Hubbry Logo
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and SciencesAcademy of Motion Picture Arts and SciencesMain
Open search
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
Community hub
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS, often pronounced /ˈæmpæs/ AM-pass; also known as simply the Academy or the Motion Picture Academy) is a professional honorary organization in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., with the stated goal of advancing the arts and sciences of motion pictures. The Academy's corporate management and general policies are overseen by a board of governors, which includes representatives from each of the craft branches.

Key Information

As of April 2020, the organization was estimated to consist of around 9,921 motion picture professionals. The Academy is an international organization and membership is open to qualified filmmakers around the world.

The Academy is known around the world for its annual Academy Awards, both officially and popularly known as "The Oscars".[4]

In addition, the Academy holds the Governors Awards annually for lifetime achievement in film; presents Scientific and Technical Awards annually; gives Student Academy Awards annually to filmmakers at the undergraduate and graduate level; awards up to five Nicholl Fellowships in Screenwriting annually; and operates the Margaret Herrick Library (at the Fairbanks Center for Motion Picture Study) in Beverly Hills, and the Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study in Hollywood, Los Angeles. The Academy opened the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures in Los Angeles in 2021.[5][6]

History

[edit]

The notion of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) began with Louis B. Mayer, head of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). He said he wanted to create an organization that would mediate labor disputes without unions[7] and improve the film industry's image. In other words, the Academy was originally founded as a company union.[8] He met with actor Conrad Nagel, director Fred Niblo, and the head of the Association of Motion Picture Producers, Fred Beetson to discuss these matters. The idea of this elite club having an annual banquet was discussed, but no mention of awards at that time. They also established that membership into the organization would only be open to people involved in one of the five branches of the industry: actors, directors, writers, technicians, and producers.[9]

After their brief meeting, Mayer gathered up a group of thirty-six people involved in the film industry and invited them to a formal banquet at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on January 11, 1927.[10] That evening Mayer presented to those guests what he called the International Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Everyone in the room that evening became a founder of the Academy.[9] Between that evening and when the official Articles of Incorporation for the organization were filed on May 4, 1927, the "International" was dropped from the name, becoming the "Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences".[11][12]

Several organizational meetings were held prior to the first official meeting held on May 6, 1927. Their first organizational meeting was held on May 11 at the Biltmore Hotel. At that meeting Douglas Fairbanks, Sr. was elected as the first president of the Academy, while Fred Niblo was the first vice-president, and their first roster, composed of 230 members, was printed.[11] That night, the Academy also bestowed its first honorary membership, to Thomas Edison.[12] Initially, the Academy was broken down into five main groups, or branches, although this number of branches has grown over the years. The original five were: Producers, Actors, Directors, Writers and Technicians.[13]

The initial concerns of the group had to do with labor.[8][14] However, as time went on, the organization moved "further away from involvement in labor-management arbitrations and negotiations."[15] During the Great Depression, the Academy lost all credibility among studio employee members with respect to labor issues when it took the side of the major film studios in the latter's efforts to convince employees to agree to voluntary reductions in wages and salaries.[8] The Academy thus evolved into its modern role as an honorary organization.[8]

One of several committees formed in the Academy's initial days was for "Awards of Merit", but it was not until May 1928 that the committee began to have serious discussions about the structure of the awards and the presentation ceremony. By July 1928, the board of directors had approved a list of 12 awards to be presented.[16] During July the voting system for the Awards was established, and the nomination and selection process began.[17] This "award of merit for distinctive achievement" is what we know now as the Academy Awards.

The initial location of the organization was 6912 Hollywood Boulevard.[14][15] In November 1927, the Academy moved to the Roosevelt Hotel at 7010 Hollywood Boulevard, which was also the month the Academy's library began compiling a complete collection of books and periodicals dealing with the industry from around the world. In May 1928, the Academy authorized the construction of a state of the art screening room, to be located in the Club lounge of the hotel. The screening room was not completed until April 1929.[14]

With the publication of Academy Reports (No. 1): Incandescent Illumination in July 1928,[18] the Academy began a long history of publishing books to assist its members.[19][20][21] Research Council[22] of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences trained Signal Corps officers, during World War II,[15][23] who later won two Oscars, for Seeds of Destiny and Toward Independence.[24][25]

In 1929, Academy members, in a joint venture with the University of Southern California, created America's first film school to further the art and science of moving pictures. The school's founding faculty included Fairbanks (President of the Academy), D. W. Griffith, William C. deMille, Ernst Lubitsch, Irving Thalberg, and Darryl F. Zanuck.[26]

1930 saw another move, to the Hollywood Professional Building, in order to accommodate the enlarging staff,[15] and by December of that year the library was acknowledged as "having one of the most complete collections of information on the motion picture industry anywhere in existence."[27] They remained at that location until 1935 when further growth caused them to move once again. This time, the administrative offices moved to one location, to the Taft Building at the corner of Hollywood and Vine, while the library moved to 1455 North Gordon Street.[15]

In 1934, the Academy began publication of the Screen Achievement Records Bulletin, which today is known as the Motion Picture Credits Database. This is a list of film credits up for an Academy Award, as well as other films released in Los Angeles County, using research materials from the Academy's Margaret Herrick Library.[28] Another publication of the 1930s was the first annual Academy Players Directory in 1937. The Directory was published by the Academy until 2006 when it was sold to a private concern. The Academy had been involved in the technical aspects of film making since its founding in 1927, and by 1938, the Science and Technology Council consisted of 36 technical committees addressing technical issues related to sound recording and reproduction, projection, lighting, film preservation, and cinematography.[15]

In 1946, the Academy found it necessary to move to a new headquarters, and it acquired the Marquis Theatre at 9038 Melrose Avenue in West Hollywood, which it renamed the Academy Awards Theatre, utilizing the building for both offices and an entertainment venue. The renaming turned out to be fortuitous, as the 21st Academy Awards, held March 24, 1949, were moved there at the last minute.[15]

The Academy acquired property at 8949 Wilshire Boulevard in Beverly Hills in 1972, and built its current headquarters building on the site; the new facilities opened in 1975.[15]

In 2009, the inaugural Governors Awards were held, at which the Academy presents the Academy Honorary Award, the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award and the Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award.

In 2016, the Academy became the target of criticism for its failure to recognize the achievements of minority professionals. For the second year in a row, all 20 nominees in the major acting categories were white. The president of the Academy, Cheryl Boone Isaacs,[29] the first African American and third woman to lead the Academy,[30] denied in 2015 that there was a problem. When asked if the Academy had difficulty with recognizing diversity, she replied "Not at all. Not at all."[31] When the nominations for acting were all white for a second year in a row Gil Robertson IV, president of the African American Film Critics Association called it "offensive."[citation needed] The actors' branch is "overwhelmingly white" and the question is raised whether conscious or unconscious racial biases played a role.[32]

Spike Lee, interviewed shortly after the all-white nominee list was published, pointed to Hollywood leadership as the root problem, "We may win an Oscar now and then, but an Oscar is not going to fundamentally change how Hollywood does business. I'm not talking about Hollywood stars. I'm talking about executives. We're not in the room."[33] Boone Isaacs also released a statement, in which she said "I am both heartbroken and frustrated about the lack of inclusion. This is a difficult but important conversation, and it's time for big changes."[34] After Boone Isaac's statement, prominent African-Americans such as director Spike Lee, actors Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith, and activist Rev. Al Sharpton called for a boycott of the 2016 Oscars for failing to recognize minority achievements, the board voted to make "historic" changes to its membership.[clarification needed] The Academy stated that by 2020 it would double its number of women and minority members.[35] While the Academy has addressed a higher profile for African-Americans, it has yet to raise the profile of other people of color artists, in front of and behind the camera.

In 2018, the Academy invited a record 928 new members.[36]

Casting director David Rubin was elected President of the Academy in August, 2019.[37]

In 2020, Parasite became the first non-English language film to win Best Picture.[38] In June 2022, Bill Kramer was named the CEO of the Academy.[39] Also in 2022, Janet Yang was elected as the first Asian American President of the Academy.[40]

Galleries and theaters

[edit]

The Academy's numerous and diverse operations are housed in three facilities in the Los Angeles area: the headquarters building in Beverly Hills, which was constructed specifically for the Academy, and two Centers for Motion Picture Study – one in Beverly Hills, the other in Hollywood – which were existing structures restored and transformed to contain the Academy's Library, Film Archive and other departments and programs.

Current

[edit]

Academy Headquarters

[edit]

The Academy Headquarters Building in Beverly Hills once housed two galleries that were open free to the public. The Grand Lobby Gallery and the Fourth Floor Gallery offered changing exhibits related to films, film-making and film personalities. These galleries were closed in preparation for the construction of the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, which opened in 2021.

The building includes the Samuel Goldwyn Theater, which seats 1,012, and was designed to present films at maximum technical accuracy, with state-of-the-art projection equipment and sound system. The theater is busy year-round with the Academy's public programming, members-only screenings, movie premieres and other special activities (including the live television broadcast of the Academy Awards nominations announcement every January). The building once housed the Academy Little Theater, a 67-seat screening facility, but this was converted to additional office space in a building remodel.

Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study

[edit]
Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study in the Hollywood district

The Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study, located at 1313 Vine Street in Hollywood and named for legendary actress and Academy co-founder Mary Pickford, houses several Academy departments, including the Academy Film Archive, the Science and Technology Council, Student Academy Awards and Grants, and the Nicholl Fellowships in Screenwriting. The building, originally dedicated on August 18, 1948, is the oldest surviving structure in Hollywood that was designed specifically with television in mind. Additionally, it is the location of the Linwood Dunn Theater, which seats 286 people.

