Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Near-Earth object
View on Wikipedia
| Near-Earth object | |
|---|---|
Nucleus of near-Earth comet 103P/Hartley as seen by NASA's Deep Impact probe | |
| Characteristics | |
| Type | Small Solar System body |
| Found | within 1.3 AU from the Sun |
| External links | |
A near-Earth object (NEO) is any small Solar System body orbiting the Sun whose closest approach to the Sun (perihelion) is less than 1.3 times the Earth–Sun distance (astronomical unit, AU).[2] This definition applies to the object's orbit around the Sun, rather than its current position, thus an object with such an orbit is considered an NEO even at times when it is far from making a close approach of Earth. If an NEO's orbit crosses the Earth's orbit, and the object is larger than 140 meters (460 ft) across, it is considered a potentially hazardous object (PHO).[3] Most known PHOs and NEOs are asteroids, but about a third of a percent are comets.[1]
There are over 37,000 known near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) and over 120 known short-period near-Earth comets (NECs).[1] A number of solar-orbiting meteoroids were large enough to be tracked in space before striking Earth. It is now widely accepted that collisions in the past have had a significant role in shaping the geological and biological history of Earth.[4] Asteroids as small as 20 metres (66 ft) in diameter can cause significant damage to the local environment and human populations.[5] Larger asteroids penetrate the atmosphere to the surface of the Earth, producing craters if they impact a continent or tsunamis if they impact the sea. Interest in NEOs has increased since the 1980s because of greater awareness of this risk. Asteroid impact avoidance by deflection is possible in principle, and methods of mitigation are being researched.[6]
Two scales, the simple Torino scale and the more complex Palermo scale, rate the risk presented by an identified NEO based on the probability of it impacting the Earth and on how severe the consequences of such an impact would be. Some NEOs have had temporarily positive Torino or Palermo scale ratings after their discovery. Since 1998, the United States, the European Union, and other nations have been scanning the sky for NEOs in an effort called Spaceguard.[7] The initial US Congress mandate to NASA to catalog at least 90% of NEOs that are at least 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) in diameter, sufficient to cause a global catastrophe, was met by 2011.[8] In later years, the survey effort was expanded[9] to include smaller objects[10] which have the potential for large-scale, though not global, damage.
NEOs have low surface gravity, and many have Earth-like orbits that make them easy targets for spacecraft.[11][12] As of December 2024[update], five near-Earth comets[13][14][15] and six near-Earth asteroids,[16][17][18][19][20] one of them with a moon,[20] have been visited by spacecraft. Samples of three have been returned to Earth,[21][22] and one successful deflection test was conducted.[23] Similar missions are in progress. Preliminary plans for commercial asteroid mining have been drafted by private startup companies, but few of these plans were pursued.[24]
Definitions
[edit]
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are formally defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) as all small Solar System bodies with orbits around the Sun that are at least partially closer than 1.3 astronomical units (AU; Sun–Earth distance) from the Sun.[25] This definition excludes larger bodies such as planets, like Venus; natural satellites which orbit bodies other than the Sun, like Earth's Moon; and artificial bodies orbiting the Sun. A small Solar System body can be an asteroid or a comet, thus an NEO is either a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) or a near-Earth comet (NEC). The organisations cataloging NEOs further limit their definition of NEO to objects with an orbital period under 200 years, a restriction that applies to comets in particular,[2][26] but this approach is not universal.[25] Some authors further restrict the definition to orbits that are at least partly further than 0.983 AU away from the Sun.[27][28] NEOs are thus not necessarily currently near the Earth, but they can potentially approach the Earth relatively closely. Many NEOs have complex orbits due to constant perturbation by the Earth's gravity, and some of them can temporarily change from an orbit around the Sun to one around the Earth, but the term is applied flexibly for these objects, too.[29]
The orbits of some NEOs intersect that of the Earth, so they pose a collision danger.[3] These are considered potentially hazardous objects (PHOs) if their estimated diameter is above 140 meters. PHOs include potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).[30][31] PHAs are defined based on two parameters relating to respectively their potential to approach the Earth dangerously closely and the estimated consequences that an impact would have if it occurs.[2] Objects with both an Earth minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) of 0.05 AU or less and an absolute magnitude of 22.0 or brighter (a rough indicator of large size) are considered PHAs. Objects that either cannot approach closer to the Earth than 0.05 AU (7,500,000 km; 4,600,000 mi), or which are fainter than H = 22.0 (about 140 m (460 ft) in diameter with assumed albedo of 14%), are not considered PHAs.[2]
History of human awareness of NEOs
[edit]

The first near-Earth objects to be observed by humans were comets. Their extraterrestrial nature was recognised and confirmed only after Tycho Brahe tried to measure the distance of a comet through its parallax in 1577 and the lower limit he obtained was well above the Earth diameter; the periodicity of some comets was first recognised in 1705, when Edmond Halley published his orbit calculations for the returning object now known as Halley's Comet.[32] The 1758–1759 return of Halley's Comet was the first comet appearance predicted.[33]
The extraterrestrial origin of meteors (shooting stars) was only recognised on the basis of the analysis of the 1833 Leonid meteor shower by astronomer Denison Olmsted. The 33-year period of the Leonids led astronomers to suspect that they originate from a comet that would today be classified as an NEO, which was confirmed in 1867, when astronomers found that the newly discovered comet 55P/Tempel–Tuttle has the same orbit as the Leonids.[34]
The first near-Earth asteroid to be discovered was 433 Eros in 1898.[35] The asteroid was subject to several extensive observation campaigns, primarily because measurements of its orbit enabled a precise determination of the then imperfectly known distance of the Earth from the Sun.[36]
Encounters with Earth
[edit]If a near-Earth object is near the part of its orbit closest to Earth's at the same time Earth is at the part of its orbit closest to the near-Earth object's orbit, the object has a close approach, or, if the orbits intersect, could even impact the Earth or its atmosphere.
Close approaches
[edit]As of May 2019[update], only 23 comets have been observed to pass within 0.1 AU (15,000,000 km; 9,300,000 mi) of Earth, including 10 which are or have been short-period comets.[37] Two of these near-Earth comets, Halley's Comet and 73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann, have been observed during multiple close approaches.[37] The closest observed approach was 0.0151 AU (5.88 LD) for Lexell's Comet on July 1, 1770.[37] After an orbit change due to a close approach of Jupiter in 1779, this object is no longer an NEC. The closest approach ever observed for a current short-period NEC is 0.0229 AU (8.92 LD) for Comet Tempel–Tuttle in 1366.[37] Orbital calculations show that P/1999 J6 (SOHO), a faint sungrazing comet and confirmed short-period NEC observed only during its close approaches to the Sun,[38] passed Earth undetected at a distance of 0.0120 AU (4.65 LD) on June 12, 1999.[39]
In 1937, 800 m (2,600 ft) asteroid 69230 Hermes was discovered when it passed the Earth at twice the distance of the Moon.[40] On June 14, 1968, the 1.4 km (0.87 mi) diameter asteroid 1566 Icarus passed Earth at a distance of 0.0425 AU (6,360,000 km), or 16.5 times the distance of the Moon.[41] During this approach, Icarus became the first minor planet to be observed using radar.[42][43] This was the first close approach predicted years in advance, since Icarus had been discovered in 1949.[44] The first near-Earth asteroid known to have passed Earth closer than the distance of the Moon was 1991 BA, a 5–10 m (16–33 ft) body which passed at a distance of 170,000 km (110,000 mi).[45] As NEA surveys were enhanced, at least one such object was observed each year from 2001, at least a dozen from 2005, and over a hundred from 2020.[46][47]
As astronomers became able to discover ever smaller and fainter and ever more numerous near-Earth objects, they began to routinely observe and catalogue close approaches.[46][47] As of December 2024[update], the closest approach without atmospheric or ground impact ever detected was an encounter with 5–11 m (16–36 ft) asteroid 2020 VT4 on November 14, 2020,[47] with a minimum distance of about 6,750 km (4,190 mi) from the Earth's centre, or about 380 km (240 mi) above its surface.[48] On November 8, 2011, asteroid (308635) 2005 YU55, relatively large at about 400 m (1,300 ft) in diameter, passed within 324,930 km (201,900 mi) (0.845 lunar distances) of Earth.[49] On February 15, 2013, the 30 m (98 ft) asteroid 367943 Duende (2012 DA14) passed approximately 27,700 km (17,200 mi) above the surface of Earth, closer than satellites in geosynchronous orbit.[50] The asteroid was not visible to the unaided eye. This was the first sub-lunar close passage of an object discovered during a previous passage, and was thus the first to be predicted well in advance.[51] On October 8, 2025, asteroid 2025 TN2, approximately 87 feet (≈27 m) in diameter, passed safely by Earth at a distance of 1.34 million km (≈0.00895 AU). On the same day, three additional small asteroids — 2025 SJ29, 2025 TF1, and 2020 QU5, measuring about 55 ft, 65 ft, and 81 ft respectively — also made close approaches, all without any risk of impact.[52]
Earth-grazers
[edit]Some small asteroids that enter the upper atmosphere of Earth at a shallow angle remain intact and leave the atmosphere again, continuing on a solar orbit. During the passage through the atmosphere, due to the burning of its surface, such an object can be observed as an Earth-grazing fireball.
On August 10, 1972, a meteor that became known as the 1972 Great Daylight Fireball was witnessed by many people and even filmed as it moved north over the Rocky Mountains from the U.S. Southwest to Canada.[53] It passed within 58 km (36 mi) of the Earth's surface.[54]
On October 13, 1990, Earth-grazing meteoroid EN131090 was observed above Czechoslovakia and Poland, moving at 41.74 km/s (93,370 mph; 150,264 km/h) along a 409 km (254 mi) trajectory from south to north. The closest approach to the Earth was 98.67 km (61.31 mi) above the surface. It was captured by two all-sky cameras of the European Fireball Network, which for the first time enabled geometric calculations of the orbit of such a body.[55]
Impacts
[edit]When a near-Earth object impacts Earth, objects up to a few tens of metres across ordinarily explode in the upper atmosphere (most of them harmlessly), with most or all of the solids vaporized and only small amounts of meteorites arriving to the Earth surface. Larger objects, by contrast, hit the water surface, forming tsunami waves, or the solid surface, forming impact craters.[56]
The frequency of impacts of objects of various sizes is estimated on the basis of orbit simulations of NEO populations, the frequency of impact craters on the Earth and the Moon, and the frequency of close encounters.[57][58] The study of impact craters indicates that impact frequency has been more or less steady for the past 3.5 billion years, which requires a steady replenishment of the NEO population from the asteroid main belt.[27] One impact model based on widely accepted NEO population models estimates the average time between the impact of two stony asteroids with a diameter of at least 4 m (13 ft) at about one year; for asteroids 7 m (23 ft) across (which impacts with as much energy as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, approximately 15 kilotonnes of TNT) at five years, for asteroids 60 m (200 ft) across (an impact energy of 10 megatons, comparable to the Tunguska event in 1908) at 1,300 years, for asteroids 1 km (0.62 mi) across at 440 thousand years, and for asteroids 5 km (3.1 mi) across at 18 million years.[59] Some other models estimate similar impact frequencies,[27] while others calculate higher frequencies.[58] For Tunguska-sized (10 megaton) impacts, the estimates range from one event every 2,000–3,000 years to one event every 300 years.[58]
The second-largest observed event after the Tunguska meteor was a 1.1 megaton air blast in 1963 near the Prince Edward Islands between South Africa and Antarctica. However, this event was detected only by infrasound sensors,[60][61] which led to speculation that this may have been a nuclear test.[62] The third-largest, but by far best-observed impact, was the Chelyabinsk meteor of 15 February 2013. A previously unknown 20 m (66 ft) asteroid exploded above this Russian city with an equivalent blast yield of 400–500 kilotons.[60] The calculated orbit of the pre-impact asteroid is similar to that of Apollo asteroid 2011 EO40, making the latter the meteor's possible parent body.[63]

On October 7, 2008, 20 hours after it was first observed and 11 hours after its trajectory has been calculated and announced, 4 m (13 ft) asteroid 2008 TC3 blew up 37 km (23 mi) above the Nubian Desert in Sudan. It was the first time that an asteroid was observed and its impact was predicted prior to its entry into the atmosphere as a meteor. 10.7 kilograms (23.6 lb) of meteorites were recovered after the impact.[64] As of December 2024[update], eleven impacts have been predicted, all of them small bodies that produced meteor explosions,[65] with some impacts in remote areas only detected by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization's International Monitoring System (IMS), a network of infrasound sensors designed to detect the detonation of nuclear devices.[66] Asteroid impact prediction remains in its infancy and successfully predicted asteroid impacts are rare. The vast majority of impacts recorded by IMS are not predicted.[67]
Observed impacts aren't restricted to the surface and atmosphere of Earth. Dust-sized NEOs have impacted man-made spacecraft, including the space probe Long Duration Exposure Facility, which collected interplanetary dust in low Earth orbit for six years from 1984.[68] Impacts on the Moon can be observed as flashes of light with a typical duration of a fraction of a second.[69] The first lunar impacts were recorded during the 1999 Leonid storm.[70] Subsequently, several continuous monitoring programs were launched.[69][71][72] A lunar impact that was observed on September 11, 2013, lasted 8 seconds, was likely caused by an object 0.6–1.4 m (2.0–4.6 ft) in diameter,[71] and created a new crater 40 m (130 ft) across, was the largest ever observed as of July 2019[update].[73]
Risk
[edit]
Through human history, the risk that any near-Earth object poses has been viewed having regard to both the culture and the technology of human society. Through history, humans have associated NEOs with changing risks, based on religious, philosophical or scientific views, as well as humanity's technological or economical capability to deal with such risks.[6] Thus, NEOs have been seen as omens of natural disasters or wars; harmless spectacles in an unchanging universe; the source of era-changing cataclysms[6] or potentially poisonous fumes (during Earth's passage through the tail of Halley's Comet in 1910);[74] and finally as a possible cause of a crater-forming impact that could even cause extinction of humans and other life on Earth.[6]
The potential of catastrophic impacts by near-Earth comets was recognised as soon as the first orbit calculations provided an understanding of their orbits: in 1694, Edmond Halley presented a theory that Noah's flood in the Bible was caused by a comet impact.[75]
Human perception of near-Earth asteroids as benign objects of fascination or killer objects with high risk to human society has ebbed and flowed during the short time that NEAs have been scientifically observed.[12] The 1937 close approach of Hermes and the 1968 close approach of Icarus first raised impact concerns among scientists. Icarus earned significant public attention due to alarmist news reports, while Hermes was considered a threat because it was lost after its discovery; thus its orbit and potential for collision with Earth were not known precisely.[44] Hermes was only re-discovered in 2003, and it is now known to be no threat for at least the next century.[40]
Scientists have recognised the threat of impacts that create craters much bigger than the impacting bodies and have indirect effects on an even wider area since the 1980s, with mounting evidence for the theory that the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (in which the non-avian dinosaurs died out) 65 million years ago was caused by a large asteroid impact.[6][76] On March 23, 1989, the 300 m (980 ft) diameter Apollo asteroid 4581 Asclepius (1989 FC) missed the Earth by 700,000 km (430,000 mi). If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, equivalent to 20,000 megatons of TNT. It attracted widespread attention because it was discovered only after the closest approach.[77]
From the 1990s, a typical frame of reference in searches for NEOs has been the scientific concept of risk. The awareness of the wider public of the impact risk rose after the observation of the impact of the fragments of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 into Jupiter in July 1994.[6][76] In March 1998, early orbit calculations for recently discovered asteroid (35396) 1997 XF11 showed a potential 2028 close approach 0.00031 AU (46,000 km) from the Earth, well within the orbit of the Moon, but with a large error margin allowing for a direct hit. Further data allowed a revision of the 2028 approach distance to 0.0064 AU (960,000 km), with no chance of collision. By that time, inaccurate reports of a potential impact had caused a media storm.[44]
In 1998, the movies Deep Impact and Armageddon popularised the notion that near-Earth objects could cause catastrophic impacts.[76] Also at that time, a conspiracy theory arose about a supposed 2003 impact of a planet called Nibiru with Earth, which persisted on the internet as the predicted impact date was moved to 2012 and then 2017.[78]
Risk scales
[edit]There are two schemes for the scientific classification of impact hazards from NEOs, as a way to communicate the risk of impacts to the general public.

The simple Torino scale was established at an IAU workshop in Turin (Italian: Torino) in June 1999, in the wake of the public confusion about the impact risk of 1997 XF11.[79] It rates the risks of impacts in the next 100 years according to impact energy and impact probability, using integer numbers between 0 and 10:[80][81]
- ratings of 0 and 1 are of no concern to astronomers or the public,
- ratings of 2 to 4 are used for events with increasing magnitude of concern to astronomers trying to make more precise orbit calculations, but not yet a concern for the public,
- ratings of 5 to 7 are meant for impacts of increasing magnitude which are not certain but warrant public concern and governmental contingency planning over an increasing timescale,
- 8 to 10 would be used for certain collisions of increasing severity.
