Hubbry Logo
Amor asteroidAmor asteroidMain
Open search
Amor asteroid
Community hub
Amor asteroid
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Amor asteroid
Amor asteroid
Amor asteroid
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Common orbital subgroups of Near-Earth Objects (NEOs)

The Amor asteroids are a group of near-Earth asteroids named after the archetype object 1221 Amor /ˈeɪmɔːr/. The orbital perihelion of these objects is close to, but greater than, the orbital aphelion of Earth (i.e., the objects do not cross Earth's orbit),[1] with most Amors crossing the orbit of Mars. The Amor asteroid 433 Eros was the first asteroid to be orbited and landed upon by a robotic space probe (NEAR Shoemaker).

Definition

[edit]
Amor asteroid Eros visited by NEAR Shoemaker in 2000

The orbital characteristics that define an asteroid as being in the Amor group are:[2]

  • The orbital period is greater than one year; i.e., the orbital semi-major axis (a) is greater than 1.0 AU (a > 1.0 AU);
  • The orbit does not cross that of Earth; i.e., the orbital perihelion (q) is greater than Earth's orbital aphelion (q > 1.017 AU);
  • The object is a near-Earth object (NEO); i.e., q < 1.3 AU.

Populations

[edit]

As of January 2025 there are 15,175 known Amor asteroids. Of those objects, 1414 are numbered, 83 are named, and 42 are designated as a potentially hazardous asteroid.[3][4]

Outer Earth-grazer asteroids

[edit]

An outer Earth-grazer asteroid is an asteroid that is normally beyond Earth's orbit, but which can get closer to the Sun than Earth's aphelion (1.0167 AU), and not closer than Earth's perihelion (0.9833 AU); i.e., the asteroid's perihelion is between Earth's perihelion and aphelion. Outer Earth-grazer asteroids are split between Amor and Apollo asteroids. Using the definition of Amor asteroids above, "Earth grazers" that never get closer to the Sun than Earth does (at any point along its orbit) are Amors, whereas those that do are Apollos.

Potentially hazardous asteroids

[edit]

To be considered a potentially hazardous asteroid (PHA), an object's orbit must, at some point, come within 0.05 AU of Earth's orbit, and the object itself must be sufficiently large/massive to cause significant regional damage if it impacted Earth. Most PHAs are either Aten asteroids or Apollo asteroids (and thus have orbits that cross the orbit of Earth), and as of November 2023 70 Amors are classified as a PHA, the named objects 2061 Anza, 3122 Florence, 3908 Nyx, and 3671 Dionysus.[5]

Lists

[edit]

For a list of articles about Amor asteroids, see Category:Amor asteroids.

Prominent Amor asteroids

[edit]
Name Year Discoverer Refs
3908 Nyx 1980 Hans-Emil Schuster MPC · JPL · LCDB
1221 Amor 1932 Eugène Delporte MPC · JPL · LCDB
1036 Ganymed 1924 Walter Baade MPC · JPL · LCDB
887 Alinda 1918 Max Wolf MPC · JPL · LCDB
719 Albert 1911 Johann Palisa MPC · JPL · LCDB
433 Eros 1898 Gustav Witt MPC · JPL · LCDB

Named Amor asteroids

[edit]

This is a non-static list of named Amor asteroids.[6]

