Hubbry Logo
Wa StateWa StateMain
Open search
Wa State
Community hub
Wa State
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Wa State
Wa State
Wa State
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Wa State[n 1] is a de facto independent state[5][6][7][8] and self-governing region[14][15] in Myanmar that has its own political system, administrative divisions and army.[5][6][7] While the Wa State government recognises Myanmar's sovereignty over all of its territory,[1][2][3][4] this does not include allegiance to any specific government.[16] The 2008 Constitution of Myanmar officially recognises the northern part of Wa State as the Wa Self-Administered Division of Shan State.[17] It is run as a de facto one-party socialist state ruled by the United Wa State Party (UWSP),[8] which split from the Communist Party of Burma (CPB) in 1989. Wa State is divided into three counties, two special districts, and one economic development zone. The administrative capital is Pangkham, formerly known as Pangsang. The name Wa is derived from the Wa ethnic group, who speak an Austroasiatic language.

Key Information

History

[edit]

For a long time,[timeframe?] headman tribes were dispersed around the Wa mountainous area, with no unified governance. During the Qing dynasty, the region became separated from the tribal military control of the Dai people. British rule in Burma did not administer the Wa States[18] and the border with China was left undefined.[19]

From the late 1940s, during the Chinese Civil War, remnants of the Chinese National Revolutionary Army retreated to territory within Burma as the communists took over mainland China. Within the mountain region Kuomintang forces of the Eighth Army 237 division and 26th Army 93 division held their position for two decades in preparation for a counterattack towards mainland China. Under pressure from the United Nations, the counterattack was cancelled and the army was recalled to northern Thailand and later back to Taiwan; however, some troops decided to remain within Burma. East of the Salween river, indigenous tribal guerrilla groups exercised control with the support of the Communist Party of Burma.

During the 1960s, the Communist Party of Burma lost its base of operations within central Burma, and with the assistance of the Chinese communists, expanded within the border regions in the northeast. Many intellectual youths from China joined the Communist Party of Burma, and these forces also absorbed many local guerrillas.[20] The Burmese communists gained control over Pangkham, which became their base of operations.

At the end of the 1980s, the ethnic minorities of northeast Burma became politically separated from the Communist Party of Burma. On 17 April 1989, Bao Youxiang's armed forces announced their separation from the Communist Party of Burma, and formed the United Myanmar Ethnicities Party, which later became the United Wa State Party. On 18 May, the United Wa State Army signed a ceasefire agreement with the State Law and Order Restoration Council, which replaced Ne Win's military regime following the 8888 Uprising.[21] After the ceasefire, the Myanmar government began to call the region "Shan State Special Region No. 2 (Wa Region)"[22]: 111–112  (Parauk: Hak Tiex Baux Nong (2) Meung Man;[23] Chinese: 缅甸掸邦第二特区; Burmese: "ဝ" အထူးဒေသ(၂)).

In 1990s, Wa State obtained Southern area by force. From 1999 to 2002, 80,000 former opium farmers from the northern area of Wa State were forcefully resettled into the more fertile south for food production, improving food security and laying the groundwork for a ban on drug production in Wa State. Some groups report that thousands died as a result of resettlement.[24]

Tensions between the central government and Wa State were heightened in 2009.[25] During this time, peace initiative proposals by Wa State were rejected by the Myanmar government.[26] The government warned on 27 April 2010 that the WHP program could push Myanmar and Wa State into further conflict.[27][clarification needed]

In 2012, Wa State began a major road construction program to link all townships with asphalt roads.[22]: 60  By 2014, asphalt roads ran through the northern townships of Wa State and connected the Wa townships of Kunma, Nam Tit, and Mengmao to the Chinese towns of Cangyuan and Ximeng.[22]: 60 

After the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état the Wa began to oppose the Myanmar government more directly, shifting away from their strategy of "forward defense" of supporting smaller anti-government forces militarily which was supposed to keep the Tatmadaw from violating ceasefires, with the goal of extending their political and military influence towards Central Myanmar.[28]

When fighting in northern Shan State escalated in late October and early November in 2023, Wa State took a neutral position urging on 1 Nov for a ceasefire. The UWSP has again stated that they would retaliate against any military action against Wa.[29][30]

Tensions between Wa State and Thailand increased in November 2024 over the presence of UWSA bases allegedly encroaching on Thai territory.[31]

Politics, society and law

[edit]
Wa State Basic Law

Wa State is divided into northern and southern regions which are separated from one another, with the 13,000 km2 (5,000 sq mi) southern region bordering Thailand and consisting of 200,000 people.[32] The total area of the region controlled by Wa State is approximately 27,000 kilometers.[22]: 4  The political leaders of Wa State are mostly ethnic Wa people.

The working language of the Wa State government is Mandarin Chinese.[33][34][35] Southwest Mandarin and Wa are widely spoken by the population, with the language of education being Standard Chinese. Television broadcasts within Wa State are broadcast in both Mandarin and Wa. Commodities within Wa State are brought over from China, and the renminbi is commonly used for exchanges. China Mobile has cellular coverage over some parts of Wa State.[32]

Government

[edit]

The Wa State government emulates many political features of the government of the People's Republic of China, having a central party known as the United Wa State Party, which also has a Central Committee and a Politburo. Wa State also has a Wa People's Congress and a Wa People's Political Consultative Conference, respectively mimicking the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. Before the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, whilst Wa State was highly autonomous from the control of the central government in Naypyidaw,[36][37] their relationship was based on peaceful coexistence and Wa State recognised the sovereignty of the central government over all of Myanmar.[32]

[edit]

The legal system in Wa State is based on the civil law system, with reference to the laws of China. As of at least 2015, Wa State imposes the death penalty (which is abolished at the national level in Myanmar) for armed assault, rape, murder, and child abuse.[22]: 53  After being sentenced to death, prisoners are sent directly to the execution ground.[38]

Labour camps exist in Wa State and relatives of those who are imprisoned or conscripted are often taken hostage by the state. The state is governed by a network of Maoist insurgents, traditional leaders such as headmen, businessmen, and traders, without democratic elections or the rule of law.[39]

Most people do not have Chinese or Myanmar ID cards, but Wa State ID cards are often recognised in those countries. It is easy for citizens to enter them if they avoid the official border crossings.[39]

Demographics

[edit]

The most-practiced religion, outnumbering Islam, Buddhism and folk religions, is Christianity, even though there are frequent crackdowns on it conducted by the Maoist government. An example for this is a campaign against churches built after 1992 in September 2018.[40][41][42]

There used to be up to 100,000 Chinese nationals residing in Wa State, many of them engaging in business. In 2021, the Chinese government ordered them to return to their homeland to combat online fraud allegedly committed by many of them.[43] The Chinese exodus has had a negative impact on the Wa economy.[44]

Administrative divisions

[edit]

Wa State is divided into counties (Parauk: kaung:; Chinese: 县), special districts (Parauk: lum; Chinese: 特区), an economic development zone and an administrative affairs committee. Each county is further divided into districts (Parauk: veng; Chinese: 区).

Below these are township-level administrations: townships (Parauk: ndaex eeng / yaong:; Chinese: 乡) and streets (Parauk: laih; Chinese: 街).

Level County-level District-level Township Village
Division
Type 		Special District (lum / 特区) Street (laih / 街)
Town (ceung / 镇)
Township (daux eeng: / 乡) 		Group (组)
Village (yaong: / 村)
Economic Development Zone (经济开发区)
County (kaung: / 县) Avenue (daux laih / 街道)
District (veng / ဝဵင်း / 区)
Administrative Affairs
Committee (行政事务管理委员会) 		Township (southern)
(yaong: / 乡)

In the table above, names in apostrophes are in Wa/Dai/Mandarin order. Avenue (daux laih / 街道) is found only once in Mong Maoe County; town (镇 / "ceung") is found only once in Mong Phing EDZ. Avenues and streets are metaphorical urban-type division name analogical to subdistricts of China and should not be understood literally. They are further subdivided into groups. Villages are rural counterparts of groups and are below townships. In southern Wa, townships are given the township identity (乡) according to their Mandarin name yet not subdivided into villages with their Wa names indicate they are natural settlements (yaong: / 寨), but might be a part of compound like daux eeng yaong: XX (XX-settlement township / XX寨乡).

In general, the Wa names of divisions follow the Romance naming order. For example, Veng Yaong Leen means Yaong Leen District and is a veng (district) instead of a yaong: (natural settlement). That of the town of Mong Phing in Mong Phing EDZ is an exception – it follows the Germanic naming order as "Mong Phing Ceung" instead of "Ceung Mong Phing". In the Wa language, x at the end of a syllable represents a glottal stop.

In the sections below, names in bold indicate county seats. Names with "quotation marks" are pinyin transcriptions of Mandarin while names in italics are Burmese transcriptions of Mandarin. Although Mandarin is one of the four working languages of Wa State, some Mandarin administrative names are non-canonical. For example, 班阳区 and 邦洋区 are two different transcriptions of the same official Wa or Dai name of Pang Yang District.

Northern area

[edit]

Wa State's northern area is divided into three counties, two special districts, and one economic development zone. Each county is further divided into districts; there are 21 districts in total.