The more complex Palermo scale, established in 2002, compares the likelihood of an impact at a certain date to the probable number of impacts of a similar energy or greater until the possible impact, and takes the logarithm of this ratio. Thus, a Palermo scale rating can be any positive or negative real number, and risks of any concern are indicated by values above zero. Unlike the Torino scale, the Palermo scale is not sensitive to newly discovered small objects with an orbit known with low confidence.[82]
Highly rated risks
[edit]The National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA maintains an automated system to evaluate the threat from known NEOs over the next 100 years, which generates the continuously updated Sentry Risk Table.[83] All or nearly all of the objects are highly likely to drop off the list eventually as more observations come in, reducing the uncertainties and enabling more accurate orbital predictions.[83][84] When the close approach of a newly discovered asteroid is first put on a risk list with a significant risk, it is normal for the risk to first increase, regardless of whether the potential impact will eventually be ruled out or confirmed with the help of additional observations.[85] Similar tables are maintained by the Near-Earth Object Coordination Centre (NEOCC) of the European Space Agency (ESA)[86] and on the NEODyS (Near Earth Objects Dynamic Site) by the University of Pisa spin-off company SpaceDyS.[87]
In March 2002, (163132) 2002 CU11 became the first asteroid with a temporarily positive rating on the Torino Scale, with about a 1 in 9,300 chance of an impact in 2049.[88] Additional observations reduced the estimated risk to zero, and the asteroid was removed from the Sentry Risk Table in April 2002.[89] It is now known that within the next two centuries, 2002 CU11 will pass the Earth at a safe closest distance (perigee) of 0.00425 AU (636,000 km; 395,000 mi) on August 31, 2080.[90]

Asteroid (29075) 1950 DA has a diameter of about a kilometer (0.6 miles), and an impact would therefore be globally catastrophic. Although this asteroid will not strike for at least 800 years and thus has no Torino scale rating, it was added to the Sentry list in April 2002 as the first object with a Palermo scale value greater than zero.[25][91] The then-calculated 1 in 300 maximum chance of impact and +0.17 Palermo scale value was roughly 50% greater than the background risk of impact by all similarly large objects until 2880.[91][92] After additional radar[93] and optical observations, as of March 2025[update], the probability of this impact is assessed at 1 in 2,600.[83] The corresponding Palermo scale value of −0.92 is the second-highest for all objects on the Sentry List Table.[83]
On December 24, 2004, five days after discovery, 370 m (1,210 ft) asteroid 99942 Apophis was assigned a 4 on the Torino scale, the highest rating given to date, as the information available at the time translated to a 1.6% chance of Earth impact in April 2029.[94] As observations were collected over the next three days, the calculated chance of impact first increased to as high as 2.7%,[95] then fell back to zero, as the shrinking uncertainty zone for this close approach no longer included the Earth.[96] There was at that time still some uncertainty about potential impacts during later close approaches. However, as the precision of orbital calculations improved due to additional observations, the risk of impact at any date was eliminated[97] and Apophis was removed from the Sentry Risk Table in February 2021.[89]
As of March 2025[update], 2010 RF12 was listed on the Sentry List Table with the highest chance of impacting Earth, at 1 in 10 on September 5, 2095.[83] At only 7 m (23 ft) across, the asteroid however is much too small to be considered a potentially hazardous asteroid and it poses no serious threat: the possible 2095 impact therefore rates only −2.97 on the Palermo Scale.[83]
In January 2025, 55 m (180 ft) asteroid 2024 YR4 reached a 3 rating on the Torino scale for a possible impact on December 22, 2032, triggering an action plan to schedule observations with more powerful telescopes as the object recedes and gets dimmer, to determine its orbit with more precision and thus refine the impact risk prediction.[98] In February 2025, the impact risk peaked at 1 in 32, then dropped below 1 in 1000 and the Torino scale rating was reduced to 0.[99] As of 2 March 2025[update], the impact risk for the 2032 encounter was down to 1 in 120,000.[83] By April, 2024 YR4 was on the other hand estimated to have a 4% chance of impacting a 70% waning gibbous moon on 22 December 2032[100] around 15:17 to 15:21 UTC.[101]
Projects to minimize the threat
[edit]A year before the 1968 close approach of asteroid Icarus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology students launched Project Icarus, devising a plan to deflect the asteroid with rockets in case it was found to be on a collision course with Earth.[102] Project Icarus received wide media coverage, and inspired the 1979 disaster movie Meteor, in which the US and the USSR join forces to blow up an Earth-bound fragment of an asteroid hit by a comet.[103]
The first astronomical program dedicated to the discovery of near-Earth asteroids was the Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey. The link to impact hazard, the need for dedicated survey telescopes and options to head off an eventual impact were first discussed at a 1981 interdisciplinary conference in Snowmass, Colorado.[76] Plans for a more comprehensive survey, named the Spaceguard Survey, were developed by NASA from 1992, under a mandate from the United States Congress.[104][105] To promote the survey on an international level, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) organised a workshop at Vulcano, Italy in 1995,[104] and set up The Spaceguard Foundation also in Italy a year later.[7] In 1998, the United States Congress gave NASA a mandate to detect 90% of near-Earth asteroids over 1 km (0.62 mi) diameter (that threaten global devastation) by 2008.[105][106]

Several surveys have undertaken "Spaceguard" activities (an umbrella term), including Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR), Spacewatch, Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT), Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search (LONEOS), Catalina Sky Survey (CSS), Campo Imperatore Near-Earth Object Survey (CINEOS), Japanese Spaceguard Association, Asiago-DLR Asteroid Survey (ADAS) and Near-Earth Object WISE (NEOWISE). As a result, the ratio of the known and the estimated total number of near-Earth asteroids larger than 1 km in diameter rose from about 20% in 1998 to 65% in 2004,[7] 80% in 2006,[106] and 93% in 2011. The original Spaceguard goal has thus been met, only three years late.[8][107] As of December 2024[update], 867 NEAs larger than 1 km have been discovered, of which one was discovered in 2024 and two in 2023.[1]
In 2005, the original USA Spaceguard mandate was extended by the George E. Brown, Jr. Near-Earth Object Survey Act, which calls for NASA to detect 90% of NEOs with diameters of 140 m (460 ft) or greater, by 2020.[9] In January 2016, NASA announced the creation of the Planetary Defense Coordination Office (PDCO) to coordinate an effective threat assessment, response and mitigation effort, which reinforced the goal to detect 90% of NEOs 140 m (460 ft) or greater, but without a deadline.[10][108] In September 2020, it was estimated that about half of these have been found, but objects of this size hit the Earth only about once in 30,000 years.[109] In December 2023, using a lower absolute brightness estimate for smaller asteroids, the ratio of discovered NEOs with diameters of 140 m (460 ft) or greater was estimated at 38%.[110] The Chile-based Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which will survey the southern sky for transient events from 2025, is expected to increase the number of known asteroids by a factor of 10 to 100 and increase the ratio of known NEOs with diameters of 140 m (460 ft) or greater to at least 60%,[111] while the NEO Surveyor satellite, to be launched in 2027, is expected to push the ratio to 76% during its 5-year mission.[110]
Survey programs aim to identify threats years in advance, giving humanity time to prepare a space mission to avert the threat.
REP. STEWART: ... are we technologically capable of launching something that could intercept [an asteroid]? ...
DR. A'HEARN: No. If we had spacecraft plans on the books already, that would take a year ... I mean a typical small mission ... takes four years from approval to start to launch ...
— Rep. Chris Stewart (R, UT) and Dr. Michael F. A'Hearn, April 10, 2013, United States Congress[112]
The ATLAS project, by contrast, aims to find impacting asteroids shortly before impact, much too late for deflection maneuvers but still in time to evacuate and otherwise prepare the affected Earth region.[113] Another project, the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), which surveys for objects that change their brightness rapidly,[114] also detects asteroids passing close to Earth.[115]
Scientists involved in NEO research have also considered options for actively averting the threat if an object is found to be on a collision course with Earth.[76] All viable methods aim to deflect rather than destroy the threatening NEO, because the fragments would still cause widespread destruction.[13] Deflection, which means a change in the object's orbit months to years prior to the predicted impact, also requires orders of magnitude less energy.[13]
Number and classification
[edit]
When an NEO is detected, like all other small Solar System bodies, its positions and brightness are submitted to the (IAU's) Minor Planet Center (MPC) for cataloging. The MPC maintains separate lists of confirmed NEOs and potential NEOs.[116][117] The MPC maintains a separate list for the potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).[30] NEOs are also catalogued by two separate units of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of NASA: the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS)[118] and the Solar System Dynamics Group.[119] CNEOS's catalog of near-Earth objects includes the approach distances of asteroids and comets.[47] NEOs are also catalogued by a unit of ESA, the Near-Earth Object Coordination Centre (NEOCC).[120]
Near-Earth objects are classified as meteoroids, asteroids, or comets depending on size, composition, and orbit. Those which are asteroids can additionally be members of an asteroid family, and comets create meteoroid streams that can generate meteor showers.
As of December 30, 2024[update] and according to statistics maintained by CNEOS, 37,378 NEOs have been discovered. Only 123 (0.33%) of them are comets, whilst 37,255 (99.67%) are asteroids. 2,465 of those NEOs are classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).[1]
As of February 2, 2025[update], 1,886 NEAs appear on the Sentry impact risk page at the NASA website.[83] All but 106 of these NEAs are less than 50 meters in diameter, only one recently discovered object has an impact risk meriting a Torino Scale rating higher than zero, while none have a Palermo scale rating higher than zero.[80]
Observational biases
[edit]The main problem with estimating the number of NEOs is that the probability of detecting one is influenced by a number of aspects of the NEO, starting naturally with its size but also including the characteristics of its orbit and the reflectivity of its surface.[121] What is easily detected will be more counted, and these observational biases need to be compensated when trying to calculate the number of bodies in a population from the list of its detected members.[121]

Bigger asteroids reflect more light, and the two biggest near-Earth objects, 433 Eros and 1036 Ganymed, were naturally also among the first to be detected.[122] 1036 Ganymed is about 35 km (22 mi) in diameter and 433 Eros is about 17 km (11 mi) in diameter.[122] Meanwhile, the apparent brightness of objects that are closer is higher, introducing a bias that favours the discovery of NEOs of a given size that get closer to Earth.[123]
Earth-based astronomy requires dark skies and hence nighttime observations, and even space-based telescopes avoid looking into directions close to the Sun, thus most NEO surveys are blind towards objects passing Earth on the side of the Sun.[123][124] This bias is further enhanced by the effect of phase: the narrower the angle of the asteroid and the Sun from the observer, the lesser part of the observed side of the asteroid will be illuminated.[123] Another bias results from the different surface brightness or albedo of the objects, which can make a large but low-albedo object as bright as a small but high-albedo object.[123][125] In addition, the reflexivity of asteroid surfaces is not uniform but increases towards the direction opposite of illumination, resulting in the phenomenon of phase darkening, which makes asteroids even brighter when the Earth is close to the axis of sunlight.[123] An asteroid's observed albedo usually has a strong peak or opposition surge very close to the direction opposite of the Sun.[123] Different surfaces display different levels of phase darkening, and research showed that, on top of albedo bias, this favours the discovery of silicon-rich S-type asteroids over carbon-rich C types, for example.[123] As a result of these observational biases, in Earth-based surveys, NEOs tended to be discovered when they were in opposition, that is, opposite from the Sun when viewed from the Earth.[110]
The most practical way around many of these biases is to use thermal infrared telescopes in space that observe their thermal emissions instead of the visible light they reflect, with a sensitivity that is almost independent of the illumination.[110][125] In addition, space-based telescopes in an orbit around the Sun in the shadow of the Earth can make observations as close as 45 degrees to the direction of the Sun.[124]
Further observational biases favour objects that have more frequent encounters with the Earth, which makes the detection of Atens more likely than that of Apollos; and objects that move slower when encountering the Earth, which makes the detection of NEAs with low eccentricities more likely.[126]
Such observational biases must be identified and quantified to determine NEO populations, as studies of asteroid populations then take those known observational selection biases into account to make a more accurate assessment.[127] In the year 2000 and taking into account all known observational biases, it was estimated that there are approximately 900 near-Earth asteroids of at least kilometer size, or technically and more accurately, with an absolute magnitude brighter than 17.75.[121]
Near-Earth asteroids
[edit]
These are asteroids in a near-Earth orbit without the tail or coma of a comet. As of December 2024[update], 37,255 near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) are known, 2,465 of which are both sufficiently large and may come sufficiently close to Earth to be classified as potentially hazardous.[1]
NEAs survive in their orbits for just a few million years.[27] They are eventually eliminated by planetary perturbations, causing ejection from the Solar System or a collision with the Sun, a planet, or other celestial body.[27] With orbital lifetimes short compared to the age of the Solar System, new asteroids must be constantly moved into near-Earth orbits to explain the observed asteroids. The accepted origin of these asteroids is that main-belt asteroids are moved into the inner Solar System through orbital resonances with Jupiter.[27] The interaction with Jupiter through the resonance perturbs the asteroid's orbit and it comes into the inner Solar System. The asteroid belt has gaps, known as Kirkwood gaps, where these resonances occur as the asteroids in these resonances have been moved onto other orbits. New asteroids migrate into these resonances, due to the Yarkovsky effect that provides a continuing supply of near-Earth asteroids.[128] Compared to the entire mass of the asteroid belt, the mass loss necessary to sustain the NEA population is relatively small; totalling less than 6% over the past 3.5 billion years.[27] The composition of near-Earth asteroids is comparable to that of asteroids from the asteroid belt, reflecting a variety of asteroid spectral types.[129]
A small number of NEAs are extinct comets that have lost their volatile surface materials, although having a faint or intermittent comet-like tail does not necessarily result in a classification as a near-Earth comet, making the boundaries somewhat fuzzy. The rest of the near-Earth asteroids are driven out of the asteroid belt by gravitational interactions with Jupiter.[27][130]
Many asteroids have natural satellites (minor-planet moons). As of December 2024[update], 104 NEAs were known to have at least one moon, including five known to have two moons.[131] The asteroid 3122 Florence, one of the largest PHAs[30] with a diameter of 4.5 km (2.8 mi), has two moons measuring 100–300 m (330–980 ft) across, which were discovered by radar imaging during the asteroid's 2017 approach to Earth.[132]
In May 2022, an algorithm known as Tracklet-less Heliocentric Orbit Recovery or THOR and developed by University of Washington researchers to discover asteroids in the solar system was announced as a success.[133] The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center confirmed a series of first candidate asteroids identified by the algorithm.[134]
Size distribution
[edit]
While the size of a very small fraction of these asteroids is known to better than 1%, from radar observations, from images of the asteroid surface, or from stellar occultations, the diameter of the vast majority of near-Earth asteroids has only been estimated on the basis of their brightness and a representative asteroid surface reflectivity or albedo, which is commonly assumed to be 14%.[118] Such indirect size estimates are uncertain by over a factor of 2 for individual asteroids, since asteroid albedos can range at least as low as 5% and as high as 30%. This makes the volume of those asteroids uncertain by a factor of 8, and their mass by at least as much, since their assumed density also has its own uncertainty. Using this crude method, an absolute magnitude of 17.75 roughly corresponds to a diameter of 1 km (0.62 mi)[118] and an absolute magnitude of 22.0 to a diameter of 140 m (460 ft).[2] Diameters of intermediate precision, better than from an assumed albedo but not nearly as precise as good direct measurements, can be obtained from the combination of reflected light and thermal infrared emission, using a thermal model of the asteroid to estimate both its diameter and its albedo. The reliability of this method, as applied by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer and NEOWISE missions, has been the subject of a dispute between experts, with the 2018 publication of two independent analyses, one criticising and another giving results consistent with the WISE method.[135] A 2023 study re-evaluated the relationship of brightness, albedo and diameter. For many objects with a diameter larger than 1 km, brightness estimates were reduced slightly. Meanwhile, based on new albedo estimates of smaller objects, the study found that H = 23 best corresponds to a diameter of 140 m.[110]
In 2000, NASA reduced from 1,000–2,000 to 500–1,000 its estimate of the number of existing near-Earth asteroids over one kilometer in diameter, or more exactly brighter than an absolute magnitude of 17.75.[136][137] Shortly thereafter, the LINEAR survey provided an alternative estimate of 1,227+170
−90.[138] In 2011, on the basis of NEOWISE observations, the estimated number of one-kilometer NEAs was narrowed to 981±19 (of which 93% had been discovered at the time), while the number of NEAs larger than 140 meters across was estimated at 13,200±1,900.[8][107] The NEOWISE estimate differed from other estimates primarily in assuming a slightly lower average asteroid albedo, which produces larger estimated diameters for the same asteroid brightness. This resulted in 911 then known asteroids at least 1 km across, as opposed to the 830 then listed by CNEOS from the same inputs but assuming a slightly higher albedo.[139] In 2017, two studies using an improved statistical method reduced the estimated number of NEAs brighter than absolute magnitude 17.75 (approximately over one kilometer in diameter) slightly to 921±20.[140][141] The estimated number of near-Earth asteroids brighter than absolute magnitude of 22.0 (approximately over 140 m across) rose to 27,100±2,200, double the WISE estimate, of which about a fourth were known at the time.[141] The number of asteroids brighter than H = 25, which corresponds to about 40 m (130 ft) in diameter, is estimated at 840,000±23,000—of which about 1.3 percent had been discovered by February 2016; the number of asteroids brighter than H = 30 (larger than 3.5 m (11 ft)) is estimated at 400±100 million—of which about 0.003 percent had been discovered by February 2016.[141]
A September 2021 study revised the estimated number of NEAs with a diameter larger than 1 km (using both WISE data and the absolute brightness lower than 17.75 as proxy) slightly upwards to 981±19, of which 911 were discovered at the time, but reduced the estimated number of asteroids brighter than absolute magnitude of 22.0 (as proxy for a diameter of 140 m) to under 20,000, of which about half were discovered at the time.[109] The 2023 study that re-evaluated the relationship of average absolute brightness, albedo and diameter confirmed the ratios of the number of discovered and estimated total asteroids of different sizes in the 2021 study, but by changing the proxy for a diameter of 140 m to H = 23, it estimated that only about 44% of the estimated 35,000 total larger than that have been discovered by the end of 2022.[110] As of January 2024[update], NEO catalogues still use H = 22 as proxy for a diameter of 140 m.[2]
As of December 30, 2024[update], and using diameters mostly estimated crudely from a measured absolute magnitude and an assumed albedo, 867 NEAs listed by CNEOS, including 152 PHAs, measure at least 1 km in diameter, and 11,167 known NEAs, including 2,465 PHAs, are larger than 140 m in diameter.[1]
The smallest known near-Earth asteroid is 2015 FF415 with an absolute magnitude of 34.34,[119] corresponding to an estimated diameter of about 0.5 m (1.6 ft).[142] The largest such object is 1036 Ganymed,[119] with an absolute magnitude of 9.18 and directly measured irregular dimensions which are equivalent to a diameter of about 38 km (24 mi).[143]
Orbital classification
[edit]
Near-Earth asteroids are divided into groups based on their semi-major axis (a), perihelion distance (q), and aphelion distance (Q):[2][26]
- The Atiras or Apoheles have orbits strictly inside Earth's orbit: an Atira asteroid's aphelion distance (Q) is smaller than Earth's perihelion distance (0.983 AU). That is, Q < 0.983 AU, which implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis is also less than 0.983 AU.[144] This group includes asteroids on orbits that never get close to Earth, including the sub-group of ꞌAylóꞌchaxnims, which orbit the Sun entirely within the orbit of Venus[145] and which include the hypothetical sub-group of Vulcanoids, which have orbits entirely within the orbit of Mercury.[146]
- The Atens have a semi-major axis of less than 1 AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, a < 1.0 AU and Q > 0.983 AU. (0.983 AU is Earth's perihelion distance.)
- The Apollos have a semi-major axis of more than 1 AU and cross Earth's orbit. Mathematically, a > 1.0 AU and q < 1.017 AU. (1.017 AU is Earth's aphelion distance.)
- The Amors have orbits strictly outside Earth's orbit: an Amor asteroid's perihelion distance (q) is greater than Earth's aphelion distance (1.017 AU). Amor asteroids are also near-Earth objects so q < 1.3 AU. In summary, 1.017 AU < q < 1.3 AU. (This implies that the asteroid's semi-major axis (a) is also larger than 1.017 AU.) Some Amor asteroid orbits cross the orbit of Mars.
Some authors define Atens differently: they define it as being all the asteroids with a semi-major axis of less than 1 AU.[147][148] That is, they consider the Atiras to be part of the Atens.[148] Historically, until 1998, there were no known or suspected Atiras, so the distinction wasn't necessary.
