Hubbry Logo
VoatVoatMain
Open search
Voat
Community hub
Voat
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Voat
Voat
Voat
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Voat Inc (/ˈvoʊt/; styled VOΛT) was an American alt-tech[1] news aggregator and social networking service where registered community members could submit content such as text posts and direct links. Registered users could then vote on these submissions. Content entries were organized by areas of interest called "subverses".[2][3] The website was widely described as a Reddit clone[4] and a hub for the alt-right.[9] Voat CEO Justin Chastain made an announcement on December 22, 2020 that Voat would shut down.[10] The site was shut down on December 25, 2020.[11]

Key Information

Overview

[edit]

Voat was a site which hosted aggregated content and discussion forums. According to Wired, Voat was "aesthetically and functionally similar to Reddit."[12] Like Reddit, Voat was a collection of entries submitted by its registered users to themed categories (called "subverses" on Voat) similar to a bulletin board system. Unlike Reddit, Voat emphasized looser content restrictions and an ad-revenue sharing program.[13][14][15] Voat was written in the C# programming language, while Reddit is written in Python.[16][17]

Voat was described by media outlets including Quartz, The New York Times, New York, and the US and UK editions of Wired, as a hub for the alt-right.[9] The site was also widely described as a clone of Reddit,[4] or sometimes dubbed "the alt-right Reddit".[22] In a January 2017 New Yorker article, Voat was described as a descendant of 2chan, 4chan, and 8chan, where users compete for shock value.[23] The Verge described the site as "Imzy's dark twin", in that both were indirect products of the Gamergate culture war.[24] The site has also been described by The Verge as a model for other "censorship-free" alt-tech services, including Gab, Parler, and Hatreon.[20]

The name "Voat" is a play on the words 'goat' and 'vote'.[17] The site's mascot is a goat.[25] The website used the top-level domain .co, and was registered in November 2014.[26]

Company and funding

[edit]

Founded in April 2014 as WhoaVerse, the website was a hobby project of Atif Colo (known on Voat as @Atko), then a college student. He was later joined by Justin Chastain (known as @PuttItOut on Voat).[27][28] The website has been labelled as an alternative to Reddit with a focus on freedom of expression.[14][25][29] In December 2014, WhoaVerse changed its name to Voat for ease of use.[30]

Although Voat was based in Switzerland,[31] Voat became incorporated in the United States in August 2015. Colo explained in a post announcing the incorporation that this was because "Switzerland seemed like a great option in the beginning, but when it comes to freedom of speech, the main idea behind Voat, U.S. law by far beats every other candidate country we’ve researched."[32] Following a large influx of users from Reddit in July 2015, Voat's operators were approached by investors interested in funding the project, though they said they "hadn't had the time to talk" about the offers.[25]

In January 2017, Colo resigned as CEO of Voat, citing a lack of time available to devote to the site. Colo was replaced as CEO by Chastain.[33]

Shutdown

[edit]

In May 2017, Chastain ran a fundraising campaign, announcing that Voat might have to shut down due to lack of money.[24] However, after forming a partnership with an investor, Voat stayed online.[20]

On December 22, 2020, Voat again announced that it would be shut down due to a lack of funding. Co-founder and CEO Chastain said that he had been funding the site himself after a key investor defaulted on their contract in March, but had run out of money by December.[20] On December 25, 2020, Voat shut down.[34]

History

[edit]

Over Voat's six years of operation, accusations of censorship against Reddit and its moderation decisions, including the banning of various subreddits, caused several influxes of Reddit users to Voat.[35] In early June 2015, after Reddit banned five subreddits for harassment—the largest of which, r/fatpeoplehate, had around 150,000 subscribers[12][36]—many users of Reddit began to create accounts on Voat.[31] The influx of new participants temporarily overloaded the site, causing downtime.[21][37] In early July 2015, following the dismissal of a popular administrator on Reddit, another influx of Reddit members registered with Voat,[38] leading to traffic levels which again caused Voat to experience downtime.[39][40] In November 2016, more users relocated to Voat after Reddit banned the Pizzagate conspiracy theory subreddit, r/pizzagate, due to doxing and harassment concerns.[41][42] In November 2017, some of Reddit's incel community moved to Voat after an incel community, r/incels, was banned on Reddit.[43] On September 12, 2018, Reddit banned several subreddits dedicated to discussing the QAnon conspiracy theory, stating that they had violated its rules prohibiting "inciting violence, harassment, and the dissemination of personal information."[44][45] This caused many of the QAnon posters to migrate to Voat.[46]

