a b Monica Chen; Joseph Tsai (September 3, 2012). "Intel may need to adjust roadmap for PC-use Atom processors". DIGITIMES.
- ^ a b Andrew Cunningham (December 6, 2014). "Don't call it a netbook (or a "Chromebook killer")—HP's $200 Stream 11 reviewed". Ars Technica.
- ^ "Digital Aid S.A". Digitalaid.gr. Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved December 21, 2013.
- ^ "What is a Netbook computer?".
- ^ Ganapati, Priya (December 15, 2008). "The Next Netbook Trend: Cellphone-Like Contract Deals". Wired. Retrieved May 20, 2009.
- ^ mehboob (March 12, 2010). "AMD plans to launch Netbooks Processors next year". Processor Discussions. smartbooktalk.com. Archived from the original on June 9, 2011. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
- ^ Patrizio, Andy (March 10, 2010). "AMD to Introduce Netbook Chip in 2011". Hardware Central. internet.com. Archived from the original on December 30, 2010. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
- ^ "Gateway LT3103u review". CNET.
- ^ Michael A. Prospero (August 19, 2009). "Gateway LT3103u Review]". Laptopmag.
- ^ Cisco Cheng. "Gateway LT3103u review". PC Magazine.
- ^ Catharine Smith (August 26, 2009). "Gateway LT3103u Review". Computer Shopper US. Archived from the original on November 3, 2009.
- ^ Rubin, Ross (December 22, 2008). "Switched On: Alpha 400 pays a high price for low cost". Engadget. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
- ^ h3rman (May 21, 2009). "The Loongson-2 MIPS Lemote Yeeloong Netbook". OSNews. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Microsoft to keep Windows XP alive—but only for Eee PCs and wannabes". Computerworld. IDG. Retrieved April 8, 2008.
- ^ "Microsoft Extends XP Through 2010 for Ultra-Low-Cost Laptops". PC World. IDG. Archived from the original on April 6, 2008. Retrieved April 4, 2008.
- ^ Shah, Agam (May 11, 2008). "Microsoft to limit capabilities of cheap laptops". ITWorld. IDG. Retrieved December 15, 2014.
- ^ Gralla, Preston (March 3, 2009). "Think Linux Rules on Netbooks? Think Again". PC World. Archived from the original on March 5, 2009. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
- ^ McDougall, Paul (April 6, 2009). "Microsoft: 96% Of Netbooks Run Windows". InformationWeek. Archived from the original on September 13, 2009. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
- ^ Hachman, Mark (February 5, 2009). "All Windows 7 Versions—What You Need to Know". ExtremeTech. Archived from the original on February 18, 2012. Retrieved August 2, 2010.
- ^ "Windows 7: Which Edition is Right For You?". PC World. February 3, 2009. Retrieved February 5, 2009.
- ^ "Microsoft making Windows free on devices with screens under 9 inches". The Verge. April 2, 2014. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
- ^ "Microsoft combats Chromebooks by cutting Windows licensing fees by 70 percent". The Verge. February 21, 2014. Retrieved February 23, 2014.
- ^ "Helping our hardware partners build lower cost Windows devices". Windows Experience Blog. Microsoft Corporation. Archived from the original on May 23, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2014.
- ^ "Windows CE takes on Linux in low-end netbooks". Windows for Devices. Archived from the original on January 5, 2013.
- ^ Krzykowski, Matthäus & Hartmann, Daniel (January 1, 2009), "Android netbooks on their way, likely by 2010", SocialBeat, archived from the original on October 12, 2017, retrieved September 6, 2017
- ^ Culpan, Tim (February 20, 2009), "Google Android May Run Asus Netbook, Rival Microsoft (Update1)", Bloomberg
- ^ "Bsquare to Port Adobe Flash Lite on New Google Android Netbook for Del", FierceWireless, May 6, 2009, archived from the original on May 13, 2009
- ^ "Acer to sell Android netbook PCs in Q3". Reuters. June 2, 2009.
- ^ "Android-x86 project".
- ^ Smith, William. "8 Things You Need to Know About Chrome OS". Pcgamer. MaximumPC. Retrieved May 14, 2011.
- ^ Sherr, Ian (May 11, 2011). "Google to launch Chrome Laptops in June". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 11, 2011.
- ^ Lardinois, Frederic (April 9, 2012). "Google's Chrome OS Will Soon Look More Like Windows Than A Browser". Techcrunch. Retrieved June 2, 2013.
- ^ Samson, Ted (May 16, 2013). "Google entices Chrome OS developers with prospect of native-like apps". InfoWorld. Retrieved June 5, 2013.