Counties
  • Hopang Township (kaung: Ho Pang, 富邦县):
    1. Ho Pang District (veng Ho Pang, 富邦区)
    2. Pang Long District (veng Pang Long, 邦隆区)
    3. Nang Teung District (veng Nang Teung, 南邓区)
    4. Nawi District (veng Nax Vi, 纳威区)
  • Mongmao County (kaung: Meung Mau, 勐冒县):
    5. Kaung Ming Sang District (veng Moeknu, 公明山区) and Monghmau Avenue (daux laih Meung Mhau, 新地方街, county seat)
    6. Panwai District (veng Pang Vai, 邦外区 (班歪区))
    7. Taoh Mie District (veng Taoh Mie, 栋玛区 (昆马区))
    8. Yaung Lin District (veng Yaong: Leen, 永冷区)
    9. Long Tan District (veng Nhawngngit, 龙潭区)
    10. Ai Chun District (veng Cheung: Miang, 岩城区)
    11. Yingpan District (veng Kawnmau, 营盘区)
    12. Man Ton District (veng Man Ton:, 曼东区)
    13. Ling Haw District (veng Moek Raix, 联合区)
    14. Klawngpa District (veng Klawng: Pa, 格龙坝区)
  • Monglin County [zh] (kaung: Mang' Leen', 勐能县):
    15. Man Shiang District (veng Man Shiang, 曼相区)
    16. Nong Kied District (veng Nong: Kied, 弄切区)
    17. Paleen District (veng Pa Leen (Nang Khang: Vu), 南抗伍区)
    18. Nakao District (veng Nax Kao, 纳高区)
    19. Pang Yang District (veng Pang Yang, 邦洋区)
  • Mong Pawk County (kaung: Meung' Bawg, 勐波县):
    20. Nam Phat District (veng Nam Phat, 南排区)
    21. Mong Pawk District (veng Meung' Bawg, 勐波区, county seat)
    22. Mong Ning District (veng Meung' Ning, 勐念区)
    23. Mong Ka District (veng Meung' Ka, 勐嘎区)
    24. Hotao District (veng Hox Tao, 贺岛区)
    25. Meng Phing Economic Development Zone (veng Meung Phien, 勐平经济开发区)
Special districts
  • Pangkham Special District (lum Pang Kham, 邦康特区):
    Guanghong Township (daux eeng: Kwang: Hong:, 广洪乡)
    Na Lawt Township (daux eeng: Na Lawt, 那洛乡)
    Man Phat Township (daux eeng: Mam Phat, 南帕乡)
    Tawng Aw Township (daux eeng: Tawng Aw, 等俄乡)
    Yaong Ting Township (daux eeng: Yaong Ting, 永定乡)
    Man Mao Township (daux eeng: Man Mao, 芒冒乡)


Economic development zone
  • Mong Phing Economic Development Zone (Meung' Phing, 勐平经济开发区):
    Mong Phing Town (ceung Meung' Phing, 勐平镇, seat)
    Mong Phing Prim Township (daux eeng: Mong Phing Prim)
    Tong Long Township (daux eeng: Tong Long)
    Yaong Khrawm Township (daux eeng: Yaong Khrawm, 团结乡)
    Pang Sax Cax Township (daux eeng: Pang Sax Cax)
    Kawx Sawng Township (daux eeng: Kawx Sawng)

Wa State overlaps with seven de jure townships designated by the Burmese government. The geographic relationship between districts (second level) and special districts (first level) of Wa State and districts of Shan State are listed below:

Kho Pang Township of Shan State
  • Cheung Miang District (Ai Chun)
  • Nawi District
Mongmao Township of Shan State
  • Kaung Ming Sang District
  • Klawngpa District
Pangwaun Township of Shan State
  • Kunma District
  • Wangleng District (Yaong Leen)
Man Phang Township of Shan State
  • Ling Haw District
Namphan Township of Shan State
  • Kawnmau District (Yingpan)
Pang Yang Township of Shan State
  • Pang Yang District
  • Ting Aw District
  • Weng Kao District (Daux Kaung Township?)
  • Pangkham Special District
Mong Yang Township of Shan State
  • Mong Pawk District
  • Mong Ngen District (Mong Ning?)
  • Hotao District

On 15 January 2024, Hopang and Pan Lon are officially transferred to Wa State by Myanmar's government.[11][45]

Southern area

[edit]

Wa State's southern area is administered by the Fourth Theater Command as the "171st military region" and enjoys a high degree of local autonomy. For example, the UWSP allowed it to implement its own COVID-19 policies.[46] The region is not part of traditional Wa territory, but was granted in 1989 by the then-ruling Burmese military junta for the UWSA's cooperation in their efforts against drug warlord Khun Sa.[47] These territories were originally inhabited by the Austroasiatic Tai Loi peoples, but now include significant Lahu and Shan communities, as well as Wa settlers.

The Southern area is administrated by the Southern Administrative Affairs Committee (Parauk: Meung Vax Plak Caw, Chinese: 南部行政事务管理委员会). The area can further divided into several districts:

  • Wan Hoong District (veng Gawng Sam Song:, 万宏区, area seat)
  • Hui Aw District (veng Huix Awx, 回俄区)
  • Yaong Khrao District (veng Yaong Khraox (Yaong Gawng), 开龙区)
  • Yaong Pang District (veng Yaong Pang, 永邦区)
  • Meung Cawd District (veng Meung Cawd, 勐角区)
  • Yaong Moeg District (veng Yaong: Moeg (Num Moeg), 勐岗区)
  • Kha Na District (veng Khax Nax, 户约区)

Kha Na District seems to have been merged into Wan Hoong District.

Treatment of original inhabitants

[edit]

In recent years tens of thousands of people (according to the Lahu National Development Organization claims 125,933 from 1999 to 2001 alone) have resettled from northern Wa State and central Shan State to the southern area, often due to pressure by the Wa government. These actions were intended to strengthen the Wa government's position there, especially the Mong Yawn valley which is surrounded by mountains on all sides is a strategically important location.[24] Wa people were also relocated from villages on mountain peaks to the surrounding valleys, officially to offer the residents an alternative to the cultivation of opium. After the resettlement, the Wa government allowed ethnic Wa settlers to grow opium for three more years and sell it freely. Serious human rights violations were reported during the resettlement and many people have died, around 10,000 alone during the rains of 2000 since the Wa settlers were not accustomed to tropical diseases like malaria in the warmer southern area.[48][24]

The original inhabitants of the area have been discriminated against by the settlers; their belongings were seized by them without compensation. Many abuses occur, including enslaving of the ones who complain about the Wa government. They have to work in the fields with chained-up legs. When a minority person cannot give enough money to the rulers, they can sell children seven years or older as soldiers to the United Wa State Army. Due to these harsh living conditions, many had no other choice but to leave their hometowns.[24]

Geography and economy

[edit]
Map of Wa State
  Areas controlled by Wa State amid the Myanmar civil war (2021–present)

The region is mainly mountainous, with deep valleys. The lowest points are approximately 600 metres (2,000 ft) above sea level, with the highest mountains over 3,000 metres (9,800 ft).[citation needed] Initially Wa State was heavily reliant on opium production.[49] With Chinese assistance, there has been a move towards growing rubber and tea plantations.[50] Wa State cultivates 220,000 acres of rubber.[51] Due to the resettlement of residents from mountainous areas to fertile valleys,[52] there is also cultivation of wet rice, corn and vegetables. Dozens died during the resettlement due to disease and road accidents.[51] One of the main income sources of Wa State is the mining of resources like tin, zinc, lead and smaller amounts of gold.[53] The proven tin ore reserves of Wa State amount to more than 50 million tons, currently 95% of the tin mine production of Myanmar comes from there, around one sixth of the world production.[54][55]

Additionally, there is also a thriving industry around sectors like prostitution and gambling in the capital Pangkham that are related to tourism from China which was thriving before the COVID-19 pandemic.[56] The region was able to vaccinate nearly all of its population against the virus by July 2021, one of the earliest dates in the world.[57] In general, the state of development of Wa State is considerably higher than in the government-controlled areas of Myanmar, which is especially true for its capital.[56][58] Wa State is economically dependent on China, which supports it financially and provides military and civilian advisors and weapons.[59][60] It shares 82 miles (133 km) of frontier with China.[61]

The Myanmar kyat is not legal tender anywhere in the Wa State. In the north, the Chinese yuan is legal tender, whilst the baht is legal tender in the south.[62]

Illicit drug trade

[edit]

The United Wa State Army (UWSA) is among the largest narcotics trafficking organizations in Southeast Asia.[63]

The UWSA cultivated vast areas of land for the opium poppy, which was later refined to heroin. Methamphetamine trafficking was also important to the economy of Wa State.[51] The money from the opium was primarily used for purchasing weapons which continues to be the case to some extent. At the same time, while opium poppy cultivation in Myanmar had declined year-on-year since 2015, cultivation area increased by 33% totalling 40,100 hectares alongside an 88% increase in yield potential to 790 metric tonnes in 2022 according to latest data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Myanmar Opium Survey 2022[64] With that said, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has also warned that opium production in Myanmar may rise again if the economic crunch brought on by COVID-19 and the country's February 1 military coup persists, with significant public health and security consequences for much of Asia.[65]

In August 1990, government officials began drafting a plan to end drug production and trafficking in Wa State.[66] According to an interview with Wa officials in 1994, Bao Youyi (Tax Kuad Rang; also known as Bao Youyu) became wanted by the Chinese police for his involvement in drug trafficking. As a result, Bao Youxiang and Zhao Nyi-Lai went to Cangyuan Va Autonomous County of China and signed the Cangyuan Agreement with local officials, which stated that, "No drugs will go into the international society (from Wa State); no drugs will go into China (from Wa State); no drugs will go into Burmese government-controlled areas (from Wa State)."[67] However, the agreement did not mention whether or not Wa State could sell drugs to insurgent groups.