Designation Prov. designation
433 Eros 1898 DQ
719 Albert 1911 MT
887 Alinda 1918 DB
1036 Ganymed 1924 TD
1221 Amor 1932 EA1
1580 Betulia 1950 KA
1627 Ivar 1929 SH
1915 Quetzalcoatl 1953 EA
1916 Boreas 1953 RA
1917 Cuyo 1968 AA
1943 Anteros 1973 EC
1980 Tezcatlipoca 1950 LA
2059 Baboquivari 1963 UA
2061 Anza 1960 UA
2202 Pele 1972 RA
2368 Beltrovata 1977 RA
2608 Seneca 1978 DA
3102 Krok 1981 QA
3122 Florence 1981 ET3
3199 Nefertiti 1982 RA
3271 Ul 1982 RB
3288 Seleucus 1982 DV
3352 McAuliffe 1981 CW
3551 Verenia 1983 RD
3552 Don Quixote 1983 SA
Designation Prov. designation
3553 Mera 1985 JA
3671 Dionysus 1984 KD
3691 Bede 1982 FT
3757 Anagolay 1982 XB
3908 Nyx 1980 PA
3988 Huma 1986 LA
4055 Magellan 1985 DO2
4401 Aditi 1985 TB
4487 Pocahontas 1987 UA
4503 Cleobulus 1989 WM
4947 Ninkasi 1988 TJ1
4954 Eric 1990 SQ
4957 Brucemurray 1990 XJ
5324 Lyapunov 1987 SL
5332 Davidaguilar 1990 DA
5370 Taranis 1986 RA
5620 Jasonwheeler 1990 OA
5626 Melissabrucker 1991 FE
5653 Camarillo 1992 WD5
5751 Zao 1992 AC
5797 Bivoj 1980 AA
5863 Tara 1983 RB
5869 Tanith 1988 VN4
5879 Almeria 1992 CH1
6050 Miwablock 1992 AE
Designation Prov. designation
6456 Golombek 1992 OM
6569 Ondaatje 1993 MO
7088 Ishtar 1992 AA
7336 Saunders 1989 RS1
7358 Oze 1995 YA3
7480 Norwan 1994 PC
8013 Gordonmoore 1990 KA
8034 Akka 1992 LR
8709 Kadlu 1994 JF1
9172 Abhramu 1989 OB
9950 ESA 1990 VB
11284 Belenus 1990 BA
13553 Masaakikoyama 1992 JE
15745 Yuliya 1991 PM5
15817 Lucianotesi 1994 QC
16064 Davidharvey 1999 RH27
16912 Rhiannon 1998 EP8
18106 Blume 2000 NX3
20460 Robwhiteley 1999 LO28
21088 Chelyabinsk 1992 BL2
52387 Huitzilopochtli 1993 OM7
65803 Didymos 1996 GT
96189 Pygmalion 1991 NT3
154991 Vinciguerra 2005 BX26
162011 Konnohmaru 1994 AB1
Designation Prov. designation
164215 Doloreshill 2004 MF6
189011 Ogmios 1997 NJ6
280244 Ati 2002 WP11
452307 Manawydan 1997 XV11
481984 Cernunnos 2009 KL2
520585 Saci 2014 OA2
605911 Cecily 2016 XD1
679829 Sucellos 2021 EC5
785648 Likho 2015 RG36

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Amor asteroid

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
1221 Amor is a stony near-Earth asteroid (NEA) approximately 1 km in diameter, notable as the prototype and namesake of the Amor group of asteroids, which are Earth-approaching objects with orbits that do not cross Earth's path but come relatively close to it. Discovered on March 12, 1932, by Belgian astronomer Eugène Joseph Delporte at the Royal Observatory of Belgium in , it was the first asteroid observed to approach Earth as closely as 0.1 AU without intersecting the planet's orbit, highlighting the existence of this subclass of NEAs. The asteroid's is characterized by a semi-major axis of 1.92 AU, an eccentricity of 0.436, an inclination of 11.9° to the , a perihelion of 1.08 AU (exterior to ), and an aphelion of 2.76 AU, resulting in an of about 2.66 years (971 days). Classified as an Amor-type NEA, its path lies between Earth's and Mars' orbits, with the group's defining parameters being a semi-major axis greater than 1.0 AU and a perihelion between 1.017 AU and 1.3 AU. As of October 2025, over 15,000 Amor have been identified, making it the second-largest NEA subgroup after the Apollo group, and they are monitored for potential future close approaches due to their dynamical stability and accessibility for missions. Physical observations of 1221 Amor are limited, with no confirmed rotation period or detailed spectral analysis available, though it is assumed to be an based on its taxonomic similarities to other NEAs in the group. Its of 17.4 suggests a low typical of stony compositions, and it poses no immediate hazard, with a close approach to projected at about 0.20 AU in 2089. The discovery of Amor advanced understanding of NEA populations, contributing to efforts in planetary defense and solar system formation studies.