Fairbanks Center for Motion Picture Study

[edit]
Fairbanks Center for Motion Picture Study

The Fairbanks Center for Motion Picture Study is located at 333 S. La Cienega Boulevard in Beverly Hills and is named for legendary actor and Academy co-founder Douglas Fairbanks. It is home to the Academy's Margaret Herrick Library, a world-renowned, non-circulating reference and research collection devoted to the history and development of the motion picture as an art form and an industry. Established in 1928, the library is open to the public and used year-round by students, scholars, historians and industry professionals. The library is named for Margaret Herrick, the Academy's first librarian who also played a major role in the Academy's first televised broadcast, helping to turn the Oscar ceremony into a major annual televised event.[41]

The building itself was built in 1928, where it was originally built to be a water treatment plant for Beverly Hills. Its "bell tower" held water-purifying hardware.[42]

The Academy Museum of Motion Pictures

[edit]
Main article: Academy Museum of Motion Pictures
Academy Museum of Motion Pictures located on the Museum Row

The Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, the newest facility associated with the Academy, is the United States' first large-scale museum dedicated to the film industry. It opened to the public on September 30, 2021,[43] and it contains over 290,000 square feet (27,000 m2) of galleries, exhibition spaces, movie theaters, educational areas, and special event spaces.[44] The museum is located at 6067 Wilshire Boulevard at Fairfax Avenue in Los Angeles, in the historic May Company Building, now named the Saban Building.

Former

[edit]

Academy Theater in New York

[edit]

The Academy also had a New York City-based East Coast showcase theater, the Academy Theater at Lighthouse International. The 220-seat venue was redesigned in 2011 by renowned theater designer Theo Kalomirakis, including an extensive installation of new audio and visual equipment. The theater was in the East 59th Street headquarters of Lighthouse International, a non-profit vision loss organization.[45] In July 2015, it was announced that the Academy was forced to move out, due to Lighthouse International selling the property the theater was in.[46]

Membership

[edit]

Academy membership is divided into 19 branches which represent different disciplines in motion pictures in addition to a separate category for artist representatives.[47] Members may not belong to more than one branch. Members whose work does not fall within one of the branches may belong to a group known as "Members at Large". Members at Large have all the privileges of branch membership except for representation on the Board. Associate members are those closely allied to the industry but not actively engaged in motion picture production. They are not represented on the Board and do not vote on Academy Awards. As of 2024, the Academy's confirmed membership is 10,894, comprising 9,905 voting members, 949 non-voting emeritus members, and 40 associate members. The largest Academy branch is the actors branch, which in 2024 stood at 1,258 members, or 12.7% of the total membership.[48]

Membership in the Academy comes only through an invitation from the Board of Governors. An individual may be recommended to the board by two current members in the branch they would prospectively join, and anyone who is nominated for an Oscar is considered for membership by special committees of the various branches.[47] Each spring, the Board will meet to consider who to extend invitations to, and new invitees are announced in a press release.[47] Once accepted, membership does not expire.[49]

In 2012, the Los Angeles Times, sampling over 5,000 of the Academy's then-5,765 members, found that membership at the time was 94% white, 77% male, 86% age 50 or older, and had a median age of 62. A third of members were previous winners or nominees of Academy Awards themselves. On June 29, 2016, a paradigm shift began in the Academy's selection process, resulting in a new class comprising 46% women and 41% people of color.[50] The effort to diversify the Academy was led by social activist and Broadway Black managing-editor April Reign.[51] Reign created the Twitter hashtag #OscarsSoWhite as a means of criticizing the dearth of non-white nominees for the 2015 Academy Awards. Though the hashtag drew widespread media attention, the Academy remained obstinate on the matter of adopting a resolution that would make demonstrable its efforts to increase diversity. With the 2016 Academy Awards, many, including April Reign, were dismayed by the Academy's indifference about representation and inclusion, as the 2016 nominees were once again entirely white. April Reign revived #OscarsSoWhite, and renewed her campaign efforts, which included multiple media appearances and interviews with reputable news outlets. As a result of Reign's campaign, the discourse surrounding representation and recognition in film spread beyond the United States and became a global discussion [citation needed]. Faced with mounting pressure to expand the Academy membership, the Academy capitulated and instituted new policies to ensure that future Academy membership invitations would better represent the demographics of modern film-going audiences.[52] The A2020 initiative was announced in January 2016 to double the number of women and people of color in membership by 2020[citation needed]. As of 2020, 25 of the Academy's 54 members of the Board of Governors are female.[53]

The Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills, California, screens many new films for Academy members.[54] Since 2021, films in contention for awards are made available to members through a designated streaming app, replacing physical screeners.[55]

Expulsions

[edit]

Five people are known to have been expelled from the Academy. Academy officials acknowledge that other members have been expelled in the past, most for selling their Oscar tickets, but no numbers are available.[56]

Resignations

[edit]

The following members have voluntarily resigned from the organization:

Branches

[edit]

The branches of the Academy are:

  1. Actors
  2. Animation (created from former Short Films and Feature Animation Branch)[67]
  3. Casting Directors[68]
  4. Cinematographers
  5. Costume Designers (created from former Art Directors Branch)[69]
  6. Directors
  7. Documentary
  8. Executives
  9. Film Editors
  10. Makeup Artists and Hairstylists
  11. Marketing and Public Relations
  12. Music
  13. Producers
  14. Production and Technology[70]
  15. Production Design (created from former Art Directors Branch)[69]
  16. Short Films (created from former Short Films and Feature Animation Branch)[67]
  17. Sound
  18. Visual Effects
  19. Writers

Board of governors

[edit]

As of April 2020, the board of governors consists of 57 governors: three governors from each of the 19 Academy branches and three governors-at-large. The Makeup Artists and Hairstylists Branch, created in 2006, had only one governor until July 2013.[69] The Casting Directors Branch, created in 2013, elected its first three governors in Fall 2013.[68] The board of governors is responsible for corporate management, control, and general policies. The board of governors also appoints a CEO and a COO to supervise the administrative activities of the Academy.

Original 36 founders

[edit]

From the original formal banquet, which was hosted by Louis B. Mayer in 1927, everyone invited became a founder of the Academy:[71]

Presidents

[edit]

Presidents are elected for one-year terms and may not be elected for more than four consecutive terms.

# Name Term
1 Douglas Fairbanks 1927–1929
2 William C. DeMille 1929–1931
3 M. C. Levee 1931–1932
4 Conrad Nagel 1932–1933
5 J. Theodore Reed 1933–1934
6 Frank Lloyd 1934–1935
7 Frank Capra 1935–1939
8 Walter Wanger (1st time) 1939–1941
9 Bette Davis 1941 (resigned after two months)
10 Walter Wanger (2nd time) 1941–1945
11 Jean Hersholt 1945–1949
12 Charles Brackett 1949–1955
13 George Seaton 1955–1958
14 George Stevens 1958–1959
15 B. B. Kahane 1959–1960 (died)
16 Valentine Davies 1960–1961 (died)
17 Wendell Corey 1961–1963
18 Arthur Freed 1963–1967
19 Gregory Peck 1967–1970
20 Daniel Taradash 1970–1973
21 Walter Mirisch 1973–1977
22 Howard W. Koch 1977–1979
23 Fay Kanin 1979–1983
24 Gene Allen 1983–1985
25 Robert Wise 1985–1988
26 Richard Kahn 1988–1989
27 Karl Malden 1989–1992
28 Robert Rehme (1st time) 1992–1993
29 Arthur Hiller 1993–1997
30 Robert Rehme (2nd time) 1997–2001
31 Frank Pierson 2001–2005
32 Sid Ganis 2005–2009
33 Tom Sherak 2009–2012
34 Hawk Koch 2012–2013
35 Cheryl Boone Isaacs 2013–2017
36 John Bailey 2017–2019
37 David Rubin 2019–2022
38 Janet Yang 2022–2025
39 Lynette Howell Taylor 2025–present

Source: "Academy Story". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on April 1, 2015. Retrieved January 9, 2018.

Current administration

[edit]
Academy officers[72]
Governors[72]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) is an American nonprofit professional organization dedicated to recognizing excellence in the motion picture arts and sciences, with a mission to inspire imagination and connect the world through cinema. Founded on May 11, 1927, by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer co-founder Louis B. Mayer and other studio executives, the Academy initially served to mediate labor disputes and prevent unionization within Hollywood, while promoting the industry's public image. It comprises over 10,500 members across 19 branches representing key filmmaking disciplines, who vote on the annual Academy Awards—commonly known as the Oscars—the most prestigious honors in the film industry since their inception in 1929. The organization also preserves cinematic heritage through its museum, library, and archive, though its awards process has drawn criticism for biases favoring established studios, specific genres, and increasingly, films aligned with progressive social narratives over pure artistic or commercial merit.

History

Founding and Original Purpose (1927)

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences was established in 1927 as an honorary professional organization comprising 36 founding members from key sectors of the film industry, including producers, directors, actors, writers, and technicians. , head of , conceived the idea in response to rising labor tensions in Hollywood, aiming to create a centralized body that could address disputes internally without resorting to independent unions. The initiative was announced on January 11, 1927, with articles of incorporation filed on May 4 and elected as the first president on May 6. The original purpose centered on fostering cooperation and harmony across branches to preempt external regulation and efforts, which studio executives viewed as threats to and costs. Mayer explicitly sought an entity to mediate labor issues, negotiate with authorities, and elevate the industry's public image amid scandals and strikes, such as the 1926 set builders' walkout. This approach positioned the as a company-aligned alternative to organized labor, enabling direct dialogue between management and workers while maintaining studio authority. Beyond labor mediation, the Academy was tasked with advancing technical standards, recognizing artistic achievements, and representing the motion picture profession professionally, reflecting Mayer's vision of self-regulation to sustain industry growth during the silent film era's transition to sound. Founding members like , , and Fred Niblo contributed to its early structure, emphasizing ethical practices and collaborative problem-solving. Over time, these foundational goals evolved, but the initial emphasis on internal dispute resolution distinguished it from purely celebratory bodies.

