Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
William M. Branham
View on Wikipedia
William Marrion Branham (April 6, 1909 – December 24, 1965) was an American Christian minister and faith healer who initiated the post-World War II healing revival, and claimed to be a prophet with the anointing of Elijah, who had come to prelude Christ's second coming; [1][2][3] He is credited as "a principal architect of restorationist thought" for charismatics by some Christian historians,[4] and has been called the "leading individual in the second wave of Pentecostalism."[5] He made a lasting influence on televangelism and the modern charismatic movement,[6] and his "stage presence remains a legend unparalleled in the history of the Charismatic movement".[7] At the time they were held, Branham's inter-denominational meetings were the largest religious meetings ever held in some American cities. Branham was the first American deliverance minister to successfully campaign in Europe; his ministry reached global audiences with major campaigns held in North America, Europe, Africa, and India.
Key Information
Branham claimed that he had received an angelic visitation on May 7, 1946, commissioning his worldwide ministry and launching his campaigning career in mid-1946. His fame rapidly spread as crowds were drawn to his stories of angelic visitations and reports of miracles happening at his meetings. His ministry spawned many emulators and set in motion the broader healing revival that later became the modern charismatic movement. At the peak of his popularity in the 1950s, Branham was widely adored and "the neo-Pentecostal world believed Branham to be a prophet to their generation".[8] From 1955, Branham's campaigning and popularity began to decline as the Pentecostal churches began to withdraw their support from the healing campaigns for primarily financial reasons. By 1960, Branham transitioned into a teaching ministry.
Unlike his contemporaries, who followed doctrinal teachings which are known as the Full Gospel tradition, Branham developed an alternative theology which was primarily a mixture of Calvinist and Arminian doctrines, and had a heavy focus on dispensationalism and Branham's own unique eschatological views. While widely accepting the restoration doctrine he espoused during the healing revival, his divergent post-revival teachings were deemed increasingly controversial by his charismatic and Pentecostal contemporaries, who subsequently disavowed many of the doctrines as "revelatory madness".[9] His racial teachings on serpent seed and his belief that membership in a Christian denomination was connected to the mark of the beast alienated many of his former supporters. His closest followers, however, accepted his sermons as oral scripture and refer to his teachings as The Message. Despite Branham's objections, some followers of his teachings placed him at the center of a cult of personality during his final years. Branham claimed that he had converted over one million people during his career. His teachings continue to be promoted by the William Branham Evangelistic Association, which reported that about 2 million people received its material in 2018. Branham died following a car accident in 1965.
Early life
[edit]Childhood
[edit]
William M. Branham was born near Burkesville, Kentucky, on April 6, 1909,[10][11][12][a][b] the son of Charles and Ella Harvey Branham, the oldest of ten children.[15] He claimed that at his birth, a "Light come [sic] whirling through the window, about the size of a pillow, and circled around where I was, and went down on the bed".[11] Branham told his publicist Gordon Lindsay that he had mystical experiences from an early age;[10] and that at age three he heard a "voice" speaking to him from a tree telling him "he would live near a city called New Albany".[10][11] According to Branham, that year his family moved to Jeffersonville, Indiana.[11] Branham also said that when he was seven years old, God told him to avoid smoking and drinking alcoholic beverages.[10][16] Branham stated he never violated the command.[10]
Branham told his audiences that he grew up in "deep poverty",[10] often not having adequate clothing, and that his family was involved in criminal activities.[12] Branham's neighbors reported him as "someone who always seemed a little different", but said he was a dependable youth.[10] Branham explained that his tendency towards "mystical experiences and moral purity" caused misunderstandings among his friends, family, and other young people; he was a "black sheep" from an early age.[17] Branham called his childhood "a terrible life."[16]
Branham's father owned a farm near Utica, Indiana, and took a job working for O. H. Wathen, owner of R. E. Wathen Distilleries in nearby Louisville, Kentucky.[18] Wathen was a supplier for Al Capone's bootlegging operations.[19] Branham told his audiences that he was required to help his father with the illegal production and sale of liquor during prohibition. In March 1924, Branham's father was arrested for his criminal activities; he was convicted and sentenced to a prison.[20] The Indiana Ku Klux Klan claimed responsibility for attacking and shutting down the Jeffersonville liquor producing ring.[21]
Branham was involved in a firearms incident and was shot in both legs in March 1924, at age 14; he later told his audiences he was involved in a hunting accident. Two of his brothers also suffered life-threatening injuries at the same time.[22] Branham was rushed to the hospital for treatment. His family was unable to pay for his medical bills, but members of the Indiana Ku Klux Klan stepped in to cover the expenses.[23] The help of the Klan during his impoverished childhood had a profound impact on Branham throughout his life. As late as 1963, Branham continued to speak highly of them saying, "the Ku Klux Klan, paid the hospital bill for me, Masons. I can never forget them. See? No matter what they do, or what, I still ... there is something, and that stays with me ...".[24] Branham would go on to maintain lifelong connections to the KKK.[25]
Conversion and early influences
[edit]
Branham told his audiences that he left home at age 19 in search of a better life, traveling to Phoenix, Arizona, where he worked on a ranch for two years and began a successful career in boxing.[10] While Branham was away, his brother Edward aged 18, shot and killed a Jeffersonville man and was charged with murder.[26][27] Edward died of a sudden illness only a short time later.[28] Branham returned to Jeffersonville in June 1929 to attend the funeral.[10][29] Branham had no experience with religion as a child; he said that the first time he heard a prayer was at his brother's funeral.[30]

Soon afterward, while he was working for the Public Service Company of Indiana, Branham was overcome by gas and had to be hospitalized.[30] Branham said that he heard a voice speaking to him while he was recovering from the accident, which led him to begin seeking God.[30] Shortly thereafter, he began attending the First Pentecostal Baptist Church of Jeffersonville, where he converted to Christianity.[31][10] The church was pastored by Roy Davis, a founding member of the second Ku Klux Klan and a leading recruiter for the organization. Davis later became the National Imperial Wizard (leader) of the KKK. Davis baptized Branham and six months later, he ordained Branham as an Independent Baptist minister and an elder in his church.[10] Supported by the KKK's Imperial Kludd (chaplain) Caleb Ridley, Branham traveled with Davis and they participated together in revivals in other states.[32][33]
At the time of Branham's conversion, the First Pentecostal Baptist Church of Jeffersonville was a nominally Baptist church which adhered to some Pentecostal doctrines, including divine healing and speaking in tongues; Branham reported that his baptism at the church was done using the Jesus name formula of Oneness Pentecostalism.[34] Branham claimed to have been opposed to Pentecostalism during the early years of his ministry. However, according to multiple Branham biographers, like Baptist historian Doug Weaver and Pentecostal historian Bernie Wade, Branham was exposed to Pentecostal teachings from his conversion.[35]
Branham claimed to his audiences he was first exposed to a Pentecostal church in 1936, which invited him to join, but he refused.[34][c] Weaver speculated that Branham may have chosen to hide his early connections to Pentecostalism to make his conversion story more compelling to his Pentecostal audiences during the years of the healing revival. Weaver identified several parts of Branham's reported life story that conflicted with historical documentation and suggested that Branham began significantly embellishing his early life story to his audiences beginning in the 1940s.[35]
During June 1933, Branham held tent revival meetings that were sponsored by Davis and the First Pentecostal Baptist Church.[10][37] On June 2 that year, the Jeffersonville Evening News said the Branham campaign reported 14 converts.[38] His followers believed his ministry was accompanied by miraculous signs from its beginning, and that when he was baptizing converts on June 11, 1933, in the Ohio River near Jeffersonville, a bright light descended over him and that he heard a voice say, "As John the Baptist was sent to forerun the first coming of Jesus Christ, so your message will forerun His second coming".[39][40]
Belief in the baptismal story is a critical element of faith among Branham's followers.[41] In his early references to the event during the healing revival, Branham interpreted it to refer to the restoration of the gifts of the spirit to the church.[42] In later years, Branham significantly altered how he told the baptismal story, and came to connect the event to his teaching ministry. He claimed reports of the baptismal story were carried in newspapers across the United States and Canada.[43] Because of the way Branham's telling of the baptismal story changed over the years, and because no newspaper actually covered the event, Weaver said Branham may have embellished the story after he began achieving success in the healing revival during the 1940s.[44]

Besides Roy Davis and the First Pentecostal Baptist Church, Branham reported interaction with other groups during the 1930s who were an influence on his ministry. During the early 1930s, he became acquainted with William Sowders' School of the Prophets, a Pentecostal group in Kentucky and Indiana. Through Sowders' group, he was introduced to the British Israelite House of David and in the autumn of 1934, Branham traveled to Michigan to meet with members of the group.[45]
Early ministry
[edit]
Branham took over leadership of Roy Davis's Jeffersonville church in 1934, after Davis was arrested again and extradited to stand trial.[46] Sometime during March or April 1934, the First Pentecostal Baptist Church was destroyed by a fire and Branham's supporters at the church helped him organize a new church in Jeffersonville.[47] At first Branham preached out of a tent at 8th and Pratt street, and he also reported temporarily preaching in an orphanage building.[48]
By 1936, the congregation had constructed a new church on the same block as Branham's tent, at the corner of 8th and Penn street. The church was built on the same location reported by the local newspaper as the site of his June 1933 tent campaign.[38] Newspaper articles reported the original name of Branham's new church to be the Pentecostal Tabernacle. The church was officially registered with the City of Jeffersonville as the Billie Branham Pentecostal Tabernacle in November 1936. Newspaper articles continued to refer to his church as the Pentecostal Tabernacle until 1943.[49][50][51][52][53][54][55] Branham served as pastor until 1946, and the church name eventually shortened to the Branham Tabernacle.[47] The church flourished at first, but its growth began to slow. Because of the Great Depression, it was often short of funds, so Branham served without compensation.[47]
Branham continued traveling and preaching among Pentecostal churches while serving as pastor of his new church. Branham obtained a truck and had it painted with advertisements for his healing ministry which he toured in. In September 1934, he traveled to Mishawaka, Indiana where he was invited to speak at the Pentecostal Assemblies of Jesus Christ (PAJC) General Assembly meetings organized by Bishop G. B. Rowe. Branham was "not impressed with the multi-cultural aspects of the PAJC as it was contrary to the dogmas advanced by his friends in the Ku Klux Klan."[32][34][56]
Branham and his future wife Amelia Hope Brumbach (b. July 16, 1913) attended the First Pentecostal Baptist Church together beginning in 1929 where Brumbach served as young people's leader.[15] The couple began dating in 1933.[48] Branham married Brumbach in June 1934.[57] Their first child, William "Billy" Paul Branham (1935–2023) was born on September 13, 1935.[57] Branham's wife became ill during the second year of their marriage. According to her death certificate, she was diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in January 1936, beginning a period of declining health. Despite her diagnosis, the couple had a second child, Sharon Rose, who was born on October 27, 1936.[57] In September 1936, the local news reported that Branham held a multi-week healing revival at the Pentecostal Tabernacle in which he reported eight healings.[58]
The following year, disaster struck when Jeffersonville was ravaged by the Ohio River flood of 1937.[34] Branham's congregation was badly impacted by the disaster and his family was displaced from their home.[59] By February 1937, the floodwaters had receded, his church survived intact and Branham resumed holding services at the Pentecostal Tabernacle. Following the January flood, Hope's health continued to decline, and she succumbed to her illness and died on July 22, 1937. Sharon Rose, who had been born with her mother's illness, died four days later (July 26, 1937).[59] Their obituaries reported Branham as pastor of the Pentecostal Tabernacle, the same church where their funerals were held.[60]
Branham frequently related the story of the death of his wife and daughter during his ministry and evoked strong emotional responses from his audiences. Branham told his audiences that his wife and daughter had become suddenly ill and died during the January flood as God's punishment because of his failure to embrace Pentecostalism.[39][34] Branham said he made several suicide attempts following their deaths.[39][34] Peter Duyzer noted that Branham's story of the events surrounding the death of his wife and daughter conflicted with historical evidence; they did not die during the flood, he and his wife were both already Pentecostals before they married, and he was pastor of a Pentecostal church at the time of their deaths.[15]
By the summer of 1940, Branham had resumed traveling and held revival meetings in other nearby communities.[54] Branham married his second wife Meda Marie Broy in 1941, and together they had three children; Rebekah (1946–2014), Sarah (b. 1950), and Joseph (b. 1955).[15]
Healing revival
[edit]Background
[edit]Branham is known for his role in the healing revivals that occurred in the United States in the 1940s and 1950s,[61] and most participants in the movement regarded him as its initiator.[62] Christian writer John Crowder described the period of revivals as "the most extensive public display of miraculous power in modern history".[63] Some, like Christian author and countercult activist Hank Hanegraaff, rejected the entire healing revival as a hoax and condemned the movement as cult in his 1997 book Counterfeit Revival.[64]
Divine healing is a tradition and belief that was historically held by a majority of Christians but it became increasingly associated with Evangelical Protestantism.[65] The fascination of most of American Christianity with divine healing played a significant role in the popularity and inter-denominational nature of the revival movement.[66]
Branham held massive inter-denominational meetings, from which came reports of hundreds of miracles.[62] Historian David Harrell described Branham and Oral Roberts as the two giants of the movement and called Branham its "unlikely leader."[62]
Early campaigns
[edit]
Branham had been traveling and holding revival meetings since at least 1940 before attracting national attention.[54] Branham's popularity began to grow following the 1942 meetings in Milltown, Indiana where it was reported that a young girl had been healed of tuberculosis. The news of the reported healing was slow to spread, but was eventually reported to a family in Missouri who in 1945 invited Branham to pray for their child who was suffering from a similar illness; Branham reported that the child recovered after his prayers.[67]
News of two events eventually reached W. E. Kidston. Kidston was intrigued by the reported miracles and invited Branham to participate in revival meetings that he was organizing. W. E. Kidston, was editor of The Apostolic Herald and had many contacts in the Pentecostal movement.[67] Kidston served as Branham's first campaign manager and was instrumental in helping organize Branham's early revival meetings.[67]
Branham held his first large meetings as a faith healer in 1946.[68] His healing services are well documented, and he is regarded as the pacesetter for those who followed him.[69] At the time they were held, Branham's revival meetings were the largest religious meetings some American cities he visited had ever seen;[70] reports of 1,000 to 1,500 converts per meeting were common.[70]
Historians name his June 1946 St. Louis meetings as the inauguration of the healing revival period.[71] Branham said he had received an angelic visitation on May 7, 1946, commissioning his worldwide ministry.[72] In his later years, he also connected the angelic visitation with the establishment of the nation of Israel, at one point mistakenly stating the vision occurred on the same day.[73][73][d][e]
His first reported revival meetings of the period were held over 12 days during June 1946 in St. Louis.[67] Time magazine reported on his St. Louis campaign meetings,[76] and according to the article, Branham drew a crowd of over 4,000 sick people who desired healing and recorded him diligently praying for each.[67] Branham's fame began to grow as a result of the publicity and reports covering his meetings.[67]
