Hubbry Logo
Vote LeaveVote LeaveMain
Open search
Vote Leave
Community hub
Vote Leave
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Vote Leave
Vote Leave
Vote Leave
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Part of a series on
Brexit

Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union

Glossary of terms
Background
2016 referendum
Campaigns
Leave campaigns
Remain campaigns
Outcome
Notice of withdrawal
Negotiations
Withdrawal agreement
Legislation
Impact
EU–UK relations
Relations with EU member states
Opposition
Calls for a second referendum
Timeline
Bloomberg speech Jan 2013
Referendum Bill blockedJan 2014
European Parliament election May 2014
2015 general election May 2015
Renegotiation begins Jun 2015
Referendum Act passed Dec 2015
Renegotiation concluded Feb 2016
Referendum held Jun 2016
David Cameron resigns as PM Jul 2016
Theresa May becomes PM Jul 2016
Article 50 judgement Jan 2017
Brexit plan presentedFeb 2017
Notification Act passed Mar 2017
Article 50 invoked Mar 2017
Repeal Bill plan presentedMar 2017
2017 general election Jun 2017
Brexit negotiations begin Jun 2017
Withdrawal Act passedJun 2018
Chequers plan presented Jul 2018
Withdrawal agreement plan presented July 2018
Withdrawal agreement released Nov 2018
Scottish Continuity Bill blockedDec 2018
Meaningful votes Jan–Mar 2019
Brexit delayed until 12 April Mar 2019
Cooper–Letwin Act passed Apr 2019
Brexit delayed until 31 October Apr 2019
European Parliament election May 2019
Theresa May resigns as PM Jul 2019
Boris Johnson becomes PM Jul 2019
Prorogation and annulment Aug–Sep 2019
Benn Act passed Sep 2019
Withdrawal agreement revised Oct 2019
Brexit delayed until 31 January Oct 2019
2019 general election Dec 2019
Agreement Act passed Jan 2020
UK leaves the European Union Jan 2020
Implementation period begins Jan 2020
UK–EU trade deal agreed Dec 2020
Future Relationship Act passed Dec 2020
Scottish Continuity Act passed Dec 2020
Implementation period ends Dec 2020
New EU–UK relationship begins Jan 2021
UK–EU trade deal ratified Apr 2021
Windsor Framework released Feb 2023
Windsor framework adopted Mar 2023
Part of a series of articles on
UK membership
of the European Union
(1973–2020)
Accession
1975 referendum
Treaty amendments
Single European Act, 1986 (UK ratification)
Maastricht Treaty, 1992 (UK ratification)
Treaty of Amsterdam, 1997 (UK ratification)
Treaty of Nice, 2001 (UK ratification)
Treaty of Lisbon, 2007 (UK ratification)
MEPs for UK constituencies
Members 1973–1979 (elected by parliament)
Members 1979–1984 (1979 election)
Members 1984–1989 (1984 election)
Members 1989–1994 (1989 election)
Members 1994–1999 (1994 election)
Members 1999–2004 (1999 election)
Members 2004–2009 (2004 election)
Members 2009–2014 (2009 election)
Members 2014–2019 (2014 election)
Members 2019–2020 (2019 election)
Officials and bodies
Issues and events
Withdrawal

Vote Leave was[1] a campaigning organisation that supported a "Leave" vote in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.[2] On 13 April 2016 it was designated by the Electoral Commission as the official campaign in favour of leaving the European Union in the Referendum.[3]

Vote Leave was founded in October 2015 by political strategists Matthew Elliott and Dominic Cummings as a cross-party campaign. It involved Members of Parliament from the Conservative Party, Labour Party and the sole UKIP MP, Douglas Carswell along with MEP Daniel Hannan and the Conservative peer Nigel Lawson. Labour MP Gisela Stuart served as chairman and Leader of the Vote Leave Campaign Committee as Co-Convenor with Michael Gove MP, of the Conservatives.[4] The campaign was also supported by a number of prominent politicians; including outgoing Mayor of London Boris Johnson, who became a key figurehead for the Vote Leave campaign. A number of Vote Leave principals, including Douglas Carswell, Michael Gove, Bernard Jenkin and Anne-Marie Trevelyan, were also members of the influential IPSA resourced European Research Group.

Vote Leave co-operated with Labour Leave, Conservatives for Britain and Business for Britain throughout the referendum campaign.[5]

At the referendum held on Thursday 23 June 2016, the majority of those who voted, voted for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, which was equivalent to a 51.9% share of the vote (a 3.8% margin); which set into motion the steps to be taken for British withdrawal from the European Union. In September 2016, Change Britain was formed to act as a successor organisation.

On 23 June and over the following days, both Vote Leave and its rival organisation, "Britain Stronger in Europe", were excoriated by sections of the media and academia for a campaign described by the Electoral Reform Society as "dire", which left the public seriously lacking proper information. On 17 July 2018, Vote Leave was fined £61,000 and referred to police for breaking electoral spending laws.[6][7]

History

[edit]
Boris Johnson MP was a key figurehead for the Vote Leave campaign

The Vote Leave campaign was launched on 8 October 2015 with support from MPs including Labour MP Kate Hoey and UKIP MP Douglas Carswell, and supporters from the business world including CMC Markets founder Peter Cruddas, entrepreneur Luke Johnson and businessman John Mills, the Labour Party's biggest individual donor.[8][9][10][11] Matthew Elliott, founder and former chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance and Big Brother Watch as well as the campaign director of the successful NOtoAV campaign in 2011 was announced as the chief executive of Vote Leave.

On 2 November 2015, Vote Leave called on the British Polling Council to investigate "serious violations" of the Council's rules by polling organisation YouGov in a survey conducted in 2013 for the Confederation of British Industry (CBI). The poll appeared to show that 8 out of 10 businesses backed Britain's continued membership of the EU. Vote Leave claimed that the poll was "wholly unrepresentative" of Britain's businesses due to skewed sampling in the poll and alleged that the research had "caused the public to be misled about the views of British businesses on the EU for nearly two years."[12][13] The British Polling Council's formal response concluded that YouGov had "not provided an adequate explanation of the sampling procedures that had been used to conduct the survey" at the time of publishing the survey.[14] Vote Leave described the CBI as the "Voice of Brussels"[15] and also published research allegedly showing that the CBI had received over £1million in funding from the EU over the previous six years.[16]

Vote Leave submitted an official statement in November in response to a House of Lords inquiry on the relationship between EU membership and UK science, calling for science research to "replace EU membership as a fundamental priority for national policy."[17][18] An analysis by Vote Leave, published in December 2015, found that the costs of EU membership outweighed the benefits of the EU's single market as reported in the European Commission's own figures.[19][20]

A "Vote Leave" poster in Omagh saying "We send the EU £50 million every day. Let's spend it on our NHS instead."
Vote Leave campaign material

On 3 February 2016, Vote Leave announced that former Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson would be taking over as interim chairman of the Vote Leave board. Lord Forsyth, the former Secretary of State for Scotland, was also appointed to the board at this time.[21][22][23]

On 20 February 2016, following David Cameron's announcement that the EU referendum would take place on 23 June 2016, five Cabinet ministers publicly declared their support for Vote Leave: Michael Gove, the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, Chris Grayling, Leader of the House of Commons, Iain Duncan Smith, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, John Whittingdale, the Culture Secretary, Theresa Villiers, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, as well as cabinet-attending minister Priti Patel, the Minister of State for Employment.[24][25][26] This was followed by an announcement on 21 February by the then-Mayor of London, Boris Johnson MP, that he would also be backing the Vote Leave campaign.[27][28][29] Boris Johnson subsequently became one of the key figureheads for Vote Leave throughout the referendum campaign.