Inception of the Academy Awards (1929)

The inaugural Academy Awards were conceived in the wake of the Academy's founding banquet on January 11, 1927, where , vice president of , proposed recognizing exemplary work across filmmaking disciplines to elevate the industry's standards and cohesion. Mayer, a key architect of the Academy, envisioned the awards as a mechanism to honor artistic and technical merits while addressing labor frictions; historical analyses indicate his strategy included linking prestige to compensation models, aiming to forestall by establishing industry self-regulation over salaries for actors, directors, producers, technicians, and writers. This dual purpose—public acclaim alongside private stabilization—reflected the era's tensions, as studios sought to counter rising actor demands amid rapid industry growth. Eligibility covered motion pictures released from August 1, 1927, to July 31, 1928, with nominations solicited via telegrams sent in late 1928 and submissions due by August 1928. The Academy's Central Board of Judges finalized winners on February 15, 1929, announcing results to the press immediately thereafter to generate publicity, though the formal ceremony occurred three months later on May 16, 1929. Held as a private banquet dinner in the Blossom Room of the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel in , the event drew approximately 270 attendees from the film community, hosted by Academy president . Twelve statuettes, designed by art director as a knight standing on a reel of film, were presented across categories including Outstanding Picture, Best Director, and Best Writing, with Wings receiving the top production honor and additional certificates issued for honorable mentions. The modest, untelevised affair lasted about 15 minutes for awards, emphasizing merit over spectacle and setting a precedent for annual recognition that bolstered Hollywood's self-image during the transition from silent films.

Expansion During the Golden Age of Hollywood (1930s–1940s)

During the 1930s, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences shifted its focus amid Hollywood's studio-era expansion, moving away from direct involvement in labor disputes toward promoting the technical and artistic advancement of filmmaking. In 1937, the organization restructured by disbanding its Conciliations Committee, which had handled employee grievances against studios since 1927, and withdrew from industry-wide negotiations to avoid perceptions of bias in an increasingly unionized environment. This pivot emphasized educational and cultural initiatives, including film conservation and appreciation programs, aligning with the Academy's original charter while the motion picture industry produced over 400 feature films annually by the decade's end. Membership grew steadily as the flourished, drawing in producers, directors, , writers, and technicians from major studios like , , and Paramount, which controlled production, distribution, and . By the mid-, the Academy's branches—spanning , directors, executives, producers, technicians, and writers—facilitated technical efforts, such as adopting a uniform camera synchronizing system effective January 1, 1937, to enhance sound-film quality amid the transition from silent era holdovers. The organization's library, established in 1928, expanded under librarian Margaret Herrick starting in the early , amassing scripts, clippings, and production records to support research and preserve industry history as film output surged. In the 1940s, wartime demands accelerated institutional development, with the Academy contributing to propaganda and training films while maintaining its core functions. Headquarters relocated multiple times to accommodate growth, culminating in the 1946 acquisition of the at 9038 in West Hollywood as a dedicated space for operations. The ceremonies, held annually since 1929, gained prominence, with the 1940 event becoming the first to be filmed live, reflecting the organization's rising cultural influence amid box-office records set by hits like Gone with the Wind (1939). Scientific and technical awards, ongoing since the , recognized innovations in color processes and , underscoring the Academy's role in fostering technological progress during a period when U.S. theaters numbered over 20,000.

Post-War Challenges and Institutional Growth (1950s–1970s)

The post-World War II era brought significant challenges to the American film industry, including a sharp decline in theater attendance from its 1946 peak of 4 billion admissions annually, exacerbated by the rise of television ownership, which reached 9% of U.S. households by 1950 and 87% by 1960, drawing audiences away from cinemas. The 1948 Paramount Decree further dismantled the studio system's vertical integration, fostering independent production but reducing overall output and box-office revenues, with Hollywood studios facing competition from televised content and suburban migration. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS), reflecting these pressures, adapted by televising the 25th Academy Awards ceremony on March 19, 1953, marking the first live broadcast on NBC, which reached an estimated 10.5 million viewers despite initial resistance from some members wary of the medium's novelty. This shift not only preserved the Oscars' prestige amid industry contraction but also positioned AMPAS as a bridge between film and emerging media, with subsequent broadcasts expanding to include radio simulcasts and contributing to the event's evolution into a major television spectacle. By the 1960s, AMPAS grappled with internal stagnation, as its membership—primarily composed of industry veterans from the studio era—faced criticism for inactivity and disconnection from contemporary filmmaking trends, amid broader cultural shifts like the movement emphasizing youth-oriented narratives. Under President (1967–1970), the Academy initiated reforms to revitalize governance and participation, including revisions to invitation criteria to prioritize active professionals and culminating in 1970 with the redesignation of 335 long-term but inactive members as non-voting "associates," reducing the voting body from approximately 3,000 to a more engaged core. These measures, announced in a letter to members, aimed to align the Academy with evolving industry dynamics, such as the rise of directors like , while maintaining eligibility standards tied to peer-reviewed achievements in 17 branches. Peck's tenure emphasized institutional self-preservation, avoiding external political entanglements like those from the earlier era. Institutional growth during this period manifested in expanded administrative scope and awards infrastructure, with the Academy introducing categories like Best Costume Design in 1948 (fully implemented post-war) and refining rules for foreign-language films starting in 1956 to reflect global cinema's ascent. Membership invitations grew selectively to incorporate technicians and emerging talents, supporting AMPAS's role in industry standardization, such as through technical research committees that influenced widescreen formats like amid 1950s technological pivots against TV. By the 1970s, under successors like Daniel Taradash (1970–1973), the Academy solidified its influence via increased educational outreach and archival efforts, laying groundwork for preservation initiatives while the Oscars' television format innovations—such as longer runtime and celebrity hosting—boosted viewership to over 50 million by 1974, enhancing AMPAS's cultural authority despite ongoing box-office volatility.

Modernization and Global Reach (1980s–2000s)

In the 1980s, the Academy Awards achieved greater global reach through expanded international television distribution. By 1984, broadcast rights had been licensed to 76 countries, up from 50 in 1970, with ABC providing satellite feeds to support live and delayed viewings worldwide. This dissemination elevated the Oscars as a universal benchmark for cinematic excellence, attracting audiences beyond North America and reinforcing Hollywood's cultural export. The Academy modernized its preservation infrastructure during the late 1990s and early 2000s to address deteriorating film stocks and advancing restoration technologies. The Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study opened in 2002 on in Hollywood, relocating the from its prior location and enabling expanded efforts in photochemical preservation, digital scanning, and public exhibition of historical films. This facility, named after co-founder , centralized resources for the Margaret Herrick Library and archive collections, supporting systematic safeguarding of over 1,100 titles by the 2010s through ongoing projects. Under presidents including Robert Rehme, who served from 1997 to 2001, the Academy adapted to industry shifts like the proliferation of digital tools and international co-productions. Rehme's tenure emphasized financial stability and educational outreach via the Academy Foundation, which he later led, funding scholarships and programs to nurture global talent pipelines. These initiatives complemented the Oscars' evolving recognition of foreign-language films, with submissions to the category rising amid heightened worldwide submissions, though voting remained dominated by U.S.-based members.

Recent Reforms and Developments (2010s–Present)

In response to the #OscarsSoWhite campaign launched in 2015, which criticized the lack of racial diversity in acting s—all 20 acting nominees that year were white for the second consecutive year—the Academy's Board of Governors approved membership reforms on January 22, 2016. These included inviting more women and individuals from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups to double their representation within two years, imposing 10-year term limits on voting membership (renewable once for active members), and granting lifetime voting rights only after three terms or an Oscar win/. The reforms also required new invitees to have worked within the previous 10 years in film-related roles. By 2020, people of color comprised 16% of active members, up from 8% in 2015, while women reached 49% from 27%. These changes expanded the total membership to over 10,000 by diversifying its 17 branches, though critics noted persistent underrepresentation in nominations relative to membership gains. To address eligibility for awards, the Academy established representation and inclusion standards on September 8, 2020, requiring Best Picture contenders starting with the 96th Oscars (2024) to meet at least two of four criteria: on-screen representation of underrepresented groups; significant roles for underrepresented creative and department heads; paid apprenticeships or internships for underrepresented talent; or industry access initiatives like paid programs. Underrepresented groups were defined to include women, racial/ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, disabled persons, and those from low-income backgrounds, with films submitting a confidential form for verification. Of 321 Oscar-qualifying films in 2023, 265 met the standards for Best Picture eligibility. The policy, part of the broader Academy Aperture 2025 equity plan announced June 12, 2020, aimed to promote systemic change in industry hiring but drew debate over whether it prioritized demographics over artistic merit. Experiments with award categories included the August 8, 2018, announcement of a new "Outstanding Achievement in Popular Film" category, intended to recognize blockbusters and boost viewership amid declining ratings, alongside shortening the telecast to three hours. Facing backlash from members over potential dilution of Best Picture prestige and logistical confusion—such as whether winners could compete in both—the Board voted on September 5, 2018, to suspend its introduction indefinitely. Voting procedures evolved with ranked-choice voting for Best Picture nominations, implemented since 2009 and expanded post-reforms to enhance proportionality; by 2025 estimates, it ensured at least 85% of voters saw a preferred nominee in five-candidate fields. Leadership transitioned with Dawn Hudson serving as CEO from June 2011 to July 2022, overseeing diversity initiatives and the Academy Museum's September 2021 opening. Bill Kramer, previously the museum's director and president, succeeded her on July 18, 2022, focusing on global outreach and technological integration. In April 2025, the Board approved rules mandating members view all nominated films in a category to vote in the final round, addressing concerns over uninformed ballots, alongside AI guidelines prohibiting deepfakes in submissions and expanded voting for animated shorts. Other advancements included entrusting the to the Academy Software Foundation on August 6, 2025, and investigating and other technologies for potential awards.