Herald of Faith magazine which was edited by prominent Pentecostal minister Joseph Mattsson-Boze and published by Philadelphia Pentecostal Church in Chicago also began following and exclusively publishing stories from the Branham campaigns, giving Branham wide exposure to the Pentecostal movement. Following the St. Louis meetings, Branham launched a tour of small Oneness Pentecostal churches across the Midwest and southern United States, from which stemmed reports of healing and one report of a resurrection.[67] By August his fame had spread widely. He held meetings that month in Jonesboro, Arkansas, and drew a crowd of 25,000 with attendees from 28 different states.[77] The size of the crowds presented a problem for Branham's team as they found it difficult to find venues that could seat large numbers of attendees.[77]

Branham's revivals were interracial from their inception and were noted for their "racial openness" during the period of widespread racial unrest.[78] An African American minister participating in the St. Louis meetings claimed to be healed during the revival, helping to bring Branham a sizable African American following from the early days of the revival. Branham held interracial meetings even in the southern states. To satisfy segregation laws when ministering in the south, Branham's team would use a rope to divide the crowd by race.[78]
Author and researcher Patsy Sims noted that venues used to host campaign meetings also hosted KKK rallies just days prior to the revival meetings, which sometimes led to racial tensions. Sims, who attended both the KKK rallies and the healing revivals, was surprised to see some of the same groups of people at both events.[78] According to Steven Hassan, KKK recruitment was covertly conducted through Branham's ministry.[25]
After holding a very successful revival meeting in Shreveport during mid-1947, Branham began assembling an evangelical team that stayed with him for most of the revival period.[79] The first addition to the team was Jack Moore and Young Brown, who periodically assisted him in managing his meetings.[80] Following the Shreveport meetings, Branham held a series of meetings in San Antonio, Phoenix, and at various locations in California.[79] Moore invited his friend Gordon Lindsay to join the campaign team, which he did beginning at a meeting in Sacramento, California, in late 1947.[80]
Lindsay was a successful publicist and manager for Branham, and played a key role in helping him gain national and international recognition.[81][82] In 1948, Branham and Lindsay founded Voice of Healing magazine, which was originally aimed at reporting Branham's healing campaigns.[81][f] The story of Samuel the Prophet, who heard a voice speak to him in the night, inspired Branham's name for the publication.[83] Lindsay was impressed with Branham's focus on humility and unity, and was instrumental in helping him gain acceptance among Trinitarian and Oneness Pentecostal groups by expanding his revival meetings beyond the United Pentecostal Church to include all of the major Pentecostal groups.[84][76]

The first meetings organized by Lindsay were held in northwestern North America during late 1947.[80][76] At the first of these meetings, held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadian minister Ern Baxter joined Branham's team.[80] Lindsay reported 70,000 attendees to the 14 days of meetings and long prayer lines as Branham prayed for the sick.[80] William Hawtin, a Canadian Pentecostal minister, attended one of Branham's Vancouver meetings in November 1947 and was impressed by Branham's healings. Branham was an important influence on the Latter Rain revival movement, which Hawtin helped initiate.[85]
In January 1948, meetings were held in Florida;[80] F. F. Bosworth met Branham at the meetings and also joined his team.[86] Bosworth was among the pre-eminent ministers of the Pentecostal movement and a founding minister of the Assemblies of God; Bosworth lent great weight to Branham's campaign team.[86] He remained a strong Branham supporter until his death in 1958.[86] Bosworth endorsed Branham as "the most sensitive person to the presence and working of the Holy Spirit" he had ever met.[87][8]
During early 1947, a major campaign was held in Kansas City, where Branham and Lindsay first met Oral Roberts.[80] Roberts and Branham had contact at different points during the revival.[88] Roberts said Branham was "set apart, just like Moses".[88]

Branham spent many hours ministering and praying for the sick during his campaigns, and like many other leading evangelists of the time he suffered exhaustion.[89] After one year of campaigning, his exhaustion began leading to health issues. Branham reported to his audiences that he suffered a nervous breakdown and required treatment by the Mayo Clinic.[90] Branham's illness coincided with a series of allegations of fraud in his healing revivals. Attendees reported seeing him "staggering from intense fatigue" during his last meetings.[80]
Just as Branham began to attract international attention in May 1948, he announced that due to illness he would have to halt his campaign.[80][91] His illness shocked the growing movement,[92] and his abrupt departure from the field caused a rift between him and Lindsay over the Voice of Healing magazine.[80] Branham insisted that Lindsay take over complete management of the publication.[80] With the main subject of the magazine no longer actively campaigning, Lindsay was forced to seek other ministers to promote.[80] He decided to publicize Oral Roberts during Branham's absence, and Roberts quickly rose to prominence, in large part due to Lindsay's coverage.[86]
Branham partially recovered from his illness and resumed holding meetings in October 1948; in that month he held a series of meetings around the United States without Lindsay's support.[86] Branham's return to the movement led to his resumed leadership of it.[86] In November 1948, he met with Lindsay and Moore and told them he had received another angelic visitation, instructing him to hold a series of meetings across the United States and then to begin holding meetings internationally.[93] As a result of the meeting, Lindsay rejoined Branham's campaigning team.[93]
Style
[edit]
Most revivalists of the era were flamboyant but Branham was usually calm and spoke quietly, only occasionally raising his voice.[88] His preaching style was described as "halting and simple", and crowds were drawn to his stories of angelic visitation and "constant communication with God".[62] Branham tailored his language usage to best connect to his audiences. When speaking to poor and working-class audiences, he tended to use poor grammar and folksy language; when speaking to more educated audiences and ministerial associations, he generally spoke using perfect grammar and avoided slang usage.[94]
He refused to discuss controversial doctrinal issues during the healing campaigns,[95][96] and issued a policy statement that he would only minister on the "great evangelical truths".[97] He insisted his calling was to bring unity among the different churches he was ministering to and to urge the churches to return to the roots of early Christianity.[88]
In the first part of his meetings, one of Branham's companion evangelists would preach a sermon.[80] Ern Baxter or F. F. Bosworth usually filled this role, but other ministers like Paul Cain also participated in Branham's campaigns in later years.[80] Baxter generally focused on bible teaching; Bosworth counseled supplicants on the need for faith and the doctrine of divine healing.[98] Following their build-up, Branham would take the podium and deliver a short sermon,[80] in which he usually related stories about his personal life experiences.[95]
Branham would often request God to "confirm his message with two-or-three faith inspired miracles".[98] Supplicants seeking healing submitted prayer cards to Branham's campaign team stating their name, address, and condition; Branham's team would select a number of submissions to be prayed for personally by Branham and organized a prayer line.[98] After completing his sermon, he would proceed with the prayer line where he would pray for the sick. Branham would often tell supplicants what they suffered from, their name, and their address.[99]
He would pray for each of them, pronouncing some or all healed. Branham generally prayed for a few people each night and believed witnessing the results on the stage would inspire faith in the audience and permit them to experience similar results without having to be personally prayed for.[99] Branham would also call out a few members still in the audience, who had not been accepted into the prayer line, stating their illness and pronouncing them healed.[88]

Branham told his audiences that he was able to determine their illness, details of their lives, and pronounce them healed as a result of an angel who was guiding him. Describing Branham's method, Bosworth said "he does not begin to pray for the healing of the afflicted in body in the healing line each night until God anoints him for the operation of the gift, and until he is conscious of the presence of the Angel with him on the platform. Without this consciousness he seems to be perfectly helpless."[100]
Branham explained to his audiences that the angel that commissioned his ministry had given him two signs by which they could prove his commission.[100] He described the first sign as vibrations he felt in his hand when he touched a sick person's hand, which communicated to him the nature of the illness, but did not guarantee healing.[100][101] Branham's use of what his fellow evangelists called a word of knowledge gift separated him from his contemporaries in the early days of the revival.[68][95]
This second sign did not appear in his campaigns until after his recovery in 1948, and was used to "amaze tens of thousands" at his meetings.[95] As the revival progressed, his contemporaries began to mirror the practice.[95] According to Bosworth, this gift of knowledge allowed Branham "to see and enable him to tell the many events of [people's] lives from their childhood down to the present".[95][102]
This caused many in the healing revival to view Branham as a "seer like the old testament prophets".[95] Branham amazed even fellow evangelists, which served to further push him into a legendary status in the movement.[95] Branham's audiences were often awestruck by the events during his meetings.[88][103] At the peak of his popularity in the 1950s, Branham was widely adored and "the neo-Pentecostal world believed Branham to be a prophet to their generation".[8]
Growing fame and international campaigns
[edit]In January 1950, Branham's campaign team held their Houston campaign, one of the most significant series of meetings of the revival.[86] The location of their first meeting was too small to accommodate the approximately 8,000 attendees, and they had to relocate to the Sam Houston Coliseum.[86] On the night of January 24, 1950, Branham was photographed during a debate between Bosworth and local Baptist minister W. E. Best regarding the theology of divine healing.[104][93]
Bosworth argued in favor, while Best argued against.[104] The photograph showed a light above Branham's head, which he and his associates believed to be supernatural.[104][93] The photograph became well-known in the revival movement and is regarded by Branham's followers as an iconic relic.[105] Branham believed the light was a divine vindication of his ministry;[104] others believed it was a glare from the venue's overhead lighting.[106]
In January 1951, former US Congressman William Upshaw was sent by Roy Davis to a Branham campaign meeting in California.[g] Upshaw had limited mobility for 59 years as the result of an accident, and said he was miraculously healed in the meeting. The publicity of the event took Branham's fame to a new level.[105] Upshaw sent a letter describing his healing claim to each member of Congress.[107][105] The Los Angeles Times reported on the healing in an article titled "Ex-Rep. Upshaw Discards Crutches After 59 Years". Upshaw explained to reporters that he had been able to walk two or three steps without the aid of his crutches prior to attending Branham's meeting, but following Branham's prayer his strength increased so that he had walked four blocks.[108] Upshaw died in November 1952, at the age of 86.[109]
According to Pentecostal historian Rev. Walter Hollenweger, "Branham filled the largest stadiums and meeting halls in the world" during his five major international campaigns.[93][110] Branham held his first series of campaigns in Europe during April 1950 with meetings in Finland, Sweden, and Norway.[111][93] Attendance at the meetings generally exceeded 7,000 despite resistance to his meetings by the state churches.[97] Branham was the first American deliverance minister to successfully tour in Europe.[112]
A 1952 campaign in South Africa had the largest attendance in Branham's career, with an estimated 200,000 attendees.[97][7] According to Lindsay, the altar call at his Durban meeting received 30,000 converts.[97] During international campaigns in 1954, Branham visited Portugal, Italy, and India.[97] Branham's final major overseas tour in 1955 included visits to Switzerland and Germany.[113]
Branham's meetings were regularly attended by journalists,[114] who wrote articles about the miracles reported by Branham and his team throughout the years of his revivals, and claimed patients were cured of various ailments after attending prayer meetings with Branham.[114] Durban Sunday Tribune and The Natal Mercury reported wheelchair-bound people rising and walking.[115][116] Winnipeg Free Press reported a girl was cured of deafness.[117] El Paso Herald-Post reported hundreds of attendees at one meeting seeking divine healing.[118] Despite such occasional glowing reports, most of the press coverage Branham received was negative.[110]
Allegations of fraud
[edit]To his American audiences, Branham claimed several high profile events occurred during his international tours. Branham claimed to visit and pray for King George VI while en route to Finland in 1950. He claimed the king was healed through his prayers. Researchers found no evidence that Branham ever met King George; King George was chronically ill and died about a year after Branham claimed to heal him.[112][119]
Branham also claimed to pray for and heal the granddaughter of Florence Nightingale at a London airport. Branham's campaign produced photos of an emaciated woman who they claimed to be Nightingale's granddaughter. However, Florence Nightingale never married and had no children or grandchildren. Investigators of Branham's claim were unable to identify the woman in the photograph.[120]
Branham similarly claimed to pray for King Gustaf V while in Sweden in April 1950. Investigators found no evidence for the meeting; King Gustaf V died in October 1950. Branham claimed to stop in Egypt in 1954 while en route to India to meet with King Farouk; however Farouk had been deposed in 1952 and was not living in Egypt at the time. Branham claimed to visit the grave of Buddha while in India, however Buddha was cremated and has no grave. In total, critics of Branham identified many claims which appeared to be false when investigated. Weaver accused Branham of major embellishments.[44][121]
Branham faced criticism and opposition from the early days of the healing revival, and he was repeatedly accused of fraud throughout his ministry.[122] According to historian Ronald Kydd, Branham evoked strong opinions from people with whom he came into contact; "most people either loved him or hated him".[123][124] Kydd stated that it "is impossible to get even an approximate number of people healed in Branham's ministry."[125] No consistent record of follow-ups of the healing claims were made, making analysis of many claims difficult to subsequent researchers.[126][127] Additionally, Branham's procedures made verification difficult at the time of his revivals. Branham believed in positive confession. He required supplicants to claim to be healed to demonstrate their faith, even if they were still experiencing symptoms. He frequently told supplicants to expect their symptoms to remain for several days after their healing. This led to people professing to be healed at the meetings, while still suffering from the condition. Only follow up after Branham's waiting period had passed could ascertain the result of the healing.[126][127]

From the early days of the healing revival, Branham received overwhelmingly unfavorable coverage in the news media, which was often quite critical.[110] At his June 1947 revivals in Vandalia, Illinois, the local news reported that Beck Walker, a man who was deaf and mute from birth, was pronounced healed but failed to recover. Branham claimed Walker failed to recover his hearing because he had disobeyed Branham's instruction to stop smoking cigarettes. Branham was lambasted by critics who asked how it was possible the deaf man could have heard his command to stop smoking.[128]
At his 1947 meetings in Winnipeg, Branham claimed to have raised a young man from the dead at a Jeffersonville funeral parlor. Branham's sensational claim was reported in the news in the United States and Canada, leading to a news media investigation to identify the funeral home and the individual raised from the dead. Reporters subsequently found no evidence of a resurrection; no funeral parlor in the city corroborated the story.[129] The same year the news media in Winnipeg publicized Branham's cases of failed healing. In response, the churches which hosted Branham's campaign conducted independent follow-up interviews with people Branham pronounced healed to gather testimonies which they could use to counter the negative press. To their surprise, their investigation failed to confirm any cases of actual healing; every person they interviewed had failed to recover.[122][127][130]
At meetings in Vancouver during 1947, newspaper reporters discovered that one young girl had been in Branham's prayer lines in multiple cities posing as a cripple, but rising to walk after Branham pronounced her healed each time. An investigative reporter suspected Branham had staged the miracle. Reporters at the meeting also attempted to follow up on the case of a Calgary woman pronounced healed by Branham who had died shortly after he left the city. Reporters attempted to confront Branham over these issues, but Branham refused to be interviewed.[131]