On 15 June 2016, Vote Leave presented its roadmap to lay out what would happen if Britain left the EU.[30] The blueprint suggested that Parliament would pass laws: Finance Bill to scrap VAT on tampons and household energy bills; Asylum and Immigration Control Bill to end the automatic right of EU citizens to enter Britain; National Health Service (Funding Target) Bill to get an extra 100 million pounds a week; European Union Law (Emergency Provisions) Bill; Free Trade Bill to start to negotiate its own deals with non-EU countries; and European Communities Act 1972 (Repeal) Bill to end the European Court of Justice's jurisdiction over Britain and stop making contributions to the EU budget.[30]

Campaign Committee

[edit]

On 13 March 2016 Vote Leave announced the Vote Leave Campaign Committee, the public facing governing body that meets weekly to set the campaign strategy for Vote Leave.[31] This coincided with the announcement of Labour MP Gisela Stuart as the new chairman of Vote Leave (replacing Nigel Lawson) along with Gisela Stuart and Michael Gove as Co-Conveners of the Committee.[32] The Vote Leave Campaign Committee was

Board

[edit]

The Vote Leave board was legally responsible for the campaign.[31]

Staff

[edit]
  • Paul Stephenson, Communications Director [4]
  • Stephen Parkinson, Organiser of the ground campaign[39]
  • Alex Hickman, Outreach Director[40]
  • Robert Oxley, Head of Media
  • James Starkie, Head of PR and Regional Press[41]
  • Lee Rotherham, Director of special projects[42]
  • Oliver Lewis, Director of Research[43]
  • Gurjit Kaur Bains, Outreach Assistant[44]
  • Hugh Bennett, Correspondence Officer[45]
  • Thomas Borwick, Chief Technical Officer
  • Ian Davidson, Labour Co-ordinator
  • Nic Conner, Event Liaison Co-ordinator[46]
  • Mark Hamilton, Head of Major Events[47]
  • Richard Howell, Policy Analyst[48]

Supporters

[edit]
See also: Endorsements in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum

Members of Parliament supporting the organisation include UKIP MP Douglas Carswell, Labour MP Kelvin Hopkins, Conservative MPs Steve Baker, Bernard Jenkin and Owen Paterson, and former Ulster Unionist Party leader Lord Trimble.[citation needed]

Relationship with other groups

[edit]

Leave.EU and Grassroots Out

[edit]
See also: Project Fear (British politics)

Vote Leave focused on economic arguments against the European Union, while Leave.EU made more of immigration-related issues. This led to situations where Vote Leave and Leave.EU statements have contradicted each other, and sometimes to direct attacks by one pro-Brexit group against the other.[53] Infighting within Vote Leave and Leave.EU, as well as disillusion with Cummings, led to the formation of Grassroots Out (GO).[54] Nigel Farage was a key member of the organisation and of Leave.EU and UKIP donor Arron Banks was a major donor to GO,[54] whereas Vote Leave was a mainly Conservative campaign.[55]

Although the groups had pledged to work together, relations between them was difficult, with some sources saying that "the loathing within the Brexit camp surpasses even that between Remain and Leave".[55] Farage said that Vote Leave is headed by "apparatchiks" and "cretins", saying that the organisation "brief[s] every day that I'm toxic, I put voters off, and there is absolutely no statistical evidence to back that up at all. ... It's crackers to think that you can win a referendum campaign with Boris [Johnson] and the likes of the cabinet", and became irritated when UKIP's sole MP Douglas Carswell joined Vote Leave.[56] Andy Wigmore, Leave.EU's director of communications, told Private Eye that "our private polling shows Remain will win if we carry on as we are".[55]

When Nigel Farage was selected for an interview with ITV's Robert Peston instead of a Vote Leave representative, Vote Leave issued a statement accusing Peston of bias and threatening "consequences" for the broadcaster if Vote Leave members formed a government post-referendum.[57] Michael Grade, Conservative life peer and former head of both the BBC and ITV, accused Vote Leave of using "unacceptable" "bullying tactics".[57] In response, Farage said that "I'm not going to compare myself to any of the others. ... But I do know the subject well. I've been doing this for a long time."[56]

Political parties

[edit]

Labour MPs who want to exit the European Union on left-wing grounds have expressed their concern over being marginalised by Conservative and UKIP domination of the Vote Leave campaign. Labour donor John Mills was replaced by Conservative peer Nigel Lawson as chairman of the group on 5 February 2016, which prompted a source close to the campaign to tell The Morning Star that "Given that we need to win over Labour and socialist voters to win, how can we have a Tory grandee leading the campaign? Labour Leave's position in the campaign is very difficult after this."[58] The Green Party of England and Wales's representative in the House of Lords, Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb, previously supported Vote Leave[11] but withdrew her support for the organisation following its decision to appoint Lawson as its chairman, tweeting that she "Will vote to Leave EU but can't work with an organisation with so little judgement as to put Lawson at its head."[59] However, in mid-March Labour MP Gisela Stuart replaced Lawson as chair of Vote Leave.[citation needed]

Economists for Brexit

[edit]

The leave vote campaign maintained close ties with the lobbying group Economists for Brexit, now called Economists for Free Trade, going so far as to share the same phone number.[60][61][62]

Charities

[edit]

Matthew Elliott, the chief executive of Vote Leave, was former chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance (TPA) and founded Politics and Economics Research Trust (PERT) in 2004. Labour MP and former Shadow Minister for Europe, Emma Reynolds, questioned the affairs of the TPA and PERT, writing to the Charity Commission that "Pert may be in breach of charities legally binding commitments to preserve their independence, specifically regarding political activity and the delivery of charitable objectives". Of £532,000 PERT paid out in grants in 2014, £300,000 went to the TPA and £205,000 to Business for Britain, both of which are Eurosceptic. £10,000 went to Global Britain, which has campaigned for Brexit. Charitable trusts are not allowed to be used for political purposes under British charity law.[63]