- ^ NetBSD Foundation (July 7, 2011). "See NetBSD in Action". Archived from the original on August 26, 2014. Retrieved January 22, 2014.
- ^ "Mac OS X Netbook Compatibility Chart (Updated)".
- ^ Sorrel, Charlie. "It Lives! Gadget Lab's Netbook Running OS X Leopard". Wired.
- ^ Chen, Brian X. "Gadget Lab Video: Running OS X on a Netbook". Wired.
- ^ "NPD Finds Consumer Confusion about Netbooks Continues" (Press release). NPD Group. June 22, 2009. Archived from the original on June 25, 2009.
- ^ Descy, D. (2009), "Netbook: Small but Powerful Friends", Tech Trends, 53 (2): 9–10, doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0256-z, S2CID 60084224
- ^ a b "Psion Continues To Extend The Reach Of E-Business Strategies Beyond The Enterprise...Announces Support For Oracle8i Lite On Its New Netbook Device" (Press release). October 26, 1999. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011.
- ^ a b "Save the Netbooks: fighting a trademark on extinct hardware". February 17, 2009.
- ^ "Psion Teklogix Discontinued Products". Archived from the original on May 17, 2007.
- ^ U.S. Trademark 77,527,311 for 'G NETBOOK' rejected October 31, 2008.
- ^ U.S. Trademark 77,580,272 for MSI's 'WIND NETBOOK'
- ^ U.S. Trademark 77,590,174 for Coby Electronics' 'COBY NETBOOK' rejected January 13, 2009.
- ^ "How To Lose A Trademark: "Netbook" Is Probably Generic". Patent Hands. Archived from the original on March 24, 2012.
- ^ "Netbook enthusiast web sites getting C & D using term "netbook"". Archived from the original on February 12, 2009. Retrieved December 25, 2008.
- ^ Schofield, Jack (December 24, 2008). "Psion threatens netbook sites over trademarks". The Guardian.
- ^ "'Netbook' trademarked already, we're all doomed". Archived from the original on March 1, 2009.
- ^ Chen, Brian X. "Using the Word 'Netbook' Could Get You Sued". Wired.
- ^ "Cease and Desist: the netbook war of words". Archived from the original on March 11, 2009.
- ^ "Dell accuses Psion of "fraud" over netbook claims".
- ^ "Dell fights back against Psion netBook trademark rampage". February 19, 2009.
- ^ "Dell Goes 'Nuclear' Over Netbook Trademark". February 20, 2009. Archived from the original on February 23, 2009.
- ^ "Newsflash: Intel counter-sued by Psion in "netbook" trademark lawsuit; jury trial demanded". Save the Netbooks. Archived from the original on March 3, 2009.
- ^ "Intel Wants 'Netbook' Trademark Canceled".
- ^ "Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Judgment & Cancellation of Federal Trademark" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2009.
- ^ "Psion, Intel settle 'Netbook' trademark dispute".
External links
[edit]Netbook
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Characteristics
Core Features
A netbook is a small, inexpensive subnotebook computer that emerged in the late 2000s, specifically designed for basic tasks such as internet access, web browsing, email, and light productivity like word processing.[2][7] These devices prioritized portability and simplicity over high performance, making them suitable for users seeking an entry-level mobile computing option without the capabilities of full-sized laptops.[8] Core to the netbook's identity were its compact specifications, including screens ranging from 7 to 10 inches diagonally, low-power processors like the Intel Atom, 1 to 2 GB of RAM, storage typically ranging from 8 to 160 GB using either solid-state drives (SSDs) or small hard disk drives (HDDs), battery life of up to 9 hours on a single charge with typical usage around 5-7 hours, weights under 1.4 kg (3 pounds), and the absence of an optical drive to reduce size and cost.[2][7][9] Connectivity focused on essentials such as Wi-Fi, USB ports, and Ethernet, supporting wireless internet use on the go.[2] The design philosophy centered on affordability and energy efficiency, with initial models priced under $400 to enable widespread access to mobile web computing, distinguishing netbooks from more expensive ultraportables through a sub-$500 price point.[7][2] This approach emphasized low power consumption to extend battery life for extended unplugged sessions, targeting casual users rather than demanding professionals.[8]Distinctions from Laptops and Tablets
Netbooks differ from full-sized laptops in their prioritization of extreme portability and low cost over raw performance, expandability, and versatility. While mid-range laptops typically feature larger 13- to 15-inch screens, higher-powered processors suitable for multitasking like video editing or gaming, and built-in optical drives for CD/DVD playback, netbooks sacrifice these elements to achieve weights of 2 to 3 pounds and prices under $400 at launch.[10][11] For instance, netbooks commonly omit optical drives entirely to reduce bulk and expense, relying instead on external USB solutions for media needs, and often incorporate soldered RAM that cannot be upgraded, limiting them to 1-2 GB configurations for basic operations.[12] This design choice positions netbooks as entry-level devices focused on efficiency rather than the customizable hardware found in traditional laptops.[13] Compared to tablets, which gained prominence with the Apple iPad's 2010 release, netbooks emphasize hardware for conventional computing inputs over touch-centric interfaces. Netbooks include integrated physical keyboards and trackpads optimized for prolonged typing and precise cursor control, making them better suited for document creation or email composition than tablets' on-screen keyboards or detachable accessories.