Core Mission and Activities

Academy Awards Administration and Evolution

The Academy Awards, formally known as the Oscars, are administered by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences through its Board of Governors, which provides oversight for the annual ceremony, rule-making, and eligibility determinations. The process involves two main phases: nominations and final voting, conducted via among the Academy's approximately 10,000 active and life members, divided into 19 branches representing disciplines such as , directing, and . For most categories, nominations are selected by members of the relevant branch—for instance, actors nominate performers—while all members nominate Best Picture candidates. Final winners, except in certain technical categories, are determined by a preferential system open to all eligible voters, with Best Picture using ranked-choice voting to ensure a majority preference. The awards' administration has evolved significantly since their inception on May 16, 1929, when the first ceremony honored films from August 1927 to July 1928, with winners pre-selected by a committee rather than voted upon. By 1933, the Academy shifted eligibility to a calendar-year basis to align with industry cycles, and voting expanded to include broader member input, replacing the earlier producer-dominated selections. Category expansions marked further changes: honorary awards preceded formal ones initially, but dedicated categories like Best Animated Feature were added in 2001, and Best Animated Short evolved from earlier short film recognitions. Technical and craft awards, such as those for visual effects, originated in the 1930s and have periodically incorporated scientific and engineering merits, with separate ceremonies for some until consolidated. In response to criticisms of underrepresentation, particularly following the 2015 #OscarsSoWhite campaign highlighting consecutive years of all-white acting nominees, the Academy implemented membership diversification efforts starting in 2016, inviting more women and people of color to increase branch inclusivity. This culminated in 2020 with the adoption of Representation and Inclusion Standards for Best Picture eligibility, effective for the 96th Oscars in 2024, requiring films to meet at least two of four criteria, such as employing underrepresented groups in key roles or ensuring diverse executive leadership and marketing teams. Additional reforms include a 2025 rule mandating voters to view all shortlisted films in a category before final ballots, aimed at informed decision-making, and the introduction of a Best Casting award starting in 2026 to recognize that discipline. These changes reflect ongoing adaptations to industry shifts, viewer expectations, and legal eligibility rules, such as theatrical release requirements adjusted during the in 2021 to include streaming qualifiers.

Film Preservation, Education, and Research Initiatives

The , a core component of the Academy's collections, is dedicated to the preservation, restoration, documentation, exhibition, and study of motion pictures, maintaining over 250,000 items including prints of all Best Picture Oscar-winning films. Established in as part of for Motion Picture Study, the archive collects a diverse range of materials such as Academy Award-nominated films, annual Oscar telecasts, documentaries, and silent-era works, ensuring their long-term accessibility for research and public viewing. In addition to analog preservation, the Academy addresses digital challenges through initiatives like the Academy Digital Preservation Forum, launched on November 18, 2021, which facilitates global collaboration on digital archiving strategies, case studies, educational activities, and university partnerships to combat obsolescence in motion picture storage. The Digital Motion Picture Archive Framework Project further supports these efforts with multi-year investigations into sustainable access and preservation of assets. In education, the Academy funds programs to cultivate film scholarship and practical skills, including the Academy Film Scholars grants awarded to both academic and independent researchers for original works advancing film history and analysis. The Teachers Guide Series provides resources for middle and high school educators to integrate the art and science of into curricula, covering topics from production techniques to cinematic . Targeted includes FilmCraft grants, which back high-quality training for emerging filmmakers from underrepresented communities, and partnerships like Spark @ the Academy, offering apprenticeships to students from underserved areas since 2013. Broader initiatives such as Gold Rising provide participants with mentorship from Academy members and industry professionals to build career networks in motion pictures. The annually recognize exemplary student films, fostering early talent development across , , and categories. Research activities are spearheaded by the Science and Technology Council, which promotes advancements in cinematic technologies through industry-wide projects on , , and , often involving external experts. Key outputs include the Academy Color Encoding System (ACES), an open-standard framework for device-independent color management adopted in professional workflows since its development in the early 2000s. The Council also evaluates scientific achievements for awards, as seen in the 2021 recognition of 17 innovations spanning , software, and preservation tools, reflecting ongoing empirical assessments of technologies' impact on . These efforts integrate with preservation by prioritizing into archival stability, such as digital format longevity, to sustain the Academy's role as a steward of motion picture heritage.

Publications, Scholarships, and Industry Support

The Academy supports scholarly publications in film history and theory through the Academy Film Scholars program, which awards two $25,000 annually to academically affiliated or independent scholars for significant new works, often resulting in books or articles. These prioritize original over previously funded projects, with recipients selected by a of Academy members and historians. The Academy Foundation, the organization's philanthropic arm, facilitates additional publications indirectly via grants to nonprofits and educational institutions for film-related research and archival projects, including digitization of historical materials like periodicals and pamphlets held in the Margaret Herrick Library. The library's digital collections encompass over 3,000 periodical titles spanning from the early onward, made accessible online to support academic and industry reference. In scholarships and fellowships, the Nicholl Fellowships in Screenwriting provide up to five $35,000 awards each year to emerging amateur screenwriters, selected from submissions vetted through university programs, screenwriting labs, and platforms like the Black List, with mentorship from Academy members. The program, established in 1986, has supported over 150 fellows, many of whom advanced to produced works. The Student Academy Awards recognize student filmmakers globally across animation, documentary, live action narrative, and alternative/experimental categories, offering gold ($5,000), silver ($3,000), and bronze ($2,000) prizes, with winners honored at an annual ceremony; past recipients include directors like Pete Docter and Spike Lee, whose films garnered 69 Oscar nominations and 15 wins. For industry support, the Academy Foundation distributes grants totaling millions annually to film schools, festivals, and organizations, funding educational initiatives, equipment, and screenings to promote access and diversity in filmmaking. Examples include $5,000–$20,000 awards to film festivals for curated programs and FilmCraft grants—currently on hold—for hands-on training of filmmakers from nontraditional backgrounds. Programs like Gold Rising provide emerging professionals with networking, internships, and access to Academy members and industry leaders to foster career development. These efforts, administered since the Foundation's inception, aim to bridge opportunity gaps without restricting to specific demographics, though recent allocations have emphasized underrepresented groups.

Organizational Governance

Membership Eligibility, Branches, and Composition

Membership in the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is restricted to individuals who have demonstrated exceptional achievements in the production of theatrically released motion pictures, excluding those primarily involved in television, streaming-only content, or non- media. Candidates for active membership must be sponsored by two current members of the relevant branch and undergo review by that branch's executive committee, which assesses eligibility based on specific criteria such as credited work, years of experience, and contributions to the field; approval then requires a vote by the Academy's Board of Governors. Academy Award receive preferential consideration, often qualifying automatically for sponsorship review in their branch. The process emphasizes professional accomplishments over self-nomination, with invitations extended annually in spring following a deadline for submissions, such as September 29, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. PT. The Academy organizes its membership into 19 branches, each representing a distinct craft or discipline in filmmaking, alongside a separate category for artist representatives. These branches include Actors, Animation, Casting Directors, Cinematographers, Costume Designers, Directors, Documentary, Executives, Film Editors, Makeup Artists and Hairstylists, Marketing and Public Relations, Music, Producers, Production and Technology, Production Design, Short Films, Sound, Visual Effects, and Writers; artist representatives encompass agents, managers, and entertainment lawyers supporting Academy members. Eligibility varies by branch—for instance, the Directors branch requires at least two directorial credits on theatrical features, one within the past decade, while the Cinematographers branch demands two credits as director of photography on qualifying films. Branches like Documentary and Animation tier contributions based on roles (e.g., director/producer vs. editor) and recency, ensuring focus on high-caliber theatrical output. This structure maintains specialization, with members voting exclusively in their branch for most Academy Awards categories, except Best Picture, which involves all eligible voters. As of September 2025, the comprises approximately 11,104 members, including over 10,143 active voting members, following the invitation of 534 new members in June 2025 from 60 countries. The branch forms the largest contingent, exceeding 1,300 members, reflecting its prominence in the . Membership includes active professionals who retain voting rights, members who transition to non-voting status upon retirement after age 80 or 30 years of service, and associate members without voting privileges. The composition prioritizes expertise in theatrical cinema, with recent invitations targeting 41% women, 45% from underrepresented communities, and 55% international, though overall demographics remain dominated by established industry veterans.

Board of Governors and Decision-Making Processes

The Board of Governors of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences comprises 55 members, with representatives elected from each of the organization's 17 branches to ensure coverage across disciplines such as , directing, production, and technical crafts. Most branches elect three governors, while exceptions include the Animation Branch (two governors) and the Short Films and Feature Animation Branch (one governor). In addition to branch-elected governors, the Board includes a small number of governors-at-large, nominated by the Academy President and approved by majority vote of the sitting Board. Governors are elected through branch-specific voting processes, with elections typically held annually to fill expiring terms; each serves a three-year term and may be reelected for up to two additional consecutive terms before a mandatory hiatus. Board members convene for six to eight meetings per year, conducted in person or via video conference, and each governor is required to serve on at least one standing , such as those addressing awards, , membership, or preservation. These meetings facilitate deliberation on strategic matters, with decisions made by majority vote; is prohibited under the Academy's bylaws, emphasizing direct participation. The Board's primary responsibilities include corporate oversight, stewardship of the Academy's finances, and alignment with its mission to advance motion picture arts. As a nonprofit, the Academy's funding derives primarily from membership dues (approximately $2 million annually), revenue from licensing the Academy Awards broadcast rights primarily to Disney/ABC (contributing about 70% of its operating budget of around $170 million), returns on investments from its endowment, and philanthropic donations, such as the $50 million gift from Haim and Cheryl Saban for the Academy Museum as part of broader global fundraising campaigns. It approves the annual as proposed by the CEO, who manages over 700 staff members, and sets policies governing membership invitations, ethical standards, and operational protocols. The Board also appoints the CEO and , while electing the President and other officers from its ranks to lead executive functions. In relation to the , the Board holds authority to revise rules on eligibility, procedures, and final voting—such as restricting category ballots to active and lifetime members or implementing campaign regulations to curb promotional excesses—ensuring these align with artistic and technical merit criteria. For disciplinary actions, the Board exercises sole power to suspend or expel members for violations of conduct standards, requiring an affirmative vote after review. This structure positions the Board as the apex decision-making body, balancing branch representation with centralized control to address evolving industry challenges, though critics have noted potential insularity in its predominantly industry-insider composition.