Criticism

[edit]

Strategy

[edit]

During 2015, the group established a fake company[64] to gain entry to a speech being given by Prime Minister David Cameron at the Confederation of British Industry where they heckled him and held banners stating "CBI = voice of Brussels". Cummings subsequently stated: "You think it is nasty? You ain’t seen nothing yet. These guys have failed the country, they are going to be under the magnifying glass. Tough shit ... It is going to be tough".[65] The campaign also stated their intention to target and disrupt meetings of pro-EU organisations and companies.[66] In a letter to the Electoral Commission, Sir Eric Pickles, the former Conservative cabinet minister, said he believed Vote Leave had disqualified itself from lead status in the referendum (which entitles the campaign to public funding) after it pledged to run a "nasty" campaign against opponents.[65]

Criticism emerged in 2018 of their relationship with their 'Outreach Groups' such as BeLeave[67] as claims emerged that they were puppet organisations through which Vote Leave channelled money[68] to circumvent spending restrictions.[69] George Eaton wrote, “[The] allegations bear the imprimatur of three senior barristers (Clare Montgomery QC, Helen Mountfield QC and Ben Silverstone of Matrix Chambers) who concluded that Vote Leave may have 'spent huge sums unlawfully', that there are 'grounds to suspect' that campaign director and former Michael Gove aide Dominic Cummings “conspired to break the law” and that Stephen Parkinson and fellow No. 10 aide Cleo Watson may have 'conspired with others to commit offences'”.[70]

BeLeave was based inside the Vote Leave headquarters.[71] On 14 September 2018, the High Court of Justice found against the Electoral Commission, stating that its advice to Vote Leave and Darren Grimes had been incorrect, but confirming that the overspending had been illegal. Vote Leave, which claimed they would not have paid BeLeave without the advice, initially appealed against their fine, but withdrew the appeal in March 2019.[citation needed]

Post referendum campaign

[edit]

Noting the absence of post-victory celebrations, Nick Cohen wrote in a Guardian newspaper article that it reflected the fear of the two main leaders Johnson and Gove, both journalists, that they would be “found out.” He said that the Leave camp had no plan and provided a single simplistic answer to EU problems condemning the UK Statistics Authority as “stooges” and other experts as “corrupt liars in Brussels' pocket.” The campaign - a cross-party alliance of left and right-wing campaigners - had made promises on immigration and the National Health Service on which some politicians[which?] were backtracking.[72]

Michael Dougan, Professor of European Law and Jean Monnet Chair in EU Law at the University of Liverpool, described the Vote Leave and other Leave campaigns as "one of the most dishonest political campaigns this country [the UK] has ever seen".[73]

In August 2016, the Electoral Reform Society published a highly critical report and called for a review of how such future events are run. Contrasting it unfavourably with the "well-informed grassroots" campaign for Scottish independence, Chief Executive Katie Ghose described it as "dire" with “glaring democratic deficiencies” which left voters bewildered. She noted a generally negative response to establishment figures with 29% of voters saying David Cameron made them more likely to vote Leave whilst only 14% said he made them want to vote Remain. Looking ahead, the society called for an official organisation to highlight misleading claims and for Ofcom to define the role broadcasters are expected to play.[74]

Electoral law violations

[edit]

In November 2017, the Electoral Commission announced that it was reopening its investigation of Vote Leave's EU referendum spending.[75] On 17 July 2018, it was announced that Vote Leave had been found guilty of breaking electoral law by overspending[76] following testimony from three whistleblowers. Vote Leave was fined £61,000 and referred to the police.[77] In October 2018, an article appeared on the political website openDemocracy claiming that the criminal investigations into Vote Leave and Leave.EU had not progressed, with a spokesman for a Scotland Yard admitting that "there were issues and “political sensitivities” that had to be taken into account.[78]

On 14 September 2018, the High Court ruled that the advice given by the Electoral Commission to Vote Leave as requested misinterpreted EU referendum spending laws. An Electoral Commission spokesperson said it welcomed the court's "consideration of this aspect of electoral law" and said it had reached the same conclusion as a subsequent commission investigation, which resulted in fines being issued to Vote Leave and Darren Grimes.[79][80][81] Vote Leave appealed against the fine, maintaining that the donation to Grimes had been appropriately signed off by the Electoral Commission, but on 29 March 2019 they announced that the appeal had been dropped, citing a lack of financial resources as the reason.[82] However, in July 2019, Grimes, having crowdfunded £90,000 for legal costs, won an appeal against the Electoral Commission.[83]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Vote Leave

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Vote Leave Limited was a cross-party political campaign organization established to advocate for the United Kingdom's during the 2016 membership , and was designated by the Electoral Commission as the official proponent of the Leave position. Led by prominent figures including , then , and Justice Secretary , the group emphasized regaining national sovereignty through its central slogan, "Vote Leave, take back control," focusing on control over borders, laws, and economic contributions to the . The campaign's advocacy proved pivotal in securing a 51.9% to 48.1% majority for Leave on June 23, 2016, with turnout exceeding 72%, marking a historic decision that initiated the process and led to the UK's formal exit from the in January 2020. Despite this success, Vote Leave encountered significant post-referendum controversies, including a 2018 Electoral Commission ruling that it had breached spending limits by improperly coordinating with another pro-Leave group, resulting in a £61,000 fine and referral to police for investigation, though the result remained unaffected and legal challenges failed to overturn it.

Formation and Early Development

Establishment as Official Campaign

Vote Leave Ltd applied to the UK Electoral Commission to become the designated lead campaigner for the Leave side in the membership , as permitted under the , which allowed registered campaigners to seek official status for enhanced spending limits and broadcast allocations. The Commission received applications from multiple Leave-aligned groups, including Grassroots Out Ltd (associated with figures) and BeLeave, but evaluated them against statutory criteria such as the breadth of support from Leave proponents, capacity for effective nationwide campaigning, and representativeness of the outcome sought. On 13 April 2016, the Electoral Commission designated Vote Leave Ltd as the official lead for the Leave campaign, determining it possessed the strongest demonstration of cross-party and backing, including endorsements from Conservative, Labour, and UKIP parliamentarians, surpassing rivals in evidenced supporter mobilization. This selection overrode objections from UKIP leader , whose preferred Out was deemed less representative despite its focus on appeals. The designation enabled Vote Leave to access a £7 million spending cap—double that of non-lead campaigners—plus rights to a free postal address to 46 million voters and designated TV debate slots ahead of the 23 June 2016 poll. The process highlighted tensions within the Leave movement, as excluded groups like continued independent efforts under stricter £350,000 limits, leading to later coordination disputes and regulatory scrutiny over parallel spending. Vote Leave's official status consolidated resources around its leadership, including figures such as Matthew Elliott as chief executive, positioning it to spearhead unified messaging on and economic control.