In 1997, the United Wa State Party officially proclaimed that Wa State would be drug-free by the end of 2005.[66] In 2005, Wa State authorities banned opium, and thereafter launched yearly drug crackdown campaigns.[22]: 54  With the help of the United Nations (which began opium-substitution programs in 1998)[22]: 174  and the Chinese government, many opium farmers in Wa State shifted to the production of rubber and tea. However, some poppy farmers continued to cultivate the flower outside of Wa State.[68] Anti-drug strategies involved opium substitution programs for farmers, seeking alternative revenue sources in the area, roadbuilding to improve access to the hills, strict enforcement, and a population resettlement program.[22]: 54  Between 1999 and 2006, the United Wa State Army began both voluntary resettlement and forced resettlement of between 50,000 and 100,000 villagers from the northern Wa State territory to the non-contiguous southern Wa State territory.[22]: 54  Malaria and travel-related deaths were significant among the relocated population.[22]: 54 

Although opium cultivation in Myanmar declined from 1997 to 2006 on the whole, the opium ban in Wa State eventually led to increased production elsewhere in Myanmar as opium producers sought to benefit from rising opium prices following the ban.[22]: 174  From 2006 to 2012, overall opium cultivation in Myanmar doubled as production shifted to non-Wa State areas.[22]: 174 

This population resettlement strategy relieved population pressures in the north Wa State hills and increased opportunities for the cultivation of rubber as an alternative cash crop to opium.[22]: 55  However, international commodity prices for rubber decreased radically by December 2012, fell to a low in November 2015, and remained low from 2015 to 2018.[22]: 56  Low rubber prices severely hampered Wa State's legitimate revenue and the income of rural people.[22]: 56 

A BBC presentation aired on 19 November 2016 showed the burning of methamphetamine, as well as a thriving trade in illegal animal parts.[69]

The production of crystal meth of high quality as well as heroin is still thriving and worth billions of dollars as of 2021. Cheaper ya ba tablets are made by neighboring rebel groups which depend on the Wa for raw materials – namely precursor chemicals sourced from the chemical industry in China and chemical industry in India which enter Myanmar directly or by transit through the Golden Triangle (Southeast Asia) and specifically Lao PDR via Viet Nam and Thailand.[28][70] The regional synthetic drug production and trafficking industry, in which Wa State plays an important role, has become a major source of illegal drugs now exported across the region and beyond.[71][72][73][74]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wa State

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Wa State is a de facto autonomous region in northeastern 's , administered by the (UWSP) and secured by its military wing, the (UWSA), which fields approximately 20,000 to 30,000 troops equipped with advanced weaponry. The entity emerged in 1989 from the collapse of the (CPB), when Wa forces seized control of territories historically inhabited by the Wa ethnic group, establishing a self-governing along the border with . Governed under a centralized, one-party system led by UWSP chairman , who serves as president, Wa State maintains internal stability through strict administrative control, including bans on cultivation since the early 2000s, though it faces persistent international accusations of facilitating production in the Golden Triangle. Its formidable military, the largest and best-armed among Myanmar's ethnic armed organizations, enables neutrality amid the country's civil war, bolstered by extensive economic and logistical ties to that provide arms, infrastructure, and border trade. This autonomy has positioned Wa State as a pivotal, if insular, actor in Myanmar's ethnic conflicts, rejecting integration into national processes while prioritizing territorial defense and self-reliance.

History

Origins of Wa Autonomy

The Wa people, a Mon-Khmer ethnic group numbering around 1 million in Myanmar, have historically inhabited the rugged Wa Hills along the Myanmar-China border, where their ancestors established self-governing village communes under local chieftains, transitioning from primitive communal systems to feudal structures amid limited external contact primarily with Shan and Chinese traders. Society was divided into "tame Wa" in the southern hills, who adopted Shan customs and Theravada Buddhism, and "wild Wa" in the northern and eastern areas, remaining isolated with animist beliefs and practices such as headhunting until the mid-20th century. This tribal autonomy originated from the region's mountainous terrain, which deterred centralized control, and partial unification against Han Chinese encroachments dating back to the 11th century, as referenced in early Chinese records from the Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE). Under British colonial rule from the late , the were designated as unadministered territory, with imperial presence confined to annual flag marches by a handful of field officers and border-marking expeditions, leaving governance in the hands of indigenous leaders. A 1935–1936 survey by the Iselin Commission mapped the area, culminating in a 1941 border agreement with , while the first road into the hills was constructed that year, enabling limited missionary activity, including the romanization of the by Vincent Young. Post-World War II administration of the "tame Wa" areas by figures like Harold Young introduced minor infrastructure but reinforced local rule, as the 1947 Frontier Areas Committee of Enquiry documented the Wa's rejection of integration into the Union of , favoring continued independence. Myanmar's independence in 1948 did not alter the Wa's self-rule, as traditional chieftains and warlords governed amid Burmese government campaigns to subdue peripheral ethnic regions, which the Wa resisted through guerrilla tactics leveraging their terrain advantage. The influx of (KMT) remnants fleeing after 1949 occupied parts of the hills, distributing arms to local militias and militarizing Wa society against central authority. These foundations—geographic isolation, resilient tribal structures, and early armed defiance—sustained Wa despite periodic incursions, distinguishing them from more integrated ethnic groups.

Armed Resistance and Formation of UWSA (1960s–1980s)

In the late 1960s, following defeats in the , the (CPB) retreated into the Wa Hills, where it began recruiting local Wa militias disillusioned with Burmese central authority and seeking modern arms. By 1969, CPB forces had established a foothold, enlisting prominent Wa warlords such as Zhao Yilai and , who brought their followers into the CPB's . These Wa recruits, previously armed through opium trades with remnants in the 1950s and 1960s, formed the vanguard of the CPB's insurgency against the military regime, which had centralized power since its 1962 coup and suppressed ethnic autonomies. Throughout the and , Wa fighters constituted the bulk of the CPB's combat forces, estimated at several thousand troops, enabling sustained guerrilla operations from bases in Panghsang and surrounding areas against Tatmadaw offensives. The CPB imposed Maoist structures, including district administrations and bans on traditional practices like , while providing ideological and limited Chinese support for training and logistics. However, resentment grew among Wa ranks over the dominance of Burman CPB leaders, who prioritized class struggle over ethnic , exacerbated by a failed 1972 CPB offensive across the that confined operations to peripheral territories. By the late , declining Chinese aid under Deng Xiaoping's reforms further weakened CPB cohesion, setting the stage for ethnic fractures. Tensions culminated in early 1989 when Wa units, inspired by a mutiny on March 11, rebelled against CPB leadership, storming the Panghsang headquarters on April 16 and forcing Burman commanders to flee to . This collapse of the CPB enabled the Wa to consolidate control over their territories, leading to the formal establishment of the (UWSP) in November 1989 through a merger of pro-Wa factions and the non-communist Wa National Council, with its armed wing, the (UWSA), inheriting CPB arsenals including and . Zhao Nyi-Lai, a former CPB Wa commander, became the UWSP's first chairman, marking the transition from proxy to autonomous Wa resistance.

Ceasefire Agreement and De Facto Independence (1989–2021)

In April 1989, ethnic Wa forces mutinied against the Burmese-dominated leadership of the (CPB), which had controlled Wa-inhabited territories since the 1960s, leading to the rapid collapse of the CPB's northern command. The mutineers, numbering around 6,000-7,000 fighters, formed the (UWSP) and its armed wing, the (UWSA), under leaders and Chao Neng. On April 17, 1989, the UWSA signed a agreement with Myanmar's , the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), marking the end of active hostilities and the start of a pragmatic arrangement that preserved Wa military autonomy. The accord, negotiated with SLORC intelligence chief , allowed the UWSA to retain weapons, administer territories in eastern (later designated Special Region 2), and relocate forces from CPB areas without interference, in exchange for non-aggression toward government positions. This ceasefire enabled the establishment of de facto independence, with Wa State functioning as a self-governing polity separate from Naypyidaw's authority, controlling approximately 30,000 square kilometers across two non-contiguous regions north and south of the . The UWSP implemented a centralized, one-party model blending Marxist-Leninist with Wa , organizing administrative divisions into townships and villages under military oversight, while funding operations through taxation, mining, and cross-border trade—predominantly with . By the , the UWSA had expanded to over 10,000 troops, equipped with captured CPB arsenals including artillery and anti-aircraft guns, and later augmented by smuggled arms, establishing it as Myanmar's largest ethnic armed organization. development, such as roads linking to Province, proceeded under Chinese investment, enhancing economic ties but reinforcing perceptions of external influence over Wa autonomy. Relations with successive Myanmar governments remained formal but distant, with the ceasefire holding despite periodic frictions, such as military encirclements in 2011 and border skirmishes involving UWSA allies. The UWSA rejected integration into the national or political system, viewing such demands as threats to , and declined to sign the 2015 (NCA), which required concessions on and . Instead, it advocated for a federal confederation granting ethnic states powers over central decisions, a stance reiterated by UWSP chairman during the ceasefire's 30th anniversary in 2019. Through 2021, Wa State maintained internal stability via strict , including opium eradication campaigns starting in 2005 that reduced cultivation by over 90% in core areas, though production persisted as an economic mainstay. This era solidified Wa self-rule, with minimal central taxation or jurisdiction, though nominal allegiance to prevented full international recognition.