Presidents, Founders, and Leadership Transitions

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences was established on May 11, 1927, primarily through the efforts of studio head , who conceived the organization as a means to mediate labor disputes in Hollywood and promote industry self-regulation via an awards system. An initial banquet on January 11, 1927, selected the 36 founding members from various film crafts, including actors like and , directors such as , producers like Mayer and , and technicians including . These founders represented the major branches—actors, directors, producers, technicians, and writers—aiming to create a professional body that elevated motion pictures as an art form while addressing practical guild tensions. Douglas Fairbanks, a co-founder and prominent actor, was elected as the inaugural president, serving from 1927 to 1929 and overseeing the first ceremony on May 16, 1929. Early leadership featured frequent transitions with short terms, often one to three years, reflecting the Academy's evolving governance amid rapid industry growth; successors included (1929–1931), M.C. Levee (1931–1932), (1932–1933), Theodore Reed (1933–1934), and (1934–1935). Frank Capra's presidency from 1935 to 1938 marked a push for broader member involvement, while later figures like (1939–1941) and (1945–1949) navigated World War II-era challenges, including wartime film production restrictions.
PresidentTerm
1927–1929
1929–1931
M.C. Levee1931–1932
1932–1933
Theodore Reed1933–1934
1934–1935
1935–1938
1939–1941
1945–1949
1949–1957
1957–1958
1958–1959
1959–1960
1960–1961
1961–1963
1963–1965
1967–1970
Daniel Taradash1970–1971
1971–1973
1973 (interim)
Howard W. Koch1977–1979
Fay Kanin1979–1983
Gene Allen1983–1985
1985–1988
Richard Kahn1988–1989 (interim)
1989–1992
Robert Reisz1992–1993 (interim)
1993–1997
Robert Rehme1997–2001
Howard W. Koch Jr.2001 (interim)
2001–2005
2005–2009
Tom Sherak2009–2012
2012–2013
2013–2015
John Bailey2015–2017; 2019–2020
2017–2019 (interim)
David Rubin2020–2022
2022–2025
2025–present
Modern leadership transitions have emphasized stability and response to external pressures, such as membership expansion and diversity initiatives post-2015 #OscarsSoWhite criticism. The role of president, elected by the Board of Governors for up to three one-year terms, works alongside a separate CEO position introduced in the 2000s for operational management. Bill Kramer assumed the CEO role on June 13, 2022, succeeding Dawn Hudson, with his contract extended through July 2028 amid efforts to integrate the Academy Museum and streamline awards processes. , elected in August 2022 as the first Asian-American president, focused on global outreach before term limits ended her tenure; she was succeeded by producer , elected on July 31, 2025, who brings experience from films like Hell or High Water and prior Academy governance roles. These shifts underscore a pattern of rotating from producers and executives to maintain institutional adaptability without centralized power concentration.

Facilities and Infrastructure

Current Headquarters, Libraries, and Theaters

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences maintains its administrative headquarters at 8949 in , a facility that serves as the central hub for , awards administration, and member services. This location, operational since the organization's relocation in the mid-20th century, includes office spaces for over 400 staff members and supports key functions such as nominations processing and executive leadership. The organization's primary research library, the Margaret Herrick Library, is housed at the Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study, located at 333 South La Cienega Boulevard in Beverly Hills, approximately one mile from the headquarters. Established in 1928 as the Academy's foundational research resource, the library relocated to this dedicated facility in 1991 after prior temporary sites; it holds over 10 million items, including scripts, posters, clippings, and production records spanning film history, with core collections open to the public on a walk-in basis and no appointment required for general access. The Pickford Center, named after co-founder , also encompasses archives and preservation operations, emphasizing empirical documentation of cinematic artifacts over interpretive curation. The Academy operates two principal theaters for screenings, premieres, and member events: the at headquarters and the Linwood Dunn Theater at the Pickford Center. The , a 1,000-seat venue completed in 1975 and renovated for advanced projection standards, is engineered for precise film reproduction with state-of-the-art equipment supporting 35mm, digital, and high-frame-rate formats, hosting Oscar nominee screenings and technical demonstrations. Adjacent at the Pickford Center, the Linwood Dunn Theater opened in 2003 as a 286-seat facility honoring visual effects innovator Linwood G. Dunn; it accommodates 16mm, 35mm, and 70mm projections, serving preservation showings and specialized viewings with capacity for analytical equipment integration. These venues prioritize technical fidelity and archival integrity, distinct from commercial exhibition spaces.

Academy Museum of Motion Pictures

The Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, operated by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, is located in the Saban Building, a renovated 1939 Streamline Moderne structure originally designed as the May Company department store at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue in Los Angeles' Miracle Mile district. The 300,000-square-foot facility spans seven stories and includes exhibition spaces, theaters, and educational areas dedicated to the art and science of filmmaking. Renzo Piano Building Workshop led the architectural redesign, adding a prominent 288-foot-diameter spherical glass dome connected to the historic building via a bridge, which serves as an offering views of the skyline and . Construction began in 2017, with the museum opening to the public on September 30, 2021, following pandemic-related delays. The project, costing over $300 million, draws from the Academy's extensive collections, encompassing more than 12 million photographs, 190,000 and video assets, 73,000 posters, and numerous artifacts such as costumes, props, and equipment. The museum's core permanent exhibition, "Stories of Cinema," occupies the second and third floors, presenting a narrative of global filmmaking through immersive installations, including contributions from directors like Spike Lee and Pedro Almodóvar. Temporary exhibitions rotate, featuring items like the shark model from Jaws (September 2025–July 2026) and in May 2024, the first dedicated permanent gallery on animation history. Facilities include the David Geffen Theater for screenings and events, supporting the museum's role in film preservation and public education. Curatorial decisions have drawn criticism, notably the 2024 "" exhibit on the industry's Jewish founders, which faced accusations from Hollywood figures of employing antisemitic tropes by emphasizing exploitative practices and immigrant ambitions in a manner perceived as stereotypical and derogatory. In response, the museum announced revisions in June 2024 to address these concerns, removing language deemed overly critical while retaining historical context on the founders' biographies. Broader critiques highlight cost overruns exceeding initial budgets and a that some argue prioritizes over functional flow, contributing to perceptions of operational shortcomings.

Former Properties and Relocations

From 1935 to 1946, the Academy's headquarters were situated in the Taft Building, ' inaugural high-rise office tower located in Hollywood. The organization subsequently operated from facilities in West Hollywood until 1975. In 1972, it purchased land on in Beverly Hills and completed a new seven-story headquarters building there, which opened that year and has remained its primary base since. Among its former properties, the Center for Motion Picture Study utilized the Beverly Hills Waterworks Building, originally constructed in 1928 as the city's water treatment plant and operational in that capacity until the . The adapted the structure for motion picture research and study after its municipal decommissioning, prior to shifting those activities to other sites. The Margaret Herrick Library, a key repository of film history materials, was housed at the headquarters before relocation to the Pickford Center for Motion Picture Study in Hollywood.

Controversies and Criticisms

Ethical Lapses: Expulsions, Resignations, and Scandals

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences maintains bylaws prohibiting members from engaging in conduct that undermines the organization's mission, including illegal activities and, since the adoption of a formal Standards of Conduct on December 8, 2017, violations involving , abuse, or assault. Prior to 2017, expulsions were exceedingly rare and unrelated to personal misconduct, reflecting a historical emphasis on professional rather than ethical accountability. The first expulsion occurred on February 3, 2004, when was removed for distributing non-commercial Academy screeners to unauthorized parties, enabling widespread piracy of unreleased films. Post-2017, amid heightened scrutiny from the #MeToo revelations, the board expelled producer on October 14, 2017—only the second such action in the Academy's history—after over two-thirds of governors voted in favor, citing his alleged and of numerous women over decades, which had been an open industry secret. On May 1, 2018, the board simultaneously expelled actor , convicted that April of aggravated indecent , and director , who in 1977 pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old but fled the U.S. before sentencing; Polanski's expulsion proceeded despite his non-resident status and subsequent legal challenge, which courts upheld in 2020. Further expulsions followed for similar ethical breaches, including cinematographer Adam Kimmel in September 2021 for allegations. Resignations tied to scandals have also occurred, notably actor Will Smith's on April 1, 2022, preempting an expulsion vote after he slapped presenter onstage at the on March 27, 2022, violating the Standards of Conduct; the Academy accepted the resignation and imposed a 10-year ban from all events and programs, while allowing him to retain his Best Actor Oscar. These actions drew mixed reactions, with supporters praising the Academy's post-2017 firmness but critics, including legal observers, questioning selective enforcement—such as the retention of members like despite unproven allegations—as inconsistent with the conduct code's intent to uphold "respect for human dignity." The expulsions underscored causal links between prolonged tolerance of and institutional scandals, as evidenced by Weinstein's influence enabling his abuses, though the Academy's prior inaction stemmed from bylaws lacking explicit ethical teeth until forced .
MemberDateReason for Expulsion or Resignation
Carmine CaridiFebruary 3, 2004Illegal distribution of screeners leading to piracy
October 14, 2017Sexual harassment and assault allegations
May 1, 2018Sexual assault conviction
May 1, 20181977 guilty plea to unlawful with a minor
Adam KimmelSeptember 2021Sexual misconduct allegations
(resignation)April 1, 2022Onstage assault of , preempting expulsion