Initial Leadership and Internal Structure

Vote Leave was established on October 8, 2015, as a cross-party organization advocating for the United Kingdom's in the forthcoming , with initial backing from Conservative MPs including and business figures such as Peter Cruddas. , a political strategist previously involved in anti-EU campaigns, was appointed campaign director from the outset, focusing on data-driven targeting and messaging informed by voter profiling techniques adapted from U.S. elections. Matthew Elliott, former chief executive of the No to AV campaign, served as chief executive, managing operations and fundraising. Following its designation as the official Leave campaign by the Electoral Commission on April 13, 2016, emerged as a prominent public leader alongside Gove, leveraging his profile as former to rally support, though decision-making remained centralized among a smaller operational core. Labour MP joined as a key cross-party figure, later chairing the campaign's executive committee to broaden appeal beyond Conservative ranks. Internally, Vote Leave operated as Vote Leave Limited, a registered company with a formal board subject to Electoral Commission oversight, but strategic direction was handled by a core group of seven individuals meeting regularly: Michael Gove MP, Gisela Stuart MP, Boris Johnson MP, Matthew Elliott, Dominic Cummings, Victoria Woodcock (chief operating officer), and Ian Davidson (treasurer). This group approved major decisions, including messaging and resource allocation, emphasizing a lean structure to prioritize rapid response over broad consultation, with Cummings exerting significant influence on analytical and tactical elements. The setup allowed for agility but drew later scrutiny for limited transparency in internal governance.

Campaign Strategies and Messaging

Core Policy Arguments and Empirical Claims

Vote Leave's primary policy arguments emphasized regaining national sovereignty, restoring control over , and securing economic advantages by redirecting EU contributions and pursuing independent trade policies. The campaign framed membership as eroding democratic accountability, with unelected institutions overriding decisions on key matters. Supporters contended that leaving would enable the Parliament to legislate freely, citing estimates that EU-derived laws influenced over 60% of regulations, including directives and secondary implemented domestically. This argument drew on analyses from groups like Business for Britain, which Vote Leave aligned with, highlighting the volume of EU regulations affecting sectors from fisheries to . On immigration, Vote Leave pledged to end the EU's principle, arguing it prevented effective border controls and contributed to unsustainable population pressures. The campaign referenced (ONS) data showing net migration reaching 332,000 in the year ending June 2015, with EU nationals comprising a significant share—184,000 net inflows from the EU alone—straining public services, housing, and wage suppression in low-skilled sectors. Proponents claimed an Australian-style points-based system post-exit would prioritize skills and reduce overall numbers, addressing voter concerns that EU rules blocked reductions below the government's 100,000 annual target. Economically, a flagship claim was that leaving would free up £350 million per week in gross UK contributions to the EU budget, which could be redirected to priorities like the (NHS). This figure represented the UK's pre-rebate payments, calculated from the 2014-2020 EU budget cycle where the UK contributed approximately 13% of the total, equating to £19.14 billion annually before the abatement rebate of about £4.9 billion. Vote Leave argued that post-Brexit negotiations could retain trade access without full membership costs, enabling investment in and averting projected EU budget demands rising to £350 million net by 2020. They further asserted that EU membership hampered global trade deals, pointing to the EU's slow negotiations with nations like the and , and burdensome regulations costing UK businesses billions annually in compliance. Leaving, they maintained, would allow bilateral agreements and deregulation to boost GDP growth beyond EU constraints.

Key Slogans, Media Tactics, and Public Engagement

The Vote Leave campaign's primary slogan, "Vote Leave. Take back control", encapsulated arguments for restoring sovereignty over , laws, and finances, drawing on themes of democratic and national . Coined by strategist and adopted early in the campaign, it appeared ubiquitously in advertisements, billboards, and merchandise, with the official logo featuring a bold arrow pointing from "EU" to "" to symbolize redirection of authority. Polling data indicated this message tested highly with voters prioritizing control over EU institutions, contributing to its role in framing the debate around empowerment rather than economic risks. A controversial numerical claim asserted that the contributed £350 million weekly to the —equivalent to £18 billion annually—which could alternatively fund the . Displayed prominently on the campaign's red during nationwide tours starting in 2016, this figure derived from gross payments before rebates and EU receipts, a point Vote Leave acknowledged but defended as highlighting potential savings post-exit. Independent analyses, including from the , later deemed it misleading for implying net savings of that magnitude, yet it galvanized public discourse on fiscal priorities, with focus groups showing resonance among those viewing EU membership as a budgetary drain. Media tactics emphasized against the Remain campaign's institutional advantages, leveraging low-cost digital tools over traditional outlets perceived as pro-EU. Vote Leave invested £2.7 million in targeted advertising via , a Canadian firm, using voter data to deliver messages on and to undecided demographics, achieving over 1 billion impressions. High-profile interventions included Boris Johnson's 2016 column comparing EU bureaucracy to Nazi parallels, which sparked media storms but amplified reach, and coordinated responses to opinion polls showing Leave gains. The campaign also secured favorable coverage through outlets like the , which ran pro-Leave editorials reaching 4 million daily readers. Note that while 's methods drew scrutiny for opacity, Electoral Commission investigations found no illegal data misuse by Vote Leave, unlike parallel campaigns. Public engagement strategies focused on and spectacle to counter Remain's elite-backed . From April 2016, Vote Leave distributed 10 million leaflets and organized over 200 public events, including town halls in marginal areas like the , where volunteers canvassed 1.5 million doors. Endorsements from figures such as farmer endorsements in rural constituencies highlighted tangible EU policy grievances, like quotas. The campaign's "People's Army" volunteer network, peaking at 12,000 members, coordinated via apps for real-time turnout efforts, boosting participation in low-propensity Leave areas; turnout reached 72.2% overall, with Leave stronger in regions like the North East at 58%. These efforts, audited at £13.7 million total spend, prioritized breadth over depth, fostering a sense of popular revolt against Westminster consensus.