Branham was also accused of fraud by fellow ministers and churches that hosted his meetings. In 1947, Rev. Alfred Pohl, the Missionary-Secretary of Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, served as Branham's guide and host at meetings across western Canada. Pohl stated that many people Branham pronounced as healed later died and produced witnesses to validate his allegations. Pohl stated that the numerous deaths "severely tested the faith" of many ministers who had trusted in Branham.[122][127] Pohl also claimed Branham was frequently given and accepted large financial gifts from individuals who he pronounced as healed, including those who subsequently died.[132]
In 1948, W. J. Taylor, a district superintendent with the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, raised concerns again following another wave of Branham meetings and asked for a thorough investigation.[105] Taylor presented evidence that claims of the number of people healed were vastly overestimated, and that multiple people pronounced healed by Branham had subsequently died.[96] While he stated his personal admiration for Branham, the troubling number of deaths led him to suggest "there is a possibility that this whole thing is wrong".[133][105]
Churches in Canada continued to experience crises following Branham campaign meetings as they attempted to explain the numerous failed healings to their congregations.[127] At meetings in Regina, Branham pronounced the wife of a prominent minister healed of cancer. The minister and his wife were overjoyed, and the minister excitedly shared the details of the healing with his radio audience in Ontario later that week. To his surprise, his wife died only days later of her illness. The confusion created by the situation led ministers to claim Branham had deceived them.[134]
According to Kydd, "the controversy surrounding Branham deepened" with time.[96] Kydd reported that by watching films of the revival meetings, "the viewer would assume almost everyone was healed", but "results were less promising whenever follow-up was made."[126] One such case was Carol Strubler, who at age nine in 1954 was prayed for by Branham at a recorded revival in Washington, D.C., when he preached a sermon entitled "The Deep Calleth Unto The Deep". One newspaper reported, "Rev. William Branham of Jeffersonville, Ind., prayed for her and assured the heartbroken mother her daughter would live.[135] A week later the mother told this newspaper she was confident the evangelist's words were true and had cancelled a scheduled visit to St. Christopher's Hospital in Philadelphia." However, Strubbler died "of acute leukemia, just three weeks after [Branham] told her mother she was healed of the fatal sickness."[135] Another case was four-year-old Donny Morton, who was diagnosed with a rare brain condition. At recorded meetings in California during April 1951, Branham pronounced Morton healed, but the child subsequently died in October. His story was published in Reader's Digest.[136][137]
Similar allegations came from Branham's European campaigns. Rev. Walter Hollenweger, who served as a translator on Branham's European tours, reported that "very few were actually healed" in the campaigns, and the overwhelming majority pronounced healed by Branham failed to recover. Hollenweger said that while there were a few "well-attested cases of miraculous healing", Branham was "naïve" and "dishonest" and misled his audiences when he reported the number of people healed. Hollenweger was disappointed that Branham refused to acknowledge the numerous failed pronouncements of healings.[138][139]
In 1955, Leonard Steiner, pastor of a Pentecostal church in Zurich Switzerland that hosted a Branham meeting reported cases of failed healing and the negative consequences for members of his congregation.[140] Allegations in Norway led authorities to limit Branham's ability to hold meetings; the Directorate of Health forbade Branham from laying hands on the sick and sent police to his meetings to enforce the order.[141]
Serious allegations also were made following Branham's meetings in South Africa during 1952 and complaints were lodged with government authorities.[142] Michael Plaff, a doctor, was pronounced healed of cancer by Branham during one meeting. In February 1952, the Branham campaign published an article claiming Plaff had visited the hospital the day after he was prayed for and his cure was confirmed by medical tests. However, Plaff had died of his cancer just days after being pronounced healed.[143] A minister attending meetings in Durban with his congregation reported that over twenty people suffering from tuberculosis were pronounced healed by Branham, but all failed to recover. In another case, a woman suffering a heart condition was pronounced healed by Branham, but died less than a week later. A 23-year-old leukemia patient was pronounced healed by Branham, but failed to recover and died about thirteen months later.[143]
The Branham campaign published a book entitled "A Prophet Visit South Africa" to publicize the success of the tour. The book related the details of dozens of healings. Investigators in South Africa followed up on the reported healings and found that 46 of the people Branham said had been healed had failed to recover.[143] After reviewing the results of the investigation, one minister concluded "that the cures claimed are so largely exaggerated as to be almost fraudulent in their claim."[143] When Branham attempted to visit South Africa again in 1965, the South African government placed restrictions on his visa preventing him from holding any healing revivals while he was in the country.[142]
Ern Baxter, who participated in most of Branham's campaigns between November 1947 and 1953 including his tours to India and Europe, reflected on the exaggerated reports of miracles in the healing revival in a 1978 interview. He explained that the allegations eroded the trust of the crowds who attended the healing services.[144]
I remember in the beginning of the healing movement, simply to report a healing would produce great jubilation and praise from congregations. However, the cynicism became so deep that the people's confidence was diminished. Even to this day, people are affected. People began to circulate healing testimonies which, when they were checked out by reputable journalists and reporters, even those who were friendly to the movement, were found to be false. The percentage of healings that stood up after investigation was embarrassingly low.[144]
— Ern Baxter
Some attendees of Branham's meetings believed that some healings were staged and accused him of selectively choosing who could enter the prayer line.[145] Some people left his meetings disappointed after finding Branham's conviction that everyone in the audience could be healed without being in the prayer line proved incorrect.[145] Branham generally attributed the failure of supplicants to receive healing to their lack of faith.[146] According to Pohl, Hollenweger, and Steiner, Branham's practice of blaming the supplicant for lack of faith was severely damaging in multiple churches and left many people who failed to receive healing in despair.[127][147]
Their expectations had been raised so high, only to be dashed after all the excitement was over. Some seemed to experience a momentary relief from pain, but all too many would discover no lasting benefit. And by that time the healer would be too far away to be questioned or to explain. The sick person would then simply be forced to accuse himself of lack of faith, or in some cases, throw his faith overboard.[148]
— Alfred Pohl
The "word of knowledge" gift used by Branham was also subject to much criticism.[123] Hollenweger investigated Branham's use of the "word of knowledge gift" and found no instances in which Branham was mistaken in his often-detailed pronouncements.[123] Criticism of Branham's use of this gift was primarily around its nature; some asserted that it was a non-Christian practice and accused him of witchcraft and telepathy.[126] Branham was openly confronted with such criticisms and rejected the assertions.[126]
Others alleged that Branham's discernments were not genuine. Many people Branham prayed for were required to first write their name, address, and what they were seeking prayer for on prayer cards. The cards were submitted to Branham's team who would choose the supplicants to be prayed for by Branham and organize the prayer line. Some critics accused Branham's team of sharing prayer card information with Branham before he began his prayer lines.[126][121]
Financial difficulties
[edit]In 1955, Branham's campaigning career began to slow following financial setbacks.[8][149] Even after he became famous, Branham continued to wear inexpensive suits and refused large salaries; he was not interested in amassing wealth as part of his ministry[12] and was reluctant to solicit donations during his meetings.[150] During the early years of his campaigns, donations had been able to cover costs, but from 1955, donations failed to cover the costs of three successive campaigns,[8] one of which incurred a $15,000 deficit. ($176,068 in 2024 dollars)[149]
Some of Branham's business associates thought he was partially responsible because of his lack of interest in the financial affairs of the campaigns and tried to hold him personally responsible for the debts.[8] Branham briefly stopped campaigning and said he would have to take a job to repay the debt, but the Full Gospel Business Men's Fellowship International ultimately offered financial assistance to cover the debt.[150] Branham became increasingly reliant on the Full Gospel Businessmen to finance his campaign meetings as the Pentecostal denominations began to withdraw their financial support.[150]
Finances became an issue again in 1956 when the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) charged Branham with tax evasion.[8] The American government targeted the other leading revivalists with lawsuits during the same time period, including Oral Roberts, Jack Coe, and A. A. Allen.[151] The IRS asserted income reported by the ministers as non-taxable gifts was taxable,[149] despite the fact Branham had not kept the gifts for himself.[152] Except Allen, who won his legal battle, the evangelists settled their cases out of court.[149]
The IRS investigation showed Branham did not pay close attention to the amount of money flowing through his ministry,[153] and had failed to document gifts and donations he received or how the proceeds were used.[149] It also revealed that others assisting in his campaigns were taking financial advantage of the campaigns.[153] Branham reported his annual salary to the IRS as $7,000 ($80,958 in 2024 dollars) while his manager Gordon Lindsay's was reported at $80,000. ($925,239 in 2024 dollars)[149] Comparatively, Oral Roberts earned a salary of $15,000 in the same years.[154] Branham's case was eventually settled out of court when Branham admitted to tax evasion and agreed to pay a $40,000 penalty. ($462,619 in 2024 dollars)[8][155] Branham was never able to completely pay off the tax liability.[8][155]
End of the revival
[edit]By the mid-1950s, dozens of the ministers associated with Branham and his campaigns had launched similar healing campaigns.[156] In 1956, the healing revival reached its peak, as 49 separate evangelists held major meetings.[157] Branham and Lindsay ineffectively attempted to encourage the other evangelists to help their local churches rather than launch national careers.[156] The Branham campaign held meetings across the United States in 1956, and a large meeting in Mexico City that had 20,000 in attendance. However the swelling number of competitors and emulators were further reducing attendance at Branham's meetings.[156]
His correspondence also decreased sharply. Whereas he had once received "a thousand letters a day", by 1956 his mail dropped to 75 letters a day. Branham thought the decline was temporary.[158] He continued expecting something greater, which he said "nobody will be able to imitate".[156] In 1955, he reported a vision of a renewed tent ministry and a "third pull which would be dramatically different" than his earlier career; he began to increasingly refer to the vision as his popularity began to decline.[156]
Amid the financial issues in 1956, Lindsay left Branham's campaign team. Branham eventually criticized the Voice of Healing magazine which he had helped create as a "massive financial organization" that put making money ahead of promoting good.[92] The loss of Lindsay as a manager and the publicity of Voice of Healing was a major setback for Branham. After 1956, attendance at Branham's meetings dwindled and his appeal became limited to the loyal following that developed around him during the earlier years. Branham came to depend on The Herald of Faith published by Joseph Mattsson-Bose as his primary publicity tool for the final years of his ministry.[92]
Branham also began to criticize other leading contemporaries in the healing revival leading to open hostilities between the evangelists. In 1957 Branham openly criticized A. A. Allen concerning the validity of a miracle reported in his campaigns. Allen replied by circulating a letter at the Christian Fellowship Convention criticizing Branham for creating divisions and suggesting Branham may soon die as a result of his actions.[159] Branham also began to criticize Oral Roberts and Billy Graham.[160] The bad feelings and breakdown of cooperation between the leaders of the movement contributed to the end of the healing revival.[159]
In the closing years of the revival, Branham helped launch and popularize the ministry of Jim Jones, the founder and leader of the Peoples Temple.[161] According to Historian Catherine Wessinger, while rejecting Christianity as a false religion, Jones covertly used popular Christian figures to advance his own ideology.[162] Jones needed a religious headliner to endorse his ministry and invited Branham to share the platform with him at a self-organized religious convention held at the Cadle Tabernacle auditorium in Indianapolis from June 11 to 15, 1956.[161]
Branham critics Peter Duyzer and John Collins reported that Branham "performed numerous miracles", drawing a crowd of 11,000.[163] Branham was an important influence on Jones, who copied many of his styles, methods, and teachings. Jones later became known for the mass murder and suicide at Jonestown in November 1978.[161]
According to Collins, Jim Jones and Paul Schäfer were influenced to move to South America by Branham's 1961 prophecy concerning the destruction of the United States in a nuclear war. Jones later said that he and Branham "did not see eye to eye", and accused Branham of being disingenuous.[164][165][h]
Consensus among historians is that the healing revival ended in 1958.[126] By 1960, the number of evangelists holding national campaigns dropped to 11.[157] Several perspectives on the decline of the healing revival have been offered. Crowder suggested Branham's gradual separation from Gordon Lindsay played a major part in the decline.[166] Harrell attributed the decline to the increasing number of evangelists crowding the field and straining the financial resources of the Pentecostal denominations.[156]
Weaver agreed that Pentecostal churches gradually withdrew their support for the healing revival, mainly over the financial stresses put on local churches by the healing campaigns.[167] The Assemblies of God were the first to openly withdraw support from the healing revival in 1953.[167] Weaver pointed to other factors that may have helped destroy the initial ecumenism of the revival; tension between the independent evangelists and the Pentecostal churches caused by the evangelists' fund-raising methods, denominational pride, sensationalism, and doctrinal conflicts – particularly between the Oneness and Trinitarian factions within Pentecostalism.[167] Weaver also believed that "fraud and chicanary" by the revivals evangelists also played a major role in the decline.[168]
Later life
[edit]As the healing revival began to wane, many of Branham's contemporaries moved into the leadership of the emerging Charismatic movement, which emphasized use of spiritual gifts.[149] The Charismatic movement is a global movement within both Protestant and non-Protestant Christianity that supports the adoption of traditionally Pentecostal beliefs, especially the spiritual gifts (charismata). The movement began in the teachings of the healing revival evangelists and grew as their teachings came to receive broad acceptance among millions of Christians.[169]
At the same time the Charismatic movement was gaining broad acceptance, Branham began to transition to a teaching ministry. He began speaking on the controversial doctrinal issues he had avoided for most of the revival.[170] By the 1960s, Branham's contemporaries and the Pentecostal denominations that had supported his campaigns regarded him as an extremely controversial teacher.[171]
The leadership of the Pentecostal churches pressed Branham to resist his urge to teach and to instead focus on praying for the sick.[172] Branham refused, arguing that the purpose of his healing ministry was to attract audiences and, having thus been attracted, it was time to teach them the doctrines he claimed to have received through supernatural revelation.[173] Branham argued that his entire ministry was divinely inspired and could not be selectively rejected or accepted, saying, "It's either all of God, or none of God."[172]
At first, Branham taught his doctrines only within his own church at Jeffersonville, but beginning in the 1960s he began to preach them at other churches he visited.[172] His criticisms of Pentecostal organizations, and especially his views on holiness and the role of women, led to his rejection by the growing Charismatic movement and the Pentecostals from whom he had originally achieved popularity.[174] Branham acknowledged their rejection and said their organizations "had choked out the glory and Spirit of God".[174] As a result of their view of his teachings, many Pentecostals judged that Branham had "stepped out of his anointing" and had become a "bad teacher of heretical doctrine".[175]