Atiras and Amors do not cross the Earth's orbit and are not immediate impact threats, but their orbits may change to become Earth-crossing orbits in the future.[27][149]
As of December 30, 2024[update], 34 Atiras, 2,952 Atens, 21,132 Apollos and 13,137 Amors have been discovered and cataloged.[1]
Co-orbital asteroids
[edit]
Most NEAs have orbits that are significantly more eccentric than that of the Earth and the other major planets and their orbital planes can tilt several degrees relative to that of the Earth. NEAs which have orbits that do resemble the Earth's in eccentricity, inclination and semi-major axis are grouped as Arjuna asteroids.[150] Within this group are NEAs that have the same orbital period as the Earth, or a co-orbital configuration, which corresponds to an orbital resonance at a ratio of 1:1. All co-orbital asteroids have special orbits that are relatively stable and, paradoxically, can prevent them from getting close to Earth:
- Trojans: Near the orbit of a planet, there are five gravitational equilibrium points, the Lagrangian points, in which an asteroid would orbit the Sun in fixed formation with the planet. Two of these, 60 degrees ahead and behind the planet along its orbit (designated L4 and L5 respectively) are stable; that is, an asteroid near these points would stay there for thousands or even millions of years in spite of light perturbations by other planets and by non-gravitational forces. Trojans circle around L4 or L5 on paths resembling a tadpole.[151] As of October 2023[update], Earth has two confirmed Trojans:[152] (706765) 2010 TK7 and (614689) 2020 XL5, both circling Earth's L4 point.[153][154]
- Horseshoe librators: The region of stability around L4 and L5 also includes orbits for co-orbital asteroids that run around both L4 and L5. Relative to the Earth and Sun, the orbit can resemble the circumference of a horseshoe, or may consist of annual loops that wander back and forth (librate) in a horseshoe-shaped area. In both cases, the Sun is at the horseshoe's center of gravity, Earth is in the gap of the horseshoe, and L4 and L5 are inside the ends of the horseshoe. Among Earth's known co-orbitals, those with the most stable orbits as well as those with the least stable orbits are horseshoe librators.[151] As of October 2023[update], at least 13 horseshoe librators of Earth have been discovered.[152] The most-studied and, at about 5 km (3.1 mi), largest is 3753 Cruithne, which travels along bean-shaped annual loops and completes its horseshoe libration cycle every 770–780 years.[155][156] (419624) 2010 SO16 is an asteroid on a relatively stable circumference-of-a-horseshoe orbit, with a horseshoe libration period of about 350 years.[157]
- Quasi-satellites: Quasi-satellites are co-orbital asteroids on a normal elliptic orbit with a higher eccentricity than Earth's, which they travel in a way synchronised with Earth's motion. Since the asteroid orbits the Sun slower than Earth when further away and faster than Earth when closer to the Sun, when observed in a rotating frame of reference fixed to the Sun and the Earth, the quasi-satellite appears to orbit Earth in a retrograde direction in one year, even though it is not bound gravitationally. As of October 2023[update], six asteroids were known to be a quasi-satellite of Earth.[152] 469219 Kamoʻoalewa is Earth's closest quasi-satellite, in an orbit that has been stable for almost a century.[158] This asteroid is thought to be a piece of the Moon ejected during an impact.[152][159] Orbit calculations show that almost all quasi-satellites and many horseshoe librators repeatedly transfer between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits.[158][160] One of these objects, 2003 YN107, was observed during its transition from a quasi-satellite orbit to a horseshoe orbit in 2006; it is expected to transfer back to a quasi-satellite orbit sometime around year 2066.[161] A quasi-satellite discovered in 2023 but then found in old photographs back to 2012, 2023 FW13, was found to have an orbit that is stable for about 4,000 years, from 100 BC to AD 3700.[162]
- Asteroids on compound orbits: orbital calculations show that some co-orbital asteroids transit between horseshoe and quasi-satellite orbits during every horseshoe resp. quasi-satellite cycle. Theoretically, similar continuous transitions between Trojan and horseshoe orbits are possible, too. As of January 2023[update], at least 20 Earth co-orbital NEAs are thought to be in the horseshoe-like phase of compound orbits.[160]

2020 CD3 · Moon · Earth
- Temporary satellites: NEAs can also transfer between solar orbits and distant Earth orbits, becoming gravitationally bound temporary satellites. According to simulations, temporary satellites are typically caught when they pass Earth's L1 or L2 Lagrangian points at the time Earth is either at the point in its orbit closest or farthest from the Sun, complete a couple of orbits around Earth, and then return to a heliocentric orbit due to perturbations from the Moon.[29] Strictly speaking, temporary satellites aren't co-orbital asteroids, and they can have orbits of the broader Arjuna type before and after capture by Earth, but simulations show that they can be captured from, or transfer to, horseshoe orbits.[150] The simulations also indicate that Earth typically has at least one temporary satellite 1 m (3.3 ft) across at any given time, but they are too faint to be detected by current surveys.[29] As of December 2024[update], five temporary satellites have been observed:[150] 1991 VG,[163] 2006 RH120, 2020 CD3,[164][165] 2022 NX1[150] and 2024 PT5.[166] Calculations for the 5 m (16 ft) asteroid 2023 FY3 showed repeated transitions into temporary satellite orbits both in the past and the future 10,000 years.[150]
Near-Earth asteroids also include the co-orbitals of Venus. As of January 2023[update], all known co-orbitals of Venus have orbits with high eccentricity, also crossing Earth's orbit.[160][167]
Meteoroids
[edit]In 1961, the IAU defined meteoroids as a class of solid interplanetary objects distinct from asteroids by their considerably smaller size.[68] This definition was useful at the time because, with the exception of the Tunguska event, all historically observed meteors were produced by objects significantly smaller than the smallest asteroids then observable by telescopes.[68] As the distinction began to blur with the discovery of ever smaller asteroids and a greater variety of observed NEO impacts, revised definitions with size limits have been proposed from the 1990s.[68] In April 2017, the IAU adopted a revised definition that generally limits meteoroids to a size between 30 μm and 1 m in diameter, but permits the use of the term for any object of any size that caused a meteor, thus leaving the distinction between asteroid and meteoroid blurred.[168]
Near-Earth comets
[edit]
Near-Earth comets (NECs) are objects in a near-Earth orbit with a tail or coma made up of dust, gas or ionized particles emitted by a solid nucleus. Comet nuclei are typically less dense than asteroids but they pass Earth at higher relative speeds, thus the impact energy of a comet nucleus is slightly larger than that of a similar-sized asteroid.[170] NECs may pose an additional hazard due to fragmentation: the meteoroid streams which produce meteor showers may include large inactive fragments, effectively NEAs.[171] Although no impact of a comet in Earth's history has been conclusively confirmed, the Tunguska event may have been caused by a fragment of Comet Encke.[172]
Comets are commonly divided between short-period and long-period comets. Short-period comets, with an orbital period of less than 200 years, originate in the Kuiper belt, beyond the orbit of Neptune; while long-period comets originate in the Oort Cloud, in the outer reaches of the Solar System.[13] The orbital period distinction is of importance in the evaluation of the risk from near-Earth comets because short-period NECs are likely to have been observed during multiple apparitions and thus their orbits can be determined with some precision, while long-period NECs can be assumed to have been seen for the first and last time when they appeared since the start of precise observations, thus their approaches cannot be predicted well in advance.[13] Since the threat from long-period NECs is estimated to be at most 1% of the threat from NEAs, and long-period comets are very faint and thus difficult to detect at large distances from the Sun, Spaceguard efforts have consistently focused on asteroids and short-period comets.[104][170] Both NASA's CNEOS[2] and ESA's NEOCC[26] restrict their definition of NECs to short-period comets. As of December 30, 2024[update], 123 such objects have been discovered.[1]
Comet 109P/Swift–Tuttle, which is also the source of the Perseid meteor shower every year in August, has a roughly 130-year orbit that passes close to the Earth. During the comet's September 1992 recovery, when only the two previous returns in 1862 and 1737 had been identified, calculations showed that the comet would pass close to Earth during its next return in 2126, with an impact within the range of uncertainty. By 1993, even earlier returns (back to at least 188 AD) had been identified, and the longer observation arc eliminated the impact risk. The comet will pass Earth in 2126 at a distance of 23 million kilometers. In 3044, the comet is expected to pass Earth at less than 1.6 million kilometers.[173]
Artificial near-Earth objects
[edit]
Defunct space probes and final stages of rockets can end up in near-Earth orbits around the Sun. Examples of such artificial near-Earth objects include a Tesla Roadster used as dummy payload in a 2018 rocket test[174] and the Kepler space telescope.[175] Some of these objects have been re-discovered by NEO surveys when they returned to Earth's vicinity and classified as asteroids before their artificial origin was recognised.
An object classified as asteroid 1991 VG was discovered during its transition from a temporary satellite orbit around Earth to a solar orbit in November 1991, and could only be observed until April 1992. Some scientists suspected it to be a returning piece of man-made space debris. After new observations in 2017 provided better data on its orbit and surface characteristics, a new study found the artificial origin unlikely.[163]
In September 2002, astronomers found an object designated J002E3. The object was on a temporary satellite orbit around Earth, leaving for a solar orbit in June 2003. Calculations showed that it was also on a solar orbit before 2002, but was close to Earth in 1971. J002E3 was identified as the third stage of the Saturn V rocket that carried Apollo 12 to the Moon.[176][177] In 2006, two more apparent temporary satellites were discovered which were suspected of being artificial.[177] One of them was eventually confirmed as an asteroid and classified as the temporary satellite 2006 RH120.[177] The other, 6Q0B44E, was confirmed as an artificial object, but its identity is unknown.[177] Another temporary satellite was discovered in 2013, and was designated 2013 QW1 as a suspected asteroid. It was later found to be an artificial object of unknown origin. 2013 QW1 is no longer listed as an asteroid by the Minor Planet Center.[177][178] In September 2020, an object detected on an orbit very similar to that of the Earth was temporarily designated 2020 SO. However, orbital calculations and spectral observations confirmed that the object was the Centaur rocket booster of the 1966 Surveyor 2 uncrewed lunar lander.[179][180]
In some cases, active space probes on solar orbits have been observed by NEO surveys and erroneously catalogued as asteroids before identification. During its 2007 flyby of Earth on its route to a comet, ESA's space probe Rosetta was detected unidentified and classified as asteroid 2007 VN84, with an alert issued due to its close approach.[181] The designation 2015 HP116 was similarly removed from asteroid catalogues when the observed object was identified with Gaia, ESA's space observatory for astrometry.[182]
Exploratory missions
[edit]Some NEOs are of special interest because the sum total of changes in orbital speed required to send a spacecraft on a mission to physically explore an NEO – and thus the amount of rocket fuel required for the mission – is lower than what is necessary for even lunar missions, due to their combination of low velocity with respect to Earth and weak gravity. They may present interesting scientific opportunities both for direct geochemical and astronomical investigation, and as potentially economical sources of extraterrestrial materials for human exploitation.[11] This makes them an attractive target for exploration.[183]
Missions to NEAs
[edit]

The IAU held a minor planets workshop in Tucson, Arizona, in March 1971. At that point, launching a spacecraft to asteroids was considered premature; the workshop only inspired the first astronomical survey specifically aiming for NEAs.[12] Missions to asteroids were considered again during a workshop at the University of Chicago held by NASA's Office of Space Science in January 1978. Of all of the near-Earth asteroids (NEA) that had been discovered by mid-1977, it was estimated that spacecraft could rendezvous with and return from only about 1 in 10 using less propulsive energy than is necessary to reach Mars. It was recognised that due to the low surface gravity of all NEAs, moving around on the surface of an NEA would cost very little energy, and thus space probes could gather multiple samples.[12] Overall, it was estimated that about one percent of all NEAs might provide opportunities for human-crewed missions, or no more than about ten NEAs known at the time. A five-fold increase in the NEA discovery rate was deemed necessary to make a crewed mission within ten years worthwhile.[12]
The first near-Earth asteroid to be visited by a spacecraft was 433 Eros when NASA's NEAR Shoemaker probe orbited it from February 2000, landing on the surface of the 17 km (11 mi) asteroid in February 2001.[16] A second NEA, the 535 m (1,755 ft) long peanut-shaped 25143 Itokawa, was explored from September 2005 to April 2007 by JAXA's Hayabusa mission, which succeeded in taking material samples back to Earth.[184] A third NEA, the 2.26 km (1.40 mi) long elongated 4179 Toutatis, was explored by CNSA's Chang'e 2 spacecraft during a flyby in December 2012.[17][25]
The 980 m (3,220 ft) Apollo asteroid 162173 Ryugu was explored from June 2018[185] until November 2019[18] by JAXA's Hayabusa2 space probe, which returned a sample to Earth.[21] A second sample-return mission, NASA's OSIRIS-REx probe, targeted the 500 m (1,600 ft) Apollo asteroid 101955 Bennu,[186] which, as of January 2025[update], has the third-highest cumulative Palermo scale rating (−1.40 for several close encounters between 2178 and 2290).[83] On its journey to Bennu, the probe had searched unsuccessfully for Earth's Trojan asteroids,[187] entered into orbit around Bennu in December 2018, touched down on its surface in October 2020,[19] and was successful in returning samples to Earth three years later.[22] China launched its own sample-return mission, Tianwen-2, in May 2025, targeting Earth quasi-satellite 469219 Kamoʻoalewa and returning samples to Earth in late 2027.[188]
After completing its mission to Bennu, the probe OSIRIS-REx was redirected towards 99942 Apophis, which it is planned to orbit from April 2029.[19] After completing its exploration of 162173 Ryugu, the mission of the Hayabusa2 space probe was extended, to include flybys of S-type Apollo asteroid 98943 Torifune in July 2026 and fast-rotating Apollo asteroid 1998 KY26 in July 2031.[189] In 2025, JAXA plans to launch another probe, DESTINY+, to explore Apollo asteroid 3200 Phaethon, the parent body of the Geminid meteor shower, during a flyby.[190]
Asteroid deflection tests
[edit]
On September 26, 2022, NASA's DART spacecraft reached the system of 65803 Didymos and impacted the Apollo asteroid's moon Dimorphos, in a test of a method of planetary defense against near-Earth objects.[20] In addition to telescopes on or in orbit around the Earth, the impact was observed by the Italian mini-spacecraft or CubeSat LICIACube, which separated from DART 15 days before impact.[20] The impact shortened the orbital period of Dimorphos around Didymos by 33 minutes, indicating that the moon's momentum change was 3.6 times the momentum of the impacting spacecraft, thus most of the change was due to the ejected material of the moon itself.[23]
In October 2024, ESA launched the spacecraft Hera, which is to enter orbit around Didymos in December 2026, to study the consequences of the DART impact.[191] China plans to launch its own pair of asteroid deflection and observation probes in 2027, which are to target 30 m (98 ft) Aten asteroid 2015 XF261.[192]
Space mining
[edit]From the 2000s, there were plans for the commercial exploitation of near-Earth asteroids, either through the use of robots or even by sending private commercial astronauts to act as space miners, but few of these plans were pursued.[24]
In April 2012, the company Planetary Resources announced its plans to mine asteroids commercially. In a first phase, the company reviewed data and selected potential targets among NEAs. In a second phase, space probes would be sent to the selected NEAs; mining spacecraft would be sent in a third phase.[193] Planetary Resources launched two testbed satellites in April 2015[194] and January 2018,[195] and the first prospecting satellite for the second phase was planned for a 2020 launch prior to the company closing and its assets purchased by ConsenSys Space in 2018.[194][196]
Another American company established with the goal of space mining, AstroForge, launched the probe Odin (formerly Brokkr-2) on February 26, 2025, to perform a flyby of asteroid 2022 OB5, but the probe showed technical problems.[197] The goal of the mission was to confirm if 2022 OB5 is a metal-rich M-type asteroid.[198] Regardless of the success of Odin, AstroForge plans to follow it up a year later with the probe Vestri, which is to land on the same asteroid.[197]
Missions to NECs
[edit]
The first near-Earth comet visited by a space probe was 21P/Giacobini–Zinner in 1985, when the NASA/ESA probe International Cometary Explorer (ICE) passed through its coma. In March 1986, ICE, along with Soviet probes Vega 1 and Vega 2, ISAS probes Sakigake and Suisei and ESA probe Giotto flew by the nucleus of Halley's Comet. In 1992, Giotto also visited another NEC, 26P/Grigg–Skjellerup.[13]
In November 2010, after completing its primary mission to non-near-Earth comet Tempel 1, the NASA probe Deep Impact flew by the near-Earth comet 103P/Hartley.[14]
In August 2014, ESA probe Rosetta began orbiting near-Earth comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko, while its lander Philae landed on its surface in November 2014. After the end of its mission, Rosetta was crashed into the comet's surface in 2016.[15]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Discovery Statistics – Cumulative Totals". NASA/JPL CNEOS. December 30, 2024. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "NEO Basics. NEO Groups". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Chapman, Clark R. (May 2004). "The hazard of near-Earth asteroid impacts on earth". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 222 (1): 1–15. Bibcode:2004E&PSL.222....1C. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.004.
- ^ Monastersky, Richard (March 1, 1997). "The Call of Catastrophes". Science News Online. Archived from the original on March 13, 2004. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Rumpf, Clemens M.; Lewis, Hugh G.; Atkinson, Peter M. (March 23, 2017). "Asteroid impact effects and their immediate hazards for human populations". Geophysical Research Letters. 44 (8): 3433–3440. arXiv:1703.07592. Bibcode:2017GeoRL..44.3433R. doi:10.1002/2017gl073191. ISSN 0094-8276. S2CID 34867206.
- ^ a b c d e f Fernández Carril, Luis (May 14, 2012). "The evolution of near Earth objects risk perception". The Space Review. Archived from the original on June 29, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c "NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects". NASA/JPL. May 26, 2004. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2018.
- ^ a b c "WISE Revises Numbers of Asteroids Near Earth". NASA/JPL. September 29, 2011. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b "Public Law 109–155–DEC.30, 2005" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 6, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Templeton, Graham (January 12, 2016). "NASA is opening a new office for planetary defense". ExtremeTech. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Vergano, Dan (February 2, 2007). "Near-Earth asteroids could be 'steppingstones to Mars'". USA Today. Archived from the original on April 17, 2012. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e Portree, David S. (March 23, 2013). "Earth-Approaching Asteroids as Targets for Exploration (1978)". Wired. Archived from the original on June 1, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
People in the early 21st century have been encouraged to see asteroids as the interplanetary equivalent of sea monsters. We often hear talk of "killer asteroids," when in fact there exists no conclusive evidence that any asteroid has killed anyone in all of human history. ... In the 1970s, asteroids had yet to gain their present fearsome reputation ... most astronomers and planetary scientists who made a career of studying asteroids rightfully saw them as sources of fascination, not of worry.
- ^ a b c d e f Report of the Task Force on potentially hazardous Near Earth Objects (PDF). London: British National Space Centre. September 2000. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 8, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Beatty, Kelly (November 4, 2010). "Mr. Hartley's Amazing Comet". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on October 20, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Aron, Jacob (September 30, 2016). "Rosetta lands on 67P in grand finale to two year comet mission". New Scientist. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Savage, Donald & Buckley, Michael (January 31, 2001). "NEAR Mission Completes Main Task, Now Will Go Where No Spacecraft Has Gone Before". Press Releases. NASA. Archived from the original on June 17, 2016. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Lakdawalla, Emily (December 14, 2012). "Chang'e 2 imaging of Toutatis". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Bartels, Meghan (November 13, 2019). "Farewell, Ryugu! Japan's Hayabusa2 Probe Leaves Asteroid for Journey Home". Space.com. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c Taylor Tillman, Nola (September 25, 2023). "OSIRIS-REx: A complete guide to the asteroid-sampling mission". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d Bardan, Roxana (September 27, 2022). "NASA's DART Mission Hits Asteroid in First-Ever Planetary Defense Test". Press Releases. NASA. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Rincon, Paul (December 6, 2020). "Hayabusa-2: Capsule with asteroid samples in 'perfect' shape". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Loeffer, John (January 23, 2024). "NASA finally opens OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample canister after freeing stuck lid". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Merzdorf, Jessica (December 15, 2022). "Early Results from NASA's DART Mission". Press Releases. NASA. Archived from the original on January 2, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Dorminey, Bruce (August 31, 2021). "Does Commercial Asteroid Mining Still Have A Future?". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 4, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d "Near Earth Objects". IAU. Archived from the original on December 17, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c "Definitions & Assumptions". ESA NEOCC. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Morbidelli, Alessandro; Bottke, William F. Jr.; Froeschlé, Christiane; Michel, Patrick (January 2002). "Origin and Evolution of Near-Earth Objects". In Bottke Jr., W. F.; et al. (eds.). Asteroids III (PDF). pp. 409–422. Bibcode:2002aste.book..409M. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1v7zdn4.33. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved December 31, 2024.