Post-2021 Myanmar Coup Developments

Following the Myanmar military's coup on February 1, 2021, the United Wa State Army (UWSA) adopted a stance of neutrality, refraining from direct involvement in the ensuing civil war against the State Administration Council (SAC) junta. The UWSA suspended formal ceasefire and political dialogues initiated under the previous National League for Democracy government, while avoiding public criticism of the coup itself. It maintained limited engagement with the junta, such as attending the SAC's 75th Union Day ceremony in Naypyitaw on February 12, 2022, and meeting the SAC Peace Negotiation Committee in Matman Seng on April 7, 2022, but refused to host junta envoys in its stronghold of Panghsang, conducting meetings only in neutral locations. This approach allowed the UWSA to preserve its 1989 ceasefire with the military while distancing itself from SAC operations. Amid the escalation of conflicts, including launched by the in October 2023, the UWSA provided initial military support, including weapons and funding, to ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) such as the Shan State Progress Party (SSPP), (TNLA), and (MNDAA). However, on August 20, 2023, following pressure reportedly from —including asset freezes and threats of blockades on essentials for Wa State's 500,000 residents—the UWSA suspended all military and financial aid to these allies. Leveraging the junta's weakening grip, the UWSA expanded its control over key areas without direct combat, such as entering Tangyan township on July 2, 2024, with SAC permission, and securing Hopang, Pan Lon, and parts of Mongkyat and Mongyaw. By early 2024, it had moved hundreds of troops into central positions and taken two towns north of its enclaves previously captured by allies from junta forces, while advancing west of the into territories held by both allies and the SAC. The UWSA's neutrality enabled it to emerge as a stabilizing force in northern Shan State, mediating between EAOs and the junta, and securing SAC approval for roles that bolstered its influence. As leader of the Federal Political Negotiation and Consultative Committee (FPNCC)—a encompassing over half of Myanmar's EAO fighters—the group, with approximately 30,000 well-equipped troops, quietly strengthened its position, controlling enclaves larger than and pursuing territorial linkage between its southern and central holdings. It sustained pragmatic ties across factions, including business dealings with the junta and arms trades with rebels, while requesting elevation of Wa self-administered zones to full state status in SAC talks. Chinese remained pivotal, aligning UWSA expansions with Beijing's interests in stability and resources like rare earths, despite occasional coercive measures to curb broader revolutionary potential.

Government and Military

United Wa State Party Structure

The (UWSP) maintains a hierarchical, top-down modeled on the Leninist framework of the (CPB), from which it emerged following the 1989 mutiny by Wa forces. This includes a responsible for strategic direction and a that formulates and oversees policies across the Wa regions. The , supported by permanent members and a Central Working Committee, exercises supreme authority in decision-making, with implementation handled through the Wa State People's Government for administrative, judicial, health, and educational functions. Leadership is concentrated at the top, with serving as General Secretary and Chairperson of the since the party's formation, also holding the role of Commander-in-Chief of the affiliated (UWSA). Key supporting positions include Vice-Chairpersons Zhao Guoan and Bao Youliang, Vice-General Secretary Bao Aikang, and Chief of Staff Zhao Zhongtang, all members. This cadre reflects familial and ethnic Wa dominance, particularly within the Bao lineage, which underwent a reshuffle in 2022 promoting Bao Youkang to deputy general secretary after the death of Bao Youyi. The structure extends downward through , , and village administrative units, where appointed governors and officials enforce central directives, ensuring unified control over an estimated 10,000 party members out of Wa State's population of approximately 500,000. This rigid hierarchy prioritizes loyalty and military integration, with UWSP policies directly influencing UWSA operations and local governance, though internal dynamics remain opaque due to limited external access.

United Wa State Army Organization and Capabilities

The (UWSA), the armed wing of the , maintains a hierarchical structure centered on several numbered divisions that oversee regional operations and territorial defense. These include the 778th Division and four others, such as the 772nd and 775th, which are positioned primarily along the Myanmar-Thailand border to secure Wa-controlled territories in . The force employs a regimental framework beneath divisional commands, enabling decentralized control over , , and support units, with overall command exercised by senior leaders including chairman . UWSA personnel number around 30,000 active troops, supported by Chinese military training and technical assistance that enhances operational readiness despite the group's de facto ceasefire with Myanmar's military since 1989. This manpower sustains defensive postures and limited alliances with other ethnic armed groups, though the UWSA announced in August 2025 that it would cease providing weapons or equipment to external organizations. In terms of capabilities, the UWSA possesses advanced infantry armaments largely sourced from , including QBZ-97 5.56 mm assault rifles, Type 56 7.62 mm rifles, Type 79 semi-automatic sniper rifles, and Type 69 rocket-propelled grenade launchers, which replaced older systems in a modernization push between and 2013. Heavy support includes truck-mounted 12.7 mm machine guns, twin 14.5 mm ZU-2 anti-aircraft guns, and man-portable air-defense systems for low-level aerial threats. Artillery assets feature 105 mm howitzers and other heavy pieces, complemented by anti-tank weapons and tracked systems for mobility in rugged terrain. The UWSA's technological edge extends to aviation and unmanned systems, with a fleet of armed helicopters equipped with air-to-air missiles—unique among Myanmar's ethnic armies—and truck-mounted drones for and potential strike roles, as demonstrated in parades since 2017. Local production of ammunition and variants of Chinese Type 81 rifles in facilities near Panghsang further bolsters sustainment, allowing the force to project power independently while avoiding direct confrontation with Myanmar's . This combination of imported hardware, domestic , and external positions the UWSA as Myanmar's most formidable non-state actor, capable of deterring incursions across its approximately 20,000–30,000 square kilometers of controlled territory.

Internal Governance and Law Enforcement

The (UWSP) exercises centralized control over Wa State's internal governance through its , which sets policies and issues commands, led by General Secretary since the party's founding in 1989. The Wa State People's Government implements these directives, managing a range of functions including administration, , , media, , , , , minerals, religious affairs, and police operations. This structure operates as a parallel administration independent of Myanmar's , with effective local governance in northern townships featuring government offices, schools, and clinics, while southern areas remain more loosely organized primarily for economic transit. Administratively, Wa State divides into the Northern Wa Region (four districts: Monglin, Mongmao, Mong Pawk, Hopang, plus special townships Pangsang and Namtit, population approximately 550,000) and Southern Wa Region (Military Region 171, seven districts including Tachilek and Mong Hsat, population over 100,000). Law enforcement falls under the People's Government's police authority, supported by the (UWSA), which maintains internal security with around 20,000–25,000 troops across nine divisions. Enforcement emphasizes strict compliance with UWSP policies, notably the opium ban imposed in June 2005, which mandated cessation of poppy cultivation and involved crop eradication efforts that reduced production in Wa territories, though displacing it to other regions. Practices can include coercive measures such as capturing individuals or holding relatives to secure compliance or personnel for enforcement and duties. In recent years, Wa authorities have extended enforcement to transnational issues, cooperating with enforcement in to dismantle cyber-scam operations in border areas, arresting thousands of suspects and repatriating over 40,000 individuals amid pressure from . The operates under the framework, handling local disputes and UWSP policy violations, though details on formal structures remain limited due to the region's opacity and military oversight. Overall, prioritizes stability and resource control, with UWSA military capacity ensuring adherence amid Wa State's autonomy.

Society and Demographics

Population and Ethnic Composition

The population of Wa State, encompassing both its northern and southern regions under control, is estimated at approximately 600,000 as of the early , with limited recent data available due to the area's autonomy and restricted access. This figure includes residents in the core northern territory along the China- border and the southern extension acquired following the 1996 dissolution of the Myanmar National Democracy Alliance Army. The Wa ethnic group, an Austroasiatic people indigenous to the region, comprises the demographic majority, bolstered by state-sponsored relocations of tens of thousands of Wa families from northern areas to the southern command zone since the 1990s to consolidate control and alter local dynamics. In the northern Wa State, Wa form over 90% of the in many townships, reflecting historical settlement patterns in hilly unsuitable for lowland cultivation. Southern Wa State, by contrast, originally featured a more diverse mix prior to relocations, with Wa estimated at around 7% of residents alongside larger proportions of Shan, Lahu, and Akha groups; post-relocation demographics shifted toward Wa dominance, though exact current breakdowns remain undocumented in independent surveys. Minority ethnicities include traders and migrants concentrated in urban centers like Panghsang (), where they number in the low thousands and influence commerce, as well as smaller communities of Burmese, Palaung, and resettled or displaced during conflicts. These groups coexist under UWSA governance, which enforces policies favoring Wa cultural and linguistic primacy, including mandatory Wa-language in schools. Demographic pressures from and cross-border ties with Wa kin in China's Province contribute to fluid population shifts, though no verified growth rates exceed natural increase amid high opium dependency and limited healthcare infrastructure.