In April 2019, Voat's CEO announced in a post that he had been contacted by a "US agency" about threats that were being posted on the website. In the post, he wrote that Voat would work with law enforcement and take down any "gray area" posts if requested. According to Vice, "Voat users took offense to the perceived curtailing of their ability to post racial slurs and endorse violence. The first comment on Chastain's post opened with an anti-Semitic slur and call to exterminate Jews."[47]

Deplatforming and cyberattacks

[edit]

Voat's web hosting service, Host Europe (a precursor to Webfusion), refused service to Voat in June 2015, alleging that the service "was publicizing incitement of the people, as well as abusive, insulting and youth-endangering content" and "illegal right-wing extremist content."[18] Host Europe is based in Germany, and is subject to stronger hate speech laws than those of the United States.[34] Voat's founder attributed the shutdown to political correctness.[18] PayPal froze payment processing services to Voat the same month due to "sexually oriented materials or services."[27][48][49][50][19] Voat shut down four of its own subverses in response, two of which hosted sexualized images of minors ("jailbait").[15] The website continued to accept cryptocurrency donations,[25][34] and was able to continue functioning as it had moved to a different hosting provider.[51] The website continued to experience downtime due to an ongoing distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, rendering the 700,000 unique visitors unable to access the site.[15]

Also in July, Voat, alongside WikiLeaks, was subject to a Bitcoin "dust" attack and more DDoS attacks. The Bitcoin attack slowed payment processing to the websites.[52] The DDoS attack, launched July 12, was unsuccessful due to Cloudflare DDoS protection services, although it had the side effect of rendering third-party Voat apps incapable of functioning.[53][54]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Voat

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Voat was an online news aggregation and discussion platform structured similarly to , launched in April 2014 by Swiss developer Atif Colo as a hobby project initially named WhoaVerse. The site featured user-submitted content organized into communities called "subs," with upvoting and downvoting mechanisms to promote visibility based on community consensus rather than centralized moderation. Emphasizing minimal content restrictions to foster free expression, Voat attracted users seeking alternatives to platforms with stricter policies, particularly after 's 2015 enforcement of anti-harassment rules that banned several subreddits. The platform's growth surged in mid-2015, drawing "Reddit refugees" to mirrored communities hosting previously quarantined topics, such as critiques of and race-related discussions, which had been removed from . This migration highlighted Voat's role as a refuge for dissenting viewpoints, though it also drew scrutiny for enabling unfiltered that mainstream outlets often characterized as extreme or inflammatory. Co-founder Justin Chastain, who joined Colo, later managed operations amid challenges including payment processor restrictions and advertiser aversion, reflecting broader difficulties for uncensored platforms in securing sustainable revenue. Voat operated until December 25, 2020, when Chastain announced its shutdown, citing the withdrawal of its sole investor in March 2020 and his inability to personally fund ongoing costs like server maintenance and legal compliance. Despite attempts to implement user subscriptions and donations, the site could not achieve financial viability, underscoring the economic pressures on independent speech-oriented networks amid dependency on third-party . Over its lifespan, Voat hosted millions of posts and served as a in the tensions between open discourse and platform governance, influencing subsequent alternatives while exposing vulnerabilities to through financial isolation.