- ^ Waszczak, Adam; Prince, Thomas A.; et al. (2017). "Small Near-Earth Asteroids in the Palomar Transient Factory Survey: A Real-Time Streak-detection System". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 129 (973). part 034402. arXiv:1609.08018. Bibcode:2017PASP..129c4402W. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/129/973/034402. ISSN 1538-3873. S2CID 43606524.
- ^ a b c Carlisle, Camille M. (December 30, 2011). "Pseudo-moons orbit Earth". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on May 30, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c "List Of Potentially Hazardous Minor Planets (by designation)". IAU/MPC. Archived from the original on January 2, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Perna, D.; Barucci, M. A.; Fulchignoni, M. (2013). "The near-Earth objects and their potential threat to our planet". The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. 21 (1): 65. Bibcode:2013A&ARv..21...65P. doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0065-4.
- ^ Halley, Edmund (1705). A synopsis of the astronomy of comets. London: John Senex. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Stoyan, Ronald (2015). Atlas of Great Comets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 101–103. ISBN 978-1-107-09349-2. Archived from the original on March 1, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Dick, S. J. (June 1998). "Observation and interpretation of the Leonid meteors over the last millennium". Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 1 (1): 1–20. Bibcode:1998JAHH....1....1D. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.1998.01.01.
- ^ Scholl, Hans; Schmadel, Lutz D. (2002). "Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros". Acta Historica Astronomiae. 15: 210–220. Bibcode:2002AcHA...15..210S.
- ^ "Eros comes on stage, finally a useful asteroid". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d "Closest Approaches to the Earth by Comets". IAU/MPC. May 16, 2019. Archived from the original on August 7, 2024. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ Sekanina, Zdenek; Chodas, Paul W. (December 2005). "Origin of the Marsden and Kracht Groups of Sunskirting Comets. I. Association with Comet 96P/Machholz and Its Interplanetary Complex". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 151 (2): 551–586. Bibcode:2005ApJS..161..551S. doi:10.1086/497374. S2CID 85442034.
- ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. P/1999 J6 (SOHO)". NASA/JPL. April 16, 2021. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b "Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes)". UCLA. Archived from the original on January 23, 2023. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. 1566 Icarus (1949 MA)". NASA/JPL. August 4, 2024. Archived from the original on January 3, 2025. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ Pettengill, G. H.; Shapiro, I. I.; Ash, M. E.; Ingalls, R. P.; Rainville, L. P.; Smith, W. B.; et al. (May 1969). "Radar observations of Icarus". Icarus. 10 (3): 432–435. Bibcode:1969Icar...10..432P. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(69)90101-8. ISSN 0019-1035.
- ^ Goldstein, R. M. (November 1968). "Radar Observations of Icarus". Science. 162 (3856): 903–904. Bibcode:1968Sci...162..903G. doi:10.1126/science.162.3856.903. PMID 17769079. S2CID 129644095.
- ^ a b c Marsden, Brian G. (March 29, 1998). "How the Asteroid Story Hit: An Astronomer Reveals How a Discovery Spun Out of Control". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on June 17, 2012. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Scotti, J. V.; Rabinowitz, D. L.; Marsden, B. G. (November 28, 1991). "Near miss of the Earth by a small asteroid". Nature. 354 (6351): 287–289. Bibcode:1991Natur.354..287S. doi:10.1038/354287a0.
- ^ a b "Closest Approaches to the Earth by Minor Planets". IAU/MPC. May 16, 2019. Archived from the original on December 22, 2024. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ a b c d "NEO Earth Close Approaches". NASA/JPL CNEOS. January 2, 2025. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ Irizarry, Eddie (November 16, 2020). "This asteroid just skimmed Earth's atmosphere". EarthSky. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. 308635 (2005 YU55)". NASA/JPL. January 7, 2022. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Palmer, Jason (February 15, 2013). "Asteroid 2012 DA14 in record-breaking Earth pass". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on February 17, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Chodas, Paul; Giorgini, Jon & Yeomans, Don (March 6, 2012). "Near-Earth Asteroid 2012 DA14 to Miss Earth on February 15, 2013". News. NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 22, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Aeroplane-sized asteroids approaching earth fast. Check details from NASA". The Indian Express. 2025-10-09. Retrieved 2025-10-09.
- ^ "Grand Teton Meteor (video)". YouTube. 10 November 2007. Archived from the original on February 14, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Ceplecha, Z. (March 1994). "Earth-grazing daylight fireball of August 10, 1972". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 283 (1): 287−288. Bibcode:1994A&A...283..287C.
- ^ Borovička, J.; Ceplecha, Z. (April 1992). "Earth-grazing fireball of October 13, 1990". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 257 (1): 323–328. Bibcode:1992A&A...257..323B. ISSN 0004-6361.
- ^ Chapman, Clark R. & Morrison, David (January 6, 1994). "Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: Assessing the hazard" (PDF). Nature. 367 (6458): 33–40. Bibcode:1994Natur.367...33C. doi:10.1038/367033a0. S2CID 4305299. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 2, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Collins, Gareth S.; Melosh, H. Jay; Marcus, Robert A. (June 2005). "Earth Impact Effects Program: A Web-based computer program for calculating the regional environmental consequences of a meteoroid impact on Earth" (PDF). Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 40 (6): 817–840. Bibcode:2005M&PS...40..817C. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00157.x. hdl:10044/1/11554. S2CID 13891988. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 17, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c Asher, D. J.; Bailey, M.; Emelʹyanenko, V.; Napier, W. (October 2005). "Earth in the Cosmic Shooting Gallery". The Observatory. 125 (2): 319–322. Bibcode:2005Obs...125..319A.
- ^ Marcus, Robert; Melosh, H. Jay & Collins, Gareth (2010). "Earth Impact Effects Program". Imperial College London / Purdue University. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025. (solution using 2600 kg/m^3, 17 km/s, 45 degrees)
- ^ a b David, Leonard (November 1, 2013). "Russian fireball explosion shows meteor risk greater than thought". Space.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Silber, Elizabeth A.; Revelle, Douglas O.; Brown, Peter G.; Edwards, Wayne N. (2009). "An estimate of the terrestrial influx of large meteoroids from infrasonic measurements". Journal of Geophysical Research. 114 (E8). Bibcode:2009JGRE..114.8006S. doi:10.1029/2009JE003334.
- ^ Allen, Robert S. (1963). "Antarctic Explosion Could Have Been Nuclear Detonation". The San Bernardino Sun (4 December). p. 40 col. f.
- ^ de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R. (September 1, 2014). "Reconstructing the Chelyabinsk event: Pre-impact orbital evolution". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 443 (1): L39 – L43. arXiv:1405.7202. Bibcode:2014MNRAS.443L..39D. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu078. S2CID 118417667.
- ^ Shaddad, Muawia H.; et al. (October 2010). "The recovery of asteroid 2008 TC3". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 45 (10–11): 1557–1589. Bibcode:2010M&PS...45.1557S. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01116.x.
- ^ Tingley, Brett (December 3, 2024). "Tiny asteroid detected hours before hitting Earth to become 4th 'imminent impactor' of 2024". Space.com. Archived from the original on December 20, 2024. Retrieved December 31, 2024.
- ^ Beatty, Kelly (January 2, 2014). "Small asteroid 2014 AA hits Earth". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on July 25, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Fireballs. Fireball and Bolide Data". NASA/JPL. December 20, 2024. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d Rubin, Alan E.; Grossman, Jeffrey N. (January 2010). "Meteorite and meteoroid: New comprehensive definitions". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 45 (1): 114–122. Bibcode:2010M&PS...45..114R. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.01009.x. S2CID 129972426.
- ^ a b "Lunar Impact Monitoring Program". NASA. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Rubio, Luis R. Bellot; Ortiz, Jose L.; Sada, Pedro V. (2000). "Observation and Interpretation of Meteoroid Impact Flashes on the Moon". In Jenniskens, P.; et al. (eds.). Leonid Storm Research. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 575–598. Bibcode:2000lsr..book..575B. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2071-7_42. ISBN 978-90-481-5624-5. S2CID 118392496.
- ^ a b Catanzaro, Michele (February 24, 2014). "Largest lunar impact caught by astronomers". Nature. Archived from the original on October 4, 2021. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "About the NELIOTA project". ESA. Archived from the original on March 7, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "MIDAS: Moon Impacts Detection and Analysis System. Main Results". Meteoroides.NET. Archived from the original on March 7, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Clark, Stuart (December 20, 2012). "Apocalypse postponed: how Earth survived Halley's comet in 1910". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 22, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Colavito, Jason. "Noah's Comet. Edmond Halley 1694". Jasoncolavito.com. Archived from the original on October 1, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e Chapman, Clark R. (October 7, 1998). "History of The Asteroid/Comet Impact Hazard". Southwest Research Institute. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Leary, Warren E. (April 20, 1989). "Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 9, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Molloy, Mark (September 24, 2017). "Nibiru: How the nonsense Planet X Armageddon and Nasa fake news theories spread globally". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Rickman, Hans (2001). Isobe, Syuzo; Asakuro, Yoshifusa (eds.). NEO Research and the IAU. International Workshop on Collaboration and Coordination among NEO Observers and Orbital Computers. Kurshiki City Art Museum, Japan: IAU. pp. 97–102. Bibcode:2001ccno.conf...97R.
- ^ a b "Torino Impact Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on February 14, 2025. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
- ^ Binzel, Richard P. (2000). "Torino Impact Hazard Scale". Planetary and Space Science. 48 (4): 297–303. Bibcode:2000P&SS...48..297B. doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00006-4.
- ^ "Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Sentry Risk Table". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on March 2, 2025. Retrieved March 2, 2025.
- ^ Chandler, David (May 2, 2006). "Big new asteroid has slim chance of hitting Earth". New Scientist. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Bassi, Margherita (February 6, 2025). "Astronomers Raise Odds of Asteroid Impact in 2032 to 2.3 Percent—Here's Why You Shouldn't Panic". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on February 8, 2025. Retrieved February 8, 2025.
- ^ "Risk List". ESA NEOCC. Archived from the original on February 7, 2025. Retrieved February 9, 2025.
- ^ "NEODyS-2 Risk List". NEODyS-2. ESA. Archived from the original on January 2, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Milani, Andrea; Valsecchi, Giovanni; Sansaturio, Maria Eugenia (March 12, 2002). "The problem with 2002 CU11". Tumbling Stone. Vol. 12. NEODyS. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
- ^ a b "Date/Time Removed". NASA/JPL CNEOS. December 31, 2024. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Small-Body Database Lookup. 163132 (2002 CU11)". NASA/JPL. June 6, 2022. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b "29075 (1950 DA) Analyses, 2001-2007". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Giorgini, J. D.; Ostro, S. J.; et al. (April 5, 2002). "Asteroid 1950 DA's Encounter with Earth in 2880: Physical Limits of Collision Probability Prediction" (PDF). Science. 296 (5565): 132–136. Bibcode:2002Sci...296..132G. doi:10.1126/science.1068191. PMID 11935024. S2CID 8689246. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 22, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
- ^ Farnocchia, Davide; Chesley, Steven R. (2013). "Assessment of the 2880 impact threat from asteroid (29075) 1950 DA". Icarus. 229: 321–327. arXiv:1310.0861. Bibcode:2014Icar..229..321F. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.09.022. S2CID 56453734.
- ^ Yeomans, D.; Chesley, S.; Chodas, P. (December 23, 2004). "Near-Earth Asteroid 2004 MN4 Reaches Highest Score To Date On Hazard Scale". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 31, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025. (Note: at the time the object was yet unnamed and was known only by its provisional designation 2004 MN4.)
- ^ Brown, Dwayne; Agle, DC (October 7, 2009). "NASA Refines Asteroid Apophis' Path Toward Earth". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 18, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Yeomans, D.; Chesley, S.; Chodas, P. (December 27, 2004). "Possibility of an Earth Impact in 2029 Ruled Out for Asteroid 2004 MN4". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 30, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "NASA Analysis: Earth Is Safe From Asteroid Apophis for 100-Plus Years". News. NASA/JPL. March 25, 2021. Archived from the original on December 12, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Sample, Ian (January 30, 2025). "Asteroid triggers global defence plan amid chance of collision with Earth in 2032". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 2, 2025. Retrieved February 2, 2025.
- ^ Lea, Robert (February 24, 2025). "'That's impact probability zero folks!' Earth safe from 'city-killer' asteroid 2024 YR4". Space.com. Archived from the original on March 2, 2025. Retrieved March 2, 2025.
- ^ "Asteroid impact threat estimates improved for the Earth and the Moon | University of Helsinki". www.helsinki.fi. 2025-04-02. Retrieved 2025-04-02.
- ^ Gray, Bill. "Risk Corridor for Gibbous Moon". Find_Orb. Archived from the original on 10 February 2025. Retrieved 18 February 2025.
- ^ Day, Dwayne A. (July 5, 2004). "Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus". The Space Review. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "MIT Course precept for movie" (PDF). The Tech. MIT. October 30, 1979. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 11, 2014. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- ^ a b c Vulcano Workshop. Beginning the Spaceguard Survey. Vulcano, Italy: IAU. September 1995. Archived from the original on October 31, 2013. Retrieved March 13, 2018.
- ^ a b Chapman, Clark R. (May 21, 1998). "Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities"". Southwest Research Institute. Archived from the original on December 6, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Shiga, David (June 27, 2006). "New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids". New Scientist. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Mainzer, A.; Grav, T.; Bauer, J.; et al. (December 20, 2011). "NEOWISE Observations of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results". The Astrophysical Journal. 743 (2): 156. arXiv:1109.6400. Bibcode:2011ApJ...743..156M. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/156. S2CID 239991.
- ^ "Planetary Defense Coordination Office. Overview". NASA. 8 September 2023. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Harris, Alan W.; Chodas, Paul W. (September 1, 2021). "The population of near-earth asteroids revisited and updated". Icarus. 365. section 114452. Bibcode:2021Icar..36514452H. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114452.
- ^ a b c d e f Grav, Tommy; Mainzer, Amy K. (December 5, 2023). "The NEO Surveyor Near-Earth Asteroid Known Object Model". The Planetary Science Journal. 4 (12). part 228. arXiv:2310.20149. Bibcode:2023PSJ.....4..228G. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad072e.
- ^ "Science Goals. What's in our Solar System?". Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Archived from the original on December 19, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ U.S.Congress (March 19, 2013). "Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session" (PDF). United States Congress. p. 147. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 6, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "ATLAS: The Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System". Astronomy. University of Hawaii at Mānoa Institute for Astronomy. February 18, 2013. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Kulkarni, S.R.; et al. (February 7, 2018). "The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) begins". The Astronomer's Telegram. No. 11266. Archived from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Ye, Quan-Zhi; et al. (February 8, 2018). "First Discovery of a Small Near Earth Asteroid with ZTF (2018 CL)". The Astronomer's Telegram. No. 11274. Archived from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "The NEO Confirmation Page". IAU/MPC. January 1, 2025. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Marsden, B. G.; Williams, G. V. (1998). "The NEO Confirmation Page". Planetary and Space Science. 46 (2): 299. Bibcode:1998P&SS...46..299M. doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(96)00153-5.
- ^ a b c "Discovery Statistics. Introduction". NASA/JPL CNEOS. 2012. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c "JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine. Constraints: asteroids and NEOs". JPL Small-Body Database. January 1, 2025. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ "About NEOCC". ESA NEOCC. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c Bottke, W. F. Jr. (2000). "Understanding the Distribution of Near-Earth Asteroids". Science. 288 (5474): 2190–2194. Bibcode:2000Sci...288.2190B. doi:10.1126/science.288.5474.2190. PMID 10864864.
- ^ a b Browne, Malcolm W. (April 25, 1996). "Mathematicians Say Asteroid May Hit Earth in a Million Years". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 4, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g Luu, Jane; Jewitt, David (November 1989). "On the Relative Numbers of C Types and S Types among Near-Earth Asteroids". The Astronomical Journal. 98 (5): 1905–1911. Bibcode:1989AJ.....98.1905L. doi:10.1086/115267.
- ^ a b "Mission Orbit and Timeline". UCLA. 13 May 2024. Archived from the original on January 2, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b "Why Infrared?". UCLA. 13 May 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Bottke, William F. Jr.; Nolan, Michael C.; Melosh, H. Jay; Vickery, Ann M.; Greenberg, Richard (August 1996). "Origin of the Spacewatch Small Earth-Approaching Asteroids" (PDF). Icarus. 122 (2): 406–427. Bibcode:1996Icar..122..406B. doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0133. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 8, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Zellner, B.; Bowell, E. (1977). "2. Asteroid Compositional Types and their Distributions". International Astronomical Union Colloquium. 39: 185–197. doi:10.1017/S0252921100070093. S2CID 128650102.
- ^ Morbidelli, A.; Vokrouhlický, D. (May 2003). "The Yarkovsky-driven origin of near-Earth asteroids". Icarus. 163 (1): 120–134. Bibcode:2003Icar..163..120M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.603.7624. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00047-2.
- ^ Lupishko, D.F. & Lupishko, T.A. (May 2001). "On the Origins of Earth-Approaching Asteroids". Solar System Research. 35 (3): 227–233. Bibcode:2001SoSyR..35..227L. doi:10.1023/A:1010431023010. S2CID 117912062.
- ^ Lupishko, D.F.; di Martino & Lupishko, T.A. (September 2000). "What the physical properties of near-Earth asteroids tell us about sources of their origin?". Kinematika I Fizika Nebesnykh Tel Supplimen. 3 (3): 213–216. Bibcode:2000KFNTS...3..213L.
- ^ "Asteroids with Satellites". Johnston's Archive. December 28, 2024. Archived from the original on January 3, 2025. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ Benner, Lance; Naidu, Shantanu; Brozovic, Marina; Chodas, Paul (September 1, 2017). "Radar Reveals Two Moons Orbiting Asteroid Florence". News. NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on September 3, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "UW-developed, cloud-based astrodynamics platform to discover and track asteroids". UW News. University of Washington. May 31, 2022. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Asteroid Institute Uses Revolutionary Cloud-Based Astrodynamics Platform to Discover and Track Asteroids". PR Newswire (Press release). B612 Foundation. May 31, 2022. Archived from the original on December 19, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Chang, Kenneth (June 14, 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 1, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Platt, Jane (January 12, 2000). "Asteroid Population Count Slashed". Press Releases. NASA/JPL. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Rabinowitz, David; Helin, Eleanor; Lawrence, Kenneth & Pravdo, Steven (January 13, 2000). "A reduced estimate of the number of kilometer-sized near-Earth asteroids". Nature. 403 (6766): 165–166. Bibcode:2000Natur.403..165R. doi:10.1038/35003128. PMID 10646594. S2CID 4303533.
- ^ Stuart, J. S. (November 23, 2001). "A Near-Earth Asteroid Population Estimate from the LINEAR Survey". Science. 294 (5547): 1691–1693. Bibcode:2001Sci...294.1691S. doi:10.1126/science.1065318. PMID 11721048. S2CID 37849062.
- ^ Beatty, Kelly (September 30, 2011). "WISE's Survey of Near-Earth Asteroids". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Williams, Matt (October 20, 2017). "Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought". Universe Today. Archived from the original on November 4, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c Tricarico, Pasquale (March 1, 2017). "The near-Earth asteroid population from two decades of observations" (PDF). Icarus. 284: 416–423. arXiv:1604.06328. Bibcode:2017Icar..284..416T. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.008. S2CID 85440139. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 10, 2018. Retrieved March 10, 2018.