[12][14] Additionally, netbooks run complete desktop operating systems such as Windows XP or Linux distributions, enabling compatibility with legacy software and file management tools unavailable in the mobile-oriented iOS environment of early tablets.[15] This hardware-software integration allowed netbooks to serve as compact workstations predating the tablet era's shift toward gesture-based navigation.[16] Netbooks occupied a unique niche as affordable, keyboard-driven computers targeted at casual users seeking basic web access and light tasks on a budget, effectively bridging the gap between outdated personal digital assistants and more capable laptops.[10] Designed for activities like email, internet browsing, and simple word processing, they appealed to cost-conscious consumers who valued portability without needing the enhanced speed or storage of emerging ultrabooks after 2010.[17]Historical Development
Origins and Initial Models
The concept of low-cost, portable computing devices predated the netbook category by several years, with early influences emerging in the late 1990s and mid-2000s that emphasized affordability and connectivity. In 1999, Psion introduced the netBook, a compact subnotebook targeted at mobile enterprise users, featuring a 7.7-inch VGA touch-screen display, optional modem support via PC Card, and up to 8.5 hours of battery life, positioning it as a PDA-like tool for on-the-go productivity.[4] Similarly, the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) initiative unveiled its XO-1 prototype in November 2005, aiming to deliver rugged, $100 laptops to children in developing countries to foster education through wireless connectivity and mesh networking capabilities, though mass production began in 2007.[18] The netbook category was formally launched with the release of the ASUS Eee PC 701 in October 2007, marking the first commercially successful device in this new segment of inexpensive, ultra-portable laptops. This model featured a 7-inch 800x480 display, 512 MB of DDR2 RAM, a 900 MHz Intel Celeron M processor, 4 GB of solid-state storage, and a customized Linux operating system for lightweight web browsing and basic tasks.[19] Priced at around $399, the Eee PC 701 quickly gained traction, selling over 300,000 units by the end of 2007 and contributing to ASUS shipping millions more across the series in 2008.[20] The emergence of netbooks was driven by rising laptop prices—averaging over $1,000 in 2007—and the widespread adoption of Wi-Fi, which enabled affordable internet access without needing high-end hardware.[21][22] In response, Intel accelerated the subnotebook market in 2008 by announcing the Atom processor family in March, a low-power line designed specifically for mobile internet devices and netbooks to support efficient, battery-friendly performance at reduced costs.[23] A pivotal moment came at the 2008 Consumer Electronics Show (CES), where multiple manufacturers showcased their initial netbook models, helping to standardize the form factor with small screens, solid-state storage, and wireless focus. Companies like MSI, Acer, and HP unveiled prototypes and early entries, such as MSI's Wind series and Acer's Aspire One, building on the Eee PC's momentum to broaden availability and refine the category's design conventions.[24]Rise and Peak Popularity
The netbook market experienced explosive growth from 2008 to 2010, fueled by the global economic recession that heightened demand for affordable computing devices under $400. Global shipments surged to approximately 35 million units in 2009, representing a significant portion of the portable PC market and helping to offset declines in higher-end notebook sales.[25][26] This boom was driven by consumers seeking budget-friendly alternatives amid financial uncertainty, with netbooks accounting for up to 22.5% of all portable computer shipments by mid-2009.[27] Leading manufacturers ASUS, Acer, and Lenovo captured roughly 70% of the market share during this period, with Acer alone shipping 9.8 million units in 2009 for a 37% stake, followed closely by ASUS.[28][29] Key milestones accelerated this adoption, including the widespread availability of Windows XP on netbooks starting in late 2008, which addressed early compatibility concerns despite the OS's modest performance on low-power hardware.[30] This shift from Linux-dominated models broadened appeal to mainstream users. Netbooks also expanded rapidly into emerging markets such as India and Brazil, where their low cost aligned with government-backed initiatives to provide affordable access to technology, boosting overall adoption in price-sensitive regions.[31] The industry responded aggressively to capitalize on the trend, with Intel launching the Classmate PC initiative in 2008 as a rugged, education-oriented netbook platform powered by Atom processors to penetrate developing markets.[32] Meanwhile, Microsoft intensified efforts to counter Linux's prevalence on netbooks through targeted campaigns, including partnerships with ASUS to promote Windows versions and highlight perceived advantages over open-source alternatives.[33] Netbooks' rise fostered a cultural shift toward "always-connected" computing, emphasizing portability and instant-on access for web-based tasks, which resonated during back-to-school seasons—where they comprised 14% of notebook sales in 2009—and holiday gifting periods, driving seasonal spikes as entry-level gifts.[34][35][36] This popularity normalized ultraportable devices in everyday use, influencing consumer expectations for on-the-go connectivity.Decline and Legacy