Despite his rejection by the growing Charismatic movement, Branham's followers became increasingly dedicated to him during his later life. Some even claimed he was the Messiah, treated him as deity, and began to baptise and pray in his name.[176] Branham quickly condemned their belief as heresy and threatened to stop ministering, but the belief persisted.[176] Many followers moved great distances to live near his home in Jeffersonville and, led by Leo Mercer, subsequently set up a colony in Arizona following Branham's move to Tucson in 1962.[176]
Many believed the rapture was imminent and that it was necessary to be near Branham in Arizona to take part.[176] Branham lamented Mercer and the actions of his group as he worried that a cult was potentially being formed among his most fanatical followers.[176] Before he died, some of his followers had already begun compiling his sermons and treating them as oral scripture, with a significant minority of his followers believing in his divinity.[171]
His followers refer to his teachings collectively as "The Message". Outsiders have referred to his teachings as Branhamism and Branhamology.[177]
Death
[edit]
Branham continued to travel to churches and preach his doctrine across Canada, the United States, and Mexico during the 1960s. His only overseas trip during the 1960s proved a disappointment. Branham reported a vision of himself preaching before large crowds and hoped for its fulfillment on the trip, but the South African government prevented him from holding revivals when he traveled to the country in 1965. Branham was saddened that his teaching ministry was rejected by all but his closest followers.[176]
Pentecostal churches which once welcomed Branham refused to permit him to preach during the 1960s, and those who were still sympathetic to him were threatened with excommunication by their superiors if they did so.[176] He held his final set of revival meetings in Shreveport at the church of his early campaign manager Jack Moore in November 1965. Although he had hinted at it many times, Branham publicly stated for the first time that he was the return of Elijah the prophet in his final meetings in Shreveport.[178]
On December 18, 1965, Branham and his family – except his daughter Rebekah – were returning to Jeffersonville, Indiana, from Tucson for the Christmas holiday.[178] About three miles (4.8 km) east of Friona, Texas, and about seventy miles (110 km) southwest of Amarillo on US Highway 60, just after dark, a car driven by a drunken driver traveling westward in the eastbound lane collided head-on with Branham's car.[179] He was rushed to the hospital in Amarillo where he remained comatose for several days and died of his injuries on Christmas Eve, December 24, 1965.[180][176][138]
Branham's death stunned the Pentecostal world and shocked his followers.[178] His funeral was held on December 29, 1965,[178] but his burial was delayed until April 11, 1966; Easter Monday.[178] Most eulogies only tacitly acknowledged Branham's controversial teachings, focusing instead on his many positive contributions and recalling his wide popularity and impact during the years of the healing revival.[168] Gordon Lindsay's eulogy stated that Branham's death was the will of God and privately he accepted the interpretation of Kenneth E. Hagin, who claimed to have prophesied Branham's death two years before it happened. According to Hagin, God revealed that Branham was teaching false doctrine and God was removing him because of his disobedience.[168][181][138]
In the confusion immediately following Branham's death, expectations that he would rise from the dead developed among his followers.[182] Most believed he would have to return to fulfill a vision he had regarding future tent meetings.[182] Weaver attributed the belief in Branham's imminent resurrection to Pearry Green, though Green denied it.[183] Even Branham's son Billy Paul seemed to expect his father's resurrection and indicated as much in messages sent to Branham's followers, in which he communicated his expectation for Easter 1966.[183] The expectation of his resurrection remained strong into the 1970s, in part based on Branham's prediction that the rapture could occur by 1977.[184] After 1977, some of his followers abandoned his teachings.[184][138]
Legacy and influence
[edit]Branham was the "initiator of the post-World War II healing revival"[62] and, along with Oral Roberts, was one of its most revered leaders.[185][186] Branham is most remembered for his use of the "sign-gifts" that awed the Pentecostal world.[88] According to writer and researcher Patsy Sims, "the power of a Branham service and his stage presence remains a legend unparalleled in the history of the Charismatic movement."[7] The many revivalists who attempted to emulate Branham during the 1950s spawned a generation of prominent Charismatic ministries.[156]
Branham has been called the "principal architect of restorationist thought" of the Charismatic movement that emerged from the healing revival.[6] The Charismatic view that the Christian church should return to a form like that of the early church has its roots in Branham's teachings during the healing revival period.[6] The belief is widely held in the modern Charismatic movement,[6] and the legacy of his restorationist teaching and ministering style is evident throughout televangelism and the Charismatic movement.[187]
The more controversial doctrines Branham espoused in the closing years of his ministry were rejected by the Charismatic movement, which viewed them as "revelatory madness".[i] Charismatics are apologetic towards Branham's early ministry and embrace his use of the "sign-gifts". Charismatic author John Crowder wrote that his ministry should not be judged by "the small sliver of his later life", but by the fact that he indirectly "lit a fire" that began the modern Charismatic movement.[166] Non-Charismatic Christianity completely rejected Branham.[j]
Crowder said Branham was a victim of "the adoration of man" because his followers began to idolize him in the later part of his ministry.[190] Harrell took a similar view, attributing Branham's teachings in his later career to his close friends, who manipulated him and took advantage of his lack of theological training.[171] Weaver also attributed Branham's eschatological teachings to the influence of a small group of his closest followers, who encouraged his desire for a unique ministry.[191] According to Weaver, to Branham's dismay,[176] his followers had placed him at the "center of a Pentecostal personality cult" in the final years of his ministry.[192]
Edward Babinski describes Branham's followers as "odd in their beliefs, but for the most part honest hard-working citizens", and wrote that calling them a cult "seems unfair".[193] While rejecting Branham's teachings, Duyzer offered a glowing review of Branham's followers, stating he "had never experienced friendship, or love like we did there".[194] Though Branham is no longer widely known outside Pentecostalism,[192] his legacy continues today.[195] Summarizing the contrasting views held of Branham, Kydd stated, "Some thought he was God. Some thought he was a dupe of the devil. Some thought he was an end-time messenger sent from God, and some still do."[126]

Followers of Branham's teachings can be found around the world; Branham claimed to have made over one million converts during his campaign meetings.[196] In 1986, there were an estimated 300,000 followers.[197][k] In 2000, the William Branham Evangelical Association had missions on every inhabited continent – with 1,600 associated churches in Latin America and growing missions across Africa.[187] In 2018, Voice of God Recordings claimed to serve Branham-related support material to about two million people through the William Branham Evangelical Association, and estimated there were 2–4 million total followers of Branham's teachings.[198][141]
Branham's followers do not have a central unifying leadership. Shortly after Branham's death, his followers divided in multiple feuding groups.[180] Many different followers of Branham's teachings have claimed to be his immediate successor, or an Elisha to his Elijah. Many also believe that Branham's son Joseph has claimed the inheritance of his father's ministry.[199] Each of the men claiming to be his successor have established new sects of Branham's followers.[199] His followers "range widely in belief in practice."[200] Some followers have attempted to reform Branham's most extreme teachings.[200] While most churches adhere to a common set of tenets, the "extreme local authority" of the church promoted by Branham has led to widespread differences in interpretation of Branham's prophetic teachings.[183] One common theme among all groups is the belief that Branham was the return of Elijah the prophet and receiving his prophetic revelations is necessary to escape the impending destruction of the world.[201] Some groups of Branham's followers refuse medical treatment because of their divine healing beliefs.[202] Many followers of Branham's teachings live within insular communities, with their own schools and with no access to television or internet or outside media. Some groups prohibit their members from having relationships with outsiders. Those who leave are often shunned or disowned.[203][25] People who try to leave the teachings of Branham often face extreme repercussions. Carl Dyck wrote, "Those who have come out of this group give solemn evidence of the devastating effect that Branhamism had on them, both emotionally and psychologically. In fact, the followers of Branham pray that evil will come upon people who leave their church."[204] Branham's followers have harassed critics and individuals who reject Branham's teachings. Dyck reported that people who published material critical of Branham's teachings have been threatened by his followers and warned they may be killed.[205] The news media have also reported critics of Branham's teaching being threatened and harassed by his followers.[203][1]
In his book Churches that Abuse, Ronald Enroth wrote that some churches use Branham's teachings to "belittle, insult, and berate" their members as part of their discipleship teachings on submission, humility, and obedience.[206] According to Enroth, Branham's followers believe subjecting themselves to this treatment is necessary for them to "be refined and perfect" and "ready to meet Jesus" at this second coming.[207] Enroth reported instances of families being separated, with children being taken from their parents and reassigned to other families to be raised as a form of discipline. He also reported multiple cases of physical abuse against both adults and children in the United States and Mexico.[208]
Branham's followers are widely spread throughout the world. In Iran, Branham's followers have faced persecution, with the government shutting down ten of their house churches in 2018 and jailing several Branham followers.[209] In 2020, the Russian government labeled missionaries of Branham's teaching as "extremists" and banned the importation of Branham-related publications to the Russian Federation.[210]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Branham reported his name as William Marvin Branham on his October 16, 1940, registration with the United States Selective Service. In later years he reported his middle name as Marrion.[13]
- ^ Branham's birthdate has also been reported to be April 6, 1907, and April 8, 1908.[14]
- ^ Pentecostalism is a renewal movement that started in the early 20th century that stresses a post-conversion baptism with the Holy Spirit for all Christians, with speaking in tongues ("glossolalia") as the initial evidence of this baptism.[36]
- ^ The United Nations debate on how to treat European Jewry following the Holocaust began in January 1946, with a committee recommending settling Jews in Palestine in April 1946. Britain announced its intention to divide Palestine in February 1947; the partition plan was adopted by the UN in November 1947, and State of Israel formally became a nation on May 14, 1948.[74]
- ^ Pre-millennial dispensationalism views the establishing of a Jewish state as a sign of the imminent return of Christ.[75]
- ^ Voice of Healing was renamed Christ For the Nations in 1971
- ^ And he said, "Well, I was the president of the Southern Baptist Convention." said, "Dr. Davis, the one that ordained you in the Baptist church, was the one who sent me here to see you." William Branham, February 17, 1954 – Jesus On The Authority Of The Word
- ^ Jones ultimately rejected all of Christianity as "fly away religion", rejected the Bible as being a tool to oppress women and non-whites, and denounced the Christian God as a "Sky God" who was "no God at all". Historian Catherine Wessinger concludes Jones used Christianity as a vehicle to covertly advance his personal ideology[162]
- ^ Charismatic writer Michael Moriarty stated, "Branham's aberrational teachings not only cultivated cultic fringe movements like the Latter Rain Movement and the Manifested Sons of God, but they also paved a pathway leading to false predictions, revelatory madness, doctrinal heresies, and a cultic following that treated his sermons as oral scriptures".[188]
- ^ Hanegraaff in Counterfeit Revival condemned the entire evangelical movement as a cult and singled out Branham, saying his "failed prophecies were exceeded only by his false doctrine" in infamy.[189]
- ^ Weaver based his estimate on numbers reported by Branham's son. The estimate included 50,000 in the United States, with a considerable following in Central and South America (including 40,000 in Brazil), India, and Africa; particularly in Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.[197]
Footnotes
[edit]- ^ a b Lupton, Andrew (September 17, 2017). "How a dead U.S. evangelist inspires London's reviled street preachers". CBC. Archived from the original on July 29, 2021. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
- ^ Sim, Jane (April 26, 2019). "LFP Longform: Inside the doomsday cult-inspired world of London's abusive street preachers". London Free Press. Archived from the original on July 29, 2021. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
- ^ "Trinidad: Cash pastor's sermons linked to 'doomsday prophet'". Stabroek News. January 4, 2020. Archived from the original on April 24, 2024. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 119.
- ^ Wade, Bernie L. (November 5, 2015). Apostolic Faith and Pentecostal Timetable of Key Events. Charistima. p. 181.
- ^ a b c d Weaver 2000, p. v.
- ^ a b c Sims 1996, p. 195.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Harrell 1978, p. 39.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 55.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Harrell 1978, p. 28.
- ^ a b c d Weaver 2000, p. 22.
- ^ a b c Crowder 2006, p. 323.
- ^ Weremchuk, Roy (April 10, 2020). "Branham's Middle Name". Gruenstadt, Germany. Archived from the original on June 24, 2024. Retrieved October 1, 2021.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, p. 25.
- ^ a b c d Duyzer 2014, pp. 26–27.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 23.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 23–24.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, p. 41.
- ^ Staff writers (December 4, 1920). "City Linked To Chicago Rum Deal Third Time". Louisville Courier Journal. p. 3.
- ^ "Serves Sentence at Night". Louisville Courier Journal. March 18, 1924. p. 4.
- ^ Staff writer (April 11, 1924). "Jeffersonville Booze Ring Jolted". Indianapolis, Indiana: The Fiery Cross. p. 1.
- ^ Staff writers (March 14, 1924). "Asks Aid For Family". Jeffersonville Evening News. p. 1.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, pp. 65–66.
- ^ Branham, William (November 10, 1963). Souls That Are In Prison Now.
- ^ a b c Hassan, Steven (September 28, 2021). "The Racist Effects of William Branham's Message Churches". Freedom of Mind Institute. Archived from the original on September 28, 2021. Retrieved September 28, 2021.
- ^ "Nine Meet Violent End Over The Weekend". Vidette Messenger. June 4, 1928. p. 1.
- ^ "Boy Held To Circuit Court On Murder Charges". Jeffersonville Evening News. June 5, 1928. p. 1.
- ^ "Boy 19 Dies At Hospital". Jeffersonville Evening News. June 20, 1929. p. 2.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, p. 27.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 25.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 26, 33.
- ^ a b Wade, Bernie L. (December 3, 2021). Apostolic Faith and Pentecostal Timetable of Key Event 1930–1940 Volume 4. ISSUU. p. 31. Archived from the original on December 3, 2021. Retrieved December 3, 2021.
- ^ Hassan, Steven (May 5, 2022). "The Message Cult". Freedom of Mind Institute. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022. Retrieved May 12, 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f Weaver 2000, p. 33.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, pp. 28–29, 32–34.
- ^ See Grenz, Guretzki & Nordling 1999, p. 90.
- ^ "First Pentecostal Baptist Church Upcoming Tent Revival". Jeffersonville Evening News. May 6, 1933. p. 3.
- ^ a b Staff writers (June 2, 1933). "Fourteen Converted". Jeffersonville Evening News. Jeffersonville, Indiana. p. 4.
- ^ a b c Harrell 1978, p. 29.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 27.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 27–28.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 28.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 29.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, pp. 28–29.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, pp. 69–70.
- ^ Wade, Bernie L. (December 3, 2021). Apostolic Faith and Pentecostal Timetable of Key Event 1930–1940 Volume 4. ISSUU. p. 32. Archived from the original on December 3, 2021. Retrieved December 3, 2021.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 32.
- ^ a b Duyzer 2014, p. 66.
- ^ Jeffersonville City Directory. New Albany, Indiana: Loftus Loduc Company. January 1935. p. 763.
- ^ "Pentecostal Tabernacle". Jeffersonville Evening News. June 13, 1936.
- ^ "Pentecostal Tabernacle". Jeffersonville Evening News. April 16, 1937. p. 1.
- ^ "Pentecostal Tabernacle". Jeffersonville Evening News. March 23, 1938. p. 3.