Definition and Orbital Characteristics

Orbital Criteria

The Amor asteroids are defined by specific orbital parameters that distinguish them from other near-Earth objects. An asteroid is classified as an Amor if its semi-major axis a>1.0a > 1.0 AU, its perihelion distance 1.017<q<1.31.017 < q < 1.3 AU, and its orbit does not intersect that of Earth. These criteria ensure that the asteroid's average orbital distance exceeds Earth's, while its closest approach to the Sun remains outside Earth's farthest extent but sufficiently near to pose potential future dynamical interest. These parameters result in highly elliptical orbits that cross the path of Mars (semi-major axis 1.523 ) without intersecting (semi-major axis 1.0 ). The lower bound on perihelion q>1.017q > 1.017 —Earth's aphelion distance—prevents the asteroid from ever entering Earth's orbital zone, as the minimum solar distance always exceeds Earth's maximum. Meanwhile, the upper bound q<1.3q < 1.3 allows the orbit to extend inward enough to intersect Mars' , facilitating gravitational interactions with the Red Planet over time. Visually, this geometry can be illustrated as an elongated with its inner vertex just beyond Earth's orbit and its outer vertex reaching into the main , creating a "grazing" configuration relative to the inner planets. The classification originated with the 1932 discovery of asteroid 1221 Amor by Eugène Delporte, whose orbit exemplified this pattern. Subsequent refinements, such as precise adoption of the 1.017 threshold aligned with Earth's aphelion, have stabilized the criteria without major alterations, reflecting improved ephemeris data. Amor asteroids form a subset of near-Earth objects, emphasizing their role in dynamical studies of inner solar system evolution.

Dynamical Properties

Amor asteroids experience significant dynamical influences from gravitational interactions with the major planets, particularly and Mars. acts as the primary perturber through mean-motion resonances, such as the 3:1 resonance at approximately 2.5 AU, which can excite the eccentricity of these bodies, leading to increased perihelion distances and potential over timescales of about 1 million years. Mars contributes through frequent close approaches, which scatter orbits and modify semimajor axes and eccentricities via interactions, while secular perturbations from both planets cause long-term variations in , including of the perihelion and node. These effects collectively drive the chaotic of Amor orbits, with median lifetimes in resonant configurations ranging from 0.5 to 2 million years before ejection or transition to other classes. The dynamical stability of Amor orbits is limited, with a notable probability of transitioning to Earth-crossing Apollo orbits due to cumulative perturbations. Numerical simulations indicate that approximately 10% of Amor bodies captured in key resonances, such as the ν₆ secular or the 3:1 mean-motion with , evolve into Apollo configurations over timescales of 10⁶ to 10⁷ years, often mediated by close encounters with Mars that reduce the perihelion distance below 1 AU. These transitions occur as secular perturbations gradually increase eccentricity, allowing orbits to intersect Earth's path, with the process accelerated by chaotic diffusion in resonant zones. The overall dynamical lifetime of Amor asteroids in their current configuration is estimated at around 2–5 million years before significant alteration or ejection from the inner Solar System. The (MOID) between Amor asteroids and is typically greater than 0.1 AU, reflecting their non-crossing status by definition, though values can approach approximately 0.0003 AU near the perihelion boundary. However, the Yarkovsky effect introduces a non-gravitational from asymmetric , causing semimajor axis drift at rates of about 10⁻⁴ AU per million years for kilometer-sized bodies, which can alter the MOID over time and potentially drive future orbital crossings with . This thermal force, combined with planetary perturbations, underscores the transient nature of Amor orbits and their role as precursors to more hazardous near-Earth populations.