The decline of the netbook market accelerated in 2010 following the launch of Apple's iPad, which shifted consumer demand toward more versatile and touch-enabled tablets that offered better media consumption and portability without the compromises of netbook hardware.[37][38] Netbooks faced increasing criticism for their underpowered processors, such as Intel's Atom chips, which struggled to run modern applications like full desktop browsers or office suites effectively, leading to user frustration and poor reviews.[39] By 2012, major manufacturers like Asus, Acer, and Samsung pivoted production toward ultrabooks—thinner, more powerful laptops promoted by Intel—abandoning netbook lines in favor of devices that balanced portability with better performance.[40][41][42] Netbook shipments plummeted as a result, with global figures dropping approximately 34 percent year-over-year by early 2012 compared to 2010 peaks, and U.S. retail sales declining 38 percent in 2011 alone.[43][44] The category effectively ended by 2013, as companies ceased introducing new models and repurposed remaining inventory as entry-level budget laptops.[40][45] Despite their short lifespan, netbooks left a significant legacy by demonstrating the viability of lightweight, low-cost computing, which directly influenced the development of Chromebooks—cloud-centric devices from Google that emphasized affordability and battery life for web-based tasks.[46][47] This shift also paved the way for ARM-based processors in portable devices, enabling more efficient power usage in tablets and subsequent ultramobiles.[48] In developing regions, netbooks promoted accessible computing for education and basic productivity, inspiring initiatives like the One Laptop per Child project and sustaining demand for inexpensive hardware where infrastructure limited full PCs.[34] Today, the term "netbook" has become a generic descriptor for any small, budget-oriented laptop, detached from its original branded context. Post-2013, netbooks saw no mainstream resurgence, with the market evolving into tablets and hybrid ultrabooks that addressed prior limitations in usability and software compatibility. Occasional niche revivals appeared in the 2020s through ultra-portable mini-laptops from specialized manufacturers like GPD, targeting enthusiasts for compact, Linux-friendly computing, though these remained far from the mass-market appeal of the late 2000s.[49] As of 2025, the netbook form factor persists indirectly in mini-PCs and 2-in-1 devices, but without recapturing broad consumer interest.Hardware Specifications
Processors and Performance
Netbooks primarily relied on low-power processors designed for efficiency rather than high performance, with Intel's Atom series dominating the market from 2008 onward. The inaugural Atom N270, introduced in 2008, operated at 1.6 GHz on a single core using the 45 nm Bonnell microarchitecture, delivering a thermal design power (TDP) of 2.5 W to prioritize battery life over speed; it lacked hyper-threading and featured a 533 MHz front-side bus paired typically with the Intel 945GSE chipset.[50][51] Subsequent single-core models like the N280 at 1.66 GHz offered marginal improvements, while later iterations such as the dual-core N450 (1.66 GHz, 5.5 W TDP) and N550 (1.5 GHz, 8.5 W TDP) introduced two cores without hyper-threading, enabling slightly better handling of basic parallel tasks.[52][53][54] These processors emphasized power savings, with idle consumption often below 5 W, allowing many netbook designs to operate fanlessly and achieve battery life exceeding 10 hours under light loads like web browsing.[55][56] Alternative processors from competitors provided options for manufacturers seeking differentiation. VIA's C7-M ULV series, clocked between 1.0 and 1.6 GHz with a 3.5 W TDP, powered early netbooks like the HP 2133 Mini-Note PC, offering comparable efficiency to the Atom but with integrated PadLock security acceleration for encrypted tasks.[57] In later models around 2011, AMD's low-power APUs such as the E-350 (dual-core at 1.6 GHz, 18 W TDP) and E2-1800 (dual-core at 1.7 GHz, 18 W TDP) entered the market via the Zacate platform, integrating Radeon HD graphics for improved video playback over Intel's offerings while still targeting sub-$400 devices.[58][59] These chips maintained the netbook ethos of ultra-low voltage operation, though AMD's higher baseline TDP sometimes necessitated active cooling in compact chassis. Performance in netbooks was tuned for lightweight applications, with Atom-based systems achieving effective speeds roughly equivalent to an 800 MHz Pentium 4 for single-threaded web tasks and office work, as measured in early benchmarks. PassMark CPU Mark scores for N270-equipped units hovered around 270-300, rising to 400-500 for dual-core successors like the N450, underscoring their adequacy for internet browsing and document editing but inadequacy for multitasking or hardware-accelerated video decoding, where frame rates often dropped below 20 fps even for 480p content.[60][61] VIA C7-M models scored similarly low in CPU Mark tests (around 200-300), while AMD's E-series APUs reached 500-800 in PassMark, providing a modest edge in graphics-intensive scenarios like casual video streaming without exceeding netbook power envelopes.[62] Overall, these processors defined netbooks as entry-level devices, excelling in power efficiency—enabling all-day unplugged use—but revealing limitations as software demands grew beyond basic connectivity by the early 2010s.[63]Displays, Input, and Form Factor