Founding and Development

Inception and Launch (2014)

Voat originated as a programming project initiated by Atif Colo, a third-year Swedish college student known online as @Atko, who began development in November 2013. The platform was designed as an open-source alternative to , emphasizing user-driven communities and minimal to foster unrestricted discussion on any legal topic. Colo coded the site part-time using C# and MVC framework, drawing inspiration from Reddit's structure but prioritizing "no legal subject off-limits" as a core principle to differentiate it from mainstream platforms. The site officially launched in April 2014 under the name WhoaVerse, initially attracting a small user base focused on niche discussions without significant moderation. Early features included user-created "subverses" analogous to Reddit's subreddits, upvote/downvote mechanics (branded as "voats"), and basic anonymity, all hosted on a simple domain. By mid-2014, WhoaVerse remained obscure, with Colo handling all technical and administrative duties solo, as it operated without formal funding or incorporation. In December 2014, the platform rebranded to to improve memorability and , adopting a to evoke the "voat" on "vote." This change marked its transition from a experiment to a more defined free-speech-oriented site, though user growth stayed modest until external events in 2015. The rebranding did not alter core mechanics but simplified access, setting the stage for later migrations from censored communities.

Early Expansion and Technical Evolution

Voat originated as WhoaVerse, an invite-only beta platform launched in April 2014 by Swiss developer Atif Colo, who built it as a clone using open-source and to replicate subreddit-style communities with minimal moderation. The site initially attracted a small user base focused on free speech, but remained niche until rebranding to Voat in December 2014, which aligned with its emphasis on uncensored discussion forums called "subverses." Significant expansion occurred in mid-2015 following 's quarantine and bans of contentious subreddits, including fatpeoplehate and others on , 2015, which displaced thousands of users intolerant of Reddit's evolving content policies. This triggered a , with Voat's daily active users and traffic spiking as Reddit expatriates established parallel subverses, marking the platform's first substantial growth phase from obscurity to a viable alternative aggregator. Technically, the sudden influx strained Voat's , revealing limitations in its initial single-server setup and database handling, prompting early optimizations such as improved query , caching layers, and load balancing to mitigate and support concurrent users. These adaptations, drawn from real-time scaling necessities rather than premeditated design, underscored the platform's bootstrapped evolution, with the open-source enabling volunteer fixes amid resource constraints. By late , Voat had stabilized enough to sustain the expanded , though persistent hurdles highlighted the challenges of rapid, organic scaling on a volunteer-led project.

Platform Mechanics and Features

Subverse System and User Interaction

Voat's subverse system organized content into user-created communities known as subverses, functioning analogously to subreddits on by grouping discussions around specific topics or interests. Users could establish a subverse on virtually any subject permissible under Swiss law, the platform's operational jurisdiction, though individual accounts were restricted to moderating only a limited number of subverses to curb by any single participant. Subverse owners retained authority to deactivate their communities, appoint co-owners or moderators, and enforce rules, with moderators empowered to remove submissions or comments deemed violative of subverse-specific guidelines. User interaction centered on submitting and engaging with content through a link aggregation model, where registered participants posted titles, optional descriptions, and external links or self-text entries to subverses. Comments formed a hierarchical, tree-like structure beneath submissions, allowing threaded replies to foster extended discussions. Voting mechanics employed an upvote/downvote system, displaying raw vote tallies unlike Reddit's obfuscated counts; however, new users initially lacked downvoting privileges, requiring accumulation of at least 100 Comment Contribution Points (CCP)—earned via upvotes on their comments—before accessing full voting capabilities, a measure intended to deter spam and brigading. Voting influence scaled with a user's history of positive engagement, amplifying contributions from established accounts. Submissions within subverses were sortable via tabs for "hot," "new," and "top" content, with each subverse maintaining up to 500 active submissions across 20 pages for navigation. This structure encouraged users to explore and subscribe to preferred communities, though analyses indicated high user turnover and a tendency toward focused, ideologically aligned participation rather than broad diversification. Overall, the system prioritized minimal platform-level intervention, delegating content curation to subverse-specific moderation while enforcing baseline prohibitions on illegal material, such as incitement or prohibited depictions.