History and Discovery

Initial Identification

The initial identification of the Amor group of asteroids traces back to early observations of near-Earth objects whose orbits intersected that of Mars. A key precursor was the discovery of asteroid (433) on August 13, 1898, independently made by German astronomer Gustav Witt at the Observatory and French astronomer Auguste Charlois at the Nice Observatory. Eros, with dimensions of approximately 34.4 × 11.2 × 11.2 km, exhibited an orbit that crossed Mars's path but maintained a perihelion distance greater than 's, positioning it as an early candidate for what would later be classified as Amor-type asteroids. Its close approach to Earth in late and early , reaching 0.315 AU, facilitated groundbreaking measurements across global observatories, yielding a refined solar value of 8.803 ± 0.004 arcseconds and establishing a more accurate scale for the solar system. The defining moment arrived with the discovery of (1221) Amor on March 12, 1932, by Belgian astronomer Eugène Joseph Delporte at the Royal Observatory of Belgium in . Designated 1932 EA at the time, this approximately 1-km-diameter asteroid approached to a historic minimum distance of 0.11 AU without crossing its orbit, highlighting a subclass of Mars-crossing bodies that posed potential future risks. Amor's orbital of 2.66 years and perihelion of 1.08 AU—outside 's but inside Mars's—exemplified these objects' dynamical behavior, prompting astronomers to recognize them as a distinct group of near-Earth asteroids later formalized as the Amor class.

Development of Classification

The classification of Amor asteroids originated in the early 1930s following the discovery of the archetype object (1221) Amor on March 12, 1932, by Belgian astronomer Eugène Delporte at the Uccle Observatory, which revealed a distinct dynamical group of near-Earth objects with perihelion distances greater than Earth's aphelion (1.017 AU) but less than 1.3 AU, placing their orbits exterior to Earth's but interior to Mars'. The formal orbital criteria for the group were refined in the late 1970s. In the 1960s, astronomers including expanded the understanding of (NEO) subgroups amid growing discoveries, incorporating Amor alongside emerging categories like Apollo through enhanced surveys such as the Palomar-Leiden project, which cataloged numerous minor planets and emphasized the need for dynamical distinctions based on orbital intersections with inner planets. This period marked a shift from isolated identifications to a broader taxonomic framework for NEOs, driven by improved observational capabilities and theoretical models of planetary perturbations. The 1990s brought formal refinements through the (IAU) Working Group on NEOs, which in 1999 adopted a standardized definition for NEOs with perihelion distances less than 1.3 AU, explicitly integrating the Amor group into this criterion while distinguishing it from Earth-crossing subgroups like Apollo and Aten based on minimum orbital distance to . This update, building on earlier proposals such as those in Rabinowitz et al. (1994), facilitated systematic cataloging and by aligning classifications with verifiable orbital parameters. By the 2000s, the classification evolved further with seamless integration into the (MPC) database, which centralized orbital data for precise designations, complemented by advanced dynamical modeling from researchers like Andrea Milani, whose simulations via systems such as NEODyS analyzed long-term orbital stability and resonance effects for Amor objects, enhancing predictions of their dynamical behavior. These efforts underscored the Amor's role in NEO population dynamics without altering core orbital criteria.

Population and Subgroups

Current Known Population

As of March 2025, there are approximately 15,382 known Amor asteroids, of which 1,415 have been assigned permanent numbers and 86 have received names by the . These figures reflect ongoing observations cataloged by the , the repository for data. The provisional designations apply to the remaining objects, which await further observations for numbering. The known population of Amor asteroids has expanded dramatically since the , when fewer than 100 were identified, largely due to limited survey capabilities at the time. Major ground-based surveys have driven this growth: the (LINEAR) program contributed thousands of discoveries starting in the late 1990s, followed by significant increases from the (Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System) since 2010 and the (ATLAS) since 2015, which together account for a substantial portion of recent finds. By the mid-2010s, these efforts had pushed the total known Amors into the thousands, with discovery rates accelerating to hundreds per year. Current surveys have achieved high completeness for larger Amor asteroids, with over 90% of objects exceeding 1 km in now detected, providing a robust estimate of the population at that size threshold. However, detection efficiency drops sharply for smaller bodies, leaving significant gaps for Amors under 1 km, where observational biases and faintness limit comprehensive catalogs. This uneven coverage underscores the need for continued wide-field monitoring to refine population models.