Netbooks typically featured compact liquid crystal displays (LCDs) ranging from 7 to 10 inches in diagonal size, with a common resolution of 1024x600 pixels to balance portability and usability for web browsing and basic applications.[64] These screens were predominantly non-touchscreen in early models, prioritizing cost efficiency over interactive features, and often incorporated LED backlighting for improved energy efficiency compared to traditional CCFL lighting.[65] Brightness levels hovered around 200 nits, sufficient for indoor use but sometimes challenged in brighter environments, with some variants offering anti-glare coatings to reduce reflections and enhance visibility outdoors.[66] Input mechanisms on netbooks emphasized compactness without sacrificing essential functionality, featuring keyboards that were approximately 80-90% of full-size dimensions to fit the slim chassis. These layouts included smaller keys and abbreviated function rows, which provided adequate typing for short sessions but often led to user complaints about cramped spacing. Multi-touch trackpads were introduced in later models around 2009, supporting basic gestures like two-finger scrolling, though early versions relied on single-touch navigation with integrated buttons below the pad for clicking.[67] Select models, such as the Acer Aspire One series, integrated 0.3-megapixel webcams and built-in microphones to facilitate voice-over-IP (VoIP) calls, enhancing their appeal for casual communication.[67] The form factor of netbooks adhered to a traditional clamshell design, with widths typically between 200 and 300 mm, depths around 140-200 mm, and thicknesses under 35 mm to ensure high portability. Weights ranged from 1 to 1.3 kg, achieved through lightweight yet durable plastic chassis that withstood everyday handling without premium materials like magnesium alloys.[68] Early models often featured non-user-replaceable batteries integrated into the base, limiting user maintenance and contributing to the devices' sealed, minimalist aesthetic, though this design choice prioritized thinness over upgradability.[69] Ergonomically, netbooks traded spacious input areas for mobility, resulting in keyboards that could cause hand fatigue during extended typing due to reduced key travel and proximity. This compromise influenced user adaptation, with many owners favoring the devices for on-the-go tasks like email and web surfing rather than prolonged productivity, as the portable form encouraged brief, opportunistic use.Memory, Storage, and Connectivity
Netbooks generally utilized DDR2 random access memory (RAM) in configurations ranging from 512 MB to 2 GB, with the majority of early models limited to 1 GB to balance cost and power efficiency in their compact designs. In many cases, the RAM was soldered directly onto the motherboard, rendering it non-upgradable and contributing to the devices' slim profiles, though select models like the Acer Aspire One offered a single SODIMM slot allowing limited expansion up to 1.5 GB or 2 GB depending on the chipset.[70] This amount of RAM proved adequate for basic tasks such as web browsing, email, and lightweight Linux applications but frequently created performance bottlenecks when paired with resource-intensive operating systems like Windows, leading users to rely on optimized software or external solutions.[71] Storage in netbooks emphasized flash-based solutions to reduce weight, power consumption, and mechanical failure risks, typically featuring 4 GB to 32 GB of solid-state drive (SSD) or embedded MultiMediaCard (eMMC) capacity, with some higher-end variants incorporating hybrid setups that combined flash for the operating system with a small 120 GB to 160 GB hard disk drive (HDD) for additional space.[72] Absent were optical drives, which would have increased bulk and battery drain; instead, users turned to USB ports or SD card slots for loading media, software installation, or file transfers, aligning with the era's growing emphasis on digital distribution.[65] For instance, the original ASUS Eee PC models shipped with 4 GB to 20 GB SSDs, sufficient for core files but encouraging supplementation via external or cloud-based storage. Connectivity options in netbooks prioritized wireless capabilities and essential peripherals to support mobile use, including integrated 802.11n Wi-Fi for internet access—upgrading from earlier 802.11b/g standards in models from 2008 onward—along with Bluetooth 2.0 or 3.0 for short-range device pairing such as headphones or mice. Standard ports encompassed three USB 2.0 interfaces for connecting drives, keyboards, or cameras, an SD card reader for memory expansion, and analog video output via VGA, with some later models adding HDMI for external displays; wired Ethernet was uncommon, appearing only in select configurations due to space constraints.[65] These features, combined with the devices' limited local storage, underscored a design philosophy favoring cloud services for data syncing and backups, as promoted by manufacturers like ASUS through bundled online storage trials.[70]Operating Systems
Linux Distributions