Organizational Framework

Governing Bodies and Decision-Making

Vote Leave Limited, incorporated on 19 November 2015 as a private company limited by guarantee, was governed by a board of directors responsible for owning and managing the organization in accordance with its articles of association. The board, comprising 16 members as of 9 March 2016—including Gisela Stuart MP as chairman, Michael Gove MP, and business figures such as Jon Moynihan—met fortnightly to set aims, ensure legal and ethical compliance, and retain reserve powers over major interventions. Directors included David Alan Halsall and Daniel Houghton Hodson from incorporation, with others like Moynihan joining shortly after. Day-to-day oversight was delegated to specialized committees and the Senior Management Team (SMT). The Campaign Committee, co-chaired by Gove and Stuart, met weekly to approve the strategic framework; the Finance Committee, chaired by Moynihan, handled fundraising and budgets; and the Compliance Committee, chaired by Hodson, monitored regulatory adherence—all reporting back to the board via minutes. The SMT, consisting of Chief Executive Matthew Elliott, Campaign Director , and Operations Director Victoria Woodcock, managed operational execution and provided fortnightly updates to the board. A Core Group of seven—Gove, Stuart, Boris Johnson MP, Elliott, Cummings, Woodcock, and Ian Davidson—convened daily during the campaign to track progress and tactical adjustments, feeding recommendations into the Campaign Committee. An independent Responsible Person, Halsall, oversaw spending and activities to maintain separation from routine management. Decision-making emphasized board approval for high-stakes actions, such as expenditures over £100,000, while empowering committees and the SMT for ; this structure evolved in February 2016 when initial board members like Elliott and Cummings faced proposed demotions amid pressure from MPs to elevate political leadership and facilitate alliances. Following designation as the official Leave campaigner by the Electoral Commission on 16 April 2016, the board ensured adherence to referendum spending limits of £7 million.

Key Personnel and Operational Roles

Vote Leave's operational leadership was headed by Dominic Cummings as campaign director, a role in which he developed data-driven strategies, including voter targeting models and experimental polling methods to optimize messaging effectiveness. Cummings, previously involved in Eurosceptic efforts, focused on disrupting traditional campaign norms by emphasizing empirical testing over conventional advertising. Matthew Elliott served as chief executive, overseeing administrative functions, compliance with Electoral Commission rules, and coordination of the campaign's £7 million spending limit during the official period from April 13 to June 23, 2016. Elliott, founder of the , managed internal structures and alliances with other Leave groups, ensuring unified operational efforts. Public-facing leadership featured Boris Johnson and Michael Gove as co-chairs, leveraging their prominence to drive media engagement and rallies; Johnson, former Mayor of London, emphasized sovereignty and immigration control in speeches, while Gove handled policy articulation on justice and education impacts. Their roles extended to the campaign committee, which included figures like Iain Duncan Smith for welfare policy input, though operational decisions centralized under Cummings and Elliott. The structure separated strategic direction from political endorsements, with non-executive directors and advisors handling legal and financial oversight to navigate referendum regulations. This division allowed flexibility in responding to Remain campaign developments, such as countering economic fear-mongering with claims of £350 million weekly EU contributions redirected to the NHS.

Support Base and Alliances

Endorsements from Politicians and Public Figures

Vote Leave garnered endorsements from several high-profile Conservative politicians, who formed its core leadership and public advocates. , former , publicly backed the campaign on February 21, 2016, becoming one of its most visible figures alongside , the Justice Secretary, after Vote Leave's designation as the official Leave group by the Electoral Commission on April 13, 2016. Other senior cabinet members, including Commons Leader , Culture Secretary , Northern Ireland Secretary , and Employment Minister , declared their support for Leave prior to the June 23 referendum. Beyond the cabinet, endorsements came from Conservative figures such as former Iain Duncan Smith and environment secretary Owen Paterson, who emphasized and control in their advocacy. Support extended to some Labour MPs, including Gisela Stuart, who co-chaired Labour Leave but aligned with Vote Leave's broader objectives, though Labour endorsements remained limited overall. Public figures outside politics also lent their voices, including actor , who stated in October 2016 that he voted Leave to prioritize British interests over bureaucracy. Singer of The Who endorsed , citing concerns over the 's lack of democratic accountability, while cricketer , actress , and footballer publicly favored leaving the . These endorsements highlighted cultural and sporting icons aligning with Vote Leave's emphasis on national independence.

Interactions with Parallel Leave Campaigns

Vote Leave competed with several parallel Leave campaigns for designation as the official anti-EU membership group by the Electoral Commission, a status that conferred advantages including a £7 million spending limit, access to TV broadcasts, and a public grant of up to £600,000. Primary rivals included , backed by financier and (UKIP) leader , and Grassroots Out, which organized rallies and local events featuring Farage, Labour MP , and others. Early attempts at cooperation among Leave groups faltered due to strategic differences, with Vote Leave emphasizing economic arguments and while critics portrayed it as elite-driven and Westminster-centric. Tensions with Leave.EU escalated during the designation process, as both vied for official status amid public disputes over leadership and voter appeal. Banks described Vote Leave director Matthew Elliott and strategist as untrustworthy, reportedly hiring a private to investigate Elliott amid over rival tactics. focused on to mobilize UKIP supporters, contrasting Vote Leave's emphasis on redirecting EU contributions to the , leading to parallel rather than unified messaging. UKIP MP endorsed Vote Leave, highlighting deep strategic divisions with Farage-backed groups like . Interactions with Grassroots Out similarly involved competition for designation, with the latter positioning itself as a grassroots alternative through events in over 500 locations. Supported initially by Farage and some Conservatives, Grassroots Out received backing from after the latter shifted support to bolster its bid, but Vote Leave prevailed on 13 April 2016. Figures like David Davis appeared at Grassroots Out events, indicating some overlap in personnel, yet overall coordination remained limited by infighting. Following designation, parallel campaigns such as continued operations under stricter £700,000 spending caps but mounted legal challenges against the Electoral Commission's decision, which were unsuccessful. Labour Leave, initially aligned with Vote Leave, operated independently to target working-class voters, reflecting further fragmentation. BeLeave, a youth-oriented offshoot linked to Leave.EU, ran separate digital efforts without formal integration into Vote Leave's structure. Despite these divisions, the groups shared the overarching goal of a Leave victory on 23 June 2016, though persistent rivalries hindered unified or joint public appearances.

Referendum Performance and Results

Mobilization Efforts and Voter Turnout

Vote Leave's mobilization efforts centered on energizing core supporter demographics, including older voters and residents in Leave-leaning regions outside major urban centers, through a combination of public rallies, regional outreach, and volunteer-driven in the weeks leading up to the June 23, 2016, . The campaign deployed high-profile figures like on a touring battle bus to host events in key areas, aiming to boost enthusiasm and counter Remain's economic warnings with messages of national sovereignty and immigration control. These tactics contributed to heightened participation among infrequent voters, with studies indicating that 60% of individuals who abstained in the 2015 general election but voted in the supported Leave. The referendum achieved an overall voter turnout of 72.2%, the highest for any UK-wide poll since the 1992 , with 33,577,342 votes cast from an electorate of approximately 46.5 million. Turnout varied regionally, reaching 76.7% in the South East, South West, and —areas with strong Leave support—while dipping to 62.7% in , where Remain prevailed. This differential mobilization favored Leave, as higher participation rates correlated with Leave victories; for instance, empirical analyses using polling data and instrumental variables like weather conditions confirmed that increments in turnout shifted outcomes toward Leave by activating low-propensity voters sympathetic to anti-EU sentiments. Demographic patterns underscored Vote Leave's targeted approach: turnout exceeded 90% among those aged 65 and over, a group that voted approximately 60% for Leave, compared to under 65% participation among 18- to 24-year-olds, who favored Remain by similar margins. Vote Leave's focus on causal issues like regulatory burdens and resonated with these higher-turnout cohorts, amplifying their influence despite Remain's advantages in urban, younger, and graduate-heavy locales. Post-referendum assessments, drawing from survey data, attribute Leave's edge partly to superior activation of "occasional" voters disillusioned with , rather than broad persuasion shifts.