Cultural Practices and Religion

The predominant religion among the Wa people in Wa State is , centered on of local spirits tied to natural features like water, trees, and mountains, alongside ancestor worship to ensure health and prosperity. These beliefs manifest in rituals involving animal sacrifices to avert misfortune or secure bountiful harvests. A minority has adopted Buddhism through centuries of interaction with neighboring Shan and Tai communities, while claims 10-50% adherence in some estimates, often via efforts. Cultural practices emphasize communal rituals and self-reliance, with Wa arts—such as , , and —deeply integrated into religious ceremonies and agrarian cycles. Traditional attire features handwoven fabrics in bold patterns, and cuisine relies on fermented staples like rice beer and preserved meats prepared over open fires. Historically, served as a rite to capture enemy souls for in swidden , a practice that persisted into the mid-20th century but has been officially suppressed since the , though isolated reports suggest remnants in remote border areas. Under governance, Wa identity has undergone revival since the 1989 ceasefire, with state-run schools standardizing the and embedding traditional customs in curricula to counter assimilation pressures from Burmese and Chinese influences. This includes festivals marking planting and harvest seasons, where animist shamans lead invocations, blending pre-communist tribal elements with the party's emphasis on ethnic . Social norms prioritize village councils for , rooted in patrilineal clans, and enforce taboos against intermarriage with outsiders to preserve bloodlines.

Social Services and Human Development

Social services in Wa State are primarily administered by the (UWSP) government through a decentralized, socialist-oriented framework that prioritizes basic provision over expansive welfare programs, often integrating oversight with community-based care networks. These efforts draw on internal taxation, cross-border Chinese , public donations from the Wa , and limited assistance, forming what scholars describe as "communities of care" rather than a conventional state welfare system. This approach reflects the region's and isolation, with services emphasizing mutual obligations between authorities, soldiers, and civilians amid scarce formal metrics on outcomes. Education remains severely underdeveloped, with an illiteracy rate of around 90% and 83% of adults possessing less than primary-level education as of 2017, stemming from historical conflict, linguistic diversity, and limited . The UWSP invests in primary schools following socialist principles, but enrollment and quality lag due to resource constraints and a focus on in Wa, Chinese, and Burmese languages; higher education access is minimal, often requiring travel to . Recent discussions with Myanmar's junta in 2025 have included expanding Burmese-language instruction, though implementation remains uncertain. Healthcare services are basic and state-directed, with the UWSP maintaining clinics, programs, and maternal-child initiatives supported by projects targeting prevention and treatment in Shan State's Special Region 2. A operates in Pangsang, the administrative center, handling routine care, but advanced treatments are unavailable locally, leading residents to seek services across the border in ; overall access reflects post-ceasefire improvements in but persistent gaps in specialized care and data tracking. Human development indicators are not systematically tracked for Wa State, but qualitative assessments indicate relative progress in and compared to Myanmar's national averages since the 1989 ceasefire, attributed to economic stabilization and aid inflows, though high illiteracy and dependence on informal economies constrain broader gains. Life expectancy and poverty rates lack verified specifics, with challenges exacerbated by geographic isolation and periodic cross-border disruptions; the UWSP's and departments oversee targeted interventions, yet systemic inequities persist in ethnic minority border regions.

Geography

Physical Features and Borders

Wa State occupies a rugged, mountainous expanse in eastern , , forming part of the Shan Plateau with steep hills, deep valleys, and forested highlands. The terrain is among the most elevated and dissected in the country, contributing to its isolation and defensive advantages. Average elevations reach approximately 1,200 meters, with peaks rising higher amid narrow river gorges that drain toward major regional waterways like the to the west. The region's physical features include limited arable lowlands confined to valley floors, supporting amid dense tropical forests and formations typical of the plateau's geology. Absence of major urban centers reflects the challenging , with settlements clustered along rudimentary road networks traversing the hills. These characteristics have historically shaped Wa society's mobility and settlement patterns, favoring highland villages over plains development. Administratively divided into Northern and Southern Wa Regions, the territory's borders align with natural barriers. The Northern Wa Region abuts China's Province along the international frontier, facilitating cross-border trade and influence, while the Southern Wa Region interfaces with adjacent areas under control of other ethnic armed groups such as the . Internally, Wa State's boundaries are fluid, defined more by military control than formal demarcations, encompassing roughly the Wa Hills and adjacent uplands.

Climate and Environmental Conditions

The Wa State region, situated in the mountainous Wa Hills of eastern at elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 meters, features a influenced by 's broader tropical patterns. Annual temperatures typically range from lows of around 10–15°C in cooler months to highs of 25–30°C during the hot season, moderated by altitude compared to lowland areas. averages 1,500–2,000 mm annually, concentrated in the rainy season from May to due to the southwest , while the spans November to April with minimal rainfall. The region experiences three distinct seasons: a cool, dry winter (–February) with clear skies and occasional fog; a hot, pre- period (March–April) marked by rising temperatures and low humidity; and the wet season bringing heavy rains that support but also trigger landslides in steep terrain. Higher elevations in northern Wa mitigate extreme heat, with frost possible in winter at peaks above 1,500 meters, though data specific to Wa remains limited due to restricted access. These patterns align with Shan State's variability, where orographic effects from the hills enhance rainfall. Environmental conditions in Wa State have deteriorated due to resource extraction and changes. Rare earth , largely Chinese-operated in Wa-controlled areas since around 2020, has proliferated, generating toxic and acidic sludge that pollute rivers and , with incidents in 2025 depositing up to 60 cm of contaminated mud on farmlands after floods, destroying crops like rice and corn. rates, driven by , expansion (e.g., rubber and ), and past opium cultivation, have accelerated, contributing to and in an area once rich in tropical forests. While Wa authorities claim some efforts, unregulated activities exacerbate watershed degradation, affecting downstream communities in and beyond.

Administrative Divisions

Northern Wa Region

The Northern Wa Region comprises the northern segment of Wa State, directly bordering China's Province to the north and northeast, and characterized by rugged mountainous terrain at high elevations. This area functions as the core political and military hub, housing the headquarters of the (UWSP) and (UWSA) in , formerly known as Pangsang, situated near the Thai ng River bend close to the Chinese . Administratively, the region is structured into four primary districts—Monglin (also called Waing Kong), Mongmao, Mong Pawk, and Hopang—supplemented by two special townships: and Namtit. Each district includes multiple townships, with Hopang serving as a key administrative center that came under full UWSA control on January 10, 2024, following gains from between October and December 2023. Governance operates through the UWSP Central Committee and the Wa State People’s Government, which manage local administration, judicial affairs, , , and internal security under a centralized, one-party framework. The estimated population stands at approximately 550,000 residents, predominantly ethnic Wa, with the region benefiting from economic ties to China, including integration into the Belt and Road Initiative for infrastructure development. Key border towns like Mongmao facilitate cross-border trade, while the area's strategic location has historically reinforced UWSA autonomy amid Myanmar's ethnic conflicts.

Southern Wa Region

The Southern Wa Region, also designated by the United Wa State Army (UWSA) as Military Region 171, forms the southern portion of Wa-controlled territory in Shan State, extending along the border with Thailand's provinces of Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, and Mae Hong Son. This area was incorporated into UWSA control following the 1989 ceasefire with Myanmar's military, after the collapse of the Communist Party of Burma, marking an expansion from the core northern territories. It borders Thailand to the south and west, with internal boundaries connecting to the Northern Wa Region via contested central Shan State areas. Administratively, the region operates under the UWSA's Fourth , which oversees operations and provides a framework for civil , though it maintains a high degree of local autonomy compared to stricter central directives in the north. The (UWSP), the political arm of the UWSA, implements a hierarchical structure here, dividing the territory into seven districts that include strategically important zones such as Tachilek and Mong Hsat . Local administration emphasizes security, with district-level commands handling taxation, infrastructure maintenance, and , often integrating ethnic militias from diverse populations like Lahu, Akha, and Shan groups. Approximately 9,000 UWSA troops are deployed across the region to enforce control and deter incursions, reflecting its role as a forward defensive perimeter. In contrast to the Northern Wa Region's focus on ethnic Wa-centric development and direct Chinese border trade, the Southern Wa Region's governance prioritizes stabilization of multi-ethnic communities acquired through military expansion, with less emphasis on autonomous civil institutions and more on UWSP-appointed overseers to manage cross-border dynamics. Townships within districts function as basic units for and , drawing from UWSA regulations that blend customary practices with centralized edicts on issues like land use and mobility restrictions. This structure supports UWSA's broader neutrality in Myanmar's conflicts, positioning the region as a buffer against southern ethnic armed groups while facilitating limited routes to .