- ^ "Asteroid Size Estimator". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ "1036 Ganymed (A924 UB)". NASA/JPL. January 2, 2024. Archived from the original on January 3, 2025. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (August 1, 2019). "Understanding the evolution of Atira-class asteroid 2019 AQ3, a major step towards the future discovery of the Vatira population". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487 (2): 2742–2752. arXiv:1905.08695. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.487.2742D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1437. S2CID 160009327.
- ^ Bolin, Bryce T.; et al. (November 2022). "The discovery and characterization of (594913) 'Ayló'chaxnim, a kilometre sized asteroid inside the orbit of Venus". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 517 (1): L49 – L54. arXiv:2208.07253. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac089.
- ^ Dickinson, David (August 25, 2021). "Astronomers Discover Asteroid that Flies Close to the Sun". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on November 30, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Unusual Minor Planets". IAU/MPC. Archived from the original on November 30, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Galache, J. L. (March 5, 2011). "Asteroid Classification I – Dynamics". IAU/MPC. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
- ^ Ribeiro, A. O.; Roig, F.; De Prá, M. N.; Carvano, J. M.; DeSouza, S. R. (March 17, 2016). "Dynamical study of the Atira group of asteroids". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 458 (4): 4471–4476. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw642. ISSN 0035-8711.
- ^ a b c d e de la Fuente Marcos, R.; de la Fuente Marcos, C.; et al. (January 2024). "When the horseshoe fits: Characterizing 2023 FY3 with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the Two-meter Twin Telescope". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 681. section A4. arXiv:2310.08724. Bibcode:2024A&A...681A...4D. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347663.
- ^ a b de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R. (April 2016). "A trio of horseshoes: Past, present, and future dynamical evolution of Earth co-orbital asteroids 2015 XX169, 2015 YA and 2015 YQ1". Astrophysics and Space Science. 361 (4): 121–133. arXiv:1603.02415. Bibcode:2016Ap&SS.361..121D. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2711-6. S2CID 119222384.
- ^ a b c d Castro-Cisneros, Jose Daniel; Malhotra, Renu; Rosengren, Aaron J. (October 23, 2023). "Lunar ejecta origin of near-Earth asteroid Kamo'oalewa is compatible with rare orbital pathways". Communications Earth & Environment. 4 (1). section 372. arXiv:2304.14136. Bibcode:2023ComEE...4..372C. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-01031-w. PMC 11549049. PMID 39524985.
- ^ "NASA's WISE mission finds first Trojan asteroid sharing Earth's orbit". PR Newswire (Press release). NASA. July 27, 2011. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Gohd, Chelsea (February 1, 2022). "Earth has an extra companion, a Trojan asteroid that will hang around for 4,000 years". Space.com. Archived from the original on December 8, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Wiegert, Paul A.; Innanen, Kimmo A.; Mikkola, Seppo (June 12, 1997). "An asteroidal companion to the Earth" (PDF). Nature (letter). 387 (6634): 685–686. Bibcode:1997Natur.387..685W. doi:10.1038/42662. S2CID 4305272. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Snowder, Brad. "Cruithne". Western Washington University Planetarium. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Christou, A.A.; Asher, D.J. (July 11, 2011). "A long-lived horseshoe companion to the Earth". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 414 (4): 2965–2969. arXiv:1104.0036. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.414.2965C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18595.x. S2CID 13832179.
- ^ a b de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R. (November 11, 2016). "Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3, the smallest and closest Earth quasi-satellite". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 462 (4): 3441–3456. arXiv:1608.01518. Bibcode:2016MNRAS.462.3441D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1972. S2CID 118580771.
- ^ Lea, Robert (April 23, 2024). "Earth's weird 'quasi-moon' Kamo'oalewa is a fragment blasted out of big moon crater". Space.com. Archived from the original on December 24, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c Di Ruzza, Sara; Pousse, Alexandre; Alessi, Elisa Maria (January 15, 2023). "On the co-orbital asteroids in the solar system: medium-term timescale analysis of the quasi-coplanar objects". Icarus. 390. section 115330. arXiv:2209.05219. Bibcode:2023Icar..39015330D. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115330.
- ^ Phillips, Tony (June 9, 2006). "Corkscrew asteroid". Science@NASA. NASA. Archived from the original on September 29, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- ^ Chandler, David L. (April 7, 2023). "Astronomers have discovered an asteroid that orbits the Sun with Earth, earning it the moniker "quasi-moon."". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on July 21, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (January 2018). "Dynamical evolution of near-Earth asteroid 1991 VG". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 473 (3): 2939–2948. arXiv:1709.09533. Bibcode:2018MNRAS.473.2939D. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2545.
- ^ Sinnott, Roger W. (April 17, 2007). "Earth's "other moon"". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on November 30, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Naidu, Shantanu; Farnocchia, Davide (February 27, 2020). "Tiny Object Discovered in Distant Orbit Around the Earth". NASA/JPL CNEOS. Archived from the original on December 19, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Lea, Robert (November 26, 2024). "Earth's mini-moon has finally departed. Will it ever return as a 'second moon?'". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
- ^ Pokorý, Petr; Kuchner, Marc (October 2021). "Threat from Within: Excitation of Venus's Co-orbital Asteroids to Earth-crossing Orbits". The Planetary Science Journal. 2 (5). part 193. Bibcode:2021PSJ.....2..193P. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ac1e9b.
- ^ Perlerin, Vincent (September 26, 2017). "Definitions of terms in meteor astronomy (IAU)". News. International Meteor Organization. Archived from the original on January 23, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Yeomans, Donald K. (April 2007). "Great Comets in History". NASA/JPL. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Study to Determine the Feasibility of Extending the Search for Near-Earth Objects to Smaller Limiting Diameters (PDF). NASA. August 22, 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 12, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Jenniksens, Peter (September 2005). Meteor Showers from Broken Comets. Workshop on Dust in Planetary Systems (ESA SP-643). Vol. 643. pp. 3–6. Bibcode:2007ESASP.643....3J.
- ^ Kresak, L'.l (1978). "The Tunguska object – A fragment of Comet Encke". Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia. 29: 129. Bibcode:1978BAICz..29..129K.
- ^ Stephens, Sally (1993). "What about the comet that's supposed to hit the Earth in 130 years?". Cosmic Collisions. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Tesla Roadster (spacecraft) (solution #10)". JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System. March 27, 2018. Archived from the original on June 30, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2024.
- ^ Koch, David; Gould, Alan (February 12, 2007). "Kepler Mission: Launch Vehicle and Orbit". NASA. Archived from the original on June 22, 2007. Retrieved March 14, 2009.
- ^ Chesley, Steve; Chodas, Paul (October 9, 2002). "J002E3: An Update". News. NASA/JPL. Archived from the original on May 3, 2003. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e Azriel, Merryl (September 25, 2013). "Rocket or Rock? NEO Confusion Abounds". Space Safety Magazine. Archived from the original on November 15, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "MPC Database Search. Unknown object: 2013 QW1". IAU/MPC. Archived from the original on January 3, 2025. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ "Earth May Have Captured a 1960s-Era Rocket Booster". News. NASA/JPL. November 12, 2020. Archived from the original on December 20, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "New Data Confirm 2020 SO to Be the Upper Centaur Rocket Booster From the 1960's". News. NASA/JPL. December 2, 2020. Archived from the original on December 20, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Mullins, Justin (November 13, 2007). "Astronomers defend asteroid warning mix-up". New Scientist. Archived from the original on March 7, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "MPEC 2015-H125: Deletion Of 2015 HP116". Minor Planet Electronic Circular. IAU/MPC. April 27, 2015. Archived from the original on November 27, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Xu, Rui; Cui, Pingyuan; Qiao, Dong & Luan, Enjie (March 18, 2007). "Design and optimization of trajectory to Near-Earth asteroid for sample return mission using gravity assists". Advances in Space Research. 40 (2): 200–225. Bibcode:2007AdSpR..40..220X. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.025.
- ^ "Hayabusa. The Final Approach. Overview". JAXA. Archived from the original on June 2, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (June 28, 2018). "Japanese spacecraft reaches asteroid after three-and-a-half-year journey". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on October 24, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Wall, Mike (September 9, 2016). "'Exactly Perfect'! NASA Hails Asteroid Sample-Return Mission's Launch". Space.com. Archived from the original on October 6, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ Morton, Erin; Neal-Jones, Nancy (February 9, 2017). "NASA's OSIRIS-REx Begins Earth-Trojan Asteroid Search". News. NASA. Archived from the original on December 3, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Long March 3B/E. Tianwen 2". Next Spaceflight. Archived from the original on September 1, 2024. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ Hirabayashi, Masatoshi; Yoshikawa, Makoto; et al. (February 15, 2023). Hayabusa2#'s Exploration to Asteroids 2001 CC21 and 1998 KY26 Provides Key Insights Into Planetary Defense. 8th IAA Planetary Defense Conference. Vienna, Austria. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (November 6, 2023). "Japan's mission to bizarre asteroid Phaethon delayed to 2025". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 1, 2025. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Hera". ESA. Archived from the original on December 31, 2024. Retrieved December 31, 2024.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (July 2, 2024). "China targets its first planetary defense test mission". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on October 8, 2024. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ Beatty, Kelly (April 24, 2012). "Asteroid Mining for Fun and Profit". Sky & Telescope. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Boyle, Alan (November 13, 2017). "Planetary Resources' Arkyd-6 prototype imaging satellite has left the building". GeekWire. Archived from the original on November 14, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ "Planetary Resources Launches Latest Spacecraft in Advance of Space Resource Exploration Mission". News. Planetary Resources. January 12, 2018. Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018.
- ^ Boyle, Alan (November 4, 2019). "One year after Planetary Resource faded into history, space mining retails its appeal". GeekWire. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved January 2, 2025.
- ^ a b Malik, Tariq (March 1, 2025). "'I think we all know that hope is fading.' Private Odin asteroid probe is tumbling in space". Space.com. Archived from the original on March 1, 2025. Retrieved March 2, 2025.
- ^ Knapp, Alex (October 18, 2023). "This Asteroid Mining Startup Is Ready To Launch The First-Ever Commercial Deep Space Mission". Forbes. Archived from the original on November 23, 2024. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
External links
[edit]- Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) – Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA
- Table of Asteroids Next Closest Approaches to the Earth – Sormano Astronomical Observatory
- Catalogue of the Solar System Small Bodies Orbital Evolution – Samara State Technical University
- Minor Planet Center
Near-Earth object
View on GrokipediaDefinitions and Fundamental Characteristics
Core Definitions
A near-Earth object (NEO) is defined as a comet or asteroid whose orbital perihelion distance is less than 1.3 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, placing it within the inner Solar System where gravitational perturbations from planets like Jupiter can alter its trajectory to intersect or approach Earth's orbit.[2][8] This threshold, equivalent to approximately 194 million kilometers, distinguishes NEOs from more distant small bodies in the main asteroid belt (typically 2.1–3.3 AU) or Kuiper Belt, as it identifies objects capable of Earth-crossing paths due to dynamical instabilities.[2] NEOs originate primarily from the asteroid belt via resonances or close encounters that inject them inward, or from cometary reservoirs perturbed into short-period orbits.[2] NEOs comprise two principal categories: near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) and near-Earth comets (NECs). NEAs, which constitute the vast majority (over 99%) of known NEOs, are rocky or metallic bodies lacking significant volatile outgassing, often resembling main-belt asteroids but with orbits evolved through planetary scattering.[3] NECs are restricted to short-period comets with orbital periods under 200 years, exhibiting cometary activity such as tails or coma from sublimating ices when nearing the Sun, though some may appear asteroidal if dormant.[3] Distinctions rely on observational evidence of activity rather than composition alone, as dynamical simulations indicate some NEAs may be extinct comets depleted of volatiles.[3] Exclusions from the NEO category include major planets, dwarf planets, natural satellites, and interstellar objects, focusing solely on small Solar System bodies (typically under 10 km in diameter for most cataloged examples) whose proximity poses potential collision risks, though the term itself denotes orbital geometry without implying hazard.[8] The definition stems from dynamical astronomy, emphasizing causal orbital evolution over size or threat level, with NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) maintaining the authoritative criteria based on integrated ephemerides and perturbation models.[2][8]Physical Properties and Composition
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) encompass asteroids and comets with diverse physical properties. Asteroidal NEOs range in size from sub-meter fragments to objects exceeding 30 km in diameter, though the majority cataloged are under 1 km. Smaller bodies (<200 m) often exhibit irregular, elongated shapes due to insufficient gravity for rounding, while larger ones approach sphericity. Bulk densities typically fall between 1.3 and 3.5 g/cm³, reflecting rubble-pile aggregates with macroporosity up to 50%, though metallic subtypes may exceed 4 g/cm³.[9] [10] Rotation periods vary widely, from minutes for small, fast-spinning objects influenced by the YORP effect to hours for larger bodies, with many small NEOs near the spin barrier of ~2 minutes due to material strength limits.[11] Compositional analysis via reflectance spectroscopy classifies asteroidal NEOs into spectral types correlating with mineralogy. S-type (stony-siliceous) dominate at approximately 40-50% of the population, composed primarily of olivine, pyroxene, and plagioclase feldspar with minor metals, exhibiting moderate geometric albedos of 0.10-0.30. C-type (carbonaceous) comprise ~10-20%, featuring hydrous silicates, carbonates, organics, and possibly water ice, with low albedos ~0.02-0.09. X-type, including metallic M-subtypes (~5-10%), consist of iron-nickel alloys and troilite, displaying higher albedos ~0.10-0.18 and potential economic value for metals. This distribution overrepresents S- and X-types compared to the main belt, attributable to sourcing from inner-belt regions richer in these materials and detection biases favoring brighter objects.[12] [13] [10] Cometary NEOs, representing a minor fraction, feature nuclei of water ice, CO/CO₂ ices, silicates, and refractory organics, often obscured by dust mantles. Their densities average ~0.5-1.0 g/cm³, indicating high porosity and loose aggregates. Albedos are very low (~0.02-0.06), and shapes are irregular with rotation periods of hours to days. Upon solar heating near perihelion, volatile sublimation drives cometary activity, distinguishing them dynamically from inactive asteroids despite similar orbits.[14] [15]Distinction from Other Solar System Bodies
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are defined as asteroids or comets with perihelion distances less than 1.3 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, enabling their orbits to intersect or closely approach the inner Solar System, including Earth's path.[8] This orbital criterion fundamentally distinguishes NEOs from the majority of small Solar System bodies, such as main-belt asteroids, which reside between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter with semi-major axes typically between 2.1 and 3.3 AU and perihelia greater than approximately 1.7 AU, preventing close encounters with terrestrial planets.[10] In contrast, NEOs are dynamically perturbed populations, often originating from the main asteroid belt through gravitational interactions with Jupiter or resonances, but their evolved orbits bring them recurrently into the region interior to Earth's orbit.[2] While NEOs encompass both asteroids (predominantly rocky or metallic bodies lacking significant volatile ices) and comets (icy bodies capable of developing comae and tails upon solar heating), the NEO designation prioritizes orbital proximity over composition, unlike broader classifications that separate asteroids from comets based on activity and material properties.[16] Near-Earth comets, a subset of NEOs, typically derive from the Kuiper Belt or scattered disk with short-period orbits perturbed inward, whereas long-period comets from the Oort Cloud rarely qualify as NEOs unless dynamically altered to shallow perihelia.[2] Extinct comets, depleted of volatiles and resembling asteroids spectroscopically, further blur compositional lines but remain classified as NEOs if their orbits satisfy the 1.3 AU threshold.[10] NEOs differ markedly from outer Solar System populations like trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) or Kuiper Belt objects, which maintain semi-major axes beyond 30 AU and perihelia far exceeding 1.3 AU, rendering them inaccessible to inner-planet perturbations and irrelevant to Earth-impact risks.[16] Trojan asteroids, co-orbital with Jupiter at its Lagrangian points, also lack the Earth-crossing trajectories defining NEOs, as their stable orbits remain distant from the ecliptic's inner zones.[17] These distinctions underscore that NEO status reflects dynamical evolution rather than primordial location or type, with NEO compositions mirroring diverse main-belt spectra (e.g., C-, S-, and V-types) due to shared origins, albeit with potential alteration from thermal processing or impacts during migration.[2]Population Statistics and Orbital Dynamics
Estimated Numbers and Size Distribution
The size distribution of near-Earth objects (NEOs), predominantly asteroids with a minor contribution from short-period comets, follows an approximate power-law form in the cumulative number of objects N(>D) ∝ D-β, where D is diameter and β ≈ 2–3 for diameters from tens of meters to kilometers, reflecting dynamical depletion of larger bodies and collisional evolution among smaller ones.[18] This results in vastly more small NEOs than large ones, with the slope steepening for objects below ~100 m due to observational biases and intrinsic population differences.[19] Debiased models from dynamical simulations and survey data estimate approximately 830 ± 60 NEOs with diameters exceeding 1 km, nearly all of which have been discovered as of 2024, fulfilling NASA's congressional mandate for >90% completeness in this size bin.[18] [6] For NEOs larger than 140 m—objects capable of regional devastation if impacting Earth—the total population is estimated at 20,000 ± 2,000, with only about 38% currently cataloged, primarily due to incomplete sky coverage and faintness limits of ground-based surveys.[18] [4] Estimates for intermediate sizes, such as >100 m, rise to around 30,000 ± 3,000, consistent with infrared surveys like NEOWISE that revised earlier optical-based counts downward by accounting for albedo variations.[18] Smaller NEOs dominate numerically: models predict hundreds of thousands exceeding 10 m in diameter, with the cumulative count scaling to millions for objects >1 m, though these enter Earth's atmosphere frequently as meteoroids without global threat.[19] The transition to smaller sizes shows a shallower slope (β ≈ 2.6) for diameters 9–50 m, indicating less efficient disruption or injection mechanisms compared to larger bodies sourced from main-belt resonances and Jupiter encounters.[20] These estimates derive from debiasing observed samples for discovery biases, using Monte Carlo orbital integrations to model steady-state populations from source regions.[21]Orbital Classifications and Dynamical Groups