Diversity Mandates and Merit-Based Critiques

In September 2020, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced representation and inclusion standards for Best Picture eligibility at the Oscars, requiring films to meet at least two of four criteria starting with the in 2024. These standards encompass on-screen representation (e.g., lead or significant supporting roles for individuals from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups, LGBTQ+ persons, or those with disabilities), creative leadership and company positions filled by underrepresented groups, paid apprenticeships or internships for underrepresented individuals, and evidence of industry access or audience development initiatives targeting underrepresented communities. The initiative, part of the broader Academy Aperture 2025 plan adopted in June 2020, aimed to promote equitable representation reflecting U.S. demographics, with the Academy stating it would encourage inclusive practices without prescribing specific content. Following implementation, data from the 96th Oscars showed incremental increases in diverse nominations, including 19% more female-led projects and 20% more non-white nominees compared to prior years, attributed partly to expanded membership efforts post-2015 #OscarsSoWhite campaign. Films like Oppenheimer qualified under the standards via off-screen technical roles and marketing to diverse audiences, despite limited on-screen diversity, prompting debates over compliance ease. The Academy reported over 1,000 films submitted confidential Representation and Inclusion Standards Entry (RAISE) forms for verification, with non-compliance disqualifying Best Picture contention but not other categories. Critics from merit-based perspectives have argued that the standards compromise artistic excellence by introducing ideological checkboxes that prioritize demographic representation over narrative integrity, casting quality, or creative vision. Actor , an Academy member, described the requirements as "so dumb" and antithetical to merit-driven awards, asserting they impose irrelevant criteria on . Filmmaker called them an "insult to ," contending that such mandates signal distrust in audiences' ability to reward quality independently and risk homogenizing content to meet quotas. Anonymous Oscars voters echoed this, labeling the rules "completely ridiculous" for potentially sidelining superior films lacking superficial diversity markers, with one stating they undermine the awards' prestige as arbiters of cinematic achievement. Further merit critiques highlight risks to , such as filmmakers altering historical narratives or hiring practices to satisfy criteria, potentially stifling in genres like biopics or period dramas. A 2021 poll found 58% of Americans opposed the standards, with most doubting they would enhance quality and viewing them as unnecessary given existing market incentives for broad appeal. criticized the approach in 2025, arguing Oscars should reward merit exclusively, as diversity mandates create unfair barriers and erode credibility. Proponents counter that barriers to underrepresented talent have historically limited merit pools, but detractors maintain that true excellence emerges from unencumbered competition, not enforced inclusion, citing stagnant overall diversity gains despite initiatives.

Alleged Political Bias and Ideological Homogeneity

The membership of the of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, comprising over 10,000 individuals primarily from the sector, demonstrates pronounced ideological homogeneity, particularly in political contributions. Analysis of donations from top Hollywood executives in 2018 revealed that 99.7 percent supported Democrats or Democratic-aligned groups. Comparable patterns persist industry-wide, with entertainment professionals contributing roughly six times more to Democratic causes than Republican ones as tracked through 2012 federal election cycles. These figures, derived from data, indicate a systemic left-leaning tilt among industry leaders and creatives eligible for or active in Academy voting, raising questions about the neutrality of award deliberations. Critics contend this uniformity fosters bias against films espousing conservative, patriotic, or traditionalist themes, resulting in recurrent snubs despite commercial or critical viability. The 2014 biographical drama , directed by —a vocal Republican supporter—and centered on SEAL Chris Kyle's service, earned six nominations including Best Picture but lost to Birdman, with observers attributing the outcome to voter aversion toward its pro-military narrative and Eastwood's politics. Similarly, the 2023 thriller Sound of Freedom, which dramatized real efforts against child and resonated with conservative audiences by grossing over $250 million on a $14 million budget, received no nominations whatsoever, prompting actor to cite anticipated "anti-Christian bias" from the Academy as a barrier to recognition. Recent cases reinforce these claims. In December 2024, the conservative-leaning documentary Am I Racist?, hosted by commentator Matt Walsh and exploring racial dynamics through undercover journalism, was omitted from the Academy's documentary shortlist despite topping charts in its category, leading producers to decry exclusionary ideological gatekeeping. Conservative filmmakers have further alleged that the Academy's (DEI) standards—implemented since 2020 to require representation benchmarks for Best Picture eligibility—prioritize demographic checkboxes over viewpoint diversity, sidelining right-leaning projects in favor of progressive narratives. Proponents of the Academy's process assert selections reflect artistic merit rather than politics, pointing to occasional nods for mainstream successes. However, the dearth of direct surveys on voter partisanship—coupled with donation disparities and patterned omissions of ideologically divergent works—sustains perceptions of an institution insulated from conservative perspectives, potentially undermining claims of impartiality in honoring cinematic excellence. Mainstream media coverage, often from outlets with documented left-leaning institutional biases, tends to frame such snubs as merit failures, yet empirical contribution data challenges narratives of ideological balance within the voting body.

Financial Mismanagement and Operational Failures

The project exemplified financial mismanagement through substantial cost overruns and prolonged delays. Initially budgeted at approximately $388 million as cited in 2015, the total cost escalated to $482 million by February 2020, representing a 24% increase driven by challenges, design changes, and site acquisition issues. The project, conceived in the early , involved abandoning an initial Hollywood site purchased for $50 million in favor of renovating the historic on , further complicating timelines and expenses amid competing visions and funding shortfalls exceeding $78 million at one point. These overruns contributed to a decade of setbacks, including halts during the , postponing the public opening from planned dates in the mid-2010s until September 2021. Operational failures manifested in the museum's post-opening struggles to achieve financial sustainability despite initial ticket sales of 700,000 in its first year from October 2021 to October 2022. Ongoing curatorial and attendance challenges persisted, with the $480 million facility facing criticism for inadequate revenue generation relative to its scale and the Academy's broader mission. Museum-related expenses loomed large in the Academy's fiscal reports, straining resources even as investment income and Oscars revenue provided offsets; for fiscal year 2023 ending June 30, operations yielded a $13.5 million surplus, but high museum costs underscored inefficiencies in project execution. In October 2024, the Academy executed layoffs affecting 16 employees—roughly 2% of its overall workforce but up to 30% in key preservation departments—targeting , , and roles as part of a restructuring effort. Preservation advocates responded with petitions urging rehiring, arguing the cuts impaired the organization's core film history mandate despite Academy assurances of sustained commitment to preservation activities. This followed the 2022 departure of Christine Simmons, who oversaw internal infrastructure amid these pressures. Broader operational critiques highlighted vulnerabilities in revenue streams, such as fluctuating Oscars telecast , where television rights softened pre-pandemic and required adaptations to maintain viability. While fiscal saw Oscars-related rise modestly to $146.6 million, persistent high costs for events like the ceremony, estimated at $56.9 million, reflected challenges in balancing prestige with fiscal prudence. These incidents collectively pointed to systemic issues in and within the Academy's .

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Film Standards and Industry Practices

The Academy's awards, spanning 24 categories, establish benchmarks for artistic and technical merit that influence production decisions across Hollywood, as filmmakers calibrate scripts, visuals, and performances to align with voter preferences evidenced in past winners, such as favoring narrative depth in drama over commercial spectacle. These recognitions extend to the Scientific and Technical Awards, initiated in , which honor innovations with a proven record of advancing practices, including advancements in stabilized operation and fire stunt safety systems that have become industry standards for risk mitigation and visual fidelity. Such accolades drive adoption of cutting-edge tools, as seen in the widespread integration of patented technologies like those from for emulsions, elevating baseline technical quality in and . Eligibility rules further shape practices, notably the representation and inclusion standards adopted in 2020 and fully enforced for Best Picture nominees from the 96th Academy Awards onward, requiring films to meet thresholds in on-screen diversity, executive leadership, and supplier contracts to qualify, thereby prompting studios to prioritize demographic targets in casting, crew hiring, and partnerships over purely merit-driven selections in some cases. This has standardized certain production checklists, with data from implementation showing increased scrutiny on compliance during development phases, though critics argue it may dilute focus on universal storytelling excellence. Concurrently, regulations on Oscar campaigning, such as centralized screener distribution enacted in 2018, curb excessive promotional spending, which previously exceeded $100 million industry-wide per cycle, fostering more restrained marketing tactics centered on member screenings and digital outreach. Economically, the Oscars incentivize prestige-oriented filmmaking, with nominations yielding measurable box office gains—Best Picture contenders averaging a 22% revenue uplift post-announcement—and wins correlating to extended theatrical runs and ancillary sales, as evidenced by analyses of releases from onward. This dynamic encourages "awards season" slates dominated by biopics and historical dramas, altering studio pipelines to allocate budgets toward voter-appealing elements like period authenticity and ensemble casts, while empirical models indicate Oscar successes induce persistent boosts in national film output, such as surges following high-profile wins. Overall, these mechanisms reinforce a feedback loop where Academy validation not only validates but perpetuates specific standards, though declining viewership since 2014—peaking at 42.9 million in versus 19.5 million in 2023—raises questions about their sustained sway amid streaming fragmentation.