Inner and Outer Subdivisions

The Amor asteroids are subdivided into inner and outer groups based on their perihelion distance (q), reflecting differences in their dynamical origins and stability. Inner Amors have perihelion distances between 1.017 AU and 1.1 AU, placing their closest approaches to the Sun just beyond Earth's aphelion but relatively near the inner edge of the group's range; these objects are believed to originate primarily from the inner main through resonant perturbations. Outer Amors, with q between 1.1 AU and 1.3 AU, typically derive from more distant sources, such as Jupiter-crossing orbits or the central main belt, and exhibit greater dynamical stability against transitions to Earth-crossing paths. Within the outer Amors, a notable subset consists of outer Earth-grazer Amors, which corresponds to orbits that allow particularly close approaches to due to alignment possibilities with Earth's aphelion; this configuration elevates their potential for minimum orbit intersection distances (MOID) below typical thresholds, increasing encounter risks compared to other outer Amors. These grazers represent a transitional dynamical regime, as gravitational interactions with or Mars can occasionally shift an object's q across the 1.1 AU boundary, exemplifying orbit evolution; for instance, asteroid (3671) has exhibited variations in its perihelion near this divide due to planetary perturbations, alternating between inner-like and outer configurations over observational timescales. This uneven distribution underscores the role of resonant mechanisms in populating the inner subgroup less frequently.

Physical Properties and Composition

Size and Shape Distribution

Amor asteroids span a broad size range, with the smallest detected members measuring on the order of tens of meters in diameter, while the largest, 1036 Ganymed, reaches approximately 32 km across. This diversity reflects the dynamical processes that deliver these objects from the main into near-Earth orbits, where observational surveys can detect them down to sub-kilometer scales. The cumulative size distribution of Amors for diameters greater than 1 km follows a power-law form with a slope of about -1.75, indicating a relatively shallow distribution compared to smaller sizes, where observational biases and collisional evolution play key roles. In terms of shape, Amor asteroids are predominantly irregular, often exhibiting elongated forms due to their rubble-pile structures and past collisional histories. Radar observations and photometric lightcurves have revealed significant shape variations, with axial ratios commonly exceeding 2:1. A prominent example is , which displays a highly elongated peanut-like shape with an axial ratio of roughly 3:1, as modeled from Goldstone data and corroborated by lightcurve inversions showing amplitude variations up to 1.5 magnitudes. These irregularities influence the asteroids' rotational dynamics and surface features, contributing to their overall morphological diversity. Rotation periods among Amor asteroids generally fall between 2 and 20 hours, consistent with the spin rates of other near-Earth objects shaped by tidal interactions and the . Binary systems are common in this population, comprising about 15% of Amors larger than 200 meters, often featuring asynchronous primaries with periods shorter than their mutual orbits. These binaries provide insights into formation mechanisms like rotational fission, enhancing our understanding of the physical evolution of these bodies.

Spectral Types and Origins

The spectral classification of Amor asteroids, derived from visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy, indicates a predominance of S-complex types, which account for approximately 60% of the observed population. These silicaceous asteroids feature spectra with a strong absorption band near 1 μm due to and , and a shallower feature around 2 μm, akin to those of ordinary chondrites. The mission provided direct evidence for this composition through and of , revealing a surface dominated by silicates and consistent with an S7 ordinary chondrite-like material, albeit with evidence of . C-complex asteroids comprise about 20% of Amors, exhibiting relatively featureless, reddish spectra in the visible range and potential 3-μm hydration bands in the near-infrared, indicative of carbonaceous materials rich in organics and volatiles. V-types, representing roughly 5%, show distinct basaltic signatures with strong 1- and 2-μm bands from , while X-types and other rare classes (such as D or ) make up the remaining 15%, displaying metallic or primitive compositions. This taxonomic distribution, based on surveys using the Bus-DeMeo system, underscores the compositional bias toward inner solar system materials among Amors. Hypotheses on the origins of Amor asteroids tie their diversity to delivery mechanisms from the main . Dynamical simulations indicate that about 50% originate from the inner belt (semimajor axis <2.5 AU), where S-complex asteroids prevail, and are injected into near-Earth space primarily via the 3:1 Jupiter mean-motion . The other half derives from mid-belt sources (2.5–2.8 AU), with a mix of S- and C-types, facilitated by the Yarkovsky effect—a non-gravitational force from anisotropic that induces semimajor axis drift over 10–100 million years, eventually placing objects into resonances or Mars-crossing orbits. These models align the observed with belt populations depleted by collisional and dynamical processes.