- ^ "Pentecostal Tabernacle". Jeffersonville Evening News. June 3, 1939. p. 3.
- ^ a b c "Rev. Branham To Leave For The Summer". Jeffersonville Evening News. April 29, 1940. p. 1.
- ^ "Pentecostal Tabernacle". Jeffersonville Evening News. April 30, 1943. p. 3.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, p. 12.
- ^ a b c Duyzer 2014, pp. 68–69.
- ^ "Pentecostal Tabernacle". Jeffersonville Evening News. September 19, 1936. p. 3.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, pp. 37–38.
- ^ "Illness Fatal To Mrs. Branham: Matron Dies In Clark Memorial Hospital". Jeffersonville Evening News. July 27, 1937. p. 1.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. v–vii.
- ^ a b c d e Harrell 1978, p. 25.
- ^ Crowder 2006, p. 321.
- ^ Hanegraaff 2001, p. 173.
- ^ Harrell 1978, pp. 11–12.
- ^ Harrell 1978, pp. 4–6, 11.
- ^ a b c d e f g Weaver 2000, p. 45.
- ^ a b Crowder 2006, p. 324.
- ^ Anderson 2004, p. 58.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 47.
- ^ Krapohl & Lippy 1999, p. 69.
- ^ Kydd 1998, p. 177.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 37.
- ^ "Milestones: 1945–1952 – Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Archived from the original on December 7, 2020. Retrieved July 17, 2017.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 37.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 46.
- ^ a b Sims 1996, p. 193.
- ^ a b c Sims 1996, p. 76.
- ^ a b Harrell 1978, p. 31.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Harrell 1978, p. 32.
- ^ a b Harrell 1978, p. 47.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 47.
- ^ Branham, William (March 1950). "How The Voice of Healing Received Its Name". Voice of Healing. p. 7.
- ^ Harrell 1978, pp. 31–32.
- ^ Faupel, D. William (2010). "The New Order of the Latter Rain: Restoration or Renewal?". In Wilkinson, Michael; Althouse, Peter (eds.). Winds from the North: Canadian Contributions to the Pentecostal Movement. Brill. pp. 240–241, 247. ISBN 978-9004185746.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Harrell 1978, p. 33.
- ^ Crowder 2006, p. 326.
- ^ a b c d e f g Harrell 1978, p. 36.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 6.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 11.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 49.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 49.
- ^ a b c d e f Harrell 1978, p. 34.
- ^ Kydd 1998, p. 169.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Harrell 1978, p. 38.
- ^ a b c Kydd 1998, p. 173.
- ^ a b c d e Weaver 2000, p. 51.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 68.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 70.
- ^ a b c Harrell 1978, p. 37.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 51.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 50.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 40.
- ^ a b c d Weaver 2000, p. 50.
- ^ a b c d e Harrell 1978, p. 35.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 74.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 57.
- ^ "Ex-Rep Upshaw Discards Crutches". Los Angeles Times. February 19, 1951. p. 2. Archived from the original on August 17, 2021. Retrieved September 4, 2021.
- ^ "Upshaw, William D". Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. Archived from the original on September 30, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2018.
- ^ a b c Hollenweger 1972, p. 354.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 50–51.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 56.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 51–52.
- ^ a b Crowder 2006, p. 327.
- ^ "Miracle sets boy walking normally". Durban Sunday Tribune. Durban, South Africa. November 11, 1951. p. 15. ISBN 9781441268488. Archived from the original on June 24, 2024. Retrieved September 29, 2017.
{{cite news}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ "Cripples rise from wheelchairs and walk". The Natal Mercury. Durban, South Africa. November 23, 1951. p. 12. Archived from the original on February 25, 2018. Retrieved September 29, 2017.
- ^ "Minister cured deafness, says 18-year-old girl". Winnipeg Free Press. Manitoba, Canada. July 15, 1947. p. 1. Archived from the original on February 26, 2018. Retrieved September 29, 2017.
- ^ "300 fill out cards at healer service". El Paso Herald Post. El Paso, Texas. December 17, 1947. p. 7. Archived from the original on February 26, 2018. Retrieved September 29, 2017.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, pp. 190–194.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, pp. 188–190.
- ^ a b Lennie, Tom (September 9, 2021). "Review: Preacher Behind the White Hoods". Prophecy Today UK. Archived from the original on September 11, 2021. Retrieved September 12, 2021.
- ^ a b c Kydd 1998, p. 172.
- ^ a b c Kydd 1998, p. 178.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 180.
- ^ Kydd 1998, p. 179.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Kydd 1998, p. 180.
- ^ a b c d e f Pohl 1982, pp. 78–85.
- ^ Randi 1989, p. 31.
- ^ "Rev. Branham In The News Again". Jeffersonville Evening News. July 23, 1947. p. 2.
- ^ "Interview". O Timothy. February 21, 1990. pp. 9–11.
- ^ MacFarlane, Charles (November 6, 1947). "Girl Cured Second Time Only Miracle Here". The Vancouver Sun. p. 2.
- ^ Pohl 1982, p. 79.
- ^ Kydd 1998, pp. 172–173.
- ^ Pohl 1982, p. 80.
- ^ a b "Rites for Leukemia Victim, 9, Are Held in Chambersburg". Waynesboro, Franklin Co., Pennsylvania: The Record Herald Newspaper. July 19, 1954. p. 4.
- ^ Smith, Alma Edwards (November 1952). "The Miracle of Donny Morton". Reader's Digest. pp. 29–35.
- ^ "Claims service benefitted boy". Logansport Press. Logansport, Indiana. June 12, 1951. p. 10. Archived from the original on February 25, 2018. Retrieved September 29, 2017.
- ^ a b c d Kydd 1998, p. 175.
- ^ Hollenweger 1972, p. 355.
- ^ Hollenweger 1972, pp. 354–356.
- ^ a b Forsberg, David (March 18, 2018). "Listens to a dead "kvaksalver" everyday". Norway: NRK. Archived from the original on March 18, 2018. Retrieved March 26, 2018.
- ^ a b Anderson, A. (2005). "New African Initiated Pentecostalism and Charismatics in South Africa. Journal of Religion in Africa". Journal of Religion in Africa. Brill: 66–92. doi:10.1163/1570066052995843.
- ^ a b c d Wymon Doyne Miller (January 1, 1956). Modern Divine Healing (First ed.). Miller Publishing Co. pp. 257–259. ASIN B002IZXO08.
- ^ a b "Awesome Account From Ern's Time With William Branham" (PDF). New Wine Magazine. December 1978. p. 23. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 19, 2022. Retrieved February 18, 2022.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 72.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 71.
- ^ Hollenweger 1972, pp. 355–356.
- ^ Pohl 1982, p. 77.
- ^ a b c d e f g Weaver 2000, p. 93.
- ^ a b c Harrell 1978, pp. 39–40.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 102.
- ^ "Ephemera of William Branham". www.wheaton.edu. Billy Graham Center, Wheaton College. Archived from the original on May 7, 2017. Retrieved July 3, 2019.
- ^ a b Crowder 2006, p. 328.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 49.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 94.
- ^ a b c d e f g Harrell 1978, p. 40.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 91.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 160.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 96.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 130.
- ^ a b c Reiterman & Jacobs 1982, pp. 50–52.
- ^ a b Wessinger 2000, pp. 217–220.
- ^ Collins, John; Duyzer, Peter M. (October 20, 2014). "The Intersection of William Branham and Jim Jones". Alternative Considerations of Jonestown & Peoples Temple. San Diego State University. Archived from the original on October 23, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2017.
- ^ Collins, John (October 7, 2016). "Colonia Dignidad and Jonestown". Alternative Considerations of Jonestown & Peoples Temple. San Diego State University. Archived from the original on October 23, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2017.
- ^ Collins, John; Duyzer, Peter (October 7, 2016). "Deep Study: Reverend Jim Jones of Jonestown". Alternative Considerations of Jonestown & Peoples Temple. San Diego State University. Archived from the original on January 8, 2019. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
- ^ a b Crowder 2006, p. 330.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 92.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 105.
- ^ Grenz, Guretzki & Nordling 1999, p. 162.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 173.
- ^ a b c Harrell 1978, p. 163.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 108.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 108–109.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 97.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 140.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Weaver 2000, p. 103.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 153, 163.
- ^ a b c d e Weaver 2000, p. 104.
- ^ "Head-on Collision Kills 1, Injures 6". Friona Star. Friona, Texas. December 23, 1965. p. 3. hdl:10605/243339.
- ^ a b Harrell 1978, p. 164.
- ^ Liardon 2003, p. 354.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, pp. 153–154.
- ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 154.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 155.
- ^ Harrell 1978, p. 19.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 58.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. vi.
- ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 55.
- ^ Hanegraaf 2001, p. 152.
- ^ Crowder 2006, p. 331.
- ^ Weaver 2000, p. 102.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. x.
- ^ Babinski 1995, p. 277.
- ^ Duyzer 2014, p. 1.
- ^ Larson 2004, p. 79.
- ^ Kydd 1998, p. 168.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, pp. 151–153.
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". Voice of God Recordings. Archived from the original on March 3, 2018. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
- ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 152.
- ^ a b O'Donnell, Kimmy (July 18, 2021). "Brief History of William Branham and Message Church Cult". Archived from the original on July 29, 2021. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
- ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 141–142.
- ^ Hawks, Asa (September 4, 2016). "Return to Amish What cult did Jeremiah Raber's wife Carmela belong to?". Starcasm. Archived from the original on August 10, 2021. Retrieved August 10, 2021.
- ^ a b Cummings, Madeleine (June 27, 2021). "This Alberta woman spent 26 years in a religious community. She now considers it a cult". CBC. Archived from the original on August 10, 2021. Retrieved August 10, 2021.
- ^ Dyck 1984, p. 24.
- ^ Dyck 1984, p. 25.
- ^ Enroth 1992, p. 158.
- ^ Enroth 1992, p. 159.
- ^ Enroth 1992, pp. 160–163.
- ^ "Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani arrested after police raid his home". Iran Human Rights Monitor. July 23, 2018. Archived from the original on August 9, 2021. Retrieved August 9, 2021.
- ^ Telekhov, Mikhail (May 21, 2021). "St. Petersburg court declares books by U.S. missionary Branham extremist". Russian Legal Information Agency. Archived from the original on August 3, 2021. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
References
[edit]- Anderson, Allan (2004). An Introduction to Pentecostalism. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521532808.
- Babinski, Edward T. (1995). Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1615921676.
- Basso, Carlos (2022). La Secta Perfecta (in Spanish). Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial. ISBN 9789566063650.
- Burkun, Michael (1997). Religion and the Racist Right: The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0807846384.
- Crowder, John (2006). Miracle Workers, Reformers, and The New Mystics. Destiny Image. ISBN 978-0768423501.
- Dyck, Carl (1984). William Branham : The Man And His Message. Saskatoon: Western Tract Society. ISBN 9780919847002.
- Duyzer, Peter M. (2014). Legend of the Fall, An Evaluation of William Branham and His Message. Independent Scholar's Press. ISBN 978-1927581155.
- Enroth, Ronald M. (1992). Churches That Abuse. Zondervan Publishing House. ISBN 0310532906.
- Grenz, Stanley; Guretzki, David; Nordling, Cherith Fee (1999). Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0830814497.
- Hanegraaff, Hank (2001). Counterfeit Revival. Thomas Nelson Publishers. ISBN 0849942942.
- Harrell, David (1978). All Things Are Possible: The Healing and Charismatic Revivals in Modern America. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0525241361.
- Hollenweger, Walter J. (1972). Pentecostalism: Origins and Developments Worldwide. Baker Academic. ISBN 978-0801046605.
- Krapohl, Robert; Lippy, Charles (1999). The Evangelicals: A Historical, Thematic, and Biographical Guide. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0313301032.
- Kydd, Ronald A. N. (1998). Healing through the Centuries: Models for Understanding. Hendrickson Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0913573604.
- Larson, Bob (2004). Larson's Book of World Religions and Alternative Spirituality. Tyndale House Publishers. Inc. ISBN 084236417X.
- Randi, James (1989). The Faith Healers. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-0879755355.
- Liardon, Roberts (2003). God's Generals: Why They Succeeded And Why Some Fail. Whitaker House. ISBN 978-0883689448.
- Moriarty, Michael (1992). The New Charismatics. Zondervan. ISBN 978-0310534310.
- Niebuhr, H. Richard (1975). Christ and Culture. Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0061300035.
- Reiterman, Tom; Jacobs, John (1982). Raven: The Untold Story of Rev. Jim Jones and His People. Dutton. ISBN 0525241361.
- Sims, Patsy (1996). Can Somebody Shout Amen!: Inside the Tents and Tabernacles of American Revivalists. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0813108865.
- Pohl, Alfred (1982). 17 Reasons Why I Left the Tongues Movement (PDF). London, Ontario: Bethel Baptist Print Ministry. ISBN 1896968325.
- Wessinger, Catherine (2000). How the Millennium Comes Violently: From Jonestown to Heaven's Gate. Seven Bridges Press. ISBN 978-1889119243.
- Weaver, C. Douglas (2000). The Healer-Prophet: William Marrion Branham (A study of the Prophetic in American Pentecostalism). Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0865547100.
Further reading
[edit]- Bergen, Rod; Jenkins, Jeff; Manuel, James; Mubanga, Benjamin; Pobłocki, Joel (2025). Under The Halo: Examining the Legacy of William Branham. FriesenPress. ISBN 9781038313928.
- Burgess, Stanley M.; van der Maas, Eduard M. (2002). The New International Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements. Zondervan. ISBN 978-0310224815.
- Collins, John Andrew (2020). Preacher Behind The White Hoods: A Critical Examination of William Branham and His Message. Dark Mystery Publications. ISBN 978-1735160900.
- Hollenweger, Walter J. (1972). The Pentecostals. University of Virginia. ISBN 978-0943575025.
- Hyatt, Eddie L. (2002). 2000 Years of Charismatic Christianity. Charisma House. ISBN 978-0884198727.
- Johns, Jackie David (2005). Fahlbusch, Erwin; et al. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Christianity. Wm. B. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0802824134.
- Sheryl, J. Greg (2013). "The Legend of William Branham" (PDF). The Quarterly Journal. 33 (3). Personal Freedom Outreach. ISSN 1083-6853.
- Reid, Daniel G. (1990). Dictionary of Christianity In America. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0830817764.
- Robins, R. G. (2010). Pentecostalism in America. Praeger (ABC-CLIO, LLC). ISBN 978-0313352942.
- Stewart, Don (1999). Only Believe: An Eyewitness Account of the Great Healing Revival of the 20th Century. Treasure House. ISBN 978-1560433408.
- Weremchuk, Roy (2019). Thus Saith the Lord? William M. Branham (1909–1965). Leben und Lehre. Deutscher Wissenschafts-Verlag. ISBN 978-3868881509.
Hagiographical
[edit]- Green, Pearry (2011). The Acts of the Prophet. Tucson Tabernacle. OCLC 827238316.