Cultural Significance Versus Perceptions of Elitism

The , presented annually by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, hold substantial cultural significance as the preeminent recognition of cinematic achievement, influencing , distribution, and public discourse on storytelling. Winners often experience boosted returns and enhanced career trajectories, with the ceremony serving as a global cultural event that shapes perceptions of artistic excellence and national values. For nearly a century, the Oscars have reflected evolving societal priorities, from technological innovations to narrative themes, positioning them as a for American cultural shifts. However, this prestige coexists with widespread perceptions of elitism, stemming from the Academy's voting body—historically dominated by older, white, male members—which has prioritized critically acclaimed, often low-grossing arthouse films over commercially successful blockbusters. Notable examples include the 1994 oversight of , a critically revered prison drama that underperformed at the but resonated widely with audiences, receiving zero nominations despite its enduring popularity. Similarly, 1995's , a high-profile crime epic directed by starring and , earned no nods, highlighting a preference for prestige dramas over genre-driven hits. Such patterns fuel critiques that the operates as an insular Hollywood club, disconnected from broader viewer tastes. This perceived disconnect manifests in declining viewership, with the 2021 ceremony drawing a record-low 9.85 million U.S. viewers—a 58% drop from the prior year and far below peaks exceeding 40 million in the early —attributed partly to nominations favoring niche films with limited public appeal. Efforts to counter , such as the short-lived 2018 proposal for a "popular " category, were abandoned amid backlash labeling them as patronizing and insufficient to bridge the gap between Academy preferences and mass entertainment. Critics argue this insularity erodes the Oscars' role as a unifying cultural , rendering it more a niche for industry insiders than a reflection of collective cinematic experience, though its symbolic weight persists in elevating select works to canonical status.

Global Perception and Enduring Challenges

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is widely regarded internationally as the preeminent arbiter of cinematic excellence, with its Oscars conferring global prestige on winners that boosts performance and career , yet this perception is tempered by persistent critiques of cultural . Filmmakers and critics from non-Western regions often highlight the Academy's historical underrepresentation of diverse narratives, exemplified by the International Feature Film category's restrictive submission rules, which require government or industry committee selections and have disqualified entries like Nigeria's Lionheart in 2019 for containing too much English dialogue, underscoring a Eurocentric linguistic despite the Academy's claims of inclusivity. Such structural barriers contribute to a view abroad that the Oscars prioritize American studio productions, with only 156 international films winning Best Picture equivalents since compared to dominant U.S. entries, fostering resentment among global industries that see the awards as an extension of Hollywood hegemony rather than a universal standard. Enduring challenges for the Academy include eroding global viewership and amid the rise of streaming platforms and fragmented , with telecast audiences plummeting from a peak of 55.2 million in 1998 to 18.1 million for the 97th Oscars in 2025, a 7% drop from the prior year and reflecting disinterest beyond core demographics. This decline stems partly from perceptions of the Academy as out of touch with international audiences, who increasingly favor regional festivals like or for cultural resonance, while Hollywood's domestic focus alienates viewers in markets like and where local blockbusters outperform Oscar-nominated fare. Internally, the Academy grapples with expanding its 10,500-member electorate—now more diverse following 2020 reforms—to better reflect global cinema, yet empirical snubs of enduring international works, such as overlooked Asian arthouse films that later gain canonical status, perpetuate doubts about its predictive accuracy and impartiality. These issues compound financial pressures, as diminished broadcast appeal strains the organization's reliance on ABC's $100 million-per-cycle deal, forcing adaptations like shorter ceremonies that risk diluting the event's gravitas without recapturing lost international engagement.