Notable Examples and Hazards

Archetypal and Prominent Amors

The archetypal member of the Amor group is asteroid 1221 Amor, discovered on March 12, 1932, by Belgian astronomer Eugène Delporte at the Uccle Observatory. With a diameter of approximately 1 km, it orbits the Sun at a semi-major axis of 1.92 AU, with a perihelion distance of 1.08 AU, placing it just beyond Earth's orbit but crossing that of Mars. Classified as an S-type asteroid based on its assumed stony composition, 1221 Amor served as the namesake for the group, highlighting the dynamical class of near-Earth objects that approach but do not intersect Earth's orbit. A prominent example is , the first asteroid discovered in the Amor group on August 13, 1898, by Gustav Witt in and Auguste Charlois in . Measuring 34.4 × 11.2 × 11.2 km, it is an elongated with a rotation period of about 5.27 hours. Eros became the target of NASA's mission, which achieved the first asteroid orbit on December 14, 2000, followed by a on February 12, 2001. The mission's data revealed an average density of 2.67 ± 0.03 g/cm³, providing key insights into the internal structure and composition of near-Earth asteroids, consistent with a rubble-pile model formed from primordial material. Early Mars-crossers like 1580 Betulia, discovered on May 22, 1950, by Ernest Leonard Johnson at the Union Observatory in , exemplify the group's historical significance. This carbonaceous , approximately 5.8 km in diameter, has an eccentric orbit with a perihelion of 1.14 AU and exhibits an unusual triaxial shape inferred from its lightcurve, which shows three maxima and minima per , suggesting a non-principal axis possibly influenced by past impacts or YORP torque. observations in 2007 further refined its physical model, confirming its irregular form and low typical of primitive s.

Potentially Hazardous Amors

Potentially hazardous Amors represent a subset of the Amor asteroid population that pose a potential risk to Earth due to their size and orbital proximity. These objects are classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs) if they have an absolute magnitude brighter than H = 22.0, corresponding to an estimated diameter greater than approximately 140 meters, and a minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) with Earth's orbit of 0.05 AU or less. This definition ensures focus on asteroids capable of causing regional damage upon impact, based on their brightness and close-approach potential. As of November 2025, there are approximately 135 known potentially hazardous Amors, reflecting ongoing discoveries and refinements in orbital classifications. A representative example is 2061 Anza, an Amor asteroid with an estimated of about 2.7 kilometers and an MOID of 0.057 AU, which is monitored for its potential close approaches. Although its MOID slightly exceeds the standard threshold, it exemplifies the types of objects under scrutiny due to their size and dynamical behavior. Risk assessments for potentially hazardous Amors rely on tools like the Torino impact hazard scale, where all currently known PHAs, including those in the Amor group, are rated at Level 0, indicating no significant threat in the foreseeable future. Ongoing monitoring by NASA's Center for Studies (CNEOS) and the European Space Agency's Near-Earth Object Coordination Centre ensures updated orbital predictions. Missions such as , which studied the PHA (101955) Bennu, and DART, which demonstrated kinetic impact deflection on , offer critical insights into the physical properties and mitigation strategies applicable to similar Amor PHAs. Some potentially hazardous Amors also belong to the outer Earth-grazer subgroup, where perihelia approach but do not cross Earth's orbit, contributing to their monitoring priority.

Relations to Other Near-Earth Objects

Comparisons with Apollo and Aten Asteroids

Amor asteroids differ from Apollo and Aten asteroids primarily in their orbital configurations relative to Earth's orbit. Apollo asteroids are characterized by perihelion distances (q) less than 1.017 AU and semi-major axes (a) greater than 1.0 AU, resulting in orbits that cross Earth's path and thus pose a higher risk of collision. Aten asteroids, on the other hand, have semi-major axes less than 1.0 AU and aphelion distances (Q) greater than 0.983 AU, placing their orbits mostly interior to Earth's while still crossing it at perihelion. These definitions highlight the boundary distinctions: Amors approach Earth closely from exterior orbits without crossing, unlike the Earth-intersecting paths of Apollos and Atens. In terms of population distribution among near-Earth objects (NEOs), Amors represent approximately 39% of the total, about 54%, and Atens around 4%, based on debiased models that account for observational biases across size ranges. Despite their relative abundance, Amors are generally less hazardous than and Atens because their orbits avoid direct intersection with Earth's, reducing the frequency of potential impacts. Dynamically, Amor, , and share influences from Jupiter's gravitational perturbations, which facilitate their delivery from the into near-Earth space through resonances. However, Amors maintain longer orbital stability, with mean dynamical lifetimes of about 14 million years, compared to roughly 12 million years for Apollos, owing to fewer close encounters with that would otherwise introduce chaotic perturbations from terrestrial planets.