Economy

Resource Extraction and Mining

The economy of Wa State relies heavily on mining as a primary revenue source, with the (UWSA) overseeing operations in tin and rare earth elements, often in partnership with Chinese firms. These activities occur in UWSA-controlled territories along the Myanmar-China border in , where extraction contributes to territorial control and funding for the group's . Tin mining dominates Wa State's extractive sector, with the region hosting one of the world's largest tin mines under UWSA administration. In August 2023, the UWSA suspended all tin operations to regulate practices and conserve resources, halting exports for nearly two years amid concerns over wasteful exploitation. Shipments resumed in 2025, impacting global supply chains as Wa State tin flows primarily to . Rare earth element extraction has expanded rapidly since Myanmar's 2021 military coup, with UWSA securing new mines protected by Chinese-backed militias and operated by Chinese companies using in-situ leaching methods. These operations, involving hillside excavation and chemical processing, produce heavy rare earth oxides at costs up to seven times lower than in regulated regions, fueling exports to —Myanmar supplied over 80% of 's rare earth imports in recent years. At least 100 workers per site engage in round-the-clock shifts, though the activity has drawn scrutiny for unregulated environmental impacts.

Agriculture and Trade

Agriculture in Wa State relies on a mix of subsistence and commercial cultivation, shaped by the region's mountainous terrain and historical shifts away from illicit crops. remains the primary staple, grown during the monsoon season on sloping fields, though yields are limited by poor and food insecurity affecting nearly 90% of villages as of 2005. Efforts by the Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) through the Kokang and Wa Initiative (KOWI), launched in 2006, have supported intensification, , and alternative livelihoods to address post-opium ban vulnerabilities, including emergency aid and vocational training. Commercial agriculture has expanded into large-scale plantations, with rubber emerging as a dominant since the mid-2000s; Wa elites, leveraging revenues from other sectors, have pioneered these ventures, often in with Chinese investors, covering thousands of hectares but frequently entailing land enclosures and labor coercion from displaced locals. and plantations have also proliferated as poppy substitutes, contributing to export-oriented production. Trade in Wa State centers on cross-border exchanges with , facilitated by the shared and economic dependencies, with rubber and other forming key legitimate exports alongside minerals. Annual border commerce has historically funded and imports of consumer , machinery, and materials, though volumes fluctuate with regional instability; fighting in northern disrupted routes as of 2024, prompting renewed emphasis on resumption. In February 2025, Wa leadership endorsed a nine-point economic plan tied to the Myanmar- , prioritizing agricultural enhancements, trade reopening, and Chinese-backed projects to integrate Wa produce into broader markets. These ties reflect 's strategic patronage, enabling Wa autonomy while channeling agricultural surpluses northward, though local benefits are uneven amid and environmental strains from expansion.

Role in Regional Illicit Economies

The (UWSA), the governing force in Wa State, plays a pivotal role in Southeast Asia's illicit narcotics economy, primarily through facilitating (meth) production and taxing associated activities, which generate revenue to sustain its 30,000-strong military and rudimentary state apparatus. Clandestine meth laboratories, often operated by Chinese criminal syndicates under UWSA oversight, proliferate across Wa territory, producing high-purity crystal destined for export via trafficking networks to markets in , , and beyond. This shift to synthetics has positioned Wa as a core node in a estimated to exceed $60 billion annually in meth alone across the region, with UWSA reportedly extracting "protection fees" or rents from labs rather than direct . Historically, Wa State's economy relied on cultivation and refining, which funded the UWSA's formation in the amid 's ethnic insurgencies; by the early , the area accounted for a significant portion of the Golden Triangle's output, with labs processing raw into No. 4 for export. In response to international pressure and internal policy, the UWSA enforced a strict eradication campaign from 2005 to 2006, reducing cultivation in its controlled areas by over 90% within two years and transitioning -dependent farmers to state-subsidized alternatives like rubber and . However, this ban did not extend to synthetics; processing persisted at lower volumes, while meth production surged, filling the revenue void and integrating with broader networks post-Myanmar's 2021 military coup, which destabilized oversight and boosted regional output. The UWSA officially denies direct involvement in trafficking, portraying itself as a regulator combating drugs through eradication drives and border controls, yet U.S. authorities, including the Treasury Department, have sanctioned UWSA leaders since 2003 for enabling and meth flows, linking them to networks shipping tons annually. This duality—public anti-drug rhetoric alongside tolerated labs—reflects a pragmatic reliance on narcotics to underwrite , with profits also reportedly funding arms procurement and infrastructure like roads extending into . Beyond drugs, Wa's illicit sphere includes unregulated logging and cross-border of precursors, but narcotics dominate, exacerbating regional crises and fueling conflicts with rival groups over production zones.

Foreign Relations

Ties with China

The United Wa State Party (UWSP) and its armed wing, the (UWSA), maintain a multifaceted relationship with characterized by military, economic, and political interdependence, largely driven by Wa State's geographic position along the 180-kilometer border with Province. This proximity facilitates cross-border trade and strategic alignment, with viewing the UWSA as a stabilizing force against spillover from Myanmar's internal conflicts, including ethnic insurgencies and junta resistance. Wa leadership, in turn, relies on Beijing for security guarantees and development aid, as evidenced by the UWSA's adoption of organizational structures modeled on the and the use of as an official language in administration. Militarily, the UWSA benefits from Chinese patronage, including access to advanced weaponry such as assault rifles in service with several brigades, mirroring equipment used by the . This support traces back to the UWSA's 1989 defection from the China-backed , after which provided logistical and advisory assistance to consolidate Wa control over territory. In exchange, exerts influence over UWSA operations, pressuring the group to avoid actions that destabilize the border, such as expanding into areas contested by anti-junta forces during in late 2023; Wa compliance has included ceasefires and non-aggression pacts mediated by Chinese officials. Reports indicate 's provincial authorities in coordinate directly with Wa commanders to manage refugee flows and maintain a drug-free , though Wa denies trafficking narcotics into . Economically, Wa State exhibits heavy dependence on , with the serving as the primary currency and over 90% of trade involving Chinese goods, including machinery, consumer products, and construction materials funneled through border points like Cangyuan and Lancang. This reliance extends to resource extraction, where UWSA-protected rare earth mines in northern , operational since at least 2023, are managed by Chinese-speaking operators exporting to , which sources over 60% of its rare earths from amid global supply constraints. projects proposed by , such as roads and dams, are prioritized by Wa authorities to diversify from ; at the UWSA's 2024 on February 10, leaders endorsed collaboration on these initiatives to enhance connectivity and revenue. Critics note this dynamic reinforces Wa autonomy while limiting diversification, as alternative markets like remain underdeveloped due to 's . Politically, China positions the UWSA as a to Myanmar's central authorities and pro-Western resistance groups, fostering a pragmatic alliance that prioritizes border security over formal of Wa sovereignty. Beijing's efforts, including summits in in 2023–2024, have secured UWSA neutrality in broader conflicts, aligning with China's post-2021 coup strategy to bolster the junta indirectly while containing chaos. This relationship, however, imposes constraints; Wa leaders publicly affirm loyalty to Chinese directives on issues like scam center crackdowns, reflecting limited bargaining power despite territorial control. Overall, the ties underscore China's instrumental approach, leveraging Wa dependence to safeguard economic corridors like the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor under the .

Relations with Myanmar Central Authorities

The (UWSA), the armed wing of the , concluded a with 's State Law and Order Restoration Council military regime on May 12, 1989, shortly after breaking away from the . This accord granted the UWSA effective autonomy over Wa State territories in eastern , in exchange for halting hostilities and refraining from expansion beyond designated areas, establishing a pattern of pragmatic non-aggression that has endured through multiple regime changes. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, interactions with involved limited cooperation on border security and resource extraction, alongside persistent tensions over territorial encroachments and resource revenues, but without resumption of full-scale conflict. The UWSA rejected participation in the 2015 Nationwide Ceasefire Accord, viewing it as insufficiently guaranteeing , yet maintained control without challenging central authority militarily. In response to the February 1, 2021, military coup, the UWSA declared neutrality, neither endorsing the junta nor aligning with anti-coup resistance groups, prioritizing territorial defense and cross-border stability. This stance was reaffirmed in July 2024, with the party explicitly adopting a non-intervention policy amid escalating dynamics. On November 1, 2023, UWSA spokespersons warned of retaliation solely against direct threats, underscoring a defensive posture amid clashes involving neighboring groups. By October 16, 2025, the UWSA shifted toward conditional endorsement of the junta's electoral roadmap, announcing support for the Union Election Commission's planned polls as a step toward political resolution, while reiterating demands for genuine federal arrangements. This development reflects ongoing economic interdependencies, such as tin exports and infrastructure projects, but analysts attribute it partly to external pressures favoring regime stabilization over revolutionary upheaval. Relations remain fragile, with Wa leaders warning of potential if central overreach erodes the 1989 bargain's autonomy provisions.