Moderation Approach and Free Speech Principles

Voat implemented a decentralized moderation model, wherein individual —analogous to subreddits—were governed by their creators (subverse owners) and appointed , who held authority to approve, remove, or ban content and users within their communities. To prevent concentration of power, the platform restricted users to owning or moderating a maximum of ten subverses. This structure shifted primary content oversight to community levels, minimizing top-down intervention from Voat's administrators. At the platform level, rules were sparse and narrowly tailored to operational integrity rather than ideological content, prohibiting spam, vote manipulation, doxxing (revealing personal information), and illegal activities such as child exploitation material or direct threats of violence. Unlike , which expanded prohibitions on and , Voat explicitly lacked a broad harassment policy, allowing on virtually any legal topic without central . Administrators intervened rarely, typically only for egregious violations affecting site functionality, such as coordinated brigading across subverses. This approach stemmed from Voat's foundational commitment to "unfettered free speech," positioning the site as an anti-censorship haven where users submitted, organized, ranked, and moderated content autonomously, with no legal subject matter deemed off-limits. Founders and proponents argued it preserved open discourse by rejecting "safe spaces" and administrative overreach, attracting migrants from platforms perceived as increasingly restrictive. However, the lax enforcement enabled proliferation of inflammatory material, prompting debates on whether absolute non-intervention truly advanced free expression or merely amplified toxicity without accountability.

Community Dynamics and Migration

User Influx from Mainstream Platforms

In June 2015, administrators banned several subreddits, including r/fatpeoplehate with over 100,000 subscribers, for violating the site's new anti-harassment policy by encouraging targeted abuse against overweight individuals. This action, part of broader efforts, prompted backlash from users who viewed it as inconsistent , leading to a to Voat as an alternative platform promising minimal intervention. The influx began immediately after the bans on June 10, 2015, with users creating equivalent "subverses" on Voat, such as v/fatpeoplehate, which quickly gained traction among displaced communities. Voat's servers buckled under the sudden demand, experiencing widespread downtime and performance issues as daily active users surged from prior levels, though exact figures were not publicly quantified by the platform at the time. Voat co-founder noted in July 2015 that the site had seen a "noticeable influx" over preceding months, accelerating post-ban, positioning Voat as a "censorship-free" refuge for those alienated by 's evolving rules. Subsequent Reddit controversies, such as the 2016 dismissal of popular moderator Victoria Taylor, further drove traffic to Voat, but the 2015 bans marked the primary wave of migration from mainstream platforms, attracting users prioritizing unrestricted expression over moderated . This period solidified Voat's reputation among free speech advocates, though it also amplified challenges in scaling for the unanticipated growth.

Prominent Subverses and Content Patterns

One of the most prominent subverses on Voat was /v/fatpeoplehate, which emerged as a direct migration point for users from Reddit's r/fatpeoplehate subreddit after its ban on July 10, , for violating anti-harassment policies; by mid-July , it had amassed approximately 18,700 subscribers focused on body-shaming memes, images, and critiques of . Similarly, /v/CoonTown recreated content from the banned r/CoonTown, a subreddit known for racial humor and stereotypes targeting , drawing users displaced by Reddit's August enforcement of content rules against "involuntary pornography" and . These subverses exemplified early user influxes, with /v/fatpeoplehate later redirecting traffic to external image hosts amid declining activity. Later in Voat's lifecycle, conspiracy-oriented subverses gained traction, particularly QAnon-focused ones like /v/GreatAwakening and /v/QRVoat, which by 2018-2019 hosted thousands of posts analyzing cryptic "Q drops," political intrigue, and theories; /v/GreatAwakening stood out as the platform's leading hub, with submission volumes surpassing general news subverses like /v/news during peak periods. Other notable communities included /v/Nigger, which mirrored extreme racial content from exiles, though such subverses often faced voluntary shutdowns by Voat administrators for skirting legal boundaries, such as child exploitation material in unrelated "jailbait" forums closed in 2015. Content patterns on Voat emphasized uncensored aggregation of links, memes, and debates on topics suppressed elsewhere, including anti-feminist critiques, , and "red pill" ; submissions typically followed a Reddit-like upvote/downvote system filtered into "hot," "new," and "top" tabs per , fostering rapid dissemination of provocative visuals and text. User behavior showed high volatility, with spikes in activity tied to external deplatformings—e.g., Reddit's 2015 bans drove initial migrations—and persistent engagement in echo chambers for , though mainstream analyses often highlighted a right-leaning skew without accounting for the site's intentional rejection of centralized . Conspiracy narratives evolved longitudinally, blending static motifs like deep-state claims with adaptive responses to real-world events, as seen in threads that integrated current news into speculative frameworks. Despite accusations of from outlets like and The Verge—which privileged platform-wide toxicity over subverse diversity—Voat's structure enabled niche, user-moderated persistence, with patterns of polite discourse amid controversial topics until financial pressures curtailed operations.