The adoption of Linux distributions on netbooks gained traction with the launch of the ASUS Eee PC in late 2007, which featured a customized version of Xandros, a Debian-based operating system tailored for hardware with as little as 256 MB of RAM. This distribution included an "easy mode" interface with large icons and simplified navigation to accommodate novice users, enabling efficient operation on resource-constrained devices.[73][74] Subsequent popular distributions optimized for netbooks included Ubuntu Netbook Remix (later renamed Ubuntu Netbook Edition) released in April 2009 as part of Ubuntu 9.04, Linpus Linux Lite on devices like the Acer Aspire One, and Fedora Mini, a Moblin-based variant introduced in 2009. These systems emphasized features such as rapid boot times—often under 30 seconds in easy or lightweight modes—and seamless cloud service integration to enhance web-centric usability on small screens and low-power processors.[75][76][77] Linux distributions offered key advantages for netbooks, including low idle RAM usage ranging from 200 to 500 MB depending on the environment, which preserved performance on systems with 512 MB to 1 GB of memory, and open-source flexibility for user modifications. Approximately 25% of netbooks shipped in 2008 ran Linux, allowing manufacturers to reduce costs by avoiding Microsoft Windows licensing fees. However, challenges arose with inconsistent hardware support, particularly for Wi-Fi adapters like Broadcom models, where proprietary drivers were often unavailable initially; these were commonly addressed through community-developed kernel modules and firmware updates.[78][79][80]Windows Implementations
Early netbooks released in 2008 frequently shipped with Windows XP pre-installed, despite the operating system's mainstream support ending on April 14, 2009. Microsoft permitted original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to continue bundling Windows XP on netbooks beyond this date, extending availability until October 22, 2010, to accommodate the low-cost, low-specification hardware prevalent in the market. This decision allowed netbook vendors to leverage the lightweight and familiar XP interface, which performed better on resource-constrained devices than its successor, Vista. With the launch of Windows 7 in October 2009, Microsoft introduced the Starter Edition specifically tailored for netbooks, becoming the standard pre-installed OS by 2010. This 32-bit-only version was capped at 2 GB of RAM and excluded advanced features to fit within netbook constraints. Customizations included a simplified user interface without the resource-intensive Aero Glass effects, optimization for non-touch input methods typical of netbooks, and Microsoft's relaxation of standard hardware minimums—such as permitting installations on devices with screens up to 10.2 inches and Atom processors—to broaden compatibility. These adaptations aimed to maintain Windows' dominance while addressing the category's hardware limitations. Despite these efforts, Windows implementations on netbooks suffered from notable performance drawbacks, including elevated CPU and RAM utilization that frequently resulted in system slowdowns and lag during multitasking. In 2009, this bundling practice drew antitrust scrutiny, particularly in Russia, where regulators investigated Microsoft for potentially stifling competition by favoring Windows XP over alternative operating systems on low-cost devices. By 2011, Windows had become the dominant operating system among netbooks, underscoring its widespread adoption but also highlighting how its comparative resource demands accelerated the netbook category's overall decline in favor of more capable alternatives. Linux distributions offered a lighter, cost-free option for some vendors seeking to mitigate these issues.Other Systems
In the late netbook era, manufacturers explored adaptations of Google's Android operating system, primarily targeting mobile-oriented experiences on low-power hardware. In early 2010, HP unveiled a prototype sub-netbook powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon processor and running Android, emphasizing always-on connectivity and touch support, though it remained a demonstration model without widespread commercial release.[81] Similarly, Lenovo announced intentions to pivot toward Android for devices like the canceled Skylight smartbook, aiming to leverage the OS's efficiency on ARM architectures, but these efforts largely stalled due to development challenges.[82] By 2010-2011, community-driven ports such as Android-x86 enabled experimental installations on x86-based netbooks, supporting Android 2.x versions with basic touch interfaces; however, the ecosystem's ARM-centric app library led to compatibility issues on Intel Atom processors, limiting practical use for productivity tasks.[83] Precursors to Chrome OS appeared in early experiments around 2011, building on netbook form factors to prioritize web-based applications. Google's Cr-48 prototype, distributed starting in late 2010 as part of a pilot program, was an unbranded 12.1-inch laptop running a developer preview of Chrome OS, featuring instant-on booting and cloud integration but lacking local storage or offline capabilities beyond basic functions.[84] This device, weighing 3.8 pounds with a trackpad supporting multi-touch gestures, influenced subsequent Chromebook designs by demonstrating the viability of browser-centric computing on netbook-like hardware, though its experimental nature restricted it to select testers and delayed broader adoption until after the netbook peak. Community efforts continue to support modern lightweight Linux distributions on legacy netbook hardware as of 2025, enabling extended usability for basic tasks.