Interactions with Neighboring Ethnic Armed Groups

The (UWSA) maintains pragmatic and often fluid relations with neighboring ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) in northern , prioritizing territorial stability, Chinese-backed interests, and avoidance of direct confrontation with the . As part of the Federal Political Negotiation and Consultative Committee (FPNCC), an alliance formed in 2016 comprising seven EAOs including the UWSA, (KIA), (MNDAA), and (TNLA), the UWSA has coordinated on political negotiations and shared anti-junta rhetoric, though its participation remains limited by neutrality declarations post-2021 coup. These ties reflect strategic alignments rather than ideological unity, with the UWSA leveraging its superior firepower—estimated at 30,000 troops equipped with advanced Chinese weaponry—to mediate or deter intra-ethnic conflicts. A key alliance exists with the (NDAA), a Kokang-based group controlling territory adjacent to Wa State, rooted in shared historical origins from the splinter and geographic proximity along the Chinese border. This partnership includes military coordination and mutual non-aggression, enabling joint border management and trade facilitation, though the NDAA operates with greater deference to UWSA influence due to the latter's resource advantages. In contrast, relations with the MNDAA—another Kokang faction—have featured tensions, including border crossing disputes in early 2024 that escalated to military posturing, highlighting frictions over territorial control amid the MNDAA's aggressive offensives in and Hsipaw districts. Interactions with the TNLA and Shan State Progress Party/Shan State Army-North (SSPP/SSA-North) have involved intermittent support, such as weapons and logistics during northern Shan offensives like in 2023–2024, but these were curtailed in August 2025 when the UWSA announced cessation of all aid to these groups, citing a policy of neutrality enforced by Chinese directives to stabilize the border. This decision followed meetings with TNLA, SSPP, and MNDAA representatives, underscoring the UWSA's role as a regional power broker amid alliance strains from territorial disputes and uneven military gains. With the KIA, coordination occurs through FPNCC channels and shared fronts in northern Shan, but the UWSA's financial superiority and Chinese arms access have positioned it as the dominant partner, occasionally unsettling KIA-TNLA dynamics. Overall, these interactions prioritize ceasefires and over revolutionary solidarity, with the UWSA intervening selectively—such as inviting SSPP forces into Mongyai and Tangyan townships in July 2024 to avert clashes—to preserve its autonomous enclave.

Controversies

Drug Production and Trafficking Allegations

The (UWSA), which governs Wa State, has been implicated in large-scale and production since the , following a 1989 agreement with Myanmar's central authorities that facilitated expanded cultivation in its territories. poppy farming boomed in the region during the early post- years, with Wa areas contributing to Myanmar's status as a leading global supplier of precursors; estimates from that era placed significant portions of Shan State's output—where Wa State is located—under UWSA influence. In June 2005, UWSA leadership announced a unilateral ban on poppy cultivation, claiming eradication efforts reduced acreage to near zero by 2006, a move praised by some observers but met with skepticism due to limited independent verification and reports of residual farming in border zones. Attention has increasingly focused on methamphetamine as Wa State's dominant illicit commodity, with allegations centering on industrial-scale "superlabs" in UWSA-controlled enclaves near the Chinese border. U.S. (DEA) investigations, including Operation Warlord launched in 2005, indicted eight senior UWSA figures for conspiring to traffic over 200 kilograms of methamphetamine precursors and finished products, including tablets bearing the UWSA emblem seized at U.S. mail facilities. Reports indicate these labs, often co-located with former heroin refineries, produce yaba (methamphetamine-caffeine pills) and crystal methamphetamine using imported from , fueling exports to markets in , , and beyond; Australian authorities alone seized 9.9 million tons of crystal meth sourced from , including Wa areas, between 2012 and 2022. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) assessments underscore the Golden Triangle—including Wa State—as the epicenter of Asia's synthetic drug surge, with regional methamphetamine seizures reaching a record 236 tonnes in 2024, a 24% increase from prior years, much of it traced to Myanmar's northern Shan enclaves. U.S. sanctions, such as those imposed in 2017 on UWSA Southern Command leader Wei Hsueh-kang, cite his oversight of trafficking networks generating hundreds of millions in revenue annually to sustain the group's 30,000-strong forces. Analysts from the note that UWSA commanders' U.S. indictments for narcotics ties preclude direct diplomatic engagement, while the group's de facto autonomy enables operations with minimal interference. UWSA spokespersons have consistently denied institutional involvement, asserting in statements as recent as May 2025 that the combats production and that accusations lack substantiation, attributing labs to rogue actors or external syndicates. However, empirical indicators—such as persistent seizures of UWSA-branded drugs, of lab in controlled zones, and the between UWSA territorial stability and regional meth output—suggest tolerance or direct facilitation, with proceeds estimated to fund up to 70% of the group's despite official bans. This dynamic has drawn international condemnation, positioning Wa State as a key node in Southeast Asia's illicit economies amid 's ongoing conflicts.

Treatment of Minorities and Internal Conflicts

The (UWSA), which governs Wa State, maintains strict control over non-Wa ethnic groups within its territory, including Shan, Lahu, Akha, and Karen populations, often through policies that prioritize Wa ethnic interests and security objectives. Reports indicate that UWSA forces have participated in forced relocations and displacement of minority communities, particularly Shan civilians, as part of efforts aligned with Myanmar's military in the , displacing tens of thousands to consolidate control over border areas. Such actions have involved targeting villages for relocation, with limited regard for minority livelihoods or cultural continuity, contributing to patterns of ethnic homogenization in Wa-controlled zones. Religious minorities, especially among non-Wa groups, face systematic restrictions and under the UWSA's atheist-leaning , rooted in its communist origins. In , the UWSA expelled eight Catholic and lay leaders from the Wa region, citing unauthorized religious activities, as part of broader crackdowns that include bans on church construction, distribution, and public worship. These measures enforce secular policies, with Christian communities—comprising a notable portion of ethnic minorities—subject to , forced renunciations of , and integration into Wa-dominated administrative structures that discourage non-Buddhist or traditional Wa spiritual practices. The UWSA has also been implicated in the recruitment of child soldiers from minority ethnic groups, exacerbating vulnerabilities among non-Wa youth in rural areas. As of 2002, the UWSA was reported to have the largest number of child soldiers among Myanmar's ethnic armed organizations, with forcible conscription practices persisting into the 2010s and affecting thousands, many drawn from impoverished minority villages lacking alternative economic opportunities. U.S. government assessments confirm ongoing use of child recruits by the UWSA, though exact figures remain opaque due to the group's isolation. Internal conflicts within Wa State are minimal, reflecting the UWSA's centralized authoritarian structure and effective suppression of dissent since its unification in following the collapse of the Communist Party of Burma. Unlike broader Myanmar ethnic insurgencies, Wa State has experienced relative stability, with no major factional rebellions or separatist movements among minorities, attributable to coercive unity measures, economic incentives from resource control, and cross-border ties with that bolster regime cohesion. Sporadic tensions, such as historical clan disputes among Wa leaders, have been resolved internally without escalating to open warfare, maintaining the UWSA's monopoly on force. This stability contrasts with surrounding conflicts but stems from policies that preempt minority-led opposition through demographic engineering and loyalty enforcement.

Geopolitical Autonomy and International Views

Wa State maintains de facto autonomy over its territory in eastern , , administering internal affairs through the (UWSP) and its military wing, the (UWSA), without substantive interference from 's central authorities. A agreement with the Myanmar military, in place since 1989, has enabled this , allowing the UWSA to control security, taxation, and infrastructure development independently. In the post-2021 coup context, the UWSA has adopted a policy of neutrality, neither endorsing nor opposing the , while rejecting demands for or integration into national forces. This stance was reaffirmed in interactions as recent as August 2025, when junta envoys visited Wa territories to solicit support for planned elections, but yielded no commitments from UWSP leaders. Internationally, Wa State receives no formal recognition as a entity from any government, functioning instead as a powerful amid Myanmar's fragmented . The UWSA's territorial control and military strength—estimated at over 20,000 active personnel—position it as Myanmar's most formidable ethnic armed organization, influencing regional dynamics without diplomatic status. exerts significant influence as Wa State's primary patron, providing economic , infrastructure investments, and tacit military support to secure border stability and counterbalance interests, with Wa leaders frequently engaging officials. This relationship has led to instances of Beijing-mediated pressure, such as in August 2025 when compelled the UWSP to halt to allied groups like the amid escalating northern offensives. Western governments, including the , view Wa State primarily through the lens of its alleged role in regional instability and narcotics production, imposing sanctions on UWSA figures under frameworks targeting rather than engaging diplomatically. The and have similarly withheld recognition, framing Wa autonomy within broader concerns over Myanmar's ethnic insurgencies and , without proposals for statehood. Amid Myanmar's 2023-2025 escalations, Wa State's preservation of autonomy has drawn analytical attention as a model of resilient ethnic self-rule, though prospects for broader international legitimacy remain dim absent resolution of narcotics allegations and alignment with federal reforms.