Vote Outcomes and Regional Variations

In the 2016 membership referendum held on 23 June, the Leave option secured 17,410,742 votes (51.9%) against 16,141,241 votes (48.1%) for Remain, with a national turnout of 72.2% from an electorate of approximately 46.5 million. The result represented a margin of 1,269,501 votes in favor of Leave, marking the first national referendum in history where a voted to exit a major international union. Regional disparities were pronounced, with Leave prevailing in but Remain dominating in and . In , Leave garnered 53.4% of votes, driven by strong support in rural and post-industrial areas such as the North East (58%) and (59%), while urban centers like voted 59.9% Remain. recorded 62% for Remain (1,661,170 votes) with 38% for Leave, reflecting its devolved government's pro-EU stance and younger demographic profile. Wales aligned with at 52.5% Leave, bucking urban trends in (60% Remain) but showing robust support in rural valleys. voted 55.8% Remain, influenced by cross-border economic ties with the , though turnout was lower at 62.7%.
Nation/RegionLeave Votes (%)Remain Votes (%)Turnout (%)
England15,188,917 (53.4)13,266,927 (46.6)73.0
Scotland1,018,322 (38.0)1,661,170 (62.0)67.2
Wales854,572 (52.5)772,347 (47.5)71.7
Northern Ireland349,442 (44.2)440,707 (55.8)62.7
UK Total17,410,742 (51.9)16,141,241 (48.1)72.2
These outcomes highlighted socioeconomic divides, with Leave support correlating with lower educational attainment and areas of economic deprivation, as evidenced by higher Leave percentages in regions outside major metros. Turnout was highest in areas with strong Leave majorities, such as 77% in Boston (Lincolnshire, 75.6% Leave), underscoring mobilization among skeptical voters. Gibraltar, included in the vote, overwhelmingly favored Remain at 96%, reflecting its EU-dependent economy.

Post-Referendum Developments

Dissolution and Transitional Activities

Following the membership on 23 June 2016, in which 51.89% of voters supported leaving the , Vote Leave Ltd ceased frontline campaigning activities as its designated objective had been met. The organization shifted to administrative tasks, including the preparation and submission of its referendum spending return to the Electoral Commission by the required deadline of 30 November 2016, detailing expenditures totaling approximately £13 million within the permitted limit at the time of filing. Regulatory investigations dominated the transitional phase, with the Electoral Commission launching probes into alleged overspending and improper coordination with parallel campaigns such as BeLeave. In July 2018, the Commission ruled that Vote Leave had breached electoral by exceeding its £7 million spending through undeclared joint working, imposing a £61,000 and referring the matter to the police for potential criminal offenses. Vote Leave challenged the findings via , arguing procedural flaws, but withdrew its appeal on 29 March 2019, accepting the penalty. Administrative closure proceeded amid these resolutions, with no of ongoing political or efforts by the entity. On 20 April 2021, Vote Leave Ltd applied for voluntary strike-off from the register, a process suspended briefly on 26 June 2021 before completion. The company was formally dissolved on 14 June 2022, ending its legal existence as a private , incorporated on 18 September 2015.

Role in Shaping Brexit Negotiations

Vote Leave's triumph in the 2016 referendum positioned its core advocates to steer the UK's Brexit strategy, as campaign principals ascended to pivotal government roles that informed negotiation parameters. Boris Johnson, a leading Vote Leave figurehead, was appointed Foreign Secretary in July 2016, where he championed positions echoing the campaign's sovereignty-focused rhetoric, including resistance to transitional arrangements that diluted UK autonomy. Similarly, Michael Gove, Vote Leave's co-chair, became Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, influencing sectors like agriculture that featured prominently in trade talks. This personnel continuity ensured that the government's initial stance prioritized ending free movement, restoring legislative supremacy, and redirecting EU contributions, aligning with the campaign's "take back control" mantra rather than softer alternatives favored by Remain proponents. Dominic Cummings, Vote Leave's campaign director, exerted outsized influence through advisory roles, first under Gove and later as chief strategist to Johnson from 2019 to 2020, devising aggressive tactics such as "Operation Red Rock" for no-deal contingencies and internal modeling to pressure counterparts. His approach emphasized leveraging deadlines and public mandates from the to extract concessions, contributing to the renegotiation of the withdrawal agreement in 2019 that removed the . Cummings' Vote Leave-honed data analytics and messaging strategies informed government communications, framing negotiations as a fulfillment of voter against perceived intransigence. The campaign's policy blueprint indelibly marked negotiation red lines, as articulated in Theresa May's January 17, 2017, speech, which rejected or membership to secure independent trade policy—core Vote Leave pledges. This framework compelled subsequent deals, including the 2020 Trade and Cooperation Agreement, to forgo automatic market access in favor of bespoke arrangements, though at the cost of new frictions like customs checks. Vote Leave alumni, including Johnson upon becoming in July 2019, operationalized these lines by proroguing to avert delays and securing parliamentary ratification of the revised deal on January 23, 2020, prior to the formal exit on January 31.