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are classified into dynamical groups based on their osculating orbital elements relative to Earth's orbit at 1 AU, particularly the semi-major axis (a), perihelion distance (q), and aphelion distance (Q). These classifications reflect the objects' potential for close approaches to Earth and their dynamical stability, though planetary perturbations and non-gravitational forces like the Yarkovsky effect can cause transitions between groups over timescales of thousands to millions of years.[3] The primary groups apply to near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), which constitute the majority of NEOs, while near-Earth comets (NECs) are distinguished by cometary activity and typically short orbital periods less than 200 years.[3] Atira asteroids, also known as Apohele, have orbits entirely interior to Earth's, defined by a < 1.0 AU and Q < 0.983 AU. Their perihelia are even closer to the Sun, often approaching Mercury's orbit, making them challenging to observe due to solar glare.[3] This group represents the smallest fraction of known NEAs, comprising about 1-2% in population models, though discovery biases limit confirmed members to fewer than 100 as of recent surveys.[22] Aten asteroids feature a < 1.0 AU and Q ≥ 0.983 AU, allowing their orbits to cross Earth's from the interior while spending most time inside 1 AU. Named after 2062 Aten, this group includes Earth co-orbitals such as quasi-satellites and horseshoe orbit objects in 1:1 resonance.[3] Atens account for roughly 5% of modeled NEA populations but are underrepresented in observations due to their proximity to the Sun during opposition.[22] Apollo asteroids, the most populous NEA group, are characterized by a ≥ 1.0 AU and q ≤ 1.017 AU, enabling Earth-crossing orbits from the exterior. Exemplified by 1862 Apollo, they dominate catalogs with over 60% of known NEAs, reflecting easier detectability at larger solar elongations.[3] [23] Population models estimate Apollos at 50-65% of the total NEA inventory.[22] Amor asteroids approach Earth from beyond its orbit without currently crossing it, defined by a > 1.0 AU and 1.017 AU < q < 1.3 AU. Similar to 1221 Amor, their orbits lie between Earth and Mars, with potential for future Earth-crossing via dynamical evolution.[3] [23] They comprise 30-40% of modeled NEAs, though observational fractions vary with survey geometries favoring inner orbits.[22] Potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs) form a risk-oriented subclass transcending dynamical groups, comprising NEAs with absolute magnitude H ≤ 22.0 (diameter ≳140 m) and minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) to Earth ≤ 0.05 AU. This criterion identifies objects capable of impactful close approaches, independent of current group affiliation.[3] NECs, while sharing the q ≤ 1.3 AU criterion, are grouped by dynamical origins such as Jupiter-family comets rather than the NEA scheme.[3]Sources and Evolutionary Pathways
The primary sources of near-Earth objects (NEOs) are the main asteroid belt and cometary reservoirs, with the former dominating the population. Approximately 90-95% of NEOs originate as asteroids from the main belt between Mars and Jupiter, where dynamical instabilities such as mean-motion resonances (e.g., the 3:1 Kirkwood resonance) and secular resonances (e.g., the ν6 resonance) facilitate their injection into Earth-crossing orbits through gravitational perturbations by Jupiter.[24] [25] The Yarkovsky thermal effect plays a crucial role in this process by inducing semimajor axis drift in small asteroids (diameters <10 km), slowly migrating them toward resonant zones over timescales of 10-100 million years before resonant capture leads to eccentricity growth and NEO delivery.[26] [27] Cometary contributions to NEOs are smaller but significant, estimated at 5-10% overall, primarily from Jupiter-family comets (JFCs) originating in the scattered disk or outer Kuiper belt. JFCs evolve inward via repeated perihelion passages influenced by Jupiter's gravity, with some becoming dynamically inactive (dormant or extinct) due to volatile depletion, mimicking asteroidal NEOs in appearance and orbits.[28] [29] Long-period comets (LPCs) from the Oort cloud contribute a minor fraction (~1-3%) through Galactic tidal perturbations or stellar encounters that send them into inner solar system orbits, though their high-inclination paths limit sustained NEO residency.[30] Evolutionary pathways for asteroidal NEOs involve short dynamical lifetimes of ~2-10 million years, characterized by planetary close encounters that further randomize orbits, potential ejection from the solar system, or collisions with the Sun or planets.[31] For cometary NEOs, pathways include transition from active comet states to inactive ones via surface mantling or cryogenic evolution, with JFCs potentially contaminating main-belt-like orbits before NEO injection.[32] These processes maintain a steady-state NEO population despite depletion, replenished continuously from source regions.[33]Observational Challenges and Biases
Detection Methods and Surveys
![NEA_by_survey.svg.png][float-right] Near-Earth objects are primarily detected through systematic sky surveys employing optical telescopes to identify objects with apparent motion relative to background stars. Ground-based observatories use wide-field cameras to scan large sky areas repeatedly, enabling the calculation of orbits from multiple observations over nights or weeks. These surveys focus on twilight periods when NEOs are often brightest and distinguishable from stationary stars via streak-like trails in short-exposure images.[34] Detection algorithms process data to flag candidates, which are then verified by follow-up observations from global networks like the International Asteroid Warning Network. Infrared surveys complement optical methods by detecting thermal emissions from asteroids, particularly useful for dark or rapidly rotating objects invisible in reflected light. Space-based telescopes like NASA's NEOWISE, launched in 2009 and repurposed for NEO hunting, have surveyed the infrared sky, discovering over 1,000 NEOs by 2023 through mid-infrared photometry that estimates sizes and albedos.[35] Ground-based infrared capabilities are limited but contribute via facilities like the Spitzer Space Telescope before its 2020 decommissioning. Radar observations, using facilities such as Goldstone and Arecibo (before its 2020 collapse), provide precise astrometry and physical characterization for close-approaching NEOs but are not primary discovery tools due to range limitations. Major ground-based surveys include the Catalina Sky Survey (CSS), operational since 1998, which has discovered over 50% of known NEOs as of 2023 by monitoring from Arizona and Australia sites with Schmidt telescopes. The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) in Hawaii, starting NEO operations in 2010, uses four 1.4-gigapixel cameras to scan the sky nightly, contributing about 20% of discoveries. The Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) program, active from 1998 to 2013, utilized Air Force telescopes and found thousands of NEOs before transitioning to other surveys. ATLAS (Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System), deployed since 2015, emphasizes rapid detection of imminent impactors using multiple sites for global coverage. Emerging and future surveys aim to enhance detection rates amid an estimated 90% undiscovered population smaller than 140 meters. The Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), commencing in 2025, will use an 8.4-meter telescope with a 3.2-gigapixel camera to survey the visible sky every few nights, projecting discovery of millions of NEOs. Space missions like ESA's Hera (launch 2024) and NASA's NEO Surveyor (launch planned for 2028) will provide infrared detection from Earth orbit, targeting hard-to-find dark NEOs. These efforts are coordinated by NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office, which funds and integrates data into the Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) database, cataloging over 34,000 NEOs as of October 2025.[36] Despite progress, detection biases favor larger, brighter objects in opposition to the Sun, underscoring ongoing challenges in comprehensive monitoring.Biases in Discovery and Cataloging
Observational selection effects inherent to NEO surveys introduce systematic biases in the discovery and cataloging process, primarily arising from telescope locations, scanning strategies, and the physical detectability of objects. Ground-based surveys, such as Pan-STARRS and the Catalina Sky Survey, predominantly operate from northern hemisphere sites, leading to a hemispheric bias that favors detections in the northern celestial sky while underrepresenting objects in southern declinations.[4] This geographic skew persists despite efforts like the ATLAS survey's dual-site setup (Hawaii and Chile), as historical data accumulation still reflects northern dominance.[37] Survey strategies exacerbate orbital biases by prioritizing regions near the ecliptic plane and opposition geometry, where NEOs exhibit higher brightness due to opposition surge effects and faster apparent motion for detectability. Objects with high inclinations or eccentric orbits that avoid these targeted zones are systematically underrepresented, distorting the cataloged distribution of dynamical classes like Atens versus Apollos.[38] Magnitude-limited observations further compound this with a strong bias toward larger, brighter NEOs; smaller objects (below ~140 m diameter) require closer approaches to reach detectable limits, but even then, high relative velocities—common in impact-risky trajectories—cause them to streak too quickly across fields of view, evading confirmation.[37] Albedo plays a critical role, as low-albedo (darker) NEOs appear fainter for equivalent sizes, biasing catalogs toward higher-albedo populations, particularly among smaller bodies.[18] These biases propagate to the Minor Planet Center's catalog, where unrecovered or unconfirmed detections are discarded, yielding an incomplete inventory skewed against faint, fast-moving, or off-ecliptic objects. Debiased models, such as NEOMOD, estimate that observed size distributions undercount small NEOs by factors of 2–10, depending on diameter, necessitating correction functions dependent on semimajor axis, eccentricity, inclination, and absolute magnitude.[18] For instance, ATLAS data reveal a velocity bias reducing detection efficiency for high-speed impactors by up to an order of magnitude for sub-kilometer sizes.[37] Ongoing mitigation through space-based assets like NEO Surveyor aims to reduce ground-based limitations, but current catalogs remain observationally weighted, informing population estimates only after debiasing.[4]Undiscovered Population Estimates
Estimates of the undiscovered near-Earth object (NEO) population derive from debiased models that account for observational biases, size-frequency distributions, and orbital dynamics, calibrated against known discoveries. Recent modeling, such as NEOMOD 3, predicts a total of 830 ± 60 NEOs with diameters exceeding 1 km, of which over 90% have been discovered as of 2025, implying fewer than 80 undiscovered objects in this size range.[21][6] For NEOs larger than 140 m—relevant for regional impact hazards—NEOMOD 3 estimates approximately 20,000 total objects, while earlier models like Harris and Chodas (2021) suggested around 25,000; with roughly 11,200 known as of mid-2025, discovery completeness stands at 38–44%, leaving an estimated 9,000–14,000 undiscovered.[21][39][40] Smaller NEOs exhibit a steeper size distribution, with undiscovered populations scaling inversely with diameter raised to a power of approximately 2.5–3. For objects around 50–100 m, estimates indicate hundreds of thousands total, but discovery rates drop below 10% due to faintness and survey limitations, resulting in the vast majority remaining undetected.[21] These figures rely on infrared surveys like NEOWISE for albedo corrections and dynamical modeling to extrapolate from magnitude-limited samples, though uncertainties persist from variable albedos and incomplete orbital coverage.[41] Ongoing missions like NEO Surveyor aim to boost completeness for >140 m objects toward 90% by the early 2030s, potentially refining these estimates further.[4]Historical Context and Human Encounters
Pre-Modern Observations and Impacts
Ancient Chinese astronomers compiled the most extensive pre-modern records of cometary apparitions, with over 400 documented events spanning from the 6th century BC to the 17th century AD, often detailing tails, colors, and durations.[42] These observations, preserved in dynastic histories like the Book of Han, captured periodic near-Earth comets such as 1P/Halley during its perihelion passages in 240 BC, 87 BC, 12 BC, and AD 66.[43] Babylonian clay tablets from the 1st millennium BC similarly logged comet positions relative to stars, enabling later orbital reconstructions despite interpretations as portents of doom.[44] Meteor showers and fireballs featured prominently in East Asian annals, with Chinese texts noting recurring displays like the Perseids as early as AD 36 and Leonids from AD 902, attributing them to "stars falling like rain."[45] Greek philosophers, including Aristotle, described meteors as exhalations from Earth but recorded bright bolides, such as those preceding the 373 BC destruction of Helike.[46] Documented meteorite falls were rarer but provided direct evidence of NEO impacts. In 467 BC, a large aerolite crashed near Aegospotami in Thrace, described by Anaxagoras and later sources as a wagon-sized brown stone emitting a rumbling sound, which locals enshrined as a sacred object for over 500 years.[47] Chinese records include a fall in 643 BC noted in the Tso Chuan, involving stones descending amid thunder.[48] The Ensisheim fall on November 16, 1492, in Alsace saw eyewitnesses recover kilogram-scale fragments of an ordinary chondrite after a daylight fireball and detonations, with the main mass initially weighing 28 kg before fragmentation and dispersal.[49] Such events, typically involving objects under 10 meters, caused localized damage but no widespread devastation, consistent with the bolide energy release of 10^2 to 10^4 kilotons. No pre-modern accounts describe kilometer-scale impacts, underscoring their geological timescales.[50]20th-Century Discoveries and Early Surveys
The 20th-century identification of near-Earth objects (NEOs) began with isolated photographic detections of Earth-crossing asteroids, as systematic surveys were absent until the 1970s. The prototype Apollo-class asteroid, designated 1862 Apollo, was discovered on April 24, 1932, by Karl Reinmuth at Heidelberg Observatory using photographic plates; this ~1.5 km object, with an orbit intersecting Earth's, was lost shortly after observation and recovered in 1973.[51] Subsequent early finds included 2101 Adonis in 1936 and 69230 Hermes in 1937, both lost soon due to incomplete orbital data and limited follow-up capacity, highlighting the era's reliance on manual astrometry without dedicated tracking networks. By the 1950s, fewer than 20 such asteroids were known, with discoveries driven by serendipity rather than targeted searches, as most attention focused on main-belt populations.[52] The advent of purpose-built surveys in the 1970s transformed NEO detection. In 1973, Eleanor Helin and Eugene Shoemaker launched the Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey (PCAS) at Palomar Observatory, using the 46-cm Oschin Schmidt telescope to expose photographic plates over targeted sky regions prone to Earth-approaching orbits. PCAS's inaugural NEO, 1973 NA (later 5496), was found on July 4, 1973, followed by the first Aten-class asteroid, 2062 Aten, on January 7, 1976—an orbit type with semi-major axis less than 1 AU. The program averaged 1–3 NEA discoveries per year initially, identifying Earth-crossers, Amors, and inner-main-belt objects, while also uncovering comets; by the late 1980s, it had contributed dozens to the catalog, estimating a total NEA population of ~800 ± 300.[52][53] Complementing PCAS, the Spacewatch project at Kitt Peak National Observatory, initiated in 1981 by Tom Gehrels, pioneered CCD-based imaging on a 0.9-m telescope starting in 1983, enabling real-time automated scanning and faint-object recovery. This shift from film to digital detectors increased efficiency, with Spacewatch discovering 69 asteroids by 1986, including precursors to later risk assessments like 1997 XF11 in 1997. Radar observations, beginning with Goldstone's 1968 imaging of 1566 Icarus, provided size and shape data for select close-approachers but did not drive discoveries. By 1990, global efforts had cataloged ~134 NEAs, predominantly asteroids, with near-Earth comets remaining sparse due to their extended perihelia.[52][54]Post-1990s Advancements in Tracking
The establishment of NASA's Near-Earth Object Observations Program in 1998 marked a pivotal shift, funding dedicated surveys that accelerated NEO discoveries from hundreds annually in the late 1990s to thousands per year by the 2010s, enabling more accurate orbital tracking through voluminous astrometric data.[55] By 2024, these efforts had cataloged over 33,000 NEOs since 1990, with post-2000 surveys contributing the majority and refining orbit determinations via follow-up observations and precovery searches.[56] Ground-based optical surveys, leveraging wide-field telescopes and automated detection algorithms, became central, as exemplified by the Catalina Sky Survey (CSS), which utilized 0.7-meter and 0.5-meter Schmidt telescopes in Arizona and Australia to detect NEOs in twilight skies, yielding thousands of discoveries by enhancing coverage of the ecliptic plane.[57] The Pan-STARRS (Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System) telescopes on Haleakalā, Hawaii, operational from 2010, further advanced tracking by scanning the entire visible sky multiple times weekly with 1.8-meter instruments equipped with gigapixel imagers, discovering approximately half of all new NEOs reported by 2015 and enabling rapid orbit refinements for potentially hazardous objects through high-cadence observations.[58] Complementing these, the space-based NEOWISE mission—reactivated in 2010 as an infrared survey using the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer spacecraft—specialized in detecting dark, low-albedo NEOs invisible in optical wavelengths, identifying over 1,600 NEOs and providing diameter estimates for more than 1,800 others via thermal emissions, which improved size-frequency distributions essential for impact risk modeling.[59][60] These surveys integrated with computational hubs like NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS), established around 2000, which processes global observations to compute precise orbits and predict close approaches, reducing uncertainties from arcseconds to milliarcseconds through Bayesian filtering and non-gravitational force modeling.[61] The 2005 Near-Earth Object Observations Act mandated detection of 90% of NEOs larger than 140 meters by 2020, spurring funding that boosted discovery rates by over 80% via survey upgrades, though the goal remained unmet, highlighting ongoing needs in southern hemisphere coverage and smaller object detection.[62] Recent transitions, such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time initiating full operations in 2025, promise further enhancements with 8.4-meter aperture imaging surveying the sky every few nights, potentially tripling annual NEO finds.[63]Recorded Close Approaches and Impacts
Cataloged Close Passes
Cataloged close passes document instances where near-Earth objects (NEOs) approach within 0.05 AU (approximately 7.5 million km or 19.5 lunar distances, LD) of Earth's center without impact, computed from orbital data spanning 1900 to 2200 AD.[64] NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) maintains the primary database, integrating observations from global surveys to predict nominal distances, minimum possible distances accounting for uncertainties, relative velocities, and estimated sizes derived from absolute magnitudes.[64] These records primarily capture small asteroids (<10 m diameter) due to their higher frequency and recent detectability, with larger objects (>140 m) exhibiting far fewer such events owing to dynamical stability constraints.[6] The catalogs reveal a bias toward post-1990 discoveries, as enhanced surveys like NEOWISE and Pan-STARRS have increased detection rates, retroactively identifying past passes via improved ephemerides.[36] For example, over 30,000 close approaches by known NEOs are listed in CNEOS through 2100, predominantly involving meter-scale objects passing within 5 LD at velocities exceeding 10 km/s.[64] ESA's NEO Coordination Centre provides complementary lists, emphasizing rarity via a Close Approach Index (CAI), where passes closer than 0.001 AU for >1 km objects rank as "very rare."[65] Notable cataloged passes of larger NEOs include:| Object | Date | Nominal Distance | Estimated Diameter | Relative Velocity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 UL21 | July 2024 | 2.7 million km (7 LD) | ~1.5 km | ~12 km/s |
| 2024 MK | June 2024 | 1.3 million km (3.4 LD) | ~80 m | ~11 km/s |
| 2025 TF | October 1, 2025 | 428 km (0.001 LD) | Small (<10 m) | Not specified |
Geological Evidence of Past Impacts
Diagnostic features of hypervelocity impacts include shock-metamorphosed minerals, such as quartz grains exhibiting planar deformation features (PDFs) with up to five sets of lamellae spaced 2-10 micrometers apart, shattercones, and high-pressure silica polymorphs like coesite and stishovite, which form only under pressures exceeding 5-10 GPa and temperatures above 1000°C.[69] These minerals are absent in endogenic craters from volcanic or tectonic processes, providing unequivocal evidence for extraterrestrial bolide collisions. Impact melt rocks, often enriched in siderophile elements like iridium and platinum from the projectile, further confirm origins, with melt sheets showing vesicular textures and breccias containing clasts of shocked target material.[70] Globally, 190 confirmed impact structures are documented, ranging in diameter from 20 meters to over 100 km, with ages determined via argon-argon dating of melt rocks or stratigraphic correlation. Preservation is biased toward younger craters (<100 Ma) in stable cratons, as erosion, sedimentation, and plate tectonics have obliterated most older or smaller features, underestimating the true impact flux by factors of 10-100 for events predating 500 Ma. The Vredefort structure in South Africa, the largest confirmed at ~160 km final diameter, dates to 2.023 ± 0.003 Ga and exhibits radial fractures, shattercones in granites, and pseudotachylite veins indicative of frictional melting during shock propagation.[70] Similarly, the 1.85 Ga Sudbury Basin in Canada, ~130 km diameter, preserves impact melt sheets and nickel-copper sulfide deposits from a ~10-15 km chondritic impactor, confirmed by osmium isotope ratios matching extraterrestrial sources.[71] Distal ejecta layers provide evidence for impacts far from craters, including tektites—silica-rich glasses formed by melting and quenching of target rocks—and microspherules. The ~790 ka Australasian tektite strewn field, covering 15% of Earth's surface, derives from an ~1-2 km impactor, with geochemical matching to Indochinese basement rocks and elevated siderophile elements. Iridium anomalies, rare in crustal rocks (<0.1 ppb) but enriched in meteorites (~500 ppb), mark major events; the global 66 Ma Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary layer shows 10-30 ppb iridium spikes, shocked quartz up to 1 mm in size, and Ni-rich spinels, directly tied to the 150 km Chicxulub crater in Mexico via ballistic ejecta trajectories and Os isotope fingerprints.[72] Younger examples include the 50 ka Barringer Crater in Arizona, 1.2 km diameter, with meteoritic iron fragments and shocked Coconino sandstone confirming a ~50 m iron meteorite impact. Such records indicate impacts of >1 km diameter occur roughly every 100,000-1 million years, scaling with empirical cratering rates calibrated against lunar flux adjusted for Earth's atmosphere and erosion.[71]Differentiating Near-Misses from Actual Collisions
NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) distinguishes near-misses, defined as geocentric close approaches where the NEO's trajectory yields a minimum distance exceeding Earth's atmospheric boundary (approximately 100-150 km altitude), from actual collisions, which involve intersection with this boundary leading to atmospheric entry, deceleration, and potential airburst or ground impact. Orbital elements derived from astrometric observations are propagated using numerical integrators to compute the closest approach distance (CAD); if the nominal CAD plus uncertainty bounds remain outside Earth's effective radius (about 6,571 km including atmosphere), the event is cataloged as a near-miss in the CNEOS close approach database, spanning predictions from 1900 to 2200 A.D.[73] In cases of high uncertainty, radar observations provide ranging accuracy to within kilometers, confirming misses by measuring non-intersecting paths, as demonstrated for asteroid 2014 JO25's 2017 flyby at 1.4 lunar distances without entry signatures.[74] For potential impactors, the Sentry system scans the NEO catalog for "virtual impactors"—discrete orbital pathways within the covariance ellipse that intersect Earth's position at the encounter epoch, assessed via Monte Carlo sampling or line-of-variations analysis. Objects initially flagged with non-zero impact probability (e.g., >10^{-9}) are monitored; additional pre-encounter data refines the orbit, often eliminating impact pathways and reclassifying the event as a near-miss, as occurred with numerous objects removed from Sentry tables post-observation campaigns. Confirmed impacts, conversely, exhibit probabilistic pathways converging to collision, corroborated by entry phenomenology.[75] Post-encounter verification for recent events integrates multi-domain sensors: Near-misses lack detections from fireball networks, infrasound arrays (e.g., International Monitoring System), or bolide sensors like U.S. Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS), which register atmospheric energy deposits above 0.1-1 kt TNT equivalent for entries. Actual collisions, such as the 15 February 2013 Chelyabinsk event (20 m object, 440 kt airburst), are identified by coincident video, seismic, and pressure wave data indicating hypersonic entry, fragmentation, and luminosity inconsistent with distant flyby reflectance. Orbit reconstruction from trajectory fits to entry vectors and recovered meteorites confirms intersection, distinguishing it from pure flybys where objects remain stellar-like point sources without ablation trails or deceleration. For smaller NEOs (<5-10 m), differentiation hinges on physical models of entry dynamics: Flybys show constant velocity against stellar backgrounds via differential astrometry, absent the radiative heating and drag-induced slowdown (reducing speeds from 10-70 km/s to terminal) observed in entries via spectroscopy or timing of multi-station observations. Undetected misses for tiny objects are inferred from absence in sensor logs during predicted windows, while impacts leave empirical traces like microseismic signals or nitrate spikes in ice cores for airbursts. Historical near-misses, like 1991 BA's 1991 pass at 0.0015 AU, were affirmed by optical tracking sans atmospheric interaction, underscoring reliance on preemptive cataloging to avoid conflation with untracked impactors.[64]Impact Risk Evaluation
Probabilistic Modeling and Risk Scales
NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) employs probabilistic modeling to assess impact risks from NEOs by propagating orbital uncertainties forward in time, accounting for non-gravitational forces and observational errors through methods like Monte Carlo simulations or line-of-variations analysis.[76] This process generates a statistical distribution of possible future positions, from which the probability of Earth intersection is derived, typically expressed as the fraction of virtual orbits that collide within a given timeframe.[77] The Sentry system automates this for the asteroid catalog, scanning for potential impacts over the next century while updating assessments with new observations to refine uncertainties.[75] To communicate these probabilities alongside potential consequences, scales like the Torino Impact Hazard Scale and Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale standardize risk evaluation. The Torino Scale, adopted by the International Astronomical Union in 1999 and revised in 2005 and 2016, rates threats from 0 (no hazard) to 10 (certain global catastrophe) based on impact likelihood and estimated kinetic energy, using color codes from white (minimal concern) to red (high threat).[75] For instance, level 0 applies to objects with effectively zero collision chance or small bodies burning up in the atmosphere, while level 8-10 denotes near-certain impacts with energies exceeding global nuclear arsenals, though currently no NEO exceeds level 1.[78] The Palermo Scale, developed in 1999 for technical use, provides a logarithmic measure of hazard by comparing the expected impact frequency (probability multiplied by energy) to the average annual background risk from random impacts, yielding values typically negative for low threats (e.g., -3 or lower indicates negligible risk) and positive only for events rarer than once per millennium.[79] A value of 0 signifies a threat equal to the yearly average, while positive scores prioritize urgent study; for example, asteroid (29075) 1950 DA holds the record at +1.81, though its probability has since dropped below 1%.[79] These scales complement modeling by prioritizing observations, with Palermo favored internally for its quantitative precision over Torino's simplified public-facing design.[75]Catalog of High-Probability Threats
High-probability threats from near-Earth objects are those with computed impact probabilities substantially exceeding the baseline annual risk of approximately 10^{-9} for civilization-threatening events, though even elevated odds remain minuscule in absolute terms. NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) Sentry system and the European Space Agency's (ESA) risk list maintain catalogs of NEOs with non-zero impact potential over the next century, prioritizing those with probabilities above 10^{-6} or notable Palermo Scale values. These assessments rely on orbital elements derived from telescopic observations, radar data, and spacecraft flybys where available, but uncertainties in non-gravitational perturbations like Yarkovsky effect can alter projections. As of October 2025, no object exceeds a 1% single-event probability, and most high-profile cases involve refinements that reduce risks over time.[75][80] Prominent examples include asteroid 2024 YR4, discovered in late 2024, with an estimated diameter of 40-60 meters and an initial impact probability for December 22, 2032, peaking at 3.1% before subsequent observations lowered it to below 1%, rendering it no longer a significant threat. An impact would release energy equivalent to several megatons of TNT, capable of regional devastation akin to the 1908 Tunguska event. Orbital uncertainties, including potential undetected precovery images, drove the temporary elevation, highlighting how short-arc observations can inflate risks until refined.[81][82] Larger, longer-term threats feature in the catalogs despite lower probabilities. Asteroid (101955) Bennu, approximately 490 meters in diameter, carries a cumulative impact probability of about 1 in 1,750 through 2300, with the peak risk on September 24, 2182, at roughly 1 in 2,700 (0.037%). Data from NASA's OSIRIS-REx mission, which returned samples in 2023, refined this estimate upward from prior ground-based figures due to modeled Yarkovsky drift, potentially yielding over 1,000 megatons of energy—comparable to thousands of nuclear bombs—and global climatic effects.[83][84] Asteroid (29075) 1950 DA, estimated at 1.1-1.3 kilometers across, poses a potential collision on March 16, 2880, with probabilities cited between 1 in 2,600 (0.038%) and 1 in 34,500 depending on spin state modeling and radar constraints. Its retrograde rotation likelihood, inferred from light curve data, influences orbital evolution, with an impact energy exceeding 75,000 megatons sufficient for severe global consequences. Updated analyses incorporating Goldstone radar observations in 2022 reduced earlier higher estimates.[85][86]| Object | Diameter (m) | Potential Impact Date | Probability | Energy (Mt TNT) | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 YR4 | 40-60 | Dec 22, 2032 | <1% (peaked 3.1%) | ~7-10 | [87] |
| (101955) Bennu | ~490 | Sep 24, 2182 | ~0.037% | ~1,400 | [88] |
| (29075) 1950 DA | 1,100-1,300 | Mar 16, 2880 | ~0.038% | ~75,000 | [89] |
Critiques of Risk Perception and Media Portrayals
Media outlets frequently sensationalize near-Earth object (NEO) close approaches and potential impacts, employing terms like "city-killer" or "doomsday" despite the objects' negligible collision probabilities, which distorts public understanding of the empirically low risks.[90] [91] For example, one tabloid publication has generated nearly daily articles on purportedly threatening asteroids since at least 2019, prioritizing clickbait over contextual probability assessments that place most such events at odds exceeding 1 in millions.[92] This pattern aligns with broader media tendencies to overrepresent dramatic, low-probability hazards, as evidenced by analyses showing disproportionate coverage of catastrophic scenarios relative to their occurrence rates, which amplifies availability bias in risk perception.[93] Planetary defense experts, including those from NASA, critique such portrayals for fostering undue alarm without corresponding evidence of imminent threats, noting that no confirmed NEO impacts are projected for at least the next century based on current orbital catalogs covering over 95% of kilometer-scale objects capable of global effects.[94] [95] A 2016 analysis in Space Policy by astronomers warned against "scare tactics" and "loaded language" in NEO discourse, arguing that misinformation—such as conflating routine flybys with high-risk trajectories—undermines credible efforts like NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office and erodes public trust in verifiable data from radar and telescopic surveys.[96] These critiques extend to risk communication tools like the Torino scale, which some media outlets misapply to inflate urgency; the scale's conservative design intentionally downplays unverified threats to counter hype, yet headlines often ignore its probabilistic nuances, leading to overestimation of events rated 0 or 1 (minimal concern).[94] Public risk perception of NEOs is further skewed by psychological factors, including the classification of impacts as "dread" hazards—perceived as uncontrollable, fatal, and inequitably distributed—which elevates subjective threat levels far above actuarial odds, such as the lifetime probability of dying from a significant impact being orders of magnitude lower than from routine causes like vehicle accidents (approximately 1 in 500,000 versus 1 in 100).[97] Studies of media coverage, including a 2013 examination of asteroid threat reporting, reveal how speculative narratives on mass extinction events prioritize emotional appeal over empirical frequencies, where small bolides (under 50 meters) occur annually but cause limited damage, as in the 2013 Chelyabinsk airburst affecting fewer than 1,500 people mildly.[98] Experts advocate calibrated messaging, such as frequency-based indices for close approaches, to align perceptions with data showing that while undetected small NEOs pose sporadic local risks, cataloged large threats are rare and mitigable with decades of lead time.[99] This approach counters both alarmism and complacency, emphasizing causal realities: detection advancements since the 1990s have reduced uncertainty, rendering media-driven panics increasingly disconnected from surveyed inventories exceeding 30,000 NEOs.[94]Planetary Defense Strategies
Detection and Characterization Efforts
NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office oversees detection efforts through the Near-Earth Object Observations Program, which funds ground- and space-based surveys responsible for discovering over 98% of known NEOs.[100][55] Ground-based optical surveys, including the Catalina Sky Survey, Pan-STARRS, and ATLAS, have identified the majority of NEOs by systematically scanning the sky for moving objects against stellar backgrounds.[101] As of late 2024, approximately 37,378 NEOs have been cataloged, with ongoing discoveries adding thousands annually, primarily asteroids larger than 1 meter but focusing on potentially hazardous objects exceeding 140 meters in diameter.[102] The upcoming NEO Surveyor mission, a space-based infrared telescope set for launch no earlier than 2028, aims to detect NEOs approaching from Earth's sunward direction, targeting over 90% discovery of hazardous objects greater than 140 meters to meet congressional mandates.[103][104] Complementing this, ESA's NEO Coordination Centre monitors orbits and risks, while proposed missions like NEOMIR seek to identify small, imminent impactors via thermal infrared observations from the Sun-Earth L1 point.[105][106] Characterization employs radar systems like NASA's Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex to refine orbits, measure sizes, shapes, and rotation states of select NEOs, often confirming or ruling out hazardous potential with high precision.[107][108] Spectroscopic and photometric observations classify compositions via spectral signatures and lightcurves, enabling albedo and taxonomic assessments, though coverage remains limited to a fraction of discoveries due to observational constraints.[109][110] Infrared data from missions like NEOWISE further estimate diameters and albedos by analyzing thermal emissions, crucial for impact risk modeling.[111] International coordination via the International Asteroid Warning Network facilitates data sharing to enhance accuracy.[112]Mitigation Techniques and Testing
Mitigation of near-Earth objects (NEOs) involves altering their trajectories to prevent potential collisions with Earth, with techniques evaluated based on the object's size, composition, lead time for detection, and the required delta-v for deflection. Kinetic impactors, which transfer momentum via high-velocity spacecraft collision, represent the most mature method following empirical testing. Other approaches, such as nuclear standoff explosions for ablation or vaporization, gravity tractors that use prolonged gravitational influence from a hovering spacecraft, and enhanced Yarkovsky effect via surface modification (e.g., painting to alter thermal radiation thrust), remain largely conceptual or limited to simulations due to higher technical risks and ethical concerns over nuclear use in space.[113][114][115] The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), conducted by NASA in collaboration with Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, provided the first full-scale demonstration of kinetic impact deflection. Launched on November 24, 2021, the DART spacecraft intentionally collided with Dimorphos, the 160-meter moon of the binary asteroid system Didymos, at 6.6 km/s on September 26, 2022. Observations post-impact, including from Earth's telescopes and the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes, revealed a 32-minute reduction in Dimorphos's orbital period around Didymos—exceeding pre-impact predictions of 7-11 minutes—primarily due to the momentum enhancement from ejecta plume expulsion, which amplified the effective mass transfer by a factor of 2-4 times the spacecraft's 570 kg impactor mass. This beta value (momentum multiplication factor) of approximately 3.6 confirmed the technique's efficacy for rubble-pile asteroids, though results underscore variability dependent on surface properties like porosity and cohesion.[116][117][118] Subsequent analysis validated DART's navigation accuracy to within 10 meters and highlighted ejecta dynamics, with over 1 million kg of material ejected, forming a tail observable for weeks. The mission's success supports kinetic impactors for NEOs up to several hundred meters in diameter if detected 10-20 years in advance, enabling deflections of tens of centimeters per second via single or multiple impacts. However, limitations include reduced effectiveness against monolithic or fast-rotating bodies and the need for precise characterization to model ejecta contributions accurately.[119][120] Testing beyond DART is nascent, with ground-based hypervelocity impact experiments (e.g., at Sandia National Laboratories) simulating crater formation but lacking orbital dynamics. The European Space Agency's Hera mission, launched October 7, 2024, will rendezvous with Didymos in 2026 to measure Dimorphos's post-DART physical changes, including mass, composition, and shape via lidar and spectrometers, refining kinetic models. No space-based tests of nuclear or non-impact methods have occurred, though simulations indicate nuclear options could handle larger (>1 km) NEOs with shorter warning times via directed energy imparting delta-v up to 10 km/s. International coordination, such as under the UN's International Asteroid Warning Network, emphasizes scaling DART-like tests for multi-impactor campaigns against higher-threat objects.[121][122][115]International Frameworks and Coordination Challenges
The United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS), through its Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, has coordinated international discussions on near-Earth objects since 2001, culminating in 2013 recommendations for global response protocols to NEO impact threats.[123] These led to the establishment of the International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN) in 2014, a voluntary consortium of observatories and space agencies coordinated by NASA, tasked with aggregating observational data to detect, track, and characterize potentially hazardous NEOs larger than 50 meters with impact probabilities over 1% within 50 years.[124][125] IAWN issues standardized risk alerts based on agreed thresholds, such as impacts predicted within 100 years for objects over 140 meters, to enable timely governmental notifications.[126] Complementing IAWN, the Space Mission Planning Advisory Group (SMPAG), formed in 2016 with delegates from 15 space-faring nations including the United States, European Space Agency members, China, and Russia, advises on rapid assessment of deflection or mitigation options for confirmed threats.[127] SMPAG conducts biennial tabletop exercises, such as the 2021 Colombo simulation of a 300-meter NEO impact scenario, to refine communication protocols and mission feasibility studies, emphasizing kinetic impactors or nuclear options where applicable.[128] Both IAWN and SMPAG report annually to COPUOS, fostering data exchange under UN auspices, though participation remains non-mandatory and focused on advisory roles rather than operational command.[129] Coordination faces structural limitations, as neither body possesses decision-making authority or funding mechanisms, relying on national agencies for execution and exposing vulnerabilities to geopolitical distrust, such as delays in data sharing amid security classifications.[130][131] The 1967 Outer Space Treaty provides a baseline for peaceful uses but lacks provisions for liability in failed deflection attempts—e.g., orbital debris risks or unintended impacts on third-party states—potentially deterring unilateral actions without multilateral consensus.[132] Resource asymmetries exacerbate issues, with wealthier nations like the US (via NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office) dominating capabilities, while developing countries depend on passive warnings, hindering equitable global resilience.[123] Time constraints amplify challenges for short-warning threats (e.g., sub-50-meter objects detected weeks prior), where divergent national priorities—such as prioritizing domestic disaster response over shared missions—could fragment efforts, as evidenced by exercise critiques highlighting communication bottlenecks.[133] Proposals like the "Responsibility to Defend Earth" principle seek to formalize collective obligations, arguing for binding protocols to override sovereignty barriers in existential risks, though adoption remains stalled by sovereignty concerns.[134] Untested in actual crises, these frameworks' efficacy depends on preemptive trust-building, with simulations underscoring the need for expanded legal clarity and integrated modeling to bridge advisory gaps.[131]Exploration Missions and Scientific Returns
Flyby and Rendezvous Missions
Flyby missions to near-Earth objects (NEOs), primarily comets, began in the 1980s, providing the first close-up images and data on their nuclei. NASA's International Cometary Explorer (ICE) conducted the initial spacecraft encounter with an NEO comet, passing within 7,800 km of 21P/Giacobini-Zinner on September 11, 1985, measuring plasma interactions and magnetic fields in the comet's environment. The subsequent international armada to 1P/Halley in 1986 included five spacecraft: Soviet Vega 1 and 2, Japan's Suisei and Sakigake, and ESA's Giotto, which approached within 596 km of the nucleus on March 13-14, 1986, revealing a 15 km long, dark, potato-shaped body with jets of gas and dust. These missions established cometary nuclei as irregular, low-albedo solids rather than diffuse clouds, informing NEO composition models. Asteroid flybys followed, yielding insights into potentially hazardous NEOs. NASA's Stardust mission flew by the Apollo-group asteroid 5535 Annefrank on November 2, 2002, at 3,079 km, capturing images of a 5 km irregular body consistent with primitive carbonaceous composition via spectral analysis. NASA's EPOXI mission (Deep Impact extension) imaged NEO comet 103P/Hartley 2 during a 700 km flyby on November 4, 2010, showing a 2 km bi-lobed nucleus with active water and CO2 jets driving 50% of its mass loss. China's Chang'e-2 spacecraft performed an unplanned 3.2 km flyby of the Apollo asteroid 4179 Toutatis on December 13, 2012, obtaining high-resolution images of its contact-binary shape, 5 km x 2.4 km x 1.9 km, and confirming a peanut-like structure with slow rotation period of 12.8 hours. Rendezvous missions enabled prolonged study, orbiting or landing on NEOs for detailed mapping and characterization. NASA's NEAR Shoemaker achieved the first asteroid orbit around 433 Eros on February 14, 2000, following a 1998 Earth gravity assist, conducting a year-long survey that mapped 70% of the 34 km x 11 km x 11 km S-type body, revealing a heavily cratered surface with a metallic-rich regolith and global ridge, before landing on February 12, 2001.[135] JAXA's Hayabusa rendezvoused with the Apollo asteroid 25143 Itokawa in September 2005, orbiting for two months and imaging the 535 m x 29 m x 20 m rubble-pile body, confirming loose regolith and boulder fields indicative of gravitational aggregate formation. Subsequent rendezvous expanded to primitive NEOs. ESA's Rosetta orbited NEO comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from August 2014, descending to 10 km altitude for multi-instrument analysis of its 4 km duck-shaped nucleus, measuring surface temperatures, volatiles, and organics before Philae lander touchdown on November 12, 2014, despite limited operations. JAXA's Hayabusa2 arrived at 162173 Ryugu in June 2018, orbiting the 900 m carbonaceous C-type asteroid for 18 months, deploying MINERVA-II rovers and MASCOT lander to study its diamond-shaped rubble pile, hydrated minerals, and organics. NASA's OSIRIS-REx rendezvoused with 101955 Bennu in December 2018, mapping the 490 m spinning-top shaped B-type asteroid at altitudes down to 226 m, identifying boulder-covered surfaces rich in carbon and water-bearing minerals before the 2020 sample collection.[136] These missions collectively demonstrated NEO diversity, from coherent S-types to fragmented rubble piles, enhancing models of solar system formation and hazard assessment.[137]| Mission | Agency | Target | Type | Arrival Date | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICE | NASA | 21P/Giacobini-Zinner | Flyby | 1985 | Plasma tail measurements |