References

  1. https://www.oscars.org/about
  2. https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/show-made-control-hollywood-history-academy-awards/story?id=37147160
  3. http://press.oscars.org/news/academy-invites-534-membership
  4. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2014/02/secret-oscar-history
  5. https://screendollars.com/motion-picture-academy-announced-on-1-11-1927/
  6. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls074571119/
  7. http://digitalcollections.oscars.org/digital/collection/p15759coll4
  8. https://www.longauto.com/single-post/2017/05/04/90-years-academy-of-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences
  9. https://nwlaborpress.org/2016/01/how-the-oscars-began-as-a-tool-for-union-avoidance/
  10. https://screendollars.com/blog/hollywood-report/academy-wasnt-launched-as-awards-giver-in-1927/
  11. https://nowiknow.com/the-anti-labor-origins-of-the-oscars/
  12. https://marypickford.org/caris-articles/mary-pickford-academy/
  13. https://www.oscars.org/oscars/statuette
  14. https://collider.com/why-were-the-oscars-created/
  15. https://nofilmschool.com/first-oscars-history
  16. https://everything-everywhere.com/the-academy-awards/
  17. https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1929
  18. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/first-academy-awards-honor-film-achievement
  19. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/may-16/first-academy-awards-ceremony
  20. https://samoaglobalnews.com/today-in-history-16-may-1929-the-oscar-are-awarded-for-the-first-time/
  21. https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1929/memorable-moments
  22. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mij/15031809.0002.201/--pr-and-politics-at-hollywoods-biggest-night-the-academy?rgn=main%3Bview=fulltext
  23. https://cinema.usc.edu/spectator/38.2/4_Sandler.pdf
  24. https://digitalcollections.oscars.org/digital/collection/p15759coll4/id/778/
  25. https://www.academymuseum.org/en/hollywood-past-and-present/margaret-herrick-library
  26. https://www.oscars.org/news/margaret-herrick-film-history-trailblazer
  27. https://nextbestpicture.com/oscars-first-decade-an-overview-of-the-academy-in-its-early-years/
  28. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/culture-magazines/hollywood-and-television-1950s-roots-diversification
  29. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/march-19/first-academy-awards-telecast-on-nbc
  30. https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/93aa_presentation_history.pdf
  31. https://deadline.com/2016/02/academy-awards-diversity-gregory-peck-oscars-boycott-pete-hammond-commentary-1201694464/
  32. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-archives-oscars-diversity-1970-20160121-story.html
  33. https://www.britannica.com/art/Academy-Award
  34. https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1975
  35. https://www.videoageinternational.com/articles/2014/05/oscars.htm
  36. https://www.academymuseum.org/en/hollywood-past-and-present/pickford-center-for-motion-picture-study
  37. https://www.oscars.org/academy-film-archive/preserved-projects
  38. https://variety.com/1999/film/news/acad-re-elects-prez-rehme-1117750635/
  39. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/academy-foundation-elects-rehme-president-87893/
  40. https://awardsdatabase.oscars.org/
  41. https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-takes-historic-action-increase-diversity
  42. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/is-oscars-inclusion-push-working-surprising-academy-numbers-1275305/
  43. https://andscape.com/features/new-data-reveals-how-oscarssowhite-changed-the-academy-awards/
  44. https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-establishes-representation-and-inclusion-standards-oscarsr-eligibility
  45. https://www.oscars.org/awards/representation-and-inclusion-standards
  46. https://www.thewrap.com/oscars-best-picture-eligible-films-list-2024/
  47. https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-announces-next-phase-equity-and-inclusion-initiatives
  48. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/08/us/oscars-oppenheimer-dei-diversity.html
  49. https://variety.com/2018/film/news/academy-sets-three-hour-broadcast-adds-popular-film-category-1202899382/
  50. https://www.npr.org/2018/09/06/645376188/oscars-drops-popular-film-category
  51. https://fairvote.org/2025-oscar-nominations-how-is-ranked-choice-voting-used/
  52. https://www.oscars.org/news/bill-kramer-named-ceo-academy-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences
  53. https://variety.com/2022/awards/awards/bill-kramer-new-academy-ceo-oscars-1235286115/
  54. http://press.oscars.org/news/awards-rules-and-campaign-promotional-regulations-approved-98th-oscarsr
  55. https://www.aswf.io/news/aces/
  56. http://press.oscars.org/news/academy-investigates-six-scientific-and-technical-areas-2025-awards-consideration
  57. https://www.oscars.org/about/board-governors
  58. https://www.oscars.org/oscars/voting
  59. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/how-are-oscars-winners-decided-heres-how-the-voting-process-works
  60. https://www.goldderby.com/feature/oscars-voting-rules-faq-1206068665/
  61. https://www.today.com/popculture/awards/how-are-oscars-winners-chosen-voting-process-explained-rcna194350
  62. https://www.britannica.com/story/who-votes-for-the-academy-awards
  63. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20240311-oscars-race-problem-oscarssowhite-2024
  64. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/09/oscars-set-inclusion-standards-for-best-picture-category.html
  65. https://www.npr.org/2025/04/26/nx-s1-5377305/oscars-voters-nominations-rule-change
  66. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2024-02-08/film-academy-announces-new-oscar-for-casting-ampas
  67. https://www.oscars.org/film-archive
  68. https://www.oscars.org/film-archive/collections
  69. https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-launches-global-digital-preservation-forum
  70. https://www.oscars.org/science-technology/sci-tech-projects/digital-motion-picture-archive-project
  71. https://www.oscars.org/education-grants/academy-film-scholars
  72. https://www.oscars.org/education-grants/teachers-guide-series
  73. https://www.oscars.org/education-grants/filmcraft
  74. https://www.oscars.org/education-grants/spark-academy
  75. https://www.oscars.org/gold-rising
  76. https://www.oscars.org/saa/apply
  77. https://www.oscars.org/learn/science-technology
  78. https://www.oscars.org/science-technology/projects
  79. https://www.oscars.org/science-technology/sci-tech-projects/aces
  80. http://press.oscars.org/news/17-scientific-and-technical-achievements-be-honored-academy-awardsr
  81. https://www.oscars.org/science-technology/adpf
  82. https://www.snpo.org/publications/fundingalert_details.php?id=1080
  83. https://www.oscars.org/margaret-herrick-library/collections/periodicals
  84. https://www.oscars.org/nicholl
  85. https://press.oscars.org/news/academy-reveals-2024-nicholl-screenwriting-fellows
  86. https://www.oscars.org/saa
  87. https://socalgrantmakers.org/profile/org/858
  88. https://www.filmproposals.com/academy-of-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences-film-festival-grants.html
  89. https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/find-a-grant/grants-a/academy-of-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences
  90. https://www.oscars.org/about/join-academy
  91. https://www.oscars.org/about/becoming-new-member/branch-requirements
  92. https://variety.com/2023/film/awards/oscars-membership-who-invited-to-vote-why-1235657196/
  93. https://www.goldderby.com/film/2025/film-academy-membership-numbers-branch-demographics/
  94. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/oscars-academy-2025-new-members-list-1236441856/
  95. https://www.animationmagazine.net/2025/06/motion-picture-academy-invites-534-new-members/
  96. https://variety.com/2025/film/news/oscars-academy-board-of-governors-2025-2026-1236435404/
  97. https://www.billboard.com/music/awards/motion-picture-academy-board-of-governors-full-list-1235359951/
  98. https://digitalcollections.oscars.org/digital/api/collection/p15759coll4/id/19667/download
  99. https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/2023_academy_of_motion_picture_arts_and_sciences_financial_statements_final.pdf
  100. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/10/movies/academy-motion-pictures-overseas-donors.html
  101. https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-museum-receives-landmark-50-million-gift-cheryl-and-haim-saban
  102. https://www.oscars.org/news/awards-rules-and-campaign-regulations-approved-93rd-oscarsr
  103. https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/93aa_rules.pdf
  104. https://deadline.com/2013/06/inside-ampas-board-of-governors-meeting-conflict-of-interest-clause-and-latino-damage-control-they-joke-about-being-old-white-guy-club-504734/
  105. https://ultimatepopculture.fandom.com/wiki/Academy_of_Motion_Picture_Arts_and_Sciences
  106. https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/87aa_academy_history.pdf
  107. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls074537656/
  108. https://www.cinemasight.com/awards-history/presidents-of-the-academy/
  109. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/film-academy-ceo-bill-kramer-re-ups-1235930941/
  110. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2025-07-31/lynette-howell-taylor-elected-new-president-motion-picture-academy
  111. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/oscars-who-succeed-film-academy-president-janet-yang-1236211574/
  112. https://www.oscars.org/about/leadership
  113. https://www.oscars.org/contact
  114. https://www.academymuseum.org/en/hollywood-past-and-present/academy-of-motion-picture-arts-and-sciences-headquarters
  115. https://www.oscars.org/library/about
  116. https://www.oscars.org/about/theaters/samuel-goldwyn-theater
  117. https://www.oscars.org/about/theaters/linwood-dunn-theater
  118. https://www.oscars.org/about/theaters
  119. https://www.rpbw.com/project/academy-museum-of-motion-pictures
  120. https://www.archdaily.com/987994/academy-museum-of-motion-pictures-renzo-piano-building-workshop
  121. https://beverlyhillscourier.com/2021/09/30/academy-museum-of-motion-pictures-officially-opens/
  122. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/20/arts/academy-museum-of-motion-pictures-opens.html
  123. https://www.academymuseum.org/en/collection
  124. https://www.altaonline.com/culture/architecture/a65874884/academy-museum-hollywood-review-failure/
  125. https://www.academymuseum.org/en/exhibitions/stories-of-cinema
  126. https://www.oscars.org/news/academy-museum-motion-pictures-reveals-new-details-inaugural-exhibitions
  127. https://www.academymuseum.org/
  128. https://kids.kiddle.co/Academy_Museum_of_Motion_Pictures
  129. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2024-06-11/academy-museum-hollywoodland-hollywood-jewish-founders-antisemitism
  130. https://deadline.com/2024/06/academy-museum-changes-hollywoodland-exhibit-backlash-industry-jewish-figures-1235969798/
  131. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/academy-museum-pandering-problem-1235952467/
  132. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/06/11/academy-museum-motion-pictures-antisemitism-accusations-jewish-hollywood-exhibition
  133. https://www.academymuseum.org/en/hollywood-past-and-present/map?filter=early-studio
  134. https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/88aa_academy_history.pdf
  135. https://www.laconservancy.org/learn/historic-places/beverly-hills-waterworks-building-fairbanks-center-for-motion-picture-study/
  136. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/14/business/media/harvey-weinstein-ousted-from-motion-picture-academy.html
  137. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/14/557790894/weinstein-expelled-from-the-academy-of-motion-pictures-arts-and-sciences
  138. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43994591
  139. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/03/movies/cosby-polanski-academy-expelled.html
  140. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2020/08/roman-polanski-academy-appeal
  141. https://screenrant.com/oscars-people-celebrities-banned-academy-reasons/
  142. https://variety.com/2022/film/news/will-smith-resigns-academy-oscars-slap-chris-rock-1235221041/
  143. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/under-fire-academy-of-motion-pictures-expels-cosby-polanski-idUSKBN1I42EJ/
  144. http://newamerica.org/the-thread/academy-awards-diversity-problem-oscarssowhite/
  145. https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/oscars-2024-rules-explained-best-picture-diversity-inclusion-standards-1234962077/
  146. https://variety.com/2023/film/news/richard-dreyfuss-slams-diversity-requirements-oscars-1235605443/
  147. https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/justine-bateman-slams-dei-oscar-rules-as-insult-to-filmmaking/
  148. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12210793/Oscars-voters-slam-Academys-completely-ridiculous-new-Best-Picture-diversity-rules.html
  149. https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/11/01/the-academys-inclusion-standards-are-a-disaster-for-cinema/
  150. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/poll-americans-dislike-diversity-requirements-for-the-academy-awards/
  151. https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-takes-aim-oscars-diversity-messed-unfair-2038557
  152. https://teensinprint.com/the-academy-awards-new-standards-ignore-merit/
  153. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/top-hollywood-execs-give-99-percent-political-donations-democrats-midterms-1151392/
  154. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/democrats-republicans-entertainment-donations-364802/
  155. https://ktar.com/uncategorized/why-didnt-american-sniper-win-oscar-for-best-picture/408819/
  156. https://www.dexerto.com/tv-movies/sound-of-freedom-controversial-movie-oscars-2024-snub-2494370/
  157. https://www.dexerto.com/tv-movies/sound-of-freedom-best-picture-oscars-jim-caviezel-anti-christian-bias-2244697/
  158. https://deadline.com/2024/12/am-i-racist-snubbed-on-oscar-documentary-shortlist-1236209076/
  159. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14457139/conservative-moviemakers-films-2025-oscars-dei.html
  160. https://variety.com/2020/biz/news/academy-museum-100-million-budget-1203501582/
  161. https://www.thewrap.com/academy-museum-of-motion-pictures-oscar-timeline/
  162. https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2022/01/27/new-motion-picture-museum-struggles-newseum/
  163. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-12/boffo-performance-at-oscars-museum-runs-counter-to-shaky-box-office
  164. https://deadline.com/2023/12/investment-income-museum-expense-loom-large-ampas-financial-report-1235645133/
  165. https://variety.com/2024/film/news/academy-ampas-layoffs-library-archive-1236196896/
  166. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robert-byrne-238a68147_academy-film-archive-lays-off-multiple-staff-activity-7258249608470921216-U9Yq
  167. https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/film-preservationists-call-on-ampas-to-rehire-laid-off-archival-staff/ar-AA1tDobW
  168. https://www.indiewire.com/news/breaking-news/ampas-commitment-to-film-preservation-after-layoffs-1235066087/
  169. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/oscars-academy-coo-christine-simmons-out-1235174932/
  170. https://deadline.com/2021/02/financial-fine-print-glimpse-fragile-oscar-economics-1234688608/
  171. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni64988635/
  172. https://fortune.com/2024/03/09/oscars-2024-cost-goodie-bag/
  173. https://www.oscars.org/sci-tech
  174. http://press.oscars.org/news/14-achievements-be-honored-scientific-and-technical-awardsr
  175. https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/patents-play-a-role-in-technical-academy-awards.html
  176. https://www.kodak.com/en/motion/page/awards/
  177. https://variety.com/2020/film/awards/oscars-inclusion-diversity-rules-standards-explained-1234763473/
  178. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/academy-cracks-down-oscar-campaigns-new-mailing-procedure-1079960/
  179. https://www.statsignificant.com/p/how-the-oscars-shape-hollywoods-movie
  180. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/128475/1/847952916.pdf
  181. https://schieffercollege.tcu.edu/ftdm/news/are-the-oscars-still-relevant-film-television-and-digital-media-faulty-weigh-in/
  182. https://theridgewoodblog.net/the-oscars-history-cultural-impact-and-how-the-academy-awards-work/
  183. https://joinouramerica.org/how-the-academy-awards-exemplify-the-american-spirit/
  184. https://journeys.dartmouth.edu/cynthiamonroe/film-and-the-oscars-impact-on-society-a-view-from-several-minority-standpoints/
  185. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/oscars/la-et-unmasking-oscar-academy-project-html-htmlstory.html
  186. https://parade.com/1350972/maramovies/oscar-snubs/
  187. https://movieweb.com/great-movies-snubbed-by-oscars/
  188. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/business/media/oscars-ratings.html
  189. https://dallasexpress.com/lifestyle/oscars-trudge-along-amid-viewership-decline/
  190. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/oscars-adds-new-popular-film-category-attempt-appear-less-elitist-ncna899001
  191. https://qz.com/quartzy/1352383/the-academys-popular-film-oscar-is-elitist-and-racist
  192. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dbloom/2025/03/02/are-the-oscars-headed-for-irrelevancy/
  193. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2019/11/oscars-international-foreign-language-film-lionheart-controversy/601630/
  194. https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/2/4/21042912/international-oscars-foreign-film-rules-language
  195. https://apnews.com/article/oscars-international-film-category-criticism-b2087eb877ddf972af7c85676dbbd475
  196. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/have-oscars-lost-value-business-cultural-analysis-cesar-espindola-q9ije
  197. https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/3/3/oscar-tv-ratings-down-18m-viewers
  198. https://www.meer.com/en/90800-why-the-oscars-no-longer-define-cinema
  199. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/24/nx-s1-5269924/why-do-the-oscars-get-things-wrong-so-often
  200. https://nypost.com/2025/02/28/entertainment/oscars-are-over-out-of-touch-with-the-audience-and-saddled-with-dei-requirements-expert/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.