[85] Rare operating system ports further highlighted niche innovations for netbooks, often blending laptop and tablet features. MeeGo, a 2010 collaboration between Intel and Nokia merging Moblin and Maemo platforms, targeted hybrid devices with its Linux-based, Qt-driven interface optimized for netbooks and convertible tablets; early netbook editions, tested on hardware like Dell's Mini 10v, offered gesture-based navigation and multimedia support but saw limited device launches due to the project's short lifespan before evolving into Tizen.[86][87] Community trials of Ubuntu Touch, a touch-focused Ubuntu variant, emerged later in the decade on select netbook hardware, such as Intel Atom-based systems, providing convergence between phone and desktop modes; these ports, often requiring custom adaptations, enabled basic app convergence but suffered from driver incompatibilities on aging netbook components.[88] These alternative systems faced significant limitations, including hardware mismatches—such as Android's incomplete x86 optimization and MeeGo's brief support cycle—and ecosystem immaturity, resulting in adoption rates below 5% of the overall netbook market, which was dominated by Windows and standard Linux distributions.[89] Short development timelines and shifting industry focus toward tablets further confined them to prototypes and enthusiast experiments, underscoring the challenges of diversifying beyond established desktop paradigms.Applications and Market Impact
Consumer and Everyday Use
Netbooks gained popularity among general consumers for performing lightweight, everyday tasks such as web browsing, checking email, engaging with social media platforms, and using basic office applications like Google Docs. Their emphasis on internet-centric functionality aligned with the growing reliance on online services during the late 2000s, making them a convenient choice for quick connectivity without the need for high-performance hardware.[90][11] The small, lightweight design—typically weighing under 3 pounds with 10-inch screens—further enhanced their appeal for portable use, such as during commutes or travel, where full-sized laptops proved cumbersome. Adoption was particularly strong among budget-conscious students and traveling professionals who prioritized cost over power, with netbooks often priced below $400. A 2009 survey by research firm Synovate revealed that 79% of potential buyers viewed netbooks as secondary devices primarily for internet access, while only 11% intended to use them as main computers, underscoring their role in supplementing rather than replacing traditional PCs for casual online activities over intensive productivity.[91][92] To mitigate inherent limitations like modest storage (often 16-160 GB) and few built-in ports, consumers expanded functionality through USB peripherals, including hubs and external hard drives, which allowed connections for additional devices such as mice, keyboards, or printers. Complementing this, cloud services like Google Docs and early offerings from Asus (providing 10 GB of online storage) became integral to the ecosystem, enabling file access and collaboration without relying solely on local capacity.[93] User experiences praised netbooks for their exceptional affordability—often half the price of standard laptops—and impressive battery life, with models like the Samsung N130 achieving up to 10 hours of runtime for light web tasks. However, by 2010, feedback increasingly criticized their sluggish performance in multitasking scenarios, such as running multiple browser tabs alongside applications, due to underpowered Atom processors that struggled beyond basic operations.[94][95][96]Educational and Emerging Market Adoption
Netbooks played a significant role in educational initiatives aimed at providing affordable computing access to students, particularly through programs like Intel's Classmate PC and adaptations inspired by the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) project. The Intel Classmate PC, introduced in 2006 and refined into netbook-like form factors by 2009, was designed as a rugged, low-cost device for classroom use in developing regions, featuring durable construction to withstand educational environments and pre-installed software for collaborative learning.[97] In the United States, during the 2009 back-to-school season, numerous K-12 school districts explored and implemented netbook deployments as part of one-to-one computing efforts, with reports indicating widespread adoption to enhance student access to digital resources amid the devices' rising popularity.[98] These programs, often subsidized by federal and state grants, distributed thousands of units to promote technology integration in curricula, though exact national totals varied by district.[99] In emerging markets, netbooks facilitated subsidized educational deployments to boost digital literacy in low-income areas, with Intel Classmate models ruggedized for harsh conditions and distributed through government partnerships in countries like India and various African nations. In India, early 2000s initiatives laid groundwork for affordable computing in education, evolving into projects that preceded the 2011 Aakash tablet by leveraging netbook designs for school distribution, aiming to equip millions of students with basic internet-enabled devices.