Dynamical Evolution and Sources

Amor asteroids are primarily injected into their characteristic orbits through dynamical mechanisms involving the 3:1 with and the ν6 secular located at the inner edge of the main . These resonances excite the eccentricity of asteroids originating from the inner main belt, enabling them to achieve perihelia between 1.017 AU and 1.3 AU while crossing Mars' orbit without intersecting Earth's. Once established in this configuration, Amor asteroids experience gradual orbital evolution driven by planetary perturbations, with a typical dynamical lifetime of approximately 14 million years before transitioning to Apollo-class Earth-crossers or being removed via ejection, collision, or absorption by the Sun. The principal source region for these injections is the inner main asteroid belt, spanning semi-major axes of 2.0 to 2.5 AU, where the ν6 resonance facilitates the drift of small bodies into Mars-crossing pathways, often aided by the Yarkovsky thermal effect. Additional contributions arise from the Hungaria family, a high-inclination population at 1.78–2.06 AU, whose members can destabilize through chaotic diffusion and mean-motion resonances with Mars, supplying fragments to the Amor reservoir over millions of years. This dual sourcing underscores the role of both resonant clearing and collisional escape in populating the Amor group. Recent collisional-dynamical simulations from the 2020s indicate that collisional families in the inner main belt contribute to the Amor population, with the remainder stemming from older, secularly evolved sources. These models refine the understanding of injection rates by accounting for family-forming events that directly feed resonant populations, highlighting the ongoing role of impacts in sustaining fluxes.

References

  1. https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/about/neo_groups.html
  2. https://dictionary.obspm.fr/index.php?showAll=1&formSearchTextfield=Amor
  3. https://www.space-glossary.com/cms/glossary/10-glossary-a/2326-amor.html
  4. https://www.spacereference.org/asteroid/1221-amor-1932-ea1
  5. https://pds-smallbodies.astro.umd.edu/data_other/objclass.shtml
  6. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095409243
  7. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19720018103/downloads/19720018103.pdf
  8. https://www2.boulder.swri.edu/~bottke/Reprints/Morbidelli-etal_2002_AstIII_NEOs.pdf
  9. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20010106120/downloads/20010106120.pdf
  10. http://www.astropixels.com/ephemeris/perap2001.html
  11. https://www.oca.eu/images/LAGRANGE/pages_perso/morby/papers/yarkoNEAs.pdf
  12. https://phys.org/news/2012-02-astronomers-solar.html
  13. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1900AN....152..203P
  14. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/a-history-of-near-earth-object-research-sp-4235.pdf
  15. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1978JBAA...88..119B
  16. https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/7/4/103
  17. https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/sslistnew.html
  18. https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/
  19. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/ad072e
  20. https://www.spaceobs.com/en/Alain-Maury-s-Blog/NEA-stats-2018
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103515002067
  22. https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3568
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103510004811
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103517307017
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103597958152
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103596956651
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103515006132
  28. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/07/aa35006-19/aa35006-19.html
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103503000472
  30. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/438/3/2621/973633
  31. https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/asteroids/433-eros/
  32. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002aste.book..351C
  33. https://arcnav.psi.edu/urn:nasa:pds:context:target:asteroid.433_eros
  34. https://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/1580_Betulia/magri.etal.2007.betulia.pdf
  35. https://www.spacereference.org/asteroid/1580-betulia-1950-ka
  36. https://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/Dangerous.html
  37. https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001910351730570X
  39. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.09652
  40. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1985MNRAS.212..817S
  41. https://sarahtstewart.net/reprints/papers/41_McEachern_Icarus_2010_Hungarias.pdf
  42. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2020/07/aa37458-20.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.