Controversies and Debates

Claims of Extremist Content

Claims of extremist content on Voat primarily surfaced in mid-2015 after banned subreddits such as r/CoonTown and r/fatpeoplehate for violating anti-harassment policies, prompting users to migrate to Voat and recreate similar communities. r/CoonTown, in particular, was noted for aggregating memes and comments employing racial slurs and anti-Black rhetoric, which critics labeled as racist propaganda rather than mere provocation. On Voat, equivalents like /v/CoonTown and /v/Nigger emerged, hosting content that academic analyses later identified as exemplars of offensive and racially charged , contributing to perceptions of the platform as a haven for uncensored bigotry. Media coverage amplified these concerns, with outlets describing Voat as a "troll haven" rife with casual racism and low-level , often linking it to broader alt-right migration from mainstream sites. By 2019, Voat's co-founder Justin Chastain publicly urged users to halt death threats and violent rhetoric, citing instances where posts veered into explicit calls for harm, which violated the site's prohibitions on illegal content despite its free-speech ethos. Later assessments, including upon Voat's shutdown, portrayed it as a repository for alongside theories, though empirical studies focused more on its role in propagating antisocial behavior than orchestrating real-world extremism. Voat's community-driven moderation, reliant on user reports and admin interventions for spam, doxxing, or direct , allowed pockets of inflammatory material to persist, fueling arguments that lax oversight enabled . However, platform rules explicitly barred content promoting violence or illegality, and no verified reports linked Voat-hosted discussions to organized terrorist activities or widespread campaigns, distinguishing it from platforms with documented ties to groups. Claims often emanated from outlets and researchers predisposed to equate speech with systemic threat, potentially inflating the platform's role in relative to its user base of under 500,000 active accounts at peak.

Censorship Resistance vs. Responsibility Arguments

Voat's operational philosophy prioritized resistance through minimal platform-wide rules, prohibiting only illegal content such as child exploitation material, doxxing, and spam, while delegating to individual subverses and user downvotes. This approach was designed to foster an environment where controversial opinions could flourish without administrative intervention, explicitly contrasting with Reddit's 2015 subreddit bans for perceived , which drove migrations to Voat. Administrators and users contended that such resistance prevented the subjective, ideologically influenced observed on mainstream platforms, arguing from first principles that open discourse counters bad ideas with better ones rather than suppression, thereby preserving platform neutrality and user autonomy. Proponents of this model, including early Voat adopters from banned communities, asserted that responsibility for content lay with users and subverse moderators, not the platform, as centralized oversight inevitably devolves into —evidenced by 's progressive-leaning quarantines of right-leaning groups. They highlighted Voat's hosting termination by a Swiss provider over "" content as a case of external pressuring platforms to self-regulate beyond legality, reinforcing the causal link between free speech commitments and risks. This stance aligned with broader libertarian arguments that platforms should emulate common carriers, avoiding liability for user speech to sustain viability against advertiser and partner boycotts. Critics, however, emphasized platform responsibility to mitigate harms from unmoderated extremism, pointing to Voat's evolution into a hub for alt-right ideologies, QAnon conspiracies, and explicit racial rhetoric following influxes post-Reddit purges. Media analyses and security reports attributed real-world amplification of divisive narratives to Voat's lax policies, arguing that anonymity and minimal rules enabled unchecked proliferation of content deemed hate speech by observers, including calls for violence short of direct incitement. Hosting and payment disruptions, culminating in Voat's 2020 shutdown amid financial strain, were cited as empirical consequences of shirking proactive curation, with detractors from outlets like Ars Technica—often critiqued for left-leaning institutional biases—claiming the platform's free speech absolutism excused abdication of duty to civil society norms. Despite this, Voat occasionally banned subverses for rule violations, illustrating tension between absolutist ideals and pragmatic enforcement needs.