Controversies and Scrutiny

Examination of Specific Claims and Their Validity

One of the most prominent claims by Vote Leave was that the United Kingdom sent £350 million per week to the European Union, with the implication that this amount could be redirected to domestic priorities such as the National Health Service (NHS). This figure represented the gross contribution before accounting for the UK's annual rebate, estimated at around £100 million weekly, resulting in a net payment closer to £250 million per week based on 2015-2016 data from the Office for National Statistics. The UK Statistics Authority ruled the presentation as potentially misleading, as it omitted rebate details and did not reflect actual usable savings post-Brexit, which would involve trade-offs like lost EU funding for programs such as agriculture and regional development totaling approximately £5-6 billion annually. Despite clarifications from Vote Leave that the slogan illustrated potential control over funds rather than a literal pledge, the campaign's battle bus and materials prominently featured the unadjusted figure alongside NHS imagery, drawing repeated rebukes from the statistics watchdog for constituting a "clear misuse" of official data. Vote Leave also emphasized risks from prospective Turkish accession to the , asserting that a population of 76 million Turks would gain potential migration to the under rules, thereby threatening border control. Accession negotiations, ongoing since 2005, had stalled by 2016 due to disputes over , , and human , with EU leaders including conditioning progress on Turkey meeting , rendering imminent membership unlikely. While the retained a theoretical in EU decisions on enlargement, Vote Leave's portrayal overstated the immediacy, as no timeline for entry existed and post-Brexit dynamics would eliminate any such leverage anyway. Critics, including analyses from the of Economics, argued the claim amplified unfounded fears of uncontrolled , potentially influencing voter sentiment in areas with high immigration concerns, though empirical migration from remained low at under 10,000 net annually pre-referendum. Claims regarding sovereignty centered on "taking back control," positing that EU membership eroded UK parliamentary sovereignty through the supremacy of EU law and qualified majority voting in Council decisions. Legally, the European Communities Act 1972 had incorporated EU law with direct effect and primacy over conflicting domestic statutes, meaning Parliament could not unilaterally override directives or regulations without breaching EU obligations, as affirmed in cases like Factortame (1990). Withdrawal via Article 50 restored full parliamentary sovereignty by repealing the 1972 Act and ending EU legal primacy, enabling independent lawmaking, trade policy, and regulatory choices—outcomes realized post-2020 through the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and subsequent divergences in areas like state aid and fisheries. This assertion held substantive validity under constitutional principles, as UK sovereignty had been voluntarily pooled rather than lost, with leaving reversing that pooling without inherent economic or practical impossibilities beyond negotiated trade terms. However, Remain counterarguments highlighted practical dependencies, such as reliance on EU markets for 44% of UK exports in 2015, which could constrain sovereign choices via economic realities rather than legal compulsion. The Electoral Commission concluded in July 2018 that Vote Leave had breached referendum spending rules by coordinating with the (DUP) on a £625,000 payment for targeted , which exceeded Vote Leave's £7 million limit when treated as joint expenditure. The regulator found "significant evidence of joint working" between the two campaigns, including shared data analytics services via , rendering the transaction improper under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. Vote Leave was fined £61,000 for the violation and the matter was referred to the for potential , though no charges resulted. Vote Leave challenged the Electoral Commission's decision through , initially arguing that the regulator misinterpreted "expenses" under electoral law, particularly regarding the classification of digital advertising costs. In September 2018, the High Court quashed parts of the Commission's assessment on ad expenses, ruling that the regulator had erred in deeming certain internal costs as reportable expenditures, but upheld the core finding of breach via the DUP coordination as a separate issue. Vote Leave subsequently dropped its appeal against the £61,000 fine in March 2019, paying the penalty without further contest. A parallel Electoral Commission probe targeted Vote Leave's £675,000 in unreported payments to AggregateIQ, which benefited affiliated campaigns including BeLeave, run by Darren Grimes. Grimes was fined £20,000 in 2018 for failing to declare these as BeLeave expenditures, but successfully appealed in July 2019 at Central London County Court, where the judge ruled the Commission had applied an overly strict standard for proving Grimes' "reasonable expectation" of the funds' purpose. The Court of Appeal dismissed a broader Vote Leave challenge in November 2019, affirming the Commission's authority in regulating joint campaign activities.

Legacy and Assessments

Contributions to Brexit Achievement

Vote Leave's decisive role in the 2016 referendum victory established the foundational mandate for , as the campaign secured 17,410,742 votes (51.9%) for Leave against 16,141,241 (48.1%) for Remain, with a national turnout of 72.2%—the highest in a UK-wide vote since 1992. This narrow but clear majority withstood subsequent parliamentary resistance and legal challenges, enabling Prime Minister to trigger Article 50 on 29 March 2017, commencing the two-year negotiation period under the . The outcome reversed pre-campaign polling trends favoring Remain by margins of up to 10 points, reflecting Vote Leave's success in mobilizing undecided and low-propensity voters through targeted appeals on and economic self-determination. Under director , Vote Leave prioritized behavioral insights and micro-targeting via digital advertising, allocating significant late-campaign spending—up to 75% of the budget in the final 10 days—to amplify messages like "Take back control" of borders, laws, and money, which shifted risk perceptions among floating voters toward embracing uncertainty over perceived EU overreach. The strategy emphasized immigration control as a proxy for broader , resonating in regions with high net migration impacts, such as the English and , where Leave majorities exceeded 10%. Cummings later detailed how a small, agile team exploited elite institutional inertia and resource asymmetries, starting from a 60-40 polling deficit with limited initial funding of £50,000–£100,000, to build momentum independent of traditional party structures. The campaign's alumni extended its influence into Brexit's delivery phase; key figures like , a prominent Vote Leave advocate, ascended to in July 2019 on a platform echoing its themes, securing a parliamentary majority in the December 2019 election that prioritized completion over delay. This facilitated the revised Withdrawal Agreement in October 2019 and its ratification, culminating in the UK's formal EU departure on 31 January 2020 and the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020, with Cummings serving as Johnson's chief advisor to enforce deadline-driven negotiations. Vote Leave's framing thus sustained public and political resolve against reversal attempts, ensuring the policy's realization despite internal Conservative divisions and external pressures.

Long-Term Evaluations of Impacts and Predictions

Economic analyses of Brexit's long-term effects, attributable to the Vote Leave campaign's successful outcome, indicate a modest negative impact on GDP, with estimates ranging from 2-3% to 5% lower than counterfactual scenarios without departure from the . These figures account for trade barriers, reduced , and disruptions, though adjusted comparisons show real GDP growth since underperforming pre-referendum peers but aligning with or exceeding that of , , and the average when isolating Brexit from global events like the and energy shocks. Vote Leave's implicit predictions of liberated trade boosting prosperity have partially materialized through new agreements with approximately 70 countries, yet these largely replicate pre-existing pacts, with - goods exports 30% below projected levels and services exports 4-5% lower due to non-tariff barriers. On immigration, a core Vote Leave pledge for restored , EU net migration turned negative post-2021, with inflows dropping nearly 70% from pre-Brexit peaks, fulfilling the campaign's aim to end free movement. However, overall net migration reached record highs, driven by non-EU arrivals—91% of work visas in 2023—via a points-based system prioritizing skills but expanding categories like students and dependents, leading to critiques that total inflows exceeded Vote Leave's envisioned reductions. Forecasts suggest sustained high non-EU migration could pressure public services unless policy tightens, though it has supported labor shortages in sectors like and care. Sovereignty gains, another Vote Leave emphasis, have enabled regulatory divergence, such as reforms in and data protection, potentially yielding long-term benefits through tailored policies unhindered by EU consensus. Public assessments remain divided: only 45% of 2016 Leave voters view regained law-making control positively, reflecting persistent economic grievances, while empirical data shows no fulfillment of Remain-side doomsday predictions like immediate or sterling collapse beyond initial volatility. Future projections from fiscal bodies anticipate modest UK growth (around 1-2% annually through 2030), tempered by trade frictions but buoyed by independent trade policy and fiscal autonomy, with causal attribution to Vote Leave's victory crediting it for averting deeper EU integration risks like fiscal union.