- Lindsay, James Gordon (1950). William Branham: A Man Sent From God (PDF). William Branham Evangelistic Association. ASIN B0007ENQ64. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 27, 2020. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
- Stadsklev, Julius (1952). William Branham: A Prophet Visits South Africa. Julius Stadsklev. ASIN B0007EW174. OCLC 1017376491.
- Vayle, Lee (1965). Twentieth Century Prophet. William Branham Evangelistic Association.
External links
[edit]
Media related to William Marrion Branham at Wikimedia Commons- "William Branham Evangelistic Association". Voice of God Recordings. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
- Evangelical Times: 'William Branham', by Eryl Davies
William M. Branham
View on GrokipediaEarly Life
Childhood and Family Background
William Marrion Branham was born in a log cabin near Burksville in Cumberland County, Kentucky, to Charles Clarence Branham (1887–1936) and Ella Rhee "Ellie" Harvey (1887–1961), who had married in 1906.[12][13][14] He was the eldest of ten children in a family of Irish descent.[15] The commonly reported birth date is April 6, 1909, as stated by Branham himself and many biographers, though U.S. Census records from 1910 and 1920 list his age in a manner consistent with a birth year of approximately 1907.[16][17] The Branhams were extremely poor sharecroppers and farmers eking out a living in the remote Kentucky hills, with the family's circumstances further strained by Charles Branham's alcoholism and occasional bootlegging during Prohibition.[15][18][19] The household lacked religious observance, as neither parent was affiliated with a church.[20] In Branham's childhood, the family relocated to southern Indiana near Jeffersonville, where they continued facing economic hardship; Charles worked as a logger but died relatively young in 1936 from complications attributed in part to his drinking.[21][22]Religious Influences and Conversion
Branham was raised in a poor, irreligious household in rural Kentucky and later Indiana, where his family provided no formal religious training or church attendance.[15] His parents, of Irish descent with nominal Catholic ancestry, did not emphasize Christianity, and his father struggled with alcoholism, fostering a skeptical environment toward spiritual matters.[4][7] Early religious exposure was thus minimal, limited to occasional interactions with local Protestant communities near Jeffersonville, Indiana, rather than structured denominational influences.[15] According to Branham's accounts, his initial spiritual stirrings occurred independently through personal experiences rather than familial or communal guidance. He reported hearing a disembodied voice in childhood—around age three or seven—warning him against smoking, drinking, or defiling his body, with a promise of future divine work, though these claims lack independent corroboration beyond his sermons.[15] By his late teens and early twenties, amid family hardships including the death of his brother Edward in 1930, Branham described a period of internal struggle with faith, culminating in a conversion experience around 1931 at age 22.[11] Hospitalized with severe illness, he claimed to hear the same voice repeatedly state, "I called you and you would not go," prompting a vow to preach the gospel if healed; he recovered abruptly and sought repentance thereafter.[15][23] Following this, Branham affiliated with a local Disciples of Christ congregation, which emphasized believer's baptism and spiritual gifts like anointing with oil, aligning with his emerging convictions.[15] He reported receiving what he termed Holy Spirit baptism after about six months, marking a shift toward active evangelism within Baptist-influenced circles, as he later described his conversion to the Missionary Baptist faith.[23] This period represented his entry into organized Christianity, distinct from Pentecostalism, which he encountered later; friends dissuaded him from early Pentecostal overtures, preserving his initial Baptist orientation.[15] By 1933, at age 24, he began baptizing converts himself in the Ohio River near Jeffersonville, during which he claimed a public supernatural confirmation of his calling—a bright light and audible voice declaring his role as a forerunner to Christ's return—though eyewitness accounts vary and no contemporary newspaper verification exists beyond follower testimonies.[19][24]Pre-Ministry Supernatural Claims
Branham claimed that a supernatural pillar of light entered the room and hovered over his crib shortly after his birth on April 6, 1909, in a log cabin near Burkesville, Kentucky, prompting his mother to scream in fear.[25] This event, described in his later sermons and biographies by associates, lacked independent corroboration beyond family recounting and was interpreted by supporters as a divine sign of his predestined role.[10] At approximately age seven, around 1916, Branham reported hearing an audible voice while sitting alone under a poplar tree on the family farm; the voice, accompanied by a rushing wind in still air, commanded him to avoid drinking, smoking, or defiling his body, assuring him of a future work to perform.[26] He further recounted a contemporaneous vision of workmen falling to their deaths during the construction of a bridge across the Ohio River, an event he later linked to the 1929 completion of the Louisville Municipal Bridge where sixteen lives were lost, though no contemporary records verify his childhood foreknowledge.[26] These experiences, self-reported in sermons and early biographies, formed the basis of Branham's narrative of early divine calling, with no external witnesses documented.[27] In June 1933, during a baptismal service at the Ohio River near Jeffersonville, Indiana, Branham described a brilliant light descending from the sky above him after baptizing the seventeenth convert, accompanied by a voice declaring, "As John the Baptist was sent to forerun the first coming of Christ, you have been sent to forerun the Second Coming of Christ."[24] Eyewitness accounts from the congregation of about 6,000 reported the light and audible voice, with some attendees fainting; local newspapers covered the occurrence, attributing it to a possible meteor or atmospheric phenomenon rather than supernatural intervention.[2] Branham interpreted this as confirmation of his prophetic commission, though skeptics noted the absence of photographic evidence or scientific analysis at the time.[28] Subsequent pre-1946 visions included a cross-shaped light appearing during his 1940 conversion experience in a shed, lifting a spiritual burden and coinciding with self-reported instant healing from physical ailments.[26] Branham also detailed predictive visions guiding specific healings, such as those of crippled children in 1939–1940, where angelic instructions led to reported recoveries matching vision details like locations and symptoms, verified by local witnesses but reliant on his testimony for the supernatural elements.[26] An intermittent angelic presence, described as speaking audibly from childhood onward, culminated in a May 7, 1946, visitation commissioning his healing ministry, though accounts of the angel's form and location varied in later retellings, raising questions of consistency among critics.[29] These claims, primarily sourced from Branham's sermons and Gordon Lindsay's 1950 biography—a work by a close associate promoting his ministry—remain unverified by neutral third-party evidence, with follower interpretations emphasizing divine authenticity amid broader Pentecostal enthusiasm for personal revelations.[26]Ministry Beginnings and Healing Revival
Post-War Context and Initial Campaigns
Following the conclusion of World War II in 1945, the United States entered a period of economic expansion and demographic shifts, including the return of millions of veterans, which coincided with heightened spiritual seeking amid existential uncertainties from global conflict and atomic age anxieties. Within Pentecostal communities, suppressed during wartime due to perceived emotionalism conflicting with military discipline, there emerged a renewed emphasis on supernatural manifestations, culminating in the healing revival of the late 1940s—a wave of itinerant evangelistic campaigns focused on divine healing, exorcism, and miracles that revitalized denominational Pentecostalism and influenced the broader charismatic movement.[30][31] William Branham, previously a Baptist pastor in Jeffersonville, Indiana, positioned himself at the forefront of this revival through campaigns launched in 1946, following his claim of an angelic commissioning on May 7, 1946, during which he alleged receiving a mandate for global healing ministry empowered by discernment of ailments and secrets.[32][2] His initial major effort occurred from June 14 to 25, 1946, in St. Louis, Missouri, hosted by Rev. Robert Daugherty's church, where Branham preached salvation and prayed for the sick in a 12-day tent meeting that drew local crowds and reports of healings, marking the inception of structured campaigns blending evangelism with faith healing.[33][2] These early meetings expanded in 1947, with Branham conducting tours starting January 15 in Camden, Arkansas, progressing through Shreveport, Louisiana, and other southern locations, attracting thousands and gaining endorsements from Pentecostal leaders, which propelled his reputation and sparked imitation by figures like Oral Roberts and A.A. Allen.[34] Media coverage, such as in the Vancouver Sun during his July 1947 campaign there, highlighted claimed cures, including a girl's recovery from clubfoot, though skeptics noted reliance on anecdotal testimony without medical verification.[34] By late 1947, associations with emerging networks like the Voice of Healing magazine underscored the campaigns' role in disseminating revival fervor, though financial and organizational strains soon surfaced amid rapid growth.[35][36]Healing Techniques and Service Format
Branham's healing services typically followed a structured format common to the post-World War II Pentecostal healing revival, beginning with congregational singing and introductory preaching by an associate evangelist, such as Gordon Lindsay or F.F. Bosworth, to build faith and explain scriptural bases for divine healing.[37] Evening sessions, often held in large auditoriums seating thousands, commenced after preparatory afternoon meetings focused on teaching attendees how to receive healing through faith.[37] Branham then delivered a brief evangelistic message emphasizing themes like the atonement's provision for physical healing, followed by the core healing phase.[38] Central to the technique was Branham's claimed supernatural discernment, described as a "gift" enabling him to identify ailments, personal histories, and sins through visions and physical sensations.[39] Participants received numbered prayer cards upon entry, from which Branham or assistants selected individuals—often by calling specific numbers—to form a prayer line on the platform.[40] As each person approached, Branham held their right hand to detect "vibrations" indicating diseases, then verbalized details such as names, addresses, and conditions (e.g., spinal issues or tumors) purportedly revealed in visions, aiming to confirm divine authentication before prayer.[37] Prayer followed, typically involving laying on of hands or commanding recovery in Jesus' name, with immediate manifestations encouraged, such as patients discarding crutches or demonstrating restored mobility.[37] These platform demonstrations served as "object lessons" to inspire collective faith, culminating in a mass healing prayer where Branham invited the entire audience to receive healing simultaneously without individual contact, asserting that faith alone activated results.[37] Services concluded with altar calls for salvation or recommitment, lasting several hours and repeated over multi-night campaigns, such as the 1950 Houston meetings drawing over 8,000 nightly.[37] Associates documented cases in publications like Voice of Healing, though critics later alleged reliance on pre-selected cases or cues from ushers to facilitate discernment.[41][42] ![Prayer cards used in Branham's healing campaigns, front and back][float-right] ![Crowd at a Branham campaign meeting in Tacoma, Washington, April 1948][center]Claims of Discernment and Verified Healings
Branham claimed a supernatural gift of discernment, asserting that an angelic presence provided him with detailed knowledge of individuals' illnesses, personal histories, and spiritual states during his meetings. This manifestation began prominently in his June 1946 campaign in St. Louis, Missouri, where he would select attendees from the audience or prayer line, describe specific conditions such as tumors or deformities, and pronounce healing. Supporters, including observers from 1947 to 1953, reported the diagnoses as consistently accurate, often revealing facts unknown to Branham or his team.[2] However, documented instances exist where the discernment included errors, such as misstating the extent of a person's speech impairment despite correction from family members.[45] A notable claim from this period was a photograph taken on January 24, 1950, at a meeting in the Sam Houston Coliseum in Houston, Texas, by Douglas Studios, depicting a halo-like light above Branham's head. Branham and followers claimed it as a supernatural sign, akin to the biblical pillar of fire, proving his prophetic ministry. The image was examined by George J. Lacy, an examiner of questionable documents, who reportedly stated it was not a double exposure. It became iconic, widely distributed among adherents as prints, cards, or booklets symbolizing divine commissioning.[46][47] Healings were said to follow these discernments, with Branham attributing recoveries to divine intervention rather than medical means. Followers compiled testimonies claiming over 40,000 cases by the early 1950s, some purportedly endorsed by physicians, encompassing conditions like cancer, paralysis, and tuberculosis.[48] Newspaper coverage occasionally noted apparent immediate improvements; for instance, the Vancouver Sun on November 6, 1947, reported a girl appearing cured of paralysis during a Branham campaign, marking it as the only "miracle" observed amid skepticism.[49] Promotional outlets like Voice of Healing magazine detailed campaigns in 1948, such as in Pensacola and Kansas City, where thousands attended and some attendees reported relief from chronic ailments.[50] Independent verification of lasting healings remains scarce, with no peer-reviewed medical studies confirming supernatural causation. Investigations into specific claims frequently revealed relapses or pre-existing remissions; one compilation identifies over 160 cases where pronounced healings did not endure, including fatalities shortly after.[51] While anecdotal eyewitness accounts from participants affirm temporary or subjective benefits, empirical evidence for permanent, medically inexplicable recoveries attributable to Branham's ministry is anecdotal and contested, often lacking before-and-after diagnostic records from disinterested physicians.[10]Expansion and Challenges
International Outreach and Peak Popularity
Branham's ministry achieved peak popularity during the late 1940s and early 1950s, as he spearheaded the post-World War II healing revival in the United States, drawing thousands to his meetings in major cities. Campaigns in locations such as St. Louis in June 1946 attracted over 4,000 attendees seeking healing, while 1948 events in Pensacola, Florida, and Kansas City, Missouri, resulted in overflow crowds exceeding venue capacities, with Memorial Auditorium's 3,100 seats filled and many standing. The establishment of the Voice of Healing magazine in April 1948 by Gordon Lindsay further amplified his reach, documenting campaigns and associating Branham with other evangelists like Oral Roberts and F.F. Bosworth.[50][52] International outreach began with campaigns in Canada starting in 1947, including Vancouver, where local media reported on claimed healings, and extended to western Canada in 1948, inspiring local prayer movements among attendees. In April 1950, Branham's team, including Jack Moore, Gordon Lindsay, and Ern Baxter, embarked on the first major tour by an American healing revivalist to Europe, departing the U.S. on April 6 and conducting meetings in Finland and Scandinavia. These efforts marked Branham as the initial U.S.-based deliverance minister to achieve success abroad, with subsequent plans for Africa in late 1951 via Voice of Healing affiliates and a 1954 visit to India, though the latter faced logistical challenges and mixed outcomes as reported in follow-up accounts.[2][53][19] By the mid-1950s, Branham's global campaigns had reportedly reached audiences in Mexico, Africa, and Asia, contributing to over one million claimed converts, though independent verification of attendance and impacts remains limited to contemporary promotional materials and participant testimonies. The expansion relied on collaborative networks like Voice of Healing, which coordinated overseas logistics and promoted results through publications.[54][55]Financial Operations and Sustainability Issues