External Pressures and Incidents

Cyberattacks and Security Breaches

In June 2015, Voat.co faced its first reported distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, with the platform announcing on that it was under , the second such incident within 24 hours, leading to significant . These early attacks coincided with a surge in user registrations following Reddit's moderation policy changes, which prompted migrations to Voat as a free-speech alternative. By July 2015, Voat endured additional DDoS attacks, including layer-7 application-level floods confirmed by its protections, which overwhelmed servers and exacerbated scalability issues during peak traffic. Over its six-year lifespan, the platform reported being targeted by DDoS attacks multiple times, contributing to intermittent outages and heightened operational costs without evidence of successful or account compromises. No major security breaches, such as unauthorized data access or incidents, were publicly documented for Voat.

Deplatforming by Hosting and Payment Providers

In June 2015, Voat's hosting provider, Host Europe GmbH, abruptly terminated all contracts and shut down the site's servers without prior warning, citing the presence of "politically incorrect content" that violated their terms of service. The action followed a surge in traffic after Reddit banned several subreddits for harassment, prompting users to migrate to Voat, which amplified scrutiny of its content. Voat's founder, Justin Chalmers, described the termination as driven by political correctness rather than illegal activity, emphasizing that the platform supported free speech but did not host unlawful material. The site was offline for several hours before securing alternative hosting from a different provider, allowing operations to resume. The same month, froze Voat's payment processing services, attributing the decision to violations involving sexually oriented material on the platform. In response, Voat administrators temporarily shut down four subverses (user-created communities), including two featuring sexualized content, to comply and restore services. This incident highlighted broader challenges for Voat in maintaining financial infrastructure, as payment processors increasingly enforced content-based restrictions amid the site's reputation for unmoderated discussions. No further public by major payment providers was reported, though chronic funding shortages persisted, contributing to operational strains separate from these events.

Decline and Shutdown

Financial Unsustainability

Voat's financial model depended heavily on user donations and sales of Voat Coins, an internal , with minimal income due to the platform's controversial content and free-speech stance. In May 2017, co-founder Justin Chastain warned of imminent shutdown owing to surging operational costs outpacing revenue, leading to a appeal that raised sufficient funds to continue operations temporarily. These challenges persisted, as the site's aversion to content moderation limited partnerships with advertisers wary of association with unfiltered discussions. By March 2020, Voat lost its primary external investor, forcing Chastain to fund server and maintenance expenses from personal resources. On December 22, 2020, Chastain announced the platform's closure, stating he had subsidized costs out-of-pocket to sustain Voat through the U.S. but had exhausted his funds. The site went offline at noon PST on December 25, 2020, exemplifying the broader vulnerability of donation-reliant platforms lacking scalable revenue streams.

Final Announcement and Closure (2020)