References

  1. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/media-centre/electoral-commission-designates-vote-leave-ltd-and-campaign-ltd-lead-campaigners-eu-referendum
  2. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36038672
  3. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/13/vote-leave-official-brexit-campaign-eu-referendum-boris-johnson
  4. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uk/vote-leave-named-lead-out-campaign-for-eu-referendum-idUSKCN0XA1N6/
  5. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/eu_referendum/results
  6. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/research-reports-and-data/our-reports-and-data-past-elections-and-referendums/results-and-turnout-eu-referendum
  7. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/media-centre/vote-leave-fined-and-referred-police-breaking-electoral-law
  8. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-44856992
  9. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf_file/Designation-process-for-the-EU-referendum.pdf
  10. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/businesses-mps-launch-vote-leave-campaign-to-push-for-brexit-idUSKCN0S22XY/
  11. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/09/millionaire-donors-back-cross-party-campaign-to-leave-eu
  12. https://dominiccummings.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/vote-leave-campaign-pilot-memo-final.pdf
  13. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf_file/Vote-Leave-Ltd-Further-evidence.pdf
  14. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36473105
  15. https://theconversation.com/fact-check-are-60-of-uk-laws-really-imposed-by-the-eu-58516
  16. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/opinion-fact-check-are-60-of-uk-laws-really-imposed-by-the-eu
  17. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/sovereignty-economy-immigration-still-the-three-pillars-of-the-brexit-debate/
  18. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36104163
  19. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/eu-referendum-claims
  20. http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org/briefing_newdeal.html
  21. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09785255/officers
  22. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2020/06/03/mike-gordon-dominic-cummings-and-the-accountability-of-special-advisers/
  23. https://www.mackinac.org/23515
  24. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/politics-interview/2024/02/matthew-elliott-brexit-vote-leave-interview
  25. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/who-actually-are-vote-leave-brexit-boris-johnson-michael-gove/
  26. https://qz.com/717700/the-head-of-the-uks-vote-leave-campaign-says-brexit-talks-can-wait-until-after-people-go-on-holiday
  27. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36672591
  28. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35616946
  29. https://www.verdict.co.uk/news/brexit-celebrities-wanted-leave-eu/
  30. https://theweek.com/brexit/73023/eu-referendum-the-celebrities-voting-for-and-against-brexit
  31. https://www.euractiv.com/news/a-nation-divided-what-uk-celebrities-said-about-brexit/
  32. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-34484687
  33. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/24/brexit-splits-leave-vote-beleave-funds
  34. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3834471/Ukip-s-millionaire-donor-Arron-Banks-set-private-DETECTIVES-Vote-Leave-chief-stir-paranoia-rival-Brexit-campaigns.html
  35. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/07/eu-out-campaign-groups-deeply-divided-ukip-mp-douglas-carswell
  36. https://www.businessinsider.com/leaveeu-threatens-eu-referendum-delay-2016-4
  37. https://whatukthinks.org/eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/NatCen_Brexplanations-report-FINAL-WEB2.pdf
  38. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7639/
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338484816_Turning_out_to_turn_down_the_EU_the_mobilisation_of_occasional_voters_and_Brexit
  40. https://natcen.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-08/bsa34_brexit_final.pdf
  41. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09785255
  42. https://www.politico.eu/article/15-things-uk-vote-leave-promised-on-brexit-and-what-it-got/
  43. https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/uk-pm-johnsons-brexit-brain-cummings-leave-downing-street-2020-11-13/
  44. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/08/world/europe/dominic-cummings-brexit-boris-johnson.html
  45. https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/news/uk-statistics-authority-statement-on-the-use-of-official-statistics-on-contributions-to-the-european-union/
  46. https://fullfact.org/europe/350-million-week-boris-johnson-statistics-authority-misuse/
  47. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/27/uk-statistics-chief-vote-leave-350m-figure-misleading
  48. https://theconversation.com/fact-check-would-the-uk-have-a-veto-on-turkey-joining-the-eu-59844
  49. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/02/09/did-the-unfounded-claim-that-turkey-was-about-to-join-the-eu-swing-the-referendum/
  50. https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/06/23/vote-leave-take-control-sovereignty-and-the-brexit-debate/
  51. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45519676
  52. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47755611
  53. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/political-registration-and-regulation/our-enforcement-work/investigations/investigation-vote-leave-ltd-mr-darren-grimes-beleave-and-veterans-britain
  54. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/19/pro-brexit-activist-darren-grimes-wins-appeal-against-fine-electoral-spending
  55. https://www.blackstonechambers.com/news/vote-leave-ltd-v-electoral-commission/
  56. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/research-reports-and-data/our-reports-and-data-past-elections-and-referendums/report-23-june-2016-referendum-uks-membership-european-union
  57. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7960/
  58. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/11/03/framing-risky-choices-how-the-leave-campaign-convinced-britain-to-take-a-leap-into-the-unknown/
  59. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/06/13/we-dumped-our-entire-budget-the-last-10-days-inside-the-behavioural-science-strategy
  60. https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/4-ways-anti-immigration-vote-won-referendum-brexit
  61. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/immigration-politics-brexit-referendum/
  62. https://dominiccummings.com/2019/03/27/on-the-referendum-24n-actions-have-consequences/
  63. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/12/14/strategy-borrowed-vote-leave-wooed-voters-tories/
  64. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36616028
  65. https://dominiccummings.com/2019/06/26/on-the-referendum-33-high-performance-government-cognitive-technologies-michael-nielsen-bret-victor-seeing-rooms/
  66. https://dominiccummings.com/2019/11/27/on-the-referendum-34-batsignal-dont-let-corbyn-sturgeon-cheat-a-second-referendum-with-millions-of-foreign-votes/
  67. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/impact-brexit-uk-economy-reviewing-evidence
  68. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/14/brexit-has-sliced-5percent-off-uk-economic-growth-goldman-sachs-says.html
  69. https://consoc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/The-Economic-Impact-of-Brexit.pdf
  70. https://www.briefingsforbritain.co.uk/how-is-the-uks-brexit-economy-performing/
  71. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47213842
  72. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrynjz1glpo
  73. https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/news/2025/08/the-reality-of-uk-services-trade-post-brexit/
  74. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/eu-migration-to-and-from-the-uk/
  75. https://premierscience.com/pjec-24-477/
  76. https://www.brunel.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/articles/Post-Brexit-UK-migration-trends-and-the-all-time-highs
  77. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2025/772910/EPRS_BRI%282025%29772910_EN.pdf
  78. https://obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/the-economy-forecast/brexit-analysis/
  79. https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51500-few-britons-think-brexit-has-been-good-for-anything
  80. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36355564
  81. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/economic-outlook-navigating-narrow-paths
  82. https://obr.uk/box/net-migration-forecast-and-its-impact-on-the-economy/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.