Branham's financial operations relied heavily on freewill offerings from healing campaigns and tithes from local congregations, including the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, where he served as pastor. Initially, from the tabernacle's founding in the 1930s through the early 1940s, Branham received no salary, sustaining his family through church-provided goods and minimal support. By the mid-1940s, he accepted a fixed weekly salary of $50 to $100 from tabernacle funds, which were derived from member tithes and offerings deposited into a church treasury managed by deacons.[56][57] Campaign finances operated separately, with Branham publicly stating he took no personal salary or offerings, directing collections solely to cover operational expenses such as hall rentals, travel, printing of prayer cards, and modest per diems like $5 daily meal allowances for himself, his son Billy Paul, and a manager. Sponsoring committees or managers, such as Gordon Lindsay in the late 1940s, handled logistics and ensured expenses were met through designated "expense offerings" rather than love offerings for individuals. Despite peak attendance drawing thousands, costs for large venues and international travel often exceeded immediate collections, leading Branham to occasionally appeal for additional support to avoid deficits.[58][59] Sustainability issues emerged from the ministry's dependence on volatile attendance and donations amid irregular scheduling and expanding scope. By the early 1950s, as campaigns grew costly and Branham reduced field work for local commitments, shortfalls prompted complaints of inadequate funds, with one 1962 sermon noting insufficient coverage for meeting expenses. Mismanagement allegations surfaced, including from associates like Lindsay, who noted Branham's "carelessness in financial matters" during high-revival periods, contributing to strains when popularity fluctuated. These factors, combined with unreported income from scattered offerings, culminated in a 1956 Internal Revenue Service investigation and tax evasion charges against Branham, underscoring challenges in transparent accounting for a decentralized, donation-driven model.[57][60]Allegations of Fraud and Examination of Evidence
Throughout his healing campaigns in the late 1940s and early 1950s, Branham faced accusations of fraud from investigative journalists, fellow ministers, and hosting churches, who alleged that his discernment of personal details and healings were staged through assistants gathering prior information or selective participant screening.[61] These claims intensified after reports of attendees witnessing apparent fatigue or inconsistencies in his performances, coinciding with declining health and attendance drops by 1950. Critics, including South African ministers during his 1950 visits to Durban and Johannesburg, labeled his platform demonstrations as fraudulent, citing discrepancies between announced miracles and verifiable outcomes.[62] Branham's discernment process relied on numbered prayer cards distributed to attendees, from which he called specific numbers for the prayer line, claiming supernatural revelation of names, addresses, and ailments without prior knowledge.[63] Skeptics, drawing parallels to contemporaries like Oral Roberts and A.A. Allen, argued this system enabled cold reading techniques or covert intelligence from ushers, as cards often included voluntary details about conditions, allowing selection of cases with verifiable or coached information.[63] For instance, former associate Roy Elonzo Davis, Branham's early mentor, publicly exposed elements of his stage persona as contrived in publications tied to the Voice of Healing magazine, highlighting inconsistencies in Branham's claimed supernatural abilities.[64] No independent audits or recordings from the era conclusively prove supernatural means, and patterns of failed or temporary "healings"—documented in over 100 cases where pronounced cures relapsed—suggest psychosomatic effects, misdiagnoses, or selective reporting rather than permanent physiological changes.[51][65] Efforts to verify healings medically yielded scant empirical support; while Branham's supporters cited anecdotal testimonies of enduring recoveries, such as family members reporting relief from arthritis or chronic conditions decades later, these lack pre- and post-event diagnostic records or peer-reviewed validation.[66] Independent analyses, including those from rival Pentecostal figures, found insufficient evidence of sustained, documented miracles beyond subjective accounts, with relapse rates undermining claims of infallible power.[67] Financial allegations were limited, focusing on operational sustainability rather than personal enrichment; Branham maintained he charged no fees and lived modestly, though a 1962 IRS investigation into his ministry's finances—spanning five years—culminated in settlements without proven evasion, per his own statements.[68] Later scandals in follower groups, such as Ponzi schemes misusing tithes, stemmed from post-mortem interpretations of his teachings rather than direct involvement.[69] Examining the evidence through causal realism reveals a pattern common to mid-20th-century faith healing: apparent successes often attributable to placebo responses, confirmation bias among believers, or unverified pre-selection, absent rigorous controls like blinded medical follow-ups. Critical sources, frequently from ex-associates or doctrinal opponents, exhibit potential biases toward discrediting charismatic claims, yet the absence of falsifiable, third-party medical corroboration—despite thousands of claimed healings—tips the balance against supernatural causation. Proponents' reliance on unadjudicated testimonies, while sincere, fails to meet evidentiary standards for extraordinary assertions, aligning Branham's methods more with performative revivalism than empirically validated intervention.[3][70]Doctrinal Development
Core Theological Positions
Branham taught a non-Trinitarian view of the Godhead, asserting that God is singular and manifests in different modes or titles—Father in creation, Son in redemption, and Holy Ghost in regeneration—rather than existing as three co-equal, co-eternal persons.[71][72] He rejected the traditional Trinity doctrine as unbiblical and influenced by pagan philosophy, labeling it the "mark of the beast" in some sermons, while insisting his position aligned with apostolic oneness without fully endorsing modalism.[73][74] Consistent with this Christology, Branham advocated baptism solely in the name of Jesus Christ, citing Acts 2:38 as the normative New Testament formula and dismissing Trinitarian baptisms as invalid.[75][74] He performed baptisms using this method from the early 1930s onward, viewing it as essential for salvation and a restoration of primitive Christianity.[71] A distinctive doctrine was the "serpent seed" teaching, wherein Branham interpreted Genesis 3 to mean Eve engaged in sexual relations with the serpent (embodying Satan), producing Cain as the serpent's literal offspring and establishing two opposing bloodlines: the seed of the woman (righteous, through Seth) versus the seed of the serpent (wicked, predestined for destruction).[76][77] This view framed original sin not merely as disobedience but as adultery and hybridization, influencing Branham's eschatology where the serpent's seed persists as antagonists until final judgment.[78] Critics, including theological analysts, have traced elements of this doctrine to earlier fringe interpretations, noting its implications for racial and ethnic distinctions in Branham's later sermons.[79] Branham positioned himself as the end-time prophet and messenger to the Laodicean church age, the seventh and final era in his interpretation of Revelation 2-3, fulfilling Malachi 4:5-6 by restoring pure doctrine before Christ's return.[80][81] He described the church ages as successive dispensations mirroring the seven seals, with Laodicea characterized by lukewarmness, denominationalism, and rejection of supernatural gifts, which Branham taught were not confined to the biblical past but accessible today to believers entering an atmosphere of faith; his ministry aimed to revive them through faith healing, discernment, and adherence to the King James Bible as the infallible Word. Branham viewed organized Protestant denominations as the "daughters" of the Catholic Church, which he described as a mixture of Roman paganism and deviated Christianity.[82][83][84] On soteriology, Branham blended predestination with conditional election, teaching that God foreknew and elected believers from the foundation of the world but required faith in revealed truth for salvation, rejecting creeds and organized religion as veils over scripture.[71] He denied eternal conscious torment, holding to conditional immortality where the unsaved cease to exist after judgment rather than suffering endlessly.[83] Divine healing was central, predicated on faith without medical intervention in ideal cases, with Branham claiming vindication through supernatural discernment of thoughts and conditions.[73] Branham interpreted the "little ones" in Matthew 18:10 as innocent children and true believers (sons of God), whom God values and protects through guardian angels that always behold the Father's face for immediate attention to their needs or offenses.[85]Unique Revelations and Prophecies
Branham asserted that his ministry involved divine revelations unveiling hidden biblical mysteries, positioning himself as the fulfillment of Malachi 4:5's prophesied Elijah who would turn the hearts of fathers to children before the "great and dreadful day of the Lord."[86] He claimed this role was confirmed by a supernatural voice during a 1933 baptismal service in the Ohio River, stating, "As John the Baptist was sent to forerun the first coming of Jesus Christ, so your ministry will forerun the second coming."[87] Followers interpreted his teachings on church ages, the rapture, and end-time restoration as aligning with this prophetic mantle, though critics noted the verse traditionally applies to John the Baptist or a future Jewish ministry, not a 20th-century American preacher.[88] A central unique revelation was the "Serpent's Seed" doctrine, first publicly detailed in Branham's September 28, 1958, sermon of the same name, positing that Eve engaged in sexual relations with the serpent—depicted as a beast-like figure before Genesis 3:14's curse—resulting in Cain as the progenitor of an inherently wicked genetic line allied with Satan, distinct from Abel's godly seed through Adam.[89] Branham argued this explained ongoing enmity between seeds (Genesis 3:15), attributing inventions, sciences, and even denominations to the serpent's lineage, while true believers descended solely from Adam's line.[77] The teaching drew from earlier fringe interpretations but was novel in Branham's emphasis on it as a restored apostolic truth, rejected by mainstream Christianity for lacking explicit scriptural support in Genesis or the New Testament, where sin enters via disobedience, not literal hybridization.[90] Branham taught that the shape of the Great Pyramid symbolizes the progression of the Church through the ages, with a wide base representing the early apostolic period, progressively narrowing through church history, culminating in a narrow end-times summit completed by the capstone signifying Christ manifested through the Holy Spirit as the Bride of Christ.[91] Branham's prophecies included the 1933 Seven Visions, which he described as sequential divine foreviews: Mussolini's rise and fall in Ethiopia (linked to 1935 invasion and 1943 death); Hitler's regime and World War II defeat (fulfilled by 1945); the failure of fascism, Nazism, and communism despite global destruction, supplanted by gospel victory; a constitutional "rider" implying a woman vice president or similar leading to U.S. ruin; societal moral decay driven by female leadership and immodesty; America's self-destruction through immorality without foreign invasion; and Christ's bodily return amid nuclear devastation.[92] While the first two aligned with historical events—Mussolini's Ethiopia campaign began October 3, 1935, and Hitler died April 30, 1945—the latter visions remained interpretive, with no woman president or VP by 2025, communism's persistence in states like China, and U.S. survival post-1945 atomic bombings, rendering fulfillment subjective.[93] Other claims included a 1937 vision of the Ohio River flooding precisely on December 1, which occurred with record crests submerging Branham's hometown, verified by U.S. Weather Bureau data showing 69.9 feet at Louisville.[94] However, later predictions faltered: Branham foresaw the world ending by 1977 via mathematical alignment of his birth (April 6, 1909) with biblical timelines, unfulfilled as global events continued; he anticipated the Great Pyramid's capstone speaking mysteries, which did not occur; and a 1962 "Thus Saith the Lord" vision of a bride's constellation vindicating his ministry yielded no empirical astronomical event.[95][94] These inconsistencies, documented in sermon transcripts, prompted scrutiny, with Branham attributing variances to conditional elements or mishearings, though empirical records show non-occurrence.[96]Critiques of Prophecies and Doctrinal Accuracy
Critics of William Branham's prophetic claims argue that several predictions failed to materialize, undermining assertions of his divine vindication as a prophet. For instance, in his 1933 visions, Branham foresaw the destruction of the United States and the return of Christ by 1977, interpreting a timeline from Christ's ministry; however, no such events occurred by that date or thereafter.[6][8] Similarly, he predicted the sinking of Los Angeles into the Pacific Ocean, describing a cataclysm 1,500 miles long, 400 miles wide, and up to 40 miles deep, potentially around December 1964 or when his son Billy Paul reached a certain age; the city remains intact without such devastation.[8][9] Other unfulfilled prophecies include Branham's 1954 claim of a massive brown bear he would personally shoot in a northern wilderness, issued as "Thus Saith the Lord," which never happened despite his travels.[9] He also anticipated the Roman Catholic Church seizing political control in the United States in the near future, a development that has not taken place.[8] In 1957, Branham publicly acknowledged the failure of his "India prophecy," where he had expected widespread conversions and miracles during a trip that yielded limited results, with only modest attendance reported.[97] Critics, applying biblical standards such as Deuteronomy 18:22, contend these inaccuracies disqualify Branham as a true prophet, as even one failed prediction suffices to invalidate the claim.[8][6] Regarding doctrinal accuracy, Branham's teachings have been faulted for departing from historic Christian orthodoxy. He rejected the Trinity, advocating a modalistic view where God manifests in successive modes rather than as three coeternal persons, aligning with Oneness Pentecostalism and requiring rebaptism in Jesus' name only for Trinitarian baptisms.[6][8] His "serpent seed" doctrine posited that Eve engaged in sexual relations with the serpent, producing Cain as the progenitor of an evil lineage, a interpretation deemed unbiblical and used to argue women's inherent culpability for original sin.[6][8][9] Additional critiques highlight Branham's endorsement of annihilationism, denying eternal conscious torment in hell in favor of the wicked's cessation of existence, contrary to traditional interpretations of passages like Matthew 25:46.[6][8] He elevated himself as the fulfillment of Malachi 4:5 and Revelation 10:7, the sole end-times prophet whose messages superseded Scripture, a self-exaltation seen as fostering cult-like devotion.[6] Branham also imposed rigid gender norms, prohibiting women from wearing makeup, jewelry, or pants, and mandating ankle-length dresses, framing these as divine revelations amid teachings portraying women as spiritually inferior.[8] These positions, drawn from his sermons, are criticized for twisting Scripture and incorporating extra-biblical elements, such as equating pyramid measurements or zodiac signs with prophetic timelines.[6][9] While some defenders reinterpret failed elements as symbolic or conditional, empirical non-fulfillment and theological inconsistencies remain central to the critiques.[96]Later Ministry
Shift to Local Teachings and Recordings
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, William Branham reduced his participation in large itinerant healing campaigns, which had peaked in the late 1940s and early 1950s, amid growing doctrinal disputes with Pentecostal organizations that led to reduced institutional support and fewer collaborative events.[98] He redirected his efforts toward extended teaching sessions at the Branham Tabernacle, his home congregation in Jeffersonville, Indiana, where he delivered in-depth expositions on biblical eschatology, including the seven church ages (initiated in late 1960) and the seals of the Book of Revelation (beginning in 1963).[99] These local gatherings emphasized interpretive revelations Branham claimed derived from divine visions, such as symbolic identifications of historical popes with antichrist figures and end-times fulfillments in contemporary events.[98] Branham's sermons during this period, often spanning multiple consecutive services, numbered in the dozens annually—89 in 1960 alone—and covered topics like the restoration of apostolic faith, critiques of denominationalism, and preparation for the "rapture" of believers.[100] Unlike his earlier campaigns focused on discernment and healing prayer lines, these teachings prioritized scriptural exegesis and prophetic timelines, attracting a dedicated core audience while alienating broader evangelical circles due to unconventional claims, such as the serpent seed doctrine linking Eve's fall to genetic lineage.[98] A key development was the systematic audio recording of these tabernacle sermons, initiated more consistently in the 1960s, which preserved over 1,200 messages from Branham's overall ministry (1947–1965) for transcription and distribution.[11] Organizations affiliated with his followers, such as Voice of God Recordings, compiled and disseminated these tapes, enabling global access that sustained his influence after his death despite limited contemporaneous media coverage.[101] The recordings captured unedited delivery styles, including pauses for claimed visions, and formed the textual basis for subsequent doctrinal codification among adherents, though critics note inconsistencies in prophetic elements when cross-referenced with historical outcomes.[102]Personal Life and Family Dynamics