On December 22, 2020, Voat co-founder and CEO Justin Chastain posted an announcement titled "I Can't Keep It Up" in the site's /v/announcements , declaring the platform's closure due to insurmountable financial challenges. In the post, Chastain explained that external investment had ceased in March 2020 amid broader economic pressures from the , leaving him to personally fund operations through personal resources and limited donations, which proved insufficient. He expressed personal exhaustion, stating, "It's embarrassing but it's true, I just can't keep it up," and noted attempts at , , and outreach for support had failed to yield viable solutions. Chastain outlined plans to cooperate with on any ongoing investigations related to site content and to explore options for handing over user data to a potential successor platform, though no such entity materialized before shutdown. The announcement highlighted Voat's operational costs, including server maintenance and moderation, which had escalated without corresponding revenue growth, exacerbated by prior incidents that limited payment processing and hosting options. Voat ceased operations as scheduled on December 25, 2020, at 12:00 PM PST, rendering the site inaccessible and ending its six-year run as a alternative. At the time of closure, Voat had approximately 50,000 registered users, a fraction of its peak activity, with subverse subscriptions totaling over 1,000 communities, many of which focused on uncensored banned elsewhere. No immediate data export was provided to users, prompting subsequent archival initiatives by third parties.

Post-Shutdown Impact

Archival Efforts and Data Access

Following Voat's shutdown on , , archival efforts focused on preserving its content for and historical , given the platform's role in hosting communities displaced from mainstream sites. Researchers Amin Mekacher and Antonis Papasavva compiled and released what they described as the largest publicly available of Voat's activity, encompassing 2.3 million submissions, 16.2 million comments from 113,000 users across 7,100 subverses (Voat's equivalent of subreddits). This spans the site's full operational , from its founding on , 2013, through its closure, enabling empirical studies of user migration patterns, such as those involving communities. The collection method involved systematic scraping of publicly accessible data prior to shutdown, though exact technical details remain tied to the researchers' access during the site's active period. While presented as publicly available for scholarly use, direct downloads require contacting the authors or accessing via associated repositories, with no open bulk mirror identified in public sources. Independent preservation initiatives included searchvoat.co, an unofficial indexing tool launched around 2018 that allowed querying Voat's content without requiring a login—bypassing restrictions imposed on the original site since mid-2019. This service indexed posts and comments, facilitating post-shutdown searches until its permanent closure on August 8, 2025, attributed to compliance with evolving online safety regulations. , a volunteer group dedicated to web preservation, documented Voat's structure and history but did not release a comprehensive public data dump or mirror, unlike their efforts for other platforms; their entry notes the site's free-speech orientation but lacks details on captured volumes. Current data access remains fragmented, relying on academic datasets like Mekacher and Papasavva's for bulk analysis, supplemented by partial captures of individual pages via the . Discussions in data preservation communities, such as Reddit's r/DataHoarder, urged pre-shutdown scraping in December 2020 but yielded no centralized public hoard. These efforts underscore challenges in archiving uncensored platforms, where institutional biases in mainstream archives may limit comprehensive retention of controversial content.

Lessons for Alternative Platforms

Voat's shutdown highlighted the acute financial vulnerabilities of alternative platforms committed to minimal . After a key investor withdrew support in March 2020, co-founder Justin Chastain funded operations personally until resources depleted, leading to closure on December 25, 2020. This reliance on limited donations and sporadic investment proved unsustainable, as the platform's user base—peaking around 2015 amid migrations from Reddit's policy changes—failed to generate steady revenue amid ongoing technical and hosting costs. A core lesson lies in the perils of by upstream providers, which alternative sites face disproportionately due to associations with controversial content. Voat encountered repeated service denials from payment processors and hosts, mirroring experiences of peers like Gab and , where similar content policies triggered cuts from entities such as and . Platforms aspiring to censorship resistance must thus diversify revenue streams—potentially via donations or self-hosted infrastructure—to mitigate control by centralized financial intermediaries, whose decisions often reflect institutional pressures rather than neutral risk assessment. User migration dynamics underscore the double-edged nature of free-speech appeals: while Voat absorbed communities banned from in 2015, sustaining engagement proved elusive without broader or advertiser . This influx amplified reputational risks, deterring mainstream viability and reinforcing isolation in niche ecosystems. Alternative platforms can learn to implement voluntary, community-driven curation mechanisms—beyond pure —to foster quality discourse that retains core users while reducing that invites external backlash, thereby enhancing long-term resilience. Chastain's reflection on Voat's endurance despite odds emphasizes prioritizing operational independence over fleeting traffic spikes.