[100] In Africa, OLPC-inspired netbook programs, including deployments in Rwanda and Ethiopia, provided devices to primary school children, supported by international aid to address infrastructure gaps and promote connectivity in underserved rural areas. These efforts emphasized durability features, such as spill-resistant keyboards and reinforced casings, to ensure longevity in resource-limited settings.[101] Studies on these deployments revealed measurable impacts on student connectivity and engagement, with one analysis of a large-scale laptop program in Peru—analogous to netbook initiatives—showing a 20 percentage point increase in home computer access (from 70% to 90%) and similar gains in internet usage, correlating with improved digital skills among participants.[102] However, challenges persisted, including theft in school environments and ongoing maintenance issues due to limited technical support, leading to significant device downtime in various programs.[103] By the early 2010s, as tablets gained prominence post-2012, netbooks' role diminished, yet their legacy in foundational edtech accessibility is acknowledged in later analyses, enabling initial bridges to digital learning in previously disconnected communities.[104] Their influence persists in modern devices like Chromebooks, which build on netbook-era lessons for affordable educational computing.[105]Legal Issues
Psion Trademark Origins
In 1996, Psion filed for a U.S. trademark on "netBook" (with a capital B) under registration number 2404976, specifically for laptop computers intended as networked personal organizers.[106][107] The trademark was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 21, 2000.[107] Psion also secured similar protections internationally, including European Union trademark number 428250 filed on December 9, 1996, and a Canadian registration, all tied to the company's vision for compact, wirelessly connected computing devices.[106] The trademark originated from Psion's development of the netBook product line in the late 1990s, which featured handheld subnotebook computers designed for enterprise use with support for wireless synchronization and networking via PC Card slots for WiFi adapters.[108][109] Launched commercially in 1999, these devices ran on Psion's EPOC operating system and targeted mobile professionals needing portable data access, though production and market adoption remained limited due to the niche focus on industrial applications.[110][111] Following Psion's strategic pivot around 2000—marked by the formation of Symbian Ltd. in 1998 and the acquisition of Teklogix in 2000, which shifted emphasis toward software licensing and enterprise rugged devices—the netBook trademark entered a period of dormancy with no active product enforcement.[112][111] Psion Teklogix, the successor entity formed after Psion PLC divested its consumer hardware division in 2001, periodically renewed the trademarks to maintain legal standing across jurisdictions, but refrained from asserting rights until the surge in low-cost portable PCs in 2008 revived interest in the term.[106][113] This historical ownership laid the groundwork for subsequent intellectual property conflicts as the netbook category gained mainstream traction.[114]Lawsuit and Resolution
In late 2008, Psion Teklogix initiated legal actions against major netbook manufacturers, including Intel and ASUS, by sending cease-and-desist letters alleging trademark infringement on the term "netbook," seeking to halt its use and demanding damages for unauthorized commercialization.[115][116] These efforts expanded in early 2009 when Psion affirmed its trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and pursued further enforcement against parties promoting the low-cost laptop category.[106] In response, Intel filed a declaratory judgment lawsuit against Psion in February 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, arguing that the term had become generic through widespread public use since early 2008 and requesting its cancellation to allow continued generic application.[107] Dell similarly petitioned the USPTO in February 2009 for cancellation, contending that Psion had abandoned the mark due to non-use since 2003 and that its renewal filing in 2006 involved fraudulent claims of ongoing commercial activity.[117] These U.S. court proceedings emphasized the descriptiveness of "netbook" in describing a new class of ultra-portable computers powered by Intel's Atom processors, highlighting its genericization amid explosive market adoption.[118] Psion countersued Intel in March 2009, claiming willful infringement through the operation of netbook.com and promotion of third-party products, seeking up to $1.2 billion in damages for unjust enrichment and dilution of its 1996-registered mark.[119][120] The disputes concluded with an amicable settlement in June 2009, under which Psion voluntarily withdrew all "netbook" trademark registrations worldwide, dropped all infringement claims against Intel and other parties, and ceased enforcement, thereby permitting unrestricted generic use of the term.[114][121] In the aftermath, Psion pursued no further actions regarding the mark, which had originated from its discontinued 1999 palmtop product line, enabling free branding in the netbook sector during its 2008-2009 peak while serving as a brief industry distraction.[122]References
- https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/atom/n270