References

  1. https://www.usip.org/publications/2019/04/united-wa-state-army-and-burmas-peace-process
  2. https://www.cjfp.org/myanmar-in-the-dragons-shadow-chinese-patronage-and-ascent-of-the-united-wa-state-party/
  3. https://factsanddetails.com/asian/cat66/sub417/item2733.html
  4. https://www.moderninsurgent.org/post/united-wa-state-army
  5. https://greydynamics.com/the-united-wa-state-party-myanmars-most-powerful-ethnic-army/
  6. https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/guest-column/tin-territory-and-the-shadow-power-of-myanmars-autonomous-wa-state.html
  7. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/pw_147-the_united_wa_state_army_and_burmas_peace_process.pdf
  8. https://factsanddetails.com/asian/cat66/sub417/item2734.html
  9. https://www.irrawaddy.com/culture/books/the-much-misunderstood-wa-of-myanmar-and-china.html
  10. https://www.cfr.org/blog/review-wa-myanmar-and-chinas-quest-global-dominance-bertil-lintner
  11. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/uwsa-leader-repeats-demands-autonomous-wa-state-30th-anniversary.html
  12. https://democracyforburma.wordpress.com/2009/04/24/the-wa-burmese-ceasefire-looks-shakier/
  13. https://eng.mizzima.com/2025/06/02/22935
  14. https://www.tni.org/files/2023-04/TNI_CeasefireMyanmar_web_1.pdf
  15. https://www.tni.org/en/article/xiao-min-liang-the-architect-of-uwsa-politics
  16. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-23300441
  17. https://www.stimson.org/2016/uwsa-and-peace-process/
  18. https://www.bnionline.net/en/news/uwsa-sales-pitch-confederacy-promotion-main-thrust-30th-anniversary-ceasefire-celebration
  19. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-regime-shores-ties-two-powerful-northern-ethnic-armies.html
  20. https://ispmyanmar.com/united-wa-state-party-uwsp/
  21. https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/analysis/uwsa-neutered-myanmars-revolutionary-driving-force-derailed-by-china.html
  22. https://www.prio.org/comments/1139
  23. https://www.voanews.com/a/myanmar-s-largest-rebel-group-quietly-gains-strength-amid-civil-war/7763683.html
  24. http://bios.myanmar-institut.org/2020/03/19/bao-youxiang-born-1949/
  25. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmars-most-powerful-ethnic-army-reshuffles-leadership-what-does-it-mean.html
  26. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/united-wa-state-army-military-parade-showcases-ongoing-modernisation
  27. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/analysis-defense-and-security-industry/with-powerful-army-and-chinese-protection-wa-is-de-facto-independent-from-myanmar
  28. https://dmediag.com/news/utssa.html
  29. https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/09/14/border-wars-the-type-81-variants-of-the-united-wa-state-army/
  30. https://www.unodc.org/documents/alternative-development/towards_sustainable_development.pdf
  31. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/90635/
  32. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2024/7/29/under-siege-in-myanmars-cyber-scam-capital
  33. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/15759/bm
  34. https://www.yunnanexploration.com/wa-ethnic-minority.html
  35. https://factsanddetails.com/asian/cat66/sub417/entry-6666.html
  36. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0308275X20974099
  37. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history/article/sovereignty-as-care-acquaintances-mutuality-and-scale-in-the-wa-state-of-myanmar/02ABC5B081AD0F1ADDA8C0BA5A30044A
  38. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/myanmars-remote-wa-state-suffers-as-fewer-chinese-come-to-party-idUSKBN156023/
  39. https://www.youngpioneertours.com/wa-state-guide/
  40. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/politics/myanmar-junta-sends-envoys-to-wa-state-to-build-election-support.html
  41. http://www.healthunlimited.org.cn/old/english/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=504
  42. https://mapcarta.com/W1093150891
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29247090/
  44. https://thediplomat.com/2024/05/patrick-winn-on-the-narco-economy-of-myanmars-wa-state/
  45. https://en-us.topographic-map.com/map-942q57/Wa-Self-Administered-Division/
  46. https://www.britannica.com/place/Shan-Plateau
  47. https://www.globalasia.org/v18no4/book/understanding-wa-from-the-inside-out_tristan-kenderdine
  48. https://www.britannica.com/place/Myanmar/Climate
  49. https://themimu.info/sites/themimu.info/files/documents/Climate_Profile_Myanmar.pdf
  50. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/rare-earth-mines-blamed-as-muddy-floods-devastate-shan-state-farms.html
  51. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/7/satellite-images-show-surge-in-rare-earth-mining-in-rebel-held-myanmar
  52. https://news.mongabay.com/2025/10/protected-areas-hit-hard-as-mekong-countries-forest-cover-shrank-in-2024/
  53. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-military-bows-to-powerful-ethnic-army-gives-it-more-towns-near-china-border.html
  54. https://www.nationthailand.com/blogs/news/asean/40050508
  55. https://thediplomat.com/2024/07/the-silent-winner-of-myanmars-northern-conflict/
  56. https://visualrebellion.org/timeline/rare-earth-mining-fuels-wa-state-autonomy-amid-myanmars-political-turmoil-and-global-energy-shift
  57. https://www.stimson.org/2025/rare-earths-and-realpolitik-future-of-mediation-myanmar/
  58. https://english.dvb.no/united-wa-state-army-secures-control-of-new-rare-earth-mines-in-myanmar/
  59. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/tin-mining-in-myanmars-wa-state-faces-prolonged-ban.html
  60. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tin-shipments-myanmar-wa-state-091222799.html
  61. https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/myanmar-tin-industry-2025-global-supply-chain/
  62. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-backed-militia-secures-control-new-rare-earth-mines-myanmar-2025-06-12/
  63. https://ispmyanmar.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Rare-Earth-Mining-in-Myanmars-War-Torn-Regions.pdf
  64. https://eng.mizzima.com/2024/08/19/12979
  65. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1469-8676.13009
  66. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/ethnic-issues/wa-state-aims-to-boost-economy-through-chinese-projects.html
  67. https://www.economist.com/culture/2024/02/09/the-wa-the-worlds-biggest-drug-dealers-with-a-tiny-profile
  68. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/united-wa-state-army-asia-drug-cartel-power-1235003689/
  69. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia-pacific/myanmar/299-fire-and-ice-conflict-and-drugs-myanmars-shan-state
  70. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/myanmar-maneuvers-how-to-break-political-criminal-alliances-in-contexts-of-transition.pdf
  71. https://globalinitiative.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Alastair-MacBeath-Cashing-in-on-conflict-Illicit-economies-and-the-Myanmar-civil-war-GI-TOC-March-2025.pdf
  72. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/js3009
  73. https://www.iar-gwu.org/print-archive/3jbhl8ch71kydhndufw0nnmnqngroq
  74. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/08/myanmars-junta-loses-control-north-chinas-influence-grows
  75. https://warontherocks.com/2024/11/china-is-off-the-fence-in-myanmar/
  76. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/north-east-asia/china-myanmar/b179-scam-centres-and-ceasefires-china-myanmar-ties-coup
  77. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmars-wa-army-vows-neutrality-in-fight-between-regime-ethnic-alliance.html
  78. https://mmpeacemonitor.org/en/cover-story-eng/the-wa-armys-actions-through-its-neutral-policy-after-the-coup/
  79. https://burmainsight.com/uwsa-expresses-support-for-military-commissions-election-plan/
  80. https://cnimyanmar.com/index.php/english-edition/29416-wa-may-break-away-from-myanmar-if-myanmar-fails-to-maintain-good-relations
  81. https://hdff.org/shan-ethnic-armed-groups-the-struggle-between-unity-and-division-within-sspp-and-rcss-in-shan-state/
  82. https://ispmyanmar.com/national-democratic-alliance-army-ndaa/
  83. https://english.dvb.no/myanmar-national-democratic-alliance-army-to-retreat-from-lashio-and-hsipaw-in-shan-state/
  84. https://www.mtnewstoday.com/en/?p=11265
  85. https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/guest-column/myanmars-strongest-armed-ethnic-alliance-is-faltering.html
  86. https://cnimyanmar.com/index.php/english-edition/31012-uwsa-meets-with-tnla-sspp-mndaa-announces-it-will-no-longer-supply-weapons
  87. https://www.xcept-research.org/publication/brothers-torn-apart-as-tnla-grows-stronger-tensions-rise-in-northern-shan/
  88. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2003/vol1/html/29837.htm
  89. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/wa-declare-poppy-free-zone.html
  90. https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/pubs/states/newsrel/nyc012405.html
  91. https://asiatimes.com/2023/06/the-poppycock-of-myanmar-drug-suppression/
  92. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/29/methamphetamine-trafficking-surges-from-golden-triangle-region
  93. https://www.state.gov/wei-hsueh-kang
  94. https://x.com/ThaiEnquirer/status/1927947849200783739
  95. https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/2025/05/regional-synthetic-drugs-report-launch/story.html
  96. https://www.hrw.org/news/2005/05/26/burma-army-and-proxies-attack-shan-civilians
  97. https://www.hrw.org/news/2006/05/03/burma-un-must-act-end-attacks-karen
  98. https://www.csw.org.uk/2018/10/18/press/4124/article.htm
  99. https://www.hrw.org/news/2002/10/16/burma-worlds-highest-number-child-soldiers
  100. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/burma
  101. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/myanmar-china-watch/under-chinese-pressure-myanmars-uwsp-cuts-off-support-to-allied-ethnic-armies.html
  102. https://www.csis.org/analysis/dilemma-shan-state-myanmars-revolution
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.