References

  1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05933
  2. https://golden.com/wiki/Voat-KMV6P4
  3. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/voat-creator-speaks-on-reddit-refugees-plans-for-future-2015-07-10
  4. https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/22/22195115/voat-free-speech-right-wing-reddit-clone-shutdown-investor
  5. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/19382/19154
  6. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/12/reddit-clone-voat-home-to-hate-speech-and-qanon-has-shut-down/
  7. https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/meet-voat-the-website-that-wants-to-be-the-anti-reddit/
  8. https://www.theverge.com/2015/7/10/8924415/voat-reddit-competitor-free-speech
  9. https://thenextweb.com/news/what-is-voat-the-site-reddit-users-are-flocking-to
  10. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33447512
  11. https://socialmediaalternatives.org/archive/collections/show/25
  12. https://kumarde.com/papers/qanon_hyperlink.pdf
  13. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/viewPDFInterstitial/13137/12729
  14. https://aaronstannard.com/voat-scalability/
  15. https://battlepenguin.com/tech/voat-what-went-wrong
  16. https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/19382/19382-28-23395-1-2-20220531.pdf
  17. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.10827
  18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/06/23/this-is-what-happens-when-you-create-an-online-community-without-any-rules-part-2/
  19. https://www.theverge.com/2015/6/10/8761763/reddit-harassment-ban-fat-people-hate-subreddit
  20. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/15/reddit-users-flee-to-voat-after-harassment-clampdown
  21. https://www.wired.com/story/reddit-rival-voatco-killed-by-hosting-company/
  22. https://www.businessinsider.com/voat-vs-reddit-2015-7
  23. https://www.wired.com/story/reddit-new-content-policy-update/
  24. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3614419.3644021
  25. https://www.vice.com/en/article/paypal-cuts-off-reddit-clone-voat-over-obscenity/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10619511/
  27. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3614419.3644019
  28. https://www.vice.com/en/article/founder-of-voat-the-censorship-free-reddit-begs-users-to-stop-making-death-threats/
  29. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3134666
  30. https://gizmodo.com/reddit-bans-r-coontown-for-all-the-wrong-reasons-1722356507
  31. https://blog.oup.com/2019/10/connection-between-online-hate-speech-real-world-hate-crime/
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365031373_I_Can%27t_Keep_It_Up_A_Dataset_from_the_Defunct_Voatco_News_Aggregator
  33. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25501466
  34. https://venturebeat.com/ai/swiss-reddit-clone-voat-has-its-servers-closed-by-hosting-provider-due-to-politically-incorrect-content
  35. https://mediawell.ssrc.org/news-items/reddit-clone-voat-home-to-hate-speech-and-qanon-has-shut-down-ars-technica/
  36. https://hal.science/hal-03609930v1/file/Reddit_hatespeech.pdf
  37. https://twitter.com/voatco/status/610125170402004992
  38. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/39tgs4/censorship_voat_is_currently_being_hit_by_a_ddos/
  39. https://fortune.com/2015/07/13/new-reddit-rival-voat-hit-by-ddos-attack/
  40. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/22/reddit-clone-voat-dropped-by-web-host
  41. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/62530/20150623/web-host-shuts-down-reddit-clone-voat-for-politically-incorrect-content.htm
  42. https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2021/12/30/voat-ceo-closes-site-citing-failure-of-meditation-and-prayer/
  43. https://archive.ph/0kOST
  44. https://www.the-independent.com/tech/voat-shutdown-christmas-qanon-reddit-b1779890.html
  45. https://gizmodo.com/far-right-reddit-clone-voat-has-shut-down-for-real-thi-1845951789
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357927216_I_can%27t_keep_it_up_anymore_The_Voatco_dataset
  47. https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Voat
  48. https://archive.ph/cS6BV
  49. https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/ki83rs/voat_will_be_shutting_down_as_of_december_25th/
  50. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/12/reddit-alternative-voat-shut-down-on-christmas-day-citing-lack-of-funding/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.