| Giotto (Halley) | ESA | 1P/Halley | Flyby | 1986 | Nucleus imaging, jets |
| Stardust | NASA | 5535 Annefrank | Flyby | 2002 | Primitive asteroid shape |
| EPOXI | NASA | 103P/Hartley 2 | Flyby | 2010 | Bi-lobed active comet |
| Chang'e-2 | CNSA | 4179 Toutatis | Flyby | 2012 | Contact-binary structure |
| NEAR Shoemaker | NASA | 433 Eros | Rendezvous | 2000 | Global mapping, landing |
| Hayabusa | JAXA | 25143 Itokawa | Rendezvous | 2005 | Rubble-pile confirmation |
| Rosetta | ESA | 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko | Rendezvous | 2014 | Comet volatiles, landing |
| Hayabusa2 | JAXA | 162173 Ryugu | Rendezvous | 2018 | Hydrated minerals |
| OSIRIS-REx | NASA | 101955 Bennu | Rendezvous | 2018 | Carbon-rich regolith |
Sample Return and In-Situ Analysis
The first successful sample return from a near-Earth asteroid was achieved by Japan's Hayabusa mission, which collected approximately 1,500 microscopic particles of regolith from the S-type asteroid 25143 Itokawa during a brief touchdown on November 25, 2005, with the sample capsule returning to Earth on June 13, 2010. Analysis revealed primitive, unequilibrated ordinary chondrite-like material, including olivine, pyroxene, plagioclase, and iron-nickel metal, confirming Itokawa's origin from a larger disrupted parent body and providing insights into space weathering processes without terrestrial contamination. Building on this, the Hayabusa2 mission targeted the carbonaceous C-type asteroid 162173 Ryugu, deploying the MASCOT lander for in-situ surface analysis on October 3, 2018, which measured magnetic fields, subsurface structure via radar, and surface temperatures before ceasing operations after 17 hours. Hayabusa2 collected over 5 grams of surface and subsurface regolith via two touchdowns in February and July 2019, returning the samples on December 5, 2020; preliminary analyses identified hydrous silicates, carbonates, magnetite, and organic compounds including aromatic hydrocarbons and amino acid precursors, with particles exhibiting high porosity (up to 40%) and low density (around 1.28 g/cm³), indicating a rubble-pile structure formed from hydrated primordial material.[138][139] The samples' volatile content, comprising about 22 weight percent light elements like water and organics, supports Ryugu's role in delivering water and carbon to the early Earth.[140] NASA's OSIRIS-REx mission to the B-type near-Earth asteroid 101955 Bennu employed the Touch-and-Go Sample Acquisition Mechanism (TAGSAM) for in-situ characterization via onboard spectrometers and cameras, revealing a spinning-top shape, boulder-strewn surface, and hydrated minerals during orbit from December 2018 to October 2020.[136] The spacecraft collected approximately 121.6 grams of regolith during a touch-and-go maneuver on October 20, 2020, with the sample capsule landing in Utah on September 24, 2023; curation efforts yielded over 70 grams of processed material by 2024, containing carbon-rich matrix, magnesium-rich carbonates, iron oxides, and a mix of left- and right-handed amino acids in equal proportions, alongside polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other organics that may represent building blocks of life.[136][141] These findings, analyzed in pristine conditions to avoid alteration, indicate Bennu's material originated from the solar system's outer regions and experienced aqueous alteration, enhancing understanding of volatile delivery to terrestrial planets.[142] Earlier in-situ efforts include NASA's NEAR Shoemaker mission, which orbited the S-type asteroid 433 Eros from February 2000 until a controlled landing on February 12, 2001, using multispectral imagers, gamma-ray, and X-ray spectrometers to map composition, revealing a regolith dominated by olivine, pyroxene, and plagioclase with trace metals and no hydration, consistent with a differentiated interior and minimal volatile content.[143] Such analyses provide contextual data on mineralogy and geochemistry that guide sample collection strategies and validate remote sensing models, though limited by instrument resolution and lack of returned material for isotopic or microscopic study.[107] Sample returns surpass in-situ methods by enabling high-fidelity laboratory techniques like electron microscopy and mass spectrometry, uncovering hydrated minerals and organics obscured by spacecraft constraints, while in-situ data from landers and orbiters offer real-time spatial context essential for interpreting returned samples' origins.[144] Combined approaches have confirmed NEOs as primordial reservoirs, with carbonaceous types like Ryugu and Bennu preserving aquated alteration records from the early solar nebula, informing models of planetary formation and impactor compositions.[138][141]Deflection Technology Demonstrations
The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), conducted by NASA in collaboration with other agencies, represented the first in-space demonstration of kinetic impactor technology for asteroid deflection. Launched on November 24, 2021, the mission targeted the moonlet Dimorphos orbiting the near-Earth asteroid 65803 Didymos, with the spacecraft impacting Dimorphos on September 26, 2022, at a velocity of approximately 6.6 km/s.[145] The primary objective was to measure the change in Dimorphos's orbital period around Didymos induced by the collision, providing empirical data on momentum transfer efficiency for potential planetary defense applications against threatening near-Earth objects.[146] Post-impact analysis confirmed that DART successfully altered Dimorphos's orbit, shortening its 11-hour 55-minute orbital period around Didymos by about 32 minutes, exceeding the minimum success threshold of 73 seconds and indicating an enhanced deflection due to the asteroid's rubble-pile structure and resultant ejecta plume.[145] Observations from ground-based telescopes and the Italian LICIACube CubeSat, which accompanied DART, revealed that the impact did not form a traditional crater but instead reshaped the asteroid's surface, generating a significant debris field including boulders that carried away additional momentum—equivalent to three times the spacecraft's direct impact energy—thus amplifying the overall deflection effect.[147][148] These findings validated the kinetic impactor approach for altering trajectories of small asteroids but highlighted complexities such as unpredictable ejecta behavior in loosely bound bodies, informing models for future missions where deflection must avoid generating hazardous debris streams.[149] Complementing DART, the European Space Agency's Hera mission serves as a follow-up demonstration to characterize the impact site's physical and compositional changes on Dimorphos, enhancing understanding of deflection outcomes. Launched on October 7, 2024, aboard a Falcon 9 rocket, Hera carries two CubeSats (Juventas and Milani) for radar sounding and surface operations, with arrival at the Didymos system planned for late 2026 to conduct close-range imaging, spectroscopy, and geotechnical analysis.[150] As part of the joint Asteroid Impact and Deflection Assessment (AIDA) program with NASA, Hera's data will refine kinetic impactor scalability, material response models, and deflection predictability for larger or more cohesive near-Earth objects, addressing gaps in pre-impact predictability observed in DART.[151] No other full-scale orbital demonstrations of alternative methods, such as nuclear standoff disruption or gravity tractors, have occurred to date, with ongoing efforts limited to simulations and subscale ground tests.[116]Resource Potential and Economic Prospects
Composition for In-Situ Resource Utilization
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are classified into spectral types that determine their resource potential for in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), with carbonaceous (C-type), silicaceous (S-type), and metallic (M-type) asteroids offering volatiles, silicates, and metals, respectively.[152] S-type asteroids dominate the NEO population, comprising approximately 66-70% of small objects, while C-types are less abundant but critical for volatiles, and M-types are rare yet metal-rich.[153] [154] These compositions enable extraction of water for propellant production, metals for structural fabrication, and other materials to support space operations without Earth resupply.[155] C-type asteroids, analogous to carbonaceous chondrites, contain hydrated minerals and organic compounds, with indigenous water contents averaging 7 wt% (ranging 1.9-10.5 wt%) as measured in CM chondrite meteorites and confirmed by samples from NEOs like Bennu and Ryugu.[156] This water, bound in phyllosilicates comprising up to 88 vol% of the material, can be extracted via heating or chemical processes and electrolyzed into hydrogen and oxygen for propulsion or life support, potentially yielding propellants equivalent to thousands of tons from a single kilometer-sized body.[157] [158] Carbonaceous matrices also provide organics for fuels or polymers, though processing challenges include low thermal conductivity and dust generation.[159] S-type asteroids, resembling ordinary chondrites, consist primarily of magnesium-iron silicates with embedded metal grains, offering 10-20 wt% iron and nickel for smelting into alloys suitable for in-situ fabrication of spacecraft components or radiation shielding.[155] These metals, along with silicates for refractory materials, support construction of habitats or solar power infrastructure, as densities and radar observations indicate sufficient metallic phases for efficient electromagnetic extraction.[160] Spectral gradients between S- and M-types suggest variable metal abundances, enhancing overall ISRU viability across NEO subpopulations.[158] M-type asteroids feature high concentrations of elemental iron-nickel alloys (5-11 wt% nickel), comprising 10-60% of the body by mass, with additional cobalt and trace precious metals like platinum-group elements exceeding terrestrial ore grades.[158] [152] [161] These enable production of conductive wires, structural beams, or tools via melting and casting, with mechanical properties of Fe-Ni alloys demonstrating tensile strengths adequate for space applications under microgravity.[161] Remaining silicate fractions provide oxygen through reduction processes, synergizing with metal yields for comprehensive ISRU.[152] While M-types represent a small fraction of NEOs, their proximity and resource density make them prime targets for missions focused on metallic feedstock.[162]Space Mining Concepts and Private Initiatives
Space mining concepts for near-Earth objects (NEOs) center on extracting valuable resources such as platinum-group metals (PGMs), iron, nickel, and volatiles like water ice, which can be processed into propellant or life support materials for in-situ resource utilization (ISRU). NEOs are prioritized due to their relative accessibility, with delta-v requirements often below 6 km/s compared to main-belt asteroids, enabling lower launch costs via rideshare opportunities on commercial rockets. Extraction methods include optical mining, which uses concentrated sunlight from mirrors or lenses to heat regolith and volatilize water and other ices into a collection bag, avoiding mechanical drilling challenges in microgravity.[163] [164] For metallic asteroids, concepts involve autonomous robotic prospectors using spectroscopy for composition analysis, followed by in-situ refining via electrolysis or vapor deposition to produce pure metals without returning bulk ore to Earth.[165] These approaches address key challenges, including low gravity causing material drift, extreme temperature swings, and dust abrasion, by emphasizing non-contact techniques and AI-driven autonomy for operations far from Earth. Economic models project high margins—up to 85% for PGM extraction versus 7% on Earth—driven by asteroids potentially yielding resources worth trillions, such as a single 500-meter metallic NEO containing PGMs sufficient for global demand for centuries. However, scalability remains unproven, with initial missions focusing on scouting to characterize targets via flybys or orbiters before full extraction demos.[165] [166] Private initiatives have accelerated since reusable launchers reduced costs, though no company has achieved commercial extraction as of October 2025. AstroForge, founded in 2022, leads with missions targeting metallic NEOs for PGMs; its Odin spacecraft launched in early 2025 but lost contact shortly after, highlighting communication risks in deep space. The company plans Vestri for late 2025, a larger probe designed for sample return using electric propulsion, followed by DeepSpace-2 in 2026 for the first private landing beyond Earth-Moon. AstroForge emphasizes replicable refineries to process ore in orbit, aiming to supply a projected $1 trillion space economy by 2040.[165] [167] [168] TransAstra, partnering with NASA since 2019, advances optical mining prototypes tested on asteroid simulants, demonstrating volatile release via solar concentration for efficient, low-mass extraction. The firm focuses on scalable systems for both NEOs and lunar resources, integrating with optical mining to capture gases cryogenically. Other ventures, such as Karman+ and Origin Space, explore similar prospecting tech, but progress lags behind AstroForge's flight hardware, with most efforts in early R&D amid legal ambiguities under the Outer Space Treaty prohibiting ownership claims. Skeptics note that while scouting succeeds, full mining faces untested hurdles like refining yields and market disruption from influxed materials.[169] [164] [170]Balancing Threats with Opportunities
While near-Earth objects (NEOs) present existential risks through potential impacts, empirical assessments indicate these threats are statistically rare on human timescales, with NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) tracking over 30,000 NEOs and identifying approximately 2,300 as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs) larger than 140 meters, capable of regional devastation.[75] The probability of a globally catastrophic impact from a kilometer-scale NEO exceeds 1 in 100,000 annually, based on orbital dynamics and discovery completeness models, though undiscovered objects below 100 meters pose higher-frequency local threats, as evidenced by the 2013 Chelyabinsk event releasing energy equivalent to 500 kilotons of TNT.[77] Recent refinements in tracking, such as for asteroid 2024 YR4—whose initial 3.1% impact probability in 2032 was revised to near zero through additional observations—demonstrate that enhanced detection mitigates perceived risks without overestimating baseline hazards.[81] These same NEOs offer substantial opportunities for resource extraction, given their compositional diversity: carbonaceous types rich in volatiles like water ice for propellant production, and metallic variants abundant in platinum-group metals (PGMs) and iron-nickel alloys, accessible via delta-v requirements as low as 4-6 km/s compared to lunar or main-belt sources.[166] Economic analyses project that in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) from NEOs could yield billions in value through fuel depots enabling sustained Mars missions, with water-derived hydrogen-oxygen propellants reducing Earth-launch dependencies by orders of magnitude in cost per kilogram.[171] Private ventures, informed by NASA spectral surveys, target M-type NEOs like 1986 DA, estimated to hold PGMs worth trillions if extraction scales with robotic autonomy, though profitability hinges on overcoming technical barriers like autonomous prospecting rather than raw abundance flooding terrestrial markets.[172] Balancing these poles requires integrated frameworks where planetary defense architectures serve dual purposes: NEO characterization via infrared telescopes like NEOWISE not only refines impact trajectories but also maps mineralogies for prospection, turning potential threats into cataloged assets.[100] Deflection demonstrations, such as NASA's DART mission altering Dimorphos' orbit in 2022, validate kinetic technologies adaptable for resource redirection, wherein controlled impacts could fragment or reposition ore bodies for easier retrieval without introducing undue collision risks.[173] This causal synergy—rooted in shared observational infrastructure—prioritizes empirical threat neutralization while unlocking economic multipliers, as the projected $1.8 trillion space economy by 2035 increasingly incorporates NEO-derived materials to fuel expansion beyond low-Earth orbit.[174] Uncertainties persist in long-term orbital stability and yield viability, necessitating rigorous, data-driven investment over speculative hype.[175]Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Key Discoveries Since 2020
The Catalina Sky Survey discovered asteroid 2020 CD3 on February 15, 2020, revealing it as a temporary natural satellite of Earth, approximately 1-6 meters in diameter, that had been in a geocentric orbit since around 2018 before departing in 2020.[176] Precovery observations confirmed its capture dynamics, providing insights into the mechanisms by which small near-Earth objects (NEOs) can become temporarily bound to Earth, highlighting the frequency of such "mini-moons" in NEO populations.[177] NASA's NEOWISE mission, concluding in August 2024 after cataloging infrared data since 2013, identified 215 NEOs and comet C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE), which became visible to the naked eye in July 2020, offering the first detailed thermal characterization of a significant number of dark, low-albedo NEOs and advancing population statistics.[178] The mission's dataset underscored the prevalence of carbonaceous asteroids among NEOs, with implications for impactor compositions.[179] The Hayabusa2 spacecraft returned 5.4 grams of samples from asteroid Ryugu on December 5, 2020, analyses of which revealed hydrated silicates, carbonates, and phosphorus-rich materials indicative of aqueous alteration on the parent body, suggesting Ryugu originated from a water-rich protoplanet disrupted early in Solar System history.[180] Subsequent OSIRIS-REx sample return from Bennu on September 24, 2023, yielded over 121 grams of material rich in carbon, nitrogen, and water-bearing minerals, including unexpected magnesium-sodium phosphates that imply a hot, water-altered past, challenging models of primitive asteroid formation.[136] The DART mission's kinetic impact on Dimorphos on September 26, 2022, shortened its orbital period around Didymos by 32 minutes, confirming the efficacy of momentum transfer via ejecta for deflection while generating over 1 million kilograms of boulders and a persistent dust tail, revealing Dimorphos as a loosely bound rubble pile susceptible to reshaping.[7] Post-impact studies detailed the asteroid's internal structure and the role of enhanced mass ejection in deflection efficiency, informing future planetary defense strategies.[181] Survey efforts achieved a record 2,958 NEO discoveries in 2020 alone, driven by Pan-STARRS and Catalina, contributing to a cumulative total exceeding 35,000 known NEOs by 2025, with improved detection of smaller objects enhancing hazard assessment.[182] Recent finds include 2025 SC79, a 700-meter asteroid with an orbit entirely within Venus's, completing a revolution in 128 days—the second-fastest known—expanding understanding of inner-Solar-System NEO dynamics.[183] Similarly, quasi-satellite 2025 PN7, detected in September 2025, orbits the Sun in resonance with Earth until at least 2083, exemplifying stable co-orbital configurations.[184]Ongoing and Planned Missions
The European Space Agency's Hera mission, launched on October 7, 2024, aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9, is en route to the Didymos binary asteroid system to characterize the effects of NASA's 2022 DART impact on the moonlet Dimorphos.[185] Hera, carrying CubeSats Juventas and Milani for radar sounding and surface imaging, is scheduled to arrive in November 2026, ahead of the original timeline due to favorable trajectory adjustments during its March 2025 Mars flyby.[151] The mission aims to measure Dimorphos's altered orbit, mass, and composition, providing data on kinetic impactor efficacy for planetary defense.[186] NASA's OSIRIS-APEX, an extended mission of the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft following its 2023 Bennu sample return, is traveling toward the near-Earth asteroid 99942 Apophis.[187] After a September 2025 Earth gravity assist, the spacecraft will rendezvous with Apophis in April 2029, shortly after the asteroid's closest Earth approach on April 13, 2029, at 31,600 kilometers altitude.[188] OSIRIS-APEX will observe tidal effects, seismic activity, and surface changes induced by Earth's gravity, using the spacecraft's instruments including the OSIRIS-REx Camera Suite and laser altimeter.[189]| Mission | Agency | Target | Status | Key Dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hera | ESA | Didymos/Dimorphos | Ongoing (en route) | Launch: Oct 2024; Arrival: Nov 2026 |
| OSIRIS-APEX | NASA | Apophis | Ongoing (en route) | Extended: 2023; Rendezvous: Apr 2029 |
| DESTINY+ | JAXA | Phaethon | Planned | Launch: 2025; Flyby: ~2028 |
| NEO Surveyor | NASA | NEO population | Planned | Launch: Late 2027 |
| Ramses | ESA | Apophis | Proposed | Potential launch: Apr 2028; Arrival: Feb 2029 |