William Marrion Branham married his first wife, Amelia Hope Brumbach, on June 22, 1934, in Jeffersonville, Indiana.[12] The couple had two children: William Paul "Billy" Branham, born September 13, 1935, and Sharon Rose Branham, born October 27, 1936.[103] Hope Branham was diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in January 1936, a condition confirmed by multiple physicians including Dr. Sam Adair; she died from the disease on July 21, 1937, at age 27, despite Branham's reported attempts at prayer for healing.[104] Sharon Rose died shortly thereafter in 1937 at age one, with causes disputed between tuberculosis and complications from the January 1937 Ohio River flood, though primary records emphasize the former.[105] Branham remarried Meda Marie Broy on October 23, 1941, in Clark County, Indiana; Meda, born in 1919, came from a local Pentecostal family and served as a supportive homemaker, managing household duties amid Branham's itinerant ministry.[106] They had three children: Rebekah in 1946, Sarah in 1950, and Joseph in 1955.[15] Billy Paul Branham, the eldest son from the first marriage, assisted in his father's healing campaigns from the 1940s onward, handling logistics and prayer lines, while the younger children grew up in Jeffersonville, exposed to the family's modest lifestyle despite growing ministry demands.[107] Family life reflected Branham's emphasis on scriptural roles, with Meda described by daughter Rebekah as prioritizing domestic stability over public opportunities, including typing sermons and maintaining the home during absences.[108] Tensions occasionally arose from Branham's strict doctrines on marriage and divorce, which he preached against adulterous unions, yet extended family members, including siblings, experienced multiple divorces and remarriages in the 1930s–1940s, prompting Branham to officiate some ceremonies despite his teachings.[109] Overall, the household centered on Branham's vocational calling, with children integrated into ministry support roles by adolescence, though personal hardships like early losses shaped a narrative of divine testing in Branham's accounts.[5]Final Public Activities
In the weeks leading up to his fatal accident, William Branham conducted several public sermons in the southwestern United States, emphasizing eschatological themes such as the rapture, prophecy fulfillment, and end-time events. On December 4, 1965, he preached "The Rapture" at the Ramada Inn in Yuma, Arizona, where he discussed the biblical concept of the church's translation and its distinction from the resurrection of the dead.[110] Two days later, on December 6, 1965, Branham delivered "Modern Events Are Made Clear by Prophecy" at the Orange Bowl Restaurant in San Bernardino, California, interpreting contemporary occurrences as signs aligning with scriptural predictions.[111] Branham's final public service occurred on December 12, 1965, at the Tucson Tabernacle in Tucson, Arizona, titled "Communion," during which he presided over a farewell-like gathering focused on the Lord's Supper and spiritual preparation amid his teachings on divine judgment and the bride of Christ.[112] [113] These late 1965 meetings, recorded and distributed among followers, marked a continuation of his shift toward doctrinal exposition rather than large-scale healing campaigns, with audiences primarily consisting of local assemblies and dedicated supporters. Attendance figures for these events are not precisely documented in available records, but they reflected a more intimate scale compared to his 1940s-1950s revivals. Following this service, Branham ceased public appearances, intending to return to his home base in Jeffersonville, Indiana.[19]Death and Succession
The 1965 Automobile Accident
On December 18, 1965, at approximately 8:15 p.m., William Branham's 1964 Ford station wagon collided head-on with a 1956 Chevrolet on U.S. Highway 60, about 6.2 miles west of Friona, Texas, near Parmerton Hill.[114] Branham was driving the Ford, with his wife Meda Branham and 14-year-old daughter Sarah Branham as passengers; the Chevrolet was driven by 17-year-old Santiago Ramos, with three additional passengers: Rodolfo Melendez, Raynaldo Melendez, and Daniel Cocanegra.[114] The impact demolished both vehicles, killing Ramos instantly at the scene and injuring the six other occupants; rescuers took around 45 minutes to extricate Branham from the wreckage due to the severity of the deformation.[114][115] Contemporary newspaper reporting, such as in The Friona Star on December 23, 1965, described the incident as a head-on collision without specifying fault or contributing factors like impairment.[114][115] Some accounts from Branham's followers later attributed the crash to intoxication by the opposing driver, but no evidence of alcohol involvement appears in the initial reports or official records. Branham sustained critical injuries including a fractured skull, multiple broken bones in his limbs, and severe internal trauma, while Meda and Sarah Branham suffered serious but non-fatal injuries.[114] The family had been traveling from Tucson, Arizona, toward Jeffersonville, Indiana, following a period of ministry and personal activities in the Southwest.[5]Medical Response and Cause of Death
Following the head-on collision on December 18, 1965, at approximately 8:15 PM, six miles west of Friona, Texas, William Branham remained trapped in his 1964 Ford station wagon for about 45 minutes before emergency responders extracted him.[114] He was initially transported by ambulance to Friona General Hospital for stabilization, as it was the nearest facility.[114] His wife, Meda Branham, and daughter, Sarah Branham, who were also passengers, sustained serious injuries but were treated and survived; Meda remained in intensive care alongside Branham initially.[114] Branham was soon airlifted or transferred by ground to Northwest Texas Hospital in Amarillo for advanced care, arriving in critical condition.[114] [5] Medical reports indicated severe trauma, including a mangled left arm, left leg entangled around the steering wheel, and fractures to both legs, arms, and skull.[114] He entered shock upon arrival and never regained consciousness, remaining in intensive care under monitoring for traumatic injuries.[5] Newspaper accounts from the period, such as The Friona Star on December 23, 1965, confirmed his ongoing critical status and the extent of skeletal damage, contradicting later claims by some associates that he suffered no broken bones.[114] Branham died on December 24, 1965, at 5:49 PM, six days after the accident, from multiple traumatic injuries sustained in the crash.[114] [116] The primary contributors were head and skeletal trauma leading to irreversible shock and organ failure, as corroborated by hospital records and contemporary reporting; no autopsy details have been publicly released to specify further pathophysiology.[114]Immediate Aftermath and Follower Responses
Branham's death on December 24, 1965, at 5:49 PM in Northwest Texas Hospital, Amarillo, elicited immediate grief among his family and close associates, who arranged for his body to be embalmed and placed in cold storage pending transport to Jeffersonville, Indiana.[114] His son, Joseph Branham, later recounted the family's distress during the hospital vigil, with Meda Branham, his wife, remaining in intensive care from her own injuries in the crash.[117] Newspaper reports confirmed the evangelist's passing from head trauma and internal injuries sustained six days earlier, prompting condolences from Pentecostal circles where he had been a prominent figure.[118] Funeral services occurred on December 29, 1965, at Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, directed by Claborn Funeral Home, with international followers attending despite winter travel challenges.[114] The event featured eulogies emphasizing his healing ministry and visions, though no single successor emerged, leading to informal leadership by family and associates like Pearry Green.[114] Attendance included devotees from the U.S. and abroad, reflecting his global influence, but the body remained unburied until April 11, 1966, Easter Monday, amid reports of harsh Indiana weather delaying interment.[119] Followers' initial responses centered on mourning and bewilderment, as Branham's claims of divine protection and prophetic foresight had led many to anticipate his survival or return.[120] Accounts from associates described emotional outpourings at the funeral, with some interpreting his final sermons—preached days before the accident—as portents of a spiritual transition rather than physical demise.[121] This shock reverberated through Pentecostal networks, where his death was seen as abrupt, fracturing unified expectations without doctrinal resolution at the time.[3]Posthumous Influence
Impact on Pentecostal and Charismatic Traditions
William Branham's ministry, commencing with reported supernatural commissioning on May 7, 1946, ignited the post-World War II Healing Revival, a surge in Pentecostal evangelism emphasizing divine healing and miracles that reinvigorated the movement after a period of institutionalization.[122] His campaigns, featuring alleged discernment of ailments through words of knowledge, drew thousands to arenas across North America, fostering widespread expectation of supernatural intervention and influencing the trajectory of Pentecostal practices toward experiential authenticity.[10] This revival, peaking from 1947 to 1958, laid foundational momentum for subsequent Charismatic expansions by demonstrating the viability of large-scale faith healing outside denominational constraints.[123] Branham's influence extended to prominent evangelists, including Oral Roberts, who launched his healing ministry in 1947 inspired by Branham's authoritative approach to demons and disease, and T.L. Osborn, who witnessed healings at a 1947 Branham meeting, prompting his global crusades.[30] These associations, documented in collaborative events like the 1948 Kansas City meetings, amplified Branham's model of prophetic healing, embedding it in the repertoires of figures who popularized Pentecostalism via radio, television, and international missions.[124] However, while Branham's emphasis on restorationist themes—such as the reactivation of apostolic and prophetic offices—resonated initially, mainstream Pentecostal bodies like the Assemblies of God critiqued and distanced from such extremes by 1949, limiting his doctrinal permeation in classical denominations.[122] Through indirect channels, Branham's 1947 healings in Canada catalyzed the Latter Rain Movement's outbreak on February 12, 1948, in North Battleford, Saskatchewan, where leaders like George Hawtin adopted his paradigms of deliverance ministry—attributing illness to demonic oppression—and fivefold ministry restoration, concepts that later diffused into Neo-Charismatic networks.[125] These elements, including hands-on impartation for spiritual gifts and extra-biblical prophecy, shaped independent Charismatic churches and movements like the Vineyard, prioritizing ongoing revelation and supernatural signs over formal structures.[122] Despite theological controversies surrounding Branham's later teachings, his early revivalist impetus contributed to the global proliferation of Charismatic emphases on healing and prophecy, evidenced in the movement's growth to encompass diverse post-denominational expressions by the late 20th century.[123]The "Message" Movement and Adherents
The "Message" Movement encompasses followers who regard William Branham's post-1950s sermons—transcribed and distributed as "The Spoken Word"—as the divinely vindicated end-time revelation, fulfilling biblical prophecies such as Malachi 4:5-6 and Revelation 10:7.[6] Adherents, self-identifying as "Message Believers," interpret Branham as the final messenger to the Laodicean Church Age, tasked with restoring apostolic doctrines obscured by denominational creeds and traditions.[126] They emphasize his teachings on discerning the Bride of Christ through supernatural signs, rejecting Trinitarianism in favor of Oneness modalism, wherein God manifests successively as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.[6] Posthumously, the movement sustained itself through audio recordings and printed sermons, disseminated globally by entities like Voice of God Recordings, Inc., established to translate and distribute Branham's 1,205 extant messages into over 70 languages by the 21st century.[127] Assemblies operate autonomously, often in rural or mission settings, particularly in Africa, India, and Latin America, with practices including exclusive baptism in the name "Lord Jesus Christ," women's uncut hair as a covering, and avoidance of modern attire deemed immodest.[126] Proponent estimates place adherents at approximately two million worldwide, though critical analyses report lower figures, such as 300,000 in 1986 expanding via missions by 2000.[128][129] Doctrinal emphases include the "serpent seed" teaching, positing that Eve's seduction involved literal copulation with the serpent, producing a genetic line of unbelievers doomed to perdition, contrasted with the seed of woman as true believers.[126] Followers anticipate an imminent rapture for those aligned with The Message, viewing Branham's pyramid-shaped cloud sighting in 1963 as a capstone vindication.[6] The movement has fragmented into sects since 1965, with some, like the "Returned Ministry," awaiting Branham's physical resurrection to complete unfinished ministry, while others debate tape authenticity or doctrinal purity.[130] Initial shock at his death prompted expectations of an Easter 1966 rising among devotees, unfulfilled upon burial.[83] Christian critics attribute the persistence to confirmation bias amid unverified healings and failed predictions, such as the world's end by 1977, positioning Branhamism outside orthodox Pentecostalism.[6]Contemporary Assessments and Debates
Contemporary evangelical and theological assessments largely regard William Branham as a heterodox figure whose ministry combined elements of genuine charismatic phenomena with unorthodox doctrines and unfulfilled prophecies, failing biblical tests for prophets under Deuteronomy 18:20-22.[8] Critics, including apologists from organizations like Evidence for Christianity, argue that Branham's predictions—such as the world's end ushering in the Millennium by 1977 and a near-future Catholic takeover of the United States—did not materialize, disqualifying his prophetic claims.[131] [8] These assessments emphasize that while Branham exhibited unusual discernment in some meetings, akin to word-of-knowledge gifts described in 1 Corinthians 12, his overall output included verifiable errors, such as prophecies of his own death via assassination that never occurred.[132] Debates over Branham's doctrines center on their divergence from Nicene orthodoxy, particularly his modalistic rejection of the Trinity—viewing Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as successive manifestations of one God rather than coeternal persons—and his "serpent seed" teaching, which posits that Eve engaged in sexual relations with the serpent, producing Cain's lineage as inherently evil and predestined for damnation.[133] Orthodox critics, such as those at GotQuestions.org, dismiss serpent seed as eisegesis rooted in superstition, lacking exegetical support from Genesis 3 and promoting a dual-seedline anthropology that echoes Gnostic or white supremacist ideologies traced to 19th-century figures like William Booth or Arnold Murray.[76] [79] Adherents within the "Message" movement defend these as restored revelations, but internal schisms reveal contention, with some factions rejecting serpent seed's implications for racial or gender hierarchies while upholding Branham's infallibility.[77] Assessments of Branham's healing ministry highlight a mixed record, with eyewitness accounts of apparent recoveries—such as restored sight or mobility in 1940s-1950s campaigns—but numerous documented failures where pronounced healings reversed post-meeting, including cases of cancer recurrence and unverified resurrections.[10] [51] Independent investigations, like those by Vancouver Sun reporters in 1947, found no medical corroboration for claimed miracles beyond anecdotal testimony, attributing successes to psychosomatic effects or selective reporting.[10] Defenders, including biographers like those at Present Truth Ministries, counter that Branham's gift operated conditionally on faith, not guaranteeing outcomes, and cite rare verified cases as evidence of divine anointing amid human limitations.[134] Broader scholarly consensus in Pentecostal studies, as in analyses from the Centers for Apologetics Research, views his healings as emblematic of post-WWII revivalism's enthusiasm but undermined by lack of empirical validation and doctrinal excesses.[3] Ongoing debates extend to Branham's posthumous legacy, where critics label the "Message" movement as cultic due to followers' elevation of his sermons to scriptural parity—treating tapes as infallible—and practices like grave veneration or end-times date-setting derived from his teachings.[131] [9] Former adherents, documented in sites like BelieveTheSign, report exiting after confronting discrepancies, such as plagiarized content in Branham's "visions" or inconsistencies with Scripture, fueling apologetics resources warning of authoritarian control in Branhamite churches.[135] [136] Proponents maintain his role as the "Elijah" precursor to Christ's return per Malachi 4:5, interpreting failures as misapplications by disciples rather than flaws in the man, though this view remains marginal outside insular groups.[134] These tensions persist in online forums and theological discourses as of 2024, with no mainstream Pentecostal body endorsing Branham's full corpus.[137]References
- ./assets/William_Branham_Healing_Campaign_Prayer_Card_Front_and_Back.jpg
- ./assets/William_Branham_Campaign_Meeting_in_Tacoma_Washington%252C_April_1948%252C_As_see_in_A_Man_Sent_From_God%252C_1950.jpg

